Video summary
The podcast episode centers on a provocative question regarding whether men possess reproductive rights, specifically framing the discussion around abortion and parental choice. The host expresses a clear pro-choice stance for women, arguing that society benefits when women are not forced into unwanted pregnancies, which can lead to negative outcomes such as criminal behavior in children born to unwilling mothers. However, he contends that this autonomy does not currently extend to men; once conception occurs, a man's ability to choose whether to become a father is effectively removed by the woman's decision regarding abortion or safe haven laws. He highlights "paper abortions" and voluntary parental surrender programs as hypothetical rights for women that do not exist for men, noting that fathers are often legally compelled to finance pregnancies they did not intend without having an option to forfeit their responsibilities early in the process. The conversation delves into specific scenarios where male reproductive autonomy is compromised, including instances of "baby trapping" and cases involving sexual assault victims who are still legally required to pay child support for children resulting from rape or statutory offenses committed by babysitters or teachers. The host challenges the common feminist slogan that consenting to sex does not equal consenting to parenthood, arguing that this perspective fails to address the reality faced by men forced into fatherhood against their will. He suggests that extending reproductive choice to men could prevent a generation of unwanted children and potentially reduce juvenile crime rates linked to fatherlessness, positing that parents who choose their role are more likely to raise happy and healthy offspring than those coerced into it. A significant portion of the discussion addresses custody rights and the systemic disparities between mothers and fathers in legal systems across America and the UK. The host explains the concept of a "presumption of joint child custody," which would place both parents on an equal footing when entering family court, but notes that this standard currently exists in very few states like Kansas while facing opposition from major organizations such as the National Organization for Women (NOW). He contrasts this with the situation in the UK and parts of America where unmarried fathers who are not named on a birth certificate have virtually no rights to their children compared to mothers. This legal asymmetry means that if a woman refuses to marry or name an unpartnered man, she retains full control over her child's life while he has none, creating what he describes as the ultimate definition of patriarchy in reverse for men who are not married. The episode concludes with a call to examine these complex issues without relying on outdated memes that ignore modern perspectives on consent and responsibility. The host emphasizes that forcing men into fatherhood creates problems similar to those caused by unwanted pregnancies for women, including potential harm to the child's well-being due to lack of commitment from an unwilling parent. He advocates for a nuanced discussion on what reproductive rights might look like for men if they were granted more choice, questioning whether such changes would foster committed parenting or enable irresponsibility. Ultimately, the dialogue underscores that while pro-choice feminism supports unilateral decisions by women regarding abortion and child support, it often overlooks the parallel lack of autonomy faced by fathers who are legally bound to raise children born from non-consensual circumstances or without their active participation in conception planning.
Read the full video transcript
Do you think that men have reproductive
rights?
Um
not in the context of the way we discuss
like pro-choice.
Like I'm pro-choice. I believe a woman
should have the choice of what she does
with her body, if or when she has a
child. I feel like not only does she
benefit from that, but wider society
benefits in the sense that we're not
forcing women to have children they
don't want. And if you look at the data,
unwantedness causes a huge amount of
issues later in life. A child born to an
unwanted mum, for example, is more
likely to be a criminal. Um I like to
apply that to men too who don't have the
same choice. So, after conception, a
man's choice to be a father is is gone.
He's sort of beholden to the woman's
wishes,
which which is quite right. He should
not be able to choose if she keeps or
has an abortion, in my opinion.
But he's coming along for the ride
whether he likes it or not. He has no
choice. His choice was to wear a condom
or not. And what whatever reason, maybe
he did, if she becomes pregnant, there's
no choice left. She can, you know, have
a morning-after pill. She can have an
abortion. She can have safe haven laws,
which basically mean that up to 3 weeks
after birth, a woman can give a baby to
a police station or fire station, and
they'll take it no questions asked. No
name, no nothing. And as a a man does
not have that choice, and he's basically
forced to finance a decision he has no
choice in. And
this is something that's called a paper
abortion, or more recently called
voluntary parental surrender, which is a
hypothetical right which doesn't exist
for a man to um
forfeit all privileges and
responsibility to a child he doesn't
want, as long as A, he tells the
mum-to-be early in the pregnancy so she
can make an informed choice, B, he
contributes to the medical fees of
childbirth.
Uh it doesn't exist. A lot of pro-choice
feminists support it, like Karen DeCrow.
And she was saying like an autonomous
woman making a unilateral decision uh
she not expect a man to finance that
choice. And I get it. It's a very
controversial thing. People think it
gives men the ability to be sort of
deadbeats and step out of childhood. And
there are some fair criticisms. I'm I
don't necessarily think I support or
unsport it. I want to have that
discussion. I want to know what might
these rights look like for men? Can we
give men more choice? And is forcing men
to be dads to children they don't want
going to have the exact same problem as
the same harm to women
where it was causing like a generation
of unwanted, more likely to be criminal
children. And we all know the links
between fatherlessness and crime,
juvenile crime in boys.
And I want to know
will is giving choice to men and fathers
going to help them make that choice to
become to be a committed parent.
