Video summary
Jonathan Haidt argues that a unique mental health crisis affecting young people, particularly girls, began abruptly around 2012 and is distinct from historical moral panics because it involves a doubling of suicide rates among pre-teens across many nations. He posits that this shift marks the transition to a "phone-based childhood," where children spend nine to eleven hours daily on screens instead of engaging in physical play with peers. Haidt explains that human development relies heavily on a period between ages seven and thirteen for cultural learning, which is disrupted when algorithms connect kids directly to strangers rather than allowing them to learn from adults or older neighborhood friends. He illustrates this danger by comparing the current reality—where corporations can train children's brains through stimulus-response paradigms—to hypothetical scenarios where advertisers could communicate with a child in their crib or men could speak to an eleven-year-old girl through her bedroom window, noting that society would never accept such overt intrusion but implicitly accepts it via social media. The core of Haidt’s argument identifies four foundational harms caused by this digital shift: the displacement of time spent with friends, sleep deprivation due to screens in bedrooms, attention fragmentation preventing executive function development during critical teenage years, and addiction or compulsion similar to gambling behaviors found in slot machines. He highlights that while some critics claim technology explains only a small variance in mental health data, he contends there is no plausible alternative explanation for the global nature of this crisis occurring simultaneously with the rise of smartphones. Furthermore, Haidt notes significant sex differences in how boys and girls interact; boys generally seek agency through side-by-side activities like video games, while girls prioritize communion through face-to-face interaction. Consequently, girls are disproportionately suffering from internalizing disorders like anxiety and depression because social media platforms amplify every comment on their images, preventing them from developing the basic security to move freely between people without fear of public judgment or cancellation. Haidt also critiques modern parenting styles that have become overly gentle and unstructured over recent decades, removing necessary punishments and opportunities for children to learn self-regulation in a safe environment. He introduces the concept of "antifragility," arguing that just as bones and muscles strengthen through stress, children need exposure to manageable risks and occasional injustice to build resilience; shielding them from all discomfort or unfairness creates adults who cannot handle real-world business challenges where rules are not always followed by others. This lack of preparation leads to a generation unable to cope with the "scumbaggery" inherent in adult industries like nightlife, as well as an inability to accept that life involves dealing with people who do not play by one's own moral code. The result is a society rotting from within due to collapsing institutions and traditions, accelerated by technology which offers material prosperity but fails to provide the sociological stability required for human flourishing. To reverse this trend, Haidt proposes four specific norms that require collective action rather than individual willpower: delaying smartphone access until high school (around age 14), prohibiting social media use until at least sixteen, making schools phone-free zones, and fostering independence through unsupervised play with peers in the real world. He emphasizes that these are collective action problems; if only one family adopts a no-phone policy while others do not, their child will be excluded from peer groups, so widespread adoption is necessary to create a new social norm. Haidt points to emerging movements in the UK and growing parental awareness as signs of hope, suggesting that parents can form local cartels or WhatsApp groups with friends' families to coordinate these changes immediately. He concludes that because this phone-based childhood has only existed for about twelve years since 2012, it is not permanent and can be rolled back through coordinated effort to restore a play-based childhood where children learn risk management, conflict resolution, and genuine human connection without the constant surveillance of algorithms or the humiliation of public shaming.
Read the full video transcript
doesn't every generation complain about
the next one that's coming along is what
we're seeing at the moment not just more
old hat that's occurred for every
generation
previously um well yes and no yes every
generation complains and the complaints
tend to be similar and that's gone on
not since the dawn of history people
always quote you know Socrates or
something but really that begins when
you start getting modernity you start
getting each generation is changing you
know around the 16 Century in in
Europe so yes that's been going on a
long time but it's never before been the
case that the mental health of the Young
Generation suddenly was really different
and really bad so you know the main
argument I get against me is just the
one you just said that oh this is just
another moral Panic there's nothing
going on here this is what always
happens no this is not what always
happens you don't ever before get a
doubling of the suicide rate of pre-teen
girls you don't ever get and across the
board across many nations plummeting of
mental health all beginning right around
2012 2013 so no this time is really
different what is it that children need
to do in childhood like we don't think
about it that importantly it's just it's
just the thing that you do before you
get to puberty where you start to become
a person but those experiences are very
formative what does a good childhood
look like yeah now thanks for just
setting it up that way because there's
so much focus on the phones and social
media and and I was focused on that too
but what I decided to do in writing this
book and writing the anxious generation
was I'm not even going to talk about the
phones and social media until I've taken
readers through what is childhood why do
we have it how is human childhood
different from every other animal
including chimpanzees and so you know if
you start just with mammals all mammals
have the same life plan which is huge
investment from the parents or the
mother in the in the baby long childhood
big brain how do you wire up the brain
play play is the thing your brain
doesn't grow from nursing your brain
grows from moving away from your mother
trying to climb something uh you know
anyone who's had a a puppy or a kitten
knows they want to play all the time
because they have to practice the skills
to wire up the brain so we have to let
our kids wire up their brains now humans
are different because we have much
bigger brains and we have culture this
is crucial other animals they grow as
you know sort fast as they can and then
they reproduce humans we grow fast and
then we slow down right age seven to 12
13 we're not growing very fast and it's
thought that that period is a critical
period for culture
learning um all the way through puberty
we're really trying to soak in how do we
do things around here um what do adults
do how do I approach the opposite sex or
sexuality so there's a lot of learning
that has to happen and the problem is
we've taken that learning period we've
said instead of learning from grown-ups
around you or even from you know older
kids in your neighborhood how about if
we just hook you up here's a phone or an
iPad we'll just hook you up and you can
get socialized by random weirdos on the
internet were selected by an algorithm
for being really extreme how about that
well that's kind of what we've
done yeah I uh I'm around kids more and
more as my friends um finally become
less Manchild and actually become
fathers themselves of of actual children
and it's so interesting like my my group
of friends largely are pretty redpilled
on this the concerns about exposure to
technology but you know when you go for
dinner at the sort of times that you do
with guys that have got families you end
up going a little bit earlier which
means you're also around other families
and we go to these restaurants and I'll
get to see you know how other families
that probably just aren't aware of this
uh are
anesthetizing a boisterous child and a
lot of the time at the table you know
it's the kid starts to act up they're a
little bit bored and the parents are
trying to have a conversation or the
adults at the table are trying to have a
conversation and one of them just goes
You know open up the phone pass the
phone and the the maddest thing that
I've seen from sort of two to
three-year-old children is their ability
to skip ads on YouTube like they
understand the difference between an
advert right and the button and how they
can get past it and I'm like well first
off look if you're giving your kid this
to antiz them buy YouTube premium it's
10 10 bucks a month and it's it'll
change your life gets rid of the ads
yeah um but also the this level of
Engagement with you know the
capitalist system of of of of Facebook
pixel tagging and and all that stuff
from two years old it's crazy yeah
that's right that's right you know we're
very protective of our kids and you know
if I said to people how about how about
if we have this thing that we have a
special door a special window and we're
going to put it on your child's crib and
advertisers and corporations can come
and they can just communicate with your
kid and you have nothing to do with it
what do what do you think is that okay
like no we would never let that happen
and then suppose when your daughter is
11 12 13 we put a special window on her
bedroom and strange men can come and
they can talk to her through the window
they can look at her through the window
how about that would you do that like no
of course you wouldn't do that but
that's kind of what we're doing you know
we're we're we're saying here companies
can have access to our kids they can
train them with the stimulus response
Paradigm and strangers can have access
to our children once they get a social
media account and they can try to
convince them to meet up in the real
world they can try to sell them things
all kinds of stuff like that actually I
want to pick up you use the word
anesthetize which is a very good word
here because you know as many people
know like 150 years ago there were a
variety of medications for children like
that had opiates in them to calm the
child and help them sleep uh or we'd
give them alcohol we didn't know that
these things interfered with with their
development and we all discovered as
soon as we got our first iPhone I mean I
have video you know like my my son was
born in 2006 and so many of our videos
of me videotaping him and with him
reaching for the phone and saying iPhone
iPhone like he you know he wants it he
needs it because it's so
stimulating back then in the early days
of all this stuff you know 2008 to 2012
we thought the technology was magical
and we thought you know yeah let's let
our kids get stimulated by like
stimulation isn't that going to be good
for their brain development like so yeah
it it seemed okay to do it it'll give
them a head start he'll be you know
digital natives he'll be comfortable
with this technology and besides
everyone else is doing it so must be
okay so yeah we ended up anesthetizing
them let's back out of the technology
thing we're going to get onto that but
let's just talk about like what has
changed with regards to Parenting Styles
outside of Technology MH over the last
few decades how has this created the raw
material foundation for the kids that
would grow up no that's a great question
it's one that I don't write enough about
because I am focused on the technology
but Greg and I did write about this in
the coddling of the American mind
