Essentials: How to Exercise for Strength Gains & Hormone Optimization | Dr. Duncan French
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this episode of Huberman Lab Essentials, Dr. Andrew Huberman speaks with Dr. Duncan French from the USC Performance Institute to explore how resistance training optimizes hormones and physical performance. A central theme is that heavy loads engaging motor neurons trigger a stress response involving catecholamines like epinephrine and noradrenaline, which activates the HPA axis to release cortisol and subsequently stimulate testosterone production at both the gonads in men and exclusively the adrenals in women. While acute resistance training can boost anabolic hormones through this sympathetic arousal mechanism, Dr. French notes that longitudinal exposure relies more on basal levels of testosterone released by the testes or ovaries. He emphasizes that testosterone influences not just muscle tissue but also tendons, ligaments, and bone density, making it a critical hormone for overall structural adaptation to exercise stressors. To maximize these anabolic effects without diminishing returns, Dr. French advocates for specific training protocols characterized by high intensity and sufficient volume rather than sheer duration or low-intensity endurance work. He suggests that multi-joint exercises performed at approximately 80% of one-repetition maximum with six sets of ten repetitions are highly effective for driving testosterone release. Crucially, maintaining this intensity requires managing metabolic stress through adequate rest periods; shorter rests (around two minutes) can drive greater lactate accumulation and metabolic strain compared to longer breaks, potentially leading to superior hypertrophy gains if the athlete can sustain the load. However, he warns that pushing volume too high often forces a drop in intensity, which negates the hormonal benefits, suggesting that for general fitness or body recomposition, two challenging sessions per week combined with other lower-intensity work is more sustainable than frequent maximal efforts. The conversation also addresses the strategic use of recovery modalities like cold exposure and heat adaptation, highlighting how their application depends on specific training phases rather than being universally beneficial. Dr. French explains that while acute stressors can enhance performance by priming the body with sympathetic arousal, using ice baths immediately after intense workouts during a hypertrophy or strength-building phase may dampen mTOR signaling pathways essential for muscle growth and natural inflammation-based adaptation. Conversely, cold exposure is appropriate before competition to ensure peak technical execution when previous training has already built necessary adaptations. Similarly, heat acclimation in saunas improves sweat efficiency and weight-cutting capabilities but requires a long-term commitment of eight to ten weeks prior to an event, as the body needs time to increase thermogenic tolerance and glandular capacity rather than offering quick fixes. Nutritional strategies are presented through the lens of metabolic flexibility, where athletes learn to utilize different fuel sources depending on exercise intensity. Dr. French argues that relying solely on carbohydrates can lead to premature fatigue at lower intensities because fat oxidation is too slow to sustain prolonged effort once glycogen stores are depleted. Instead, a tactical approach involves cycling between ketogenic diets for daily living and low-intensity work to promote lipid utilization, while timing carbohydrate intake specifically around high-intensity sessions or competitions where glucose demand peaks. This periodization allows the body to remain metabolically efficient by teaching it when to tap into fat reserves versus when to rely on carbohydrates, ensuring that fuel stores are available exactly when needed for maximal output without unnecessary depletion during rest days. Ultimately, Dr. French and Huberman conclude that high-level performance is less about training harder than understanding the precise timing of stimuli to drive specific adaptations. Whether through weightlifting protocols, sauna sessions, or dietary manipulation, success comes from "adaptation-led programming" where athletes consciously monitor their subjective feedback regarding sleep, mood, and recovery. The ability to reproduce technical skill and physical output day after day depends on managing fatigue and cognitive load, as mental exhaustion can degrade movement mechanics just as quickly as physical tiredness does. By treating the body as a plastic system that responds differently to various overloads based on individual biology, athletes can optimize their training environment for strength gains, hormone optimization, and long-term health without succumbing to burnout or injury.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome to Huberman Lab Essentials,
where we revisit past episodes for the
most potent and actionable science-based
tools for mental health, physical
health, and performance.
I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a professor
of neurobiology and ophthalmology at
Stanford School of Medicine. And now, my
conversation with Dr. Duncan French.
Duncan French, great to see you again.
Likewise. Likewise. Thank you. We don't
often have many Stanford professors in
the Performance Institute, so I'm I'm
I'm really excited.
