Submind YouTube summaries
Thumbnail for Goody Goody

Goody Goody

Watch on YouTube

Video summary

The video review focuses on the upcoming 2026 horror film *Goody Goody*, a Shudder Original directed by Raymond Creamer, which is set to release on September 18th. The story follows a couple attempting a home birth in an isolated cabin during labor, accompanied by a midwife and her assistant, creating a classic confined-space horror scenario where help cannot arrive if complications occur. While the reviewer notes that the film was written and directed by Creamer, who has previously worked on projects like *Autumn's End* and a lesser-known version of *This Is Us*, they admit to having seen none of his prior work before this release. Despite some initial reservations, the reviewer acknowledges that there are redeeming qualities in the movie that suggest potential for Creamer's future career, even if the current film is not entirely successful. The cinematography and direction receive significant praise, particularly for how the isolated cabin setting is captured from both interior and exterior perspectives to enhance the feeling of seclusion appropriate for a horror genre. The lighting choices are highlighted as a major strength, with specific attention paid to the cold atmosphere outside, frost on the windows, and the use of blue lighting that creates aesthetically pleasing shots. However, these visual strengths are undermined by significant issues with the script, which the reviewer describes as lacking depth and realism. The dialogue is often criticized for feeling like filler, with characters engaging in nonsensical conversations or actions that do not make logical sense within the context of the story. A primary criticism of the film is its poor pacing and excessive runtime, clocking in at 1 hour and 20 minutes despite having enough material to tell the story effectively in around an hour. The reviewer argues that the extra time allows for unnecessary scenes that drag on too long, bogging down the narrative and failing to add value to the plot. Additionally, the audio quality fluctuates throughout the viewing experience, sometimes sounding clear and other times becoming muted or losing bass, though the reviewer notes this might be an issue with their screener copy rather than the final release. The acting is considered solid across the board, but the frequent yelling and screaming required by the childbirth plot become increasingly annoying and distracting to the point where the reviewer had to lower the volume multiple times. Ultimately, the reviewer concludes that while the film suffers from budgetary constraints evident in some practical effects and scope, the core issues lie in the writing and direction rather than technical limitations. They suggest that Raymond Creamer would be better served focusing solely on directing future projects with scripts written by stronger collaborators to fully realize his potential. Given the mix of strong visual elements and solid performances against a backdrop of weak storytelling and pacing, the reviewer awards the film two out of five stars, noting they considered a lower rating but decided to give it credit for its direction and cast efforts. The review ends by inviting viewers to share their own opinions in the comments section while encouraging support for the channel through subscriptions and memberships.
Read the full video transcript
Thanks for checking out this movie review video. This is for the 2026 release Goodie Goodie. It's a Shudder original and it's coming to Shudder on Friday, September 18th. So, this is a no spoiler review. Now, this one was written and directed by Raymond Creamer who did things such as Autumn's End, The Marriage Counselor, and This Is Us. No, not the popular TV show. It was a movie called This Is Us. So, totally different. But, I have not seen any of the work that Creamer has done prior to this film. I'm going to say off the top, I wasn't a huge fan of this movie. I actually wasn't really a fan of it in general, but there were some really good things in this film that gives me a lot of I wouldn't say hope because I that that seems like a more pitiful word, but it gives me a lot of I guess a little bit of anticipation about where Creamer is going to end up going with with the their career. So, this is one of those people who I'm I'm like I want certain things given to them in order to have them flourish because I see a lot of potential in this person. And obviously, I'll talk about some of that stuff as I go through this. So, uh this again, Shudder original coming Friday, September 18th. So, quick synopsis. This is about a couple who are going to be having a baby. The woman is going into labor. So, it it's kind of like a home birthing situation that they have set up. It's in this kind of like cabin type house in secluded wooded area which looks very appropriately isolated for a horror movie setting. And it's actually shot extremely well. I love how they shoot this house from the inside and the outside of it. Both ways, it looks really good. Uh but, you get that great feeling of it being super isolated. So, if anything goes wrong, which it's a horror film, so obviously it will, uh they're very isolated. Can't get any help. That's also very good for the fact of, you know, not a having to account for, "Oh, but neighbors would hear this." Or, you know, cell cell phone reception not being there can easily be kind of written out in those situations. But, anyway, >> [clears throat] >> they're trying to do this home birthing. They have like a midwife and her assistant who are there for it. And it's about horror. Things aren't going to necessarily go the way everyone was planning. And they're all kind of in this together, trapped in the spot trying to deliver this baby and make sure it's healthy. So, that's as much as I'm going to give you on the synopsis if you do have interest in checking out. The opening shooting location is nice and isolated, which is shot in a very eerie way, which I was saying. And I think just in general, I think the cinematography in this film is nice. I do feel like Kramer has a good eye for direction, is good at direction. This is one of those people where I'm like they're not good at everything, but they are a good director. So, it's one of those people where I would love for Kramer to get a script given to them by a really good writer or have or for their next project bring on a really good writer to collaborate with because I really just don't see writing as a complete strong suit for Kramer. It's not that script is terrible, it's that the script just isn't great and the direction is significantly better than the writing. So, but it it is one of these things where with a lot of these low budget independent horror films, they end up having to do a lot of stuff themselves. So, that's kind of what you end up with a lot of the time. And sometimes it just becomes it it's just easier if that person controls more of what's going on with what goes into making