that um there is a long-term transition
over
Generations as when life is hard and
families are big um and religion is an
important part of life you tend to have
a very structure there you know kids are
growing up a lot of structure there are
dos and don'ts there are punishments if
you misbehave um and there's a big
liberal conservative split on this in
general conservatives want more strict
childbearing progressives want more
lenient liberal now called gentle
parenting and in general as as our
societies have gotten wealthier and
safer and our families get smaller we've
all kind of moved over to the gentle
side uh you know when I was a kid
spanking was normal but it was like only
for the very like my my sisters and I we
got spanked like a few times when we did
something really terrible uh but now
it's you know at least in you know
educated circles like that's almost
unheard of whereas a couple Generations
before there would have been a lot more
physical school teacher would have yes
that's right schools would would hit the
kids that's right so you know so in many
ways it's progress on the other hand if
you take out if you take out the threats
the punishments all the negative stuff
and you kind of leave it with like what
you see a lot of parents doing like now
Johnny was that A wise choice or an
unwise Choice as opposed to saying no
you do not hit your sister um so I think
we become a little too gentle too
unstructured and this might also help
explain a really interesting twist in
the data that it's not really in the
book I found a lot of it even afterwards
um is that the Mental Health crisis is
much worse for children in families on
the left than on the right um so
liberals or progressives have always had
slightly higher levels of neuroticism
anxiety depression just a little bit
more than conservatives it's a big you
know long studied thing conservatives
are a little bit happier than liberals
adults and children and if you plot out
the levels of you know of happiness or
the negative stuff like meaninglessness
on all the graphs in my book you'll see
like you get a straight line until
around 2011 2012 and then all of a
sudden the lines go up like a hockey
stick well if you break it out by uh are
you a liberal or conservative which is
asked on one or two surveys um it's the
liberal kids especially liberal girls
they go up first and fastest something
happened whatever it was that changed in
the early 2010s it hit liberal kids
especially Lial girls the hardest and I
think part of it is what we're talking
about if you are rooted deeply in
structure and community and you have to
go to church every Sunday or you know
you're an Orthodox Jewish kid you've got
Shabbat you've got you know 24 hours
where there are no devices and you're
with your family moving to the digital
technology didn't wash these kids out to
see but if you're a more Progressive
family usually a smaller family uh more
econ more mobile you move around more
perhaps um you have weaker ties
a lot of freedom a lot of creativity but
those kids seem to be especially
vulnerable to being washed away in the
early 2010s it's not just left right
it's also religious conservative
religious or secular so so secular
religious I'm sorry uh secular
conservative
kids show the least increase everybody
goes up but they show the least increase
whereas uh Progressive non-religious
kids or families that's where you see
the biggest increase in mental health
problems I wonder how much of it from
the liberal Progressive side comes from
this very softly softly gentle approach
to discipline and parenting because you
know I I hesitate dropping into bro
psychology this early in a podcast but
it like if you think about your
level of discomfort exposure what you're
what you're comfortable being
uncomfortable with how often has someone
told you no how often have you been told
that you're in the wrong how often has
someone raised their voice at you how
often has someone been Stern you know
all of these opportunities are are times
where you learn okay I can self-regulate
this is this can happen to me and I'm
still safe this can happen to me and I'm
still loved no one's going to abandon me
this isn't a comment on my moral
character or my worth as a human this is
an inbuilt part of being a fallible
flawed human that makes errors and Mom
and Dad are going to say you don't hit
your sister you don't do that go your
own timeout go sit on the step and sit
on the step until you've calmed yourself
down and if you've never experienced
that and you Contin it like you don't
even need you don't need need to know
anything about human psychology to know
that if you train a system on a type of
stimulus it will become hyper sensitized
when you get outside the bounds of that
stimulus yeah and that's where we are
that's right no I think that's perfect
um I can just add a little psychological
color to it in two ways uh one is to
bring in the concept of antifragility
which I hope many of your listeners are
already familiar with um you know some
things are fragile a glass is fragile
you don't let kids play with it it'll
break so we give them plastic which is
resilient uh if a kid drops it it won't
break but it doesn't get better uh but
some things are antifragile um they need
to be stressed and strained and dropped
and and and suffer setbacks in order to
get strong uh and this comes from my NYU
colleague Nasim TB so bones and muscle
are antifragile if you raised your kids
by saying I never want you to put stress
on your bones you know never go down
stairs take the elevator you know their
bones are going to get weak same thing
with muscle the immune system is
antifragile and kids are antifragile so
that's that's like the psychology
underneath a lot of what you were just
saying but then there's other one which
I haven't really talked about publicly
because it sort of can easily get taken
out of context maybe that'll happen here
when I never we have the most
unreasonably reasonable audience on the
internet you'll be fine okay it's really
important for kids to learn how to
accept Injustice now let me quickly keep
talking so that that doesn't just get
taken out of context
um you know oh you know John height you
know white guy says that people need to
just suck it up and accept Injustice no
but but the situation that you just
talked about you know like you know no
you do not hit your sister time out and
it might be the case that your sister
hit you first and maybe there's more to
the story and so maybe your parents are
actually treating you unfairly and in
general we would say you know
authoritative parents would always hear
them out like why did you hit your
sister tell me why you know if you can't
justify it we'll punish you but
sometimes
sometimes things are unfair and if
you're a child who is raised where in
general your parents you know you trust
them in general they they're fair but
sometimes they're not sometimes they're
just not and you just learn like okay
you know it happens I'm a little mad and
I'll get over it okay now fast forward
15 20 years imagine you're an employer
hiring two recent College grads one of
them has never had to face Injustice one
of them everything was always fair and
if they thought it wasn't they could say
I think that's unfair and then they
could work it out another kid had
authoritative parents who sometimes made
mistakes and sometimes was treated
unfairly who would you rather hire and I
think what we're seeing in universities
is that there's a certain kind of
activist young person who who sees flaws
in the world and thinks that they see
everything as it is and they should
never have to accept any unfairness and
they can just become very very difficult
to to work with because they're used to
getting their way so yeah we're doing
kids no favors with this sort of you
know gentle you shouldn't have to do
anything that doesn't make you
comfortable like no sometimes in life
you do have to do things that make you
uncomfortable or that you know or that
you think you have to respond to
situations that you think are unfair I
spent a lot of time running a big events
company in the UK so I ran nightclubs
for for a decade and a half and one of
the things that I've very quickly uh
realized stepping into that industry is
it's full of scumbags I was train in the
art of scumbaggery but uh you know if
I'd gone into that I had this really
interesting experience because I was at
University right so I was seeing and I
was doing two business degrees did a
master's in and a bachelor's in business
stuff but I was running a business and
from doing NTI you get to see HR
marketing B2B b2c hiring firing every
you see the full works right it's a full
gamut of everything so I was getting to
learn about business 101 but I was also
experiencing business and what I was
being taught thought and what I was
experiencing were diverging very quickly
but the interesting point here
is up until you leave
University most people
can campaign their way out of situations
that they don't want to be in this is
wrong the uh standards that this
professor is holding me to are too high
you know we've seen this happen a good
Bunch etc etc etc right people when you
enter the world of
business someone doesn't need to play by
your rules they can they can bring you
up to the brink of signing a contract
your balls deep in lawyer fees
everything's ready to go you bet the
business on it and they can go uh by the
way this is It's called Crank on
confirmation is is the the actual tactic
and they just crank the out of you
and they go hey um yeah we're going to
pay 20% less are this Deal's dead in the
water and you go no wow you can't I've
got I I'm I'm and yeah we know that
you're this deep in it which is why we
want to pay 20% less like that's
business works like this is what crank
on confirmation is and it happens in
night life over and over and over and
over again my point being if you like if
you're unable to deal with someone
coming and twisting you or you going all
right well I know that you need me let's
let's play a game of chicken here with
who needs who the most you're just going
to be so disregulated that you can't
deal with anything my point being this
sort of hyper I think of it like an
Overton window of sensitivity you know
you have the entire gamut of human
experience and then you have this range
within which you're familiar the tighter
that you make that any small movement
outside of that is going to feel like
like disregulation and I suppose as well
this gets into something I've spoken
about with Dr animation and and and tons
of people to do with child rearing the
importance of risky play and why that's
so important yes that is such a key word
and that this is something I think that
won't be as familiar to uh to listeners
um you know even listeners who might
have read the cing the American mind or
might know about the importance of
play there's really interesting research
there's a a play researcher from Norway
named Ellen
sanser and she has a couple of papers
from 2010 and more recently on the need
for risk specifically risk and thrill
and the key word that I really resonate
with is thrill so you know we know that
even if you know kids need to play but
we don't want them to play in any place
dangerous we don't want them to climb
any trees as far as I can tell um New
Zealand is the only English speaking
country left in the world where children
are allowed to climb trees you know like
I remember you know at recess when I was
a kid if there's a tree you know
sometimes we climb a tree um but we we
sort of decided we have to keep kids
safe from danger so nothing that could
have any real danger but what s Ceder
points out is why are kids seeking out
danger why is this almost a universal
feature why are kids doing things that
they're almost certainly going to make
them get hurt you know why are boys
doing jumps on their bicycle they know
they're going to get hurt why are kids
skateboarding down steep hills they know
they're going to fall at some point and
the reason she says is because part of
