EUROPE'S TICKING BOMB - Scott Ritter & Patrik Baab on THE WORLD THIS WEEK
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this episode of "The World This Week," hosts Joe Lauria, Scott Ritter, and Patrick Baab examine the escalating geopolitical tensions in Europe and the Middle East, focusing on recent events that threaten to deepen global conflict. A central point of contention is a drone found at Leipzig airport containing explosives; while Germany blames Russia and calls for new sanctions, Ritter and Baab argue there is no credible evidence linking the device to Moscow. They contend that the incident was likely a false-flag operation designed by Ukraine and NATO to draw Germany further into the war and justify additional escalation, noting that leaving identifiable signatures such as serial numbers or specific explosive types is uncharacteristic of professional intelligence services. The discussion also highlights internal instability in Kiev, where a shootout between SBU and HUR intelligence agencies is interpreted not as a genuine security threat but as a power struggle over influence and funding within Zelensky's administration.
The conversation further addresses the legal and strategic implications of Western actions, with the hosts criticizing the lack of legal justification for closing the Russian House in Berlin, which they claim violates post-reunification treaties. They warn that the dehumanization of Russia is preparing the ground for full-scale war, while simultaneously asserting that NATO lacks the logistical capacity to effectively project power against Russia due to the destruction of US bases in the Middle East and the inability of European forces to sustain prolonged operations. Ritter emphasizes that Ukraine is financially bankrupt and relies on stolen funds to flood Russian airspace with drones, a tactic he suggests could lead to terrorism if successful. These points underscore a broader argument that the West has effectively abandoned Europe, the Middle East, and the Pacific due to depleted carrier groups, missing air defense systems, and exhausted missile stocks, leaving the United States with zero meaningful global combat capacity.
Shifting focus to the Iran conflict, Ritter argues that the US has already lost the war due to a lack of political will and the destruction of its infrastructure by Iranian missile strikes, which neutralized American capabilities and depleted Patriot missile stocks. He suggests that President Trump should pivot toward a negotiated settlement rather than further military escalation, proposing an "elegant face-saving" mechanism where the US supports a civilian nuclear program for Iran while securing oil flow through the Strait of Hormuz. Ritter attributes the decline of US power to corruption within the military-industrial complex, which he accuses of selling ineffective weapons while deceiving the public, and cites the CIA-backed regime change in Venezuela as proof that the US can buy off elites to seize resources and turn sovereign nations into colonies.
Ultimately, the segment concludes with a nuanced warning about the potential consequences of provoking the United States, even as Ritter acknowledges the possibility of a multipolar future where the West declines naturally. He cautions that despite its current exhaustion, the US retains latent logistical and industrial strength that could be unleashed in senseless wars if provoked. The hosts emphasize that the current trajectory of dehumanization and military overreach risks triggering catastrophic outcomes, urging a shift toward diplomatic solutions that recognize the reality of diminished American power. The episode ends with a promotion for Consortium News, reinforcing the message that understanding these complex dynamics is essential for navigating the coming geopolitical landscape.
Read the full video transcript
[music]
There.
Welcome to the world this week, episode
33. Our first program in the new time
slot of 9:00 a.m. US Eastern time this
week from Basin Hyde, Switzerland, 45
minutes outside Zurich. Today's program,
Europe's ticking time bomb. Germany
blames Russia for airport drone attempt.
Zalinski threatens Russian commercial
air traffic. And when will the Iran war
end? Germany is blaming Russia for a
drone with explosive found in Leipzig
airport. CNN reports Germany has accused
Russia of being responsible for the
drone attack targeting Leipik airport
last month and announced a slew of new
measures against Moscow. Quote, "We are
not at war, but we are a daily target of
hybrid attacks." Germany's interior
minister Alexander Dorrint told
reporters Tuesday as he raised the
country's threat level from general to
high, not at war with Germany. Maybe he
should have added yet. [snorts]
Germany's foreign minister Johan Vadapul
also ordered the closure of Russian
consulate in Ban the Russia house a
cultural center in Berlin and Germany is
also tightening controls about of
Russians entering the country Vander of
course the president of the EU's
executive arms said European foreign
ministers would announce a clear
response to Russia including additional
sanctions later this week. This comes as
German and British leaders keep saying
there will be war with Russia by 2030.
The US CNN goes on previously assessed
that an explosive laden drone discovered
at the airport in the east of Germany
belonged to a Russian intelligence
service. A US defense official in Europe
told CNN. Now it's me. Of course, US
have given no proof about this. The next
day,
president of Ukraine threatened
commercial air traffic in Russia. He
urged airlines to avoid Russian
airspace, warning that expanding
Ukrainian drone operations and making
the skies increasingly unsafe over
Russia. Meanwhile, a shootout between
Ukrainian SBU intelligence servants and
members of the country's military
intelligence agency broke out in the
streets of Kiev. What does that mean?
And US Vice President J. D. Vance said
during the week that he doesn't know if
the Iran war would end by the time of
the US congressional elections in
November, critical to Trump's rule.
And if we have time, we're going to talk
about whether the US has completed its
takeover in Venezuela after a huge
chevron deal is announced there. To
discuss these issues, we welcome
independent investigative German
journalist Patrick Bob and Scott Ritter,
uh, a regular on our program. Of course,
he's a former UN weapons inspector, US
Marine counter inelligence officer,
pundit,
and guest on our show. So, uh, Patrick,
let me start with you. The drone attack
in in Lipac airport was was this drone
was with explosives was found supposedly
near a Ukrainian cargo plane. What do
you think's going on here?
>> So, I think
the German government is standing on
thin ice.
I never saw a single proof that this
drone is linked to Russia.
It's just an imagination or propaganda
of our government.
Well,
the thing happened like that.
A bus driver saw this drone
He stopped his bus, went out,
and kicked the drone away.
This could not be a Russian drone.
Possibly it was
a kit for children.
>> Oh, what?
>> Something else. A kit for children.
>> Children.
>> Yeah, a tool kit for children. I don't
know.
So
they're saying no link to Russia and it
looks like a false flag operation.
asked the question,
who is interested in that?
And this could
mo possibly lead to Ukrainian circles in
Germany who are interested into drawing
Germany deeper and deeper into the
Ukraine war
and to forced Germany
to deliver long range cruise missiles.
to Ukraine. I think this is the a
possible background. And on the other
hand, the whole show and it was a show
after this so-called drone attack was
orchestrated
on the NATO level.
NATO officials,
German officials, EU officials
spoke the same sentences and posted the
same sentences on social media.
So it is orchestrated on a higher level
and I think the whole interest in this
thing is to drew Germany
deeper and deeper into the Ukraine war
and to escalate the Ukraine war to a
fullcale Europe to fullcale war in
Europe step by step.
>> Now, you live in Berlin. The public is
not all that keen on war with Russia.
Absolutely not. So, an attack, an attack
like this, putting a drone there in the
upper war, is that designed to get the
German people to be more supportive of a
war against Russia, the one they keep
promising?
>> So, the German people are split up.
The majority of German people does not
want a war.
So
the people [clears throat]
must be convinced that our government
who is l directly linked to the United
States and NATO
is doing the right thing
uh confronting Russia more and more
and I think
the light case is a part of a larger
propaganda operation.