>> Well, this place is amazing and you have
a huge role in making it what it is. I
found dozens of papers on how weight
training impacts hormones
and your name is on all of them. What is
it about engaging motor neurons under
heavy loads sends a signal to the
endocrine system, "Hey, release
testosterone." I've never actually been
able to find that in a textbook. Yeah, I
mean, I think it's the stress response,
right? It's mechanical stress and it's
metabolic stress. And these, you know,
the downstream regulation of of
testosterone release at the gonads comes
from many different areas.
You know, the
my work primarily looked at,
you know, catecholamines and and and
sympathetic arousal. So, things like
epinephrine adrenaline.
>> Correct. Yeah, epinephrine adrenaline,
you know, and noradrenaline.
How how they were signaling that
signaling cascade using, you know, the
HPA axis releasing
cortisol and then, you know, looking at
how that also influenced the adrenal
medulla to release,
you know, androgens and then signaling
that at the gonads. There is is an
interesting question. So, in
presumably weight training in women,
people
who don't have testes, also it increases
testosterone. And is that purely through
the adrenals? When women lift weights,
their adrenal glands release
testosterone.
>> Absolutely. I mean, that is the only
area of of testosterone release for
females. And yes, it's the same
downstream cascade. Obviously, the
extent to which it happens is is
significantly less in females, but
that's how you there's good good data
out there that shows, you know, females
can increase their anabolic environment,
their internal anabolic milieu
using resistance training as a stressor,
and then they get the consequent muscle
tissue growth,
you know, whether it's tendon, ligament
adaptations, you know, the the
beneficial consequences of resistance
training, which is driven by anabolic
stimuli. Yeah, I have two questions
about that. The first one is something
that you mentioned, which is that the
the androgens, the testosterone comes
from the adrenals under resistance loads
in women. Is the same true in men? I
mean, we hear that the testes produce
testosterone when we weight train, but
do we know whether or not it's the
adrenals or the testes in men that are
increasing testosterone or both, a
little bit from each? The field is
divided presently in as much as
understanding the acute
the acute
adrenergic response in terms of, you
know, anabolic response to exercise in
an acute phase and the exposure to
you know, a stimulus that is
stress-driven, which might be partly
from the adrenal glands, partly from the
gonads versus a longitudinal exposure
to anabolic environments, which is
primarily driven by obviously the gonads
and the release of the endocrine
environment from from testosterone
release at the gonads. So, this the
field is split in terms of how exercise
is promoting hypertrophy, you know,
muscle tissue growth, and whether that
is very much
an adrenal
stimuli or if that's significant enough
in these acute responses versus the
longitudinal exposure just elevated
basal levels of anabolic testosterone
habitual levels. And then you mentioned
that testosterone can have enhancing
effects or growth effects on tendon and
ligament also. That you don't often hear
about that. People always think, you
know, testosterone muscle, but
testosterone has a lot of effects on
other tissues that are important for
performance, it sounds like. And what's
the story there?
>> I mean, the the testosterone hormone is
it I mean, listen, there's androgen
receptors on neural tissue, on neural
axons. It's pretty much everywhere.
>> Exactly. So, you know, it the the
binding capacity of testosterone and
influence in different tissues within
the body. I touched on, you know, muscle
tissue, but, you know, the the the
ligaments, the tendons, and even bone to
to some extent, you know, testosterone
is is potential to influence that
in in terms of removing muscle
osteopenic characteristics, etc. So,
yeah, it's it's a it's a a magic a magic
hormone, let's say, with many
many ends and impacts in terms of
adaptation. Could you say that there's a
there are some general principles of
training that favor testosterone
production in terms of that the that
somebody who's not an elite athlete
could use, who's trying to use weight
training to build or maintain muscle,
Yeah. lose body fat, so body
recomposition, and or stay strong and
healthy for sport of a different kind?
Testosterone is really stimulated by an
intensity factor, and also a volume
factor. Now, growth hormone is a little
bit different. That's largely driven by
an intensity factor alone. If you look
at many of the exercise interventions
that we use to try and investigate and
interrogate testosterone,
it was it was usually, you know, a 6 by
10 protocol. So, six sets of 10
repetitions, which is, you know, it's
quite a large, you know, 60 repetitions
is quite a large volume for a a single
exercise, and that was usually pitched
at about 80% intense of a one repetition
max intensity. Okay, so 80% of the one
rep max, six six sets of 10 reps
separated by rest of
>> 2 minutes. 2 minutes, which is actually
pretty fast, at least to me. And every
time you see these 2 to 3 minutes, when
you're actually watching the clock,
those 2-minute rest periods go by pretty
fast.
