HistFest 2026: The Log Books – Voices of Queer Britain and the Helpline that Listened
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The panel for HistFest 2026 centers on *The Log Books*, a significant work derived from the Switchboard helpline archive spanning 1974 to 2003, which captures intimate volunteer notes documenting LGBTQ+ lives in Britain through handwritten records. Speakers Tash Walker and Adam Smith explore how these logs serve as vital queer ancestry for individuals whose families often lacked such heritage due to Section 28 censorship, allowing them to recover lost lineage stories that were previously silenced within their own households. The discussion highlights the profound power of active listening without pre-planned responses as a mechanism for healing, particularly for those raised under the oppressive silence of laws like Section 28, positioning volunteers and elders as "living archives" who preserve these narratives against historical erasure.
The log books chronicle major societal shifts and crises that defined an era, starting with early inquiries about safe sex amidst police raids in 1974 and evolving to address the devastating impact of HIV/AIDS, where volunteers collaborated to decode symbols like handkerchief colors during a time of panic and lack of counseling. The archive also records critical legal battles regarding women losing custody over their sexuality until the late eighties, failed attempts to equalize age of consent laws prior to 1999, and the community trauma following the Admiral Duncan bombing which altered police-community relations. Furthermore, the text details Switchboard's transformation into a trans-inclusive charity in the late eighties after advocates like Diana James pushed against internal resistance, illustrating an ongoing journey toward inclusivity that persists even as technologies change from landlines to remote lockdown calls mirroring historical expulsions.
Beyond documenting facts, the book delves deeply into themes of grief, shame, and reconciliation, recounting personal journeys where confronting internalized homophobia led to healing through community connection rather than isolation. Adam Smith challenges the myth of objective neutrality in history writing, arguing that true honesty requires writers to engage with their own biases and feelings, a lesson reflected in his transition from hiding his sexuality until age 29 to becoming an integrated freelance writer who values direct human conversation over digital noise. The narrative also addresses operational realities such as volunteer burnout prevention during the HIV crisis and funding challenges like government cuts that forced structural changes from all-volunteer models to employing staff, underscoring the resilience required to maintain support services under political headwinds including transphobia.
Ultimately, *The Log Books* serves as a testament to collective action and the enduring need for listening in an increasingly noisy world, urging society to reject state control much like weeds that grow against oppression to form their own garden of identity. The speakers emphasize that while future history preservation may face hurdles such as GDPR restrictions on anonymous logs, sharing stories remains easier than ever through unique methods like voice notes and diaries if political will exists. By uniting around shared experiences of trauma and survival, the archive proves that unless lessons from this unique historical record are learned, patterns of isolation and silence risk repeating themselves, making the preservation of these voices essential for future generations to understand the full scope of queer British history.
Read the full video transcript
[music]
Good afternoon everybody and welcome to
our second session of Hissfest day two
the log books voices of queer Britain
and the helpline that listened. Just a
couple of housekeeping bits. Um if
you're watching at home and you want to
use the captions, you can turn those on
on your app and you can also send
through questions in the online box and
we'll have time for 20 minutes of Q&A at
the end. Um, we have books on sale out
in the foyer and our speakers will all
be signing the book after today's talk.
We have three amazing uh, writers on
this afternoon's panel. Tash Walker is a
writer, poet, audio producer, and
community organizer who's worked with
institutions as the B such as the
Barbin, the National Archives, BBC, the
Charles Cley Trust, and Queer Britain.
They were a member of Switchboard's
board for eight years. In 2021 and 2022,
they were named one of the top 101 LGBTQ
plus trailblazers by Attitude magazine
and in 2022 were included in Stonewall
and Divas Power Pride List. Adam Smith
is a writer and multiiformat producer.
His book Deep Sniff, a History of
Poppers and Queer Futures, won the
Polari first book prize. He writes
theater shows, talks, and podcasts,
including Press Play, Turn On, which won
podcast of the year at the British
Podcast Awards 2024.
Tash and Adam produced and hosted the
log books podcast series, which has now
been turned into a critically acclaimed
book um and charts the LGBTQ plus life
in Britain through a uh and charts. The
book charts the LGBTQ plus life in
Britain through a rare helpline
switchboard archive. And our chair this
afternoon is Dan Vo. He founded the
award-winning volunteer-led VNA LGBTQ
plus tours. He's developed uh LGBTQ plus
programs for the VNA, the National
Gallery, National Galleries of Scotland,
National Museum Wales, and the Fitz
William Museum in Cambridge to name a
few. And he's presented for BBC Arts and
is a trustee of Queer Britain Museum.
Thank you so much. Welcome to our panel.
[applause]
>> [applause]
>> Thank you very much. What a lovely
[clears throat] audience. Good to see
all of you. Fantastic. I'm just going to
do a quick uh quick pop quiz. Who's
heard of Switchboard before?
>> Oh, excellent. We're among friends. Uh
you don't have to on this one, but who's
called Switchboard before? I'm going to
personally put my hand up. Okay, so I
you don't have to, but I think uh you
Thank you. I think um for me I I wanted
to start this talk by giving a little
bit of a personal uh story if I could
and I just want to tell you about uh so
I'm a trustee of queer Britain uh the
first museum LGBT uh of LGBTQ plus
history in the UK. We are just a bit
north of here. We're in King's Cross and
in our first exhibition we had a
telephone. Uh so I want you to imagine a
rotary dial telephone. Yeah. Uh those of
you who remember what that is, you've
got to spin the dial to to get it
working. Um and so I I I I uh the
curator invited me to pick it up and
what they' done is they loaded it with a
few interviews with volunteers from
Switchboard. And so I picked it up and
instantly my body kind of reacted to it.
I kind of curled into it. My pinky went
into the cord and I I I dialed zero. Oh
no, one one. I dialed one. And the story
that I heard was um a a volunteer who
said that uh they had a caller who
called Switchboard because their lesbian
lover had passed away and they had no
one else to tell because it was a secret
affair. And so you can imagine what that
was like uh to speak to somebody on
switchboard. And about a year later,
they called back uh on the anniversary
of death. And lo and behold, they got
the same volunteer. And that sense of
recognition, that sense of understanding
that somebody instantly had was
remarkable for them. And so as a as a
person who works in this museum, I just
totled off into the corner and had a
little cry because it was it was
remarkable because as soon as you kind
of like start to feel this, it just felt
like I could imagine all the
conversations that I'd had on a phone
with somebody that intimacy that you
have.
>> But at the same time, I I start to
imagine all the conversations that
possibly were not had as well because,
you know, it uh it's quite a journey to
call switchboard sometimes. you know,
you kind of dial the the you dial the
rotary and you kind of it takes a little
while. Zero first, one uh one was um but
uh you know, at any point in time you
could just hang up. So I think
switchboard is remarkable. Uh and I
wanted to to sort of just read a quote
from the book to to kick us off and then
I was going to ask Tash and Adam to just
share with us exactly what Switchboard
means to both of you. Um because uh
switchboard was a nexus and a counselor,
a database and a friend and uh and the
log books sort of helps us remember all
those conversations that that just is
there. So the log books are a racket
hundreds of volunteers down the decades
writing in different inks, various tones
and a right of diverse hands.
Although rich the log books were a very
basic technology.
Those scruffy pages were the only things
the volunteers had if they wanted to
record something of the call they' just
taken. A volunteer would open the log
book, pick up a cheap pen, and jot down
a few notes before the phone began to
ring. Again,
we love the log books for their nature
of being dashed out in a hurry. Entries
were hyperspecific to a person, a place,
a time, but they were just a snapshot.
So Tash and Adam,
it's quite an incredible book. Very
special, very beautiful. Lots of amazing
stories. What does the log books What do
they mean to you?
>> That's a massive question. Um, and I've
noticed you're wearing corgi socks.
>> Yes.
>> Um, what do the log books mean to us?
