Food & Supplements for Brain Health & Cognitive Performance | Huberman Lab Essentials
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this episode of Huberman Lab Essentials, Professor Andrew Huberman outlines three primary signals that drive food choices: gut neurons sensing nutrient content, metabolic accessibility for brain energy use, and belief regarding a food's effects. He emphasizes that structural fat is the most critical element for neuron integrity, as nerve cell membranes are composed of essential fatty acids like EPA and DHA rather than storage body fat. While fish remains the top dietary source for these omega-3s, Huberman notes they can also be found in chia seeds, walnuts, and soybeans, suggesting supplementation with at least 1.5 grams daily to support cognitive function long-term. He further identifies phosphatidylserine, abundant in meat and fish or available as a supplement, choline primarily from egg yolks (aiming for 500 mg to 1 gram daily), creatine monohydrate at a threshold of 5 grams per day, anthocyanins found in dark berries like blueberries, and glutamine from protein-rich foods such as cottage cheese or vegetables. These compounds support neuronal structure while offering modulatory benefits for sleep, inflammation, and cardiovascular health without harming other body systems when taken reasonably. Huberman then explores the complex mechanisms behind food preference, describing a "yum, yuck, or meh" analysis driven by taste receptors on the tongue that send signals to the insular cortex via the gustatory nerve. Beyond conscious taste sensations like sweet, salty, bitter, sour, and umami, he introduces neuropod cells in the gut which subconsciously detect amino acids, sugars, and fats, sending electrical signals through the nodose ganglion to trigger dopamine release and motivate food seeking. He argues that what we truly seek is not just taste or immediate blood glucose spikes but foods that allow neurons to remain metabolically active. This distinction explains why artificial sweeteners initially fail to provide a reward unless paired with caloric intake, yet repeated consumption can condition the brain's dopamine system to respond even without actual sugar, highlighting how learned associations and belief systems directly influence physiological responses like insulin secretion. The discussion highlights powerful experiments demonstrating that beliefs about food composition can alter physical outcomes; for instance, participants told they were drinking a high-calorie milkshake exhibited higher blood glucose and insulin levels compared to those told it was low-calorie, even when consuming identical shakes. This "belief effect" underscores how subjective thoughts impact physiology more than simple placebo effects might suggest. Huberman suggests that individuals can rewire their food preferences by pairing less desirable but healthy foods with items that shift brain metabolism, potentially making them taste better within 7 to 14 days as the dopamine system reinforces new habits. He warns against becoming overly attached to "super palatable" super sweet or savory foods which hijack reward circuits, noting that while some aversions are hardwired, soft-wiring allows for adjustment toward less sugary options over time. Ultimately, Huberman concludes that food choices should be guided by a combination of nutritional necessity and psychological adaptation rather than rigid diet wars where communities claim exclusive superiority in their preferred diets. He references research published in the Annual Review of Psychology regarding "Rethinking Food Reward" to illustrate how perception shapes reality in eating behaviors. The overarching message is that while we are hardwired to seek certain nutrients, our preferences are also soft-wired and malleable through consistent practice and belief adjustment. By understanding these three channels—taste, gut signaling, and learned association—one can strategically pursue foods beneficial for brain health, longevity, and overall well-being without relying solely on willpower or restrictive measures that may backfire due to the powerful role of dopamine in food reinforcement.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome to Huberman Lab Essentials,
where we revisit past episodes for the
most potent and actionable science-based
tools for mental health, physical
health, and performance.
I'm Andrew Huberman, and I'm a professor
of neurobiology and ophthalmology at
Stanford School of Medicine.
Today, we are talking all about food and
the brain. We are going to talk about
foods that are good for your brain in
terms of focus, in terms of brain health
generally, and the longevity of your
brain, your ability to maintain pain,
cognition, and clear thinking over time.
We are also going to talk about why and
how you prefer certain foods to others.
And I'm going to talk about the three
major signals that combine
to drive your food choices. One of those
signals comes from your gut and is
completely subconscious. These are
neurons in your gut that are sending
signals to your brain that you are
unaware of about the nutrient contents
of the foods that you are eating. The
second signal is how metabolically
accessible a given food is, meaning how
readily that food can be converted into
energy that your brain, not your body,
but that your brain can use.
