Dr. Andy Galpin: How to Assess & Improve All Aspects of Your Fitness | Huberman Lab Guest Series
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this episode of the Huberman Lab Guest Series, Dr. Andy Galpin outlines a comprehensive framework for assessing and improving fitness based on nine distinct physiological adaptations rather than vague generalizations like "health" or "fat loss." These nine categories include skill development (movement efficiency), speed, power, strength, muscular endurance, muscle hypertrophy, anaerobic capacity, maximal aerobic capacity ($VO_2$ max), and long-duration steady-state endurance. Galpin emphasizes that while aesthetic goals often drive the desire for hypertrophy, true health is determined by addressing limitations within these nine specific areas; therefore, a healthy protocol must be tailored to an individual's current deficits rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach. He argues against historical misconceptions in exercise science where bodybuilding paradigms dominated strength training or CrossFit prioritized scores over movement quality, advocating instead for a balanced integration of broad-strength and endurance movements that support longevity without excessive fatigue. To assess fitness levels effectively, Galpin provides practical testing methods ranging from gold-standard laboratory metrics to accessible at-home protocols. For skill assessment, he suggests recording video of fundamental movements like squats, deadlifts, presses, and pulls to evaluate symmetry, stability, range of motion, and control across major joints such as the ankle, knee, hip, shoulder, elbow, and spine. Strength can be measured via one-rep maximum tests or estimated using percentages (e.g., 75% load for muscular endurance), while anaerobic capacity is tested through all-out efforts lasting 30 to 45 seconds. Galpin specifically highlights $VO_2$ max as a critical marker of aerobic health, noting that men should aim above 50 mL/kg/min and women above 30-50 mL/kg/min for optimal longevity, citing legendary athlete Dave Costello who maintained high levels well into his eighties. Long-duration endurance is defined by the ability to sustain work output without breaks or intervals for at least 20 minutes, ideally while maintaining nasal breathing. The discussion also addresses significant gaps in current exercise science regarding female athletes and hormonal influences on performance. Galpin notes that while women are increasingly represented in coaching roles and scientific studies due to NIH mandates requiring sex as a biological variable, specific high-performance data for females—particularly concerning birth control pills and menstrual cycles—is still lacking compared to male counterparts. He encourages listeners not to fear strength training but rather to view it as essential for bone density and overall functionality. Furthermore, he advises on how to structure testing days to minimize fatigue interference, suggesting that non-fatiguing tests like body composition scans or skill assessments be performed first in the day, followed by maximum effort outputs like power jumps or $VO_2$ max tests later when energy reserves are depleted but before long-duration steady-state work. Ultimately, Galpin concludes that individuals do not need to excel at all nine adaptations simultaneously; instead, they should identify their "performance anchors"—the weakest links limiting overall function—and prioritize improving those specific areas. He recommends conducting a full battery of these assessments once every six months or year to track progress and adjust training protocols accordingly. By understanding the mechanisms behind each adaptation and utilizing reliable testing tools, individuals can move away from inefficient isolation exercises toward movement-based prescriptions that yield better results in less time. This approach ensures that exercise serves as a tool for maximizing wellness span rather than just chasing aesthetic ideals, allowing people to maintain high levels of fitness throughout their lives regardless of age or gender.
Read the full video transcript
[Music]
welcome to the hubman lab guest Series
where I and an expert guest discuss
science and science-based tools for
everyday
life I'm Andrew huberman and I'm a
professor of neurobiology and
Opthalmology at Stanford School of
Medicine today's episode marks the first
in a series with Dr Andy Galpin Dr Andy
Galpin is a professor of kinesiology at
Cal State University Fullerton and one
of the foremost World experts on the
science and application of methods to
increase strength speed and endurance
hypertrophy and various other aspects of
fitness exercise and sports performance
across the six episode series Dr Andy
galin pulls from his expertise working
with everything from professional
athletes to recreational exercisers and
teaches us the mechanisms logic and
specific protocols for how to achieve
any of the number of different exercise
adaptations that I mentioned a moment
ago ranging from strength to endurance
hypertrophy and everything in between we
get really far into details but at all
times paying attention to the
macroscopic issues that is how to create
a program for endurance or strength or
hypertrophy or speed or one that
combines all of those we also talk about
supplementation and nutrition and how to
maximize recovery for each of the
different types of exercise adaptations
during today's episode Dr Galpin teaches
us how to assess our level of fitness
and more generally how to think about
Fitness so that we can best achieve our
fitness exercise and performance goals
Dr Professor Andy Galpin
super excited to have you here you're
such an immense Treasure Trove of
information on physical training and
optimizing for specific goals and
outcomes with physical
exercise I'm curious however so many
people have different levels of
Fitness some people are professional
athletes of course but most people are
not many people exercise regularly some
people are trying to do that more some
people are doing too much of that
they're overtraining they're not
recovering
enough if we were to take a step back
and each and every one of us ask how fit
are
we with the word fit of course being a
very broad encompassing word you know
could Encompass endurance certainly it
does strength the ability to run fast
even if for short distances um it might
even include hypertrophy or directed
hypertrophy trying to balance one's
musculature to offset asymmetries
recover from injuries Etc how should I
or anyone else for that
matter think about their level of
Fitness you know I know my resting heart
rate but what do I do in terms of really
assessing whether or not I'm as fit as I
could be and should be both for sake of
health and performance and here I'm
asking you the question not as an
athlete but as somebody who's been
pretty consistent as an exerciser but if
we were to throw our arms around this
question of how do we assess our
fitness what would be uh sort of the
different levels of assessment that we
should think about and do when it comes
to exercise people generally have two
major goals in mind goal number one is
achieving some sort of appearance right
this is I want to be big or I want to
not be too big or I want to be lean
something right it doesn't matter what
that goal is but there is an aesthetic
component to almost everybody they want
to look a certain way or not look a
certain way the other one is
functionality so I want to be able to
perform a certain way now again that
definition differs per person so I want
to be better at strength I want to be
better at Mobility I want to be able to
um have energy throughout the day
whatever it is so there's some sort of
appeal to aesthetic and there's some
sort of appeal to functionality So
within both of those categories we want
to be in a position where we can
understand where do I need to go with my
exercise training so that I can be as
fit and as healthy and Achieve these
goals that I want now as well as be in a
position where I can maintain them for a
long period of time so this Blends both
immediate goals so say you're just
interested in squatting a lot of weight
say you're interested in running 5K time
the best you want it doesn't matter it
Blends that with the ability the the
desire to have a long Wellness span to
be fit throughout life to achieve all
those things for as long as possible so
then then the question kind of comes
back to saying how do I
know which area I need to focus on the
most and why am I not achieving these
these goals or how can I get there more
effectively and if we look at the big
picture we have to understand that there
are several major components to physical
fitness that are going to be required in
all of these categories and to achieve
that there are a handful of components
that have to happen to be able to hit
those goals now there are infinite
methods so the same we actually use here
a lot is the methods are many but the
concepts are few so what I'd love to do
today is over the course of our
discussion is hit exactly what those
concepts are and then cover a whole
bunch of different methods and we could
do that for hours but we'll cover a
number of them for various goals so one
of the reasons I went into neuroscience
and not into exercise science is because
of this thing neuroplasticity the
nervous systems ability to adapt but the
more time I spend with you and the more
I learn from you I realize that many if
not all of the organ systems of our body
have this incredible ability to adapt
and when we're talking about physical
exercise there are incredible
adaptations that of course involve the
nervous system but also involve muscle
and connective tissue and so many other
cell types and
tissues that said when we talk about
Fitness what are the major types of
adaptations that underly this thing that
we call Fitness and later I know we're
going to get into how different forms of
exercise can trigger different types of
adaptations but what are the major
adaptations that one can create in their
body using exercise there there are many
reasons why one should exercise and we
could perhaps cover that later in our
chats but the physiological adaptations
can be bucketed really into nine areas
so the very first one is what I call
skill or technique so just learning to
move better more efficiently with a
specific position and timing and
sequence or whatever that is this could
be running more effectively this could
be practicing a skill like shooting a a
ball or an Implement swinging a golf
club anything like that I call that
skill development the second one is
speed this is simply moving at a higher
velocity or with a better rate of
acceleration okay that's very similar to
the next one which is power and power is
speed multiplied by force um the next
one then of course on top of that is
force or strength those are really
synonymous terms right uh how
effectively can you move something now
this is often confused strength rather
as muscular endurance so what I mean by
that is strength truly is a marker of
how what's the maximum thing you can
move or what's the maximum amount of
force you can produce one time it's not
how many repetitions in a row you can do
that's actually another one of our
adaptations called muscular
endurance all right so that is typically
under the order of like say five to 25
maybe 50 repetitions think of a classic
how many push-ups can you do in a row
how many sit-ups can you do in a minute
like things like that are muscular
endurance muscular endurance tends to be
localized so this is you know specific
to just say your triceps and your and
your deltoids it's not a overall
cardiovascular endurance marker or
anything like that so that's strength
number four number five is muscle
hypertrophy and this is the first time
now we're talking about uh an appearance
rather than a functional outcome so you
know moving better moving faster moving
heavier are uh indicators of how well
you can move this is the first one
that's just simply how big is your
muscle and that's muscle hypertrophy or
muscle size after that is muscular
endurance so this is how many
repetitions you can typically do of a
movement so think of how many push-ups
in a row you can do how many sit-ups in
a minute you can do things that are
typically in like five to 50 repetition
sort of range and it is often or it is
almost always local muscle so what I
mean by that is uh it is I know a
push-up test is is really how many reps
that your triceps and pecs and and
deltoids can do it is not a
cardiovascular endurance it is not a
global physiological endurance it's
specific to typically one or a few
muscle groups at a time this is why you
have to do multiple tests for for sort
of every group there uh after that now
we've moved into number seven which is
what I call Anor robic capacity this is
more synonymous with maximum heart rate
and now we're actually looking at rather
than a single movement or muscle group
it is a total physiological
um limitation so it is uh the maximum
amount of work you can do in say 30 to
45 seconds maybe even up to 120 seconds
of all out work um think of your classic
interval type of stuff here so how much
work can you do at a maximum rate where
you're going to enter tremendous amounts
of global fatigue then next past that is
maximal aerobic capacity and this is
probably something like in the 8 to 15
minute range where you're going to reach
probably both a maximum heart rate as
well as a true V2 Max which we'll we'll
talk a lot more about what that is later
so that is is uh different from the
previous one where you can't reach this
in a matter of seconds it simply takes
multiple minutes to get to a position to
where your VO2 max is actually going to
be sufficiently challenged or an
indicator there and then the last one
number nine is what I call long duration
and this is just your ability to sustain
submaximal work for a long period of
time with no breaks no reduction
whatsoever this is often called steady
state training or a lot of people just
think of this when they think of quote
unquote cardio but your ability to
continue move without any breaks or
change or drop uh is the last and final
adaptation and for longdistance steady
state um I'm guessing it exceeds 15
minutes because uh the previous one was
8 to 15 minutes or so um what sort of uh
R time ranges are we talking about in
terms terms of this uh long duration
well that's actually wonderful you can
be anything past 15 minutes so really if
you look at a kind of a minimal number
there it's generally 20 minutes of what
we're looking for but a more typical
would be 20 to 60 minutes but anything
past that would still be limited by your
long duration endurance so your ability
to sustain work over time okay so given
that there are nine different major
adaptations that can be induced with
exercise of specific types is there any
one global test or assess
that people can take or do that allows
them to determine what level of ability
of Fitness they have in each and every
one of these nine different categories
there are probably dozens or more tests
that you can do for each one of those
nine categories and what I would
actually like to do is walk you through
my favorites for each and giving you
both the scientific gold standard so if
you had the ability unlimited resources
what should you go do as well as some
that are are equipment free that are
cost free things that anyone can do
across the world in addition to that I
want to walk you through what those
numbers should be how do you identify if
you're really poor in something or if
you're great and then if you aren't as
good maybe in a category and you want to
get better at it exactly what to do in
terms of protocols uh for how to achieve
optimal results in each of those steps
so I noticed in your list of the nine
different adaptations to exercise that
you did not mention fat loss or health
promoting benefits which are two reasons
that a lot of people exercise was there
a specific reason that you did not
mention those absolutely it's because
those things are actually not specific
training Styles they are byproducts of
these nine so what I mean by that is if
you understand how fat loss occurs which
we can certainly talk about you'll
realize some of these nine Protocols are
effective for fat loss and some are not
uh General Health is the same thing when
we understand what it actually means to
be healthy from a physiological
perspective persective then the
rationale for what to train for is going
