Video summary
In this episode of the Huberman Lab, Dr. Andrew Huberman explores the biological mechanisms of sexual differentiation and how hormones shape both physical anatomy and brain development from conception through adulthood. He defines hormones as chemical substances released by glands or neurons that travel to distant targets, distinguishing them from local neurotransmitters. The discussion centers on three critical stages: chromosomal sex (determined by X and Y chromosomes), gonadal sex (the formation of testes or ovaries), and hormonal sex (the effects of steroid hormones like testosterone and estrogen). Dr. Huberman emphasizes that while the presence of a Y chromosome typically triggers testis development via genes like SRY, which also inhibit female structures through Mullerian inhibiting hormone, external factors can alter this trajectory. For instance, high maternal testosterone levels or environmental exposures during pregnancy can lead to masculinization in XX fetuses, illustrating that biology is not solely dictated by chromosomes but significantly influenced by the hormonal environment within the womb. The podcast delves into specific substances and toxins that disrupt these delicate endocrine pathways. Dr. Huberman cites research on atrazine, a common herbicide linked to severe testicular malformations in frogs and declining sperm counts in humans, noting data showing a drop from 113 million to 66 million sperm per milliliter between 1940 and 1990 due largely to such environmental factors. He also addresses the impact of cannabis (specifically THC) and alcohol on aromatase activity, an enzyme that converts testosterone into estrogen. Increased aromatase can counteract masculinizing effects in males or lead to earlier puberty in females, while cell phone radiation is noted for showing statistically significant defects in ovarian and testicular development in animal studies. Additionally, he warns against evening primrose oil due to its potential transdermal estrogenic activity, which could interfere with testosterone replacement therapies or natural hormonal balance. A central theme of the episode is how early fetal exposure to hormones organizes brain circuitry that influences adult behavior and sexual preference, independent of later social conditioning. Dr. Huberman presents compelling evidence regarding otoacoustic emissions—sounds generated by the ear itself—which are more prevalent in males than females but significantly higher in self-identified lesbians compared to heterosexual women. Furthermore, he discusses finger length ratios (specifically the D2/D4 ratio), explaining that prenatal androgen exposure causes ring fingers to be longer relative to index fingers; gay men often exhibit typical male or hypermasculinized ratios, while lesbians tend toward female-like ratios where these digits are more equal in length. These biological markers suggest that sexual preference is biologically rooted in early developmental hormone levels rather than being a choice made later in life. The discussion also highlights the complexity of androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), an XY condition where individuals possess testes but lack functional testosterone receptors, resulting in female physical development despite male chromosomal sex. This case study reinforces Dr. Huberman's point that hormones require receptor binding to exert their effects on phenotype. He references groundbreaking work by researchers like Dennis McFadden and Mark Breedlove, as well as the discovery of brain differences in the interstitial nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus (INAH) among homosexual individuals studied by Simon LeVay. The episode concludes by acknowledging that while hormones organize early development, they do not dictate every aspect of identity or behavior; environmental factors like having older brothers can also statistically influence sexual orientation through epigenomic effects on the mother's placenta. Ultimately, Dr. Huberman aims to provide a science-based foundation for understanding these topics without engaging in cultural debates, focusing instead on the physiological interplay between genetics, hormones, and environment.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome to the Huberman Lab podcast,
where we discuss science and
science-based tools for everyday life.
I'm Andrew Huberman, and I'm a professor
of neurobiology and ophthalmology at
Stanford School of Medicine.
This podcast is separate from my
teaching and research roles at Stanford.
It is, however, part of my desire and
effort to bring zero cost to consumer
information about science and
science-related tools.
In keeping with that theme, I'd like to
thank the sponsors of today's podcast.
Our first sponsor is InsideTracker.
InsideTracker is a personalized
nutrition platform that analyzes data
from your blood and DNA to help you
better understand your body and help you
reach your health goals.
I'm a big believer in blood tests and
DNA tests for the simple reason that
many of the factors that are important
for your short-term and long-term health
and overall well-being can only be
analyzed from blood and DNA tests.
Things like metabolic factors and
hormone levels really can only be
assessed accurately from blood and DNA.
The thing I like about InsideTracker is
you don't just get back levels of
different hormones and metabolic factors
and so forth. You also get directives.
It has a dashboard that's very easy to
use that tells you, based on your data,
what sorts of foods you might want to
eat more of or less of, what forms of
exercise you might might want to do more
of or less of. It's really a wonderful
way to assess how your behaviors and
lifestyle choices are interacting with
what's going on deep within your
biology.
InsideTracker makes all of that super
easy to understand. It's also really
easy to get the blood tests and DNA
tests taken. You can go to a local
location or they can send somebody to
your home if you prefer that. If you'd
like to try InsideTracker, you can visit
insidetracker.com/huberman
to get 25% off any of InsideTracker's
plans. Use the code Huberman at
checkout. That's
insidetracker.com/huberman
to get 25% off any of InsideTracker's
plans and use the code Huberman at
checkout. Today's episode is also
brought to you by Helix Sleep. Helix
Sleep makes mattresses and pillows that
are designed to meet your sleep needs in
order to optimize your sleep. I've done
several episodes of this podcast and
there's a ton of information out there
pointing to the fact that getting really
deep restful sleep each night is vital
for mental and physical health. And the
mattress that you sleep on and the
pillow that you use is very important
for getting optimal sleep.
Helix Sleep has a brief 2-minute quiz
that you can take. It asks you questions
like do you sleep on your side or your
back or your stomach or maybe you don't
know. Do you tend to run hot or cold as
you sleep or maybe you don't know.
That 2-minute quiz matches you to a
mattress and pillow that's ideal for
your sleep needs. I took this quiz, I
matched to the mattress they call the
Dusk, DUSK, and I've been sleeping on
the Dusk mattress for many months now
and I've been sleeping better than I
ever have before. It's really wonderful
to have a really good night's sleep on a
consistent basis. It's a total
game-changer. So if you're interested in
upgrading your mattress, you can go to
helixsleep.com/huberman,
take their 2-minute sleep quiz, and
they'll match you to a customized
mattress. And you'll get up to $200 off
any of their mattress orders and two
free pillows. So that's
helixsleep.com/huberman,
take the 2-minute sleep quiz, they'll
match you to a mattress, and if you
order one of their mattresses, you'll
get up to $200 off any of their
mattresses and two free pillows.
They have a 10-year warranty and you get
to try out the mattress for 100 nights
risk-free. And if you don't like it,
they'll pick it up and take it away.
If you love it, then you keep it and I
think there's a very good chance that
you're going to love it. I certainly
love mine.
And today's episode is also brought to
you by Athletic Greens. Athletic Greens
is an all-in-one vitamin, mineral,
probiotic drink. I started using
Athletic Greens way back in 2012.
And so I'm delighted that they're
sponsoring the podcast. I started using
athletic greens because I found it
rather confusing to figure out what
vitamins and minerals to take. And
athletic greens, I get all the vitamins
and minerals I need to cover my bases.
As well, probiotics are really
important. Probiotics have been shown
now in numerous studies to be important
for the gut microbiome, which impacts
the gut-brain axis, as well as various
aspects of bodily health. So, in
athletic greens, I get vitamins,
minerals, and probiotics. I also really
like the way it tastes. It's a greens
drink, so you mix it with some water.
You could mix it with something else
like juice if you like. I mix mine with
water and lemon juice, and I drink it
once or twice a day.
If you want to try athleticgreens, you
can go to athleticgreens.com/huberman.
And if you do that, you'll claim their
special offer, which is to get a year
supply of vitamin D3K2.
There's now also a wealth of data
showing that vitamin D3 is important for
various aspects of brain and body
health.
So, that's athleticgreens.com/huberman
for athletic greens and the year supply
of vitamin D3K2. You'll also get five
free travel packets. The travel packets
are just a really convenient way to take
athletic greens when you're on the road,
in the car, on a plane, or just moving
around. You just empty one of the
packets into a water bottle or a glass
and mix it up really quickly. It saves
any kind of mess or anything of that
sort. So, once again,
athleticgreens.com/huberman
to get vitamin D3K2. That's a year
supply and the five free travel packs.
It's a new month, which means it's a new
topic here at the Huberman Lab podcast.
For the next four or so episodes, we're
going to be talking all about hormone
effects on the brain and body.
So, that's a huge number of different
topics. We're going to talk about sex.
We're going to talk about reproduction.
We're going to talk about puberty a
little bit more. We talked about that in
the previous episode. We're going to
talk about menopause. We're going to
talk about birth control. We are going
to talk about aggression, competition,
winning, losing.
Basically, we're going to cover as much
about hormones as we possibly can in
this month. And in doing so, we are
going to go deep into tools and
protocols. We are also going to talk
about a lot of tools that relate to
things that you might not want to do in
order to optimize hormone health
regardless of stage of life or your
goals, etc. So, it's sure to be a month
rich with discussion,
rich with tools, and you're going to
learn a lot of neuroscience and
endocrinology.
There's actually a field of
neuroendocrinology. It's actually where
I started my graduate work. I did a
master's in it, which is only to say
that I love the topic. I have a lot of
friends that work on this topic, many of
whom I've consulted for these episodes,
and I'm really excited to share the
information with you. Before we dive
into today's episode all about emotions
and sex, I want to just have a few
announcements that are designed to point
you to some useful resources. Last
episode talking about the science of
emotions and relationships, I mentioned
the Mood Meter app. The Mood Meter app
was developed by um people out at Yale
University who study the biology and
psychology of emotions. It's a really
wonderful app. However, many of you
quickly told me
that the Mood Meter app isn't available
in your area.
You went to the link we posted, and it
just was saying not available in your
area. The situation was actually a lot
worse than that. The situation was that
when we recorded the episode, the Mood
Meter app was working. I know because I
downloaded a a fresh copy of it to my
phone, and then in the ensuing weekend,
they took the Mood Meter app down for
some repairs. The Mood Meter app is now
up. It is available. I want to be really
clear.
