How To Increase Your Testosterone Levels Naturally | Derek from MPMD

There's an array of things that are supported critically by testosterone. >> I often hear from many people about testosterone levels being lower now in men than they have ever been. >> Is there a trend downwards? I would say yes. >> What are some of the major contributors? >> Pollution, I think, is a big factor to be chronically dealing with a toxic environment will inhibit broad systems. If their libido is like totally down, if they're having a harder time losing fat, gaining muscle, losing fat, it could come down to this, right? >> Bone integrity. Almost >> bone integrity, right? So, your top four supplements for testosterone would be >> zinc, magnesium, vitamin D. Not in order, just the top three, I would say. And then, >> who should consider hormone replacement therapy? Um, in general, I think >> I'm sitting here with Derek from More Plates, More Dates. You may know him from his very large YouTube channel where he talks about all sorts of things. Um, hormones, exercise, training. I became sort of aware of your work because you were on our mutual friends podcast, Peter Aia, a couple of times. super interested in, you know, your own personal experience, but you also run a company that's a preventative health company that helps people optimize their hormones, among other things. And so, I mean, I'm excited to have a conversation with you. You've got a lot of this experience, you know, personal experience, but also experience just running this company where people are coming to your company to help optimize their hormones. And so, um, it's a a little bit of a different episode here. As you guys know, I cite everything on the podcast and so I'm excited to kind of dive in and talk about all things hormones with you, uh, Derek. So, thanks for coming on the show. >> Thanks for having me. Really appreciate the invite. >> Um, I'd love to kind of start. I want to talk about testosterone as you know, you know, kind of discussed this earlier. Um, you're very knowledgeable in this area. In fact, we had a conversation and I was asking you some questions and uh your knowledge was very impressive in terms of um the scope and and depth. >> So, >> all things testosterone kind of just wanted to start with the role of testosterone in men. I mean, it's obviously fundamental for male health, but I'd love if you could kind of just outline some of the primary functions of testosterone in men. Yeah, I think at a basic level it is the primary anabolic hormone men rely on for the sustainment or growth of muscle tissue. Um bone health, bone integrity, inhibiting degradation um indirectly through some of those pathways as well like insulin sensitivity. If you have worsened body composition, it becomes more difficult to handle glucose adequately. Um, neurological health or the aromatization um in the actual tissues themselves. Um, there's an array of things that are supported critically by testosterone and its indirect metabolite uh activity as well through its aromatization to estrogen. And I guess notably, but often overlooked, it's easy to forget, but in adolescence, the five alpha reduction to DHT, so the conversion of testosterone to DHT is um necessary for full maturation, sexual differentiation to basically reach full adult male maturity. And there's a myriad of examples where if DHT is either uh too low via genetic predispositions or through different means then there is inhibited maturation and that's where you get into some of these more uh unique interex cases. But essentially at a base level this is the primary male all but significantly impactful in females as well hormone that is present at about 10x the concentrations in males and kind of differentiates them in terms of uh sexual identity and male characteristics. I I do we are going to focus a lot on the role of testosterone in in in males and men but I do kind of just briefly before we will eventually talk about females and women but what what is the major role of testosterone in women? I mean women obviously don't make as much as men >> but they do make testosterone and it does play a functional role. >> Yeah. Yeah. And like again it's a non-exhaustive list that I just presented like the list extends beyond into ariththropoesis the production of red blood cells intrasticular testosterone production absolutely critical for fertility as well. Um and women all but not directly analogous introatalie but elsewhere in the body the activity of testosterone is still necessary for a lot of the same things. cognitive health, um some level of cardiovascular support, bone integrity as anabolic activity and muscle tissue, all of the same stuff is still the case in women, just to a much lower magnitude. So, but similar as you would expect, there's less of a concentration required to sustain a female musculature than a male. So, the concentration differential is about 10x. But in women the main function of testosterone still overlaps with males but intrainatal it is more to facilitate as a substrate of estrogen production. So getting that sufficient amount of aromatization into uh uh estradi but also the conversion into estrone which then turns into estradile as well to facilitate all of the uh female fertility facilitated processes. So given the role of testosterone in all these important physiological processes that you just described, everything from muscle health, bone health, neurological health, red cell production, um, etc. What about trade-offs of testosterone? And I mentioned this because of my interest in longevity, my long interest in, you know, life expectancy and looking at, you know, life expectancy between men and women. And you really see amongst like pretty much all mammal species that the females outlive the males. Obviously, there's a lot of differences going on there, but testosterone is al something that does, you know, differentiate. There's a big difference between the levels of testosterone between males and females. So, I'm kind of curious. I know you you think about a lot of these things and so I'm curious what your thoughts are with respect to the tradeoffs of testosterone with respect to longevity. I think it would be highly speculative because obviously I would love to just point to some clear-cut literature that says based on these studies on you know inhibiting IGF-1 or having really low uh androgen levels equals lower body weights equals longer lifespan or something to that effect that could be a common kind of denominator but it's not as cut and dry. I do think there is some level of metabolic uh resource demand that is needed to actually support the infrastructure of a male that is more intensive than a female. So I would in general like larger humans are going to die quicker than smaller ones at least from what I've seen trendwise. And in supporting that it is something that requires more hormone production in general which is also more uh intensive on all organ systems accordingly to actually facilitate and get that hormone production to the level it needs to to sustain that larger human. So that's a highly speculative take on it, but that would be part of the reason, but obvious at a high level if you wanted to extrapolate to, you know, at higher levels, androgens will be neurotoxic in a dose dependent manner past supra levels. Um, it will cause uh cardiac remodeling in a negative manner. Like all of the dysipidemia, all of the negatives that you would hear about when it comes to anabolic steroid use to some extent at supra levels are going to be present from testosterone all but to a more muted extent because it's not a synthetic drug that is manipulated in a lab to create, you know, something that is not a substrate for aromatization and some of the other stuff that is protective. But that's a highle speculative take. Yeah, I mean the it's kind of a loaded question because there's probably a lot of factors that play here in terms of like the differences in life expectancy between males and females and you're pointing out the size difference is one one you know maybe it's the lack of estrogen right not the presence of testosterone but not lack of estrogen obviously men make estrogen but not to the same degree as women um premenopausal women but have you have you looked at any of that literature are you aware of it the like the male castradi Like so the the men that are like >> yeah castrated like >> they are osteoporotic as a consequence of a lack of sufficient aromatization into estrogen and their growth plates the epithesial growth plates don't close fully because of that lack of aromatization in adolescence which is facilitated essentially entirely by testosterone as a substrate similar to what it is in women. But if you castrate a male in adolescence and he no longer has intraticularicular testosterone production, he is now functioning off of solely adrenal production, which is like a drop in the bucket to what you actually need to function at a high level. Like you're not going to have sufficient bone development and you are going to suffer from osteoporosis inevitably. And if those those who don't know what the castradi are, it's really interesting. So it's individuals who were had angelic singing voices. And I'm not sure where the last who the last documented one was, but it was actually more recent than many would probably think. It's like within the last 100 to 200 years. But anyways, you can listen to them on YouTube singing and some of these old audios that were recorded. And it's, you know, a youthful angelic singing voice that comes across as somewhat in like androgynous to some extent. And obviously going through male puberty and being subjected to male amounts of testosterone and DHT would, you know, like quote unquote wreck that voice because it's going to be masculineized and get like fully, you know, the deepening that would happen that's irreversible. So the castradi were individuals that were castrated in order to prevent them literally from going through puberty adequately. So they would actually grow into men without the full maturation that would come from androgen exposure and adolescence. And as a result, you know, they would have a lack of adequate sexual differentiation maturation and their bones would reflect that as well via the osteoporotic outcomes they underwent. Did you um happen to see that their life expectancy was increased though compared to I mean so I mean it's like you're you're living longer but not necessarily the quality of life is >> notably though their estrogen levels are in the ground. say you saying a second ago about the estrogen, >> right? So maybe I don't know. It's it's interesting like what is it, you know? >> Well, it's definitely lower capacity to build muscle and bone which is less resource intensive and you're a smaller human. So maybe as a result you are literally a walking I don't know like shell of a man essentially. So you don't require as much to sustain but your quality of life is dramatically hindered, >> right? Yeah. So you live longer, but you don't necessarily want to, right? >> Um, yeah. So that's kind of interesting. I just kind of want to get your perspective on that. So, um, I'd love to kind of dive into an area that I know you have a lot of knowledge, you know, just based off of your your company, Merrick Health, where you guys are really helping people optimize their hormone levels. And so I kind of want to talk a little bit about some of the best practices for measuring testosterone, interpreting the results. Um, could you kind of outline some of the optimal best practices for actually measuring testosterone levels? So, you know, optimal timing, repeated measures like free testosterone versus um bound testosterone or total testosterone, right? Like what's the difference here? What what do people what should they like consider? Mhm. So total testosterone is the number that most people are familiar with which reflects the total production that can be detected in your sample of blood that was taken. So floating around how much testosterone is there inclusive of the testosterone bound to binding proteins. So just because it's in your blood though it doesn't mean it's biologically active. If it's bound to these binding proteins produced by the liver, it could be either uh entirely inactive or like readily available to be dissociated but not yet fully active as well. So you have you know SHBG is the primary one sex hormone binding globulin produced by the liver. This acts as a regulator of androgenicity in the body which is like how much androgen exposure systemically you would be exposed to. And the body has this kind of regulating mechanism to partly to make sure that you know females stay feminine, males stay male and regulate which tissues get which hormones when and transported around the body cuz these are um hydro uh phobic like they're fat soluble and would not go through uh the blood to where you want them without some sort of carrier. So they have a um hydrophilic vehicle similar to like how cholesterol would get moved around through its you know apo particles and whatnot. Um and these binding proteins SHBG and albumin comprise the vast majority of testosterone. Um I think SHBG is about 60% of your total tea will be bound by SHBG and then like 38% is albumin and then 2% to 3% roughly depending on how much SHPG produced and some other factors is actually free testosterone. So the free testosterone number is just like freely circulating, not bound to binding proteins, and it's like ready and readily available to be used by target tissues um should it bind to the androgen receptor and cause the transcriptional activity. But in general, the two numbers you care about the most are going to be the total testosterone, which is like total production reflection. So like how much are you actually capable of making, which is important. And a lot of people will just say just look at your free cuz that's like the number that matters cuz that's what's actually available to use. And that's true, but it still doesn't reflect total production capacity which is important to assess the viability of the organ response to the pituitary output a myriad of things. So total testosterone total production including that bound to binding proteins influenced by liver health diet bunch of different factors free testosterone about 2 to 3% in an optimally healthy male typically that is just freely available to be used and then as far as um measurement kind of like best practices typically in the morning is the best testosterone is kind of it's like a pulsatile secretion fashion. So you would see in a dial rhythm chart showing the secretions of testosterone throughout the day, it kind of pulses out in waves. So you would have like the biggest pulse early in the morning and then it kind of like goes ac and flows throughout the day until it reaches its uh low point later at night and then as you sleep it starts to ramp back up again. So typically the best way to assess peak levels would be early in the morning and ideally you would have um not taken certain confounding variable supplements like biotin that can cross detect is you know estrogens and whatnot. And typically labs will provide kind of like a a guideline of what not to do. But in general the r rule of thumb is you know go in fasted early in the morning. Avoid uh your multivitamin probably if has biotin in it or biotin containing supplements. And uh be hydrated to reflect your actual uh hematology profile correctly cuz some people incorrectly think they have a elevated you know hematocrit level when in reality they're just super dehydrated when they go in because they just got up rolled out of bed and are you know dehydrated from hours of sleeping and you know not hydrating properly when they wake up and they just roll in and think that oh I'm gonna have a heart attack and then I got to donate blood now which might not be the case. So, I know that's a a mouthful, but early in the morning and ideally, you would get a repeat measurement before you make any sort of especially before you make any sort of choices on uh path forward because you definitely want to get confirmation if you have a low reading or even one that's like mildly concerning cuz again, these things can be so variable depending on so many factors that you might have a blip where it's a snapshot in time of your blood. you see, you know, a 495 total tea. And you think, well, that's not great. It should be closer to a,000. That's what I hear is good in, you know, all these podcasts and whatnot. That's what my friends are at. They're at 900. Like, I only have 495. I should have way more than that. And some people haphazardly get on testosterone. Shockingly, but it happens. And there are a lot of clinics that will tell you like, "Oh, yeah, you could get that up. Let's get this up to, you know, 900." And that's all they need to give, you know, to justify it to themselves. Um, so yeah, you definitely don't want to go off of one reading. You want to go off of symptoms and repeat measurement to confirm your findings before you even decide what the path forward is for natural interventions and assessment of what is happening at the organ level and at the hypothalamic pituitary level. So, you sort of alluded to this, but like talking about reference ranges, and I kind of want to get into that because like, you know, there are these like reference ranges that you see, and I'm just kind of like curious like how does a man navigate where their testosterone should be, what the reference ranges mean? How do you look at this? you how does like you know how do how does your company look at this in respect to uh with respect to age with respect to like symptoms. Let's say someone's on the lower end of the reference range, but they have no symptoms. Or someone's at the higher end of the range, but they have symptoms. Like, how does one sort of interpret what their testosterone data shows? And um how does the potential for someone who's actually hypogonatal, so people that are actually not making testosterone, right? >> How does that sort of complicate it? Um, in general, I think, um, it does get convoluted because people will see a reference range and assume, and understandably so, like there's a lot of things that people will just say, "Oh, target the top of the reference range. This is where you should be." And in general, that's not a bad recommendation. Often for things that modulate quality of life related outcomes, you know, like even when we talk about vitamin D, it's like, you know, you should probably be at like 60 even though the low end is like 30. Typically, if you were at 40, people would be like, you know, try and bump that up to 50 or 60. With testosterone, people think similarly, and justifiably so sometimes, but often what is overlooked is the fact that the actual androgen receptor content, which is like how many androgen receptors you have in like a concentrated area or also the sensitivity of it, like what kind of transcriptional activity do you get subsequent to binding? Those things all factor into like how much of an impact the androgen has after binding to the receptor. So just because you have less testosterone than the next guy, it doesn't necessarily even mean that you have less muscle growth potential or less, you know, you know, bone support capacity or less uh neurological support. Like it's not guaranteed any of these things based on absolute values. It should be a combination of symptoms as well as uh blood values. But often times too, the blood values should be superseded by symptoms in some cases too because you'll have some individuals who have insensitivity at the AR. So it's not just about how sensitive are you and can you get away with lower testosterone. Some guys need higher testosterone to be able to actually function well. And they might otherwise be told, oh, you know, you don't need testosterone. Your total testosterone is 900. But they might have a, you know, super high sex hormone binding globbulin that's gobbing it all up and they have a low free testosterone or their actual receptor activity after binding is like subpar or they have a, you know, gene mutation that inhibits the actual activity of it. And that's where you get into some of these convoluted cases with like you know the Olympic boxer and like we're not going to go down that road but some of these individuals who like you know there's a spectrum of androgenic activity that is influenced not just by the total levels on paper but it is very much dictated by your actual response to the hormone too. C is that something that's measured readily like can you measure your response to your androgen receptor activity? Is that or is that something that's not really known and you kind of have to do some >> There are like proxies for it. Um in general it's very uh crude the way they assess if you are one of the individuals on this like spectrum of androgen insensitivity. It's literally like manual assessment essentially of like your gonatal development which is like kind of uh you know demeaning potentially if you're somebody who is like already obviously insecure about what's happening and then you're just subjected to some sort of like subjective analysis of like an expert who determines if you've had sufficient enough like male sexual secondary characteristic development. But in general there are proxies for activity. And you know if you're somebody who has like if you if you looked at blood work for example some individuals think oh the guy with a natural like 1300 total tea that's probably great that guy is like an outlier genetic phenom. Often times it's a reflection of some sort of problem like they need to produce more to reach adequate activity. So like sometimes the body is screaming at the testes because it's not getting adequate production to do what it needs to do and it's resulting in you shooting out more gonadotropins to make more testosterone. So typically you will see this reflected in some sort of symptom either through actual development in adolescence being not adequate or through biomarkers it becomes pretty clear because you there will be other factors that are clearly outlier uh oddities in blood work when you see somebody who is not responding adequately. What will you mentioned the gonut tropins like what would like the lutein lutein lutin luteinizing hormone or follical stimulating hormone f what would those kind of look like in in the cases where it's kind of like a a red flag I mean is >> like these are very outlier scenarios that I'd be deviating into where people are like you know overshooting to try and meet some sort of physiologic activity like most guys are going to be falling into the bucket of they have low gonadotropens or low response respon to it from age related decline. That's more of like you know what most people will find relevant. So I'll start there. Um in general the thing you would be looking to first is okay like what are your levels your total and your free levels? Are they do they look good? Do you have any symptoms? And let's just say you do have symptoms and you're looking at these numbers and they look you know okay. At that point you would be looking um the actual output from the pituitary is going to be dictating what the signal to your testes is to actually produce testosterone. So the LH from the pituitary signals to the light cells to make the intrasticular testosterone. So is that signal adequate is one thing to assess and that has a clinical reference range. Um but also individuals who are primary hypoganatal uh similar to what we talked about when it comes to assessing you know when women are hitting menopause like what kind of would you look to in men if you are not responding and producing adequate testosterone at in the testes like you will be trying to make more luteinizing hormone typically to try and push that signal. So it's your body's going to recognize I'm not getting enough testosterone out of this LH that I'm making. So, the signal isn't sufficient. I'm not getting enough testosterone and or enough estrogen from that to provide the negative feedback that tells me to stop making G&RH and the other the pituitary