And the third signal is perhaps the most
interesting one. It's the signal of
belief. It's the signal of what you
perceive and believe the food that
you're eating to contain and what you
think it can do for you health-wise and
energy-wise. What are the things that
directly impact brain health, and what
are the foods that we can eat that will
support brain health? Generally, when we
think about neuron function and brain
function,
we default to a discussion about fuel,
the fact that neurons use glucose, which
is blood sugar, in order and that they
require a lot of it. But, before we can
even consider the fuels that neurons use
in order to function, we have to talk
about the elements that actually allow
those neurons to be there and to stay
healthy. What actually makes up those
neurons? And that brings us to what I
would argue is the most important food
element for brain function, and that is
fat.
And that may come as a surprise, but
unless one considers the water content
of the brain, which is very high,
a lot of our brain and a lot of the
integrity of the nerve cells, the
so-called neurons in our brain, and the
other types of cells comes from fat. And
that's because nerve cells and other
cells in the brain have a external
layer. It's
what's sometimes called a double-layered
membrane. It's essentially two thin
layers that serve as a boundary between
those cells, and that boundary is very
important because how things pass across
that boundary actually regulates the
electrical activity of neurons, which is
the way that neurons fire and
communicate and keep you thinking and
acting and doing all the good things
that those neurons allow us to do. And
those membranes are made up of fats, but
they're not made up of the fats that are
around our belly,
around the other organs of our body.
They're not made up of storage fat, they
are made up of structural fat. And
maintaining the so-called integrity of
that structural fat, meaning the health
of those neurons, is going to come in
large part from the foods that we eat.
So, what type of fat is it, and what
should we eat in order to support that
fat and those neurons? And the answer is
the so-called essential fatty acids and
phospholipids. Now, those are more or
less the same thing, but I just want to
make a very large literature very
crystal clear.
Essential fatty acids can include the
so-called EPA variety or DHA variety.
You hear about omega-3s and omega-6s.
Most people are getting enough omega-6s
from their diet. However, most people
are not getting enough omega-3s in their
diet to support healthy brain function
in the short and long term. What are
foods that are high in omega-3s that we
should all probably be consuming at
least on a daily basis.
The number one
is fish. Now, I don't know about you,
but I'm not eating a lot of fish. I will
from time to time, but that's one reason
why one might want to supplement with
EPAs from another source.
But,
also EPAs are found in chia seeds, in
walnuts, in soybeans, and other
plant-based foods. You can look these up
online, and you'll immediately see that
there are a lot of sources of EPAs.
And many of the foods that I listed off
might be appetizing to you. Some of them
might be unappetizing to you, or some of
them you might be sort of neutral about.
But, it's very clear that eating foods
that are rich in omega-3s and/or
supplementing with omega-3s to get above
that 1.5 g and ideally up to 2 or even 3
g per day of EPA can be very beneficial
for cognitive function in the short and
long term. The other compound that has
been shown to be directly supportive of
neuronal function is phosphatidylserine,
which is abundant in meats and in fish.
So, for those of you that do consume
meat and fish,
provided you're getting enough fish,
you're probably getting enough
phosphatidylserine. For those of you
that are interested in supplementing
with phosphatidylserine, it's a
relatively inexpensive supplement that,
again, is lipid-like. So, it's mimicking
some of the same things that you would
get from food, but in higher
concentration.
Now, after EPA fatty acids and
phosphatidylserine, I would say third on
the list of things that come from food
that can readily support brain function
would be choline. And that's because of
the relationship to choline in the
biosynthesis pathway for acetylcholine.
Acetylcholine is a neuromodulator, not a
neurotransmitter, but a neuromodulator
in the brain. So, it's kind of a
electrical highlighter pen, if you will,
by analogy.
That is the basis of much of what we
call focus or or our ability to
concentrate on a particular batch of
information that's coming in through our
eyes, our ears, our nose, or even things
that we're just thinking in our head.
