Video summary
The webinar hosted by EIF's Shane Olop and the EIF Global South Committee for Open Science provides a comprehensive overview of efforts to map and strengthen the open science landscape across the Global South. Established in 2023, this committee aims to increase visibility and coordination among researchers from regions that are often underrepresented in global scientific discourse, with founding members representing diverse nations including Thailand, Argentina, Nigeria, Kenya, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Brazil, and Rwanda. The session featured insights from three panelists who detailed their respective national initiatives: Nita Nasar from Thailand described the long-standing role of the Thai Information Technology Service as a national hub supporting research through databases and digital collections; Susan Fman from South Africa highlighted the ongoing tensions between commercial publishing models and open access, noting that while an open science framework is drafted, it awaits parliamentary approval; and Washington Segundo from Brazil outlined infrastructure built since the late 1990s to reduce dependence on commercial platforms, including the Open Research Portal which hosts over five million digital objects.
A central theme of the discussion was the strategic shift away from a heavy dependency on high-impact factor journals toward more sustainable open science models, though the panelists acknowledged that changing entrenched research evaluation systems remains a significant challenge. To address this, Thailand allocates budgets based on university clusters that prioritize societal support and innovation rather than rankings alone, while Brazil has recently focused on supporting local publishing initiatives to reduce reliance on expensive Article Processing Charges. In South Africa, breakthroughs were achieved through a consensus study that centralized activities under the Academy of Sciences, leading to improved journal quality and standardization. The panel also emphasized the necessity of interoperability through international standards and shared software to facilitate cross-border collaboration, alongside the importance of multilingual publishing supported by AI translation tools to enhance local reach while preserving original languages.
Beyond technical infrastructure, the conversation addressed critical barriers such as high subscription costs, decentralized data activities, and the slow evolution of research metrics that still favor traditional commercial sources from the Global North. Best practices for overcoming these hurdles include forming library consortia to negotiate transformative agreements, engaging stakeholders to understand technical barriers like connectivity, and respecting local laws regarding sensitive data to prevent "helicopter science." The panelists advocated for a bottom-up approach supported by national policy frameworks, suggesting that institutional policies should precede governmental ones and leveraging prominent researchers and Academies of Sciences to lobby for change. Furthermore, they stressed the importance of investing in persistent identifier systems, utilizing the Open Government Partnership to secure national commitments, and connecting diverse actors—including researchers, societies, and organizations—to build robust national networks that foster democratic discussion and secure funding.
The session concluded with a forward-looking emphasis on leveraging AI applications in medical data sharing while carefully considering ethical implications and ensuring data remains accessible within originating countries. Washington Segundo highlighted the need to connect diverse open science communities to build cohesive national networks, citing Brazil's efforts as a model for uniting various groups. Susan Fman reinforced the strategy of establishing domestic funding agencies to create a conducive environment for open science, while Nita Nasar pointed out the specific challenge in Thailand of connecting researchers with business sectors and startups. Ultimately, the webinar underscored that while scaling bottom-up initiatives without supportive national policies is difficult, active agenda items like reforming evaluation metrics, investing in shared infrastructure, and fostering international partnerships are essential steps toward a more equitable and inclusive global scientific ecosystem.
Read the full video transcript
thank you everybody for joining us today
really excited to have you here for our
second e life Global South committee for
open science webinar uh topic being
mapping the open science landscape in
the global South um I'm Shane olop I'm
eif's publishing development manager and
it's my pleasure to welcome you today
please feel free to introduce yourself
in the chat uh it's always interesting
to know who you are where you're from
dialing in from and any other Associated
information you'd like to share uh
welcome today so as context eif is a
nonprofit organization that operates a
platform to improve all aspects of
research communication by encouraging
and recognizing the most responsible
behaviors in research while a new model
has potential to make publishing a more
inclusive Enterprise offering the
benefits of scholarly review while
giving authors more agency in the
publishing process we share a link now
to the one-year Milestone uh about which
you can read more about our publishing
model including milestones and findings
from the first year uh but in order to
fulfill the potential of our new model
we need coordinated efforts and to hear
from the communities most impacted by
the inequity in the status quo to this
end we've established the eif global
South committee for open science to
learn directly from our peers in the
global South so we can strive to
overcome these barriers uh in the
pursuit of an inclusive Equitable and
more diverse scientific
Communications today we're joined by the
committee's founding
members and three esteemed guest panal
ists who will discuss how policy
socioeconomic factors cultural context
and interdisciplinary collaborations
Define and shape their open SCI
landscape in the global South following
the panelist presentations and
discussion we'll invite questions and
comments from our
audience but first I'll start with a bit
of housekeeping uh so during the webinar
we ask that you please be respectful
honest inclusive accommodating
appreciative and open to learning from
everyone else we ask that you do not
attack demain disrupt Terra or threaten
others or encourage such behavior and if
you ever feel uncomfortable or unwelcome
on any of these webinar email via Eli
safety teampro mail.com we reserve the
right to ask anyone to leave and also
deny access to a subsequent webinar so
that we can continue to improve upon our
webinars we' appreciate if you could
complete our brief four question form
which you can access from the link or by
scanning the QR code with your
smartphone
camera and all that is left is for me to
introduce Alo uh to welcome today's
guest speakers and introduce our topic
thank
uh thank you Shane welcome everybody
thank you for joining us uh I'm
delighted to welcome my fellow committee
members as well as uh Our Guest panelist
I was just have say some brief words
about the action of of the committee the
the El life Global South committee for
open science was initially formed in
2023 it brings together researchers from
different countries and territories that
share characteristics with regard to
social economics politics and uh limited
representation in the scientific space
and it tries to provide a work a way to
to to give a greater visibility to this
region so the committee currently has
representatives from uh Thailand from uh
Ronda from Argentina from
Nigeria Kenya Bangladesh Indonesia and
Brazil which is myself uh and we have
just finished recruiting additional
three members will be announced in
January uh and uh we have been working
for a little more than a year in trying
to to to think of different ways to to
increase the visibility of open science
in the global South and the visibility
of the global South in the open science
discussion and I think one thing we have
learned from a personal perspective at
least is how little actually know about
what's happening in in other regions of
the world I think each of us in the
