Health Workforce for Integrated Primary Health Care | Prof James Avoka Asamani, WHO Africa
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Professor James Avoka Asamani opens his presentation by emphasizing that primary healthcare is not merely a service but a comprehensive approach designed to provide universal coverage through early intervention across the entire continuum of care, from health promotion and disease prevention to treatment and rehabilitation. He argues that this approach must be delivered as close to the people's environment as possible, requiring a health workforce strategy that avoids relying on a single occupation to solve all problems. Instead, he advocates for a cohesive team where various roles are defined according to specific skill requirements and stationed physically near the populations they serve, ensuring that the workforce is tailored to the actual health needs of the community rather than just filling generic vacancies.
The core of his analysis reveals a severe deficit in Africa's health workforce, noting that while life expectancy has improved by eleven years since 2000, Africans still live eight years shorter than their counterparts globally due to significant gaps in service access and infrastructure. The speaker highlights that Africa currently possesses only about 51% of the health services needed to meet population demands, a stark contrast to the global average of roughly 70%. This shortage is driven by financing deficits, lack of medicines, and critically, an insufficient number of workers; with approximately 5.85 million additional health workers required across the continent, Africa currently has only 46% of what is needed. Furthermore, there is a troubling mismatch between training capacity and employment opportunities, leaving nearly one million trained workers unemployed or underemployed, including many young doctors who struggle to find practice positions immediately after graduation.
Beyond the sheer numbers, Professor Asamani points out critical issues regarding competence and deployment that undermine the effectiveness of the existing workforce. Evidence from twenty-five studies suggests that on average, only 62% of cases at primary care facilities receive the correct diagnosis, and even among those correctly diagnosed, only 40% receive the appropriate treatment according to national guidelines, with complex conditions seeing even lower success rates. He identifies a fundamental misalignment where only about 32% of doctors are deployed at the primary care level despite up to 90% of population health needs being addressable there, a disparity also seen in nursing and other professions. Additionally, he notes that definitions of who constitutes a "family doctor" are inconsistent across countries, with many nations lacking official recognition for family medicine as a specialized field, leading to curriculum standardization issues and unclear career pathways that disadvantage practitioners in this role.
To address these challenges, the speaker proposes a strategic roadmap that involves developing a clear model scheme for service delivery and career pathways specifically for family doctors, aiming to properly classify family medicine as a specialist area within the next two decades. He urges stakeholders to move beyond simply adding more workshops or training sessions, which can sometimes lead to high absenteeism, and instead tackle the foundational issues of workforce distribution and recognition. The ultimate goal is to prioritize community health workers while systematically planning to train and deploy at least three million new health workers across Africa, ensuring that future investments yield maximum social and economic returns by aligning workforce deployment with the actual epidemiological needs of the population.
Read the full video transcript
And I apologize up front for those who
in the family meeting because what I'm
going to share here is not fundamentally
different from what we discussed on
Tuesday. So if you are bought by it,
please can attend your emails.
[laughter]
>> But it's great to be with you and I
would like to share with you maybe four
things. First I will not
definition of primary health care and
how it relates to primary care. I would
like to only highlight what we count
when we say
course and I will give you a broad
overview of the health course in Africa
and I will try to zoom in into family
medicine and I'm [clears throat] having
questions for you not questions I
crafted but questions that I got from
everyone I spoke to and told them I'm
coming for family doctor's meeting
and the questions are these
Who are they? [laughter]
What do they do? Where are they? And how
do you do it?
You got the questions?
Who are they? What do they do? Where are
they? And how do we actually live of
those doctors?
I don't have all the answers to these
ones but I will attempt to provide for
those that there is some glimpse of
data.
So as you saw the definition for primary
healthcare is very well uh founded and
professor Karen already took this up.
The key thing I want to mention here is
that primary healthcare is an approach
and that approach has the how. The how
to give universal coverage to everybody
is to focus on the needs of people as
early as possible and along that
continuum of care from health promotion,
disease prevention and detection,
treatment and the disease management,
rehabilitation and palative care that
you already do and that [clears throat]
it should be done for the people as
close as close to their environment. So
from a health workforce perspective
we look at this as saying if you want to
tell which kind of health worker do you
need for this population
and how many of them first you need to
understand what are the population's own
health needs
that is plan from the people's need then
the second is that the health workers we
should we have we should avoid dealing
with one occupation as if that
occupation will be a partial to
everything. Also look at the rate of
skills that are required in a team and
then you can define the roles
appropriately and then they work as a
cohesive team. And finally they should
be physically stationed as close as
possible to where the people who need
the services are like profess
is working and I was very impressed from
the back. I said this cannot be
Australia it's probably Africa
if I were to see that picture randomly.
