Hedge Fund Manager Turned AI Founder Emad Mosaque: "Digital Assets Are The Future!"
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Emad Mosaque, a former hedge fund manager turned AI founder, offers a unique perspective on navigating current economic shifts through the lens of human connection and digital assets. He highlights stark demographic changes in America, noting that approximately 10% of women aged 18 to 24 are OnlyFans models, illustrating how traditional industries like sex work have evolved into massive online platforms driven by human attention rather than just physical presence. Mosaque argues that as AI advances and automates cognitive tasks, it cannot yet replace the "soft skills" required for genuine human interaction or build enough robots to handle all manual labor within a decade due to cost constraints; consequently, sectors relying on retraining, meaning, and direct human connection will remain vital while attention becomes an increasingly scarce resource. The conversation shifts to the future of media and digital assets, where Mosaque predicts that video games and new media spaces will explode in popularity as people seek ways to absorb their growing free time without employment. He expresses concern over US legislation regarding digital assets but remains bullish on the sector's growth potential, forecasting a boom that could exceed even the AI bubble. While acknowledging that many current crypto projects are essentially gambling mechanisms or celebrity coins with no utility, he believes NFTs will eventually find relevance if they move beyond their current association with pure speculation and leverage technology to create value. He contrasts this with traditional stock markets, which have increasingly become narrative-driven vehicles for capital flow rather than fundamental investments, making them risky places to deploy money in an era of uncertainty. Mosaque introduces his own venture, Foundation Coin, as a solution to the lack of "blue chip" assets within the digital asset ecosystem that offer tangible social benefits. Unlike standard cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum, which serve primarily as monetary stores or networks, Foundation Coin is designed so that every coin sale funds supercomputers dedicated to solving critical issues such as cancer research and education. He describes this project as a superior alternative because it combines high-speed blockchain technology with free AI assistance for users while directing capital toward humanitarian causes, thereby building trust and addressing the need for ethical investment options in an industry currently dominated by speculative behavior. When analyzing how investors should approach their portfolios amidst these changes, Mosaque emphasizes looking at "marginal narrative creation" rather than traditional fundamentals like cash flow or earnings per share. He points out that companies with strong narratives around AI and robotics, such as Tesla, Palantir, and Oracle, have seen valuations skyrocket based on future potential rather than current profits. For institutional investors who cannot directly buy Bitcoin yet due to regulatory hurdles in markets like the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, he suggests buying proxy vehicles like MicroStrategy or digital asset treasury companies that provide exposure to these narratives. He also touches upon Michael Saylor's all-in strategy with Bitcoin, viewing it as a high-leverage play on capital flows at exactly the right time, though noting that such strategies carry risks if market sentiment shifts dramatically against crypto assets. Ultimately, Mosaque concludes that digital assets represent the future of wealth allocation because they are poised to capture the deluge of attention and capital flowing away from obsolete industries like taxi medallions or traditional factories replaced by automation. He warns investors to be intelligent about selecting projects in this crowded space, distinguishing between mere gambling platforms and those with structural growth potential backed by real-world utility or community building. Whether through investing in defense technology companies leveraging AI for surveillance due to global unrest or supporting initiatives that organize knowledge globally, the key is identifying where capital will flow next year as rates drop and economic structures evolve around artificial intelligence and digital ownership.
Read the full video transcript
Give me the hedge fund manager look at
how do we win in this moment.
>> Actually, you know, just you saying that
last thing
I had that thought. You said, "What's
changed since 2008?" And I thought,
"OnlyFans." You know, like
how much of America is signed up
or actually on OnlyFans. It's crazy
statistics, right?
>> Dude, it's wild.
>> It's wild.
>> women 18 to 24, something like 10% of
them are OnlyFans models. That is
insane.
>> It's insane.
But, um
again, I think
the oldest profession in the book, human
connection, these kind of things.
>> That is the nicest way to say sex I've
ever heard in my life.
