Video summary
Andrew Szanton is a collaborative memoirist based in Newton, Massachusetts, who specializes in helping individuals craft their life stories through a deeply personal and iterative process. Originally from Washington D.C. and educated at Princeton University, where he studied under the legendary writer John McPhee, Szanton views his work as a form of literature that bridges fact and fiction. He distinguishes his role from that of a traditional ghostwriter by insisting on being listed as a co-author, believing that a memoir should reflect the "genetic material" of both the client and the collaborator. While he has worked with high-profile figures like Senators Edward Brooke and Bill Bradley, as well as civil rights leader Charles Evers, Szanton emphasizes that his primary goal is to help ordinary people articulate their unique passions and quirks, ensuring their voices are heard authentically rather than being sanitized for public consumption.
The process of collaborative memoir writing often involves extensive negotiation between the author, the client, and sometimes publishers, balancing personal truth with commercial viability. Szanton frequently conducts interviews over the phone or in person, depending on the client's location and comfort level, creating a draft that the subject then edits to refine their own narrative. This dynamic is particularly evident when working with clients like Charles Evers, who demanded that Szanton "pay the price" by traveling to Mississippi and engaging directly with the realities of the civil rights movement, or Senator Brooke, who insisted on focusing on policy rather than his symbolic status as the first African-American senator since Reconstruction. Szanton also notes that working with non-famous individuals often yields more unvarnished and honest accounts because these clients lack the public relations teams that celebrities rely on to manage their image, allowing for a rawer exploration of family dynamics and personal struggles.
Beyond the mechanics of writing, Szanton describes the collaboration as a therapeutic experience that requires establishing clear boundaries while fostering deep trust and intimacy between the writer and the subject. He compares his role to that of a defense lawyer in a court of public opinion, aiming to present his clients in the best possible light without compromising their truth, whereas he views traditional biography more like judging, which forces uncomfortable revelations that may not serve the subject's emotional needs. This approach has led him to write his own memoir as a way to better understand the resistances and vulnerabilities his clients face, reinforcing his belief that every person possesses a remarkable story worth telling. Ultimately, Szanton argues that while artificial intelligence can generate quick, superficial narratives based on data points, it cannot replace the human craft of listening, empathizing, and helping someone discover the distinctive essence of their own life story.
Read the full video transcript
[music]
We are grateful to our friends at
Northshshire Books and Monroe Street
Books for their underwriting of this
program. Northshshire Books has outlets
in Manchester, Vermont, [music] and
Saratoga Springs. and Monroe Street
Books is on Route 7 just north of
Mberry. Both are wonderful independent
[music] bookstores and we thank them.
Hello, I'm Lewis Meyers and this is Meet
the Author [music] where we're joined
today with Andrew Zanton from his home
in Newton, Massachusetts. Um Mr. Zanton
is a collaborative memor memoist and
we're going to talk about that what that
means and some of the uh remarkable
people he's worked with over the years.
Mr. Zanton is originally from Washington
DC. He attended Princeton as a college
student and there had the good fortune
to be in a class with John McY the great
and legendary writer for the New Yorker.
Uh Mr. McI uh actually uh reminisced
about Mr. Zanton in a recent New Yorker
article from last year. Uh and I was
fascinated by by that and wanted to
learn more about what he's Mr. Zanton's
done in his own career. Um, since then
he has written uh uh collaborated on
memoirs from uh people such as Charles
Evers, the great civil rights activist,
uh, Senators Edward Brookke and Senator
Bill Bradley, as well as a nuclear as
well as a Nobel Prizewinning uh,
physicist among others. And he continues
to work with students and to post uh,
memoirs about everyday people as well on
his website. So, Mr. Zanton, welcome and
thank you for being here.
>> Thank you so much for having me.
>> I thought we would uh first look back in
time a little bit to to your Princeton
days. Uh I mentioned that you were in a
class with John McI uh who has written
for the New Yorker for gosh 40 or 50
years at this point, still writing I
believe. Um and talk about that
experience and and the impact uh he may
have had on you early in life.