to determine itself so what I mean is
looking at things like in order to be
healthy you have to have sufficient
strength you have to have cardiovascular
fitness you have to have sufficient
muscle and Etc therefore training for
one's health is determined by those
restrictions so for you Andrew you may
need to do more strength training to be
healthy where me because I'm strong
already way stronger than you I may not
need to do as much strength training so
our quote unquote health-based Protocols
are based on our current status or
limitations in physical fitness among
these nine areas so what I would like to
do today is to cover a brief history of
exercise science and the reason is it's
going to explain a lot about why people
are not getting the goals in their
exercise programs that they want as well
as giv you very specific Direction about
what to do instead I can't wait to hear
all the things that I'm doing
incorrectly and to have you help me
remedy that before we begin I'd like to
emphasize that this podcast is separate
from my teaching and research roles at
Stanford it is also separate from Dr
galpin's teaching and research roles at
Cal State Fullerton it is however part
of our desire and effort to bring zero
cost to Consumer information about
science and science related tools to the
general public in keeping with that
theme we'd like to thank the sponsors of
today's podcast our first sponsor is
momentus momentus makes supplements of
the absolute highest quality the
huberman Lab podcast is proud to be
partnering with momentus for several
important reasons first of all as I
mentioned their supplements are of
extremely high quality second of all
their supplements are generally in
single ingredient formulations if you're
going to develop a supplementation
protocol you're going to want to focus
mainly on using single ingredient
formulations with single ingredient
formulations you can devise the most
logical and effective and costeffective
supplementation regimen for your goals
in addition moment to supplement ship
internationally and this is of course
important because we realize that many
of the h Lab podcast listeners reside
outside the United States if you'd like
to try the various supplements mentioned
on the huberman Lab podcast in
particular supplements for Hormone
Health for Sleep optimization for Focus
as well as a number of other things
including exercise recovery you can go
to live momentus spelled o so that's
lives.com huberman today's episode is
also brought To Us by element element is
an electrolyte drink that contains the
exact ratios of the electrolyte sodium
magnesium and potassium to optimize
cellular functioning for mental and
physical performance most people realize
that hydration is key we need to ingest
enough fluids in order to feel our best
and perform our best but what most
people do not realize is that the proper
functioning of our cells and nerve cells
neurons in particular requires that
sodium magnesium and potassium be
present in the correct ratios now of
course people with prehypertension and
hypertension need to be careful about
their sodium intake but what a lot of
people don't realize is that if you
drink caffeine if you exercise and in
particular if you're following a very
clean diet that is not a lot of
processed foods which of course is a
good thing chances are you're not
getting enough sodium potassium and
magnesium to optimize mental and
physical performance element contains a
science spack ratio of 1,000 milligrams
that's 1 gram of sodium 200 milligrams
of potassium and 60 milligram of
magnesium and no sugar if you'd like to
try element you can go to drink element
that's lm.com huberman to get a free
element sample pack with your purchase
again that's drink element LM nt.com
huberman to claim a free sample pack
today's episode is also brought To Us by
eight sleep eight sleep makes Smart
mattress covers with cooling Heating and
sleep tracking capacity I've been using
an eights Sleep mattress cover for about
the last8 months and it has completely
transformed my sleep I'm sleeping about
the same amount but I'm sleeping far
deeper and I'm now getting the proper
ratios of so-called rapid eye movement
or REM sleep and slow wave sleep and
waking up feeling far more recovered
mentally and physically the underlying
mechanism for all that is very
straightforward W I've talked many times
before on this podcast and elsewhere
about the critical relationship between
sleep and body temperature that is in
order to fall asleep at night your body
needs to drop by about 1 to 3 degrees in
terms of core body temperature and
waking up involves a 1 to 3 degree
increase in core body temperature with
eight Sleep mattress covers you can
adjust the temperature of your sleeping
environment to be one temperature at the
start of the night a different
temperature the middle of the night and
a different temperature as you approach
morning Each of which can place you into
the optimal stages of sleep and have you
waking up feeling more refreshed than
ever if you'd like to try Aid sleep you
can go to AIDS sleep.com huberman and
check out their pod3 cover and save $150
at checkout eight sleep currently ships
in the USA Canada United Kingdom select
countries in the EU and Australia again
that's eights sleep.com huberman to save
$150 at checkout before we get into how
the history of exercise science informs
the mistakes that we are all making and
how to remedy those mistakes I'm curious
as to whether not you have any favorite
one or two
studies that point to a sort of
naturally occurring uh example of how
people can become very fit in one area
and not another you know I'm familiar
with seeing endurance athletes that
apparently have terrific endurance but
at least to my eye don't look like they
are particularly strong I'm also
familiar with seeing individuals that
are very very strong particular on
social media but that don't look like
they could walk up a flight of stairs
much less run a mile do you have any
examples of studies in or outside the
laboratory that point to that in a
concrete way there's a lot to have to
discuss here but I I'll answer it really
clear uh if you look across the
literature and this is actually back to
as early as the mid 1950s in fact it
actually goes back to previous to that
to the Harvard fatigue lab 1927 to 1947
area people actually were advocating at
that point a combination of strength
training and endurance in the 1920s way
back then in fact actually goes prior to
that the late 1880s there's scientific
evidence back then um it became more
welldeveloped in the mid 1950s and 60s
in fact there was um the initial stages
of What's called the exercises medicine
movement which is the movement now but
the initial stages of that actually root
back to the 1950s and I could actually
go into that whole discussion and the
story of how that all came about but
that's the health as wealth um Mantra
that came from the 1950s um from the
scientific Community then all those
those data points are going to suggest
you need a combination of some sort of
broad strength training and Broad
endurance thing now if you have a
specific goal five months from now you
want to compete in a race or hit a
certain physique thing that's fine to
focus on one area of training certainly
if you're an athlete that's different
but if you want to maximize health and
and overall functionality throughout
time it needs to be a combination and to
really really highlight this I can
actually talk about a couple of studies
that I've done um one of them we
actually did in Stockholm Sweden so I
did this at the Carolin Institute which
you probably are aware of um it's
actually one of the founding places of
all of exercise physiology generally it
started there it was called something
different back then but really our
entire field came out of Stockholm and
the Carolin Institute and we worked with
a whole bunch of cross country skiers
that were in their 80s and 90s and so
they were competitive skiers in the
1940s and 50s and they had been skiing
competitively for that entire duration
so you're talking 50 to 60 consecutive
years of competing
um so these are 80 to 90 year olds
living alone unhealthy and we compared
them to a group of individuals uh here
in America who are the same age but
we're not exercising and what we wanted
to do is to see and kind of look at what
are these lifelong endurance individuals
what do they look like when we brought
them into the lab which is by the way
amazing to do a V2 Max test on a 92y old
um especially in a language that they
don't speak and you're in a you can
imagine you're doing this in the
hospital right and you're running people
through this is a cycling test and so
for a V2 Max test you have a mask on
your face you're hooked up to a
metabolic cart so it can collect all the
gases that are coming out of your mouth
and you're chanting these people on and
basically every minute the workload gets
harder and harder and harder until you
can't complete it and we're doing this
in a in a Cardiology Center and the
cardiologists are usually waiting for
their heart rate to get like slightly
elevated and they stop them because
they're you know 85 86 years old and not
only are we not stopping them but we are
screaming in their ears just like go go
go in Swedish or English in English
right and then the translator but it
doesn't take a lot of translation when
someone's screaming at your face like go
go go um so we ran them through a whole
bunch of VO2 max tests and we did the
same thing for those folks back um here
here in America and what was um
incredibly clear from that study was the
V2 Max um you can think about these
numbers and this is what's called
relative so in the relative terms are
milliliters per kilogram per minute and
so a standard number is about 18 is what
we call the line of Independence so if
your V2 Max is below 18 milliliters per
kilogram per minute it's very hard for
you to live by yourself so your Fitness
is so low you probably are going to need
to have somebody living with you or
you'll need to be in some sort of
assisted living home so if you are in
like VO2 max of 20 or 21 or 22 you're
not below that line of Independence but
you're on that threshold and so what we
found was our folks here in America the
group average was right around that
number so they were living at home by
definition we picked them to be people
living by themselves in their 80s and
not in a living room but they didn't
have any bandwidth so if they got a cold
or they had anything pop up where they
lost a little bit of Fitness they were
going to drop below that line and would
probably have to go to some sort of
assisted living situation um the folks
in Stockholm the the cross country
skiers the group average was most closer
to like 35 to 38 milliliters per
kilogram per minute now that number is
about the V2 Max you would find for a
normal College male and so these folks
that were literally 80 or 90 um if the
you know the joke if a saber-tooth tiger
ran in the room or or whatever and it
chased it down and we all had to run to
see who didn't get eaten alive the the
college men would probably have gotten
eaten before the the 90y olds and in one
case we had a 92y old individual and I
think his VO2 max was 38 which was in
our estimation a world record the
highest V2 Max for somebody over the age
of
90 ask what what is the typical resting
heart rate for somebody uh very fit like
these um older Swedish cross country
skiers if somebody has a um this let's
say their number is 35 milliliters per
kilogram in this V2 Max test but since
most of us don't have access to that
kind of equipment but that we can
measure our pulse rate y um what was a
typical resting heart rate resting pulse
rate sub 60 sub 60 yeah I mean and
typically that's a good number to go off
of for anybody regardless of age
um anytime I see somebody above that I'm
I'm going to start asking questions
certainly above now you'll see in the
literature people will say 60 to 80 is
normal and I I don't agree with that at
all if you're up if your resting heart
rate is 75 BS per minute there's either
something going on or you're not fit how
much CrossCountry skiing were they doing
on average in the previous let's say if
we take the previous 20 years since
they' been longtime cross country skiers
divide that by 20 years yeah uh on
average these people cross country
skiing 5 hours a day two hours a day an
hour a day yeah that's actually a good
question I don't remember it's been many
years um but they were not doing it
every single day and that the volume
would not have shocked you it was the
consistency over 50 years that got them
there now obviously these people were
again world champions and Olympic gold
medalists in the 1940s and 50s so they
were Elite they just continued
consistently over time but it wasn't a
shocking amount of physical fitness they
also didn't go out of their way to train
hard they were busy chopping wood they
were busy doing number of other things
and then they just happened to do some
of these races and ski along the way but
it wasn't a crazy amount to where you're
like oh that's great but I could never
hit that number it was something much
more reasonable so is the takeaway to be
consistent about getting cardiovascular
exercise and we can Define yeah what
consistent means in terms of days per
week a little bit later and I I know we
will yeah what are some other examples I
love these examples of um from The Real
World so here here's the downside though
so I only told you about their V2 Max
what I didn't tell you about is their
leg strength and functionality and that
part was no more Superior than it was
their counterparts who were not
exercisers so what that showed really
really clearly and many other Studies
have been done since then that look at
the classic what we call lifelong
endurance exercisers you will see in
general their V2 Max their
cardiovascular function their resting
heart rate their blood pressure it will
be markedly healthier than folks who on
exercise it is extraordinarily clear
that type of exercise is very important
for chronic disease management no doubt
about it however it is not sufficient
for overall Global health because it
does almost nothing for leg strength for
any other marker of Health which we can
talk about what are the things that are
actually going to predict mortality more
the most so that was a a big a big
smashing indication that's like hey this
is great however you're leaving things
on the table for your overall health now
one could argue they're 80 and they
they're doing pretty well but they
weren't doing as well in these areas and
so a study we did later actually as a
follow-up was looking at monagas twins
so this is actually interesting being a
scientist this is a classic example of
one of my graduate students who had been
in my lab for probably three or four
years and she was in our single fiber
physiology lab and she's now you imagine
she's in she's isolating individual
muscle fibers from an athlete one by one
with the tweezer and she's going to do
several thousand individual cells right
so she's you're down there for hours and
and things happen down there you kind of
lose your mind and she was just kind of
going on one day with one of my
colleagues just talking and she's like
oh yeah my uncle is really really fit
and something or other and then oh yeah
he's a twin and I was like oh is he
monozygous and she's like yeah for those
that don't know monozygous are identical
twins yeah which is interesting so you
basically have what what I'm setting up
here is this is the perfect exercise
scientific experiment monozygous
identical twins mean the they have the
exact same DNA so an egg was fertilized
split and then two humans grew out of
that with the exact same DNA and so now
we can start answer the question well
yeah okay what about maybe these cross
country skiers maybe they were just
genetic freaks maybe it didn't matter
it's like some people have well genetics
are always a component to it but how
much well now we have a scenario lining
up where it's like wait a minute you
have monos like twins so we have a
replica of a human being exact same DNA
the only differences that we would see
in their physiology now would be due to
Lifestyle
circumstances interesting so mono us to
an a dad and an uncle right uhhuh great
do they exercise well one of them does
he's a lifelong endurance exercise
Runner cyclist swimmer Iron Man all
these things what about the other one
nope he doesn't exercise at all and at
that point like I wanted to kill my