>> Oh, you know.
>> Thank you.
>> I'm a I'm a gentleman. What can I say?
The
If we take a step back, what's the
inevitability here? Is the government
going to abandon all these middle-class
people and voters?
Actually, probably
>> Definitely not the voters.
>> Yeah, especially in the blue states,
actually.
Blue states will probably be impacted
more than red states. Various reasons.
If you look at the demographics.
They're not going to, are they?
So, what you have is
you just need to do your classical
analysis of
what does that person do when they lose
their job?
And they've still got dollars, they've
still got savings. People will be
looking for retraining, they'll be
looking for meaning. Religion is going
to go crazy and boom.
You know?
These kind of things are things of
almost inevitabilities because they'll
still have purchasing power to a degree.
On the other side, you have like two
economies, right? You have your
AI economy and your human economy. The
AI is providing increasingly customized
services and getting a lot of the
cognitive surplus, etc. But, a lot of
things you can't substitute for a human
for at least another 10 years. And the
reason for that is just we can't build
enough robots, honestly. Like, I think
robots in a few years will be able to do
just about everything a human can do,
apart from the very soft skills,
although the Japanese are going very
aggressively on that.
But you just can't build enough of them.
That's the issue. They're only thing
holding it back because if you look at
what Elon Musk says about Optimus,
and you work out the math,
an Optimus robot will be a buck 50 an
hour.
Jesus.
You work out the math, it's $20,000. You
have a depreciation schedule.
And again, you look at Unitree and other
ones, like they have fine finger
manipulation now.
They can make recipes. They can do all
this. They'll have skin suits, etc. But
again,
human connection, retraining,
attention is the thing that doesn't
become scarce.
This is the really interesting thing. Do
you think video games are going to go
down or up over the next few years?
They're going to go up.
Because again, there's only a finite
amount of human attention, and as people
get more free time, they will want to
absorb that attention even more.
So, the new media space is going to go
crazy.
Digital assets,
I think the US has gone too far on
legalizing them now in some ways when I
look at the legislation that's coming
out.
>> Mhm.
>> Like I said, AI would be the biggest
bubble ever.
The
digital asset bubble's going to exceed
that by far.
You'll be able to buy any cryptocurrency
ICO from your smartphone using Apple Pay
on Stripe next year.
So, what are they going to do? There
will be some really interesting
classical stuff, and I'll find coin that
we're building is the better Bitcoin
that helps kill cancer going to be
probably at the top, he says.
But there will be so many of these crazy
Dogecoin, Fuckcoin type things,
celebrity coins that never took off,
NFTs,
because they're scarce forms of capital,
and again, people have a certain amount
of attention, and they'll be looking for
the casino. Like you look at Cal She and
Polymarket,
they've legalized those now. What are
those? They're betting.
>> Yeah. Straight gambling. So is the stock
market, in my opinion, but
>> The stock market yeah, but you know, at
least they had the excuse whereas casino
has straight betting.
>> It is gambling with a better cover
story, yes.
>> But a year ago, that was completely
illegal, and now it's legal.
So I think if you look at it, there's
the soft human aspect, there's the
repurposing of all these people, and
their attention is the key thing.
How can you capture people's attention
that they'll pay for cuz there'll be a
lot more of it?
Cuz they won't have jobs and other
things. Kind of coming forward.
And so we're going to see some booms
like we've never seen before, and I
think media is going to be ultra
interesting in that aspect. Um
plus, like I said, I
I
was really shocked by the US government
on digital assets. Like I know they want
to get money moving, but I can't see how
next year the digital asset boom will
completely outstrip everything.
Actually, it's interesting to see this.
If you look uh
OpenAI and Tropic this year probably do
$20 of revenue.
The entire listed software sector in the
US
will do $40 billion in incremental
revenue.
>> Wow.
>> Crypto has done $150 billion in net
inflows.
>> Jesus.