And
uh the goal of this propaganda operation
is
to make people think and majority of
German people think that Russia is our
enemy.
>> Yeah. Scott, if Russia really wanted to
attack Germany, shoot the dog, as you
once famously said, would they leave a
drone on the ground in an airport with
explosives? What would that prove? And
would that that's not how they operate,
is it?
>> It's not how a professional intelligence
service operates. Um, the last thing you
want to do is leave identifiable
signatures. Um, if you want to use a
drone, then you would use um a drone
from Ukraine. Um, you would use a
domestic a European Union domestically
acquired drone to create the impression
of perhaps, you know, homegrown
terrorists. Uh the other question is the
explosives. Um what are the explosives?
What is the source? I mean Germany has
them. Have they put out a forensic
analysis of the explosive package? Uh
which should say where the explosives
came from? Were they sourced? Are these
explosives that you know the Russian
military uses? Are these explosives that
are commercially available in Europe?
Things of that nature. Because the drone
drones just don't appear out of nowhere
and fly themselves. Uh the drone has to
be assembled. Uh the explosives package
has to be very carefully attached. Uh
the fusing mechanism attached. Uh and
then launched. Um what frequency was it
operating on? Um, I mean there's just so
many forensic questions that if you're
going to say this is a Russian drone,
then what you need to say is this is a
Russian drone because the serial number
on this drone u is in the same family
line of the uh you know ocopter drones
used by the 50th vary independent drone
unit that's been attacking Kerosone for
the last 16 months and it comes from the
same stream or something. But they don't
want
>> we haven't heard anything like that.
Well, the reason why is that what it
probably sounds like is the Ukrainians
have when when I was just in the U the
Donetskin Lugansk I visited a number of
Russian drone units and one thing they
all had in common is that they have this
giant graveyard of drones. Um early on
in the war between Russia and Ukraine
they they simply swapped out drones um
before they came into the kamicazi.
They'd use them for reconnaissance and
Ukrainian electronic warfare would down
a Russian drone. The Ukrainians would
take it, repurpose it, send it back. The
Russians would down it. And as a result,
and even today, drones come in and fail
to operate. And there's a whole
graveyard of drones. So the Ukrainians
are sitting on
hundreds, maybe thousands of Russian
drones that have fallen from the sky and
a state of disrepair. The Russians do
the same thing. Most of them are
repaired and brought back into service
and used uh back in again because
there's similarities and features. But
the uh the point is I know the Russians
have a whole bunch of Ukrainian drones
that they repair, they use, they they
they they operate them to see what their
operating characteristics are. Um you
know, just to better understand drone
wear. It's the same thing with the
Ukrainians. And so where's the serial
number? They don't want to give that
away because if it is a Russian drone,
um [laughter] Russia would never use
that drone. and you probably can trace
it to a Ukrainian unit. And then you
also have to talk about the explosives
package, how it's put together, what the
fusion mechanism is. Give me the
characteristics of the weapon before you
say it's a Russian drone. I'm leaning
towards, and again, we have to say we
just don't know. But I'm leaning towards
this being a coordinated false flag
operated by Ukraine that was designed to
be detected and then you go into a rapid
uh information warfare response on the
part of Europe prepackaged presscripted
um you know declarations uh designed to
do and timed because the timing is
interesting. The attack on Leipig
airport
predates Zalinsk's declaration of war
against Russian civil aviation
>> the day before the announcement was
made.
>> Correct. So there's just a lot going on
here that uh strongly suggests that this
is a uh coordinated false flag effort
being done by uh the European Union with
Ukraine coordinating with NATO to create
uh things. The other thing you have to
understand is this also creates
political cover for the decision um
regarding storm shadow and German
decisions supporting continued drone
operations into Russia. It creates a uh
a kaz belly so to speak uh for the
Europeans to say this is why we're
supporting Ukraine.
>> So they knew about it the NATO. This
wasn't wasn't this wasn't Nordstream
where some Ukrainians on a small boat
with nobody's knowledge went out there.
>> It it doesn't appear to be I mean, Peter
could probably, you know, talk about
that, but Patrick, I'm sorry.
>> Oh, I'm fine. [laughter]
>> You can call me Joe, but
>> No, we'll call you Jeffrey. Exactly.
>> Well, [laughter]
I answer to that name on occasion,
apparently. But no, but the the timing
of it, how, you know, how quick was the
German European Union NATO response upon
discovery? Were there were there a day
or two of reflection or was it an
immediate knee-jerk reaction? It took
three or four days and that means it was
enough time to coordinate the the
so-called response.
But let me get back to the important
point. There is not a single proof that
this is a Russian drone or that Russian
secret services initiated
this attack.
The government has nothing on her hand.
It is a case of propaganda, nothing
else. And they searched
a reason
to start a another step in information
warfare against Russia. They start they
searched a reason to close um the house
of Russian culture in Berlin
to cut all links between German and
Russian people because it's easier to
make people hate another nation if they
don't have any contact.
>> That's the background.
>> That's definitely a preparation for war
when you
>> Yes. dehumanize.
>> Is there a legal justification? I mean,
my understanding is that the Russia
house is actually um an arrangement that
Germany just can't walk away from. That
it's part of the postwar, postc cold war
unification things that Germany simply
doesn't have the legal authority to
close the Russia house. Am I right on
this?
>> Yes, that's completely right. And we
have to keep in mind that Russia agreed
to German reunification.
Without the agreement of Moscow, it
would have been impossible to reunify
the whole country. And
>> I'm sorry, we know why they agreed
because they were promised that NATO
would not expand, but that's exactly
beside the point. So part of the
so-called
2 + 4 treaty is
that NATO does not expand
on the eastern part of Germany. Only
German troops should have been
dislocated over there. But today NATO
advanced to the Russian frontier
and this is against the treaty on German
reunification clearly. Clearly, so our
government is denying that. It's very
clear. But this is the reality and they
want to make people forget what are the
circumstances and the reasons and the
agreements of German reunification.
They are well you have to see
in the time of independence
Ukraine
had
52 million inhabitants.
Today
we see an amount of inhabitants of 25
million. That means the whole country is
bleeding out
in this war of attrition
and in this proxy war on the ground of
Ukraine between the United States and
Russia.
And so
if this country Ukraine is bleeding out
completely, so our American friends will
say, "And now the Germans to the front."
>> How sophisticated are the German people?
Would they buy this story about the
drone or are they also asking the
questions that we are?
>> So in Germany
always a majority is following the
propaganda line of the government and
most intellectuals are following the
propaganda line of the government
because the intellectuals are paid for
following the government.
And we see that
in the beginning of the first world war
and in the beginning of the second world
war.
Most people in Germany are following the
propaganda narratives
up from 555 we will fire back. This was
39 when we attacked Poland.
Of course, in the propaganda war, it was
counterattack.
In the first world war,
we have to respond.
We have to reattack the French and the
Russian aggression. It's always the same
story.
In the Vietnam War, we have um the let
me say this propaganda case, the false
flag of
>> go for tonkin. the the case of Tonkin,
it's always a counterattack. We only
defend ourselves and it's always the
same story.
>> Yeah.
>> And hopefully we can convince German
people that our government is part of an
aggressive organization called NATO.
