Gov. Wes Moore: Trans Kids, Newsom's Failures & 2028 Dark Horse | PBD #791
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Governor Wes Moore recounts his political journey as a self-made underdog who initially polled at just 1% without establishment support until winning over conservative voters in Western Maryland, emphasizing that effective governance must prioritize constituent needs over party ideology or talking points. He highlights significant achievements in public safety, noting historic investments in law enforcement technology and community violence interruption have driven Baltimore's homicide rate to its lowest level in fifty years while statewide violent crime dropped nearly 50%, rejecting symbolic gestures like "thoughts and prayers" in favor of tangible action. Moore also addresses his complex relationship with Donald Trump, stating he does not view the former president as an enemy despite vehemently disagreeing with policies that cut child nutrition benefits; however, he acknowledges support for wealth gap initiatives like baby bonds while explaining how disputes over National Guard deployment led to him being disinvited from a National Governors Association dinner.
The discussion extends to social issues where Moore advocates for fair competition in transgender youth sports and safety, preferring local jurisdiction decisions with active parental involvement rather than federal mandates due to the deeply personal nature of these choices affecting children's lives. He further explores demographic shifts regarding declining birth rates and rising LGBTQ+ representation among youth, arguing that parents should lead education on sexual orientation similar to Poland's approach rather than teachers imposing opinions, while sharing anecdotes about military service under "Don't Ask, Don'Tell" to illustrate how external pressures influence personal choices. On infrastructure, he defends his administration's rapid response to the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse, citing debris removal in 78 days and design-build phases completed in fourteen months against projected timelines of over five years, achieved by firing delaying contractors despite increased costs from litigation risks and modern construction expenses.
Moore contrasts Maryland's pragmatic approach with California under Gavin Newsom regarding homelessness, explaining that the state avoided massive spending allocations by focusing on affordable housing construction near transit hubs to prevent revolving door scenarios that disrupt children's education, while also detailing tax reductions through the "Decade Act" that attracted major investments from companies like AstraZeneca and Samsung Biologics. He addresses net migration trends where many blue states are losing population due to over-reliance on federal sectors impacted by recent layoffs, outlining efforts to diversify Maryland's economy into IT, life sciences, aerospace, and defense leveraging assets like Johns Hopkins University and IonQ's quantum computing leadership. Additionally, he argues that Maryland must leverage its unique competitive advantages such as proximity to Washington D.C., superior healthcare systems, and a supportive business environment rather than competing solely on tax policy against states like Florida or Texas, noting the urgent need to diversify industries to retain residents instead of asking citizens to leave.
Looking toward future political landscapes, Moore expresses strong support for Josh Shapiro as a potential Vice Presidential pick due to his electoral success while rejecting claims that other Democratic leaders were merely "DEI hires," and maintains mutual respect with Republican governors like Ron DeSantis despite differences in demeanor regarding figures like J.D. Vance. On foreign policy, he supports targeted military operations against Iran and Venezuela that avoid mission creep without broad international coalitions for long-term stability, questioning whether regime changes constitute true success if underlying conditions remain unchanged as seen historically in Cuba. Finally, Moore condemns a Supreme Court decision weakening the Voting Rights Act by allowing partisan gerrymandering which could hand additional House seats to Republicans across Southern states, calling for national redistricting reform because over 92% of congressional maps are non-competitive and arguing that politicians should be chosen directly by voters rather than through manipulated electorates.
Read the full video transcript
I got a bunch of things I'm going
through this saying, "Wait a minute. Is
this guy a Republican or a Democrat?
Member of the College Republicans at
Valley Forge Military?" When I ran for
governor, I was not the Democrats'
choice.
You were like an underdog at the highest
level. I was polling at 1% in my first
poll.
When you look at the current Democratic
Party and you watch the positions
they're taking, your [music] son comes
in saying he wants to transition. What
do you do?
Um I've been asked Do you see Trump as
your enemy? If you come after my people,
if you say something against the folks
in Maryland, will I respond? Absolutely,
that's my job. You can come to Maryland
to learn, but don't come here to
lecture. This is a call you guys have.
>> Yeah, then and and then it but it turned
into a back and forth on Twitter.
Crime, you'll typically hear Baltimore
being in the top five.
>> Listen, I refuse to be a governor who's
just giving thoughts and prayers and
offering eulogies for 8 years and not
doing nothing about the violence. We're
now seeing how Maryland's population is
the fastest-growing population we've had
in Maryland in over a decade. Your net
migration isn't impressive. You're still
ranked at the same place. 45th.
I don't even know if it's a fair
question to ask you. You're a governor,
you run a state, Newsom runs a state,
he's a governor. You've been able to fix
the state. He hasn't been able to fix
the state. What do you think has
happened to the state of California with
the way Gavin Newsom's led versus the
way you've led?
>> I I can tell you about what we've done
in Maryland and [music]
why
>> You're going to play it safe. You can't
give me that answer. You're You're
You're leading all of these guys.
Governor Wes Moore in the house. We're
doing this.
We are doing this, man. I'm so happy to
see you.
>> Likewise. I want to say this cuz I said
it off camera, I want to say it on
camera.
So,
anybody and everybody that brings up
your name, who knows you, loves you.
Okay, whether it's Stephen A. Smith,
we're out there saying, "Pat, I'm
telling you, watch Wes.
>> [laughter]
>> Watch Governor Moore." Ray Lewis, he's
swear Ray Lewis is like, "I'm telling
you, he's the guy. telling you." So, I
mean, of course, you know, when it comes
out to you know, on the political side,
you know, your philosophies, ideology,
we'll have those conversations as well.
But, uh for me
seeing guys that come up with one of the
best stories out there. One fun fact
that you may not know this, you know
we're born 3 days apart. Get out of
here. You're 3 year 3 days older than
you. You're October 15th, '78. I'm
October 15th,
>> than me.
>> no, stop. [laughter] Stop it.
And then when we look at the background,
well, what you've done, bachelor's, John
Hopkins University.
First black governor in Maryland's
history, paratrooper, uh White House
fellow under Condoleezza Rice, captain
in army 1998 to 2014, served at the in
Afghanistan, 82nd Airborne.
Southern Baptist, church going, received
bronze medal. You know, we investment
banker in New York. I got a bunch of
things I'm going through this saying,
"Wait a minute. Is this guy a Republican
or a Democrat? What do you You and I
found something from old school telling
me member of the college Republicans at
Valley Forge military 1998 yearbook?"
Well, you know what's funny and and I
tell people this all the time. When I
ran for governor, the I was not the
Democrats' choice.
The Democrats, they they were like 11
people running or whatever it was and we
had statewide elected officials. We had
two Obama cabinet secretaries. We had
the former head of the Democratic Party
who was running for governor and me, the
guy who'd never run for office in my
life.
>> at the highest level?
True. I was polling at 1% in my first
poll. "I'm not voting" was polling
higher than Wes Moore. And so, I was
like the underdog of the underdog when I
first started running. But, I was like,
"But, I'm not running to be, you know,
to to lead the Democratic Party.
I'm not running because that, you know,
I take any any party's talking points
and just swallow them. Like, I don't do
that and that's not my family's
background, that's not my background. I
was like, "Does it make sense or not?"
And so when I ran,
I wasn't the Democratic Party's choice,
but it turned out that I was a choice of
the people of the state of Maryland.
Which is all that ever mattered to me.
And that's exactly how I've tried to
govern now, where it's like, you know,
I'm not I don't take my talking points
from party bosses. I don't do that.
It's like, "Does it make sense for my
people or not?" At what point when you
were running for governor did Obama call
you and say, "Hey, we're going to
endorse you, we're going to support"?
Did that call ever happen or no?
>> No, that that did that didn't happen
until the general election. I never got
a I never I wasn't getting big
endorsements in the primary. So the
primary you did it all by yourself? No,
the the primary we had a a bunch of the
established Democrats were already
endorsing other people cuz they'd worked
with them and they're like they didn't
know me. They're like, "We've never
worked with What was the breaking point?
What event happened?
Was there a talk? Was there an event?
Was there a speech? Was there a debate?
Was there a You know what was
interesting? You know what actually,
it's interesting you said that.
There is something called the Western
Maryland Summit. Mhm. Western Maryland
is arguably one of the more conservative
areas in the state of in in the state of
Maryland. I'd say probably about 77%
in that area voted for Donald Trump in
the last election.
And there was a summit that went out
there
>> 2024. In 2024, sorry, 2024.
And they have a summit every time
there's a gubernatorial election and
they do a straw poll at the end.
And you go out there, you make your
case, you talk about all the different
things that you want to be able to do.
And it's kind of a bit of a bellwether
as to where things are going to go
because this is not a traditional really
a Democratic area.
And I ended up winning the straw poll
and like basically like doubling the
person who came in second.
>> Mhm. And part of it was because we just
show up.
We went everywhere. And part of you
know, we went everywhere because people
were like, "There's not a lot of
Democrats there." But I was like, "Yeah,
but there's a lot of Marylanders and I
want to be your governor, too." But also
it's like I need to go places where I
can get any votes I can find because I I
didn't have a machine. I didn't have I
didn't come from that background. And
when we won the Western Maryland straw
poll, I think people were like, "Hold
on.
Something's going on here." 77% 2024 and
you won it. That's exactly right.
>> So then you go general, Obama then calls
you because he sees that you could be
formidable? Yeah, well after after we
won the primary, Right. I think that's
when everybody everybody then kind of
came home at that point. We're like,
"Well, listen. If he continues to run
the race that he's running, he's
probably going to be the next governor."
Mhm. And so that's when people were
like, you know, "Now we're going to come
in and endorse his campaign." But that
really did not happen because a lot of
the establishment Democrats in many
ways, for the most part. We had a couple
here and there. But it's like but for
the most part, they supported other
candidates. Did I read it correctly that
in 1996 in a New York Times article
that somehow some way they were
interviewed 1996 you're 18 years old
they're interviewing you saying that you
have interest in politics long-term? Is
that is is that a real story? It um I
think I remember that article. I mean,
honestly, I don't know if I
thought that or had it as clear as that.
>> famous at 18 for New York No but how did
that even happen? Did people know you
were going places? Like was it something
where in high school they kind of knew
there's something very special about
this young man? Well, you know what
happened was I was a pretty good
basketball player in high school. And
was getting recruited by colleges and
all that kind of stuff. And I decided to
join the army
out of high school.
And it was kind of a curious thing.
They're like, you know, you have
scholarship offers to go to colleges.
But you chose to join the army at 17
years old. And it was kind of two-fold
for me.
One was that um I was good but I wasn't
that good. And like for example, like I
played against folks like, you know,
Kobe Bryant was in my same graduating
class in Pennsylvania. And we're in in
you know, he played out in the suburbs
of Philadelphia.
>> against him? So yeah so yeah so not only
I have a great Kobe Bryant story about
the time I actually first got to first
got to meet him, but you play against
guys like that. You play against guys
like, you know, Stephon Marbury who were
in the AAU circuit. And you just realize
like they're just better.
Like for them the game was easy. For
them the game was smooth. For me the
game was hard and it was just so much
easier for them. So, that was one thing.
But the second thing was
I knew I wanted to lead soldiers.
Like I was I was sent to a military
school when I was probably 13, 14 years
old.
And I hated it at first.
But it helped save my life.
And so, I had a mandatory year in
military school. After that first year
my mother was like, all right, what do
you want to do cuz you're doing better
in school, things are going well. And I
said if it's okay, I'd like to sit
tight.
Um I ended up finishing high school
military school. I graduated as a cadet
captain. So, I'm now 17 years old and I
had 120 people under my command.
And when I thought about what I want to
do with my life, I was like, you know
what? I I think I want to lead soldiers.
And so, I had a chance to go play
basketball in college and get
scholarship offers, but I said you know,
actually what I really like to do is I
want to I want to join the army. And
that was I think the reason the New York
Times and them found it to be such an
interesting story because it's just not
usually what a
a recruited high school basketball
player does.
>> But that is such a great story to say at
18 years old New York Times does a
story, you're being quoted in it. I'd
like to go into politics one day and
then you become the governor of the
state, you serve. It's a phenomenal
story on what you've done. It's a On Cal
sheet on Cal sheet you're at 1.9%. So,
if you were at 1% governor
I'm already doing better.
>> right. You're already doing better. So,
so I won't answer. So, a lot of people
you talk to behind closed doors God is
good.
>> They say Wes is an event away from being
a leading candidate. I don't know what
that means. He's an event away. An event
away, you know, whether it's a DNC,
whether it's a uh heated moment of
rising up, whether it's you know, but
right now and and by the way, the reason
why I think when I talk to Stephen A and
we talk a lot about him politically, you
know, you want to run you we have a lot
of these conversations privately and I
love Stephen A. We have a very very good
relationship together. He's like a
brother. I mean, we are we are uh but
when it comes out
he's he really is a good dude. I know he
really is a good dude. Of course, his
job he has to push the envelope and he
has a lot of enemies, but he's
comfortable in the limelight with the
enemies which we learned you need this
after the last few elections that we've
seen.
But on the Democratic side right now,
when you look at it, this kind of what I
want to go through and you know, but by
the way, just so you know, Obama just
tweeted something massive. Uh President
Obama just tweeted something massive
because of redistricting. We're going to
get into that as well. I don't know if
you've seen this or not. This just
happened literally a couple hours ago.
So, we'll talk about this here in a
minute.
>> That's great. But prior to going to that
with redistricting, gerrymandering, all
these other issues that we'll get into.
When when you look at the current
Democratic Party
okay and you watch the positions they're
taking
and America has said, "Listen, we're not
for some of these weird policies on what
you're doing. We're just not, okay? You
know,
uh
men competing in women's sports. That
just doesn't make any sense to the
average person who is independent
because to win you need the independent
and the libertarian voters, right? And
maybe some of the disgruntled Republican
voters. You need them to kind of flip a
little bit. But you need the
independent. Yes, you'll get the
Democrats if you say trans and all this
stuff. I also believe on the Democratic
Party there's a couple percent that
they're not game with some of the stuff
that's happening. So, open-ended to you.
>> Yeah. Uh we we see right now the
gubernatorial race taking place in
California. You know, Katie Porter and
and Hilton and all these guys are
debating the resume of Newsom and he's
going to have a hard time with his
resume. So, if there's ever been a time
that any Democrat can come out of
nowhere that it that can have some
sensible policies
you know this the first time in 25 35
years that no leading Democratic
candidate is at 25%
and according to CNN polls this hasn't
happened for 35 years. So we're not used
to that. What what does Wes Moore what
does Governor Wes Moore believe in? What
values do you believe in? Oof. Um
you know honestly I think the heart of
what I believe in is what the army
taught me.