>> And next year
is that going to go down or up? What's
going to go?
>> Mhm.
>> Absolutely ballistic.
>> Okay, but so how are you treating that
as an investor? By the way, do you still
actively invest at least for yourself?
>> No, I've gone all in on my new thing. So
I mean, like
we've got a Bitcoin competitor coming
out, Foundation Coin, or complement,
shall we say? It's 99% the same code,
but every coin sale goes to
supercomputers for cancer, education,
etc., and giving people free AI.
And then we're going to put computers in
every country, computers for all the
sectors, and you can direct the computer
the network to organizing our knowledge
so benefit.
>> Mhm.
>> We think that will do well because
crypto is a $4 trillion industry
with nothing blue chip in it. Like
Bitcoin is blue chip cuz it's lasted a
long time. Ethereum cuz it's a network.
But what's the alternative to Bitcoin if
you want a monetary asset?
And we thought, what if you create a
monetary asset where every coin sale
goes to helping people? That builds
trust. You use the free AI that builds
trust.
You organize knowledge and it helps
people with cancer or something.
>> there an interface where I'm saying I
want this to go to that compute? I want
this one allocated to cancer, this one
allocated to autism. Can I allocate to
anything I want or is there it's only
from your six in the drop-down menu?
Like how does that work?
>> It'll be anything that can be benefited
by compute. So we start with all the
healthcare things and then we're going
to expand it out. And you'll have a free
version of chat GPT as your AI assistant
to organize that. And you'll be able to
buy it
with your Apple Pay or whatever.
And again, it's 99% the same code as
Bitcoin but like a million times faster.
So things like that, I think we'll do,
he says, very well. That's why I've gone
all in on that versus trading the
market, etc.
But in general, I think if you think
about attention,
actually,
digital assets have to be the biggest
thing.
If you think about so many forms of
capital being completely flooded out,
like again, your taxi medallions, your
factories, even other things being
replaced by this, your workplaces,
offices,
digital assets will come to the fore.
It's just there's going to be such a
deluge of them
that you have to be intelligent about
that. Because what's more fun, watching
Netflix or trading crypto? Probably
trading crypto for a lot of people.
>> For a certain personality type, yeah.
>> Hey, NFTs NFTs might make a comeback.
You never know.
>> Well, the interesting thing, like if
people understood the underlying
technology, NFTs haven't gone anywhere.
They're just not part of the gambling
mechanism right now, which honestly, I
think is better, but
uh nonetheless, it does the the whole
crypto ecosystem in this economic moment
is bound to attract gamblers.
And I think that we're going to see a
lot a lot of lot of that. First of all,
people just like to gamble, the dopamine
rush of it all. But, um they also, in a
time where nobody can afford a house,
you're like, "Well, if I am smarter than
the next guy, and I can out-bet them on
when to get out, uh then I really can."
And so, yeah, you're going to see a lot
of that, which is the get-rich-quick
impulse. This all started from me asking
you through the lens of a hedge fund
manager, where should we where should
people be allocating their capital? Uh
digital assets is the thing that you
have the most conviction in. Obviously,
you're not backing anything, you're not
giving anybody specific advice, but I do
want to drill in more. Um
So, attention is part of what makes that
interesting. Um With the stock market,
the nice thing is, at least until, call
it 2008, you can really understand what
stocks to move on based on fundamentals.
I think that's largely gone out the
window as it's become more and more of a
gambling mechanism. Uh but, what do
if somebody were surveilling the digital
asset landscape, is there a type of
fundamental that you look for?
>> So,
you said the fundamentals are out the
window for the stock markets cuz it's so
much of things are narrative-driven
that it's crazy now, right?
>> Mhm.
>> And again, what's your marginal
narrative for various companies against
each other, various things? Like, in the
digital asset space,
you have something like hyperliquid,
which basically is doing almost direct
buybacks of its um
shares or pump fund or something like
that, of its tokens with cash
being valued less than things that have
absolutely no cash and no fundamentals
whatsoever. Like, Dogecoin is still
worth $20 billion. You know, something
like that.
