Is Prophet Muhammad ﷺ Prophesied in the Bible? | Dr. Ali Ataie
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The video explores the concept of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ as a restoration of the primordial monotheistic tradition of Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham), known as *Milat Ibrahim*. The speaker argues that Islam corrects theological deviations found in later religious traditions, particularly regarding the nature of God and the Messiah. In Christianity, the Quran rejects the doctrines of the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus, emphasizing that God is self-subsisting and does not need to eat or be born, unlike Jesus who was a human being. Similarly, the video addresses Jewish beliefs in a chosen race or an irrevocable covenant that ignores individual obedience, clarifying that true monotheism requires adherence to the message of Ibrahim rather than ethnic lineage. The Quran is presented as a guide that validates the prophethood of Muhammad ﷺ by calling believers to follow him if they truly love Allah, thereby restoring the pure faith of Abraham.
A significant portion of the discussion focuses on the messianic prophecies found in the Bible and how they relate to Jesus and Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. The speaker explains that while Jews and Christians agree on the human nature of the Messiah, there is a divergence regarding his identity. Historical analysis suggests that the expectation of a Messiah arose after the destruction of the Second Temple, with prophecies pointing to a figure from David's line who would restore the temple. The video posits that Jesus cleansed the temple in Jerusalem, an act historically attested in all four Gospels, which aligns with messianic expectations. However, the speaker argues that Jesus was not killed but removed from the earth by Allah to delay his mission until the end of times, a view supported by the linguistic meaning of his name "Yeshua," which means "God saves" or "he is saved," rather than implying resurrection. The video also critiques certain Christian narratives and Jewish interpretations that claim Jesus claimed divinity, suggesting these may be later additions or misunderstandings given that the earliest Gospels do not record such public claims.
The transcript concludes by addressing the relationship between the Quran and the Bible, specifically regarding prophecies of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ in texts like Deuteronomy 18 and Isaiah 42. The speaker acknowledges that while there are descriptions of the unlettered prophet in these scriptures, the Bible has undergone textual alterations and interpolations over centuries, as admitted within its own pages. Therefore, the Quran serves not only as a confirmation but also as a corrective criterion (*Al-Furqan*) that clarifies the original truths buried under later distortions. The video emphasizes that truth exists within the Bible alongside falsehoods, and scholars must use critical thinking to distinguish between the authentic prophetic descriptions of Muhammad ﷺ and later theological corruptions like the "two powers in heaven" heresy or claims of a chosen people. Ultimately, the message is that Islam restores the original monotheism of Ibrahim, rejecting racial supremacy and theological errors while upholding the truth found in the core messages of previous revelations.
Read the full video transcript
I guess I'll begin with talking about uh
Ibraimisam. This is we're in
um it's the month of the pilgrimage. Of
course, we celebrated Eid not too long
ago and the new year is coming. And so
usually during this month uh we
commemorate
uh our father Ibraimisam
as the Quran says that Ibrahimisam is
our spiritual father and the Quran is
very clear um of course the Quran makes
Allah subhana wa tala I should say of
course when I say the Quran makes I'm
speaking rhetorically we know that Allah
subhana wa ta'ala is the author of the
Quran. Uh the argument that he makes
amongst many arguments is that this
tradition this religion this dean under
the prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi
wasallam is a restoration of the milah
of Ibraimisam
right a restoration of the creed or the
uh religion of Ibraimisam because
different religions uh in the world
what's known as the broader sort of
Abrahamic tradition different religions
claim spiritual descendancy
of Ibraim.
And so Allah subhana wa ta'ala he tells
us
say Allah speaks the truth follow
means to follow closely adhere to the
milah of Ibraimisam.
He was not from the mushri
Ibraim Hanifh the or monotheist the
quintessential monotheist Ibraimisam
right and so with Christianity right
there has been a theological deviation
okay uh in the form of the incarnation
the divinity of Isaam
and the trinity and the Quran is very
clear about these beliefs. The Quran is
is clear guidance. There are people who
want to muddy the waters and say, "Oh,
you know, the Quran is not really
criticizing, you know, orthodox
Christianity. It's criticizing these
deviant forms of Christianity." This is
not a very compelling argument.
Don't say three. The Quran doesn't say
don't say trinity. It's more broad than
that. Don't say three anything
because there are Christians who say
there are three hypotheases
in Arabic, three persons of God that
share one essence. There are Christians
who say there are three gods. The
monarchical trinitarians. I debated one
a few months ago or a year ago or
something. I don't know. Time flies.
