Video summary
Ghostbusters (1984) stands as a monumental achievement in cinema that transcends its genre to become an integral part of popular culture and personal identity for millions. Released by Columbia Pictures with a budget of $30 million, the film achieved a staggering box office return of $300 million, proving itself to be more than just a supernatural comedy but a cultural phenomenon. The movie's enduring legacy is built on its unique ability to blend multiple genres seamlessly; it functions simultaneously as a workplace comedy, a horror film, and a science fiction fantasy without ever compromising the stakes or undermining the tension with forced humor. Unlike later entries where jokes often distract from the narrative, the original film uses dry, sarcastic wit that mirrors how people naturally cope with trauma, allowing scary moments to coexist comfortably with laughter. This balance has allowed the special effects, which relied heavily on practical techniques like miniatures and optical compositing rather than digital enhancements, to hold up remarkably well over four decades, making the impossible seem believable even in an era dominated by CGI.
The film's success is also attributed to its exceptional ensemble cast and the specific circumstances that shaped their roles, particularly regarding Peter Venkman played by Bill Murray. Originally intended for John Belushi before his untimely death, the role was perfectly suited for Murray's natural charisma, though other casting changes further refined the movie's dynamic; Eddie Murphy turned down Winston Zeddemore to star in Beverly Hills Cop, leading to Ernie Hudson taking on a character written as an everyman outsider rather than a scientist. This shift grounded the story and made it more relatable to audiences. The chemistry between Murray, Harold Ramis, Dan Aykroyd, Sigourney Weaver, Annie Potts, Rick Moranis, and Ernie Hudson created a perfect balance where no single character overshadowed another, each fulfilling a distinct role that represented different facets of society—from the skeptic and the scientist to the believer and the audience surrogate. Even minor characters like Walter Peck or background extras contributed significantly to the film's rich tapestry, creating an immersive world that feels complete despite its 1984 origins.
Beyond entertainment value, Ghostbusters has fostered a thriving global community known as "Ghostheads," where fans unite through service projects, parades, and charitable work rather than just consuming media. The franchise continues to inspire new generations by providing representation for diverse groups, including individuals with disabilities like Garrett in the animated series or Louis Tully's journey in Ghostbusters II, offering a sense of belonging that resonates deeply with children and adults alike. As noted by creator Dan Aykroyd himself, who has been diagnosed on the autism spectrum, the franchise holds potential to normalize neurodiversity through authentic storytelling rather than stereotypical portrayals seen elsewhere in media. The film's impact extends into real life for many viewers, including those inspired to become paranormal investigators or mental health professionals, with quotes like "Back off, man! I'm a scientist!" becoming permanently wired into their brains. Ultimately, Ghostbusters remains the reviewer's favorite film of all time not just because it is funny and clever, but because it successfully bridges the gap between grounded reality and wonderment about the unknown, inviting audiences to explore what happens when ghosts are real and studyable without fear or ridicule.
Read the full video transcript
In 1984, one movie burst onto the scene
and asked audiences one question.
If there's something strange in the
neighborhood, and it don't look good,
who you're going to call?
Ever since the beginning of this channel
in 2016, 10 years on YouTube, we have
been producing Ghostbusters content. One
of the very first film reviews we did on
this channel was of Ghostbusters: Answer
the Call in 2016.
Since then, we've interviewed the IDW
Ghostbusters creative team. We've done
Funko Pop reviews, toy reviews, trailer
reviews, and so much more involving
Ghostbusters. And now we're taking it
back to the beginning. Today, we are
going to be reviewing each of the films
in the Ghostbusters franchise as part of
our 10-year anniversary. I hope you guys
enjoy.
How do you feel about it, Slimer?
>> [screaming]
>> All right.
>> [music]
[music]
>> Welcome back to Comic Gadget TV, the
only place on YouTube where all geek
culture collides. I'm Shannon, and as I
stated earlier, today we're going to be
looking at all of the Ghostbusters films
in the Ghostbusters franchise, starting
with the very first Ghostbusters movie,
1984's Ghostbusters, starring Harold
Ramis, Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Ernie
Hudson, Annie Potts, Sigourney Weaver,
and Rick Moranis.
There are movies that entertain you.
There are movies that become classics.
And then, there are movies that become a
part of who you are. For me,
that movie was Ghostbusters. I've loved
Ghostbusters for as long as I can
remember.
As a kid, Saturday mornings for me meant
sitting in front of the TV with a bowl
of Cookie Crisp cereal,
watching The Real Ghostbusters on TV.