And not surprisingly then, many of the
treatments for Alzheimer's disease,
which is an inability or challenges with
remembering things and focusing,
are drugs that impact the acetylcholine
pathway and
are aimed at enhancing the amount of
acetylcholine that's available to
neurons. And the primary source for
dietary choline would be eggs and in
particular egg yolks.
Eggs are an incredibly rich source of
nutrients for the brain.
And that's because the egg actually, if
you think about it, contains all the
nutrients that are required in order for
an organism
to grow. So, if you're somebody who
doesn't eat eggs or doesn't want to eat
eggs, things like potatoes, nuts, and
seeds, and grains, and fruit, they don't
have as much choline as eggs, but they
do contain cholines. In general, most
people should probably strive to get
somewhere between 500 mg and a gram of
choline per day, so 1,000 mg. Next on my
list of compounds that have been shown
in peer-reviewed research to improve
neuronal and brain function is creatine.
Creatine can be derived from meat
sources. It can also be supplemented.
Creatine can actually be used as a fuel
source in the brain.
And
it there's some evidence that it can
enhance the function of certain frontal
cortical circuits that feed down onto or
rather connect to areas of the brain
that are involved in mood regulation and
motivation. What is the threshold level
of creatine to supplement in order to
get the cognitive benefit? Appears to be
at least 5 g per day. Now, the most
typical form of creatine is so-called
creatine monohydrate. Think it's
interesting that creatine
supplementation of 5 g per day, that's
creatine monohydrate, has been shown to
improve cognition in people that aren't
getting creatine from animal sources.
So, I personally take creatine, 5 g per
day, and have for a very long time. I
can't say that I've noticed a tremendous
benefit because I've actually never
really come off it. And so I've never
done the control experiment. I take it
more as kind of a baseline insurance
policy for me. But what I can say is
that
I generally consume these things like
EPAs, creatine,
alpha GPC to set a general context of
support for my neurons, for my brain.
And of course I do also pay attention to
the foods that contain these various
compounds. So I don't actively eat
additional meat just to obtain creatine.
I eat a fairly limited amount of meat. I
don't restrict it, but I and I do eat
meat. But
I don't actively seek out creatine in my
diet. Rather I use supplementation in
order to hit that 5 g per day threshold.
Next on the list of foods that are
beneficial for brain health is one that
you've probably seen pictures of online
because there seems to be a practice of
putting pictures of blueberries and
other dark berries next to any title
that says foods that benefit your brain.
There are a lot of foods out there that
have been purported to improve brain
function.
The interesting thing about blueberries
and other berries, blackberries,
dark currants, any of these thin-skinned
berries that are purplish in color
is that they contain what are called
anthocyanins.
Anthocyanins actually have some really
nice data to support the fact that they
improve brain function. Now whether or
not it is
direct effects on neurons or whether or
not it is by lowering inflammation or
some other modulatory effect isn't quite
clear. But I think by now
there's enough data to support the fact
that eating a cup or two of blueberries
pretty often every day or
maybe you have blackberries or maybe
it's black currants, that these
anthocyanins are are good for us. That
they are enhancing our overall
well-being at a number of different
levels. So, we've got EPA fatty acids,
we've got phosphatidylserine, we've got
choline, we've got creatine, and we have
the
anthocyanins, and the
last item that I'd like to place in this
list of food-derived things that can
enhance brain function
is glutamine. Glutamine is a very
interesting amino acid. I've talked
about glutamine on here before. There's
some evidence, although somewhat scant,
there's some evidence that glutamine
can enhance immune system function. So,
people will supplement with glutamine,
or people can get glutamine from foods.
Foods that contain a lot of glutamine
are things like cottage cheese. There
are also other sources of glutamine.
Glutamine is rich in protein-rich foods,
things like beef, chicken, fish, dairy
products, eggs, but also for you non um
animal-food uh consuming people out
there, um
vegetables, including beans, cabbage
once again, spinach,
parsley, things of that sort. So, those
foods contain glutamine.
For people that supplement with
glutamine, generally they will take
anywhere from a gram as much as 10 g per
day.
Why would they want to do that? Well,
there's also some evidence starting to
emerge that glutamine can help offset
sugar cravings. In brief,
we all have neurons in our gut that
sense the amino acid content, the fat
content, and the sugar content of the
foods that we eat, and signal in a
subconscious way to our brain whether or
not the foods that we're we are eating
contain
certain levels of certain amino acids.