Well, it's many effects. One of them, a
very basic thing is that if you think
about the way we socialize people
growing up, novelists have an award, the
Nobel Prize for literature. Um, fiction
is considered literature. John McY was
the first person who directly kind of
confronted me with the fact that
non-fiction writing can be and is
literature. His class was called the
literature of fact.
So simply to say what you're doing or
thinking about doing what you what all
of the students in this class are
contemplating doing is something serious
and important. That in itself was was a
great thing. Another was that John was
kept the class small and he had
one-on-one conferences with each person.
So this was not just hearing the great
man lecture or reading some of his
things. It was going over line by line,
sentence by sentence your own work with
this absolute master. And many people
found it intimidating. It was on some
level for me. But I was fortunate to
have a father who had also gone over my
work all my life with me. So I was more
familiar with that sort of having a
older man of of more talent and
experience uh critiquing heavily what
you're doing. And so I found it
interesting and I would sometimes ask
John," well why would you do this?
Turned the tables a little bit and asked
him probed why did you do this or that.
So I think we began to have a rapport
that was a little bit unusual even when
I was an undergraduate and he is a very
very very very good with words. Um and
has a manner which sort of disguises
that. Uh he reminds me a little bit of
the the person who can build an amazing
stone wall without using any mortar
simply by looking at the stones and
piling them up. And you look at him and
he's a very ordinarylooking person, but
he's got this just extraordinary ability
almost hidden.
>> Did you know from an early age, you talk
about in college you were already
sounded like you were heading in
direction of becoming a writer. Did you
know from an even earlier age that you
wanted to be a writer as as a
professional?
I think so. Um I think I'm as a born
writer about as much as you can be. Uh
both my parents read a lot. The house
was full of books. Um being an artist of
any kind was something that my parents
really respected. Um I also was just
really fascinated with words. Um I
remember for example coming home from
school and telling my parents I
delirious with joy of this thing which I
learned which I assumed they didn't know
which was alphabetical order. And I
explained to them how in a dictionary
you can have thousands of words and you
can know exactly where each word is
because of this thing called
alphabetical order. And as I was
explaining it to them they sort of
nodded and said yeah we know about that.
Um, and I was dumbfounded and and I
said, "Why didn't you tell me about it?"
Um, and they just said, "Well, I guess
we didn't think it was so incredible as
you do." Um, so whatever that is, I have
some sort of a obsessive compulsive need
to deal with words and a love of words,
a fanatical interest in compressing
words and rearranging words. Um, so it's
it's somewhere deep in me. Well,
certainly that must have seemed uh your
made your parents seem very wise if they
already knew about the alphabet. But um
let let's talk about being a
collaborative memoirist. Now there's
another term and I called ghostwriter
which may people might be more familiar
with but I suspect that there's a
difference between ghostwriting and
collaborative memorist. Can you sort of
explain those two terms?
>> Well, a true ghost writer is invisible
like a ghost. So, I have had clients who
will tell me,"Andrew,
I'm going to need you to do much of the
writing of this, but for my own reasons,
I need to be listed as the sole author."
In that case, I am a ghost. I have been
a ghost for a number of books. In
general, I feel it's more honest to have
my name on the cover, and of course, it
helps my career to to be known as a
writer. So, I ask for that, but I I
never need that to happen. Um, there
are, as I say, good reasons sometimes
why the client can't really afford to
have my name there. In that case, I am a
ghost. But the work is almost always
collaborative. And I see what a good
collaborative ghost writer does is to
really insist on having a key role in
the project. uh if you think of the book
as the child of the two people that your
parents just as a a baby will have
genetic material from both mother and
father. I feel a good collaborative
memoir
should have genetic material from the
collaborator as well as from the client.
>> Uh way to describe it um uh do people
find you? So how do the people find you?
who who reaches out to you and and how
does that happen?