committee uh is knowledgeable about
their own regions but really I mean the
road is very large and there's multiple
initiatives in different parts of the
global South uh they're sometimes
convergent sometimes inun and I think
one of our main priorities
that that we have perceived is that we
have to try to map these initiatives and
make us more visible towards each other
which is one of the reasons we're
promoting this webinar so uh we have
done a previous webinar in the middle of
the year uh which was focused on
Grassroots communities promoting open
science you can watch this in YouTube uh
the link is here and should be in the
chat as well uh and today we're actually
bringing in people who have been
involved in more institutional
initiatives concerning Open Access open
data open education in different regions
of the world in order to extend the
discussion about how we can best join
forces to promote open science and to
actually make ourselves more visible uh
so I'm the your first guest who is Nita
nasar she has led strategic initiatives
at unet which is a network under the
Thousand Ministry of higher education
science research and Innovation which
Fosters educational Partnerships and uh
expand to expand digital resources and
learning networks uh she has been head
of learning resources at
and she leverages her expertise to
enhance research accessibility and
strengthen tha's Li networks supporting
collaboration Innovation and accessible
resources for academic and research
communities in Thailand so Nita uh
welcome and feel feel feel free to start
whenever okay thank you uh thank you for
having me here uh first of all I have to
uh inform that I'm um sick today I have
a sore thought but I will try to do my
best okay okay um I have to introduce
myself a little bit right uh I start my
career in education almost 20 years ago
as a computer teacher and I later become
a full-time lecturers at universities
and have some experience with uh
corporates in Thailand and what's L me
here working as a head of learning
resources uh kis un
under the ministry of higher education
science research and Innovation
Thailand as from um the
introduction
okay okay about tiis um tiis it's
establishment in
1990 um Tes department has been a
Cornerstone to in driving research and
knowledge dissemination across Thailand
our mission has been all uh sorry our
mission has always been empowered
research and education for focusing on
centralized ICT management fostering uh
collaboration and leveraging
Technologies in to enhance efficiency to
promote uh knowledge
development uh through the range of
diverse services such as reference
database Union catalog or UC uh I thesis
Auto and also um TI Digital Collection
or TDC we have uh consistently provide
vital support to the academic and
research communities these services are
more than tools they are Catalyst for
collaborations Innovative and Society
progress so um at tyus we focus on our
key pillars that drive our mission and
impact first uh we serve as the center
of in information and communication
Technologies for research providing a
centralized Hub that empowers research
with Cutting Edge ICT tools and
resources second we are commit to
promotion and support of collaboration
research and resources fostering
Partnerships andamp amplify the reach of
effectiveness of research efforts and
third we prioritize the pro promotion
and support of Knowledge Management
ensuring that Innovation and learning
are at for font of what we do and
finally uh we emphasize the application
of ICT for organization management and
dissemination to network members stream
streamlining operations and delivering
valuable insight and resources to our
Network so so through these um pillars
we work strengthen with the academic and
research landscape Connecting People
ideas and ins institutions across
Thailand and
Beyond highis has proudly established
itself as the national hub for
information and communication
Technologies research serving as a cenal
resource be managed and provide
essential ICT tools that empower
research studies across this the
country uh we have uh five Services okay
I will um start with the first one
reference
database um we serve a whal hub for
member
registration providing seamless access
to electronic academic research database
services for higher education
institutions currently we offer access
to n comprehensive database supporting
the research needs of 0 government
higher education institutions across the
country second one is Union catalog we
offer database system that complies
biographic list
of uh Library resources following
International
standards uh specifically Mark 20 one
the system Empower uses uh for simple
search features allowing them to easily
search for the check and availability of
the Library
resources next one is I thesis we
provide a comprehensive data management
system designed to support the
preparation of thesis and
visitations uh this system include um
pism detection mechanism to ensuring the
Integrity of the academic work and
streamlines the management of doctoral
and Masters level thesis and research
projects okay we also have uh the
software which is called autol software
automate Library we provide um this
system spe specific designed for Thai
higher education
institutions our goal is to reduce the
cost um associate with purchasing and
maintaining Library
software and currently we provide green
systems that have already been
successful Implement in our 65
locations helping institutions optimize
their Library management efficiently and
affordably
and the last one is uh Tha Digital
Collection or
TDU um it's a our database serve as a
comprehensive repository for higher
education institu
institutions it includes thesis research
papers academics articles and uh even RS
providing and um valuable resources for
researchers Educators and students
okay and last year uh we were honored to
receive a certificate from Asia Pacific
Advanced
Network um to recognizing our efforts in
Connecting People cultures research and
educations and uh we set this this award
as a new Benchmark for Tha Library
Network we are commit to sharing it uh
to our Cooperative libraries in coming
year so we pass these
Awards and want to encourage users to
take
pride um in utilizing our service and
share uh valuable feedback to recognize
the Excellence and uh we give the awards
to uh our networks following this cat
atories uh for UC catalog we give the
awards to the top three universities
with the highest number of Il or inter
Library loans within the system and top
three universities that have
consistently contribute the most
resources to the
system and for CDC orai digital
collections we Awards to the top three
universities with the highest number of
the documents downloads showcasing
exceptional resources usage so um these
Awards celebrate the dedication of Our
member institu
institutions and highlight the active
engagement in advancing research and
education so at Tha list uh we remain
dedicate to supporting the academic and
research communities through our
service resources and Innovative
platforms we are constantly working to
improve the way knowledge is share
manage and disseminate and your
engagement is vital to our continued
success I would like to um extend my
heartful thank you to all of the
partners and members and all the um
participations in this um um
webinar your collaboration collaboration
and feedback are valueable for us in
order to moving forward together thank
you once again to for having me here
today and looking forward to see the
impact of our collaborative efforts in
next further development
together thank
you thank you nid uh Jak can we have a
our slides back so uh we move on now to
Susan fman Susan is a director of The
Scholar republication unit at the
Academy of Sciences in South Africa and
she has been responsible for driving the
open science agenda to raise the
visibility discoverability and
accessibility of South African scol
Journal and improve the quality of South
Africa research output she has received
the electronic publishing trust award
for her her contributions to the
promotion of Open Access in developing
countries uh she has uh been the
co-chair of the important in combating
predatory journals and conferences and
she has received recognition for her
role in establishing SE South Africa
