Video summary
Dr Anna Machin explains in her book *Why We Love* that love evolved primarily as a form of biological bribery to facilitate human survival within complex social groups. While cooperation is essential for humans, who can maintain relationships with approximately 150 people over decades, it is inherently stressful and costly; therefore, evolution developed neurochemicals like dopamine, oxytocin, serotonin, and beta-endorphin to motivate individuals toward these difficult but necessary behaviors. Dopamine provides the motivation and reward system required to make an effort in social interactions, while oxytocin orients us toward others and calms fear responses by acting on the amygdala. Serotonin contributes to obsessive attachment, and beta-endorphins are crucial for maintaining long-term relationships because humans do not develop tolerance to them as quickly as they do with oxytocin alone. This neurochemical cocktail allows individuals to sacrifice personal comfort, wake up early to care for offspring, and navigate dangerous social hierarchies without retreating into solitary survivalism. The nature of romantic attraction involves distinct systems where lust is driven by the hypothalamus and sex hormones, whereas attraction relies on oxytocin and dopamine to facilitate learning about a potential mate's sensory cues, such as facial symmetry and voice tone. Women possess an evolutionary advantage in assessing genetic compatibility through their Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC), allowing them to smell whether a male is genetically distant enough to provide the most diverse immune response for offspring; men have largely lost this ability because reproductive failure carries less risk of maternal death than it does for women. This biological drive extends to behaviors like kissing, which may serve as an additional method for checking health and compatibility, though not all cultures practice romantic kissing. Furthermore, Machin notes that while monogamy is a societal construct designed to ensure predictable population growth, humans are biologically inclined toward serial monogamy or even dual mating strategies similar to chimpanzees, where individuals seek to maximize reproductive success by pairing with high-quality mates and potentially having affairs if the current partner cannot provide optimal genes. Machin addresses the complexities of cheating in long-term relationships, noting that while testosterone drives male sexual variety, cultural upbringing and learned behaviors also play significant roles in infidelity. She discusses "beta marriages," a concept suggesting limited-duration contracts to test compatibility before committing for life, though she emphasizes that love is not merely an objective calculation but a multifactorial experience involving deep emotion. The discussion extends to the hierarchy of love, challenging the notion that romantic love sits at the pinnacle above platonic or familial bonds; instead, Machin argues there is no strict hierarchy and that all forms of connection offer equal health benefits regarding longevity and life satisfaction. This perspective becomes even more relevant when examining asexual individuals who experience profound platonic loves without sexual attraction, proving that society's obsession with romantic love as the ultimate form of affection is largely cultural rather than biological necessity. Modern dating apps have fundamentally altered how people meet but have not changed the underlying neurochemistry or deep-seated behaviors governing mate selection; instead, they handicap our brains by removing rich sensory information and increasing the efficiency of rejection avoidance. Machin argues that these platforms encourage a low-effort approach to relationships where individuals swipe through profiles without engaging in the difficult work required for genuine connection, leading to extreme mate choice dynamics like "superficiality" driven by algorithms rather than biological assessment. Additionally, she explores parasocial love and religious devotion as valid attachment systems, noting that the brain's capacity to form deep bonds with celebrities or deities utilizes similar neural pathways used in human relationships. Ultimately, while science can explain the drivers of behavior through evolutionary psychology (EP), Machin concludes that it cannot fully capture the subjective experience of love, a realm where art, literature, and poetry remain essential for expressing feelings that biology alone cannot define.
Read the full video transcript
nice to see you again I really enjoyed
our first conversation we talked about
Dad's the importance of fatherhood today
your most recent book why we love I want
to talk about that very Universal
perhaps one of the most universal things
that humans have got yeah why did love
evolve at all okay so love evolved
basically in the same way that most
thing evolved is because it aids our
survival so humans are arguably the most
Cooperative species on the planet both
in terms of the number of relationship
ship we can keep going at once which is
about 150 uh in terms of the duration of
those relationships that can last
decades and in terms of the very many
different categories of relationships
that we have so we're very Cooperative
but cooperation is really hard as I'm we
we all know we all know get along with
our friends with our family with our
co-workers can be a little bit stressful
sometimes and it would actually be much
much easier to be solitary but we have
to live in a group and we have to get
along with with each other to just
survive and so Evolution came up with
love basically it's kind of like a form
of biological bribery at the most basic
level so it's it's a set of
neurochemicals which motivate and reward
you for starting and then maintaining
what we call your survival critical
relationships so those relationships
that are critical to you both surviving
on a day-to-day basis but also passing
your genes down to the Next Generation
so at the most basic level that is all
love is it's just this biological
bribery to make us feel good about doing
this really quite difficult thing are
there any animals that don't have love
are there any animalss that haven't
evolved
that it's hard to say because love is a
really nebulous concept and it depends
how you define it I think we all have
our own definition of love and it
depends at what stage you you define it
I think a lot of animals feel what we
would call Basic love so all the mammals
for example experience attachment all
the mammals are underpinned by things
like oxytocin and dopamine um you know
all mammals have those sort of caring
nurturing relationships particularly
between mothers an offspring so we would
say all mammals experience love what we
get a little bit hot in the head about
is whether any animals experience human
type love which is a little bit more
complicated and what I find a little bit
sad really is you know when we just
assume All Humans feel love so if I say
to you do you know what love is have you
experienced love you'd go yeah and I'd
go okay um but with animals we hold them
to a very high level of evidence and so
to actually tell whether an animal
experiences humanlike love you kind have
sort of a che a checkbox of five
different things so do they experience
attachment is there um neurochemistry
does their neurochemistry involve beter
endorphin as well beter endorphin is a
more complex neurochemical it's involved
in human love which we don't see in the
less of mammals do they grieve which is
the loss of Love uh do they have
friendships so do they have
relationships which are nothing really
directly to do with reproduction or
passing genes down just for the hell of
it essentially and do they experience
cognitive empathy so there are different
types of of empathy um there's emotional
contagion which is just oh my God you
scream I scream I have no idea why I'm
screaming but something's scary that's a
lot of animals have that there's
emotional empathy which is I can see
you're really
upset but I don't know what to do about
it and then there's cognitive empathy
which is I can see you're really upset
and I'm going to help you in the
appropriate way which is what humans
have so I think if we use those five
things um then we can say yeah some high
higher mammals definitely do so for
example citations the Dolphins the
whales do uh gorillas chimps do um
beyond that it's a little bit tricky to
say dogs
might um we're still not sure on the
cognitive empathy with dogs but dogs
certainly may experience human levels of
Love um there's a wonderful effective
neuroscientist unfortunately he's no
longer with with us now called Yak pans
and he spent his whole life researching
love and what he said about human love
is he said you know love is like the
cupcake and loads of animals have the
cupcake but what humans have done is
they've over decorated the cupcake
they've put lots of rubbish on top which
is mostly the cultural stuff we
associate with love but all that lovely
decoration on top isn't actually
necessary to experience love we've just
kind of overly complicated it so I would
say yes a lot of animals experience love
I I think keeping it exclusively for
humans and setting this very high bar is
is maybe not fair I think going back to
the biological bribery is this just a
neurochemical motivation in that way
it's a motivation in terms of yes so
dopamine's evolved and dopamine is the
hormone of motivation uh it's also a
hormone of reward though so it's
definitely it involves the dopaminergic
system which is your reward system in
your brain and if you look at the
activations that occur in love certainly
the dopaminergic circuit is there but
it's more complicated than that uh
because it involves things like beter
endorphin which is addictive and that
undermine that underpins long-term Human
Relationships you need to make very very
powerful to underpin a relationship for
decades
um it involves oxytocin oxytocin isn't
just about um they call it cuddle
hormone which kind of annoys me but um
oxytocin is about orientating you
towards social objects in your
environment and it also acts on the
amydala to calm the amydala so that you
are more confident about building
relationships and serotonin's evolved a
serotonin is about obsessive love so
it's more complicated than just a
motivation to go over there and chat to
someone it has this quite complex uh
structure of different roles for for
neurochemicals but it's bribing you or
motivating you in one way or another to
do things that perhaps without that soup
of neurochemicals you wouldn't go and do
you wouldn't sacrifice yourself in this
way you wouldn't care as much you
wouldn't be as Vigilant you wouldn't
wake up at 3: in the morning to feed the
baby etc etc no you wouldn't you
wouldn't because it's just really really
difficult because being social as I'm
sure you know being in a group is
actually costly to your survival you
know it's very stressful being in a
group you don't get to do exactly what
you need ideally for yourself every day
you have to coordinate with everybody
else you've got people who are
constantly trying to stab you in the
back or do one over on you so you have
to spend a hell of a lot of time
monitoring everybody else to make sure
that everyone's behaving you exist in a
hierarchy which is going to dictate the
access to resources you get so if you're
at the top Fab you're going to get the
best matate you're G to get the best
food you're G to get the best shelter if
you're at the bottom you're kind of
screwed so um it's really really hard to
do but humans
mainly because we birth our babies so
incredibly early we need to help each
other particularly to raise our children
um and we talked about fatherhood before
fatherhood's one of the things that
started but we need we do need that
Village to help us raise our children
and we need each other to learn
everything we need to learn about our
complex technological world so social
learning is really important so we need
each other to do that so it's this
balance we need all these things from
each other but it's so stressful it's
actually quite costly um and it can be
quite dangerous you have to compete you
might not actually come out of it alive
so yes it's at the most basic level it's
there to go here we go I know it's
really hard but I'm going to give you
all this lovely stuff and hopefully
that'll make you feel better obviously
as I can hear people screaming love is
much more complicated than that but that
is the the reason why it evolved in the
first place what about the phases of
romantic love explain the way that love
and lust and all of the different
systems work okay so lust and attraction
are two entirely separate systems lust
is driven by a hypothalamus and it's