our evolutionary programming is to test
our abilities learn to manage risks that
are small risks uh because life is full
of R once you're not protected by your
parents boy is life dangerous out in the
jungle out in the wild out in the world
of nightclubs um so we have to part of
our our mandate as a child is try things
that are a little bit dangerous and you
get to select how dangerous it is and so
you know when I would take my kids to
Cony Island here in New York City you
know big you Mum Park area um there the
kids like in the car there would be so
much discussion of like are you gonna do
the Thunderbolt today or the you know
the slingshot like oh no that's no
that's too scary for me you know
everyone they're all trying to adjust
but then once they do it they come off I
mean they are jumping they are
exhilarated The Thrill is what they've
been craving and what sand Cedar says is
it's that process of being afraid being
really afraid like the roller coaster
it's about to go over the top and it's
about like you're really afraid and then
on the way down you're screaming and
it's thrilling and pleasurable and
fearful and then when you get to the
bottom and you you make it off the other
end it's just thrilling and when you do
that you're actually changing your brain
you do that over and over again and you
develop the brain of a person who can
face down some scumbag or some person
threatening them who can actually deal
with threats and stand their ground and
think quickly and not just panic and
melt down so our kids need risk and
thrill that means they're going to get
hurt they're going to sometimes break
bones um but the alternative is to keep
them soft so that they're going to break
their
minds what this obviously rolls from um
infancy parents into preschool School
Secondary
School what's happening
to children when they get into school
and they are first faced with test
scores and assessment and and structure
you have to get to school at this time
and no you can't do that and the teacher
like how much of this is laid at the
feet of parents and how much of this is
laid at the feet of the education system
yeah it's a kind of a yeah it is a mix
um the sort of the normal human
progression is up until age six seven
maybe even eight
um there's really no value at all to
homework or having too much structure
you know by 8 n10 you know they they
they can really learn um you know to to
fit in to conform but the early grade
especially kindergarten in first grade
here in the US um there's really very
little evidence that they benefit from
being pushed to read faster or to learn
math faster we have this naive idea that
if they start learning multiplication in
kindergarten they will end up in high
school further ahead it's kind of a
naive notion we give them a head start
and they'll end up further ahead but
that's not
true in Scandinavia especially Finland
where they don't really start kids until
age seven they don't really do any
academic stuff until age seven and their
kids are among the best in the world in
all these academic measures so um so I
guess I would say at a certain point
yeah they do need to learn all that
stuff uh they do need to be
self-regulating and if they're going to
fit into a free market capitalist
economy and be functioning people and be
prosperous they need s they need all
those skills but that doesn't mean you
have to really start them very strictly
early on what kids need in kindergarten
first grade is especially a lot more
play than we give them uh we need to
really back off on the homework and the
heavy academics uh in kindergarten in
first grade is my
opinion what's happening to test scores
with regards to
students so uh there are two there's a
global measure of test scores around the
world that's Pisa the program for
international something
assessment um Scholastic I suppose and
uh with Pisa what we see is that scores
were going up from the 90s I think it
started in the 90s scores were sort of
going slowly up um from the 90s to the
2012 assessment it's every three years
and beginning at the 2012 assessment
some of them start to go down and then
they go down further in the most recent
and everybody points to that says oh co
wow Co was so terrible and it was it was
terrible that we took kids out of school
it was terrible that we took kids who
weren't any danger and said you don't
get to go to school uh because what if
you bring home the virus to an adult um
and so it's true that covid you know
being out of school did hurt test scores
but what people are only just beginning
to realize when you look at those graphs
it didn't start with covid it started
when kids and everybody got on phones
around 2012 in America we have the neep
NA national assessment of educational
progress It's called the nation's report
card same thing there we have data back
from the 70s so we were making progress
like kids literally you know in fourth
or eighth grade whenever they measure it
kids literally were learning more about
math science and and better and reading
there was progress for decades slow but
steady progress until 2012 and then it
begins to reverse and yes it reverses
even more during covid but the reversal
started around 2012 so um I think the
main thing we should be focusing on here
is phones in schools um we you know
we'll talk more about what phones are
doing to all of us but the idea that a
child has access you know like a seven
you know seventh grader has a smartphone
in their pocket they're going to text if
any if the phone is available someone is
texting and if someone is texting or
group texting or posting on on on
Instagram then everyone has to be
checking otherwise at lunch they're
going to be the one who doesn't know the
thing that happened during third period
so once kids uh around 2012 is when we
get the phone based childhood that's
rough that's roughly when teens switch
from flip phones to smartphones right
around them as soon as that happens
they're not paying as much attention in
school they're not learning enough
they're not learning as much as they did
they're not paying as much attention to
each other and they start getting
lonelier so after 2012 our kids are
getting stupider and lonelier and I
think a lot of it not all but a lot of
it is because of the phone what was that
article that you tweeted about jenz
reading books for play pleasure or them
not doing it yes so Jean twangy uh who's
been fantastic she was one of the first
to really call attention to this in 2017
that something big is happening to our
kids and Jean is a master of these four
giant data sets that we have in America
long running surveys monitoring the
future goes back to the
1970s every year they uh they interview
repres large samples of 12th graders
10th graders and eth graders um and so
we have DEC of data and one of the
questions they they ask a lot of
questions one of them is uh you know
have you how often do you read books for
pleasure or have you read a book for
pleasure in the last month I can't
remember the exact timing and what what
jean shows is that the number who have
read no books I think that's how it is
like how you know how many of you read
you know zero in the last year for
pleasure or you know one to three or
five to 10 the number who have read zero
books in the last year uh has been going
up for a while it didn't start in 2012
um as kids are watching more television
cable TV going on the internet book
reading has been declining being
replaced by by other screens that's been
going on for a long time but it
accelerates after 2012 because again
once you have a smartphone and you have
social media which is going to suck up
all of your time there is no limit to
how much you need to consume or post or
monitor so um life on a smartphone what
I'm calling the phone based childhood
takes up so much time there is no time
for hobbies or reading or anything and
so Jean shows these dramatic graphs of
you know the number who never read a
book those go up and the number of books
people read on average goes down we have
a nation of young people who have read
very very few books is there anything
else
that we need to say about the education
system and what it's got wrong maybe
from a disciplinarian standpoint we know
about this sort of um early th of
academic achievement onto kids in the
hopes that it kind of starting earlier
pushes them out ahead more late is there
anything else aside from the technology
that the education system got wrong oh
my goodness yes so um one of the you
know in this book I'm trying to be
totally not political and and just
really just focus on the kids but since
I'm talking with you Chris I'll I'll
share some other thoughts Rel here it's
fine
Jonathan um so educ schools have been
accused of being ideologically
Progressive since the 1930s uh and they
are they lean left um the military leans
right the police lean right the Arts
lean left education education schools
lean left that's just the way it is
that's not necessarily a problem but
what I've been focused on since 2011 as
a social scientist is the loss of
viewpoint diversity when everyone trying
to figure something out if everyone's on
the left or the right you don't get conf
you don't get your conf information bias
is challenged and you start getting what
I've called you start getting structural
stupidity that is you know someone can
say something really stupid and and no
one dares to challenge them because if
you challenge them you look like you're
a conservative or you know a sexist or a
racist or something you'll be accus is
something so people just keep their
mouth shut I get emails from students in
uh grad programs in education
periodically and they say basically help
I came here to learn how to teach all we
learn how to do is racial Justice and
equity like we never learn you know
everything is oppression everything's
racism we don't learn how to
teach so I can't say this is true for
all ed schools but for the elite schools
I think they are largely they become
very very ideological they were that
before 2015 but in the kind of the great
awokening that we've had in the real
intensification of of sort of the Left
Right culture War uh you know we can see
the right going off the deep end in a
lot of ways but you know for talking
about schools it's really it's you know
the left and the education schools so I
think that um there's always been a
debate between sort of progressive
educational ideals and conservative and
I've always seen that as a yin-yang sort
of thing like you actually need the
tension of them pushing but since there
are very few conservatives left in
higher education um you know in the
social sciences and in educ and in
education schools it's all now very very
ideologically Progressive and that means
you have a lot more the gentle parenting
the focus on equality of outcomes by
race um regardless of inputs let's get
rid of tests let's get rid of honors
classes uh so I think education schools
have been working very very hard to lose
the trust of centrists Republicans uh
and anyone who actually cares that their
kids get an education um so again you
know in the current book on Mental
Health I I'm not I don't want to get get
into it but if we're talking about
what's happening to our kids schools in
education I think I think the
educational establishment is becoming
structurally stupid um and we saw clear
evidence of this in San Francisco during
Co where the school board was you know
they were totally Focus on pulling down
statues of ab Lincoln and renaming
schools um you know um and the the
citizens of San Francisco who are you
know very far left were so fed up with
it they voted out the school board um so
yeah I think the education system is is
becoming in this country very very
ideological talk to me about the newest
data that you found around smartphones
you know you've been circling this wagon
for quite a while uh spent a good bit of
time on this book since your last one
which was something not too dissimilar
what what are the primary harms of
Technology on kids and and what's the
latest data about that sure so there's
