Feminism Is a Deathtrap for Society? | Jake of @rattlesnaketv Vs 7 Challengers
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The central thesis presented in the video is that feminism acts as a "death trap" for society because it inherently leads to the decline of its own ideology and a catastrophic drop in birth rates. The speaker argues that the original goal of feminism was to liberate women from traditional family structures, which he believes has resulted in women prioritizing careers and personal autonomy over reproduction. Consequently, this shift causes fertility rates to plummet, leading to a demographic collapse where the very group advocating for these changes stops reproducing themselves, effectively causing the ideology to eat itself alive. The speaker contends that while feminism may offer short-term benefits like access to education and bank accounts, it fails to account for long-term societal stability, which he defines as requiring high birth rates to sustain civilization over centuries.
A significant portion of the discussion focuses on the role of men in maintaining societal infrastructure and the perceived failure of modern masculinity compared to traditional virtues. The speaker asserts that men are essential for performing dangerous tasks such as driving ice road trucks, serving in the military, and maintaining critical infrastructure like sewage plants and power grids. He suggests that if men were to lose their sense of duty or courage, society would crumble into chaos or be filled with "pacified gimps." Furthermore, he attributes many societal issues to a lack of male leadership and the influence of propaganda that convinces women to view abortion as a noble right rather than a sacrifice. He contrasts this with his personal experience, where he credits his wife for keeping him from making stupid mistakes, though he acknowledges that relying on women for moral guidance might be seen as an appeal to authority or a logical fallacy by his challengers.
The debate also explores the concept of short-term versus long-term thinking within feminist ideology. The speaker claims that feminists focus on immediate desires such as abortion rights, individual autonomy, and financial independence without considering the long-term implications for the survival of the human race over hundreds of years. He posits that even if women currently enjoy these freedoms, there is no guarantee they will be allowed to maintain them indefinitely; he speculates that future generations might revert to patriarchal structures where husbands control finances and household decisions to ensure family stability. He uses the analogy of Pokémon cards to illustrate how a movement can shrink and become niche over time without completely disappearing, suggesting that feminism will eventually wither away as it loses its mass appeal and fails to produce the next generation needed to carry its legacy forward.
Ultimately, the speaker concludes that while there may be some women who are feminists and still have large families, the core ideology of modern feminism is unsustainable because it discourages reproduction. He argues that true societal health requires a return to traditional family values where men lead households financially and women focus on nurturing children, a dynamic he believes has been dismantled by current feminist movements. The conversation ends with an acknowledgment that while the movement has evolved significantly since its inception decades ago, the speaker maintains that this evolution has led to detrimental outcomes for society, including rising consumer debt among women and a breakdown in family cohesion. He leaves open the possibility that feminism will persist only as a minor subculture while the broader concept of mass female suffrage and autonomy fades away due to its inability to sustain itself demographically.
Read the full video transcript
Men are [ __ ] stupid.
We're we're not smart.
We make [music] stupid mistakes all of
the time. I do it every single day. I
called that guy a [ __ ] the other day
and I completely regret [music] it. I
was
>> I thought what he was saying was
[ __ ] but
>> not want educated women teaching
children?
>> Educated women, what do you mean by
educated?
>> Like maybe she goes to some college and
schooling and then they are better
equipped to teach their children.
>> No.
No.
My next prompt is that feminism is a
death trap. It leads to not only death
of its own ideology, it eats itself
alive.
It also leads to the death of millions
of unborn children.
>> Why is feminism the death trap and not
men failing in their own regard?
>> Well, the idea here is that feminism is
a death trap. We can talk about men and
their duties and responsibilities in
another debate, but this one's about
feminism.
It's a different debate.
>> All right.
I think men are dropping the ball and I
think yes, maybe we might be heading
that way, but it's not because of
feminism.
>> Look, I mean I'll I'll engage with it.
Look, largely I don't actually think
that men are really dropping the ball.
I've tried seven ways to Sunday to try
and say, "Well, it's the both sides."