>> Well, in a variety of ways. Um, I I will
confess I've never been very good at
self-promotion. It was part of the
reason I'm very sincere in saying I I
appreciate being invited on your
program. I don't go around doing a lot
of self-promotion. Um, so it's generally
a friend of someone who I've already
worked for. Um, often when I start
working with someone, I'll say, "Who are
the people I should interview?" Family
members, friends, college roommates,
neighbors,
childhood friends, anyone you knew who
really has interesting information about
you that might be helpful. And if the
client is a quiet, reserved sort of
person, that's especially important. If
it's a geralus client with a million
stories, it's obviously less important.
But often those those threshing
interviews that I do with others who
knew the client will turn up somebody
who will say, "Oh, I didn't know that
there were people who specialized on
memoirs. You know, give me a call
sometime. I might be interested in doing
this as well." So, it's it's haphazard.
I don't uh never know exactly where the
clients will come from.
There are uh uh there's also editors and
of course for example Robert Carrow with
his series of of books on Lynden Johnson
has had the great editor Arthur Gelb or
former you know late Arthur Gelb work
with him over decades now and they had a
very close working relationship
reportedly they went sentence by
sentence. What what would be the
difference between an editor and a
memoirist?
Well, an editor is generally
working with material that the writer
has produced, not actually producing
material. In a great number of my books,
the client will say, "I know my story
well, but I'm just not a writer. I don't
I don't feel comfortable writing." So
the most common dynamic with me and a
client is we speak on the telephone. I
take notes and create a first draft and
they edit the draft. I take more notes,
write another draft, they edit the
draft. So they're involved intimately in
telling the stories and also editing
what I produce, but I'm usually doing
most of the writing.
>> You do this over the telephone, for
example, people like Edward Brookke,
Bill Bradley, Charles Evers. Did you
spend much time with them literally in
the same room?
>> Well, Edward Brookke was living in
Massachusetts where I live. So,
obviously, if somebody lives close by, I
would prefer to be in the same room with
them. Um, many of my clients are from
parts of the country where it's just not
really feasible to spend a whole lot of
time together. I always try to spend
some time with them because there is
something about being face to face. Uh,
but sometimes it's just less possible.
In the case of Charles Evers, Evers was
sort of the king of a little town called
Fyet, Mississippi. And um Fyet,
Mississippi did not that I could tell
have a single white person except me
when I was there. Um I went down and
stayed in his house. And it was just
fascinating to be the minority. Uh to
just give one little example, it was
very, very hot and I was getting a
sunburn. And when I went to the little
store there, there was nothing for
sunburn.
it wasn't a problem for the other people
in town.
>> Well, I think yeah, I think that's a
very good point because without seeing
Fyet, Mississippi and seeing the
surrounding area that he grew up in, um
capturing his voice and his story as you
have in this remarkable book called Have
No Fear uh would have been more
difficult, I think, had you been writing
just from New Town, Massachusetts or
Princeton, New Jersey, uh places that he
had probably never been. And and of
course, you'd never been to Fate,
Mississippi. So
>> he Charles Evers had a phrase to pay the
price. He felt that there were a lot of
leaders who tried to sort of slip into
the civil rights movement, get on
television, get a little fame for
themsel, but they hadn't really paid the
price. To him, paying the price is going
on the marches, going doortodoor,
signing up voters, doing all the little
things that are not fun or easy, but are
essential to a movement. And so when I
asked him, would you be willing to let
me write your story? He immediately came
back with, are you willing to pay the
price? And so then we have to negotiate.
What does that mean? Um, I'm not a
member of the civil rights movement per
se. I'm sympathetic. I'm much younger.
I'm white. I'm a Yankee northerner. What
is the price? So that there's always
something negotiated with a client. And
that was an interesting negotiation with
him. But part of the price was coming
down to fet.
>> Yeah, we should say that uh I I can
imagine negotiating it with Charles
Evers would be would be quite the
exercise because this was a tough guy.
Just to give a story from from his book.
Uh, of course his brother, older brother
Megar Evers was killed, shot in his own
driveway. It was a top civil rights
activist shot by a Ku Klux Clan person.
