Submind YouTube summaries
Thumbnail for Do You Approach Photography Skill From The Wrong Angle?

Do You Approach Photography Skill From The Wrong Angle?

Watch on YouTube

Video summary

The video explores a common misconception in photography where enthusiasts often prioritize mastering technical skills over cultivating artistic vision. The speaker argues that while photography is indeed a blend of art and science, chasing techniques for their own sake can lead to mediocrity rather than greatness. Many photographers feel compelled to learn new methods simply to prove their proficiency or to keep up with trends, such as the once-popular HDR craze or complex focus stacking. However, the speaker suggests that this approach often results in images where the technique is celebrated more than the photograph itself, leaving the final result somewhat unremarkable. Instead of learning a skill and then forcing it onto every subject, the speaker advocates for identifying an image one admires first and then reverse-engineering the techniques used to create it. This purpose-driven method ensures that technical knowledge serves a creative idea rather than dictating the outcome. A significant portion of the discussion addresses the balance between understanding camera mechanics and relying on automatic settings. The speaker acknowledges that modern cameras can produce decent, average-exposed images when set to professional modes, but warns against becoming a "slave" to the equipment without knowing how it functions. If a photographer lacks even a basic technical understanding, they cannot effectively troubleshoot issues or adapt their workflow when the camera's automated decisions do not yield the desired result. The speaker admits his own limited grasp of complex mathematical formulas behind f-stops but emphasizes that practical knowledge is sufficient for creative exploration. One does not need to be a mathematician to understand how aperture affects depth of field; one only needs enough insight to manipulate those tools intentionally to support their vision, rather than blindly following the camera's suggestions. The narrative further illustrates the danger of adopting styles simply because they are popular or trendy, drawing on personal experiences from film photography days where photographers would artificially include film rebates in prints just to fit a "cool" aesthetic. The speaker contrasts this with the idea that great photographers do not merely collect techniques; instead, they collect reasons to discover them. Techniques like cross-processing or creating light halos should be adopted only when they genuinely serve the specific image and the story the photographer wants to tell. By treating photography like a detective game where one analyzes how an admired image was made, a photographer can learn techniques with purpose and avoid the trap of applying processes that do not naturally fit the subject matter. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure that every technical choice enhances the artistic intent, transforming the photographer from a follower of trends into a creator who understands both the science and the soul of their craft.
Read the full video transcript
We're talking about taking photographs using the learn about series of books from Ladybird. Within here there's a bunch of pictures stuff about teaching the you know the the the keen photographer keen child photographer to use things like form light color effect. It's got some very basic techniques in here and we've all been taught techniques as photographers. That's where we get started. That's where we learn. But in doing so, we have been fed a bit of a red herring. Photography is as we know it's part art and it's part science. And it's tempting to think that if we nail the technique, if we are like masterful technicians with our camera, then nothing is beyond the rem. And in some respects that's true, but in many respects, and I certainly had this problem for ages, we end up chasing technique for techniques sake. So, we want to learn a new technique because we feel that that makes us improve as photographers. Feels like we're actually getting somewhere. But then we go off and try and apply that technique to literally anything that our camera points at. I'm thinking about the HDR craze. This is this is now going back quite a while, right, where everybody was just HDRing the hell out of like everything. And that was people learning a technique and then finding ways to apply, finding things to shoot. Where I think the better way is to find photographs and then look at it pictures that we like or have an image in our head and says, "What techniques do I need to learn to be able to take that photograph?" Because then we're learning techniques with a purpose. We're not just taking the time to learn a technique so that we can then take the photograph, show it to somebody, and say, "Look what I've done." And they go, "Wow, what a good technique that you have." So, I'm thinking about focus stacking. Now, I don't take macro photographs. I just I I don't. You know that I don't. And I appreciate the people who do. I think I appreciate the work that they put in. But when I see people posting images of, you know, like Focus, Microsoft, the the the the composition of the of the discussion, not the composition of the image, the composition of the discussion is it's all about like this is how I did it. This is a focus stack of a trillion billion pictures that I put together and I stitched and th and it's like what what are we celebrating here? Are we celebrating the picture itself which often is let's say it's somewhat it it's somewhat mediocre or are you celebrating the technique because the two are not the same thing. Creating a great photograph I feel doesn't require loads of technical skill there. Yes, there are obviously very technically proficient photographers for whom that is their approach. That is what they feel comfortable with, but they also manage to understand that that needs to be balanced with still taking an aesthetically pleasing photograph. Somebody sent me an email the other day. They were talking about how they work in a camera store and and what have you and their boss remarked how they were quite surprised how and I think the words that the person is how little that they knew about the technical side of photography. It's like how can you possibly work in photography and selling cameras and stuff if you don't know the technical side of things and they didn't elaborate about what the conversation was about. I don't really know what sort of technical things are there, but it it did get me thinking that I've just sat here and talked about like are we going to display the the technical skill or are we going to display the uh you know the creative side of things and that you don't need masses of technical skill to create a great photograph which obviously is going to raise a a point, raise a a question in the mind that says, "Okay, Alex, if you don't need the technical skill, then why do we learn it at all? Why not just put the camera on auto and have done with it?" I feel if you if if we do that, especially in today's world where you can take basically any camera, put it on P for professional, right? And it will just do it will do a good job. It will it will get it will get you a what it thinks is a a an averageely exposed