It's not an app I'm affiliated with. I'm
just mentioning it to you. They don't
know me. I know them, but they don't
know me. So, we don't have any kind of
business relationship. They do charge 99
cents for the app. I think the free
version has disappeared in in the last
year or so. So, that's Mood Meter app.
We'll provide the link again, and it the
link should be working. Hopefully, they
won't take it down again in between this
announcement and the release of this
episode. Also, just want to take a step
back for a moment and talk a little bit
about the logic of how to make the most
of the information on the Huberman Lab
Podcast. I tend to throw a lot of
information about a given topic. Many of
you have pointed out, however, that I
don't cover certain things. And once
again, I'll just say the goal is always
to be accurate, but there's no way I can
be exhaustive. There's no way I can
cover everything for a particular topic.
The good news is we have time. My goal,
at least in the first year of the
Huberman Lab Podcast, is to give you a
basis, a foundation in these different
topics of neural plasticity, focus,
sleep,
hormones,
etc. And, of course, to provide tools
along the way. We are going to host
guests. I've actually started recording
with some of these guests already. And
even those episodes will include a
little what we call primer, a little
description of the basics of a given
topic, so that you can get more
information from those topics. My goal
really is to educate you in these
topics, give you a foundation in these
topics, and allow you to start exploring
them here in the episodes with our
future guests, but also in other
podcasts and books and other sources of
information. So, for those of you that
are saying, "It's too much information,"
I just encourage you to remind yourself
that you have a pause button. You can
return to it. Everything's time-stamped.
For those of you who feel it's not
enough information, I'm not covering
enough, just know that this is just the
beginning. We intend to do this for a
very long time, and we will be thorough
over time.
So, thanks for your patience, and please
be patient with yourselves. There's no
reason why you have to digest all the
information in one swoop.
The other thing is that I've been told
both that I speak too fast and speak too
slow. So, there's a wonderful solution
to this. If I speak too fast or too
slow, you can adjust the speed in
YouTube. If you're listening on a
different format, I think you also can
adjust the speed of playback. So, that's
a something that wouldn't be possible in
the classroom, um but you may find
useful. And then, last but not least, I
want to point people again to this NSDR
non-sleep deep rest protocol that the
folks over at Made for have put out as a
free resource.
It does, as many of you pointed out,
bear resemblance to things like yoga
nidra, other forms of meditation, but
what we've done is we've stripped out
intentions or any kind of the the uh
verbage related to um
what some people might perceive as kind
of related to the yoga community or um
specific to kind of new age-y type
techniques. Not because we don't like
yoga nidra. In fact, I've done yoga
nidra daily for almost the last uh
goodness, um 8 years of my life. I love
yoga nidra. But sometimes, the
complicated language can be a separator
and can discourage people from taking on
these protocols that are extremely
useful. So, NSDR is is intentionally
generic. It's designed to bring you into
a state of deep relaxation through a
combination of breathing and body scan.
There's the YouTube script over at you
at Made for, which is linked in the
caption.
And many people find that they prefer
that to scripts like yoga nidra scripts
where they're doing intentions and
they're hearing a lot of um kind of uh
unusual language around the process.
This is just very basic, and uh I hope
you'll enjoy it. And if you prefer the
more typical yoga nidra scripts, then um
go with those. There are many of them
available on the internet and elsewhere.
And last but not least, I want to point
out that all our episodes now are
subtitled both in English and in
Spanish. So, for those of you that
prefer to digest this information in
Spanish, that's now available to you in
the subtitles.
Today, we're going to talk about the
science of sex.
In particular, sexual differentiation.
Now, that's a complicated topic because
sex is both a adjective, a noun, and a
verb, depending on the context.
Today, we're going to talk about the
hormonal effects
and the neural effects of particular
events that happen during development
and how those guide adolescent and adult
behavior, including sexual preference.
It's an area that's fascinating and for
which there are actually very solid
textbook findings. So, textbook findings
means that there are many studies that
have been aggregated over decades that
point to what we now know to be absolute
truths in terms of how hormones affect
brain development, how the brain impacts
hormonal development, and how those
interact to control behavior, for
instance.
We are also going to talk about
reproduction, the verb sex. And of
course, sex
the verb can also be carried out
independent of reproduction. It's not
always, in particular in humans, just to
produce offspring. So, that's going to
be covered in the next episode, but you
absolutely need to understand the
information in this episode in order to
make sense of the information in the
next episode. So,
today, we're going to explore hormones,
what they are, how they work, what leads
to masculinization or feminization of
the brain and body. I'll just throw out
one really interesting fact that perhaps
most of you didn't realize that hormones
have direct effects on the body. Most
people know that because there are
hormone differences and sex differences
in bodies in terms of genitalia and body
hair, distribution of body hair, etc.
But, there are also effects of hormones
on the brain directly.
And believe it or not, there are also
effects on the spinal cord, on the
neurons and structures within the spinal
cord that impact in a very direct way
what sorts of behaviors are possible.
So, it's a fascinating area. You might
notice I'm going to go a little bit more
slowly through this topic than I
normally do. I want to be extremely
careful with my language.
Some of these topics,
some of you may be thinking are
extremely sensitive, right? And of
course, any discussion about sex and
reproduction is a sensitive but today
we're just talking about the biology.
We're not getting into the cultural
constraints or the cultural dialogue.
What we're trying to do today is really
get to the biology, the physiology, the
endocrinology, and the behavior. So,
let's start by talking about what
hormones are, just to remind you, and
what they do.
Hormones, by definition, are a
substance, a chemical that's released in
one area of the body, typically from
something we call a gland, although they
can also be released from neurons, but
they're released often from glands that
travel and have effects both on that
gland, but also on other organs and
tissues in the body. And that
differentiates hormones from things like
neurotransmitters, which tend to act
more locally.
So, that's important. A hormone is a
substance secreted at one location in
the body, travels, and has impact on
things elsewhere in the body. Examples
of tissues that produce hormones would
be the thyroid, the testes, the ovaries,
et cetera. And then of course, there are
areas of the brain like the hypothalamus
and the pituitary, which are closely
related to one another and release
hormones that cause the release of yet
other hormones out in the body. So,
we're going to cover all this. If you
don't know anything about endocrinology,
you're still going to be able to
understand today's discussion. And we're
going to start with a discussion about
what hormones actually do to create this
thing that we call masculinization or
feminization. So, let's start with
development. Sperm meets egg. Everything
that happens before that is a topic of
the next episode. But, sperm meets egg.
This is mammalian reproduction. And that
egg starts to duplicate. It starts to
make more of itself. It makes more
cells. And eventually some of those
cells become skin, some of those cells
become brain, some of those cells become
muscle, some of those cells become
fingers.
All the stuff that makes up the brain
and body plan.
In addition, there are hormones that
come both from the mother
and from the developing baby, developing
fetus, that impact whether or not the
brain will be what they call organized
masculine or organized feminine. And as
I say this,
I want you to try and discard with the
cultural connotations or your
psychological connotations of what
masculinization and feminization are
because we're only centering on the
biology.
So,
typically
people have either two X chromosomes
and the traditional language around that
is that person is female, right? Or an X
chromosome and a Y chromosome and that
person will become male. Now, it's not
always the case. There are cases where
it's XXY where there are two X
chromosomes plus a Y chromosome. There
are also cases where it's XYY where
there are two Y chromosomes. And these
have important biological and
psychological impacts.
So, the first thing we need to establish
is that there is something called
chromosomal sex. Whether or not there
are two X chromosomes or an X and Y
chromosome is what we call chromosomal
sex.
But, the next stage of separating out
the sexes is what we call gonadal sex.
Typically, not always, but typically if
somebody has testes
for their gonads, we think of them as
male.
And if somebody has ovaries, we think of
them as female.
Although that's not always the case,
either. But let's just explore the
transition from chromosomal sex to
gonadal sex because it's a fascinating
one that we all went through in some
form or another. So,
this XY that we typically think of as
promoting masculinization of the fetus,
we say that because on the Y chromosome,
there are genes,
and those genes have particular
functions that suppress female
reproductive organs. So, on the Y
chromosome, there's a gene
which encodes for something called
Mullerian inhibiting hormone. So,
there's actually a hormone that's
programmed by the Y chromosome that
inhibits the formation of Mullerian
ducts, which are an important part of
the female reproductive apparatus.
That's critical because already we're
seeing the transition between chromosome
Y chromosome and gonad. And other genes
on the Y chromosome promote the
formation of testes. So, there are genes
like the SRY gene and other genes that
promote the formation of testes, while
they also inhibit the formation of the
Mullerian ducts. So, the transition from
chromosomal sex to gonadal sex is a very
important distinction. It's kind of a
fork in the road that happens very early
in development while fetuses are still
in the embryo. Now,
what's interesting as well
is that just because there's a Y
chromosome that can suppress Mullerian
duct formation and there are other genes
on the Y chromosome that promote testes
development,
the placenta itself is an endocrine
organ. I think most people don't know
this, but the placenta is an endocrine
organ. As well, the mother, which of
course is carrying the fetus,
has an adrenal gland which can produce
testosterone.
There are instances, for example, where
a mother has either a tumor or for some
other reason is secreting large levels
of testosterone while carrying a fetus
that is XX and that leads to what we
would call masculinization of certain
aspects of the fetus. Typically,
um that would be enlarged clitoris.
There also some examples of other
phenotypes on the body that are created
even though it's a purely XX
chromosomal baby. So, we have to
distinguish between chromosomal sex,
gonadal sex, and then there's what we
call hormonal sex, which is the effects
of the of the steroid hormones, estrogen
and testosterone and their and their
derivatives, on
what we call morphological sex or the
shape of the baby and the human and the
genitalia and the jaw and all these
other things. And so, it actually is
quite complicated. So,
you know, it's a long distance from
chromosomes to gender identity and
gender identity has a lot of social uh
influences and roles. This is an area
that right now is very dynamic and in
the discussion out there, as you know.