And so, we actually have
glutamine-sensing neurons in our gut
that actually have their little
processes, their little um axons and
dendrites, as we call them, in the
mucosal lining of the gut. They're not
just sensing glutamine, but when they do
sense glutamine, they respond, and they
send signals to the brain that are
signals of satiation, of satisfaction,
and in doing so can offset some of the
sugar cravings that many people suffer
from. So, that more or less completes
the list of things that, at least by my
read of the literature,
are things that are supported by at
least three and, in some cases, as many
as hundreds of studies
in various populations that have been
explored in mouse studies, often, but
also in a number of human studies.
I want to emphasize again that all of
the things I listed out, whether or not
it's EPAs, whether or not it's
phosphatidyl serine, whether or not it's
choline, whether or not
it's
the various compounds that are in
berries, etc., all of those can be
extracted from food. There is not any
law that says that you have to get them
from supplementation. Supplementation
can help you get to the very high levels
of those things if you want to work on
the higher end, if that's right for you.
Obviously, check with your doctor before
taking anything or removing anything
from your diet or supplement regime.
But,
in general,
you can get these things from foods. It
just so happens that for some of these
compounds, the foods that they're
contained in, like fish, are not foods
that I particularly enjoy. And so, I
rely on Excuse me, I rely on supplements
in order to get sufficient levels for
me. But, again, you can get these levels
from food. And the reason I made this
list,
the reason that I emphasize these things
in this particular order is that
they support the structure of neurons,
they support the structure of the other
cells of the brain that make up our
cognition and that are important for our
focus and our ability to remember things
and so forth. And they are less so in
the category of so-called modulatory
effects. They will also have modulatory
effects on sleep, on inflammation, or
reducing inflammation throughout the
body, on cardiovascular function, all of
which, I believe, are positive
effects. At least, what the literature
tells us is that none of these compounds
are harming other systems of the body,
provided they are taken at reasonable
levels.
But,
everything in this list is directed
towards
answering the question, "What can I eat?
What can I ingest by way of food and or
food supplement that can support brain
function in the short-term and in the
long-term?" So, I hope you find that
list beneficial for you, if not for use,
at least for consideration. So, now
having talked about some of the foods
and micronutrients that are beneficial
to our immediate and long-term brain
health,
I'd like to shift gears somewhat and
talk about why it is that we like the
foods that we like.
We've all heard before that we are
hardwired to pursue sugar and to like
fatty foods and that calorie-rich foods
are attractive to us for all sorts of
reasons, you know, surviving famines and
things of that sort.
And while that is true,
the actual mechanisms that underlie
food-seeking and food preference are far
more interesting than that. There are
basically three channels in our body and
nervous system
by which we decide what foods to pursue,
how much to eat, and whether or not we
will find a particular food
attractive, whether or not we will want
to consume more of it,
whether or not we want to avoid it, or
whether or not it's just sort of so-so,
what I refer to as the yum, yuck, or meh
analysis.
And indeed, that's what our nervous
system is doing with respect to food.
So, let's talk about what these three
channels for food preference are.
The first one is an obvious one. It's
taste on the mouth. It is the sensation
that we have of the foods that we eat
while we're chewing them, and those
sensations, which are literally just
somatosensory touch sensations, you
know, the
the palatability of food as it relates
to the consistency of food.
