Video summary
Ukraine has escalated its military campaign by targeting major Russian e-commerce giants like Wildberries and Ozon, effectively bringing the war into the daily lives of ordinary Russians. These strikes, conducted using drones, have destroyed billions of dollars worth of merchandise in logistics hubs across the country, disrupting the supply chains that many citizens rely on for essential goods. The strategic goal behind these attacks is to inflict economic pain on the general population, moving beyond traditional military objectives to create a sense of inconvenience and frustration among civilians who previously felt insulated from the conflict's realities. By hitting infrastructure that facilitates sanctions evasion and directly supplies the front lines with items like body armor and drone components, Ukraine aims to erode public support for President Vladimir Putin by demonstrating that the war has tangible consequences for everyday life.
The impact of these attacks extends into the political sphere, as the disruption of major retailers forces consumers to seek alternatives in smaller, less developed stores or face long delays for online orders. This economic pressure is intended to translate into indirect political leverage against the Kremlin, challenging the narrative that the war can be fought without affecting the populace. While the Russian government and its inner circle have historically maintained a degree of separation between the state's military actions and the private wealth of oligarchs, the systematic destruction of massive retail networks threatens to destabilize the economy in ways that could not be easily absorbed. Experts note that while some powerful figures may attempt to bail out these companies or diversify their infrastructure, the sheer scale of the losses and the psychological effect on consumers could eventually force a reckoning within the Russian leadership, although such a shift remains uncertain given the regime's current grip on power.
Despite the mounting economic strain and the growing apathy among Russians who fear severe penalties for dissent, President Putin appears unwilling to compromise or seek an exit strategy from the conflict. His decision-making is driven by a desire to prove his resilience and legacy, leading him to continue the war even as the economy falters under sanctions and internal pressures. The Russian government has tightened controls on anti-war sentiment, arresting activists and silencing critics within the military and business sectors who suggest that the country is losing the struggle against both Ukraine and Western competition. Consequently, while there are whispers of potential private negotiations or a future palace coup if conditions deteriorate further, Putin's current mindset suggests he will only consider ending the war if the situation becomes untenable for his own survival, making any significant political change highly dependent on him reaching a breaking point.
Read the full video transcript
This is the sound of a Ukrainian drone
hitting Wildberries, the Russian
equivalent of Amazon.
Ukraine has targeted dozens of the
company's warehouses and logistics hubs
in recent weeks,
destroying billions of dollars of
merchandise.
It's now taking aim at Ozon, Russia's
second largest online retailer, too.
>> Large Ozon logistics complex has been
struck in Dagestan, covering a an area
of approximately 130,000
square meters.
>> Ukraine says it's targeting these
companies because they've been providing
supplies to soldiers on the front line.
But, is something else going on here?
Ukraine wants to bring the war home to
everyday Russians, disrupting the
convenience of 21st century life. So,
are they hoping the Russian people will
turn on their president? And how
realistic is that?
I'm [music] Justin Bergman,
international editor of The Conversation
Australia, and this is The Conversation
Weekly,
>> [music]
>> where experts explain how we ended up
here.
I'm joined today by Russia expert
Matthew [music] Sussex, an associate
professor at Griffith University, and a
visiting fellow at the Australian
National University.
>> [music]
>> Matt, welcome.
So, who is Tatiana Kim?
>> [music]
>> Well, Tatiana Kim is Russia's richest
woman, and she is the head honcho for
Wildberries.
Wildberries is, I guess, Russia's answer
to Amazon. It's Russia's biggest online
retailer, and Russians use it all the
time.
It's estimated to account for something
like 10% of of all Russia's retail
sales.
Um so, it's a very large business and
one which Kim herself has struggled to
maintain control over against her
ex-husband. Her husband previously
wanted to take the company away from um
relationships with um the Russian state.
And when there was uh
a merger announced, he showed up at one
of the Wildberries offices with a bunch
of armed Chechens.
There was a gunfight and two people were
killed. She then probably divorced her
husband and remained in charge of
Wildberries, which about half of all
Russians estimated use at least once per
month.