>> By the third, fourth set, you're you're
dying for more, yeah. Yeah. We
formulated that kind of exercise
protocol to really target, you know, the
the release of testosterone and try and
drive up these anabolic environments to
study that, you know, the endocrine,
um, you know, consequences. But, I think
that's that's that's the type of
protocol that is mo- most advantageous
for driving anabolic environments.
>> And that was it for the workout? Yeah, I
mean, we we would do that in a back
squat. So, you know, multi-joint,
um, you know, challenging exercise,
multi-muscle, multi-joint, 80% loads of
of your one repetition max, and then 6
by 10. We did play around with, you
know, your classic German volume type 10
by 10, um, kind of protocols. Um, but
they were just unsustainable at that
80%. The The key to what we also did was
we always adjusted, um, the loads to
make sure that it was 10 repetitions
that were sustained. So, if the load was
too too high and an athlete or or a
participant had to, uh, drop the weight
on on the sixth repetition, we would
unload the bar and make sure they
completed the 10 repetitions.
>> I see. Bringing me back to the point of
it's an intensity and a volume
derivative that that is going to be most
advantageous for testosterone release.
So, that sort of hints at the
possibility that the thresholds for
going from a workout that increases
testosterone to a workout that
diminishes testosterone is actually a
pretty narrow margin. Yeah, and I think
it comes back to that intensity factor
then. You know, what what we saw with
the that 10 by 10 protocol really sees
pretty significant drop-offs in the
load.
Um, and again, we're trying to stimulate
with intensity, with mechanical strain
through intensity, as well as metabolic
strain through volume. And I think
that's that's the paradigm that you've
got to look at is that the mechanical
load has to come from, you know, the the
vo- the actual weight on the bar, and
the volume, um, is is the metabolic
stimulus. How much are we driving
lactate? How much are we driving, you
know, glycogenolysis in in in terms of
that type of energy system for, um, you
know,
executing a a 10 by 10 protocol. And
what we often saw was just a significant
reduction in the intensity capabilities
of a of an athlete to sustain that. So,
we shortened the volume um to try and
maintain the intensity. Is there any
evidence that training slowly can offset
some of the negative effects of doing a
lot of volume? The rest is often the
consideration that's overlooked um out
there in general population and in many
sports and environments. You know, that
the rest is is as important a
programming variable as the load and the
intense the intensity the load the the
volume, etc. If you extend the the
duration of your rest periods, what
you're ultimately doing is influencing
that metabolic stimulus again. You're
allowing the flushing of the body, the
removal of waste products, you know,
lactate to be, you know, removed via
from from the body and then the the
metabolic environment is reduced. So, if
I if I understand correctly, you want to
create a metabolic stress.
>> Absolutely. So, I could I could in
theory do a 45- or 60-minute session
where I pack in more more work per unit
time. I'm not going to be able to
quote-unquote perform as well. I won't
be able to lift as much. I'm going to
have to you know, unweight the bar
between sets or maybe even during sets
if I have someone who could do that.
But, it sounds like that's the way to
go. So, it's got to be So, this the old
adage of high intensity short duration
is probably the way to go. Correct. And
and and you know, in in in layman's
terms, if the same objective, the same
training goal is just muscle tissue
growth, and we're not talking about
maximal strength or any of those type of
parameters if you're just talking about
growing muscle, if there's an athlete A
and they do six six sets of 10 with 2
minutes rest, and there's athlete B that
does six sets of 10 with 3 minutes left
rest, athlete A will likely see the
highest muscle gains because of the
metabolic stimulus that they're driving
with the shorter rest periods. What
about day-to-day recovery? I mean, can
Work out that you described as intense
but short. How many days a week can the
typical person do that and sustain
progress? Yeah, I mean, I think that
comes back to your training and your
training history. Obviously, there's a
resilience and a robustness with with an
incremental training age. So, a protocol
like that, we would look at two two
times, you know, a week, something
that's that's pretty intensive like
that. Because again, it comes back to
the point you make is that you really
need to be
for want of a better term, suffering a
little bit through that type of
protocol, both in terms of of the
challenge of the load, but also being
able to tolerate the the metabolic
stress that you're exposed to. It's it's
a it's a you know, a bit of a sicko
feeling, right? Because of the lactate
that you're driving up. So, you know, I
wouldn't promote as an athlete doing
that type of modality, you know,
multiple multiple times unless you're
from the realms of bodybuilding, and
then you really that that's the sole
purpose of of what you're trying to
achieve. If it's just somebody, um, you
know, a weekend warrior that wants to
keep in shape and look and look good, I
would say, you know, two times a week
for a really challenging workout like
that, and then flex the other types of
workouts within the week to have more of
a volume emphasis, where you reduce the
intensity, and you might just look at,
you know, larger rep ranges from 12 to
15 to 20. Another workout where you're
looking at, you know, reducing the
volume, but increasing the intensity,
and really trying to drive, you know, a
different stimulus to
to give you more end points of of of
success. Mhm. Last time I was uh here at
the USC Performance Institute, we had a
brief conversation, and I I want to make
sure I got the details right, that in
the short term, and a big increase in
stress hormone can lead to an increase
in testosterone. Like a like a parachute
jump.
