Video summary
The speaker begins by acknowledging the immense popularity of the Jack Reacher book series, noting that millions of copies have been sold over the last quarter-century despite some dismissing them as mere airport fiction. He expresses his genuine enjoyment of the books, praising their simple premise of a homeless drifter solving crimes across America. While he admits the concept can seem silly, he argues that the stories are well-structured mysteries filled with action and humor because they are self-aware; the author understands the absurdity of the premise but still delivers thrilling narratives about fighting despicable villains. He extends this appreciation to the Amazon TV show, which he considers the best adaptation, though he notes that the two Tom Cruise movies are enjoyable but ultimately a step down from both the source material and the series.
The speaker identifies several reasons why the films do not fully capture the essence of the books and the show, primarily citing underdeveloped characters and a failure to balance the gritty tone with the necessary silliness. A significant portion of his critique focuses on Tom Cruise's portrayal of Reacher; while acknowledging Cruise's intensity as an actor, he argues that Cruise lacks the physical stature required for the role, which alters the intended intimidation factor of the character. Furthermore, Cruise's intense acting style makes his version of Reacher feel less friendly and slightly less psychotic than the book counterpart, who is explicitly a psychopath without excuses. Additionally, the films are constrained by PG-13 ratings, preventing them from depicting the full extent of Reacher's violent nature, which results in him feeling more like a standard action hero rather than the unique vigilante found in the literature.
When analyzing the two specific films, the speaker finds the first movie, *Jack Reacher*, to be superior to its sequel, *Never Go Back*. He praises the decision to adapt the middle book *One Shot* rather than an origin story, as it effectively introduces Reacher's character and his history with a corrupt former comrade without needing extensive backstory. The speaker highlights the film's delayed action sequence as a bold choice that pays off well, noting that the fight choreography is smart and purposeful rather than just a series of random punches. He also appreciates the self-deprecating humor in the script, such as jokes about auto parts stores and ambushes gone wrong, which helps maintain the story's unique blend of seriousness and silliness. However, he feels the mystery plot itself becomes somewhat dull once the conspiracy is revealed, involving generic evil businessmen that lack the excitement of the initial setup.
In contrast, the second film, *Never Go Back*, is viewed as a decline in quality due to a less engaging mystery and weaker character development. The speaker notes that while the main villain lacks depth, the antagonist known as "The Hunter" provides a better screen presence with a creepy yet friendly demeanor and a genuine rivalry with Reacher. The film does succeed in humanizing Reacher through his relationship with a young girl named Samantha, exploring themes of loneliness and guilt that resonate with his drifter lifestyle. Despite these moments, the speaker concludes that the sequel feels predictable and less cerebral than the first, though he still recommends watching it as a fitting conclusion to this specific version of the character before potentially moving on to read the books or watch the TV show for a more complete experience.
Read the full video transcript
So, the Jack Reacher books are some of
the bestselling books that have ever
been written. I mean, millions and
millions of copies have been sold over
the past about 25 years. Your dad
probably loves them. I I mean, you can
see them being sold at like the airport
and stuff and so some people just kind
of dismiss them because of that, but I
don't know. I from the books I've read
in the series, I really like them. The
premise is simple. There's a homeless
drifter named Jack Reeer who travels
America. And along the way, he solves
crime and fights baddies. And like,
yeah, that sounds silly, and in many
ways it is. It is self-aware, but eh,
they're still really fun, good books.
Like, they're mostly fun because they're
good mysteries. They're well structured
mysteries, and they also have enjoyable
action and some humor mixed in there.
Cuz like I said, they are self-aware.
The author understands that yes, this
premise is kind of silly. You shouldn't
take it too too seriously, but at the
end of the day, Jack Reacher is still
solving mysteries, and he is still
fighting some truly despicable bad guys.
As I said, I like the books that I've
read. I haven't read all of them, but
the couple I've read have been very
good, and I love the Amazon TV show.
Like if if you want to exper experience
Jack Reacher then I would recommend
checking out the Amazon show because in
my opinion that's the best of this. Now
it took me a while to watch the movies
however even after loving the show and
liking the books and I watched them
recently and they're good. Yeah, I
enjoyed them. They're good enjoyable
movies but at the same time I can see
why they never really took off. You
know, I feel like the movies are a step
down from both the show and the books
that they're adapted from. I think I can
summarize the reasons why pretty easily.