And it sounds simplistic but it's it's
actually not. It's when we're 17 and we
first joined
uh I remember on day two
we learned this concept of leave no one
behind.
Ever right? You get one of my people I
will send a battalion in to go get them
if I have to cuz we leave no one behind.
Um and that's very much how I view the
world.
Where I just feel like we have an
obligation like
if I'm starting with 10 I'm finishing
with 10.
That everybody's going to matter
as we make it across the finish line and
mission accomplishment isn't that one
component of mission accomplishment is
actually did you take care of all of
your people? Did all of your people make
it back okay?
And I actually think that's the right
kind of guidance in terms of the way we
think about our our our policy work like
you know and when people say well
in you know for example you talk about
public safety that
Republicans say law and order and
Democrats say you abolish the police or
whatever or like do you support law
enforcement or do you support community?
My point is I don't I don't think you
have to choose.
And so like for example what are we
doing in Maryland? Well we had a crisis
of violence in Maryland when I first
became the governor where Baltimore City
in 2022 was averaging almost a homicide
a day.
And I said listen I refuse to be a
governor who's just giving thoughts and
prayers and offering eulogies for eight
years and not doing nothing about the
violence. So we made historic
investments in local law enforcement. We
made historic investments in technology
and analytics and and stopping crime
before it happened. We made Maryland one
of the only states in the country that
helps to fund the US attorney out of
balance sheet. So, if someone commits a
violent crime with a firearm, not only
am I going to have you in handcuffs in
24 hours, chances are we're going to
work this to make your case and take it
federal, right? And we invested in
community violence interruption. And we
work with the mayor and the state's
attorney.
And the results have been that now
Maryland has one of the fastest drops in
violent crime anywhere in the United
States of America since I've been the
governor. The last time the homicide
rate was this low in Baltimore City, I
wasn't born yet. And we're literally
talking statewide, nearly a 50% drop in
violent crime. But, it's because Lowest
in 50 years. Lowest in 50 years. But,
it's like but it's because I'm not
choosing, y'all. This is not an ideology
for me. This is not a political game to
me. It's leave no one behind. And if you
if you really believe in that
philosophy, you will do anything to make
sure that your people are good. Mhm. I
think I think those two are very
important. Leave nobody behind. You
know, the whole defund the police was
very weird. That campaign that happened
early on. Everybody was confused saying,
"What are you talking about?" Even
Democrats are like, "I don't know if I
believe in this or not." So, to give you
credit, top 10 richest states per capita
is is Maryland.
Ranks top five in education nationally.
Lowest homicide in 50 years. Strong
access to portals, rail, East Coast
trade. Port of Baltimore, major US
logistics. Average home price, $200,000
which means people can still afford to
get something there. Uh you know,
crime-wise, Maryland and property crime,
you're eight. Maryland as a state is now
15. It's not a top five. It's not a top
10. It's number 15. You you've done a
great job improving it. But, let's go
with it. Let's go to the next issue.
Issues with uh
Trump. Do you see Trump as your enemy?
Do you see Trump as the boogeyman? Do
you see Trump as
you know, because right now you watch
everybody campaigning. As long as they
get up and say Trump say horrible human
being, he's a criminal, he's a this,
he's a that, I'm going to get the
Democratic ticket. How do you view your
relationship with Trump and Trump as an
individual? So I I don't I don't view
any of these people as my enemy.
You know what I mean? Like I I just
I never ran for office because I wanted
to have fights with the President of the
United States. Like that's that's so
silly to me. Because every time I am
spending time on that,
I'm not spending time on my people.
I'm not spending time on making sure
they're good. Now, are there certain
policies that I just vehemently disagree
with that the president is doing? 100%
>> Such as? I mean that I that I disagree
with? Oh, I mean
for example, what happened last year
around food and snap and the attempt to
cut snap for our kids, I just think that
is abhorrent.
Because these are children Mhm. who
relied on this. And so like for example,
what we did in our state, you know, we
have you know, we actually have a fund
called the fiscal responsibility fund,
which is primarily made of of capital
gains tax that we actually pulled about
$63 million from that because I was
like, I'm not going to let my children
go hungry because Washington, D.C. was
having a food fight.
But the thing about it is is that while
there are policies that I vehemently
disagree with the president, I think
we'd be foolish to not say but there are
certain things that we have to be honest
about that were good ideas and things
that we want to lift up. I mean for
perfect example, you know, the president
was able to get something done that
we've been calling for for over a
decade, which is essentially baby bonds.
Baby bonds,
uh what he calls the Trump accounts.
>> Mhm. This one of the best ways of
actually being able to address things
like the racial wealth gap and things
like wealth gaps because if you can
actually start investing in children
there early and then have that continue
to grow and materialize, Yep. it's one
of the best ways of addressing things
like wealth gaps. Well, the truth is
we've been fighting for that for years.
And the reality is a Democratic
Democratic presidents have not been able
to make that happen.
But Donald Trump did.
And so give credit where credit is due.
I can fight all day long on the policies
that I think are backwards, don't make
sense, and in some cases illegal.
However, the things that do make sense,
give credit where credit is due. And I
think that's important in in our in
actual our Democratic process.
>> Respect. Have you and him ever spoken?
Have you guys had a Oh yeah. You guys
have spent time together.
>> Absolutely. No, we we spent time
together. We had a you know, I remember
the first time the first time we met was
very
was very interesting cuz it was actually
at an Army-Navy game.
And so, you know, I heard that the
president-elect is coming to the
Army-Navy game. This was This was a
sorry, this December before he was like
second time.
And so I'm the governor that time. So
I'm like, "Listen, he's coming to my
state cuz the game is being played in
Prince George's County, Maryland." So
I'm like, "Of course."
So he comes up and you know,
vehicle pulls up, Beast pulls up, and
gets out of the vehicle. And I said to
him I was like, "You know, welcome back
to Maryland, Mr. Mr. President-elect."
He says to me he says,
"You're a really good-looking guy in
person."
>> [laughter]
>> He would say something like that.
>> First words out of his mouth. So I was
like
I [laughter] was like, "Go Army, Mr.
President."
And and then he and then he started
talking. He's like he's like, "My people
tell me you're doing a doing a really
good job." He's like, "How can I help
you?" And we started talking about the
bridge. Talking about the Talking about
the Key Bridge in Baltimore. So I have I
I have conversations with the with the
President of the United States.
>> What happened in February of this year
when he was doing a national governor or
something and you were uninvited and you
said I don't know why I was not invited.
What happened with that one? Patrick,
that that honestly that was weird to me.
Because I I like
and I and I think about it where listen,
there are governors
>> Did you say something? Did something
prompt it or
>> And and so what happened was with that
which was really weird is that there are
governors who like spend a whole lot
more time and you know, they are like
going after him every single day. That's
not me. Yeah. Cuz I'm just like, listen,
if if you come after my people or you
say something against the folks in
Maryland, will I respond? Absolutely,
that's my job. I'm the I'm the chief
executive of my state, right? But I
don't spend all day long focusing on the
present like I'm too busy. I got to make
sure that I'm fighting for my folks,
right? And
so when I got personally disinvited,
I was like,
"What did I say? Like there are other
governors who are coming at your neck
every day. I'm not like what did I what
did I do?"
And so I did not understand it. It was
And And honestly, it wasn't a big deal
to me because I'm not I'm not that
interested in going to fancy dinners
anyway. Like I'm I'm good. Like I'm
fine.
But it was very odd. And the thing about
it that
>> Who else was uninvited? Is it just you
or
>> It was just me and then and then and
then um and then Jared Polis also was
added on to it as as well. Did he
explain why or no? Did he ever say why?
>> Never.
>> So till today you don't know why you
were not invited.
>> I've no idea. I would love to know why
you were invited.
>> no idea. Wasn't Was it around the time
of ICE? Was it around the time of uh
What would he think?
>> So that But but even but but my my
dispute with him about uh about actually
was the National Guard. When he was
talking about putting the National Guard
in Baltimore, my dispute with him on
that actually came months earlier. And
the reason was because when he was
saying, "Well, we you have to deal with
your crime problem. So therefore, I'm
going to deploy the National Guard like
you did in Washington D.C." And I just
told him I was like, "Mr. President,
listen, you know, numbers are numbers.
Let's be clear. Baltimore has had a
faster drop in violent crime than in
Washington D.C. even post the
introduction Sure. of the National Guard
folks. And I said, "If you want to talk
about ways to reduce crime like we just
talked about." I was like, "You can come
to Maryland to learn, but don't come
here to lecture."
Because actually we're doing the work.
We're doing the things
>> This is a call you guys had.
>> Yeah, then and and then it but it turned
into a back and forth on Twitter, which
I can't stand. Um but then he was just
like, you know, then he started from the
Oval Office, he's like, you know, uh
that place is a hellhole, no one would
walk through it and so on and so forth.
And I'm like,
that's that's our home.
Like,
you know, like folks in Baltimore, like
we hear that.
We hear that coming from the President
of the United States. And you're talking
about Baltimore, like those are
Americans.
Those are your people, too.
And for you to come at us like that and
and with the with just the the the
ignorance was so offensive to me because
you have to remember, these are these
are, whether they voted for you or not,
these are your folks, too.
And you have to respect that. And so, um
so,
that happened that happened months
before.
And, you know, the thing that I continue
to remind him when I when I told him was
like, "Hey, listen, you know, you're
you're disinviting me from a dinner from
first of all, from an organization that
you didn't make me a part of. The people
of Maryland made me a part of the
National Governors Association when they
elected me to be their governor. And I
was the I'm the vice chair of the
organization. In June, I become the
chair
of the National Governors Association."
In June? In June? Next month? 2 months?
>> that's exactly right. And I said him and
and Mr. President, you did not make me
the vice chair of the National Governors
Association. You know who did?
The nation's other governors.
Democrats and Republicans, they were the
ones who selected me to be a leader in
the organization. So, when he disinvited
me, and again and again, shout out to
all the other governors, shout out to
Kevin Stitt, who's the governor of
Oklahoma,
uh Republican governor.
>> He's a stud, by the way. I 6'5 6'6 He's
huge. Very well-spoken. I am such a huge
fan of Kevin. I I really am. He's just a
he's a good good friend. And I remember
and and we've had we've had some I mean,
Kevin is actually probably one of one of
my closest friends. I have a lot of
close friends amongst the governors, but
Kevin's right up there. And I remember
when I told when I told Kevin, I was
like, you know, the the president just
disinvited me from the dinner.
He's like, "What?" And I was He's like,
"For what?" I was like, "I have no
idea." And I remember Kevin was the
first one to say, well, let's be clear.
If one of us is not invited, it is no
longer a National Governors Association
dinner. And I was like, respect, Kevin.
Wow. Good for Well, I heard him speak a
couple months ago.
I was at a Goldman Sachs event in
Dallas, and he got up and he was selling
Oklahoma. Because everything about the
event was about Texas, and you know,
Ross Perot got up there, you know, the
the the the son or the grandson. He was
selling Texas as the best play gold me
in a play Goldman Sachs is coming out of
the They're building their second
biggest headquarters.
And then he gets up there, says, "Look,
I know this is a Texas thing, but let me
tell you what we're doing in Oklahoma."
I kind of like the way he handled
himself. But you know, you know, Trump
every once in a while will do things
like that, and you don't know what the
reasonings are. At that time, I think it
could have been a little bit with the
ICE agents. And by the way, he's about
to call an ICE agent, so I don't know
you saw that whole thing about him
approving it being an ICE agent. But let
me get back to this. So, question with
SNAP. Yeah. Fair on what you're saying
with SNAP. I have two questions on SNAP.
One,
are you for SNAP not being given
to many of these
illegal immigrants and folks who are
taking it at percentages higher where
that money needs to be going to
Americans for people that need it rather
than for people that are coming to take
advantage of the system? Yeah, and and
honestly, that's the way the system and
it's it's structured now, right? Is that
>> Abuse is there, though. Well, well, but
then abuse but abuses is one thing,
right? And abuse If if anyone is
breaking the law, then of course you
need to be accountable for being able to
break the law. But what we're talking
about and the way the system is
structured right now is that it's a
joint responsibility between the federal
government and our states to be able to
provide supplemental nutrition for our
kids. And honestly, it's a better thing
for all of us. Because like I don't want
my kids going to school hungry.
I don't want my kids, you know,
suffering from having now suffering from
illnesses that are now going to cost
more money for them to have to go to
emergency rooms and deal with I don't
the more people I can have being
productive members of my community the
less money I have to spend on social
services.
And so I actually think this is actually
a good investment to be able to do these
things. And if the president is going to
adjust it my point is this then have a
conversation with the nation's governors
who are your partners inside of this
work, but you cannot just unilaterally
decide that you're going to adjust it
and again violate the law to do it and
then expect for us to just come up with
it. That's not the way a partnership is
supposed to work. Got it. So so you are
against folks who abuse the system, but
you're for the people that actually need
it to take advantage of it.
>> Absolutely. I'm I'm listen I I will
debate with anyone who is saying that
you need to be able to break the law in
order to be humane. No, no. You need to
make sure you are both doing two things,
right? You got to make sure you are
following the law. You got to make sure
you're following the constitution and
you can make sure you make sure that
you're also being humane with the people
in your jurisdictions. And I don't think
you have to choose between those two
things. Okay. So so the baby bonds idea
great you you know with what he's doing
you're supportive of it. Walk me through
one of the issues that was just an
absolute caused so many people to become
independent and that is men competing in
women's sports. Okay, transgenders.
Where are you at there? I I understand
at the beginning everybody's like well,
you know, what is this some people that
are maybe Democrats or maybe even
independent saying what what's the
argument? We we should let them be able
to transition and now we're having men
compete against women. That's the part
where it completely stops. Where are you
at with that? So I I
I can tell you I think about this as a
parent, right? And I think about this as
as a someone with a
you know, a 12-year-old son
14-year-old daughter.
Um
I want them to get some sports the same
thing that I got from sports
where it gave me a chance to be a part
of a team.
It gave me a chance to learn great life
lessons like from sports I learned how
to win and how to lose.
>> Mhm.
And it gave me a chance to compete
fairly.
And I think we have to always show a
sense of humanity in where we are. We
want to make sure that we're protecting
all of our kids. We want to make sure
we're doing that. But if the competition
becomes unfair,
I think that's where you have to be able
to draw a line.
And I think there's ways you can do it.
I think there's You know, you know, one
thing I know is that our local
jurisdictions are actually the ones who
are responsible for this. And actually I
think that's a good thing. Like I don't
think that the president or a governor
should be getting involved in something
that is actually a decision of a local
jurisdiction. And I trust local
jurisdictions to be able to figure this
out.
However, I also know when I think about
it from the perspective of my daughter,
I want her to be safe and I want her to
be able to compete fairly.