>> Correct.
>> Um, but uh so, stress can promote the
release of testosterone. Yeah. That was
news to me. Right.
>> Um, we always hear about stress
suppressing testosterone, stress
suppressing the immune system, all these
terrible things, but in the short term,
you're saying it can actually increase
the release of testosterone. Uh so, I
have that right? Correct.
>> Okay. And so, So the second question is
does my cognitive
interpretation of the stressor make a
difference? In other words, if I
voluntarily jump out of a plane with a
parachute,
does it have a different effect on my
testosterone than if you shove me out of
the plane against my will? Well,
presumably with a parachute, too. I
mean, so so this was what all my PhD
work was was looking at was the
you know,
the pre
the exposure to a stressor and the
pre-arousal of how your body essentially
prepares for that stressor and then how
it manages it throughout the exposure to
the stress. We used a resistance
training protocol that that these
athletes knew was going to be very very
challenging. It's going to be there's
going to have some anxiety to doing it.
They knew there were going to be some
physical distress from doing it. Um and
therefore, you know, their their mindset
of how they were going to approach that
was already set. So what we saw prior 15
minutes prior to the the start of an
ex-exposure to to the workout, that the
epinephrine, the noradrenaline, the
adrenaline was already starting to
prepare the body sympathetically
to go into what it knew was going to be
a very very challenging workout.
>> So what's the what was the takeaway
there? Is it is the stress good for
performance or is it harmful?
>> That's a great question. From my data,
certainly the the greater arousal, the
higher the performance was from a from a
physical exertion perspective. There's
definitely a bio-an individual
biokinetics to some of these hormonal
kind of releases and as much as those
guys that had the highest
you know, adrenergic response in terms
of epinephrine release, norepinephrine
release, also sustained force output
through for a longer period of the
workout than those that didn't. So the
the the individuals that had a lower
stimulus of of the sympathetic arousal,
let's say, certainly didn't perform as
well throughout the workout. There's
another side to this that I want to ask
about which is
the use of cold. In particular things
like ice baths, cold showers. In theory
that's stress also. It's epinephrine.
And so um
how should one think about the use of
cold for recovery? You know, throwing
your body into, you know, a cold tub, an
ice bath, or whatever it may be, um
certainly is going to have a
physiological stress response. Now,
people using that for different end end
goals. And again, I think that's where
the narrative has to be explained. Um if
you are using that stress specifically
to manage the mindset, um to use it as a
specific stress stimulus, that's the
same as me doing 6 by 10 80%. You know,
you you're just trying to find something
to disrupt the system to do something
that's very
um if you want a better term, painful,
discomfort, whatever. Um you're just
finding a stressor and then being able
to manage the mindset. But if you're
using cold um specifically from a
physiological perspective to promote um
you know,
redistribution of vascularity of blood
flow, you know, to to different vascular
areas of of muscle that that you feel
have gone through a workout, that are
damaged, or whatever it may be. I think
there's we we've got to understand what
that stress mechanism is.
Um and you know, the the data, the
literature is certainly still out there
with respect to cryotherapy and cold
baths and some of these
um you know, high these these cold
exposures in terms of what they do at
the at the level of the muscle tissue.
If that's if that's the target, if
you're trying to promote a flushing
mechanism, or you're trying to promote
redistribution of of the blood flow,
what you've got to understand is that
cold is going to clamp down every part
of the vascular system. Um and we've
really got to understand how the muscle
would be redistributed
um to areas of interest. So, you know, I
think the stress response is is is is a
real thing with respect to, you know,
cold exposure.