Well, Scott, this is the hardest thing
for American people to accept that they
are part of an aggressive alliance like
NATO and they're the head of the
alliance. And what would it take for
American people to understand this?
>> First thing is for American people to be
cognizant of the world outside of uh the
boundaries of the United States. I
continue to say that the American people
are the most ignorant people um about
the world they live in.
>> I want to debate this. I think that
German people are the most brainwashed
people in the world. But but at least
Germany can point the United States out
on a map. There's many Americans who
couldn't point Germany out on a map. Um
let alone uh point Keningrad or you know
tell me where you know the Salki
corridor is or what the Baltic states
are or any of the complexion where
Leipzig is. What is the history of
Leipzig? Why is Leipzig important?
Berlin. They couldn't tell me about the
United Nations charter and the fact that
Germany continues legally to be
classified as a defeated state and
therefore has no right for
militarization or any of the activities
they're currently undertaking and that
Russia at any time it wants without
permission of the security council can
annihilate Germany off the face of the
earth. Maybe the German people need to
wake up for that and the American people
need to wake up to the consequences of
that. Um, I'd like the American people
to talk about article five of the United
Nations Charter. Although they don't
can't articulate some of them think it
means automatic collective defense, but
it doesn't. There's a certain
deliberation involved that doesn't
require instant military um, you know,
you know, we don't dispatch the troops.
This isn't the Cold War when we had
300,000 troops in Germany ready to go to
war at a drop of a hat. Today we have a
brigade,
a striker brigade uh that's going to get
pulled out uh from Germany at Graphen at
Hoenfills. We have a OP four battalion
minus mean it's not even a full
battalion. It's trained to be the
opposing forces. And we have an airborne
uh battalion in uh in in Germany. That's
it. That's all we have. We went from
300,000 to 39,000. And of that 39,000,
fewer than half of them are combat
troops. We have zero combat capacity in
Europe today. This is what the American
people need to understand that Europe's
trying to draw us into a conflict with
the most combat hardened army in the
world. And we have zero combat capacity
in Europe. None. We couldn't fight the
Russians today if we wanted to fight the
Russians today. And we don't want to
fight the Russians today. And that's the
other thing the Europeans need to
understand. We don't want your war. And
I'm not talking about the American
people are too stupid to breathe. I'm
talking about our government doesn't
want your war.
>> This government, the Biden government, I
think, wanted a war.
>> Well, Biden's not the government
anymore. And we have a president named
Donald Trump who's going to be president
for at least two more years unless he
totally screws the pooch and the 25th
amendment is invoked. But for the
moment, the president's under tremendous
criticism right now because he's saying
we need to have good relations with
Russia.
>> Yeah. And so at the time when the United
States and Russia are actually talking
about the potential of resuming a
negotiation process, Germany and NATO
are trying to kick up a war with Russia.
Do you think Trump is going to say, "Oh
no, it's a better idea to go with the
Germans right now, who he hates, by the
way. He despises it."
>> And so he's going to drop everything and
come to the assistance of the Germans
whom he hates.
>> No. So the Germans need to grow up.
You're starting a fight that we're not
going to come to your aid and you're
going to lose. And there's a reason why
there was a Russia house in Berlin. And
the reason isn't the unification. The
reason is the occupation. The Germans
lost the war against the Russians. The
Russians occupied Berlin. And um history
may repeat itself if the Germans
continue to go down this path. I'm not
being I'm not threatening. I'm just
saying come on Germany, wake up. You
don't do well in wars against Russia. So
German elites don't learn from history.
It's very very clear they are racistic
and resop.
>> I discussed that point with General
Kuyat who was a highranked officer on
the NATO level and the chief of the
Buddhism for years and we were laughing.
the coalition of the willing, Great
Britain, France, and Germany.
We could bring on wheels, let me say, an
expedition core of 50 or 60,000 guys,
soldiers to be sent to Ukraine.
The Russians, the Russian army has
800,000 soldiers in Ukraine. And this is
not the total amount, 1.5 million
soldiers under weapons.
And General Kuya told me such an
expedition core will be wiped out in one
week. That's the reality beside the
prophecy.
>> He's a retired general, I imagine. Yes,
of course.
>> They don't speak that way that way when
they're still
>> Well, it's very clear. I have a lot of
friends in the United States, especially
in the southern states.
Whatever comes from Washington,
they find this is [laughter]
It's southern great justice. And those
people don't want war. All these people
are hardworking people, but they know
nothing from Germany as the Germans
know nothing from the United States.
They don't even know where is San
Francisco. They couldn't find the town.
So uh the best way to avoid wars is to
keep people in touch to each other.
Yeah. Yeah. It's the best what you are
doing right now in with your visit
visits in Russia to shake your hands to
listen to show respect and to learn to
understand what's the history of people
experience of people and so our
government want to avoid this. They want
to interrupt
the relations between both sides to
drive people's
faster and faster into the next war. It
>> It's curious. You mentioned a NATO core.
I know that's what they envision, but
let's just let's let's get real for a
moment. Germany couldn't get a brigade
mobilized today if it wanted to.
>> Absolutely.
>> Couldn't get a brigade out of the
barracks. All right. A core is like two
or more divisions. Germany cannot get a
brigade out of the barracks. The British
can't get a brigade across the channel.
And the French can't get a brigade off
the port. Um, so even if they got their
core together,
>> they would literally lose the war
getting to Yes. the front. Logistically,
it's unsustainable.
>> They would have to get them to Romania
and then assemble the force in Romania
and then as they project their power
forward, they're going to run out of
logistics before they even get into
Ukraine. The moment they cross into
Ukraine, their logistics are be
interdicted. They will run out of fuel
before they get halfway to the front.
And then the Russians will bring the
drones in. An American heavy brigade
went up against a handful of Ukrainian
drone operators who are pretty good, but
they're not as good as the Russians.
They stopped the brigade in its tracks.
The brigade had to hit reset three times
and before they admitted, "We can't go
against them." Nobody in Europe today is
ready to fight the modern drone-based
war. The Russians would have every
single tank, every single vehicle, every
single soldier in that column killed
before they got within 20 kilometers of
the front. This is a NATO pipe dream. It
will never happen. It can never happen.
And what shocks me is there was a day
when military officers had the courage
to tell their political leaders, "We
can't do that. You're asking me to do
something that is impossible. We cannot
accomplish this mission." Um and and and
yet here we have NATO living this
fantasy world. Every single NATO officer
knows that every word I just said is
true. Yeah.
>> There's not a single NATO officer will
dispute what I said. And yet they
continue to go forward with this fantasy
of somehow NATO projecting power in a
manner that threatens Russia. It's a
joke. I mean, thank God Vladimir Putin
is a very pragmatic man who is not
looking for war. He's very careful.
He's very, in my point of view, he's
very defensive. He always waited long
and evaluated the situation and then he
reacted.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. He's not aggressive.
When I met people in Donbos at Arab
visit, many people told me
should have come after the Maidan coup
in 2014.
>> But he said so himself.
>> He let us down.
>> Yeah.
>> Now he's doing his job.
That's the that's the position the
perspective the majority of the Donbos
people because they have a war
experience since 2014 for those people
the war began not in February 2022 began
after the Maidan coup
>> April May June July 24 but you know what
the German people don't
>> remember this you know why Putin didn't
destroy the Ukrainian army at the Bolza
in in 2014 because Angala Merkel the
chancellor of Germany
>> Exactly. Yes.