the actual film. But, those are my hopes that moving forward this person Kramer could just stick to being a director cuz that's the strength. The the scene feels overly slow and the dialogue seems a bit less than realistic. So, there are instances where characters are kind of not doing things that really make sense or not saying things that make sense or there's a bunch of dialogue that just gets thrown in and you're just like, "Okay, this is obviously filler." There are scenes that get thrown in where you're like, "This is obviously filler." And there are a lot of scenes that just they go on way too long to a point where you just feel that they're trying to stretch things for runtime and that's not great. That goes to the biggest issue with this film, which is the pacing is not very good. Uh and it's an hour and 20 minute film and that's with credits included. So, a lot of time was not wasted for the viewer because it's under an hour and a half, so I commend them for that. But there isn't enough story for even an hour and 20 minutes, which is problematic. And it's just one of those situations where if you realize that you should just cut it down further. Now, there's no way that Creamer could have known this Well, may I I wouldn't think so. It may have been one of those situations where Creamer didn't know that he would end up having this film being Wish Shudder. But if it's going directly to a streaming service, it's kind of like you can definitely go like 1 hour or sub 1 hour. You know, I point to it so many times, the film Host that came out during the thick of the pandemic, um that film was like I think 58 minutes in total and it was great because the pacing was phenomenal cuz that's all the time that was needed to tell the story effectively. With a film like this, it would be probably around there that is the time that would be needed to to tell the story effectively. And the fact that they go further than that just really bogs the film down in bad pacing and just having all this extra dialogue, we're just like, "Why are we hearing this? It's not adding anything." There are also could have been a situation where more story could have kind of been fleshed out in the writing process, but it just wasn't. Uh the audio fluctuates with sounding right and then sounding very muted like the bass kind of disappears from the audio. So, that's a technical problem. Now, whenever I bring stuff like this up, I do have to say I watched it from a screener, not the copy that was on Shudder. So, it is possible that it's a problem with the screener and that if you watch it on Shudder, you wouldn't actually have that problem. But, I'm going based off of what was provided to me for review. And with the reviewing, it it was up and down. Now, it seemed to kind of get better as the film went on, but early on, it happens a lot and it's very annoying and very distracting. Uh, it feels like there's a good amount of time wasting going on. I already talked about that. Uh, there are some well-framed shots that look very interesting, especially with some interesting lighting choices at times. That's the other thing. I really like the way they chose to do the lighting with this film, especially from the interior Well, actually the exterior as well, but a lot with the interior of this cabin that's that's in these secluded wooded areas. Um, there there's a really cool thing with there's it it's cold outside during this uh, this film. So, like the frost around the windows and how they shot that and it's kind of like gives this little bit of blue lighting to everything. It looks really cool. And then they play around with those windows like having a person stand in a certain way in front of the window, which looks like a really cool shot framing. Things like that. Like there's a lot of cool aesthetically pleasing things like that done with the cinematography, which is why I was saying earlier how I think the cinematography's quite good and the direction is there as well. It's just the script is not there, unfortunately. Uh, the acting is pretty solid. I thought that all the performers did the did what they could with the material that they were given. So, there's not a problem with the cast whatsoever. Uh, there does end up being a lot of yelling and screaming in this film because of the whole like childbirth aspect of it and they stick with it a lot. Sure, there are some things they could have written to kind of lessen that, but it does get very annoying. It got extremely annoying to me that there was so much of the screaming and yelling in the film. I ended up turning the volume down numerous times because it got really loud with that and you know, just continually doing something like that, it just grates on your nerves and not in a horror way, in an annoyance way. Uh it feels like the filmmaker doesn't have much of a story and has poor pacing, very unfortunate. Uh but again, like I said, I a few things I would love for this director, um stay as just a director, get a really good script from someone else or someone else primarily, you could work on it a little bit and then uh get someone give this person more money. That's another thing because you can tell that there were monetary constraints with this film. They could have gone bigger. There were some practical effects that were solid for what they are, for what I assume the budget was, but if this person had been given more money, it could have been a lot better. It could have been a lot bigger. So, some of the things are budgetary restrictions with this film, but the script stuff is definitely not, unfortunately. Um but yeah. Um all all things said, I would give it a two out of five star rating. Uh I thought about going one and a half, but I think with the the direction, the performances of everyone, you know, those types of things, I think that it warrants being at a two uh instead of a one and a half, but would love to hear other people's opinions. Uh it didn't have enough I I usually compare it to what the rating is on Letterboxd. There isn't an overall average rating currently cuz there just aren't enough reviews for it yet. Uh but tell me your thoughts on this film if you've seen it or if you plan to see it and come back. Good go ahead and put it in the comments and we can do spoilers in the comments. That's totally fine. Uh do me a quick favor, do all the free things to support this channel if you like this video or any video I've ever done, you can hit the subscribe button, you can hit the thumbs up on the video, hit the notification bell button, watch the videos. That's a big thing for helping out. And if you have a few dollars just lying around each month, you want to throw them at me for what I'm doing here, I do have memberships available with the channel, three different tiers with perks for each one. You can check the link in the description. It's just right down there. But regardless, thank you so much for taking your time to watch this. I appreciate that the most. And until next time, keep it brutal.