And look, there are some things that
they aren't doing right, but if you look
around at the infrastructure around like
everything still runs properly, we still
have a functioning military.
And I think that
generally one of the virtues that men
need to have in in society is courage
and leadership. And if they're not
courageous enough to get up on the high
lines and to drive the ice road trucks
and to go to war, then everything falls
apart. Like just imagine tomorrow that
men were not courageous like that.
Just imagine what would happen to
society. But then you look on the
reverse, just imagine if women shirked
their duties of having children and
nurturing the next Oh, wait, that's
happened now. So, that's the argument
there.
>> Well, I don't know. I kind of see the
infrastructure of America starting to
crumble.
And everything's
kind of falling apart. And now we're
we're claiming that men are still doing
the best.
>> Well, it's not it's not necessarily that
they're doing the best. It's not
necessarily that they're doing
perfectly. But I guarantee you, if men
were to collect And look, this is a
possibility. These sorts of things have
happened before. If there was some sort
of revolt where men were like, "You know
what?
What's in it for me? Like I'm not going
to do this anymore because
I can't really have any of the benefits
that I would have had or that my
grandparents would have had. I can't buy
a home. I can't have access to like a
noble, loyal, virtuous wife, all these
sorts of things." Then
I think that we would see actually
detrimental effects on society. And
there would be roving bands of people
killing each other. And there would be a
vacuum of power that opened up.
Or they would just all turn into sort of
pacified gimps.
>> Are they not already kind of pacified
gimps?
>> No, I don't think so. I think that you
look around everywhere and you see like
there's a guy here I was just speaking
to who's like, you know, hobbling around
because he got hit by shrapnel in a war.
And there's you know, the lights are
still on here. We still have all of this
dangerous infrastructure. We still have
you like A lot of people think that they
flush their toilet and just sort of goes
you know, down. But you know, there's
infrastructure beneath the roads and
sewage plants and men who are in [ __ ]
plumbing to do these sorts of things.
And then like that's all still happening
today. But what's not happening is we're
not like sustaining our birth rates.
>> Right. [snorts] And I've
I work around that kind of stuff with
infrastructure and what not. And
it always kind of feels like
we're just almost there where it's going
to teeter off.
>> I do want to get to the prompt though
because
>> was
>> Yeah.
The prompt is that feminism is a
death trap.
It leads to the Let's just say it to the
death of its own ideology. And I'll
explain what what I mean by that.
>> Right.
>> So, if feminism wants to seek out
egalitarianism and they want to put
women in higher education and they want
to have more women having access to the
workforce. And ultimately, what feminism
is is is the dismantling of the family
unit. That was the original goal of
feminism. They said that in order to be
truly liberated, women need to be
oppressed from the shackles of their
loving families and their and their
children and all these sorts of things.
So, if that is the goal,
then obviously women are going to forego
having children in pursuit of this more
noble virtue, apparently. So, if they're
foregoing children, then they're not
reproducing themselves,
then someone else is going to be
reproducing,
and it's not going to be the feminists.
And so, that ideology ends up taking
over.
>> Do you not want educated women teaching
children?
>> Educated women, what do you mean by
educated?
>> Like maybe she goes through some college
and schooling and then they're
better equipped to teach their children.
>> No.
No. I don't I don't I don't necessarily
even see why like like you mean like a
teaching degree or like
>> Mhm, not necessarily, but get a lot more
information on grand scheme of things.
Like uh my mother, uh I was actually
homeschooled, but she went through
college and
she I think got her master's in some
sort of mathematics and stuff like that.
So, she really helped me a lot with
that, but it's kind of cool to have that
basis for her instruction for me.
>> I get why that would have been helpful,
but like when if you if you need to get
a college education to teach infants, I
don't really see why you why you'd
necessarily need that. Like I'm I'm sure
you could get a high school education
and you could be a human being who has
your wits about you and you could teach
children about like 1 + 1 is 2 and basic
English and
you know? And I don't I don't I don't I
don't necessarily I think a lot of the
subjects that are taught in public
school these days are totally
unnecessary as well. So, even if it's
not the most educated woman in the
world, like
she could still if she has virtue and if
she has good social skills and
everything and if she sort of does her
own research into how to educate your
children, I think that it'll be just
just fine.