associated with the sex hormones and we
kind of sometimes conflate attraction
and lust in Our Minds when we talk about
attraction most people think about
romantic
attraction um actually attraction is the
stage that starts all relationships all
attraction is is being drawn towards
somebody out of Interest or out of
Desire or whatever in my or simply
because you like them so attraction is a
stage that you go through in your
friendships it's you go through it when
you first meet your baby for the first
time that's a stage you go through so
attraction underpins all forms of love
lust is only there in romantic
relationships and it's a very separate
area of the brain so attraction is based
in oxytocin and dopamine and and as I
said oxytocin Works to orientate you to
social beings in your environment and
kind of block out
distractions and it also quens your mixa
which is the fear Center of your brain
which means that sort of the nagging
confidence sapping voices that can
sometimes occur when you're thinking
about striking up conversation with
somebody those are quietens so that you
feel more confident you feel more
chilled about doing this quite difficult
thing dopamine is there to reward you
certainly but it's also there to give
you a bit of a kick up bum because
oxytocin is lovely but if you just have
it on your on its own you probably
wouldn't make any effort at all because
it makes you feel really really chilled
and so you probably wouldn't make the
effort to go across the bar or the
playground or wherever you are so we
have some dopamine because it's wide
into your muscles it's wide into your
motor circuits go come on you've
actually got to go and do something and
the other important things about about
dopamine and oxytocin is they make your
brain more plastic so particularly in
the areas relating to memory and
learning and when you first meet
somebody think of all the stuff you've
got to learn about that person
particularly if you're going to meet
them again you're going to recognize
them you're going to know their name
you're going to know what they're
interested in sound of their voice all
these sorts of things so your learning
areas and your memory areas become more
plastic which means they're very open to
change and and you do that very
efficiently in those sort of first so
you're being you're being
neurochemically primed to be a good
receptor
friend yes yes to take all of this on
board so that you remember that person
essentially and so that's what happens
in the attraction stage and attraction
initially is entirely unconscious so in
the Romantic sense what we do is we take
lots and lots of sensory information
from that person and and we're taking
that sensory information because what
we're trying to judge from that person
is is this a good potential
mate um and so we're going to take
visual information about things like
body shape about facial symmetry we're
going to um hear what they're saying
what the tone of their voice is we're
going to if you're a woman you're going
to smell whether they're genetically
compatible so you men can't do that
women can um and you're going to take in
all this information and it goes through
this very complex algorithm in your
brain and what that algorithm is trying
to test is yeah how valuable is this
person as a mate how reproductively
successful are they going to be and
that's known as their mate value we all
have a mate value on our head it's kind
of like Financial value in the stock
market and we will be calculating that
using the indicators we've looked at to
work out okay how reproductively
successful is this person actually going
to be and if they're a good a good bet
if they're good then basically you kind
of get the three cherries on the slot
machine and oxytocin and dopamine floods
an area of your brain called the nuclear
cumbent which is incredibly unconscious
very very deep um and it's simply there
to start this Kickstart this process and
it's entirely unconscious and that whole
process of sensory intake of algorithm
chundering away of oxytocin or dopamine
that's like Nan seconds of time
um and then at that point you know
hopefully you cross over and you say
hello but at some point that that signal
moves from the unconscious brain into
the conscious brain and we have kind of
both things going at the same time where
you start to you know consciously
contemplate this person oh you know
thinking things like oh my God they got
lovely eyes or actually their tone of
voice is quite annoying or oh do I agree
with what they're saying what my friends
think what my family think all those
sorts of things and then attraction
becomes an unconscious and conscious
process basically dig into that genetic
compatibility thing to super super
sniffer skill that women have that men
don't yeah okay so what that is is um
there's an area of your genetic code
known as the major hsto compatibility
complex and that underpins the diversity
of your immune response to disease
rather bizarrely some of the um genes in
that complex also underpin your sense of
smell go figure and um what women can do
is they can actually smell
how close a male's set of MHC genes are
to their own so if they're close to
their own they will not like the smell
of that person because they're too close
it's suggestive of in breeding and
actually what you want for your child is
the most diverse immune response you can
have so you need your partner to have an
MHC complex as far away from yours as
possible and so what we find with women
is they are able to smell that and they
can they can tell so it's really funny
you would never consciously know you're
doing it but sometimes you know like
women will say to me I met him he was
perfect in lots of different ways but
it's just just something just something
that I I can't put my finger on but
didn't work for me and that's that we
think women can do it and men can't
either because they've evolved to do it
or they've retained it we don't know
where the mammals can do it obviously
you can't really tell um or they've
retained it and men have lost it you
think because for a woman making the
mistake of in breeding is much more
serious because she's then if she
becomes pregnant going to be out of the
game nine months doing in our
evolutionary past something very
dangerous which is be pregnant and give
birth um and so the risk to her of death
is high and therefore you know you kind
of have to be pretty sure that this baby
that you're that you're going to birth
is going to be strong and it's going to
be healthy essentially so we think women
can do it and Men Can't for that reason
is that why humans kiss as
well possibly we actually don't know not
all humans kiss in the Romantic sense
actually all humans kiss but only 100%
of kissing across the cultures occurs
between mothers and children so there
are some um cultures where you don't
romantically kiss so there's always been
this massive debate about why did we
evolve kissing because some primates
kiss but they kind of they don't do it
very consistently and they don't seem to
do it in any
particularly sort of regular context so
it's quite hard so chimps you'll see
chimps kissing but it's not really quite
sure what they're doing some theories
have been it evolved in moms and
children to sort of pass masticated food
um the other thing is that yes maybe it
is something to do with getting closer
to people and smelling them though
having said that you know mammals other
mammals managed to do that without
kissing so why do we need to do that
some people think it's something to do
with testing the health of the person
tasting the health of the other person
um and something some people say yeah
it's just a really good bonding thing
your lips have got a lot of uh sensory
um uh lots of nerve endings and
therefore by kissing you you you know
you might be increasing in terms of the
bonding in terms of oxytocin and things
like that cuz it's touch but do you know
what nobody actually knows the answers
to why we kiss I think it's really
interesting the compati I think it was
actually uh Mr Dunbar himself who I read
I can't remember what it was I was
reading I was reading something of his
and he was talking about the evolution
of of kissing and why it was potentially
then I think he posited maybe it's
increasing proximity it's a allowing you
to check for compatibility between
immune systems but yeah uh it's so
ubiquit maybe you're right maybe you're
right I I didn't realize that not all
human cultures do kiss no but um at
least Mo many do uh many do and it's you
know it's culturally something that yeah
I would say probably 80 85% of cultures
kiss in the Romantic context so it's
it's certainly something that's there
what the ones that don't do you know do
you know any of the ones that don't I
know that there are some in terms of
there are some uh cult in Africa that
don't and there are some cultures I
think in South America that don't but we
don't really know why they do kiss their
children so I don't know why they don't
but it's just not seen as as a as a sort
of a sexual romantic thing um so it's
definitely got a cultural undertone to
it and whether we've just all you know
learned to do it I don't know talk to me
about the role of love in maintaining a
romantic relationship long term in
dealing with the vicissitudes and
jealousy and concern and male parental
uncertainty okay so love is different
obviously to attraction it's a different
set of
neurochemicals um and they are as I said
they they're unique to humans uh and
some of the higher primates so these are
the chemicals that underpin really
long-term relationships because oxytocin
is is great if you are quite a
shortlived little mammal like a little V
or Mouse which is which is the creatures
that were studied to discover oxytocin
in this context but the problem with it
underpinning long-term relationships is
first of all it doesn't last very long a
hit of oxytocin lasts maybe 30 minutes
and secondly um it we grow tolerant to
it so over time the hit of oxit you're
going to get from someone is going to
lessen and that's not going to underpin
Something in the long term so we needed
something that you didn't grow tolerant
to the other issue with oxytocin is it's
only released in any large quantities in
relationships which are associated with
reprodu so that's in the mother child
father child relationship and in the
sexual relationship it's it's increased
it's sorry it's released for example in
quite large quantities during orgasm and
during during sexual activity it is
released in friendships but at a much
lower level and the problem with humans
is actually the vast majority of our
relationships in that 150 Network aren't
sexual aren't reproductive aren't with
children and so we need a chemical
that's decoupled from reproduction to
enable us to maintain relationships and
that's where beter endorphin comes in
and beter endorphin was discovered
actually in the primates it's it's
what's released when primates groom each
other and you know all the
primatologists out there will know that
grooming isn't isn't a utilitarian
activity it's not about hygiene it's
about bonding so primates groom when
they've had an argument they groom to um
underpin alliances they groom to make
friendships and be Trend orphan is
what's released and so when we knew that
there's a group at Cambridge who
discovered that then Robin and I at that
point were like okay well this is much
more likely candidate to be the
underpinning of human love than oxytocin
is and so we began to research the role
for beer endorphin in in human love um
and we've you know spent many years
doing that and done lots and lots of
scans and things like that and that's
that's the answer is that beer endorphin
is beer endorphin is the is the
neurochemical of long-term love it's
your body's opiate um it evolved in the
first instance as your body's painkiller
so it's what's released when you hurt
yourself but over time it's been coopted
into the social realm and it's now what
is released when you do something social
and there's lots of activities decoupled
from reproduction that produce it such
as laughter touch exercise dancing
singing you know even having a hot curry
bizly um there's lots of things that
that release beer and dolphin so um so
it's really good for that social con
context that you can get it released
from and as it's and we don't grow um
Toler to it over time it it remains a
very potent chemical um so so that's
what's underpins human love in terms of
neurochemistry but obviously there are
many other things going on there you've
got the psychological elements of of
human love so you've got things like
attachment um but you've got you know
all lots of things around sort of Love
Languages and maintenance behaviors and
empathy and trust and reciprocity and
all these other things which sit in your