Why is this the case? Everything's about
marginal narrative and so what you're
looking at is as the world evolves in
the next few years, what's going to
capture the marginal narrative?
You see Elon setting this up with Tesla
or
X or whatever by saying they're going to
be AI companies and robotics companies.
Because that's the next narrative and
Elon is a master
narration, right? Like
Oracle just got to 900 billion dollars
yesterday. I think it was up 46%.
Right? Why? Because suddenly it's an AI
company versus a legal company with a
database attached, right? Because they
kept suing all the people. Like people
are looking for the narratives being in
the stock market or crypto markets. You
have to think what does it look like and
then what are the narratives that are
going to incrementally improve and
attract more and more people?
Because it's dangerous now to deploy
your capital.
Are you going to give your capital to
bonds in the government or are you going
to start deploying it everywhere else?
What does growth look like? Growth is
probably going to come down. Rates are
going to come down.
But what's going to happen then? So, I
think that what I look for primarily is
marginal narrative creation.
And then
understanding where the capital flows
go. So, when I created foundation coin,
you know, I was like, I'd like to have a
Bitcoin but backed by GPUs where the
GPUs are doing good. I want as much of
that new compute capacity
going towards helping organize cancer
knowledge in the world, helping give
that knowledge to people because that's
a good thing.
100% of your purchases go towards that.
That's a good thing. That's something
you can tell your grandma about. And we
don't have a blue chip like that in the
digital asset sector.
So, that's how I kind of looked at it
but at the same time you see
areas where communities build around
certain things, right?
And that's what crypto has done
classically well but it's also why you
have rapid Tesla owners, right? Or you
have people that love Palantir
and other things and they suddenly go
from 10 times earnings or 20 times
earnings to 200 times earnings.
>> Wow. Yeah.
I mean, Palantir I think is like 200
times earnings now or something like
that. $400 as a company.
>> Geez.
>> Cuz people like that's the structural
growth. So, you look at your
inevitability, you look at the narrative
that will get you there, and you look at
what steps these entities are taking
against that structural growth.
And that's kind of come in instead of
profits and these other things.
And that's the nature of how companies
go. They go from their assets to a story
about future earnings to a story about
market capture with structural elements.
And so, here on your podcast, you've
given your audience a bunch of stories
of the future.
Any company that does like defense
technology with AI is going to do well
now. Full stop. Why? Because of the
increasing unrest. Surveillance
companies will do well.
Companies that do attention better or
attention capture than others will do
well.
You know, digital assets, you can
Honestly, I just buy an index of these
things cuz indexes are usually good
things. But you know, all the endowments
of the world and others are just going
to buy craploads of digital assets.
That's why you have these digital asset
treasury companies
raising billions of dollars.
Completely crazy.
Because people want exposure.
>> What do you think about Michael Saylor's
all-in strategy on Bitcoin?
>> I mean, it came at just exactly the
right time.
And it's kind of similar to
classical
It's it's it's a leverage play on crypto
assets at exactly the right time.
So, if Bitcoin went down 50%, then he'd
be in a bit of trouble, right?
Because then the market demand for him
selling his shares to buy more Bitcoin
would evaporate.
But right now,
he's going to do well. Why? Because
is there going to be less money in
digital assets next year than this year?
>> Mhm.
>> No.
Is there anything decent apart from
Bitcoin?
Get a bit of Ethereum, bit of Solana,
but there's nothing that institutions
will buy.
Can institutions buy Bitcoin directly?
Probably in a year or two it'll be
available on the Chicago Mercantile
Exchange as a commodity.
Right now they can't. So, what do they
do? They buy MicroStrategy.
>> Mhm.
>> So, again, you're talking about a trade
versus a company.
For a trade, always look where the
puck's going to go and where the
capital's going to flow.