That's important. And as you've all
heard before, we have sensors on our
tongue and elsewhere in our mouth that
detect the various chemicals contained
within food and lead to the senses of
taste, which we call bitter, sweet,
umami, salty, and sour. The umami
receptor
is a receptor that responds to the
savory taste of things. So, that's
uh what you might find in a really
wonderfully rich tomato sauce. For those
of you that eat meat and like meat, um a
really well-cooked, not necessarily
well-done, but properly cooked, I should
say, steak, uh if that's your thing. And
umami is present in both plant and
animal foods and gives us that sensation
of savoriness. So, we have those five
basic tastes. Those are chemical sensors
on the tongue that what we call
transduce those chemicals. Those
chemicals literally in food bind to
those receptors and it is transduced,
meaning the binding of those chemicals
to the receptors is converted into an
electrical signal that travels in from
the tongue along what's called the
gustatory nerve, then synapses, meaning
meaning it makes connections in our
brainstem,
in the so-called nucleus of the solitary
tract. There are other nuclei back
there. Nuclei are just aggregates of
neurons. And then it sends information
up to the so-called insular cortex. The
insular cortex is a
incredible structure that we all have
that mainly is concerned with so-called
interoception, or our perception of
what's going on inside our body. So, it
could be the amount of pressure in our
gut because of how much food we've
eaten. It could be the acidity of our
gut if we're having a little bit of
indigestion, for instance. And not
surprisingly, the taste system sends
information up to the insular cortex to
give us a sense, literally,
of
what we've ingested, whether or not what
we're tasting tastes good or not. What
this means is that your perception of
what you like is a central, meaning
within deep within the brain,
phenomenon. It's not about how things
taste on your mouth. But as we'll see in
a few minutes,
turns out that that is not a direct
relationship that is hardwired. You can
actually uncouple the preference for
particular tastes with the reward
systems in the brain. It's actually
possible to rewire one's sense of taste
and preference for particular foods. But
the most important thing to understand
is that
like with our hearing, like with vision,
like with smell,
taste is an internal representation
that has particular goals for you.
Your sense of what tastes good is
related to particular things that are
occurring in your brain and body and
that are likely to give your brain and
body the things that it needs.
It is not simply a matter of what you
{quote} like or what tastes good or what
doesn't taste good. Let me give you a
relatively simple example
of how your body and your brain are
acting in a coordinated way to make you
prefer certain foods and indeed to
pursue certain foods more.
So I just mentioned you have neurons on
your tongue that respond to different
tastes. But of course your digestive
tract isn't just your tongue, it's also
your throat. Goes all the way down to
your stomach and of course your
intestines.
Here's a long tube of digestion.
All along that tube there are neurons.
Some of the neurons are responding to
the mechanical size of
whatever portion of the digestive tract
it happens to be. So for instance, how
distended or empty or full rather, it
doesn't have to be distended. How
depends on how much you ate, but how
full or empty your gut happens to be.
Whether or not something you just ate is
temperature hot, you know, is hot in the
sense of hot to the touch or whether or
not it's spicy hot, whether or not it's
soothing, whether or not it's
kind of hard to swallow, this kind of
thing. So, you have neurons all along
your gut that are responding to the
mechanics related to food and digestion,
and that are related to the chemistry of
food and digestion.
There's a population of neurons, nerve
cells, in your gut that are exquisitely
tuned to the chemistry of whatever it is
in your gut.
And these are neurons called neuropod
cells. They respond to
amino acids, sugars,
and fatty acids.
So, as your food is digested, as food
lands within your gut, neurons there are
sensing what types of foods are
available, and what types of things are
making their way through the gut
environment. And these particular
neurons send electrical signals up into
the brain
through a little passage that we call
the nodose ganglion. The nodose ganglion
is a a cluster of neurons that then go
for send up their own processes into the
brain and trigger the release of
dopamine, which is a molecule that
inspires motivation, reward, and more
seeking for whatever it is led to their
activation.
These are super interesting neurons,
because what they're essentially doing
is they are providing a subconscious
signal about the quality of the food
that you're eating, what it contains,
and then triggering the release of a
molecule within your brain, dopamine,
that leads you to go seek more of those
foods.
So, now I've mentioned two of the three
mechanisms by which we prefer certain
foods. One is from the actual taste that
we're familiar with, the taste on our
tongue and in our mouth, and the
sensations that make us go
or
or uh
the yum yuck meh responses as I referred
to them earlier. And then there's this
subconscious signaling coming from the
gut that's really based on the nutrient
content of the foods.
There's a third pathway,
which is the learned association
of a particular taste with the
particular
quality or value that a food has. And
this is where things get really
interesting and where there's actually a
leverage point for you to rewire
what it is that you find tasty and that
you want to seek more of. We are driven,
meaning we have mechanisms in our brain
that make us motivated to pursue more of
what brings both a taste of sweetness,
but also that brings actual changes in
blood glucose levels up. Okay, so we are
motivated to eat sweet things not just
because they taste good, but because
they change our blood sugar level. They
increase our blood sugar level. What
your brain, meaning what you are seeking
when you eat is not taste, is not
dopamine,
is not even a rise in blood glucose.