It's mostly due to the characters being
less developed than they are in the
books. And it also doesn't nail the
gritty but also very silly tone of the
books and the show. Like Jack Reacher
himself is played by Tom Cruz. And no
hate for Tom Cruz as an actor. I think
he's a very good actor, but he doesn't
work for a couple of reasons. And I'm
I'm not just going to say he doesn't
work because he's short. Like, okay,
obviously Jack Reacher is supposed to be
a giant dude and Tom Cruz is not, but
that's not really the problem. The
problem is that people are scared of
Reacher when they see him because like
he's a big hulking mass of meat and they
think, "Wow, this guy could really,
really hurt me." Uh, but they act the
same way towards Tom Cruz even though
he's a regularsized dude in the movie.
Or well, okay, they they use camera
tricks to make him look like a regular
sized dude in the movie. And I think
part of the reason that you can sort of
look past that sometimes is that Tom
Cruz is really intense. Like that that's
what makes him work as an actor is that
in pretty much every role he's ever been
in, he's been really intense. And so he
just looks at characters and you can
tell he's like drilling holes through
their head and looking directly at their
soul like he's trying to rip it out and
eat it. You know, that's that's how I
would describe Tom Cruz in these movies,
if that makes any level of sense. But uh
the thing is because he's so intense,
he's also less friendly than Reacher is.
And he's also,
weirdly, he's less crazy and less
psychotic than Reacher is in the books
because in the books, Reacher is a
straightup psychopath. And the books
make no excuses for that. Like, he he
does some heinous things, but he does
them to people who deserve it mostly.
And he also just doesn't think twice
about killing or otherwise hurting
people. And I I don't know like Reacher
in the movies, Tom Cruz Reacher, he has
that intensity, so it feels like he's on
the verge of violence at any moment, but
at the same time, we don't really see
him be as psychotic as he is in the
other uh versions of this story because
the movies are, you know, PG-13 and
they're trying to keep it that way. So,
in the end, he winds up just feeling
like a regular action hero. So, they
only made two movies. One's just called
Jack Reacher from 2012 and the other one
is Jack Reacher Never Go Back from 2016.
And I'll just go over them one at a
time. Again, I think they're both
enjoyable, but I think the first movie
is several bits better than the second
one. The first movie is better than
Never Go Back
>> on the ground.
>> That's a pretty impressive response
time, fellas.
>> Do it.
>> So, the first movie, just called Jack
Reacher, is based on the book OneShot,
which is right in the middle of the Jack
Reacher series. Now, that might sound
like a bad idea at first. But the thing
about the Jack Reacher books, and a lot
of thrillers like them, is that there
isn't an overarching plot really. So,
you can just pick up any book anywhere
in the series at any time and read it,
and you'll have a nice self-contained
little adventure. And that works pretty
well in this case. that I don't know if
that would work well in every case, but
I think it works well in this one
because if you read the first book in
the Jack Reacher series, Killing Floor,
that is meant to be kind of sort of an
origin story, like it was also adapted
into season one of the TV show. And so,
it's basically Reacher when he first
started doing his homeless drifter thing
and then he first gets wrapped up in
this bigger adventure. And I I think the
best way to describe it is that it's an
origin story because it shows how
Reacher truly got cut off from the rest
of the world. Because at the beginning,
the only family he has left is his
brother. And he finds out very close to
the beginning that his brother has been
murdered. And so he gets sucked in by
trying to solve that murder and figure
out what happened. And then he gets
pulled into a bigger conspiracy. In the
movie, based on one shot, uh, someone
goes on a killing spree in the middle of
Pittsburgh, kills several innocent
people, and while he's being
interrogated by the police, he just
writes a note saying, "Get Jack
Reacher." Because it's somebody that
knew Jack Reacher from back when they
were in the army together. And Reacher
is just chilling on a beach in Florida
when he sees his name brought up on the
news. So, he goes, "Okay, I'll go check