platform in South Africa uh which is of
course an initiative in collaboration
with Latin America which we're very
proud of so welcome Susan U Flo is
yours and thank you Al um for the
opportunity and good afternoon then to
all the colleagues it's afternoon with
me if it's good morning or good evening
that in in your place well we'll be
greeted anyway some going to change the
discourse a little bit you will see that
the title is open signs um and Open
Access in Africa so I'm going to take a
a continental view on all these issues
um and I think that's also very
important sort of in going forward and
promoting in open signs so we must
realize and we must recognize all of the
tensions that's currently in Colony
publishing um for instance the
commercial pressures in scholly
publishing and the pro The Profit Motors
of Publishers and high subscription cost
the monetization of knowledge then of
course the whole push for the Open
Access movement for accessibility and
also to have a look at the business
models um the article processing charges
especially in developing countries where
this is quite a challenge um and this is
quite on top of the debate of
researchers in um de developing
countries and then of course the funders
role to
incentivize um and and to promote um
Open Access license and then of course
all this have an impact on the
researchers um as I said the publication
f um the equity concerns and namely that
the commercial models might disadvantage
researchers from developing um countries
considering the underfunded
institutions that might lead to unequal
participation in global scholarship and
then the incentives and the recognition
to participate in openness when it comes
to um promotion and the evaluation of
researchers as such and then on the
technological and social considerations
front um the emerging Technologies of
digital platforms and of course AI power
tools um that can support us in research
um publication and output uh through
peer review efficient peer review
streamline up access processes and
provide perhaps new funding me
mechanisms through collaborative
platforms and then the societal
expectations where um there's a pressure
on governments and institutions to
ensure research is freely available so
as you can see this is a whole ecosystem
of pressures that forces us to look
openly towards research output and the
participation um in Global Research Etc
would just like to mention and just
confirm that um although we here at the
tip of um Africa we all take cognizance
of the um up S UNESCO
recommendations um I always say that I
have been in open science Open Access
since 2002 and I think for the first
time we are contextualizing the debate
um much better um the rhetoric around
open open signs Open Access is better
positioned um to show the world that
they can benefit in just opening up as
such so that's why we like the UNESCO
recommendations quite a bit also because
it takes place in a very particular
value system of quality and integrity
connective benefit Equity fairness and
diversity and
exclusiveness um but that the principles
sort of um anchor all these values in
practicing open science
principles um also the international
science Council has a very good
definition of open science and they put
it under three pillars so to speak Open
Access publishing open DI data and open
to society and this resonates very well
with us being at the Academy of Sciences
of South Africa uh because we believe
that the results um should really
support Humanity in achieving
sustainable and an equitable life on
planet
Earth just want to say then broadly if
we look at Africa it is very important
that the that the um open science
policies policies sorry um should be set
in a broader government policy context
of socio economic development that takes
complicance of global issues that
codified within sustainable development
goals just want to mention and just say
that South Africa has started about in
um
2018 already also with some dialogues um
under the um multilateral bilateral um
of the sa European Union Dialogue on
open signs and we came up with a
particular framework um to advance open
science um in South Africa as well but
um I'm sorry just to mention that it has
not been approved and passed by
parliament yet but it's at quite an
advanced stage um for South
Africa and then of course um we also
look at other policies um being
published internationally to see if we
do align um and and whether we are all
subscribing then to the same um
principles and value systems as such
we're not staying behind as as Africa
continent we are within the African
Union there's a digital transformation
strategy that was crafted a data policy
framework in the sharing of data between
countries um it's a highly problematic
area within Africa because there's so uh
many disparities between the different
um rules and regulations of countries so
it is important that we all function
from the same premise when we also share
data and that we align with European
Union as well as with um United States
um regulatory sort of
framework um currently the African open
SS project which is a very important
project that you should take cognizance
of is driving through the sadic um a
regional SDI policy um for open signs as
such and I think that's very important
to see the movement that's happening
already on the continent as well as the
artificial intelligence there are some
um intelligence strategies and
artificial intelligence strategies
happening um the criticism and the point
that I want to point out is that it does
not address research per se so we'll
have to have a look at that but also in
Regional um forums um open science is
also promoted and highly um recommended
in um do in official documents Etc which
I think is all important from a policy
perspective as we move along so if we
look at policies in Africa we can see
that the blue part is is the one that is
um sort of it has been crafted but it's
it's sitting on the desks of um the
parliamentarians to finally approve it
those in the gray the dark gray is in
development or under discussion um so
you can see the countries are starting
to um talk about it and the only country
on the Africa continent is Ethiopia who
has passed um a open It's actually an
open access on policy but they also
included open data as as um to be
recognized um when talking about um Open
Access Etc so that's quite significant
as such um so there is movement but
extremely slow um we must say but does
that deter us from actually um looking
at open signs and Open Access and does
it hold us back from our initiatives no
it doesn't because I think we're clear
about the policy and sort of the
framework in which open size should
happen and we just
drive forward regardless of not having a
um policy in place for the country um as
if has been in this space since
2009 and we realize it is time to
actually showcase what we're doing and
we started to formulate it in an open
science policy and which you can see
right here also in line again not only
with national imperatives but also the
continental and international
imperatives as well so there's huge
alignment to um all these
documentation so like any open access
initiative starts it normally starts
with institutional
repositories um so
little bit um disappointed sort of as we
started with major projects U namely
there was Data D all um of African
thesis and dissertations which was
Federated under one platform that seems
to um actually come to a stop because of
a lack of support of um funding and
leadership in that space But now we can
see again that the African um African
Association of univers ities is again
starting to launch the Africa wide
University Research Archive of research
being done in South Africa and of course
afria is doing some major Works in
creating pre
repositories um for uh for authors to
deposit their work in um and then to
receive um up and peer review on the
particular platform so um you can see
that there's also quite um some
happening right there Then in terms of
the directory of Open Access journals
you can see that the footprint is
growing very slowly and there's a huge
Drive within Africa to have the journals
included into the director Open Access
journals just want to mention that in
South Africa in Cape Town there is a
open SS um SL Diamond Open Access
Journal Summit taking place has been for
the whole week and um this is quite a