>> made a phone call and pleaded to him to
show mercy.
>> Yes.
>> And Vladimir Putin listened to her and
he said, "Okay, I will go to the
speech." France Holland, the French
leader made a phone call and they began
a diplomacy where Vladimir Putin instead
of destroying a Ukrainian army that
deserved to be destroyed. If people
understand what the Ukrainians did to
the people of the Donbass in May, June,
July, August, September of 2014, the
raping, the pillaging, the murdering,
they treated the civilians as
terrorists. They called it an
anti-terrorist operation. They were
bombing women, bombing children,
slaughtering them in the streets. And
they all deserved to die. And they were
surrounded by men from the Donbas who
were ready to kill them because these
are the men who killed their families.
And Vladimir Putin said, "Stop. We're
going for peace. And this is what nobody
in the United States and Europe
realizes. Vladimir Putin is a man who
seeks peace first. War is the absolute
last option. So the fact that we're
talking about the potential of conflict
with Russia means, you know, how far has
Europe gone promoting this war. And the
answer is it's been a non-stop promotion
since 2014.
>> Absolutely. Non-stop.
>> Absolutely.
>> The threat against the Russian airspace,
is it real? Can we can we expect what
would happen if a commercial airliner
was shot down by a Ukrainian drone
somewhere over Russia?
>> What happens?
>> It will.
>> No,
the Ukraines can't shoot down a
commercial airline with air defense. A
drone could hit it.
>> Yeah.
>> But drones don't operate at that
altitude.
>> So, it would have to be an airplane
coming in for landing, right?
>> But by that, the Russian radar would
have detected it and Russia would have
cleared the airspace, diverted the
airplanes. I know because I've been on a
commercial airline flying into Russia
that had to divert because of a drone
attack and my airplane was delayed
taking off. I missed my connection uh
taking off because of a drone attack.
The Russians have this under control.
What the Ukrainians are threatening to
do is flood the zone
>> with drones. Well, how much more can
they flood it? They in three days they
put 1,400 drones into Moscow airspace
and they were all shot down except four
which penetrated in and it went poop
here, there, and everywhere. Uh,
Zalinski is acting as if he has drones
to spare.
>> Right.
>> All right. His Featherov, his former
minister of defense, uh, bought all
these drones that they're using in this
drone warfare uh, today uh, by stealing
27 billion that was meant for the second
half. Ukraine's defense ministry has no
money right now. They're bankrupt.
They're begging Europe to cough up 30
billion euro because they're at zero
because Fedrov stole their budget to buy
drones that they flooded it in. Those
drones are gone. The industrial base for
building the drones is gone. Ukraine has
zero drone capacity sustainable. So what
Zalinsky is saying is, I'm threatening
you with weapons that have yet to be
provided to me by Europe. Please give me
the weapons so I can close Russian
airspace. And what the Russians have
said, that's an act of terrorism. And if
you do this, you'll be treated as
terrorists. You remember Putin's preser.
>> He said, why do you keep Zalinsky alive?
because we need someone to negotiate
with and when the time comes to
negotiate we need we need to know
something. But he said if you act on
this action against our airspace that's
a terrorist act and you will be treated
as terrorists. So if they do this you
want to know what the response is?
Zalinski is dead. Budano's dead. Zulus
is dead. They're all dead. They will all
die. The Russians can kill them anytime
they want to. They keep them alive for
the potential of a negotiated surrender
of Ukraine. But if Ukraine wants to play
stupid games, they'll win the stupidest
prize of all.
>> How would Europe, uh, NATO and United
States react if all those men were
killed after an attack on a Russian
plane?
>> Well, I think they would replace the
government in Kief.
>> The new
>> because Silinski
is just a puppet.
>> Yeah.
>> A showman directed by Washington and
London. Nothing else. And there is
another NATO illusion or illusion of the
west
and an illusion of the KF government,
the KF regime. They want to provoke
unrest under the Russian population. But
this will not work. The Russian
population will rally around the Russian
flag in times of a crisis.
The majority of the Russian population,
the citizens are strongly and supporting
Putin.
They are strongly supporting Putin. It's
only a majority
of younger academics
who fear
to receive a letter that they have to
come to the front line. Half a million
of those people
uh left Russia in fall 2022
were in the first mobilization wave. But
now they don't mobilize. [snorts] It's
just a subscription system and the
military services could pay to Russia.
So
the Russian army has more people who
want to come to the army than they can
use.
>> Yeah.
>> This is a completely difference to the
Ukrainian army. Yeah, you have more
casualties that they can get new people
to recruit
and they must press more and more people
[clears throat]
into the army and to the front line.
This is a a problem Russian don't Russia
don't have. No,
>> they have enough soldiers because well
in the year 1922
the Donbas region
that was a very rich region, gas, steel
factories and all that
where became part of the Soviet Republic
of Ukraine to industrialize
the agricultural
farming regions in of western Ukraine.
And those people living in the Donbas
area had mostly relations
and relatives in Russia and this lasts
until today.
And the mood in Russia
in the time
before the beginning of the so-called
special military operation was why don't
we help our friends in the Donbas
region? They are under pressure. What's
the government doing? Are they sleeping
right now? That's the mood of the
people. And most people in the west
cannot understand because they know
nothing about Ukraine and Russia. They
know nothing about Russia. Yeah.
>> Yes. That's the problem.
>> You know, you you talk about the liberal
elite that is concerned. You know,
500,000 left. You know, most of them
already come back.
>> Exactly. Yes.
>> Because they they got to the west and
they realized the West isn't everything
it was supposed to be and they miss
mother Russia. And I mean I I know
people that came to the United States,
went out to California uh to go to
college and uh they saw their Ukrainian
counterparts getting free money, free
housing, free everything, total
subsidized living and still being
critical of America. All these spoiled
Ukrainian refugees living off the
American dime. And the Russians are
sitting there going, "Why are you
getting all this free stuff?"
>> Yes.
>> And then so you know, they come home.
But these these this liberal elite is
actually you know a minor Europe
it feeds off of you know the the
European criticism of Russia resonates
into Russia and then echoes back from
the liberal elite. Yes.
>> And so they take that as a reinforcing
signal.
>> But the liberal elite is totally
neutered. They have no there's no power
at all. the but what they they're seeing
is what they're saying is sort of voices
of opposition but they're taking the
voice they're conflating the anti-Putin
liberal elite with the people saying
Putin should do more and they're
combining them saying this is a
collective opposition but those people
saying Putin should do more are not
anti-Putin they are pro Putin they are
lining up with Putin and that the West
is getting this 100% wrong you're 100%
correct to say that the goal of the west
is to bring about a Moscow Maidon to
generate social unrest, economic
collapse, uh military males so that
there's a Maidon in Moscow to remove and
you hear people say that's our goal,
that's our objective. This is what we
want. This will never happen.
>> It's a complete delusion.
>> Yeah,
>> it will not happen. Uh some weeks ago, I
spoke to a young Russian musician from
St. Petersburg. He's a friend of mine
and he left his country in late 22 and
went to Belgrade.