>> Okay, so wow, she's got a colorful past.
I mean, this is somebody whose story is
really remarkable. And she's also
incredibly wealthy, I take it.
>> Yeah, she's worth over 8 billion US
dollars.
Although recently she will have lost uh
a bit of that given that Ukraine have
been targeting Wildberries warehouses.
Um it's been reckoned that in the 25 or
so Wildberries sites that have been hit
by Ukrainian drones, about 6 billion US
dollars worth of goods have been wiped
out.
>> So, why is Ukraine doing this? Why are
they targeting this company in
particular?
>> Well, it's an extension of what
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy referred
to as long-range sanctions, uh which is
basically targeting Russian
infrastructure. Now, of course, we know
that they've been attacking Russian oil
refineries that have caused nationwide
shortages of petrol and diesel.
>> Across many parts of Russia, cars crowd
around fuel pumps, while others sit in
long lines waiting in some cases hours
for a chance to fill up.
>> And attacking Wildberries is another way
to get inside the heads of Russian
consumers.
Because for a long time this war really
hasn't hurt um many of the people who
live in places of wealth and power in
Russia. And mostly that's Moscow and St.
Petersburg. And when it doesn't affect
your daily lives, you tend to assume
that it's either all going well or it's
not something you need to worry about.
But when you have to line up for hours
to pay for petrol at the petrol pump and
when you put in an online order that
can't go through because the merchandise
has been blown up by Ukrainian drones,
that starts to put indirect political
pressure
on people like Vladimir Putin because it
hits the everyday Russian consumer.
>> [music]
>> And of course Wildberries sells just
about anything. They have millions of
square meters worth of warehouses
>> [music]
>> full of stuff. And and part of the
reason also that Ukraine has been going
after these sites is because they say
Wildberries participates in sanctions
evasion. So effectively what Wildberries
does is it purchases up goods from
Western companies and then resells them
in Russia after importing them through
third parties. But more than that,
Ukraine charges that Wildberries has
been involved in directly aiding Russian
forces at the front. And in fact, if you
went online and searched Wildberries
just a few days ago and you put in the
search term things for the special
military operation,
you'd find body armor, helmets, drones,
cable for first-person view guided
drones, and even little components you
can attach them to drop explosives.
>> [music]
>> So, you know, it may be the free market
that's been hit by Ukraine, but
nonetheless that free market in Russia
has effectively been aiding the Russian
military.
>> Yeah, okay. So, uh I guess I was curious
about Tatiana Kim and her relationship
with Vladimir Putin. Are they tight? Has
he offered to help her out with all of
these attacks on her warehouses and the
company?
>> Kim is probably closer to the Prime
Minister Mishustin. He's regarded as as
one of her key backers than Putin
himself. But, of course, when these
attacks do happen and they take out a
large amount
of Wildberries stock, prompting people
to to flee to other smaller, less
developed retailers, it causes a shock
to the Russian economy. And this is why
there have been suggestions that the
Russian government might have to bail
Wildberries out by giving it a cash
injection so they continue to operate.
>> And how is Wildberries responding?
>> Wildberries has said that it's looking
at diversifying its infrastructure.
There is another online retailer in
Russia called Ozon, which people have
been flocking to, which has much smaller
sites. Wildberries model is the you
know, the great big warehouse. So, it's
looking at doing that, but that won't
happen overnight. There's something
like, you know, nearly 100,000 pick-up
points for Wildberries merchandise
across Russia with the idea being that
you really don't have to travel too far
outside your apartment to be able to
pick something up. Um now, it is
a fairly wealthy company, so it can
probably keep going for a while, but not
when its warehouses keep going up in
smoke, and that's already a third of
them that have been lost and more to
come presumably as the Ukrainians
[music] step up their attacks.
>> [music]
>> After the break, as the economy falters
and the death toll mounts, can anyone
put pressure on Putin to end the war?
>> [music]
>> I was saved by God to make America great
again.
>> [applause]
>> An autocrat loves a crisis. A crisis is
the way that they mobilize their base.
