Submind YouTube summaries
Thumbnail for How Casual Sex Affects The Rest of Your Life

How Casual Sex Affects The Rest of Your Life

Watch on YouTube

Video summary

The podcast explores the often controversial relationship between an individual's body count and their long-term success in monogamous pair bonds, arguing that a higher number of past sexual partners is intuitively linked to lower future relationship stability. The host cites data indicating that individuals with high body counts are statistically more likely to experience divorce, report lower satisfaction levels, and engage in infidelity compared to those with fewer partners. This correlation holds true for both men and women, though the effect may be even stronger in men according to some analyses. A specific study by the Institute for Family Studies (IFS) highlighted that individuals with a body count above five had an infidelity rate double that of those below this threshold, reinforcing the idea that past behavior serves as a strong predictor of future actions regarding sexual fidelity. The discussion delves into why casual sex might predict cheating later in life, drawing parallels to how unhealthy habits like excessive drinking or drug use can become entrenched patterns rather than temporary fixes for unfulfilled needs. While some argue that early exploration allows people to "get it out of their system," the host counters this by noting that building a habit often solidifies behavior rather than eliminating future desire for similar experiences. The transcript references David Buss's influential work, *The Evolution of Desire*, which posits that premarital sex is one of the single biggest predictors of extramarital affairs. However, the speakers clarify that relationship dissatisfaction acts as a confounding variable; when a relationship falters, underlying traits like high sociosexuality or wandering eyes become more salient and visible, making it difficult to isolate casual sex itself as the sole cause without experimental data that is ethically impossible to gather in humans. A significant portion of the conversation addresses the nuance required when interpreting body count statistics, emphasizing that aggregate data often masks individual motivations and contexts. The host introduces a behavioral genetics analogy from Robert Plomin regarding obesity: just as there are many different biological and lifestyle routes to becoming overweight (such as ghrelin levels or metabolism), there are diverse reasons for having a high sexual history, including social approval needs, difficulty with commitment, job requirements like being a stripper, or simply a naturally higher sex drive. Consequently, looking at the raw number alone is insufficient; one must understand *how* those encounters occurred and what they signify about an individual's personality traits rather than assuming all paths to that statistic lead to the same outcome. The speakers conclude by advocating for a more sophisticated evaluation of sexual history based on recency and relationship context rather than just total numbers. Recent research discussed, involving teams like Thomas's with Stuart Williams, suggests that people are sensitive to whether past partners were long-term relationships or one-night stands; sleeping with ten people in college is fundamentally different from having ten partners within the last month for a thirty-four-year-old. The host advises listeners against adopting a "caveman" mindset where low body count equals good and high equals bad, suggesting instead that context matters immensely—for instance, five long-term relationships by age 30 might be a green flag indicating experience with commitment, whereas five one-night stands in college for an undergraduate is expected. Ultimately, while the data suggests caution regarding sowing wild oats if lifelong monogamy is the goal due to habit formation risks, individual cases can vary significantly based on underlying motivations and the specific nature of past sexual experiences.