hormones. So, I would just it would just keep shooting and trying to like probably overshoot you into adequate territory. So you would if you're primary hypogonatal you would see the reflection typically of high gonadotropens um or you would also see some sort of like structural defects and that's where you would get into like you know ultrasounding for I think the prevalence in males is like 15% of males have a varicus seal. I don't know if you know what that is but it's like varicose veins in your testes essentially and it looks like like twisted kind of like the same thing you would see in varicose veins in your legs. that's like in the side of like the testes and it uh inhibits thermmore regulation and significantly impedes testosterone production locally and fertility. So that often times well 15% of men from what I recall is the number for prevalence. Pretty significant though for something a lot of people don't know exists. And if you are, you know, doing all the lifestyle stuff and it's not working and you think you're doing everything correctly and you must need testosterone, sometimes it can be overlooked that there are structural defects. So like typically the first thing you would look to is like am I capable at the organ of responding to the signal and like is the signal adequate to begin with? Because if there's like a primary hypoganatal outcome, it would be some sort of like structural response problem in the testes themselves. If that's not an issue and you've ruled out all structural problems, you know, age related decline and is not a factor and you're, you know, otherwise, you know, everything's all accounted for from that angle, you would look upstream to the pituitary and it's like, okay, well, at that point, am I producing enough LH and FSH? And this is typically the outcome you would see in men uh not always, but like a lot of men who are kind of like not sure if they need testosterone, they'll have like a relative proportional inadequate signaling driven through a myriad of factors including but not limited to lifestyle, some age related decline, toxins, exposures, a myriad of things. And that's kind of like where people have this uh opportunity to try and incrementally maximize all the areas in their life to try and improve the output. Because if you have sufficient functioning organs and your output is just insufficient, you might be able to get that up to snuff to where you need it just by getting leaner, losing body fat, fixing your diet, addressing micronutrient deficiencies, um quitting smoking, not drinking anymore, fixing your sleep, you know, all the smorgesborg of uh things. >> Yeah, we're going to that we're going to get into a little bit, but okay. Um, what about the sexbinding globul globbulin hormone? SBGH >> SHBG sex hormone binding globulin. >> Sex hormone binding globbulin. Um, what about the sex hormone binding globulin? Like you're talking about like if if you have a lot if you have a high level of that and it's bound up to your testosterone. Um, so couple couple of questions here. what regulates those levels and what regulates like how much of that testosterone can then get away from that, you know, binding protein and then be used to, you know, obviously exert hormonal activity. So, you know, h can you can you like dial in looking at just that binding protein itself to help kind of solve some issues? Yeah. And it gets really complicated in this regard because what a lot of people don't address is so DHT dihydrotestosterone mentioned earlier how it's like the primary hormone that will determine if you reach full maturity in adolescence. Like you will still be markedly male probably if you have adequate testosterone production but you won't get full maturation if you have you know zero DHT from a defect in the enzyme that encodes for five alpha reductase or something. But that hormone, the most androgenic hormone in the body that essentially determines if you fully masculineize or not, where you end up, you know, with a micro penis, that has a much higher binding affinity for SHPG than testosterone does. And then testosterone has a much higher binding affinity for SHPG than estrogen does. So even though on paper we're talking about the importance of free test versus total test which is very important also very important which most people aren't going to test in their blood is the DHT level that males will rely on through adolescence and to some extent in adulthood potentially depending on their test levels that is going to get gobbed up even more proportionally by SHBG. So if you have high SHPG, not only is your free test potentially inadequate despite adequate testosterone production, proportionally your free DHT, which is like the main androgenic hormone is like way more gobbed up. And this gets really rough in females because they a lot of them are using things like combined oral contraceptives which crank SHBG through the roof through the liver uh interaction with the oral combined oral contraceptive pills. Depending on which drug they're using in general, ethanol estradile plus some progesterine depending on how androgenic the progesterine is. It'll depend on how much the SHPG goes up. But you'll see in uh adolescent women or women who are you know in full adulthood that are taking combined oral contraceptives their total testosterone will suppress upwards of 50 to 60% and free testosterone upwards of like 70 to 80%. So they're walking around like borderline asexual castrated by a pill essentially >> and that's only with oral. >> That's with oral but like any sort of progesterine that is synthetic will have negative feedback to some degree. all but much lesser so via a localized IUD releasing a levonorest or something and you're not having to take that supporting estrog estradiol that comes compounded into it. So it depends on the format but a lot of girls are still using the combined pill. So it's just worth noting nonetheless that when these SHBG levels are skyrocketed or even like high on you know a clinical reference range if you are somebody who is like moderate you know tea production or low normal or whatever like the proportional hit to your DHT getting gobbed up could be like the differential between you being symptomatic versus not as well as your free tea even though it's proportionally less gobbed up the DHT T could be like nuked entirely essentially via the SHPG levels being high. >> Since we're talking about the SP spghGH levels, I kind of want to like what is there lifestyle? So, does age regulate that and and also like lifestyle factors? >> Yeah. So, like a common thing that people hear is when you hit 30 years old, your total testosterone will decline by 1% per year. But the reality of what makes this even worse is your SHBG levels will increase year-over-year proportionally faster, thus making the velocity of free testosterone decreases dramatically more so proportionally. So even though total test decreases by 1% a year, your free test will decrease by up to 2% per year. And that's the one that you need to like do stuff in the body through like freely circulating activity. So, it's very important and very relevant for dictating what activity you have in different tissues in the body because it's ultimately the only one that can actually bind to the receptor and do what it's supposed to do. So, the SHPG levels will be dictated by age, will be dictated by liver health to some extent, will be dictated by other medications, especially oral formulations. Um, insulenic signaling as well hugely implicated. If you're on a ketogenic diet, you can absolutely expect your SHBG levels to be through the roof and your free test to be much lower. So carnivore diet guys, there's a reason they eat fruit now. It's because their free test levels are all [ __ ] and their total test levels were high and they thought it was fine. But in reality, they had like borderline hypoganatal free test levels often because they were overlooking the fact that insulenic signaling is needed to actually get SHBG to a meaningfully reasonable level for a male. >> So, and this is also something that would be relevant for females too, right? >> Yeah. And these binding proteins also exist for other hormones in the body cuz they all function in similar ways through cargo systems and transport mechanisms in the body. Like you will have binding proteins for IGF-1, you'll have binding proteins for thyroid hormones. Like it's not uncommon to see people with like normal on paper levels for certain hormones, but then when you dig deeper, all the free hormones are like proportionally horrible because they're all bound like the the total production looks okay, but it's cuz it's factoring in all these like bound up hormones that are in use like unusable essentially. >> Is that something that's common? Like I mean would you say that's >> uh it depends on the person and lifestyle. So, but yeah, probably especially among women cuz I you know a lot of them are you you only have so much androgens to work with to begin with like your production is you know a tenth of males typically and then if you are occupying all of your androgens because you know essentially the SHBG is going to with a much higher binding affinity mop up all your DHT and testosterone not all of it but like a significant amount of it if it's high in any like higher than it should be like it will impact your like free androgenic signaling so significantly that might put you into like the you know female hypoganatal equivalent territory essentially. So you could be like it's not uncommon for girls to walk around borderline asexual or like literally no drive throughout their entire adolescence 20s30s and think it's normal and it's just not what they're supposed to be walking around like. So, in other words, like if they have if their libido is like totally down, perhaps like they're having a harder time losing fat, gaining muscle, losing fat. Um, it might it could come down to this, right? >> Bone integrity. All >> bone integrity, right? Yeah. So, that sounds like >> less a bit lesser. So depending on if they're on like obviously you know if you're on a combined roll contraceptive pill that has estrogen in it you know however much it does that to what dose you know you can get into the nuance but ultimately like you're inhibiting natural hormone production quite dramatically through a myriad of means like think about guys who are just like natural having to deal with what they deal with as is you know the sleep impact the cortisol impacts the fat impact of being you know obese and then if you have women who deal with all those same problems you're going to have all the the suppressive results of all of those lifestyle things, the diet, the nutrition, the whatever. And then you also factor in medications on top of that too that maybe men don't typically have to take to, you know, achieve contraception. Like, you know, that's typically like often I think the final blow that will like push women into like, you know, closer to low drive territory often and almost certainly lower quality of life for a lot of them. Now, that's not to say, because I think this gets misconstrued often, is that's not to say don't use contraceptives at all. Like, there are absolutely better ways to go about it. I'm just giving examples that I see as common place. >> No, no, it's this is great. This is great information. Um, you know, since we're kind of talking a little bit about symptoms, let's kind of circle back to talking about like what are the symptoms of low testosterone? You know, we're talking about men here, but like we talked about libido, muscle mass, like what are what are like the classic symptoms that men should be looking out for? Is it something that's hard to differentiate between okay, this is testosterone or other things? It does get tough because as you would imagine a lot of the lifestyle related things that lead to low testosterone will come with the decrement to quality of life just via you know if you have poor sleep like you're not going to feel great because you didn't rest enough and then you add that on top of the inhibition of you know your output of ginadotropins pituitary hormones and response to them as well like it's like a one-two punch off in a lot of this stuff. So, in general, I would look to things like libido, um, erection quality. Obviously, that's more, you know, circulatory often, but still notable nonetheless. If you suddenly, you know, if you don't have morning wood anymore, like you got to look into it regardless if it's circulatory or hormone mediated. Might be a combination of both. Um, you no longer are able to hold muscle as easily or build muscle as easily. you're, you know, losing strength in the gym, your recovery capacity is inhibited relative to what it was when you were younger. um mood dysregulation, um irritability and these are all like really general vague symptoms and I would love to just say oh look at you know the this exact thing will happen but in reality it's often a constellation of things that comes as a vicious circle effect of the you know factors that led to that deterioration of testosterone to begin with or if you were just you know never had reasonable testosterone to begin you would have probably not gone through puberty adequately to begin with. So like the genetic factors like some of these like more outlier cases become a bit more obvious because it's like you just never really like fully masculineized in adolescence. You might have a higher voice. You know you a lot of those things but are less relevant for the average person. For the average person it's going to be more of these general symptoms and it's warranted to get a test at that point and just see what's up, >> right? Yeah. So then that in combination with the test and the things that we just talked about is kind of like where >> you know like pre-diabetic you know progressing towards you know pre-diabetes um insulin resistance a lot of this stuff is going to be ultimately determined by blood work though because a lot of people aren't going to be able to identify this autonomously reliably. So that's kind of where I'd point to the more vague stuff like the quality of life. Like do you notice a blatant deterioration with no other factors changed, erection quality, you know, libido, uh vigor, muscle mass, strength, fat, body composition, stuff like that. >> So you mentioned the the by age 30 total testosterone decreases by about 1% per year. And then you mentioned even >> in general >> in general, right? Right. On average like Yeah. Exactly. There's and that's where I ask >> I've absolutely seen 70 year olds with you know 900 total te's. >> So so the the question is then like there there are lifestyle factors that really can sort of modulate that you know general decrease or not. So maybe you can accelerate it or maybe can slow it, right? And I kind of want to dive into some of that those those lifestyle factors like what should men avoid or try to minimize in terms of their environmental exposure or lifestyle factors that are known to accelerate the decline in testosterone and or increase the binding protein so there's less free testosterone, right? anything that's going to necessarily um regulate the ability of testosterone to exert its, you know, its function essentially. >> Mhm. Um I would love to bang out an exhaustive list, but forgive me, I guarantee we'll miss something, but like alcohol, you know, the direct toxicity effects of that um does inhibit actual uh steroidenesis in the testicles themselves. It will also impact sleep dramatically which has the vicious backhand effect of you know inhibited uh output of signaling hormones which indirectly will also impact body composition which you know the whole downstream cascade of that. Um smoking obviously not helpful. Um >> how much alcohol is it? Is it like any amount or like light drinking moderate drinking? I think it like obviously the safe answer for me is to say no drinking. I think it would be more like a dose dependent toxicity effect and what is your capacity to handle it because ultimately the testes are very uh affected by oxidative stress and if you're not capable of handling that adequately like it will reflect in your inadequate output of hormones locally. So, I would love to give like hard and fast numbers, but there are a lot of people who will be able to get away with like murder and probably be okay. There are some guys who like you might be low normal uh function to begin with and like that, you know, couple drinks a week like, you know, throws off your sleep a bit and kind of pushes you over the edge. Like it all depends. Um it is very much a spectrum. So, like going from like optimal to like blatantly hypoganatal from a symptom perspective, it's not like it's just on verse off. like your way there is a you know it's it's transition of you know shittiness as you arrive to that like worst case scenario. Um so uh other things I could point to um if you have a totally fat deficient diet I think that's you know of a macro distribution that would be reflective of something that's almost certainly going to hinder your capacity to produce hormones. Um, also if you have a void of carbohydrate intake diet, it would also be something that would inhibit freely circulating hormones from liberating themselves. Um, and lack of protein like you would not be able to produce, you know, get as robust of a response recovering from workouts and be able to build muscle, which indirectly is going to improve body composition and improve your hormones as well. So, it's all kind of like balanced diet, don't eat bad. Um, micronutrient intake. I could definitely point to if you're deficient and not every mineral or vitamin is going to be, you know, gamechanging dramatic impact on your test levels, but things like zinc, magnesium, vitamin D, like these all have a marked impact on your testosterone either response to it or capacity to produce it or even like like you mentioned in our podcast, a conversion of vitamin D into active vitamin D. like you might think you have adequate vitamin D status via your dose you're taking that's super high but you're not actually utilizing it but you think you are and that's that's impacting your testosterone production and your response to it at the androgen receptor itself as well. So I think from a minerals and vitamin standpoint, the low hanging fruits are typically going to be like B vitamins, but in particular like from a mineral side, you know, you have uh you know, magnesium, zinc, and the vitamin D3 are going to be three things that specifically on top of the minerals and vitamins that everyone's familiar with from multivitamins and whatnot are more difficult to get in adequate doses. All but zinc is typically adequately in many multivitamins, but the magnesium in particular almost never is because of the weight of it. You would be having to take a multivitamin that's like eight to 10 capsules otherwise, which just nobody does. Um, and then the vitamin D, it's fat soluble. Typically, you're going to have it in like a soft gel or something, and it's not always going to be at the dose you need in the multivitamins. It's just worth noting. Um, so those are just some lowhanging fruits that are if you don't look to those as part of your micronutrient optimization strategy like you could be overlooking low hanging fruit that like is a deterioration of you know 100 plus nanogs per deciliter per deficient micro potentially depending on how severe the deficiency. Um, other things I could point to, being obese, like the worst one probably that I probably should have mentioned first, but is like so dramatically impactful on your uh negative feedback to the hypothalammic pituitary axis. So, by that I mean men who are obese and women, if you have uh a significant amount of fat, it is going to elevate your aromatization, which is, you know, your conversion of testosterone to estrogen. And this is more impactful in males because of how the brain gets signaled from estrogen, not testosterone directly as significantly. There's a bit of a nuance there, but in general, like you need adequate estrogen to tell your brain, okay, we're good. You don't need to make enough testo more testosterone because I have enough estrogen. Like that's kind of like the downstream cascade of these metabolite conversions is you produce testosterone in order to produce other things, too. And the estrogen is a very potent mediator of telling your brain we're good. And if you have a significantly elevated amount of estrogen being converted from your testosterone that you make because of how much fat you have, you are basically achieving the proportional increase in estrogen that is much higher than the amount of testosterone substrate that led to that conversion. So you have that signal telling your brain, okay, we're good. But the amount of testosterone you actually had to begin with was not good. So that's problematic. People who are obese have, you know, upwards of I would love to give hard and fast numbers, but it could be like significant like half of a reference range maybe, you know, the it could be the differential between you being, you know, the quality of life of you're fine versus you're blatantly in, you know, severe deficiency. And what else could I point to? Um >> what does weight loss do to to the to those levels? Like if you are someone that's obese and then you lose weight, does that bring you back? >> Yeah, as long as you are losing ideally like visceral fat and like overall fat loss is going to be very uh supporting of getting that ratio back into balance of your estrogen and the amount that's converted to estrogen, estradiol in particular. And once that balance is favorable because you are leaner, you will have a balanced amount of feedback to the brain that then regulates like the perfect homeostasis between okay, now we have adequate testosterone and estrogen. So you will actually notice more testosterone being produced because it realizes to get this signal that we deem adequate, we had to produce more testosterone to get that amount of estrogen. So there's a goldilock zone of course. You can't just, you know, become, you know, a malnourished uh, you know, low like bodybuilder shredded person and just continue to get this elevation in proportion. It's at some point you will end up essentially starving your body of the nutrients needed to actually support hormone production. But in general, you know, guys who are, you know, like 12, like 12 to 15% body fatish will find that they have a increase in testosterone dramatically relative to when they were obese. And it's like super significant and how much it will improve uh hormone status. So, and then the sleep. I think I might have already mentioned that. >> Yeah. What I definitely want to dive into some of the diet things in a minute, but I wanted to ask you about um a couple of things for with respect to maybe factors to avoid. Um what effect is like excessive endurance training have on testosterone? Because I thought I came across some literature where it was a negative effect and I wasn't sure like how robust. I think it is pretty dramatic pending it exceeds your capacity to recover. So that sounds like a weird way to answer the question, but like some people have a higher tolerance for stress and that's, you know, reliance on a bunch of different factors, but if you are somebody who is not fueling yourself correctly to handle that amount of endurance training, like you were, let's just say you're in a calorie deficit and you're trying to be like, I don't know, six-pack shredded for the summer and like look as good as possible, but also fuel your like endurance event efforts, like you're probably like not doing two you're not doing two birds one's don't stone like you're doing two things like inadequately almost certainly and malnourishing yourself and ending up in a state of hormone deficiency as a result probably like you see in studies all there are uh cases that you can point to of what happened to natural bodybuilders as they diet for a show and you can see in like as they start to get closer to stage ready which is like the most shredded basically any