Neo cortex so human love is very
complicated when people say to me what
is love
I tend to say it's really hard to Define
depends what level of explanation you'd
like me to answer that at but what I
will say is very broadly it has two
Dimensions which is what sets it apart
it has a biological Dimension which is
the neurochemistry the neural activation
the genetics that kind of thing the
psychology and then it has a social
Dimension and that's all that cultural
stuff so that's religion politics
Society media education family stories
that kind of thing and that ALS Al
impacts how you personally would Define
love how much has our conception of Love
been molested by culture do you
think quite powerfully culture can
overwhelm biology quite easily culture
is very powerful and culture can tell
you to work against what your biology is
telling you to do very definitely there
are many Societies in the world where
there are rules around acceptable love
or what is you know which drive very
strongly against our biological drive to
to experience love so culture is very
powerful and it certainly does underpin
a lot of how people Define love so if
you ask the question what is love around
the world you will get some very
different answers I mean we obviously in
the west are kind of enthralled to the
concept of romantic love for example if
we look at it in that context um there
are many cultures in the world who don't
believe in the concept of romantic love
for them love between a man and a woman
might be more spiritual
it might be more centered simply on the
family it might be actually seen as a
form of
self-sacrifice um in some countries is
actually seen as being quite a negative
thing something to do with sort of
unrequited love and and kind of losing
yourself in the other person so it
really does depend the culture you've
been brought up in the rules you've been
told about what love is and what is
acceptable when it comes to Love Is Love
different romantic love different for
men and women do men experience love in
a different way do women experience love
in a different way it's a it's a myth
that there's this amazing I quite often
I get asked that question and people say
to me well you know we've got all this
thing that men aren't emotionally
intelligent and d d d and all that kind
of stuff no if you look at the averages
there are more differences within the
sexes in terms of how someone
experiences romantic love than there are
between the Sexes so if I put somebody
in my scanner and nobody tells me what
sex they are I would not be able to tell
from looking at the screen when we were
doing it experiment for example I
couldn't possi tell so the activations
are the same the neurochemistry is the
same what influences how individuals
experienced love is much more their
genetics which are not sex linked um
their attachment profile um and a lot is
to do with their upbringing so all of
that is much more influential than what
your biological sex is now some of that
will be influenced along gender lines we
do um tells stories differently to boys
and girls about what love is and it's
there's a really interesting study that
I quot in the book which was looking at
school children and asking them at the
age of five to draw a picture of you
know romantic love and all the kids
regardless of their their sex or gender
draw you know people happily holding
hands and there's butterflies and it's
all lovely and d d d and then after the
age of 11 when kind of puberty's kicked
in and maybe we've had a little bit of
gender you know um cultural gender sort
of bias coming on then the boys all do
pictures of big strong man looking after
small weak woman and then the girls are
still doing butterflies in hearts and
and that's
quite no but you know it's really
powerful it's really powerful what we
tell boys they should feel when they're
in love and how they should act when
they're in love but actually if you look
at their brains they're no different
it's just very heavily gendered what do
you think is the subtext that we tell
young males about their role in
love that they're the protector that
they're the protector and they're The
Rock and therefore you shouldn't really
show emotion you shouldn't um become
involved in yes the sort of emotional
extremes of love you should be
very balanced very controlled and and
you are there to protect the female
essentially and I think that's what we
tell boys about love and that you know
showing emotion being upset by love or
being passionate about Love or Whatever
these things is is a female a feminine
thing to do and to cry about love is a
feminine thing to do and I think that's
the stories we tell because if you go to
other cultures where they don't have
those stories men are very open and
emotional about about love not just love
in the Romantic sense but love love for
their friends you know you will see for
example in some Arab cultures men
holding hands and kissing each other and
it's all very passionate it's all very
out in the open and very emotional and
you would not see men for example in the
UK doing that because that's that's not
what we do but it's not because they're
incapable of it it's because they've
they've been told you you don't do
that you know so love is is pretty
heavily gendered
definitely talk to me about the genetic
upbringing and Detachment
contribution okay so it's it's hard to
say exact what the balance is as
everyone knows there's a quite there's a
very complex interaction between
genetics and the environment
particularly when it comes to love
because the genes that underpin our
social cognition and the neurochemistry
I spoke about are many there's many of
them um even on the oxytocin receptor
Gene alone which is one of the major uh
genes that influences how you experience
love and how you feel you know there are
26 point mutations on there that affect
how you experience love or how you
behave or for example how skilled you
are at certain things to do with love
such as empathy so in itself that's
really complex and then you've got
serotonin you've got dopamine you know
you've got beter endorphin and they've
also all got their little point
mutations going on and there's probably
many many more point mutations out there
we haven't even found yet so it's very
very complex some of them have more
power than
others um and some of them are what we
call cumulative so there are five point
mutations on the oxytocin receptor Gene
which impact how good you are at
empathizing that empathy as I mentioned
cognitive empathy is one of the
Hallmarks of human love but how Adept
you are at it how Adept you are reading
people's emotions and meeting that need
is partly under genetic control um and
of these point mutations there are there
are five beneficial versions and there
are five which means it's harder for you
to do so the more of the beneficial
versions you carry the better you are at
empathizing for example um there are
other areas on the oxytocin receptor
Gene which are associated with your
motivation to want to be in
relationships um and so some people
carry a version where they're very
motivated to be in relationships they
tend to have a lot of different
relationships friendships family
relationships you know love romantic
love relationships they tend to find
them really satisfying they're the kind
of thing that that grounds them and
makes them happy um whereas other people
carry a version of that Gene of that
that point mutation find relationships
quite hard they tend not to be that
motivated to be in them and actually
when they're in relationships they find
them quite stressful I wonder if you
could do a self-report for people people
there must be an introversion
extroversion scale or maybe you could
just do a a survey of do you find time
with people to be revitalizing or do you
get your energy from being on your own
and then to match that up with this
exactly see this a genetic influence
then exactly exactly because um the oxit
as I said what the oxytocin receptor
Gene does is it orientates you to social
people and it gives you confidence and
makes you feel chilled now what it
sounds like with those people who find
it difficult is that that Gene it might
influence things like the density of
oxytocin receptors so for example you
just obviously don't have as many
oxytocin receptors so oxytocin just does
not have the same effect on you so you
are less motivated you're getting less
of a benefit you're getting less of this
lovely chilled feeling and less of the
confidence and that might be what's
affecting you and as you say that might
be associated with those personality
traits of introversion for example um so
it's really interesting the genetics but
as I said there's a very complicated
interaction with your environment
because the reason why your environment
is so influential on how you behave in
relationships how you feel is because
the human babies have a very V quick
period of brain growth after birth of
about two years and that's because we're
born too early with a very incomplete
brain and the bit that's not complete is
the prefrontal cortex which is where
your social cognition sits and so that
means it's very susceptible to the
environment in which is raised and we
know that now looking at um brain scans
of children who are brought up in both
nurturing environments and also in
neglectful environment so if you're
brought up in a nurturing environment
you get very very high connectivity you
get very dense gray and white matter in
that area if we look at your amigdala
it's small it's it's not hyperactivated
so you're not constantly detecting risk
for example uh you tend to have high
circulating oxytocin um so you're kind
of you've got this wonderful Foundation
that you've been given by this nurturing
environment to this is this is largely
in independent of your genetic
predisposition this independent of your
this it sits on top of it uh whereas if
we looked at looked at a child who maybe
was neglected or even not neglected but
had insecure attachments intrusive
parenting or that kind of thing then you
can see kind of you well in extreme
places you get neuronal death so
actually that person just does not have
the density and of gray and white matter
in there it does not have the
architecture which is going to provide
the foundation they tend to have
overlarge uh amigdalas which are
constantly activated they T have very
high levels of cortisol these sorts of
things so you see the impact the
environments had and we know also that
children who are brought up in those
environments go on to struggle with
relationships they go on to have more
risk of antisocial behavior that kind of
thing um whereas children who are
brought up in nurturing environments
there's much less risk of that so but
having said that I would have said maybe
10 years ago if you'd said to me and my
colleagues attachment so attachment is a
psychological mindset um to do with uh
attachment relationships are very
intense their development mentally
significant uh they're marked by
particular characteristics such as
separation anxiety disas proximity that
kind of thing and they're quite rare but
they're very important and your
attachment profile is important in
influencing how you behave when you're
in love and how you feel but we always
thought that it was entirely
environmental that really how you turned
up because that's kind of how it looked
to be honest you know neglectful
environment much more lik to have
insecure attachment going into life you
know nurturing environment much more
likely to have secure attachment you
know good at having relationships all
that kind of stuff but then on again on
the oxytocin receptor Gene a team not us
found um a set of genes which are known
as being differentially
susceptible and what these genes are is
they or these point mutations they
influence how powerful the environment
is on your attachment
profile so if you carry a version of
this Gene which means that your
environment is less effective in terms
of altering your attachment profile if
you're in a really nurturing environment
then that means obviously that the
environment you're not going to have the
same powerful influence of it being
secure but what it does mean is if
you're in a neglectful environment that
environment will have much less of an
effect upon ultimately your attachment
relationships when you get older your
ability to navigate relationships and we
kind of call them the armor PL genes
because we would meet people who would
come into the lab and I meet people at
public talks even who come up to me and
they've had the worst upbringings you've
heard like really awful but they are
navigating their social relationship so
well completely stable completely secure
doing really well and we used to joke
we' be like wow they must have some
amazing jeans because there's something