But, just getting from chromosomal sex
to what we would call gonadal sex or and
hormonal sex and morphological sex
involves a number of steps. So, today
we're going to talk about those steps
and there's some fascinating things that
do indeed relate to tools, do indeed
relate to some important behavioral
choices,
important choices about things to avoid
while pregnant, and for those of you
that are not pregnant, things to avoid
if you're thinking about eventually
having children.
And that is not to drive development in
one direction or another, but there are
examples where there are some
deleterious things in our environment
that can actually negatively impact what
we call sexual development overall,
regardless of chromosomal background.
So, let's get started with that. Let's
talk a little bit more about what
hormones do.
Hormones generally have two categories
of effects. They can either be very fast
or they can be very slow. There are
hormones like cortisol and adrenaline
which act very fast. Adrenaline can
increase your heart rate
very fast when it's secreted into the
body. Cortisol can be a little bit
slower, but it also can have some very
fast effects. And then there are
hormones like what we like testosterone
and estrogen which we refer to as the
sex steroid hormones.
The sex steroid hormones can have quick
effects through signaling meaning they
can attach to cells and make those cells
do different things. They can have a
actually quite quick effects on the
brain. A lot of people don't know this,
but there are some very fast effects of
estrogen and testosterone as well as
long-term effects.
These molecules, for those of you that
are interested, are what are called
lipophilic which just means that they
like fatty stuff. They can actually pass
through fatty membranes and because the
outside of cells as well as the what's
called the nuclear envelope where all
the DNA contents and stuff are are
stuffed inside
are made of a of a of lipid, of fat.
These steroid hormones can actually
travel into cells and then get into the
basically interact with the DNA of cells
in order to control gene expression. So,
they can change the sorts of things that
cells will become and they can change
the way that cells function in a
long-term way. And that's actually how
the presence of these genes like SRY and
Mullerian inhibiting hormone lead to
reductions or elimination, I should say,
of things like the Mullerian ducts and
promote instead what's called in males
the Wolffian ducts
or promote the the development of testes
rather than ovaries. So, all you need to
know is that hormones have short-term
and long-term effects and the long-term
effects are actually
related to their effects on genes and
how those genes are expressed or
repressed not in order to prevent them
from having
particular proteins made. So, these
hormones, these steroid hormones, are
exceedingly powerful.
And if we're going to have a discussion
about masculinization or feminization,
etc., you also need to think about the
counterpart. It's not just about
masculinizing the body or feminizing the
body and brain, it's also about
demasculinizing
the brain in many cases as a normal
biological function of of
typically of XX females. And
defeminization, the suppression of
certain pathways that are related to
feminization of the body and brain. But
there are some really fascinating twists
in this story. So, I've just thrown a
lot of biology at you, but this is where
it all starts to get incredibly
surprising.
You would think that it's
straightforward, right? You have a Y
chromosome, you suppress the female
reproductive pathway, like the like the
Mullerian ducts, you promote this the
development of testes, and then testes
make testosterone, and then it organizes
the brain male, and it wants to do
male-like things, and then
in females you get estrogen, and it
wants to do female-like things and air
quotes here for all of this. And turns
out that isn't how it works at all.
Here's where it's interesting. We have
to understand that there are effects of
these hormones, testosterone and
estrogen,
on what are called primary sexual
characteristics, which are the ones that
you're born with,
secondary sexual characteristics, which
are the ones that show up in puberty,
and these are happening in the brain and
body and spinal cord. And so, I'm going
to disentangle all this for you by
giving you some examples.
First, let's talk about the development
of primary sexual characteristics, the
ones that show up at birth. And one of
the more dramatic examples of this
comes from the role of testosterone
in creating the external genitalia. Now,
you might think it's just
straightforward if there's a testes cuz
there was a Y chromosome, you know,
you've got a gene that codes for the the
development of testes, you get
testosterone, and the penis grows. And
the baby is born with a penis. You know,
one of the first things that happens
when the baby comes out is they look at
the genitalia and they try and make an
assessment of whether or not it's a
quote boy or it's a quote girl, right?
This has been done for a very very long
time in in uh throughout human history.
It turns out that it's not testosterone
that's responsible for the development
of the penis in a baby that has an X
chromosome and a Y chromosome.
It's a different androgen. Androgen is
just a category of hormones that
includes testosterone, but testosterone
is converted
in the fetus
to something called dihydrotestosterone.
And that's accomplished through an
enzyme called 5-alpha reductase. Now,
dihydrotestosterone has important
effects later in life, too. We will talk
about those. In fact, if you just want
to know, dihydrotestosterone
is what we would call the dominant
androgen in males. It's responsible for
aggression, it's responsible for a lot
of muscular strength, it's involved in
beard growth and male pattern baldness.
We're going to talk about all of that.
But dihydrotestosterone
has powerful powerful effects in
determining the genitalia while the baby
is still in the embryo. So, this ends
There's testosterone that's made
and that testosterone gets converted by
this enzyme 5-alpha reductase
in a little structure called the
tubercle. That tubercle will eventually
become the penis. So, you say, "Okay,
straightforward. This testosterone's
converted to dihydrotestosterone, and
then if there's dihydrotestosterone, it
controls penis growth."
And indeed, that's the case. So, that's
a primary sexual characteristic. That
baby will then grow up and later during
puberty
there will be the release of a molecule
I talked about this last episode called
kisspeptin, k i s s p e p t i n,
kisspeptin, which will cause the release
of some other hormones,
gonadotropin-releasing hormone,
luteinizing hormone, will stimulate the
testes to make testosterone. So, in
puberty, testosterone leads to further
growth and development of the penis as
well as the accumulation of or growth of
pubic hair, uh deepening of the voice,
all the secondary sexual
characteristics, okay?
So, dihydrotestosterone
creates what we would call the typical
masculine phenotype for
primary sexual characteristics and
produces uh testosterone, excuse me,
produces secondary sexual
characteristics during puberty.
There's a very interesting phenomenon
that was published in the journal
Science in the 1970s, for which now
there's a wealth of scientific data,
and this relates to a genetic mutation
where 5-alpha reductase, the enzyme that
converts testosterone to
dihydrotestosterone,
doesn't exist. It's mutated in a way in
a genome that it doesn't exist.
And this actually was first identified
in the Dominican Republic. It has shown
up elsewhere.
It's quite rare, but where it shows up,
it's robust.
What happens is
baby is born. Typically, when a baby is
born, they don't measure chromosomes.
They don't look at chromosomal sex, XX
or XY. That's not typically done
nowadays.
Baby is born. If you were to look at
that baby, it would look
female. There would be very little or no
external penis. And so, people would
say, "It's a girl." And they might, you
know, have the celebration, "It's a
girl." And I guess now they call them
gender reveal parties or something like
that. I don't know about this, but um
anyway, they would reveal that the baby
would reveal its um its external
genitalia simply by being there and
being naked when it's born has nothing
to do with gender. It has to do with
genitalia and sex. That baby would be
born
and
what was observed is that
from time to time that baby after being
raised as a girl, perfectly happy as a
girl,
would around the age of 11 or 12 or 13
would suddenly start to sprout a penis.
There's actually a name for this. It's
called huevedosis, which the translation
is more or less
penis at 12.
And as strange as this might sound, it
makes sense if you understand the
underlying mutation. What happens in
these
children, these huevedosis, is that the
child is born, it has testes which are
not descended, so up in the body.
They're not making a lot of testosterone
early on.
They weren't able to convert
testosterone to dihydrotestosterone
because they lack this enzyme 5-alpha
reductase.
As a consequence, the primary sexual
characteristic of external male
genitalia, penis, doesn't develop.
And then what happens is the baby grows
up as a young child, essentially as is
treated as a girl. It generally they
report being pretty comfortable as as as
girls, although not always.
And then
testosterone starts getting secreted
from the testes cuz kisspeptin in the
brain signals through gonadotropin and
luteinizing hormone travels down to the
testes. The testes start churning out
testosterone and there's a secondary
growth of the penis and all of a sudden
there's a penis. And this leads to some
very complicated situations in families
and culturally.
And actually the outcomes in terms of
whether or not these children decide to
self-identify as males or females and
how people treat them actually varies
quite a lot. There's actually been a
kind of an um adopting of a third
category of sex and gender in these
swavadoces for in order to just offer
them of the opportunity to
explore not just what would be a typical
kind of
girl or woman or boy or man phenotype
but something in between, something that
some people call intersex although
intersex and pseudohermaphroditism is
actually a separate thing altogether. So
it's fascinating and the point here
is
that dihydrotestosterone,
not testosterone, is responsible for
this primary growth of the penis and
that testosterone later is involved in
the secondary sexual characteristics,
deepening of the voice, etc.
Now this is where the information gets
even more interesting
and applies to essentially everybody.
You might think
that testosterone, because it
masculinizes
the body in these in the secondary
sexual characteristic way,
and because dihydrotestosterone,
another androgen, masculinizes
the primary sexual characteristics, the
growth of the penis early on, that
testosterone must masculinize the brain.
And there are in fact aspects of
masculinization of the of the brain and
body that are independent of genitalia.
Now it might be obvious to some of you
but some people probably don't realize
that. Yes, indeed, the brain has
receptors for testosterone.
It also has receptors for estrogen.
But the fascinating thing is that
if you look at the brains of people that
have Y chromosomes and that have testes
and that make testosterone and you look
at the brains of people that don't have
Y chromosomes or testes and therefore
make far less testosterone
in general,
what you realize is that the cells in
the brain that differ between what I'll
call males and females, but between XY
and XX,
have
receptors for testosterone, but the
masculinization of the brain is not
accomplished by testosterone.
I want to repeat this. The
masculinization of the brain is not
accomplished by testosterone.
It is accomplished by
estrogen.
Testosterone can be converted into
estrogen by an enzyme called aromatase.
This is vitally important to understand.
Testosterone can be converted into
estrogen by something called aromatase.
I'll give an example of where this
happens later in life to just illustrate
the principle and really embed it in
your mind.