Charles, the Ku Klux Clan came after
Charles Evers, too. Evers was Charles
Evers was a big guy. I think over 6
feet, 220 lbs. Uh very strong guy, but
uh backed off from nobody. He told he
sat on his porch with his shotgun, told
the clan to come on. H they didn't. Um
and so this is a guy that I imagine
working with him
must have been quite interesting.
>> Yes. Um and he was also a old-fashioned
male chauvinist. So you know that that
will happen with the clients too.
There's no reason to make the book about
how women should be treated in your life
particularly. But it was just obvious
from comments that he made in the
lifestyle he was live living that he and
I sort of felt differently about that.
But it just it wasn't the key to Charles
Evers. And so we focus much more on the
civil rights movement and his
entrepreneurism which was close to his
heart.
>> And the book really is would have to
imagine is his voice. It's not, let me
put, it's not the most literary book
I've ever read. I'll I'll put it that
way. It is rough. It is his voice as, as
I imagine, he spoke, but he gets his
message and his personality across so
much in this book. I'm sure that was
very different than say Senator Edward
Brookke, one of the I believe was the
first uh African-American United States
senator in the u postmodern era. Uh and
Mr. Uh, Senator Brookke was a very
highly educated, wellspoken, very
carefully political gentleman because
I've read his memoir that you helped
write wrote. I I've read Bill Bradley's
as well. So, how was it different
working with them, say, than a Charles
Evers?
Well, Senator Brookke was, as you said,
very well educated, extremely
intelligent, and what struck me as a
little bit sad was that he did not want
to be seen as the first African-American
senator since reconstruction, which he
was to the national media. He was a very
important symbol, but Ed Brookke was a
serious policy guy. He wanted to be
known for his positions in foreign
policy, in federal housing policy. He
wanted to be known as someone who did
his homework and knew his stuff and was
really, really strong on issues. He
certainly wasn't going to vote against
civil rights legislation, but he didn't
want to spend his time in the Senate on
civil rights issues. So when it came
time to do his memoir, I like everybody
else began with how did it feel to be
the first African-American senator since
reconstruction. It didn't take long to
realize that really wasn't the direction
he wanted to go. But it also complicates
the finding a publisher and promoting
the book because the publisher wanted a
lot of stuff about being an
African-American. So there there's
always this figuring out what the client
wants and then there's also connecting
the client if they want commercial
publication to what the publisher and
what the public are going to want. Uh
there's a famous case when Lauren Beall
was writing her memoir. She was had very
mixed feelings about being so associated
with Humphrey Bogart being the wife of
Humphrey Bogart. She had had a
distinguished acting career had done
many many things unrelated to Humphrey
Bogart. And when she went to write her
memoirs, she announced Bogart isn't
going to be a very big part of this. And
the publisher told her, "He has to be.
That's what your public wants. He
doesn't have to be all of it, but you
got to have a big piece of it about him.
That's what readers want to know. What
was he really like? What was your
marriage really like?" And reluctantly,
she did that. And I think it made it a
better book. So, it's a it's a
relationship. As I said, it's about
negotiating. Sometimes you're
negotiating. the the collaborator is
negotiating with a client. Sometimes the
collaborator is negotiating with a
publisher or an editor at a publishing
house. Sometimes the client and the
publishing house negotiate directly, but
they're always have slightly different
interests and the the publisher wants
what's going to sell the most number of
copies and the client is interested in
saying exactly what they want to say
about themsel and those things are not
the same.
another senator that you know we just
mentioned Bill Bradley known as Dollar
Bill because he was such a clutch
college famous college and professional
basketball player with the New York
Knicks. He was a road scholar. Um and
then he I think in some ways similar to
Senator Brookke, Bill Bradley was a very
policy wonk really. Um very serious guy
and uh how did that how did that play
out when you were writing with him?
Absolutely. And Bill Bradley is another
person I have enormous respect for. Um I
I had enormous respect before I started
working for him and I respect even even
more having done something like 80
interviews with his close associates. Um
but it did strike me as as with Brooke.