going on there that and this team found
that and they found that actually these
people who carry these armor plated
jeans they are kind of protected from
that environment and they can kind of
sail through that environment kind of
unscathed because they have these genes
which means no actually these genes are
more powerful than that environment is
so it's it's really really interesting
and I think we will probably
find more genes and more point mutations
which are differentially susceptible
because the more you dig into the
genetics the more complicated it gets
well it's this wonderful interplay
between genetic predisposition and then
environmental reinforcement I suppose
especially given
that the genes that you are given Pres
that you live in the household with your
biological parents that gave you the Gen
the genetic material that you're made
from they have likely on average the
traits that you have inherited
genetically but they manifest
behaviorally so if you have the genes
for anxiety you tend to lean toward
anxiety in terms of your genetic
predisposition you're going to grow up
in a household that is likely to
behaviorally be more anxious so you end
up with this sort of very strange ever
and but it's Al yeah and it's why it's
why problems cross Generations partly
because of that partly because of that
though obviously we have to remember
that depending on recessive dominant
genes fact you're anx anxious doesn't
mean necessarily that that expressed
itself in your in your parents but um
that's why things cross Generations
because if you live in an
abusive household as a child and you and
you build this architecture in your
brain that's not particularly healthy
and not particularly helpful that that
is that is the brain that's going to go
on to raise your children MH and you're
going to be that you don't have the
skills because your parents didn't have
the skills that is imprinted in your
brain you simply don't have the brain
architecture and then you're going to
pass it on so and that's why a lot of
people in this field work very hard to
break break that
cross-generational problem because and
Inter I certainly think from uh my
generation's perspective a lot of the
guys that I talk to almost see it from a
the ascended millennials job is to be
the kind of
Breakwater uh or the breako in between
you know Granddad was in the Faulkland
or Vietnam or something and dad was a
classic Boomer parent who kind of didn't
really do much of the self work and
didn't have access to the things maybe
he would have done you know if he had
access to the school of life and Dand de
boton's Psychotherapy insights maybe he
true would have you know done the self
work and all the rest of it but a lot of
a lot of my friends and I think me too
um kind of see it as all right we have
genuinely been given tools that allow us
to kind of make a big uh Dam in front of
a lot of patterns that I think have been
passed down generationally uh and how
much of that has come from a genetic
predisposition how much of that has been
reinforced by the environment that we've
grown up in kind of doesn't really
matter you have if if you're able to
listen to a podcast like this you have
the agency to be able to okay I'm about
to have a kid I've got nine months as as
a dad or or as a mom
time for me to learn I'm going to sit
down I'm going to read enough books I'm
going to do the self work I'm going to
you know prepare
to stop this weird repetition this sort
of cycle that has continued to happen
for God knows how long um and this is
why one of my friends has a really great
answer to the question if you could go
for uh dinner with four people alive or
dead who would it be and he says that he
wants to go with all four of his great
grandfathers because he thinks would
learn way more from being sat around
them than he would from being sat around
Isaac Newton or chel or Einstein or
someone because he wants to see where do
I come from and he wants oh that's
that's that fear that's the that's the
part of me that makes me really worried
and concerned that's the social anxiety
bit coming through that's the rebel in
me that's where that comes oh my God
that's from Granddad Tim or whatever and
um I just thought that that's such a
cool a cool Insight it is and and and
it's also shows the huge power of the
human brain for change because that's
one thing thing because when I when I
talk about this at talks and and the
impact of upbringing on brain structure
and all that kind of thing and you you
always get people like oh my God you
know Panic that oh it's determined and
it's not because the human brain is
hugely
plastic and actually if you if you do
the work sometimes it's much much harder
for some people sometimes it's a bit
easier it kind of depends but you know
you can change that pattern and you can
change that pattern within yourself um
because the human brain is very open to
changing if you give it the work getting
back to romantic relationships
cheating why why do men cheat what
what's in it for
them um well why do men and women cheat
same reason um they cheat because it
ultimately it's about passing your genes
down the generations so human males are
in this position where we're in in most
societies we're in like a monogamous um
structure and from from a sort of
genetic reproductive success point of
view that's quite constricting because
you know you just have this one female
and you're going to put everything into
them and they're going to bring you know
birth your baby and that's how your
genes are going to get down the
generation but you know if you're
looking at a chimpanzee male he's there
spreading it everywhere you know he's
going to have a hell of much higher
reproductive success than you are
because he's in a multimale multif
female group and he can just you know
have sex multiple times a day and be the
father to multiple multiple babies at
the same time and so really that's kind
of the way way monogamous species deal
with that problem is that they have
affairs U and we see it even in the most
monogamous you know I used to work with
a with a professor at UCL who studied
Gibbons which is the monogamous primate
and he was like no they're not they are
literally always sneaking away behind
rocks to you know have sex with other
other you know Partners who aren't
aren't in them monog Perry because
that's from an evolution point of view
that's how you're going to increase your
reproductive success particularly if
you're a male because literally sperm is
not worth anything and if you're pretty
damn sure that that baby can be raised
without your input great you've got
you've got some jeans there going down
another family tree um as well as the
ones that are in your in your committed
relationship for women it's slightly
different and for women the reason they
do it because obviously once they're
pregnant they're pregnant is to get
better
genes it's just you know that's that's
the evolutionary drive to be unfaithful
is because you've obviously got this
wonderful investing male here who's
probably going to be a great dad
he going to protect provide be nurturing
do all those wonderful wonderful things
but hey maybe his jeans aren't so great
um so I'm actually going to go and have
a affair over here with this person
who's really good-look and I'm going to
become pregnant with him and you know in
an ideal world he you know investing guy
doesn't find out and they get the best
of both worlds I get some really
cracking genes but I also get somebody
who's going to commit and raise this
child alongside me so from an
evolutionary point of view being
unfaithful makes perfect sense because
ultimately your job on this Earth from
Evolution spot is to increase maximize
your reproductive success as far as you
can it sounds like we're strin toward
here is dual mating hypothesis versus
mate switching what I know that this has
kind of been up in the air it was one
way then it was the other way and now
maybe it's going back another way what's
the current state of the literature have
you got any idea where we're at whether
duwel mating or mate switching is
currently in
ascendency I don't think we're because
you get two very strong
sort of schools of thought really I mean
I I definitely I think maybe because I
come from a primate behavioral
background I'm very much a dual mating
person I think I think it you will I
don't think we've come down on either
side and it might be that they're both
right and it's a mixed methodology and
it it depends on the
individual um because you'll observe
both in humans so I don't think
necessarily there's one answer or
there's another answer but ultimately
it's what works in your circumstances
and in your environment of that time the
basis of your drive is to maximize your
reproductive success so how are you
going to do that does that mean that
women on average tend to have affairs
with men that are better looking yes
than their current on average on average
yes they tend to go out with men who are
who so one of the major measures of
genetic strength is facial asymmetry um
so we are genetically programmed if we
if our genes were left to
you know Express themselves in the
phenotype in us without any
environmental challenges no stresses
nothing we would be symmetrical we're a
bilaterally symmetrical being but when
you're in the womb particularly and
you're developing um they get knocked
off course because you know your mom
might be stressed you might be ill
whatever it might be so so none of us
are symmetrical but some people are
pretty damn close and those are the
people who managed to go through all
this environmental turmoil and still
come out with because the genes were
strong being pretty close to Symmetry
and those are the people we tend to find
most attractive and what you will see on
average with women is if you look at the
facial asymmetry of their partner you
look at the facial asymmetry of the
person they had the affair with the
person they had the affair with is more
attractive objectively um it doesn't
mean that actually that person with the
lovely close to symmetry face is
actually the better mate because they're
probably not if we look at who people
end up with they tend to end up with
people not who are extremely close to
symmetry they send to send up with
people who are a little bit more average
um because that tends to go alongside
other things particularly for men things
like provision and protection and all
that sort of thing but yeah if you look
at if you look at it on average that's
what women tend to do what about the
role of cheating among men given that we
need to account for drops in
testosterone as we learned last time uh
when they get into a committed
relationship when they get married and
then especially when they have children
so you know there is a sort of
Chad to Dad pipeline um that goes on
from a testosterone perspective and that
is going to reduce a desire for sexual
variety I'm going to guess not entirely
uh and not in all men in probably but
I'm going to guess that um the sort of
classic male lothario that you may use
an example of a single guy to then Port
across onto men that are married with
kids uh you're you're not quite talking
about two different species but you're
talking about a a little sort of
Splinter faction uh away from the the
original one yeah you are absolutely um
and but I think we need to be aware that
whilst The evolutionary drive to Cheat
is is based in testosterone testosterone
yes is the hormone of mate selection
that's what it's there for it's there to
help you select a mate and it's there to
help you compete for a mate um there are
other things that come into whether or
not a man is going to cheat or not one
of those for example is his upbringing
so was he brought up in a in a culture
or in a family where cheating was
something that men did did was his
father faithful if your father's
Unfaithful you are more likely to be
unfaithful so it's also to do with those
cultural messages we get and also your
upbringing in terms of so it's not just
testosterone that will drive you to have
an affair there are many other things
that come into it as well I had a
fascinating conversation a couple of
months ago talking about uh mating
ideologies over time and um it was just
so uh mad Lawson he's from some Finnish
Swedish scandi Place uh and he was just
so so great and that really got me
thinking about the biological and
cultural mismatch when it comes to our
sort of mating preferences that we have
this sexual redistribution policy which
is one man with one woman and that means
that kind of in the best scenario
everybody gets somebody and that's good
because it means that you have a
populace which is going to continue to
reproduce and you're not going to have a
ton of upset disgruntled men running
around pushing over cars and setting