that out." And he goes off and
investigates it and again gets embroiled
in a bigger conspiracy. That's that's
basically how every Jack Reacher story
begins. Like he he's just chilling,
having fun, and then something happens
and then that escalates and snowballs
into something much much bigger. But
like I was saying, this isn't an origin
story. It just sort of throws you into
the middle of things, but it still works
as an introduction to Reacher and to his
character because after the guy, his
name is James Bar, uh asks for Reacher,
we see the police trying to look for him
and they go, "Wow, this guy's really
difficult to find." And then he just
sort of pops up there. And they also,
you know, like what they do in action
movies where they have a monologue about
how this guy's really badass and cool
and they list off a bunch of
accomplishments that he has. Like, you
know, it works well as an intro to
Reacher. Like, not just what he's done,
but the sort of person he is and the way
he acts. Now, everybody assumes that Bar
would ask for Reacher because he thinks
Reacher is going to get him out of
trouble, but Reacher is actually there
to do the exact opposite. He's there to
bury him, as he puts it, because he knew
Bar back when they were in the army
together, Bar actually murdered several
people and Reacher tried to investigate
him and get him sent in to prison for
it, but it wound up being covered up
because, well, to put it bluntly, bar
that the people he murdered were
rapists. Like they they were working for
the American military and they raped a
bunch of women in Iraq. So, they were
just like, "H, you know what? let's not
have this get out. And they just kind of
again swept it under the rug and let Bar
get away with it. And that's really
strange to me because like Reacher hates
this guy because he's a violent
murderous murderous vigilante,
but Reacher is also a violent murderous
vigilante. Like even just in this movie,
he murders people. Like like without
getting into too much spoilers, like he
breaks the law a lot. And again, he
usually only kills people that really
deserve it, that are truly heinous. So,
you're not going to think too hard about
it. But also, that's what it is legally
speaking. So, it's not like he has this
ironclad need to always follow the rules
and follow the law in all situations.
And again, if the situation was a bit
different, Reacher would happily have
killed all those rapists or happily
gotten them sent to prison. So, I'm just
not sure why Reacher is upset with Bar
for killing those guys. Maybe it's
explained better in the book. I haven't
read it yet, but I don't know that
that's just a weird thing that sticks
out to me about this movie. One thing
that's kind of interesting is that
Reacher gets hyped up a lot in the
opening, but we don't really see him do
anything other than investigate until
the 34minute mark. See, at the 34 minute
mark, the bad guys send some dudes to
jump Reacher and just beat him up really
badly. And Reacher fights several of
them and defeats them without any real
trouble cuz Reacher can do that. He He's
just that awesome.
>> So, there's no real action in the movie
until the 34minute mark. And that is
that's a ballsy move. Now, there's a lot
more action after that, but it is ballsy
to keep it uh I don't know, keep us on
the edge of our seats. Keep keep edging
us, I guess. Should I say that? I don't
know. It's a ballsy move to keep it
contained for that long and then it
actually happens. You know, like
normally action movies, they have to
start off with a bang or something. So,
it is different that they did it that
way. I'm not going to say it's
necessarily better or worse, but it is
different. And I also just want to take
a moment to say that the fights and the
action are all great. Like Reacher
doesn't just wreck dudes, he wrecks them
with purpose. You know, it'd be very
easy to write and choreograph that scene
in such a way where it's just, okay,
Reacher punches this guy. He runs over
here and punches this other guy. He
flips over and hits him with a chair or
something. You know, it'd be very easy
to do that. But Reacher goes into it
with a plan and he's clearly not just
fighting, he's being smart about it.
Like there's one guy who he gets into a
position where he's got him and he the
other guy can't really do anything to
him and then he looks over at his
friends and punches this guy in the
balls just to intimidate the guy's
friends and get him to walk away
really.