been you know a lot there's a huge
academic literature on whether we all
agree that there's a correlation we all
agree it turns out even there's a few
major sort of Skeptics and critics and
then there's Jee twangy and me on the
other side and that's sort of the where
a lot of the debate has been and it
turns out we actually agree on the size
of the correlation between how much time
you spend on social media and how
anxious and depressed you are when you
say we agreed do you mean you and Jean
or you and the other side no me and the
other side they've done a number of met
analyses and they say you know the
correlation is around 0.1 to
0.15 uh but that's for boys and girls
together whereas Gan and I and many
others have found the correlation is
much bigger for girls social media harms
girls much more than boys so uh Gan and
I found that the correlation for girls
is about 0.2 well that's actually pretty
much the same if they say it's 0.1 to
0.15 correlation for everyone that means
they're basically saying the correlation
is around 0.15 maybe even higher for
girls so we actually agree and that that
correlation is actually pretty big in
public health effect it's not big in a
mathematical sense of variance explained
but it's about the same size as you get
from many other public health things you
know calcium consumption and later
osteoporosis I mean all sorts of effects
are around that size so we actually
agree on that but then the debate they
say it's small we say it's actually as
big as everything else um uh the big
debate is okay there's a correlation but
correlation doesn't show causation you
know we have to prove causation and so
I've been uh collecting I I started this
in 2019 after I I was challenged on the
codling the American mind um I said well
let's get to the bottom of this is there
a mental health crisis because back then
the critics were saying there isn't even
a mental health crisis it's just you
know self-report stuff it's it's not
it's an illusion well now it's clear no
it was not an illusion the rates have
been going up since 2012 um now the
question is what caused it and I've been
collecting experiments these big Google
Docs if you go to Jonathan hey.com
reviews you can find all of our Google
Docs create with Zack
Rous uh and we have one that lists all
the studies we can find that are cor you
know correlational studies the
longitudinal studies the experimental
studies sorry and this is like getting
too geeky and all but the point is
there's like we have about 20 25 exper
true experiments that we found and uh
the Maj and the large majority of them
do show causal effects and the ones that
don't show causal effects is very
interesting if you look at the six or
seven that fail to find an effect of
like taking kids off phones they all use
a very short time period so if your
experiment is we're gonna make kids St
or college students stay off of social
media for a week you know or three days
and then we're going to see how they're
doing and guess what you take somebody
who's heavily addicted you take away
their drug and you check in on them a
day later or a week later how are they
doing not well but the studies that
waited a month almost all find they're
doing a lot better they're much happier
so you know I don't know what else we
can do here like we've got the
correlational evidence we've got the
experimental evidence the experimental
evidence shows a clear pattern where if
you refine it to the ones that match
theoretically what's happening the
effect gets bigger you've got the Quasi
I mean you know people should go look at
this Google doc I mean I don't know what
else we can do to convince people that
it's not just correlational there's a
lot of causal evidence what ways could
you be wrong about this
evidence um so on the experimental
evidence the published experiments uh my
critics say that if you look at each of
these studies they're mostly pretty weak
um some of them have small sample sizes
just one or 200 um some of them there's
some other flaw and so you can you know
you can find you can definitely find
flaws in most of the experiments um so
it's possible that they're right and
that only experiments that find in
effect get published um that is
conceivable
but um there are so many different lines
of evidence here and so I I would ask uh
listeners to think about we have a
situation in which the parents see the
problem the parents whose kids are dead
think that it wasn't it was only because
of social media the you know that the
kid committed suicide they can they can
see the harassment taking place on
online so you have the parents saying
this is this is causal I don't know many
parents who say oh no it's wonderful for
my kid to be on social media the
teachers see it the principal see it the
psychologists see it um the kids
themselves see it uh you you had Freya
India on she is one of the best writers
on what is happening to girls uh and
Freya published a great essay on on my
substack I think she referred to it on
on your show uh on the the algorithmic
conveyor belt of just you know once you
express an interest in something the
algorithm is going to pull you all the
way to eating disorders or self harm or
whatever it is
um so given that I can't find I
literally cannot find anything written
by someone in gen Z that says no we love
our phones our phones are great we're
our phones make our world better you
know smart social media is so good for
like I can't even find anyone saying
that but we have lots of people like
Freya we're saying this is destroying us
so when you look at the experimental
evidence that uses very limited
manipulations one very particular
operationalization of the question finds
a effect size you got to ask yourself
which is more plausible that everyone is
wrong and all the experiments are wrong
or maybe it's the case that something is
really happening here what is the
proposed mechanism by people that say
smartphones don't have this big of an
impact on mental health because the
mechanism is what's being debated the
change in mental health is pretty
undeniable we have very very high rates
of whatever it's like the the most
cataclysmic language about girls between
age 12 and 16 it's like persistent
feelings of hopelessness or listlessness
or something like just this like awful
apocalyptic language what are the people
who disagree with you saying is the
mechanism that's causing this to happen
right they don't they don't that's the
amazing thing so you have you know you
look at the graphs and they go up in
very much the same way same time in the
US the UK Canada Australia New Zealand
uh Scandinavia we've got graphs of all
this I hope you're listeners will go to
after babble.com that's my substack it's
free we've got all the graphs from all
these countries we've got the world's
repository of data internationally it
all starts in the early 2010s and so my
critics say well the amount of variant
explained is very small so you know the
so you using social media can only
explain a small amount of variance
therefore it can't explain the explosion
and we're done here and then I said well
what do you think does explain it no one
no one even offered there's no alternate
Theory the global financial crisis is at
least Global but that was 2008 so why is
it that nothing happens to Teen Mental
Health until 2012 2013 by which time
unemployment is dropping stock market's
Rising everything's getting better you
know it so the global financial crisis
doesn't work there is no other
explanation that I can find not even one
that's been proposed other than the loss
of the play based childhood to be
replaced by the phone based childhood
and that really happened between 2010
and 2015 is when the phone based
childhood came in that explains the
globalness of it it explains the
suddenness of it it explains the gender
difference it explains everything that I
found and you know my critics say well
we're not convinced but we have we're
not even going to offer an alternative
explanation so boring super lame all
right what are the primary harms of
Technology on
kids uh so once you see that kids have
to grow up in a physical world we
evolved Outdoors nature and animals
people um when kids grow up on screens
so it's not just about social media when
you grow up with what what I'm calling a
phone based childhood where you're
spending the latest data I think is nine
hours a day average for American Kids uh
11 hours Freya just said there's a
British study it was like 10 or 11 hours
a day for British kids on their phones
which includes other it includes tablets
I think and and video games I think in
any case it doesn't include homework or
school work just recreational time 9 to
11: hours a day that pushes out
everything else and so what I say in the
book is that there are four foundational
harms once you see that it's it's taking
up 10 hours a day pushing everything
else out what matters the most important
thing is time with other kids time with
friends that's crucial I all of your in
person that's right in person uh and
we'll talk about whether virtual is is
good it is not but time actually with
other kids other with with your friends
and that has plummeted um since 20 12 it
was dropping before in the earlier
internet age but boy it really speeds up
in the in the smartphone social media
age um and so kids the the most
nutritious thing your kid can do is be
out playing with other kids and this is
even true for teenagers hanging out with
no adults telling them what to do um so
that's crucial that's really nutritious
as it were now if kids you might say
well but you know they spending of this
10 11 hours a lot of that is spent
virtually interacting you know like on
video games well let's look at multi
player video games now those are at
least synchronous synchronous is good
you're talking so that's actually a good
thing the girls on social media it's
asynchronous I comment I wait anxiously
for you to comment on my comment and so
we're not really connecting we're
actually performing and we're
anxious um video games are at least
synchronous but you actually you tell me
I've I was never a gamer it seems to me
that I'm you look at me and just guy
that wasted a lot of hours playing video
games am I wrong I wasted a lot of hours
playing video games your okay there you
go stereotypes sometimes have a basis in
reality um so oh look basically you know
you're a healthy male that means you
almost certainly were playing video
games I mean that's just the way it's
been since the 90s
um so but you tell me in video games do
you ever get in fights like like you get
mad at each other because someone broke
a rule Co oh how does how does that
happen because I assume that the game
itself regulates all the interactions
how fights in game right no no no I mean
you just have disagreements you have
disagreements you shout and you say that
that was that was totally stupid like
it's more oh yeah fine no but what I
mean is like think about when you when
you and your friends played a you know
pickup soccer game or baseball game or
whatever when your kids and someone says
no you know it was out of bounds no it
wasn't yes it was no it wasn't like you
argue about it and what I'm trying to
say is the arguments are really
nutritious the arguments uh Jean P the
great developmental psychologist really
talked a lot about this when kids play
marbles they get in all kinds of
disputes and that's crucial they learn
how to work it out so you tell me when
you when you're playing video games in
an average day you know four hours of
video game playing do you get in those
kind of fights about yes it was no it
wasn't yes it was no it wasn't
everything the game the game is the game
mandates the rule set for you ex there
there is no mediating needed that's
right there you go so it's just like if
I said we're going to replace all your
kids food with rice white rice and then
someone said yeah that that should be
just as good I mean it's got just the
same number of calories you know you
might say yeah but it it's missing all
the other nutrients and that's what we