Now
he returned to Russia and he's living in
St. Petersburg again because he said I
realized
I didn't find myself in a kind of
paradise.
[clears throat]
>> Belgrade was as well. So I went
back to do my job. We'll be better paid
in Russia.
So that's the point. What you said, they
returned to Russia. The majority
returned to Russia later on because they
learned Turkey, Kazakhstan,
>> Georgia,
>> Serbia, Georgia are no paradises.
>> No. And there's a lot of anti-Russian
sentiment. Yes. All the other thing was
interesting is um St. Petersburg has
always been this bastion of uh of sort
of snobbery and western. We're different
from the rest of Russia. We're the we're
the cultured people, not those Moscow,
Nikoi. And and this um when I was there
in June, the day I arrived, 98 drones
were coming into St. Petersburg through
the Baltic corridor and the drones hit
the day I left. Um what was curious is
that in the month of June and July
uh the volunteer
contract
numbers in St. Petersburg shot into over
10,000 10,000
elite St. Petersburg men who previously
had avoid had said we're not going to
we're not going to join the military
when the West attacked St. Petersburg.
They volunteered to go serve in the
front. And the mood is increasingly not
just we're going to go serve.
>> We're serving until victory.
>> They're not saying we're going to go
throw in a six-month tour or here.
They're serving until victory. They are
committed to the complete defeat of the
collective west. Not just Ukraine, but
this whole western machine that's
empowering Ukraine.
>> Yes, that's the mood of the people. They
started in 22 a special military
operation to show by naming this a
special military operation
to the west that they have limited goals
only on the ground of Ukraine. Now
Moscow is discussing about
a second great patri patriotic war. It's
a completely different approach.
The Russians realized that they have to
fight against the collective west right
now.
So all signs are showing escalation.
Yeah, like we said, a time bomb in
Europe. If you're watching the world
this week, I'm Joe Lauria and my guests
are Scott Ritter and Patrick Bob. Scott,
there was, by the way, I reminded what
you said about Americans not knowing uh
their geography. what Mark Twain
apparently said that's going America
goes to war so Americans could learn
geography that's when everyone reads in
the newspaper about Afghanistan for
example um Scott there was this very
strange event in a neighborhood in Kiev
this week where members of the SBU which
is their main intelligence service had a
shootout with members of the military
intelligence is this just a one-off
strange event what do you know about or
is it say speak something deeper about
what's happening in in Kiev right
Well, I mean, I think it's it's it's I
mean, [snorts] it's a unique event. I
don't think we've had a shootout of this
nature uh in in downtown Kiev. Um what
apparently is happening is that um the
military intelligence, the HUR, um they
run a number of units, um Russian
volunteer units, you know, Russian
anarchist units, things of that nature.
And so there's a unit within the HUR
that's responsible for maintaining these
various units and the people inside
these units. One of these units is a
Russian volunteer unit that you know
very anti-Russian uh participated in the
invasion of Kursk and and such. the
deputy leader was detained by the SBU
and they were bringing him in for for
questioning and his people made a phone
call to the HUR said, "Hey, your boy is
being arrested by the SBU." And so his
handlers show up and they object to the
the detainment and uh somebody went for
a pistol and he got shot in the legs.
Exchange of fire. I think two guys are
dead, several are wounded. But what's
curious here is that this deputy
was then released.
but released with the sub story, the sub
thing that the reason why the SBU went
after him is that he was working for the
FSB
and that he confessed under
interrogation that he was working for
the FSB Russians
>> for the Russians and that the Russians
had hired him to assassinate other
anti-Russian Russians who were coming to
Ukraine. So the SBU made an intervention
to stop the assassination, but they
released him because he totally
cooperated with the SBU. Now this is
where their story falls apart because if
he had been working with the FSB, he'd
be dead right now. They would have taken
him, interrogated him, and executed him.
but instead he's released
which means that this is a larger
propaganda war against the HUR that this
is an internal power struggle that the S
the SPU is trying to undermine the
authority of the HUR and you and you see
there's ongoing battles for instance um
in the drone wars we um we see Zalinsky
promoting um people from the SBU uh from
the alpha unit that that that did, you
know, that famously did some drone
stuff. But on the other hand, you have
the HUR doing deep strikes into Russia,
human uh penetration, and they're both
vying because there's a political vacuum
right now in Ukraine. And they're
they're both sides are vying to get up
the ladder in the political vacuum for
the money. Everything in Ukraine is
about the money. It's all about the
money. It's all about the money. And so
these two guys are fighting. So, the SBU
concocts this raid to set up this guy.
Uh, I don't think they wanted a
firefight, but they wanted to create the
notion that one of the uh HUR's guys was
working for the FSB and was trying to
assassinate and all this stuff to muddy
the waters for the HUR so that SBU would
be better positioned internally. This is
classic Ukrainian
corrupt politics.
Apparently this guy who was arrested is
an extreme these Financial Times call
him an extreme writers or something. He
probably is a neo-Nazi himself as
he was supposed to be working for the
FSB.
>> Well, they have him on tape confessing,
but then he came out and recanted the
confession saying it came under torture.
>> Um, so who knows
>> who tortured him?
>> He's saying the SBU tortured him.
>> It's a strange story. Uh, you don't
think it's over yet? You told me
previously, do you think? No, it's
because we're dealing with a p a a power
struggle right now between the SBU and
the HUR for influence within Zalinsky.
Uh who's going to be the special forces
of uh of note who's going to be able to
get their guy uh put up right now? I
think it's uh a former SPU guy is the
acting minister of defense or now he is
the minister of defense uh the the alpha
commander who led the uh the uh
spiderweb drone attack against Russia in
uh in in 2024. So um but the hur you
know Budanov is their boy remember
Budanov comes from that group.
>> He's in London now right?
>> No Budanov is the presidential adviser
>> talking
you've got a a secretary of defense and
presidential adviser who come from
different factions SBU HUR and there's
there's just a power struggle going on.
So I don't I don't think that it's over
at all. Mhm. But is uh is Yes. I just
also to ask you whether Zalinski's
position is secure. Now
>> the security of Zilinski's position
depends on the continuation of the war.
He's well just a figure of the West.
He's a showman of the West. Nothing
else.
And if
he will not function anymore, he will be
dead.
not killed by the West, by his own guys.
>> And he's he's playing a role and he
lives in the illusion that he can leave
the president's palace
and the capital of Kiev in the very last
moment. But this is an illusion. He will
be killed from my point of view.
>> He's got the plane waiting fueled up to
take him to Florida.
But the plane won't come. [laughter]
>> It'll be hit by a Russ. Are we a Russian
drone this time? Not a fake one in Le.
>> Well, what what uh Scott said, keep in
mind that uh Ukraine is one of the most
corrupt
>> Yeah.
>> uh countries in the world. And I learned
in western Ukraine in 20 2021, the war
didn't start yet, that different
fraction, different factions of police,
military and secret services are
fighting each other. Um and
um
the case was
uh the control of the smuggling, the
cigarette smuggling, the the the weapons
smuggling and
>> the women
>> and the women smuggling all these shady
businesses and they all want to make
money and so sometimes they have a fight
on the streets. It's not completely
unusual in this country. H. Wow. So, uh,
let's move on if we can in the last few
minutes we have to talk about this very
strange war in Iran. It's 6 months on
now. It's an on-again, off-again war.