During puberty in boys, XY chromosome
individuals,
it's not uncommon for there to be
transient or sometimes long-lasting
breast bud development. Testosterone
goes up during puberty
for the reasons we talked about before,
and some of that testosterone gets
converted into estrogen by an enzyme
called aromatase. Aromatase is made by
several sources in the body. One of the
main sources is body fat, so it can make
a lot of aromatase. Sometimes you'll
even see a fairly dramatic breast
development in males during puberty.
Sometimes it's transient, sometimes it's
not. The other place where you see this
is in
athletes and bodybuilders that take a
lot of anabolic steroids, that take high
levels of androgens. So, they'll be
taking testosterone at super
physiological doses.
Sometimes, not always, they will convert
some of that testosterone into estrogen,
and they'll get what's called
gynecomastia,
which is the development of male breast
tissue. Sometimes they'll get it cut out
surgically. Other times they'll start
trying to take estrogen blockers in
order to try and suppress it, or they'll
try and block prolactin. It's a topic
that we're going to get into in more
detail, but what's important here is to
understand that testosterone can be
converted into the estrogen by
aromatase. Aromatase is not just made in
body fat. There are neurons in the brain
that make aromatase and convert
testosterone into estrogen, and it is
testosterone converted into estrogen. In
other words, it's estrogen that
masculinizes the XY
individual, that masculinizes the brain.
And this has profound effects on all
sorts of things, on behavior,
on outlook in the world, etc. But I
think most people don't realize that
it's estrogen that comes from
testosterone that masculinizes the male
brain, the XY brain, not testosterone
nor dihydrotestosterone.
So, I just want to mention some tools.
You might be asking yourself, how could
tools possibly come up at this stage of
the conversation where we're talking
about sexual development and we're
talking about the differentiation of
tissues in the body. Well, this is true
both for children and parents and
adults. I want to emphasize that there
are things that are environmental,
and there are things that people use
that in their homes sometimes that
actually can impact hormone levels and
can impact sexual development in fairly
profound ways. And I want to be very
clear, this is not
uh me pulling from some rare journal
I've never heard of it. This is pulling
from textbooks. In particular, today I'm
guiding a lot of the conversation on uh
work that on behavioral endocrinology.
There's a book by um Randy Nelson and
and Lance Kriegfield, ex- true experts
in the field. I'm going to talk about
some of the work from Tyrone Hayes uh
from UC Berkeley
about environmental toxins and their
impacts on some of these things like
testosterone and estrogen.
I'm going to touch into them They're I'm
going to give some anecdotal evidence
that's grounded in studies, which we
will provide in the caption or that I'll
reference here.
One of those that's actually really
interesting, but helps illustrate the
principle that we've been talking about,
is a few years ago there was a lot of
excitement about evening primrose oil.
Evening primrose oil is in a lot of
products that typically are associated
with skin beauty and skin health. And
so,
I'm generalizing here, but typically it
was mothers or sisters that were using
it. And there were actually examples
starting to crop up of young boys
getting accelerated breast bud
development from cont- skin contact with
women who are using evening primrose
oil. So, evening primrose oil is
chemically a lot like estrogen and it
has a lot of estrogenic compounds. There
are a number of things out there like
this. So, believe it not, things like
pine pollen look very much like
testosterone structurally. They are more
or less are testosterone. Their
bioavailability in humans isn't as
clear. Evening primrose oil has a lot of
estrogenic
elements to it, just structurally how
it's built. And so, there were cases
where boys were understandably, you
know, being hugged by their mom or maybe
even like showering and and taking a
you know, using the evening primrose oil
solution. Those
things will actually change levels of
estrogens in boys and girls. And so,
this wasn't just an issue for young
boys. This was also an issue for young
girls. So, it's not that evening
primrose oil is bad. It's just that many
of you have probably heard about the
dangers of soy and isoflavones and
things like that. The impact of soy on
estrogen levels is are
there are some decent evidence to
support that. However, there's a lot of
other factors that are more severe. And
one of those is this evening primrose
oil. So, regardless of age, if let's
just put it this way because people
might be wanting to drive their hormones
more estrogenic or more androgenic.
It's how could I know which what your
preference is? I don't know. But in any
case
things like evening primrose oil can
actually promote estrogenic pathways in
the body and some of it can go
transdermal. Likewise, because
testosterone replacement therapy is
fairly widespread nowadays and some
people accomplish that through cream,
it's pretty well understood that if
someone's taking that that they want to
avoid contact with anyone
skin contact with anyone that is trying
to promote
more estrogenic activity in their body.
And and especially in children. So
that's one. The other is this issue of
environmental factors. Now this you know
I again I'm going to just going to
highlight when one starts talking about
environmental factors and how they're
poisoning us or disrupting growth or
fertility rates it can start to sound a
little bit crazy except when you start
to actually look at some of the real
data. Data from quality research labs
funded by federal government, funded not
from companies or other sources that are
really aimed at understanding what the
underlying biology is. And
for that I really we we should all be
grateful to Tyrone Hayes
at UC Berkeley. I remember way back when
I was a graduate student in the late 90s
goodness
at UC Berkeley and I remember him he was
studying frogs. He was talking about
developmental defects in these frogs
that live in different waters around it
was California but also elsewhere. And
he identified a substance which is
present in a lot of waterways throughout
this country and other countries. So US
and and beyond. Certainly not just
restricted to California. Which is
atrazine. This is a t r a z i n e. Again
this is the stuff of textbooks and it
causes severe testicular malformations.
So again atrazine exposure is serious
and what's interesting is if If look at
the data
what you find is that at sites in
western and midwestern sections of the
United States, 10 to 92% of male frogs,
these were frogs mind you, had
testicular abnormalities. And the most
severe testicular malformations uh were
in the testes rather than in the sperm.
So, it's actually the organ itself, the
gonad itself. Now,
it's very well known now that atrazine
is in many herbicides. And so, you know,
whereas I would say in the '80s and
'90s, the discussion around, you know,
herbicides and their negative effects
was considered kind of like hippie-dippy
stuff or the stuff you hear about at um
you know, at the your local community
markets and the these kind of new age-y
communities, now there's
very solid data from federally funded
labs at major universities that have
been peer-reviewed and published in
excellent journals
showing that indeed many of these
herbicides can have negative effects
primarily by impacting the ratios of
these hormones in either the mothers or
in the the
the testes, altering the testes of the
fathers, or direct effects on developing
young animals and potentially humans.
And so, you ask, "Well, what about
humans? Frogs are are wonderful, but
what about what about humans?" So, here
are the data on what's happening
um and this isn't all going to be scary
stuff. We're also going to talk about
tools to ameliorate and offset some of
these effects.
One would be be cautious with evening
primrose as well as testosterone creams
depending on whether or not you want to
be more
androgenic or estrogenic um depending on
your needs. But, across human
populations, sperm counts are indeed
declining, okay? So, in 1940, the
average
um
the average density of human sperm was
113 million per milliliter of semen.
That's how it's measured. How many sperm
per milliliter of semen. In 1990, this
figure has dropped to 66. So, it went
from 113
million per milliliter to 66 million per
milliliter in the United States and
Western Europe. So, it's not just a US
thing. Researchers also estimated that
the volume of semen produced by men has
dropped 20% in that time, reduced sperm
count per ejaculation even further.
So, between 1981 and 1991, the ratio of
normal spermatogenesis has decreased
from 56.4%
to 26.9%.
So,
there's a lot that's happening primarily
because of these herbicides that are in
widespread use to reduce sperm counts.
And these are going to have profound
effects not just on sperm counts, but on
development, sexual development at the
level of the gonads and the brain
because you need testosterone to get you
to
dihydrotestosterone for primary sexual
characteristics. You need
estrogen that's come from testosterone
to masculinize the brain. And of course,
we're not just focusing on sperm and
testosterone. You of course
also know that many of these herbicides
are disrupting estrogens in a similar
way or are leading to hyperestrogenetic
estrogenic, excuse me,
states which might explain why
puberty is happening so much earlier in
young girls these days. So, there are a
lot of things that are happening. Now,
does this mean that you have to run
around and neurotically
um avoid anything that includes things
like atrazine and
should you be avoiding all kinds of
herbicides? I don't know. That's up to
you, but it does seem that these have
pretty marked effects in both the animal
studies and in the in the human studies.
Uh you know, you can open up a textbook
like the endocrinology textbook and
think and find things like vinclozolin.
This is v i n c l o z o l i n, which is
is fungicide and it's an anti-androgen.
You give it to animals, to rats, and
instead of forming a penis, they don't
form a penis. They basically It's not
that they form a
um a clitoris, they just don't form a
penis. So, let's talk about female
sexual development.
And
as always, what we'll do is we'll talk
about the normal biology, then we'll
talk a little bit about a kind of of
extraordinary or unusual set of cases,
but
we'll talk about them
because they illustrate an important
principle about how things work under
typical circumstances.
So, there is a
mutation
called androgen insensitivity syndrome,
and understanding how androgen
insensitivity syndrome works can help
you really understand how hormones
impact sexual development.
So, here's how it works.
There are individuals who are XY, so
they have a Y chromosome, that are born
that make
testosterone.
They have testes,
and they don't have Mullerian ducts
because they because on the Y chromosome
is this Mullerian inhibiting hormone.
However, these individuals look
completely female.
And in general, they report feeling like
girls when they're young, women when
they're older.
But there's something unusual that's
happening in these individuals because
they have an XY chromosomal
type and not XX. So, what's happening?
Well, what's happening is
the testes are making testosterone, but
the receptor for testosterone is
mutated, and therefore, the testes never
descend.
They don't have ovaries, they have
testes, but the testes are internal. And
so, typically, these individuals find
out that they are actually XY
chromosomes, so that you know, their
chromosomal sex is male, if if will, and
their gonadal sex is male, but the
gonads, the testes are inside the body.
They don't actually develop a scrotum.
They don't make ovaries, and when they
don't menstruate around the time of
puberty,
that's a sign that something is
different. And so, they never menstruate
around puberty, and if they look into
this deeply enough, what you find is
that they are actually XY, they make
testosterone, but their body can't make
use of the testosterone because they
don't have the receptors.
