“I Would Criminalise What You Do” - Louise Perry & Bonnie Blue Debate
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this debate, Louise Perry and Bonnie Blue explore the ethical implications of their differing views on sexual liberation and pornography within a free-market framework. Perry argues that while she cannot condemn Bonnie for following her logic to its conclusion in a system favoring personal freedom, there are significant costs associated with such an approach. Conversely, Bonnie emphasizes that individuals do not need to agree with one another but should be open to listening without the pressure of justification. She asserts that sex workers and porn performers are genuine people who deserve acceptance rather than judgment for their profession or lifestyle choices, challenging the stigma often attached to them as desperate or harmful figures. The conversation shifts to a critical exercise in "steel-manning," where both participants attempt to construct the strongest possible version of the opposing argument while identifying potential negative externalities if their respective worldviews were widely adopted. Perry suggests that her anti-porn stance would lead to criminalization and imprisonment for Bonnie, representing a severe personal cost. However, she acknowledges a hypothetical scenario where access to pornography might reduce sexual aggression toward women or bisexual sex workers in some men, suggesting it could be the "better of bad options" if such benefits were proven true. This highlights the complexity of binary thinking versus nuanced reality, noting that solutions often depend on individual circumstances rather than fitting into rigid boxes. Bonnie introduces an analogy involving "fake natties"—fitness professionals who claim to have achieved their physiques naturally while secretly using performance-enhancing drugs—to illustrate how non-representative outliers can create unrealistic expectations for others. She compares herself to these athletes, noting that her ability to navigate the adult industry and manage its demands is statistically rare, akin to a one-in-3.5-billion outlier. While she maintains transparency about her experiences, Bonnie admits that this lack of struggle makes it difficult for others to emulate her path without facing severe physical or psychological consequences, effectively creating negative externalities for those attempting to follow in her footsteps who are not similarly constructed. Throughout the discussion, both speakers grapple with the tension between personal autonomy and societal impact. Perry questions whether a completely unregulated environment where people watch pornography at any age would cause cultural harm, while Bonnie points out that restrictions often fail because younger individuals engage in sexual activity regardless of porn consumption levels. The dialogue reveals that neither side offers simple solutions; instead, they highlight how extreme individual cases can skew public perception and policy debates. Ultimately, the episode concludes with a sponsorship segment for Momentous supplements before transitioning into further testing on attention span, leaving listeners to consider the nuanced trade-offs between liberty, regulation, and human variability in controversial industries.
Read the full video transcript
Given the little logic puzzles that
we've stepped through today, on what
basis can someone condemn what Bonnie
does given the world that we're in?
>> Well, given the world that we're in,
yeah, I don't think that you can condemn
Bonnie Blue if you're generally in favor
of sexual liberation and the free market
and just letting all this stuff rip. I
don't think you can. I think you just
have to accept that Bonnie has followed
all this stuff through to the logical
end point and is and is winning that
game. Yeah. Um, if you I mean it doesn't
bother doesn't worry me because I've
already thought for for years and I've
always said that actually sexual
liberation has some really serious
costs.
>> Um, as does letting the free market rip
and so on. So um,
>> yeah, I've really enjoyed talking to you
and you're a really likable person.
>> Same. I like how you're, you know, you
don't agree with what I do, but you're
very open to listening because I've had
I always say you don't have to agree.
I'm It's not my job to convince you and
I I'm not bothered. But I always really
appreciate when someone can just listen
to my side because I'm not just some
blonde porn star that's got no brain
cells. Like I'm not overly intelligent,
but I can explain. And
>> the justify is probably not the correct
word because I don't need to justify,
but I can explain why I do what I do and
why. I believe it's acceptable and why
it's it's not damaging. So it's always
>> good to have people that can listen. And
I'm not saying you're now going to be
queuing up and I won't lend you a blue
ski mask just yet, but it's nice to have
an open conversation.
>> I want to try and finish up by getting
you guys to steelman the cases for the
other side. You know what that is?
Steelmanning. So, you know straw man,
it's uh I take your argument and make
the weakest version out of it.
>> Okay.
>> Steel manning is taking the other side
and making the strongest version for
that case. So, if you could uh think of
the biggest tradeoff or or downside of
your worldview being successful, um if
your perspective and lifestyle was sort
of more widely adopted, what would be
the most negative externalities? What's
the best case that is anti Bonnie Blue?