And I think that both of those two
things can live simultaneously where you
can provide measurements for people and
all young people to get the same
benefits in sports that we all got, but
also know I I do not want my child to be
have it be either unfair or unsafe.
>> You haven't answered it yet.
>> Oh, no, no, I I know I I just did.
>> men competing in women's sports.
>> Yeah, no, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
>> Leave it to them, not a federal So you
don't want it to be a federal thing
deciding whether So do you think puberty
blockers given to kids under the age of
18 should be a federal decision? It
should be a state or a local decision?
Well, all of them right now are are
local decisions. Okay. All of them right
now are local decisions. But I think
that just like many things when it comes
to our kids, parental involvement does
matter. Like I I I want if for my
14-year-old and my 12-year-old, I I want
to be involved in a decision-making
process. First especially for something
that has lasting implications on their
life.
>> Okay, question. What about parents? I
got four kids, 14, 12, 9, and 4.
>> Yeah. Your your your son comes in saying
he wants to transition. What do you do?
Um
Well, first I mean if if it's if you
know it's my son.
So, I love him regardless.
Right? Um
and he's always going to have my undying
love.
That's That's me.
Right?
Um
I want to make sure that I'm involved in
understanding
uh
where he is,
how he's feeling the way he's feeling,
why he thinks it's important.
If this is a journey that he wants to go
down,
um I want him to always be comfortable
in his own skin,
and I want him to always know that he
has a
partner in me to help him
along that journey.
>> Would you advise him to wait till he's
18?
I I I If If this is how he is feeling
and I feel like I'm I'm closely tied to
him,
I'm not going to advise him
on something that he feels is At 14
years old, Wes? No, I understand it, but
what I'm saying is
the most important thing for me
is I want him to feel
safe in his own skin,
safe in his own decision-making, but
also know that at 14 years old, I want
to be involved
inside of that process as well. I'm not
going to
condemn him nor castigate him. I'm not
going to kick him out of the house.
I'm not going to do anything that's
going to hurt him. Yeah, so so But I
just want to make sure that I'm
involved.
>> I I fully By the way, just uh
my crew came in here, okay?
And uh
I was coming from the other building. I
came on this side. They said, "Pat, I
got to tell you something." "What's
that?"
"I like him a lot." That's all they're
telling me. "I freaking like this guy a
lot." Right there he's looking, waving,
going like this. I got to So, at these
guys. "I like him a lot. I don't know
why. I like them a lot. So, I something
tells me and and you know, correct me if
I'm wrong.
I don't think it would happen to your
son.
Because of the way you've raised him.
So, that I don't even think that's a
thought that you have. But, maybe let me
rephrase the question on what some
people have a hard time with. Okay?
So, I still live in Glendale,
California. I went to Glendale High
School.
So, I lived in California most of my
life. If you ask me what freeways I know
on the like the back of my hand, it's
anything in LA, I know all of them. 405,
217, 134, 14, 5.
You name them. I know. Okay.
If all of a sudden, you've raised your
kids in a certain way.
And say you put them in a Christian
private school till fifth grade.
Your son has never brought anything up.
In fifth grade, your wife gets fired.
And we you were relying on that $72,000
a year income that she had.
She hasn't found a job to replace that
income.
You guys talk and you say, "Babe, I
think we got to do public school."
You put your kids in public school.
And all of a sudden, you notice 6
months, 12 months, your son is behaving
in a weird way.
And then he has support with a teacher.
They build a relationship.
And then you find out that the teacher
maybe is part of the LGBTQ community
is encouraging your son, who's never,
since he was in fifth grade, ever
brought this up, now because of a couple
friends and a teacher,
he is thinking about taking puberty
blockers to go through the transition.
As a parent,
how informed would you like to be when
that teacher is talking to your kid
and is persuading them? And what
position would you have to say, "Wait a
minute. I've never seen any signs like
this. Why are you going through it right
now?" Would you then say, "Son, if you
do want to get on puberty blockers and
transition under the age of 18, I'll
support you." Or would you say, "No, we
got to kind of get to the bottom of
this." Well, first, um
I I don't care whether we're talking
about puberty blockers or whether we're
talking about what type of math you're
learning. I want to be involved. You
know what I mean? Like I I'm an involved
parent. Uh, my wife is an involved
parent. And I just think it's very
important for parents to be involved in
everything
that happens with their with their
child. And that's why I think that
anything that happens in a school should
be a, you know, a a joint process
between the teachers and the parents,
always. And no And no matter what.
>> should know what's happening. Teachers
can't keep a secret away from parents
and not informing informing them what
conversations they're having.
>> I think parents have to be involved.
>> but I'm saying there's a lot of parents
that maybe don't have the luxuries that
you and I have, who don't make the money
that maybe we make. And, you know, you
you've done well for yourself. You're
taking care of your finances over the
years. You were in the military. You You
give me the vibe of somebody that's done
made good decisions. You were an
investment banker. You've done well for
yourself. Yeah. But, some of the people
that don't have that luxury,
you know, it it's it's Here's what I
think's going to happen. The reason why
I'm asking this question, when I talked
to Steven A, Steven A's like, "Nope."
Full stop. I got a daughter. Men, no,
not going to happen. I think 2028
election
is going to be the most free agency
election. And I actually think whatever
Cal she's got you right now is not the
right number. I think if anybody's a
betting man right now and is willing to
put a little bit on Cal she to say,
"Hey, who I think has the
potential of doing something that could
have a plus minus?"
I would support uh uh, you know, if you
got like you go to Kentucky Derby. I
like to go to Kentucky Derby a lot. And
you'll you'll have three horses on a
final race.
If you want to vote and and, you know,
support somebody on the Democratic
ticket,
I think I would put you as a long shot
because I don't think it's a long shot.
I really don't. I really believe in your
abilities to go through this next phase.
Charming, likable, military background.
You flirted with being a Republican back
in the days, Condoleezza Rice, maybe you
were Republican back in the days and you
know, whether you want to talk about
that or not, the market kind of sees
that you were, so it's out there, so
it's good for that district you were
talking about, 77%. But I do believe if
you want the independent votes and that
position is
a little bit vanilla, I think it'll
backfire versus it being black and white
because I do think independents are
willing to support a guy like you.
But that's an area that just loses
husband and wives, mom and dads are
like, "Dude, come on, guys. Just give me
a real answer." No, but but honestly, it
it is my real answer to say that I I
think we always have to make sure the
parents have involvement in this. That
parents parents have a say in this.
These things cannot be decided without
any form of, you know, adult
uh you know, with any any form of adult
>> wants to go through it,
you know, in in
puberty blockers are available, you're
saying it's okay for parents to try to
give the kids puberty blockers as long
as parents approve it. Uh That decision
becomes on the parents. Listen, I I
think that um it's not a choice that I
would make. It's not a choice that you
would make.
>> It's not It's not a choice that I would
make. Um
you know, I I I think that it is a very
personal decision between
these families.
And um
and honestly, my uh
for the kids that are going through
this, I mean, my honestly, my heart
breaks for them because that is that is
a weight.
Um
and something that's become so
politicized that I I just think it's so
deeply unfair to that child.
>> You know, um I agree. But um
but I think this is something that they
uh
this is a decision that the child cannot
make on their own. When you were in high
When When you were in high school,
um do you remember how many gay friends
you had in high school? Do you remember
how many gay guys were in high school
that we knew about publicly, openly? Cuz
I remember myself. I was in a school
with 4,000 kids.
It's a good question. You know you know
what's interesting. Um I don't say their
names. I don't want you to say their
names. Barry Jackson was a you know No,
but you know but you know what's
interesting. Yeah.
When I went to military school cuz I got
sent to military school when I was
young.
That was a
that was an offense that could get you
kicked out of school. I remember that.
That was so cuz remember
>> Don't ask don't we don't That was that
that was that was pre when I first went
I think don't ask don't tell was passed.
Um
but a few years after after I started
military after I started military
school.
No, in fact
Yes, don't ask don't tell was I think
year two of my military school. So
actually that was a
dismissible offense before. So you know
I actually didn't really get to know
other people who were like openly other
teenagers who were openly gay until
probably when I was like 15 16 years old
and that wasn't people I went to school
with. That was you mean the people you
went to school with? Was it a big school
or was it a smaller school or was it a
smaller school? I I think there were
about 900 cadets.
>> Okay. In my school.
>> Got it. So I actually remember a couple
guys in the military that were gay.
One of the guy was and ended up marrying
a girl and had two kids. But I'm like
hey, I remember you know he he DM'd me
on Facebook 15 years ago and said hey,
you won't believe it. I'm married with
two kids. I'm like no All right,
great. Good for you. But we we laughed
about it cuz
uh it was good conversation. He was
actually good soldier.
But in high school
what's if I say three?
That's a big number. Yeah. And it was
like nobody cared.
But one of the concerns and I'll move
on. I don't want to stay on this story
for too long. One of the concerns is
that the percentage Bill Maher talked
about this. We have you do you have the
chart I would shows
uh you know all of a sudden generations.
You and I are from a different
generation. So for me I sympathize with
this generation because I wonder how
much more exposure they're getting that
some of the kids that maybe are having a
hard time getting a boyfriend or a
girlfriend. They're like maybe I'm not,
maybe I'm this, maybe I'm that, and
they're kind of going through a
direction. And then that kind of leads
to a complete different thing. If I was
an enemy who hates America, say there's
an enemy who hates America,
and we know when we look at our current
stats right now,
our birth rate in America is 1.58.
Lowest we've had in God knows how many
years, ever. General So, we need to be
at 2.1. Now we're at 1.58.
If the LGBTQ community increases, birth
rate goes down. So, now we are
introducing all these birth controls in
there, then we have the LGBTQ, then we
have,
you know, making life expensive, then
you have affordability, then you have,
you know, some of the programming that's
happening with the kids. I mean, this is
generation, if you think about a silent
generation, only 0.8% is gay. Baby
boomers 2.6, Gen X 4.2, millennials 10
and 1/2, Gen Z 20.8, and then next
generation 41.6.
I mean, so this this part becomes where
parents,
serious parents are saying, I feel
there's guy
people that are Democrats who will never
vote Republican, but they're sitting
there saying, I'm considering going to
the other side because they're
pro-choice.
But they're not for this. And so, a part
a part of it becomes
they're going through it because maybe
kids
are being pushed to think in a certain
way, and I think it's unfair to the
kids. You know, Poland had a guy here
whose name is Dominik Tarczyński.
And he said something to me in Poland.
Lowest rate in all of EU, lowest
unemployment, okay? They're doing great
with economy,
and out of all the stats you look at, if
in school,
if you if you do sexual education to
minors in school, you go to prison,
Poland. They leave that to parents.
They're like, hey, Wes, Patrick, it's
your job to teach your kids on sexual
orientation, not teachers. If I leave it
to the teachers to teach me, they're
imposing maybe some of their opinions
that's not factual.
So, I I kind of have some some thoughts
there where I'm like, "That's an
interesting idea to have that." But
anyways, before we close, I'll give you
the final thoughts on this before we
close.
>> And and and and and this is why I think
everything about education, to include
all this, it cannot happen in the
absence of parents.
It just can. Like, parents have to be
involved in what's happening inside of
classrooms. Now, now, especially when it
comes to things like the LGBTQ
community, um I also believe that, you
know, that we're not talking about
something that for our our friends this
is a choice.
Um I I'll give you a
an example um where, you know, I
actually got involved in the in the the
the don't ask, don't tell lifting. And
it wasn't because it was like it was a
personal issue for me, but it was
because I found out that one of my good
friends uh was exited from the military
Because of being because of don't ask,
don't tell. Cuz cuz he had the audacity
of telling, you know, something that was
his truth.
And
I remember him talking about kind of the
impact it had on his family and all this
kind of stuff. And he said something
that was really important to me where he
said, "Do you think I would choose
to have my family um
discard me?"
Um
he was one of the best leaders
that I'd known in the military. Um and
still a a dear dear friend.
He was the kind of leader that
I would put my children under his
command.
Cuz he's that good.
Right? And but the army was at that
point telling him that, "But, you know
what? Because you're gay,
we don't have a place for you here."
>> '99, '98? Uh no, this was um
God, when when when was this? This must
have been like 2000
2010 or something like that, I think. Or
>> By the way, they got rid of don't ask,
don't tell in 2011, if I'm not mistaken.
>> 2011, right?
>> 2011. So, that's that's when it must
have been.
Because I I very involved. I was working
with a group called Iraq Afghanistan
Veterans of America who were doing a lot
of work on this issue. Um
the reason that I say that is because
I don't think that this is something
that people are choosing
to go and start I think that I think
that if this is I think a percentage, I
agree.
I think a percentage, I fully agree.
>> Yeah.
And and
you know, but I also think
a bigger percentage
I don't agree.
Because so I grew up in a single-family
home.
Parents got a divorce to each other
twice.
I hung out with kids from Burbank 13,
from TVR. I don't know if Toonerville
was a gang in LA. Mhm. And we had all
these other guys. And I got because I
had bad grades and I was a troublemaker,
they put me in this uh
basketball league called the New Century
City Basketball Association, something
like that in Echo Park. If you know LA
Echo Park
in the '90s, horrible. 1994 Echo Park,
horrible. Mhm. So I'm in a group with
kids who are from Black Diamonds, from
Bloods from from uh MS-13, Mara
Salvatrucha, from Toonerville, from you
name it. We're all together playing
basketball. Everybody's a One day
there's a shooting. My dad is there. My
dad just turned 84 last 2 weeks ago.
He's there and old friend of mine,
Adrian, if he sees this, he'll crack up
because we were hiding in the bathroom
cuz they're shooting everywhere.
And the helicopter comes couple guys The
guy that was a best scorer was with
Bloods. He got arrested, went to prison.
Um
so guess what? What happened to me? I
was never a gangster.
I wasn't a kid in Iran that was going to
be a gangster or tough guy.
And then all of a sudden I start like
listening to
RBL Posse, I start listening to all this
gangster rap and I start hanging out
with them and all of a sudden I'm like,
you know what? Maybe maybe I am. And
that influence me. If I don't join the
army, my life goes a very different
direction. So to me, I do agree with
you.
You know, and and I'm not a scientist to
sit here and say what happens with the
chromosomes and all this I'm not I'm not
playing that card cuz that's not my
space.
But I do believe a bigger percentage of
it
is a pattern of kids who get confused
that go through it.
I don't think this will be the topic of
discussion for election 2028. Like
meaning, you know,
whether you're born, whether you're not.
I don't think that's the issue. I think
the issue will be puberty blockers,
transgender. I think men and women
sports, I think that's going to be
there. And I think the Democratic
candidate, you will be on the stage when
you're debating, if that day comes, and
they're going to ask that question. And
how that's answered will be very
interesting to see whether you're going
to get the independent voters or not.
