LONGEVITY: Start Doing This To BUILD MUSCLE & Live Longer! | Gabrielle Lyon
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this discussion with Dr. Gabrielle Lyon, the central thesis revolves around skeletal muscle serving as the primary organ of longevity and a critical nutrient-sensing mechanism that regulates metabolic health. As humans age into their 30s and 40s, hormonal drivers diminish in favor of dietary sensing mechanisms, making protein intake essential for survival. Skeletal muscle is responsible for approximately eighty percent of glucose disposal from the bloodstream; without sufficient active muscle tissue to clear this glucose, individuals become insulin resistant, leading to metabolic disease. The conversation highlights that while modern diets introduce massive amounts of glucose, the body's evolutionary adaptations are complicated by a lack of adequate muscle mass and usage, which prevents proper fuel utilization and leads to downstream health issues like obesity and inflammation. The dialogue explores the delicate balance between energy expenditure during famine versus abundance, noting that skeletal muscle is an energetically expensive tissue that requires significant effort to maintain. While there is concern regarding protein reduction for longevity due to mTOR stimulation and cancer risks in rodent models, Dr. Lyon argues these findings do not translate well to humans or account for the protective benefits of high-quality muscle mass. She emphasizes that as people age, they face "anabolic resistance," a condition where muscles become less efficient at sensing amino acids like leucine and utilizing protein for synthesis via mTOR pathways in skeletal tissue specifically. Consequently, older adults actually require higher intakes of high-quality proteins to overcome this decreased efficiency and prevent sarcopenia, rather than reducing intake as some longevity narratives suggest. A significant portion of the interview addresses the flawed paradigm that focuses on fat loss (adiposity) while neglecting muscle building. Dr. Lyon contends that obesity is not merely a storage issue but often a symptom of insufficient skeletal muscle to handle dietary loads and manage substrates effectively. Even individuals with high muscle mass can suffer if their diet overwhelms their system, yet the presence of healthy, active muscle provides flexibility in managing glucose spikes and reducing insulin resistance. The discussion also touches on myokines—hormones secreted by contracting muscles such as interleukin-6—which play a vital role in lowering systemic inflammation and protecting other organ systems like the liver and intestines from cellular turnover issues. The speakers conclude that current conversations around longevity are often distracted by dogma regarding animal products or unnecessary protein restriction, which lacks transparency and robust human data support. Instead of fearing calories or specific macronutrients, individuals should focus on building a strong foundational muscular base through high-quality resistance training that induces physical stress, alongside consuming adequate amounts of complete proteins rich in branched-chain amino acids. Dr. Lyon asserts that strength is the ultimate metric for quality of life and healthspan; maintaining mobility prevents frailty, falls, and conditions like Alzheimer's (linked to "Type 3 diabetes" or brain glucose metabolism). Ultimately, shifting focus from fat-phobic narratives to a muscle-centric approach allows individuals to optimize their metabolic health, extend their functional lifespan, and ensure they remain mobile and independent well into old age.
Read the full video transcript
The body is changing. Whether we want to
believe it or not, when we are younger,
we are driven by hormones. When we are
older, older,
30s, 40s, we are now no longer driven by
hormones. We are now driven by dietary
sensing mechanisms.
You have to account for dietary protein.
You have to.
Dr. Gabrielle Lyon, welcome back to the
show. Thank you. Thanks so much for
having me. I'm very excited and we're in
person this time, which is wonderful.
Now, I've been thinking a lot about your
area around muscle and muscle being the
organ of longevity. I know you wanted to
make sure that we covered that and that
really is um
where I'm I'm I'm getting very
interested in what the the interplay
going on in the body is between muscle,
fat, glucose, and I'm going to lay a
hypothesis on you that I think will set
us up well for the conversation. So,
uh
modern diet has introduced just a
massive amount of glucose into the
system. Our body has mechanisms or
mechanism, we we will debate,
uh for dealing with that once it gets
inside the body.
Those mechanisms are evolutionary le
selected for, so they're advantageous,
but it is a very complicated dance. I've
recently um had uh a couple different
people on the show talking at this the
glucose issue and fat storage issue and
insulin resistance from a really
interesting angle. Um so, I feel like
I'm beginning to understand how by
having these constantly elevated levels,
we end up insulin resistant, we're not
able to Right.
get the glucose out of our bloodstream,
which causes a whole host of downstream
effects, which we call metabolic
disease.
Um okay, so now we introduce your idea
of muscle
Yes.
being the the organ of longevity and and
it being a
uh an organ that secretes hormones.
Myokines, yep.
Okay. So, the dance becomes I can
control my intake through glucose. You
can control your
insulin. Are you saying just in general?
through my diet.