And I guess Louise, you might be able to
start and do what is the best case
that's pro Bonnie Blue and also what are
the negative externalities of if you
were successful with what you wanted to
have happen?
>> Yeah. So if I had my way, um I would
like criminalize most of what you do and
you wouldn't have all this money,
>> right? So obviously personal
>> is in prison.
>> Well, but not for money. Um
so that's obviously like a personal cost
for you. I guess also that um maybe it
is true that for some men access to porn
reduces their sexual aggression towards
other women or reduces the chances of
them going to um
>> bisexual women in prostitution. So maybe
I mean I've never really seen that case
made strongly, but I think I said
earlier in the conversation that if that
were true that it did actually reduce
sexual violence,
>> I would accept it as being the worst of
the options.
>> Yeah.
>> Sorry, the better of bad options.
>> Mhm.
>> I think sometimes it's hard though
because people think it's either got to
be A or B.
>> It's not always got to be the case.
Sometimes for one person something works
and the other person it doesn't. or we
try and say, "Okay, porn is better to
cancel it." But sometimes it's not. Like
everyone tries to make you fit in a box
and sometimes things are one or the
other. Or sometimes it might depend on
what day it is. And like you don't have
to pinpoint yourself to one or the
other.
>> What is the best case argument against
Bonnie Blue and the world that she wants
that you can think of?
>> Um, I mean, for me, I'm already in it. I
get to do what I want and no one can
stop me basically. But the one of the
main things I want is people that do pay
for porn, do pay for sex workers or the
arqin for people to be more open-minded
about him, that they're not disgusting,
they're not desperate, they're not here
to hurt anybody, they are genuinely
lovely people. So that would be the
biggest thing I would love to happen.
>> No. What would be the case against?
>> Yeah. So Louise's position of anti- porn
would criminalize, would monetize. If
you were to make the argument for that,
is there something where you think,
okay, this is the best way that I could
justify what Louise is saying? Can you
see the other side?
>> Yeah. Like I mean, I think a lot more
restrictions should be added like it's
this was done by a professional either
speak to the person. There should be
like a a clause beforehand. Um I think
>> it's hard cuz I think a lot of porn is
very heavily regulated. um and the
amount of consent forms and IDs you've
got to upload but as a whole just
greater education um I think you do see
that complete wild west porn is is bad
even if the ind individuals are
consenting do you think that there's a
cultural
harm done if we had completely let rip
you know watch it at any age watch
anything you want do you think that
there would be a significant downside
from that
>> yeah I don't think it should be any age
but at the same time people are watching
porn a lot younger than 18 and it's
they're also having sex so you know you
could stop watching porn I mean you
could they make so many restrictions you
can only watch watch porn once you're 18
they're probably having sex those
younger than that though so who's
educating them on them younger years and
I'm not saying porn's the best place to
educate them but something needs to fill
that gap
>> I have got an example that brings this
into sort of my area of expertise which
is bro science and
I'm going to talk about fake natties you
That is it's not to do with boobs. It is
uh guys who are in the fitness industry
and have achieved a very admirable
physique and claim that they haven't
done it without performance-enhancing
drugs but they have used
performance-enhancing drugs. Fake
naturals, fake natties. Um what the
argument against fake natties and
specifically the sort of ethical
argument is these men are
creating an unrealistic expectation of
what can be achieved naturally which
inevitably means that any guy who tries
to do what they do feels inferior.
They're going to fall short. The costs
of trying to do what this person has
done with peeds
>> is unattainable. Therefore saying that
you didn't use them is giving them a
false sense of hope. Also, if you then
come out and say that you did use drugs,
there's often an accusation that this
person is now encouraging the use of
testosterone because they have an
admirable physique in this person.
They're downstream effect of using uh
hormones on yourself as a guy. I wonder
whether you are kind of not the fake
natty because you're completely open
about it, but you are the testosterone
hyperresponder of the sex world, which
is
>> your results may vary and bonnie are the
most outlier that you're going to have.
Most guys, most women would not be able
to sort of run the cycle that you have,
as in run the testosterone
performance-enhancing drug cycle and
survive in the same way that you have.