Maybe two years ago now. What year is
it? [cough]
uh he he was saying no there's actually
three gods and the father is the gatheos
because he is the uh he's the
fundamental deity who produces the other
two but they're just as god as as he is
three gods
there are Christians who say there's
father son and holy spirit there are
Christians who say father son and mother
the coloridians they were in the hij
the meaning is open. Okay. With the
yahood, the deviation is in and also
inab and to say that there's a chosen
race
that Allah subhana wa ta'ala made a
covenant with us and it's irrevocable
that no matter what we do, Allah is
bound as it were. His hands are tied to
stay true to his covenant and we are the
chosen people irrespective of our
obedience.
Right? So that's a problem. And so the
Quran says have of Ibraim.
And this so if you look at our tradition
there's
right this is the strongest type of
where our exigits they will interpret
one verse of the Quran with another
verse of the Quran.
So there's an ayah in the Quran called
right the verse of the examination. This
is surah number three verse number 31.
Say if you really love Allah because a
lot of people claim to love Allah.
We are the sons of God. We're the
beloved of God. People make this claim,
right? If you really love Allah, follow
me. So the Allah subhana wa ta'ala is
speaking directly to our master Muhammad
sallallahu alaihi wasallam. You have to
follow the prophet sallallahu alaihi
wasallam of the prophet sallallahu
alaihi wasallam is of Ibraimisam.
You see then Allah will love you
right with a sukun meaning this is a
result clause then if then if you do
this then Allah will love you and
forgive you your sins.
Okay. And then Allah says
indeed the closest of people to
Ibraimisam
are those who follow Ibraimisam
are those who follow him right
and then Allah subhana wa ta'ala he says
in the Quran he's speaking to Ibraimisam
I have made you a leader, an im for
humanity.
What about my progeny? What about my
seed?
Then Allah responded to him and said,
"My covenant, my
is called in Hebrew." It's very uh very
important concept in Judaism. The Bit
that God made with Bi isel.
My covenant does not include the
wrongdoers.
There's no such thing as a chosen race.
There's no such thing as a chosen
ethnicity.
This is a delusion.
This is not is this is not Islam. This
is not the tradition of Ibraimisam.
Of course, in our tradition, we honor
the SAT, the descendants of the prophet
Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam,
right? for the sake of him sallallahu
alaihi wasallam they have a special
place but first and foremost is im first
and foremost is tawa and Imam Abd Aliad
who died in 1720 of a common era he's
from Yemen he's widely regarded as the
of his of his generation he said
and this is a a descendant of the
prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam
speaking a direct descendant from Im
Hussein
he said by your life a person is only
the son of his religion
so don't leave tawa and lean on your
lineage
will not save you lineage my father is
so and so his father is so and so taqua
number one
Islam
for indeed Islam raised the Persian.
It's one of my favorite poems by the
way.
Islam raised the Persian Salman, right?
Salman al- Farese, by the way, Salman, a
Pharisee was
a a biblical scholar. He knew the Bible
inside and out. He knew Hebrew and
Syriak. He probably knew Greek.
uh just amazing amazing person and so
the Ansar and the Muajarim were fighting
over him and so the Muajarim were saying
he's from he's a muhajer he traveled to
Medina he's from us right uh and then
the Ansar were saying no no no no he he
he became Muslim in Medina so he's he's
from the so there was a difference of
opinion the prophet sallallahu alaihi
wasallam says
so he's he's from us the people of the
house like an honorary member of the
bait
As Imad concludes the couplet and indeed
shik has debased the noble born Abuahab
from bani hashim the uncle of the
prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam his
uncle fraternal uncle
perish the hands yada right the say what
does Allah subhana wa ta'ala say yada
that it's because Abu Lahab used to put
hands on the prophet sallallahu alaihi
wasallam very bad idea very bad idea
theith
Allah subhana wa ta'ala says upon the
tongue of our prophet sallallahu alaihi
wasallam
whoever shows enmity towards my
however you want to translate this
sometimes that people say saint and then
they kind of freak out oh we don't
believe in saints my friend one who is
close to
Whoever shows enmity towards my friend,
take notice of war from me. This is
hadith on the tongue of the prophet
Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam
where Allahhana wa ta'ala speaks in the
first person.
And so Ibrahimisam is a central figure
in our tradition. Ibraim the father of
nations. Right? So Islam is this
restoration. Islam is a restoration of
his milah.
And
so in terms of um Isaam right so there's
something called christologology
Christologology means the study of
Christ [snorts] so this idea of the
messiah right and so Jews Christians and
Muslims this is something we have in
common
all of us all three religions they
believe in the concept of the Messiah
okay and there's what's known as
positive Christologology ology and
negative christologology. So positive
christologology is answering the
questions what is the messiah
essentially and then who is he in
particular
and then negative christologology what
is not the messiah essentially and who
is he not in particular.