>> Fair point.
>> Thank you, sir.
>> So, you say that feminism leads to the
death of itself along with the death of
>> millions of children.
Why
Why do feminists lean more towards
you know
aborting their children?
>> Uh well, I actually think that it's like
a demonic inversion. And this is maybe a
little bit off topic, but uh I I believe
that there's something inherent about
human sacrifice in the human condition
when we stray far enough away from the
good. Like for example, uh in
Christianity one of the central themes
is it's like sacrifice. Jesus says,
"This is This is my body and I give it
to you. I sacrifice it for you. I die
for you." But feminists, they say the
same thing, "This is my body,
but I get to do what I want with it.
It's my body and I get to kill inside
it. It's not that I'm sacrificing, it's
that I'm killing." So, I think that
there's a there's like a demonic satanic
inversion that goes on there. And I
think that it's a it's a spiritual
thing, but uh
uh in terms of on a more practical
level, I think that uh actually
women are just completely and utterly
propagandized to think that this is some
sort of like uh
a noble right. Like I was at the table
yesterday on the No Fugazi podcast.
Shout out to my boy my boy Cooley. And
there was eight women with me and me and
my friend Cooley. And we asked them
"Who here wouldn't date a Trump
supporter?" And they're all raising
their hands. And then I said, "Okay,
well, what are the policies that would
make you not want to ever date a Trump
supporter?" And each one of them went
around the table and didn't know any
policies, had no idea what they were
talking about. They were functionally
[ __ ] when it came to politics. But
each one of them said along the lines
of, "Well, you know, Trump doesn't want
abortion."
So, I think that it's just mass
propaganda and then they understand that
women don't tend to engage with ideas
and these sorts of things as much as men
and they and that there's a very very
big chunk of low information women who
will just be able to be propagandized
and used uh by NGOs and you used by
political parties to their ends.
>> Well, obviously they buy into the
propaganda. So, it's appealing to them.
>> Yep.
>> And couldn't men sacrifice something so
that women would be more willing to have
children?
>> But do what do you mean by sacrifice
something?
>> Like more men staying at home.
>> More men staying at home?
>> you know, women don't like to be
constrained. They're complaining a lot
about, you know, it's a trap. It's a
trap.
>> Yeah. Well, I I appreciate that you're
playing devil's advocate. I know you're
doing the best job that you possibly
can, but if men were to stay home en
masse and women were to pursue their
careers, that's like the exact same
problem is that they just are going to
forego having children and that doesn't
help anything. And they've actually
tried this to an extent in Scandinavian
countries, for example. They've tried to
give a lot of benefits to women where
they can like have a lot of maternal
leave and and everything, but it it just
doesn't doesn't help at all. Like it's
it's a cultural problem and we need to
address the cultural problem.
>> Fair enough.
>> Thank you, sir. Good man.
>> I've been married for 19 years.
And uh
she's the most independent and strong
person that I've ever known and I've
achieved a lot in my life.
Um
but I wouldn't have achieved half of
what I've done without her standing
behind me with her arms folded.
So,
her having the the the choice to do what
she wants and to to stop me doing my
stupid things,
uh
I see women having the rights to choose
as a benefit for everybody because
men are [ __ ] stupid.
We're we're not smart.
We make stupid mistakes all of the time.
I do it every single day. I called that
guy a [ __ ] the other day and I
completely regret it.
>> Was he [ __ ]
>> I thought what he was saying was
[ __ ] but I 100% should not have
said that. I was wrong to do that and
and I've apologized and I should not
have ever you know, I make stupid
mistakes. And I'll tell you what, I
wouldn't have made that mistake if my
wife was sitting next to me. She would
have slapped me in the face before I'd
even got those words out of my mouth.