So there are six basic elements when
we're looking at who is a health worker
that we count as the PHC workforce. So
when we say PC workforce what we
actually mean is that we are looking at
people when I say people here I'm
talking health workers who are
contributing to some of the basic
functions of the primary
health care not just primary care
primary health care and those functions
there are at least six of them that are
fundamental you need to contribute to at
least one
and these are the six
at least any worker contributing to one
or more of these functions and they are
stationed at the primary level of care
then we come as a peace workforce. They
can sometimes be stationed at tertiary
or quinary levels of care but through a
network of service that they can provide
when they are referrals and counter
referrals or tele consultations here and
there but we try to quantify those that
contribution a bit differently.
Now having said that I'm now coming to
look at what is the state of workforce
in Africa.
Professor Karen already mentioned this.
The graph to my left is life expectancy.
As doctors sitting here, I believe all
that you are trying to do is to make
sure people live longer and in good
health. True or yes?
>> It's both true and it's right.
[laughter]
Sir,
>> in Africa, your effort has been
recognized. You've added 11 more years
to Africans since 2000.
But the reality is that Africans are
still expected to live 8 years shorter
than their counterparts born at the same
time in any other place in the world.
So we are 11 more years better living
longer but we are still 8 years below
how many years people expected to live
if they born any other in any other part
of the world not in Africa. That means
we are not healthy enough or living long
enough.
I have always said that if you have a
car that is not performing you take it
to where?
>> To the shop to fix it.
to have a better health. The shop to fix
it is to get health services.
The measure for health services,
the what we have come to live with as
the single metric that summarizes access
to health services is called the
universal health coverage index. It's
measured between zero and 100. The
higher the better.
In Africa, our current average is 51.
the global average is around um 70 71 or
so.
What this means is that Africa is about
20 points less than the global average.
For an ordinary man walking the street,
I would tell the person that in Africa
only 51% of your health needs can be met
reasonably by the services we provide.
Only 51 that mean 41 can be met.
And if you're in Africa, the
differential between you and someone in
any other part of the world is 20 points
in how much services you can access.
So the car is not performing. We are not
performing well on life expectancy.
Where to get the servicesing? We are
also not performing enough. But don't
forget you have we have made good
progress thanks to your effort cuz we
have made at least 11 years of gains in
that respect. All of this is not a fl
many factors account for it. Financing
deficits, infrastructure deficits,
medicines deficit as well as fake and uh
counterfeit medicines that are all over
the place. All of this account but one
thing has been standing up. How many
health workers are there to provide
services? And this map you see is the
density of doctors, nurses, midwives,
pharmacies and dentists per 10,000
people across the world.
The more blue a country is, the better
density they have. The less blue or the
more red a country is, the less density
they have.
And if you look at this map, Africa
looks like a continent without health
workers. Same for a few countries like
Botswana, Algeria and others that are
showing a bit of and then maybe South
Africa showing a bit of um some blue
coloring at some point otherwise Africa
is like a continent with that kind of so
fundamental issue is that there are no
enough workers in Africa. Whatever the
challenges are, they are there but they
are not enough.
So I don't want us to get the message
later on because of count to me
unemployment to say oh we have more than
we need. Look no we don't have
but we don't have enough. How many do we
actually have? 5.7 million as of our
last count. Of those almost 1.2 million
are community health workers train at
variable degree of training. Some train
for just 5 days, some maybe two weeks,
some maybe 6 months, some two years. All
of the those are in the mix.
What we have is only 46% of what Africa
requires to put the population on the
good path to universal health Africa and
that translate to needing additional
5.85 million health workers. It's not
uniform across the sub regions. For
example, southern part of Africa has 60%
of their requirement. West Africa 51,
east and then central Africa uh 34 and
35 respectively.
The educators here, please thank you
very much. You have increased capacity
in training and we now training nearly
to 326,000
health workers per year for more than
4,000 institutions across Africa.
This is fantastic.
But the effort to create job to absorb
these health workers who are trained is
not matching the training capacity.