do when we put Boys on video games yeah
it's social it's great fun it has some
benefits it gives them some social
calories they're talking but it's
missing a lot of the nutrients that you
get from face- tof face interaction okay
face to- face interaction that gets
squeezed that's one that's just one I'll
go faster on the rest of them number two
sleep deprivation um when kids have a
screen in their room again these things
are designed to be addictive and when
you let your kids spend hours with a
device designed to be addictive
sometimes they get addicted and so the
kids who have a who have dependency
they're going to take their phone into
bed with them under the covers you know
Mom can't see that the light is still on
because it's under the covers so social
media in particular and browsing the
internet takes away a lot of sleep and
if you take away sleep from teenagers
who are already not getting enough
they're going to be crankier less
healthy they're going to gain weight
there's all kinds of things that happen
physiologically and emotionally uh which
exacerbate the mental illness epidemics
that's two the loss of sleep uh the
third is attention
fragmentation one of the main things
kids need to do in as teens your brain
is reiring throughout childhood you know
your brain is sort of pretty big by the
time you're five or six and then a lot
of is just the rewiring the myelination
of
circuits uh in your teen years the
frontal cortex myelinates the the
prefrontal cortex especially is the seed
of executive control can you set a goal
keep your eye on the goal do the things
necessary to reach the goal even though
there are distractions and as adults
we've all learned to do that to some
degree but crucial in that learning was
those teen years when the frontal cortex
is really laying down you know like how
do you do this and instead what we do is
it's like we put little distractors you
know if a lot of the kids are getting
interrupted every couple of minutes for
their whole life they never even spend
10 minutes without an interruption this
appears to interfere with their
development of executive function so
we're creating uh young people who when
they come to the office they can't just
pay attention to something they need
more stimulation and then they don't pay
full attention so attention
fragmentation is devastating to their
ability to be productive and creative
and then the fourth foundational harm is
addiction um you know I get in big
arguments with this with some of the
researchers who are who study video
games who think video games are
good um and they point out you know you
know most boys are having a great time
and there's no sign of TR problem well
and that's true that's true most boys
who play video games I can't say that
they're damaged by it but five or 10%
are um the ones who develop problematic
gaming who are compul have compulsive
use when they're not playing they become
sirly their brain is deficient in
dopamine they are addicted they have a a
dependency um if you're going through
your puberty years as a boy getting this
incredible amount of fixed stimulation
you know from you know fortnite or you
know whatever game you're playing this
is uh in addition to messing up your
life you're not you're not spending time
with friends you're not learning how to
talk to girls whatever it is um this is
likely to have some very lasting
possibly permanent effect so those are
the four foundational harms they affect
boys and girls girls on social media not
so much video games um and then there's
all the specific harms that affect boys
and girls we can get into those but if
if all you knew was here's this consumer
product it's going to take your kid away
from his friends it's going to deprive
him of sleep it's going to fragment his
ability to focus um and it's going to
addict him what do you say do you want
this for your kid like who would ever
say yes but we did is it right to call
social media use an addiction I had this
discussion with Andre hubman a couple of
years ago and um I sort of yeah what did
he say he said it looks to him more like
a compulsion than an addiction it feels
like compulsive behavior um he said you
know if you if you saw an animal uh
scratching scratching scratching in the
corner looking for food scratching
scratching scratching scratching scratch
You' think that animal's sick and it it
feels to me you know I you're on a plane
how many times it's such a great example
you're on a plane you have no signal you
know you have no signal you pull your
phone out you open it up you go through
the the little cycle of apps or whatever
it is that you do and you go yeah goes
back down so to me that seems compulsive
now obviously yeah addictive things can
have a compulsion that's the reason I
haven't got anything long and thin that
I can use but that's the reason that
smokers will get pens and you know chew
down on pens it actually satiates I
think I saw something that's saying that
uh people who have smoking addiction can
satiate a little bit of the uh desire
for the next cigarette by actually
putting a replacement cigarette in their
mouth cuz so much of it is about the
like
physiological the movement of that
habituated thing yeah um so I and I mean
the semantics of what is an addiction
where does that cross across into a
compulsion can something which is
addictive lead you to have this sort of
obsessive compelled Behavior the way you
kind of Pol it kind of doesn't really
matter um but have you got have you got
any insight on that sure no I I I do you
know I know that among addiction
researchers there's a debate about
whether behavioral addictions are true
addictions and if you look at what
happens in the brain when a person is
addicted to heroin or to cocaine you
know there's that's incredibly well
studied you know I don't know the
details this is not my Arab expertise
but that's incredibly well studied and
then I think some of them are saying
when you look at behavioral addictions
it's it's a little different it's not
quite the same fine I can totally accept
that but to me the question is just
let's just take gambling addiction you
know mo most of us have been to a casino
the great majority don't have any
problem don't have any addiction but a
small number I don't know what the
percentage is I'm guessing it's probably
you know 2 to 7% because that's what I
keep finding for Behavioral addictions
um for for some number they uh when they
get into a Zone it's straight Behavior
psychology stimulus response variable
ratio reward schedules they get into a
Zone and they lose track of time and
they forget their troubles and of course
their troubles are in part because
they're blowing all their fam's money on
slot machines but they can't stop so um
uh I think would you say that a person
who compulsively uses slot machines
spends most of her family's money so the
family is now bankrupt and yet she still
keeps doing it would you call that a
compulsion or an addiction both okay
what you even if you call it that's fine
with me if you want to call it just a
comp that's fine my point is whatever
that is for gambling addicts word yeah
call it whatever you want whatever you
want to call it that is what is
happening to social media compulsive
users you know whatever you want to call
it it's the same thing and it's I mean
in a sense it's literally the same thing
because some of the features of our life
on phones were directly copied from
casinos the thing where you pull down to
refresh and then it kind of bounces up
and you see things like that was
literally copied from slot machines
shout out Tristan Harris yeah he was a
yeah that's right yes oh Tristan is a
hero in all of
this telling everyone about this yeah
for sure all right so you know there's
been a lot of talk recently I've got
Daniel Cox coming on the guy that did
that really fantastic study about young
boys breaking to the right and young
girls breaking to the left I've got him
coming but we're seeing a lot of sex
differences in worldview in belief in
mental
health yeah what mental health is is
declining but the ways that it's
declining the sort of usages of
technology so talk to me about the sex
differences in technology how do boys
and girls use technology differently
sure yeah so the master variable here I
believe is is a set of motivations uh
that we've talked about psychology for
50 years um called um agency and
communion so everybody has needs for
agency to be an agent to make things
happen you know a child knocks over
block tower it's thrilling I did that I
caused that to fall so that's agency and
then communion is connection being part
of a group being welcomed and embraced
and and connecting um uh so everyone has
both motives but on average
boys have stronger agency motives and
when you let boys and girls choose what
to do the boys are going to gravitate
more towards games that allow agency and
so fake war is one of the best examples
they want to practice their skills boys
I think are evolutionary programmed for
hunting and War to enjoy hunting and War
I found this out when I was 29 years old
and for the first time in my life played
uh paintball with my buddies and hunting
each other we were mixed in with other
other people but hunting each other in
small groups and shooting guns to try to
hit each other was the most thrilling
thing we'd ever done get you yeah yeah
yeah so that was really cool like wow
there like a room in my heart for being
a hunter and a warrior like I didn't
really know it was there but it was so
anyway boys choose to pursue agency
motives girls choose to pursue more
communion motives they talk more with
each other as Richard Reeves this you
wonderful wonderful British man who has
this uh who has been been making the
case for boys have you have you had
Richard on the show of course yeah he's
great he's coming back on again soon
yeah his new initiative that the center
for boys and men American Institute for
boys and men yeah thank you uh that
sounds awesome I I'm fully Richard
Reeves pilled I'm on board with all
stuff me too we're all Richard Reeves
pilled yes um so Richard points out uh
uh girls like to do things face to face
boys like to do things shoulder Tosh
shoulder like we're next to each other
but we're doing something in I've got I
I need to bring this up so in in a robin
dunbar's book friends which came out
maybe 18 months ago he's got this
phenomenal study so the next time that
you're at a party look at the angle of
the feet that women have when they talk
to each other and look at the angle of
the feet that men what what do you mean
what do you what do you see women will
talk uh perpendicular 180° they'll be
pretty much straight on like this oh men
talk at about 120 degrees oh that's
fascinating so they blade and the reason
being that this is a bit of sort of
evolutionary bro psychology coming in
but I think it's true if you if even try
it you can try it the next time that you
you're at a party just you know you'll
be stood sort of like this with a guy
just blading on and just turn yourself
so that you're actually straight onto
them and there's this just Rises up
inside of you because really the only
time that two guys would do that is if
they were going to fight or they were
going to kiss and if you don't intend on
doing either of those things and you
just feel you're like this feels right
there's something about that angle it's
like two magnet two North Poles of a
magnet they kind oh good example di it
away they don't want and yeah dude look
at it 120° for men
180 degrees for women it's and it you
can't not say once you see it you can't
unse it it's so I will look for that and
actually that this could suggest a
really cool difference between real and
virtual you know virtual interactions
are not embodied like we can see you
know we can see each other's upper
bodies here but but I think what we
would find because I don't at all feel
freaked out by you you know your face on
to me on my yeah but I don't at all feel
like oh we've either got to kiss or
fight like because we're virtual well