Um, well, Switchboard to me, to sort of
take a step back, uh, is an organization
I joined in 2012. Um I was in my 20ies
in my mid20ies and um I grew up within
that organization. I it is a f my family
to me. It's full of the uh amazing
things that a family can offer which is
love, support and joy as well as
conflict and uh lots of um protests and
tiffs and heartbreak and all of those
sorts of things. But what the log books
represent and what I felt when I found
the log books um which was when I was on
shift back in 2014. I was rooting around
in places that I shouldn't and uh
squeezed into a crawl space and found
these boxes um of books and pulled out
these A4 books which said log book on
them. And as I opened up these log
books, the pages fell out onto my lap.
And out of these pages, I started to
read these stories and realize what I
was looking at, which is uh what Dan
spoke about that these scribbled entries
taken by volunteers in the moment they
put the phone down. And I realized what
I was reading, what I was reading was my
stories, my histories that I did not
know, that had been censored because of
the complexity of the world that we live
in that had also been stuffed away in a
crawl space. They had been hidden. And
it was this amazing moment and
experience of recognizing myself in
those log book entries. 15 year old kids
ringing up who thought they might be gay
like I was when I was 15. So what the
log books are to me is a connector. It's
a connection back to my queer heritage,
my queer ancestry, but it was also
it was also an opportunity to open up a
door into who I was as well and and
start to lean in and learn about all of
those queer people questioning and
living just their everyday lives which I
had never seen or or known until that
point.
>> What they said I I that's amazing
answer. Uh, I think I would, you know,
co-sign that, but also say, um, even
more specifically that, uh, for me, I
haven't volunteered for Switchboard. Um,
I just worked on this project with Tash.
Uh, but I am a queer person born in
1984. And I think for me, like when I
Tesh and I started to um do research on
what became the podcast and then the
book, what the log books came to mean
for me was all of the stories that um I
would have had with my mom more dad or
my grand or great granddad or great
great great granddad. Um, but I didn't
because um I was not uh out to my family
when I was growing up and also as far as
I know they were all straight um and
cisgender. So it it's that sort of
weirdly unique thing about LGBTQ plus
people is that um most of us grow up um
in well all of us probably grow up in
predominantly straight and cisgender
families and some people don't have any
LGBTQ plus uh or queer like family
members. And so you if you are from a c
you know you might inherit stories from
your grandparents or your parents about
your religious heritage or your regional
heritage um my granddad was a fisherman
in Grimby you know or um your ethnic
heritage or your migration your history
of migration in your family but I think
if you're queer people growing up in a
family often there's um you're like the
first person um and you might not be but
effectively you might be because um
people haven't told you about uh or we
don't talk about you know great uncle
Harold um because he you know because uh
you know why so uh it's that it was that
lineage
that I didn't realize that I had not
grown up with until I read the log books
from Switchboard and heard the stories
of volunteers and heard the fact that
people called Switchboard and that these
log books were then filled with all of
those stories.
that were there for me and now you to
>> uh hear basically it's our lineage.
>> I think in the book you talk about doing
history quite a lot. It recurs as an
idea and uh in this instance the doing
history is uh your witnessing your
reckoning and doing it
>> powered by the tradition of protest and
I think that lineage is something that
kind of feeds through in this particular
book. And I just want to say that even
though you didn't volunteer on
Switchboard, you as a media producer, it
is about listening as well.
>> And I think both of you talk about the
power of listening in this particular
book as well.
>> Tash, can you sort of talk about that a
bit?
>> Yeah, totally. Um, if you're in a
conversation with someone, you're often
talking to them and you're thinking
about what they're saying, but you're
thinking about what you want to say
next. If you just listen to someone and
not focus about what you're going to say
next and just really hear what they're
saying, it allows this space for that
person to feel really heard and also to
sort of stretch into what they're
saying, which is um a sort of skill that
I learned at Switchboard. But when you
like Adam, what Adam was saying then is
so true. When you um when you grow up,
so we're both children of section 28,
which was a law that was brought in
under Thatch's government in 1988. It
was a local government act and it um
prohibited the promotion of
homosexuality as a pretended family
relationship. Um effectively what that
did was uh created an air of silence
especially with anything that was um
like funded by the local authority,
libraries, schools, teachers, especially
teachers who were LGBTQ plus. Maybe they
were feeling like they couldn't come
out. They were forced back into the
closet. But um what we realized in the
in the doing of this work was that we
were children of section 28. our
education was 1988 to 2003, the exact
years that that piece of legislation was
in place. And it created this thing
where it sort of spearheaded a
separation between the older queer
generations and our generation. And it
it it stopped many of them and ourselves
from being able to make that connection.
So this is what we grew up under under
this sort of framework of silence, of
censorship. And it's that complex thing
when it comes to silence. Someone says
you're not welcome here, you know that.
If someone says you are welcome here,
you know that. But if someone doesn't
say anything,
then all you have is all you're left
with is just filling in the gaps. And
that can have really complicated and
often deadly consequences. So to come
back as children of section 28 in our
30s to find these log books to go around
interviewing over a hundred people who
are LGBTQ plus whether they called
switchboard whether they volunteered or
just have lived memories. What we're
doing is actually a really radical act
listening. We're listening to our elders
um in response to having been raised in
a society that told us you can't talk to
these people, you can't listen to them.
And so it's through this act of
listening that I think we're creating
a a healing collectivity, a healing
connection. Um and and I think that this
power of listening and Adam and I like
you say talk about it a lot because um
if you give space to hear someone and to
listen to someone um it it changes who
you are and it it changes who you are
and also um you impact each other and we
talk a lot about living archives about
how and you just mentioned that then
Adam like these stories are in this book
and if you read the book then you'll
know those stories but those stories
will impact you and they will change you
after you've listened to them and then
you'll share them with other people and
they will impact and change those people
and it's this idea of being living
archives. Um but without listening none
of that will happen and it's uh it's a
really powerful space to be able to sort
of grow into. Um yeah. Do you want to
>> No, I
was going to say uh part of we will come
back to section 28. I think we
inevitably have to and there'll be big
sweeping moments in society that I'll
probably ask you to explain a little bit
more as the log books cover 75 to 2003
as well coincidentally ending on the
same year uh but uh there's about 63
volumes so there's there's quite a lot
that happens through all that time but
uh this was a beautiful quote from the
book which is history is not just the
wars between states or the great
discoveries it is also the personal
trials of every one of us and Adam I was
going to ask you to it was it uncle
Bruno Who do we not talk about? Uh
Harold Harold. Harold
[laughter]
>> in some of
>> he's dead. We can talk about him now.
>> We don't talk about Bruno. Uh so
um in in this book though in preparing
both the podcast and the book you've
kind of created a family for you as
well. I know that some of the
interviews, the interviewees rather
became very important to you for your
own self understanding and in some ways
as section 28 survivors a self-healing
and a for self forgiveness.
>> Yeah. Um I think we both
met
a lot of uh people who became
contributors to the podcast, you know,
people that we interviewed. Um, and then
a lot of them we reintered again for the
book. And um, I think yeah, for each of
us, every single one, every single
person that we interviewed was like a
connection. And I'm not saying that like
it was the mo I'm not I don't want you
to think that like every single moment
of uh, interviewing someone is like this
like profound experience. It's kind of
like it's mostly just like, oh, let's
sit down, put the recorder on, have a
cup of tea, and like get talking. Um,
but it it kind of afterwards you do
realize like wow that was a great
conversation that I had and like with
Tasha was saying like I was really
listening to this person and they were
really sharing and they were talking in
a way that like maybe they don't get the
opportunity to talk about um because how
often is it that honestly in our lives
when someone sits down and says I just
want to listen to you for an hour or an
hour and a half just I want I'll ask you
questions um but I want to hear you talk
like how often does that happen really?
Um and so uh it so that framing does
make it really um interesting and really
potentially connective I think. And so
uh that was a lot of for a lot of times
for us both with different people the
foundation of um really interesting
connections that we had. And of all of
those there were like a handful that I
think we both felt really well connected
to. Um, the one that sticks out for me
is probably George, who I met only in
about 20 20 uh must have been 2020.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. 2020. And he died in 2023, so I
only knew him for three years. Um, he
was 70 when I met him and 73 when he
died. And um, we write about him in the
book. And, um, he's basically the same
generation as my dad. He was only two
years older than my dad. Um, and but it
was weird because I I felt like it he
was like a granddad to me. Um, even
though he was the same generation as my
dad, but it was partly because I'd not
had a granddad like that before who was
talking to me about going to sex clubs
in San Francisco in the 70s, you know.
