First Minister’s Questions (Party Leaders) (BSL) - 10 September 2026
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The session opened with ceremonial remarks regarding the Jewish New Year, Rash Hashana, before shifting immediately to a serious debate on women's health and the crisis in neonatal services. The SNP opposition highlighted alarming statistics showing that women in Lanarkshire face waiting times of over four years for hysterectomies, while thousands across Scotland wait more than a year for gynecological treatment. Specific cases were presented to illustrate systemic failures, including the story of Elizabeth Kramond, who was not seen by NHS staff despite 60 attempts to contact an early pregnancy unit after experiencing bleeding and pain, ultimately miscarrying nine days later. Similarly, the case of Katy Lion revealed a seven-day delay in confirming a miscarriage due to lack of capacity and coordination issues. The First Minister responded by expressing deep sympathy for these women and confirmed that the government has launched unannounced inspections of maternity services across the country to address these vulnerabilities and ensure person-centered care is delivered effectively.
The discussion then turned to education, where the SNP criticized the government's handling of recent PISA results, arguing that Scottish pupils are falling significantly behind their English peers in science, math, and reading. The opposition pointed out that 49% of S4 students were not entered for National 5 Maths in 2026, a figure they described as a systemic failure to narrow the attainment gap, particularly for working-class children. They accused the First Minister of reducing Scotland's educational standards from outstanding to average and claimed that primary teachers are now forced to teach basic literacy at secondary level due to poor foundational skills. In response, the First Minister defended Scottish education by citing internal data showing record proportions of S3 pupils achieving third-level or better in literacy and numeracy, as well as a 93.5% rate of young people moving into positive destinations like university or employment. He attributed some perceived declines to external factors and emphasized the government's commitment to eradicating child poverty and expanding early learning opportunities to support families.
Finally, the leaders addressed urgent climate concerns, specifically the UK government's plan to license new oil and gas fields at Jackdaw and Rosebank in the North Sea. The SNP argued that approving these licenses amidst a backdrop of severe heatwaves, wildfires, and glacier collapses constituted climate vandalism that would endanger future generations. They noted that the Scottish Government had previously held a presumption against new licenses but questioned why this stance had been abandoned, especially given public support for maintaining it. The First Minister maintained that the government must assess each application on a case-by-case basis within the legal framework of the UK, noting that failing to do so would be unlawful. He reiterated the Scottish Government's absolute commitment to achieving net zero and transitioning to clean fuels, pointing to recent investments in hydrogen projects and community renewable schemes as evidence of their dedication to addressing the climate crisis while managing energy security.
Read the full video transcript
Thank you, Cabinet Secretary. That ends
general questions. The next item of
business is first minister questions for
party leaders. Question one, Jackie
Bailey. Presiding officer Rash Hashana,
the Jewish New Year starts tomorrow. And
I want to wish everybody in the Jewish
community a happy new year. Presiding
officer, today the campaign against the
dangerous downgrading of neonatal
services was at the petitions committee
in this parliament. Its message is
clear. Mothers and their children should
not be put in danger due to SNP
centralization. But this is just one
example of how the SNP are failing on
women's health. Statistics show that
women in Lannshire are facing weights of
over four years for hyctomies and
thousands of women across Scotland are
currently waiting over a year for
gynecology treatment. But what was John
Swinn's answer to this crisis in women's
health? He scrapped the role of women's
health minister. That's simply not good
enough. So, can I ask the first
minister, does he know how long on
average women in Scotland have to wait
for an endometriosis diagnosis?
First minister,
>> first of all, Professor, let me
associate myself with Jackie Bailey's
comments in relation to Rash Hashana and
to express my good wishes to the Jewish
community at the celebration of Rash
Hashana. Can I also take this
opportunity present officer to indicate
that tomorrow we will mark the 25th
anniversary of the 911 tragedy and I
will represent Scotland at a service of
commemoration at St. Giles Cathedral uh
to commemorate those whose lives were
changed irreparably by the 911 incident.
Jackie Billy raises significant issues
in relation to women's health and uh I
expect these issues to be taken forward
by my all female health minister team.
Uh I have three health ministers. They
are all women and I know from the
leadership that the health secretary
will give to that team that all of these
issues will be prioritized. And women
wait too long for treatment for
endometriosis in Scotland. And the
government, as Jackie Bailey knows, is
working very hard to ensure that waiting
times are reduced so that treatment can
be delivered in a credible and
acceptable time scale to everyone
involved, especially to women who suffer
from endometriosis.