Bill Bradley did not want to be thought
of as a great basketball player. He
wanted he was proud of his basketball
career naturally. But someone a telling
anecdote that one of his friends told me
was there was some sort of a
issue that involved sports or basketball
or something a political issue and
someone had brought to a meeting an
actual basketball and were passing it
around and people sort of thought well
what's going to happen when Bill Bradley
gets the basketball maybe he'll twirl it
on his finger or something like that. Um
and and they said he sort of handed it
off to the next person like it was a
dirty diaper. Um it was just it was not
where he was then. He was he had done
extraordinary things in basketball, but
basketball was over and now he really
wanted to focus on the Senate.
>> When you talk about the work you did,
you mentioned 80 interviews in Bill
Bradley's case and and obviously a lot
with Charles Evers probably down in
Mississippi and other places. uh that
you probably had enough material to
actually write a biography
uh as opposed to being their sort of
collaborator memoirist. Have you ever
were you tempted at that point to say,
"Wait a second, maybe I'd like to write
a actual biography and just be the sole
author."
>> I have thought about it from time to
time. I won't say I haven't thought
about it. Um but I'll give you another
metaphor.
Being a biographer to me is sort of like
being a judge. And being a memoir
collaborator is like being a defense
lawyer. And I feel more comfortable
being a defense lawyer than I do a
judge. I like to say to somebody, we're
going out into the court of public
opinion. Please tell me about yourself.
Don't tell me anything that's not true
because I don't want to be caught, you
know, lying in court. But I'm I'm trying
to put you in the best light possible.
I'm trying to help you tell your story.
That's really where I feel psychically
most comfortable, helping somebody tell
the story that they want to tell. A
biographer is often forced to say things
which the subject will find painful,
doesn't want to have out there. But just
to be objective, the biographer has to
bring up these things. And it's just
it's a role that I don't feel quite
comfortable with. I like to work with
people. Sometimes it seems in
biographies that the the differential
between an authorized and an
unauthorized biography biography uh can
it suggest that the uh the authorized
biography was uh written with more
collaboration perhaps than the
unauthorized biography? Um,
>> yeah. Well, there's there's a whole
subject called pathography where, you
know, it's just a long list of the drugs
that they took and the, you know, other
mistakes that they made. And to me,
they're they're rather dreary because
you never get a sense of what made this
person really remarkable. There are all
sorts of people on drugs. What was it
about them creatively or in some other
way that made them remarkable? So, when
I'm working with a collabor with a
memoir client, I always try to get to
that. What are your passions? What are
your quirks? What is really distinctive
about you? What would your friends say?
You're the only person they know who
does what.
>> Was there ever or have there been other
people that you started to work with and
just felt this isn't working? Uh either
they or you felt this this just isn't
working. Uh don't feel comfortable with
this particular project.
>> Yeah. I mean, I'd rather not give names.
Most of them are not well-known people
anyway. But there is a well-known
phenomenon where a client or potential
client will tell the family that for
years I'm going to do my memoirs. I'm
going to write my life story. But they
never actually do it. So the family is
sort of used to this is just talk. And
then one year at Thanksgiving the person
says, "Well, I've hired a collaborator.
I've got I've got Andrews in is gonna
help me with this and we've already done
several chapters." And then somebody at
the Thanksgiving table says, "Well, I
hope you're not going to be writing
anything about daddy's drinking." And
that the client says, "That's chapter
one." And then the family has a big
to-do, and how could you do that? You're
you're you're washing dirty laundry in
public. Blah blah blah. So sometimes the
client will just come back to me sort of
sheepishly and say, "Look, it's it's
touched off a civil war in my family.