Throughout my childhood, the only copy
of Ghostbusters we had was on VHS and is
recorded from ABC's Saturday Night
Movies. If you grew up in the '80s or
'90s, you probably know exactly what I'm
talking about. And if memory serves me
correctly,
the copy we had,
somebody had accidentally recorded over
a portion of the film.
And this portion
was right where the street car starts to
collapse in uh and the Ghostbusters fall
in.
And then, as you're watching, all of a
sudden,
it cuts.
And
an episode of Fraggle Rock starts to
play.
The first time I experienced this,
it was heartbreaking.
Because Ghostbusters was such an aspect
of me. It was my favorite film.
I'd watch it as often as I could.
Fortunately,
the movie picks back up right as the
Ghostbusters are reaching Dana Barrett's
floor.
Oddly enough,
having Fraggle Rock integrated into
Ghostbusters
became a part of the experience for me.
Ghostbusters wasn't just a movie in my
house.
It was the movie.
Today I want to talk about why more than
40 years later Ghostbusters
is still
one of the greatest
supernatural comedies
ever made.
Released in 1984 by Columbia Pictures
Ghostbusters was directed by Ivan
Reitman and written by Dan Aykroyd and
Harold Ramis. It starred Bill Murray,
Harold Ramis, Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson,
Sigourney Weaver, Annie Potts, Rick
Moranis, and William Atherton. Atherton
would forever
comment on how fans regarded him
since his portrayal of Walter Peck. Um
often being cited as old peckerhead and
being booed. Um something that really
caused a lot a negative impact for him
going forward until maybe the last
decade when he began to accept it and
embrace it.
Um which is what encouraged his return
as Mayor Peck in Ghostbusters: Frozen
Empire. The film was produced for about
$30 million
and
ended up seeing a return of $300 million
at the box office. That was a very
surprising return.
Especially considering most of the cast
wasn't originally planned to be in the
film. Originally Peter Venkman was
supposed to be portrayed by John Belushi
who sadly passed away in 1982. And it
was only going to have John and Dan
as
Peter and Ray traveling around time and
space busting ghosts together. But,
sadly, John Belushi passed away and the
role went to Bill Murray. I say sadly
only because John Belushi passed away. I
think the role of Peter Venkman was
designed, maybe unintentionally,
for Bill Murray because
he is such an integral aspect of the
role. Now, once Peter Venkman was recast
as for Bill Murray, it was decided that
Dan and Harold and Ivan wanted another
big-name comedian
to play the part of Winston Zeddemore.
And they ended up turning to fellow
Saturday Night Live alum Eddie Murphy.
Unfortunately, Murphy had was torn
between two different roles. Either he
could take the part of Winston
Zeddemore, which included a lot of what
eventually became
Peter Venkman's lines in the film, or he
could star in his own film, Beverly
Hills Cop. Needless to say, history has
found that Beverly Hills Cop won out.
And so, he was replaced with Ernie
Hudson. Now, at the time when Murphy was
set to play Winston, he was going to be
a much bigger part of the film from the
very beginning. He was also going to be
a scientist. But, when they recast,
they decided turn Winston into the
everyman, the outsider coming in,
helping
the rest of us
relate.
And I think it made the movie better
than what it would have been. Had the
cards not fallen where they did, I think
the movie would have faded into time.
It wouldn't have become such the
blockbuster franchise that it is today.
It might have spawned a Saturday morning
cartoon, but very likely it would have
only lasted one season. What's
impressive about this is that the film
as it is now has gone on to spawn
animated series, comic books, video
games, action figures, costumes,
collectibles, haunted attractions,
sequels, and reboots. Now, say what you
will about the 2016 film. Anytime it
gets brought up on Facebook or YouTube
or TikTok or Instagram or whatever, the
comments are flooded that the 2016 film
is not a Ghostbusters movie, but it is
regardless of what you feel. It has the
spirit of the originals, even if it may
not have the stylistic humor. And I'll
be reviewing that film later on as well
as part of the 10-year anniversary of
Comic Con TV. To say the fan base for
Ghostbusters is still thriving today
would be an understatement. An entire
documentary was made around the fan base
called Ghostheads. Very few movies out
there become an active part
of popular culture the way Ghostbusters
did.