>> Well, America is under invasion from
within. We're under invasion from
within.
>> He's testing the boundaries of what he
can get away with.
>> We should use some of these dangerous
cities as training grounds for
our military, National Guard, but
military.
>> We've asked six of the world's
preeminent scholars how we can measure
the make of an autocrat.
It's a recipe of sorts, tried and tested
by the most infamous leaders in history.
>> Hugo Chavez in Venezuela.
>> Vladimir Putin in Russia.
>> Joseph [music] Stalin and Adolf Hitler.
>> Viktor Orbán in Hungary.
>> He's basically bulletproof in terms of
criminal prosecution.
>> Join us from December 29 as we explore
Trump, The Making of an Autocrat from
The Conversation.
>> Matt, what is the mood like in Russia
right now?
How much do we know?
>> Well, I think people are heartily sick
of the war. It's now estimated that
about 1 in 25 Russians will know someone
who has been killed in the war and
something like 1 and 1/2 million to
well, possibly even more than that have
been either killed or injured in this
war. So, I
I don't think it's a popular thing at
all in Russia. The question is then,
well, what do you do about it if
anything?
And Russians typically when the
government does things they don't agree
with, simply go into apathy mode. If you
ask Russians what they think about the
special military operation, they just
say they have no opinion or they try to
stay out of politics, so don't really
have a view. And look, partly that's
self-preservation instinct because if
you hold up a white piece of paper
outside of Moscow metro station, you can
potentially be jailed for 10 to 15
years. So, there are very, very heavy
penalties that come with protesting in
any way against the war and it's
something that the central government
has continued to tighten the screws on.
Whereas the Ukrainian strategy may be
effective on one level in getting into
the minds of everyday Russians, whether
or not that actually transfers to
political pressure with the exception of
the economic damage is something I guess
we'll have to wait and see.
>> We've read a lot about these military
bloggers during the war. Is pressure
starting to ramp up from that circle?
>> Yeah, Russia's mill bloggers are
supposed to sort of a
a pressure release valve for those
either in the military or connected to
the military. And for a long time,
they've been saying that the war has
been going very badly.
But interestingly enough, they've have
tended to side much more with a more
aggressive approach by the Russian
military. They say Putin's been too
soft, that he should be the basically
carpet bombing Kiev uh to cow the
Ukrainians into submission.
Um so, you know, this is certainly not a
sort of end the war movement. There are
some who say that the war needs to come
to a close and that Russia needs to be
able to rearm so that it can do the job
properly. But generally speaking, the
mill bloggers are not very close to the
power center in the Kremlin.
>> And what about Putin's inner circle?
>> Russia's oligarchs have been putting
subtle pressure uh on the Kremlin for a
while, but of course they can't go too
far.
Uh and that is because Putin basically
did a deal with Russia's richest people
and that was that they could continue
making money and he wouldn't go after
them but they stayed out of politics and
that's often been the case. So there's
no real groundswell
of a real anti-war movement that people
or powerful Russians could coalesce
around and that's of course entirely by
Putin's design because he also plays a
revolving doors when it comes to people
who are favored within his inner circle.
There are those who will speak out. For
instance, the chief economist of one of
Russia's biggest banks recently said
that Russia is losing the war with the
West but also losing competition with
China, economic competition and losing
the competition with Ukraine as well
and for that he was fired. So again, you
can speak out but there are
consequences. There's one political
party called Yabloko which means apple
in Russian. It's been around for forever
since basically the emergence of the
Russian Federation and that's the only
really anti-war party and it's been
precluded from running in elections.
It's also had its members arrested,
labeled as foreign agents which has a
particularly pejorative meaning in
Russia and also been imprisoned for some
length of time. So the state has many
many levers it can pull to get people if
not singing from the government's song
sheet then at the very least saying
nothing.
>> How bad is the economy right now and
could things change if
the economy really does take a a major
hit?
>> Yeah, I think that the mistake we often
make
is assuming that the types of economic
pressure that would affect us and would
change our behavior would change
behavior in in Russia, and that's often
not the case.