wait until we finish yeah yeah you you
are you are pretty handsome I must say
um so so again something you know we are
embodied creatures we're physical
creatures we're animals we evolved
Outdoors you we we we had fights we had
hunts we're physical creatures and when
we interact now virtually we have only
it's you know it's like the white rice
thing we have just like a little few of
the nutrients but we're missing most of
them um so anyway on to boys and girls
sorry I'm taking too long on this but
the the point is boy so
when when uh you know laptops and then
especially smartphones come out all the
kids love them all the kids gravitate
all the kids are on them the boys head
straight for video games and YouTube um
the boys are spending more time on video
games and YouTube and porn um the girls
go straight for the visual social media
platforms especially Instagram uh Tumblr
Pinterest in the early days uh and so
what are the effects the girls are now
on these platforms that are all about I
post a picture of me and my life and
then I wait for strangers to comment on
it and that's really really bad for
mental health and that I think is why
the girls as soon as we hit 2012 2013
the girls have very sharp elbows in the
graphs very hockey stick lines in the
graphs um boys on the other hand um
they're playing video games especially
video games aren't making them depressed
now the boys are getting more depressed
and anxious they are roughly twice as
depressed and anxious as they used to be
but it's more gradual
it starts a little sooner it starts more
like 2009 2010 and it and it's more
gradual so I think what's happening and
what you know what Z rush and I
concluded in our in the book and here we
drew Richard weaves is you know for
girls boom they get on social media they
get depressed for boys they've been
withdrawing from The Real World since
the 70s and 80s you know it used to be a
male World there used to be a patriarchy
you know but boy would has it been
dismantled and as everything shifts
towards girls and as schools get more
and more structured towards girls and
girls needs and girls ways of learning
and as we all freak out about gender
gaps and we think that it's the girls we
have to help in the 9s which wasn't true
girls had already passed boys um boys
are finding that they don't do well in
school they don't like school but man
these video games are just getting
better and better and and you know it's
it's hard to approach a girl but man the
pornography is getting better and better
um and now you've got AI girlfriends and
soon AI girlfriends will be put into
incredibly sexy robots so what we're
seeing is the progressive withdrawal of
boys from effort in the real world that
will pay off in the long run and instead
boys prodigious energy and their desires
are being directed into a virtual world
that generates nothing absolutely
nothing of any value in the real world
yeah the audience is going to know what
I'm going to bring up but I'm going to
do it again it's my I've only had two
citations ever in Academia and this is
one of them so um you'll be aware of
young male syndrome
uh no tell me what just that they're you
know more violent and yes correct yeah
High proliferation of young sexless men
high tea high risk-taking they set
on fire and push over Granny it's not
good totally agree we have the highest
rates of loneliness and sexlessness
amongst young men at least in the modern
world maybe ever uh apart from in maybe
some like crazy gerontocracy style like
tribal 10,000 years ago um
where's all of the incel violence like
this isn't a request but why we not
seeing more mass shootings why are we
not seeing rest that's a good point so
it's my contention that men are being
sedated out of their status seeking and
reproductive seeking Behavior through a
combination of social media video games
and porn so they're not given a
sufficient dose to make them happy or
satisfied but it is enough to dampen
down and Nerf that um that impulse so
and this is what I've called the male
hypothesis and this is being studied uh
so why have we not got this uh yeah I'm
legitimate illegitimate academic now um
but this is and there's there's a
question to be asked there but you know
everything that you're talking about
there that it's triggering it's playing
off the back of this desire for them to
um work together as a team to have
intertribal Warfare to uh create Mastery
to increase in status to be able to
accomplish things okay but it's within
the virtual world and you can become an
eamer and so on and so forth but how how
much can you cash out that status into
the real world but then a more
interesting question comes which you
know the game is very well may do and
say well if I'm enjoying it why do I
need to cash it out into the real world
what is real and what isn't why you why
is there this sort of weird axiomatic
value judgment about the fact that the
real world is better than the virtual
world it's all part of a world it's all
just in dopamine serotonin ticking
around in my brain who cares same thing
goes for porn you know I I worried about
getting me toed or I don't have to this
thing or whatever whatever whatever like
all of these things allow them to do
that couple of white pills that me and a
friend William Costello think with
regards to the AI girlfriend virtual
relationship thing uh first one being
dating and flirting is something that is
incredibly anxiety inducing for men the
guy that created CBT made it so that he
could overcome approach anxiety I don't
know if that's oh really that's
supposedly Aon Beck or was this the
other guy the other dude um oh right
what's his name I forget the name yeah
David David B told me about him it was
created to to help with approach anx
maybe Aaron back was it too I everyone
just has approach I don't think so yeah
um but the uh the primary challenge that
you have in dating is that there is no
such thing as practice dating if me and
you want to get better at pickle ball we
can go to the local pickle ball court
and you can just hit drives at me and I
can practice my drop volley right I
can't it is one of the few things where
you practice in public you learn out
uh so there's always this high pressure
to to not fail and what that means is
that men often have really really they
never get Beyond they never go zero to
one they never actually get that first
step done so me and William think that a
really phenomenal and this you don't
even need to wait for the sex robot
thing or the whatever the inperson robot
you could do this with Apple's VR
headset if it was sufficiently well
trained on a good data set so you have a
virtual interaction with a woman like a
computer game and in this virtual
interaction the Avatar is able to see
your movements they can hear what you're
saying they use natural language
processing to work out the intonation
and and you know they're able to go back
and forth and they can you know you can
program in like consent and you can
program in like uh flirting and and
and I want to know increase the
difficulty the disagreeability of this
girl I want her to make me work and you
level up and level up and level up and
if you can form that on actual human
psychology you can have guys practice
playing the video game in the safety of
their own home and then go and deploy
this in the real world it's like you
know tonal one of these like at home gym
things it's like or wi sports right like
you know you're playing a video that's a
better example you're playing Wii Sport
at home you're playing tennis or
whatever and then you go into the real
one you're like hey I played a video
game but I'm kind of fitter and this is
the same I I played a video game but I'm
kind of better at
flirting yeah I think uh uh um I think
having practice flirting in the virtual
world is actually a great idea I think
um you're right that it I remember you
know when I was in seventh grade and the
adults would organize a dance it was
terrifying you know and occasionally I
would ask a girl to dance and either
she'd say yes or no but it was
terrifying but again that's that like
fear and thrill when she does
occasionally say Yes um I I agree that
in theory we could do that that the
headsets that the virtual reality you
really could give boys practice flirting
with realistic girls and the difficulty
could get harder and harder now how
would this actually play out in the real
world um I fear that it's not really
going to be hey let's try to make you
into the best possible romantic partner
likely to find a really wonderful woman
and they get happily married I fear that
it's going to turn into either here's
you know the game is to get the woman in
bed and then move on to the next woman
and here you know we'll learn teach you
how to how to bed women um or it's going
to be design the woman you want and
you're going to you know let's make her
even Lovelier let's give her an even
better sense of humor How about if she
never gets mad at me you know you
program in all these things that are
just going to take you in an unrealistic
way so well you over and over again you
you've got an evolutionary background I
have to say I I want to bring you back
and once this tour is done I want to
bring you back on and if you can
remember it to talk about the happiness
hypothesis because it it was one of the
three books that got me into the world
of EP and and and and really sort of
made me fall in love with it but with
given that background again me and
William have spoken about this an awful
lot we talked about this AI girlfriend
Revolution one of the problems that you
have and one of the reasons that I don't
think we need to fear the AI girlfriend
thing quite as much
is no guy brags about the fact that he
has subscribed to some woman's only fans
the reason that you don't brag about it
is that there is no status associated
with being selected there is no makes
you look like a loser and but not only
that that even if it didn't even if it
was neutral in the like loser oh I see
trick because you haven't been
pre-selected by the the the gatekeeper
is the price of a cheeseburger per month
yeah therefore anyone has access to this
and because of the access it's you know
maybe if you have a $30,000 sex robot
it's a flex of your wealth but it's also
like dude you spent $330,000 on a sex
robot how weird are you so and I just I
I
don't I don't know what's going to
happen but I certainly know that that
pre-election the status associated with
a woman who is the gatekeeper choosing a
man who is the
protagonist yeah that accounts for so
much of the bragging rights of the guy
yes great so this brings in a key a key
word we haven't mentioned is status and
boys are boys and girls are each
competing for status but uh boys
competition is really much more it's
about ultimately about like physical
toughness dominance originally and S the
Primeval State ultimately backed up by
the ability to physically beat the
out out of somebody um but in modern
times that gets converted into other
other ways of contesting and we've had a
long slow evolution of our economy uh
such that such that it we've harnessed
male ambition for status and turned it
in productive directions in fact I was
going to write a book I got a contract
to write a book called three stories
about capitalism the moral psychology of
economic life I was going to write a
book on like the psychology of
capitalism and then the universities
melted down and I wrote the coddling and
I got drawn off into all these other
other things but one of the key insights
um is there's a uh um is you know Adam
Smith realized that when you get an
economy set up the right way it's not
from the benevolence of the Butcher and
the Baker and the Brewer that we expect
our dinner but from their regard for
their own self-interest when people can
get money for doing something that helps
others well then men try very hard to
make money but it's not just money when
you can get status by doing something
productive that's going to challenge
like men are like rockets like they have
this they have this incredible capacity