One of the reasons Ghostbusters has aged
so well
is because it never commits to just
being one thing. It's a comedy, but it's
also horror. It's science fiction, but
it's also a supernatural fantasy. It's a
workplace comedy and it's a blue-collar
business story. Somehow all those
ingredients work together. The humor
never actually undercuts the stakes,
unlike the 2016, which is why fans have
such a problem with the 2016 film is
because the humor was just so in your
face, so out there,
so obvious,
so forced. It made fun of men
in a very disparaging way, and fans
didn't really connect because of that.
But with the original Ghostbusters film,
the humor was subtle. It was dry,
sarcastic, natural. This is how people
in the real world would very very likely
respond to these events.
A lot of people use humor as a way to
deal with traumatic events. And let's
face it, if any one of us would have
gone through what the Ghostbusters had
gone through in the film, we would very
likely be traumatized for the rest of
our lives. But it worked. The horror
never overwhelmed the comedy. There were
scary scenes. I know as a kid when the
library ghost did the jump scare at the
uh whenever the Ghostbusters first
encountered her, I was terrified. But
even young me being terrified was able
to get through it. I was able to move
past it because the next scene had
Venkman laughing about it. Had him
making a joke out of it. We could see
that the Ghostbusters were okay.
The science feels just believable enough
to make the impossible seem possible. A
lot of reality shows today
focus on ghost hunting and paranormal
investigating, and they've
created this culture
around equipment that isn't really used
in the way it was designed. You know,
currently you have EMF meters as the
modern-day PKE. As a former paranormal
investigator myself, EMF meters do not
detect ghosts. I don't know how this
theory began or why people continue to
believe it, But, it creates a
confirmation bias. You can
move the EMF meter around the room, and
as soon as it gets close to a wall with
an electric current running through it,
it's going to go off. If you got a cell
phone in your pocket, it's going to go
off. If you're standing under a light or
near a TV, it's going to go off. But,
the equipment used in Ghostbusters,
that's what it was designed for. It was
designed to hunt ghosts. It wasn't
designed to be something else and then
moved into the realm of the
supernatural. No, it was designed to
detect ghosts. Egon Spengler designed
the PKE meter and then used the readings
obtained from the library ghost as a way
to
contain
the spirit world.
And that's something that's actually
been theorized here.
Um even recently, the
collider
at CERN
has been theorized to be able to open a
gateway
into the
afterlife, into the underworld, into the
dimension where our energy goes after
death.
One thing that always surprises me when
I watch Ghostbusters is how well the
special effects hold up.
It's something a lot of special effects
films from the '80s
struggle with.
But, Ghostbusters doesn't.
Why is that? The films today, whether it
be the 2016 Ghostbusters, Afterlife, or
Frozen Empire, still utilize a lot of
the same effects that that original
movie did. Sure, they a lot of times
they are enhanced digitally, but that
was one of the ways that developers,
producers, the director, the special
effects crew wanted to approach
Afterlife was a return to basics. The
films rely heavily on practical effects.
They use miniatures, optical
composition, matte paintings, puppets,
real lighting interacting with real
environments. Nothing feels weightless.
Everything has texture and even today
Slimer, for instance, the library
ghosts, the terror dogs, Gozer, and
especially the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man
still feel surprisingly convincing.
Sure, you can tell the movie was made in
1984, but it never stops feeling real.
Now, I want to spend a few minutes
talking about my favorite Ghostbuster,
Peter Venkman. I've seen a lot of people
describe Peter online as the lazy
Ghostbuster, the skeptic, the guy who's
motivated by money and women, but I
don't think that's true at all. In fact,
I think Peter Venkman is probably the
most misunderstood character in the
franchise. Peter isn't pretending that
ghosts don't exist. He's pretending that
he doesn't care. There's a difference
there. People often point to his sarcasm
and assume he's being dismissive, but I
think he's actually one of the most
observant characters in the film. In all
of the films, throughout the original,
Peter is constantly watching people. He
studies Dana. He reads Walter Peck
almost immediately. He notices subtle
changes in situations before anyone
else. When Stay Puft explodes, Peter
immediately takes cover. Now, behind the
scenes this is because
Bill Murray developed an allergy to the
shaving cream they used to mimic the
marshmallow. And so they used that as
part of Venkman's character.
Peter immediately took cover. No one
told him to.
He recognized the danger.
In Ghostbusters 2, when they're sitting
in the psychiatric hospital
being interviewed by Brian Doyle Murray,
who is Bill's brother, who plays the
psychiatrist. And
Ray is talking about the painting and
all this other stuff.