fighter houses and doing stuff like that
uh and yet it seems like at best humans
are serial
monogamous serially monogamous uh and at
worst are closer to chimps and bonobos
and and Gibbons yeah no absolutely and
this is the problem I mean I write a
whole chapter on it in in my book um
under the title exclusive because we
have this there are many particularly in
the west we yes we have this monogamous
model in society where there's one man
or one woman or two people to the
exclusion of everybody else now humans
are aren't
actually as in fact no species is purely
monogamous we're just not um what
monogamy is is to a large part a
societal construct that's been placed
upon our biological behavior in a way to
try and constrain it because if we all
acted like chimps and we all just
followed our biological drive and did
whatever we wanted to do it would be
chaos and what a structured Society a
civil society does not want is chaos
what we want is to be predictable we
want all the masses to be predictable so
that the people in power can work out
what you're going to do next and so one
of the ways you can do that is you can
put rules around um relationships and
you can formalize them with marriage and
you can you know say lots of legal
Frameworks so you for example you can't
split up without going through the
courts properly because we all have to
keep control of everybody's reproductive
relationship so we can predict what's
going on and everybody stays within
their box essentially and that's what
monogamy is in most societies is it's
just been placed upon us by Society
because by because as you say at least
you know the rate of monogamy of sorry
um being unfaithful is is high because
actually that's more of our biological
Drive is to do that and this is really I
spoke to a lot of polyamorists for my
book and polyamor gets a bad name uh if
you ask a lot of people about what they
think of polyamory they see it as
immoral they see it as people who are
you know have massive sex drives and um
can't control their sexual urges and all
this sort of stuff and it's corrupting
and actually if you speak to them they
say well actually what we're doing is we
are acknowledging it's very moral
because we are acknowledging what humans
do and what humans do is they have quite
often more than one romantic
relationship at once so what we are
saying is we're going to acknowledge
that we're going to say um that this
happens we're going to be open about it
we're not going to creep around behind
people's backs we're going to put in
place rules about being respectful of
each other and rules about how we
balance everybody's needs in this
particular complex of relationships and
we're going to have open communication
so that everybody knows where they stand
and so in a way what they're saying is
actually we are reflecting what for a
lot of people is the natural
state and that is that is actually how
we should behave and so it's really
interesting they've created like paleo
relationships yeah in a way yeah they
have they've sort of said this is
actually how most people behave but most
people pretend it's not happening and
actually cause huge pain because they
lie about it um and it's really
interesting and actually I think
particularly this this younger
generation are much more open about that
you know there's a lot this consensual
non- monogamy um idea about the fact
that actually a lot of people don't find
being monogamous particularly natural
and they are fighting against their urge
their biological urge to remain within
this quite constrained societal
structure and therefore actually I'm
going to be open about that and we're
going to find somebody else who's happy
with that
and and be with them and be with other
people and I think it's interesting I
mean polyamory isn't for everybody
obviously it's it it rears its head in
terms of
jealousy um and jealousy is something
that comes from the fact that humans do
have to couple up for a period of time
after you've had a child just to make
sure that child survives and that's
where jealousy comes from but um for
some people it works really really well
what about the opposite of that the a
Romantics h a Romantics I are a really
interesting group of people who have had
a really bad press and are quite
difficult to reach I was really lucky to
speak to a few from my book um a
romantic people The View that people
have on them is that they are very cold
because they assume that when you say
someone's very romantic they don't
experience any sort of love and actually
they do they just don't experience a
romantic love so they experience
platonic love very much so they have
love for family love for friends love
for Community love for their pets love
for God whatever it might be they just
do not experience romantic love and in
most cases they're also asexual so they
do not feel sexual attraction um and
they are a fascinating group of people
we don't we haven't done a lot of what
we would call invasive scientific
research in terms of um in terms of
genetics or in terms of scanning as yet
on that particular population because
they are very sensitive to being looked
at in that way because they don't they
they're nervous about how the results
would be seen but having spoken to them
it shows how obsessed we are with
romantic love and we place it at the
Pinnacle and we really think it's the be
all and end all of everything so
somebody could have the most loving
relationships in their lives like a you
know a social network that's overflowing
with love but if you don't have romantic
love then you're a bit weird and that's
how they're seen they're seen is a bit
weird and it's bizarre because they have
things called platonic life Partnerships
which is they will build a life with
somebody they will even have children
with somebody but it's based on platonic
romantic love and and for me it's very
powerful because they tell us two things
first of all how how imbued our society
is with romantic love how difficult it
is to live in a world which references
romantic love so often when you don't
feel it that's hard that's very
exclusionary and secondly the fact that
we think there's a hierarchy of love
with romantic love at the top of it and
that's the most effective love that's
the most powerful love that's the one
which is the best for your health and
the best for your longevity and the best
for everything else and actually it's
not not that's just some cultural you
know rubbish we've been told and which
we swallowed um actually it's it l there
is no horck it's flat and what we need
to embrace as humans is how lucky we are
to be able to love in so many different
ways you know we have so many different
ways you did mention that there's kind
of a hierarchy neurochemically uh
between sexual relationships and father
child mother child that those seem to be
the most intense at least when it comes
to sort of what our body is providing us
or at least what our brain is providing
us with so I don't know maybe that maybe
that does seem to make sense a little
bit that you would look at a a
friendship as a second class type but
it's actually it's it in terms of when
we look at things like it's very hard to
compare people's feelings of love so you
would say to somebody what's the most
powerful of you experience and they will
say yeah with my child for example but
then you'll say somebody else who hasn't
got children you know what's the most
powerful love you've experienced I'll
say with my God now it's very hard to
know whether those two things are
anywhere the same whether they're in the
same ballp when we look at and you can't
really measure love from like the
intensity on a scanner screen it doesn't
work like that it's not like a dose
response um and you can get just as big
a hit of beer endorphin for example from
having a really good I don't know dance
with your friends as you can from from
hugging your baby or whatever so it's
very hard say that one is more powerful
than the other the only argument you
would have for them being more more
important is because they are the
reproductive ones they are the ones that
that Evolution says maybe are the more
important because those are the ones
that are directly going to pass genes
down the generations from reproduction
and from raising your children but when
we look at things like health
benefits um in terms of their in their
effect upon your longevity upon your
life satisfaction it really doesn't
matter what sort of love you have for
those for those particular measures you
know we do know that the relationships
you have are the biggest factor in your
mental and physical health your
longevity uh and your survival
absolutely but what sort of love that is
doesn't seem to matter that
much going back to the non- monogamy
thing sort of this uh battle that we
have culturally and biologically what's
a beta marriage I'd never heard of this
before it's like a beta test so a beta
marriage this was an idea that that kind
of comes raise its head every now and
then and it's to do with the fact that
we never kind of expected to live this
long you know so the idea that you would
have a marriage and it would last 60
years people are like oo that sounds so
you can have things called beta
marriages which is they're kind of
looked at in two ways either they're
like a practice marriage they're like a
beta test so you're going to run this
marriage and probably you're restricted
for like 5 years 10 years and at the end
of it you can both walk away there's no
formal divorce it's like a it's like a
you know yeah a limited contract you
know um and then you'll both walk away
and maybe you've learned something about
yourself or you've learned something
about them or you might renew it for
another 10 years who knows so so some
people see it as like a test other
people see it just as all marriages
should have break Clauses like a lease
and like after five years you should be
able to go no it's not working let's
just leave with what we came with no
expensive divorce I'm off and that's a
be to
marriage um it all sounds a little bit
cold and objective to me um to be honest
because you know the whole love is a
neurochemical cocktail of passion and
amazingness and and you don't just
suddenly switch that off one day and go
oh it's absolutely fine I'm just going
to cut that now it's the same but yeah
every now and then you know it rears its
head as an idea it's the
same in part similar to what I think
about
surrogacy uh that you know
being pregnant doesn't just make a child
it makes a mother and
the just because you've been paid 70
grand to do this doesn't mean you cut it
off no yeah exactly exactly um it talked
to me you know mentioned with uh
appropriate scientific rigor and
restraint and rationality today kind of
what our ancestral setup for mating was
about how actually appears in the human
system but phenomenologically it doesn't
feel like any of that's happening right
it's this you're carried away by this
wonderful roller coaster of things and
you're you're you're a mother you at
least two kids maybe but you probably
got more now um how do you as someone
who you know is swimming through the
world of love at the moment how have you
learned to blend some of the insights of
the more kind of rational
cognitive sterile uh learnings about
love with what it means to be a human
and to be in love and to feel it and and
to navigate
it I think because actually the more
because people ask me quite often
because you study love has it kind of
lost its magic for you because you can
kind of get okay I know exactly what's
happening in your brain first of all I
don't know exactly what's happening in
your brain yeah exactly I mean first of
all I don't we probably know like 10% of
what's going on so first of all I don't
secondly love is hugely complicated I
mean really really really really
complicated highly multifactorial so
many different things that feed into it
highly individual like really individual
how I feel when I'm in love how you feel
in love probably not the same you know
because there's so many things that
factor into it um and the more I study
love the more in awe I have of it
because it literally does infiltrate
every fi of your being and come into
every aspect of your daily life even if
you're not consciously thinking about
it you know you are you probably think
about your family you think about your
friends you do things for your family
you do things for friends they do things
for you you're cooperating with people
all day long you know you're thinking
ahead how to make somebody happy you're
planning things for the future whatever
it might be and it it it infiltrates
every aspect of our media every aspect
of our religions or based on love you
know our politics everything includes
love and so for me it's a hugely or
inspiring phenomena and we are so lucky