It's a war that clearly Trump cannot
admit that he lost. He certainly can
admit that before this election in
November. And it's interesting that JD
Vance, the US vice president, was asked
about whether the war would end by the
time of the election in early November.
And he said he didn't know. So, it looks
like Trump doesn't want to have it going
on, won the election because it's deeply
unpopular in the US, but he can't end it
because that would mean he lost and he
doesn't know how to get the hell out of
this. Patrick, uh, Patrick, I'm going to
ask Scott. No, you're Peter and his
Jeff. So, [laughter] uh,
>> I screwed that one up.
>> Scott.
>> Scott, what what is the meaning? What
how does this war end? Does it end?
It has to end because look, the United
States has literally run out of options.
I mean, it's funny. I talk to people and
they say, "Oh, the United, you know,"
and I say it, "The United States lost
this war." They say, "That means that
the United States has no power." No, I I
I I beg to differ. Um,
if you get the United States mobilized,
get the public mobilized, and you get
our defense industry mobilized, and we
actually build the military that we're
capable of building, um, and we have the
political support, uh, we could defeat
Iran in a stand-up fight. It would take
a year and a half, two years to build up
for that. But the notion that we can't
beat Iran is an absurdity in the
extreme. Uh, we put 1.2 million men on
the ground and we will we will defeat
Iran. We don't have the political will
to do that. Um, and right now there's
just no desire amongst the American
people to to make that happen. And so
what what Trump has to realize is that
within his presidency, he lacks the
capacity to defeat Iran. And so he has
to deal with that reality, especially
when the with the with the midterms
coming up. You know, this isn't Franklin
Roosevelt getting bombed in Pearl Harbor
and saying, "Okay, begin to rebuild
build our military so that by 1942,
uh, I can land in uh, in Normandy in in
North Africa." 43 we go into Italy. 44
we go into into Europe and we win the
war by 45. That's not the case. This is
Trump going I gotta have something on
board by November. And so you can't win
this war. And the problem with Trump is
that he keeps falling to Pete Hex says
trap. We've evacuated 15 bases in the
region. We don't have any meaningful
military power there at all. Uh the
residual capacity that was there that we
could fall back in on has been
destroyed. is the fifth fleet. What was
left of fifth fleet in Manama, Bahrain
is is gone. The radars that were in
place in Qatar are gone. In Kuwait,
they're gone. There's nothing there. And
yet, somebody convinced Donald Trump
that uh he could launch in order to
declare victory, he was going to launch
a massive raid into the straight or
moose to take not Car Island, but I
think Sonac Island, one of these little
islands off the off the coast. And we
actually did the preparatory bombing the
night the night before we hit that.
Remember the wedding party that we hit?
Yeah. That was supposed to be
>> not. You don't. I wasn't.
>> We America, man.
>> No, no, [laughter] I had nothing to do
with
>> America. But well, I unfortunately I
voted for him, so I have to take
responsibility.
>> You have to remind us of that by going.
[laughter]
>> Well, you know, I hold people
accountable. Um, but somebody convinced
him that in order to declare victory, he
needed to launch a raid, occupy Iranian
territory, be seen as occupying Iranian
territory, and then withdraw or stay
there and negotiate the straight horos
opening or something. And so since we
don't have any bases in the region, we
assembled a a strike force in Jordan
that was assembled there. It's a Marine
battalion uh core with a special
operations uh capability attached to it.
Uh we have a Ford operating base in
Iraq. They were getting ready to leave
from the base to the Ford operating
brace before launching the raid. Iran
hit the assembled area with the most
powerful missile in its arsenal. Um, and
if you take a look at the explosion,
it's uh you don't you just pray that we
got enough advanced warning to get our
troops out of the way because that took
it out. That's the end. They destroyed
most of our helicopters because this was
a helicopter uh raid. The helicopters
are gone. The other helicopters are
being evacuated to Israel as we speak
because they're at risk. We have nothing
left to defend ourselves with. you know,
the the the day before the Iranians
fired like 36 38 missiles into Jordan. I
think we responded with almost 140 uh
patriots, all of our patriots. We cycled
them through u which was the Iranian.
That's what they did. They they fired
their missiles in and said, "Cycle all
your patriots. Now you got nothing."
Boom. What it tells is that the Iranians
are following everything. They know
everything. There's nothing we can do
that's going to take them by surprise.
Trump needs to fire Pete Hex. Um and and
maybe even prosecute him. I would uh and
I would make a political show that this
is a man who's a traitor. He lied to me.
He's this is Pete Hex's fault and I'm
going to give you his head for November.
That's too politically risky, but it
sure would be fun. But um but the the
point is we can't win this war
militarily. So now the best bet thing is
to find a a negotiated settlement. I
think Trump can still because the the
key is that the Iranian uh speaker of
the parliament made a visit to Iraq uh a
week ago I believe a week or so ago and
when he arrived he said something very
interesting he said that we know the
Americans are looking for a elegant face
saving way out of this war and the fact
that he's saying this means that Iran
recognizes this and is like how can we
help you have an elegant face- saving
way um you know we don't know what uh
you Ratcliffe did when he went to
Moscow. There's a lot of speculation,
but I I know this because I look at
patterns. The day before he went there,
the Secretary of Commerce came out and
said, "The United States will support a
robust civilian nuclear program in
Iran."
>> That's a strange statement to make out
of the blue. President Trump saying, "I
want to get rid of all their
>> The United States will support a robust
civilian nuclear power program in Iran."
Radcliffe
goes to Moscow. The next day, Russia
signs a $2 billion agreement with the
Iranians about the provision of Russian
nuclear power in Iran where Russia will
control the fuel cycle. And it's signed.
And I'm looking at that in parallel as
the United States inking a similar deal
with the Saudis and what you've done
here because you remember everybody's
talking about on the nuclear uh you know
they're worried about Iran having their
nuclear program uncontrolled. The Saudis
would go for nuclear weapons, the Turks
go for nuclear weapons, everybody goes
for nuclear weapons. And what appears
happening is an elegant
face-saving mechanism for Trump to say,
"I solved the nuclear program that we
now have created an NP nuclear
non-prololiferation treaty leveling
playing field." Um, so that's one thing.
And then
you have the blockade that isn't a
blockade, but we call it a blockade. Um,
and we, you know, but the Iranians and
the Omanis
have come up with an agreement on how to
manage the strait and and get traffic
flowing. Now, Trump screws it up by
bombing and then the Iranian. But the
point is, if Trump fires Hagith, just
stops listening to him, stops this
military escalation, comes back, takes a
pause, takes a victory lap with the
nuclear, distracts everybody with the
nuclear, then turns to the straight and
say, "Oh, by the way, the the blockade
worked. Oil's flowing through like a
champ. We're going home. I won the war.
I won the peace. I'm the greatest thing
in the world." And the Iranians will
say, "Not a damn thing." Because that's
an elegant face saving me. The Iranians
don't need to speak. Scott Besson said
they'd be isolated. But Peskin,
Pzeskian, I can't say his name either.
Pzeskian I think is his name. The
president was just in Bishquek where he
met with Putin Xi Modi.