The only way we could write this would
be to do a sanitized book, which I don't
want to do. Um, I may come back to you
at some point or I may write this
without a collaborator and just stick it
in my desk drawer for somebody to find
after I'm gone. But I'm sorry, you know,
we we can't really go in the direction I
want to go. So that does happen and I
always have a number of clients at the
same time because I know that a certain
number of projects for whatever reason
will not complete. There are also some
unfortunately where the person only
starts because they can feel that
mortality is very close.
they're ill, they're near death, or
they're beginning to have serious
dementia issues, and sometimes a project
just can't be completed because it was
started too late. So, one thing I would
urge anyone who's listening to this is
if you have a friend, if you have a
parent, an aging, somebody who really
needs to have their book done, do not
wait. Get started. It doesn't have to be
with somebody like me. It can just be
you and a video camera, you and a tape
recorder. Um, but very often the family
will sort of be in denial because this
is a treasured person. They don't want
to face the fact that they may not be
around for that much longer. So there's
the denial and delay and then sometimes
it's too late.
>> As you were talking about that, I was
thinking about one of the most famous
memoirs uh in American history, which is
uh General President Ulysius Grant's
memoirs uh which he wrote when he was
dying of uh I believe throat cancer. He
was broke. he wanted to leave money for
his family and if he wanted to get his
story out in his collaborative memoirs
collaboratist
was um uh Samuel Clemens Mark Twain if I
recall uh or at least they had many
letters back and forth um
>> and and what's especially interesting to
me about that incredibly ironic is here
is Twain arguably our greatest writer
and here is Ulissiz Grant who is not a
writer at all and both of them wrote
their memoirs and Grant France is much
better than Twain's.
Twain wrote a sort of a memoir which was
unpacked a hundred years after it was
written and it was sort of a series of
you know shaggy dog stories and and
witty boasts and aides. It wasn't really
a proper memoir. Grant Grant's memoir is
beautifully written. I I strongly
recommend it even to those not
particularly interested in Civil War
history.
>> Yeah. Let talk to me about some of the
other your colleagues who do this. Are
there any other books out there that you
would recommend, memoirs that you found
particularly moving or incisive?
>> Oh boy, it's it's hard to pick out one.
Um, there are two brothers named Jeffrey
Wolf and Tobias Wolf. And Tobias Wolf
wrote This Boy's Life, which was a
Robert Dairo movie, and many people may
be aware of that. Um, Jeffrey Wolf,
Tobias's older brother, wrote a book
called The Duke of Deception about their
father. So, both sons wrote memoirs of
coming of age. The parents split so that
the Tobias Wolf book is more about his
mother and the Jeffrey Wolf is more
about the father. But it's fascinating
to read them both because they
complement each other beautifully and
both writers are are gifted.
the um
you also write memoirs as you uh for
people who are not famous. Um and what
is what is that like? Is that the same
process or is there some significant
difference?
>> There are a number of differences. Um
one is often the client has trouble
believing that their life is important
enough. So often it's sort of been put
together by their children, not by them.
So you know, a 40-year-old will approach
me and say, "Would you be willing to to
write the memoir of my 72-year-old
mother?" Um, and the 72-year-old mother
begins by saying, "I don't even know why
we're doing this. Um, my life isn't very
interesting. I'm not the tiniest bit
famous. Um, I I know my children love me
and I love them, but does that mean that
I should write a memoir? what's going on
here? So, it it's sometimes difficult
even just to kind of get started. But
there's something very nice also about
working with nonfamous people in that
they often really haven't rehearsed
their story. Um, if you think about a
celebrity, they're often surrounded by a
whole team. They have a management team.
They have a lawyer. They have a public
relations person. and all of these
people are going to be involved if
there's something that's going out with
that person's name on it to the public.
So then I'm kind of part of a a larger
team and maybe something one of the more
interesting things that I write has to
be taken out because the public
relations person doesn't want it in
there. Um whereas with an ordinary
person there's just much less of that.