to experience it in the fome way that we
do and in the spread of different ways
that we do and the fact that we have all
this art and this literature and all
this these stories around love we do
that because it's so hard to put into
words how amazing it is so difficult to
to fully say what so I can reduce it to
chemicals for you and tell you which
genes are involved and show you the
brain activation and say uh but that's
not it that's just some objective
measures of something which is nebulous
constantly changing highly individual so
you know people come to my talks I think
sometimes maybe they're a little bit
lost because of Love cuz love in the in
this century is quite difficult
particularly if you're young and they
think I'm going to give them a formula
of okay if you do this and you do this
and you do this then this is going to
happen and it's all going to be fine no
idea there will never be a formula for
love because a while we can objectively
measure bits of it there's this massive
bit mainly
subjective don't know anything about it
um and we probably won't ever touch it
because it's impossible to measure and
shows to me how phenomenal it is and how
lucky we are to have it so I actually
don't get bored of it the more I
experience it the
more I am inspired by and I genuinely
genuinely do think it's it's
absolutely possibly the Cornerstone of
Being Human or at least one of the very
important ones because we literally
wouldn't survive our culture wouldn't be
the same without it we wouldn't be
around without it the relationships we
build would be devoid you know I mean
it's just to me it's it is actually
everything and that's kind of how I
conclude the book you know I I basically
say what is love well love is actually
everything everything if you don't have
it you live very much half a life
definitely talk to me about the Dark
Side of love how it can be used as a
control yeah so the problem with love um
because we need it so viscerally and
because it imbues every fi in your
body that need that absolute drive to
find it to keep
it means that it can be used against
you um and we are we talked about animal
love at the start the only thing that
definitely separates us from the animals
is that we are the only creature that
uses love to
manipulate so the fact that somebody
needs our love we will use to make them
do stuff for us now we all do that we
all probably at some point have said if
you loved me you'd make me a cup of tea
or if you loved me you'd let if you love
me you'd let me choose the color of The
New Sofa or whatever it might be we have
all done it but there are really serious
extremes of that and because again
things like beer and Dophin is addictive
unfortunately some people seem to be
more susceptible to that that that level
of addiction find it much much harder to
break so yeah it it can be used to you
know at the at the minor minor end
there's obviously jealousy and jealousy
evolved as an emotion for the same
reason as all emotions it's there to Aid
our survival and when kept under control
it is important because it it draws your
attention to threats to your survival
critical relationships and and then you
can act because you felt jealous and you
can do something but obviously in
extreme cases it's very
dangerous um you know people use love to
coer to manipulate to abuse and I think
we don't talk about that enough we don't
talk about this dark side of it most
human adaptations of which love is one
have are never 100% beneficial there's
always a downside and for love that
downside is the fact that we use it in
that way um and I there have been
studies done by other people looking at
abusive relationships and the role for
love in abusive relationships I
personally have studied it in men and
men who are victims of domestic violence
or domestic abuse and you know people
always say yeah oh well there can't be
love there because that's not love but
if you speak to the people who are
within these relationships they very
definitely think there's love
there um and quite often they will stay
for love either because they see
glimmers of love in that person and they
love that person so much or they think
their love can rescue that person I can
change them I can be the person who
changes them they will be different
because I love them so much um and I
don't think we talk about that enough
because ultimately love evolved as a
form of control it's Evolution's way of
controlling us to make sure we reproduce
and do this really difficult thing but
it's kind of gone a long way the the way
and and yeah we can use it to control
other people and that's not a nice side
of it I'm afraid that's a very unique
Insight what
do male victims of domestic violence or
abuse say about love what what's the
sort of narrative and the story that
they tell you it's that it's that story
sometimes it's that they
love they love the person so much they
think they can change and they think
they can rescue them so so for some
people it's kind of like a not a night
and shining armor sort of thing but they
do feel that this person is is damaged
in some way and I can rescue them
sometimes they will literally talk about
love being
blind
and they will a lot of them had come out
of the relationships when I'd spoken to
them they they'd managed to end the
relationships and they would look back
and go I I just can't believe I didn't
see it so there's like one guy who said
who he he himself was violently abused
but this his wife would also for example
violently abuse her parents so they'd be
having a having dinner and suddenly
she'd pour a c a pot of hot coffee over
the mother's head and drag her out the
door by her hair and he would just sit
there W and he was like wow I mean did I
not think at the time that's really not
right but it so they will talk about
love being blind and and that they're
just so overwhelmed by it that they
don't see this thing in front of them
and sometimes it's not love for the
partner that keep it's love for the
children unfortunately we live in a a
court system here in the UK where it's
still very biased towards mothers and
mothers getting children in in custody
battles and so a lot of them will stay
because if they leave leave they are
really worried the kids will end up with
the mom a they won't be able to see the
kids because the mom will use them as
weapon and B the mom might start abusing
the kids um so a lot of them will stay
for that reason as
well so interesting God what a what a
wild i' never even thought about the the
likelihood of someone who is a um abuser
in the home being abuser outside of the
home as well m there's this I for anyone
who wants to read the housemade uh the
book uh skip forward by about 90 seconds
but there's a really interesting story
in this so um this woman is recruited to
become a housemade for a rich family the
wife of the family is a total [ __ ]
throughout the entire time and the child
is a total [ __ ] throughout the entire
time uh she ends up being locked in the
upstairs attic by the husband the
housemid gets locked in the Attic by the
husband what it turns out is that the
husband was doing this to the wife the
wife then found a attractive uh
supplanter of her basically someone who
could come in and take her role uh and
that would liberate her and the daughter
because this husband was super super
smart and whatever and it's this sort of
weird generational trauma thing and then
at the end of the book The housemade
outsmarts the guy causes him to do a he
like makes makes him pull his own teeth
out makes him lie with uh big stack of
bucks on his testicles for hours and
hours and uh watches him on CCTV and
then at the
funeral uh she sees the mother and
obviously the son had pulled his teeth
out he' done all of these things and she
sees the mother of the son of the the
the husband H and the mother basically
says good to see that you finally
disciplined him I've been trying to do
that since childhood wow wow yep so she'
made him pull his teeth out during
school when he was a child just and that
totally made me think I mean it's such a
good twist even just describing it in 90
seconds it's such a great twist um so
just a really lovely uh explainer of
that lineage you know talking about how
hurt people hurt people this sort of
Pang generational trauma thing that gets
passed down its patterns it's genetic
predisposition uh but I i' never
considered it that yeah you'd have you
know a abusive partner why would they
why would that stop you know it's going
to happen to the dog it's going to
happen to the friends it's going to be
emotionally manipulative to the
supermarket worker to the the people
that they're in the office with yeah I
mean because some people that that is
their personality I mean I talk about a
personality in the book called The Dark
Triad personality and dark Triad
personality are people who are
narcissists Psychopaths and
Machiavellian and there is good data now
showing that people who possess that
particular personality type are much
more likely to be abusers because the
way they retain people the way they
retain relationships is by I mean love
scientist but it's called you know
costly mate retention behaviors but
basically through violence through
coercion through abuse through
manipulation um and you know they are
much more likely to do that now but the
question arises why are those people
like that why do they have that
personality um and and if you look back
at their their childhoods quite a lot of
them are perpetuating abuse they had as
children
so fascinating talk to me what about
this tension between female
relationships and their romantic
relationships the sort of female female
thing and whether or not romantic love
is the most important one in that
scenario yeah it's really interesting
that one of the first studies I did when
I went to Oxford um was to look at
compare romantic relationships and best
friendships and one of the things we
found when we've looked at women was
that they are more emotionally intimate
with their best female best friends and
they are with their romantic partner and
that was really quite surprising because
you're like wow because you think you
think of like the most emotionally
intimate relationship being the Romantic
relationship maybe and these women were
like absolutely not you know I keep my
my deepest darkest emotional
vulnerabilities uh for my for my friends
my female best friends and that's really
interesting and I think what we're
seeing with female best friendship is
actually there's quite a Revolution
going on at the moment and has been for
maybe the last 10 20 years in terms of
how important that relationship is in
women's lives what when we're looking
like demographic data more women are
remaining single and more women are not
are choosing or aren't having children
and when you that's your your life
pattern then your survival critical
relationships become something else and
for most women they become their friends
and and again I I talk about it a lot in
the book and I've done quite a lot
research on it because it's really
fascinating because it's only really
happened in the last 10 20 years because
women can control their
contraception and also women don't have
to now marry to be independent you know
you go back finally liberated on them
exactly so they're on their own they
don't need to marry for support for
financial support for protection and
they certainly don't need to have
children if they don't want them and so
we're seeing women building these whole
chosen families now of their friendships
and their friendships literally being
their survival critical little bubble
and that's those are the people they
rely on and as I said earlier you know
they they those relationships bring just
as much benefit in terms of love as as a
romantic relationship or a child parent
relationship from an objective point of
view so it's really interesting that
that we are seeing this slight
revolution of women choosing their
friends as their pre as their premere
relationship in their
life why is it the case that women show
more um affection or more love toward
their friends and it seems like guys
don't is that is that vestigal Alo
parenting stuff no it's not I think it's
very very cultural to be honest um as I
said you know if you go to other
countries um and you look at male male
friendships they're not like ours I
think we are we do bring up little boys
to be quite restrained in their
friendships you know um whilst I think
we've moved on a bit where you know M
men might hug each other now they
certainly St very rarely will you see
male friends kiss each other you won't
see male friends walking down the street
arm in- arm you know you won't see overt
displays of affection which you will see
between women friends but you go to
other countries and you will see that so
I think a lot of it is cultural actually