So in terms of what is the messiah we
are in agreement with the Jews. The
Messiah is a human being
and nothing more than that. 100% human
being.
It's a very interesting argument Allah
subhana wa ta'ala makes in the Quran
that the Messiah right which is
translated Christ Messiah in Hebrew
translated into the Greek Christo same
meaning was no more than a messenger
many were the messengers before him and
his mother was a truthful woman Allah
subhana wa ta stresses the truthfulness
of Mariam
Why? Because in Jewish tradition like in
the Talmud, she is slandered,
right? And this is this is considered to
be for them sacred writings. The Talmud
for the Orthodox tradition, even some
conservative Jews, is considered to have
a status of of near scripture, a type of
or not quite like the Torah, but still
sacred. And so Allah subhana wa ta, he
tells us
They slander her.
They both used to eat food.
Right? So the argument here that
Allahhana wa tala is making Allah speaks
to humanity.
Right? I mean you readl
you can you know if a very simple
bedawin man who you know is not educated
he can understand las. And then you'll
have, you know, someone with a triple
PhD write a whole dissertation on on the
theological implications of las and how
it's actually responding to the nyine
creed and things like that. So the Quran
is this incredible
uh text, this this incredible linguistic
tradition that speaks to all of
humanity.
The argument is Allah subhana wa ta'ala,
God is intrinsically independent. He has
his which means by himself or through
himself. He's not dependent on anything
else. He has
right that he is self-subsisting.
He feeds is never fed.
But Isaam used to eat and so did his
mother. Therefore they cannot be God
because God has intrinsic aity. This is
the argument in a nutshell.
Or you can understand it as yeah it
makes sense. God doesn't need to eat.
God is all powerful.
And so we have that in common with Bi is
in terms of what is the Messiah a human
being. Where does the idea of the
Messiah
arise historically?
So
when the second temple was destroyed
right by the Babylonians in 586 B.CE
and Allah subhana wa ta'ala according to
the mufas
speaks about that moment that many is
they had two they had two
they came into power twice.
The first one was during the Davidic
monarchy
uh and then they disobeyed Allah subhana
wa tala for
Then Allah subhana wa ta'ala he sent
against them. He said, "I sent against
you certain servants of ours."
Not that would mean that we're believers
according to the
certain at the end of the day everything
is a slave of Allah subhana wa tala.
Everything is in the state of whether
they like it or not or they know it or
not who were very skilled in warfare. So
the second temple is destroyed. A lot of
the banani is taken into captivity in
Babylon and that was the Muslim ummah at
that time. The bani is a Muslim ummah at
that time.
And so during the Babylonian activ
captivity,
Jewish sages and scholars and prophets,
Israelite prophets, they began to
prophesy that one day a king will come
um who's going to be from David's line
who will either rebuild the temple or
restore, rededicate,
cleanse the temple in some way. Okay,
just as Hezekiah had done a few
centuries earlier, restored the temple.
Okay, and so the Babylonians are
defeated by the Persians
and most likely
is Cyrus, the king of Persia. There's
difference of opinion about this.
Nothing is definitive.
Uh but I find that opinion most
compelling.
Um there's another opinion that it's
Iscander al Yunani or Alexander the
Great. This a little difficult
uh to convince me of that. Um most
likely again probably Cyrus. And so
Cyrus, he releases Ben Israel and they
rebuild the temple. But no king had come
yet. So half of the prophecy is
fulfilled. The other half remains
unfulfilled.
And this king is called Hamsiach the
Messiah.
Okay.
So if you fast forward to the first
century, the time of Isaam.
So before I do that, what we have in
common with Christians.
So the what the what of the Messiah, the
essence of the Messiah is human. We have
in common with the ban is with the Jews.
The who of the Messiah we have in common
with Christians.
Both Muslims and Christians say that
Isaiam
Jesus of Nazareth peace be upon him is
the Messiah,
right? He is the Messiah. [snorts]
And so according to the four gospels,
uh, and this is probably historical. I
know there's things in the gospels that
are problematic.
um you know you can take a class I mean
I took classes at Christian seminaries
at Christian madatis Jesuit schools
Dominican schools and they admit all of
these things and these are not like
liberal you know crazy leftist scholars
these are conservative our teacher was a
Catholic priest wore a collar and he
said yeah we really don't know who wrote
these gospels and they're written
decades later and they're written in the
wrong language and you know I don't
But you know, the holy holy spirit tells
me that they're
Yeah, I mean that they're inspired and I
I I trust our tradition. Okay, that's
fine. I don't find that very compelling,
but you know, whatever you want. You can
believe whatever you want,
you know. Um
uh but it's very interesting in all four
gospels and twice in John, the first
thing that isam does when he comes into
Jerusalem is that he cleanses the
temple.