>> Jackie Bailey, presiding officer, the
answer the first minister was looking
for was 10 years. It's got worse on his
watch and that was when there were two
female health ministers. So 10 years of
waiting in pain and having your struggle
dismissed or diminished. But women with
endometriosis are not the only ones
being let down this way. After previous
miscarriages, Elizabeth Kramond was a
high-risisk pregnancy. But when she
experienced bleeding and pain, she tried
to contact the early pregnancy unit in
Kakotti. She asked for help 60 times but
wasn't seen. Elizabeth was so desperate
she had two private scans. But nine days
later when she was finally seen by the
NHS, she was told she had miscarried.
Nine days. The government miscarriage
care framework states that women who are
high- risk or have complications should
be able to self-reer to the early
pregnancy assessment service. So can I
ask the first minister why was this
support not available for Elizabeth
Kramond?
>> First minister
>> sir I'm aware that Elizabeth Kramond has
been in dialogue with uh Jackie Bailey
on this question and that Jackie Bailey
has written to the cabinet secretary for
health on this particular issue and we
are exploring the circumstances that
affected Elizabeth Karland. The most
important thing I can say at the outset
is to express my sympathy to Elizabeth
with Karland at the experience that she
had. She should not have had that
experience and I state that clearly to
parliament and we have we'll have to get
to the bottom of exactly why that was
the case because it is so important when
there is any vulnerability whatsoever in
relation to a pregnancy that the
earliest possible intervention is
provided. That's what the maternity
framework is designed to offer. It has
clearly not delivered that in this case.
We must understand why that is the case
and provide a remedy. I appreciate that
that will be of little consolation to
Elizabeth Kramond, but it is part of
what we have to do in uh in in in
transparency and openness when things do
not go as they should go uh to make sure
that all steps are taken to ensure that
that situation is not repeated in the
future.
Jackie Billy,
>> can I thank the first minister for his
response? Elizabeth feels failed by NHS
FIF and NHS TAI and it's left a
devastating and lasting impact on her
and her family. But her experience isn't
unique. There are lots more women in
this situation. Katy Lion was pregnant
following a previous miscarriage when
she noticed spotting on the 23rd of
December. On Christmas Eve, she had to
go to A&E because her condition had
deteriorated and because there was no
capacity to see her in the maternity
service. While Katie waited anxiously
for news of her baby, the staff
struggled to coordinate with gynecology
and maternity care. When she finally got
a scan, no heartbeat could be found. It
was another 7 days before her
miscarriage was confirmed. only after
she had two further scans. Both Katie
and Elizabeth are in the chamber today
to demand change. As Katie herself said,
families should not have to endure
repeated loss before their concerns are
taken seriously. The framework for
miscarriage care is not working. So will
the first minister do the right thing
and ensure that miscarriage care is
urgently reviewed and women's voices are
heard?
>> First minister
presiding officer Jackie Billy has
raised with me two particular cases. Um
first of all the case of Elizabeth and
now the case of Katie and I am terribly
sorry for the experience that these two
women have had within our health
services. Um the the whole issue to come
back to some of the points I made in my
response to Jackie Bailey's second
question. The framework for the delivery
of maternity care should address the
circumstances that Jackie Bailey has put
to me. It has clearly not done that and
Jackie Bailey is putting two cases to me
where that is very apparent. That is why
the government has um commenced a whole
series of inspections of maternity
services that are underway around the
country. Um the there is a a range of
those inspections that have been carried
out by um healthcare improvement
Scotland. They are unannounced
inspections and the government receives
the reports on those and obviously from
those h there are action points as we
have rehearsed in the chamber before.
When some of those reports come forward,
there are significant reforms required,
significant actions, and we must the
health secretary is monitoring the
implementation of those uh those
examples. um on the I'm very happy to
explore the specific cases that Jackie
Bailey puts to me because it matters to
me and to the government that there is
person- centered care available for
every single person who interacts with
the health care service in Scotland
regardless of this the the case and the
details that um are involved to make
sure that people get the best and the
most appropriate care and the cases that
Jackie Bailey has put to me today that
clearly has not happened and I apologize
for that and I will happily explore both
those cases to provide as much
information and as much response as I
can to the to Elizabeth and to Katie to
whom I express my my sympathy and my
empathy of what they've experienced.
>> Malcolm Wford.