Um, and so that was really nice. And
then um another great profound thing
about him was that he had been um he'd
gone through so much in his life being
diagnosed with HIV in the mid 80s being
very poorly with age- related illnesses
um over several decades um having his
partner his grandpassion his great love
uh also get um sick and die um quite
quickly uh from AIDS related illnesses
and um and then being very very poor uh
because being unable to work through
disability because of his illnesses over
decades. um and making very private um
privately making lots of art um that was
really like um
uh expressive of his uh sort of
loneliness and isolation um and uh an
ostracization actually um I think uh and
so it was just a really we just had he'd
been like hoarding these stories I think
and then um I just came along long. I
met him through another contact who I
said I was saying to I was interviewing
um a nurse called Lee and I said uh who
I was we were talking about HIV because
Lee had worked on HIV wards in the 80s
and I said do you know of anyone who
like is um you know a survivor of HIV
obviously now he'll probably be a bit
older and like who I could talk to about
that um who's who would be okay and
comfortable talking about what um that
was like and he just instantly said
George you got to speak to George. Um,
he's ready,
>> you know, and so I he was ready.
>> And he was ready as long as I brought
along a box of French fancies. He he was
that was his rider. He was very ready.
[laughter]
He had been like hoarding these stories
for so long about the 80s and well 70s,
' 80s, 90s, naughties. And um and it
just it it uh it was um yeah just like
one of the I guess like strongest um I
guess like professional creative
experiences in my life. Um and uh you
know he he passed away a couple of years
ago and um yeah it's uh it's that it's
that grandfather lineage thing and it's
also like well who else would have
you know how many other people are like
that who don't have someone turn up at
their house with a microphone and a box
of cakes who don't get to tell their
stories you know but we have George's.
So
>> that was a really long answer but it was
it was great
>> beautiful answer. I think I think part
of this was you mentioned you grappled
with professional objectivity in this as
well and I wonder if it's that that
close connection that is formed that
makes it a little bit hard to
>> to maintain that sense of objectivity
what what whatever that means.
>> Well, whatever that means.
>> But also I I think in many ways you've
inherited you've literally inherited his
stories as well.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Because he'd been making
like lots of notes. He was he spoke so
um like fluidly and fluently about his
memories and his stories. Um and I'm
there like with the mic like not even
having to like nudge or prompt or say,
"Oh, can you say this? Can you say that
story again?" It was a bit muddled. You
know, they were so fluent and so fluid.
Um and then after he died, um me and
some other of his friends were clearing
out his flat and we found all of these
pages and pages where he had handwritten
his own stories over and over and over
again and edited them over the years
himself. So that's why he was so fluid
when it came to an interview with
someone finally because he'd um been
writing and rewriting and editing his
own stories.
>> He'd been waiting.
>> Yeah, he'd been waiting.
>> Yeah.
>> Can we maybe get a glimpse into uh into
the log books themselves? We've got a
few entries. I think maybe we'll start
with uh uh I think sexy first and then
we might go into [laughter]
>> section 28. Yeah.
12th of January 1976.
[snorts]
Amazing. Super marvelous. A girl phoned.
She's had her first sexual experience
with another woman over the weekend and
it was super
and she was so happy and so pleased that
she wanted to tell someone about it. She
was bubbling over.
>> Okay.
[clears throat]
26th of October 2002.
Call via get connected. 15-year-old male
school found out was gay and informed
parents who are fundamental Christians
and now verbally abusing him and making
him feel suicidal. Many issues in call,
lack of access to support, lack of
resources, money, etc. to contact
services. School very unsupportive
citing section 28 as a barrier to
tackling abuse. And that log book entry
was the 26th of October 2002 and section
28 was repealed on the 18th of November
2003, just a year later.
So in the book you describe Switchboard
as a clearing house for information
about the gay scene, clubs and pubs,
medical VD, what's on tonight. Uh and
and of course it changes over time. So I
wondered if we could reflect on maybe
some key moments. So can we point out
maybe a few key moments in history and
what was swirling around in society
around switchboard that I suppose in one
hand leads to switchboard but also
shapes the sort of calls that comes into
switchboard as well.
>> Yeah. Wow. So many um after I spent two
years reading the log books at the end
of that time um I I was reading them at
Bishop's Gate Institute. We'd moved the
archive to there. It's amazing Liverpool
Street archive doing great work. Um,
yeah, I spent two years reading them. At
the end of it, I did a presentation for
LGBT history month, which was called the
really catchy, better connected
milestones of the LGBTQ plus society and
how they can be traced in the calls to
switchboardable today since 1974. I'm
>> surprised you remember it. [laughter]
>> I know the log books is much catchier,
isn't it? Um, yes. And so I guess what
that was part of what uh the foundation
of that um presentation was um looking
at what were these sort of key points in
queer history. Um when switchboard
started it grew out of the partial
decriminalization of homosexuality in
1967 in England and Wales and there were
like an everinccreasing number of calls
to gay news and gay liberation front
asking questions like where's good to go
out or I think I might be gay and those
organizations were not set up they had
other things to do. They were protesting
and they were writing articles and they
were not set up to answer those
questions. So Dennis Lemon who was the
editor of gay news at the time had just
come back from America where they had
seen a gay switchboard having started
over there and thought okay let's do
this here. So when switchboard started
on the 4th of March 1974 literally you
know less than a mile away from here um
above Hman's bookshop um in Kings in
King's Cross just down the road. Um the
uh the reason for it was to be there to
help people answer questions and give
them information. It was started by a
group of radical librarians who believed
in the power of information. So what it
was at the beginning was a big
information service. The first three
calls were at 5:05 p.m. is the first
one. I think it was um someone ringing
to want to get the telephone number for
the campaign for homosexual equality.
That's kind of like the suffragists to
the GLF suffragettes. So they were more
like letterw writing policy writers.
Someone an American um tourist wanting
to know where would be a good leather
gay bar to go to and someone who thought
they might be bisexual. They were the
first three calls to Switchboard. Um and
what you see over you know the years
Switchboard's still going today. There
will be people on the phones right now
is um that it's become much more of a
support giving service that when it was
when it started because of things like
the internet. [snorts] Um, so at the
beginning you had people asking where's
good to go out um and yeah like what
what what club is open and you started
to see switchboard becoming like a
really early Twitter what Twitter was
the community asking questions and
switchboard answering but answering from
what it was being told from what each
other knew but for what people were
telling it it was like it's a it's a
really evolutionary um organization it's
continuing to evolve and change all
throughout that time. So it's much more
of an information giving service at the
beginning and you had um lots to do with
the police raids and the police riots uh
with the partial decriminalization in '
67 which was a positive step forward as
is often the way when you see progress
um through legislation. And it also
shone a light onto the predominantly men
having sex with men community. And there
was so many um targeted raids and
arrests and the pretty policemen
dressing up to ent trap um men and
people being arrested for import tuning
which was just sort of like looking
someone up and down like chatting
someone up. And so at the beginning you
saw this as like a really prominent
call. Where's good to go out and where's
safe to go out? Where can I have sex?
And it's illegal. Watch out. the police
are coming for you. Then um in the early
80s you saw lots of women um who were
falling in love with other women and
were mothers ringing to help them with
custody battles. In the early 80s to the
mid 80s if you were a woman who loved
another woman and had children um nine
times out of 10 you would lose custody
of your children because you can't be a
lesbian and a mother. There's not space
for those two things. And so what would
happen is these women if they were able
to access legal aid or had the money to
get the legal support, they had to stand
up in court and say that they loved if
well if they said that they loved
another woman, then they would lose
custody of their child or they had to
lie. And it was also a point in time
where coming out as homosexual would
often lose you your job. So really
complicated parts of history. Um then we
move into the HIV and AIDS crisis which
um completely flooded the log books and
maybe I'll read a log book entry from
that and Adam you could pick up
>> from that. Um so there's like hundreds
of thousands of calls switchboards 24
hours at this period of time and the
first noted cases around HIV and AIDS in
the UK are in 8384. Height of deaths
were 9394.