And the receptors are vitally important
for some for most all of the secondary
sexual characteristics that we talked
about, body hair, penis growth at during
puberty, etc. They live fairly happy
lives as females, although of course
they can't conceive, right? They don't
have a uterus, they don't have ovaries.
Um they also in general don't produce
sperm at in quantities enough that they
could actually um reproduce with
somebody else, although sometimes they
can. And believe it or not, uh and I'm
not going to name names, but there are
actually reports of several um people,
uh fairly prominent people throughout
history, who have had this androgen
insensitivity syndrome, or people
suspected they did.
And the reason to not name names is that
it gets right to the heart of whether or
not they are male or female. How how
could you say, right? They have XY
chromosomes, but gonadally they have
testes that are inside, and yet if you
looked at their bodies,
if you looked at their their faces, you
would say
uh almost with certainty that they were
that they appeared female. And that
naturally occurring experiment
points to the fact that testosterone
that shows up in the body and impacts
the things at the levels of the receptor
has a profound effect on phenotype, on
the external or um body plan. So, again,
we're talking about this in order to
illustrate the principle that in order
to have its effects,
a hormone doesn't just have to be
present. That hormone actually has to be
able to bind its receptor and take
action on the target cells.
And once again, I'll just throw out the
example of where people are using
performance-enhancing drugs, although
that's a pretty broad statement.
Nowadays, there's a lot of excitement
about the so-called SARMs, which is
which are more on the receptor side. And
so, we'll talk about this in a future
episode. Um and I just say that as a
teaser because the SARMs and what's
happening right now in augmenting sports
performance both with testosterone
directly, but also testosterone
derivatives, and then also altering
things at the level of the receptor is
exceedingly interesting and is um ill
revealing to us the many ways in which
hormones can impact brain and body
in ways that we didn't suspect. Perhaps
the simplest way to understand
how estrogen and testosterone impact
masculinization or feminization of the
brain and behavior is from a a
statement. It's actually the closing
sentence of an abstract that my
colleague Nirao Shah at Stanford School
of Medicine
uh published, which is that estrogen
again, it's estrogen that is aromatized
from testosterone by aromatase
sets up the masculine repertoire of
sexual and in animals and in humans
territorial behaviors. So, it sets up
the circuitry in the brain. Estrogen
does that. Estrogen sets up the
masculine circuitry in the brain.
And testosterone
is then what controls the display of
those behaviors later in life. And I
find that incredibly interesting. You
would think it was just testosterone did
one thing and estrogen did another, but
it turns out that nature is far more
interesting than that. Okay, so what are
some things that impact sexual
development early in life and later in
life?
Let's talk about
cannabis.
Let's talk about alcohol.
And, dare I say, let's talk about cell
phones. Something that I never thought I
would ever do, either in this podcast or
in the classroom, but
these days, there are really interesting
data, and I think you should be aware of
them. First of all, cannabis
marijuana, THC. I realize that there are
now a lot of different variants on this.
There are a lot of different strains of
cannabis. Um
I personally am not a pot smoker. I It's
just not not for me.
I'm not talking about the moral or legal
implications. You know, in some states,
it's decriminalized. In other places,
it's really illegal. In other places,
it's basically legal.
You have to check at you know, where you
live and understand the laws. That's not
what this is about. What we do know,
however,
is that, with the exception of one
study,
there are many studies that point to the
fact that THC and other things in
cannabis
promote
significant increases in aromatase
activity.
Now, pot smokers aren't going to like
this. Especially male pot smokers aren't
going to like this. But, it's the
reality. Remember,
if what you're hearing in the background
is Costello snoring really loud. Should
we put him on screen? He He's not a
cannabis smoker, but you can imagine
why. Here. Come here, Costello. Come
here, buddy. Come here. He's asleep.
Come here.
You might Come here. There you go.
He Oh, he
This dog definitely does not need uh
cannabis. This is his state for most of
the time. He's highly paranoid. He's
asleep still.
So, some of you have asked to see
Costello. If you're just listening on
audio, maybe he'll give us a wave.
That's a Oh. Okay, we're going to let
him get back to sleep. He's always here.
Some of you have asked to see him.
Uh Costello is not a pot smoker, either.
Um he did have a dog sitter that um was
a was a pot smoker years ago. It was It
was his favorite dog sitter, but
um I'm not a pot smoker.
Again, no judgement, but here's the
here's the deal.
That cannabis, and it's not clear if
it's THC itself or other elements in the
marijuana plant, promote aromatase
activity.
Now, this has been observed anecdotally
where pot smokers have a higher
incidence of developing something I
mentioned before, gynecomastia, breast
bud development, or full-blown breast
development in males.
There may be some women who want to
increase their
uh estrogenic activity. Remember,
females make testosterone. It comes from
the adrenals, right? They don't have
testes, so it comes from the adrenals,
and that testosterone can also be
aromatized. Although, typically most
most of the aromatase activity that
we're referring to in these examples is
in males. So, testosterone can increase
estrogenic activity. So, you might say,
"Oh, you know, therefore, does
testosterone
reduce uh
you know, sexual behavior? Does it uh
create all sorts of things that are
related to um
you know, low testosterone?" Not
necessarily. Not necessarily, and here's
why.
Estrogen itself,
in males and females, is important for
things like libido and and and sexual
behavior.
I'm going to repeat that. If estrogen is
too low in males, it can actually
inhibit libido and sexual behavior. So,
you don't want estrogen too high or too
low,
whether or not you're male or female.
Now, of course, in females,
estrogen levels tend to be higher than
in males. I'm speaking very generally
here. You just think back to the
chromosomal sex, that's what I'm
referring to when I say male or female.
Although, there's nuance there, of
course.
In females, the testosterone that comes
from the adrenals has a powerful effect
on libido and desire to reproduce. And
in the next episode, we're going to talk
about how that works and its
relationship to birth control, its
relationship to menopause. We're also
going to talk about how that whole thing
works in males as well. But cannabis
and other aspects of the marijuana plant
can impact levels of testosterone and
estrogen by increasing aromatase. And so
people should be aware of that. As well,
there are good data. I was able to find
several studies on PubMed pointing to
the fact that
smoking marijuana during pregnancy can
shift the pattern of hormones in the
developing fetus
such that it promotes more estrogenic
outcomes. Now, earlier I said that
estrogen is what masculinizes the male
brain in utero. That's true, but the way
that cannabis seems to work, at least
from the studies I was able to identify,
is that it promotes circulating
estrogen in the body and therefore can
counteract some of the masculinizing
effects of
uh things like testosterone and
dihydrotestosterone on primary and
secondary sexual characteristics. So I
mention this because um
you know, I think nowadays uh marijuana
use is far more widespread and certainly
during puberty it it can have profound
effects on these hormonal systems. And
so we'll do another episode that goes
really deep into this, but yes, cannabis
promotes estrogenic activity by
increasing aromatase.
Most everyone can appreciate that
drinking during pregnancy is not good
for the developing fetus. Fetal alcohol
syndrome is a well-established
uh negative outcome of pregnancy
and it's something that there cognitive
effects that are that are really bad.
There there's actually physical
malformation um etc. So drinking during
pregnancy not good. Probably drinking
during puberty not good either because
alcohol in particular certain things
like beer, but other grain alcohols
can
increase estrogenic activity. Now,
this isn't just about protecting
young boys from estrogenic activity.
It's also protecting girls from from
excessive or even hypoestrogenic effects
of alcohol
in puberty.
Now, many teenagers drink, college
students drink, and it's important to
point out that puberty doesn't start on
one day and end on another day. Puberty
has a beginning, a middle, and an end,
but development is really our entire
lifespan. This idea that, you know,
puberty, uh, you know, has a open and
close, that's just false. Okay, so we
talked about cannabis, we talked about
alcohol. Let's talk about cell phones.
First of all, I use a cell phone, I use
it very often, and I do not think they
are evil devices. I think that they
require some discipline in order to make
sure that it does not become a negative
force in one's life. So, I personally
restrict the number of hours that I'm on
the phone and in particular on social
media.
I only answer email at particular times
of day.
But, what about the cell phone itself?
You know,
when I was a junior professor, as a
pre-tenure early professor, I taught
this class on neural circuits in health
and disease. And one of the students
asked me, you know, are cell phones safe
for the brain? And it, you know, the all
the data point to the fact that
they were, or at least there were no
data showing that it wasn't. I still
don't have the answer on that, frankly.
I don't see a lot of studies about it.
I'm not personally aware of any evidence
in quality peer-reviewed studies showing
that cell phones are bad for the brain
or that holding the phone to the ear is
bad or that Bluetooth is bad or any of
that. I'm just not aware of any quality
studies. If you are aware of quality
studies, peer-reviewed studies, please
reference them, put them in the comment
section, send them to me, however you
like. I'd love to see them. I'm not
aware of them. However,
I
was very interested in a particular
study that was stud- that was published
back in 2013 on
rats. It was basically took a cell phone
and put it under a cage of rats and
looked at basically testicular and
ovarian development in rats and saw
minor, but but still statistically
significant defects in ovarian and
testicular development.
Since then, and now returning to the
literature,
I've seen a absolute explosion of
studies, some of which are in quality
journals, some of which are in what I
would call not blue ribbon journals,
identifying
defects in testicular and/or ovarian
development by mere exposure to cell
phone
ad- emitted waves. Let's just call that.
We don't know what they are. And this
sounds almost crazy, right? Anytime
somebody starts talking about EMFs and
things like that, you kind of worry
like, is this person okay? But,
look, the literature pointing in a
direction where chronic exposure of the
of the gonads to cell phones could be
creating serious issues in terms of the
health at the cellular level and then
terms of the output. So, the output in
for the testes would be sperm
production,
um swimming speed in sperm it is an
important feature of sperm health. In
the ovaries, it would be estrogenic
output, um how
how regular the cycles are. So, in
animals, the cycles are a little bit
different um than in in humans. They
don't have a menstrual cycle, they have
an estrous cycle, which is a generally
around 4 days.