problem atic phenomena because um we can
see that many of the other African
journals are actually being um
disqualified in the in this directory
because they're not adhering to
standards so there's a huge space for
training and advocacy and to see that
sou that African journals actually
comply to the criteria of doaj so um
there's a lot of work to be done there
and um that will certainly help us with
a Open Access journals on the continent
to get it of a particular quality then
just want to point out in response to
the open research Europe platform um
repository um there's open research
Africa that this is a um a pre-print
repository but it is subjected to
subscription prices which is also quite
difficult for researchers from Africa to
actually participate in and we'll have
to have look at new ways in how we can
participate in this very important
platform um as such then
AAR um has this pre repository SLE just
want to mention that um the application
or the depositing of preprints very
significantly across academic fields and
um geographical regions in Africa
specifically so there's very limited
evidence as well at the moment regarding
the number of pre preprints posted and
used so that is still another field that
that that needs um some further
development if we look at data sharing
this is a very interesting field um what
we try to do here is to actually plot um
the different um activities um Open
Access activities open repositories
activities um on the Africa sort of map
and you can see there are very there's a
lot of decentralized
activities um going on um so that is
actually quite problematic uh because
they are not United in one platform or
under one sort of initiative and drive
so to speak so again these countries
actually Backle to showcase the work
that they have done what is also
important is to note that only two data
repositories as a assigned C trust seal
and that we we should work for and
strive towards um the core trust seal
that we can showcase trust at
repositories two very interesting very
large collaborations in Africa which is
um really a game changer um not only for
Africa but for the rest of the world is
the H3 Africa human um her heridity and
health in Africa it's a genomics
research in Africa with genomic data and
data science um just to collect this
data to um put them more centrally
available to um analyze them and to
visualize them is is is quite a tedious
task but despite these challenges this
particular collaboration has managed to
work around the different challenges
that the countries are um receiving and
this is a critical and a cool um
database to geonomics research in Africa
particularly Africa also has a very
particular genomic pool which is not
present in the rest of the world and of
course if we talk about languages
African languages um the data sets um
you can see there are some um drives as
well to take this further and
collaborations um again the
international science Council plays a
huge and a mammoth role in driving
collaborative research in Africa which
is also a very important part in in what
we
do as if I started with a a personal the
personal
protction sorry personal um um
protection of of personal information
when sharing data and um this is the one
that we're trying to um also get support
from gdpr and from um from the state
trans disciplinary research is also in
the upcoming um quite a complex way of
doing research putting the teams
together and ensure that you have the
right person on the particular team but
certain needs not lacking and then as
Academy we also um have just launch a
statement from the network of African
academ sciencey in Africa on open
science where we also promote um open
signs Etc just want to see I think I am
at the end um of my
presentation um I just yeah it would not
move on so I think I'm going to stop
right here onavo so welcome and and I'm
passing it over and back to you there uh
thank you Susan so uh I'll next move to
Washington uh Segundo uh who's our fan
panelist is from Brazil uh his basis a
presan Institute of information Science
and Technology i b uh his uh
actually holds a degree in mathematics
but has worked in information science
for most of his life he's technical
coordinator in the area of treatment
analysis and dissemination of scientific
information at his institution and he uh
coordinates projects commed in the areas
of open science uh he's the leader of
the Brazilian scientific research
ecosystem laboratory and research uh and
he's also the representative of vibi in
initiatives in which we we collaborate
such as
the open government partnership uh
compromis for science in Brazil and the
Brazilian repr bu Network so do so have
you here Washington Flo is
yours thank
youu uh thank you all for for the
invitation of participating of this this
Workshop this webinar so I start um the
discussion um with the um reflection uh
for example we we have um a problem uh
in
in in Psychology in
Psychotherapy that
is how uh when you you we need to to
take medicine uh a psychoactive uh to
solve a a psycho problem or when we need
to uh do
Psychotherapy so uh the the moment that
we we are uh living I think it's we are
using much more uh medicine than uh
doing
Psychotherapy I I I'm I'm doing analogy
with the the use of
subscriptions uh the the payment of apcs
and the commercial scies sciencey that
is very strong uh
nowadays um in the opposite side we have
the diamond sustainable and open science
as a public good so and it's much less
expensive than the commercial science
it's there are lot of studies that show
show that so the problem is that we need
to to transform this this communication
system uh from the perspective of the
commercial uh uh um way to the open siiz
and public good
way uh this is was this is uh be braams
it's a researcher of the University of
wburg uh he um in N 20 uh
2019 uh he says that we need to to do a
reform in the infrastructure that we
have in the the communication system so
we need to change the the the money that
we are uh in investing wasting uh it's
the the most uh uh the most uh correct
way to to say that the money that we are
wasting in subscriptions in apcs and
reports that we are uh uh getting from
the the commercial um Point uh to
uh invested in our own infrastructures
of communication in the the to to to
promote
the the circulation of the information
uh Beyond these infrastructures uh that
are financing by mainly U by the
government of the
countries so my institutions institution
is the brazilan Institute of information
science technology
uh it has the the mission of promote
competence development of resources uh
and information infr infrastructure in
science in technology for the production
socialization integration of scientific
technological technological
knowledge um so the mission of my my
institutions is a government uh
institution uh is um right uh to the the
to build this infrastructure to to
mainly in the Science and Technology uh
uh um
field uh and we where we have a strong
focus in open science uh
since the end of the '90s
we we have uh a very strong um work in
actions to Foster open science so
uh we are working in creating these
infrastructures um and
to to Foster policies uh to that that
are important to sustain uh our uh open
science in Brazil and also in the Latin
America America region uh we are working
mainly on research data repositor
scientific journals open scientific
journals persistent identifiers and also
um in supporting the the the new
evaluation models for science uh and new
matrixes for for
Science and uh which is uh open science
open science commonly is um exhibited as
a as a
umbrella uh but it could could
be uh thought as a a puzzle with
different fields of of actions but I
think that open science is more uh like
a inter intersection of different fields
so we have
uh a lot of fields that are intersected
in the the the the the K of this
intersection uh could be open
signs and also I like this definition of
open SCI from John tenant uh that
unfortunately uh died in
2020 uh that open science is just
science don't
right so uh to implement uh and to
collaborate with International
initiatives Regional International
initiatives uh we have uh following some
the working groups and other um ways to
to to participate
uh in UNESCO K that is the Coalition for
advancing research assess assessment and