[clears throat]
Hence about 27% of health workers are
currently unemployed or still looking
for better jobs. But I want to tell you
all the numbers
what whichever institution that has done
an analysis on the return on investment
for health workers from the World Bank
or the IMF or the UN Commission WH
Africa CDC all point to one thing. When
you put $1 in investing in the health
doctor as a very minimum you expect $9
back in the economy. And if you take
into account the full social value of
what health workers do,
the health they give to the population
and the work they do, the catalytic
employment. If you doctors work, you use
uh um medicines, you use logistics like
gloves among others. Those are
manufactured in another industry,
transported,
stored and when you finish using them,
they disposed of. People do all of these
jobs and they are jobs that are being
created by the working. If you put
everything together, investing in health
worker can return 33 times the value of
invested in
But the reality is we have getting close
to a million workers who are not
employed and there are no exceptions
anymore. For young graduates we are
seeing even doctors 58% of young
graduate doctors struggle to find jobs
in the first year of their graduation.
And last uh last Tuesday I was telling
the the meeting that I had a very
unpleasant
surprise of being driven by a doctor who
was as a taxi driver and he had been
doing so for at least 2 years. Yeah. is
no longer interested to say that we put
public resources to train a doctor for
six or seven years only for the person
to finish and spend two years of their
lives driving taxi and not working in
the uh front lines of service delivery
when we know that for every year they
don't practice their knowledge they lose
roughly 10% of what they have learned.
But there's another animal in the room.
That animal in the room is about
competences
and our ability [clears throat] to
provide services according to national
guidelines.
There has been so many attempts to
research on this and there's been a lot
of debate about whether the evidence
will reverse or not. What we can tell
you is that we have now taken our time
to look at the evidence across 25
studies big and small from all contexts
in Africa limited to Africa alone. Our
conclusion is that it may vary for your
country but on average 62% of cases that
present at health facilities
predominantly at the primary care level
do get the correct diagnosis.
The flip side is that if we all walk to
the health faces today, for every 10
people sitting there, four of us will
come back without the correct diagnosis.
And for those who get the correct
diagnosis, 40% are likely to get the
right treatment
according to this guidelines. That means
if we have 10 people going to the
clinic, we will come back with six
people not having the right treatment.
Even if they got the right diagnosis,
don't forget it.
But when the cases are more complex,
think of somebody with hypertension, HIV
with diabetes in at the same time. For
those ones, they tend to get up to 27%
of the treatment [clears throat]
correct. This is not just a statistic.
What this means is that the health
system is bleeding financially or some
of these are wasted resources and the
health system sometimes do not have the
resources to make the right decisions
for diagnosis and treatment. So instead
of blaming the health for not being
competent, let's look at what are the
enablers that we need the health
perform. So that these are some of the
things and when we go a bit further you
would notice that
a lot of governments and decision makers
recognize this and what they try to do
is to provide inservice training
workshops in hotels here and there try
to uh patch up the gap
but it has created a new reality also
that in some context we have seen up to
35% health worker absentism
because of some of those frequent
workshops.
>> So the solution is not just add more
workshops only. We have to tackle it
from the foundation.
Across several occupations between 19
and 70% of them are deployed at the
level of the health system that is
considered the primary care level.
And if you were to look at uh since um
I'm speaking with doctors uh where the
interest might be more only 32% of
doctors are deployed at this level but
we heard from profaring that up to 90%
of the population health needs could be
addressed at the primary care level. So
there's a complete mismatch
between where the need is and where our
doctors are deployed. And it's not only
doctors. You can [clears throat] one
would expect more nurses at the primary
care level, but it's not the case. It's
only almost 48%. It's only midwives and
um the clinical process of physician
assistants that will have more than half
of them deployed. I just focus on the uh
these four top clinical patients.
Then as I head towards conclusion, I
want to now begin on
who are they and where are they and how
many are needed.
First, who [clears throat] are they?
Since yesterday, I have been listening
carefully to speakers to understand what
they understanding, their
conceptualization of who a family doctor
is,
cuz that is key in what we count as
family doctor and what we don't count as
family doctor.
Internationally,
occupations are classified through the
international standard classification of
occupations.
This is a comprehensive
tool that tells the names of occupations
and the different variants of naming
what they do and how to become one.
It is done under the opices of the IO
the international labor organization and
is revised at least in the last ones
approximately every 20 years.
The current version was done in 2008.
The next one will be released in 2028.
Hopefully you can count 28 years from
there when the next one will be.
This classification that we call it the
ISC OA for short
founding um doctors as part of general
practitioners
but general practitioners are defined as
people who have the first level
qualification from a medical school.