Um but I think the narrative around what
are you using the cold for has to
precede the conversation.
>> Mhm. And cold, I've heard, can actually
prevent some of the beneficial effects
of training. That it can actually get in
get in the way of muscle growth, etc.
Yeah, there's there's there's some
pretty robust data out there now showing
that it it definitely has an influence
on performance variables like strength
and power in particular. Um but
absolutely in terms of muscle
hypertrophy. And there's a big kind of
theme in in the world of athletic
performance right now in terms of
periodization
of cold exposure as as a recovery
modality. You know, what when do you use
cold? You know, should you be using cold
for recovery in periods of high training
load when you're actually pursuing, you
know, maybe general prepa- preparatory
work, or you're actually trying to
pursue muscle growth. Well, that's
usually where you get the most sore.
It's usually where, you know, you you
feel the most fatigued, but it's
probably not the most beneficial
approach to use an ice bath in that in
that scenario because you're dampening,
you're dulling the you know, the mTOR
pathway and and the the hyper-
hypertrophic um signaling pathway.
Whereas in a competition phase, where
actually quality of exercise and quality
of execution of skill and technical work
has to be maintained, you want to throw
the kitchen sink of recovery uh
capabilities and recovery interventions
in that scenario because you now you
know, the the muscle building activity
should be in the bank. That should have
been done in the in the general prepa-
preparatory work and um now you're
focusing on technical execution. So,
you're absolutely right. No, it's
interesting. So, if I if I understand
correctly,
uh if if I want to maximize muscle
growth or power it or, you know,
improvements and adaptations, then the
inflammation response to the late-onset
muscle soreness, all this stuff that's
uncomfortable and that we hear is so
terrible is actually the stimulus for
adaptation. And so, using cold in that
situation might short circuit my
progress. But, if I'm I, you know, I
don't know that I'll ever do this, but
if I were to do a an Ironman or
something or run a marathon, under those
conditions, I'm basically coming to the
to the race, so to speak, with all the
power and strength I'm going to have.
And so, there reducing inflammation is
good because it's going to allow me to
perform more work, essentially.
>> Absolutely. Yeah, you have to be
strategic about when you use some of
these interventions. And, you know, the
the time when you're preparing for a
competition is the appropriate time when
you want to drive recovery and make sure
that your body is optimized.
Um, you know, when you're far away from
a
competition, you know, date or, you
know, out of season or whatever it may
be, and you're really trying to just
tear up the body a little bit to allow
it to to its natural, um, you know,
healing and adaptation processes to take
place, well, you don't want to negate
that. You you know, you want the body to
optimize its internal recovery, and
that's how muscle growth is going to
happen. So. So interesting. There
there's a time kind of consideration
that you need to make with these
interventions, for sure. At the UFC
Performance Center, are the are the
fighters periodizing their cold exposure
or are they just you doing cold cold at
at at will? Well, it's not just the UFC,
and again, I I I talk about my personal
experiences with different sports. I
think just education around where
science is at and that our understanding
of of concepts like the use of cold
exposure for recovery, ice bath, you
know, everyone wants to jump in an ice
bath. But, I think as we've as we've
stepped back and scientists have started
to say have have started to figure out
and look at some of the data, you know,
we we're now more intuitive about, well,
actually that might not be the best or
the most optimal approach. And I think
that's that's any given sport. So, yes,
certainly here at the at the UFC, we're
trying to educate our athletes around,
you know, appropriate timing. And it's
the same with nutrition, it's the same
with an ice bath intervention, it's the
same with lifting weights, it's the same
with going for a run or working out on
the bike, you know, the
there's there's tactics to when when you
do things and when you don't do things.
And I think, you know, stress and and
cold exposure,
um we have to have a consideration
around that as well, but it's not just,
you know, MMA fighters, that's any any
athlete. And I think it's the best the
best professionals, the most successful
professionals, do that really well. They
unders- they listen, number one, they
they educate themselves, and then they
build structure. And I think, you know,
at the most elite level, we we always
talk about it here at the UFC, but the
most elite level, you're not necessarily
training harder than anybody else.