I think that it's fair to say, based on
the literature,
that
there are effects of cell phone emitted
waves on gonadal development. The
question is
what is the proximity of the cell phone
to the gonads? Now, I've taken the the
literature as I observe it
and then of course we'll point you to in
the captions and I I don't like to have
my cell phone on and in my pocket. Um
I'm well past puberty, but nonetheless
some of these effects were seen in adult
animals. There are effects now that have
been demonstrated in humans, so let's
just talk about a couple of those
effects.
So paper published in the journal
clinical biochemistry
from Eskander et al.
looked at hormone profiles in people
based on
proximity and fre- proximity to their
phone and frequency of phone use, where
they stored their phone on their body,
as well as proximity of where they lived
to I guess they they're called these uh
radio frequency towers, so the base
stations.
And they were looking at effects of
radio frequency uh radiation RF
on human hormone profiles. And they
showed significant decreases in
cortisol. You might say, "Well, that
might be good." But you need that
morning cortisol bump um in order to
wake up. Morning cortisol is good.
But also thyroid hormones were
significantly reduced. Prolactin in
young females, that's definitely
concerning.
And testosterone levels in males and
females. And so there are now quite good
data showing that
being close to the phone too much of the
day um and how close it is an
interesting question or living near one
of these base stations I apparently can
have effects on hormone profiles.
And
when you see a study like this, one
should always ask, "Well, what are the
other things that could also have
effects on these hormone profiles,
right?" Cuz you could imagine that um if
you ran the same study of people that
live close to a waterway or close to a
highway where there's a lot of uh
exhaust from buses and and cars, you
might see similar effects. So, you have
to take these sorts of studies with a
grain of salt, but I think it's very
interesting and given that the last time
I looked into these data were way back
when
I was a junior professor and there was
like one or two studies that I could
find. One of the studies pointed to
increases in testosterone in rats where
they were had close proximity to these
radio frequency radiation waves. And
then in the other case it showed
decreases in testosterone. It's so there
really wasn't any conclusion to take
away from that. Now, there's pretty
impressive amount of data pointing to
the fact that there are effects of these
things on hormones. I don't know what to
do with that information. I'm not going
to stop using my phone, but
in light of the work from Tyrone Hayes
and others looking at
at sperm counts and looking at the
decrease in testosterone levels and
sperm counts and fertility over the last
20-30 years, perhaps it's
you know, not surprising. Although,
there again, cell phones and smart
phones have really been in prominent use
mostly within the last 10 or 11 years.
And so, it's hard to explain all of
those declines simply on the basis of of
cell phone use. There's some interesting
effects of hormones that actually you
can observe on the outside of people
that tell you something about not just
their level of hormones, but also about
their underlying genetics. And these
relate to beard growth and baldness. And
it's fascinating.
The molecule, the hormone
dihydrotestosterone
made from testosterone,
is the hormone primarily responsible for
facial hair, for beard growth.
As well, it's the molecule, the hormone
primarily responsible for lack of hair
on the head, for hair loss. So, how does
that work? Well, DHT circulates in the
body
and it binds to DHT receptors in the
face
to promote hair growth.
But it binds to DHT receptors on the
scalp to promote hair loss.
Not incidentally,
the drugs that are designed to prevent
hair loss
are 5 alpha reductase inhibitors.
So, remember 5 alpha reductase from the
huevo dosis? Well, the people that
discovered the huevo dosis went on to do
a lot of research on the underlying
biochemistry of this really interesting
molecule dihydrotestosterone.
They identified 5 alpha reductase
and 5 alpha
reductase inhibitors are the basis of
most of the anti-hair loss treatments
that are out there.
And so, there are some interesting
things here. First of all, the side
effect profiles of those
treatments for hair loss are quite
severe in many individuals. Remember,
DHT is the primary androgen for libido,
for strength and connective tissue um
repair, for
uh aggression, even if that aggression
of course is held in check, but just
sort of ambition and aggression is
related dopamine, but within the
testosterone pathway less so pure
testosterone, although it pure
testosterone has its effects, but DHT is
at least in primate species including
humans is the dominant androgen for most
of those sorts of effects.
And if you look at somebody,
everyone
can predict whether or not they're going
to go bald based on looking at their
We're always taught our mother's father.
So, if your mother's father was bald,
there's a higher probability that you're
going to go bald.
The pattern of DHT receptors on the
scalp will dictate whether or not you're
going to go bald everywhere or just in
the front or so-called crown type
baldness.
And the density of the beard tells you
about the density of DHT receptors. Now,
this varies by
by background, by genetic background.
And actually, around the world nowadays
because people travel and people
form couples and have kids with
so many different people of different
mixed cultures, you're seeing this
starting to disappear. But, there are
areas of the world where all the men
seem to be have the same pattern of
baldness like a strip of baldness down
the center with hair still on the sides
and and full beards. That's because
these patterns of DHT receptors
are genetically determined. Elsewhere,
testosterone levels can still be very
high, DHT levels in the blood can be
very high, and yet people will have very
light beards or no beards, and that's
because they don't have a lot of DHT
receptors in the face. And still other
cultures, you'll see people with with
huge beards, tons of beard grow like
their beards are growing all the way up
to their eyes, and they have huge heads
of hair, and that's because they have a
lot of DHT receptors on the face and not
and not on the scalp. So, there are a
lot of effects of DHT that you can just
see in male phenotypes. And it's
interesting that these hair loss drugs
that are
or to prevent hair loss drugs are
directly aimed at preventing the
conversion of testosterone into
dihydrotestosterone,
and that's why they to some extent
prevent hair loss, but also to some
extent have
bunch of side effects that are
associated with low DHT.
Along these lines, there's a particular
sports supplement that a lot of people
use called creatine. Creatine now,
there's a lot of research showing that
creatine can bring more
more water into the muscle. It can
support strength.
It does a number of other things.
Might even have some important cognitive
promoting cognitive enhancement effects,
although mild. The studies there show
that it can be significant. Some people,
not all, it's more anecdotal, report
that creatine promotes hair loss.
It differs by individual. For some
people, that's true. For others, no.
But, yes, it does appear based on the
studies I was able to find on PubMed
that creatine does promote 5-alpha
reductase activity.
And therefore, the conversion of
testosterone into dihydrotestosterone.
And so, it makes sense that it might
promote
some degree of hair loss as well as
beard growth as well as the other
effects of DHT.
I recall in junior high school and
middle school going home one summer, it
was seventh grade, coming back in the
eighth grade, and a kid that I knew that
I was friends with went from being like
a young kid to he was like a grown man.
He had a full beard. It was amazing. It
was like he had completely transformed.
I mean, puberty, as I've said before, is
without a doubt the most accelerated
rate of development that we will go
through at any point in our lives, even
faster than infancy, just in terms of
the huge number of different cognitive
changes and physical changes.
Not surprisingly, that same individual
was mostly or bald by his early 20s. And
that's because he must have had just
exceedingly high levels of DHT. I also
played soccer with this kid, and he was
basically like dribbling past everybody.
He was like a grown man playing soccer
with a bunch of little kids. Full beard,
you know, bald at 20. And so, the rate
of maturation, the rate of aging,
is very interesting. It's hard to know
rate of aging. There are some genetic
tests that now can allow you to do that,
things like Horvath clocks and things of
that sort.
Beautiful work of David Sinclair at
Harvard and others has pointed to this.
The
speed of entry and exit from puberty
might be, putting out there as a
hypothesis, might be an interesting
window into how fast one is going
through their aging or developmental
arc, because development, of course,
doesn't just start at birth and end
after puberty. It continues your entire
life.
So, I think it's interesting.
I You will often see
that people, boys and girls,
I should say boys or girls, will
develop secondary sexual characteristics
at different rates and sometimes it's
sequential. You know, you might see a
kid will
um she'll grow very tall or she'll have
a big growth spurt, but then breast
development will come a little bit later
and then other features will come a
little bit later. You You can also see
this in boys. The person that I referred
to earlier, my friend that developed
full beard, you know, went bald. He was
also quite muscular. He's a great
athlete. So, he went through puberty
exceedingly fast. Other people go
through it more slowly. Some people will
go through puberty at age 14, but they
won't start to accumulate facial hair
until much much later.
Or their voice will change first very
early and then they won't uh get the
other secondary sexual characteristics
until much later. And so, we don't
really know how that impacts or relates
to overall trajectory or rate of aging,
but it's an interesting thing to think
about for each and every one of us. I'm
going to offer you the opportunity to do
an experiment today
while listening to the podcast. But
first, I want to tell you a story
about
hyenas,
professional baseball,
and clitorises the size of penises.
So, when I was a graduate student at UC
Berkeley,
we had a professor in our department,
phenomenal scientist named Steve
Glickman.
Steve Glickman
had a colony of hyenas, spotted hyenas,
that lived
within caged enclosures, of course, in
Tilden Park behind the UC Berkeley
campus. The enclosures are actually
still there. I run past there fairly
often. The hyenas are no longer there.
This was a federally funded field
station. These animals were
brought over from Africa or were bred
there.
And the reason why there were hyenas in
Tilden Park
enclosed in Tilden Park was because
hyenas exhibit an incredible feature to
their body,
their hormones, and their social
structure.
Hyenas, unlike many species,
have a situation with their genitalia
where the male penis is actually
smaller
than the female clitoris.
And I should say that the male penis
itself, having seen a fair number of
hyena penises, is not particularly
small, which means that the
hyena clitorises are extremely large.
This was well known for some time.
It turns out that in the spotted hyenas,
the females are dominant. So, after a
kill, the females will eat, then their
young will eat, and then the male hyenas
will eat.
As well,
when the female hyena gives birth,
she gives birth not through the vaginal
canal that we're accustomed to seeing,
but
through a very enlarged clitoris-like
like
phallus, although it's not a phallus,
it's a clitoris.
And it literally splits open. So, the
many fetuses die during the course of
hyena
development and birth.
These animals have this
what is could only be described as a
very large or giant clitoris, although
for a hyena, it's not giant, it's
normal. And it splits open, and the baby
actually comes through. The baby hyena
actually comes through
the the tissue, and it's it's a very
traumatic birth. A lot of tissue is torn
away, etc. And as I mentioned, a lot of
baby hyenas die.