>> Uh and on September 12th he's going to
be in New Delhi where he meets with
everybody again. Um agreements are being
signed, deals are being made. Iran is a
player in the biggest economic form the
world seen bigger than the G7
and [laughter] you know more important
than the G20. So Iran's not isolated. So
Iran I think is in a position to say as
long as you get the hell out of here. We
don't care what you say at home. We've
already made our decision. We're we're
committed to the East. We've pivoted to
the East. We just want sanctions lifted
so we can fully engage.
I can't say this is going to happen
because this is Donald Trump. But what I
can say is that
when I hear face saving elegant
mechanism for withdrawal and I look at
some of these pieces, I scratch my head
and say, could this be?
>> So I'm a little bit optimistic and you
don't normally hear me being optimistic.
>> No, it's encouraging. What do you think?
Yeah,
>> those in
Washington and in Israel underestimated
the possibility of retaliation of Iron.
They underestimated the level of support
uh Tehran got and get by Moscow and
Beijing. Beijing is delivering,
providing satellite information,
satellite reconnaissance
to hit American bases
and factories around the Gulf States.
And the Russians are delivering parts of
missiles
and drones and um and um long range
um attack facilities.
And this shows
the war theater in Iran is part of a
greater picture of the de the fight on
the decline of the west and the upcoming
multipolar world. This is one side and
on the other hand
it shows the iron war is a war on
natural resources on the control of
natural resources.
like the attack on Venezuela was
and
the attack on the Nordstream pipeline
wars and these wars in the Middle East
and who controls the resources
has
um
new
securities for new loans.
uh led by the banks. So financial
capitalism can go on working
because capitalism financial capitalism
is in a deep crisis because the profit
rates are falling
for the last four to five decades. And
so the capitalists got nervous at the
background. So they need new resources
to make the machine run. This is exactly
what those people in Moscow are picking.
No,
Moscow is sitting on resources and want
to have its own hand on those resources
and Beijing needs resources and
connectivities
especially to Russia. So we have a great
block and the message of this iron war
is
for all countries in the global south.
It is possible to fight the United
States and to stand up to the United
States. And this is what the iron
government shows
indifference in opposition to the German
government
who surrenders under the interests of
the United States.
>> Yeah. The foreign policy foreign affairs
which is a very mainstream conservative
linked to the the um Council on Foreign
Relations had a cover story in its last
issue about the end of the US world
basically and because they've lost in
Iran. It was an incredible you saw the
piece. I thought that was a very
surprising piece to read in that public.
The kind of things like you Patrick and
you Scott and other guests on our show
and other shows have been saying for a
couple of years now or certainly since
the war began in six months ago. This is
the Suez crisis for the United States.
This is what it says. But you we saw
that piece.
>> This war was a mistake.
>> Yeah.
>> It's a very expensive war
>> and Americans are realizing and we're
agreeing to that. That's the thing. It's
really hurt Trump. One of the
interesting things though is I don't
think the Americans have I mean I think
Americans are realizing that we can't be
Iran that there's there's something
going on that that that and and we're
not we don't have what it takes and we
don't want to have what it takes that
because we don't understand it. We're
like we're not we're not going to commit
to this. Um
>> but what they don't understand is what's
happened globally.
Um, for instance, with with Iran, when
the Abraham Lincoln went off, we had to
bring, I think, the George Washington
in. There's no more carriers in the
Pacific. The Pacific is the major
theater. We don't have carrier battle
group in the Pacific right now. Um, the
other thing we don't have in the Pacific
is air defense because we stripped all
of our air defense to send to the Middle
East and it was all destroyed and it's
gone. There's no air defense for South
Korea. There's no air defense for Japan.
Um the Navy whose Aegis class uh uh
destroyers and frigots are supposed to
provide anti-bballistic with their SM3s.
We're out of SN3s. We don't have those
are the special anti-missile missiles
that we have been cycling through. You
know how bad it is when uh you know all
a lot of our European
uh agents were off the shore of Israel
supporting the defense of Israel and the
head of the European command said uh
either pull them back or send me more
but you can't be asking me to do these
things with the Russians in the Arctic
unless I have more ships. We don't have
more ships there. We've reached a finite
you know military capacity um today in
Europe and this is another reason why
Europe should just wake the hell up. We
don't have air defense in Europe. We've
got nothing in Europe. Again, I go to
zero combat capacity in Europe. Zero
meaningful combat capacity. Um, now and
KBY just went to uh to to Europe. He's a
deputy secretary of defense
>> and he met with Rut [clears throat]
secretary general of NATO and he's up
there going, "Yeah, NATO 3.0 is a good
thing." Well, explain to the American
people what 3.0. means we leave, you own
everything. Um, and he says because, you
know, yeah, we'll have a residual stay
behind, but we won't because we we're
pulling them out anyways. Um, but you
know, this is because we have to
protect the Western Hemisphere and still
deal with the Pacific. So, not only are
we abandoning Europe, we just abandoned
the Middle East. He just basically said,
"We're out of the Middle East. We're
going to leave Europe so we can defend
the Western Hemisphere in the Pacific,
but we've got nothing in the Pacific
right now. And this is what you know,
this is why we have no leverage with the
Chinese on anything right now. Because
the National Security Strategy document
that was published in November of 2025
said that the key aspect of America's
power projection, the Pacific was our
ability to have conventional military
overmatch with the Chinese. Meaning, we
didn't have to go nuclear because we
were just so supremely superior to the
Chinese. It was overmatch and the
Chinese understood it was overmatch and
Chinese are looking at us today going
you've got nothing. We have nothing,
Joe. This is the sad thing. We have no
military power in the Pacific. We have
no military power in Europe. We have no
military power in the Middle East. And
we have we don't even have enough have
enough military power to take Cuba
today. We've got nothing. That's good
given the US doesn't really have any
enemies. They just made them up
basically. I think this is a a sigh of
relief for most of the world if the but
you did say before that the US if it
raised 1.2 million men in arms they
could go into Iran and win that war and
many many Americans would die obviously
and there's no political will but you
did say the capacity could be there how
could they get 1.2 2 million men uh to
Iran.
>> Draft.
>> A draft. Okay, that's a good answer.
>> That's how we got it in World War II. We
we we declared war. This would require
declaration of war.
>> Oh, that I haven't heard about that.
>> Right. But I mean, because a draft
without a declaration of war isn't going
to happen,
>> right? I see.
>> But if the president United States went
to Congress and because the American
people are fundamentally the dumbest
people in the world and he could make a
case that Iran represents an existential
threat. Their nuclear weapons are
rebuilt as we speak under Pickax
Mountain.
>> We got to go.
>> We got to go. We got to go in this. We
have to destroy this regime. It's in the
long-term ministers of the of America
and the world. I'm asking Congress to
declare war. They have declared war and
I'm turning to the American people. We
are mobilizing as a nation to write in.