I can also though control my insulin
response by you having muscle and using
the life out of it. Because it will suck
the glucose out of my bloodstream.
And burn it for fuel. I'm not sure what
word.
uh muscle skeletal muscle is responsible
for 80-some percent of glucose disposal.
Okay. Yep. Now, the final capstone to my
thesis is So, my thesis in a very um
simple sentence is you're existing in
this incredibly delicate balance between
what you eat, Mhm.
your insulin response to what you eat,
and you the muscle that you carry, and
how much you use it. Yes. And so, when I
was first going through the things that
you say about how critical muscle is, it
begs the question that in a time of
famine, muscle is actually dangerous
because muscle needs this energy. It's
going to burn energy. And so, if
my response to fructose
is to essentially become pre-diabetic,
and that's good because it caused me to
store a tiny bit of fat to cling to the
fat that I have, and to store extra
glucose in my bloodstream,
and that's what get got us through the
winter famines, then I was like, "Well,
wait a second. If muscle is this hungry
organ, then it would be problematic."
And then I thought, "Well, that's
exactly why we lose muscle so rapidly if
we're not working out."
When you think about and there's some
interesting concepts here. So, the the
idea that in famine the body tries to
protect itself. You're essentially
talking about a highly
Protect itself by staying alive. Yeah,
highly catabolic.
No fuel is coming in. There's basic
energy needs that we have. Skeletal
muscle is one. Turnover in skeletal
muscle is not great. Let's say it's a
couple grams a day. Where
Meaning I can't use it as quickly as I
can use that.
longer. Muscle turnover takes longer.
So, the body goes through a
And I want to push on that turnover.
That word doesn't immediately click for
me.
Okay, we're going to talk about it
because it also brings up this concept
of longevity. Is it gluconeogenesis?
No, it is the replacement of body
proteins. It is the regeneration, the
cleaning house, and the replacement of
body proteins like liver goes through
protein turnover. Intestines go through
protein turnover. Bone. You know, like
you said, there's a dance that's
happening.
was storing that in So, I'm let's stay
in the context of famine if we can for a
second. So, I don't have incoming
nutrients or not very many. So, I'm
breaking down my muscle To provide, in
essence, in part, the body will use that
those amino acids
to protect your organs. Okay. So, that
they can have their turnover of cells.
The cells can die and be replenished
with healthy healthy new cells. Right.
That is a non-negotiable. And not for
gluconeogenesis at all? Well,
gluconeogenesis, the way in which I
think about gluconeogenesis is
branched-chain amino acids or proteins
in general can be utilized by the liver
to go through a process of
gluconeogenesis.
And would that be happening in a period
of famine or would I just completely
shift over to ketone production? So,
over a period of time, eventually you
would shift over to ketone production.
The body doesn't want to lose its
skeletal muscle.
Skeletal muscle is very important, but I
will say it's something that the body
would give up for the other organ
systems. Let me ask this. So, as
somebody who
works out very consistently,
but if I even reduce my intensity, my
muscle and and don't change my diet, my
muscle mass will begin to dwindle. So,
my body is is responding, and my
hypothesis is that it's so afraid to
carry more muscle than it needs that the
second I don't need it, meaning I'm not
putting it under that level of strain,
it goes, "Cool, I'm getting rid of
No, I would I would I I would say that
that is not a hypothesis I would go
with. Cool. So, let's take a 21-year-old
since they are [ __ ] just prime, man.
So,
I'm a Twinkie diet, and they're just
jacked and tan. I get it. So,
if they stop working out,
can we not agree that they will lose
muscle? Maybe not as fast as I will in
my 40s, but they will lose muscle. I
would say, yes. And why do you think the
body does that? I think that the body
thrives under activity.
And whether you take a human, whether
you take an animal, if you essentially
domesticate them, and they are not
training, they will lose muscle.
And so, I have a theory that that's the
body the body is giving you a signal,
which is these tissues are calorically
expensive, and it's dangerous to have
anything that's calorically expensive.
So, with some wiggle room, if I see
nutrients or demand,
back off, then I'm going to shed those
muscle tissues. But muscle we know is
really, really important for longevity,
for morbidity and mortality. It's
something that the body needs to
maintain to be healthy. But the I I I
think uh
another way to think about it is that,
yes, it is a metabolically expensive,
energy-driven tissue. It is. And it
takes a lot of effort and energy to
maintain that tissue. But I don't think
it's the body trying to get rid of it. I
think under well thought out conditions
training, increase in energy, increase
in dietary protein, the body will do
whatever it can to maintain that tissue.