>> Look, I I think this is an this is a
basic logical fallacy. It's an appeal to
the same period and I don't I don't
really think that you basically saying
my wife is awesome and I'm so stupid and
I'm a big dummy and if it wasn't for my
wife then I'd just sort of be dead or
homeless or in prison. Like I I actually
don't think that that's the case. I
think that women are actually actually
a much more likely to need the guidance
of men than the other way around.
>> My experiences disagree with you.
All the men I know in my life, no matter
how smart they are,
they'd be
probably dead without the women in their
lives.
Um
>> I don't know I do think that you're just
like using a lot of hyperbole here.
Look, women play an integral role in
men's lives and like the symbiotic
relationship that you can form with a
woman, with a wife is is an incredibly
important thing and I see a lot of the
best men all of the best men that I know
pretty much are the ones who are in
long-term marriages and they have like
the counsel of their wife. But
>> It's an important thing.
>> Yeah, yeah, 100% but I don't really see
how this
actually relates to the prompt though
about how feminism is is is a disgrace.
>> point is that women have the ability to
choose
and because of feminism.
Uh so they can
choose
to stop the men doing the stupid things
and and not be in that subservient role
of just doing what they're told and
being in their place in the house. Um
and I think that that's
>> relate to abortion?
>> That I haven't really formulated the the
thoughts for.
Please bear with me. I'm having bit
issues with my leg so I'm I'm just
trying to think as quick as I can.
Um
The the the the
>> So are you Can I try and steel man it
for you?
>> Yeah, yeah, please. Sorry. Bear with me.
>> All right. So I think what you're trying
to say is that
women being able to choose in many
different capacities is important
because they play a very integral role
and some sort of like a demoralization
of women if they weren't able to choose
in terms of abortion would lead to
negative outcomes.
>> I think the empowering of women to have
those choices and realize that they're
not they don't have to just be
subservient has benefited women and
given them the
um
How do I word this? Given them the
the um
I'm sorry. Uh it's given them the
ability to
um
I'm sorry. Bear with me.
>> Self-actualize?
>> So, yeah, it's given them the ability to
uh you realize that they are more than
just a housewife.
Um you know, but it's also if they would
choose to be a housewife and that's what
they want to do, they can. But because
they've now realized that they're more
than just this housewife, it's given
them the uh
the the forefront to push men forward
sometimes.
>> I I I'm going to grant what you're
saying here. I'm going to I'm just going
to grant for the sake of the argument
that
uh women feel good about having the
ability to choose, right? That they can
choose whatever they're doing in life
and they can choose uh to have an
abortion if they want to.
But the logical conclusion of this is
still that feminism eats itself because
they're not going to have children and
the ideology will eventually die. So,
even if in the moment it feels good for
them if even if I just grant that for
you, in the long term the ideology dies
despite the short-term feelings of
happiness.
>> But not all feminists don't want
children.
>> I understand. Yeah.
>> So, I mean
feminism could still continue in some
form just maybe without the ones that
>> If it can Look, if it continued in an
underground sequestered away
>> Well, no, that's not what what what
>> private meetings way, I would I wouldn't
care. But the fertility rates are the
fertility rates.
>> Yeah, yeah, yeah, but there is feminists
that have large families and they're
still feminists. So, let's say that the
the feminists that don't want the babies
are the ones that end up going away.
They're still going to be a version of
feminism, but with just women that also
want to have lots of babies.
>> Will you grant that it will shrink in
size?
>> The feminism will shrink in size? Yes.
>> Yeah, and it will continue to shrink in
size?
>> Uh
>> until it withers away?
>> I think it it in in my hypothesis of
there being now a different version of
feminism, but the ones that actually
want to have lots of babies, it wouldn't
at that point it wouldn't shrink in
size. It would get to a point where it's
shrunk and it's now that bubble of
people that want the rights and equality
that feminism has given them, but they
also want to have lots of babies.