He makes a whip. A lot of a lot of
Christians, they don't hear about this
story in Sunday school because it's a
little embarrassing. It passes what's
known as a criterion of embarrassment
because Pauline Christians who are the
majority of Christians in the world,
they want to present Isaisam as a gentle
lamb led to the slaughter. He opened not
his mouth. He he said resist not evil.
He said turn the other cheek, etc.,
etc., etc. But here he is now committing
an act of violence, an act of stasis, an
act an act of insurrection because
there's a Roman presence. This is during
the Passover week. There's 50,000 Jews
in the city. The uh the Roman legion is
on guard during this time. And here he
is making a whip and kicking people out
of the temple and cleansing the temple.
You have made this house into a den of
thieves. So most historians would say
this probably happened. Isaam did do
something like this. And by doing this,
he's cleansing the temple. He's claiming
to be the Messiah,
right? This is a clear claim to
messiahship because that's the second
half of the prophecy. The first half is
the second temple will be built. There's
no such thing as a third temple. There's
no indication old or new testament. This
a total bid. It's it's a it's a it's a
um a post70 of the common era ad hoc
interpretation to explain why did a
temple get destroyed? Oh, they must have
been talking about a third temple.
There's no basis that's that's strong in
the Bible, old or new testament for a
third temple. Okay, second temple is
here. Isaam cleanse the temple. He's the
messiah. Now what happened was the
Pharisees at the time
um who were like sort of the religious
establishment of the time amongst the
ban is many of them were very very
corrupt.
Okay. So they saw what isam had did. So
now they expect him immediately
to pick up the sword and start you know
getting down to business and taking out
the Romans. you're the Messiah, let's
let's get going here.
Isaam, he doesn't do that initially.
What he does is he turns around and he
starts uh condemning their hypocrisy.
Like Matthew 23, woe unto you scribes
and Pharisees, you're hypocrites. You
overlook the weightier demands of the
law, justice, mercy, and good faith. You
strain at the knat. You swallow the
camel. You're like whited supplicers. on
the outside you're clean, but on the
inside you weak of death. Right? So he's
attacking them. They don't like that.
He's exposing their hypocrisy. It
doesn't mean he's not going to pick up
the sword, but first he's taking care of
the Israelites internally.
First we start internally, right? And
when we do that then Allah will
naturally bring about a change in
society externally. But if we try to
change things externally
in disobedience to Allah, Allah won't
have that. It's not going to work.
There's no ti in that.
Right? So we can work, you know, we can
work 80 hours a week to bring positive
change to the um in the world, but if
we're missing our prayers,
it's in vain. They say, "Why aren't
things getting better?" Because we're in
disobedience to Allah subhana wa ta'ala.
So this is what Isaam is doing. So
here's here's what they said. The
Pharisees said, "Okay, here's what we'll
do. We're going to uh put him in trouble
with the Romans.
And if we do that, he's going to have
one of two reactions. Either they're
going to kill him and then okay, he was
the false messiah
or he's going to flex as it were and
will force him to pick up the sword.
Right? It's called,
right? Allah subhana wa ta'ala many many
ayat in the Quran he says don't ask for
things to be hastened
things will happen naturally with Allah
subhana wa ta'ala so they tried to
hasten with isam and now if you look in
the world or if you look in the 20th
century
so traditional Judaism is we were kicked
out of the holy land by the Romans in 70
and again in 132 of the common era and
we have to stay in exile and wait for
the Messiah. But by the 20th century,
many European rabbis among the
Ashkanazim,
they were saying, you know, this has
taken way too long.
Yeah. Where's where's where's our guy?
So, here's what we're going to do. We're
going to start doing his job for him and
start flooding into the holy land and
start cleansing the land of the
indigenous Palestinians and start
pushing for a third temple and that will
bring out the Messiah. We'll force him
out and then when he comes out we'll
say, "What took you so long? We're doing
your job.
Where where have you been?
This is bad with Allah subhana wa
ta'ala." No, you stay in exile. Those
are Zionist Jews. Not all Jews are
Zionists. Most of them today are. At one
point, none of them were, but this is
something that caught on, especially
after World War II, especially after the
Holocaust,
right?
Um, and so
they went to the Roman authorities and
they said, "This man is claiming to be
the Messiah, which is our king, which
means that he's going to take you out.
What are you going to do about it?"
And so the Christian narrative is they
crucified him. They killed him. A dead
messiah is no Messiah at all.
There's no indications whatsoever of
anything in the Old Testament in the
Tanakh. Even though there's been
corrupted corruption in the text and in
the meaning, there's no indication
that someone will come back from the
dead to fulfill the messianic mission.
There's no there's no indication of
this. In fact, the name of Isaam is
Yeshua in Aramaic.