also the confederation of Open Access
her posteries and finally La referencia
that is a Latin Latin American uh
network of open science it's a network
of uh 11 countries and also Spain 11
countries from Latin America and is also
Spain from from Europe and Portugal is
has also some collaboration with life
fin uh Brazil is part of life
Fin and um bya our uh work with life fin
so the main infrastructures that we have
uh in big and in Brazil uh I
think um I will I will talk about from
the perspective of iic uh in open
science are uh the bdd that that is the
Brazilian Digital Library of it
dissertations uh osbr that is the
research
um um the open uh research uh
portal in in Brazil that has uh research
data and also uh Publications is in
dissertations uh we also have the dris
that's the K research information system
for Brazil um and also uh director of um
journals Brazilian journals uh that that
has the name Ming we also have uh an
action of building a data Lake for
processing scientific data that has the
name Laguna and also um per identifier
that that is
decentralized uh that we we had uh the
name
dark so bdd uh has more than 140 digital
libraries uh it has more or less one
million of these
dissertations uh that is aggregated by
this portal it's a network indeed uh
that has
the the metadata from the digital
libraries that are maintained by the
organizations the the universities and
research institutes in Brazil um so bdd
um it's a
very traditional uh database for T
dissertations in
Brazil uh and we we also have wbr that
is a an extension of bdtd that
Aggregates not only tations but articles
uh and books uh book chapters and uh
also uh research data dat research data
sets so we have more than five million
uh digital objects in this uh search
portal that is uh that are harvested by
a via 1.5 ,000 uh soures so from this
soures as the searches are digital
repositories uh digital libraries um
research data repositories and we have
uh 17 search data hosers in the network
uh we have also uh around 1,000 and and
and 100 uh open journals uh and the the
the the the the rest is are repositories
and G libraries of te
dissertations uh we also have a
mechanism that certificates the the
Declaration of uh te dissertations and
the our main um platform of curriculum
of research curriculum uh this
certificate is is provided by wbr via
our uh C or national Cris that is BR
Cris this uh could be uh
yeah you could follow the the the the
the the seal that's it's it's exposed in
a on the sitation until the O be
registry record in in in the portal and
also uh accessing the the full text in
the the local digital library of report
or or
hpo so this is our Cris um at National
level H is is a project that took uh
several years but finally in
2023 we we launched it um it's a a
portal that H
allows uh to search for Publications uh
people journals organizations patents um
courses uh postgraduate courses and also
uh research groups and software uh it's
a graph it's a it's
a database based on
graphs and uh it it allows us to to
generate a lot of indicators uh and
dashboards that could helps uh the the
evaluation of of
Science and we also have this open uh
information infrastructure in data Lake
that has the name Laguna uh it's
the data Lake that we are uh building to
uh Foster uh the analysis of of uh
research data and also uh over research
uh about uh open research information uh
to also to provide some um uh uh ways to
to to to change the evaluation model
that we have uh for for for science in
Brazil uh this uh
data data lake is using a local
infrastructure and also um a
WS uh uh infrastructure in
Amazon so finally we have this um Ming
it's
a directory of journals in Brazil
Brazilian journals it has more than
5,000 uh journals that that are mapped
in the Brazilian context
um it has a lot of metadata that
describes these these journals uh and it
allows us to to to U make some analysis
about these journals in the Brazilian
and in the international
context and uh to finalize the my my my
expose uh my Exposition is uh the doc
it's a it's a per dig fire that we
built over um de centralized network uh
based on
blockchain so this is in the first phase
of uh the beta first phase uh it's it's
already working uh and we are also um
assigning some pits to her posters to to
articles and things interations records
that uh that are in Heros
uh via ybr that we have
presented so the idea is to have the the
assigning of pets uh from all the the
the the sources that you have
inbr and uh it to have and to have a
decentralized way of governance of this
p network in the p is not only applied
to
to uh outputs of research but uh we want
to apply it of any object of the uh
research ecosystem uh organizations uh
um um at least people and other
resources other other agents in this
ecosystem so perspectives we are
expanding this open siiz infrastructure
in Brazil uh and we want to disseminate
the Brazilian um production in a more
efficient way open open uh production uh
into develop models and Technologies for
for the development of Latin American
and Global Sal and to reduce the
dependence on Commercial platforms that
you have and to create new scientific
evaluation matrics and to promote
Regional International collaboration in
open science this is our perspective and
the challenges is to have source of
financing of this long-term projects uh
and the technical technological
difficults that we always have the
limited human resources and mainly the
lack of legalization of open science uh
especially for for Public Funding
research uh our our academic our
academic culture is strongly based on
traditional commercial sources and
evaluation models in Brazil and also in
Latin America it's a
reality so that's it thank you very much
for your
potion uh thank you very much uh
Washington so we're open for questions
now you can send them there's a Q&A
function uh which is called Q&A down
here we also have uh the chat if you
want to as the chat is a little bit more
confusing but it works as well I see a
single question at the moment uh which
is from uh maxud to
or to need it but I may extend this to
the others as well so it's how open and
accommodating are you to collaborating
with developing countries what
opportunities or potential AV for
collaboration do you see in this context
I think this is important question so
like I think Nita and and and Washington
particular have have uh have uh have
shown multiple infrastructure
initiatives within specific countries uh
are
this can this be made open to other
countries I again I guess get back to
Susan's point I mean there's like a lot
of decentralized initiatives around
Africa but no single platform so uh how
do you see this I mean can you extend
the initiatives in your countries uh
elsewhere and uh if so how should we do
this I think all three panelists can can
pitch in on this starting with Nita
perhaps oh okay uh thank you so much for
the question I think my team will be um
my team uh his the uh project manager of
the TDC Tha Digital Collection the
platform which just uh collect thesis
and dissertations uh we'll be glad that
uh uh you interested in us okay um um I
don't know whether I can completely
answer the questions Theory but I think
um from my point getting the research
recognized globally can open so um many
opportunities for like
researchers uh for like sharing ideas um
sharing the title of the research which
is which is impact for Society for um
the global and uh we can use the tools
as this platform like elif sign.org
right to uh collaboration or to sharing
the ideas among
researchers or um
institutions um yeah so that's that's my
my point of
view Washington Susan
perhaps yeah I think it's it's very
important to to share all the
achievements that you have in terms of
technology and also in terms of policies
I think it's it's necessary to
collaborate on it ver in a very strong
way and um we are participating in this
these forums like cor and Life to ensure
it
always um and we are very open to to
share everything we are
developing uh because we think that it's
important to do that
Susan um yes so so that that's an
interesting question so within the cello
Network
um we collaborate with um Brazil and
with all the um network connections in
that particular platform um I mean there
there's there such a lot of journals
into that platform and um I just saw in