Cuz I think you're going to need the
independent voters. My opinion. Look
what Trump did. Trump knew he needed the
independent voters. When they asked him
about LGBTQ, what did he say? That
That's all We've already had that
discussion. I don't even need to answer
this. Just moved on.
So, a Republican took that position.
Yeah. And he moved on and it helped him.
I think on a Democratic side,
uh you're going to want the reasonable
parents to support you. And it's going
to be, "Look, I don't want any boys
competing in a women's sports." My
opinion. Let me get to the next one.
>> Yeah.
Um in regards to uh other things with
the bridge in in um
uh in um in uh uh Baltimore and uh
Maryland. Because I don't think people
give you enough credit. I think you've
done a very good job uh improving that
market. You know, if the anybody gives
credit for lowest crime. When I think
I've been to Baltimore. I used to go to
Gibson Island. There's a There's a place
called Gibson Island. Real nice place.
>> Beautiful. Beautiful place. And I'm a
baseball guy. So, look, I mean,
Baltimore's a baseball city.
>> It sure is. Uh I'm a football guy. You
know, one of my good friends, Manny
Asadi,
who is a CEO of one of the biggest
insurance company in America, number one
in Index Universal Life. He lives in
Baltimore. He's been a season ticket
holder I don't know 25 years. And he's
there. So, good people come out of this
place. When the bridge happened, uh and
we all saw the video. Okay? Everybody
saw the video what happened to it and it
got hit and all this stuff. The debris
took 38 days, right? I think 28 or 38
days to clean up. I don't know the exact
number. It's something eight.
It's either uh damage okay.
Uh uh
uh uh let me see the exact because I
want to say it correctly.
Uh Francis Scott Key Bridge took 78 days
to remove the debris. Yeah. Okay and
then it's a 1.6 mile steel truss bridge.
A lot of people say well how did
DeSantis fix the bridge that's 3 miles?
It's a very different bridge. So people
can't make that comparison it's apples
and oranges. I I'm putting that in I'm a
DeSantis guy. So I'm not pinning you
against him. I don't want to say that.
It's very different. Yeah. But then the
numbers came out that you said you want
speed. You want to get it done quick
right? Then the budget came out to 5.2
billion. I want to say somewhere around
there and saying it'll take till 2030.
To your critics that say
Governor Moore
why can't we get this thing done faster?
What do you say to them? So I'd say that
when they said it was going to take 11
months to clear the channel we got it
cleared in 11 weeks.
When they said it was going to take
years to get permitting done we got it
done in months. When they said it was
going to take literally 5 to 7 years to
get a to get a 7% design build we got it
done in 14 months. This is the fastest
moving major project inside of the
country. And people forget that initial
bridge
the Francis Scott Key Bridge was
initially built nearly a 2 mile long
bridge. That from design permitting
implementation took 12 years right?
We're talking about now getting this
thing done within literally less than
half
of the time.
And the bridge that we're going to have
to build is going to have to be a bridge
according to federal guidelines a bridge
that has more safety implementations
because what happened that morning
on March 26th can never happen again.
This is a ship the size of three
football fields that slammed into a
nearly 2 mile long bridge and took it
down instantaneously.
Um this is a engineering marvel what
happened and and you see here where
literally the the the bridge is sitting
on top of a ship.
>> Mhm. Right? Um we knew and the thing
that I was focused on is I want speed,
I want safety, and I want cost savings.
And we've been able to help to deliver
on those things. In fact, just recently
when I saw that the people who were the
contractors,
uh you know, were not were actually, you
know, estimating that this is going to
be more expensive than what we initially
laid out. I fired them.
And now we're going to go through the
process, but the work is still
continuing.
>> You're back at it again. So, from the uh
Well, the work is still happening right
now. Okay.
>> Because phase one phase one is still
going to happen for the next 6 months.
The initial the initial company that we
had as a contractor, they're going to
keep on working through January cuz
phase one still has time to go.
>> But they're not going to be the ones
that's going to get the job done.
>> I I want a different team for phase two
because
>> speed? You're not happy with the speed
or Well, A, I want it run faster, and
it's the cost.
I'm very I am a hawk when it comes to
taxpayer dollars on this. And when I saw
that the cost continued to escalate,
that's when I made the decision that I'm
going to fire them. And we're going to
go through the process that once phase
one is complete, I want phase two to
begin immediately, but I want phase two
to begin immediately with the with the
with the company that's going to get us
to the finish line. And and so, while I
know when people say they're like,
"Listen, it still seems aggressive that
you can get something like that done."
If you look at some of the comps, things
like the Gordie Howe Bridge, the Gordie
Howe Bridge a 20 years, similar size
bridge. You look at the you look at the
the the Harbor Bridge in Texas, same
thing. Where this thing took has taken
decades to get done. And I'm talking
about getting it done in a fraction of
that time. The answer is yes, because
we're focused, and again, I'm very
clear. It is speed, it is safety, and it
is cost savings. Those are the three
things that I want to be able to focus
on to make sure we can get this bridge
done. So, is it going to be above 5.2
billion?
Uh well, we'll have to wait to see what
the next contract comes back to.
>> they make? Yeah, but and and and now in
in in fairness to the other contractor,
sure, the thing that they were saying
was this, was that this thing cost you
know,
a couple billion dollars when it was
done in 1977.
Right?
Since 1977, the cost of everything has
increased. This has to be a bridge that
can take on bigger cargo and allow allow
more cargo.
>> 2,000 cars a day. I mean, this is like a
very important bridge. This is the most
This The Port of Baltimore is one of the
most important ports in the United
States of America. 2/3 of the country
get their goods from the Port of
Baltimore. It's the largest roll-on
roll-off port in the entire country.
It's the largest when it comes to spices
and sugars, etc. Like whether you are
driving in Michigan or whether you are
eating a meal in Louisiana, chances are
those goods came from the Port of
Baltimore. And that bridge is a major
artery for it. So, the reason that we
were so focused on getting that channel
cleared quickly and the reason that even
last year after the tragedy
last year was the second most productive
year in the history of the Port of
Baltimore.
So, when people talk about the speed,
this is speed that is just absolutely
unheard of when it comes to dealing with
this kind of crisis. The state of
Maryland put on a case study in how you
deal with moments of crisis. We had six
bodies
that we still had to recover and make
sure we're getting them back to their
families. So, I'm really proud of how
the state moved, but also the state
knows I'm very clear. It is speed,
safety, and cost savings.
>> Let me ask you this. Have you had a
conversation with the president about
this? Absolutely. Okay. We've and and
Secretary Duffy as well, who who's
actually been a very good partner.
>> He's he's very good. He's he's a classic
himself. He and his wife are phenomenal.
Yeah. Uh so, i- i- is it something where
did the president, when you speak with
him, offer to help you
working collaboratively together to get
it done faster? Did that conversation
take place?
>> Yeah, in fact, um not only have we been
working very closely with Secretary
Duffy on it. Uh yes, when I made the
announcement that I was firing the other
contractor cuz cuz
we weren't getting what what my
expectations were. Secretary Duffy then
put out another note from the Department
of Transportation basically echoing what
we said and saying I think the state of
Maryland did the right thing. So, this
was something that that it was both for
the not just the state, but also the
federal government came back and
piggybacked and said this was the right
thing. In the past when this has
happened cuz this has probably happened,
you know, not many times, but it's
happened in the past before.
What role does the federal government
play to help accelerate cuz this is not
just a regular place. This is a very
important bridge.
>> It is. What role has the federal
government played? So, for this bridge
the the federal government and also I I
got to give credit to Congress
and both Democrats and Republicans in
Congress because they voted for the 100%
cost share. And so the what a 100% cost
share is it's essentially bridge
financing. It's essentially saying
listen, you know, we know that this is
going in litigation and when and we know
then when the litigation is is is
settled because even Lloyd's of London
has indicated this is probably going to
be the most expensive maritime tragedy
in our nation's history.
But what they know is I can't wait for
that to be complete. So, what the
federal government is saying is that
listen, we're going to help to support
it, but essentially we are going to do
bridge financing. Once everything is
settled, that money then comes back to
the treasury. But then the federal
government on not just this project, but
the federal government when it comes to
most projects that take place around the
country, they serve as the main
underwriter because whether you're
talking about roads or bridges or
tunnels, no state has the resources to
be able to take care of all
infrastructure in your state alone. That
support comes from Congress. That
support comes from Washington. And so
this like other projects in the last
round
came to came from Washington where they
said we are going to support because we
think this project is important enough
to be able to serve as an underwriter.
Okay, fair enough and the best of luck
to you guys. This is story that came out
I think today Maryland drops
construction company for Baltimore's Key
Bridge as federal partners seeks to
lower cost. Maryland will start looking
for new construction companies working
together with the government. So, more
power to you working with the
secretary Shawn Duffy.
He seems like a stud of a guy and and
best of luck to you guys.
>> He's He's been He has been He has been a
very very
>> See, that's the part about you. Let me
tell you what This is the part that's
important about you on how you are.
That you're willing to work with
anybody. Your relationship with Oklahoma
governor, you're now Duffy. You know,
the conversation's giving credit to what
the president's doing with the baby All
this stuff is very important. This is
why
people like you as much as they do
because you know, the next level of
leadership
is is we need that because today the
biggest thing is like even California. I
don't know. I'm sure you're following it
closely because
you know, there's only 50 of you and I
believe you're the only African-American
governor we have right now. And only and
only the third in American history. And
the only one ever in Maryland.
Yeah, it's pretty So, it's not like an
it's an easy feat to do. So, you're
you're one of very few in the history of
America that we have, right?
Um
when it comes on to homelessness, okay?
Crime, you'll typically hear Baltimore
being the top five.
At one point it was one, two, three,
five. Now, some people even say six,
seven maybe. It's dropping, right? It's
dropping.
Homelessness in California, this next
phase if you choose to go through it on
the national stage as a president,
Newsom's going to be one of your
opponents if you choose to go on the
national stage.
And Katie Porter
was asked what grade do you give Gavin
Newsom on the way he's handled
homelessness because
you know, he was given $24 billion.
Taxpayers gave it to him.
$85,000 per homeless person. I think the
number The math's been done.
And she was asked what would you give,
you know, Newsom on homelessness and she
said I'm a
tough teacher, but I would give him a B,
right? Yeah. I would give him a B."
I don't know how you would answer this.
I don't even know if it's a fair
question to ask you, but you know, on
the national stage, you're a governor,
you run a state, Newsom runs a state,
he's a governor. You've been able to fix
the state. He hasn't been able to fix
the state. A lot of people say
California's worse
than it was the day he got elected, the
fifth year today. You know, he lost a
trillion dollars of wealth during COVID,
he just lost another trillion dollars
mishandling the, you know, wealth tax.
And we just saw the story they got the
1.55 million votes to be able to put it
on the ballot, so most likely it's going
to pass. Who's not going to vote?
There's only two, you know, hundred and
something, 200 billionaires in the state
of California. Of course the rest are
going to say, "This is to just to punish
the 200 people, tax the hell out of
them. Let's do the tax 5%."
What do you think has happened to the
state of California with the way Gavin
Newsom's led versus the way you've led?
Well, honestly, I I I I can tell you
about what we've done in Maryland and
why You're going to play it safe? Well,
no, and honestly, this is not a play
safe because I I I have not spent time
digging into You're about to be the vice
chair, you're the you're going to be the
chair of the go You can't give me that
answer. You're
You're You're leading all of these guys,
so you got And you know why? Because I
think we follow best practices and I
think we've got to some really
interesting best practices that I think
Maryland can share with other people and
some things that we've learned from
other from other states. And I can tell
you about some of those things as well.
How would you have Okay, so let me ask a
question a different way. You were given
24 billion dollars to fix homelessness
in the state of Maryland. What would you
have done? Well, I I can tell you what
we did to help fix homelessness without
24 billion dollars.
>> Even better. Um you know, the the first
thing that you got to do, you have to
focus on the acute problem and making
sure that housing has to become you
know, has to become an issue.
You have to make sure that people are
not becoming homeless in the first
place, which deals with the issue of
housing insecurity, which means that we
need to build more housing, right? We
have to build more affordable options
and affordable housing for people. It's
one of the big reasons why I've been
very aggressive when it comes to housing
when in my state because I don't think
the way you deal with housing and and
the rising cost of housing is by capping
the cost. I think you have to build more
housing. And so what we've done, for
example, in Maryland, where I said,
"Who's the largest landowner in the
state of Maryland?" Well, the answer is
the state of Maryland.
And I get that 70% of my state is either
water waterlined or waterlogged. You
can't build everywhere, but in the
places that you can build, you need to
build and you need to make it faster.
Cut the red tape. Cut all the
regulations and all the permitting
processes and everyone who wants to slow
this process up and say on things like
transit-oriented development and density
bonuses, get that stuff done and build
more housing. And actually, I passed
legislation that says, particularly
around around transit, trains, buses,
etc. If it is state-owned land, I want
to build housing on it, right? Cuz
that's going to increase more inventory
for people. And I know inventory of all
types, affordable housing and a whole
bunch of variety of different types of
housing.
Come up with better ways of supporting
your renters so you're not having more
people fall into homelessness. And if
people fall into homelessness, make sure
it is temporary
and make sure you can have more supports
for them. So people don't have this
revolving door when it comes to
homelessness and particularly for
children because one of the biggest
challenges you have for a child is if a
child has to move around multiple times
during a school year, that child is not
going to learn.
And that child is not going to have a
real chance of real of long-term
academic success. And so we've actually
been really successful in driving down
homelessness and in our state.
>> billion.
Without needing 24. So if you were given
24 billion, what would you have done?
Would you have said to taxpayers, "We
don't need it. Take the money back."
When we set out to create a shoe that
blends comfort, function, and luxury, we
had the choice to make [music] it fast,
we had the choice to make it cheap.
We chose neither.
Instead, we chose Tuscan, Italy.
We chose true Italian craftsmanship.
Each pair is by 50 skilled hands. We
chose patience, spending 2 years
perfecting [music] every detail, and we
chose the finest quality at every step.
Introducing
the Future Looks Bright Collection.
Not rushed, not disposable, not
ordinary.
Rather,
intentional, luxurious, timeless.
Well, I would say give me what you give
me what you need to be able to solve a
problem. And now And it's funny because
that's very much the way I think about
budgeting, period.
>> Mhm. Like I don't And it's the same way
when I think about taxes, right? I I
think there are people who think about
taxes like it's an ideology,
right? Taxes are not an ideology.
They're a tactic.
What do you need in order to get done?