Uh and the Russian economy has an also
nasty habit of being able to keep
ticking along. It is true, I think, that
having a war economy for a significant
period of time, and of course, after the
full-scale invasion in February 2022,
Russia's war in Ukraine has now gone on
longer than World War I. Having a war
economy for that long does put
significant pressure
uh on things like consumer spending,
particularly on things like jobs, which
have started to dry up, and overall
Russian economic activity is declined
significantly, along with inflation
going up, which is the breeding ground,
of course, for stagflation. And that
means real problems for the economy. So,
I think a combination of those things,
plus Western sanctions, partly effective
though they are, uh having an impact on
Russia. So much so that it can't
continue its war in Ukraine
indefinitely,
and at some point will need to find a
face-saving way out. The problem with
that, of course, is there's no sign from
Putin yet that he's prepared to consider
that option.
>> So, with all of this in mind, do you
think Putin is at all vulnerable?
>> I mean, I've said for a little while
that I think it is the beginning of the
end for Vladimir Putin, but that may be
a very long time coming. Essentially,
Putin really, I don't think,
can see any way of leaving power
unless it's in a box or out a window.
So, that means either revolution from uh
his inner circle, which is kind of
unlikely,
um or revolution from below, from the
people. And that's also unlikely given
all the constraints they have and all
the potential things the government can
do to make their lives miserable.
Um I don't think the situation with the
Russian economy is going to be
salvageable over the short term,
uh or even over the medium term, and
that will continue to cause real
problems for the Russian government. So,
it may be that we will reach a situation
where either Putin dies in office, or
there is some kind of palace coup. Um
but the risks of doing so you're toying
with your life. So, things have to get
pretty bad, and I suspect things will
have to get worse before there's any
real change. Mind you, if there is
change, it will happen very, very
quickly, and virtually no one will have
predicted it.
>> So, why does he push on in Ukraine with
all of this going on, with the economy
faltering,
with public opinion against the war, and
the negative views back at home? Why
continue? What's his mindset at this
point?
>> Well, I think he still thinks he's going
to win.
Um Putin's raison d'être, if you like,
is to communicate to others that he has
the higher risk threshold. Um that it
doesn't matter what adversaries do to
him, he will stay in the game.
That doesn't mean he hasn't backed out
in the past when it's been, you know,
sort of fairly obvious that he's been
losing, but I think he really has staked
his legacy on this invasion of Ukraine,
and that's something that's really hard
for him would be really hard for him
personally to back away from, uh but
also in terms of his view about his
political longevity and his place in
Russia's history books.
He's given no sign that he [music] wants
an off-ramp, but the pressures that will
build on him to seek one will continue
to grow.
Uh so, it is not beyond
the realm of possibility that Putin
within the next year or so decides to
seek an [music] end to the conflict.
There are whispers that privately there
have been some contact between the
Russians and the Americans to say that
we you know we'd like to find a way out.
But ultimately if Putin [music] isn't
prepared to compromise and it'll take
some time before it gets to that place
and he'll have to weigh the risks in
doing so. It's basically very much
dependent on him. As [music] President
Volodymyr Zelenskyy says
the war could be over tomorrow if Putin
pulls the troops home.
>> Matt, thanks for your time today. It's
been really great getting your insights
on all of this.
>> Thanks very much for having me Justin.
>> That's it [music] for this week's
episode of the conversation weekly. You
can read more expert analysis of the
Russia-Ukraine war from Matthew Sussex
[music]
at the conversation.com.
We'll also put a link in the show notes.
This week's episode was written by me
Justin Bergman.
>> [music]
>> Isabella Podwinski was the executive
producer. Sound mixing is by Lloyd
Barrett and our theme music is by Nita
[music] Sarol.
Gemma Ware is head of audio. Ashley
McGee is head of editorial innovation
and Misha Ketchell [music] and Stephen
Khan are our editors in chief. The
conversation is a non-profit news outlet
dedicated [music] to sharing the work of
academic experts with a wider audience.
If you like what we do, please support
[music] us at
donate.theconversation.com.
Thanks for listening.
>> [music]