And
Brian's character says, "Yes, tell me
about the painting."
And looks at Peter.
Peter immediately raises his head
and says, "Don't look at me. I think
these people are completely nuts."
I've always interpreted it that as Peter
maintaining the image that he's built
for years.
The films never say this outright, but
when I look at the behavior across the
franchise, a pattern starts to develop.
Being autistic myself, I'm a very strong
observer of patterns.
He's hiding in plain sight.
People underestimate him because he lets
them.
That means expectations stay low.
Nobody expects the sarcastic slacker to
be paying attention, but he is. Even in
Ghostbusters Frozen Empire, Peter is one
of the first ones to notice how Nadeem's
emotions are impacting the flame behind
him. Now, a lot of people will comment
back that Peter was the only one in the
room. That's not true. Lucky and Lars
were back
behind the glass in another room,
observable, near the fire, working on
some equipment. They didn't notice the
fire increasing till after
Peter
kind of
did this.
Looked around Nadeem and noticed it.
Everyone else is watching the
phenomenon. Lucky and Lars are observing
the fire after, you know, stopping what
they were doing.
Peter begins observing the person. He
does what he can to get an emotional
response out of Nadeem.
He throws a pen at him and he begins to
notice the fire increasing as Nadeem's
emotions increase.
That's who Peter has always been,
observant,
adaptable,
quietly intelligent. He just lets
everyone think he's the class clown.
Take the first film when the
Ghostbusters are in jail and everyone's
going over the blueprints. He knows what
the guys are talking about. He begins to
notice everyone else gathering around.
He begins to notice
their intrigue into what the
Ghostbusters are talking about. And he
asks Ray to explain it to him as if he
does knows nothing about metallurgy
and all these other things, knowing
that these other inmates, these other
prisoners,
would like to better understand what the
Ghostbusters are talking about. He
doesn't respond whenever Ray says, "You
never paid attention. You never
studied." He just smirks.
Peter was one that didn't have to study,
similar to Patch Adams,
Robin Williams' character in the film
Patch Adams.
We always see Patch having fun. We
always see him doing what he wants and
not really focusing on the books and
acing every test. In fact, Philip
Seymour Hoffman's character calls him
out on that and reports him to the dean
for it, thinking he's cheating.
In Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire, when the
whole crew is at the firehouse preparing
for the final battle, there's a knock on
the firehouse door and everyone's
getting their proton throwers ready,
pointing, waiting for the big bad to
come bursting through. They cautiously
open the door and they're about ready to
pull the trigger. As soon as they open
the door, there's no one there.
And their guard drops for a minute
before Peter
steps around. He knew enough
to stand out of the way of fire. He knew
that they would likely be expecting the
big bad to come and attack. And so he
stepped out of the way. My canon for
Peter Venkman, analyzing him from a
clinical perspective, I'm a clinical
mental health counselor. I majored in
psychology and sociology in school. I
see somebody who's not surprised
by the metaphysical. I see someone who's
experienced some before the film
even takes place. When he encounters the
library ghost for the first time, he
tries [snorts] to strike up casual
conversation with it. He's a little
stand-offish, sure, but he's just he
tries to strike up casual conversation.
He's not
afraid, per se. Similar with all the
other experiences. When the Ghostbusters
get up to the penthouse or the corner
apartment, Dana's apartment, and they
get ready to go up the stairs, Peter's
the first in line to go up, but then he
sees the lightning and he's like, "No,
no, you guys go ahead."
It's not because he's afraid. I mean,
maybe that's a little bit of it, but his
experience has shown him what it means
to be the first on the scene.
He's the first one to encounter Slimer
and get slimed for it. He doesn't want
that to happen again.
So he sends the others up instead. My
theory why Peter decided to major in
psychology and parapsychology, and
because those are the easiest courses to
take far from it.
As somebody who has an associates and a
bachelor's in psychology and sociology
and a master's degree in clinical
counseling, I can tell you for sure they
are not easy degrees to obtain. In fact,
to earn a doctorate, you have to
contribute something to the field. You
have to provide education. You have to
bring something new. You can't just
analyze other things and write a paper
on them. You have to contribute. Peter
Venkman would have had to contribute
something significant
to the field of psychology in order to
earn his doctorate. He's never really
surprised by any of the things that go
on in the film. The only time you see a
hint of surprise is when Slimer starts
charging at him because he doesn't know
what's going to happen. Is he caught off
guard when he encounters Slimer for the
first time? Sure, but it's not horrified
surprise. It's just something he wasn't
expecting. And so he's cautious. He's
right here, Ray.