Um, and the log books entries are
bursting with entries just like this
one. Um, so 7th of March 1987,
caller Patrick from York had an
antibbody positive test with no
counseling at all. Had his lover Martin
die of AIDS 3 weeks ago. Wouldn't talk
to me, but knows my name. Called at 4:13
a.m. on the 8th of March, hence the
incoherent scribble. He could call back
at any time. Please be gentle. He's
scared. Stupid.
>> What year was that?
>> 87.
>> 87. Okay. Yeah. I was gonna answer with
or like build on that with like four
dates. It's like a history GCSE history
exam. Um it's not even that much that
that long ago. Uh 83
was the um like first conference in the
UK about HIV AIDS that was held at
Conway Hall. And that was put together
by um some uh gay and medical activists
from the USA, from New York who were
seeing it and some um gay uh junior
doctors based here
>> um in London and people from Switchboard
um and it was also around the time that
the Terrence Higgins Trust was starting
as well and there were people from
Switchboard volunteers from Switchboard
who were involved in setting that up as
well. So that's 83. 8 uh7. Is that the
don't die of ignorance campaign?
>> Uh or is that 86?
>> 1987. 12th of January 1987.
>> Yeah.
>> 87. Like the first time the the
government really um did like publicly
acknowledged that this was like a
problem and did a campaign around it and
they printed a leaflet that went to
every single house in the country uh
about HIV AIDS. And Switchboard they
they listed some services on that
leaflet and one of them was Switchboard.
Um, switch only got word the night
before this leaflet started to be sent
out. Um, and so like Tash said, the
phone lines were flooded. A lot of
people calling, most people calling in
that immediate moment. Were people kind
of confused about the information and
were they at risk? And for the most
part, people weren't.
>> Um 94 was the 1994 was the big so moving
away from HIV was a big vote on the age
of consent. Um, trying to uh equalize
the age of consent.
um for uh gay for for men having sex
with each other. Um it was 21 um it was
16 for um other kinds of sex. Um so that
there was a vote in the House of Commons
in ' 94. It was a big moment and then
there was lots of campaigning in the '
90s through that but that was like a big
moment because there was a a chance to
equalize that. Um and parliament didn't
equalize it. They brought it down from
21 to 18 but it was still unequal in law
until uh for another six or seven years.
And then finally, I would say 1999, the
ad the bombing at the Admiral Duncan pub
in uh Soho, um which was one of three
bombs by uh neo-Nazi and um attacking
different minority communities including
the Bangladeshi community and the black
community um and then the gay community
in Soho. Um and people died in that bomb
attack. And it was um we uh the way that
we write about that um is using the
memories of people at Switchboard who um
heard that there had been a nail bomb in
a pub, a gay pub in Soho um and ran to
the phone room knowing that people were
going to be calling Switchboard and
finding out about that. Um so their
memories of that and also their memories
of just being people out and about at
the time and um and then the aftermath
of it in the relationship with the
police and there's a huge long running
story and uh saga about the relationship
between the police and the LGBTQ plus
community which continues today that
saga but um that's a particular moment
in 1999 when the relationship um uh
started like like shifted quite
significantly and the police and
switchboard worked together um in the
response to that attack. So those are
like for I think you were asking for
milestones and um maybe yeah we've got
the JLF stuff all the way through those
other things. Yeah, I think part of the
of many of the milestones that you talk
about that I find remarkable is I
suppose at the time that the podcasts in
particular season two which you know has
uh does carry through in some of the
book as well
>> some of the remarkable parallels was as
you as I read about HIV AIDS and I
suppose the the level of uncertainty
over such a prolonged period of time for
us to understand that perhaps it's to
kind of think what we were going through
during co the lack of information the
the misinformation. I think you were
lamenting the loss of Tumblr at the time
as well. You know, the key key
information source is suddenly starting
to to not be as reliable. So, the fact
that switchboard is always there as an
anchor. And I suppose
>> Tash, you talk about this idea that
switchboard volunteers must always be
prepared for anything. And at the
moments when our community needs it
most, switchboard sort of steps up. it.
The volunteers all know when they will
have to turn up for a bigger shift
because there's something that's
happening. Yeah.
>> That everyone's going to need support
for.
>> Yeah, totally. There was um so we made
the second season of the podcast during
lockdown and I was um co-chair of
Switchboard at that time. So,
Switchboard shut its phone room for the
first time in 40 odd years to protect
the volunteers. And um I remember uh we
went remote. We took our first ever
remote phone call the next day. We were
only shut for 12 hours, which was great.
Um, and I'm I'm so pleased that we were
able to do that because shortly after we
took a phone call from a young kid, um,
I think they were 15 or so, who had just
been kicked out of home in lockdown
because their parents had found out that
they were trans. And I was reminded of a
phone call that I had read in the log
books from 1978 where a 17-year-old kid
had called Switchboard because they had
just been kicked out of home because
their parents had just found out that
they were trans. 2020 1978
and it was such a shock to be able to
connect that moment to that moment then.
And I think about history a lot, right?
and the power of history. And we talk
about progression not being linear. And
we talk about um history repeating
itself. And one of the things that we
really want to do with our work and with
this book and with these stories is to
share them and to put them on the shelf
and say that this is history. Because
how do we know history is repeating
itself unless we know the history in the
first instance? I would not be able to
say in 2020 this has happened before.
we've been here before unless I had read
the log books and remembered that log
book entry from 1978. And I think that's
really amazing with the framing of
Switchboard as a place that has listened
that has unintentionally recorded down
all the all of these stories, not for me
and Adam and our gentle nosiness or
intrigue um into all of this amazing
gossip if you like. Um, but they were
doing it for a job to be able to share
with each other to keep evolving and to
be able to be there for people who
needed them. And incidentally, in doing
that, they've created this amazing
archive that tells us of all of these
lives that have lived and happened
before, which we can now look at and
learn from so that we can stop it
happening again and repeating itself. So
yeah, I think lots of switchboard
volunteers and lots of people don't
realize what they are doing in that
moment. They think they're helping
people here and now, but actually what
they're doing is they're connecting us
to our past to be able to connect us to
a better future.
>> I think if you read through the
switchboard log books over time, let's
say during that HIV AIDS moment,
>> you see that people workshopping through
the problems together and you know they
haven't quite worked out what the
solution will be, but it's the we need
to do a workshop on this, we need to
understand more about that. Who knows?
I'm gonna go to that clinic and test it
out myself and come back with Zack
review.
>> And I I think that to draw a parallel
with the Admiral Duncan bombing, I think
we could look to the Orlando Pride
moment when we all gathered and I think
it's sort of just after co isn't it? We
all gathered uh in Soho and I think uh
had gay men's chorus sing
>> bridge over troubled water. It was a
remarkable moment. There's a parallel
there as well. And I suppose uh Adam,
I'd love for you to kind of point to
parts in the book where maybe it's that
resilience of the people at switchboard
that sort of trickle down into the
community as well. That resilience that
we must
>> power on, but we also need to find the
solutions and we also need to find a way
to to pull together as well.
>> Yeah. I think that if I think about the
log books um and the volunteer the
switchboard volunteers
um work over the decades that we cover
um there are um and it's interesting
that you me there are lots of like
really um kind of internal processy
things which to them at the time when
we're reading their notes now it looks
like um like you said they're trying to
figure out the right way to support um
this subgroup of callers or that
subgroup of callers. Um and they're
doing that because they know that they
want to support them. But like we look
back at that now and we're like wow.
It's kind of like your talk that you
gave at Bishop's Gate. Um you're like
that was actually like a moment for the
LGBTQ plus community and family because
it wasn't just this bunch of volunteers
were doing. So let me give you some
examples. So um HIV is a really good
one. you know, they would say like, "Oh,
a volunteer would write, I'm going to,
you know, this other charity or this um
part of the health service is doing a
training. I'm gonna go and get some
information and bring it back." Or um
there's um this this bar has been taken
over by some people that are trying to
turn it into a gay bar and I'm going to
go and source it out and then I'll
report back. Um
>> the hanky code.