graduate student cuz I'm like like
you've been in my lab for 3 years or
more probably and you've never told me
that in your household is the perfect
scientific experiment for exercise you
could ever create and like she's just
the look on her face when my colleague
and I were staring at her she's just
like oh my God so I'm like call them
right now they are coming in the lab
they fly them in from Chicago I don't
care what we have to do like we're
getting them in and so I wanted to
actually going back to the model that
was first developed by the Harvard
fatigue lab one thing that's interesting
about that Community is they started off
with the concept of trying to examine
Human Performance through a holistic
lens and so it was the antithesis of
looking at U either organ by organ so
we're going to only look at the
cardiovascular system we're only going
to look at skeleton muscle and then
we're saying we're looking at this
entire picture and so that model we
wanted to carry through when these twins
and I said all right I want to bring
them in the lab but I'm not just going
to look at one system I want to do
everything so we took stool samples we
took blood we did vertical jump test we
did maximum strength test we did MRIs of
muscle mass we did um uh V2 Max test we
did efficiency stuff we we did genetic
testing we did an IQ test we did
psychological battery we wanted to look
at everything to figure out of these
things what differ between the Twins and
if so the second key question there is
by how much so can I improve my V2 Max
sure everyone knows that but how much
can it change by 5% 80% like where is
the number and so putting some Quant
ification on this was very important and
so again we had another example of a
classic endurance only training Paradigm
compared to a a non so this is a person
who's I think he's a truck driver by
vocation which is I think actually drove
for a potato chip company which was even
fun here the the endurance athlete
actually was great because like any
endurance people he had a he had
physical books of all of his training
mileage for the last 35 years and we
could we just went through them we
calculated the total amount of miles he
ran his averages his heart rates per
time we had this unbelievable thing like
what races he was in he had the
documentation he was just totally nuts
right like something that endurance
people are like shaking their head right
now going oh yeah I got that too and
every else endurance folks are pretty
nerdy yeah they're super nerdy right so
it was great because now we could
validate as close as one could to
actually how much you ran and things
like that so they had about a 35 year
Discord um they both exercised up
through high school about 18 they
stopped doing it by the time they
brought them in the lab they're in their
mid-50s so it was about 35 years of
difference and when we ran them through
the testing if you look at the the
measures that were similar to the Sweden
study it was almost identical the the
the exercising twin was
significantly better at things like a
lipid panel resting heart rate blood
pressure V2 Max any of those markers as
predicted were were much better what was
very interesting though was the things
that were in the middle first of all
their total amount of muscle mass was
almost identical like to the gr within
the margin of error of a dexas scan
could possibly ever be the non-
exerciser though was a little bit fatter
so the difference in actual body weight
was explained almost entirely by body
fat or non-lean tissue really same sort
of deal so okay like no one's surprised
there that the exerciser was a little
bit leaner even though it didn't change
the whole amount of muscle mass at all
when we looked at some of the more
functional tests and we looked at things
like muscle quality so this is a metric
you can get from an ultrasound you can
kind of think about this as how much fat
is inside the tissue which is sometimes
an advantage for an endurance athlete to
have a little bit more of what are
called intramuscular triglycerides
because it's a fuel directly in the
tissue but in general the exercise or
the U the muscle quality was not in
favor of the
exerciser um if you looked at the
performance testing and if you looked at
strength it favored the the non-ra and
so now again we have the same finding we
saw our Sweden study but in identical
twins and so it really really
highlighted the fact that if you want to
move forward with Optimal Health simply
picking one Silo is not going to get you
there one Silo meaning just running just
cycling right does this mean that the
twin that did not exercise could jump
higher or win an arm wrestling uh
competition not that that's a vital
thing to be able to do but just in terms
of measuring strength you know it's our
isometric strength um was the
non-exercising twin stronger or at least
as strong as their exercising yes
particularly in grip strength yep and
any of the measures uh like the vertical
jump leg extension power and a number of
things um they often favored the non-
exerciser which you're still a little
bit of a chicken and egg you don't know
if necessarily the endurance training
reduced that other twins strength or it
doesn't even really matter per se I
think the highlight of it is can you
change some of these metrics of V2 Max
yeah not even close these things are
very responsive regardless of your
genetics your genetics will give you a
starting Place very clearly um even the
non- exerciser was a pretty healthy guy
so they were in a good spot his mid-50s
doesn't exercise doesn't really pay
attention to his diet at all and he was
in a pretty good shape
however if you want to actually move
progress and move forward uh High
functionality you have to do something
besides just run right just distance run
now I could say the same thing for
strength training that alone because I
don't want to make this seem like I'm
saying under exercises it worked in both
case both these studies those folks were
uh much better off in metrics that are
incredibly important to mortality how
long you're going to live V2 Max Etc
it's just not going to get there in
terms of strength we took a look at
muscle fiber physiology as well which is
very interesting so what I mean is
there's generally two types of muscle
fibers fast twitch slow twitch and one
of the things that is a Hallmark of
Aging is a selective reduction in fast
twitch fibers and that's because it's
difficult to activate them unless you're
doing High Force activities um you're
going to activate slow twitch fibers
doing almost any activity of daily
living and so they stay around fast
twitch fibers unless you're doing
something of high Force are going not be
used and they're not going to be kept
around and that's a problem because when
you look at things like the need for leg
strength through aging the ability to
catch yourself from a fall
these things are incredibly important if
you don't have fast fibers you don't
have the speed to get your foot out in
front of you on time and you don't have
the Ecentric strength to stop the fall
from happening and so if you look across
again the Aging literature they're very
clear about the importance of
maintaining strength and and fast fibers
over time so we know that this is an
important distinction here of Ro and
people will often talk about okay how
much of that um is genetically
determined can I change my fiber type
and the answer there is is resounding
yes and can I change it with exercise
and the answer is absolutely you can and
the next question is how much so now
again we're going to see order of
magnitude in general without going too
far down an area maybe we could save for
for later um each one of your muscles in
your body has a different percentage of
fast twitch and slow twitch for example
your calf um if you look at your Solus
which is kind of the smaller one that
goes in the back that's generally mostly
slow twitch typically 80 % or so slow
twitch um the gastrock which is the
other one right next to it so if you
were to point your toe next to your face
and that part that kind of flexes out in
the middle pops out that's your gastro
that is almost the inverse so it's
generally 80% fast twitch maybe 20% slow
twitch um generally anything anti-al or
postural rather anti-gravity uh spinal
Erectors things that are meant to keep
you up or moving all day are going to be
slow twitch and things like your
hamstrings which are for explosion are
going to be fast switch well we biopsy
the quad in these these individuals and
in that muscle it's generally about
50/50 fast twitch slow twitch as is a
really broad number well one of the
things that we found was in the non-
exerciser it was almost textbook what
you would predict it was about 50% or so
slow twitch a little bit of percentage
of fast twitch and then about 20% of
what are these called hybrid fibers
which are a Hallmark of V activity all
right great in the exerciser it was
about 95% slow twitch
and so it's extremely clear again I
don't know if maybe their set point was
a little bit higher towards that and the
non-
exerciser you know devolve down to his
place or the other one but it doesn't
matter I mean you're going from 40% slow
twitch in one case to 95% slow twitch in
another case it shows you that the the
limits of physiological adaptation are
darn near boundless given enough
exposure and in this case 35 years of
extremely consistent training and his
muscle morphology was completely
different than his is identical twin
with the exact same
DNA those are two beautiful examples of
people doing endurance work for a number
of years and what that gives them in
terms of benefits and
functionality has the opposite
experiment been done or observed where
somebody just weight lifted or just
sprinted for a number of years uh I
don't know that there's a identical twin
uh control that's a little I wish we had
a third twin too muchow right right
triplets okay so triplets out there um
if you're exercising in different ways
or people who have triplets maybe you
assign one kid to be a runner one to be
a weightlifter and the other one to be
sedentary please don't do experiments
like that but the
expectation as I understand it would be
that the person that Sprints or that
does heavy
squats explosive work would then have
more fast twitch muscle fibers in their
quad and their non- exercising
counterpart would fewer that that would
make sense but what happens if you
assess the the endurance level in
somebody who's just done strength
training or just sprinted y so we don't
have those data specifically there's
we're actually just starting to have
studies come out on lifelong strength
trainers and there's actually a very
good reason for this U which is a whole
story we can get into but the the quick
answer is we don't have a lot of people
who've been lifting weights for 30 or
plus years we have a whole swath of
people who've been doing endurance
training for that long is that because
fewer people have been weight training
or the weight trainers all dead you got
to go back to the 1953 1954 you had two
major things happen that changed the
entire course of exercise physiology and
exercise science and really exercises we
know it it's important to understand the
history of our field a lot of the
questions I get are based on false
assumptions of what exercise can and
can't do as an example we questions like
momentum should I use momentum or or
that's cheating right or it doesn't work
uh it compromises my results it's
actually totally untrue there are
excellent reasons when you should use
momentum when you lift there are reasons
when you should not it is sometimes very
beneficial to go fast with your exercise
repetition sometimes very slow and
controlled is better any question I get
in fact I'm very Infamous for always
responding with it depends the reason I
say it depends is it depends on the goal
when training for Speed or power or
muscular endurance the answer to some of
these very common question differs what
people fail to realize is they think
they're asking the right question
because they don't understand this
history what's being planted in your
brain
subconsciously is driving that question
and it's not necessarily the right one
so if we walk through that a little bit
you'll see what that field has led you
why you think certain things matter when
they actually don't or maybe your
assumptions are incorrect and then
exactly what to do about them I'd like
to take a brief break and acknowledge
our sponsor athletic greens athletic
greens is a vitamin mineral probiotic
and adapted in drink designed to help
you meet all of your foundational
nutritional needs I've been taking
athletic greens daily since 2012 so I'm
delighted that they're a sponsor of this
podcast the reason I started taking
athletic greens and the reason I still
take athletic greens once or twice a day
is that it helps me meet all of my
foundational nutritional needs that is
it covers my vitamins my minerals and
the probiotics are especially important
to me athletic greens also contains
adaptogens which are critical for
recovering from stress from exercise
from work or just general life if you'd
like to try athletic greens you can go
to athletic greens.com huberman to claim
a special offer they'll give you five
free travel packs and they'll give you a
year supply of vitamin D3 K2 again if
you'd like to try athletic greens go to
athletic greens.com huberman to claim
the special offer so in 1953 1954 you
had Roger banister breaking the 4minute
mile so sub four-minute file and then
you also had sir Edmond Hillary and then
his Sherpa Norgate uh Summit Everest in
the same basically two-ear span that
exact same year after that was a
formation of What's called the American
College of sports medicine now that is
still around today it is the preeminent
group for this exercises medicine so if
you're interested in things like
exercise for obesity prevention for
cancer treatment for for things like
that it's not really sports medicine
it's more for clinical exercise that's
the place to go American College of
sports medicine so we have this
launching of both a ton of people
wanting to start doing endurance
exercise and start swimming and cycling
and running and then you have a launch
of people coming off of the back of the
Harvard fatigue lab so the fatigue lab
actually shut down in 1947 so you have
these people interested in physical
fitness but nowhere to go well all those
people left the harbard fatigue lab and
started their own labs and other places
so you've launch the careers of people
like um Dave costell and and and John
halasi and some of these very famous
exercise physiologists and they start
building Laboratories and we start for
the first time ever studying the science
of exercise so years go by and these
people happen the 1960s the 1970s is
what we call the runners boom so people
start if in fact if you look at the
numbers of people who are doing
marathons it explodes through these two
decade spans right because it's like the
we could do these endurance Feats notice
both those feeds were endurance right
running shortterm as well as going over
there no one has thought anything about
strength training and here's why in the
late 1880s there was a very famous uh
physician named George winchip I think
was his name who was a big proponent of
strength training well he died like in
the age of 50 Something of a heart
attack and that terrified people of
strength training for 70 years because
they're like whoa whoa whoa whoa that
stuff will kill you because he was a
doctor he was trying he was running
around the country doing these
exhibitions and Reporting it and then he
died it's sort of like Atkins 100% dying
although some people say he died of a
heart attack other people said he fell
through the ice into cold water that's
debated but the fact that a a heavy
proponent of a given nutrition plan dies
suddenly yep not good for business so
now the little storm is brewing 1940s
and I'm going back a little bit but bear
with me for a second there's a guy named
um Peter karpovich and he is a a a
scientist out of Springfield like the
decorated physical education PE like
that's a legendary place Springville
college and he is anti- strength
training for a lot of the same reasons
in his entire career he talked about not
do this he's the one that launched these
ideas that strength training will make
you lose
flexibility it will be bad for kids like
all these things that we know now are
clearly not true he's proponent of these
things and there's a show that happened