And then let's focus on actually being
able to make targeted investments. In
our state, for example, you know, the 4
years that I've been the governor, do
you know we have actually had a general
fund in our state that the fund that you
know, that you the fund services You
know, I've actually decreased the
general fund every single year?
First time this has happened in decades
where the Maryland governor for four
straight years has actually decreased
the size of the budget. Because I said,
"Tell me what works and fund that. Tell
me what doesn't work
>> Every year you lowered it? Every single
year I've been the governor. Look it up.
>> Dude, that's
Every year I've been the governor, we've
lowered the general fund in the state of
Maryland. Look it up. And but it's
because I don't People oftentimes think
about a number and they move towards
number. No, tell me what you need.
Tell me what it is that we have to
resource. And I've told the state,
"We've got to do more with less."
>> Okay, so let me ask you. I just looked
up right now. What are you ranked in the
highest in taxes, right? You're ranked
eighth
to 12th, somewhere around there, as the
highest taxes in America. 10 11% tax
burden.
>> Yeah. Okay, state income tax.
>> where it was 4 years ago.
Right. Right. So, the state income tax
So, So, let me ask you this. Here's a
question for you. Yeah,
uh
here, I love him. He's phenomenal as a
governor.
And
you know, we were living in Texas. We
were happy with Texas. I escaped
California. I knew California did not
like guys like us 10 years ago when we
left. I just knew that was going to be a
problematic place. Yeah. And now they're
introducing a wealth tax.
DeSantis is thinking about He sits there
and he says, "We have $31 billion that
we were getting every year from uh
property tax." Rob, can you pull up the
number? He says, "Now I'm getting 63
billion. I don't need that additional 31
billion or 33 billion, whatever the
number is
in surplus. I want to find a way to give
that back to Floridians." Okay.
So, then he's starting to have
conversations about eliminating taxes
for
homestead.
Okay? Eliminating taxes for homestead.
>> Yep. Um
have you thought about a dramatic way
of lowering taxes so it attracts other
people to come to you
because right now, if you think about
where business owners are leaving,
a lot of people are leaving in New York
because of what Mondani is doing, what
Hochul is doing. Ken Griffin is just
having a meeting with her right now. I
think today or yesterday the meeting was
taking place. I'm like, "What are you
guys talking about? Just targeted me."
California is losing business owners
because,
you know, taxes and where they're at.
What what would you or could you do
Yeah. to work with taxes to start
attracting others, especially in a blue
state like yours, to get others to come
in and say, "Hey,
I think we can get rid of following
taxes to attract some business owners."
What would you do? So, I I think there's
a few things that we can do and and have
done. Um one is you do need to make it a
more tax-friendly environment for your
businesses. Uh this year I actually we
introduced a piece of legislation that I
just signed called the Decade Act. And
the Decade Act is actually the most
business-forward piece of legislation
that I think Maryland's probably passed
in decades.
Uh and, you know, with a Democratic
governor and a Democratic legislature,
which actually provides incentives for
businesses. It's about a hundred million
dollars tax cut uh going to businesses
that both incentivizes businesses to
stay in the state of Maryland and come
to the state of Maryland. And if you
just look in recent months, we've now
announced that that AstraZeneca has now
made the largest private investment in
Maryland in over a decade. It's going to
support about 2,600 jobs. We saw how
Samsung Biologics has just announced
that it's creating its first
manufacturing facility in the United
States and they're creating it in
Maryland. Um we saw how the Sphere
in Las Vegas, the Sphere uh is now, you
know, it's it announced it's doing its
second one in Abu Dhabi.
It's second one they're doing in the
United States is in Prince George's
County, Maryland. Stop it. Prince
George's County, Maryland is where the
Sphere is coming.
>> Why? And and I'm I'm I'm I'm telling you
why. Sick. It's Well, it's because we
provided the right kind of incentives
for them to choose to come to Maryland.
And that is going to be worth about
6,000 jobs uh in just in the creation
and over 8,000 jobs once it's created.
Right? So, we are making sure we're
incentivizing our businesses to be able
to come to the state of Maryland.
Providing the right kind of incentives
and providing the right kind of climate
and environment. But also, we have to
make sure we're investing in the things
that makes businesses want to come to
our state. You know what makes business
want to come to our state? That it's one
of the most educated states inside the
country. That we have now they Top five.
That's exactly right. And if you look at
the state of Maryland, we have the
fastest jumps in reading scores anywhere
in the United States of America under
the leadership of Dr. Carey Wright. That
we are making sure that we're providing
you know, a greater level of support
when it comes to our anchor
institutions. Like we are the home of
the NSA. We're the home of US Cyber
Command. We're the home of the United
States Naval Academy, of Johns Hopkins
University, of of of of of of NIST, of
of you know, the only pure play public
company in quantum, which is IonQ. We're
the literally we are the capital of
quantum. And so, you have to also create
the ecosystem that makes businesses want
to come, that makes businesses want to
grow and thrive. And so, that's the
thing I think you have to be be to do.
That yes, it's about tax policy and
making it more attractive for
businesses. Uh Uh and by the way,
we're now seeing how Maryland's
population is the fastest growing
population we've had in Maryland in over
a decade. And so, you both have
>> Your net migration isn't impressive.
Well, a great agreed. But but if you
look at if you look at the population
growth that we've had over the past
decade, net migration has actually been
a challenge in Maryland that we've had
for a very long period of time, but
we're now actually starting to see a
population growth. Yeah, so 10 to 23 a
net loss of 300,000 residents. 2.3
million leaving and 2 million moving in.
So, that's net 300,000.
>> Yeah. Can you pull up by state, Rob?
By state, I wonder where Maryland ranks
because to me, 100 million is good, but
I think you have a bigger opportunity.
You know you know what would be a very
>> I agree with you, by the way. You know
what would be a very creative story?
Um what what you your governor till what
year? What's the Till 2030. So, I'm I'm
up for re-election. I'm up for
re-election this November. You're up for
re-election this November. Okay. Uh uh
And and by the way, you could
go through it again and then still run
for president. That's something that you
can do, right? The answer is yes. I
think you The answer is yes. Yeah. But
you know what would be crazy? Is you
know, when you think about a state like
yours,
if if you made a radical decision to
Okay, what's this one here? 50 states
from what year? Since 2010. Florida's at
the top. Mhm. Texas, Carolina, Arizona,
South Carolina, Tennessee.
Red red red red red red red red. You see
the red states? Yeah. Okay, they're net
they're gaining.
Then you go to not moderate, go to the
bottom. Let's do Okay, bottom is what?
Uh uh biggest losers. Go to biggest
losers.
You got California, Gavin Newsom,
New York, Hochul, Mumdani, Illinois,
Pritzker,
Jersey, Connecticut, Maryland.
You're at 45. Yeah. Net migration. Now,
2010, I'd like to know what it is since
you became governor because 2010 is kind
of unfair
because you were not a governor. You
were still in the military.
>> I was still in the military. Exactly.
Right. No, no, that's why I'm saying.
So, it's unfair to judge it from that
number. Uh
but I I think some blue states if a blue
state became business-friendly
so this is 2023 to 2025
oh wow, Florida jumps to six. Carolina's
one, Texas
South Carolina, Tennessee, Arizona,
Florida, Idaho, Georgia. Okay, so it's
still red. And then go to the bottom.
Uh all the way to the bottom.
You're still ranked at the same place.
Yeah. 45th. And then bottom I'm assuming
California is still the worst. What
could you do to increase net migration?
Because data doesn't lie. Why are people
leaving certain states and going to red
states? So, I mean, cost of living is
still very much an issue for a lot of
places. Now, you know, if you actually
took a look and you started looking at
things like education levels, if you
started looking at things like uh you
know, you know, the the the
attractiveness for corporations to be
able to select different places I think
you would actually see more of a flip.
You would see where uh you know, a lot
of those states are at the bottom of
that actually have some of the best when
it comes to healthcare, best when it
comes to education. Uh Rob Rob to be
fair, Rob, run the report on education.
I I I want to I don't want to be a
one-sided. Let's run the report on
education to see where they rank where
Maryland ranks. But to me, I think
Wes, it's
massive opportunity for business owners.
Business owners just are sitting there
saying, "Dude, you don't like me? I will
leave. I'll go anywhere and create
jobs." That's right. So, what what can
blue states do to get a positive net
migration cuz it's not been happening?
So, I think there's a few things. One is
you've got to be Yeah, and you've got
you've got to be focused on what is it
that you are really good at.
And I think that's actually been part of
the problem. It's It's the same thing
and I think about it from from a
founder's perspective and from an
entrepreneur's perspective, right? Where
if I ask a founder
"What is is that you do?"
No founder worth his salt is going to
tell me, "Oh, I do everything."
Because then what he's telling me is
you're not focused.
>> Mhm. What does your company do?
>> Mhm. And why are you best in class? And
I think part of the problem is that for
a lot of states, that's kind of been the
answer. Where if you look at Maryland,
Maryland has said, you know, that we
have been focusing on the eds, the feds,
and the meds, right? That's kind of been
Maryland's economic base.
And it's been like that for a very long
time. One of the things that I've been
focusing on is saying, what are we doing
to diversify our economy? Because we
cannot simply rely on who's sitting in
the Oval Office, or if you look at the
fact that, you know, in the past year,
I've had over 31,000 people fired.
Federal workers.
You know, and and so that's more than
any state in this country. There's been
no state that's been under a greater
level of assault than what we've seen uh
from from this federal administration
than Maryland.
So, we've got to find a way to diversify
our economy and quickly. And so, I
decided that I said, here are the things
that we are going to target. We're going
to target IT, we're going to target life
sciences, we're going to target
aerospace and defense.
It's very clear why. Because some of the
greatest assets in the country reside
and exist in the state of Maryland. And
it's insane for us not to be able to
compete for those things. I think about,
for example, biotech in, you know, then
Massachusetts 20 years ago.
They said, you know what, we're going to
be the home of biotech because we're the
home of
Harvard, we're the home of MIT, da da
da. And so, they said, we're going to
invest in biotech. And guess what? They
became the global head of biotech
because they were intentional. We've got
to be intentional about the way we're
thinking about cyber, about the way
we're thinking about AI and quantum,
about the way we're thinking about life
sciences.
>> How do you do that? How do you do that
with policies? How do you How do you
make a dramatic policy change today
for a business own because here's here's
a massive opportunity have. Do you think
people from New York want to move to
Florida or you think they'd rather move
to Maryland? You think people from New
York want to make that massive If some
people like East Coast the cold weather,
some people like that area. So,
Proximity to Washington, D.C.
>> Oh my god, totally. So, so
>> if I was a governor of a blue state like
Maryland and I know New York is royally
screwing up. Now, you may not say it
because, you know, it's party lines and
you know, you know, some of the stuff
that
>> I I don't do party lines.
>> Okay, so I'm just saying they're they're
really screwing up and I don't know if
you would agree with that or not.
They're losing business owners, right?
New York is losing business owners, so
is California.
It's a lot easier for me to move from
New York to somewhere in Maryland to
move down here. And we and we and and
frankly, we've seen that, right? We've
seen businesses who, you know, for
whatever reason uh have chosen and
chosen Maryland because they like the
regional landscape.
>> negative in that migration. It's It
needs to be bigger than that. Yeah. It
needs to be bigger than that because
right now, you know, I'll walk around,
I'll go to Palm Beach, okay, and I'll
run into So, "Hey, where are you from?"
"Oh, I'm from Illinois." "What part?"
"Chicago." "What What brought you down
here?" "Taxes, lifestyle, safety."
"Really?" "Yeah." "Where are you from?"
"New York." "Where are you from?"
"California." It is, you know, when I
was in California, we When I was in
Texas, we saw a lot. We moved to Plano,
Texas and Addison and Preston Hollow.
So, you run into a lot of Californians
that are leaving. Here, it's a lot of
New York, you know, it's a lot of DC,
it's a lot of Illinois that you'll run
into people. You know,
and you see DeSantis. DeSantis created
policies that got people to say, "You
know what? I'm moving to Florida." And
in a major way. In a major way.
But if you guys are blue state like
Maryland, and I think you're reasonable
enough to think about ways to bring
small business owners, and that
you're on the stage 2027, 2028, and it
shows, "Hey, net migration for small
business owners. Look what's going on."
You're going to get conservatives who
are going to be like, "Wait, we have to
choose between who and who?"
Cuz right now, I think on paper,
choosing a Democrat 10 out of 10 times,
I choose you over over Newsom, and it's
not even close.
Well,
and and I'll say this for you. You know,
and from for me, this has, you know,
nothing to do with with what anyone else
is doing, right? It It's about what can
we do to make my state win?
And I know there's more we've got to do.
I know the kind of hole that we had to
walk into. I know we walked in with a
multi-billion-dollar structural deficit,
and part of the reason is because our
state is very good at spending.
Right? If you look at the 7 years before
I became the governor, spending in
Maryland increased by 70%.
In the previous 7 years?
>> 70. Yes. 7 years before I became the
governor. 70. It's nuts, right? And GDP
stayed relatively flat. So, I'm like, so
hold on. So, we were spending, we just
weren't growing. Wow. And so, one thing
that So, I said, you know, so what do
you do to be able to address that? I
frankly just put on my business hat and
say, what what do you have to do to
address it? You have to control your
spend. You have to increase your top
line, right? You do those two things,
that actually increases growth.
And so, that's what we've had to do.
That's why, you know, like we mentioned,
for 4 years in a row, decrease the
general fund within the state of
Maryland, control your spend, and
actually invest in industries that are
going to help you to grow. So, while
we've made movements on those things,
there is no doubt there's still more
that needs to get done. And there's a
measure of urgency that we've got to
move at from our state that, you know, I
I you know, for anyone who just wants to
sit there and say, oh, you know, they
have it all figured out or any of these
people have it all figured out, the
answer is, no, we don't.
Because as long as you're dealing with
some of those data points, it means we
still got work to do.
>> Why do you think DeSantis is winning?
You know, listen, I I mean, you winning
with getting businesses come down?
Winning with a lot of different things.
Winning with businesses, winning with
people that are here who are staying,
winning with, you know,
younger generation coming that There's
many ways Florida's winning right now.
Why do you think he's winning? So, I
mean, I I I mean, I honestly, I have the
same way when I was about I have not
spent my time digging into other states.
I would include Florida in that
category. The thing that I The thing
that I do think is this. And here's the
thing that I think we want to make sure
that we are modeling and making an offer
for.
Is that when people are trying to decide
between, okay, am I thinking about
Maryland or am I thinking about Florida?
I want to be able to leverage the things
that I think we have a unique
competitive advantage at. So, for
example, you there's a there's a
proximity leverage to Washington, D.C.
and and that whole area that I think we
have a a specific focus on. I think if
you look at things like healthcare, I
think if you look at things like
education, I think if you look at things
like both K-12 education and higher
education, we've got to make sure we're
leveraging that. But, also we have to
make the business community
feel like they are they are not just
welcomed, but supported in that. And
that can't just be passive.