I do think it's interesting how you're
phrasing it and how you're thinking
about it that the body would be trying
to get rid of it. But I I don't
to I think we
Yeah. I am almost certain that you and I
agree 100% on how important muscle is.
Like I'll say my hypothesis includes the
fact that uh if you want to survive for
a long time, you better have good
quality muscle on your body because if
you're right that that's the store of
these building blocks, then I want to
make sure that I always have that and
should I ever lose it that I immediately
when that insult, whether it's the
famine, a great illness, or something
like that is gone that I rebuild that
muscle. So
if the nutrients stop coming in, the
body goes, "Okay, woah. Like this could
Now that I have these very expensive
tissues, I may need to prune them back
even though I know like, 'Oh god, I
don't want to do this and I would really
appreciate if you would Or wait, can I
can I So or is it that because you're
not getting enough nutrients, the rest
of your organs need to function?
So having a high amount of skeletal
muscle that can be then utilized for the
protection and the utilization and
energy for all the other organ systems
is necessary.
Yes. Now let's
cuz without the brain, without the
heart, without the liver, without the
kidney it
a problem in those tissues will have an
immediate effect. Will the body pull
from Let's So we'll come back to the
famine in a second. Um Which is not
happening right now. It's not and that's
a big part of the problem. But for
people, I think, to really wrap their
head around what's going on for a long
time for a just an unimaginably long
period of time there would be periods of
massive food scarcity. And so,
understanding the dance
becomes interesting to me. So, stepping
out of the famine for a second and going
back into what you're saying. So, organs
are critical and the body's going to do
whatever it needs to do to protect that.
So, when the nutrients are coming in
well, my I assume my body will
preferentially choose to take the
proteins, the whatever, from what I eat
versus from skeletal muscle.
Yes. Okay. Right. So, there are 20 amino
acids, there are nine essential. You are
going to eat those for, you know, based
on a lot of the current research. There
is some other data out there that
suggests that some of the gut microbiome
may be able to scavenge for some of
those essential amino acids, which is
incredibly interesting. And how does it
hand those off to us? As metabolites?
Um
well, these are proof of concepts right
now and they're in rodent models.
What is happening is what they believe
is that when an individual is eating a
very high fiber type more vege-
vegetarian vegan diet that the gut mic-
microbiome can turn a bit into what like
a ruminant would be. So, that is one way
in which some people can be able to get
some essential amino acids. But I don't
want to go down that rabbit hole yet
because it is still proof of concept,
but I do think it's very important.
This episode is sponsored by Athletic
Greens. Get a free one-year supply of
vitamin D and five free travel packs
with your first purchase. Simply visit
athleticgreens.com/impacttheory.
Now, enjoy the episode.
But going back to what you said about
muscle and going back to what you said
about famine, I think it's an
interesting concept in the way that in
my mind the fittest, most muscular
individual, the the people that have the
most muscle are going to be able to
survive.
Because they're going to have more of
but let's talk about the myostatin gene.
Okay. So, the myostatin gene And I have
thought about this and I'm not sure what
to think about that. So, I have a guess.
It's way less educated than yours, but
it's nonetheless a guess.
Uh so, for those who don't know what the
myostatin gene is, the myostatin gene
actually inhibits the creation of
muscle.
And if you break the myostatin gene, you
get what they call double muscling.
Where if you've ever seen a double
muscled cow, it's crazy. They look they
look like a bodybuilder. It's insane.
And you get that some people hypothesize
that basically some bodybuilders that
get to like an elite elite elite level
have a way less active myostatin gene.
And
that to me is another signal that the
body is like, "I want muscle, but I
can't just slather it on." Like it's
it's expensive tissue.
it's a difficult process and it is we
become forged by our training. We become
forged
it's difficult, meaning?
Meaning skeletal muscle is not an easy
process to put on, right? The idea that
we can just work out and put on skeletal
muscle, people are different. This idea
of being able to put on muscle in
general, it takes effort and energy,
meaning it takes physical energy. It
also is an ex- expensive nutrient
process in the body, right? It requires
a whole host of things to go right. It
requires being able to trigger mTOR,
subsequent muscle protein synthesis. you
have to have the building blocks, you
have to have the correct stimulation,
then you have to have muscle damage,
then you have to have rest. It's not
necessarily an easy process, and the
more well-trained you are, the more
difficult it becomes to put on muscle.
So, by, you know, for you to maintain
your muscle mass, you probably put a lot
of extra effort
into doing that, and it becomes more
difficult as we age because the skeletal
muscle, you know, aging is a process.
And when we age, things in general often
times become more difficult.
Building muscle is one of those things.
The efficiency of being able to build
muscle,
muscle as a nutrient sensor, goes down.