um in his at Springfield College and a
guy named Bob York and if you York
barbell that's still around today is
going around the country and and putting
on these exhibitions they come to
Ringfield and it's sort of like a a new
aged um like social media thing where
it's like the students know what's about
to happen CU kovich shows up to this
event and everyone knows he hates
strength training and everyone's like
waiting for it to end just to see what
he's going to say so this whole
exhibition goes on and these people are
doing now you got to remember back in
the time like bodybuilding weightlifting
power lifting strength strong man it's
like all the same thing there's no
differentiation yet and it finishes and
kovich stands up and like the crowd goes
silent and he just asks one question and
he just points to one of the guys and
says scratch your back and now he's just
assuming and waiting for the guy to be
like H and not be able to put his hand
behind his head and I think he pointed
to John gimmick who's like a famous
bodybuilder and he reached back and
scratched his back no problem and then
they proceeded to grab two dumbbells I
think they were 50b dumbbells and do a
back flip standing back flip with both
in each hand they start doing the splits
on stage and they start going performing
all kinds of physical function tests and
and karpovich is
stunned he's like holy she has nothing
to say he leaves there and his whole
life has changed all these things he was
claiming were shown in his face to be
false he does a 180 on his career he
starts running study after study on
strength training and starts finding
immediately there are no detriments to
strength training in terms of like
Global Health right of course you can do
it wrong and things like that and in
fact here comes a whole bunch of
benefits so through the 1950s while this
thing's going on with the endurance
folks no one's still strength training
because there's no there's no record to
see there's no American College of
sports medicine there's no societies
there's no science we're not sure it's
safe and meanwell carpit is just
hammering study after study after study
showing you it's safe it's safe it's
safe but it hasn't picked up yet and
then everything changed in
1977 thank you Arnold Schwarzenegger he
came out with the trifold he hits you
with Pumping Iron which I know you know
that movie right pumping interesting
movie even for those not interested in
bodybuilding it's a very interesting
movie because it really gives a window
into not just him but the way in which
weight training started to show up as a
regular practice you know when I was
growing up the only people weight
trained were people preparing for
football bodybuilders who basically
didn't exist in the town where I grew up
and the only people who did yoga were
like yogis doing bickram but now you
drive through any major American city or
European city and there's yoga studios
there's gyms with free weights yep
Arnold Schwarzenegger is largely
responsible I think for for initiating
that that shift yep he because he think
about it he hit us with Pumping Iron
Conan and then the Terminator almost in
back to back like very close within
years so you've got this whole Cascade
of the 70s of people running cycling and
swimming now science is starting to come
out that it's not dangerous and maybe
actually some benefit and then boom not
only is it not bad for you it can make
you into a real world superhero
I mean think about the psychology of of
a child growing up watching somebody
like Conan think about what Batman
looked like in the 1950s and 60s right
and then boom I can look like that now
not everyone wants to look like Arnold
but you see like you see the power that
can land in people no one had ever seen
or thought you can make your body
transform like that you could maybe be
born like that but no chance that's
within the grass of all of you when I
was a kid growing up one of my favorite
books was the Guinness book of world's
records yeah I live still have images in
my mind of the the uh coldest animal you
know the the longest lifespan Etc you
know and there was a picture in there of
Arnold Schwarzenegger and you know what
his record was it said perfectly
developed man yeah yeah yeah which is as
you point out that isn't the physique
that most people aspire to but it really
I it did Inspire this this shift the
other thing about resistance training
that I think um has a certain Allure for
some people men and women is that it's
one of the few forms of exercise that
because of the enhanced blood flow to
the muscle that occurs during the
training the so-called pump y it gives
you a transient but somewhat real window
into what your results will be% you when
you run and you're gasping for air you
don't get this you aren't experiencing
what it's like to be faster than you are
that day that's correct but when you
weight train you get an aesthetic
picture into how your functionality and
aesthetic will change it disappears a
few hours later as the the So-Cal pump
sub subsides but it's a very um
interesting form of exercise in that way
it's almost as if you go in to learn a
language and during the process of
learning for brief moments you're
actually fluent and then it gets taken
away it sort of puts the dopamine carrot
out in front of you this is just me
hypothesizing as to why weight training
might have taken off the way that it did
yeah I mean it's like if you got paid
every hour on the hour when you're
working and then at the end of the day
like they take the money back but you
still like as the time clock is going on
in your day you're looking up and you're
just seeing while you're watching your
bank account grow and life like you can
see why it's so addicting to those folks
so to finish the story here with going
back to your actual question to answer
it this is happening in the late 70s
early 80s and so now Joe weer all these
gyms they're exploding because people
want to look like that or if they have
they realize they have the chance to
change how they physically look that had
never been a reality before you mostly
meant at that point I'm almost
exclusively yetep for a large number of
reasons cultural acceptance Etc even
with endurance and stuff you could get
fitter and run faster and that's better
but it just wasn't going to change how
you looked unless you were losing fat
now you can change how you look which is
so incredibly addicting in fact there's
a a very famous quote um I think it was
actually Joe weer who said show me one
man who wants to be strong and I'll show
you T to want to look
strong right it's like that's very very
powerful right there's there's a whole
like whole there's tons of this history
I can go into which is sort of
explaining to you but now you now you're
in the mid 80s and you have what I call
my generation so you have my generation
who fall in love with strength training
in the 18 in the 1980s and 90s but
there's really no scientific field for
it it's not really come about yet the
science of endurance and exercise
physiology is now humming along at a
massive rate because these people came
up in the 70s and ' 80s and their five
10 15 years in their career they're
producing they're gen they're generating
graduate students they're starting their
own labs and the exercise physiology
still to this day is 80% endurance
steady state stuff almost exclusively
well now my My Generation you love um
you love sports you love lifting you
love all these things and now what we
see happen is the Chicago Bulls Michael
Jordan starts picking up strength
training oh that's in that's on TV he's
on Sports Center in the mid1 1990s
lifting weights and we go back actually
to the late 1970s and I'm I'm not sure
if you're a football fan but any
football fan will recognize the Nebraska
Corn Huskers in the 1970 and ' 80s
changed how football's played well the
reason is because they started strength
training and they started doing it with
a guy named Boyd Epley who is the
founder of the NCA so the national
strength conditioning Association is
formed in the late 1970s as well so just
like ACSM was developed the year after
those two events happened 1978 the year
after Arnold comes out boom NCA is
formed and now you have a scientific
organization dedicated to strength and
conditioning you've got NFL strength
conditioning coaches that are starting
to come on board you've got scientists
that are starting to come into labs and
strength conditioning becomes a
scientific field well everything swings
now from an exercise perspective into
bodybuilding and so almost all of the
things in fact we were sort of talking
before I could run a whole bunch of
tricks on you and I could ask you a
whole bunch of questions about things
that you think are absolute standards or
guarantees about training I'm supposed
to do this I'm never supposed to do that
for instance uh for instance is it okay
to train a muscle group on back-to-back
days most people are at home thinking no
you're not supposed to train a muscle
group it needs to recover and that's
total nonsense
right um other things like body part
split training right training one muscle
group per day um other things like
cardio uh endurance training influencing
will it ruin my gains for my lift all of
these things are on at a a base of
assumptions that come from bodybuilding
now that's a fantastic world but because
everything started in the late 197s as
bodybuilding in terms of basically
strength training was that weightlifting
and powerlifting were not at all B
around right they were but nobody cared
again show me someone who wants to be
strong I'll show you 10 to want to look
strong the physique thing just dominated
and we're we're not getting out of that
yet we're not all the way out of it
we're starting to though because here's
why people started to realize this this
bodybuilding thing is fantastic I can
change my physique I'm getting better
but damn these workouts take an hour and
a half two hours and I'm going to spend
that whole time on one or two body parts
which means I'm going to have to live
six days a week and I'm going to have to
do that consistently right now all a
sudden boom two hours on my on my elbow
flexors damn my elbow starting to hurt
and yet my understanding is that it
doesn't really require two hours a day
not at all of training in order to get
benefits even just for hypertrophy
totally but but uh a lot of the times
you're going to have to get some amount
of time in because you're spending so
much isolation so we've gone away from
training movement running is a movement
cycling is a movement um training my
biceps is a muscle or B muscle Group
Training my hamstrings are a muscle
group that's not a human movement so
we've done a 180 in terms of selecting
the exercises from movement based
prescription to now muscle group Based
training so when you're isolating muscle
groups that means a whole chunk of your
body is really not doing much throughout
the day so what happens if you're doing
say legs on Monday and you miss Monday
because you're on a
flight now your legs have to wait a
whole another week right that's
there's solution to that but so this
starts to become problematic people
start getting beat ups people start
realizing I actually don't feel that
great I'm not super fit I'm sweating
just walking up the stairs I'm out of
breath why because all that training
you've done nothing for your
cardiovascular fitness you've done
nothing to improve um heart rate
oxygenation blood flow and so that
Paradigm swing way too hard into the
exercising especially lifting weights is
single joint often machine often slow
often High volume isolation stuffff and
that left a giant opening of people
going well wait a minute what if you
could get in the gym I could promise you
the same or better results in under 30
minutes and in fact you also feel better
you'll lose more weight and that opened
up group exercise classes kettle bell
stuff CrossFit type of stuff circuit
training because you can come in you
won't get so beat up because the
volume's lower the time is much lower
you get multiple adaptations at the same
time great the problem with that though
fast forward 10 years is it started
burying people because you've now
deemphasized movement quality and you've
overemphasized scores right so this is a
classic example if you go and you watch
Pumping Iron you'll see or anybody
Builder you'll see if they're doing a
bicep crew they don't even really pay
attention to the rep range they don't
really pay attention to the load they
are looking at their muscle they're
trying to figure out how do I get that
thing to fire they're squeezing they're
flexing they're posing at the end of
every set they're trying to figure out
am I getting enough pump it is
exclusively founded on exercise quality
the rep range the numbers almost
irrelevant when you go to the other
model exercise technique it doesn't
matter just get the most amount of
weight up or the amount of reps or the
fastest time etc etc high should be
CrossFit I've walked past some CrossFit
seros I've done two CrossFit I don't
want get Su so you said CrossFit I
didn't oh I know I I enjoyed them I
definitely uh felt like I was working
hard I I observed a lot of people in
very close proximity um doing Olympic
lifts and doing Kipping that's where you
kick your legs folks so you know sort of
like bucking and um Kipping type
pull-ups um no I I enjoyed it uh it
wasn't for me for the long term but it
did seem that there was um a lot of
bullistic movement in close proximity to
other people um so the hazard to me
seemed more about that than the actual
movements well again the the point I'm
setting up here is that was actually a
really brilliant solution for a lot of
the problems the classic body building
hypertrophy introduced so it got away
from isolation movements and got people
doing big movements which are more
effective generally better it got people
doing things fast and explosive that's
more athletic that is more important for
longevity it solved a lot of the
problems joint health wasn't getting
crashed the issue they went with is they
just pushed the pace on score rather
than quality they pushed the pace on how
many people can be in here at the same
time so now you're doing higher risk
movements higher intensity higher
fatigue and with a total not that they
don't care about technique but it's not
the thing that they're most concerned
about it's getting the number and the
thing done they solve the time issue
though you can get tremendous results in
three days a week under 45 minutes each
session Etc burn people out though way
too much high intensity way too often
and the other problem safety concerns
all kinds of Orthopedic issues and other
stuff can I um interrupt you for a
moment and just ask a question as we go
through this Arc of the history of why
endurance training predominated or
strength training or bodybuilding type
training or CrossFit type training
because I think this is fascinating I
know we're about to arrive at where we
are today and what the future looks like
for for people and what they should
focus on and
do at what point if any do you think
resistance training started to become
adopted by women you know there was no
equivalent of Arnold Schwarzenegger
there was um Linda Hamilton in The
Terminator yeah um there are some
impressive uh physiques certainly on
female actresses and um athletes um the
William sisters you know very impressive
U musculature and physiques and of
course their tennis playing speaks for
itself
um has that happened yet I mean what I
mean is um do you think since you work
with both men and women yeah um do you
think that most women understand that
weight training um done properly is
going going to be extremely beneficial
for them maybe even especially for them
in terms of um offsetting bone density
loss and things of that sort um or are
we still waiting for the stim the uh
popular uh stimulus for getting you know
80% of of young women thinking I want to
lift weights yeah um hard for me to
answer because I'm not like I'm not a
woman right now I have a daughter she's
four so we'll we'll see um what I can
say is is I've probably worked with I
don't know how many professional
athletes in total a lot I've worked with
them probably 14 professional sports
I've worked with sa young winners MVPs
like the whole all all the credentials
right I bet 35 40% of the athletes I've
worked with are female so I've worked
with Olympic gold medalists I've worked
with bronze medalists in multiple Sports
I've worked with the most decorated