What you're seeking, even though you
don't realize it because it's
subconscious,
is you are seeking things that allow
your neurons to be metabolically active.
And this is fundamentally important for
understanding why you eat, why you eat
particular foods,
and how you can change your relationship
to those foods. Now, earlier I referred
to these circuits as wired to do
something.
And in biology and in particular
neuroscience, we talk about something
being hardwired or soft-wired. Hardwired
meaning that it's there and it's
immutable, it cannot be changed.
Soft-wired meaning it's very amenable to
change. The taste system and this
general system of seeking particular
foods, similarly, is hardwired to obtain
certain types of nutrients. It tends to
like sweet things. Most children
naturally like sweet things, some more
than others. So, there's some hardwiring
of preference, but there's also some
soft-wiring in the system that allows it
to change.
So, the experiments that were done
that beautifully illustrate that you
seek out particular foods because of the
way they taste, because of their impact
on blood glucose levels, but also
on their impact on the dopamine system,
even if your blood glucose levels don't
change. So, here's the experiment.
One group of subjects is given a sweet
taste of a substance that also raises
blood glucose levels, blood sugar, and
dopamine goes up, not surprisingly.
Second condition, separate subjects
consume an artificial sweetener or a
non-caloric sweetener. It is not
preferred much over other substances,
but it is sweet, so it's preferred
somewhat, and it does not cause an
increase in blood glucose levels.
And not surprisingly, dopamine levels
don't go up.
So, initially, we don't tend to like
artificial sweeteners that much.
However, if subjects continue to ingest
artificial sweeteners,
even though there's no increase in blood
glucose level and therefore no increase
in brain metabolism,
dopamine levels eventually start to
rise.
And when those dopamine levels
eventually start to rise, you've
essentially conditioned or reinforced
that
artificial or non-caloric sweetener, and
then subjects start to consume more of
it and they actually get a dopamine
increase from it.
So, that's interesting. It says that
consuming more of these artificial
sweeteners can start to tap into the
dopamine system and lead us to seek out
or consume more of these artificial
sweeteners. Now, there's another
condition that's been explored,
and that's the really interesting
condition, and it's the condition where
an artificial sweetener is paired with a
substance that can increase blood sugar,
but not because it tastes sugary like a
normal sweet substance. The natural
world scenario where this would happen
would be drinking a diet soda, which
contains no calories and therefore would
not increase blood glucose, but is
sweet, with a food that increases blood
glucose.
And when that happens,
what you're essentially doing is tapping
into the dopamine system. This
non-caloric sweet that sweet taste is
paired with it,
and there's an increase in in neuron
metabolism.
So, you have all of the components for
reinforcement, and as a consequence,
you get in a sort of Pavlovian
conditioning way
a situation where later, when you ingest
that artificial sweetener,
you actually get not only the increase
in dopamine, but you get alterations in
blood sugar management. I'll make this
in the natural world context. If you
ingest an artificial sweetener, say
drink diet soda while consuming foods
that increase blood glucose,
then
later, even if you just drink the diet
soda,
it's been shown that
you secrete much more insulin, the
hormone that regulates blood glucose, in
response to that diet soda.
And the simple extractor tool from this
is if you're going to consume artificial
sweeteners,
it's
very likely best to consume those away
from any food that raises blood glucose
levels. So, if you're going to enjoy
diet soda, be my guest,
but do it while not while consuming
food. In particular, foods that raise
blood glucose because what these studies
show is that they can disrupt blood
sugar management by way of the insulin
glucose system. Studies by my colleague
Alia Crum in the psychology department
at Stanford have explored
the bodily response in terms of insulin
release and the release of other food
and eating-related hormones,
as well as overall feelings of
satisfaction, etc.,
in groups of people that
drink a milkshake
and are either told that it's a
low-calorie shake that contains uh
various nutrients that are good for them
or a higher calorie shake that has a lot
of nutrients, etc.
