Video summary
The video highlights a troubling incident where Lloyds Bank denied a mortgage application to Emma Cameo, the mother of jailed Palestine activist Ellie Cameo, citing "adverse media" as the reason. This decision was made despite the bank being informed by her broker about the ongoing legal proceedings affecting the family before the application was even fully processed. The rejection occurred shortly after Ellie's sentencing for criminal damage related to a protest, but long before she had been officially convicted of terrorism charges or when such convictions were widely known to the public. Emma, who runs small businesses including a Pilates studio and works as a homeopath, found herself unable to secure financing for her commercial properties, forcing her sister to take over the mortgage under less favorable terms.
The situation escalated further when Lloyds also closed Ellie's bank account in February 2025 while she was still on remand and had not yet been convicted of any crime. A letter sent to an old address stated that the bank could no longer maintain a banking relationship with her without providing any explanation or written justification for the decision. This action left Ellie unable to manage her finances, pay direct debits, or access funds needed for basic living expenses, causing significant stress for both her and her family. The bank's official statement claimed that their decisions are based on laws and regulations rather than political beliefs, yet the timing of these actions strongly suggests they were influenced by internal assessments regarding the case that were not disclosed to the applicants or the public.
Emma expressed deep frustration over the lack of transparency and the severe impact this has had on her livelihood and family stability. She noted that while she had been honest with her broker about her daughter's case and her own wrongful arrest history, the bank still refused to proceed, citing an unexplained "reputational risk." Her small business team remained loyal throughout the ordeal, but the financial strain and emotional toll have slowed her professional growth and affected her health. The family has been banking with Lloyds for decades collectively, making the sudden revocation of services feel particularly unjust, especially given that the potential terror connection in Ellie's case was concealed from the jury and the public at the time of the bank's decisions.
The video concludes by emphasizing the broader implications of how banks handle cases involving political activism and legal uncertainty. With Ellie's appeal against her terrorism conviction pending, the family hopes for a reversal of the charges that could clear their names and restore their financial standing. The narrative underscores the vulnerability of individuals facing powerful institutions when their lives are entangled with high-profile political controversies, even in the absence of final convictions or public knowledge. It serves as a cautionary tale about the potential for banking practices to disproportionately affect families involved in social justice movements, raising questions about fairness, accountability, and the true criteria used by major financial institutions in making lending and account maintenance decisions.
Read the full video transcript
We all rely on banks, whether we like it
or not. You can't get paid, you can't
pay bills, and most people can't borrow
the funds to buy a house, start a
business, or manage their debts without
one. But banks are far from our friends.
They're ruthless businesses that can
turn on you at any time. That's what
appears to have happened to Emma Cameo,
the mother of jailed Palestine action
activist Ellie Cameo, who has been
denied a financial service from her
long-time bank, Lloyds, over what they
call adverse media.
That report is by Novara Media's Harriet
Williamson. You can find the link in the
description, who writes this.
Ellie's mom, Emma Cameo, a small
business owner in South Wales and mother
of three, applied for a new mortgage
with Lloyds on her commercial properties
in April. Her mortgage broker had made
the high street bank aware of the legal
process affecting the family prior to
the application.
However, Emma's broker was told by a
Lloyds business development manager in
early June, "We've now assessed the deal
and consulted with our credit sanction
team. Unfortunately, due to the adverse
media, it's not something they are
comfortable supporting at this time."
Adverse media about someone's daughter,
rather than the applicant herself, seems
a strange reason to turn down a mortgage
product for a business.
And at the beginning of June, when
Emma's application was rejected, Ellie
Cameo had, along with the rest of the
Filton Four, only been found guilty of
criminal damage in a 2024 raid on an
Albert site near Bristol.
But she hadn't yet been sentenced as a
terrorist. That would only happen later
that month. In fact, a lot of the
adverse media at the time was about the
fact that the possibility of a terror
connection being found in the case had
been concealed from both the jury and
the wider public by a court order.
And also about the fact that the
counter-terror law was about to be used
for the very first time against people
protesting in the tradition of the
suffragettes.