and it's
not really innate necessarily female
friendships are made in the bathroom
trip together that's well they are and
women as I said and it's that and it's
that emotional vulnerability because one
of the best ways to get close to someone
is to be completely emotionally
vulnerable with
them um and that's what we you know
that's what counselors or therapists
will teach people who are struggling is
be emotionally vulnerable um and because
women do that with each other it's a
really really tight Bond you know you
literally I spoke to a lot of women um
for one of my studies and I quote some
of them in the book about about their
friendships and they will literally say
they have seen me at my worst times they
have seen me at my best times and they
are still here and they will always be
here they don't judge me you know know
and we and and you know where's my
family do for example um and I know that
I can literally be anything do anything
and they will be there for me do you
think there's something that men can
learn from women when it comes to
bonding and sort of friendship love in
that case I do think and I think it has
improved but I do think men need to be
more able to talk about emotional
vulnerabilities and concerns and
anxieties
because I think that's something that's
still quite hard for a lot of men to do
um and we all have those just because
you're male doesn't mean that those
don't affect you they do and I think if
we can come to a point where it's it is
normal for men to do that and manag to
do it without you know it only taking
two minutes and then everyone making a
joke out of it which is generally what
seems to happen I think that that's very
very healthy because you know men go
through
a lot of difficult life transitions as
women do but I think they are taught to
suck it up you know just suck it up move
on particularly when it's something like
fatherhood or it's something like you
know getting a partner you you are the
rock of that relationship you've got to
be the one that's supporting and
protecting and all that kind of thing
and you've got to be immune to
everything going on around you well of
course you're not of course you're not I
mean I followed in a father this now to
know how
incredibly emotionally practically
psychologically diff difficult it is
that transition is tough men take longer
to transition to be fathers than women
do to be mothers and I think there's a
reason for that I read a study uh
probably about a year ago now saying
that on average men say I love you first
and it's quite common for men to say I
love you first and I thought well first
off I I look I thought back to my
relationships and I think it was usually
me as well almost always me actually I
think that said that first uh and I was
like okay well that's that's interesting
why might that be the case and I thought
about you know the only person that I've
had Direct experience of which was me
and I think a part of it is feeling like
you should lead in one way I'm supposed
to sort of Forge forward this feels like
the brave thing to do you kind of know
both of you know already yeah but it's
kind of on you to say it properly uh one
ex-girlfriend it slipped out when she
was drunk and then a couple of weeks
later I was like okay well I guess we
you know we both need to say this now um
but then I dug a little bit deeper into
uh what the authors said and it seems
like this data is quite heavily skewed
by uh couples who haven't yet had sex oh
really ah I was like ah [ __ ] okay but it
was a nice theory for a while and it
still May hold true I don't know how
much um this is contributed to by
couples that haven't yet yet had sex but
yeah as you were saying using using love
to manipulate um sometimes for a variety
of different goals mhm oh absolutely
absolutely I'm afraid yeah that's not a
study I've ever done who said who said I
love you first but yeah I there's going
to be a lot of confounding fact is there
I think probably I've had this um idea
in my mind for a little while and you're
the the person I'm going to try and work
it out to uh for the first time
so I've fallen in love with evolutionary
Psych ol over the last sort of four
years or so and I think it's as close to
a complete vision of how human mating
works that we have it's um impressively
survived the replication crisis I think
it's it and behavioral genetics the two
most unspeakable uh of the the
psychological disciplines have actually
managed to survive quite well which
probably says something uh and also you
know the manosphere by whatever term you
want to use that uh tangential to it
although I've never never been a part of
it um but there was increasingly and
this might be because I've I've been
doing a lot of therapy and sort of
emotional work over the last year or so
being just sort of seeing a few holes or
one particularly large hole I think that
EP in particular misses and that kind of
the manosphere does as well given that
it's it's Downstream from it and you
know when we're talking mating from a an
EP perspective we're talking mate value
we're talking resource provisioning
we're talking City and and fertility and
waste to hip ratios we're talking the
environmental security hypothesis and
what's the economy doing at the moment
and how's that impacting the size of the
all of this stuff I do understand and
yeah that's maybe the that's like the
nuts and bolts of what mating looks like
from a human perspective but what I as
of yet haven't heard any EP stuff really
dig into is the phenomenological
experience of what it is like to be a
human going through that what does it
feel like to fall in love with someone
to not be able to think about much other
than them to be worried about them not
texting you oh well that's my male
parental uncertainty getting in or
that's the the the alpha difference in
our mate value and you think yeah okay
maybe that is what's going on from a
source code level but it becomes sort of
functionally pretty useless when it
actually starts to imbue with the
feeling of being that person of being
the person that feels the feelings and
um yeah I just it's something that I've
been thinking about uh recently and I'd
love you know I'd love to try and and
maybe maybe this can't even be explained
academically maybe this is the the place
of Art and film and music and you know
dance and and and Theater and stuff like
that maybe that's where we need to go
maybe poetry is the place that we need
to go to to try and explain those
machinations of of the person but yeah
it's the it's the first time the maybe
the sort of new shine of my my shiny new
toy has worn off a little bit with
regards to just that I love it I love it
so much but I'm now starting to see the
areas in which I wish that it could it
could grow a little bit more yeah I
think the thing about EP and yes EP is
not is definitely not a perfect
explanation for anything what it is is
it gives us
a set of drivers which we can initially
place over a human behavior and go how
much of this human behavior Can I
explain from this set of principles
based upon EP and a lot of those EP
principles have come from observing
animals um and from comparative animal
behavior and I'm going to place those
upon this human behavior I think the
thing about human behavior though
is humans are for phenomenally
complicated
things and we have so many different
facets and our brains are so
complex that I would be very surprised
if any of us were completely driven by
the explanations that EP gives to be
honest I think it's a good starting
point I think it's a good basic starting
point but I think it's like the the
basis and then on top of that you have
lots of other possible explanations you
have lots of other things that we can't
even explain that's the point there's so
much we can't explain about how humans
feel um even that how do you feel I
don't know how you feel you know you
can't objectify that and I think as
humans we always want to objectify
everything and we want to be able to
explain everything in scientific terms
and particularly something like love you
can't and I think that's something we
find it hard to accept because we've got
these big brains we should be able to
explain everything and and also we don't
like uncertainty we don't like
uncertainty we like to know exactly
why something is happening but I think
with something as complicated as love
that's not probably ever going to
happen and I think that is why art and
literature and a lot of those things
help or exist because that's what those
people are trying to do they are trying
to express how they feel you know so I
can tell you what exactly you know what
the brain scan looks like and I explain
to you why when you're first with
someone you're obsessed and exclusion
everything out that's because you're
tone instruct I can explain to you why
you're not very good at spotting people
who aren't particularly nice at the
start of a relationship that's because
love is in fact blind because part of
your brain called the mentalizing area
shuts down I can explain all of these
things to
you but that's not the experience of
it and in a way that's why I love love
because actually I can't touch bits of
it and that's good so I think EP is a
good place to start but it's not like
the
Bible yeah you it can't explain
everything because we are more than
that talk to me about the introduction
of online dating dating apps and modern
mating culture and what you think that's
done to love and
attraction fundamentally it's done
nothing to love and attraction so it
hasn't changed any of the neurochemistry
it hasn't changed actually what we look
for or any of those really deep-seated
behaviors that we've had for a long time
um what it's changed is the way we meet
people and what it's kind of done is
it's handicapped our brains to a certain
extent unfortunately so I love the way
Helen fiser calls says dating apps
shouldn't be called dating apps and they
shouldn't they should be called
introduction apps because that's what
they are you're not having a date on the
app they slow you into an idea that you
can assess whether you're attracted to
somebody by looking at a photo of them
or maybe having a few texts with them no
you can't so they're really good for
introducing you to people um but beyond
that they really don't give you very
much at all because your brain has
evolved to be really really good at this
and that mechanism we talked about
earlier when you when you start
assessing people that's a really sensory
experience that's based on a lot of
sensory information which you don't get
from a dating app the most you might get
from I think hinge now you can record
your voice so you might get some
information from someone's voice but
photos tell you nothing also dating apps
you can just laugh I mean you know we're
really good in person at spotting Liars
um but we're not so great when it's
online because again our brains are
handicapped we don't have any any of the
indicators that we would use to tell so
they haven't altered how we how we
actually choose somebody but they've
kind of made it a bit trickier in some
ways unless you set yourself some really
strict rules which is this is an
introduction app I'm not going to try
and assess whether I'm actually
attracted to this person on this app the
only way I'm going to really be able to
do that is to meet them I mean obviously
safely but I I that's the only way I can
really really do this I'm going to limit
myself to I don't know a certain number
of texts or WhatsApp messages and then
I'm going to say we're going to have to
meet now because I can't possibly know
whether or not I'm attracted to you um
and I think that's the problem I think a
lot of young people in
particular think that they are a really
efficient way of meeting some we're kind
of a bit obsessed with efficiency aren't
we and I think they think it's an
efficient way to meet somebody
but it's not because your your brain
just can't do it and also you know what
relationships aren't supposed to be
efficient things that are really
valuable to you in terms of survival
generally aren't efficient aren't
generally time time you know efficient
or cognitive energy efficient they tend
to take time and that well the effort
the effortfulness is part of the value
right exactly exactly and in the old
days you know when I was dating many
many years ago you know yeah you put
effort in you kind of tried to make
yourself look reasonably acceptable you
know you went out to a pub or you went
out to a club or or whatever and you
made an effort to talk to people and get
to know people then now the fact that
you can do it sitting on your sofa it's
incredibly low cost you can do it while
you're watching telly the risk of
rejection is much less because you're
not being rejected face to face so the
pain is less the risk of intimacy is