Yeshua means
he is saved. That's what it literally
means. or
Jehovah saves. God saves. And his name
comes from a Hebrew root, Yasha. Yasha
means to save. Every single time this
verb is used in the Tanakh in the Old
Testament, it means to save someone from
dying. Not out not not out of death in
the sense of being resurrected. It means
to prevent someone's death and to extend
his life. Every single time this verb is
used in the Old Testament, this is how
it's used to preserve someone's life and
extend their life.
So they backed into a corner. They told
him, "Kill or you're going to be
killed."
Allah subhana wa ta'ala removed him from
the earth and delayed his messianic
mission, his kingly mission. He's not
died. It's not a false messiah until the
end of time. The ban is to this day
continue to wait for their msia.
They're still waiting for their guy.
You see where this is going?
and they want to build the third temple,
right?
So, so during these times, you know,
the reason why the prophet sallallahu
alaihi wasallam spoke about the end of
time is because towards the end of time,
there's going to be a lot of confusion
and just people are going to be
perplexed like oh how is this happening?
This is so confusing. Did the prophet
sallallahu alaihi wasallam say anything
about this? Yes, he did. So the point is
that when we see these thing these
things happening we say aha he mentioned
this
oh he mentioned this oh he mentioned
that jirel how many questions is the
prophet asked
anyone
I heard three I heard four
no
five questions
[laughter]
What is Islam? What is im? What isanan?
When is the sah?
What are its signs?
This a foundational hadith bkari in
Muslim.
to the prophet sallallahu alaihi
wasallam in this hadith he gives us a
couple of signs
and then our hadith our esqueologgical
hadith corpus is extremely vast because
the point is when these things happen
we need to hold on to our iman because
the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam
told us these things would happen the
coming of the antichrist right the
coming of the beast from the earth the
second coming of Isaam
but unlike
well not I don't know about this We're
in I forget I'm in Canada but in America
there are people in our government who
want to make
right they want to bring about the
second coming of Isaam so they support
the Zionist state even though
fundamentally theologically
they're 180 degrees opposed
there was an evangelical Christian a lot
of these people are well-meaning they're
very nice I was in I was in Memphis
Tennessee right in the heartland And and
this evangelical Christian lady, she
said I said to her, "You know, the Jews
don't believe in Jesus." And she said,
"What?
What do you mean?" I said, "They don't
believe in Jesus as as as what as
anything. He's nothing." No. Yes.
In fact, I'm putting it quite mildly.
[cough]
[clears throat]
Allah subhana wa ta'ala tells us in the
Quran,
you know,
so why would the Quran quotes the the
saying we killed the Messiah? Why would
they say that we killed our Messiah?
Because they mean that as in a in a
sense of mas it's
our Messiah. We killed the Messiah,
right? It's mascara.
And if you read Talmudic literature,
they refer to Isaam as Yeshu.
Yeshu. So it's just it's a slip of the
tongue. This is what they do. Like when
they would come and sit, they would
listen to the majus of the prophet
sallallahu alaihi wasallam and the
Sahaba, some of the younger Sahaba, they
would say,
which means like shepherd to us. Like
they would hear something from the
prophet and it was amazing. So they say
say it again or explain it again and
they would say and then some of the many
is not all of
but some of them would come and they
would say
in Hebrew means our evil one. They're
calling him evil. They're calling him
evil. The Quran says
right or they walk by the prophet
sallallahu alaihi wasallam they say
and then immediately the prophet
sallallahu alaihi wasallam responds
[laughter]
the never humiliates himself the
believer is humble but not humiliated
there's a difference right so this
hadith a famous hadith one of my
favorite hadith
And so he was with Aisha and this
happened in Medina and people sometimes
you know they go to a grocery store
somewhere in like California and they
say oh this person was giving me dirty
looks because I was wearing my kufi. Oh
it's okay. The prophet sallallahu alaihi
wasallam they threatened his life in
Medina his own city. He's the head of
state. He's the uh uh the the head of
the military the commander-in-chief
because a death threat. May death be
upon you. Right? So he's walking with
Aisha and then Aisha she turned around
and she said
to boot
and then
so that's she reacted out of love.
That's that's her beloved. The prophet
sallallahu alaihi wasallam was her
beloved. Right? But the prophet is the
great teacher.
the great teacher
from Alama, the one who makes an
impression, the one who impacts you.
That's why we can remember things. I can
remember things from my third grade
teacher because she was a great teacher.
She made an impression on me. But I have
college professors. I have zero
recollection from them. Zip. And I was
an adult. And it's not because, you
know, I was partying. I never partied.
Alhamdulillah.
And so he says, "Mahalan, relax.
Relax.