>> I think we can finish it off and I'll
I'll I'll grant you some more ground,
Craig, and uh finish off on a little bit
of middle ground. I can understand the
argument that feminism, you grant that
it will shrink, right? And it could
shrink to a to a minuscule size, but
there'll always be some sort of like
short-haired, middle-aged woman who
tries to yearn for the days of old, but
in terms of policy prescriptions and in
terms of uh you know, uh
mass universal female suffrage, those
things will go away and those are sort
of the the outcomes of feminism and
those things those things will die.
>> I think the suffrage has got That's not
That's what brought feminism about and
nowadays feminism is just a thing that
exists. You know, people aren't really
fighting for it in the streets anymore.
It's just, you know, there is a movement
of of feminists. So, I I think feminism
today is a very different thing to
[clears throat] what it was, you know,
even 30, 40 years ago. Um the movement
has evolved. The the the policies and
and the thoughts around feminism has
evolved. Um and
>> considerably worse, yeah.
>> in a lot of aspects, but um
there's extremism to everything in life,
right? There there's Pokémon players
that will go and fight kids to get the
best card. Does that mean that all
Pokémon players are bad and it's just
going to lead to violence?
>> think that Pokémon will die, you know.
>> Pokémon is weird, right?
>> I think that Pokémon will will live on.
>> Yeah.
>> [laughter]
>> Uh
but what if story What if for instance
you know Pokemon there's always the
fights in the stores so the stores
decide to stop selling the Pokemon and
then Pokemon will shrink and go away
because people have less access to it.
>> But I think that there'll always be now
I'm making your argument for you they'll
always be someone with a collector's
item in their basement somewhere. But
it's not like mass adopted anymore.
Anyways, the roles have really changed
here Greg so
>> Yeah, a good conversation.
>> Yeah, thank you sir. My next prompt is
that feminism destroys society by
short-term time preference meaning that
feminism is all about my feelings, my
rights, my autonomy, my abortion and all
these sorts of things and eventually
this kills society as we know it or
virtuous society Christian society.
>> How?
>> [snorts]
>> Well, because feminists they tend to
think in the short-term. They're
thinking about what I want right now. I
want abortion. I want to be able to go
and get educated. I want to have a bank
account and all these sorts of things.
When really
>> short-term?
>> Well well yeah because this is what I
want right now and it's not necessarily
looking at the long-term implications.
>> But isn't the reasons that they want
those things is that so that all females
can have them in the future which would
by definition be long-term? If they're
not doing it just because they want the
bank accounts feminists are doing it
because they want all women to have
access to these things. So that would by
definition not be short-term that would
be long-term.
>> Uh, it would be on a mass scale and they
can want that if they want like I want
uh, my bloodline to uh, persist
throughout thousands of years and I want
there to be a statue of me in all of
their front yards. But just cuz I but
just but just cuz I want that doesn't
mean that it's going to be descriptively
true. I have to
put the put the measures in place to
actually have that implemented.
>> So how does that
back up your case?
>> So you're saying that women want to have
bank accounts therefore they want
everyone in the future to have bank
accounts which I'm not necessarily sure
this true. I don't even really think
that they think that far ahead, but like
just because they want that doesn't mean
that that's actually going to happen.
They have to put they they have to put
the measures in place for it to happen
over the long term.
>> But it has happened over the long term.
Women can now have bank accounts because
of
the the the advance of women's rights,
women do have bank accounts and
mortgages and a lot of debt and
>> They do right now, yeah.
>> You so hasn't it become a long-term
thing? Even if let's say let's grant
your premise that the feminists wanted
it for them at the time, hasn't it now
then become a long-term thing because
any woman can go and get a credit card,
a bank account, a mortgage, do what they
want?