also much less yeah exactly and that's
the problem because the reason you make
effort in relationships is because
they're very valuable they are really
valuable and you're supposed to so it's
it's in a bit of a I wouldn't say it's a
mess but I think we kind of need to
recalibrate what we think they do a
little bit because again people are
quite particularly younger people I get
a lot of 20 25 year olds in my talks and
they are just fed up Fed Up of them
tired they find them really quite
difficult to deal with um and they don't
seem to feel like they're getting
anywhere with them so I think Eddie
design is listening you know you kind of
have
to recal C or rethink what they're
actually meant to be doing and I don't I
don't actually think that the um people
who invented them are to blame you know
I think they had good intentions I think
they thought when they were invented
this is going to be a lovely way for
people to meet but they did not take
into account human
behavior I don't think they talk to
anybody who studied human
behavior um because humans will take
something like this and go oh shiny new
tool I'm going to do something which is
going to completely warp what you
thought this was going to do and they do
I mean that you know you know we get we
get the stats coming in from Tinder
where you know 35% of men like every
single female they see because then they
might actually get a match you know I
mean that's like and then that causes
extreme mate choice because then the
women go Jesus Christ I'm only gonna
like one because if I like more than one
I'm gonna get like a million matches and
not be able to have any time so it's
this extreme mate choice is happening
and yeah and I don't think the designers
thought that would happen but that's
where we are wow that's funny and what
about the contribution of my uh previous
education institution of Love Ireland
how do you think dating shows have
contributed to uh what we think of for
modern mating in love
um I don't know the thing is we all love
a dating show because we're all obsessed
with other people's lives um and that's
human because as I said we live in a
hierarchy and we spend our whole time
being uh really interested in other
people's love lives because in a way
they affect the pool of our love life
you know you're getting with them so I
can't get with them but actually oh it's
looking a bit Rocky I might be able to
get with them you know so so that's why
we love watching that that's why we're
really nosy
um I think it depends on the data I
think some of them are quite
transactional and I think that's not
very helpful a lot of them are obviously
heavily based on looks um and looks are
not as important in a long-term
relationship as they are in a short-term
relationship so they kind of skew a
little a little bit towards short-term
relationships I suppose I don't
personally I know that some of my
colleagues are like oh but actually I
don't mind them that much as well as
long as you know they are a
formatted program which is very I mean I
worked on a dating show you know that I
worked on Married at First s side and
they are edited and they are interfered
with by producers so what you're
watching isn't necessarily completely
natural behavior it's not the most
unencumbered of of what was going to
happen yeah I mean no for for love
Island which was I guess kind of a
unique one because it was every 24 hours
there's basically
CCTV hundreds of cameras placed around a
villa every single thing that you do is
captured you have people listening to
just your mic feed 24 hours a day even
when you're asleep so know yeah it's
it's I mean it's a level of supervision
that Stalin could have only wished for
and uh I I understand
the the concern that people have about
the sort of molesting of of those
storylines in my experience it's kind of
like just thinking about a midwit
meme this person was a hairdresser four
weeks ago if they tell her to run this
scene back with a little bit more
emotion this time please Melanie Melanie
doesn't have that in her toolkit what
she can what she can probably do is just
act up to the cameras so everyone's like
a bit more of what they were yeah but I
I I think that you actually you're
actually probably pretty right on
saying in some ways it might teach young
people maybe not necessarily a
representative example of how
relationships work but it teaches them
about makeups and breakups and how
people deal with disagreements and and
and things like that yeah it just needs
to be couched within dot dot dot and
this is not real life yes exactly
exactly and that's fine you know you're
still watching
human behavior it might not be you
couldn't 100% guarantee it's all natural
human behavior but you're still watching
human behavior and yeah that there is a
source of entertainment but you know I
think it's important that we do talk
about our relationships and we do
observe other people's relationships you
know all of these things as you say are
teaching things um so I I personally you
know I don't have a problem with them
and there are so many but I think there
are so many because we are fascinated by
other people's love lives absolutely
fascinated
is the have you ever looked at
parasocial love yes right tell me about
that so parasocial love is love for a
either a celebrity or for example a
character on a film or a character in a
book or something like that and um it's
something which we're in the kind of
Foothills of studying in terms of the
Neuroscience of it but obviously there's
been quite a lot of work done you know
it's what we would have called a crush
um if you're a teenager you know got a
crush in a pop star or a crush in a film
star and what I find fascinating about
it is several things first of all the
Neuroscience of it is fascinating the
fact that you can build a whole
relationship in your head an attachment
relationship having either barely ever
had into any interaction with person or
none I mean that's pretty amazing that
the brain can do that and actually I
believe it's probably extrapolated from
a religious love which is the same kind
of mechanism um and we used to think if
you weren't a teenager so in a teenager
a crush is important because it's
developmentally important because it
allows you to explore your sexuality it
allows you explore sensations of Love
without being vulnerable basically
because it's kind of all in your head
it's a bit of a fantasy can help you
decide and we know now particularly with
lgbtq plus kids particularly if you're
in an environment or a community where
there are many people who uh identify as
you do actually celebrities or
characters and books who identify like
that are really important attachment
figures they're very developmentally
important however the what the answer
always was was but if you're an adult oh
my God you have a Psychopathology
there's something really badly wrong
with you you must be really weird you
must be really trying to fill a void in
your world by you know fancying I don't
know Barry Manalo or something um and
actually what we're finding is that's
not the case the majority of people who
have parasocial relationships have
perfectly normal functioning social
networks families Partners all that kind
of thing but this person fulfills
something in them um either as a fantasy
figure or as an attachment figure or
somebody who just shares similar
interests to them and obviously with
social media you're now kind of more in
touch with a version of the person you
fancy than you ever have been before and
it's not weird actually you know
parasocial relationships only really
became a thing from about the 1950s
onwards when people started regularly
having
Tellies basically so you were regularly
in contact with people and of course you
know your brain doesn't understand
screens when it sees someone on a
Telly it's like they're in the room with
you so these people are usually
charismatic good-look Rich of course
you're going to fancy them your brain's
going well hey Perfect Mate go for it so
parasocial relationships aren't strange
it's just it's we have the brain
capacity to add add these people to our
social networks and and they can be
really important how
funny the uh lineage between this and
potential religious um attachment uh
seem
really really interesting yeah yeah and
I do have to be careful I am not saying
the love of God is like the love of
Taylor
Swift yes okay um yeah religious Love is
fascinating because we have taken our
ability to obviously love in person
which you know a lot of animals can do
and we can build a relationship with
someone which is a fully attachment love
relationship with someone who we will
never have physical contact with so
that's pretty astonishing that we can do
that and if we look at the Neuroscience
of
religion um if you put there's been some
wantful work done not not by me by
groups for example putting um religious
followers in Scanners and asking them to
have mystical experiences with their God
particularly there been some good stuff
done on like Karma like nuns um and
they've had religious mystical
experiences and absolutely on that
screen is the fingerprint of love and
what's really interesting also is the AA
of the brain the prefrontal cortext
which fars up when we are communing with
a a fellow sentient being is also highly
active so they are in love with a
sentient being who is real and who they
experience a full reciprocal loving
relationship with and
attachment um you know I spoke to a lot
of nuns in fact for my book and really
wanted to talk to them about and see
whether their relationships with God had
all the Hallmarks of a human you know
earth-based relationship so you know
yeah was the reciprocity did have
maintenance behaviors what did they
bring to the relationship what did God
bring to the relationship did they feel
empathy with God did he feel empathy
with them you know all these sorts of
different things and they do they have
fully functioning relationships and
attachment relationships which provide a
secure base and which are
developmentally important to them so I
just think it's a phenomenal ability to
have that kind of relationship and for
the people who experience it hugely
beneficial in most cases it's a hugely
beneficial relationship to have you know
we know that and we know that it's not
just so the health benefits of of having
religious uh relationship aren't just
you go a church and there's a load of
other people in it's a social network
which we do expect we know people who
have personal prayer with God rather
than what we would call ritualistic
prayer with God so you do it on your own
so rather than say the Lord's Prayer
which is a ritualistic prayer have
personal prayer which is conversations
with God we know that people have
conversations with God are much
healthier have good mental health good
physical health have all the longevity
benefits because they are having a
personal relationship with someone and I
it's really powerful literature actually
it's really powerful research I think
that's so cool it's so interesting as
well to think that
that pathway that we have for building
relationships with other people has been
tapped into by religion and you know the
ubiquity of religion independently
arising in God knows how many different
places across the planet
always makes people think well you know
it must serve some sort of a purpose or
else why would it it completely yeah it
completely does completely does religion
definitely serves a purpose and this
talks about you know it's this really
wonderful blending of what happens when
you have a cultural technology with an
existing
predisposition uh in terms of the way
that our psychology works and these two
things just slot together pretty
perfectly yeah exactly yeah I mean I
find it the most and of all the areas of
love that I look at in one sense it's
one of the most fascinating I think
because it's very powerful yeah Dr
animation ladies and gentlemen and I
love you I love your work I think that
all of the things that you're doing are
great uh what can people expect from you
next and where should they go if they
want to keep up to date with your okay
so next I'm going to be shutting myself
in the bodan library in Oxford and
hopefully hopefully writing my next book
which will be another book on dads but
updating all that and then after that I
am hoping to do more work on control the
darker side of love I'm afraid um but
yeah I've got a website at
animations.com and I'm on Instagram and
Twitter so or X as we're supposed to
call it these days um and I post a lot
of stuff out there which you can always
see what I'm up to hell yeah and I
really appreciate you thank you thank
you if you enjoyed that episode you will
love a selection of the best clips from
the podcast over the last couple of
months and it's available right here go
on give my watch