>> business community. So, if you take the
business community, Florida's winning
the Florida's winning the business
community nationwide. The only one that
maybe you can make an argument for is
Texas. Why do you think they're winning?
Why do you think Texas and Florida
winning the business community? Well, I
I think it cannot just simply be and the
answer is not just simply well, it's
just tax policy. I think that's one of
them. I don't think it's the only thing.
>> it's I do think it's one of them. I
think it's one of them. But, I think
you've also got to be able to compete
and win in other areas. So, listen,
is is Maryland or any of these other
other places are we ever going to say
this is going to beat Texas on tax
policy? No, right? And and I don't and I
don't think that's actually even a
realistic expectation. However, do you
know what is a real expec- a realistic
expectation? Find the things that CEOs
care about when they're making their
decisions. So, when I'm speaking to CEOs
all the time and and listen, I always
say when I go to different places, I I I
my intention I'm bringing three
businesses back with me, right? So, a
lot of time talking with CEOs. Mhm. And
cuz that's also part of my job and it's
also my background.
And so, when I'm talking to them like,
what are the things that you're most
interested in and you're focused on?
Mhm. And they'll talk about tax climate,
but in many ways tax climate for a lot
of these states, it's the same when
you're when I was doing banking and I'm
really thankful for the time that I had
to do banking, but you realize that
whether it was Goldman or Morgan Stanley
or City offering something, we're
talking bips of difference on a deal.
A company didn't choose to go to Goldman
or Morgan Stanley because one was
offering a better deal cuz generally all
the deals were in the similar type of
bandwidth and some were offering
>> Right. You're that that is very small
difference. Right. Here it's massive.
Yes.
>> Wes, I'll give you I'll give you an
idea. I sold I I had I had I had my
business in state of California.
And I started hearing California's
whispering about clawback taxes. Like
you know how Canada does exit tax? I
think it's called exit tax. Clawback
taxes. What clawback taxes? What do you
mean? If you leave but this you come
back you have to pay for this. I'm like
wait a minute. I know my business was
going to sell.
So I started doing the math. Said okay,
if my business sells for $50 million
I'm going to have to pay 13.3% here.
What's 13.3%?
Six and a half million, okay? Six some
If it sells for $100 million I'm saving
$13.3 million. I mean dollars.
I sat there. My wife did not want to
leave Cali She's from Houston, Texas.
She does not want to leave. I said baby
you don't have an option. We're moving
to Texas.
We moved to Texas
uh in 2016.
We moved to Florida 2021. We sold the
business June 27th of 2022
for $250 million. Do you know I owned
88% of the company?
13.3% equals what? If I take Let's just
do the math right now so we kind of see
how this works. I just want to say how
much money was saved. And I'm just
giving basic math here, right? If I take
250
times 88%
>> Mhm.
Okay. times .133
My kids got an additional $29 million
net in my pocket. Why would I stay in
California? Why why would I stay in some
of these states that I have to pay that?
So people are starting to sit there and
say why would I do so at the end of the
day
people who are small business I'm not a
I'm running Open AI. I'm not you know,
Sergey Brin with $265 billion or Musk
who left California or some of these
other I'm not Ken Griffin in Illinois.
I'm a small business owner that grew it
and I sold it for a good amount.
Families got some money.
I sat there. I'm like, I'm not paying
that $29 million to tell me
>> mean It's a mean It's a meaningful
difference. And that's the thing, right?
It's like And I think part of the thing
that we all have to do as chief
executives is is you have to be able to
make an argument to business leaders and
to and small business leaders large
large large corporations say like
what is staying here worth it to you
for? Right?
>> Let me Let me keep more of the money to
make the decision instead of giving it
to the federal government or the state.
>> Or the state. But but and and it's also
what are the things that you care about?
Right? And so part of it is going to be
absolutely If you If you
>> Taxes, regulation, talent. Yes. Quality
of life.
What Where Where do I want my kids to be
able to grow up? Where do I want them to
going to schools? Where do I have Where
they going to be safe?
>> You have his sense of the historic.
Maryland has a sense of historic.
>> Exactly.
>> baseball. You have Ravens. You have Ori
You have a lot. But we have to be also
be able to move with a sense of urgency
on economic diversification and
attractiveness when it comes to
business. Listen, since I've been the
governor and I'm and I'm very proud of
this. Since I've been the governor, we
have added over 35,000 new businesses to
the state of Maryland. Either businesses
that have grown within Maryland or
businesses that we've gone and stolen
from other states. So we're very We're
We're happy that we're actually making
progress on that front. Since I've been
Since I've been the governor and this is
despite watching what's happened with
our federal workforce which I which I
talked about. We've added nearly 100,000
new jobs to the state to the state of
Maryland. And by the way, that's
majority that's a majority private
sector jobs that have been added. So
we're very happy about that, but I'm
also very clear we've got to move faster
because that economic diversification,
being able to focus on these new
industries of the future, the places
that we can uniquely capture that type
of alpha and that type of growth for our
state is something that we can't
compromise on. And I think for too long,
we've been a state that has relied on
asking more of the people who are there
and not producing enough to be able to
keep them.
And I think if we can change that
mindset and change that mentality as we
start to make a move towards we know we
have more work to do.
Uh I think that's going to be the right
answer particularly in the neighborhood
that that we that we call home as well.
>> I think when your age starts with 65,
maybe 70, I think we're going to be
neighbors in Palm Beach.
>> [laughter]
>> Who knows? I don't think you will be
because you have to stay there as as a
as a Maryland guy. And and I and I and
honestly [laughter] and here's the thing
it's like and I I I I love my state and
I love what it offers. And honestly, do
you know what I'm trying to do right
now? I want to make sure that you don't
have to be in Palm Beach.
I want to make sure that every single
Marylander doesn't feel like they have
to go anywhere.
I want people to know that Maryland is a
place that you don't just want to grow
and stay and build, but you want to have
your kids grow up there.
>> man. You can do something really as a
blue state. You can
You can truly confuse Republicans to say
Wait, this guy Wes Moore's very
confusing. What is this guy You have You
truly have a shot at changing the face
of the Democratic Party cuz it's a lost
right now.
So, here's the numbers. I know you can't
say anything. Kamala Harris surges in
new 2028 poll. Uh report came out I
think yesterday. I don't know if you see
the Do they show everybody else
underneath the list?
Rob, do you have that or not? I know she
came up yesterday
and they had a list of them.
Uh uh Oh, here we go. Um Notably not
result in No, there was something I saw
on X that actually showed percentage
where it was.
And Kamala was at the top. I'll say
this. You don't need to say this.
There is nowhere
where I see her ahead of you.
Nowhere. You've ran a state. You were in
the military. You've been in the private
sector.
Okay.
Family guy, personal,
you know, faith,
you you understand what
people in business go, you're willing to
talk to anybody, you don't think you're
above everybody, you don't So, to me,
you know, that's that part. Pritzker, I
don't think he's the guy because he has
a lot of things to explain for for
Illinois. You By the way, these are your
friends. So, yeah, I know you you know,
Josh Shapiro, I'm a fan of Josh Shapiro.
I actually like Josh Shapiro on the
Democratic ticket. I think
I think if Biden would have chosen him
as a VP, I think it could have been a
different result if they would have
chosen him because this isn't about DEI.
Like, you're not a DEI hire, even though
you're African-American,
it's not because you're African-American
you became the governor. You're you're a
governor because you kicked everyone's
ass. So, it's not like it's a DI DI
hire, which a lot of people would have
said that Kamala Harris was a DI hire.
I'm saying it. You're not saying it.
I'll take the heat for saying that.
And then you go to Newsom with the
record. So,
I don't know, man. I really think you
you're the number one draft pick for for
me for 2028. The right marketing, the
right campaign, the right timing of the
book being launched, podcast tour, going
out there talking to a bunch of guys
like this on the podcast on the other
end, people seeing how you handle
yourself doing all that other stuff, but
you know, just the same way you won as
governor where you were at barely 1% on
the primary and then all of a sudden,
boom, then you get a call saying, "Wait
a minute, this guy's the general.
Obama's calling you." And then the rest
is history.
I I and I I'll I'll say this. I um one
And and you're right. Uh you know, those
people who you mentioned, um They're
friends of yours.
>> Yeah. And and like and sometimes people
like, you know, oh, they're political
friend like some of them are like
legit. Like, sometimes when you're
really wrestling something, um you know,
being a governor sometimes can be
lonely.
And there's not many people you can call
up who
when you have a conversation with them,
you don't always have to provide
context.
And some of those folks you mentioned
are some of the people who I will call
up when I don't have time to provide
context and they'll just give me their
thoughts and their advice and so some of
them are just legit friends.
Um, the thing I will say You're going to
compete against a lot of these guys.
Well, no. Well, the thing I'll say is
this. If you ask people cuz this is the
equivalent of 2020, right?
If you ask people in 2020, you went to a
Maryland 2020 and say, "You know what?
Your next governor is going to be Wes
Moore."
You know what most Marylanders would
have said? Who the hell is Wes Moore?
>> [laughter]
>> They had no idea who I was and so I just
think the whole idea of who is the
frontrunner, who is the this, who is the
that in 2026,
about 2028
is um, you know, I I think history has
shown that um, you know, that that's not
something that people pay much attention
to.
>> Are you Are you friends with Rubio or
uh, DeSantis or Vance? Is there a
friendship? There's a relationship
there? There's There's not as much with
um, there's not as much with them. I I
actually got to know J.D. years ago.
Um, and actually ironically it was
because I wrote a book called The Other
Wes Moore
and he wrote a book called Hillbilly
Elegy and there were a couple times we
did things, you know, because they're
like, "His story is kind of the story of
rural poverty and The Other Wes Moore is
the story about urban poverty." And so
it's kind of like this I totally see it.
comeback kind of right?
>> see it. And he was a military guy. He
was all this kind of stuff and I was and
I'm a military guy even though he was a
Marine and I was I was an Army guy.
Army's always better by the way. It's
just I I couldn't agree with you more. I
I mean, Marines I I mean, they're
they're they're it's they're fine, but
>> [laughter]
>> they're fine. We're going to get in
trouble. They're going to run into us.
>> know. I know. I know. But But so I so I
got to know got to know uh, you know,
him him through that. Um, you know, the
the the thing though that does, if I'm
just being totally honest, um,
that person who I, you know, got to know
not not terribly well, but just to know
them, um,
just doesn't seem like the same person
that I'm seeing right now. JD? Yeah.
Tell me why. Because
I just feel like the
the foundation feels different.
And that's one thing I always tell
people is like I remember telling my
team
when I first ran for governor. I said,
"Listen, y'all.
Most people don't know who I am.
I have no problem
introducing myself I will spend all day
long introducing myself to people who
don't know me.
I won't spend a second
reintroducing myself to people who do
know me.
That I take pride in, you know, when
people say like when I'm all done with
this politics thing
um
do you know the comment that is going to
make me the happiest? If people are like
"He's the same dude."
Like I've known Wes for 20 years. He
hasn't changed. He is who he is. You
like him, dislike him.
But he is who he is.
And he's comfortable in his own skin.
Like that's what I want people to always
believe in me. Um
I don't know if I can say that about JD.
And that
is not
disappointing. It's actually kind of
heartbreaking.
Um cuz I think that's just tough. And I
think that's a really tough existence.
Um but um but you know, but I but again,
you know, like we talked about before
some of these other Republican governors
I mean, Stitt
uh Spencer Cox in Utah. Like these are
these are my guys, man. I mean, and
people who I just really
lean on, laugh with
>> Do you you understand to speak a lot or
no?
Not a lot cuz he doesn't do a lot with
the with the National
>> low-key guy. Yeah, he Yeah, he he he
doesn't he does not do a lot with the
National Governors Association at all.
At all?
>> Which is which is I I and I'm not going
to lie. Um and I and I hope he he hears
me on this. Like it is a bit
disappointing because I think um it
could add value to him and I think he
could add value to it.
And so, especially as I'm taking on as
chair of the National Governors
Association in in in June.
Um I would love to have Ron more active
in the organization.
>> Have you called him? Have you guys
Have you reached out to him? I haven't
reached out to him about this. At all?
Like reaching out and talking to him or
just about this specifically?
>> No, just about this specifically.
>> So, you guys have spoken. Oh, no. We
we've spoken. We've met each other.
We've spoken. So, abs- absolutely.
>> No issue No issues when you guys speak.
No.
>> Mutual respect.
>> No. No. I Absolutely. I I know you.
>> what, though? Ron, you know,
he uh um
he's not a like, you know, to me, he's
such an operator and a doer Yeah.
that he is
very much in it.
He's He's You know how you say in the
business, on the business? He is so in
it, right? Where you,
you know, you're going out there shaking
hands, talking to people, doing your
thing, you know, you're being seen.
I think he can probably work on doing
that more. And this is my guy. This is a
guy that I support in a big way. So,
especially if he wants to go on to the
national scale,
you know, you you you you have to be
seen with guys on the other side. It
can't just be only conservatives.
Um
and
>> about Ron? I'm talking for Ron. I'm not
talking to you, cuz you you're doing it
with that You'll go You know, you're If
you're coming here, you'll go anywhere.
So, it's not like you'll go, you know,
uh but you know, I'm sure you know
behind closed doors that I like you. And
I'm sure we know, like we've had the
conversation with these different guys
that we are friends with, cuz I think
you're a fair guy. Let me Let me talk to
you as a military guy. Yeah.
Afghanistan. What What do you think
about what's going on with Iran? I'm
honestly curious. What's your opinion?
Because that's more of a foreign, you
know, do you think that could have been
prevented? Are you somebody that's
saying, you know, you support the
president what he's doing? What's your
position on that?
>> It It It It absolutely could have been
prevented. And then the problem with the
So, I I have a few different issues with
it. Um one is, for example, I was
actually a fan publicly. And I know some
people got on me about it, about
Midnight Hammer.
I was like, I think that's a smart
operation.
I think it was there was risk analysis.
I think there was enough international
consensus and coalition about a need to
be able to address it.
>> Mhm. And at least from what we heard
from the initial reports, um it
accomplished
the set out established mission, right?
>> I think that's necessary and required
for military operations, right? They
were clear about what is the consensus
and the goal. Specific for Iran to not
have nuclear capabilities.
>> Correct. For that reason.
>> And I thought Midnight Hammer was the
right kind of operation. With the
outcome of eliminating Iran having
nuclear weapons. Correct.
>> capabilities. Okay.