Everybody in the UFC trains hard. Like
everyone is training super hard. But the
best athletes, the the true elite
levels, are the ones that can do it
again and again and again on a daily
basis and sus- sustain a technical
output for skill development. Therefore,
their skills can improve or physical
development, their physical attributes
can improve. So, that ability to
reproduce on a day-to-day basis falls
into a recovery conversation. Now, when
is the right time to use something like
an ice bath and when isn't is part of
the the high-performance com-
conversation, for sure. For somebody
that wants to get better at sport, uh do
you recommend a particularly, um
long or short training session? Does
intensity matter, or is it just reps?
No, it's it's not a volume-driven
exercise, it's a quality-driven
exercise. It is about rehearsal of
accurate movement, accurate movement
mechanics.
Um and the soon as soon as that becomes
impacted by fatigue or inaccurate
movement, you're now losing the the the
motor learning. You're losing the
accuracy of the skill that, you You can
call it muscle memory or whatever they
want, right? But essentially you're
grooving neural axons to to create
movement patterns and they're
situational throughout sport, right? You
know, whether it's a Cruyff turn in
soccer or a jump shot in basketball or a
forehand down the line.
You can carve out that particular
posture and position and skill and you
can isolate it and you can drill it
again and again and again. Now, as soon
as fatigue is is influencing that
repetition, it's time it's time to stop.
And the best coaches understand that.
It's shorter sessions that are very high
quality and I think the best athletes in
my experience are the ones that
consciously and cognitively
are aware of it at every moment of the
training session. A 3-hour session
versus a 90-minute session,
you know, we'll we'll take the 90-minute
session any day when it comes to skill
acquisition because that's going to be
driven by quality over quantity. Yeah,
training and skill learning is
incredibly mentally fatiguing. You hit a
really hard workout or run early in the
day.
What leads to the mental fatigue after
physical performance? If you have an
amazing coach who is setting up training
in a particular way, it's challenging.
It there's a strain related to it and
I'm not talking physical strain, I'm
talking figuring things out, you know,
figuring out the skill and I think that
can be stressful. Like, you know, if
they if they hit the right technique,
you know, that reward center in the
brain, that dopamine shot is is going to
fly up there and there's only so many
times that we can get that before that
becomes dampened. And I think there's an
energetic piece to it, you know, there's
the fueling of of the brain. There's the
there's the the the carbohydrate fueling
exercise that actually the strategy
around how you fuel for learning and
fuel for physical training is is
actually pretty similar.
Yeah, it's it's glucose. It's sugar at
the end of the day, right? Do you think
that um
nutrition that doesn't include a lot of
glucose, doesn't include a lot of
carbohydrates,
um is a problem. Yeah, again,
disclaimer, I'm not a dietitian. Um but
I I I I I think for it's it comes down
to metabolic efficiency. You know, we
rarely advocate a high-performance
athlete in a in a high-intensity
intermittent sport like MMA being
totally ketogenic. Because at the end of
the day, some of those high-intensity
efforts um
usually require, you know, carbohydrate
fueling um for for the high and at the
energy um
the energy produced at those high
intensities.
>> Can I interrupt you real quick? What
about ketones for people that are
ingesting carbohydrates? This is an
interesting area because people always
hear ketones and they think, "Oh, I have
to be ketogenic to benefit from taking
ketones." Right.
>> But there are a number of athletes and
um recreational athletes now as well
taking liquid or powder-based ketones on
even though they do eat rice and oatmeal
and bread and other things. As So, w-
are there any um known benefits of
ketones even if one is not in a state of
ketosis? The use of ketones that I'm
primarily aware of is is um in our sport
is after the event, you know, in terms
of the brain health with with athletes
that take, you know, potentially taking
trauma to the brain, etc. and looking to
maintain the the the fueling and the
energy supply to the brain. But yes,
it's probably a little bit out of my
remit. So, I I don't want to talk on
that because I'm not I'm not fully
familiar with that. Um to come back to
your original question, if it's a you
know, general population, then yes, I
think there's there's a place to argue
that actually being on a ketogenic diet
at times and maybe that's to cycling
exercise, maybe not, I don't mean
cycling a bike, I mean cycling um
ketosis um is beneficial because I think
it's going to lead to better metabolic
management and and and better metabolic
efficiency at those lower intensities
where we should be fueling our our
metabolism with lipids and fats. Um
clearly the the Western diet and and you
know, the modern day diet is heavily
driven by processed food and
carbohydrates that, you know, people
become predisposed to utilization of
that fuel source
above lipid use, fat use at intensities
that are very low. So, you know, some of
our data with the fighters shows that as
well.