documented human gets essentially Okay, the requirement to get there is a state of malnourishment essentially. And at some point typically once you start to cross into that like you know singledigit body fat threshold you start to become so malnourished that you are inhibiting your actual capacity to produce hormones adequately. You almost enter into like you know preservation mode slash like hibernation or something and it's kind of just like save yourself. we're starving to death. Like, how do I stop everything metabolically taxing from happening? Let's shut down all systems. Nor do we have the substrate to actually produce these hormones to begin with. That's kind of what happens when you get like really really malnourished. And with endurance running, like I've seen guys out eat, you know, 5,000 plus calorie per day diets when they're doing like really intensive endurance activity. So if you are not fueling adequately and with the right fuel, micronutrient density, macro aotment, the uh how much of it is like carbs versus fat versus protein. Yeah, you could absolutely exercise yourself into a uh state of hypoganism easily. >> Um I kind of like >> I would I would caveat not easily. It's hard to train that hard, >> right? Yeah. No, it's definitely not easily. Like there's not a lot of people that are >> Yeah. Kudos to the people mentally strong enough to do that, I guess. Well, I I kind of think of the analogy here for women. It would be like when women are excessively endurance training and in a severe caloric deficit and they become a menoretic, right? >> So, they're essentially not ovulating anymore. And in fact, you mentioned like wanting to get shredded for the summer. Well, I actually in my 20s >> was was doing this very thing where I mean I was running like 10 miles a day >> and I was eating like carrots and hummus and that's it, you know? And it was like not fueling myself. No, like hardly any fat, you know, it was very like very sort of like low protein, you know, low-fat diet. >> Yeah. >> And I definitely got shreddedish, but like I became a benetic for several months, you know, where I just didn't get my period and I wasn't ovulating and so I had to add back the calories in the food. It was like and it took a while >> before my body kind of like re-calibrated. >> Yeah. Yeah, >> but I feel like that's kind of like the analogy that like women it is. It's like your body shuts down. It's like, okay, >> I'm not getting enough calories. >> Reproduction is not essential right now. Survival mode, right? Not reprod not reproductive like happy growth mode. It's like survival mode. >> And like some people might not even realize how significant of a deterioration in hormone production I'm talking about. Like to give context, men who are dieting for bodybuilding shows naturally, it is not uncommon to see the end result of a hormone profile on like the last week them to look more female on paper than like their girlfriend. Like that's how low their testosterone levels are. >> That's wild. That's wild. Um, just to kind of sum up the like factors to avoid, >> not always, but sometimes. Um, I wanted to get your opinion on endocrine disrupting chemicals like how how have you or has your um you know your company looked or seen anything or do you have any speculation into like what the scientific literature has shown in terms of them affecting hormone levels? >> Yeah, I think we're pretty convinced that there is an effect. It's just the magnitude at which you often see hyped up. I think maybe overexaggerated. There are low hanging fruit things to absolutely avoid like don't use, you know, plastic Tupperware and like heat it up and stuff like that. Try and use glass when you can. Um try and ensure you have like high quality air if possible. like pollution I think is a big factor for like your body's capacity to deal with stress and like the allocation of resources to be chronically dealing with a toxic environment will inhibit systemic like broad systems. um water quality, like if you could make sure you have like decent water, I think that'd be solid. But as far as like the actual magnitude of impact of those things for most people, I think is going to be relatively negligible in contrast to like the obesity, the diet, the exercise, the sleep quality, the uh potential uh carcinogens they might be exposing themselves to. you know, some of the lifestyle stuff is like way more important to be addressing as like the base infrastructure before you start thinking about like, oh, it must be my like shower that is like shooting chlorine at me, like it must be that or sure, get a shower filter, but like it's not going to be the game changer. I do think avoiding like the basics though, like you know, switch to glass where you can, don't use plastic water bottles, stuff like that. And there is blatant evidence showing interactions with estrogen receptors with some of these compounds as well as androgen receptors which in turn will impede the ability of the actual hormones you produce to bind to those receptors and do what it needs to do. So you're like essentially competing with yourself for activity in the body. like you're, you know, competing with these like uh even if they're like moot activity compounds, they still act as like anti-androgens or anti-estrogens via their occupying of receptors. So, to whatever degree they are, doing it at all is not ideal because it's inhibiting like space that could be occupied by actual endogenous hormones that you need to produce and need to work properly and you don't want to be competing with like environmental toxins to like do things in the body. What do you you hear you like I often hear from many people popular you know media as well as just people I I speak to or comments that I read about testosterone levels being lower now in men than they have ever been. >> Mhm. >> Um for one like is that true? Do you think that's true? And two like what are some of the major contributors? Is it obesity since obesity is rampant? I mean, or is it just like everything that you mentioned all sort of like compounding together and not necessarily just like increase in, you know, BPA and plastic, you know, endocrine disrupting chemicals that are now a lot more prevalent than they were, you know, 60 or 70 years ago. Mhm. I did a video a while ago on like the earliest finding I could find of recorded testosterone levels in I think it was like military soldiers or something. One thing that I think is notable is the actual detection sensitivity of testing is absolutely much different now than it was you know 60 years ago. So to contrast like oh the total test of some guy 60 years ago verse now is equivalent even on like a testing methodology basis is like flawed to begin with because it's probably not an accurate comparison. But is there a trend downwards? I would say yes. And I think it is mostly dictated by the obesity, the diet, the lifestyle stuff. So, you know, like you there's obviously things to deal with in the environment that are less favorable and are not supportive and probably not benign, but like in general, I think most people that worry about this stuff, they would be put their mind at ease by dialing in everything else, which is not that hard to do. It's often free or, you know, cost less money. You're eating less food, you know, go to the gym, etc. I'm not saying that's easy to do, but like dial in your basics. And once you do that, you have like an incre you have your baseline. Let's just say you get a blood test and you see where you're at. From there, you can start doing some of the minute changes like putting, you know, a chlorine filter on your shower head, do this, change your water source, whatever. Do you notice an incremental uptick in your gonadotropen output or your response to it at that point? If yes, like okay, maybe it was a meaningful change. But like until you do that, like you're kind of just taking shots in the dark, assuming all of these things are, you know, occupying your mental bandwidth and concerning you that may not be worth your concern to that degree. >> Does chlorine have an effect on testosterone? I don't I don't like >> maybe. >> Okay. Yeah, I think I think more of like BPA, but um and consuming it like orally, like you said, hot like heating up the plastic or like hot beverages like going into like something plastic. But >> um yeah, I I agree. I think these lifestyle factors are are paramount and >> I'd love to kind of get a little bit more into some of those particularly like so you've already mentioned the diet and I'm kind of you mentioned protein, fat, um carbohydrate, you know, like so what what what are some of these important? And so fats are important to make, you know, the backbones of of um hormones. Maybe we can talk just a little bit about like why low-fat diets and why people should be incorporating fat into their diet to make sure that they're >> Yeah. Like in general, it's not like if you have, for example, if you ingest cholesterol, it doesn't necessarily mean you're going to have like a dose dependent elevation in your like serum cholesterol, as I'm sure everyone knows here. Um but there are like certain baseline requirements to serve as the substrate for producing cholesterol derived uh steroids in the body and these are all ultimately derived from cholesterol and then get cleaved and manipulated through enzyatic processes to make all the hormones in your body including but not limited to testosterone estradi etc. So, in general, it does seem like having a sufficient amount of fat is worthwhile and does seem to impact um how much hormones you can actually produce. Um, and the carbs for actually mediating uh, and this is going to depend on, you know, activity levels, how demanding of exercise you do, if you burn through them versus not, if you're sedentary versus not, but in general is going to be the insulinogenic signaling is somewhat necessary to facilitate a balance of free androgens, including free other hormones in the body that often go overlooked to actually do what they're supposed to do. cuz a lot of people won't even measure the free levels of, you know, like the IGF-1, the, you know, the T3, like you'll, you know, some of this stuff gets like hyper nuance when you get into what hormones are actually bound up that you don't realize. Um, estrogens, DHT, etc. So, having a balanced diet and then the protein like you mentioned, um, from like a mechanistic perspective, like I think in general, these things all serve as building blocks is the simplest way I can put it. and having a deficiency entirely of one or the other. It's just like it's kind of the expected outcome. Like it's often not going to be ideal to be missing something entirely that your body utilizes for critical, you know, structural things. >> Well, I it's interesting. I learned something from you because I, you know, I was aware of the importance for, you know, of of fat, particularly like, you know, a certain amount of saturated fat, which is known to increase endogenous cholesterol production. Um, but the carbohydrates and the insulin response and like having that insulin action or response like and I didn't realize that was also important and you know especially for the free you know hormones like the act or the amount of free hormones. >> So it's it's it's interesting to think about like a ketogenic diet you know as you mentioned like some people can really be >> um in in a problematic state if they're on a ketogenic diet and their free testosterone just kind of tanks. And it's not to say that it will absolutely happen. Like I'm sure there are a lot of people that thrive on long-term ketogenic diets or may even clinically require them. So like I certainly don't want to come out here and suggest if you're on a ketogenic diet, stop doing it. Like talk to your doctor first. Obviously, it's just like mechanistically this is what happens if you have a lack of insulin signaling. You will have less capacity to suppress the binding proteins. >> Well, what you're saying is like get your hormones measured. Measure them right and make sure that you're monitoring. >> Yeah. informed before you like freak out about anything, >> right? Yeah. Um, with respect to other sort of like lifestyle factors that can maybe boost testosterone. So, we're talking about dietary factors here. >> What about exercise? I, you know, resistance training is one that comes to my mind when I think about trying to boost testosterone. I mean, is there merit to that? Is that something that moves the needle? >> Yeah, I think it's kind of like in simplest way I could put it is like descending order of intensity essentially. So like you know weightlifting at the top and then you have like um some of your more like hit style workouts underneath that and then at the bottom of it would be like the most basic of I don't know barely exerting yourself but like getting out there and moving that is going to have the least impact in general and at the top it's going to be you know the muscle building facilitating processes the things that build bone etc. resistance training. That's going to be the most directly impactful, but ultimately it's also going to be what is the overall exercise regimen that you adhere to because a lot of people the problem is not even necessarily like oh what's the perfect thing like it has to be something you enjoy enough that you'll adhere to it. So like adherence almost trumps optim optimal in some capacity. So like get the thing you can adhere to the diet model that you can adhere to. Like a lot of people the the diet that on paper is the best won't be the one that you stick to for more than like 6 weeks. So like don't do that one if that's the case cuz you're not going to stick to it and you're just going to end up where you were before. So calories trump everything unfortunately you know or fortunately cuz it gives you a lot more versatility with like your choices. I think it's not like you're stuck in a myopic kind of, you know, box of I have to be on like the Mediterranean diet or I have to be on the carnivore diet or I have to be on the vegan, you know, the whatever. There are a lot of ways to skin a cat and ultimately it's going to come in mainly from energy balance and then also from there optimizing for, you know, having adequate protein, fat presence, carbohydrate balance to support your, you know, whatever exercise you're doing and the intensity of it. um and all the things underlying that. >> Before we continue, I just want to mention something important. If you're finding these episodes valuable, please consider subscribing to the channel and clicking the notification bell. It's the only way to ensure you'll be notified when a new episode goes live. Many people assume they'll be alerted automatically, but unless the bell is clicked, they won't be. We cover a lot of detailed evidence-based content here, and I want to make sure that you don't miss any of it. Now, back to the episode. Um, with respect to some of the micronutrients, it kind of this kind of gets into the the supplement area as well, but you mentioned some important ones that I've also kind of like come across in the literature and that being vitamin D, zinc, magnesium. Can we can we kind of just dive a little bit into their effectiveness? Like there's like is there human data on it? Like do you know anything about how they're working? I mean, I've seen I've read some of the the human studies particularly on the vitamin D and like getting like higher dose vitamin D supplementation improving testosterone, but I mean, I'd love to kind of just take a moment to kind of talk a little bit more about that if if you want. >> Yeah. Like in general, I think the most reliable things that move the needle if you were deficient is I don't know if people are familiar with the ZMA. It was like a the first like combo supplement that was sort of seen as like a testosterone booster that was available on the market. And it's, you know, like zinc, magnesium, and I don't remember the the A was something else, but vitamin D is the third thing you >> I don't remember what the A stands for, but those were the three things that move the needle most reliably that are natural you, you know, otherwise would get through your diet, but likely not sufficiently. Maybe zinc you might, but like magnesium pretty difficult I would say for a lot of people. They don't realize how deficient they are. And then even like supplementing accordingly it's like you know getting one that you respond that you tolerate well with your digestive system has the yield that actually produces enough magnesium from like the elemental weight of the supplement. Um which is not that complicated. I don't want to make it sound super complicated. Like a lot of them are fine. Rhonda has great articles on magnesium formats that are bioavailable and yield more than enough magnesium. Um, and yeah, the vitamin D having an adequate amount, making sure you're converting it and actually getting the activity from it. um mechanistically there is some level of um like gene transcription capacity facilitated through these like like vitamin D is a hormone for example and it does also affect androgen receptor activity and some like the capacity for androgens to do what they do not just like the production of the amount of them. So, similar to what I talked about earlier where you have this kind of like receptor interaction, how well can you actually utilize these hormones to do the things it needs to do in the body, some of this is going to be facilitated by the adequate uh minerals and hormones for vitamin D supporting it. And it's not necessarily measurable as much like directly, but all you can really do is like back fill accordingly to hit your needs and then assess your kind of like proxies and your blood work and your symptoms and kind of go from there. >> In your opinion, like let's say someone is on the deficient range of vitamin D, their inadequate magnesium, perhaps their zinc is, you know, maybe okay or in the in the inadequate range. Would getting to that sufficient status really move the needle with respect to like testosterone? >> I think if you were on the low end of the reference range or literally hypoganatal and you were clinically low or deficient for those depending if it's all three or not because obviously there' be an additive effect. >> Most of them are I mean at least vitamin vitamin D and magnesium pretty common deficient. Yeah, I would say like you're looking at probably a potential incremental difference of 100 to 150 total T maybe it kind of depends on the person of course like I've seen more robust response in some studies but I also don't want to like overexaggerate the expectations um but it is meaningful like it's something that abs and some of it can't be directly measured either like we're talking about the total tea number but it's like how do you know how much deficient vitamin D is impacting your ability to like use it correctly And then even if you had the sufficient vitamin D, the magnesium impact on all that and the DNA interactions and whatnot, it's like, you know, you would have you'd be speculating at best. So, >> and then there are some other more like uh tangential supplements that are not as like obvious no-brainers that are helpful. They're just facilitating mechanisms that are not like this is a vitamin you need almost regardless of what your test levels were kind of thing. >> Yeah, I'd love to talk about those. I mean you hear some of these herbal supplements and like some of the ashwagandha fenugreek with tonga ali I mean let's dive into that like are they effective which ones are effective which ones are hype >> yeah um I think one that I would would be worth mentioning al but the literature isn't super robust it is boron so that potentially has a suppressive effect on SHBG levels there's some literature that looks promising saying all, but I wouldn't hang my hat on and say it's a guarantee. It's going to suppress your SHBG from like the high end of the reference strains to something that's like much more, you know, much better. But like it may, it does seem to work for some people. And in general, it can be a supporting adjunct that some people are, it's not something you typically get through your diet in like significant quantities anyways. Like often people will it'll come into multivitamin typically but the quantity that moves the needle for SHBG I believe was like 6 to 12 milligs and can be meaningful for actually liberating free testosterone not for actually producing more total tea. Um the other one that's probably worth mentioning ashwagandha specifically uh extract that is standardized to a sufficient quantity of wthanol and not just your standard run-of-the-mill generic ashwagandha. You want to look for ideally a patented, you know, uh sensoril or a KSM66. These are patented formats of ashwagandha that are standardized to a um target yield. So you know that what you're getting is what you're supposed to be getting rather than relying on you know certificates of analysis from China of a generic extract. So I would >> what was that compound they're standardized to again >> with analytes? >> Okay. >> It's like the it'll show right on the label. be like ashwagandha bracket standardized to x percentage with with analytes and depending on if you have ksm66 that's 5% sensor is 10% the difference between why you would pick one or the other is the actual total dose you could get away with using less milligrams of the ks uh of the sensoril because it has more with analides per milligram inclusion in your product but they're both like >> impactful is that the active compound that affects testosterone or >> it seems to be and when I say testosterone >> yeah clarify >> it's like the indirect effect via suppressing uh cortisol seemingly and kind of like the stress response manipulations that it can induce which are favorable for people who are anxious who have very stressful lifestyles who could benefit from it but it is not a catch-all supplement that will benefit everyone and some people it will push them into anhidonia territory which is like a numbing of emotion. So you don't want to >> really >> Yeah. If you overdo it, it will like literally suppress your stress response so significantly that everything's just like black and white. >> What's what's So what what what's a dose that would be considered overdoing it? And what's a dose that would maybe be effective for suppressing the cortisol response and indirectly affecting testosterone by not having the cortisol decreasing the testosterone? like I would go with the clinically like supported dose for something that's efficacious. I wouldn't necessarily suggest somebody, you know, take something that's lower than what I've seen to actually work. But in general, it seems to be a cumulative effect over time. Maybe there are some people who might push you over the edge sooner and like certainly it's something to be cautious of and be aware of as a disclaimer before you jump on any testosterone augmenting supplements. just be aware of the mechanism of how it works based on your own individual biochemistry because this is not something like a vitamin D that you can just sequester into subq fat and just like get rid of at some point. It's like it could impact your mood regulation quite significantly for a bit depending on like what your neurotransmitter balances at baseline. Like if you are already borderline like emotionally numb as a person and you take ashroandha like you might literally like cease to care about anything for all I know. >> That sounds awful. Yeah, >> but I mean for someone who is more of an anxious phenotype like >> 600 millig I think is the dose, but double check on that because I might be misremembering, but I'm pretty sure. And that is impactful um to the tune of upwards of another 100 points seemingly. I could be misremembering exactly, but it's like I think it's triple digits pretty reliably for those who can benefit from it. And for some people, it's like a gamecher supplement that really improves their quality of life outside of just the testosterone enhancing capacity of it. Because some people deal with a lot of stress in