>> And and and I and I and I think there is
a I think there is a at least I believe
there's a bipartisan consensus of the
danger of the Iranian regime having
nuclear weapons, right? And I very much
fall into that that category.
Um I am I am not confused about the
danger that that regime pose to the
world.
>> Mhm. The truth is, probably both for you
and myself, we lost people
because of the Iranian regime,
>> Mhm. right? So, I'm very clear on that.
>> Mhm.
There's a difference between Midnight
Hammer and what we're doing right now.
Because Midnight Hammer I understood
risk calculation
and understood like what was it that we
were looking to accomplish and once
mission accomplishment was laid out,
then the operation is complete. No
mission creeps.
Cuz there's nothing that
worries me as a military guy more than
mission creep. What is the mission? Know
what to accomplish and then once it's
accomplished, if you have something
else, that's a secondary operation. This
is no mission creeps.
With this mission,
I feel like there's three things we
should know every time you decide to
deploy military personnel. One,
was military force and kinetic force the
last option?
Two,
what is the end state and the mission
that people can understand?
And that you're able to bring the
American people along for it as well,
because the American people are paying
for this. I mean, we saw testimony today
indicating that, you know, and this is
this is, you know, DOD's numbers, where
they're talking about this has cost
around $25 billion so far.
Have we really explained to the American
people
what $25 billion has gone towards? And
the third thing is is that what is the
international coalition
that you're building around it? Now, I'm
not saying there needs to be an
international coalition to be able to
fight wars, because the truth is
the US military's one of one.
If the US military's coming after you,
there's nothing you can do.
We're that good.
We're that good, right? We are one of
one. However,
it takes a coalition not to fight the
war, but to build the peace.
Right? Because one side can start a war.
Generally, one side cannot end it.
That's where we need to have a sense and
a consensus of what this thing is going
to look
>> You're referencing NATO. Is that Is that
a NATO message?
>> No, I think I think I think it's it's
past NATO. And first of all, I actually
think it starts more with the regional
partners.
Right? Because I think Is NATO going to
be important in it? Yeah. But I think
NATO also has his hands full in other
things. I'm talking about the regional
partners. I'm like,
are we making sure that we're getting
the UAE involved? Are we making sure
What has been the conversations with
Pakistan? What has been the
conversations with Saudi Arabia? What
has been the conversations with with
with with Egypt and all the other part
of Israel? All these other partners that
are going to have to be involved in
this. And I feel like when you're
thinking about all those three criteria,
was kinetic operation the last option?
Was there a stated end goal and a
stated, you know, real mission
accomplishment of what this is going to
look like?
And did you do the work
to be able to build out the inner
caliber coalitions? I I think the answer
in all three of those is is no.
And that's what makes me so
bothered
about where we are right now, where I
think there is no one who wants this war
to end more right now than Donald Trump.
He wants this over.
But again, one side can start a war.
Generally, one side can't end it. Did
you support what he did with Venezuela?
Cuz I know midnight hammer you said yet,
but did you like the way he did
Venezuela? In, out, got Maduro, boom,
took control. You like the way he did
Venezuela?
>> I I I think that I'm
>> That was like a ridiculous operation the
way they did it.
>> It was a ridiculous military operation,
sure, 100%.
>> Yeah.
I think the thing that
society can't confuse though is again,
our military can kind of do anything.
Um
while our military can do anything,
I don't think our military should do
everything.
And I would actually put that in the
same category, right? Where if you say,
"Listen, the job is to go take out
Maduro." And the job is to make sure
that you are securing the capital and
the job is to make Our military can do
that all day long and twice on Sundays.
But what becomes the larger conversation
that is then being had about basic
measurements of stability, about what
does this thing look like in 6 months,
in 12 months, and in 18 months? And if
the answer is And if the answer is
simply that well, you're still looking
at the same type of abuses and maybe
what now we've gotten some, you know,
some more barrels of oil out of it. Um
is that worth that potential risk and
cost analysis? And that's the thing that
I don't know.
>> Oh, but if you if you think about like a
a
Go go to the other side of the argument
because I do think there's a lot of
uncertainty with this. Fair enough,
that's that's not undisputable. The 13
lives cost, you know, $25 billion. I
even think it's more than $25 billion,
but let's just say low numbers $25,000.
Like $51 billion, but let's say 51
>> I I agree. That's probably my number.
Yeah. So uh uh if I think about the way
he did it.
So he whispers Greenland, people lose
their minds. Okay? Why did he say
Greenland? Well, we need the resources
from there because of China. Okay, so he
goes gets Venezuela.
And he's doing all the boats and
everyone's getting upset and all of a
sudden boom, we got Maduro. So, then,
suddenly, Venezuela's part of OPEC.
We're not part of OPEC. Venezuela's I
think they're number seven for the most
production out of everybody. Yep.
And then,
he gets the Panamanian president
to tell China, "CK Hutchinson, get these
ports out. You have no longer
jurisdiction here."
So, you mean to tell me they know No,
they don't. China doesn't That's
massive. So, that's two. So, now China
cannot bully us
with Panama Canal, and China needs
Venezuela. Now, Venezuela's under
control of US pretty much, if you think
about it. The VP
reports to him. And then he goes and
does this to Iran.
If he's able to pull this off, where now
with the blockade, every day Iran is
bleeding $450 million,
$12 to $13 billion per month,
1 million jobs lost directly, another
million lost indirectly,
food prices 67% up year over year.
They're getting destroyed. All the
people that have been gone,
the leader went and met with Putin
couple days ago, taking a picture
together, conversation makes sure Putin
is like, "I got your back."
If he's able to
get the IRGC to be gone,
where now Gulf states are supporting
what he's doing.
UAE now left OPEC. You better believe
UAE's got a relationship with Trump that
they're talking offline and saying,
"Hey, don't worry about it. I'm going to
get you a bunch of business. Leave it.
You're going to be fine."
OPEC is now sitting there cuz OPEC is
Iran, Iraq, all these other guys, right?
Cuz number one is Saudi, number two is
Iraq, three is used to be Iran, now it's
UAE, and then four is I think Iran. Yep.
If he's able to get this thing done and
get rid of IRGC, let's say in the next 6
weeks, story drops,
IRGC's gone, they sign a 20-year no no
clear capabilities, they're doing
nothing,
and we
have partners where nobody can come and
do anything with us in in
Strait of Hormuz. We're good to go. Now,
we just shipped 910,000
barrels to Japan that just arrived today
or a couple days ago. So, now people are
ordering from us
and China sitting there saying, "Wait a
minute. I can't get my oil out of Iran
straight of Hormuz. I can't get oil from
Venezuela. I can't
Wait a minute. I'm cornered now. Don't
you Would you be able to comfortably
give him the credit on this
if that ends up happening? If it's a big
if. 5 to 10% chance of that happening.
But if it happens I I
I actually don't think it's 5 to 10%. I
think it's more than that.
>> However, of course
>> Okay. Listen. All right. If if all of
those variables are in place All right.
>> then that would be extraordinary.
Um but here is but here is what we know
right now is right now we have a total
blockade
of the Strait of Hormuz which is having
very real consequences in in And again,
not just in the United States. I mean
people say, "Yeah, it's having huge
impact on gas prices in the US." Yes, I
mean gas prices what's over 420 now on
national average. But but that's just
the US. This is having huge
international It is. implications It is.
right? That we still have military
personnel that are being deployed to
include my old unit and I believe to
include the 101st as well. And people
have to remember, that's not free.
Like every time our units move
the American people are paying for this.
>> Gulf states want IRGC to be gone. 100%
>> if we're able to do that that's massive.
But we also know that we're talking
about a regime that at the start of the
year right? When we had an uprising and
there were what 20 25,000 people Mhm.
that this regime just mowed down Mhm.
and massacred
>> Mhm.
What we haven't seen in the past 60 70
days is the same type of uprising.
We haven't seen it. Well, the internet
is still not there. So we still can't
see anything. They don't know what's
going on. Fair. But but we haven't seen
that same
And you're right. The internet's not
there. So we so but
And I don't know if you believe that
that energy is happening right now.
>> The uprising internally? Internally and
sorry, internally, yes.
>> No, they have the the the challenge they
have with that, which is to give you
credit on the argument is they thought
the military would flip on them and
decide to go and say, "Look, well, I'm
not with you, IRGC. Whatever you guys
are doing, I'm out." That hasn't
happened yet. And the weapons that we
tried to give to courage, they kept it.
It never went to the people.
>> Exactly.
>> So, that part
>> Exactly. I I agree that that part's
right. And then Reza Pahlavi is doing a
pretty good job, you know,
going out there speaking. He's going
viral, but quite frankly, mobilizing
military hasn't happened. The people
have come out. The people have come out
for a lot of things, but the mobilizing
part with the military side hasn't
happened.
>> And unfortunately, you know, as we find
in these situations, the guys with the
guns generally have the bigger voice.
>> You're right. And that's the issue that
we're facing right now. Is that is you
know, when people talk about, "Well,
what is going to be the regime change?"
For me, regime change is less about
personnel, it's more about ideology.
Right? It's like you could have a regime
change of people, but do conditions
change for the people? And let listen,
take take take other examples. Take
um
take Cuba.
Right? Take the Cuban example after
Fidel died, right? Fidel died, Raul
takes over. That's a regime change.
It wasn't?
And I think we we have to really think
critically about what that means and
about what the goal then becomes and
what it looks like because the same type
of energy that we were seeing at the
start of the year when it comes to
people really uprising and then that's
when I think there was a hope for people
that the United States and others would
come up and support that. And
tens of thousands of people were killed.
So, that same energy is not there right
now, which is not providing any forms of
incentive for
a regime change in its real meaning to
actually exist right now for the RGC.
>> Very low I'm saying 5 to 10%. You're
saying lower. You're probably right that
the chances is slim. But that's even
more of a thing that if he does pull it
off, I am so curious to know how the
critics are going to come out and say
Mr. President, credit to you for pulling
it off. I'm curious to know what's going
to happen there.
>> Will you hear me right now?
>> No, I respect that. And I don't I don't
put you as a critic. I actually think
you're a reasonable player. I'm talking
about the guys that there's nothing that
anybody can do right. You're not in that
state. You're you're fairly reasonable
guy. Now, I will say one thing though. I
still think though that there needs to
be a bigger conversation in Congress
about how they are looking at war
powers. Because and again, to be clear,
this is not a Trump thing.
We Our last official war was World War
II.
So, you're trying to tell me the United
States has not been in conflicts since
World War II? We've been in conflicts
every year
>> Nonstop.
>> since World War II. But the president
has the flexibility to be able to do it.
Now, do I think there needs to be a
bigger Do I think a president needs
flexibility because a president is
dealing with more information than
anyone in Congress.
>> And more than definitely more than any
of us, right? So, a president needs to
have a measure of flexibility to be able
to do that.
>> it. And I want him to, right? And that's
why I want him to, right? And that's why
elections matter. Have consequences.
>> Right. However, um when we're talking
about large-scale, long-term conflicts
for there not to be an ability
for other bodies to have a say as to
what's going on. The fact that we were
in Afghanistan for 20 years
and never
had to go and and and explain what was
happening in Afghanistan. And again, I
think about this from a very personal
perspective.
We were there for 20 years.
Spent over 2.4
trillion dollars.
Lost over 2,400
service people.
And never had to, you know, qualified as
a war?
Say that to the 20 to the families of
over 2,400 people. Mhm.
>> Say that to the fact that our treasury
lost over $2 trillion.
So, there's got to be there has to be a
different type of conversation about
where does
jurisdictional prudence for a commander
in chief start?
And when does authorizing ability for a
president of the United States begin?
Cuz I do think those things have gotten
very, very muddied over the years. And
again, this is not a democratic
>> right, center dis- By the way, you have
the support with that message of a a
a lot of people who are with you on
that. You wasted wars, money for no
reason, weapons of mass destruction, all
this stuff that we fell for. You got a
guy over there, Vincent Oshana, that's
probably listening to this podcast. If
he hasn't already left, he's sitting
down right now. He was in the Air Force.
He was Airman of the Year in the Air
Force, right there. He's looking at the
glasses, him right there. He for that
specific reason, Afghanistan wasted
time. He's like, "Dude, I can't even
support that." So, he's conflicted.
Yeah.
>> And he's a Trump supporter. He's
conflicted. Like, like, what are we
doing here? So, I don't think you're
alone there. Let me ask the last thing.
And then I got to ask the most important
question of it all, which is the Kobe
Bryant. We have to get to that here in a
minute. But
So, the moment you came in,
>> Yeah. I was in meetings. My phone's
blowing up. Did you see what President
Obama just tweeted? I'm like, "What did
he just tweet?" So, just so you know, I
haven't even looked into this. So, we're
both going green into this. And I'm
curious to know what you're going to say
about this. So, President Obama tweeted
this.
Uh 2 hours and 14 minutes before you and
I started the podcast. Today's Supreme
Court decision effectively guts a key
pillar of the Voting Rights Act, freeing
state legislatures to gerrymander
legislative districts to systematically
dilute and weaken the voting power of
racial minorities so long as they do it
under the guise of partisanship rather
than an racial bias. And it serves as
just one more example of how majority of
the current court seems intent on
abandoning its vital role in ensuring
equal participation in our democracy and
protecting the rights of minority groups
against minority overreach. The good
news is that such setbacks can be
overcome, but that will only happen if
citizens across the country who cherish
our democratic ideals continue to
mobilize and vote in record numbers, not
just in the upcoming midterms or in
high-profile races, but in every
election and every level. If you want to
go to the story, Rob, I can read it, and
I'll turn it over to you. So, New York
Times So, Supreme Court weakens a
landmark
civil rights era law and aids GOP
efforts to control the House. If you
want to go a little bit lower,
Supreme Court on Wednesday hollowed a
landmark civil rights era law that
increased minority representation in
Congress and elsewhere, striking down
the majority-black congressional
restrict district in Louisiana and
opening the door for more redistricting
across the count- country that could aid
Republicans' effort to control the
House. Ruling 6-3, the court's
conservative majority found that
Louisiana's district represented by
Democrat Cleo Fields relied too heavily
on race, and Chief Justice John Roberts
described the sixth congressional
district as a snake that stretches more
than 200 miles to link parts of
Shreveport, Alexandria, Lafayette, and
Baton Rouge. The map is an unconst-
constitutional gerrymander,
said Samuel Alito wrote for six
conservatives. And if you show the map,
Rob, I think there's a breakdown by New
York Times. If you want to go to the New
York Times article,
that if Connor hasn't sent it to you
yet,
uh uh New York Times, what should you
put in it? I think the main uh while I'm
talking to
um
uh the governor, he sent it to me.