powerlifter you know of all time so in a
number of these areas Fighters World
Championship all these things um for
me I I feel like that burst is already
happen um my students if you look at my
classroom uh I don't know what the
numbers are but there is no small number
of females in exercise science and
exercise physiology um if you look at
our Laboratories that's one thing you
will see there are very few female
exercise scientists there are very few
uh female strength conditioning coaches
but that number is is is coming down at
a at a astronomical rate you have um
people that are being hired um in every
sport uh you pick the NFL you pick Major
League Baseball
every every few months we're hearing
first female hired for this first female
hired for that um the Yankees Rachel
Rachel Bel fantastic uh you know yeah
Rachel's been out to my lab she's
terrific yeah yeah oh yeah that's she's
fantastic I mean she's now being hired
as the I think she's a hitting coach now
actual sport coach she she's going to be
a GM right that's is her goal she's a
Terminator um so that that's already
happening and my students that are
coming through our program are getting
placed in these roles they haven't
gotten through yet a lot in terms of
being an actual scientist but they're
getting there um sport scientists in the
NBA you're being hired females in terms
of like big data collection and Sport
Science and Tech will'll cover you know
um in another discussion but I think
it's happening whether or not the the
cultural and social I can't speak to
that any the equation what I can speak
to though is um one of the things I
think is is most fun coming forward
scientifically is you know a number of
years ago NIH came back came through
with their mandates of saying it's no
longer acceptable to exclude women from
scientific research right because we
just did that for decades well what
happened just to fill this in because I
think it's worth noting is that for many
years um studies even on rodents yeah
were mainly carried out on male rodents
because the Assumption and the
Assumption turned out to be wrong but
the Assumption was that the physiology
of female rodents because they don't
have a menstrual cycle it's not 28 days
they have an estr cycle it's 4 days
different type of cycle that that would
somehow disrupt the data turns out
that's entirely wrong now it's actually
required when you sit on a grant study
panel U which are the people who
evaluate grants you they ask they
literally say did they meet the criteria
for sex as a biological variable here
we're not talking about sex as the verb
we're talking about sex as biological
sex and um if you don't say yes that's a
strong hit against the Grant and if you
say yes then it checks off that box so
it's now required that both male and
female rodents and humans be studied in
a given study unless the study is
specifically geared toward understanding
that only exists in one uh one or the
other population such as menopause for
instance yeah menstrual cycle um
andropause um for instance but um no
this is extremely important I'm excited
to hear that um so where where I was
going to go with that is actually so
that was step one which is cool you got
to include them where we haven't gotten
to yet but I I've seen more and more
Grant applications come through for this
it's just the funding hasn't hit yet
which is it's one thing to in to let
women be in the same studies that's
great it's another thing though to start
performing high performance research
specifically for female questions that
has not happened yet and that's just
like a funding issue right we haven't
gotten money yet people aren't aren't
supporting that we don't get a lot of
financial support for sport Science but
we can't track down the money yet of
some go me going I want to do a study in
female athletes that answers female
athlete questions these won't help men
these are questions specific to the
female that's the next step right that's
where we got to get to so we can say
maybe we should do things differently um
around training or recovery or or we
shouldn't or it doesn't matter there
there's some there's a handful of not
lower quality but like some studies um I
don't love them yet there just needs to
be a ton of work uh birth control is a
very good example right we the the
information for women at female athletes
or even just like hard exercises you
don't have to be a competitive athlete
around what is birth control doing what
types how should I manage that what
conversation should I be having with my
doctor almost nothing like women have
nothing to go on for high performance
stuff so what if I'm trying to compete
in an event or or run a race how like
all those types of questions should be
answered um normative value normative
data performance testing like it's just
not there on the female so that's an
area I think like if somebody really
wanted to make a change that the
scientists want to do it I know it I've
talked to so many in our field that
would really love to explore it um
because it's getting there the the like
I said the coaching side is getting
there they're seeing it they're hiring
these people I'm seeing it in my
students um you know my following is not
all men like it's a very large
percentage of females and all I do is
post about exercise science you like
this is all I do so well this podcast is
uh very we know very clearly the
audience um is 50% women 50% men that's
right um which is great so just to jump
back in our history discussion and to
finish that point of where we're at now
and where I think we're going to go or
should go so we walk through the
bodybuilding kind of running everything
and people walking into a gym anytime
they lift weights they're they're making
all of their choices based on the
assumption that maximizing muscle size
is the goal and clearly that's not the
case there are other adaptations you may
be after so we talked about how that had
problems then we talked about how some
of these other forms of exercise filled
those gaps and then what problems those
things introduced well I think we're
actually at a point where that pendulum
is kind of slowly shifting into the
middle what I mean by that is if you
want to maximize muscle strength we look
towards the power lifting Community if
you want to maximize muscle power we're
going to look to the weightlifting
Community if you want to look for
muscular endurance or well redness maybe
we look into the CrossFit communities
and some of these obstacle course races
or functionality things so what we can
do now is generate protocols that get us
the exact adaptations we want and not
ones we don't want because we can look
back at each of these different styles
of training and pick and choose optimal
protocols or combinations for them so
somebody simply wants to get healthy
like we talked about when we listed the
nine adaptations and I mentioned Health
wasn't one of them that's because what
determines your health versus what
determines my Optimal Health differs so
if I need more hypertrophy I can look
towards bodybuilding Concepts but if I
have enough or maybe for personal
reasons I decide I have too much or I
don't want to add any more then I can
say hey how can I get stronger without
getting bigger and boom I look towards
powerlifting Concepts how can I get more
powerful how can I get faster but I
don't uh you know again want to lose fat
okay great or if I want physique changes
so we have all these different areas we
can pick and choose from uh that have
expertise in specific adaptations and
develop ourselves perfect protocols
based on that information I'd like to
take a brief break to acknowledge our
sponsor insid tracker inside tracker is
a personalized nutrition platform that
analyzes data from your blood and DNA to
help you better understand your body and
help you reach your health goals I've
long been a believer in getting regular
blood work done for the simple reason
that many of the factors that impact
your immediate and long-term health and
well-being can only be analyzed from a
quality blood test one issue with a lot
of blood tests and DNA tests out there
however is that you get information back
about various levels of lipids and
hormones and metabolic factors Etc but
you don't know what to do with that
information inside tracker makes knowing
what to do with all that information
exceedingly easy they have a
personalized platform that lets you see
what your specific numbers are of course
but then also what sorts of Behavioral
dos and don'ts what sorts of nutritional
changes what sorts of supplementation
would allow you to bring those levels
into the ranges that are optimal for you
if you'd like to try insid tracker you
can visit insid tracker.com huberman to
get 20% off any of insid tracker's plans
again that's insid tracker.com huberman
to get 20% off so with the understanding
in mind as to how we all myself included
arrived at such lopsided
Fitness too much endurance not enough
strength too much strength not enough
endurance it's really hard to imagine
anyone's perfect in this
regard can you walk us through the nine
different adaptations that you mentioned
earlier and give us a way to assess our
level of ability or our level of
adaptation in each of those nine all
right the very first one we want to talk
about is is movement skill Now set aside
sport specific so I'm not going to give
you an assessment for optimal golf
technique swing this is really about
human movement so that you stay injuryf
free and and you can continue to train
for as long as possible so what are the
minimum requirements now if you can have
access to a highly qualified physical
therapist or movement specialist That's
the best route right go to them have
them uh identify all of your movement
patterns overhead pressing squatting
running all these things that's your
gold standard if you want to do it
yourself though here is a very simple
four-step solution so the way that I
teaches is I go joint by joint and so I
I think of this just as the major ones
your shoulder your elbow um your low
back hip knee and Ankle okay now what
you can do is do a representative
movement for you so if you bench a lot
use the bench if you do pull-ups use a
pull-up if you squat do that I would
recommend doing an upper body press an
upper body pull a lower body press and
lower body pull an example would be a
push-up a pullup or a bent row
uh a squat and then a deadlift that
would be a very very well-rounded
approach what you're going to do is do
that movement and and I would record it
for
yourself and and record a frontal view
and a side view uh probably do three to
10
repetitions per angle okay slow and
controlled you don't need any body
weight what you want to do is move and
you want to look for four key things at
every joint all right so again imagine
I'm doing a squat I'm going to do a
squat and I'm going to focus on just my
ankle and I'm going to look for these
four things of the ankle and then I'm
going to go back and watch my knee and
look for these same four things of the
knee through the hip Etc all right so
what are these four things number one is
you want to look for symmetry so
symmetry is front to back left to right
and uh your right Limb and your left
limb all right and so what we want to
look for are um if they aren't moving
perfectly that's fine but you want to
see is one moving further ahead than the
other one is one uh turning to the side
and one's not is one fidgeting and and
twitching around differently so you want
to look just to check to see and make
sure that they're stable that's one
number two you want to look for
stability so key indicators here are
things like if you if you can't through
a a squat a controlled squat where your
knees don't start shaking like that
would be an instability issue so can you
do the movement slow can you pause at
the bottom maybe three seconds maybe 5
seconds or 10 you should have complete
control of that movement at all of these
joints
um are your hips sliding to one side
when you stand up is one elbow closer to
your body when you're benching and the
other one's more flared out these are
the things I'm talking about right I'm
not worried about what angle they should
be at or not you're simply looking for
asymmetries or instabilities all right
so again as you're pushing up does one
elbow start flipping and twitching and
going all over the place the third one
is what I call awareness so uh there are
a lot of movement technique issues that
are simply people don't know and so
you'll watch watch them squat I do this
in my classes all the time I'll have 100
kids out there squatting and you'll see
some horrible squat technique and when
you just tell them hey did you realize
your heels are supposed to be on the
ground all times when you squat they're
like oh okay and they can correct it
it's not actually a movement flaw it was
just simply an awareness I didn't know
and then I actually didn't realize that
that was happening that position so we
want all of our joints to be going
through a general full range of motion
which is number four so the ankles uh
during like a squat your knee should be
able to go as far over your toe as
possible while maintaining good position
your feet flat on the floor your you
know three points of contact your whole
flat foot and you're not compromising
another joint so that's all you're going
to look for those four things symmetry
stability awareness and range of motion
through each joint through each movement
it sounds
um difficult and timec consuming it's
really not right you can generally kind
of clear these things in one or two
repetitions in a couple of seconds and
what you're really going to look for
there's lots of scoring schemes you can
you know tests that physical therapist
sort of you I just look for absolutely
terrible like can't do it at all minor
flaw or pretty close to good that that's
really all I'm looking for so my scoring
system is 0 1 three Z is like you're not
going to do this exercise because you're
at a very high acute risk you might get
hurt on rep one
tomorrow number one like a score of one
is like there's a minor flaw here we can
probably do it but we need to be
cautious of load and volume the other
one is maybe it's perfect maybe it's
it's not but go ahead and sort of do it
on a reasonable protocol you'll be fine
um so that's generally uh what you would
need to do is a cost-free method of
identifying good movement technique
within any of the things that that you
would do what about speed I actually
don't think this is one most people
should test if you're a high performance
athlete we can run a 40 yard dash or we
can do uh some different things with a
velocity transducer on a barbell if
you're a weightlifter or something for
most people pure speed is really maximum
velocity or acceleration or kind of the
two ways we break it down it's not just
generally not that necessary to test
what about number three power which I
believe before you told me was speed
times Force so the reason why I don't
worry too much about speed is because
you can infer a lot of it from a power
test and a power test is easier to do as
well as easier to train for for most
people so the the cost free version here
is a simple broad jump so this is stand
uh with you know normal position jump
out as far in front of you as you
possibly can and measure the distance
between where you started and the back
of your heel where it lands a super
basic number to look for there is your
height so you should be able to broad
jump how tall you are if you're 5 foot
five you should hit 5' five 6'5 Etc it's
not perfect um that's going to ratch it
down a little bit about 15% for females
they just simply don't have the power in
general that men have and so you're
going to want to bring that down a
little bit but that's a it's a very
crude number if if you were to look at
like a high performance NFL player if
they're 6 feet tall they're going to be
jumping like 9 to 10 to 11 feet if you
can jump your body height um we're not
looking for optimization in this
particular test but you are looking for
red flags if you can jump your body
height you're going to be just fine
that's incredibly straightforward and
yet I have one question yeah I'm
assuming that I can squat down as low as
I need to before I jump I can swing my
arms from Back to Front
as hard with as much momentum um as I
can muster and when I land you said I'm
going to take the measure from where the
back of my heels you want to measure the
distance you actually covered so to
clarify there's no running approach here