Uh
as I feel like a parent that's chosen to
be one is more likely to raise a child
that's happy and healthy. And that's why
I'm pro-choice for both men and women.
Yeah. What do you say to the people who
would claim if you didn't want to be a
father, you shouldn't have had sex?
I mean there's a feminist slogan that
says consenting to sex is not consenting
to parenthood, and I agree. And that
applies to men and women. Like you'll
see that sign on placards outside um
in protests held by feminists.
Consenting to sex is not consenting to
parenthood. Some people disagree. That's
why that's my personal belief, and I
like to extend that. I feel like
I think like one in 10 men in America
have been
forced or had a partner try to trick
them into getting pregnant when they
didn't want to. One in 10. That's like
the classic thing of like, "Oh, I'm on
the pill. Oh, no, I'm not." Like baby
trapping, I suppose you'd call it that.
And I'm like, well, they should have a
choice. There are men who have been
raped that have been legally compelled
to pay child support. Uh they didn't
have a choice either. And boys, there
have been boys that have been raped by
babysitters, teachers, and they grow up
like four or five years later, and then
they're served court documents saying
you owe this much money in child
support. And I'm like, they didn't have
a choice either.
So, again, it's very complicated.
Um and I just don't think this meme of
well, you shouldn't have had sex is
pixelated and not very modern
perspective in my opinion and it
certainly doesn't apply to women.
Unless you're of course pro-life.
I suppose this
tumbles down from reproductive rights
into custody rights as well. I haven't
actually seen you write much about this.
Uh,
although you post a lot on your
Instagram, so I very well may have
missed it. What's the TLDR of
uh, fatherhood custody rights?
Um, um, in America, probably best to
talk about it. Um,
so what a lot of people want is called a
presumption of joint child custody.
I think I got that right. And what that
means is that the father and mother who
are fighting for custody enter court on
a level playing field. It's a
presumption that we're going to have
shared child custody here.
Uh, currently that doesn't exist. That
only exists in two states. I think one
of them's Kansas. Florida was going to
bring it in, but it got thrown out
because of so much campaigning against
it by, ironically, the National
Organization for Women, which is the
biggest feminist group in America. They
were the ones that were campaigning
against equality, which is just doesn't
make any sense.
Um, so presumption of shared custody
basically allows both parents to go in
level playing field and they basically
build their case from there. They say,
well, I I earn this much, I have this
much free time and then obviously people
start making accusations of abuse and
becomes very messy in family court. But,
like I said, that presumption of shared
child custody only exists in maybe two,
perhaps three states. It's increasing,
but not all of them.
And in America in England in the UK it's
even worse. Like in the UK, and if if
you're not married, you are screwed.
Like,
if you're not married or named on the
birth certificate as a father, you have
no rights to that child.
Oh, yeah, you um, you said that's about
This was your justification for why men
should get married. Or this is part of
your justification for why men should
get married.
I mean, I don't know if I made that
argument, but if you want to keep If you
want to have equal rights to your child,
you should be married. Yeah. And I don't
think that's I mean imagine a woman not
having rights to something unless she
was married to a man.
That is that is ultimate that is like
the ultimate patriarchy definition. Like
you have to be married if you want equal
rights. That's exactly how it exists in
the UK for fathers. You have to be
married or named on the birth
certificate. And in both instances, the
mother can just be like, "No, I'm not
going to marry you. I'm not going to
name you." And then she has all she has
full
control over that child's life. You have
none. And she'll have full rights no
matter what. She doesn't have to be
married. She can be single, divorced,
separated, or married, it doesn't
matter. She has full rights to the
child. Not in the UK.
And not for men. And it's not much
better in America, but
if you want to see serious systemic um
sexism,
then just go and spend a few hours
outside a family court and talk to some
of the fathers coming out and you'll
hear some stories that will change your
mind, I think. Yeah. This episode is
brought to you by Element. Stop having
coffee first thing in the morning. Your
adenosine system that caffeine acts on
isn't even active for the first 90
minutes of the day, but your adrenal
system is and salt acts on your adrenal
system. Element contains a
science-backed electrolyte ratio of
sodium, potassium, and magnesium with no
sugar, no gluten, no coloring, no
artificial ingredients, or any other BS.
It plays a critical role in reducing
muscle cramps and fatigue while
optimizing brain health, regulating
appetite, and curbing cravings. The
orange flavor in a cold glass of water
is literally the best way to start your
morning. I've done it every single day
for over 3 years now, way before they
were a partner on the show, and I love
it. Best of all, there is a no-BS,
no-questions-asked refund policy, so you
can buy absolutely risk-free, and if you
do not like it for any reason, they will
give you your money back, and you don't
even need to return the box. Right now,
you can get a free sample pack of all
eight flavors with your first box by
going to the link in the description
below or heading to
drinklmnt.com/modernwisdom.
That's drinklmn.com/modernwisdom.
If you enjoyed that clip, you will love
the full-length episode, which you can
watch right now, right here.
Go on.
Tap it.