>> He wins a November election, too,
doesn't he? Then
>> he could, but he's not going to do that
because this is Donald Trump and I don't
think Congress will go for it. uh you
know, but my my point is I I created a
hypothetical just to make the point
because there's a lot of people even
though the American empire is in
decline, it ain't over. And um if you
tickle the beast, you know what I'm what
I'm advising the world is let it happen
naturally. Let it let let us go away
peacefully and naturally. Uh and we will
go away like the dust in the wind. But
if you if you kick us, if you if you
sting us, if you bite us, we're still
pretty damn strong. We got a we got a we
got a defense industry. If it got its
act together, could punch out equipment
like you wouldn't believe. We've got a
nation full of fat, pudgy boys that
don't know how to fight, but we could
train them and get them in shape in a
year and a half. But we could actually
build a military capable of projecting
power. And the one thing we do better
than anybody in the world is logistics
and command and control. and um and so
you know we have the capacity for global
operations. Um I don't think it's going
to happen. I don't want it to happen.
I'm just putting that out there to
people who think that America is just
all all bluff, no action.
>> Um right now we Yes, we have zero
military capacity because we have a
military-industrial um MIC
uh military-industrial
what's the C complex
>> complex. There it is. Complex. I was
going to say committee.
>> You must you must have a complex if you
can't complex. Look, [laughter] I've
been but the the mick Mickey Mack as Ray
would call it. But um our good friend
Ray McGovern. Hey Ray. Um miss you. But
uh you know the the military-industrial
complex is one of the most comp. We talk
about Ukraine being corrupt. There's no
corruption in the world like the
corruption of the military-industrial
complex in the United States. They have
taken trillions of dollars of US
taxpayers money over the past decades
under the presumption that they were
providing the American servicemen and
women who put on the uniform the best
weapon systems in the world capable of
winning any war. And Iran just proved
that the American people have been lied
to. I mean, this is this is one of these
cases where we don't take just generals
and put them into jail. We have to take
all of the CEOs, all of the executives
and put them in jail. And we should be
arresting half of Congress for allowing
this to happen. the Lindsey Grahams who
sit there and say how wonderful we are,
how strong we are. He's part of the
corruption. His whole stick was
>> Yeah, he's dead now. The whole his whole
stick was to create crises to justify
increasing defense expenditure to buy
weapons that don't work. You mean those
ads that you see in the metro station at
Pentagon uh from Loheed Martin and
Boeing saying that they're giving these
soldiers who getting off the train to go
to work at the Pentagon, they give them
the best equipment in the world. It's
not true.
>> It's not true at all. It's the worst
equipment in the world. It's expensive
and it doesn't work.
>> Let's end with this. Um you mentioned
Venezuela. I think Trump was fooled
going into Iran thinking he could do the
same thing. This was a from their point
of view a great success. And I when I
when this first happened, when they when
they snatched Maduro and brought him to
New York, I wrote a piece. I'm just
saying what the Miami Herald had
written, which was that Dulce Rodriguez
either had something to do with it or
just bowed out. She didn't want to get
involved, let it happen, and that she
was going to turn over the country to
the US. Well, that's basically what
happened. I don't know what happened
that night with her role. We may never
know that, but there's no question she
is not defending Venezuela's revolution.
And a lot of colleagues of mine uh
criticized me heavily for writing that
piece, but let's face it, they can't
defend her anymore. And just this week,
Chevron signed a $7 billion deal. Annie,
the Italian oil company, also made a big
deal now. And if you recall, Chevron at
one time said to Trump, "Forget it.
We're not going in there." And it made
it look like, see, Trump's plan is not
going to work. Well, seven billion.
What's going on? Was Venezuela a lost
cause in terms of the sovereignty of
this country? Yeah, the CIA bought it. I
mean, you you were 100% correct. The CIA
bought her. They bought everybody.
There's no way you could have Delta
carry out that mission um without people
standing down, people getting out of the
way. Um and she was part of it. And
there was there wasn't even a hiccup in
we went from a nation that everybody
said millions of people are going to go
into the streets. the, you know, Maduro
supporters will be out there, the
militia, it'll be another Vietnam. Hell,
I was saying that I was, there's no way.
[laughter]
Again, I'm not an expert on Venezuela,
but just reading stuff, I I said there
had there, you know, you talk about, you
know, the boulevard, you talk about
Chavez, you know, popular boulevard is a
national symbol. Chavez was very
popular. Maduro, yeah, maybe there's
corruption and stuff, but they still
seem to be popular amongst the masses.
And so there's just there's no one I I
there's not a single person that that
said, "Yeah, my my crystal ball says
that Delta is going to launch a
nighttime raid um and grab Maduro and
then Venezuela folds like a house of
cards." Not a single Venezuelan expert
out there made that prediction because
it's it's unthinkable. But we went in
the CIA the CIA's been operating
Venezuela forever. Hell, that girl that
won the Nobel Peace Prize is a CIA
operative. Um they're all operatives.
are all paid for the families that that
they're but the CIA maintained
connectivity and what the CIA is able to
do is go in and buy the right people. Uh
and and and part of the buying of the
people was predicated on the the notion
that oil wealth would return to
Venezuela. And so what we're seeing here
is that but I mean is oil wealth return
to Venezuela? I think in this deal they
get $19 a barrel.
>> That's it.
>> And that's it. And uh you know that
that's only going to be seen by the
elite. it'll not percolate down to the
people. Um, so who knows what
frustration may manifest it down the
road, but uh you Venezuela is done as a
sovereign state. Venezuela is 100% a
United States colony uh today and it's
governed as a colony by Marco Rubio.
>> Cuba could be next. What do you think,
Patrick? Well, you have the final word.
Well, I visited
Koopa for years and I know many people
over there and I know that uh Havana is
preparing for an underground war if the
Americans want to get in and they will
do the same thing that Phil did in the
Sie Mesta.
It's a very wild part of the country and
if you have the support of the farmers
we're living over there. It is
impossible for an army
to win this war
and that's [clears throat] the problem.
Uh that's why America or Washington
didn't give the order to invade Kuba at
the moment. And well it was very smart
what they did from an American point of
view in Venezuela. They bought the
elites and provoked a regime change and
then they had their hands on the oil. It
will take years to restructure the oil
production in Venezuela. But one of the
main points from my point of view was to
cut off the oil line from Venezuela to
China, right?
>> It it is another resource war.
So
we are now in the beginning from my
point of view of a global neverending
war that would produce a lot of chaos
all over the map
and in the end I'm sure that the
multipolar world will win. I agree. So
it would be the best deal to see
the hedgeimon
decline step by step in cooperating with
the other nations which are upcoming
nations but I think this is too
optimistic I think so we will see a lot
of senseless wars.
On that note, we'll end this program and
I thank Scott Ritter and Patrick Bob
here in Basal, Switzerland.
We're we're attending a conference and I
thank the audience for watching and
Kathy Voggan back in Sydney, our
producer. I ask you to subscribe and to
uh donate to our channel. And until next
week, remember Sunday mornings now 9:00
am Eastern US time for the world this
week. And for the show, I say goodbye.
is Joe Lauria in Switzerland.
>> All right, Peter.
>> All right, thanks very much. [laughter]
Get out your notebook. There's more.
>> If [music] you are a consumer of
independent news, then the first place
you should be going to is consortium
news. And please do try to support them
when you can. It doesn't have its
articles behind a payw wall. It's free
for everyone. It's one of the best news
sites out there. And it's been in the
business of independent journalism and
adversarial independent journalism for
over two decades. I hope that with the
public's continuing support of
Consortium News, it will continue for a
very long time to come. Thank you so
much.