He's looking at me. He's an ugly little
spud, isn't he? I think he can hear you,
Ray. As soon as that line drops, Slimer
starts charging. He didn't know what to
expect, but he knew it wasn't going to
be good. So these fan-made posters of
Venkman, the first Ghostbuster, I think
there is a movie there that most fans
don't really understand. They aren't
seeing Venkman from the psychological
perspective. They're seeing him exactly
how other characters in the film see
him, but there's more to him than that.
And that's what makes him so great
because people see him the way he wants
them to see him, even those of us who
are watching. But it takes a certain
perspective to see the person beneath
the character. But, Ghostbusters doesn't
work because of one character. It works
because of all of them, even the lesser
characters and their interactions with
the core four. Dana Barrett, Louis
Tully, Walter Peck, the mayor, even.
Even the cameo appearances, Larry King,
Cheech Marin, and so on. Hell, the guy
in the background of the news report
that Ghostbusters News has begun using
as their part of their logo or whatever,
the jean jacket guy with the long hair
and beard who's just standing there and
he is part of the film. People come to
expect to see him, even though he has no
lines and he's such a very minor
character, he's still part of what makes
the film great. Ray is the believer,
Egon is a scientist, Peter is the
communicator, and Winston is us. He's
the audience's point of view. Each
character fills a role that balances the
others perfectly. No one overshadows
anyone else, and that's incredibly rare.
You can't talk about Ghostbusters
without mentioning Ray Parker's
incredible theme song for the film,
inspired in part by Huey Lewis and the
News's I Want a New Drug. It's become
one of the most recognizable
movie themes ever written, but it also
led Ray Parker Jr. into a court battle
that didn't turn out in his favor, but
eventually did in the long run because
somebody on Huey's side ended up
commenting on it
and costing Huey
a ton of royalties. Even people who've
never seen Ghostbusters, they know
exactly how to respond to that one
question, who you going to call?
Ghostbusters had a much bigger impact on
me than simple entertainment. As a
teenager and in my 20s, it inspired me
to be a paranormal investigator. Having
had encountered experiences on my own
with the paranormal as a child. Even
today,
working as a mental health counselor and
researcher, I find myself quoting Peter
Venkman's line, "Back off, man.
I'm a scientist."
It's become one of those movie quotes
that is permanently wired into my brain.
Ghostbusters has always been more than a
movie to me. It's part of my history,
part of my collection, part of this
channel. If you've been watching Comic
Gan TV for a while,
you've probably seen Ghostbusters come
up a time or two. It's because
Ghostbusters helped shape the person I
am. If you're a long-time fan, I highly
recommend checking out the
novelizations. Richard Mueller's
Ghostbusters The Supernatural
Spectacular, which, as you can see here,
is actually part of the omnibus of
Ghostbusters 1 and 2. It was the
original release, but then it was halted
in favor of
the official
licensed
Ghostbusters novelization that is a more
closely resembles the film.
But the Supernatural Spectacular
includes the original concepts that were
written into the script, as well as
additional scenes and details.
The proton packs were exactly how they
were originally designed in the original
script. They were wands that came out of
the wrist-mounted
devices on the Ghostbusters' arms. It
includes
more linear path.
Uh the montage scene that's included in
the film is is up in this book
and expanded upon. Now, Larry Milne's
adaptation stays much closer to what we
ultimately saw on the screen. If you're
interested in exploring the Ghostbusters
universe beyond the films, they're
worthwhile reads. Ghostbusters is funny.
It's clever. It's endlessly quotable. It
has unforgettable characters,
groundbreaking special effects,
and an incredible soundtrack. It has one
of the greatest ensemble cast ever
assembled for a comedy. Over 40 years
later, it still feels fresh. It still
makes me laugh. And it still reminds me
why I fell in love with movies in the
first place. Not just the Ghostbusters
movie, but every movie I've fallen in
love with. Brings up a sense of
nostalgia for me.
It also brings up wonderment.
It allows me to take myself
out of the grounded clinician and into a
world of the unknown. What would happen
if ghosts were real and we could
actually contain them and study them.
Ghostbusters isn't just one of my
favorite comedies. It isn't one of my
favorite supernatural films. It is by
far my favorite film of all time.