>> Thank you, presiding officer.
While I was in the BBC studio on Sunday,
getting wired up for my final interview
of an eventful weekend, I was forced
[snorts] to listen to the first
interviewee, droning on and on and on
for 15 minutes without answering a
single question. To stop myself drifting
off as the first minister talked himself
into oblivion,
I reached for the Sunday Times. And what
did I see on the front page? none other
than deputy first minister Kate Forbes
her new column in the Sunday Times does
the first minister agree with her common
sense analysis excuse me let's hear the
question please
>> on North Sea Gas on defense on taxation
I quote the less complex the tax system
the better you cannot tax your way to
growth does this sound familiar
>> very
>> so
>> will the first minister look forward to
reading her column in the weeks to
First Minister.
>> Well, I'm I I'm I'm always interested in
lots of views that are expressed in the
political debate. I have to listen to
them all. And it's not my fault if the
BBC wants to put me on in a prime spot
spot instead of Malcolm Offford. Um that
that uh that um
that perhaps speaks volumes, but I'm
sure for Mr. were offered listening down
the line from the reform fest where
members of the public were being
assaulted in the reform conference. He
would learn a lot from the dignity of
the way in which I expressed my case on
Sunday morning.
[applause]
Markford
officer turning to serious matters.
Mari McCallen has tried to dress up yet
another disappointing PISA result as
stability
and competitive by international
standards. While presenting officer Kate
Forbes might say continue continuity
won't cut it, but I say this isn't even
continuity. This is disastrous for our
young people and embarrassing for our
nation. To fall so far behind England in
education is a national emergency.
Pres officer, we invented education. The
Scots have had universal education since
1660. The English only got there in
1873.
In August 2016 at Wesley Hills Education
Center in Edinburgh, Nicholas Sturgeon
asked to be judged on her on her record
in education, especially on closing the
attainment gap between the poor and rich
postcodes. Well, presiding officer, 10
years on, the results are in. Scottish
pupils are now a full academic year
behind their English peers in science
and Scotland has scored the worst
results ever in maths and reading.
Meanwhile, England scored a top 10 place
in all three disciplines. This is
shocking. And all the while honest John
has been present. As finance minister,
he presided over devastating college
cuts. As education minister, he marked
down 75,000 working-class kids during
the pandemic. And now as first minister,
he's reduced our great tradition in
education from outstanding to average.
>> The ruination of a once proud nation. My
question is this presiding officer.
>> Is a full school bag, a free school bag.
The only gimmick left to this hapless
first minister.
First minister.
>> I'll tell Malcolm offered what ruination
looks like. It's people like him and
Thomas K going around spreading racist
filth in our society. That's what
ruination looks like.
[applause]
Now, presiding officer, I accept the
outcome of the PISA assessments, but
there are but the PISA assessments are
one part of the data set that looks at
Scottish education. If we look at the
achievement of curriculum ex for
excellence levels data which is produced
by the teachers of Scotland who Malcolm
offered has just insulted shows that the
proportions of S3 pupils achieving third
level or better in literacy or numeracy
are at their highest level ever. We have
the highest level of young people
leaving school going to positive
destinations at 93 and a half%. We have
record levels of young people in
Scotland going to university for the
first time including record numbers of
young people from deprived backgrounds
according to UKCASS at national 5 higher
pass and higher pass rates were both up
compared to last year and pre- pandemic
and the poverty related attainment gap
narrowed for national 5 higher and
advanced higher. That is the full report
card on Scottish education and I'm proud
of Scottish education
[applause]
Malcolm.
So presiding off let's talk about the
attainment gap. Mara has been foolsome
in her praise of recent exam results in
Scotland but presiding officer in 2026
49% of the S4 student cohort were not
even entered in that five maths. This
compares with 41% in 2019 while student
numbers have grown 12% in the same
period. So the [snorts] SAP might claim
success for half the pupils who sit
these exams but this mass a systemic
failure to narrow the attainment gap for
all pupils. We must narrow the
attainment gap by raising the floor, not
by lowering the ceiling. And the bottom
line is that standards are falling in
Scottish schools. Now, during this
week's education committee, Patricia
Gibson argued it may be impossible to
close the attainment gap as children are
quote unquote starting from very
different standpoints. Really, is this
really the stark reality of S&P lack of
ambition? First, destroy an
internationally admired gold standard
education and then give up. Presiding
officer reform will never let Scotland's
children down with this with this
acceptance of mediocrity.