Emma Cameo even tried going back to the
bank with another option, with Harriet
reporting this.
Emma's broker then offered an
alternative plan, transferring the
properties into her sister's ownership,
but Lloyds still refused to proceed with
the mortgage application.
While Emma was refused perfectly
ordinary banking services, Lloyd's went
ever further with her daughter, Ellie.
Harry also reports this.
Ellie was sent a letter notifying her of
Lloyd's decision to close her bank
account in February 2025, while she was
on held on remand and had not been
convicted of any crime.
The letter sent to an address Ellie no
longer lived at and seen by Novara
Media, states, "Following a recent
review of your account, we are writing
to let you know that unfortunately,
we're unable to maintain a banking
relationship with you."
No explanation of why Lloyd's was unable
to maintain a banking relationship with
Ellie was provided.
So, that's Ellie losing her bank account
almost a year and a half before she's
been convicted of any crime. And when
the question of a terror connection was
nowhere near the public consciousness,
either.
Asked for comment on both of these
stories, Lloyd's provided Novara with
the statement.
"We do not close customer accounts or
make lending decisions based on
political or personal beliefs. Our
decisions are based on relevant laws,
regulation, account conditions, or
lending requirements. We're unable to
comment on individual cases."
Earlier today, I was joined by Emma
Cameo, the mom of Ellie Cameo, and I
began by asking how Ellie is doing.
>> Well, she's just been moved to back to
Gloucester. She, after sentencing, she
was in Bronzefield in London, and
they've now sent her to Gloucester,
which isn't where she wanted to go. So,
it's been a bit of a
struggle, a bit of a
any move takes about 2 weeks to settle
into the new prison new regime. It's not
as straightforward as everything goes
with them. It's nothing would be be far
too simple.
Um but, she's just coming through the
other side of that, and I spoke to her,
I think it was not last night, the night
before, and she did a really good day.
She's just been
um
given a blue pass, which is what she
they would never allow her before. It's
all None of it makes sense. Um a blue
pass allows her to be um
moving around the prison without being
escorted and she needed one of those to
get a gardening job, which is what she
really wanted.
Um, they wouldn't give her it to her in
Gloucester prison last time, but they
have now just given it and she's she's
got a gardening job, so she's just
trying to settle into it and
she said she's beginning to process the
sentence. Um, I think uh
she said, "I allow myself to go there
for a little while um, then pulls
herself back and says, "Okay, that's
enough for today." Um, yes, we've got
the appeal coming up, but you know, it
she's she's she's she's a survivor, so
she
um,
you know, we're looking all around us
and how you're going to survive and it's
about settling into this new environment
and getting ready for the long haul.
>> So, now Lloyds refused to remortgage
some properties associated with your
business over what it calls adverse
publicity. What did you take them to
mean by that and why do you think it
impacted their decision?
>> I have no idea. I never gave it any
thought whatsoever. Um, I was the
remortgage application. Um,
I went I went through all the details
with the broker and um, he asked me a a
list of, you know, normal questions.
Have I got any criminal convictions and
I told him that I hadn't, but I did give
him the history that I'd been wrongfully
arrested and why, you know, with my
daughter's case.
Um, and then I said I did a protest um,
to protest the proscription of Palestine
Action, but that I since had my court
case and that I was found not guilty. He
then relayed that to the lender, who I
didn't actually know was Lloyds Bank at
that time. Um, it was just whatever
lender he'd come up with.
Um, and he came back and he said, "Yeah,
it's okay. They've okayed everything.
Let's let's set to go." So, um, then you
start all the documentation that they
need and etc. And and that went in. Now,
don't forget I was juggling a second
court case with Ellie. You know, this
was just something that was going on in
the side and and I left them to it. And
it was approximately 6 weeks into it
when he came back and said on the phone
to me,
um he said I've got some bad news. He
said they He said I only found out 2
days ago, but I've been I haven't told
you straight away because I've been
trying to challenge it. He said because
I gave them all the information before
we went into it.