Period. I rate Ghostbusters a 10 out of
10 and would very much love for them to
do a director's cut or producer's cut
where it takes out the montage and puts
the scenes in chronological order and
expands upon them and includes the
deleted scenes.
I would love to see that just once or
twice.
It wouldn't be my go-to, of course,
on any given day as the original is my
go-to. I I watch it several times a
year. But, it's a film edition that I
would be I would be interested in
watching. If somehow you've never seen
Ghostbusters and you made it this far
without spoilers, do yourself a favor
and give it a watch. And if you've loved
it for decades like I have, I'd love to
hear your memories. Did you grow up
watching The Real Ghostbusters? Did you
have a well-worn VHS copy like I did?
Let me know in the comments below. What
do you think of our review, Slimer?
>> [screaming]
[crying]
>> Mhm.
Ghostbusters is one of the greatest
franchises to hit cinema in
forever. It has made such a huge impact
on
the culture of the world. So many people
now consider themselves Ghostheads.
Ghostbusters fans who make Ghostbusters
a central part of their lives. Before
John passed away, he started developing
a Decatur, Illinois branch of
Ghostbusters. Now, for those of you who
don't know, um when we say a
branch of Ghostbusters, that means fans
who come together, who have uniform
flight suits, um maybe they built their
own proton packs, maybe they bought one
from Spirit Halloween or whatever. They
come together and then share their love
of Ghostbusters. And in doing so, they
participate in community service. They
hold fundraisers. They attend and
participate in parades and celebrations.
They go to children's hospitals and so
much more in order to bring their love
and joy for the franchise to others.
Now, we don't actually mean that these
individuals are actually building active
proton packs, nuclear accelerators, and
going out and thinking they're going to
bust ghosts. No, it's more of a fandom
and something that brings something to
the community. It provides a community
service of sorts. And I hope now that
Ghost Corps, the production studio
behind the Ghostbusters franchise,
is starting to put out more content.
Recently, we received news that the
Netflix animated series is going to be
entitled Ghostbusters night shift. And I
hope that with that comes more and more
Ghostbusters content. I think one of the
biggest mistakes the Ghost Corps made
though was not the 2016 Ghostbusters
film. It was moving the license away
from IDW and then putting it elsewhere.
With IDW, the team was building a
universe that connected to the films,
connected to the animated series,
connected to other comics, merged the
original universe with the 2016 Answer
the Call universe, and even had them
teaming up with the Ninja Turtles. There
could have been no limit to where that
universe could have went in the future.
I would have loved to see Phoebe and her
family come into the IDW universe and
interact with those characters. And in
that universe, we received a look at
some characters who were possibly going
to be the future of the Ghostbusters
franchise. Even an autistic character
who, even though it wasn't actually
divulged in the comic that he was
autistic, it was very apparent. And Dan
Schoening and the others confirmed in
our interview that he was autistic. And
it wasn't the standard media portrayal
of autism, the way it's seen in The Good
Doctor and Big Bang Theory. It was a
very real characterization of autism.
Dan Aykroyd himself has been diagnosed
with Previously, it was Asperger's at
the time of his diagnosis. Asperger's
has now been merged with into the autism
spectrum. And so, Dan Aykroyd is
autistic. So, essentially, Dan Aykroyd
is the first autistic Ghostbuster. But,
I think having that displayed more
prominently in the Ghostbusters
franchise, in the Ghostbusters universe,
can give kids and adults alike a sense
of belonging. Think about what Garrett
did for those with other disabilities.
Maybe they were confined to wheelchairs.
Maybe Maybe they were non-verbal. Maybe
they didn't have the use of certain
limbs, or whatever the case may be.
Garrett being the first Ghostbuster, the
first hero in a wheelchair without any
special powers or anything like that,
gave kids and adults a place to belong.
Think about Rick Moranis's portrayal of
Louis Tully. And in Ghostbusters 2, when
Louis picked up the proton pack, put on
the uniform, and became a Ghostbuster.
That scene at the end of Ghostbusters 2,
where he said, "I did it. I did it. I'm
a Ghostbuster." That is what every child
wishes they could say. And they can if
they have representation within the
cinematic universe, within the comic
book universe, within the animated
universe. They can see themselves as
Ghostbusters. Ghostbusters has been very
near and dear to my heart my entire
life. If you enjoyed that video, make
sure to check out one of these two
playlists for more videos just like the
one you just watched.
>> [music]
>> I've been Shannon. This has been Comic
Front TV, the only place on YouTube
where all geek culture collides. Take
care, geeks.