Read the full video transcript
What is the impact of body count on long-term relationship success? Um I mean, it's very intuitive. I'm always surprised by how controversial this is. Cuz I say it quite a bit. And I say it not even kind of bracing for impact if that makes sense. I'm like, this will this seems intuitive, right? But people who love to have casual sex and sleep with lots of people and hop from relationship to relationship and as a result of all those behaviors end up with a higher number for their age than you would otherwise expect, those people are less likely to succeed in long-term monogamous pair bonds than people who do not like doing that and do not have that sort of track record. And that And when I say succeed, I mean in terms of every outcome measure. I mean you know, more likely to get divorced, less likely to be satisfied in their relationships. Uh more likely to cheat. Uh there there was one analysis, I believe it was by the IFS, where if an individual, and this is from this is all true for men and women, by the way. There I know that on the internet there's a huge focus on women, but the all these effects, there's no sex difference and sometimes the effect is even larger in men than women. So, that aside, right? We're we're we're talking about everybody here. Uh if you subdivided the data neatly and said people with a body count below five, people with a body count above five, what's their infidelity rate? The infidelity rate of the above five five group was double that of the below five group. >> No way. >> Yeah. So, this is not this is not a nothing burger, right? This this is a thing. Uh and the reason it's a thing is very intuitive, right? It's like what is an affair, for example? Like an affair is a form of casual sex. And so, if someone has had lots of casual sex, they're telling you to some extent, oh, I'm more likely than someone who has not done this. I I probably enjoy this, right? Cuz I keep doing it over and over. I mean, I'm sure there's some cases where that's not true and and people change, obviously, but it's a huge, you know, past behavior is a predictor of future future behavior. So, you're basically saying, oh, I've got Like when people are surprised by this, I'm surprised. Cuz it's like you've got two groups of people, let's say, people who have slept with lots of people and people who haven't. And you're trying to predict who's going to sleep with more people in the future going forward. >> Mhm. Like why why would you why would you predict anything other than >> the only explanation I could come up with is that somebody has closed the loops. >> Oh, they've gotten it out of their system. Yeah, the classic I Imagine if I said that with alcohol. Right? I'm going to get it out of my system. I'm going to So, I can drink less in the future, I'm going to drink more during my undergrad, right? Imagine if I said this with drug use. Imagine if I said it with positive things. Imagine if I said I'm going to get the gym out of my system, right? That That's That doesn't happen. That it's like, oh, I'm going to go to the gym every day. I'm going to work on my muscles. And then in the future I am not going to want to do it as much cuz I used to do it. Like you build healthy habits, you build unhealthy habits. Do you think >> Do you think that there's ever the potential for somebody to stray because they had unfulfilled variation early on in their sexual uh career? That's I mean, it's a really good point and I think that what we're talking about here is average population level trends, which is the sort of thing this data is good for. I think that there probably is some causal relationship, but the data don't speak to that yet and you actually can't ethically design the sort of experiment that would tell us. >> [ __ ] ethics boards, dude. They suck so hard. Um so, I look at >> questions that we could answer. >> I think I think it's an interesting one around um how people interpret sociosexuality. Buss had in The Evolution of Desire, I swear one of the lines that's still in my Readwise is the single biggest predictor of extramarital sex is premarital sex. Yeah. Is that true? Well, it's sex predicting sex, right? >> But is that true? >> Is the single biggest predictor of extramarital sex premarital sex? >> Single biggest predictor? I Well, it's David Buss saying it, so I'm very tempted to just >> Slightly older book, though, right? Like has Evolution of Desire is what how old now? >> Yeah, that's true. It's It's It's like 1999, I believe. So, I I mean, in my data and looking at other people's data, I would say relationship dissatisfaction. Mhm. But that is >> Could that be due to >> about that and think about relationship satisfaction as like the dam lifting up. Mhm. >> all the other causes being allowed to run roughshod >> Relationship dissatisfaction is not one of the predictors that you could be able to >> say in advance. >> Exactly. Exactly. It's like obviously when things get bad, they get bad, right? It's It's kind of it's predicting itself. >> it's because they've got wandering eyes. Maybe it's because they're not paying as much attention to you. >> And then it's it's also it's not a like it's it's kind of an all cause thing because as soon as you don't care about the relationship, any other motivator becomes much more pertinent. Like maybe you were the sort who never had a wandering eye and you know, couldn't be swayed. >> Dissatisfaction has now meant that the first thing to the surface is now what burst out and the most salient personality trait you have is your high sociosexuality because you slept with 25 women before you got to this relationship. >> the the best predictor of extramarital sex is premarital sex. Maybe that's true. I mean, I do know that the if you look at people who do go the very religious route and they just have one person and and that sort of thing that that I mean, they do tend to have or and they don't live together before marriage and they do all that stuff. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, they seem to do they seem to do pretty well. Um I do think, though, that this is correlational and so there are going to be individuals who don't fit that pattern and one thing that we cannot test, this is a huge caveat, is that we can't know like if you take that person who had a a high body count, let's say, and cheated, we can't rewind the clock and say, oh, if you hadn't built that habit, you would have like maybe maybe it would have been maybe it would have been even more like like like I can't recommend from this like I can't I can't Like tentatively, I would say it's probably not a good idea if you want to marry for life, it's probably not a good idea to sow your wild oats. It's probably not a good idea to try and get it out of your system with the caveat that it's hard to know from the data with great confidence that um that there aren't individual cases where that actually is protective. >> this I I really wanted to get into this. The causal effect, somebody is somebody's just lost their virginity yesterday and they're going to get into a relationship which is going to be their lifelong relationship in eight years' time. They want to have sex with lots of people. They want to. They really really want to. >> is me saying hold it back is that going to make them less likely to cheat? Yeah, I I It's a good point. It's a good point. I think >> And does it change? Does it change? Does you sleeping around cuz one of the questions would be, well, you know what it's like, developed some sort of habit, some sort of lifestyle, you've maybe gotten rid of some of the stigma that's a part of it, inculcated some kind of [ __ ] sexual rhythm with new partners, whatever it might be. Uh you know what's out there. Yeah. Right? >> know the mechanics. I mean, people who have never had a one-night stand actually don't know the mechanics of a one-night stand. >> They don't know how that works. >> Yeah, yeah, yeah, exactly. I That's such an interesting point. I think one-night stands are apart from in modern media, often romanticized by people that have maybe only been in long-term relationships, like the taxi home, the [ __ ] cleaning up of the clothes in the morning, it's not the beginning of a Love Actually movie. It's not. It's just It's steeped in awkwardness and stories that you tell your friends in WhatsApp chats the next day. >> Yeah, I think there's some cases probably. I mean, I I think there's some cases probably where people have that experience, don't like it, and it actually solidifies their commitment to monogamy. >> Yeah, [ __ ] I'm not doing that again. >> But the I think that when we're talking about I made it I made kind of a glib analogy to I was feeling quite cheeky, made an analogy to alcohol, that kind of thing. And I think that to to walk that back to some degree, I would say that it's probably true if we're talking about like very high cases. Um but there probably are some cases within normal normal range where like if you came to me and said, look, Mac, and I really really want to drink and party and and all that sort of stuff, like would my advice really be going into undergrad, well, don't do it because you'll become an alcoholic later, or would it be like, well, have a have a little bit of fun, try not to go too far, and then after check back in and maybe maybe don't. Maybe you could make similar advice about like how to navigate sexuality if you are someone who's, you know, sociosexual. This is the problem with these sort of like big population level data, these big surveys. We don't know what the underlying motivation is. >> Yeah. Like there are lots of different ways. Robert Plomin, I always think about Robert Plomin when I think about this stuff. I always think about casual sex. I think about Robert Plomin. >> Yeah. And um he said to me that uh there's lots of ways to get fat. He's talking about behavioral genetics. He's saying there's lots of different ways to get fat. Some people have a higher ghrelin release. Some people have got a bigger stomach. Uh some people just don't like exercise. Some people have got a slower lower BMR. Uh lots of a million other ways I haven't thought about. Okay. What that means is when you look at fat people, you are looking at many different routes up the top of the same mountain. When you look at high body count people, Yeah. many different routes up that. Maybe it's because of social approval. Maybe it's because of a need for connection. Maybe it's because of a difficulty with commitment. Maybe it's because of high sociosexuality. Maybe it's