So, uh, presiding officer, I'd like to
know, does the first minister agree with
Miss Gibson? Does he think that closing
the containment gap is really
impossible? Has he given up on Scottish
children?
>> First Minister,
>> I think the only person that should
contemplate giving up is Malcolm
offered.
the the government if if Malcolm offered
had followed the program for government
h presentation to parliament last week
he would have seen at its heart the
primary objective of the government to
eradicate child poverty that is the
stated aim of the government and that is
what we are taking a variety of measures
to to achieve that's why we have lower
levels of child poverty in Scotland
which I suspect is contributing to some
of the achievements that we're making on
narrowing the attainment gap within
Scottish education. So the other policy
measures that we've taken such as
expanding more than doubling the
availability of early learning and child
care to make sure that children get the
best start in life through their
engagement with early learning. Uh some
of the other measures that we brought in
such as the um the the measures on book
bug work for for babies and families to
make sure that children and families
have the opportunity to engage in
literacy from the earliest possible
stages. All of it h justified by
international evidence. These are just
some of the steps the Scottish
government is taking to support families
to make sure that we close the
attainment gap and most of all to make
sure that every child in our country has
the best start of life. That's what
children will get from an S&P
government. [applause]
>> Jillian Mai.
Over the coming weeks, the prime
minister is expected to travel to
Aberdine to publicly announce the
license for the Jack Dog gas field.
After a summer of climate breakdown,
after a summer of climate breakdown here
in Scotland and across the globe, this
is an act of sheer climate vandalism.
We've had 72 separate wildfires here in
the UK with over 700 households
evacuated. Over 1,400 people have died
in Nepal and Tibet after the recent
glacier collapse with over 5,000 still
missing. And across Europe this year,
over 35,000 excess deaths have been
linked to the backto-back heat waves.
Every license we grant to drill more and
oil and gas in the North Sea will
contribute to more wildfires, more heat
waves, and more loss of life for
generations to come. So will the first
minister join me in condemning the
climate wrecking behavior of the UK
government and say no to drilling at
Jack Daw and Rosebank.
First minister [applause]
the first thing I want to say is that
the government attaches the strongest
possible importance to the taking of
climate action and the fulfilling of our
statutory obligations to achieve net
zero. which is why the achievement of
net zero is one of the one of the four
principal priorities of the government's
agenda as I set out to parliament in the
program for government last week. Now
the the United Kingdom government in
considering decisions in relation to
Jack Door and in relation to Rosebank
have got to make an assessment of the
climate impact of those proposals. That
is the legal duty. That is why these
applications have had to be re-examined
because that was failed to be undertaken
in the past. So I think that is a an
absolutely fundamental assessment to be
undertaken. It must be part of the
decision-making process of the United
Kingdom government and the UK and we
also have to accept that as we undertake
as we utilize oil and gas in the years
to come the question the UK government
has to uh to assess is whether the
development of these fields will
contribute more to the carbon emissions
that would that would be realized as an
alternative to the importation of oil
and gas from other jurisdictions and
that is the assessment that has to be
made of In all of this, the Scottish
government is absolutely focused on
making sure that we make the transition
to uh to clean fuel. I was in Aberdine
yesterday to set out more grant funding
to support the transition to net zero in
Scotland and that will remain the focus
of the Scottish government.
>> Jillian Mai,
>> the Scottish government used to have a
clear position on this, a presumption
against all new licenses for oil and gas
fields in the North Sea. That would have
clearly ruled out support for both Jack
Daw and Rosebank. But the draft energy
strategy has lain in a drawer for over
three years now, never published or
finalized. That's despite a majority of
people responding to the consultation
supporting the presumption against new
licenses. And polling from earlier this
year shows that that's still the case.
Last week's program for government
promises a refreshed energy strategy at
some point down the line, but it also
says that new licenses should be treated
on a case-by case basis. First Minister,
people who've had their homes destroyed
by wildfires and floods, people who've
lost loved ones in the recent heat
waves, want to know what the government
are going to do to not make this worse.
So, does the first minister think new
oil and gas fields in the North Sea will
make the climate crisis better or worse?