there's no um steps into it you're going
to stand at a still yeah you can swing
bounce as much as you'd like to do
you're going to projectile off so you're
going to measure the distance from the
tip of your toe so basically stand
behind the line and then the furthest
point back where you land so basically
the worst possible score not the best
possible uh cuz your feet won't land
symmetrically one's probably going to be
a little bit farther now technically if
you fall backwards and your hand touches
the ground we Mark that number but in
this case just use the furthest point
back of your back heel and go from there
I'll be trying it tomorrow morning now
if you have access to a little bit more
technology or you just really want to
know a better number a a classic
vertical jump uh is is a good starting
place so you can actually do this in a
simple costree way you can just measure
two of your hands put them together so
that both of your uh middle fingers are
touching overlap them and put them
directly over your head okay and then
you kind of want to reach up as high as
you can get and you mark that on the
wall my brother and I used to do this
all the time we would take a a
highlighter uh the the yellow ones and
color as much as we can on our
fingertips touch the wall so that the
highlighter would stay in the wall if
you actually go back to my house from my
childhood you'll see these markers all
over our our house I'm sure your parents
were thrilled my dad didn't care single
he didn't care he's just like whatever
you guys do whatever you want so you
want to measure that and then of course
you're going to jump with those two
hands and touch as high as you can up
and you're going to measure the distance
between your standing reach and the
actual height that you jump there um now
the reason you're doing it two-handed by
the way is because if you do one-handed
you can actually reach pretty high by
offsetting your shoulders and now you're
getting into differences of you know who
has more shoulder Mobility who has the
ability to kind of get up there a two-
foot stand or two-handed standard
approach is there uh same thing no
running approach here um you can dip you
can drive you can and do all those
things you can swing your arms but
you're going to be a two-handed touch is
is a general way to do that um you want
to look for a number of something like
24 Ines or higher uh if you're past the
age of 50 that number can come down a
little bit to closer to 20 and again for
females it's going to be ratcheted down
about 15% everywhere you want to go if
you're a a middle-aged female and you're
jumping 20 in you you're in a pretty
good spot um you're going to looking
really nice there so now if you can do
that on a force plate that's even better
so these are very uh basically scales
that will go out to multiple digits
sometimes five to nine digits past zero
and you're going to stand on these
things you do the exact same test and
these are very interesting because
they'll tell you not only how high you
jump but they'll tell you how much force
you put into the ground they can also
tell you how long it took you this is
called your rate of force development as
well as impulse and speed and a bunch of
other stuff which are are important to
help you understand where on the power
Spectrum you need to be so you would do
that in addition to using some sort of
velocity transducer on a barbell so a
very classic thing to do would be um
let's say you're going to do a squat and
you're going to put this uh device on
the Barb and and that's going to measure
the speed which the barbell moves and
you're going to do that at 40% of your
one repetition Max 50% 60% 70 80 90 up
to 100 and that allows you to create
what's called a force velocity curve and
you can start to see at what point when
you start loading things heavy do you
start slowing down too much and that'll
tell you what part of the force velocity
curve that you want to train in to
optimize your power um why that's
important a lot of people will do things
like when I'm training for power how
heavy should I lift well the general
answer people say is 30% of your one rep
max but that's actually not true at all
what's most optimal for power
development which we'll discuss more
much later is depending on where your
flawed and the force velocity curve so
if you have access to technology like
that that can give you a lot more
insight and information if not do the
broad jump test or the highlighter on
your fingertips and jump and touch the
wall test at Andy galpin's house hey
just you know what come along there's
already the walls are already messed up
just go ahead and come up to Washington
and we'll do it
fantastic what about strength right so
strength is really important you need to
measure this in a in multiple areas and
we'll start off with grip strength okay
so you can do this in two ways um you
can buy a hand grip dynamometer now
these are anywhere between $ 20 to
$100 anywhere um these actually used to
be like when I was in school like
hundreds of dollars and now you can
literally buy them on any website for 25
bucks so my honest recommendation is
technically that's not cost free I know
your whole thing about the cost free
protocols but 25 bucks I'm calling that
basically cost free um you can bring
that in and test that and that's just a
little device where you're going to
squeeze and you're going to do and I
would do your right hand and your left
hand um you want to look for asymmetries
there but you want to look for something
like typically those are they're going
to give you a value in
kilograms and uh you want to look for
something like a minimum score here of
40 kilog ideally you're up past 60 would
be a really good spot to be in um you
want to make sure that there's no less
than 10% variation between your left and
right hand your your non-dominant hand
actually shouldn't be that much weaker
in this test so what you'll actually see
a lot of times is the non-dominant can
be often times stronger um because the
dominant hand is more for movement
Precision writing things like that so
you want them to be close um if you a
male and you under 40 kilograms on a
hand grip
dynamometer like we're we're going to
need to train that if you're a female
it's not that much lower but about 35
kilograms is the cuto off point um if
you're above
55 we can add out to your training but
I'm not worried about leaving it out of
your training if you're a female if it's
about 50 that's my sort of CAU off of
where we want to go so that's a fairly
cheap one another one that you can
actually do is just a dead hang so you
can hold on to any bar ideally one that
is thin enough to where you can wrap
your whole hand around it so you don't
want to be using a a giant fat grip um
you're going to have a false reading
here so something like going to the gym
and jumping on any pull-up bar or or
pull-up rack and you want to hang and
this is a simple time test so in general
we we should be able to hang for a
minimum of 30 seconds is what we're what
we're looking for 30 to kind of 50
seconds is my like good but we could
probably get better here if you're
cruising above 6 60 seconds I'm
generally pretty happy um this is
actually a good example of when females
tend to be better grip strength and
women is tends to be strong and they can
hang for quite a long time so those
those standards don't really change that
much uh for women now if you are
exceptionally large this thing doesn't
scale perfectly you know if you're 240
pounds and even if you're lean it's just
hard to hang and hold 240
lb conversely if you're 1405 lbs even if
you're unhealthy you're going to be able
to hang for a long time it's just not
that much weight to carry so just rough
numbers as to start off with so that's
grip strength what about strength
elsewhere in the body the primary ones
um you can do an upper body strength
test if you would like although it's not
technically something we do very often
happy to do a One Max PCH press or
something like that that's great the
more one I'm generally more interested
in is a leg extension test and the
reason I like this is a back squat is
better a barbell back squat is look
that's my like that's my jam that's my
life right it's just very technically
demanding and it it's challenging you
need spotters you need comfort um a lot
goes into this for so for the average
person a leg extension test is fairly
standardized you don't have to worry
about technique and people can just get
into it and go and so what you want to
look for there is is uh a couple of
Standards you want to hit again a very
simple answer here is body weight can
you do a leg extension with your body
weight how one repetition one repetition
uh I can answer that right now can you
no you can't no I can hack squat a
reasonable amount of weight but um I was
on the leg extension this morning and I
as a nautilus ma machine and I certainly
could not like extension my body weight
let me let me clarify were you doing a
single leg no so Bilal you can't leg
extension your body weight no but I
certainly can hamstring curl my body
weight oh okay so we maybe have some um
deficiencies in our quads that we need
to go after but that's a pretty good
number you want to be at if you go up
and age past age 40 every decade that
can come down about 10% and you'll still
be in a pretty good slot so if you're 50
years old and you're 170 lbs if you can
do 160 you're in a pretty good sort of
spot and then you could just again take
it down about 10% every decade after 40
but prior to 40 there's really no change
in strength um but certainly somebody in
their 40s to 50s should be able to leg
extension their body weight
noted I look forward to our discussion a
bit later talking about how to build
strength yeah any of these strength
tests they don't have to be done to a
technical true one rep max you can use
what are called repetition uh conversion
equation so put on a load that you think
is kind of close to your maximum and
just do it for as many reps as you can
as long as it's under five reps total
you can then actually go online and
enter that into any number of
calculators anywhere and it will tell
you okay you did three repetitions at
200 lound your one rep max is probably
215 whatever so there's estimate
equations so if you don't want to spend
the time or you're not truly comfortable
like absolutely going to your true one
rep max just get to a number that's
fairly close and do as many as you can
and then go in line again one rep max
estimator equations are everywhere um if
you get past five repetitions or so the
accuracy of those equations starts going
down so don't put on something and go I
did 12 reps of it and then try to figure
out where your one R Max it'll get close
you start moving past that you're just
getting worse and worse and worse
accuracy so I want to make sure whether
you're doing a leg extension test or a
front squat test you don't technically
have to do it an absolute one R Max um
if neither of those are an option
another one I like a lot here is simply
a front squat or goblet squat hold so
you're going to hold a weight in front
of your chest whether a kettle bell is
is great here a dumbbell is fine here
and you want to hold about half of your
body weight go all the way to the bottom
position and try to hold that for about
45 seconds so it's it's a pretty good
indicator of um number one your position
it's hard to be in a bad position for
that long at that load as well as core
strength and low back stability so it's
a very different indicator um than say
the leg extension test but it's it's a
really nice one so it doesn't require
many moving Parts it's more difficult
than the leg extension but it's it's
quite a bit more functional and it's
going to give you insight into a lot
more areas than just the quadriceps so
45 seconds down at the bottom of the
squat yep and then returning to a
standing position yep and if you can't
do the return actually I'm not that
worried but as long as you can hold that
good position without a technical
breakdown in that 45 seconds that's a
really good spot um as an intro I want a
third of your body weight for 30 seconds
terrific I plan to attempt all of those
strength tests very soon what about
hypertrophy sure um actually before we
get into that I want to jump back really
quickly it's important to add a couple
of caveats to the strength training
stuff so there's two that I want to do
number
one these are assuming you are
technically proficient so I don't want
you to do any exercise to exhaustion or
to maximum strength if you're not
comfortable with your Technique so
adjust these accordingly if you're not
comfortable with the front squat do the
leg extension if you're not even
comfortable with that do something
different so we never want to utilize
maximum
testing if it's going to come with the
consequence of of serious secut injury
so that's the most important flag the
second one is your warmup protocol will
have a huge effect on your actual
results and so whenever you do these
tests especially if you're going to do a
test and then I test again down the line
you want to make sure that that warm-up
protocol is standardized now again the
nsca and I can we can I can give you
resources has specific guides for
exactly what to do for your warm-up
protocol prior to one rep max testing so
we can go there and you can look that
stuff up we can add that to show notes
or something yeah and I think um when we
get into a deeper discussion about
strength and hypertrophy and resistance
training in general if we could touch
into the the best warm-up protocol I
know I have mine and I'm I'm certain
it's going to be suboptimal based on
everything uh based on every
conversation we've ever had where I
learn all the things I'm doing
incorrectly but I do make changes on the
basis of what you tell me it's not
incorrectly so much as it is like
suboptimal that's a very kind way of
telling me it's incorrect thank you uh
what about hypertrophy so the thing you
want to pay attention to here
is you have the aesthetic uh portion of
hypertrophy that's entirely up to you
there is no rationale you can decide
what you feel like looks good or doesn't
look good that's irrelevant there is a
sufficient amount you need to have where
below that is detrimental to your health
regardless of your outcomes and so the
best way to do this is a couple of ways
um any sort of body composition test can
do this so whether this is a um a scan
through like a dexa scan which is a gold
standard or other uh ways of biological
U bioelectrical impedance or other way
so there's a ton of different tests you
can get that are pretty close Okay so
what you want to pay attention to when
you get like a dexa scan is a number
called
ffmi and so that stands for fat-free
mass index so you can look at again any
number of online calculators these are
all standard so it doesn't actually
matter where you pull them up you don't
have to worry about looking it up and
whether or not it's right or not or
something and so that's going to
actually tell you if you have sufficient
muscle math and so a number you want to
look for in general is something like if
you're if you're a man your ffmi should
be something like 20 or higher uh if
you're a woman you want to look for
something like 18 so that those are the
targets if you get past like 24 25 for a
man that's a lot of muscle mass assuming
you're reasonably lean now if you're
ffmi is like 24 25 but your body fat is
like 40% you're actually just a very
very large individual you're not like
you're not in a great spot so when we
say these sort of numbers it's the
assumption that you're probably sub 30%
body fat um for a man and sub35 for a
woman so those are the numbers um there
are online calculators all you really
need to know is your total body weight
your body fat percentage and then your
height you can enter those three numbers
and then they'll tell you your ffmi
score and it'll correct for an adjusted
value and most of those will actually
tell you the grading rubric in them so
good average bad Etc but those are the
numbers we look at if you are as a man
sub 17 as a woman sub 15 now we're in an
area of of pretty severe physiological
detriment for insufficient muscle and
some of our later discussions we'll talk
about why that matters so that's not um
sub 17% body fat this is specifically
the ffmi that's correct yeah what about
muscular endurance is this where you're
going to tell me I need to do walls sits
so this is really nice you can do any
number of tests here a a standard
plank is a good Testament of of muscular