Its efficiency goes down.
Insulin resistance in skeletal muscle
goes up. Just part of normal aging,
whether you're training or not. These
are fundamental things that happen.
Talk to me about the anabolic
resistance. And I'm looking at that in
the context of
um insulin resistance. Is it the same
where I've given it too much of
something and the body's like, "Yo, back
off." No, but it's a it's an interesting
thought process.
As we age, the muscle becomes less
efficient at utilizing protein.
Muscle utilizes protein, obviously, for
protein turnover and for muscle protein
synthesis, which is so valuable.
You know, and often times I talk about
muscle as the end point and eating for
muscle health. The reason, one of the
reasons I talk about it is exactly for
the reasons that you were talking about.
If you can optimize for skeletal muscle,
then the subsequent effects on the rest
of the body, like being able to have
proper tissue turnover turnover for
liver and intestines, all happen. So, if
you reach that threshold for muscle,
which you're absolutely right is a
highly energy uh taking process, the
rest of the body is
gets what it needs. So, if you eat for
high-quality muscle, if you eat
high-quality protein, you create
high-quality muscle. So, are those two
things in just correlated and it's
really the intake of the nutrients that
matters? The intake of the nutrients
absolutely matters.
Absolutely matters. And when we age,
anabolic resistance, which is really
defined as the efficiency of protein,
the efficiency of muscle to utilize and
sense protein goes down. Skeletal muscle
is a nutrient-sensing organ.
When it gets enough of the amino acids,
it goes through process of protein
turnover. It goes through
on. Let's Let's really put a fine point
on that. That's interesting. I've never
heard that before. I've heard it said,
and this makes a lot of sense to me,
that um,
food are signaling molecules.
And that's what I heard you just say.
Muscle is a nutrient-sensing
organ.
Right. So, the muscle is listening for
the signal of the food that I eat to
say, "Ah, cool. There is adequate
amounts of protein available to me right
now." And that turns something on. Yes.
Exactly. Um,
and that would be the branched-chain
amino acids.
As we age, the ability for that skeletal
muscle to sense that decreases. Okay.
So, I know I'm derailing us a little bit
here.
Um, but now going back to incomplete
proteins like are found in cuz one of
the things you take the most heat for
um, is, you know, saying, "Ah, some of
the protein that you're going to get in
vegetable matter isn't going to be as
complete." So,
which what you just said would predict,
which is that if the muscle is looking
it's sensing that signal, and the signal
comes in the form of branched-chain
amino acids,
Right. and the branched-chain amino
acids from the vegetable matter keep me
in some sub-threshold where it doesn't
click over into this.
That it's not, you know, we use protein
as a blanket term, but it's complex.
You're looking at 20 different amino
acids. It's not the protein that we need
essentially, it's the amino acid
requirements that we have. And skeletal
muscle has very specific amino acid
requirements. To do the turnover
what is necessary and to do turnover to
be able to maintain its structure, to be
able to put on new muscle, to be able to
maintain its health.
This comes in the form of branched-chain
amino acids. As we age, the sensing
mechanism of one of one of the
branched-chain amino acids, which we've
talked about before, is leucine. That's
sensing mechanism decreases.
The way in which we which ultimately
leads a less efficient turnover, leads
to subsequent sarcopenia,
a decrease in muscle function, muscle
strength, muscle mass as we age.
By optimizing for protein intake, you
know, specifically high-quality protein,
then just like you said, high-quality
protein is typically what we think about
animal-based proteins. Does it just have
to be animal-based proteins? No, but
these are hard fast in the literature.
High-quality protein is defined by amino
acid content.
It's not a negotiable nebulous concept.
These are hard fast biological numbers.
And each protein has very specific roles
in the body.
And specifically as we age, and if
you're thinking about
famine and fasting,
specifically as we age, the
branched-chain amino acids, in
particular leucine, is required by
skeletal muscle to begin that process.
As we age, this concept of anabolic
resistance, meaning there's a decrease
in efficiency, the body becomes
know what's happening at the cellular
level? Well, yeah.
There's a decreased sensing of mTOR.
Okay. And mTOR,
um, which I understand vaguely enough to
be dangerous, is, uh, basically what has
to happen for us to grow.
Yes. It's mechanistic target of
rapamycin. There's mTOR 1, mTOR 2.
And it's in all cells?
It's in all cells.
It's a
Will it happen differentially in
different cells?
And it's stimulated by different things
in different cells. And in muscle, Like
what? I'm going to tell you. Break it
down.
Can't wait.
In muscle, it's exquisitely sensitive to
leucine.
In areas like pancreas or liver, it's
exquisitely sensitive to energy, extra
calories. It's sensitive to insulin.