First minister, Presiding officer, there
is there's no alternative to considering
applications that are made within the
legal framework of the United Kingdom on
anything other than a case-by case
basis. It would be it would be unlawful
to do anything other than that. and what
the Scottish what the Scottish
government will do in reinforcing as I
have reinforced already today the
government's absolute commitment to
taking climate action which has been
reinforced by the commitments we've made
in various budgets as I announced
further measures on yesterday in the
city of Aberdine to support the moves to
the utilization of clean energy I was
support announcing a project at a
hydrogen uh related organization
yesterday of ensuring that we invest in
making that transition to net zero and
that will be the focus of the Scottish
government's agenda.
>> Jillian Mai,
>> this is a departure from the previous
energy strategy which had that
presumption in there and I'd be keen to
know from the first minister what has
changed to move away from the
presumption that was in the draft energy
strategy. Jack Daw is a gas field which
would contribute just 2% to our current
gas supply. Any argument that this will
somehow contribute to energy security or
making our homes cheaper to heat this
winter is simply wrong. What would make
a real and immediate difference is a
rapid roll out of clean green heating
for homes in Scotland. Replacing gas
boilers with electric heating and
insulating buildings will make our homes
warmer and cheaper to heat and won't
contribute to the rapid climate
breakdown like Jack Doaw. When the
Scottish Greens were in government, we
published a plan to roll out clean
heating to a million homes. Last week's
program for government cut that plan by
90%. Has the Scottish government bought
the line that Jack do and Rosebank will
solve the crisis of high energy bills?
Or do they intend to take real action to
ensure every home in Scotland has clean,
green, and affordable heating?
>> First Minister,
>> all of the measures that Julian Mai
talked about are measures the Scottish
government has taken forward. They're
all part of the the the steps that were
taken. Whether that's about home
insulation, whether it's about
alternative heating systems, whether
it's about a community renewable
schemes, all of these are part of the
government's program for government. And
we have taken these measures forward for
some time. I'm grateful from the support
from members of the Green Party for the
measures that the government takes. But
these are integral to the program for
government that I set out to parliament
last week, including right at the heart
of the program for government, one of
our four priorities, which will be
disputed across this chamber because not
everybody will agree with the fact that
one of the government's four priorities
is to make the transition to net zero
because we've got people in this
parliament that don't think we should
make the transition to net zero. We've
got people that don't agree with that
agenda, but that's the Scottish
government's agenda and I'm proud to put
that and set that out to Parliament and
to the people of Scotland.
>> Russell Finley.
Thank you, PL officer. I'd also like to
wish all the best to Scot Scotland's
Jewish community as they celebrate Ross
Shashana. John Swinny says that Scottish
education is essentially stable and the
new PISA results confirm that he is
utterly delusional. After finishing
primary school, many Scottish pupils
can't even read or write.
>> Primary teachers are now teaching basic
literacy at almost half of Scotland at
Glasgow's secondary schools. And one of
these teachers said they've get reading
ages of maybe five or six years old.
They can't recognize basic words. this a
decade since Nicholas Sturgeon said
she'd put her neck in the line to
improve literacy in deprived areas of
all the SNP's many failures is trashing
Scottish education the greatest of them
all
>> first minister
>> as I set out to Malcolm offered earlier
on the I'm proud of Scottish education
and I would simply say to Russell Finley
that for S3 pupils the proportions
achieving third level or better in
literacy and numeracy are at their
highest level ever and that's because of
the investment the Scottish government
has made in closing the attainment gap
in delivering excellence and equity in
Scottish education and ensuring that
young people are supported to fulfill
their potential and that will remain the
focus of the government's improvement
work which has been brought forward
following the Pisa results in 2022 2 to
make sure that we have the delivery of
curriculum improvement to constantly
strengthen the delivery of Scottish
education and that's the focus of the
government.
>> Russell Finley failed education sector
absolutely nothing to be proud of.
>> Here are the facts. English pupils
thanks to conservative policies are in
the world top 10 for reading, math and
science. And the same rankings confirm
that Scottish pupils continue to
decline. They are intelligent. They are
ambitious. They're hardworking. But they
are failed by this negligent, useless,
and complacent SMP government whose only
answer is a free school bag.
>> Glasgow's education director, John
McGee, says that Scotland's success
depends on the skills of young people
leaving our schools. The leading ex
education expert, Professor Lindseay
Patterson, says that Scottish young
people face a competitive disadvantage
in the jobs market. So why is John
Swinny sabotaging the prospects of a
generation of young Scots and Scotland's
future prosperity?