endurance so can you hold a front plank
for 60 seconds can you hold a side plank
for 45 seconds pretty easy if you're
able to do a push-up so if you can't
that sort of tells you alone it's
actually interesting if you can't do a
single push-up that's not a muscular
endurance issue that's actually now a
strength issue because that's a one at
Max problem um so we want to be able to
do for again for a general male we
should have no problem doing 25 plus
consecutive push-ups I apologize for
interrupting you but as long as we're
talking about push-ups you just di
menion form are we talking chest
touching the ground uh elbows breaking
right angles what is a proper push-up
according to your laboratory unless you
have a very specific reason to limit
range of motion I want all my testing
done through a full joint range of
motion uh this is different for the
person so it's individualized to them
but in general for a push-up this would
be a full complete lock out of the
elbows on the top and a full chest touch
or close to it at the ground you can do
it different it doesn't really matter
but just keep it standard from your
preest to your post test if you're
trying to Mark progress okay but for US
unless we have a very specific reason
we're going full range of motion for all
of these tests okay so 25 push-ups 25
push-ups for a male is is a standard and
even something like 10 is a number we're
looking for again as kind of minimum
categories uh for an upper body muscular
endurance and not to get too down in the
weeds but uh I have observed other
people of course never myself no I'm
kidding but observed other people
positive at um maybe at repetition 15
catching their breath and then
continuing or you um continue like a
like a like a piston that would be a
fail test so no pauses correct just up
down up down and trying to hit at least
10 but ideally 25 or I learned this
lesson in one of our studies uh probably
nine years ago where we didn't clarify
that and so we actually had an
individual he wasn't there was he wasn't
being nefarious he just figured out if I
do a couple take a quick break and do a
couple he like quadrupled his post test
results from his pre-test result because
he figured out that little hack there so
you want to standardize it it's not that
I'm against or have some sort of strong
belief it's just trying to keep protocol
standardized and which means any break
failed test so 10 to 25 push-ups minimum
for males what about for females I'll
clarify uh if it's sub 10 for a man
that's again in you're like very severe
red flag problem um we really really
like to see a number above 25 okay that
that's where we're anchoring any between
between 10 and 25 is like uh yeah but
not severe it means they have work to do
we have work to do and for and for
females for a female you're going to
scale that sort of back so a female the
answer could be as little as zero right
so you're going to see that can you do a
full um position if they're in that
position we're generally not going to do
a muscular endurance test from the knees
we already know the answer is years zero
we'll actually default to another test
which I'll talk about in a second here
so for those those folks any that's
going to scale down a little bit right
so basically you're looking at 15 is
that marker like 25 was for the maale
where I want to see above 15 and if I do
we're good anything between five to 15
is the number of like
okay um if you're sub five like we we
generally have some problems and if that
is different between one and zero then
like now we zero is is is a problem so
we should be able to do that so if a
female cannot do 10 full push-ups yeah
10 full push-ups is hard for a female
depending on size okay let's say a
female can't do five full push-ups you
said rather than go to a Knees Down
Version Y what would you do to assess
their muscular endurance and would you
then also encourage them to work on
their strength well absolutely so again
if they can't do they can do anything
less than
three uh you're going to be strength in
fact if you want to look at muscular
endurance in general so this is a bit of
a off topic but I'll promise I'll keep
it short and I'll come right back
when I was a doctoral student I had uh
two lab mates one of them was a runner
female uh 120 PBS something like that
small the other one was a male and he
was basically like a straight bro like
he lifts weights doesn't do any other
sort of training does like a very
classic not training program but kind of
training and they were sort of bantering
back and forth for a while and basically
she was saying you're so unfit you can't
run it all and he's saying you're so
weak you can't do a pull-up and so they
challenged each other to a competition
they said at the end of the year the
girl is going to do 26 pull-ups and the
guy had to run a marathon so 26 miles so
that was the thing and then there was
some sort of consequence for whoever
sort of failed it so the guy quickly
tried to figure out how the hell am I
going to run 26 miles when I have not
run a mile in like many many many years
so he just started running you know
three miles four miles whatever she well
of course they both of them ran
immediately to me right and then she was
like how the hell I can't do a pullup
and I was like great and I gave her a
very specific maximal strength protocol
and she was like whoa I want to go to
the assisted pull-up machine and work on
doing like sets of 25 cuz I've got to
get my muscular endurance up and I tried
to explain to her your muscular
endurance is irrelevant if you can't do
one it's never going to matter she did
the muscular endurance protocol for the
entire thing didn't listen to me the end
of the year came she still produced
exactly zero pullups so point is if you
look at muscular
endurance where is it uh strength and
where is it actually muscular endurance
the general sort of number that you're
looking for is under like
80% right that's going to tell you is
this a muscular endurance problem or is
this an absolute strength problem under
80% of a one repetition maximum okay yep
so what I mean by that is this in fact
this actually leads into into your
question the other way to assess
muscular endurance is take the exact
strength test you did from the the talk
five minutes ago what which one did you
do load that to
75% and then do that for as many
repetitions as you can and that is a
tremendous barometer
uh of muscular endurance so if you are
able to do 200 lbs on your leg extension
test put 75% on that and do that as many
repts as you can you want to look for
more than eight repetitions if you are
below eight repetitions then we have a
muscular endurance problem right if it
if it is higher than that if you got 15
or 20 then we know we have probably some
problems in your Peak strength or the
test itself so that is a good 8 to 12
sort of number I is where you want to be
looking at um for there
what about anerobic capacity this one's
more challenging you either have to go
to a laboratory and do something like a
Windgate test so this is a 30 second
maximal um test where you're going to
see how much work can you possibly
do um in that 30 seconds if you don't
have a access to a laboratory you can
you can do this on any any protocol you
want this could be sprinting this can be
on a uh like an airbike this could be on
a rower anything like that anything
where you can exert maximal effort and
you don't have to worry about technical
problems so I generally don't like to do
things like a kettle bell swing or
something like that there's just too
many other variables you need to be able
to go as hard as you possibly can
knowing you're going to get to a place
of tremendous fatigue now in the lab we
often use what's called a Bosco protocol
and you're going to stand on a force
plate you're going to do as many
vertical jumps as fast as you can as
high as you can for 60 seconds and
you're absolutely destroyed by like
second 45 so we either use that Windgate
protocol or that Bosco protocol if you
want though again take any of those
other places 30 seconds or so up to 45
seconds up to a minute if you want it
doesn't really matter and you just mark
down the distance you cover that's all
you're we don't really have standards
for these things because it's going to
be different how far you can travel in
30 seconds on a treadmill is just going
to be so different than sprinting in the
field or on the assault bike or whatever
so um what you really want to worry
about there is can you complete it and
then how awful do you feel afterwards so
what what you really want to think about
here is not those protocols but this you
want to think about can you get close to
your predicted maximum heart rate so the
the number we throw out is 220 minus
your age so if you're 50 years old 220
minus 50 you should be able to get to a
maximum heart rate of around 170 beats
per minute now that number is extremely
generic if you don't get there that
doesn't have any indication of your
Fitness if you get higher that doesn't
mean you're any more fit it's just a
rough number so here's what I'm what I
want you to do in this case your heart
rate recovery is the better metric so I
want you to get up to a maximum heart
rate and then test your heart rate
recovery and what you should be looking
for there is about half a beat uh
recovery per second so you're going to
get up to a place where you reach like
absolute terrible exhaustion right
maximum
fatigue test your heart rate and then
count right have a timer going within 60
seconds you should have again that half
a beat per second you should have a
heart rate recovery of 30 beats per
minute within the next uh the next
minute so two minute recovery it should
be half that so 60 beats those are rough
numbers to go by and your three minute
recovery is again half of that again so
that is the closest way if your heart
rate recovery is worse than that then we
know we have a problem in your anerobic
capacity or your cardiovascular
capacity I love it what about number
eight maximal heart rate because what
you just described sounds a lot like
maximal heart rate so this is your VO2
max so the goal standard here is to
actually go into a laboratory and get
this thing done so we can actually run a
a VO2 max test where you put a mask on
collect all your gases and run you to
there and there's a very specific
protocol for uh completion of a a true
maximum test and any the scientists will
know that if you don't have access to
that you can do a couple of tests one of
them is called a 12-minute Cooper test
so this is simply time you're going to
run for 12 minutes as far as you can and
you're going to record the distance you
covered again you can go online to any
uh any number of of calculators enter
that distance in and that will tell you
your proximal your estimated V2 Max so
that's a 12 minute Sprint 12 minute
Sprint maximum distance you can cover in
12 minutes keeping a steady Pace the
whole time or going do whatever you want
the goal is to get maximum distance
covered in 12 minutes so that's anywhere
between a mile to two plus miles
depending on how fit you are but you
just do that Cooper 12 minute
test got it I told you all right so if
you remember aerobic capacity is 8 to 12
sort of minutes where you're going to
see a real true test of that V2 Max you
simply can't get that um in under a few
minutes so it is a is a that if you want
you can do a little gentler version of
that um so there are a number of
submaximal tests there in fact there is
a one M walk test you can do so again
all you're going to do is in this case
you have to have some sort of either a
stopwatch or ideally a heart rate
monitor and all you have to do is this
is a Rockport one mile submaximal test
so you're going to walk a mile record
the time record your heart rate at the
end enter those in and those will give
you again estimates of your V Max so
that's the the like oh my gosh I can't
run for 12 minutes as hard as I possibly
can or I don't want to do it or uh we
have a lot of these um in our executive
program it's like my knee hurts too bad
I've got back pain when I run or
whatever can I okay and you do the walk
test and it's pretty accurate if you do
it correctly so technically all you have
to actually do is measure your heart
rate on your you know that can count 60
seconds but it's just easier to work
with everyone's watches and stuff now
just wear the heart rate monitor plug in
those numbers um and again those are all
standard calculations so any anywhere
you find those um you don't have to
worry about the source so you just enter
your stuff in and they're going to be
running off the same equation I like the
idea of the 12 minute run I'm gonna give
it a shot we did for for years we did a
one mile version of this and um there's
just a lot more science on the Cooper
12min coer test so we did that it's
pretty good uh and it is not even
remotely close to
fun it sounds like fun for other reasons
yeah yeah well it is it it fun in the
sense that it reveals a lot yep powerful
potent super there's
no hiding you can hide with a leg
extension test it doesn't hurt that Pat
but you you cannot feel anything but the
12-minute run as far as you can test so
these are really actually psych
psychiatric diagnostic test they they
are of sorts number nine long duration
steady state y exercise I think of this
as AKA endurance but as you mentioned
before there are other forms of
endurance so long duration steady state
exercise yep so you really want to think
about this as not a standard number this
is you should maintain consistent work
output for over 20 plus minutes okay and
this one I want you to just pick
something that it was in your lifestyle
so is there a loop around your house
that you can do is there some protocol
that you you like to use for and you're
simply going to test your ability can
you maintain work without stopping
that's all it needs to be now ideally I
personally like to throw a little twist
in here which is can you do this with
nasal breathing only that's when I feel
really good if you can go 30 straight
minutes without needing to take a break
um walking doesn't really cut it unless
you're very very unfit in which case if
walking 30 minutes without a break is a
challenge okay like there but if you can
I want you moving at a non walking pace
I don't care what zone this is 2 3 4 5 I
don't care show me you can maintain
minimum of 20 minutes of work with no
breaks no intervals no downtime uh and
again ideally breathing through your
nose only I love this list but it
worries me a bit not because any one of
these tests is necessarily that
overwhelming but because I'm unclear
about how to arrange performance of
these different tests yeah for instance
do I separate them so I'm doing one test
like long duration output on one day and
I'm doing strength on another day those
seem pretty obvious to me but are there
ones that one can combine on different
days how much time should one give
oneself in between these tests and how
often should one do an
assessment just as we don't want to
necessarily evaluate body weight changes
by getting on the scale three times a
day maybe once a day at the same time
each day is more practical how often
should we be assessing our fitness for
each and every one of these well the way
that I was say this is you want to pick
the one that is the worst and do that
more frequently so if for example you do
the upper body strength test and you are
fantastic if you can bench press double
your body
weight I don't need to test your bench
very often for the average person you're
not a powerlifter like maybe once a year
or so maybe not even that we just don't
need to get there however if we then
test your your V2 Max and in your 12
minutes you cover a total of a half a
mile then like we might want to test
that every month right and so we're
going to let our priorities emphasize
which one we're going to do more often I
would recommend doing this full battery
once a year full battery mean the entire
list on one day the entire no not on one
day but within a week so you could take
a week now you could do these
technically all in two days uh three-day
split here is probably best so if you
were to just say hey this is like
testing week I actually love this for
beginning of the year or whenever it is
that you sort of change your training
but I think once a year just like once a
year you should probably go to a
physician and get full blood work um a
full you know
heart scan and everything like that um
and then if maybe you had a heart issue