>> Uh and yeah, the Yeah, the hanky code.
Volunteers writing, you know, um expl
like having getting calls about from
people saying like what's all these
different colored handkerchiefs that men
are wearing in their back pocket and
what does it mean? And then the
volunteers would say right well let's
pull our resources like who you know um
Richard knows what red means cuz
Richard's interfisting um and um so we
write that down and then who knows what
black is and we write that down. Um so
there's all of that. So
>> can I just quickly say I felt seen in
the hanky code section because I just
want to read this out to you.
>> Blue. [laughter]
>> No, I think peace.
>> Peace. Thank you.
PCE uh Puse Hanky left unlimited but
wants to discuss pre-colian art first
right [laughter]
only looking for a discussion on
pre-colian art sorry
um Grinder could never [laughter]
honestly um yeah so yeah so like um
there are like kind of fun things like
that and then there's things that that
are kind of like internal processes
which now we look back on as being like
quite enormously significant you know
there's a volunteer called Diana James
um who's an incredible woman um and a
lesbian. Joined in the um uh in the I'll
kind of shorten the story. Joined in the
80s um well applied to join um in her
interview um mentioned that she was
trans. The interview continued and that
she was a lesbian. Interviewed continued
and then she gets a call a couple of
weeks later thinking, "Oh, this is the
result of whether I'm going to be able
to volunteer or not." And um a volunteer
says on the call says, "Um, let's go out
and have a coffee." And that volunteer
who is Lisa Power said to Diana, "Look,
I want you to join Switchboard as a
lesbian. This is who you are. I think
you'll be enormously helpful for us.
You're exactly what we need. You know
your Um um but some people won't
accept a trans volunteer and you need to
know that and I'm going to back you if
you want to do it, but you know, think
about it." Um Diana was like, "Yeah,
I'll do it. Like, let's do it. You know,
I can do this." So, she joined and some
uh women volunteers left. um at that
time and so that is a moment and and
then and then Diana um the the women's
group volunteers um collapsed which was
like a support group internally for
women volunteers that collapsed because
of the women leaving um and then Diana
just like started that group again and
then eventually more you know more women
joined etc um and then switchboard
became a trans-inclusive charity um this
is in the late 80s and so um that being
one of those things where you're like
that's an enormously significant moment
that switchboard board uh as an
organization faced that
>> as well as Diana facing that personally.
It was not her responsibility at all,
but she did it. Um Switchwood facing
that, figuring out the way to do it. One
volunteer saying to Diana, "This might
be trouble and you should know, but I'll
back you and we'll try and make this
work because and then eventually that's
what happened and switch became
trans-inclusive." So, we look back at
that now, you know, 30 years later and
um it it it means something. It means
something that Switchboard, it's partly
the reason why Switchboard's still going
today and why actually today it's one of
the few places where so many trans and
gender non-conforming people go to for
support because it is trans-inclusive.
>> Um, and uh, so that's just another one
of those examples of like switchboard
like figuring out something which
actually has a huge enormous impact on
society.
>> And we've spoken a lot about why that
is. Why does Switchboard keep going? and
we sort of settled on the idea because
the phone keeps ringing.
>> It's almost like you don't have time to
squabble about it for too long because
the phone's ringing and you've got work
to do.
>> It's like that thing that thread that is
just pulling you forward that focus.
>> I think there's a volunteer who says uh
you know it was a difficult call for
them as well personally. It touched them
but
>> they had a job to do. So they carried on
with that call and they they helped that
person through. We're coming close to
Q&A time. So for those of you watching
at home uh of course do get your
questions in. We'll be asking them very
soon. Uh, but I thought I I've now
confessed that I'm into puse on the
right hand side. [laughter] I I wondered
if we could turn to the personal aspect
of this book as well because it is quite
personal. There's your first kiss, Tash,
and Adam. The first time you
>> tumble into bed with a with another man.
>> Uh, tell me about the personal part of
all this as well and uh and and how that
feels to be maybe confessional to to to
or maybe is it just putting yourself out
there?
>> Uh, yeah. History. Oh, wow. Yeah. How do
you um as queer people who have grown up
without having the visibility of
querness helping you connect? Like it's
like we created a map by walking those
roots. And so to find the log books and
to recognize myself in these histories,
how do I write about that history
without talking about the experience of
feeling this and also living as a queer
person? Those things I don't think you
can uh extract away from each other. Um,
and yes, my first kiss was by some bins.
So, not that sexy. Although, I thought
it was sexy, but um, yeah, it it was
yeah, it was really fun to sort of lean
into the personal stories of ourselves.
I don't think we realized quite um, like
our editor and our agent were really um,
encouraging us to do that um, a lot more
than we had intended. Um, but it was
also complicated because there's a lot
of um, elation and excitement in finding
these histories and these stories and
interviewing the people like Adam was
talking about and you feel like it's
like an a million amazing first dates,
but then there's there's also a lot of
moments of grief that you didn't have
those connections before and there's
those um, in having those connections
now, you feel the absences at the same
time. And in writing the book, there's a
real journey that you go on. And I guess
like the j one of the journeys that I go
on is about like um being at school
under section 28 and trying to reach out
to trying to speak to two of these
teachers that I was at school with. So
there was like my hockey coach and um my
history teacher. So stereotypes are
super real. I played hockey. My hockey
coach was there. And um one day in a fit
of like teenage bravado around like the
age of 15, I went up to them and I was
like, "You guys are gay, right?" Like
me. Um I don't know why I said that and
I was so brave. But um the hockey coach,
Miss Morgan, turned to me and she said,
"No, no, Tash, why would you ask me
that? No, I'm not gay. I like men."
Which is a strange thing to tell me. Um
no, why would you ask me that? And I
felt so confused. I felt hurt. I felt
shamed. Um, and also I was like, "But
you are though." [laughter]
Uh, look at you
>> hockey.
>> Yeah, hockey. Hello. Um, and I just
remember feeling really angry and, um,
that is something that fed me and drove
me for a very, very long time, anger and
shame. And I sort of, yeah, raced
through my 20ies with that. Um, and part
of what we were doing in the book is
looking back at those reflections and
those years and understanding what was
going on for me. And I realized where
that shame had come from. Um, where that
guilt had come from. And also I got to
understand section 28. And there's a
person who was a volunteer at
switchboard who I interviewed for the
book called Ruth who was a teacher
during section 28 and she qualified in
1988 and she uh just as the legislation
came in and she started to tell me
stories about how hard that was for her,
how um hard she found it to be a teacher
during section 28 when she was gay and
um students would come to her to look to
her like I did for support, for guidance
and she she didn't know what to do. she
couldn't do anything and she told this
story about um saying to her pastoral
line manager um we need to do something
around uh sex education and HIV because
people are dying and the manager said we
can't do that Ruth it's against the law
and she literally said what could I do
what could I say and as I was sat there
interviewing Ruth and listening to her
experiences I realized for the first
time I was listening to my teacher to
what my teachers had gone through what
it had felt like to be on the other side
of section 28. Up to that point, I just
thought about myself. I thought about
how I wasn't held, how I was shamed, how
I was pushed away. I never once thought
about it from the other angle. And Ruth
and I are really, really good friends.
And after that conversation, I reflected
on the understandings I'd had, be able
to sort of put my myself in the shoes of
my teachers. And um and I reached out to
them and I got in touch with them uh all
of these years later. And I ended up
going to visit them. ended up going to
stay with them because surprise surprise
they were gay and they were in a
relationship and they have two kids and
my French teacher was a sperm donor. Um
[laughter]
I end up spending the night there and um
it's a really emotional and complicated
not necessarily easy conversation that
we had and I had wild dreams in the
spare room under the single bed minion
duvet. Um, but none of that would have
ever happened if I hadn't interviewed
Ruth, if I hadn't started the project
with Adam, if I hadn't climbed into that
cool space that day. So, how can you
talk about this history when you are
living so much of the uncovering, the
unraveling, and the um healing of the
damage of so much of what's happened to
us within this like modern Yeah. modern
queer history.