But, I think the challenge for us is
that we're working with a clientele that
require high intensity bouts of effort.
So, you know, fueling appropriately
is very important for that. Now, we use
we use tactics here where we essentially
have athletes on what you would say kind
of a is it a largely a ketogenic diet,
but then we will fuel carbohydrates
around training sessions. So, we'll do
very timed exposure to carbohydrates.
So, it's not post training, post
training, immediately pre
during and then immediately post. And
then the rest of their diets, you know,
breakfast, lunch, and dinner
what would look like ketogenic type
approaches. So, we're trying to be very
tactical in the exposure to maximize the
intensity for the training
and then return to a metabolically
efficient diet which is
heavily reduced in carbohydrate because
we've fueled the sessions that needed
it. The way I understand metabolic
efficiency is that you you teach the
body to use fats by maybe doing long
long bouts of cardio, maybe lowering
carbohydrates a bit, so teaching the
body to tap into its fat stores for
certain periods of training.
And then you also teach the body to
utilize carbohydrates by supplying
carbohydrates immediately after training
and before training. You teach the body
to use ketones and then you use them at
the appropriate time as opposed to just
deciding that one of these fuel sources
is good and all the others are bad or
dispensable. Do I have that correct?
>> Yes, you're absolutely right. I mean, at
low intensities of exercise or just
day-to-day living, we shouldn't be
tapping into our
carbohydrate fuel sources extensively.
That that's that's for higher intensity
work or, you know, the fight or flight
needs of of stress, you know? Um
if, you know, athletes or any individual
has a, you know, a high carbohydrate
diet, they're going to start to become
predisposed to utilizing that fuel
source preferentially. Now, at low
intensity, that can be problematic,
certainly for an athlete because if they
preferentially use carbohydrate at lower
intensities, when the when the exercise
demand goes to a higher intensity,
they've already exhausted their fuel
stores, you know? They can't draw upon
fat because the oxidation of that that
fat is just too slow. So, they're
essentially now become fatigued
um because of they've already utilized
the carbohydrate stores. So, what we try
to do, yes, through diet manipulation
and a little bit of exercise
manipulation is, as you say, teach the
body or train the body to preferentially
use a specific fuel source, fat
obviously at lower intensities and
carbohydrate at high intensities. And we
look at specifically the crossover point
between the two tells a lot in terms of
how an athlete is is ultimately um yeah,
how their metabolism is working. I think
most people are looking for that one
pattern of eating, that one pattern of
exercising that's going to be best for
them or sustain them, and they often
look back to the time when they felt so
much better switching from one thing to
the next, but the adaptation process
itself is also key, right? Teaching the
body. And I um so, if we were to
um just riff on this just a little bit
further, if somebody is eating in a
particular way and they want to try this
kind of periodization of nutrition, um
could one say, "Okay, for a few weeks
I'm going to do more high-intensity
interval training and weight training,
and I'm going to eat a bit more
carbohydrate cuz I'm depleting more
glycogen. Then if I switch to a
uh phase of my training where I'm doing
some longer runs, maybe I'm not maybe
I'm training less, maybe I'm just
working at my desk a little bit more,
then I might switch to a low lower
carbohydrate diet. Do I have that right?
And then if I'm going to enter a
competition
of some sort, certainly not UFC right?
Or MMA of any kind to be clear.
Not because it isn't a wonderful sport,
but because it's that wouldn't be good
for my other profession. But
if I were going to do that, then I would
think about stacking carbohydrates,
ketones and and fats. Is that do I have
that more or less right?
>> I think yeah, you just said it
eloquently. At the end of the day,
you're consciously understanding what
the
the exposure to to physical exertion is
and you're flexing your diet
accordingly. A couple more questions. I
I can't help myself. I know we talked
about temperature earlier. I have to ask
you about heat. One of the reasons to a
deliberate expose oneself to heat is for
things like growth hormone release, etc.
We talk about this, but how does one get
better at heat adaptation or at least
what are you doing with the fighters to
get them
better at dealing with heat? Barring
like hyperthermia and death. Like I mean
obviously heat up the brain too much,
people will have seizures and die. But
you lose neurons. But what's the right
way to acclimate heat? Yeah, so we we we
normally start with about 15 minutes of
exposure. Now if someone's really
lacking acclimation to heat, you know,
you can do that in three five minute
efforts. Do you know what I mean? And
actually take time.