Regardless of macronutrient?
Well, arguably, it would be more
sensitive to insulin and glucose, in say
the liver or the pancreas.
But, skeletal muscle is exquisitely
sensitive to amino acids. That sensing
mechanism decreases as we age. So, then
this brings me to this concept of
longevity, which is very hot right now.
People talk about longevity, and there's
this conversation of decreasing protein
intake, because that's going to help
longevity.
hypothesis.
I have no idea. It's because of the
stimulation of mTOR.
So, they're worried about cancer?
Yeah, they're worried about cancer. But,
if you were worried about cancer,
And by the way, mTOR is signaled by
exercise in skeletal muscle, as well.
So, it's not an mTOR issue in muscle.
Let's talk about Athletic Greens, my
friends. The all-in-one daily drink to
support better health and peak
performance. To help each of us be at
our best, AG1 by Athletic Greens
simplifies the path to better nutrition
by giving you the one thing with all the
best things. One tasty scoop of AG1
contains 75 vitamins, minerals, and
whole food sourced ingredients,
including a multivitamin, multimineral,
probiotic, greens superfood blend, and
more in one convenient daily serving.
And right now, Athletic Greens is
doubling down on supporting your immune
system. They're offering our audience a
free one-year supply of vitamin D and
five free travel packs with your first
purchase. Simply visit
athleticgreens.com/impacttheory.
That's athleticgreens.com/impacttheory
and get your free one-year supply of
vitamin D and five free travel packs
today. athleticgreens.com/impacttheory.
All right, guys. Take care and be
legendary.
But I I just want to to stay on this
longevity topic of individuals saying
you should reduce your dietary protein
because of longevity, which that's
probably the worst piece of advice I
could ever give someone.
Let's define longevity.
What does that mean?
Is it living from to 95? Or is it living
to 95 and a half?
And the question is, do you want to be
mobile and healthy, or do you want to be
frail and sarcopenic?
If we believe in the hypothesis of
anabolic resistance, which arguably we
should, this is well documented in the
literature, you look at my mentor's
work, uh Dr. Donald Lehman or Stu
Phillips, any of these guys, Van Loon,
you know, uh this is a well-documented
phenomenon
that as we age, our capacity to
generate, heal, um keep muscle goes
down.
So, I just told you about the sensing
mechanism and that we actually require
more dietary protein. Really, we require
high-quality protein because we require
that amino acid stimulus.
So, if you now further reduce
dietary protein from aging individuals,
and aging can start in your 30s,
how are you going to then stimulate
tissue?
You have to be very careful about how
you want to age and this concept of
longevity. Longevity for a C. elegans or
a fruit fly
doesn't take into account the complexity
as a human human agent. Is that where
they're drawing that from?
These are not human studies. You're not
looking at randomized control trials.
You're not looking at good high quality
data
to support a reduction in dietary
protein. And as a trained geriatrician,
no geriatrician says, "Hey, Study old
people. Yes. You you need to reduce your
dietary protein. We know that
skeletal muscle protects against
disease. It protects against morbidity.
It protects against mortality. Muscle is
an organ system. It's an endocrine organ
system. When you contract it, it
secretes myokines. These myokines, you
know, the the most studied myokine is
interleukin-6. Goes throughout the body.
It affects bone. It affects liver. It
affects nutrient partitioning. What
group do we put interleukin-6? Is that
considered um immune response? It So, in
it is an immune response when it's
released from macrophages. It is a
myokine when it's released from skeletal
muscle.
is. You You and I talked about this last
time. I don't I still don't know. So,
the myo So, this is This is actually a
newer science and this really comes from
the work of Pedersen and she has
essentially paved the way. She's an
immunologist and internal medicine.
And what a myokine is, it's a protein
released from contracting skeletal
muscle.
And when we are deconditioned and when
we are not training, you don't secrete
interleukin. Interleukin-6
once it's in the bloodstream? What it
does, there's there's thousands of them,
which is interesting.
kinds?
Interleukin 6, decorin, irisin, there's
thousands.
Again, this is new emerging science and
arguably what we should be studying. I'm
starting to look at blood levels
post-exercise in my patients.
Right? And this just goes back to a
broken obesity model, which we know
you're not over fat, we know everyone is
under muscled, right? When we are
talking about the general population,
you know, typically people don't have
a good solid founda- foundational
muscular base. They don't. And this idea
that we would further reduce dietary
protein is going to have a much more
negative effect. And the
Here's another question. Do you think
there are problems with So, cuz I'm
trying to get to muscle, obviously
hugely important. I couldn't agree more
with that. It just that makes so much
sense to me.