Most girls would not be able to live the
life that you do. And I think when we're
talking about like without exaggeration,
a one in 3.5 billion outlier.
Lots of people would ask the question,
does it make women want to emulate her
or warn them off of her behavior, not do
it? But the issue is you are so
non-representative.
There is no warning those people off
because there's no negative
externalities that happen within this
system that is you. Does that make
sense?
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> I tried to bring fake natties into this,
but
>> no, I I get it though. Like the good
thing is I'm very transparent. I'm very
open and
>> I don't think you're transparent about
how weird you are.
>> Yes, I would agree.
>> You did say earlier. Yeah, cuz you did
say earlier I'm I'm really normal. I
swear I'm really
>> honestly anyone like so a lot of people
that either work with me or my friends
when people that know they either work
with me or they know me one of the first
questions they get asked is oh my god
what is she like and they're like she is
surprisingly
>> but you're surprisingly normal this is
exactly the same as me talking about Jon
Jones or actually not Jon Jones that's a
bad example Tom Asenol who's UFC
champion I go oh he's a normal guy you
know he sits down he eats dinner he
plays with his kids he does the thing
it's like yeah but he also beats people
up that are over200 lb for a living like
this guy has a very specific skill set
within a very narrow domain and yeah
he's normal outside of that but is also
within that a world champion. So I I
think
>> I would encourage you to to check check
your thinking for one of a better term
on I am not that weird because nobody
else you've already said yourself nobody
else has been able to do what you can do
the people that are trying to go in your
path. This is the same as you having
unbelievable natural strength and being
able to squat. There's a guy who
recently broke the deadlift record. Um,
no one else on the planet has ever been
able to do that. And somebody else
trying to do that will snap themselves
in half trying to chase it. He is a one
in 3.5 billion uh human.
>> Yeah.
>> And I do think
>> that creates a
>> an odd sense of the cost that other
people would pay if they were to try and
do the same thing.
>> For sure. because you do not deal with
the situation in the same way like
largely you're inhuman in the way that
you are dealing with what is going on
here. Is that is that
>> I think I guess
>> fair
>> it'd be easier if I did struggle a bit
and I could open up and say look it
comes at this cost. It comes at me
crying myself to sleep at night. It
comes that my family are, you know,
upset with me and I'm dealing with
physical issues. But that isn't the
case. Like for me it really has been an
easy ride. And but I do always like to
try and make it as clear as possible.
This is not normal for most people. I I
am a normal girl, but in terms of the
way I deal with it and the way I'm able
to manage it all, yeah, to a certain
degree isn't normal. And I don't have
any tips.
>> As much as I wish I could say, look, if
you do want to do this, here's some tips
on how to manage it or how to be
successful in it because I don't know. I
just
>> You were just constructed for built for
this.
>> I just made for it.
>> Yeah. The LeBron James of porn. This
episode is brought to you by Momentous.
Trust really is everything when it comes
to supplements. A lot of brands may say
that they're top quality, but very few
can actually prove it, which is why I
partnered with Momentous. They make the
highest quality supplements on the
planet, and I've fallen in love with
their whey isolate protein powder. It's
grass-fed. It is a super convenient way
to get more protein into your diet, lean
muscle mass, muscle growth, recovery,
all that stuff. But most of all, it just
tastes phenomenal. Most clean proteins
do not taste good. And this is better
than anything else. It's also NSF and it
informs sports certified, meaning that
even Olympic athletes can use it. It is
guaranteed to be free of banned
substances. Best of all, there's a
30-day money back guarantee. So, you can
buy it completely risk- free. Use it
every single day. How many servings is
in this?
25 servings in this. Use it every single
day for a month. If you don't like it,
they'll just give you your money back.
That's how confident they are that
you'll love it. Plus, they ship
internationally. And right now, you can
get 35% off your first subscription and
that 30-day money back guarantee by
going to the link in the description
below by heading to
livemus.com/modernism
using the code modernwisdom a checkout.
That's 35% off
livemoment.com/modernwisdism
and modern wisdom a checkout. Thank you
very much for tuning in. Congratulations
for making it to the end of a relatively
short clip. Your ADHD has not taken over
that much. And let's put it to the test
fully with the actual episode right
here.
[Music]