Sometimes there'll be a sibling or a son
or daughter or something who has an
issue, but generally you get a much more
unvarnished account. Um, and as I said,
I don't like the term ordinary people
because I don't think anyone is ordinary
if you just dig under the surface a
little bit. If you think about the
so-called ordinary people that you know,
um, I'm sure they all have passions,
they all have quirks, they all have
things that are distinctive about them
and about their seeing the world. Um,
another way to look at it is any skilled
person likes a degree of difficulty. So,
you know, a basketball, Bill Bradley
gets more satisfaction out of making a
25- foot shot than making a layup. And
you could argue that writing the memoir
of a very famous person is sort of a
layup. Um, to to work with an ordinary
person is like a 25- foot shot.
the uh
who would you choose to write to work
with you if you were going to do a
memoir of yourself?
>> Uh well, there's a guy also lives in
Newton, Massachusetts named William
Novak, Bill Novak, who's very very good
at what he does and I've been fortunate
to become friends over the years with
Bill. Um so if I if I was entrusting
anyone with myself other than myself, it
would be Bill. But I am writing my own
memoir. Um, and I think it's been a
healthy thing to do just as it's a
healthy thing for a psychiatrist to have
been through therapy. Um, it makes it
easier for me to understand the
resistances that a client will have.
>> Yeah, there is. You know, you mentioned
that speaking of analogies, there is
something about it's almost like a
therapeutic process. Uh, I would think
when you're obviously it's not therapy
and you're not a professional therapist,
but there is something about that trust
level of trust and intimacy when you're
helping someone write their life story
that must feel similar.
>> Absolutely. And another common issue is
boundaries. Um, in other words, I have a
set time when I'm going to talk on the
phone. At some point, a client may just
call me not during that set time. Hey, I
want to tell you something.
um I can allow a little bit of that but
if there's a lot of it then I have to
say I'm sorry this is not the time that
we set aside to talk and I'm busy right
now um if the client tells me there are
various things will set off sort of
professional alarms and I have to kind
of create a boundary so a good therapist
does that as well
>> we are in an era now with with Facebook
and all the uh social media where
everyone many people seem to put many of
their most private private details out
on the uh on the internet. Um
is that changed the process or uh how do
you see that? Uh and I'm going to add a
a second thing. I we we need to we only
have a few minutes left, but I want to
bring up AI. Uh because there's now
going to be AI writing uh whether it's
AI slop or whether it's an actual uh
book that that's generated by AI. Um can
you talk about those things briefly?
Sure.
Um, to start off with AI, many people
have asked me about this. I think that
it it will be increasingly possible to
just feed into a program where you were
born, who your parents were, what your
occupation was, where you live, a bunch
of other questions, and have, you know,
whether it's Chat GBT or some other
program, just spin out your memoir, you
know, in in a very short time. like any
craftsman, I would argue that
what I do is really, however
superficially it may resemble that, is
really something different. Um, if you
go back to that craftsman I talked about
laying stones without using any mortar,
that's a that's a very difficult craft.
Now, you can certainly get a
mass-roduced stone wall. Um, and you may
that may be what you want, but AI is not
going to replace me, what I truly do any
more than a
machine making stone walls is going to
replace that guy who does beautiful
walls without mortar. It's it it
superficially looks the same, but it's
not the same. So, I would just hope that
people like me who are craftsmen would
say this is a craft. It's a difficult
craft to learn. It's a craft I spend a
lot of time thinking about and it it
operates at a much higher level than AI.
If you want something quick and cheap
and dirty, you know, AI is what you
want. But it's not I don't think it can
truly replace anyone who is an artist at
it.
>> Well, I think we'll end with that
because I think that's a very powerful
statement. Uh, and I appreciate that. I
appreciate the books you've written. Uh,
Andrew Zanton. uh you can look at the
the uh some of the memoirs that he's
written of prominent people and perhaps
less prominent. Uh they're all worth
reading. Uh but I want to thank you for
being with us today and we look forward
to reading your collaborative books in
the future and perhaps your own memoir.
>> Thank you so much. If you Google Andrew
Zanton Medium, that's where the profiles
are listed. Thank you so much.
Appreciate it.
>> Thank and thank you. [music] And please
join us for our next episode of Meet the
Author.
[music]