First Minister,
>> I I I I don't accept the point about
competitive disadvantage for Scots
pupils because on the data that I set
out earlier on, uh, young people from
Scottish education are going into
positive follow-up destinations at a
rate of 93.5%
when they leave school and that's going
into education, work or training as a
consequence of their education. And
secondly, UKcast data shows that 97% of
Scots who applied to a university got a
place. Now that doesn't suggest to me a
competitive disadvantage about the
outcomes for young people. Now Russell
Finley introduced a comparison to about
the English system and he introduced and
he said that was attributed to the
Conservative government. Well, let me
also tell Russell Finley what the
Conservative government have given to us
all. Because of his support for Liz
Truss, the public finances of this
country were absolutely absolutely and
completely trashed. So I am not going to
take any lessons about anything from
somebody who thought Liz Truss was a
good idea as prime minister.
Alex Cole Hamilton.
>> Thank you, presid presiding officer and
presiding officer, may I extend the good
wishes of the Scottish Liberal
Democrats, the Scotland's Jewish
communities on this most apicious of
holidays. Um, presiding officer, when it
comes to education, we can't just ignore
international assessments. Education
used to be up there with the best in the
world, but not any longer. And if we are
to confront that reality, then we need
Scottish ministers to address their
shortcomings and accept responsibility.
But it's not just school pupils this
government is failing. I have badgered
the first minister about businesses who
have suffered endless ferry disruption.
And yet the SMP government repeatedly
refused to compensate coastal
communities. But this week, Parliament
voted for a Scottish Liberal Democrat
amendment that would see compensation
heading to the very port towns that have
suffered the most. the likes of Arden,
Denoon, Malle, Oben and Alipool. So in
the spirit of respecting the will of
this parliament, will the first minister
tell businesses in towns like these
exactly which of them will qualify, how
much they will get, and when that money
might actually reach them. First
Minister,
>> sir, I announced during the summer the
implementation of a support uh scheme,
financial support scheme for communities
affected by ferry disruption earlier on
the year and that's a matter of public
record and the information is available
on the government's website.
>> Alex Cole Hamilton,
>> these communities are still suffering
and not getting access to the cash
promise. It's clear that this government
presiding officer is simply all at sea
when it comes to compensation and feries
more generally. Yesterday in parliament,
the transport minister and his director
of feries were completely oblivious to a
major BBC news story. 700 kilos of
highly flammable gas was released into
the Glenn Sanics with 82 passengers on
board. A critical safety failure hidden
for a year and only exposed by
journalists for all to see. Presiding
officer, this is the latest in a long
line of ferry failures. The Glen Rosa
now 8 years overdue, 20 million pounds
for a shipyard in Turkey, while our own
yard in Port Glasgow is shedding a
quarter of the workforce. An election
promised for four new vessels, but still
no contract. And now and now a transport
minister at a transport committee
clueless about a transport safety
failure. Now presiding officer, we have
all heard the rumors that the first
minister gave Mr. Flynn this job to set
him up to fail. Did he really expect it
to happen so soon?
>> First minister.
Well, it takes Alec Cole Hamilton some
distance to get to the point. Um, let me
just let me just pick apart a few of the
things that Mr. Cole Hamilton said. The
first thing is that his comment about
the absence of a compensation scheme
ignored the fact that I announced the
compensation compensation scheme over
the summer. So, all I would say to Mr.
Cole Hamilton in the spirit of decent
parliamentary exchanges is that he needs
to pay attention to what the government
is actually doing. And if he and if he
and if he actually if he actually paid
attention to what the government was
doing, he wouldn't ask me questions
about things I've already done. Second
point is on Ferguson's and Mr. Hamilton
is um essentially talking about the uh
the the the Ferguson yard and the
intervention of the government to
safeguard employment there. Now when the
government intervenes on these cases,
his colleague next Willie Renie
criticizes the government for so doing.
He was criticizing the government for
intervening in the DL steel plate
steelard the other day there. So I
simply point out that there is a level
of inconsistency coming out of the
Liberal Democrats on all of these
issues. And what the government is doing
on fairies is the government is
investing in the ferry fleet. We have
four new vessels coming from the yard in
Turkey. We've got the Glen Rosa coming
out of Ferguson's and the government is
investing to strengthen our ferry
services and that's exactly what we're
going to deliver.
>> Thank you first minister. That ends
first minister's questions for party
leaders. The next item of business is a
debate on motion 114 in the name of
Steven Geffins on Scotland's energy
opportunity.
Members wishing to speak should press
the