>> No, I don't think it's long-term. I
think it's been over the course of like
a hundred years and that's definitely
not long-term. Like when you when you
when you're thinking about long-term,
you're thinking about over the course of
hundreds and hundreds of years. And if
feminists if feminists actually wanted
to promulgate their ideology, then they
would need to go about it in a different
way. And I know it just comes back to
this all the time, but it's like they're
just not reproducing and they're going
to get replaced and the ideology is not
going to be sticking around forever, at
least not in a prominent way. So all of
these ideas like if you want women to
have bank accounts
200 years from now, you have to make
sure that you still have the ability to
be able to manipulate men in power. You
still have to be able to appeal to men
in power. And if men actually flip the
switch and they say, "Actually, you know
what?
This isn't working for us. Like our
rivals are getting much stronger and our
society is decaying. We need to sort of
rein it in and rein in suffrage and
these things, then over the long term
that actually won't happen. So you might
get bank accounts now and it might
happen for a little while longer,
but unless you actually have a plan to
promulgate the ideas of feminism, then
over the long term it's just it's going
to wither away and die.
>> Well,
do you for bank accounts specifically,
do you even have to do think about
feminism? Can you just not make sure
that everyone can have a bank account? I
mean, aren't you making the assumption
that in the future they're not going to
allow women to have bank accounts
anymore?
>> Yeah.
>> Do you honestly think that's the case?
That's the men will be like, "Nope,
that's it. No women. You're not allowed
a bank account anymore." Do you think
that's going to happen?
>> Well, I mean, I think that if consumer
debt gets to a certain level and they're
looking at societal trends and they're
looking at and they're looking at and
they're saying, "Well, you know, women,
when they have their own bank accounts,
tend to be extremely irresponsible. And
actually, all of these financial
disputes, they're breaking up families.
And if we want to really prioritize the
family, we've got to actually centralize
this and we've got to give the husband
the autonomy over the family's
finances." So, if when you're looking at
it like that, I think that there's every
chance that over the long term that
women's rights to voting, bank accounts,
all these sorts of things go away again.
Like, just because we're currently
living in this secular society, I don't
think that that's necessarily the way
that it has to go
for all of eternity. I mean, I think I
would like that,
but I don't think that they're putting
in
in place uh the means to do it.
>> So,
let's say men decide to take away
women's bank accounts. How do you think
that would work?
>> Well, same as it worked last time. It
would just mean that women will more
incentivized to get married and have a
family and have a husband who they could
appeal to.
>> physically. How how are we going to be
like, "No, you can't have bank accounts
anymore."
>> It's digital. Just boom, take it away.
Like that.
>> Yeah, but women are in charge a lot now.
>> Yeah, but like but that's that's the
idea though. Is that like patriarchal
structures, like they're trying to
dismantle patriarchal structures, but if
these patriarchal structures were
reinstated and they were like, "We need
to do everything we possibly can to
reinstill family values." One of the
first things that they would look at
would be, "Okay, the husband obviously
needs to have autonomy. There needs to
be one vote per household. The husband
casts the vote. And also, in terms of of
the finances, the husband is the leader
of the family so that these financial
disputes aren't always breaking families
apart like this."
>> So, just one more question before we
finish. Um
do you know what percentage of consumer
debt belongs to women versus men?
>> I think it's something like 80%.
>> Is that just the US or do
>> Uh I'm not sure. You'd have to fact
check me. I'm sure they'll fact check me
on this. But it's yeah, they they have a
higher
>> honestly
>> that's what I've not looked into and I'm
just interested in in how that and
>> Especially student debt they they they
there's a lot more student debt. Now, I
think that I think that when you look at
debt as an overall, men have a lot more
debt, but you'd know obviously that some
debt is good when you have it with
assets and you can positively gear
things, but some debt is bad. So, in
terms of the liability debt
>> and like car loans and stuff like that,
you think that's more women?
>> Credit student debt is a big one because
women are obviously
you know, going into college a lot more
than men these days. That's a big one.
And then credit card debt as well, you
know, women like to buy makeup and [ __ ]
>> I mean again, I guess it's just talking
about my life personally, but I know
that I'm useless with money and my wife
has to tell me what to do, but you know,
that's just me. Anyway, thank you for
that.
I enjoyed that.
>> Thanks, Craig. Appreciate it.