for work but they're often Mis aimed and
so I think it's quite remarkable that
you know when you know Elon Musk and
Jeff Bezos want to face off how do they
do it who can build the more effective
rocket launch system into outer space I
mean that's a great way for men to
compete so that's productive um and I
think what you're saying what you're
pointing out is part of dating I mean
part of is very intrinsically motivated
you want a girlfriend you want sex you
want love but you also yeah you want a
hot girlfriend you want someone that
other guys will respect you for because
yeah I got this woman so any discussion
of boys yes we must consider status
especially what are other men going to
think of me and also what are other
women going to think of me based on who
I date um women are extremely concerned
with what other women will think of them
as as well separate status competitions
but yeah that's a key and video games
give them an alternate World in which
they can gain status within that
alternate world but I keep coming back
to the metaphor of the black hole you
know black hole is a place where
anything gets sucked in but nothing
comes out and so okay here here's
another controversial idea I'll air it
with you maybe you can you can disprove
it um here I'll just put this as a
contention I don't know if this is true
my contention is that nobody or is that
hardly anyone in gen Z has re has done
anything yet that has really made an
impact on the world let me just qualify
there are always going to be athletes
always there always going to be singers
coming along that's not the issue the
issue is did you start a company did you
make some Discovery did you write an
amazing book did you do something that
the world notices and says like oh wow
you know that's impressive and when I
ask this of audiences they only come up
with two names so I'll ask you who are
the members of jenz who've really you
know dented the UN they've really done
something when does jenz start and
finish jenz is now 28 years old so
everybody who's 28 years old or younger
starts in 1996 I'm one
year old I was going to say buan slat
the guy that founded and was the CEO of
the ocean cleanup you know that huge uh
thing that cleans plastic out of the
ocean but that would count yeah he's 29
he's 29 so we missed him he's the
Millennials are creative and productive
and mentally healthy but j z so wait try
again I'm sure you're gonna come up with
the one name that everyone comes up with
what's one person under 29 who really
has changed the world Greta tbug that's
it that's when everyone comes up with
and then there's a second that people
sometimes come up with Mala who Mala uh
the woman pakist from Pakistan she was
shot by you know fundamentalists but she
survived and she's a you know right
activist I was never gonna get that okay
anyway so Greta Greta is the one that
everyone comes up with um but that's it
so there are no Americans um they no men
um and I started thinking this two or
three years ago and I keep waiting
someone's going to find me a person
who's really done something big now a
lot of them want to start their own
business as an influencer they want to
create an app so it's I'm not saying
they're not lazy what I'm trying to say
here is as far as I can tell they have
been raised in an economy where what
you're desperately trying to do is get
more followers get more influence and
it's all Quantified and as long as
you're working hard at that you're not
generating anything that will leave the
black hole of social media nothing that
will affect the world out side of your
closed world
of I'm sure that you're aware of it but
the percentage of primary school kids
that say that they want to grow up to be
a YouTuber or an influencer so you know
you have they're being fed in on the
front end with this presupposition and
then they're being spat out on the back
end too with this lack of impact in the
real world yeah well I mean you know
maybe this is one of the white pills of
uh Automation and Ai and Le what's a
white pill I haven't heard that term
thatan so a a black pill is uh something
that's IC and it's an Insight that makes
you feel kind of apocalyptic and and and
fatalistic and a white pill would be a
reason for hope it's a justification for
Hope oh nice okay I've got to start
developing a few of this because my
talks can get kind of dark so all right
white pills go ahead yeah just talking
about a white pill so a white pill from
you and it's particularly useful to use
in contrast to something that people see
as something that's bad AI is going to
come it's going to take all our jobs and
everyone's going to be it's going to be
the Matrix but one of the advantages is
that if we're in this current lull of
real world invent invention from gen Z
maybe um the increase in leverage that
we have through code means that a
smaller number of people can have a
larger amount of impact so the few that
break through from gen Z and do do great
things can maximize and magnify their
impact on the world in a way that might
be able to compensate for the rest of
their generation's lack okay that that's
a good point I agree that that's
possible um but this just sort of slots
right into one of my main concerns about
what's happening which is that digital
technology and now artificial
intelligence is likely to usher in an
era of material Prosperity if we all
have an infinite number of servants to
help us make whatever we want yes
there's going to be a rise of
productivity and all these people who
point to the coming Golden Age they're
looking at Material Prosperity they're
looking at physical health discoveries
will will cure cancer yeah materially
things are going to get better as they
have been continuously um you know Matt
Ridley pointed this out Steve Pinker
pointed this out but I'm a social
psychologist and I play sociologist in
my spare time because I think what we're
heading into is a sociological
apocalypse that is all the things it
takes to make a stable Society they're
not visible uh I learned this from Mill
durkheim and from Reading conservative
writings um institutions structures
Traditions all the things that make our
Society possible but many people don't
see and these are being rotted out and
this precedes this precedes the internet
I mean there you know there's always you
know there's the thing uh Hard Times
create strong men strong men create good
times good times create weak men weak
men create hard times so you know
there's been kind of a decline since the
World War II was a huge stimulus for all
kinds of amazing After Effects um and
there's a decline since then so it's not
all caused by by the recent Technologies
but I think it's been accelerated by it
and so what you're pointing to is yes
more material prosperity and yeah that's
true but if we have collapsing
institutions no trust in anything um and
we're willing to consign a generation to
just wasting their time struggling for
status on you know on Tik Tok because as
long as 12 of them are creative and
create gigantic new things will be just
this as good off as we were you know 10
years ago yeah so yeah okay maybe that's
a great pill that's a grill pill perh
yeah oh good you know what great pill
that because it's both it's black and
white I like it okay a zebra pill a
zebra pill perh it's striped it's
striped Okay so we've spoken about boys
and what's happening with them you know
there's so much conversation around
young teen girl mental health give me
the latest data what are you seeing
what's happening with with the young
girls sure so I mean Freya covered
covered this beautifully and and she
writes about this beautifully on her
substack girls um but sort of you know
the big picture here
is let's start with the mental health
but there's a lot more going on uh with
the mental health it's very specific for
girls it's what's what are called
internalizing disorders it's especially
depression and anxiety um you know other
things are up but like you know
schizophrenia bipolar disorder they're
all up a little bit but it's really
depression anxiety um uh girls have what
are suffer more from what are called
internalizing disorders so if there's
stresses and problems they kind of turn
it inwards and they suffer anxiety
depression boys
historically um suffer more from what
are called externalizing disorders when
there are problems with their
development they act out they make other
people miserable crime you know deviant
violence um so so that's historically
the way girls and boys were but what's
happened is actually both girls and boys
have moved more in the direction of
internalizing disorders but girls
especially so the numbers are hard to
believe but they're up around 30 or 40%
of girls uh teenage girls with qualifies
having depression or anxiety disorders
um it used to be more like 10 or 15% so
uh it's now a normal thing to be an
American or British teenage girl it's
just a normal thing that you think about
suicide and you have your anxiety and
you manage your anxiety it's part of
your identity it's part of uh it's it's
it's with you all the time so it's
tragic it's it's so sad you know um it
used to be the case that middle-aged
people least happy it's a well-known
thing called the youth shaped curve of
Happiness the happiest people used to be
young adults you know teenagers and
young adults and then people in their
60s and 70s they're done with the hard
work they get to enjoy their lives but
there's always people in the middle you
know taking care of kids and parents
that's not true anymore in Western
countries the young people have plunged
and especially the girls so we have a
graph in the book Canadian data uh
Canadian young Canadian women used to be
the happiest now they're by far the
least happy uh group of people in Canada
so uh for girls the mental health the
anxiety depression that's like the
central finding but there's a lot more
um oh you question about that go on go
on go on okay um so you know so much of
the debate is just about the mental
health data but there's so much else
that's warping girls development and
making them less happy um the the hypers
sexualization the pornification of
everything the fact that you've got
these young girls on Instagram aping
these Millennial women with gigantic
boobs and butts and fillers and all
kinds of things this just this is just
really really bad for them so even if
they don't get depressed and anxious
when they do but even if they
didn't the fact that they oh my God the
number of girls now Middle School girls
who are using skincare products and who
are concerned about their skin um and
you know and doing makeup tutorials you
know like no your skin is perfect go
have fun you know yes you you you'll
care about how you look girls have
always cared about how they look that's
part of life it's part of for boys to
but to take to take these you know
Wonderful sprightly funny you know fifth
sixth grade
girls and then suddenly to have them
Focus so much on on their face and their
beauty because they're on social media
is a tragic loss of
girlhood there's that there's the
exposure to older men
uh creepy men who want to watch them
dance who want to talk with them there's
the the whole economy of nudes from the
boys in their class if the boys will
send them a dick pick and then say come
on send me one of yours come on come on
you know don't be approved don't beud um
and if a and then if a girl does send
anything now the boys really got
something valuable and we cite uh you
know there's a a book American Girls you
know she the author documents how Middle
School boys will get a a nude photo of a
girl and then they can give it they can
trade it to high school boys for beer
and so the girl's nakedness the girl's
humiliation is valuable to the boy
because he can get alcohol and Prestige
by giving it to an older boy who can buy
him beer or get him beer somehow or
other so you know the commodification
the hypersexualization the humiliation
of girls once they enter the world to
social media you know it's just I mean
it's just on so many fronts the