It's a New York Times story. I don't
know if you have it or not. So,
is that the one? Okay. While you're
doing this, what are your thoughts about
this, the story and what Barack Obama
just said? So, I I think what what
President Obama said is is is absolutely
correct. Where it is just it feels very
odd that you can say that we are okay
with partisan gerrymandering but no
other forms. Especially when you
consider the fact that over 92% of this
country has congressional maps that are
not competitive.
This country is so gerrymandered.
And it's actually embarrassing in the
way that it's been gerrymandered. I have
long believed that we need national
redistricting reform.
Because this is not okay where we
continue to have politicians that that
are picking their voters instead of
voters picking their politicians. We
need to have national gerrymandering
reform.
Um
I also know that what's happening right
now and what we are continually to see
and why this is such a heated issue for
a lot of people is
you think about what's happening right
now in just the past year.
Where these decisions that are being
made by the Trump-Pence administration
on going after these basic democratic
frameworks, right? The idea that we
should nationalize elections, even
though we know that's unconstitutional.
Like part of the part of the beauty of
the Constitution is there are state
rights. We are in control
of our
of our elections.
So we should not be nationalizing
elections. The idea that somehow we
should get rid of mail-in balloting,
which actually we sued Maryland. I sued
the the Trump administration on this and
we're going to win in court on this
because the president and the federal
government does not have the authority
to do that. That that when the
president's talking about things like,
"Well, we should uh take control of the
ballot boxes and we need your voter
rolls." Again, unconstitutional.
The fact that the president is calling
up
Florida and Texas and Missouri and North
Carolina and saying, "You all should do
mid-decade redistricting. By the way,
everyone else you can't.
But you all should do it."
This is blatant what is happening right
now. And what's happening right now is
is this is an assault on the basic
democratic framework and the basic
democratic values.
And so I I I I I think what the
president said is not just fact
President Obama. What he said is not
just factual.
But I think he highlights the bigger
concern that a lot of us have about some
of these actions that are then taking
place. When you look at that decision,
the the
decision around around Louisiana and the
Supreme Court decision.
Um this was happening because there was
just a
a a
basic and an intentional and a
racialized gerrymandering
that was then taking place that was
disenfranchising black voters. So
they're saying we have to come up with
ways of being able to make sure that
black voters after the passage of the
Civil Rights Act would actually be
enfranchised and be able to be part of
this of of this electoral system. Um
by doing this by this action, this does
represent one of the largest forms of
political redlining
that we have now seen in generations.
And so um I am very much for national
redistricting reform.
I think Congress on so many different
levels Congress is just completely
failing to do its job. This is the most
unproductive Congress. Not to mention
the fact that this Congress has actually
been out of work this year more than
they've been in work.
>> Lowest lowest approval rating Congress
has had in the history. Well, how can
you get high approval rating when you're
not at work?
Like the government has been shut down
longer than it's been open this year.
This Congress is almost laughable. What
is happening right now? And I think when
you're looking at what's happening with
our Congress, they need to be taking up
this issue and they are not. And so we
continue now seeing how states
are then doing this continual race to a
bottom because there's just no type of
guidance that we're getting from
Congress.
>> Yeah, when you think about
gerrymandering, it's three ways, right?
Partisan, racial, and bipartisan. Very
rarely does there bipartisan
gerrymandering, but it happens every
once in a while. And so this one's born
to the racial side. Can you go back to
the New York Times article you pulled
up? So meaning if this passes, just to
put it out there, Yeah. this case hands
the house to the Republicans. Democrats
who hold 24 seats
in
Louisiana,
you mean to tell me that 24 is going to
go to 12? Yeah. Republicans gain 12 more
seats just in the state, Rob? And does
this apply to any other state or is it
just a Louisiana case that they're
talking about here?
I believe according to this chart it
says these states. I think it's
Tennessee, North Carolina, South
Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama,
Mississippi, and Louisiana.
>> So all of those states combined,
Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi,
all of them, Democrats hold 24. After
this, Republicans get 12 more seats.
And and and if you look at this map,
right? This if you look at the 24, even
that's just a fraction
of this map, right? But then you take a
look at to the right side.
Look at that.
Is that is that really what we think is
fair representation?
And this this becomes the the the
challenge. And by the way, it's actually
not even just about these states. What
it's also doing is you're now setting
legal precedent that you're going to now
have other states who are then going to
try to navigate this. It's the same
reason why the Supreme Court earlier
uh proved because of their ruling that
partisan gerrymandering is allowed, that
partisan gerrymandering is legal. So you
saw how other states were then moving
and using and being completely blatant
about the fact they're like Yep, this is
a partisan gerrymander. I want I want
three more seats. I want three more
Republican seats. I want three more
Democratic seats. And do you know why
they were unafraid to say that? Was
because of precedent.
So now this is adding on a whole new
layer of precedent.
Yeah, because gerrymandering is what?
Once every 10 years, Correct. It's on
the census. every 10 years on the
census.
>> On the census. And typically who gets
criticized the most? Illinois, I believe
is one of them, right? Can you go to
Illinois gerrymandering cuz they have
like a monopoly on their house on their
representatives if I'm not mistaken that
the the the numbers in Illinois it has
to be
what is the number? I think it's
honestly like 86% is on the Democratic
side in the state of Illinois 14-3.
So 14-3 is what it is with Illinois if
I'm not mistaken.
Is [clears throat] it? Yeah, 14-3. So
Illinois congressional Democrats created
a 14-3 to Republicans when they did this
in 2021
and so often cited as one of the most
aggressive gerrymanders in the US it
packs Republican voters into a few
districts reducing GOP seats
from five to only three. Okay,
California tried to do it as well
and they're at 43-9. Can you type in
something California? I think it's 43-9
if
they were able to pass it in California
it would be 48-4 which means California
is going to be controlled on the left
for God knows how long. I want to say
they're right now at 43-9 with the yep
43-9.
And if they pass it. So you know, people
will say this happens on both sides. It
happens on both sides. And if they could
do it they would do it. If they And by
the way, there's there's groups of
people on both sides that like I hate
gerrymandering. Let's put a stop to it.
None of this should be happening. Let go
of it. Left, right, center just let the
people vote the way they're voting. Do
you We don't need to be doing this part.
And there's a lot of people on the
Republican and Democratic side and then
there's the people that are like if
you're going to do it I'm going to do
it. If the person could do it I'm going
to do it. If you're going to
And then you know, there's no stopping
there. And and and and this becomes the
problem with this larger political
system that it it's not even just the
back and forth, right? Cuz cuz you do
have the issue of the back and forth and
but and and and let's be clear. Like I
understand why you have the back and
forth because you cannot have people who
are just trying to rob an election in
front of your face and you're just
sitting there and taking I got to get
you to a dinner. So No no but but but
you know, but
I'm I'm lost. But um but but so you
can't you can't let that be the case.
You've got to be able to fight. You've
got to be able to fight, particularly
when when our democracy is on the line.
Yet, at the same time,
we need Congress to put an end to this
because this type of these type of
actions, what are happening right now,
the fact that you have districts in in
in Maryland, in my state, that are just
not competitive. That when a person wins
a primary, that's it. It's over. They're
not going to lose in a general. And
unfortunately, that's the way it works
in the vast majority of these
congressional districts all across the
country and even in my state. Where the
biggest competition you're going to have
is a primary.
But once you win a primary, you're good.
And that that includes both Democratic
seats in my state and it includes the
Republican seat
inside of my state because this packing
that often times takes place. Like,
we've got to be better as a country. And
I think we and and we need to, but until
we get Congress to do something so
basic, just do your job, guys.
Until we get that, we end up getting
this.
>> This is this is this is massive. This is
massive for something like this. Listen,
Republicans are probably celebrating.
This is massive, but this is one of
those things where No, no, I I I'm I'm
with you where there's a lot of people
that agree with you that this is not
okay. Last story, your team's text me
you got a dinner to get to. I want to
get you to dinner. That was great. Share
your story with Kobe. I want to know the
Kobe Bryant story because I you know you
know Kobe and I you know, we had a Oh,
we had a Oh, you interviewed him.
>> Yeah, we have a very very good
relationship. It was a devastating day
for us when we when when when it
happened.
And you know, he was he's one of a kind
man. I mean, I'm a I'm a
you know, I'm a I'm a die-hard die-hard
Kobe fan and what he did. So, but what's
your story with Kobe?
>> he was one of a kind, bro. And I'm going
to lie. I mean, he was when he was
coming out of high school cuz that's
where where I first got a chance to meet
him when he was actually a high school
senior.
And um
>> [laughter]
>> And another true story, I did not think
he was going to be as good
as cuz he was very good in high school,
but I was always like, "Ah, his jump
shot isn't quite there." And I'm
thinking like you're going to the NBA,
like shows how much I know about
freaking basketball. Um
And cuz also you can never measure
someone's work ethic.
Um yeah, that's the year he was in Lower
Merion. So that was the Kobe that I got
a first chance got a chance to meet.
Uh his cousin slash friend, he said he
was his cousin. I think that's right. Uh
played for my high school team.
And he was like, "Listen, you know,
being and I are going out to a movie.
You want to come out?" I was like,
"Yeah, of course."
So I'm a high school senior.
Uh Kobe's a high school senior and our
buddy's a high school senior.
We go out to a movie.
Go buy movie tickets. Sitting there,
getting popcorn. And this was I'm trying
to remember if he had just declared for
the draft or he was right before he
declared for the draft. But Kobe was
the thing in, you know, the suburbs of
Philadelphia. And everywhere else, but
you know.
Um so somebody comes up and is like,
"Hey, think I can get an autograph?"
He's like, "Yeah."
Then two more people.
Then four more people.
Now there's just a crowd
around Kobe.
And I'm sure this is not a very
comfortable thing for Kobe cuz he's
like, "We just want to go get a movie to
a movie." And And but the truth is Kobe
was what, like 6' 6" or something like
that. Uh
you know, our buddy was 6' 9". And so
you can't miss him. You can't You can't
miss them. And so and finally Kobe just
kind of, you know, goes to, you know,
goes to our my teammate and he's like
and he whispers something and he comes
over to me and he's like, "Hey, do you
mind if we just get out of here?" Cuz I
think Kobe at that point realized this
is not going to be a fun evening
anymore. So he was like I was like,
"Yeah, no problem." And our buddy was
like, "But don't worry, we'll we'll give
you the the back for your for the movie
ticket." cuz like
we're in high school, man. It's like
that's not whatever it was back then,
five bucks, six bucks, right?
>> of money.
>> That's a lot of money back then. So,
like, okay, yeah, cool. Don't worry
about it. And
I never forgot the fact that I never got
my money back cuz I was always like, yo,
like I I really wanted my money back.
[laughter]
What was the movie about? What were you
guys going to do? Do you remember the
movie or not?
>> at this point, but it was [laughter] it
was 1996 and uh you know, I um
>> ever see him again? Was there any any
other encounter?
>> him again. I never And And I always said
I said I I really hope I get a chance to
see him cuz I want to share that story
with him. Um
um but the thing that I loved about um
Kobe and why I was such a fan
is
he completely understood that to be
great
it means sacrifice.
It means that if you really want to be
great at something
it means the other stuff
might have to go off to the side.
And not everyone's going to like it.
Not everyone's going to understand it.
You will get judged.
You will get criticized.
Block it out. Mhm.
And that Mamba mentality
>> Mhm.
that he brought to basketball, that I
think he brought to the business world
after he was done with basketball
um is actually a really important lesson
learned
because whether you are
a
soldier with 101st
or an entrepreneur
you got to block stuff out.
There are things that other people going
to say, "Hey, Patrick, let's go Mhm. No.
Can't.
I'm working.
Or there's going to be people
distractions saying like this person
said this about you. Don't care. Mhm.
Focused.
There is something that I think he
provided such a beautiful lesson to
humanity
>> Mhm.
about if you want to be great
know what that looks like
and know what's required.
And that's the only way you can ever
actually achieve your greatness. And I
think
you going to have some Mamba mentality
between now I hope you bring it out in
27, 28. I want to see what you're going
to do. You know, I'm I'm I'm stirring a
pot but a part of me wants to see you up
there man. I can't wait you're going to
be up there I'm going to be like
>> [laughter]
>> But
I'm excited for I truly I truly enjoy
talking to and I know I would. I knew I
would when we were everybody would tell
me you're going to love this guy. You're
going to love this guy. Uh
you're class act just talking to you man
just hearing you know your story your
background what you've done one of the
you're telling me my story off the
camera. One of the best stories 18 years
can you imagine like if it happens one
day and it's like it started off with
this it'd be one of the greatest success
stories of all time. Appreciate your
time. Appreciate you for coming out. Is
there a site is there anything you want
people to go to is there anything where
if if people want to see more things
that you're working on is there anything
we want to drive to? Yeah, I think um
well if you if people go to to
wesmoore.com they can see a lot of the
stuff that we're doing
and also just some of the work that
we're doing that we're doing in
Maryland.
You can go to to maryland.gov and you
get a chance to see exactly what we're
working on. All of our social stuff is
is at both I am Wes Moore and also Gov
Wes Moore. Put everything below Rob so
the audience can find him. Yeah, but you
know but I I think you know listen I and
I and I'll
I'll say I'll say this this this one
thing if this okay too. Um
you know I really believe that God
doesn't make mistakes on stuff.
Right? Whether we
fully understand it or appreciate it and
sometimes we
can even push back against it it's like
God is in charge
of everything.
And I think that this moment is it is a
really complicated moment for people and
I think for a lot of people it's a scary
moment. I think for a lot of people it's
an uncertain moment. I mean we didn't
even get a chance to talk about AI and
some technology and and some of the
things that I am incredibly excited
about and some things that I am I want
folks to pay attention because we have
not seen a technology like this. And I
think we have to be very clear about the
type of guardrails that we need to think
about. Um however,
I think about even in our most
complicating moments in our nation's
history,
there have been two things that have
gotten us through. It's been God's grace
and moral leadership.
That's it.
Everything falls into those things.
God's grace, moral leadership.
If we can lean on those two things
inside of this moment, um I think it's
just important to remind people that
we've seen tough times before
and we're okay before.
We'll be okay again.
My man.
Excited about this conversation. I
wasn't expecting it to go this good.
Take care everybody. Go to his website.
Subscribe. God bless everybody. Take
care. Bye-bye. Bye-bye. When we set out
to create a shoe that blends comfort,
[music]
function, and luxury, we had the choice
to make it fast, we had the choice to
make it cheap.
We chose neither.
Instead, we chose Tuscan Italy.
We chose [music] true Italian
craftsmanship. Each pair touched by 50
skilled hands. We chose patience,
spending 2 years perfecting every
detail, and we chose the finest quality
at every step. Introducing
the Future Looks Bright collection.
Not rushed, not disposable, not
ordinary.
Rather,
intentional, luxurious, timeless.