Um and he said all I can tell you is
that it's something to do with something
that happened on the 12th of June. And I
went, well, that was my daughter's
sentencing. I said she was sentenced as
a terrorist. And I said, well, what has
that got to do with me? Um and he said
so
So, that was his his feedback to me. And
then I asked him, could I
Could he tell me what grounds they gave
for for not for taking me this far down
the road before before denying me? And
he said His words over the phone were
they said reputational risk, but I
haven't seen that in writing.
Um all all I've seen in writing cuz I
then asked him for the email thread, um
which he did later send to me, and that
was All it said was for adverse media.
So, make of that what you will.
>> So, what will this mean for your
businesses and your livelihood?
>> I've got three businesses,
um and um it's It sounds big, but it's
not. I'm a very small business owner
where I run a small Pilates studio, and
I'm a homeopath. The commercial property
is just something my sister and I had on
the side.
Um
and because the last 2 years, I mean, I
haven't looked up. I've just looked
forward and um and I've been fighting
Ellie's campaign. Um and my business
I've got a small team of instructors
that that work for me, and they've
carried my load hugely all the way
through the court, you know, the first
trial was 3 months long
in London, and I'm in Wales. So, um
you know, the team have carried me for
long enough. My patients have been
patient with me.
Um
I've I've to see a lot of them online,
but it
it's hasn't been anything drastic, but a
slow I've certainly I'm certainly not
growing in the trajectory that I was
before this whole thing.
I then sort of plateaued for a little
while and then you can just see little
and and I was worried. So we remortgaged
so that I could help buffer buffer that,
but as a result, I mean it's a
culmination of a lot of things. My
health has taken its toll. And
my sister that I was in business with,
we've both lost another sister about 20
years ago and she just said to me
I'm taking it off your hands. She said
you've got enough stress going on.
So I'm going to take it off you. So she
is now currently
taking the mortgage on
and um
and the remortgage rather, not the
mortgage, the remortgage with another
company which haven't got such
attractive rates.
But
but yeah, my sister's going to carry the
can for me.
>> You've been very actively campaigning
for Ellie. Has this had any impact on
your businesses as well?
>> I don't teach that many Pilates classes
these days and the ones that I do have
been with me for so long
that
I took a long time to tell them. I could
tell that some of them knew. Some of
them had seen the media, but you know,
Swansea's a small town.
A isn't aware of what's going on in the
rest of the world and B it's a small
town so if somebody knows, everybody
knows.
I've played I think
a great professional game throughout
this two years and you know,
I'm on this side of the camera one
minute in London and and campaigning
with horror and then you know, Thursday
night 7:00 dinner.
You know, Pilates time and
they have admitted to me that they could
see, you know, this was early on before
it was openly spoken about that they
could tell that I was under stress and
they didn't know why, but you know,
they're all incredibly loyal and um, my
team are um, are incredible as well.
They carry the can a lot. Um, and and I
just don't look I don't look too far
forward. I just deal with the here and
the now and what I've got to, you know,
what I've got to do. So,
yeah, it is what it is and we shall see
how how long I survive.
>> Now, Ellie still had banking long before
she'd been convicted of anything. It's
also pretty shocking. According to
charity Unlock, which works to make
financial services fairer for people
with criminal records, people on remand,
as Ellie was, should still have access
to their bank accounts. So, what
happened there?
>> Well, that was a long time ago now and
honestly, I was I was in an interview
yesterday with Fatima Zaynab's mother
and there is just so much to cover in
the last 2 years that we haven't been
either able to talk about, um,
openly, you know, whilst the trial was
going on and and then once it is all
over and you can't talk about it, you're
exhausted. Um, and you can't remember
all the details along as the way as you
go, but Ellie was living in London
before her arrest. And, um,
when she was first arrested, we, uh, I
just said to her, "Have you got enough
money in your because she wasn't
expecting any any of thing of what
happened, you know, she thought she may
do, you know, maybe a month at worst."