And he said,
"Allah is gentle and he loves
gentleness."
And then she said,
"Didn't you hear what they said?" And he
said,
"Didn't you hear what I said?" I said,
"Alaykum,
right? And do you think Allah is going
to answer their dua over my dua?
Right.
Uh
and so um
and so Allah subhana wa ta'ala he
thwarted their plots of killing the
Messiah. Okay. And so the Quran is a
vindication of Ibraimisam in in
conclusion. I know I didn't talk about
the prophetam in the Bible.
This was supposed to be introduction. I
tend to do it, you know, I just kind of
I give a long introduction and I never
get to the actual thing. Sorry about
that. I hope this has been helpful a
little bit. The Quran restores the milah
of Ibrahimisam. It reforms a Jewish
mentality of racial supremacy.
It rejects Christian theology. Not all
of it. Some of it they got right. Some
of it they got wrong. Okay? And it
restores what's known as Jamesian
Christianity. Did you guys know, have
you heard of James the Just? This is
something that people don't even know
about. Even like I go to I talk to
Christian audiences and I talk about
James the just and they say, "Oh, you
mean James the less?" No, that's a
different James. Isaam had a brother
named James. Whatever brother means,
you know, it could mean that Miamisam
had a son after Isaam.
That's there's nothing wrong in our
theology. I mean in Catholicism that's a
big problem because the greatest virtue
in Catholicism is to remain celibate.
But that's not our tradition, right?
That's considered a bid, right? And in
fact, it's interesting, you know, like
the pope is a priest and he's celibate.
I'm going on another tangent, by the
way. Sorry. [laughter]
Um,
so the first pope according to Catholics
was Peter. And interestingly, if you
read the New Testament, it says that
Isaam gave a sermon in in Capernaum in
the Galilee in the house of Peter's
mother-in-law.
Interesting. That means he was married.
So the Quran says this
they invented this is
we did not prescribe this for them.
Quran is exposing
uh their faults as it were. Um the
speaker is Allah subhana wa ta'ala
and then the Quran is also I think is
restoring Jamesian Christianity. So very
early on there were two strains of
Christianity Pauline and Jamesian.
Pauline Christianity headed by Paul who
is Jewish e ethnically
but he mixed in a lot of hellistic or
Greek elements into his understanding of
the gospel. This form of Christianity
became dominant
and took over the Roman Empire. The
other form was vindicated by the Quran
Jamesian Christianity. Allahhana says
that Isaam asked the
who's going to help me to do the work of
Allah subhana wa tala they said we will
help you
there's two factions
and then we aided those who believed
over their enemies the meaning of this
according to Mama Razi is that that
group was vindicated by the Quran
Quran vindicated them those are the
Jamesian Christians
And James was the head of the early
Nazarene movement. They weren't even
called Christians. They were called,
they were called Nasaro, Nazarene, not
in Hebrew. For 30 years, he was the head
of that movement.
And so the Quran is just an amazing.
It's an ocean.
You know, we only just scratched the
surface. Immazali calls it the Mad. It's
a vast ocean.
And from the Quran, there's different
types of ayat that have different sort
of levels of meaning. And so he likens
them to different gems and rubies and
pearls and things like that.
Um in his jaw Quran,
and so
in conclusion,
there are prophecies of the prophet
sallallahu alaihi wasallam in the Bible
because there's truth in the Bible.
Okay? The Quran says, and there's some
Christians now that make this argument.
This is a very bad argument. They call
it the Muslim dilemma or something like
this.
There isn't a single academic that has
any advanced degrees. No professor who
agrees with this. But they say, "Oh, the
the Quran agrees with the Quran confirms
the entire Bible hook line and sinker.
No academic takes takes this position."
Quran says
so in the Quran there's something called
equivocation Allah this happens in
scripture Allah subhana wa ta'ala uses
the same word
uh in a different context
same word different meaning it's called
equivocation for example in the Quran
the word n means a physical light in the
Quran it's it also means the prophet
sallallahu alaihi wasallam
it's also one of the names of Allah
same word the context determines. So
here in the context of these ayat Allahh
is chastising the the people of the
Bible
to those who write the Bible with their
own hands and they say
this is from God to make some gain from
it.
So that's called
right. Allahh also says
those who follow the message surah 7
verse 157 those who follow the messenger
the unlettered prophet or the gentile
propheti means gentile what does gentile
mean
non-Jewish prophet there's prophecies in
the bible of a non-Jewish prophet the
word umi means gentile the Quran quotes
some of the ban is in medina saying
we will never be held to account for
exploiting these goim.
It's the Hebrew word the goim, you know.
So there's been there's been some emails
recently that were discovered
that exposed this type of supremacy.
You know, it's it's
you know, it's very disturbing.