their life and need that extra resilience or suppression of how much it's affecting their mental state. Like some people they can't even get to sleep because they're ruminating and they're constantly anxious and having that kind of suppressed uh stress response can be very very net beneficial. And then on top of that improves their sleep and also improves their testosterone through the uh reduction of the kind of like gluccocorticoid responses and yeah so it's it works for sure the literature seems sound on it. Um some of it is funded by some of these companies that do have the patented extract so just be aware of that but at least from what I've seen in blood work anecdotally too it seems to work. Tonat Ali another very notable one. This is one that um works through a different mechanism. It seems to be a bit more speculative how it works, but it seems to do a few things potentially. One being minor uh serum activity potentially. And this is more speculative. Serum is like a selective estrogen receptor modulator. So something that binds to estrogen receptors and either like positively or negatively modulates them in selective tissues. So there are certain tissues where it would be more favorable to have a selective inhibition of certain hormones versus others who would be detrimental. Like you wouldn't want to inhibit estrogen's activity in bone for example because that would cause bone degradation. Um having an inhibition at the hypothalamus level level may depending on the person help increase testosterone via the inhibition of that feedback loop. Now I don't necessarily think it is a serum. That's just like the tertiary potential mechanism and it is speculative. the main mechanism that people seem to agree on that it does do suppression of SHBG to some extent as well as the uh upregulation of steroidenesis um intraesticularly so like locally upregulating I believe it's steroidogenic acute regulatory protein that basically incorporates um cholesterol into the mitochondria to actually undergo these enzyatic cleaving uh sequences that result in the production of testosterone locally So it seems to like help upregulate the process that actually uh enzyatically spits out testosterone essentially uh locally. So that one seems to work well for individuals who have high SHG levels or um potentially higher estrogen levels than they, you know, is otherwise fixable via basic lifestyle changes and whatnot. Um because everyone has their own proportion of metabolism at the end of the day. it's not always going to be optimal even if you have what is otherwise like a great diet and lifestyle. Um but also it's just like I think it's for people who have adequate everything looks on paper to be sufficient but their SHPG might be a bit high or they could use a little bit of a boost and it seems to work to the tune of 100 to 200 nanograms per deciliter for some people and depends on how potent of a standardized uh extract you get. You want to look for one that is HLC tested for uricomone. That's the active ingredient in tonad ali that actually has the bioactive effect that you're looking for. There are a lot of tonad ali supplements that just say tonad ali or it'll say tonad ali like 100 to one or like 10 to one or whatever. Like these are kind of meaningless numbers from what I understand. Like you're not going to get a 200 to one version of a tonat and even if you did there's no indication there's any uricomone in it. So, similar to the Ashwagandha, you want something that actually says this is how much of the literal ingredient that does what you're looking to get out of it in it. And here's a third party test to verify it. So, >> and what was that ingredient called again? >> Yurione. >> Got it. >> E U R Y A C O M A N O N E, I think. >> Now, how does Tonat Ali compared to like boron? Is it I mean it sounds like for men it might be like you're getting a bigger bang because it's doing it's working in two different ways. >> Yeah, it's a good question. Boron is a mineral that is um seems to be something that is mechanistically I wouldn't be able to say um for certain what the differential is and how they affect the SHPG binding complex. Like I would be trying to I might misremember and I don't want to misspeak. I don't know. >> Okay. Well, yeah, it's just kind of interesting. Would would would the tonat le work in women as well just through the SHBG >> or maybe the B like I don't know which just for off like off the you know topic here. Boron has also kind of been thought to potentially be a longevity molecule as well. There's some evidence that boron may be involved in like improving aging. So when you said boron I was like oh really that's interesting. Um, >> yeah, I feel like that's almost like a lowerhanging fruit thing because it's just typically part of a multivitamin that may just not be dosed high enough and you can just like stack on top and see if it has an incremental decrease to SHBG. And then the Tonkat is like more of a speculative one that you don't want to just like take until you've exhausted some of the other options, but is like the more exotic kind of like hammer that you might want to take to the situation if it's like your last resort before, you know, I've tried everything. My lifestyle's perfect. My diet's dialed, my micronutrients are accounted for, my sleep is good, I don't drink, I don't smoke, and my total tea is still inadequate and I don't feel that great. Should I try some of this like one of these exotic things that seems to have a reasonable safety profile and like an efficacious, you know, um, you know, impact in men and young healthy men at that like there are literature showing the effects in young healthy men, not just like age- related like declined men. So notable. Now, as far as its impact on women, I would think mechanistically would do a similar thing, but like I don't have a study I could point to that says it's the same. So, I would think, but I don't know. >> Are there are there any others? You know, I hear about, you know, the the fenugreek and then the some of these like deasper um aspartic acid or are there any others that are notable or would you say more hype? >> Um I think a lot of those have been disproven like tribulus, daspartic acid, fenugreek. Um, one that is notable that might do something is chiliget. If you get a high quality chilleet, it may provide enough like the actual capacity of your organ to respond to hormones is partly conditional on its ability to tolerate stress and reactive oxygen species locally too. So if you have more than you can deal with and you introduce a potent antioxidant to the equation, you may be able to like attenuate and neutralize the kind of like decrement to performance and kind of like net out more local hormone yield. So, chiliget seems to be impactful on intesticular antioxidant activity, but I wouldn't uh it's another one that requires like careful sourcing and it's also one that's like more speculative and indirect cuz like there are probably better ways to manage your oxidant like your antioxidant profile I would think. So, >> so your top four supplements for testosterone would be >> zinc, magnesium, vitamin D, not in order, just the top three I would say. And then I guess for impact, I would probably say like tonat ali, but probably boron would be my safer next choice just for like safety profile. >> Okay, great. Unless and and then if you're like the anxious person added >> Yeah. and just be like cognizant of what it's how it works cuz you you may be able to get the benefit at a lower dose. You may be able to cycle it um depending on how you respond to it. Like similar to you with caffeine like there's no hard and fast rules on all this stuff. Like there are studies you could adhere to like the protocols designed but they're ultimately just designed by you know scientists who thought this was the way to do it. And like for you and your individual biochemistry it may not be the ideal way, >> right? I I mean I've been interested in ashwagandha. I kind of experimented with it like half-heartedly like years ago and I think I'm going to now bring it back into circulation. Okay. >> Um because >> I do I am interested in in the stress management part of it like lowering some of the the cortisol and stress although I do that with exercise but um if there's like a side effect of like you know just a little bit of testosterone boost like that would be great you know for me. So, I think that's going to be another experiment of mine that I I try out. Um, >> check your blood first, though. >> Yeah. No, I'm that's I already told you I want to get my my hormones. It's I've had them measured, but like I don't feel confident. I haven't had repeated measurements. I >> Once you got that blood test, you're going to be like, "Fuck, I shouldn't have taken Astroghre cuz now I have no idea what this means, >> what the what the baseline was." Yeah. No, definitely. For sure. Um, but let's talk about like let's say people are, you know, trying >> if you do assess your cortisol stress response, I would highly recommend a Dutch test over a blood test. >> Why is that? >> Salivary cortisol levels uh are far more indicative of what's happening from a stress response standpoint than your like transient serum cortisol levels will be. >> Oh, really? >> Yeah. And because this >> just like the snapshot in time and it in the serum is just like not an accurate reflective measure. Um the salivary levels will fluctuate and they get like multiple readings and they create like an average curve for you and they actually map out your day as opposed to with blood you get like one big draw. The cortisol is measured one time and it's like okay you're like high end of normal like what do we do with that information? The salivary one's a little bit more indicative of like here are multiple time points of the day and like here's where we'd expect you to be at these points and like this is how you're responding to your day stressors kind of thing. >> Cool. All right. Well, >> and it's like less intrusive to like spit in a tube, you know, or whatever, >> right? And do they and do you usually you spit in multiple times a day to kind of get that >> I've actually not done a Dutch test personally, but I'm pretty sure it's just you spit in a tube. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Okay. Um, good information. Let's kind of transition to like people that have, let's say, like we're, let's get back into the men category here, that have like exhausted these natural ways. They've like, you know, perhaps lost weight or done all the lifestyle factors that we've talked about to improve their testosterone. They're both total and free, all all that above. Who should consider hormone replacement therapy? Like, how does a man identify whether or not they're a good candidate? I mean, is it really just recommended for men with clinically low testosterone and symptoms or like what we kind of touched on this a little bit earlier, >> but I kind of want to just go into this um area now of actual testosterone replacement therapy. though >> um like there are definitely scenarios in which it's more obvious because there is a structural issue that cannot be rectified via any sort of lifestyle change or like sleep hygiene manipulation or whatever like if you have primary hypoganism and you've ruled out the ultrasound like varicusia there's no issues you're not like cooking your testes in like a hot tub every night you're not uh I don't know like your sleep is dialed your micronutrient you know, intake is on point. Also, satisfactory amounts of calories. Like I think I might have probably indirectly touched on this, but like via the getting to a good body fat like you still need to have an adequate amount of energy to actually meet the needs to produce hormones too. So like adequate amount of calories, not overdoing it, not underdoing it. Um, if you've done all the stuff that we kind of like talked about and you've ruled out um pituitary adenoma, you've ruled out any sort of like I don't know like uh um structural defects and signaling is adequate or even supra physiologic and you're just not responding. Like at that point it's kind of like okay you're we could try hammering you with some hCG and see if we can stimulate a satisfactory response with like a manual like extra push at the light cell. Um or use some you know some of these other like augmenting you know steroidogenic supporting things like tonat or whatever. But if that's not working either like your your testes are cooked and you got to be on test at that point because you're just not responding to any natural stimulation whatsoever. That is not typically the I the outcome of a lot of guys who end up on testosterone. A lot of guys end up on it through like like secondary diet like hypogonatal symptoms through like the pituitary either inadequate output or insufficient response to that output plus an insufficient amount coupled with it coming out of the pituitary. There's not a lot of people that are literally showing up with like your testes don't respond whatsoever. um in those individuals like it's app it's kind of like if you've exhausted all resources you've tried the whole manual stimulation directly because hCG is the way you would actually test that out is you would actually look at okay if we actually hit your lighting cells directly with a signal and we escalate that to like the maximum degree and we use FSH2 exogenous it's like if you're still not responding to that like there's no saving it at that point unless you have like such a significant amount of oxidative stress that you're just like not dealing with that would have been taken care of with the lifestyle stuff we mentioned. So, primary hypogenatal like you're going to probably be on exogenous testosterone and it's literally like testosterone. You can't fix it with any clomophene. You can't fix it with hCG. You can't fix it with HMG. There's no other way around it. Like you're taking the literal hormone because it's the only thing that will get you testosterone. Like you can't produce it. So, there's that. Um, and there's different ways you can take it, of course, which we could, you know, get into later. But the next situation that's a bit more relevant is like the secondary hypoganadism situation where somebody has pro like testes that function just potentially to like a suboptimal capacity and there might be some level of like low gonadotropen output facilitate facilitated through some level of like lifestyle or diet or whatever. Um, like Peter for example, like he's pretty dialed and like he did a lot of stuff to try and like fix it before he went to any sort of replacement. Sleep hygiene is on point. Like the guy like what else could you do when you're him, right? He's I think 50 years old. So what he did was he used hCG which was assessing okay like are the testes responding to like a manual signal and they were and he's like replaced his hormones entirely by using a manual LH mimic essentially why his pituitary wasn't shooting out enough LH to hit the amount like the enough stimulation he would need to produce the same amount of test that would hit his like optimal variety of factors age related decline who knows but probably a combination of multiple things. And at that point, it's kind of like, do you want to manually back fill with signal or do you want to take hormones pending, you've done all the exhaustive, you know, uh, things to try and like check the boxes? Cuz, you know, some people don't care as much and don't want to check the boxes. But, like, in general, I would say it would be worthwhile to learn why you have the problem, even if your intention is to just end up on testosterone anyway. Like I wouldn't I wouldn't delay treatment if you're symptomatic and it's like hurting your quality of life, but I also would like do some due diligence to just like assess like what's happening. And I think hCG for people who are like secondary hypoganatal is sometimes a good middle ground of assessing like is this a testicle functionality problem or is it like my pituitary output is not sufficient because at that point you can kind of tell like which organ is it that's failing me here. So there's that. Um, and then like upstream to that, there's the actual hypothalamus and the G&R output, which is the thing that stimulates the pituitary to make the LH and the FSH. And throughout that whole cascade, you could have insufficient signal from that, insufficient response to that signal, and then insufficient pituitary output from that weakened signal and the response to it. like it's a deteriorating thing that by the end of it when it actually hits your testes may just be like suboptimal for your response to be adequate through often age related decline but it's a culmination of things. So certainly back to the original question like how do you make sense of all this and decide when is the appropriate time to be on hormones versus not? That's where you'd have to work with like a really highly educated medical professional in general. Like I would not try and uh cowboy this yourself. Um even trying to like learn it from, you know, online content, whatever. Like I think it's I think it's good to learn how this stuff works mechanistically so you go in informed and don't end up putting on a haphazard regimen by a doctor who actually just wanted you on medications. Cuz if you know this stuff, it's pretty easy to identify who's like a shitty clinic who just wants to like get you committed and stuck on lifelong hormone support. and you can like weed it out really quick even if the doctor seems well-intentioned. He wants to help you. He wants to, you know, support your quality of life, says all the right things, seems professional, seems knowledgeable. If you don't know this stuff, it's kind of like you would be going in blind and assuming that's what you need to do. And a lot of people just end up on hormones and that's it. And sometimes there's nothing wrong with that. Sometimes that might be what you need, but sometimes people want to know what were the natural avenues I could have taken. Could I have, you know, done something else? Could I have maintained the signal from my brain to my testies this whole time and I'm just missing something? >> No, it's a really good point, you know, and also like talking about what any, you know, key risks and side effects are as well. So, I mean, that's that's kind of important, but like before we get to the risk, like what kind of benefits for can someone who is, you know, clearly like experiencing these symptoms of low testosterone expect from, you know, perhaps doing testosterone replacement therapy. I mean, you mentioned HC, HCG, but I'm I'm kind of here directing it more towards like actual testosterone replacement therapy. >> Um, yeah, it would be in general if you are satisfactory in your replacement of these hormones to a physiologic replacement level like you should notice a ailaration of all symptoms. That's >> the best way I could put it. Um, now again, it's uh obviously you should not expect that you're going to feel exactly the same as you did when you were like 20 years old. Like I think some people think when they're 50, oh, I'm going to get on TRT and it's going to be, you know, like being 20 again. And like to some extent it could be because like on paper like your test levels might be the equivalent, but it doesn't mean the way you metabolize the hormones into estrogen is going to be the same. It doesn't mean that the way you respond is going to be exactly the same. In general though, the target is to ameliate the symptoms and then like dial in from there kind of thing. So like I think what people should expect is like the intention of it is get rid of your symptoms similar to like menopausal therapy like you want to get rid of your hot flashes. If you want to ensure that you are not uh like your bone integrity is like actually supported like all these things are like your baseline requirements of why you're doing it is just to like get rid of the negative and get to a baseline and indirectly you will feel much better. So it's like you will feel better from the result of it but like don't expect to be Superman unless you're you might feel like Superman relative to your state just depends how deficient you were to begin with and it's all contingent on multiple things. So, it's hard to put hard and fast generalities on this stuff, but like your target should ideally be symptom relief, >> right? So, you're not like necessarily going to be shredded in a in a couple of weeks. And exactly. >> Um, yeah. I mean, I think, you know, it's it's important to point out like some guys might see that their testosterone is like on the lower end of the normal reference range and like want to do something about it. like with respect to like not skipping over the lifestyle factors and just like I'm going to go straight into like I'm just going to take some testosterone, right? And I think that would be the case to avoid, right? If you're not especially if you're not really having symptoms, but you're just kind of like freaked out by the numbers, right? >> Yeah. I definitely wouldn't make any rash decisions based on numbers on a piece of paper. Cuz I uh I know a lot of guys who like the best physiques in natural bodybuilding are like guys with 500 total testosterones. Like I know guys with three times the amount of testosterone production, much worse physiques. Like it's not always the number on a piece of paper. It's your genetics, your response to it, literally how many muscle fibers you have at birth. Like there are a lot of factors that determine what you're going to look like, how you're going to respond, the shape of your muscle bellies and how they appear to people, your body fat level, especially like if you are leaner, you will just appear more muscular, you know, stuff like that, >> right? >> Yeah. Um, okay. So, let's talk about some of the important risks that, you know, people should keep in mind when they're going to start testosterone replacement therapy. I know you've like talked about this, heard about it, like the cardiovascular disease risk. I mean, for a while it was a controversy, right? Like doing testosterone replacement therapy is going to increase your cardiovascular disease risk. Um there's the the Trevverse trial that came that's kind of we got some pre preublic like pre pre- data here where it seems as though um this is a very large trial placebo controlled where it seems as though men these are older men that were at least it seems to be hypogonatal like they were low testosterone and if they were given testosterone replacement therapy to a normal like physiological restoration range there's no really adverse effects on cardiovascular outcomes. >> What are what's what's the thought here with respect to cardiovascular disease risk? >> Um I think the only issue is like defining what restoration of physiological testosterone production equates to is like when we were talking about like coffee and like how much caffeine is in a cup of coffee like it could vary so much. like some guy's replacement to adequate physiologic replacement what he was when he was younger highly variable and in that traverse trial using andro gel to bump your total tea from like hypoganatal to like 400 is not necessarily indicative of what I would say a lot of people are looking to the data to see what the results were of testosterone therapy because a lot of guys are on injectable test boosting to 1,000 total tea with a disproportionately high free testosterone cuz when you inject infrequently too you drive your SHBG down proportionally that is not the same as a guy who's using an androgel to get to like 430 total T. So taking that outcome and running with it as like no cardiovascular risk like I think it's a bit haphazard personally. Now it's obviously promising data and like it's great that it came out like it's very very promising. The only problem is it's like how many guys are actually using that medium of therapy? Like I don't know, none. Like I don't know a single guy using androgel. And that's fine. Like it's still data and it's still worthwhile and it's still good. It's just like not