And what they found was that the
different groups, and here again I'm
being very general with my description
of these studies, but what they found is
that the physiological response, the
insulin response, the blood glucose
response, and the subjective measures of
whether or not people enjoyed something
or not
were heavily influenced by what they
were told were in these milkshakes. So,
blood glucose would go up, insulin would
go up when people were told it was a
high-calorie shake with lots of
nutrients, less so when people ingested
a shake that was uh you know, that they
were told had less nutrients and so
forth. When in reality, it was the
identical shake.
This is incredible. This is a belief
effect. This is not placebo, right? A
placebo effect is different. Placebo
effect is in comparison, it's where the
control condition actually
influences outcomes
to a same or to some degree just like
the experimental condition. This is a
belief effect where the belief and the
subjective thoughts about what a given
food will do has a direct impact on a
physiological measure like blood sugar
and blood glucose. Okay. So, let's zoom
out from this for a second and think
about how we can incorporate this into
adopting consumption of healthy foods
that serve our brain health in the
immediate and long term. What this means
is obviously you want to consume foods
that you like, but because brain health
is very important and many of the foods
that promote brain health
perhaps are not the most palatable to
you or desirable to you. If you want to
eat more of a particular food because
it's good for you, pair it with that
other food that provides you a shift in
brain metabolism, because that's really
what your brain and you are seeking even
though you don't realize it. How long
will this take? Well, the data really
point to the fact that even within a
short period of time of about 7 days,
but certainly within 14 days, that food
will take on a subjective experience of
tasting at least better to you if not
good to you. Now, I believe this has
important implications for much of the
controversy and food wars that we see
out there.
Food wars being of course
these groups that ardently
subscribe to the idea that their diet
and the things that they are eating are
the foods that are good for us and that
are the most pleasurable and the things
that everyone should be eating.
We see this with
every community within the nutrition
realm. What's very clear, however, is
that what we consume on a regular basis
and what leads to increases in brain
metabolism,
leads to increases in dopamine and
thereby our motivation to eat them.
So, what this really says is that what
we tend to do regularly becomes
reinforcing in and of itself and I think
in large part can explain the fact that,
yes, indeed, for certain people a given
diet not only feels good, but they
heavily subscribe to the nutrient and
kind of health beneficial effects of
that diet.
What this emphasizes is that foods
impact our brain and its health, but
that they also impact
how our brain functions and responds to
food. And that is largely a learned
response. We can't completely override,
for instance, that certain foods evoke a
strong
yuck component. Certain foods are truly
putrid to us, but it's also true that if
we continue to eat foods that are
progressively sweeter and sweeter and
highly palatable,
it shifts our dopamine system because it
activates our dopamine system to make us
believe that those foods are the only
foods that can trigger this reward
system and make us feel good and taste
and that they taste good. But after
consuming foods that perhaps are less
sweet or even less savory that are not
what we would call highly or I would say
nowadays it's super palatable foods, we
can adjust
our sense, literally, of what we
perceive as an attractive and rewarding
food. And indeed the dopamine system
will reward those foods accordingly. Put
simply, we don't just like sweet foods
because they taste good. We like them
because they predict a certain kind of
metabolic response.
If you want to learn
more about food reward
and food reinforcement, cuz it turns out
those are slightly different things,
there's a wonderful review written by
Ivan de Araujo, they have a middle
author Mark Shaker, and Dana Small. It's
called Rethinking Food Reward and it was
published in the Annual Reviews of
Psychology.
You can find it very easily online. It
was published in 2019. And it's a
beautiful deep dive, although quite
accessible to most people, about how
different foods and the way that we
perceive them
impacts our brain and body and why we
like the things we like and how to
reshape what we like. So once again,
we've done a fairly extensive deep dive
into food and your brain. Came up with a
relatively short list of what I would
call superfoods. And we also talked
about food preference and why particular
tastes and particular events within the
gut and particular events within the
brain combine to lead us to pursue
particular foods and to avoid other
foods and how you can leverage those
pathways in order to pursue more of the
foods that are going to be good for you
and good not just for your brain, but
for your overall body health and to
enjoy them along the way.