So what it means is that the recognition
about the value of what family doctors
do is there because at least it's
mentioned
but the appropriate placement of what
they do as a specialized services at
that level is what is lacking
as a result. This is how countries
report on their doctors to the rest of
the world. It's called the national
health force account system. It's freely
online and you can go to you can just
check it out to see how many people are
in how many doctors in the country.
You can see that 1.1 is general medical
practitioners including family medicine
practitioners.
So this is where the issue is. If you
pick a phone and call a random health
policy maker and ask the person how many
family doctors do you have in your
country? First is it's impossible for
them to keep the number in their head.
But second, there's no way they can just
click to find and tell you this the
number because of how the reporting
structure is. So the question of who
they are, we need to now better define
who the funding medicine doctor is based
on based on what we have received in
this conference.
Even with shaky definitions, we have
tried to understand how many there are
in Africa.
From 24 countries, we found 5,075
family doctors who represent just 2% of
the doctors in those countries. 2%.
[snorts]
and approximately
0.59
doctor if you like one doctor for
200,000 people
but how do they actually need in Africa
and in those countries
the way we do need analysis for health
workers follow what we call the
epidemiology based need analysis and
that approach
takes the population the disease burden
at least 90 we normally go up to 99%. So
for Africa we do 98.1%
of the disease burden in any country and
then we combine that to estimate how
many people actually require care for
different diseases risk factors and
conditions and we come and look at what
services or interventions are proven and
known to address these diseases and risk
factors. So there is a tool online
called the UNHC compendium. It has that
list also. And we now come and look at
which health worker is best placed to
deliver these interventions. How much
time do they require to do it? And how
often should that intervention be
delivered for those affected. Put all of
that together, we are able to quantify
how many health workers of a particular
kind is needed in which country and
across Africa. So uh this is our
approach to this analysis and uh with
the we have we have a tool for it which
is publicly available. they call the
heavy river market analysis of two and
we have published this in across a
number of journals on this methodology
and the estimates. So all of the
estimates you see are based on this
approach for fun doctors using this
approach our estimation is that today
2026 Africa require at least 41,000
doctors and this will rise by at least
8,000 or if you like 19.5%
in 10 years. So by tuning for the 35 we
expect Africa to need at least 49,000
family doctors. This translates into
having four family doctors per 100,000
people or if you like for simplicity one
for 25,000 as a minimum
because context vary it can also vary
but this is the best scenario. uh please
this should not be puted yet as
according to the law we need 400 per
100,000 because we haven't published it
put it publicly yet so when we put it
publicly you are free to code but we are
very confident in this process the
methodology and record for all other
health workers you can use as your
working scenario
for the countries that have shown data
for found doctors all across those
countries they only have 21% of what
they require
21%. So if someone asked me today to say
what proportion of the required family
doctors do we have in Africa I will say
that 24 countries have family doctors
present and amongst them we have 21% of
what they need but Africa as a whole we
need between now and 10 years time
between 41,000 and 49,000 family
doctors. So as I summarize
who are family doctors these are experts
providing comprehensive care we have
just 5,000 plus in Africa but we need
49,000 more
doctors in Africa face a recognition
issue 30% of countries we have spoken to
do not officially yet recognize or at
least have the mechanism to recognize
them as a special as a specialist area.
There are issues around
lack of standardization in curriculum
and what we call a family doctor. The
one from Tanzania and the one from
Nigeria are they the same as the one
from South Africa and also there are
also the BL career pathways.
uh if you become a family doctor would
you be disadvantaged compared to one who
has done obstet and when they are
looking for appointment to appoint the
CEO of something later in the future
would you be advantage or disadvantage
all of these things are not clear would
you earn the same salary
all of these are not clear so some of
these things need clarity as I conclude
what do we propose Bob Marc spoke about
this yesterday let's count better the
family buttons have a road map for
scenario farm doctors for Africa.
Develop a model scheme of service and
career pathway for family doctors and
work towards properly classified family
medicine as a specialist area.
Let's I'm not too ambitious but it's
workable.
The next may be in 20 years but 20 years
is still a short amount of time for the
evolution of a professional field.
[laughter]
We have a number of
curriculum we have done around
um health workers and countries the
uptake is quite impressive and I believe
you do a similar family medicine it will
have a good uptake as I conclude I want
to tell you don't give up keep pushing
and do the work we are doing and tell
everyone to plan train and attain at
least 3 million health workers to Africa
but in that they must Prioritize
communism. Thank you.
[applause]