don't take that as like the the sign off that like you're you know 200 milligrams of testosterone and anth per week that you're like, you know, more uh aggressive protocol has been designed to do is like going to be the same outcome. Like it's not. You're going to have the ariththropo pois increase that might not be reflected in the traverse trial. You're going to have the disproportionately high energetic signaling. Like you're going to have a lot of things that you would you looking to get the reassurance that won't happen but you have absolutely need to be cognizant of because will probably happen. Um, still >> no this is this is so important and um that's kind of why I was like these are hypogonatal and you know it's like I guess their normal physiological range that's not really accurate if it's only going to like 400. So basically you're just making them non hypogonatal but it is important because you mentioned yourthropesis and so this is this is another kind of concern you know with testosterone which does regulate red blood cell production. it does increase you know the thickness of blood and polyythemeia is a is a is I would say a risk factor right so you know how how substantial is this um I mean I think I've read studies where it's like almost 25% of men have thicker blood that are on testosterone replacement therapy doesn't necessarily mean it's like to the point where it has to be treated but it is thicker right it is like the hermaticra is is it's thicker. So um you know how how should men weigh these risks for the cardiovascular disease risk the poly polythemia. So for people like listening or watching that isn't a concern because it increases you know stroke risk it increases the the potential for um you know cardiovascular events as well. So like what are your thoughts on sort of weighing those risks? Um to the opposite side of the coin on that androgel, you know, like it's not necessarily physiologic replacement. The thing to note is it it should be expected that if you use more testosterone, you're going to have more thropoesis. Like that's literally what it does. So to think that it would be a net negative because you have a 25% increase in that via your testosterone administration if you were hypogonal. to begin with, which presumably is the reason you're getting on TRT, you know, depends on the person, but like going from hypoganatal where you might be like borderline like anemic for all we know and then having the 25% bump like maybe you need that to actually like have adequate oxygen carrying capacity and like actually sufficiently fuel your body. So, it's not to say it's like net bad, net good. It's all about where do you achieve like the problem is is like the definition of symptom relief too is so vague because you could achieve simp symptom relief at you know 450 total t maybe depending on the person or it might be at like 800 or it might have been like even if it was 450 like if you got up to 800 you're still in normal on paper so like is that bad you know who's to say yeah I think most people would say it's the high of normal because that's literally what it is on a reference range so it all is going to be just being cognizant of the fact that androgens will do what androgens do which is they will in a dose dependent manner drive ariththropoesis. They will induce cardiac remodeling if you push it too hard. Not necessarily within physiologic limits but like these are things to be aware of. Dysipidemia will become more of a concern at a higher level especially depending on the medium of administration. If you're dosing infrequently like once a week with a shot, it's going to be a different outcome than if you're doing like daily, you know, little pulsatile uh cream administrations or like micro injections like subcutaneously where you're bleeding out the effect more. It will all be impactful. So I think it's more about there is a risk all but there's not going to be data that says directly if you replace the 800 total tea it's going to be dangerous nor is there data that says it's safe either like you can kind of take from the traverse trial what they found and extrapolate out like what you know from graded dose response studies which do exist and like realize okay like somewhere in the middle here if you're one of those guys who like wants to hit that, you know, high normal because I don't know, like who's to say you're in the wrong for wanting to be like optimally vital, too. It all kind of depends on the person. You have to weigh the risk accordingly cuz it's not risk-f free. Like you're still going to have to keep a an eye on your hematology panel. Is it getting out of whack to a degree that is like unsustainable? you're like looking at phabbotoies just to maintain something that looks normal or is it like adequate slash like optimal for you now to feel like you have enough energy to not like faint when you get up? I don't know. It depends on the person. Um yeah, it's just like an understanding of all of the interplay of things and not taking the sign off, you know, the one the traverse trial is like, you know, your get out of jail free card. Like it's just you're still going to have to keep an eye on your blood work. You're still going to have to have like a doctor who knows what they're talking about and is like very rigorous about this stuff. You have to know how the different administration methods and frequency will impact things cuz like you're probably not going to be on androgel using a little dose that gets you to 420 nanogs per deciliter. You're probably not on that protocol. And if you are like yeah okay look at the traverse trial and like maybe you can get like a bit more reassurance but like you're probably not that guy and that's fine if you're not. It's just like being very realistic about what to expect and you know there is uh dysipidemia there is an increase in uh blood viscosity to some extent there will be a uh suppression of SHPG if you're doing injections infrequently um which will elevate your androgenic signaling beyond what is physiologic like most people are supra at least transiently without knowing it and by that I mean by supra I mean like more than you would have produced physiologically because it's not physiologic to have your hormones transiently shoot to like I don't know 1,200 or 1500 total tea with a disproportionately high free testosterone from administering once or twice a week twice a week is a bit quite a bit better but once a week for example and then it crashing back down before you shoot again like that's not physiologic really at all. So you need to be aware that's going to cause more uh elevations in these like problematic biomarkers than would be if you tried to maintain what is reflective of like daily normal production. So like the ideal protocol would be literally replacing your daily testicular output which is adherence problematic for a lot of people cuz not everyone wants to be using like a scrotal application of cream twice a day. A lot of people don't want to be injecting daily subcutaneously with like a micro amount of testosterone. They just want to be one and done, one shot a week. Even some of the the problem too is like the pharma pharma has set it up so you might be forced to take it infrequently and at a high dose because they have these auto injector pens that are pre-loaded. So you like have to shoot it in one shot or you don't take it. Yeah. So like zestad is like the preloaded testosterone anantthate pharmagrade that is often prescribed and it's like well you gota you you either do the one shot one kill and take the whole dose or you like don't take it. So so the you're you're touching on an important point here that that supra physiologic level like the amount that you wouldn't necessarily have like a normal physiologically. I mean, I read a study where it was like 25% of men have this and it seems like it might be due to this like dosing this injection, you know, protocol. What what's what's wrong with the cream? Like, is is that something that doesn't get your levels high enough or is it just like annoying to have to do every day? >> It kind of I mean, >> it depends on the person because it would be personal subjective opinion for me to say like why I wouldn't want to do it. In general, the reason most people don't want to do it is adherence lifelong. Like this is something you're going to do forever. Typically, somebody going to apply a cream to their scrotum twice a day, it's not that fun. Like, it's like something that you have to go out of your way to do wherever you are, you're traveling, whatever. Like, you will go hypoganatal with pretty quick if you don't get in the bathroom and wipe some cream on your balls. >> Yeah. That's not >> I mean I I get that but like you know like stroke risk, cardiovascular disease. >> Oh yeah. If you want to be optimal, the problem is a lot of people will favor adherence and sustainability similar to diet over optimal and that's fine. It's just you have to be accepting of the risk profile that comes along with it. >> Okay. What about other like parts of the risk profile? So like how does it affect the prostate? Um I read about fertility. I mean being a big one too. It's it's suppressing fertility. Yeah, >> sleep apnnea can be exacerbated as well. I mean, these are all like >> part of the risk profile things to consider. >> Yeah. When it comes to prostate, that is something that at least based on the most recent literature that I'm aware of is Are you familiar with the androgen saturation model? Basically, if you go from hyper >> Oh, yes. Yes. Yeah. But go ahead. Please, please explain it. Yeah. So essentially from what I understand based on most recent literature it shows that if you go from hypoganatal to yugenatal or like the threshold of it which is like you know on a reference range roughly like 300 plus nigrams per deciliter going from hypo to that that differential will be positively stimulating of like prostate growth you know PSA levels will go up etc but beyond that you are not necessarily in a dose dependent manner like a muscle or something going to be inducing size increases. Like if you took even if that were the case, you'd have bodybuilders who take, you know, thousands of milligrams of steroids per week. They would have prostates like busting out of their bodies at that point. So, it's not necessarily the case, but it's not like it's it's still worth monitoring your PSA for trends and longitudinal patterns as you get older cuz like it will still have the same, you know, susceptibility to things that happen as you age. But the actual impact on prostate related issues and like growing cancer from scratch if you don't have pre-existing cancer cells like you're not going to just like spawn cancer from taking testosterone. So I think that risk is a little bit overblown. Fortunately, we have data that seems to be pretty strongly indicating that you're not going to have to worry about that if you are somebody who is otherwise healthy cancerree and you're just going from like you know like you would probably have a small prostate to begin with if you were hypogonatal anyways. you're probably just going to where you would be if you had normal levels. So, it's not like that growth is even bad either. Getting to the yugenital state. Um, so just keep an eye on the PSA and be aware of it, but it's not something that seems to just like dose dependently escalate. The other stuff is worth mentioning. Um like you in general like when I said testosterone does testosterone things in a dose dependent manner even if your protocol is dialed in if you're producing more than you would physiologically that your body can tolerate as well like you will have the whatever backhand consequence of managing the extra estrogen the extra DHT you know that could lead to extra acne hair loss um gynecomastia If you have excessive aromatization locally in the tissue that is not antagonized sufficiently by the DHT and testosterone signaling, hair loss in the scalp, annoying body hair that sucks to get rid of if you care about that sort of thing. Um, more facial hair growth, deepening of the voice, um, more than you already have as a male, surprisingly. There's like often like if you're if you were low te to begin with like typically guys who get on and then like push their test levels up to high normal especially will notice like a little bit of a deepening. Um like these are all kind of like the ex kind of like the maximization of the male secondary sexual characteristics being like pushed to the nth degree. um within physiologic parameters. Um sleep apnea will get exacerbated pending your neck size increases, muscle increases in size, things that are contributing to the obstructive nature of your soft tissue falling into your airway will get worse pending you are dosing in a manner that pushes you there. So if you're physiologically replacing, like a lot of this stuff is probably a moot point. Um, but a lot of people won't be. They'll be pushing to optimal optimal quote unquote, which is fine. Just be aware that you will potentially increase your risk of sleep apnnea and keep an eye on it. I would absolutely recommend anybody even before they get on TRT get their uh uh like a basic sleep study done. Um, it's a lot less intensive than you might think. And there are actually like pretty reasonable at home devices that measure like uh uh apnea episodes per hour that will like essentially put you on a chart of how many um episodes of like ceasing breathing are you having per hour and you could have a baseline there and see if that goes up when you get on TRT. So it's not like this is a questionable like what's going to happen in your sleep apnea susceptibility. Like literally measure it like you have your baseline when you're not on it. Now you're on it. What's the difference? And like you would see in real time the literal diagnostic metric either going up or not changing at all and then you would have your answer kind of thing. But it is a possibility for sure. Um just like any of the stuff is um but if you're physiologically replacing like the risk is relatively low >> unless we're talking about that super physiological level where it seems as though like one in four men don't even know they're in that level. they are >> even transiently cuz I'm in blood work if you for example if I'm on zestad and I'm shooting >> once a week an auto injector pen >> and I'm checking on trough day which means like typically you're a lot of physicians will say check your test levels on like the day where your test levels are lowest based on the pharmacocinetic profile of whatever the format of testosterone you're using. So if you're on a long estrotestosterone formulation like a testosterone cipionate or an ananthade, these are the typical prescriptions to make allow you to get away with dosing only like once or twice a week for adherence. But the reflection of that in blood work is you would typically see because you're bless dosing it at once, your blood work would shoot into supra range depending on the total dose of course, but like a lot of people this is what happens. they shoot into like I don't know 13004 1500 1500 total T with the proportional five alpha reduction to DHT suppression of SHBG disproportionate freeing of free androgenic signaling via more DHT being free than would otherwise be normal more free tea than is proportionately normal more aromatization than would be possible if that dose was like even spread out on an even curve throughout the week on micro injections increase in ariththropoesis acutely beyond physiological you know, capacity to, you know, an unhealthy acute level at least for a periodic period of time and then you're in like a slow or steep depending on like the estester crash essentially into like sort of normal looking territory until your next shot. That's the reality for a lot of guys. I think in Europe they do testosterone uh undeanoate maybe or it's either a sustenon formulation, maybe it's undocu like shot every like few weeks. It's crazy. So they'll like shoot their test into the stratosphere and then it'll like crash into hypoganatal territory and then they pin again or shoot inject. That's what I mean by pin. >> Yeah. My I mean you So >> it's like a roller coaster of like I can imagine it's like the equivalent of what females deal with times like some magnitude. I mean it it sounds they must be like also just like they get aggressive and stuff and like >> what irritable regulation would be like impossible to expect >> you know like >> I don't know like I wouldn't want to wish that on uh anyone like that would suck >> I mean to me so like let's say adherence like compliance that's a whole issue right obviously but let's just like if we're just talking about risk profile right? Like you're not wanting to really get into that supra physiological level. You're not like, you know, you're not like the bodybuilder. You're not like, you know, you're the person that just really wants to keep that risk low, but you want to get the benefits. Okay. Like that's that's what you want. You really don't want the risk. Like you're just not not on the not on the table for you. >> What would be the best There's the different methods. You kind of mentioned a few. Maybe you could kind of just go through them again briefly, but like what would be the best method to get you to a more normal range. >> Um maybe you're not someone that's totally hypogonatal, but like you know, low tea symptoms, right? Lower tea and symptoms. Um what would what you're aging? You're an aged, you know, like 50-year-old man or something. >> What would be the ideal delivery method that would really get you those benefits but lower that risk profile? Yeah. Um, and one thing just to add before we entered that subtopic, I do want to clarify. If somebody was to take an amount of testosterone, even if it put them to like high normal of the reference range, but it was something you tolerated in youth and like your body was capable of handling, which a lot of people are. if you do it responsibly, understand what you're taking, know how to monitor your biomarkers, are lean, healthy, have a good diet, lifestyle dialed in, you're aware of the risks. Um, all that stuff is like overseen with a level of education, some level of rigor, and like obviously decreasing need over time as you start to dial it in. It's not as like rigorous of an oversight process cuz after you're in your dial protocol, it's just kind of like living your life and you know what to expect from your blood work at that point and how it affects everything. You'll probably be fine probably. It's just being aware is not zero risk. Like it's just like that's the thing people need to accept if they want to be pushing, you know, to some level that is like just in general like it's never going to be risk-free. But I could still also say with certainty that if you're hypoganatal, you're going to be healthier replacing to physiologic than you would staying hypoganatal for sure. Like you are a thousand% in cardiotoxic, neurotoxic, uh, quality of life down the, you know, the toilet territory if you're like in hypoganatal levels almost certainly. So hopefully that's like somewhat of a consolidated array cuz I don't want to like sound too uh like it's worth being cautious and aware of all this stuff, but like it's certainly not to don't dissuade yourself out of like fixing your levels too. Like it's critical that you have adequate hormone production similar to women in menopause. Like the the benefit outweighs the risk like essentially every single time essentially. And you just have to be responsible about your approach to what that is. Listen. >> Well, especially if you're you're monitoring biomarkers and we'd I'd love to like talk about some of those in a minute, but I think that's that's the key too, right? Like monitoring, right? >> Yeah. Okay. So, then circling back to administration, like the ideal way to go about it. >> Um, I can say off the rip, I would not do pellets. I would probably not do androgel if you're a male. If you're a female, it's a bit different, which we can get into. um the creams through compounding pharmacies. That's probably the only like tolerable way you're going to have something that you can apply scrotally to get the ideal absorption and pharmaccoinetic profile that would be reflective of something that's like more natural. So like that is probably on paper arguably the best way to go about it. It's just not necessarily something everyone wants to do. But it it works well and it will get you to the levels that are great and look pretty physiologic and like kind of reflect the pulsatile dial nature of normal testosterone secretion. And it's also converting like locally like in the area you would actually be producing it too. Like there is a local effect too through like five alpha reduction in the skin and stuff like that. um which can result in that's why monitoring like DHT and some of this other stuff can be important but it's like a whole more nuance discussion but in general the cream scrotally is reliable good produces a very favorable outcome and a lot of guys will be quite happy with that method the other method that I would say is worth uh considering and like the typical one that most guys do is injection which it's a bit more predictable typically in terms of like what you're going to get out of it in terms of adher appearance. It's a lot easier because you don't have to shoot it daily. You can also modulate the release pattern of it through either the Esther. So like you'll typically get prescribed like the longest bleed esther. So, cypionate has a halflife of like I think it's like 10 days or something 8 to 10 days depending on how uh depending on individual biochemistry and how you kind of like cleave the esester but you can also change the way it absorbs via injecting subcutaneously into stomach fat or into any subq fat versus intramuscularly where it's more quickly going to get absorbed and assimilated. So you can also bleed out the effect even more and make it even more stable in your blood levels. And it's pretty easy to adhere to a TRT protocol of like micro injections even on like a relative frequent basis like every other day is pretty damn stable. Subcutaneously is what a lot of guys do and works really really well. And you know keeps a very stable uh hormone concentration curve. It's pretty predictable and what's going to happen. you just kind of like got to be aware of the you know how hard you're pushing it and what that will do to your risk profile accordingly. The other way that's promising that I would say is uh oral testosterone undeanate lymphatic absorption patented format. So there is three I believe tando um jatenzo and kaotrix and they've basically managed to make a lymphatically absorbed testosterone underway you can actually swallow orally whereas back in the day they would have had to make it hepattoxic to actually make it through the liver um through a first pass metabolism and actually like make it into circulation to any meaningful level they'd have to like add like a 17 alpha alkalated group to it and make it like a terrible for you oral steroid Essentially, this does not have the same level of stress. It's not stress free as far as I know, but it's will get you the me a meaningfully significant like get you replacement of total tea levels to like mid to high range depending on the person. Likely achieve symptom relief for guys who are hypoganatal and is pretty sustainable because you're just popping something. So, some people prefer that. pretty expensive though and kind of like a newer medium of administration but promising nonetheless. Um, typically what guys are doing though still is the injections and the or the cream. And the other method is intraasal, which I'm sure you've probably heard of for like, you know, hypoactive sexual disorder for women has a potential for that. Um, as well as uh for men as like a different medium of getting like an ariththro poising free version of test cuz it's so acute. It's just like an unsustainable daily treatment. Unfortunately, like it's okay if you're trying to have like an ondemand libido boost as a female