Um, so it was all a big surprise and she
said, "Yeah, yeah, my bank account is
okay. I've left enough money to pay my,
um, you know, she cancelled certain
things." She's incredibly organized and
she cancelled certain things and then
made sure there was enough money to
cover direct debits. And, so we were a
long I think, if I remember correctly,
from sending Harriet the paperwork, I
think it was last March, I I believe,
when maybe they sent it. I think that
was it, but we didn't get it then
because they sent a letter to her old
address. And they never gave any reason,
so I can only surmise that she will have
been flagged up on some system somewhere
as having a terror connection, even
though the public didn't know, the jury
didn't know. We might have known and
clearly the banks have access to that
knowledge. And because there is no other
reason, you know, myself and three
children have all banked with Lloyds our
entire lives collectively it makes up
like 87 years
that we've been banking with Lloyds and
there is absolutely no reason for them
to you know to debank her.
But we didn't know about it.
Luckily
one of her direct debits was a I think
it was a mobile phone or a
TV license I can't remember what it was
it was something Sky so I think it might
be the mobile.
And she she had when she had set that up
it was using my address before she had
gone to London. And that is the only
reason that I found out because Sky
suddenly not getting their direct debit
payments and sent a letter addressed to
her at my address so I opened it and it
said that you know she was in debt. So
I then tried to get back into her bank
account and I couldn't
and then I contacted the house that she
was in and I said is there any mail
there? And they said yes there's a a
pile sitting here waiting for us so they
sent it to me and that's when I
discovered that um
they'd debanked her closed her account
and all the fund with no word says no
you know no reason it did they didn't
give a reason and a check for the
contents contents of it so then there
was this whole
escapade in trying to there was a a
credit card for another bank that she
was paying monthly
a couple of other direct debits and in
order for me to continue those payments
or to to see they they we won't deal
with me because I'm not her obviously.
So you know it causes incredible stress
and I'm no end of you know that on top
of the prison system you know we you
need a whole show on it
but you know it wasn't simple.
>> So we don't have any information showing
whether or not the banks did any have
any information regarding the potential
terror connection on that issue. Now
when it comes to the
recent coverage that we've done there
was the announcement that the Filth and
Fury would be appealing the
extraordinary sentencing as terrorist
which you mentioned earlier. How are you
feeling about that?
>> Well, you know, I am somebody that sees
the glass half full my entire life. I am
an incredibly positive person and very
hopeful. Now, I'm not religious, but I
am spiritual and I do believe this whole
thing is, you know, has got to come for
count for something and be a part of
something. Um
that that is for the greater good of
mankind, but but in all honesty, uh the
amount of corruption that I have seen
unfold in front of my very eyes in the
last 2 years, um
you know, it's I'm not I'm not expecting
justice to be done, but it would be
nice.
Um
she's the we're appealing the terror
connection and from what I've
understood, God, I've gone from a lay
person, I'm still a lay person, but I've
learned an an enormous amount in the
past 2 years. And um
the for there to be a terror connection,
I think you have to tick two of three
boxes. And one is a financial bracket,
which doesn't quote a particular amount,
so that's odd in itself. Um but staying
on that on that thing that that's it
said that they did 1.2 million pounds
worth of damage, but all they've got for
that, which was never scrutinized in in
court, was an insurance claim.
Um now, Elbit were never enforced to
turn up in court to answer any questions
during the trial. And so, the the
insurance claim was never
scrutinized. It was just accepted by the
judge. Um so, that's the one thing that
they'll be
I don't know what exactly they're
they're appealing with that, but I know
it's something to do with the finances.
And the other one was influencing the
government, which they quite clearly
they they spoke for themselves during
their case and said that, you know, they
had no hope in influencing a government.
They'd tried that before they took
direct action. You know, they did the
marches, they wrote to MPs, they they
did encampments. See, they did all sorts
of things um
to try and influence the government to
stop arming Israel. Um and it simply
didn't work, which is why they took
direct action.
>> That was Emma Camio speaking with me
earlier today. And remember, you can
find Harriet Williamson's full article
in the link below.