>> Adam,
>> my answer. Um, great answer, Tash. Uh,
again,
I
I I during my as as a teenager and then
a 20some I was uh not honest with
>> anyone else around me or myself that I
was gay and I didn't have sex. So I had
sex at 29 uh first time. It wasn't late.
It was my time
>> and uh
I was also a journalist. Um and
and that's relevant. Um
[laughter] it is relevant because
because you mentioned the word Dan
mentioned the word objectivity earlier.
Oh yeah. And when I hear that, I kind of
go like, you know, like, and I think
that chill that I have about that word
um is
that these two things are connected like
I
wasn't open with myself and I um and
other people and um I I wasn't listening
to myself right all that time until I
was 29. Then I started to listen to
myself. Um and then started to ga
through that through sexual sexual
community and new queer friendships
started to listen to other people and
gather all these um friendships and
connections and stories and experiences
around me and um realizing also that
yes, I was a journalist and that I liked
like writing. Um and then in my mid-30s
I made the change to go like freelance
um and to start work on my own projects.
Not just continue the journalism that I
was doing but like actually different
projects with obviously writing and
other kind of journalistic kind of
things. Um, and actually as I was doing
that, now that I look back on my mid-30s
when I made that shift and up to now,
um, the the way that I do that is a sort
of and it will probably forever be so,
an antidote to the teens and the 20s
when I um thought I was being objective
>> because I can't do this work. I can't
write about this stuff if I don't write
about myself and my feelings and my
connections because it's not true and if
I I have to find my own way into that
>> to somehow undo that violence that I did
to myself and that society also did to
me.
>> I was going to say
>> it's not I'm not you know I'm not saying
that I'm responsible for that um fully
at all um partly but also it's society
that um bred that in me. So, um, that's
my dank answer, [laughter] but I was
going to add to that and just say, but
that surely that's a question that gets
asked here quite a lot. Who has the
right to or who writes history? Who who
has the chance to write history? And
it's full of biases. So, that
objectivity is difficult. But I I, you
know, you do address that in the very
top of your book as well. Yeah, I sort
of just have like I I think I I have a
or I've come to have a natural um
distrust of anyone who says, "Well, I've
written the the history book about this
thing, about this event or about this
person. I've written a biography of such
and such, the prime minister or
whatever, and it's an objective account
of blah blah blah." I'm like, "Well,
it's not true, is it?" Like you might
not have put your thoughts and feelings
into it, but you are a human being who's
done that work and there are thoughts
and feelings that have touched those
pages and flavored those words.
>> So don't pretend to me that it's not
that.
>> I think also when you write an
autobiography as well, unless you're
coming back to the source material, like
unless you have notes from the time, it
it's you sometimes become not the most
reliable narrator of your own story as
well. So it's remarkable that you've got
>> you've got
>> Well, we've got Tash's teenage diaries.
[laughter]
Wild.
>> Lots of bins.
>> Talk about feelings. [laughter]
>> Actually on there. I'm gonna grab the
>> Oh my god.
>> Oh, do you do you ask the questions or
>> two questions?
>> Oh, brilliant. Okay. Well, yeah, we
might turn to Q&A, but before we do, I'm
going to ask you the the trickiest
question. No, Dan.
>> I believe this was asked in your uh your
interview for Switchboard. Um
>> Oh. [laughter]
>> Oh god.
>> Tash.
>> Oh no.
>> Can you name a sex act between two
women? What did you answer? I said
holding hands. [laughter]
I was really nervous.
>> And arguably that is right. You know,
intimacy comes in all forms. [laughter]
>> Incredible.
>> I hope that's as hard as the questions
going to get. We're going to take a few
from the audience. [laughter]
>> So, we've got two questions.
>> Thank you so much. I'm sorry. I think
first kissed by some bins is less
embarrassing than mine, which was a
opening screening of Lord of the Rings.
Um, yeah. Um, two questions from home.
So the first is how do um how do
volunteers I mean I think more yourself
and your contemporary colleagues how do
you look after yourselves with all the
kind of very difficult subject matters
that you and sort of people do you ever
feel like maybe you're um kind of like
failing at all or ever had those
difficult kind of conversations that
you've not been able to quite help with.
Um and the second question is um about
switchboard. How is it funded and how is
it supported and how has it been
affected by I don't know um different
government um different governments
coming in or um what I will call the
gender critical movement for example now
>> okay uh first question so um you get
lots of training at switchboard when you
join you go uh undergo training that's
either um like it's like about six weeks
whether you do it on a Wednesday evening
or on a Saturday day and then um as part
of that training you're learning about
how to hold those stories and um also
the the sort of barriers and boundaries
that you put in place. One of the things
that you don't do at Switchboard is
share your story. And in not sharing
your story, there is a distance. You are
a voice of Switchboard. Um and then
you're also once you qualify from the
training, you then um start taking calls
with a personal trainer. You have to do
30 hours of calls before you're allowed
on your own. Um and you're never on
shift with another person. So whether
that's physically in the phone room or
um online there is a slack channel where
everyone is in helpline live and you're
all talking to each other and then after
the shift you um check in with someone
about the shift and then uh you also
have someone and I used to be this
person who is a sister sa I cannot
remember what the acronym is uh who is
the on call person for a day that day
and you are encouraged to check in with
me um or to have a phone call if you've
taken in a call that was particularly
difficult. Having said all of that, you
know, everyone at Switchboard volunteers
as LGBTQ plus and that means that they
may be helping someone get through
something they are experiencing in that
very moment. And that happened a lot
within the HIV and AIDS crisis. Someone
that we found in the log books was
called Steve who left anonymous notes um
saying uh that he had been diagnosed HIV
positive. Was anyone else out there? and
you tracked these notes and eventually
he comes out as being Steve. Um, and he
just says, "I can't do this anymore.
It's too hard." Um, and he leaves
Switchboard. And we found him. He's
alive still. He lives in Neath in Wales.
I got to go and give him a hug. Um, but
he couldn't deal with that. Um, he
couldn't deal with going through his own
diagnosis and supporting the community
at the same time. And you you don't have
to there, you know, you have to
prioritize yourself. and doing that is
really really important as a volunteer.
So there are lots and lots of support
structures in place but sometimes they
aren't enough you know and everyone has
their own limits but a continual
checking in and conversation around
emotional well-being is the core when it
comes to that and that's something that
you know we've experienced as well in
volunteer in volunteering in listening
to people to interviewing people that's
a really complex and emotional uh
process in and of itself hearing all of
those stories and then how do you hold
those stories as well even on this um
book tour we've had a layer of complex
complexity in doing that. Um and then in
terms of the funding, so uh switchboard
has been volunteer and led until uh a
couple of years ago when I and the other
co-chair and board restructured the
organization and brought staff in to
create a a staff structure because um
burnout is so alive and real within the
charity sector and it was just happening
left, right, and center. Um and also
it's really really hard to get people to
volunteer for an organization um because
it's you know there's a lot of privilege
in volunteering and um you have to give
up a lot of time and need that time
could be spent elsewhere and earning
money if you need to and all of those
sorts of things. The funding came from
lots of different places um individual
funding grants um there was a lot of
funding that came from the government.
When I joined Switchboard in 2012 we had
just lost a massive piece of funding
from the government. um we were getting
50 to60,000 pounds a year for our work
in HIV awareness and they cut the
funding because HIV wasn't a problem
then 2012 I can tell you it was and um
uh yeah and then we were going to I
think we had two years left to run on
the money that we had um but we managed
to pull it back and and get the funding
again. How is it today when it comes to
gender critical uh complexities,
transphobia? It's a really complicated
place and Switchboard is very visible
and it always has been as you'll read in
the log books um because it's a very
visible queer um entity and so it gets a
lot of targets it gets a lot of attacks
um but it keeps going and I you know I
think that if we talk about gender
critical people or transphobic people or
the turfs whatever language you want to
use they're actually a really small
percentage of society and there's a lot
more people in this world who believe in
querness and trans inclusivity and the
power of collectivity and movement
together. And I think actually like what
switchboard is really good at and what
has always been really good at is
recognizing that collectivity is the key
but it cannot be done in isolation. Our
work can't exist in isolation. We will
only move forward together if we move
forward as a collective as a chorus. Um
and so I think switchboard has always
been really good at seeing that.