the question and answer sort of boxes
there's the one about MultiLing
multilingualism um into publishing and
and this particular platform serves as a
very good example the Spanish is
Portuguese there is Africans which is my
home language um there's English there's
Dutch there's German there's French into
that particular platform but I think
what is very important is that we all
use the same standards and we all use
the same softare so I think
technologically it is really very
possible is to collaborate and to work
together the thing is just that we have
to follow International standards to
make them interoperable and I think
that's where the the problem normally
lies is that the interoperability of
different systems
and that is what we have to work towards
to uh thank you I think Susan has
already started to answer the the the
second question here which was what's
the importance of publishing research
outcomes in languages other than English
on one hand publishing in local
languages May enhance the reach of the
studies within local communities on the
other hand these studies are virtually
invisible to the international
scientific Community what are views I
think Susan has already answered the C
might be a good model I think C has a
lot of of Articles which are in multiple
langu anges I'm not sure Washington or
neita want to
comment oh I think it's it's very
important to to have this
um translation of the Articles and other
things in in multiple languages but I I
think it's it's important also to keep
the original language of the article uh
for example like in Africa in Brazil and
and Spanish uh countries that are
Spanish spoken
um uh but I think that it's important
also to to have some automatic
translation tools uh that are very
fostered by by the E ia uh tools uh
nowadays so we we want to to to
implement some some translation
automatic translation to to to to
provide this more uh easy way and also
um another important I think it I think
it's is is to have some discovered uh
systems that could uh recover not only
uh English as a a main Lang main
language a very very a very effective
recovery of English but also other
languag and and um until the the the
language that don't use the Latin
alphabet uh for for for recovering so
it's important to have this
multilinguism multilinguism in the
systems uh and we need to to advance on
that do you want to
comment um I think there's a lot of um
AI research that's help this language
barrier problems these
days
yeah uh so next question here uh uh you
all showed us examples of great
platforms journals and initiatives from
the global South
uh so this person who is anonymous asks
whether they are being widely adopted by
local research communities or is there
still some resistance due to the
pressure to publishing journals from the
global North and high impact factors I
think Washington touched this on the end
of his presentation maybe you can
start yeah the problem is that we have
um very old way of evaluate size and we
need
to EV make Evol Evolution and evolution
that I think it's it's it's time to do
that and uh I I I I think that are a lot
of countries in institutions that are
putting working on on this and we need
to to to push it also in our region uh
mainly Brazil because
Brazil it's always the the the country
that pushes the the the the the train in
the Latin America I think and uh we in
together with olavo and and other um
important uh researchers in Brazil we
are trying to do that uh with with some
organizations in Brazil uh that are
responsible for the evaluation of sici
for example CIS that is the organization
that make makes the evaluation of the
the graduate programs The Graduate and
postgraduate programs in Brazil uh it's
it's a is starting to do a a change in
the evaluation um but it's a process
that I think it's very slow and we want
to go faster but we need to to have
patience to do
that uh
Susan want to comment just want to um
concur with What U Washington has been
saying you know especi especially in the
open signs sort of remit of things the
Reformation of of the research
assessment system of course is also
highing on our agenda it's a long
process it moves very slow I think for
us that was a breakthrough in South
Africa is when our University of Road
who is a small University but a high
intensive research institution declared
with other um universities on the globe
that they will not support university
rankings anymore and I can see part of
their process is they starting to break
down this notion to publish in journals
bomb um with high impact factors um you
know so yes it it is quite a process to
change the research system especially
research evaluation system but certainly
it's on the agenda and there's a lot of
work being done around
that uh Nita
um in in term of policy I can share that
um um Thailand um we um have the Pol
policy that allocate the budget for um
among the university as the Clusters
like uh we we
um um we classify the university to be
five
clusters such as innovation
um the universities that focus on
support the society and others and we
try to focus on
um allocate the budget to um the
university which is focus
on the university
ranking in order to um to make the
budget uh
efficiency yes uh yeah I I I mean just
adding to this I think the tide has turn
turned a bit in Brazil I think we're
always slow to adapt and I think we've
been chasing the global North in terms
of evoluation for a long time but I
think particularly because of the whole
open science
uh like exploitative APC like once the
open science budget actually sorry the
publishing budget actually shifted to
researchers uh in for in the form of
apcs I think people started seeing the
bill and I think that has slowly led the
research Community to realize we need
change I think I think the last year or
two in Brazil have been quite positive
in a list acknowledging that we should
uh be more supportive of of of local uh
publish publishing initiatives and and
and and less dependent on on high impact
factor
Jers uh so next question is from Chris
Wood uh congratulations for all these
impressive initiatives the M of open
science practices are AR he's a director
of at a national
facility but uh he says that it's
obvious that everything we were doing
will be better if implemented as an
institution wide policy framework and
even better as a national policy
implementation I mean so things work
better and work in more in scale when
they're uh up in the letter but he says
every time we try to take the argument
up the letter we get zero interest
nobody sees a point nobody wants to pay
and uh he says the initiatives presented
today clearly had a number of
stakeholders involved including
institutional and governmental actors
and he ask how did these initiatives
Reach This level of organization uh
bottom up approaches really cannot get
very far they quickly reach limits of
cost and scalability so how do you
connect these various bottom up
initiatives to the top to make their
more more institutional idity at the
national level Susan you want to
start um yes and and I suppose it will
differ from country to Country and
you're absolutely right Chris youa it
did need a lot of institutional and
governmental actors um
societies
um um University South Africa Etc to
make this work but I think what was a
breakthrough is from the Canam point of
view is we did a consensus study um and
the title of the study was a strategic
approach to scholarly publishing in
South Africa so it showcased in what bad
State the scholarly journals were at the
time in South Africa what did they mean
what did they contribute remember in
South Africa we get um um we get funding
in publishing in accredited journals so
you know that also quite a a driving
factor and and the purpose of the
research output policy was not only to
drive um output that that that should
increase but also the quality of these
journals and when we released this
report we came up with a number of
recommendations of one very pertinent
recommendation was is to go up nexx and
to look at centralization of all these
activities where this could be driven um
from a central point and at that point
also the Academy of Sciences took a
decision by its Council that um ASF will
be the implementing agency of all this
work so that has help us incredibly to
mobilize and to strategize around now
sort of the next label of open signs um