You know, they a lot of these people
believe that they're literally a higher
species of human being,
that we're just kind of like beasts and
they have a different kind of soul. Not
all of them believe this.
When all got up, that means I should
stop talking. I've I've come to the end
of my session,
right? So, let me just finish here. So
that ayah 279 alakar 79 this indicates
this indicates that the Bible has been
altered in its text and the Bible itself
admits it's been altered in the text.
Jeremiah 88 says this very clearly that
the law of the Lord has been the false
pen of the scribe has turned it into a
lie. And then in the next surah
This is indicates
that they they mess with meanings in the
Bible or they mess with translations.
And there's many many examples of this.
And from them there's a section of the
people of the book, the people of the
Bible who distort the book with their
tongues and they say this is from God,
but it's not from God. And they know
it's not from God.
Inshallah, one day we'll come back and
we'll actually do a a talk on the on the
topic as advertised. [laughter]
Isaiah 42, the whole chapter is a
there's no doubt about it is talking
about the prophet sallallahu alaihi
wasallam. Isaiah 42 and there's
cooperation from Sahabah.
He was asked is the prophet mentioned in
the Torah. He said and then he basically
paraphrased Isaiah chapter 42. And if
you read that chapter, it becomes very
very clear.
He's a universal covenant,
a light from the Gentiles.
Right. Anyway,
I have to stop here. sister has a
question here.
>> Um just because of your um background in
linguistics about the topic. Um I hear a
lot from Christians about specific
verses in John that refer you know in
the beginning was the word and the word
was with God and the word was God or
before Abraham was I am referring to
Isaiah. I just wanted your commentary
about that stuff.
>> Before Abraham was I am is not quoting
Isaiah. So, so this is a good point. Um,
if you ask a Christian at random, where
does Jesus claim to be God in the New
Testament? 99.99999%
of the time they're going to quote
something from John.
See, when was John written? He'll say 90
CE,
100 CE. So, it's the last gospel to be
written, right? Matthew, Mark, Matthew,
and Luke are before. If you ask a
Christian, you press him and say, "Who
wrote Matthew?" you say a disciple of
Jesus. No historian really believes this
by the way, but this is a traditional
attribution. This is what they teach
like at Oral Roberts University or at um
Liberty University, right? Like
Evangelical College, the Moody Bible
Institute where Bible is our middle
name. That's where they teach this.
Matthew the disciple, who's Mark, a
student of Peter? Who's Luke? A
traveling companion of Paul. Why did
Matthew, Mark, and Luke not record these
statements?
Jesus is going around according to John
claiming to be God. Before Abraham was,
I am. The Father and I are one. I don't
I don't even think these are divine
claims, but let's just say, okay,
they're divine claims. I am the
resurrection and the life. John 1:1, the
beginning was the word, the word was
with God. The word was God. How did
Matthew, Mark, and Luke miss all of
these statements?
Matthew is a disciple. He didn't record
Jesus saying that one time. So, this
sets up a Christian dilemma.
the Christian dilemma. Either Matthew,
Mark, and Luke
uh either Jesus made those statements in
Matthew, Mark, and Luke missed them,
which makes them pretty bad reporters.
How can we trust them at all then? In
Matthew, Mark, and Luke, they mentioned
that Isaam wrote a donkey into
Jerusalem. Is that really important?
Maybe it's important. But when he's
going around claiming to be Allah, they
missed all of them. That means they're
pretty bad reporters. Or the second horn
of the dilemma is
Jesus never made those statements and
John made them up.
So why would you trust John? And in
fact, most historians, they take the
latter and say John made them up.
That's the dominant opinion. They're not
historical.
Some Christians will say, "No, no, no.
This is like um you know the parable of
the four blind men, the four blind men
and You say, "Okay, here's an elephant.
Go touch the elephant and tell me what
it looks like." So, one guy goes and he
touches the trunk. "Oh, an elephant is
kind of like a snake." And another guy
goes and he touches the side and says,
"An elephant is round like a ball." And
then the third guy goes and he touches
the ear and he says, "An elephant is
it's like a kite." And then the fourth
guy, you know, touches the tusk and
says, "Oh, an elephant, whatever."
Right?
So, that's that's what it is. So,
Matthew, Mark, and no, the problem with
that is in the Gospel of John, Jesus
makes these statements in public debates
with Pharisees and the disciples are
present.
He's not telling John, "Come here, John.
The Father and I are one."
Sh, write it down later.
Before Abraham was, I am.
Nope. He's saying these things in
public. Matthew, Mark, and Luke failed
to record them. So, it's reasonably true
that he never made these statements.
Therefore, he never claimed to be God.
>> Yes.