>> Thank you. I'm going to turn to
questions from the audience. I should
have asked earlier. So, we've got uh
sort of a one two there if that's all
right. So, I'll start back there and
then we'll move to the frontier. Thank
you.
>> Uh thank you. Such a good talk. Thank
you. Um I'm just interested in your
point about healing. Can I make an
assumption that when you've been out on
tour, you've had a lot of people coming
and talking to you about it because it
is a powerful topic for people. and my
generation, your generation, there is a
lot of stuff that we've all been
through. Um, so I'm just interested in
your thoughts about healing as a process
and looking back and uh what we can take
forward.
>> Yeah.
>> Should I take that?
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Collective grief is
>> Yeah, you're so right. Um, that's been a
really big part of the tour. Like we the
book came out in January and over and
then over a course of about six weeks we
did about 20 events. None as big as
this. This is our biggest audience.
Yeah. It's like amazing and
>> and best and the best.
>> We've laughed at everything
>> honestly the like um also most
attractive audience. [laughter]
Um and so uh yeah so and like you know
there was um yeah there's like an impact
on us as well but also what we noticed
and we just now we're still doing events
but they're a bit more spread out a bit
more sporadic and um and we're still
noticing that at every event that we do
there's um usually at least one person
that actually shares a moment when they
called switchboard and what that meant
to them. Um and or there's moments when
people want to take they take the
opportunity to like share um yeah like a
a a an event in their life or a general
kind of theme in their life that's um
somewhere in the realm of what we've all
been talking about already today, you
know. Um and what we so therefore what
we've noticed is that the um the fact of
the book um is creating a space and then
bookshops often or the libraries are
hosting that space and um we are the
first two to step into it but then other
people keep stepping into that space and
sharing that. Um, and that's um
sort of that's the work extending out of
the book, you know what I mean? It's
like whether you buy the book or don't
buy the book, that's happening and and I
think we're pleased and proud about
that. Um, but you're asking about
healing and I think that um in a way
that that that's our approach to it is
that um we're not we're not therapists.
We're if we're doing a book event in a
bookshop, it's you know a Thursday
evening 7 o'clock till half past 8 in a
bookshop in Yuki and then we all go to
the pub or we go home we go to the hotel
whatever it's not therapy it you know
you got to be careful about that and how
you hold that space and anyone who's
like sharing it's got to be careful as
well but the for so therefore what is
what how do we see this how we see it is
it's literally this is the space and
it's the start of a conversation and if
that person is sharing something in that
event or if they're not sharing at that
moment, but they're thinking it and then
we go away, they all go away and then
we've started something and it might I
would hope that it's the start of a
healing if that's what they need. And
it's sometimes it's a kind of trigger
for that person hopefully to be like,
you know, I'm going to get some support
about this
>> or I'm going to actually tell my friend
about this part of my life that they
don't know about, you know, from years
ago. Um, so there's a limit to what we
can offer in terms of healing because
we're not therapists and it's just a
two-hour event or something. But, um, so
therefore, I think how we've thought
about what we're offering is is just
that we can create a space um, stimulate
some thoughts, maybe stimulate some
conversation, and then hopefully people
know where there's other support in that
if that helps.
>> Can I pick up on the idea of the
circuit? We talked about LGBT plus
history month and come February there'll
be
>> hundreds of events all around the
country and I Adam you just put the
thought in my mind the exciting thought
that
>> in libraries now they get to put this
book right front and center you know
across the country and
>> how important that might be for somebody
looking for healing part of healing is
finding a connection finding
>> the next step and I suppose
>> your connection came from the talk as
well it was it was your talk that led to
this connection so this wouldn't exist
had you not also true
>> stepped up and shared
>> the story of Switchboard at the Bishop's
Gate and now that you're sharing it via
a new circuit on a larger scale with
more stories, more people um sharing
that platform now you're you're you're
creating a platform for others to be
able to share their story as well via
this book and via the podcast. I think
>> I imagine the connections that come out
of that as well. I don't know if you
want to comment on that or whether you
want to speak that as read.
>> Yeah, I love it. I love it. Um, I've
been saying this quite a lot on the
tour, but um, Joerel Taylor, who is a
queer poet, lesbian poet, said,
"Collectivity is the antidote to
cultural fascism." And I really believe
in that. And I believe in this
complicated thing of collective grief
that's happening. Um, there's I've
tapped into that, Adam's tapped into
that, we hear that from everyone. It's
this collectivity, this movement, but I
think it's more than that. Like there's
a moment where you understand that
you've got a grief or you've got some
healing to do, and then there's the
process of going through that. and the
connections that that can then build and
make. But then it's what we do with it
next. Where does that go next? Because
it doesn't have to end. And I think as
queer people, we have been born into a
world where we don't see ourselves. This
world doesn't look very queer. So what
we do is we break it apart and we build
it back together so that we make sense
of ourselves within it. And that is so
creative. That is a very queer and
creative and radical act. And you do
that as a child even if you don't
realize that you are LGBTQ plus that's
happening in your head. So that maybe
there is this moment now of grief and
healing and all of this unraveling to be
able to then build something that is
amazing and I'm so excited about what
that could be. And if the book can help
people to start piecing that together
then I feel really proud that we're part
of that wider movement.
>> Thank you. Can I have a show of hands if
there's any more questions? There's one
at the back and one here, but I'm going
to come here first. One at the back,
>> please.
>> Um, is it on?
>> Yeah, I think so.
>> Yeah. My question is regarding the
writing process. Um obviously there are
a lot of um notes that have built up
over the years and you've mentioned um
seinal moments and themes but how did
you come to decide what was going to go
in the book
>> and I wondered if you could um elaborate
a little bit on that please.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Lot lots of conversations. There
is so much that's not in the book. um we
sort of almost had to like argue with
ourselves about what deserved to be in
the book or not. So I read the log books
for two years, did that talk, Adam was
at the talk and then we chose to work
together on the podcast. Um so we had
this step before making the book, before
writing the book where we looked at um
the log book entries. Adam had to go
into the archive and read them to catch
up with where I was and started tagging
them and cataloging them with like the
most common themes. So HIV or nightlife.
Um and then uh we looked at that and
looked at what the most common themes
were and the podcast was in three
seasons chronologically. So the first
one 1974 to 83 84 to 90 something and
then until 2003 and each episode was a a
theme except for the HIV and AIDS one
which we did over three episodes because
there was just so much to uncover. So,
we'd done that work already in terms of
framing it. And then when we um took a
step back after we'd finished that and
decided that we wanted to write a book,
we looked at um all of that work that
had been done, but we wanted to sort of
zoom out and um encapsulate something
bigger. Not only the impact of doing
this history because we hadn't really
thought about that, I don't think when
we were making the podcast. We were just
so so keen to just be like making it,
getting it out there, so thirsty for
this queer content. Um, and then with
the book, we had some more time. We went
into other archives and and maybe Adam,
you can pick up on the rest of this
answer, but what we wanted to do with
each chapter was to do something a bit
different. So, not just to have a
chapter on sex, but to have a chapter,
which is chapter one, um, which it
should be, which is about having sex
with who you want to have sex with, but
in the body or the gender expression
that feels right to you. So, we coined
this term gender sex. So it's bringing a
slightly different angle to the idea of
sex. And then instead of writing a
chapter about HIV and AIDS, we zoomed
out and we thought, how can we frame
this differently? And so we did a
chapter on care that interweaved HIV and
AIDS um uh teachers during section 28
and how they struggled to care for uh
children at schools, but also how they
weren't being cared for by the state.
And then um trans healthcare as well.
And so, how could these points in time
that we're looking back at actually draw
bigger themes and try and bring in a a
newer angle to them?