in the country um it it's not to say
that it's not without a battle a daily
battle and continuous discussion and um
advocacy and lobbying um but certainly
that strategic approach that study to
understand what's happening to South
African journals and how poor they were
way back in 2008 and we if we evaluate
them now we can see a huge Improvement
in their quality and standardization and
following standards best PR practices
Etc of course yellow Brazil is also
quite a big driving Factor behind the
standards and upping the game on on a
continuous and a fiveyear basis thank
you uh
Nita okay
um uh um for the for the quality of the
the research or the journals it's um the
requirements um
um in like almost every uh academics in
order to
um
um uh in order to apply for uh the the
uh Professor carrier in academic Fields
but uh our challenge is in Thailand is
uh we
have so many
research from all the universities but
we would like
to uh connect the researchers to the
business
sectors to implement some
ideas or to connect to startups and and
um to maybe
to um connect to the research that uh
researchers that which
uh I mean which uh
title
which
uh what what what they need to do to the
research uh is a challenge for Thailand
right now to like not
um to collaborate with uh business
sectors and like all the partners or the
like stakeholders not only in academic
Fields yeah Washington do you want to
comment I mean touching on the example
cell which I think again has been a
successful initiative which has moved up
might be I mean we're neither of us work
at yell but I think if you can comment
on
that yeah I think it's
a very impressive intive that you we had
at the end of the the 90s as well and uh
I think it's we need to to invest in C
and to promote it at a more uh inclusive
um platform for for journals of not only
for Brazil but of of all only for all
the the the c
network and uh and I think that the work
we have we are doing
via uh ogp the open govern partnership
it's also a way to to promote um
Democratic discussion on it and to
evolve all the high high level uh uh
directors of all the Brazilian
institutions uh I think it's a this is a
way also to to to have a awareness of of
uh the importance of this discussion and
the higher level uh
uh uh people that want that make the
decisions of of uh implementing policies
uh at the national level so I think we
need to to contining this way to to to
promote the this this awareness of the
importance what we are
doing yeah yeahp may be an example I
just just explaining to everybody I mean
people may not feel for me but like the
open government partnership is a is a
international initiative I think has
over 70 countries in which uh government
entities and the Civil Society
collaborate to set a few uh a few goals
for open government in general and in
Brazil I think we have managed to put
open science within the open government
scope for the last three plans so that
actually creates uh uh compromises on a
national level that that that
commitments on a national level that
countries should aspire to and that
gives the opportunity for a lot of
people from the Civil Society as well to
as well to to comment so if this happens
in your country if your country is
committed to the open government
partnership uh there are periodic calls
for themes and topics within open
government and you can certainly insert
open science in that in terms to to to
to try to to get higher up the lad we
have done that I think that has been
successful so next question is from uh
to students specifically from ag3
Africa's experience in building data
sharing capacity and consensus what are
some best practices suggestions for
other fields with established standards
interoperability
already um I would certainly say to
start off with stakeholder engagement
understand who are those organizations
that will be partnering with you um
secondly understand the problems that
they might have not only with Gathering
by recording and to upload perhaps the
data to a central place um and
definitely sort of um work in a
collaborative way with each other um
listen to each other that this was very
important this particular project is to
understand what the problems are and to
find solutions for them because the
problems were on different levels
especially on connectivity on computer
capacity um on um availability of of um
the internet Etc so sometimes it's very
um um very technical um almost problems
that that they would occur and you have
to get some roundabouts like that and
then work towards the different
standards being um failed uh Etc also
recognize that each country functions in
its own framework
Year and that you have to honor and
respect the laws in that particular
country especially when it comes to data
sharing and if you share in it how
should you share it and especially in
the bionet um um framework is where
there are some personal information also
attached to that data the sensitivity
around it and then of course very
important is to ensure that the data is
always available for that particular
country and that we do not practice any
helicop excuse me helicopter signs is
where researchers leave a particular
country that take all the data all the
visualizations and Analysis with them
and Africa doesn't have access to their
own data so there must be fairness
Equity equality also embedded in the
sharing of um these this data set Etc
and by visualizing and making the
results um then
available thanks uh do the committee
have any questions we have ISU Max
Mercury nto to
Rose uh I can
start I think Susan touch on and and and
oh Mark sorry you can
start thank you
sorry um I was just wondering when we
when we look at the open access when we
are mapping and doing things like that
do we also check to see what are the
other uh elements within that open
access structure uh that exist that are
still acting as barriers I'm talking
about the charges the apcs and if we can
also see how we can uh not necessarily
regulate but see how we can be able to
make it into something which is
manageable because many we talk about
Open Access but when when you look at
the
apcs they're too expensive so you still
can't really publish yes you can publish
and your work will be visible but we we
are not able to to to afford to publish
so maybe that's something to to think
about Susan would you like to start um
Mercury I just want to respond and say
yes you're absolutely right that is a
continuous battle but that's
also very important where consortiums
Library consortiums come into play is
where they actually negotiate for
transformative agreements where they use
the monies in the system through
subscription models to actually Remodel
and to reapply them to allow for um let
be call it almost a freeo publish free
article processing charges so it's a
whole ecosystem and that we must realize
and and um we must not see these debates
in in isolation from each other because
they're all plug into each other to in
the end actually constitute open signs
but it's a very important point it is
still a problem um there's slow progress
on the African Contex in terms of um
artical processing charges there has
been more progress in South Africa
because of the huge subscriptions we pay
um but I know that there are initiatives
in in Africa particularly where they
work and and operate like transformative
agreements towards Open Access
Etc
is Washington
G momentary yes uh nid you want to
comment okay um I agree with Susan um to
to work as a library consultant because
um in Thailand we uh uh we did that for
um the reference database I mean if uh
you have seen my presentations uh we
provide a lot of uh reference database
online such as e iple e sprinkling oh
sorry can I can I set the
name uh to 80 government institutions
universities uh and also we assist uh
Public University I mean private
universities uh for like help them
negotiation with the um publes
also uh
ISU thank you uh thank you to all the
speakers uh for the wonderful uh maing
of the global South and with respect to
open science I'm going to direct uh my
question to Susan uh I mean you also
kind of uh highlighted my interest again
on the issue of policies you know when
you look at Africa particularly you'll
see the great a bit of diversity we have
in terms of the depth of adoption you
know with respect to policies for
example when you you look at the numbers