or something, but for a guy using it like multiple times a day in snorting something, it's like not something any guy I think would want to do for and even if they think it's cool to begin with, I think for once you get to like the month or couple month mark, you the novelty would probably fade. Um like a lot of guys are you know super excited when they start testosterone injections like it's like this roster you're using like this hormone and it's you know I'm replacing and it's you know it feels like this big significant thing and then you know a year in it's just like oh I got to do my injection. So it's like whatever you can most sustainably adhere to that is like the safest will achieve the outcome you desire. The symptom relief is the one you should stick to. And the cream, I guess I didn't mention the obvious, but like transference, if you have children, you have pets, like there are uh concerns with, you know, like what you are going to rub it off on and like how like your hygiene with it. So that's worth mentioning cuz like there are cases of transference issues that have been noted in media. You know, I think I did a video a while ago where some dad accidentally was like wiping residue on his kid without even realizing it, even after he like thought he cleaned it and his kid was like starting to get masculineized from the from the testosterone residue or something. >> Wow. >> Yeah. Crazy. Cuz it's like the levels are so low like any like significant amount will like push things in like a significant incremental direction that is like going to cause problems. So that's a thing. Whereas injection, it's like you're in the bathroom, you do it and it's clean and done. Totally sterile. You don't have to worry about like are my hands fully clean, you know, is somebody going to get into it like good luck accidentally like breaking into like a multi-dosese vial or something. It's not going to happen. So, >> right. >> Yeah, there's like different like logistical advantages too to some of these administration methods that probably should not be understated but are worth mentioning. Um so yeah I think the three most viable cream scrotal application injection intramuscular or subq if you want to bleed out the effect or maybe the oral um all but I want to see more of the literature as it evolves >> right so it's kind of a newer thing and when it comes to the injections it sounds like more frequent subq is like subcutaneous is like where you're going to get more less of the prob probability of having that supra physiological peak versus like if you're just doing it once a week intramuscular >> not bleeding out that like response or effect. Um, but again it as you mentioned compliance is definitely going to be better if you're doing it once a week. But I mean twice a week, three times like every other day. I mean, you know, for people that are that are really concerned about risk profile, perhaps they have >> already like, you know, a family history of cardiovascular disease or stroke or whatever, they probably are more incentivized to like lower that risk for any potential side effects. >> Yeah. Like in general, I think >> or fertility. What about men that are wanting men men that are wanting to reproduce? >> Yeah, we gota talk about that too. But one rule of thumb that's like to make it as easy to understand, at least for me, this was the easiest to understand like how I remember it is the closer something is to what would be equivalent to what you would naturally make should you have had should you have healthy functioning testes producing natural testosterone. that's going to be the one that has the least impact on all of the un like intentional consequences of like spikes in hormones. So like normally on a daily basis you would pulse out like in es and flows multiple times. So like the more you can get these like the more stable you can get it with the more micro administration spread throughout the week, the more stable everything will be and as a consequence less spikes into the territory that would produce things that are not representative of physiologic and typically daily administration is the way to go. Whether it's like cream is going to be twice a day at least, but then for injection it's like every day and every other day there's diminishing returns, but you can kind of like we said bleed it out a bit. So yeah. So as far as fertility goes, yeah, like you will absolutely crush your fertility pretty significantly if not entirely depending on some things. So intraicular testosterone is the significant mediator of spermatogenesis. So it's not uncommon even for bodybuilders who are on huge amounts of steroids to still accidentally get their wives, girlfriends pregnant thinking that they're sterile when in fact they have so much testosterone in their body that it's like actually like like producing the spermatogenesis effect via the exogenous hormone. what that does to epigenetics, all that stuff. No idea. Would freak me out a bit, but like it's it happens and it's like on paper these guys should be completely infertile, but still see accidental pregnancies all the time in the bodybuilding world. So, I wouldn't rely on that as a means of uh contraception as a guy, first of all. Um, but you will almost certainly have like inhibited to like horrifically low if not auspermic level fertility if you were on even just like baseline replacement because you are shutting down the signaling from your brain that otherwise dictates the intraesticular activity. So by that I mean the hypothalamus releases the G&R, the gonadotropen releasing hormone. So it's the hormone that causes the release of ginadotropins, hence the name. At the pituitary gland, the pituitary responds to that G&R to then produce the ginadotropins, which are the luteinizing hormone LH and the FSH follicical stimulating hormone just like in women. Goes down to the gonads and the thing that happens is you uh produce intraicular testosterone at the litic cell. Um and women do too. It's just thea cells instead of you know lighting cells. Um and that intesticular testosterone mediates spermatogenesis in unison with the cerolei cells which are also uh supported by follical stimulating hormone. So if you have exogenous testosterone so like you're administering it yourself synthetically you have basically told your brain I have enough estrogen and testosterone via this injection I'm doing or whatever it is. So you cannot produce any more G&RH cuz like why would we need you to? We have enough hormone. It's like okay well let's turn that off. Let's turn off as a result we have no signal to produce pituitary hormones or the the ginadotropen.in. So we turn that off and now you have no signaling to your testes. So now you're just like literal organ uh atrophy is occurring because there's no signaling happening there. So the only thing you can really do at that point if your HRT protocol is not built around replicating manual signal because that is a means that some people do if you have adequate organ function you could theoretically do that instead of TRT. But if you're going to be on TRT, like you either replicate that natural signal or you sustain organ atrophy to the point of potentially some permanent likely deterioration, all but likely not inability to restore fertility. Like it's very rare that I see guys who are actually like not truly fully hypogonatal, like their testes still work. They just had inadequate signaling or something via like secondary hypogonatism. If those individuals maintain the signaling like you can retain the structural integrity for the most part of the testes and then if you want to get pregnant or whatever you are either currently fertile still because you're manually stimulating it or you could like you can basically manually manipulate how fertile you are in real time essentially. So you could fully retain all fertility parameters even push them to super levels if you wanted to. I don't recommend it, but like you can maintain everything while you're on testosterone via that manual signaling of hCG plus reccombinant FSH. That's like the combo that basically replicates what would otherwise be the LH and FSH from your pituitary to your testes. You maintain structural uh the size, the uh functionality, sperm production, etc. But then you also have to account for the extra testosterone you're producing because that's stacked on top of your exogenous test. now. So now your dose might have to change and the amount of estrogen. There's like local activity in the testes for how much aromatization happens and whatnot, which is different than if you're injecting it like in your butt or something. So you have to account for that differential, too. Some people get highly estrogenic from hCG in particular, which is like a female like literally in pregnant women's urine to stimulate lighting cells. That's what it's like purified from. Um, and you know, there's some speculation as to if HCG is like healthy to be on as a guy. Like you're taking like an extract of like women's urine. It's like a light cell stimulator similar to LH and seems to mimic the effects of LH, but it's still not LH. It's HCG, which like human corionic ginadropen isn't what comes from your pituitary to your testes. It's just something that stimulates the lighting cells significantly. So, do we see any like notable effects on like I don't know epigenetic modifications from hCG plus FSH mediated babies? Like not that I'm aware of. Not that I've seen any literature point to, but it's worth noting nonetheless that hCG is not like a bioididentical ginadotropen for men that you would otherwise be using to shoot to your testes. It's like a replacement for it. And reccominant FSH is like it's FSH but it's still like grown in a lab. it's not from your pituitary. Does that matter? I don't know for sure. But either way, you can maintain your fertility metrics to literal baseline if you had an adequate adjunct uh therapy. It's just very cost prohibitive. Like the cost of recompetent FSH is insane. And hCG in itself is expensive. And then you're stacking that on top of your testosterone that you're using. It's not necessarily an affordable thing for everyone. So, a lot of guys just let their testies atrophy because that's what they can afford to do and they want to still get the symptom relief. And then once it comes time to have a kid, they have a bit of a more intensive protocol ahead of them to restore organ size and functionality, which is uh more intensive of a process than if you just sustained like I'm sure like you could speak to like it's easier to keep stuff where it is than it is to try and like regain health. So if you've literally atrophied an organ until like you know a fraction of its functionality trying to like bring it back from the it's not it's not dead but it's like very compromised. Um it's likely not going to restore to like full functionality and the road to getting there will require more aggressive intervention. You'll still probably get back to fertile but like it might not be as good of uh health of the sperm for all we know. um it might not be the same capacity to produce the same volume. Who knows? So, all that to say, yeah, you should expect your fertility to go down the toilet and you should expect that you have an adjunct protocol in place if you want to sustain it, if you're on testosterone and you want to sustain the fertility, but it's possible to sustain it. A lot of people thought until like relatively recently that if you're on testosterone, you just couldn't. You were going to be infertile for sure. And it's unfortunate because there's a lot of guys, especially bodybuilders, who underwent severe atrophy and then had like really more difficult roads to recovery because of just bad information. >> Wow. Yeah, I mean that's >> like imagine finding out like for 10 years you've been on like hormone therapy and you could have kept your testicles where they were the whole time and now you just have like these shriveled, you know, like raisins that you have to like restimulate to baseline through like insane aggressive dosages of AC hCG and FSH. Like not cool. >> At what point does that atrophy start to occur? I mean like how long do you have to be on, you know, TRT before that really starts to happen? Um it's pretty quick because like the suppression of the ginadotropins happens like within days like once you start to inject that hormone like you've introduced an amount that is going to tell your brain we have enough don't make anymore and once the ginadropins bottom out you have no signal like you will atrophy over you know the next months and get to some level of atrophy that is variable depending on the person but regardless you're stimulating activity. So even if like the structural size isn't like as significant of a drop, like there's a lack of activity entirely. So like, you know, it's all kind of individual dependent, but like you should expect shrinkage within, you know, weeks to months. >> Wow. And so this is also kind of important to point out for like guys that are, you know, cowboying it and trying to like they want to they want to get their tea up for like maybe some muscular effects or something, right? and they're just kind of like maybe not hypogonatal but like lower range. >> Yeah, I like doing this very seriously like it's a you know that you want to be on it. It's not something to experiment with. Um, in my opinion, if it's like the route of hormone therapy, like treat it as such, like you treat it like you are on it forever probably. >> And biomarkers to monitor, right? Let's say you are going to be on this. And so some of the biomark you mentioned like lipids and we're talking about hematocrit, right? like some of these biomarkers are important like what what would be or what are some of the ones that that your company measures or what you think are important to measure PSA right? >> Mhm. Yeah. I think uh um hematology you know this kind of like covers the basics of you know red blood cell count hematocrit hemoglobin etc. um metabolic parameters. Um like there there's a lot of stuff you want to incrementally assess like how well it's working too like how much more metabolically like fit are you becoming in your blood work and insulin sensitive and whatnot because these are metrics of progress you can use to actually determine how well this is going for you. So it's not just about like where did your total tea and free tea end up on paper. It's also about like the real health benefits that you're seeking not just from a symptom relief aspect but also from like you know what's your fasting insulin now? Is it like way better cuz you have more muscle mass on your body? Like if not like you know there there's things to be had that are going to be net beneficial from a health standpoint, not just like a cosmetic and like I don't know sexual health standpoint that should be monitored regularly. And I think one of the key things is just making sure you have a good baseline cuz it's like once you a lot of people make the mistake of like this is kind of like mediated by default through us like you have to get a baseline to even like see where you're at before you would get even recommended to do anything but a lot of people they get on hormones before they have a baseline and then they just like don't know what they're looking at after they're on it. Like if you have a problem and you've shut down your system via hormones and you're trying to like retroactively figure out what happened and what went wrong, it's pretty difficult to see what like the change was that was marked and like significant that led you to where you are, that might be, you know, a problem. So um if you have like a reasonably comprehensive baseline that assesses the hematology um a CMP that assesses your kidney uh status via cystatin C estimated GFR or um a uh SDMA which is like a uh uh symmetric um is it symmetric d uh it's another marker more progressive marker for kidney function that is a proxy for inulin clearance with relative accuracy, which is like the gold standard of um actual GFR for kidney for uh kidney filtration capacity. Um I forget what it stands for, but you could just type in ADMA and SDMA and you'll see what the acronyms stand for. I think you've talked about on your show, too. >> I don't know what they stand for either. >> One of them is like asymmetric dimethylene and one's Yeah. So, one of them assesses vaso dilation potential and one is more of like a for cardiovascular and one is more of like a kidney marker. um that is equivalent or slightly better than cyatin C estimated GFR which is not influenced by muscle mass creatine intake or the array of things that can cause transient >> complete like to the point of it being unusable uh changes in the marker cuz creatinine calculated EGFR the amount of guys I've seen think that they're on borderline like death store of kidney failure from a creatinine that's high because they're you know a muscle bound guy who takes creatine and like works out harder or whatever. It's like it's startling that this isn't more widely known. So either of those two kind of like strong proxies for inulin clearance. Um you have your kind of like metabolic parameters to see your insulin sensitivity, hemoglobin A1C, you know, all the kind of basics. Um, I think uh the lipid panel definitely a baseline HDL to see how much it gets lowered by the dose of testosterone you're you're using because you will likely see a suppression if you are elevating your testosterone beyond what you are at. Doesn't mean that it's bad or good. It's just worth noting like how much of a deterioration it has based on your dose because it's one of the proxies for kind of like androgenic activity. SHBG and your binding proteins like what's your baseline relative to after? Because if you are injecting infrequently or a dose that is significantly suppressive like it might otherwise be a proxy for like using more than you might need. Not necessarily the case always, but SHBG will get suppressed dramatically by exogenous androgens in a dose dependent manner. So it's not uncommon to see with bodybuilders who are using full-blown steroid cycles, SHBG levels in the single digits, which is like you have essentially no regulation of androgenic signaling at that point. It's just like everything's flying around. So with guys on TRT, it's like worth knowing where you stood to begin with and then how much it decrease because it's like if you didn't know the baseline too, any of your diet changes at that point, the carb manipulations, the exercise change, the calorie intake change, the sleep, like you would have no idea what the impact thing was for sure that impacted the SHPG if you didn't have the baseline. So um what else as far as assessing um free tea and total tea measured through the accurate assays which would be the gold standard for total testosterone is liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. If you use an equilibrium, if you use a uh immunoassay test, which is like the cheaper version, often it will be relatively inaccurate. Um especially at lower like more uh low levels, it is like notoriously inaccurate because that the very low numbers like you need to be more specific. So like with women especially like you don't want to be messing around with amuninoassay test. You want to be using sensitive assay estradi every single time. sensitive assay testing for total tea. And for free testosterone, you don't want to be using a calculation. Ideally, you would want to be measuring through equilibrium ultrailtration or equilibrium dialysis, which are like actual measurements, not estimates based on calculations. Um, that's kind of what I recommend. I would recommend. And then estradi is LCMS as well. The same as what you use for total testosterone. Um, and what else? Um, I'm probably missing some stuff. Basic liver markers would be to have like so the stuff that's going to get directly affected the most by androgens though is going to be like your gonadotropins, LH and FSH. They're going to be in the ground and if they're not, it kind of indicates that you don't have adequate either androgen or estrogen signaling. It would be odd if you were on testosterone replacement and your LHF weren't like at the bottom of the barrel. It would almost be questioning at that point like am I having something inhibit the androgens from working or the estrogen because it's like you could theoretically blunt estrogen mediated feedback by using you know an aromatase inhibitor or a serum or something and like blunt that response and you would see in your blood work it'd be like your body still thinks it needs to make more natural testosterone and you know it's kicking up the ginadotropen. So, if you're on like true replacement, those levels should be like not like even present essentially. Um, which is odd like seeking to have like a bottom note number as like what the target is. Um, that would kind of indicate you've definitely kind of like satisfactory replaced to what you need to stimulate like the negative feedback. Um, yeah. And then I mentioned the lipids. Um, yeah, I'm definitely missing something, but fasting insulin, some of the insulin resistance markers, and um, there's some stuff you should probably check like baseline like clotting risk, you know, predispositions, uh, factor 5 laden, you know, things like this. Um, LP little A at baseline. Um, especially because androgens suppress LP little A uniquely, which a lot of people don't realize is affected by androgens, which is typically not something that can be manipulated through anything really that I'm aware of through like diet and lifestyle. So, you might think you have like a I don't know, you might have like a think you have a better LP little AA than you actually had at baseline. So, like your genetics might be like masked a bit by your androgen use. Um, I don't know, thyroid balance, you know, thyroid levels are good to have. How much TSH do you have? you know, T4, T3, the free balance of those hormones, IGF-1. None of these are like critical necessarily, but they're just worth having for basic health assessments and to see where you land. But like yeah, it's basically like your total test, your free test, your estradi, the free levels, um, sensitive assay measurements, LH, FFSH, hematology, HDL, kind of like the basics, metabolic health, insulin sensitivity metrics, I think, are kind of like the critical baseline ones. >> It's pretty comprehensive. Yeah, >> I don't I don't imagine everyone is doing that. Uh, >> well, fortunately, a lot of good panels will just like have it for you. Like it's not like you would ever be expected to remember all that stuff. And I'm probably missing it. Like I'm I'm sure I like I can't even remember it all. I'd have to go look at our own pre-esigned panels to tell you. I probably should have done that at the beginning of the thing rather than rambling nonsensically. >> So just briefly women, you know, this is another I'd love to know. We've talked a lot already about like testing methodology, timing, test, you know, time of the day to test and all that stuff, but you know, how how does a woman go about like determining whether or not she has low testosterone, needs to kind of figure out dietary, lifestyle wise, like you know, obviously that's the first line of, you know, defense, right? You kind of address that first. But I just would like to talk about like generally speaking, clinical symptoms in women. And sounds like it's pretty similar to men. We talked about that. Um what females are a candidate for testosterone replacement therapy? Like what's the actual reference range for women? Let's say they also have symptoms or maybe they just want to have some of the benefits of a little bit more testosterone as they're getting into pmenopause and um and such. So yeah, can we talk a little bit about like women? >> Yeah. So the reference range I believe for it's going to depend on the lab of course but in general I believe lab corp is 15 to 70 nanogs per deciliter so like the rough equivalent of you know a bit less than maybe like onetenth that of men. Um, and for them defining low tea gets a bit more difficult because you're