they would come back in and test you
more frequently whatever the case is
right you should probably run through
this and you're going to be thinking
yeah but I don't want to like give up on
my exercise routine that week well I
promise you you're not going to finish
this week and think I didn't do very
much work this week it's it's going to
feel great and then you're going to have
a very nice barometer of exactly where
you need to change and and prioritize
your training for the next quarter half
a year or wherever you want to go if you
want to actually do this every six
months mon that's really we end up
actually doing this quite honestly like
more like every six months as a general
um test that's a really good way to do
but if if minimum of if you're arguing
with me give me once a year you want to
do this so which order to do them in the
non-fatiguing test you can do whenever
so this is the the body composition scan
the ffmi the body fat composition all
this stuff can be done whever I
generally like to do that though as your
very first activity the reason is we
know that acute exercise
can heavily influence things like body
composition measurements because of INF
inflammation water storage Etc so it's
easiest to just sort of get that off of
a 48 hour rest you want to make sure you
don't do any Hard Exercise the day
before a body composition test and
probably 48 hours before that so just
start yourself off of that your movement
test can be the same thing um you don't
want to try to do a assessment of how
well you're squatting if you're
incredibly sore from your your brutal
squatting test so tend to do those
things when you're the most fresh then
what you want to do is any skill or
maximum strength or power goes at the
very beginning of the day and any
fatiguing thing happens at the end and
so you could easily do this all right
I'm going to do my power test my broad
jump great you're not going to be
fatigued at all from that and on the
same day since I'm already pretty warmed
up now I'm going to roll right into my
leg strength test and since I'm really
warmed up I'm going to do my leg
muscular endurance test right there so
this is a very common strategy we use we
do our one rep max leg
extension 5 minutes 7 Minutes whatever
we need to do come back load up to 75%
do as many reps as you can boom you
could roll right into then your upper
body test or your grip strength test or
anything else that you want to do there
um is there a little bit of
influence yeah but really for most
people it's not that bad um what
influence I mean if you do a leg
strength test coming back and doing an
upper body strength test afterwards it's
not that big a deal give you yourself 15
give yourself 20 minutes give you plenty
of time so you can knock out your
strength testing and muscular endurance
testing all in one day that could be you
could do your performance um your skill
diagnostic your power jump test your
strength and your musk endurance and all
that stuff is knocked out you're going
to have to come back on a separate day
and do your Anor robic tests this is 30
seconds maximal endurance things like
that you could though if you wanted do
that after your long duration test your
long duration test is again is just
going to function as like a a big
warm-up or you could flip those things
or you can do them on separate days
you're going to have to do your VO2 max
test on its own day for the most part
unless you wanted to do again your
movement or your body composition sort
of before those things um so you really
have the ability to kind of mix and
match ideally this most realistically
probably takes three days if you want to
separate them into four or five the more
separation you do the better data you're
going to get it's just a question of
like how how pedantic are you really
trying to get here and are you willing
to lose
5% to then save a whole day then you can
do sort of these things in multiple
Stacks so that's that's how I would
break it up so what I'm hearing is
better to do it than to not do it most
definitely and be rational don't um
don't try and do your strength output
late in the day when you're fatigued you
know if you're going to combine some of
the um steady state endurance and um
maximal heart rate fine understand there
might be a slight deficit there but but
test it the same way each time and what
you're really looking for is Improvement
yep and you could also do the heart rate
recovery under any of the modalities so
you could do the heart rate recovery um
after your V2 Max as well so you finish
that thing and then just you know again
do the same test for up to three minutes
these are Fantastic Tools I'm almost
tempted to say that I'm willing to post
my numbers but that actually violates
the S of core principle that I think
we're getting at here which is that it's
highly unlikely that anybody is going to
be phenomenal across the board I mean
certainly there will be individuals that
are but based on everything we talked
about earlier specificity of training
and um how extensively somebody's been
training a certain way will without
question lops side them if you will yeah
toward being better in some of these
assessments and less good in others and
that's just simply the way that these
adaptations work yep and it's not you
don't need to be optimal in all these
areas to be quote unquote Optimal Health
from this perspective you just want want
to make sure again there's no severe
performance anchors this is what we call
them right we don't want any of these
severe constraints cuz you're going to
get limited by that thing and so what
you want to do is move that up to just
sufficient or concerning right and get
it away from that if you do that that
thing's not going to catch you you're
going to be able to continue to pursue
pursue optimization any any of the one
things that you have a specific passion
for which is generally what moves people
right you you train um so that you feel
better you train because you know there
are all these benefits to it and and gez
this audience probably could list
hundreds of them but you also train
because you generally like to get better
at something a lot of us like have
something and so you want to make sure
that you're not going hey I know you're
good at endurance but you really
shouldn't train anymore we don't want
that message not at all I want you to
love your training we just want to make
sure that you're not loving that so much
that you're not taking some blinders off
and missing another area which would
actually um again you pull that
performance anchor this whole Ship Sails
faster with less effort and less
friction what I love about this is also
that as you've described it it's not
just for athletes or people that are
super into fitness it's also for people
that just want to be healthy and want
aesthetic changes and that's why they're
exercising which I think accounts for a
fairly large percentage of people out
there yeah so so I think um what you
described is it incredibly well
structured incredibly clear and
Incredibly actionable so so I I want to
thank you for that uh I'm serious about
my willingness to do this and uh at
least share those numbers with you and I
think for most people that are seeking
what you listed off before aesthetic
changes functionality and Longevity it's
clear that all nine of these are going
to be important yeah in some regard or
another so before we close out I want to
go back and finish off uh the metrics
for v2 Max because I don't actually
think I gave you numbers on that so in
general for men a minimum number we want
to look at here is 35 milliliters per
kilogram per minute and for women that'd
be about 30 so we we can actually push
uh a lot higher on those things in
reality I want to see men above 50 if I
could just interrupt you for a second
when you say 40 milliliters per
kilogram milliliters of what
specifically yeah so what actually those
metrics mean is uh the first one
milliliters is oxygen so it's amount of
oxygen kilograms is body weight so it's
how much oxygen can you bring in per
kilogram of body weight per minute so it
is a volume of oxygen per your size in a
Time duration in fact the way that you
calculate it uh is you multiply your
cardiac output by what's called your
avo2 difference your cardiac output is
your heart rate times your stroke volume
so how much uh blood you're pumping out
per pump is your stroke volume how many
times you're pumping or you're beating
you multiply that by your avo2
difference your av2 difference is artery
minus vein difference so it's the amount
of oxygen in your arteries minus the
amount of oxygen in your vein which is
going to tell you how much you took up
in your capillaries in your muscle so
you take those two factors multiply them
together and there's your V2 Max you
know as you were describing that I
imagine you getting to an fmri machine
and seeing that equation lighting up in
your brain because clearly it's
committed to memory very well thank you
for that clear description yeah so to
finish those numbers um I really truly
want to see some a man above 50 uh and
I'm not really stoked until I get above
55 in fact it's sort of funny Dave
costell whose lab I did my PhD and he
was retired by the time but he he's
again one of these legendary figures in
exercise physiology started in the 70s
he would always say there's no human
excuse to be below 60 which I was always
like damn like that's really actually
pretty hard to get to was he was he 60
he's still actually setting World
Records like in these last couple of
years and his like all the Master's
records for swimming and and cycling and
stuff so he was a super super fit guy um
so he was always above 60 he's probably
like 50 something now even though he's
you know 80 or whatever 80 years old
yeah with a V2 Max of 50 he's probably
really not 50 he's probably but he's
probably going to remember that earlier
in the we talked about how I had the 92y
old the V2 Max of 38 Dave's probably
gonna break that record when he gets
there I'm sure I'm sure I in fact I
guarantee you he has that number in his
brain I haven't talked to him in 15
years but I guarantee you that number is
in his brain and he's probably training
for it I love it and I love it
because it proves that exercise pays off
oh it's one of the few things in life
where there's a direct relationship
between work and outcome yeah that's as
Henry Rollins described in his wonderful
essay if you're familiar with that oh my
gosh you're a punk rock guy you know
Henry I'm sure I mean I certainly know
who he is and I know his his work an
incredible onepage uh paper sort of
something to do with the iron uh and he
basically describes that is like this is
the one thing where it's truth like it
is the most true thing you'll ever do uh
which is I love for that um it's almost
like a principle of nature 100% yeah so
with with the women I really want to see
the women uh if I want to see men above
55 I really want to see women above 50
um as the Target and if be like you're
there I'm pretty good so you can do the
math on then the middle ground of what's
like okay but we need to work on it in
fact if you look across the literature
at different athletes you're going to
see like the the really high level
endurance folks um you know they may
pass 70 or 80 in fact um there was talk
a few years ago of a guy breaking a 100
as like an 18 or 19 year old but I
actually don't think it was ever fully
confirmed or repeated but certainly
you'll see plenty of people like
95 um in those extremes if you look at
other sports like football or basketball
they're probably going to be in the 5565
sort of range so if you as an average
person are 55 um that that's a real
really good marker to be and if you get
even close to that you're in a good spot
I'm sorry if I let you down Dave I just
love how as you're describing this
average person you're look at me with
Just a Little Bit of Sympathy like like
if you if you reach the standard of
average Andrew um listen you're giving
me prompts all over the place to try and
uh improve my metrics whatever they
happen to be and I think that's one of
the great values of getting objective
numbers even if they have to be measured
by some of these back of the envelope
techniques that um you know I guess we
always teach people in the laboratory
right that a tool can be um not
extremely precise but as long as it's
reliable of course there is still value
there I mean of course you'd love to
have the most precise and most reliable
tool but if you can't then at least go
for a reliable tool and measure for
consistency yeah for the real world
reliability beats validity as as much as
we can for a lot of things we're talking
about especially for using it as a
metric of did I get better as long as
that tool is reliable um body
composition does all these things have
inherent error in them some of them are
smaller some of them are larger but as
you mentioned having standardization
within the testing protocol um is going
to allow you to measure progress and
that's going to tell you sort of where
you're at um now that we've sort of
covered all the these areas of
adaptation we walk through the history
and we walk through a bunch of the
explanations for why people are maybe
not getting the results that they want
to get through their training the way I
would like to go with the rest of our
conversations would be to just go
through each of those adaptations step
by step and make sure I cover very
specific protocols for if you have run
through this testing and identified an
area of weakness so maybe you've sort of
been lifting a lot because you like
lifting and you maybe realize that your
cardiovascular fitness or your heart
rate recovery is not where it really
should be or the opposite like we've
talked about maybe you're doing a lot of
that type of work and your strength
isn't there your movement quality is not
there so you've identified a problem how
do I specifically solve it what are the
evidence-based um and most effective
protocol calls that I could put myself
in for each one of these categories and
I think that would uh give people a lot
of take-home value um but it's going to
take us some time to cover so it's it's
going to have to come across over
multiple conversations uh between you
and I great well I'm looking forward to
each and all of those conversations and
um I want to add just one more metric to
our discussion today uh which is really
just my way of saying thank you because
if there were a metric for amount of
useful information per sentence spoke
you would be at the upper level of that
metric you have this amazing ability to
provide so much knowledge in a clear and
concise and today listed out format that
is both interesting grounded in science
and actionable so on behalf of everyone
listening and certainly for myself as
well I just want to say thank you well I
appreciate the compliments and I'm
looking forward to the next conversation
uh jumping right into speed strength and
hyy training and what of the
evidence-based and best practices for
protocols in those areas if you're
learning from Andor enjoying this
podcast please subscribe to our YouTube
channel that's a terrific zeroc cost way
to support us in addition please
subscribe to the podcast on Spotify and
apple and on both Spotify and apple you
can leave us up to a five-star review if
you have questions for us or comments or
suggestions about topics you'd like us
to cover or guests you'd like me to
include on the hubman Lab podcast please
put those in the comment section on
YouTube we do read all the comments
please also check out the sponsors
mentioned at the beginning and during
today's episode that's the best way to
support this podcast I'd also like to
inform you about the hubman Lab podcast
free newsletter it's called the neural
network newsletter and each month the
neural network newsletter is sent out
and it contains summaries of podcast
episodes specific protocols discussed on
the human Lab podcast all in Fairly
concise format and all completely zero
cost you can sign up for the neural
network newsletter by going to hubman
lab.com go to the menu and click on
newsletter you provide us your email we
do not share it with anybody and as I
mentioned before it's completely zero
cost by going to hubman lab.com you can
also go into the menu tab and go to
newsletter and see some example
newsletters from months past thank you
once again for joining me for today's
discussion about fitness exercise and
performance with Dr Andy Galpin and as
always thank you for your interest in
science
[Music]