And that's very entertaining, but it's
also very in line with the sort of
person Jack Reeer is. He's uh yeah, he's
big and tough and can fight his way out
of situations, but if he can think his
way out or talk his way out, then he's
going to do that. And again, just him
punching that dude in the balls and then
looking over to the crowd for approval
is just a very funny moment. In fact,
there are a couple of those in the
movies that got an actual laugh out of
me. you know, the the books, the movies,
the show, they all have a very good
sense of humor about themselves, and
they can acknowledge that some of this
is pretty silly. And that's one thing
that makes them very enjoyable. Like in
the first movie, there's also a scene
where Reacher is talking to someone and
says, "Uh, take me to the auto parts
store." The first auto parts store that
comes to mind. And then she drives him
over there and we see it's just called
default auto parts. Like that's that's
funny. or a scene where some dudes try
to ambush Reacher and they hit him in
the back of the head with a baseball
bat, but the bat catches on a door frame
so he doesn't take the full force of the
blow. And then there's two dudes in a
very small room who are both trying to
attack him, but they keep getting in
each other's way.
[Music]
>> Or a moment in the second movie where
they steal the keys to someone's car and
they're looking for the car and they
they're like, "Well, it's a black
sedan." And then it zooms out and you
can see the entire parking lot is filled
with black sedans. You know, just little
moments like that. They they always got
a laugh out of me. That's what I mean
when I say that the Jack Reacher stories
are gritty, but they're also very silly.
Like, they have a sense of humor. They
have moments like that, but at the same
time, they don't shy away from the
violence, and they don't shy away from
how horrible some of these situations
are and just how heinous some of the
villains are. The whole process of
Reacher investigating this mass shooting
and uh uncovering the big conspiracy
that's at the heart of it is great, but
I did feel the reveal of what's going on
was pretty dull. You know, ultimately
it's just some evil businessman men are
doing evil businessman things and it's
just it's not not really that exciting.
But at the same time, the reveal of why
the massacre was done was pretty good.
And the villains are very much a mixed
bag here. Like they're very very smart
and it's great to watch them be capable
and watch them do evil stuff while also
covering up their tracks and everything.
Like they're very very smart. At the
same time they are ridiculous. Like I
I'm not even gonna bother looking up the
name of the main villain, but he has one
eye and a ridiculous over-the-top
foreign accent and he has a couple of
fingers that are missing because he
spent years in a Siberian goolog and he
bit off his own fingers to prevent the
frostbite from going gangrous. Like he
he's just he's just way too over the
top. Even back in the 80s, that sort of
villain would have been seen as just
being stupid. They would have said,
"Hey, tone tone it down just a little
bit." and he also doesn't really do
anything. He's just the guy who's in
charge and throughout the movie, his
minions are the ones doing all the bad
stuff. Now, his main minion is played by
Jai Courtourtney and he's better, but
there's not that much to him, you know,
like at least he actually goes out and
does stuff like he actually fights and
kills people and stuff and he's
unflinchingly loyal to his boss for some
reason. I I don't know. There's just
there's not much to him. He doesn't have
a lot of personality. He doesn't have
any interesting motivations or backstory
or anything. He's just he's there. But I
guess Jai Courtourtney gives a okay
performance. So he's there. And then you
look at Jack Reacher's allies who are
also all right. You know, we we have
Roseman Pike. She's a lawyer who's
committed to justice and wants to help
him get to the bottom of all this and
she she's fine. Obviously Roseman Pike
gives a good performance, but they don't
give her that much to work with. There's
the owner of the gun range who has a
little bit more personality. Like you
can see him and Reacher uh bond a little
bit because they're both army vets and
you know that's kind of cool but yeah he
doesn't have that much to him. He's just
a guy who helps Reacher out and is kind
of fun to watch. I I don't know. I just
don't have that much to say. They don't
have the presence that side characters
usually have in the Jack Reacher books
and the TV show, you know, and that's a
problem because Jack Reacher, the
stories tend to be very formulaic.
Again, Jack Reacher wanders into a new
town. There's some big event that
happens. Usually someone gets killed in
that event or multiple someone's get
killed and then he somehow gets pulled
into it and then he investigates and
then he uncovers a bigger conspiracy and
along the way he fights a bunch of bad
guys and then at the end he blows the
whole thing up, defeats all the bad guys
and then wanders off again. So it's
formulaic. What keeps it from getting
stale is that the characters again have
a lot of presence. Not just Reacher
himself, but all the side characters.