so close to like zero essentially that one if you're not doing sensitive enough testing like you're probably not going to be accurate. So that's where the it's super critical that you have these levels assessed accurately through the LCMS methodology that I mentioned. Um, but also like are they doing anything that is extra suppressive on top of all the stuff men already have to consider like contraceptives? Cuz it's like you could be artificially inducing a state of low tea that you otherwise wouldn't have and then maybe like self diagnosing thinking that you have it like which you technically do maybe on paper but it's like selfmediated through something that you were also prescribed that's like a hormone too. So that gets a bit tough. But in general to simplify like a lot of the stuff we just mentioned is like directly analogous to like what women should look to as well. Like it's the same micronutrients. It's the same just at a different scale and proportion. It's the same eating enough calories and not starving yourself and leading to you know amenorhea. It's uh making sure you have like a normal you know menstrual period. All this stuff. Um um and then yeah like you know the the oral contraceptives is significant and worth noting if you're on that like you almost certainly are artificially suppressing yourself into like the equivalent of hypo territory for women. So if you're on it like I would probably check where you stand and you know decide if that's the medium you want to continue moving forward. And for some women it works. Like it's not to say that that's something you shouldn't be on at all. Some women like that. Some women have like hyper androgen leaning, you know, uh, phenotypes and they might actually maybe benefit from some suppression. It kind of depends. Like some women need to use like anti-androgens to maintain like a more neutral profile to not get like heretism and whatnot, which is like like hair growth that would be reflective of like masculine characteristics. Um, so yeah, like in general, I'd be looking to that. um basic sympto symptoms symptoms and the biioarkers while there is a reference range of 15 to 70 I don't think you're ever going to have a doctor who's not part of like I don't know like the more progressive kind of like preventive really on the cutting edge tell them for sure just because they were low or like clinically low that they should replace because there's not really like a there's no FDA approved medication for women for testosterone in the US there is in Australia apparently, which is kind of wild considering it's like the most regulated uh place ever that is like almost nothing's legal there, but somehow like testosterone is for women. U shockingly, but in uh the US, everything's like off label. So, you're going to have to use like a male formulation androgel and like apply like a PS size amount to your arm or something if you use it. And even that would be done with the oversight of like a pretty rigorous doctor ideally. And one of the things I can point to is if somebody was to go on TRT as a woman, one of the things that would be freaking most of them out is the side effect profile that are irreversible. Like for men, it's not a huge deal if you had a bit of a deeper voice. Like it might be a benefit and you get a bit of hair growth, whatever. For women, if you get irreversible voice deepening, like that is quality of life destroying for some of them and you can't just fix it. So, one of the things I would absolutely do, um, because there are a lot of doctors now that are like in the cutting edge that will overshoot women based on their more like liberal kind of like women should be optimal and like you they should be at like 200 total tea. And like I had one doctor even when I was like first getting into this industry who's like really respected. I'm not going to necessarily put him on blast cuz hopefully he's kind of fixed his protocols, but he had a cookie cutter protocol that was like way too aggressive and like I could uh he had my mom on the protocol. And I picked up the phone one day and like I didn't even recognize her voice. I was like, "What the hell?" And fortunately, we like got her off it immediately and it sort of like self-regulated to some extent, but it was like fast and aggressive and blatant. And I was like, if I wasn't looking for this, like she could have been like for sure viralized to the point of an unrecognizable voice within a matter of weeks. Yeah. Yeah. So, you got to be like hyper aware. Even if you think you have like the most knowledgeable guy overseeing you, I would recommend downloading uh like a really vetted and highly reviewed app that monitors your actual like tone of your voice to assess any sort of change in inflection, tonality, deepness, cuz that's the only thing that will assess in real time that change without just some subjective assessment from your like significant other or something. Cuz eventually if you don't when you're seeing yourself every day and it's like micro changes, you don't really notice and then all of a sudden one day you notice in the mirror you have hair loss or all of a sudden you have like you know hair on your lip that you didn't have or somebody tells you like your voice sounds deeper and you didn't even realize it was happening. This stuff is insidious, but it'll still creep up quick and you might not notice the change incrementally because you're so either the changes are still like on a daily basis, you might not notice it yourself, but also a lot of women are kind of wi even some of them are willing to like overlook it because they feel so good with the protocol. It's like my quality of life is so great now. I don't want to mess with anything. And they'll just stay the course and then like [ __ ] themselves up and they don't need to. they could have got the same symptom relief at like a much lower dose. So, >> wow. Yeah, you got to be careful if you're a woman like replacing test especially cuz it's uh there are a lot of doctors that like especially the ones have cookie cutter protocols that are like you know everyone should get to a total te of you know 200 to 300 like >> might be a bit aggressive maybe they should like you know >> yeah I mean especially as you were mentioning like the the the range is so small for us right for women that like >> I mean I I'm concerned like even trying I mean I don't know if I need it right now So, you know, I'm not saying that I'm going to, but um you know, for women that like do go and get a test, again, we don't even know that they got the right test. Maybe it wasn't even sensitive enough, right? And so now they're getting on testosterone replacement therapy and then it's like, >> you know, it feels like kind of like the wild west in a way, right? It like you mentioned, it's there's no FDA approved TRT for women, so it's off label. You're kind of just >> Yeah. >> going I don't know. It feels like uncharted territory. So, >> yeah. You know, I mean, like there's definitely a way to go about it that I think is net beneficial for sure. It's not like clinically like there's a guideline that says like at this level equals, you know, you're the equivalent of hypoganatal and you should be on testosterone. Like it's always going to be an off label recommendation based on a assessment of like what kind of net benefit you would hopefully get out of it, which for a lot of people with responsible use in menopause would probably be a net benefit if they needed it. But your deterioration in testosterone production is not going to diminish to the same degree of velocity as your estrogen progesterone that essentially plummet into nothingness. Like a lot of the testosterone is mediated through adrenal synthesis and like peripheral tissue conversion. It's not all ovarian. So like your the proportion of how much testosterone you make in each area is not going to be equivalent woman to woman. It's going to change depend you know individual genetics. So like you might not have that big of a drop in testosterone or even like the perceived impact of that drop relative to another woman. It might not be nearly as significant. Like you might be totally fine in menopause just be on estrogen and progesterone micronized or whatever. Um it all depends and that's where like a nuanced assessment and like no cookie cutter protocols. Like there are general guidelines of kind of like where to start with things. But like that's the reason you got to be like insanely educated about this stuff going in, especially if you're a woman using like an off label prescription of something that is not FDA approved. Like there could be a huge quality of life bump, but like you got to know what you're doing when you go in. And like it sounds bad, but you almost like got to know what the ideal protocol is for you like before the doctor tells you. You have to like find the doctor who like you know is responsible which is crazy but like >> yeah you got to do your due diligence. You got to educate yourself. No, I mean that's what podcasts like this are for as well. >> And if you find that there's a a way that you could get there like for example if you found out you were like adrenal insufficient for example like there are natural things that you could do on the women's side like DHEA. I'm sure at some point we would have ended up talking about not meaningfully impactful for men's testosterone levels because the majority is driven through intraicular testosterone production. But for women because you only have such a amount it's like you know 15 to 70 total a significant chunk of that could be driven through DHEA mediated conversion. And if that is the case and you're low DHEA via an assessment of the biioarker DHEAS typically as a proxy sulfated DHEA, you may highly benefit from like a basic DHEA oral supplement that's like, you know, uh easier to predict what's going to happen. It's like an actual marker you can point to as deficient based on like a validated, you know, clinical biioarker and you know exactly what happens when like like there isn't a it could convert technically to different metabolites, but in general women respond favorably to an adequate DHEA dose when warranted for testosterone conversion. Like I've seen pretty dramatic changes to the degree of women on combined or old contraceptives attenuating entirely the loss in testosterone production via the progesterine and estrogen induced suppression through the DHEA. So like by that I mean starting off with like a 70 total tea getting suppressed down to like you know 30 or something on your combined oral contraceptive taking DHEA and getting back up to 70 while you're still on the combined oil contraceptive. >> What kind of dose of DHEA? 25 to 50 would be like what you see in the studies, but I would start lower for sure just to see how you respond because it is again an androgen and women some of them respond pretty aggressively with acne flare-ups and androgenic side effects and it should still be treated with the respect that it deserves cuz it's an androgen. It will still mediate similar side effects and some women don't respond favorably to it and like you know testo testosterone could be warranted depending on the person. You just got to know like the dose is like really really small and like it's probably like a tiny little blip of cream or gel like whatever you're using. It's probably going to be uh just be like aware of, you know, and extremely cautious about like who you're deferring to for information on it because it's not something you want to mess with without like knowing exactly where your dose should theoretically put you on like a reference range and like what that might yield in terms of symptom relief or like benefit, quality of life via an array of people that are trusted in the like widespread community for this kind of stuff. and you, you know, multiple opinions, not just like one guy who, you know, is a cowboy doc. >> Totally. Yeah. No, this is great info. Um, kind of the last topic to to get to and we've already sort of touched on it was like some of the side effects of maybe perhaps some of this androgen, you know, therapy or hormone replacement therapy, hair loss. >> And this is something I know you've personally talked about. It's it's very interesting and I'm I sort of just want to talk about it out of my own my own interests like why why does hair loss occur like what is the role of DHT in that process you know >> it's kind of a crazy thing how in this day and age we have like advanced AI stuff we have like all these like cutting edge treatments for you can like literally completely get rid of the likelihood of ASVD for crushing APOB and like different things of this nature but like hair loss No one has a [ __ ] clue what happens or how to prevent it without just crushing your DHT levels essentially, which is wild that that's still a thing. But as long as I've been researching this stuff, there's been people that are like, "Oh, the, you know, the solutions on the horizon like every two weeks you'll see some viral article on Twitter like UCLA scientists found like rodent regrow all his hair after shaved from like random thing." Like, oh my god, Dribbos is the solution. I'm going to go dump it on my head. You should see the nutty [ __ ] that people on like Reddit and whatnot dump on the >> right. Yeah, sulfurophane was one too at one point. Broccoli sprouts on the head. Didn't end up working though. >> Um I'm sure it has like some like indirect benefit for like systemic health, but like >> at the end of the day, the unfortunate reality inherently in the name of what it is is what is causing it, which is androgenic androgen mediated alipcia. So the miniaturaturization of hair follicles mediated by androgens primarily the one that is the most potent in its androgenic activity which is DHT and these hormones it's not just like they convert and then have like in the in the blood or like at the liver or something there is like tissue specific concentrations of enzymes that are more prominent and in particular in the skin in the scalp especially too you will have there's way more five alpha reductase density in uh men for converting testosterone to DHT. So that like local reaction where you're converting more testone into DHT is resulting in like a significantly high per surface area amount of DHT than like any almost any other area in the body with exception of like um like other other skin areas that are hairy, you know, the prostate as well. um like the scrotum when you apply the cream like you actually get a bit of a disproportionate spike in DHT I mentioned earlier but anyway in the scalp highly expressing five alpha reductase and that conversion seems to be what mediates androgenic alipcia in essentially all cases. There are some fringe cases in men where okay you might have a um you know nutrient deficiency or you might have some weird genetic predisposition that was totally corrected by adding in fill in the blank thing or you had undiagnosed hypothyroidism or what have you. Typically not the case. Typically it's pattern hair loss, miniaturization of the hair follicle. And if a lot of people unfortunately get misled by these like crazy, you know, wild stories like, "Oh, the solution's on the horizon. Oh, just like wipe some broccoli on your head. Oh, do this." And then they just lose their hair and there's no recovering because unfortunately what happens is if you leave it for too long, the area starts to undergo fibrosis. So, it's not like it's something that you can necessarily recover to baseline. If you're completely slick bald, the scalp environment is no longer habitable to like healthy hair follicles that are like, you know, your original hair. You're not going to be able to grow it back probably until they start like cloning hair follicles or something. So, you kind of got to get in front of it similar to ASCVD as absurd as it sounds like before it starts stacking cuz it's something that's cumulative and insidious and over time eventually all of a sudden it's a problem. So, when you're young, you know, why is it This is one of the stupidest things I hear. Why is it that when your DHT levels are at their highest, when you're young, you have no hair loss, but then when you're old, you have hair loss. It's like the same reason that you've been stacking plaque in your arteries since you were like a teenager. Like, it's cumulative. So, being preventative and proactive is the name of the game when it comes to hair loss. And I'm not to say that like there isn't a solution that exists in the planet that somehow addresses the downstream cascade of like you know TGF beta and like you know the the W NT pathway all this fringe stuff that is a result of the androgen induced transcriptional activity but at the end of the day nothing seems to be potent enough to attenuate whatever is happening downstream. So like the net result is the follicle literally like starves itself and miniaturizes like the follicle becomes weaker, thinner and over time the antigen phase which is like the growth phase of the hair follicle shortens shortens shortens and over time you're just like shedding weaker and weaker hair and it's growing back thinner and thinner and eventually it's so thin, sparse and insignificant cosmetically that you can't even see it. And it's just like these follicles have essentially died and gone undergone literal apoptosis because each one is an organ in itself individually. And once it dies like it's not going to just come back from the dead and then that area you know fibrosis or under goes fibrosis and like you're screwed in that spot essentially unless you transplant non AA androenic alipesia affected hair follicles into that dead zone. But like you need a lot of hair to offset like a completely bald head and it's like typically not possible if you've let yourself get too far gone. So, and it's really interesting too cuz these hair follicles they're not prone to the same miniaturaturization. So like even if you transplant it from here to here like it's not going to undergo the same effect even though it's like in that area interestingly enough. But these hair follicles are like highly prone to miniaturaturization if you are susceptible to hair loss. What makes you susceptible to hair loss? Genetics, but in general, are you gonna bank on you being the one guy? Like, how many guys do you know who 50 years old plus have like no visible hair loss whatsoever and it looks like they did when they were 19 years old? >> My dad, but his hair is gray, but it's essentially the same. >> Is it actually though? >> Yeah. Yeah. Full thick like head of hair, but it's just white. >> Okay. Well, >> very thick. Yeah. But it's it's an out he's an outlier for sure. >> And you you have a son, you said >> I do. >> Oh, he must he's going to be thrilled then. >> Is it is it on the mom's side? >> Typically, it's thought to be the mom's dad. It doesn't always play out like that. >> It doesn't seem like it always does, >> but like that's a good he might not have to take, you know, the hormone crushing drugs. He might be one of the fringe lucky ones. >> Well, let's talk about the proactive. I mean, so you know what are these proactive measurements that can be done that >> so proactively as unfortunate of a reality as it is, you have to weigh the risk-to-reward on inhibiting DHT. So how far ahead you get of this kind of impacts how intensive of a a protocol you have to use as well as your like susceptibility to that androgenic stimulation which is also going to be contingent on your hormone level. So if you're you know hypoganatal and then you correct that and bump yourself up to you know high normal like you might have just doubled your androgen load in your scalp for all you know and the proportional increase is like magnified multiplefold because it's more five alpha reductase expression in the scalp than like anywhere else essentially. So getting in front of it, the only thing like how they developed these drugs was they found that um individuals that had a mutation in the gene that encodes for five alpha reductase seem to not undergo full sexual maturation in adolescence and they would end up with shockingly the same amount of muscle mass as like you know their like for example siblings who weren't affected but inhibited uh maturation of uh genitals for example like not full that often end up with like a micro penis that's like where that comes from typically but also no facial hair growth really and no temporal recession is like one of the hallmarks of uh you know the uh they're called pseudoh hermaphrodites which is like I don't know male pseudo hermaphrodites and maybe that's not like a a correct term now but that's what they are in the literature and it is literally these individuals have no inhibition in their capacity to produce testosterone it is all the DHT. Now, it doesn't mean that testosterone doesn't also have a similar effect on hair follicles. It's just the magnitude of effect is so much less that if you get in front of it like, you know, day one, unless you're highly susceptible, the inhibition via inhibiting that enzyme is likely going to be sufficient to offset loss for visibly for your entire life because it's a progressive thing. And you won't even notice the cosmetic difference in hair density until you've lost like 25 plus% of your hair. So like if I pull a hair out of my head right now, you visibly would look no different. If I pull two hairs on my head, it would look visibly no different. But once you start to get to like tens of thousands of hair follicles, like you have on average, depending on the ethnicity, but like I think it's like 70 to like 80,000 upwards of 100,000 hair follicles on your head. Once you've gotten to the point that you're down like 10,000, 20,000, 30,000, all of a sudden you're starting to see visibly like in down lighting, you can see through your scalp and you couldn't before. You're starting to see yourself in pictures and you're like, "Huh, that's weird." Like I don't remember seeing I have to like part my hair weird now to cover this spot. Like what the hell's going on? And then like one day it hits you and it's devastating and you're just like, "Shit, I guess I am prone to hair loss. I thought I was immune this whole time." That's not the case, >> dude. >> Yeah, that's rough. >> That's depressing. >> Yeah. Um, okay. So, >> no, I I certainly don't want to leave a podcast saying, "Get on finasteride. We're duty or else you're screwed." Like, there's an ROI calculation to be made similar to any sort of hormonal therapy that is not to be minimized. There are side effect profiles with these drugs just as there is with any drugs. But I would compel you to look at the actual literature and assess what the prevalence was among those who were subjected to DHT deprivation and finasteride users and dutastasteride. And it is not much different than placebo in very very rigorous and significant high number of uh subject studies that were well uh well constructed studies. Like this is not something that a lot of it is mediadriven. It's not to be ignored. Some people get devastated by these drugs, but it's a minority of individuals. And it's just kind of like do you want to be one of those individuals who takes the risk or not? There are ways to assess if you're more likely to be one of those individuals. If you were a low androgen status individual to begin with, for example, I have low normal free testosterone with a borderline, you know, hypoganatal looking DHT level to begin with and I'm still already having hair loss like, and I already have symptoms, will crushing my DHT to nothing be more likely to result in a side effect than somebody who's like vital, no side, like thriving, no issues whatsoever. ever seemingly like there is an androgen load component to assess like how significant of an impact it might have on your uh ability to support functions driven through androgens cuz it's like every person is going to have a some degree of impact. It just might not be perceivable in any noticeable way whatsoever. Like you might have like a some like few% deterioration to your nitric oxide capacity in your erection. Will you notice that? I don't