>> I think we also um knew from reading all
the log book entries that um there are
some that are like so distinctive in one
way or another or so important or
significant in one way or another um
because of the story that they're
sharing or something like that um that
that earn their place in a way just
because of that. But then also there are
so many log book entries that are very
very similar. And so we're not going to
include 20 log book entries which are
all about a a 15year-old kid that's been
kicked out of home for being gay for
example. Um there's one in Bradford,
there's one in uh Red Roof, there's one
in Glasgow, whatever. But um you know,
but we knew that we could pick one of
those that would stand for all the
others. And also because of
confidentiality, you know, we were
changing names and details and and
things like that anyway. Uh and so a lot
of the log book entries um there are the
text of them is still very very close to
the original. Um but they also a lot of
them are sort of they're not generic,
but they kind of can stand in you know
for many others that are similar. So in
a way that was a sort of easy selection
thing would be like well look we've got
these 15 and they're the same. So which
one of them is the best one that
>> represents that grouping, you know, or
that theme?
>> Yeah.
>> And when we didn't have a log book entry
to tell a story because not everyone's
stories are represented in the log books
and you only know what a caller is
telling a volunteer and then what a
volunteer writes down, we tried to then
speak to someone who could speak to that
experience and help us to tell a wider
tapestry of of stories.
>> Last two questions. So one up the back
first.
Thank you very much for your talk. Um,
you've uh both spoken so beautifully
about the situation and I'm personally
very moved. Um, my question was though a
little bit sort of drier but operational
I guess you might say. Um, as you've as
you have touched on um, history isn't
linear and there's progression and there
steps back and there's different kinds
of progression. So my question is in a
postGDPR world,
what what [snorts] stands in for the log
books, what how do we make sure that
those stories are are seen and heard and
understood and shared like you've been
talking about when we can't share that
information in the the same way. So
that's my question.
>> PostGPR world. [snorts]
Um yeah, well um we can tell our
stories, can't we? And I think that's
something that probably wasn't as easily
available in the 70s when Switchboard
started, the 80s, maybe even the 90s.
Um, how the volunteers are recording
things today is on Slack, you know, it's
online, it's on a computer. Um,
Switchboard has an archive team. I've
suggested doing things like leaving
voice notes. Um, because I was trying to
think about what is as representative as
handwriting now. You know, everyone's
typing looks the same. Um, and the voice
being unique. Um, but I think that
that's what's different. We are, you
know, sometimes it feels like we really
haven't made much progress and that the
world can feel really hard to live in
and difficult at times. But I think we
do have more of a platform to share our
stories. Queer stories are on TV. You
know, people who are [snorts] famous are
coming out as LGBTQIA plus. Um, and
maybe what the log books did was uh
create a safe space to capture that that
those stories and those information. Um,
but maybe now we live in a space where I
don't know it's complicated within
certain frameworks and if you feel able
to that you can share yours. Um, but
it's really comp complicated. I think I
don't know maybe diaries like there's
something about like the everyday nature
of the log book. Stories are really
important, right? It's not someone who's
necessarily done something particularly
notable to them. They haven't won an
award or they haven't chained themselves
to railings or they're not this person
or that person. They just got up, made a
cup of tea, kissed their partner, you
know, went to work, came home. But that
is so powerful. It's so amazing. It's so
meaningful.
Um yeah, I don't know. It's a really
good question. But um maybe just living
Maybe just living is the answer.
>> The last question up the back. I think
it was on this side. Then of course I
think you'll be signing if you don't
mind raising your hand again if you
asked to Oh, was up the front. I'm
sorry. Okay. Last question up here. Run,
[laughter]
>> but don't trip.
>> Of course, you'll be signing books
afterwards as well, so there'll be more
time to to speak after this as well. And
I'm ready to stand by you and speak
about pre-colian art. Great.
>> Okay. Great.
Well, just throwing it back to history
again. Um, who do you think from history
would have really benefited from
something like Switchboard? And is there
anybody that you personally would have
liked to offer help or support to?
[laughter]
>> Sorry, that's
>> I would love to offer help and support
to anyone who has a gender critical way
of thinking. Um because I think that
yeah that they just need to speak to
more trans people and be open. Um Adam,
what about you? Who do you think should
have called switchboard?
>> Oh my gosh,
>> that's such a good question. [laughter]
>> I'm being thrown by it.
>> Um
>> I don't know. I I I read a lot of um sad
gay novels.
[laughter]
>> Uh and some non-fiction that's also sad
and gay. And you know, there's just so
many of these stories of these lonely
men in the 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, and I've
read so many books like that. It's like
a whole genre. Um, and whether it's
non-fiction or fiction, uh, you just
can't help but think like they were so
lonely and so isolated and often very
secretive.
And if only they could have called
Switchboard to have an anonymous,
confidential conversation where they
don't even have to give their name, but
just to be able to talk to someone else
like them.
Yeah,
>> I think I'd probably say myself and
maybe someone like Emily Dickinson.
>> Get her out the house.
>> I think the yourself is an interesting
one because I think sometimes you're
invited to think about your 16-year-old
self. What would you have said to your
16-year-old self? I'm going to come back
to last thoughts.
>> Also sad and gay. Sorry. [laughter]
>> Sad. Also sad and gay.
Uh I'm going to I'm going to I think do
a last quote from the book and then I'll
I'll give space for you both to do your
last thoughts. Maybe I'm first and then
Tash. But uh
>> uh this I thought was a very striking
part of the book. Uh and you know I
think part of the thought when we do
talks at Queer Britain for example is
always to help the audience go what do
you do next? What's the next thing that
you can do that can help? And I I I
loved this. [clears throat]
How can you be with someone through
their pain when you can't hold their
hand? You listen. You really listen. You
let them breathe. You answer their
questions. You speak gently. And you
listen more. You tell them their
feelings are valid. You give them space
to breathe. And you tell them that they
can call again. You love. You care.
But you also need to keep caring for
yourself.
>> Lost thoughts.
I think that the one of the um lessons
that I've learned from this work um goes
back to what Tasha was saying way
earlier on about active listening um
because and and I just think we should
place that in the context of the moment
that we're all living in right now
because it's such a noisy time
>> and that is
good and bad. You know, like the part of
the noisiness of our time is that anyone
can someone someone might be here right
now live streaming this on Instagram and
like great, you know, we can do that. We
can go and make a podcast this afternoon
and put it out. We can, you know, we
have this all this amazing technology.
We can immediately call our loved one in
Australia right now. You know, we can do
this. It's amazing that we have this
technology but it creates a very noisy
environment and um everyone's kind of
fighting over the airwaves and internet
and I I mean actually fighting and I
also just mean speaking in parallel to
each other. So the noise is it's a lot
of speaking in parallel and um it's
just worthwhile always remembering the
lesson of switchboard which is you know
it's just one person speaking to another
person on the phone and I think about it
a lot in in friendships is you know the
sort of most momentous
maybe parts of my emotional life have
been just like private conversations
with friends you know on the sofa and I
just I think that it's such a noisy time
that we're
always running the risk of forgetting
that um
and forgetting the power of the direct
conversation with another person whether
it's on the phone or in real life. Um
and that's that's it. That's that's
something that I've learned. And that's
not even anything to do with like
queerness necessarily. It's just more
it's that's just a thing that we've got
to we've got to kind of keep it analog
in a way,
>> you know?
>> Yeah, that's so nice. talk and listen.
>> Yeah. Um well, I don't think I can add
anything more to what Adam said around
that. So maybe I'll just talk a bit
about weeds. Um I've been thinking a lot
about weeds. I think about weeds a lot.
Um and how weeds that's not a botanical
category. That is a judgment that's been
put on a plant. Just how we have been
judged the weeds or anyone who is deemed
other by the state and is trying to is
tried to be uh controlled by the state.
There's a weaves act like there was
section 28 like there's an aliens act
and there's all of these different ways
in which we um are being tried to be
controlled and what is more powerful
than claiming yourself a weed and saying
we the weeds resist we the weeds fight
back and we the weeds resist so I would
say claim yourself a weed and uh let's
all be a collective garden of weeds
together and stand up and fight back um
cuz you're not alone and you have to do
it together and this kind of work will
only really thrive um if it's done in
unison with other people.
>> Beautiful. If I could ask for a sort of
an Alice in Wonderlandesque sort of
pitch, can all the weeds please
collectively appast
[applause]
Thank you.
[applause]
>> [music]