They have very well-defined
personalities and sometimes they're a
bit silly and larger larger than life,
but you remember them. And also, the
settings of the stories tend to be very
different. The scenarios that they go
through uh are different from one
another, so they help stay fresh and it
like that's what prevents it from
getting stale. But overall, the Jack
Reacher movie very enjoyable. I don't
think it's really anything to write home
about, but it's very, very enjoyable. I
liked it.
>> You're supposed to be watching him.
>> What do you think? I've got eyes in the
back of my head.
How's it going?
>> Then there is Jack Reacher Never Go
Back, which is a step down from the
first movie. I don't think it's bad. A
lot of reviewers think it's bad, but
personally, I just think it's a step
down. It's still fun, enjoyable, but
having watched it twice now, I'm going,
"Yeah, no, I can see why the critics
were kind of harsh on it." The mystery
is worse than in the first movie. The
setup for the mystery and for unraveling
the conspiracy and everything is a lot
less interesting. The action is not bad,
but it's less engaging and it feels a
little bit less cerebral. Like I feel we
didn't really get a moment like in the
first movie where Jack Reacher punches
that dude in the balls to intimidate his
friends. Like we didn't really get a
moment. We're like, "Okay, yeah, this
guy's very smart while he's fighting."
And the characters are worse. The basic
setup here is that Reacher is traveling
to Virginia to meet someone that he
somehow became friends with. uh her name
is Major Turner and she's actually in
charge of the old uh unit that Reacher
used to be in charge of. But then she
gets arrested for murder and he thinks,
well, she's obviously innocent and then
he gets swept up in it and the whole
story unfolds from there. And
story-wise, I don't have a lot to say.
Like I said, the mystery is less
engaging. There's again evil businessmen
doing evil businessmen things, and it's
just I don't know. The the mystery
wasn't as engaging. It wasn't as
interesting. And the whole time I just
felt like, eh, like, yeah, I could see
what was coming a mile away. Which might
have been fine if, again, the characters
were better, but they're just not. Like,
we have Major Turner. She's just kind of
Reacher's sidekick in this one. There's
there's not much to her. Like, she's
tough and angry at times and determined
to clear her name, which is
understandable, but there's not a lot to
her. And again, just like Roseman Pike
in the first movie, Kobe Smolders is
given a good performance here. Like,
she's clearly trying, but the script
just does not give her that much to work
with.
>> Soldier, you know who I am. I need you
to stand down.
>> You've been relieved of command, man.
>> Now, another side character here who I
thought was a lot better was Samantha,
who is introduced as possibly being Jack
Reacher's daughter. And she's a lot
better because she's like 15 years old.
Uh but she's very very smart and
resourceful and capable and she doesn't
think twice about, you know, stealing or
lying in order to protect herself
because she's lived a hard life. Reacher
clearly sees a lot of himself in this
girl and the two of them connect really
well and it it helps humanize him a bit
because again, Reacher is a psychopath.
So the moments where he gets humanized
and where we see the person underneath
his harder exterior is th those are good
moments you know like again in the first
book or the first season of the TV show
when his brother is murdered we see
under it and in this one when he's
thinking that maybe he has a child and
he hasn't been there for her for 15
years and he clearly feels ashamed and
guilty because of that. That is also
very good. There's a scene near the end
of the movie where he's about to go off
and continue wandering and drifting
again and Sam asks him if he ever gets
lonely and he just says sometimes. And
that's actually one of the things that I
like about Jack Reacher and what
prevents it from feeling too silly is
that it acknowledges that yeah, his life
is lonely and he's not a very well
adjusted person and that's kind of why
he is a drifter. like he can't adjust to
live in regular society, at least not
for long periods of time. He's too
volatile. He's not good at following
rules and he just doesn't connect well
with other people. Like that's why he
became the person he is. And he likes
his life of freedom. He likes not being
tied down. But at the same time, it does
get lonely. I also think that the
opening of this movie is a great
introduction to Reacher because just
like the first one, it just sort of
throws you into the middle of it, but it
also kind of throws you into the end of
whatever adventure Reacher was going on
before cuz it starts off he's in a
diner. He just beat a couple guys up.