of those who even have that discussion
going on just just a handful of them and
then when you also compare that with you
know the countries that have you know
the the higher you know higher number of
um outputs in terms of knowledge output
I mean Publications for example like
Nigeria like South Africa like Egypt is
just one out of three of them that have
a policy that is actually working so I'm
I'm looking at you know uh someone
mentioned about you know bottom top
approach or to bottom approach you know
what do you think that has that is
actually that has been the issue with
respect to policies from the
institutional level to the National
level even to the Continental level
we've seen walks across a life sense
working even UNESCO you know trying to
bring everybody together but something
seems not to be working I don't know if
you ask me I may say diversity but what
do you think I want to see your
perspective with respect to you know
policy uh in countries and in the
continent as they
whole I think um what is important is
that you know which levels should we
start with the
policies um I I think at the way back
when we started with Open Access we
advocated for institutional Open Access
policies and that sort of paved the way
for governmental policies and raising
Awareness on a much higher level um
about the open
signs um secondly I think you you need a
couple of people leaders prominent
researchers in in different fields that
would start lobbying um for open signs
and start discussing also with
government um this this opportunities of
open signs and the possibilities of um
of policies and then we must not
underestimate the roles ofies of
Sciences in the different countries
because you know they are they are
positioned to inform government about
evidence-based studies um consensus
studies policies um Etc so so that's
another Avenue that that one could Tye
is is the academies of Sciences um we
must also remember that research is not
funded in all the countries on the
Africa continent and that's the biggest
problem so there's a system um project
going on it's called the science um um
science granting council's
initiative so that is to establish
funding agencies to fund research in a
particular country those that initiative
is very important because it also makes
a case
forem for um for research funds within a
particular country and as soon as you
put those building block blocks in place
then the situation becomes more
conducive um to adopting and listening
to the lobbyists who advocates for for
open science
Ethiopia has followed the South African
model very closely and they have a very
strong Academy in their country and that
Academy has a lot of influence and
profile within government which I think
is also important that
relationship is is also so important how
you position yourself um in terms of
government committing thy I hope that's
helpful that's just a few
ideas uh
Nita any thoughts on
that okay um I agree with Susan um about
the um maybe um the the policy need to
uh be support for the researchers by but
if for in Thailand we our challenge is
we have
to um show the result and impact of
every investment in supporting in order
to to supporting all the learning
resources
um uh and we we we try to um connect
more uh to um the stakeholders business
sectors or um other like research
communities to uh make the
collaborations and make the impact
together yes so Washington has had to
leave the webinar uh for an emergency he
just told me so like he he sends his
apologies if I can answer for Brazil uh
taking over uh I think we I think again
I super agree with Susan I think it
comes from multiple from multiple actors
you you have researchers who who become
a open Advocates of of open science you
have learn
societies uh you you have research
organizations that are keen on this
Washington is is is one example they're
the Brazilian Institute for for
information Science and Technology but
they actively do research and provide
infrastructure for this and they pay for
their institution that does this uh I
think it's important to connect this
within the country as well I think not
it's very frequent that people don't
know each other within I mean of course
Brazil is very large but I mean I I I
came into the whole open science field
from the reproducibility SL research
quality uh uh debate I think there's a
lot of open science people who have come
from the Open Access movement or for Via
CI citizen science or VI open so like I
think this SP qual I think we don't
always know what people so it's
important to try to gather these people
together I think the open government
partnership which I have just mentioned
has put me in contact with a lot of
other Advocates who come from other
sides of the debate which I who I didn't
uh really know I also had the Brazilian
reproducibility Network these days which
tries to connect institutions
researchers it's more focused on Mr
Verity but it has a large overlap with
open science and this can be built from
the ground I mean this can be BN by but
this can be built from the ground up I
think there's a a big there's a big nich
to be filled in terms of like just
connecting people who are already
working I think this happens in the
National at the national level within a
large country such as Brazil perhaps
small countries
might with smaller research communities
it might be more easier easier to to see
who's working on this but I think it's
should work in on a larger scale as well
and then I I don't really know how to
make it work on the Latin America or or
Global South level but I think it's
important to think about this how to
make these connections I think there's a
lot of a lot going on and and really I
think connecting this people and mapping
what's out there is is super
important do we have more questions on
the
panel I don't see any more from the
public can I um I I just want to
elaborate a little bit on my my answer
from Christine Rogers is how could we
collaborate Etc you know especially in
the medical field um there's huge
possibility for II II Technologies to be
implemented um she was mentioning a
example there of um of of eegs you know
for instance um there are great
initiatives worldwide where sort of
imagery U is shared and placed on a
repository and where um diagnosis and
and sort of solutions to to um certain
um health problems then happens actually
um across the world even if you're based
in Brazil or in South Africa and you
have this particular um problem so you
know this is a very interesting field of
collaboration
especially as I said you know
introducing AI to this this spectrum
because AI has the possibility to also
open up even further more of course it
raises issues in terms of research
ethics and integrity and copyright and
and a lot of other issues um which it
brings to the full um but a very
interesting field and that was quite an
interesting question and thank you
Christine
that's uh I think we have to end in 3
minutes so
uh does anyone have any final remarks
which fit in a
minute otherwise I might just thank the
panelists and uh Shane do you want to do
the the close reminds for
us perfect yes thank you all so much for
joining in to our uh to our to our
committee members and panelists today
for that really uh really great uh Q&A I
think there's lots of resources
initiatives that I was previously
unaware of I'll be really excited to
check out uh following this event so
thank you again um so uh I think to wrap
up um just to share a few ways you can
stay up to date with our various
initiatives you can visit El Community
page and join eif's Community newsletter
following the links in the chat thank
you Anna for sharing those and you can
also follow e community on X and Twitter
and also on Blue
Sky um so yeah just a sincere thanks
again to our panelists and to everyone
that tuned in today contributed to
today's discussion um thanks to
everybody that's participated um in the
committee since it was founded
um and hope you all will continue to
follow along um we're also really Keen
to establish Partnerships and
collaborations with ethos aligned
organizations and initiatives who work
in this space um so uh please welcome
you to get in touch with eif's research
culture manager Anna kinova using the
email address provided thank you all
very much and have a wonderful day thank
you very much thank you