The question is what, and maybe it
doesn't even matter, but which is more
important, the the muscle or the fat?
So, for instance,
Muscle. somebody in my life who is
lovely, lovely human. They're really
[ __ ] strong, like really strong, but
they're also morbidly obese.
And so, what is the muscle going to
protect them enough from the obesity?
And the story I've always told myself is
that
because he has such a massive surplus of
calories and so much of it is
insulin-secreting that he's in a growth
phase all the time, mTOR is just kicking
off like crazy. He's also eating too
many calories.
The muscle can only do so much.
At some
a point at which the muscle just can't
carry the burden of your diet.
Yeah, you know, I and I when I think
about insulin, I think about when I
think about carbohydrates, I think about
it in a meal threshold, not in this
24-hour period, but carbohydrates are
okay. You just got to make sure that you
are not overextending yourself in terms
of a meal-per-meal basis.
Let's say someone has really, really
healthy muscle, but they're
over-consuming calories, they're not
going to have a chance.
There has to be some
you know, there has to be some balance.
But these issues start in skeletal
muscle first, and I think that that's
very misunderstood. Everybody's focusing
on adiposity, everybody's focusing on
insulin resistance, and if you care
about root causes, you have to care
about skeletal muscle.
So that's where it feels like it's maybe
complicated. So
if if this guy who has a ton of muscle
can still end up having the problem, it
feels like muscle is necessary but not
sufficient. You have to both have muscle
and a diet that isn't overwhelming your
system.
Yes, it is necessary but not sufficient.
I love the way you put that. And
wouldn't it be great to see this guy
lose some fat, adipose tissue?
And I think that that would make a lot
of sense. You say that he has a lot of
muscle,
but what individuals that we see when we
see MRIs or we see cat scans, there's
fat infiltration into skeletal muscle.
Skeletal muscle becomes marbled.
You know, there's no free lunch or no
free pass. Mhm. If you struggle with
obesity, it's not just limited to
visceral fat. It does get into the
organ, it does get into skeletal muscle.
This ultimately affects this this cycle,
it ultimately affects your ability to
manage, you know,
glucose, it affects your ability to
manage substrates, it affects the health
of the muscle. You know, we talked a
little bit about myokines and you know,
the big the biggest, most famous myokine
is interleukin 6, and when you contract
skeletal muscle, it actually
does this whole body crosstalk where it
can lower some inflammation
throughout the whole body, right? So
exercise is in and of itself, I don't
want to say anti-inflammatory because
oftentimes the process of exercise does
create
free radicals, you know, there's this
you these these concepts, like you said,
are very complex. Yeah. It's not just
this way and that way, and I think that
we try to oversimplify it.
But, to the best of our ability, there
are some fundamental things that are
important to understand.
And that is we have to address skeletal
muscle. You must. Get your muscle. And
while I I understand that it makes
people afraid,
it doesn't mean that it's true.
Fear can be validated, but it doesn't
have to be true.
That's a really we could derail this
entire episode around that sentence. Um
but I
is that we're not having transparent
conversations. Mhm. And this is really
what I'm fighting for.
Because of dogma, you're saying.
of dogma. It is Now, I've been I've been
in this space for 20 years.
10 years ago, this was not a
conversation.
The sort of ethical thing.
Animal cruelty, ethical kind of a a
conversation.
Bad on the planet.
It wasn't It wasn't that way.
And what's happening is that at the very
heart is this
anti-animal
dogma.
And there's nothing wrong with not
wanting to eat animals, and there's
nothing wrong with not wanting to harm
animals. Okay? I I can appreciate that.
But, what's happened now is there's not
transparency around it. So, this whole
conversation then goes to well,
how can we get people to stop utilizing
animal products?
Well, we're going to scare them. We're
going to generate so much fear. We're
going to put out fake
educational documentaries. We're going
to completely obliterate the science.
or sinister?
It's sinister. It's It's totally
conscious.
The people at the top, it's totally
conscious. And then what's happening is
then it's getting into
um you know, it's then training
physicians, and then it's affecting
influencers that are then going ahead
and talking about longevity and reducing
protein. And they believe they're saying
the right thing, they're not. They
believe they're saying the right thing
for the body or for the planet?
body.
But they're not understanding that at
the very heart of that is is actually
coming from an anti-animal narrative.
And what's happening is there's no
transparency in the data. And
our expectation is now to lower
the quality of evidence to be able to
say, "Well, no, plant and animal protein
are the same." No, they're not.
Last 20 years, this has not been a
conversation.
of branched-chain amino acids.
No, or any amino acid. And there's this
whole argument about it. Now it's So now
then it's the longevity piece. Reduce
protein because it's going to affect
your longevity.