The police try to arrest him and then he
says, "Actually, you guys are running a
human trafficking operation." And then
military police come and arrest the
sheriff. And you can tell that he was
going on some other adventure before
this and he was also fighting bad guys
before this. And like, yeah, that's how
the Reacher books work. I think that is
a great way to introduce us to the
character in only a minute or two. And
it's also just fun for us to imagine
what he was getting up to before this.
And we know that at the end of the
movie, he's going to go off and he's
going to get into more very similar
adventures. And so, we get to imagine
what sort of adventures he gets into
after that. And I don't think they're
going to make any more movies, at least
not with Tom Cruz. So, I don't know.
It's just like that that is the end of
that character at the end of uh you know
never go back like that's the end of
this version of the character I should
say and so I don't know h being able to
use our imagination and fill in the
blanks is a lot of fun. Now I think that
Reacher and the other characters in this
movie are a bit weaker than they were in
the first one. However, I think the
villains are a lot better because again
the main villains in charge of
everything. Not much to say about them.
But the main threat that they actually
face off against, like the enforcer for
the villains, is a guy who's just called
the hunter. And he's some sort of former
special forces guy. Again, just like
with Jai Courtourtney in the first
movie, he doesn't have much to him. You
know, he doesn't have that much
personality. He doesn't have an
interesting backstory or motivation for
why he's doing what he's doing.
Presumably, he just gets paid very well
to be a hitman. But he works really well
because he has much more screen presence
than Jai Courtourtney did. You know, he
has this way of seeming kind of friendly
but also really creepy at the same time.
And at the same time as both of those,
he also seems like he could explode into
violence at any moment. Like it just it
works really well. So anytime he's on
screen, you you feel his presence there
and I really liked that. And on top of
that, he is intimidating. He's an
intimidating villain. He's one of the
only people that can actually fight
Reacher to a standstill by himself. Like
the first scene where him and Reacher
fight, he's winning and Reacher has to
run away.
>> Stay back.
And as the movie goes on, they develop a
bit of a rivalry and the hunter begins
to hate Reacher on a personal level. So
yeah, this guy doesn't have any complex
motivations or anything, but he's more
fun to watch than the villains in the
first movie. I'll give him that. And
yeah, I don't know. Never go back. I
don't have a whole lot else to say about
it. It's a very meh movie, but I still
think it's worth a watch. Like if you
watch the first one and enjoy it, then I
would recommend checking out the second
one because again that's that's the end
of that version of the character. Like
we're almost certainly never getting
anything more than that. So I don't
know, just enjoy it. Overall, if you
want to get into Jack Reacher, I would
recommend reading the books or watching
the Amazon TV show because those are
just both better than the movies. But
the movies really aren't bad, guys. like
they're they're enjoyable films.
Obviously, Tom Cruz is a great actor and
a great filmmaker. Whatever else you
want to say about his involvement with
the Church of Scientology and just I
don't know. I I don't think I have a lot
else to say. The Jack Reacher stories
tend to be very simple, but that's part
of what makes them fun. That's all.
Thank you for watching this exclusive
video. Goodbye. Ahoy. Thank you for
watching this far. If you didn't watch
this far, but you still wound up here
somehow, then I still appreciate you.
You're great. All these names you see
here, these are my patrons. You can go
over to Patreon and pay $1 a month or
more if you feel like it. Get access to
stuff like one exclusive video every
month, early access to videos, things of
that nature. My $10 and up patrons are
Arthur D. Gonzalez Martin, Brother
Santos, Karolina Cle, Lexi Delarm, Lord
Tybreaker, Michael and Katie Hake, Mr.
A5013, Prescriptions of Duo, Jang,
Psych, XX, Slumbering Jellyfish,
Observing Outer Space, Tesla Shark, Toa,
Michael, Victus, and Wesley, as well as
all the other names here. I appreciate
all their support. Also appreciate all
of my people over on YouTube who are
channel members. Yeah, you can become a
channel member and get most of the same
bonuses that you get from Patreon. You
just don't get your names here. And you
know what? Everybody who just watches my
stuff, you're all great. I couldn't do
this without you. Please rate this
video, comment and subscribe if you
haven't already. Check out my
merchandise which you can go down below
and look at and you know all that other
stuff I'm supposed to say here. Have a
lovely day and goodbye.