Doctor
for the um I wanted to ask why would
Allah subhana wa ta mention to us in
surah that he's prophesied prophecied
the prophet sallallam in the Bible so
Deuteronomy 18:18 Isaiah 42 like you
mentioned when we also simultaneously
say that there's interpolation in the
texts and we also you know what we would
say to the Christians that the authors
of the gospels are pseudonmous um the
same would apply also to Isaia and
Deuteronomy, correct? According to
critical scholarship, so how can we how
can Allah tell the Yehood to follow the
Jewish dispens dispensation and some
verses in the Quran that you know they
should follow their law? Um I'm not
exactly quoting it, but you probably
know the the verse. But how can Allah do
that? Uh quote say that the prophet is
prophecied and then we can also say that
he's that it's interpreted.
>> Good question. So both could be true at
the same time. There's been of the and
the but there's also truth. The Quran
the Quran refers to itself as a
means a confirmation but it also calls
itself mu mu means an overseer or a
corrective. It also calls itself alan
the criterion of judgment right. So is
Isaiah 42 really do I know is it that
it's talking about the no I don't know
but there are some descriptions of the
prophetam in the Bible but it takes
scholarship this is what I think Allah
subhana wa ta is challenging the
when you look at the bible through
scholarship
through an intellectual understanding
you will come to understand that there's
truth and falsehood in the Bible and
there are descriptions of the prophet
sallallahu alaihi wasallam in this text
because it's not all or nothing. There's
truth in the Bible. Take a judgment from
the Torah. That's that's a specific
judgment. In this case, stoning. It's
mentioned in the Torah. Somebody tried
to to cover the verse. It's not a
blanket statement. The entire or they
use this hadith in Abu D. Prophet
sallallahu alaihi wasallam, he was at
the midrash, the like madrasa of the
bunny is in Medina and he picked up it
says the Torah and he put it on a pillow
and he said that Allah revealed this and
he said ah you see the entire Torah hook
line and sinker is a revelation of God.
The word Torah, if you study the word
Torah in Judaism, the word Torah can
mean anything from one verse of the
Bible to the entire Old Testament and
the Talmud, which is millions of words.
Torah can mean one verse. Genesis 1:1.
That's Torah. I quoted the Torah.
Elohim.
I just quoted the Torah.
That's Torah. Or a Torah could mean all
39 books of the Old Testament and the
entire Talmud millions of words that the
whole thing is called Shamayim the Torah
from heaven. Torah means teaching Jewish
tradition. So the prophet sallallahu
alaihi wasallam he took some portion of
Jewish tradition that was true. He put
it on the pillow and said Allah revealed
this.
Does that mean Oh, from Genesis 1:1 all
the way through Malachi and the entire
uh um the the the entire Talmud with uh
both parts of it,
the Mishna and the Gomorrah, all of that
is absolutely true based on this one
hadith. No, this is a ridiculous
interpretation.
Yes.
This this is this is Jewish this is
Judaism. This is Jewish tradition. Yeah.
That that the covenant the beta that God
made with the Israelites is irrevocable
is unconditional.
But if you read the Bible closely you'll
see that's not even true. Yeah. Uh go
ahead. is Ozer Ezra.
So this ayah is Toba ayah number 30.
One of the names of God
in the Jewish tradition is uh isra is it
means power or help.
Right? Also the same root is in Arabic
is dimminative
is some like Hassan Hussein Hassan
beauty Hussein little beautiful or like
cute right?
So little god or means little god
in rebbitical Judaism
starting in the first century or 2n
century B.CE E there was this heresy
called the two powers in heaven heresy.
The two powers in heaven heresy.
The Jews in in Palestine and the
surrounding areas
were influenced by Greek metaphysics and
mythology and came to believe that
there's two gods. There's the father god
and the son god. The father god and the
son s o n. Father and son.
Right? The Pauline Christians are all
the Pauline Christians Paul himself and
the gospel authors in my opinion are all
exponents of the two powers in heaven
heresy. They're bytheists. They believe
in two gods.
The Quran says very clearly, don't say
there are two gods.
The Jews that didn't believe in Jesus,
they also fell into this heresy. And
they said, "There's God, there's Yahweh,
and then there's his son, the Metatron,
not Megatron.
Metatron is Greek,
right? Meta methronos."
In other words, God has a son who sits
next to him on his throne. He's an angel
named Metatron.
What was the name of Medatron in Medina
among the Jews? I don't know. Probably
Ozair.
I would guess it was Ozair.
I think it's referring to the Medatron.
That's who Ozair is. There's a book by
Gordon Newbie called the Jews of Arabia
where he says in that book also,
however, just as Enoch was translated
into heaven and became the Medatron and
were became the object of worship, the
same thing might have happened to Ezra.
the scribe.