It was a mystery as to how the the
female hyenas have this
we'll call it masculinization, but it's
really a androgeni-
Excuse me, androgenization
of the periphery
of the genitalia.
And it turns out through a lot of
careful research done by Steve Glickman,
Christine Drea,
uh and and others, that it's
androstenedione,
what is essentially a prohormone to
testosterone,
it's androstenedione at very high levels
that's produced in female hyenas that
creates this enlargement of their
genitalia. So, if you want to read up on
androstenedione,
androstenedione is made into
testosterone through this enzyme 17-beta
hydro- hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase.
It's a complicated pathway to to
pronounce. It's a fairly straightforward
pathway biochemically.
You may recall during the '90s and
2000s, there were a lot of uh
performance-enhancing drug scandals, in
particular in Major League Baseball, and
it was
purported, although I don't know that it
was ever verified, but it was purported
that the major um performance-enhancing
drug of abuse at that time, in
particular players whose names we won't
mention, but you can Google it if you if
you want to find out, was
androstenedione. And I actually recall
long ago when you could buy
androstenedione in the health food
stores.
And so, it was sold over the counter.
So, a lot's changed since then, um but
it's interesting that these hyenas with
these highly androgenized genitalia
accomplish that through high levels of
androstenedione in the females. Now, if
that's unusual, what might be even more
unusual than is that a graduate student
that I was working with at the time,
alongside, we didn't uh share research,
her name was uh Nicola Cipka. She is
actually a trained behavioral animal
behavioral expert. She had trained
ferrets for that show the Beastmaster,
and she would train wolves for
television shows, and was a dog trainer.
She had these two large dogs that,
unlike my dog, would actually listen to
her when she would give them commands.
Um a remarkable scientist, she was
studying a species of mole that also
lived in Tilden Park. People are going
to start to wonder about Tilden Park.
What's in Tilden Park? But this
particular mole
that lived there
had testes for part of the year and had
the capacity to transdifferentiate its
testes into ovaries in order to balance
out the ratio of males and females in
the population to keep reproduction at
appropriate levels for that certain
population. So, some animals are
actually able able to adjust whether or
not they have androgenized
or estrogenized
gonads in order to adjust the
ratios of offspring or the males and
females and therefore promote offspring.
And the last little anecdote about this,
which is
also published in the scientific
literature, which is weird but I do find
interesting. Hormones are so
fascinating. They're just incredible to
me. is
going back to the marijuana plant.
You know, the marijuana plant has these
estrogenic properties.
And I asked a plant biologist whether or
not this was unusual.
And I asked because there's all this
this stuff out there about, oh you know,
soy does this and these plants are, you
know, highly estrogenic, etc. Although
we should probably point out that a lot
of factory meats are also estrogenic.
So, this isn't a meat versus plants
thing. But this plant biologist told me,
oh yeah, there are plants that make what
is essentially the equivalent of
testosterone. Like pine pollen is looks
a lot like testosterone. And there are
other plants that make what is
essentially estrogen. And I said, well
why would they do that? Well, they said
and, you know, plants, at least as far
as I know, don't have a consciousness.
They don't have a brain. They don't have
neurons, even. But
his answer was fascinating. He said that
one of the reasons why some plants have
evolved this capacity to increase
estrogen levels
in animals that smoke not smoke it, but
then animals that consume them. I'm
guessing that animals aren't smoking
marijuana, although I don't know. Send
me the paper if you've heard of this.
Is that plants have figured out ways
they've adapted ways to push back on
populations of rodents and other species
of animals that eat them. So, plants are
engaged in a kind of plant to animal
warfare where they increase the estrogen
of the males in that population to lower
the sperm counts to keep those
populations clamped at certain levels so
that those plants can continue to
flourish even if those animals are
reproducing very robustly. And I find
this just fascinating. And hormones
therefore aren't just impacting
tissue growth and development within the
individual and between the mother,
remember the placenta is an endocrine
organ, and the offspring, but plants and
animals are in this communication. And
today we're in this communication. I'm
telling you that there are certain
herbicides that humans are using for
which there's very good data are
disrupting the endocrine pathways. And
so, it's fascinating that humans and
other animals were always in this
interplay with plants and the other
things
in our environment. And hormones and
adjusting the hormone levels of animals
and plants is one way in which the
environment kind of pushes back or
pushes forward, if you will, in terms of
promoting their well-being and
longevity, as well as you trying to
promote your well-being and longevity.
If anyone wants to see the incredible
paper by Steve Glickman and colleagues,
it was published in the Proceedings of
the National Academy first in 1987.
That's Glickman et al. That was the
hypothesis that it was androstenedione.
And then if you just Google Glickman
hyenas science magazine there's a
beautiful
cover article and feature all about that
important discovery. It's a fascinating
one and I should mention also that those
discoveries both the moles and the
hyenas weren't just
impactful for the world of animal
behavior and endocrinology. They've also
strongly impacted understanding of
conditions that show up in the clinic
which we haven't talked about today
which is actually pseudo hermaph
roditism. Occasionally babies will be
born where it is unclear if they are
boys or girls based on the genitalia and
this has very important ethical and
other issues do you raise them as a boy
or a girl? It's not super uncommon for
this to happen and there have been
terrible cases where people have gone
against the
chromosomal sex
and the person was very unhappy with the
with the choice that their parents had
made for them. There were also cases
where they've gone with the chromosomal
sex and the person was very happy about
the outcome. There have been cases where
they've been treated with hormones and
there have been cases where they have
not been treated with hormones. It's a
a complicated literature
and it's
has to be sorted out on kind of a
case-by-case basis but it is something
that does happen and the studies on
androstenedione and hyenas and in these
very interesting moles
pseudohermaphroditic moles that live in
Tilden Park
have impacted not just the science but
the therapeutics around those important
issues. So now last but not least I want
to discuss the effects of hormones while
you and I were separately in utero
and the effects that that had on who we
are
who we select as mates
so mate choice sexual preference
and
all other aspects of what you would call
sexual development.
Now, this is something that's gotten a
lot of popular press.
And it has to do with how exposure to
androgens in particular while we were in
utero
impacted whether or not people report as
homosexual, heterosexual, identify as
male or female. I'm very familiar with
this work because I was a graduate
student in the department that first
published this work and I'm an author on
the paper.
I was not the main driver of the work,
but I was involved in the work and I
certainly know the people that did this
work.
First, it starts with a story.
There was a researcher who's still going
now. His name is Dennis McFadden.
I believe he's at UT Austin back then.
And he was studying the auditory system.
And people would come into his clinic
and he would um or his laboratory and he
would look at
hearing and he would explore different
aspects of what they call the
psychophysics of hearing and
understanding hearing thresholds and
frequency thresholds. And he made
several observations.
And those observations were
that
young males tended to have what are
called otoacoustic emissions
more often than young females did.
Otoacoustic emissions, as the name
suggests, are the ears actually making
sounds. Now, these sounds have to be
picked up by a special apparatus cuz
they can hear into that frequency, but
it turns out that your ears don't just
take sound waves and convert them into
these things that we this thing we call
hearing, but they also in some cases
make sounds. So, your ears are making
sounds. Strange, right? So, it turns out
that there's a
sex difference in otoacoustic emissions.
Turns out also that people that
self-report as lesbians,
they also have otoacoustic emissions
significantly more than females that
don't self-report as lesbian. And Dennis
noticed this
and published this and it was an
important discovery because it was one
of the first discoveries that there
could that pointed to the fact that
there are sex differences
in biology that are independent of sex.
I mean, this is hearing and otoacoustic
emissions. And just to really illustrate
what that what the former problem was
and why this study was so important you
know, a lot of people had explored for
instance whether or not
um
homosexuals had lower testosterone for
instance in males. And actually the
result often was the opposite that gay
men or men that self-report as gay often
had much higher testosterone.
And those studies then became
controversial because people said, well,
you know, sexual behavior can relate to
testosterone etc. And so it became very
controversial. And then there were some
studies that attempted to look at the
equivalent
phenomenon in people that self-report as
as lesbian or self-report as
heterosexual. And so it became very
complicated. But this was an
identification of a phenomenon
otoacoustic emissions that was
independent of anything that had to do
with sexual or even social behavior.
1998 rolls around
and
I'm a graduate student at UC Berkeley
and a guy by the name of Mark Breedlove,
kind of an ironic name given that he
worked on he worked and still works on
sexual dimorphism
in the brain and in the spinal cord and
nervous system
and Mark, who's a phenomenal scientist
comes running down the hall, I'll never
forget this, and he said, "Give me your
hands." I was like, "Why?" And he said,
"Give me your hands." And he pulls out a
ruler and he starts measuring my fingers
and he takes down a couple measurements
and then he goes away.
And I was like, "What was that?"
Well
I was in a course that Mark was teaching
at that point
and soon after
we did a study
that Mark directed exploring the finger
length ratios, and I'll explain what
those are, of
males and females
and people that self-reported as
homosexual or heterosexual.
So, let's just get to the basic
what we'll call sex differences first.
These are averages. I want to point out
anytime you get into this kind of topic,
people are, you know, assume it's
causal, but it's not causal. These are
averages that I'm about to report.
It is the case that the ratio of what's
called the D2 to D4 digit. So, the D2 is
your index finger. So, your thumb is D1,
then D2 would be your index finger that
you would point with. Middle finger is
D3, which you whatever with, and then D4
is this so-called ring finger. Okay? And
D5 is the pinky.
It is the case
that
the D2 to D4 ratio is greater
in self-reported females than it is in
males. What does that mean? It means
that the the digit D2 and D4 are more
similar in length in females than in
males, and the effect is
particularly, excuse me, pronounced on
the right hand, although not always.
Okay?