know. It depends on the person. In the studies, it doesn't seem like the prevalence is very significant. And uh shockingly, dutasteride is a similar side effect profile to finasteride even in studies comparing them where you have near full inhibition of systemic DHT versus only 60 to 70% via finasteride which only inhibits two of the three iso enzymes in the scalp. So it's like it's not there's a side effect profile. It's just overblown by media, but it's not zero. And it's definitely worth reading the literal studies yourself before you come to an opinion because there will be people who try and plant their opinion and their subjective assessment based on their experience in your mind. Like, oh, I had no side effects. It's fine. Just get on it, bro. Don't worry about it. Or, I had the worst experience ever and it ruined my life. It's going to [ __ ] you up. Join my lawsuit to sue Merc. You know, that's like the kind of like disparity in these communities. And they all have like some it's it's not like they're both wrong. Like everyone has their own individual drug response and some people will have like the most insane response to Tylenol, you know, like it's not like anything is risk-f free in this world. So just be aware that these are ultimately hormone therapies that you're getting on. Like it's not it will also not dramatically but could suppress fertility metrics mildly because intrusicular androgenic signaling does dictate spermatogenesis that includes DHT. So like if you're reducing the DHT a lot that might impede your fertility to some extent too even if you're natural and have no you know testosterone therapy and you're like a yugenatal male. Um but yeah the most impactful therapy for sure intervention wise is going to be inhibiting DHT. The degree to which you inhibit it will be dictated on how susceptible you are. But if you nuke DHC into nothingness via highdosese dutasteride, it's pretty difficult, if not near impossible, to lose hair as a male. Now, the most susceptible might need to be on a topical anti-androgen or maybe their side effect profile would be superior with a lower DHC inhibition and some sort of adjunct topical anti-androgen therapy with it or some topical uh five alpha reductase inhibition with the topical anti-androgen. It's all kind of like a a bit of a strategy approach based on your individual risk profile and what you want to take. But if you don't attenuate miniaturization potential, like you're not going to prevent hair loss. You could take minoxidol all day. You could take all the pumpkin seed oil, sa pelmet meadow, dump sulfur on your head, do whatever you want. Like it's not going to move the needle for inhibiting miniaturization mediated through androgens, which is ultimately what it is. And for females, PCOS females, like it doesn't take that much of an androgen burden to start to miniaturaturize. Like it's pretty quick and noticeable. And most hair loss uh outcomes with women come from autoimmune related alipcia ariata, uh Hashimoto's thyroiditis, nutrient deficiencies, things of this nature. They're typically not in a pattern of like androgen related miniaturaturization. But when it is, it's like often pretty obvious why. And it's just more rare. So like, you know, when people want to speculate about what caus it, what doesn't cause it, it's like the largest anecdotal experiment plays out in real life every day with men versus women aging. And it's like, who's the ones with hair loss? Like the guys. Like I know the most dialed of biohackers with infinite resources who are still bald as hell regardless of all the special stuff they tried that wasn't like the drugs that work and it didn't work unfortunately. I would love to have a natural therapy that moves the needle but at least for me and what my knowledge the extent of it it's that DHT inhibition is almost a necessity if you're prone to hair loss. The capacity to which you do it is dictated by genetics, androgen load in the scalp and free androgenic signaling. And your risk profile will be dictated by your own, you know, tolerance based on your interpretation of the scientific literature. And then there's some adjun stuff like once you attenuate the miniaturization potential through the androgen related activity in the scalp, that's where you can then look to you could have a bit of a top up. like ketoconol shampoo for example is like a mild anti-androgen too that could add some additive protection on top of let's just say you're on finasteride instead of the more nuclear dutasteride and you felt like that risk profile was superior for example kiconil does help there's studies showing it's equivalent to the hair growth results of 2% minoxidil via totally different mechanism which is like very significant for something that's like an over-the-counter shampoo that also you can get that attenuated dand dandruff to some extent, saboric derm dermatitis um can improve the scalp environment to your your scalp environment to some extent depending on I don't know if you're prone to like I don't know fungal overgrowth for example but in general it's like a mild five alpha reductase inhibitor and topical anti-androgen that's just like a good shampoo that doesn't require like the risk profile of a finasteride dutasteride but it's like typically for most people not going to be sufficient to offset it unless you're like mild mildly very lightly prone. That's where you need to like layer up >> with the five alpha reductase inhibition pharmaceutically. And then minoxidil is the growth stimulant that is FDA approved and works reliably. It's just hit or miss if it works based on your own enzyatic conversion capacity. So it needs to convert into minoxidal sulfate in the scalp to actually work. And if you have inadequate sulfot transansferase enzyme activity, it will not you could be a total non-responder even though you're using the full drug dose every day. those individuals either have a issue with the scalp environment, like they're not getting it into where it needs because with topicals, some of the problem often is just like your scalp either is unhealthy the environment or it's not clean enough or like you're not using a high enough dose of the drug. It all depends on the person and the formulation that you're using. But in general, if you're using it properly and at a high enough dose, you'll be limited by this enzyatic pathway. And there are ways to upregulate it. One is compounding the minoxidil with tininoan which can upregulate the sulfot transferase enzyme and allow more of that conversion to take place. And then there's micro needling which also seems to be pretty dramatic turning some non-responders into like significant responders or magnifying the results like multiple fold for people who were responding just not as well as they could be either driven through lack of adequate absorption and or lack of adequate sulfot transferase enzyme activity. that also seems to be upregulated via this like manual like micro damage essentially. Like there's some crazy studies with individuals who've like burned their scalps that had balding and then they ended up like regrowing hair after which is pretty weird via like the recruitment of growth factors that like you wouldn't have gotten if it wasn't for that like dramatic event. >> Now obviously no one's going to light their head on fire hopefully but that's a thing. Um so with respect to the the topical you know strategies like the minoxidil I mean obviously what what are the side effects of that is that >> so it's like a very terrible blood pressure drug so it was originally prescribed for uh high blood pressure as lonitin >> oral. >> Yeah. >> Oh I thought it was topical. >> Yeah. And so what they found when they prescribed it for blood pressure decades ago was that one of the side effects besides like people like fainting when they're standing up or having low blood pressure or water retention was hair growth everywhere including their scalp significantly. So like huh maybe we can take this drug and repurpose it for a topical for hair growth because it's like essentially a a really bad blood pressure drug with a blackbox warning on it. and they did successfully and now it's known to be like the growth stimulant for your hair and seems to avoid a lot of that systemic side effect profile that comes with the oral formulation. Some people still use the oral formulation. dermatologists have uh seemingly adopted it, I would say, a little bit haphazardly without really accepting the risk profile accordingly cuz it's like a pretty it is a bit of a sketchy primitive drug orally especially because the liver has so much sulfot transferase uh enzyme conversion enzyme activity that leads to the minoxidal sulfate conversion that you get systemically it leads to some people like paricardial uh diffusion like water retention, disregulation of uh uh electrolyte balance like it's a potassium channel opener. That's how it works. And systemically it has a much more significant side effect profile than topically. And it's not uncommon to see people even micro doing it, getting arrhythmias and like talking about like chest pains, like freaking out and going to the hospital. And it's a lot of people just get chucked on it at like low dose, but it's still low enough. It's still high enough that it causes like these problems in some people. works really well though, but topically it's like the most benign at least entry level way where you can not you can get over the counter like you can just buy it off Amazon or at Costco or whatever. Um way more uh likely that you won't undergo side effects using it topically. And there are some studies many studies that show like similar benefit profiles. It's just like a bit more of a nuisance because it's topical and you have to adhere to the protocol. But like you know blackbox warning drug from like you know pre200 for blood pressure versus like the topical reiteration that is like likely not to cause that worst case scenario you can elevate the uh efficacy profile by trying the trenan with it trying the the micro needling with it and if it doesn't work like maybe at that point look at the the oral if you want but like that's kind of like the escalation in risk. Um, >> is the tenino oral or top >> topical? You would get like a compounding pharmacy to formulate it with a minoxidil because you can't buy that over the counter. That would be like you would now have gone to the pharmaceutical route at that point cuz you would typically what I would do like if it were me is like I'd start with the minoxil topically. If no response, I would probably look at micro needling to ensure there's actual absorption occurring and or the enzyme activity that can be manipulated via that manual cuz it's not an extra drug that I'm adding. It's just like manual like micro damage essentially that I do once a week. And newest literature reveals that you might be able to get away with only doing a 0.6 millimeter depth as opposed to the old studies had everyone doing 1.5 which was like guaranteed to draw blood. Like I have some of my old YouTube videos where like I have like a bloody scalp in the video because of like the depth that it would I would be going to to be, you know, using this uh the devices. So 0.6 seems to be potentially uh as efficacious with less of a cosmetic issue, quicker recovery, etc. And it's not it's not more drugs. It's something that like I recover from quick in my scalp seemingly. you know, is there some potential downstream issues to hitting my scalp with that once a week? I don't know. But like so far so good from a lot of the data that I've seen and like for me using it. And then from there, I would escalate to like the pharmaceutical compounded route at that point if you needed to with like the tinino and compounded minoxidil. >> Um it's funny the micro needling like I'm interested in it for skin effects and so >> yeah, people use on their face too like all the time. >> Yeah. So I you know it is something I'm going to do. Um, and when I went to my dermatologist and saw like some of the brochures with their studies, like because my dermatologist does actual research, >> and it was funny in their brochure, it was like there's like this whole hair loss area to the micro needling and some of the the stem cell growth factors that they use. >> Yeah. >> And I was like, hm, what's going on here? And I was like, oh, so it's like regrowing hair. and she was like, "Yeah, we've done like a small study and we added some it was like a combination of growth factors that are involved in like you know stem cell production in the hair follicle." >> And so I'm wondering if like you but that's why I was like interested in the micro needling too with the hair. I was like oh so they're essentially just making it better absorbed. You're like you're getting whereas if you were to put some you know stem cell factors on just your scalp like it's just not going to get absorbed really. >> Yeah. I think the majority of the benefit is likely mediated via ensuring adequate absorption of the drug because when you do micro needling on its own like versus minoxidil on its own versus micro needling plus minoxidil like it's not a comparable outcome in terms of like you would expect the micro needling alone group to be very significant if it was recruiting some sort of local growth factors that were dramatic. It seems more like it's probably in ensuring you're actually getting this to where it was supposed to go to begin with, but maybe wasn't getting fully assimilated, >> which is fine if that's what it does. It's just like that's what some people need in order to get the absorption. But it could be like the difference of 4x the results I've seen in some studies. That seems like a legit pathway for for some men that are like a little bit skittish about potential side effects with the oral um drugs as well because like the finast finasteride and what is the other one? >> Dutasteride. >> Dutasteride. Um, you know, you mentioned the the erection, but like is are there any other serious side effects with those that are really >> neurological potentially through the balance of like neurotransmitters and zolytic versus like there's a whole rabbit hole to go down of like inhibition of alopregendall which is thought to be the main thing implicated in postpartum depression being deprived of it. And there's a literal pharmaceutical that was developed to like manually restore that in women that just had birth and have postpartum depression. It seems to be efficacious. And seemingly by inhibiting five alpha reductase, you may be inhibiting that like gabaurgic signaling through that like anolytic kind of like calming thing uh uh molecule essentially >> and it results in kind of like a depends on the person like it can get pretty severe. I'm sure you've seen um or at least you know depending on if you've seen the podcasts where people talk about it or not but >> no I've heard of this like postdutastaster or post finasteride. >> Interesting. You'll never have you you'll never hear about postdutastasteride syndrome though even though it's a way more potent drug because it's largely a mediadriven construction. >> It's not to say it's not real. There's definitely side effects from these drugs, but like there's a huge nibo effect that comes with these drugs where, you know, I have friends who get on it and they're like, "Dude, I swear like you know, my penis is not working like I used to." I'm like, "Dude, like you're probably fine. Like, don't worry about it." And it's like they've read all the stuff that could happen and they're convinced they just like killed their ability to, you know, have sex or something. And it's like, you know, the noibo effect is absolutely real and significant. and I think is accounting for a large proportion of people who think they are affected cuz you can actually noibo yourself into like real side effects by believing you have them. >> Oh, for sure. It's very real. Yeah. And there's actually, believe it or not, there's genes that you can there's snips that are known that you can look at and even 23 and me um does measure these snips for placebo versus no SIBO. And so like some people are more >> like susceptible to a placebo effect where they like believe in something and it's going to happen and I'm like like I'm taking all my creatine. And I'm like, "Yes, I'm like, I'm not getting sleepy in the afternoon and it could be placebo, but I don't care because it's a real effect, right?" No SIBO effect is the same. And again, there's snips that like some people that have those snips are more susceptible to to believing that something is harming them um if they're like aware of those things. And so, yeah. Well, that's interesting to to know. But >> clarifying quick on the minoxil though, it's a growth stimulant. It does absolutely nothing that we know of to attenuate the miniaturization caused by DHT. So like the only strategy that works is attenuating androgenic activity via either like the mild ketoconol which probably is not going to be sufficient but like over the counter pretty benign helpful good shampoo regardless that's why I use it but finasteride or dutasteride or topical anti-androgen probably going to be necessary for most people minoxil is the thing you use to regrow hair it's not the thing that prevents loss you can cosmetically offset the visual perception of loss via the growing of hair, but it does absolutely nothing to prevent the further miniaturization. So, at some point, if you just use minoxidil, you will have a net catchup where you miniaturize to the point that you are caught up with what you've grown and then you blast past it and you still end up losing your hair. >> Okay. >> Yeah, >> I see. So, >> but you can still delay the visual perception of it still if you're somebody who wants to avoid inhibiting hormones entirely. You know, that's a strategy. It's still like biding time. Transplants bide time. You know, it all makes a difference. >> Yeah. But essentially, if you want to completely bypass it, you have to get you have to inhibit >> essentially you have to like turn your scalp into a female. >> Okay. Well, >> um, interesting stuff. And you're you're >> mild exaggeration, but like you get it. >> And you're and you're you've been doing this yourself, right? >> Yeah. I've been on due task right now for years and at least to date I have had no perceivable detriment to my cognitive state to my sexual function to anything that I would point to and I know a lot of individuals that I respect in you know the anti-aging longevity community who also use it and think that it's you know a reasonable enough risk profile for them and that's not to say that I that means I endorse it or I don't endorse it I just use it and I've been okay to date knock on wood cuz maybe So something will happen. I don't know. >> Are there any long-term studies looking at >> uh yeah cuz like these are drugs that are used for pro benign prostatic hyperlasia and even at dosages up to like 2.5 milligrams daily of dutasteride has been used with great success with individuals with like no you know like a minority of prevalence of side effects and like they're relatively minor from what I've seen. um the longest study that I know of um off the top of my head like there's definitely studies assessing follow-ups of individuals who've been on it for like a decade plus I think. Have they looked at like all cause mortality or any of these? Like >> if any, okay, this is going to be a controversial one, but my speculation is that if anything, these would net increase your longevity because they're decreasing androgenic stimulation significantly because DHT is literally the most androgenic hormone in your body. And if you're inhibiting it and you're just left with the testosterone and the anabolic activity because DHT is entirely inactivated in muscle tissue, so you get no muscle growth benefit. graded dose response studies using dutasteride alongside testosterone. Even at supra dosages, the dutasteride getting wiped out had no impact whatsoever on strength and muscular uh hypertrophy. So like there's no benefit muscularly to DHT in any capacity as an adult, which is notable because a lot of people think their physique is going to deteriorate if they use one of these drugs. Not the case. Has no impact on it whatsoever. So I would think especially somebody who's on TRT and like candidly I don't take enough to put me at 400 total T like I take enough to put me at like 800 and like my free tea is like the high normal. I think that the dutastasteride like probably whatever like exytotoxic toxicity or cardiotoxicity that I might otherwise be like net netting over into like an area I wouldn't want I I would anticipate and speculate that the DHT reduction is probably inhibiting that whatever detriment might be there to some magnitude. Could be wrong but like I have a net increase in intraissue aromatization from the inhibition of the 5 AR enzyme. So like in you know all the tissues that would otherwise be like prolongevity from estrogen locally you're getting a benefit you're getting the proportional increase of 15 to 20% of intrissue estradile and if you don't have any side effects from that if anything you would think okay well it's probably uh vaso vasoddilative it's probably like more pro um antioxidant it's probably less exyitotoxin sick. It's probably less glut glutamineergic like all the stuff that is going to be potentially damaging of I don't know killing of brain cells. This is a speculative thing though. I wouldn't hang my hat on that or tell anybody that that is the case. I do think if there's some sort of direct study though that would be interesting >> that I was just going to say the same thing. >> I'm pretty sure there is some anti-aging studies on finaster and dutastra though that might I wish we could pull up but we don't have the >> Yeah. Well, I'll something to dive into later for sure and maybe, you know, it'd be nice to have a study to see like people that are on TRT and, you know, doing these these androgen, you know, blockers like how how that affects >> life expectancy or cardiovascular related disease, right? So, >> yeah. And just like wrap it up on the hair loss front, like just cuz I do something like it does not mean I endorse it because it's a very controversial topic. The side effects are real, not to be ignored. Some people they deem the risk profile is worthwhile to the benefit they get. The depression and mental anguish they endure from going bald might outweigh the risk profile. It's all an individual decision. Don't listen to a guy on a podcast who tells you he uses something as your indicator if you should use a heavily hormone modulating drug. Like these are like very significant drugs that should be respected accordingly. >> Yeah. Yeah. For real. Thank you. Um well this has been a very interesting conversation Derek. We've been talking for I mean just hours. I don't even know how many hours. Eight. >> Was that your first double pod back to back? >> That was my first back to back. Oh, really? >> Yeah. Especially like long podcast back. Two long podcast back toback. >> Oh, cool. >> So, um it's been it's been a fun day talking to you. Thank you so much for coming on the show talking all things hormones. Very uh informative. I've learned a lot. I have a lot to look into. Um, I learned, you know, I've made not mental notes of things that I want to look into and I'll go back and when I look at the read the episode again, read the transcript of the episode. I'll uh go back and look at some of these studies. So, um, thank you so much for coming on the show and you obviously have a big YouTube channel podcast called More Plates, More Dates. Where else can people follow you? You have uh your your healthcare company, Merrick Health. >> Yeah. Um, I think Merrick Health on social media is just mealth or the website is at is mealth.com if you want to check it out. And um, yeah, I think I'm more played more dates everywhere except Twitter. I don't think that was a handle I could get. So, I think I'm just Derek Fitness there. But yeah, that's uh, that's me. >> Awesome. Well, thanks so much, Derek. >> Thank you for having me. Appreciate it.