photograph that you kind of look at and go, "Yeah, that's fine." If that's the thing that you're into. And if that's as far as you want to go with photography, then absolutely that that's fine. But if there's no interest in the technical side of things, then we don't know what the camera's doing. We don't know how to we become a slave to the camera. The camera sits there and goes, you will take that you will have the photograph that I have decided that you will have. Uh and of course, if you don't have any technical uh background, then it's like, well, How do I change it? How do I fix it? Right? So I do think I think there needs to be a modicum of understanding technically. But at the same time, going back to the other point, we don't need to have a comprehensive understanding of every single technical thing in photography. I have been taking photographs since I was basically like six or seven. I'm 52 now. I am not very good at maths. I have the vaguest understanding of how f-stops are numbered, why they're numbered. I know something to do with a percentage of the the lens or something that is open or what have I you see? I don't know. I I do not know. What I do know is how to use them. Right? So there's this it's like f-stops. You can if I sit there and I say I I don't know how fabs are named. There will be certain photographers who might sit there and go, "Well, Mr. Kilby, you sit there on your wobbly chair sitting and telling everybody about photography, but you know nothing about the the mathematical formula behind f-stops. You you are you are a charlatan, sir." And I would turn around and I would hit them over the head with my MPA important photographer of the year award 2014 and say take that. Right. So we do need to know something. We we need to know enough that allows us to explore our creative ideas to look at a photograph and say what is what is that person doing and and do I like that? So can I explore that technique? Can I design and and one of the people who I really love in their photography is is Nadav Kand look at that. His head well this is not him. This is David Lynch I think. Yeah. Right. See his head's as big as mine. Hello. So he's he's right. So he's going to do all the talking from now on. Uh does actually look right. So, I have seen his work quite a bit and I'm just flicking through trying to find one of his photographs that illustrates the point that I'm trying to make. Uh, this is where I should have tagged it earlier, but it's there. So, there there's one of Lily Allen, right? So, so this Lily Allen photograph, it's got like a kind of a a little crossrocessed sort of feel to it. Something like that. Now, I know this because I've done cross processing myself back when I was a student and things of that nature. So, I can look at and go, "Oh, okay. There's a thing." But if I didn't know that this cross processing and then if I wanted to replicate that feel, I said, "Hey, do you know now that I've kind of got this photograph here and I absolutely cannot find the one that I'm looking for. This is typical, right?" that I could say to somebody, what is it that that Nadev's doing here? What is going on with the photograph? There's a photograph here. Found one of them of Desmond Tutu. Hopefully I can show you that without the the light there. Desmond Tutu. Now, he has like a weird sort of halo around his head. And I remember seeing this and other pictures are like that. What is What is he doing there? So, I'm starting to explore and I'm breaking down. And I'm using the basic technical knowledge that I have. And I don't mean like my knowledge is basic. I just mean like some basic things like what's going on here? I'm not over complicating it. I'm not going I you know this is deep and heavy man. I'm sitting there going why is there a halo there? Why on some of these images are there like specular light sources moving across? Okay. Well, that tells me the shutter's open here. So that's a clue. It's a little bit like a detective thing, isn't it? You sit there like a poor a poor. You go, "Ah, I have seen what you are doing." Or maybe maybe I should just leave I should leave my bad expressions, my [laughter] bad impressions some, but I'm going in there. I'm looking at it and I I'm I'm learning the technique. I I don't not just following a tutorial because if I follow a tutorial, I'm not really learning it. I'm just I'm just following along by looking at a picture by picking it apart and by trying to copy it and enjoying the process. I'm actually learning what to do and in doing so because obviously I am not native and so I cannot make that image exactly like him. I can just take some guess work. I find a technique of man and I go hey do you know what that works really nice. it makes this kind of photograph, right? And and I have discovered something rather than being taught a technique and trying to apply it to images that don't necessarily work for it. This is always a thing, you know, you can't just you can't just slap a process or look or something. You know, we talked about style recently. We can't just we can't just put these things onto any old image that we feel like and expect it to just happen. when I was a student and a lot of these stories come like when I was a student mostly because this is when I did a lot of like mistakes and learning so it's a thing we used to print images with uh with negatives it was it was a wet dark room and some of the negative carriers so you put your negative into like a big carrier and it would sit in the enlarger when you made a print some of the carriers and they had like a 35 a shape for the for the negatives 35 5x 120 4x5 stuff. Some of those carriers had been filed away a little bit so you could print the entire image with the film rebates and you know the corners and stuff. Uh and subsequently that that term later on when people started using Photoshop a lot and so became became called sloppy borders. But in those days it was like oh do you know what the style is to print the full frame so everybody could see the rebates and stuff and you just put it on not because there was an actual reason for doing it. You know I was like hey you know this I'm going to put this style on my thing because because of a re because of an actual reason. It's simply because oh you know it looks kind of cool looks kind of cool and everybody else is doing it so I'm like I I better do it as well because I I want to be one of the cool kids. I and I feel a lot of these styles and things that that go around these days that technical thing it's it's it is appealing because it's popular. It's just a style of a photograph in in the kind of more basic way of talking about style like you know like it's focus stacking or it's HDR or it's it's crossrocessing or [clears throat] something and then people you it's just a trend. So they just do their thing. Look for techniques that serve the image that serve the idea that you have in your head. What we're looking at here is is not being able to sit at the next camera club meeting or somewhere something you know we get together talk photography and say do you know look at all the things I can do look all these techniques that I have great photographers don't collect techniques great photographers collect reasons to discover techniques that's the message I want to leave with you today thanks ever so much for watching I See you guys soon.