>> hot sauna. Yeah, hot sauna. Take time to
step out.
>> 200 degrees or something.
>> Correct. Yeah. 200 Fahrenheit, yes. And
we we we try to work up to 30 to 40
minutes to 45 minutes in the sauna
continuous. Now we we have to
understand, you know, what what's the
advantage of heat acclimation for our
athletes? Ultimately, their ability to
sweat and to lose, you know, body fluids
is going to be advantageous to their
weight cut process. So their ability to
make weight. It is a technique that
these guys some of these guys adopt. So
if you don't have, you know, a high
sweat rate, it means you're going going
to sit in the sauna for longer and
longer and longer to get the same delta
in sweat release. Um so, the more
acclimated you are, the more your body
is thermogenically adapted, the more
sweat glands you have. So, you know, we
start with 15 minutes and then we just
try to add on and add on across a time.
And now now for us we kind of found
about 14
um sauna exposures starts to really then
drive the adaptations that we're looking
for. So, it's not a quick fix. You know,
a a heat acclimation strategy has to
happen long before fight week or long
before the fights. You know, this is a
this is a process that has to begin, you
know, 8 to 10 weeks before the fight so
that we can actually get that adaptation
and that tolerance to the stressor to
the exposure of heat. That's
interesting. I until today, when we
talked about this earlier and again now,
I didn't realize that um but it makes
perfect sense now that I hear it that
heat adaptation is possible. That you
basically can train the body to become
better at cooling itself, which is what
what sweating is. The body is a you
know, as an organism, as an organic
system, it's it's hugely adaptable. It's
hugely plastic, but I think the skill is
understanding the whens, the whys, and
the whereofs in terms of changing the
overload, changing the stimulus to drive
specific adaptation. And philosophically
that's that's how we go about our work
here. We talk about adaptation-led
programming. Now, adaptation-led
programming
fits into every single category, not
just lifting weights or running track.
It fits into nutrition. It fits into
sitting in the sauna. It fits into being
in a cold bath or not. It fits into so
many different things because we're
driven by scientific insights. And and
that's how we really want to go about
our business. If someone wanted to
experiment with heat adaptation or
experiment with cold adaptation or
change up their training regimen or or
diet and look at metabolic efficiency,
do you think
12 weeks is a good period of time to
really give something a thorough go and
get
get gain an understanding of how well or
how poorly something works for oneself
or would you say eight is enough for
three? For 99% of things that change
within the body that physiologically
adapt to a training stimulus or an
overload stimulus, you're going to start
to see either regression or progression,
you know, beneficial or detrimental
effects within three months. Absolutely,
I would say. And I think, you know, the
individual interpretation is always has
to be considered. And I think that's
where it comes back to to be a thinking
man's athlete or be a thinking man's
trainer. Like someone that's going
through exercise. Don't
you have to cogni- consciously
understand where your body's at any
moment in time. You know, you've got to
be real with yourself. You create a
journal, create a log of your training,
create a log of your feelings, your
subjective feedback of
you know, how you felt, your mood, your
sleep.
>> athletes do that?
>> Yeah. Yeah, we we we try to promote that
because again, that's that's part of
this this process, you know. Um
Maybe 12 weeks for you, but I might get
the same responses in eight eight weeks,
you know. We could put 15 guys on the
mat and give them the same workout and
there's going to be 15 different
responses to that same workout because
the human organism is so complex and
innate that it's going to adapt
differently. You know, some people will
tolerate it, some people are going to be
challenged by it. Some people have got a
metabolic makeup that's going to promote
it, some people are meta- metabolically
challenged by it, you know, there's
there's just so many different things
that we have to consider and that's what
we try to do here. It's the cross we
bear is that we try to understand on an
individual level how to optimize
athletic performance. Duncan, when you
speak, I learn so much. I I'm going to
take the protocols that I've I've heard
about today. I'm going to think about
how I'm training and how I could train
differently and better, how I'm eating,
how I could eat different differently
and better for sake of performance and
just in in general.
Um
Thank you so much for your time your
scientific expertise the stuff you're
doing in the practical realm it's it's
immense so hopefully we can do it again.
Yes thank you this has been a blast I
appreciate it and yeah keep doing what
you're doing cuz I know there's a lot of
people out there that love the platform
so thanks for the invite it's been
awesome. Thank you thanks so much all
right.