phone-based childhood is not a human
childhood and kids are stuck in it you
have an evolutionary
background you titled the book The
anxious generation of all of the Litany
of different human emotions that we have
anxiety is the one that's very prevalent
which hearing about anxiety disorders
and things that are Downstream from it
there's even a disorder now where people
can't distinguish between anxiety and
depression uh and and it it means that
then what the f I literally learned it
yesterday from David Brooks God damn it
anyway it's it they they struggle to
work out the difference between anxiety
and depression so it's bleeding into Wow
first off from an evolutionary
perspective I think it's a bit of a cope
by people with my intellectual interest
background of EP to say well well you
know we're built to be vigilant you know
we've got the smoke detector principal
blah blah blah I'm like yeah but it's
really tuned up now it's not just tuned
up it's
like super charged and okay my my my
question
being why
anxiety what is it about the soup the
cocktail of stimulus that we have at the
moment that's causing anxiety to be the
prod outcome yeah so I think it's two M
there many contributing factors but two
big ones one is the loss of thrilling
play in childhood which we talked about
if kids don't get to take risks they
don't learn to manage risks and then any
little thing seems threatening this is
why students were suddenly asking for
trigger warnings in part because the
idea that a book that describes a Greek
myth in which Zeus rapes a woman can we
expect young women to just have to read
this like so one is just exposure
if kids don't have exposure when they're
young and they don't have Thrills and
they don't have risk then any little
thing is going to be much harder for
them when they're older that's one piece
the other is growing up on the stage um
you know when you're growing up you make
a lot of mistakes you say something
stupid to your friend and then your
friend might criticize you your friend
might even get angry at you and then you
make up but when that happens on the
stage you say something and before you
know it everyone is talking about it and
they adding on their own comments and
you're the butt of the joke and as
anyone ever knows who's been through any
kind of a cancellation attempt or any
kind of public online thing it's painful
in a way beyond anything that we know in
in terms of physical suffering U it it
really makes people want to disappear
and it is a Spur to Suicide so when the
entire school is laughing at you you
know or the you know the photo you sent
of your of your genitals or the thing
you said somebody caught and then added
a you know so kids should not grow up on
a stage the British I'm told have a
saying don't put your daughter on the
stage Mrs Worthington is this something
you've ever heard no okay older British
people I believe it's a no coward song
from like a hundred years ago but uh
don't put your daughter on the stage Mrs
Worthington um is good advice especially
for girls and girls are much more
anxious than boys so if a girl grows up
everything she says can be Amplified
every image of her is commented on she
never develops just the basic security
to move from minute to minute and hour
to hour in person to person like because
anything could blow up at any time
people are always judging you so we have
to give kids a normal human childhood if
we expect them to develop normal human
strengths what can we do ah good because
I was just noticing we are our time is
running out let's turn to the solutions
and here's my white pill um if we were
talking about democracy and American
democracy I'd be all black pill like I
think we're you know know how we get out
of this in American democracy but when
we're talking about the Teen Mental
Health crisis we can get out of it in a
year or two uh and they've already
started in Britain uh and here's what
you do um because it's all a series of
collective action problems the reason
why fifth graders now are getting
smartphones is because all the other
fifth graders are getting them the
reason why my students can't quit
Instagram and Tik Tok even though they
know it's wasting their time and making
them anxious is because everyone else is
on it so they have to be on it so it's a
these are all Collective action problems
and the way you deal with a collective
action problem is with Collective action
so if we just have four clear nors four
Norms we can solve this first Norm no
smartphone till high school if you want
to High School uh uh in America it's
around age 14 so in Britain the movement
is 14 because I think you don't have
quite the exact cut off we have a very
clear almost all schools it's like you
know 8th grade is still middle school
early puberty but then 9th 10th 11th
12th is is high school roughly age 15 to
18 um or you know 14 15 to 18 so if if
we just delay smartphones till High
School give them a flip phone let them
communicate with each other and with you
as the parents but to give them the
internet in their pockets so that when
they're on the bus they're not talking
with other kids they're flipping through
stuff at lunch they're flipping through
stuff um so no smartphone till high
school at the earliest two no social
media till 16 this one is going to be a
little harder to get a norm but you know
if most of us parents would say like no
you're not getting until 16 they can't
say but I'm the only one I'm excluded
they have to say you know half the kids
have it but half don't then you say well
you know you're going to be in the half
that don't and before you know it it'll
be a lot more than half that don't uh
the third Norm phone free schools this
is a must and this one we can do this
year this year like this September um
the teachers hate the phones the
principals hate the phones I ask them
why don't you ban them why don't you
have the kids lock them up and they say
because some of the parents will freak
out they demand to be able to contact
their kid anytime during class text them
anything but most parents are now
beginning to see this is messing up our
kids so I'm urging if if you're
listening to this if you have kids in
school and the school allows kids to
have phones on them please contact the
principal of your kids school and say
please go phone free it's it's messing
up their education it's making them
lonely there's no good that comes from
kids having phones in schools same thing
with access to anything that can text
that's the third Norm the fourth Norm is
more Independence replay and
responsibility in the real world because
you can't just take away the phones and
the screens or you know reduce it you
can't just like reduce it 80% let's say
and then say now sit in your room and
look at the wall or you know learn how
to knit or something what kids really
want I once read a long ago I read a
book on like the secret life of dogs
like what do dogs really want the answer
is each other like they they're pack
animals they really want to be with
other dogs and the same true for kids um
what do they really want to hang out
with other kids and so doing that on a
video game isn't nearly as satisfying
but try to arrange it so that your kids
can really spend a lot of time with
other kids unsupervised no adult telling
them what to do no adult resolving the
conflicts um so if we do those four
things no smartphone till High School no
social media till 16 phone free schools
more Independence responsibility and
free play in the real world do those
four things we will roll back the phone
based childhood this childhood only
really came in around 2012 we've only
had it about 12 years it wasn't like
this in 2008 2009 um so it's not
permanent you know we can change it and
we have to change it uh because it is
devastating our kids there's no other
explanation for the multinational Mental
Health crisis and with four Norms of
collective action we can act
collectively to reverse it how's that
for a white pill I like it I and I also
love the fact that you've inculate this
new lexicon is just is swimming through
you it owns you now and it's staring
Through Your Eyes um that's what happens
when you write a book I'm going to guess
that there'll be a lot of parents
listening who have got kids that maybe
going to be getting to that age that
probably kids get phones now maybe like
eight nine something like that maybe
even earlier I suppose um yeah they get
through an iPad yeah you can't do we we
don't have a God's eye view and we can't
coordinate perfectly would a small scale
solution be something like try and speak
to your your child's friends parents and
say yep let's go cartel let's have this
I've I listened to this phenomenal
episode with this great psychologist and
this very handsome British dude and they
said that we really need to do this why
don't we hey do you have a watch or read
the book anxious generation can can we
get together we can't do this nationally
but can we do this locally presumably
that's a good first step absolutely
that's right that's exactly the thing to
do
um and there are a number of
organizations almost all started by moms
um who are helping so if in the UK um
I've only recently learned about delay
smartphones. org.uk and smartphone free
childhood. co.uk so those are two
organizations that are trying to help
parents do exactly that now of course if
you simply know the you're in touch with
the parents of your kids best friends
which usually you are you can just text
them you can just call them you can just
talk to them at school pickup or
whatever so yes coordinating on a small
small scale will really really make it
easy for you and your those other
families to give your kids back a
play-based childhood the goal isn't just
to delay the phones the goal is to give
them a play-based childhood if the
school can help and say we're going
phone free and if the principal could
say and parents given the latest
research you know I urge you to consider
delaying you know try to at least wait
till high school if the school could
give some guidance that really helps set
the norm so this is why I'm so
optimistic because the Revolution began
in the UK last month literally I there
was an article in the guardian you know
the these these two women the the women
who run smartphone free childhood um
they you know had a WhatsApp group there
was a little publicity you know huge
numbers of parent like everyone the
parents hate this stuff the parents are
ready to act and in Britain they are
rising up and taking matters into their
own hands and my hope is that is that
we're ready to pop in the United States
that in in March and April of 2024
everyone will really understand like you
know we know something's wrong here
let's try to really put our finger on it
and then what do we do what we do is
enact these four Norms hell yeah
Jonathan height ladies and gentlemen
Jonathan I love your work I've been a
fan of it for a very long time it's
great to finally have you on the show
you're officially a modern wisdom alumni
now uh where should people go they want
to keep up to date with all your writing
and you did a really like interesting
writing process for this where it was
sort of very transparent in in a way
that that is pretty typical yeah I
started a substack um I thought I would
never do that because I don't have time
to write but I started a substack at
after babble.com and Zack Rous and I we
put out all our findings all our
research all our graphs invited comment
invited criticism um and now we're
bringing in voices like Freya India and
and Ricky schlot um we're bringing you
know Jen Z so just please go to after
babble.com sign up subscribe to the
substack uh the website for the book is
anxious
generation.com and of course I hope
you'll buy the book itself uh anxious
Generation Um you know sold wherever
books are sold hell yeah Jonathan I
really appreciate you thank you for
today Chris what fun thank you very much
for tuning in if you enjoyed that
episode there is something else you will
absolutely love right here go on give it
a tap