because of a high sex drive. Maybe it's because Whatever the Whatever's going on. Maybe it's because of your job, right? You're a stripper or you Whatever. a [ __ ] metal guitar player. >> I think in that case the the negative predictive outcomes might might be maintained, but yeah. But >> I I completely take your point. >> And we don't know how people are getting up because we're just taking these big aggregate pieces of data. I also think that another thing to keep in mind, we're the reason that body count means anything is likely because it's a proxy for sociosexuality. And so when we're looking at an aggregate as you say, sure there's some predictive benefit. But if we were to look at any individual case, you could assess it and say like, okay, well how predictive is this of sociosexuality? And we even see this in the recent research from again, it's it's it's Thomas's team and I believe Stuart Williams is on it as well again, where they looked at this across nations and they took a more fine-grained nuanced approach than they did in 2019. And what they did was they looked at essentially the effects of recency, right? And it's like if someone let the number can be the same, but if it's like all of them and you can really think about this, like what's a better cue to sociosexuality? If you're 38 and you meet a woman who's 34 and she's slept with 10 people, but they were all in undergrad and since then it's been like one boyfriend, right? That's very different to meeting the same 34-year-old woman who's like, you know, actually it's been 10, but they were all this past month, right? And you're number 11. Like what's what's the cue, right? In terms of personality. And what they found was that people were sensitive to that. And I think they're sensitive to a lot of things. Like I think that if you're talking about like like a body count of seven being quote-unquote high, it's not really high for like a 35-year-old, right? And it's certainly not a 35-year-old for someone who's only slept with one person in the last 10 years. >> Yeah, exactly. But it actually is insanely high for like a 19-year-old, right? Like that's a shock, right? So I think that for people listening to this, I would say that if you're trying to I mean, I talk about this stuff first and foremost because I find it interesting. I'm not necessarily like it's kind of a second-order effect. >> Lifestyle advice. >> Yeah, if anything happens to be useful, that's wonderful, right? And we want to extract that as much as possible. But that's not my primary motivation for >> a lifestyle coach, are you? >> Yeah, like in terms of looking Yeah, in terms of looking into it, it's But I would say that if you were trying to glean something practical from this, don't I wouldn't take the kind of caveman like, oh high body count bad, low body count good approach or or you know, a cavewoman as well because these these preferences are apparently very similar. I would end these outcomes as well. I would say, okay, well I've got this piece of information, but what's the context of that number? Like is this a person like if you want long-term healthy monogamy, is this a person who has had five long-term relationships? Because that might even be like a green flag. If you're like 30 and they've they've had a few >> Yeah, yeah, yeah. That that sounds pretty good. If you're an undergrad and you met someone and the number's five and it's all one-night stands and all that. >> Yeah, that's such a good point. If you were to do a third iteration of Thomas's study and say were these in a committed relationship that lasted for longer than 6 months or were these one-offs? Yeah. Well, Completely different story. >> different. Yeah, that's so great. In other news, you've probably heard me talk about Element before and that's because I am frankly [laughter] dependent on it and it's how I started my day every single morning. This is the best tasting hydration drink on the market. You might think, why do I need to be more hydrated? Because proper hydration is not just about drinking enough water, it's having sufficient electrolytes to allow your body to use those fluids. Each Grab N Go stick pack is a science-backed electrolyte ratio of sodium, potassium and magnesium. It's got no sugar, coloring, artificial ingredients or any other junk. This plays a critical role in reducing muscle cramps and fatigue while optimizing brain health, regulating your appetite and curbing cravings. This orange flavor in a cold glass of water is a sweet, salty, orangey nectar and you will genuinely feel a difference when you take it versus when you don't, which is why I keep going on about it. Best of all, there's a no questions asked refund policy with an unlimited duration. Buy it, use it all and if you don't like it for any reason, they give you your money back and you don't even have to return the box. That's how confident they are that you'll love it. Plus, they offer free shipping in the US. Right now, you can get a free sample pack of Element's most popular flavors with your first purchase by going to the link in the description below heading to drinklmnt.com/modernwisdom. That's drinklmnt.com/ modernwisdom. Congratulations for making it to the end of a clip. Your brain has not been fried by TikTok. Watch the full episode.