And it does not have to do with
handedness. This D2 to D4 difference has
to be measured correctly. You can't just
look at somebody's hands and say, "Oh,
you know, their
ring finger and index finger are very
similar, and therefore they are female
in you know, or they were exposed to
very little testosterone in utero." You
can't look at somebody and see that
their index finger is much shorter than
their ring finger and say, "Oh, you
know, they must have been exposed to a
lot of androgen." You have to actually
measure it, and you have to measure it
correctly. You have to measure it from
the base of the finger where there's
that first crease all the way to the tip
past the
You can't include the fingernails. if
you're growing fingernails. You have to
be logical here, folks.
So, you can't normally see it from the
from the the back of the hand. Although,
I don't know if this will show up here,
but um if you look at the back of the
hand, sometimes you can see it. You
know, in my case for instance, um
let me see if I can do this. So, my D4
is a little bit longer than my D2. In
some people, it's more pronounced. And
that's on my right hand. On the other
hand, the difference actually is far
less pronounced. It's a little bit It's
a little bit pronounced there, but not
so much. Okay? So, that's sort of the
typical ratio that you would see.
Turns out that in mice and in humans,
the more androgen that you were exposed
to in utero,
the smaller the D4 D2 ratio, meaning
that the ring finger tends to be
slightly longer than the pointer finger.
And in females, because they're exposed
to less androgen
in utero, typically, then those fingers
tend to be more equal in length. And
these are subtle differences, and these
are averages. I invite you to look up
the paper. This was published in Nature
in 2000.
And it's been replicated six times. Now,
here's where it gets even more
interesting.
And potentially precarious, so we're
going to step cautiously here.
If you look at the finger length ratios
of men that self-report as homosexual,
they have either the typical male
pattern of D2 to D4 ratio,
or a hypermasculinized D4 to D2 ratio.
Now, this can't be something that's
established or modified by behavior.
This has to be something that was
established in utero. And in fact, it's
present
at birth. Okay? So, it completely
divorces the interactions between
hormones and behavior. And that's an
important theme that we've been talking
about, and we're going to talk about
even more next episode, is that hormones
impact behavior, but behavior also
impact hormones. But this is a case of
hormones impacting what really should be
considered a primary sexual
characteristic because it doesn't show
up in puberty, it shows up before
puberty, it's actually established in
utero.
And in people that self-reported
lesbians,
and I remember going out there and
collecting these data with with these uh
with the collaborators on this work.
Again, I wasn't the main driver on the
work, but I participated in some of the
analysis.
People that self-report as lesbians also
tend to have a smaller D2 to D4 ratio.
So this is consistent with the
otoacoustic emission study that Dennis
McFadden had published, and it points to
the fact that early exposure to
androgens
may have an impact
not just on androge- androgenization
of the body plan, but also separately
on sexual preference.
Now this raises all sorts of interesting
questions about biological basis of
sexual preference. I'll tell you about
another study.
A guy named Simon LeVay, who was at
UCLA,
who trained under Hubel and Wiesel. If
any of you remember early episodes on
plasticity, David Hubel and Torsten
Wiesel, my scientific
great-grandparents, won the Nobel Prize
for discovery of critical periods for
brain plasticity. They defined some of
the most important aspects of how we see
and brain plasticity.
Simon LeVay trained with them, and then
Simon went on to discover that in
the brains of people that self-report
homosexual, there is a brain difference,
and the brain difference is in an area
called the interstitial nucleus of the
anterior hypothalamus. So
it's the INAH.
And so there are
published reports. That was published in
Science.
The other work I referred to was
published in Nature and then replicated
no fewer than six times, and the
McFadden results that point to strong
biological correlates of
mate choice, of sexual preference.
And these tie directly to things like
androgenization or estrogenization,
meaning we could call it maleness or
femaleness, but that's sort of tricky
territory because of the way that we
described the huge range in which sex
can be defined earlier.
So,
if you want to measure D2D4 ratio,
you're welcome to, but you also have to
understand that it's not predictive of
anything, right? It's just a window into
the possible androgen exposure that you
had early in life. There are plenty of
hetero- men who report hetero-
themselves as heterosexual who are out
there who have similar or have D2D4
ratios to females, and there are plenty
of females whose index fingers are
shorter than their ring fingers, and
they're perfectly happy, or they say
they're perfectly happy, and we are
inclined to believe them being
heterosexual. So, there's variation. In
fact, Mark tells a really good joke.
If you want to know whether or not
somebody is homosexual or heterosexual,
simply look at their hands, look at
their D2D4 ratio,
and guess heterosexual, and you'll be
right 96% of the time, because 96% of
the time people report themselves as
heterosexual on average. Those numbers
might be changing. So, the joke really
is a joke on science because that falls
within the realm of statistical
significance, and yet it really
illustrates the fact that none of this
is causal.
But, it's nonetheless very interesting
because it means that hormones are
organizing the brain early in
development in ways that can potentially
impact same or opposite sex partner
choice later in life. Now, of course,
there are other things that can impact
opposite sex or same-sex partner choice
later in life.
The study did not look at people who
reported bisexual. There hasn't been a
lot of studies on that
yet. One thing that's very interesting,
for which there are some good scientific
data, but there's also some controversy
is that it appears that the probability
of a male human self-reporting as
homosexual
increases
with the number of older brothers that
he has. Now, that doesn't mean if you
have an older brother, or even if you
have 10 older brothers, that you are
sure to self-report as homosexual, but
the statistically it becomes more likely
that somebody will with each successive
older brother that they have.
And the idea that's starting to emerge
in the developmental neuroendocrinology
landscape is that there's a record
within the mother of how many male
fetuses she's carried because male
fetuses are secreting certain things,
dihydrotestosterone, other things that
can feed back onto the genome, so these
could be epigenomic effects, or onto the
placenta itself, so that there's a
higher probability in subsequent
pregnancies
that offspring will self-report as
homosexual. So, it's a fascinating area
of biology, and as you've noticed today,
none of this deals with the current
controversies around gender and how many
genders and sex, etc. That's a separate
conversation that is
by definition grounded in the kind of
concepts we've been talking about today,
and needs to take place taking into
consideration all of the aspects of sex
and the effects of hormones both on the
body, on the brain. We didn't talk a lot
about spinal cord, but we will in the
next episode, on but we can just say on
the brain and the periphery, early
effects, late effects,
acute effects, meaning effects that are
very fast of levels of hormones going up
or down, something that absolutely
happens during the and across the
menstrual cycle,
as well as long-term effects, like the
effects of these hormones on gene
expression.
So, today, as always, we weren't able to
cover all things related to sex and
hormones and sexual differentiation or
development.
There's no way we could, but we have
covered a lot of material. We talked
about some effects of environmental
toxins. We talked about potential
effects of cell phone radiation,
something I never thought that I would
be talking about, especially not in a
podcast, but for which there are
interesting emerging data. We talked
about considerations about evening
primrose oil and its estrogenic effects,
about creatine and its pro DHT effects,
about cannabis, alcohol, about plants
exerting warfare on animals by
increasing aromatase, the conversion of
testosterone to estrogen. We talked
about hyenas with giant clitorises, and
we talked about moles that can convert
from having ovaries to
testes, and throughout this Costello has
been snoring non-stop. He missed all of
it, although he might be learning it in
his sleep, for all I know.
And
I do understand it's a lot of
information, a lot of detail. As always,
I just want to remind you, you don't
have to absorb all the information at
once. Next episode, we are going to be
talking about the science of sex the
verb, actual reproduction. We're also
going to be talking about effects of
hormones on various aspects of behavior
and ways to modulate hormones through
the use of
behavior,
supplementation. Also, we'll touch on
diet and nutrition a bit, and we're
going to talk about interactions between
those things and behavior as they relate
to important themes like sex and
reproduction, like workplace
performance, like motivation and drive,
and even anxiety. There's a very
interesting relationship between
hormones and anxiety and the desire to
explore novelty. So, just to remember as
we go forward that hormones affect
behavior and behavior affects hormones,
but that doesn't mean that cutting off
your index finger will increase your
testosterone.
Many of you have asked how you can help
support the podcast, and we thank you
for the question. There's several ways
to do that. The first one is to
subscribe on YouTube. If you haven't
subscribed to the YouTube channel
already, please do so. As well, please
hit the subscribe button so you're sure
not to miss any of the episodes. We do
release episodes every Monday, but we
also occasionally release short clips in
between.
As well, if you could subscribe on Apple
and or Spotify, that's very helpful. And
on Apple, you have the opportunity to
leave us up to a five-star review and to
leave a comment.
On YouTube, please do leave us comments
and suggestions for future episodes. We
really appreciate the feedback and we
appreciate those suggestions. Also, ask
us any questions you have about the
material. Those questions help guide our
office hours, this discussion about your
questions that we hold from time to
time, as well as inform future content.
Also, if you could tell people about the
podcast, please tell your family, your
friends, your co-workers, anyone that
you think might benefit from the
material. That really helps us get the
word out.
As well, if you're interested in
supplements, we've partnered with
Thorne, t h o r n e,
and we've partnered with Thorne because
Thorne has the highest level of
stringency with respect to the
ingredients that they put in their
products, as well as the precise amounts
of those contents. You know, a lot of
supplement brands out there claim to
have x amount of some supplement, but
then when people have measured the
amount in capsules and tablets, it's
turned out to be very different. Thorne
is very precise about this. They
partnered with important and stringent
institutions like the Mayo Clinic, all
the major sports teams, so that's why we
partnered with Thorne.
If you want to try any of Thorne's
products, if you want to see what I
take, you can go to Thorne, that's t h o
r n e, {dot} com {slash} the letter u
{slash} Huberman. And if you do that,
you can see any of the products that I
take, you can get 20% off any of those,
as well as 20% off any of the other
products that Thorne makes. So, that's
Thorne {dot} com {slash} u {slash}
Huberman. Please also check out our
sponsors, check out the sponsor links.
That's perhaps the best way to support
us. And of course I want to point out
that any of the ways that support us,
whether or not they are cost-free like
subscribing and leaving comments or
whether or not you're interested in the
products that I've referred to,
those all help us and so we really
appreciate it.
So once again, I want to thank you for
embarking on this journey through
neuroscience and today
neuroendocrinology with me. And as
always, thank you for your interest in
science.