Longevity defined as what?
Six months? And also, have you
that were the case, let's say that plant
uh based proteins actually did make you
live for an extra six months.
What kind of muscle mass would you have?
Would it Would it?
Yeah, but if if it seems to me that if
it actually makes you live six months
longer, that's worth talking about. But
But we don't know that to be the case.
Right.
I mean, like I said, a fruit fly isn't
the same. And you know, I have taken
care of people more than I can count at
end of life. That last six months is
brutal. So, are you saying that what I'm
trying to understand cuz the analogy you
always use is that what? It gives you
six more months? If it does, I think we
have to talk about that. But is your
hypothesis that that data is flawed?
You're looking at the wrong animals in
humans based on
It's about the quality of life.
Okay. And
at the end of life
that like maybe it doesn't It's
possible.
It's possible.
about that?
Well, it's possible. You know, I'm never
going to say, "Okay, well, you know,
these are things that are highly
complex. Is it possible?" Maybe.
But let's say let's say, "Okay, that's
possible."
Towards the end of life, you want to be
mobile. You don't want to have a broken
hip and be spend the last 6 months in
a nursing home bedridden. Or you don't
want to spend your time in an
Alzheimer's ward.
These things are related to skeletal
muscle.
Alzheimer's as well. There's a metabolic
component to Alzheimer's. It's type 3
diabetes of the brain. If you care about
Alzheimer's, you have to care about
connect muscle to metabolic disease for
me. Exactly what's going on?
Okay. Skeletal muscle is your primary
site for glu- glucose disposal. And I
use the term disposal to get it out of
the bloodstream. Anything to get it out
of the bloodstream.
So, right? So, when you think about
skeletal muscle, you have to think about
glucose utilization
or disposal.
You have to think about fatty acid
oxidation.
Skeletal muscle.
Healthy muscle stabilizing blood
glucose, which you've seen.
So, I don't get too much insulin
secreted. So, I don't get insulin
resistant.
that's more of a dietary thing, right?
So, when you have too high of a glucose
load, you're going to get a subsequent
insulin response.
Right? That that is what happens.
So,
skeletal muscle for all these ways in
which it can help dispose of nutrients
is really what we're thinking about when
you think about metabolic syndrome.
Ultimately, it is a intake issue.
And I think that you
Meaning I could control it through my
diet.
You could, but you still want to have
healthy skeletal muscle for all the
other things.
No doubt. And it gives me a lot more
flexibility in my diet.
Gives you flexibility, gives you you
know, there's mitochondria, it gives you
a lot of positives.
Okay. So, now coming back to the
longevity piece, we've got people and
I'll be generous and say they really
really have amazing intentions. They
want to protect animals. They want to
protect the planet. They don't have any
evidence that it's better for us yet,
right? Cuz the science is
you can't now animal protection is
different than planet protection.
And I think that we just have to be
really clear.
Animal protection is animal protection.
All the other lines of narrative really
go back to animal protection because the
data doesn't support that, you know,
it's just that these cows are now
killing the environment, right? That's
not true. You know, if we look at the
US, it's
greenhouse gases, industry,
transportation, and electricity. 50% of
our fruits are flown in.
25% of our vegetables are flown in.
So, that it can't be so convoluted. It
has to be I I think there just has to be
transparent conversations. When you talk
about longevity, I think we have to
define longevity and we have to have
these health conversations of what are
the endpoints that we're going to be
looking at.
And when you say define longevity, I
think it
your debate is maybe longevity isn't the
right question, it's quality of life is
the right question.
I and I agree with I yes. And I you
know, I was thinking before I was coming
here, you know, what is a different word
that we can use because people talk
about longevity, which is just the span
of life, you know, and then there's
terms thrown around like healthspan.
I think it really is about quality of
life and it can't necessarily be
And a big part and I agree with this,
but so if I'm putting inappropriate
words in my mouth, just tell me, but a
big part of quality of life for you is
really strength.
Yeah. Of course. And we know that to be
true, not just my personal opinion.
Well, I think a lot of people don't
really think about strength. They will
when it starts to decrease. When you can
no longer lift something up to put it in
your overhead bin when you're flying. Or
you can
It's crazy how as you get older, that's
like the most dangerous thing you're
going to do is walk around. Right.
But if you listen to the current
narrative, that is going to be
inevitable.
And that's very scary.
You know, this idea that we should not
focus on skeletal muscle and continue to
try to address obesity is a broken
paradigm. We are focusing on the wrong
tissue. Obesity is not the problem. It
is not the root cause. It's skeletal
muscle as a root cause. And diet, yes?
Well, yeah.
But they the two kind of go hand in
hand, right? Cuz because you can deal
with more bad diet if you have more
muscle. Yes, but you also have to nail
diet for
a quality of life going forward. Partly
because I have this um sensing organ
that is waiting for a certain amount and
kind of protein.
lot of energy. When I say energy, I mean
both physical, mental, and food-wise
energy to maintain. Mhm.
It is not easy to put on muscle, you
know. Facts. I mean, I listened to Alan
Aragon. He's amazing. He would be
amazing to have a conversation with. You
know, I was asking him about how much
muscle could someone put on in a year.
And if you are totally untrained, you
might get 12 lb, maybe 12, maybe 24 lb.
That would be outrageous.
24 lb if you start from scratch.
You would look so different. But that
would be outrageous, right? This is like
at the absolute upper level that, you
know, we don't really see happen.
Mhm.
But the reality is it takes so much
energy and effort, again I use those
terms kind of interchangeably, to
actually put on tissue.
What's so cool about this organ system
is that we can actually add to it.
And I like to think about it as we add
to it, we add to our life.
All right. This is so powerful. Give
people in like just one a quick couple
sentences
the thing they should be doing, whether
it's diet, working out, whatever.
Let's start with resistance training.
You have to train hard.
Whether, you know, volume is what's what
is what is important, but you have to
get the volume in and you have to get
the stress in. The body thrives under
stress.
There's this concept of we should have
less stress, we should No. Your body
requires physical stress.
After you get that physical stress, you
know, whether you're doing
high-intensity interval training, you
need to you need to train, you know,
resistance training, you need to
strength train, and you need to do
aerobic training. You do.
And you probably need to work harder
than you think you're working.
I think you've said you need to feel
like giving up at least twice and about
to vomit.
And people will argue with me and they
say, "Oh, no, that's not true." Well,
okay, but as you age, the tissue it
becomes more and more difficult to
respond to.
And number two, you have to account for
your changing hormonal milieu. The body
is changing, whether we want to believe
it or not. When we are younger, we are
driven by hormones. When we are older,
older,
30s, 40s, we are now no longer driven by
hormones. We are now driven by dietary
sensing mechanisms.
You have to account for dietary protein.
You have to. Yes, you have to account
for carbohydrates. Yes, you worry about
insulin.
Yes, you worry about fat. Yes, I do
worry about total calories, but you have
to get the foundational piece
right up front. And that is high-quality
training is a non-negotiable. And number
two, high-quality proteins.
And that is not the narrative that is
being discussed. It is obesity,
longevity,
and that stuff's all It's You know what
it is? It's a distraction.
It is a distraction from
core fundamental things that are
action-oriented that people can do.
Losing weight is challenging, yes. How
about we focus on a positive, like
building muscle, optimizing for dietary
protein, and then let's see what your
blood glucose levels are. Then let's see
what your triglycerides are.
Then let's see what your energy is.
So, this is now moving from fat-phobic
to muscle-centric.
Let's look Not Let's stop looking at all
these obesity endpoints.
At you know, elevated insulin, glucose,
triglycerides, cholesterol. I mean,
that's great, but these are all diseased
models. Why don't we start looking at
myokines, which I think we're going to
have to talk about in the next episode.
But why not look at post exercise blood
levels
to see are we training? Are we
stimulating our tissue? Skeletal muscle
is an organ system, just like the
thyroid.
It should be tested and treated as such.
Facts. Um
This was so fun.
Thank you so much for um letting me like
practice, rehearse like this whole sort
of integrated idea. Um I think it's
really fascinating. The complexity of
all this is so crazy, and getting people
focused on muscle mass and working out,
I think will reward people so richly.
When you're young, when you're
middle-aged, when you're old, like being
strong is awesome. It's protective.
Um
It looks good. Like there's a whole host
of reasons um to do it. Where can people
follow along with you? Learn more. Yeah,
they can find me on Instagram, Dr.
Gabrielle Lyon. My YouTube, Dr.
Gabrielle Lyon. I have a lot of
conversations with my mentors, and we
talk a lot about the science behind this
stuff. My website, I have a great
newsletter that I pick uh data and
things that I'm reading and I I send
that out. And if people would like to
apply to be a patient, they can do that
through my website, Dr. Gabrielle Lyon.
Amazing. This was amazing. Keep doing
what you're doing. It's absolutely so
critical that people understand the role
of muscle in this incredibly complex
dance of
metabolism, metabolic disease, all of
that, it's absolutely absolutely
critical. And speaking of things that
are critical, if you haven't already, be
sure to subscribe. And until next time,
my friends, be legendary. Take care.
Peace.