Dirty Little Marketing Secrets That Always Work - Rory Sutherland (4K)
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Rory Sutherland argues that companies will struggle to drag knowledge workers back into offices five days a week, noting that while serendipity and collaboration benefit from collocation, autonomy over one's environment significantly boosts productivity for independent tasks. He highlights a counterintuitive trend where absenteeism is higher in the US than Europe or the UK, attributing this partly to geographical dispersion rather than cultural differences regarding face time. Sutherland suggests that once individuals experience new behaviors—such as remote work with high-speed internet at home—the old ways of commuting and adhering to rigid schedules seem ridiculous by comparison. He draws parallels between electric car adoption and music downloading, positing that early adopters often pay a premium for status signaling rather than immediate utility, similar to how birds evolved plumage for display before it aided flight. This concept extends to business tools like the typewriter; despite reducing productivity due to error correction needs in an era without word processing, typing was mandated because handwritten notes signaled unprofessionalism, illustrating that market forces often prioritize social signals over pure efficiency until a tipping point is reached. The discussion shifts to economic inequality and tax policy, where Sutherland critiques models using single representative agents for ignoring disparities between inherited wealth and earned income. He points out the absurdity of pensioners living in massive houses while worrying about small expenses like lemons, contrasting this with younger people who lack a financial safety net despite working hard. Proposing solutions inspired by Roger Martin's idea of tax-free lifetime allowances for early earners, Sutherland advocates for "lifestyle arbitrage," where individuals work for high salaries in expensive cities but live and spend money elsewhere to maximize purchasing power. He also touches on the tragedy of the commons regarding urban planning, noting that while scenes like Austin or Newcastle emerge organically through population density, there is a secret desire among many to return to suburban life with space and lawns, even if current cultural trends favor dense city living in places like London over suburbs in Bromley. Sutherland explores how wealth inequality impacts social behavior and consumer psychology, citing research that links high local inequality to increased self-objectification behaviors such as posting "sexy selfies." He explains the environmental security hypothesis, suggesting men prefer larger women during economic downturns due to ancestral survival instincts regarding resource scarcity. The conversation also covers flawed decision-making processes in markets like real estate; platforms like Rightmove force users into rigid price filters that prevent them from discovering properties outside their predefined criteria or areas they haven't searched, whereas humans naturally refine preferences through exploration. Furthermore, he critiques the obsession with speed and immediacy in communication, questioning whether "slow" technologies or decision-making processes might yield better outcomes by allowing consumers to discover what they truly want rather than just selecting from pre-filtered options based on initial, often inaccurate, criteria. Finally, Sutherland addresses workplace culture and public policy through behavioral economics principles like hypothecation—allocating funds specifically for certain purposes—to reduce resentment in systems like queue-jumping or road pricing. He suggests that charging a premium to use fast lanes could be framed as a charitable donation rather than just paying more, thereby removing the sting of privilege while still allocating resources efficiently to those most in need. The episode concludes with reflections on how economists often misunderstand consumer behavior by treating money as abstract numbers rather than feelings; spending decisions are deeply tied to well-being and happiness, not just wealth optimization. He emphasizes that governments should focus less on bureaucratic hurdles like cookie consent banners or rigid office mandates and more on creating environments where people can thrive, whether through better public services funded collectively or allowing individuals the freedom to spend their money in ways that bring them genuine flourishing.
Read the full video transcript
so talking about lockdown how effective
do you think companies will be at
dragging people back into the office
it's interesting actually because in the
UK for whatever reason there are
exceptions if you go to tech companies
they there's tumble weed you know
companies which are very strongly kind
of tech engineering driven still seem to
be very empty what I know best is the ad
industry and actually they're generally
a fairly gregarious bunch and I think
it's return to a pretty acceptable kind
of equilibrium and by the way I don't I
I don't want personally I don't want to
see people in the office 5 days a week
because everybody who's engaged in some
sort of part of the knowledge economy 20
to 40% of your working week is going to
be stuff where you just need to truckle
down choose your own environment and get
on with it and you're much more likely
to be more productive if you have some
degree of discretion over where and when
you work for those tasks that you
perform on your own but there is this
value of what you might call Serendipity
coaching for example
co-creation collaboration which I think
still requires some degree of of of
collocation uh you know it helps to have
people in the same place at the same
time for all kinds of reasons however
what's weird is that the level of
absenteeism if you want I don't want to
call it that but you know what I mean
okay is much much higher in the US and
Canada than it is in the UK okay now I
always Le I well some of it's probably
geographical in the simp simple sense
that there are people who've moved in
other words it's difficult in the UK to
move so far away from the office that
you can't come in for one or two days of
the week you have to choose an island
somewhere you know or or go to Scotland
I
guess um in the US there does seem to
have been a sort of widespread
dispersion of people to a distance away
from their place of work where it's a
away not a train ride away but uh it's
not it's absolutely not what I would
have predicted because if anything the
um the US had a very strong culture of
prism of people effectively getting in
early staying late uh being absolutely
desperate to show their face and the uh
the office occupancy rates are much much
lower in the US and Canada than they are
in in Europe or or the UK one of our
mutual friends uh has a team that works
remotely around the world so they speak
to each other on slack but they don't
see each other in the office and as part
of a team building exercise I think
every so often they bring people
together uh and he thought this would be
brilliant everyone's going to get to
know each other going to become friends
it's going to bond a team together so
much the week after they had this
in-person Meetup separately three people
asked for a pay rise because they all
got together together and had beer and
we're like so what do you want hang on a
second I was told such a because you
don't have that kind of
noncritical conversation if you're just
dealing with people on slack right first
off there's a digital record of it maybe
someone's able to check I don't know can
the admin check slack maybe they can I
don't know uh and secondly it's like
we're just here to do the job this isn't
sort of play around time outside of work
and do you really text the other
marketing guy or whatever after work
about stuff to do with it probably not
no uh so there is from a totally mellian
totalitarian state organization point of
view there is an argument to be made div
Silo off yeah compartmentalize the staff
and then they never know if one of
them's managed to negotiate a pay rise
and the rest of them haven't that
reminds me of an agency back in the
1990s who sent their staff on
assertiveness training and uh they all
came back and half of them resigned oh
God be careful the skills be careful the
skills that you no no be careful what
you wish for it is interesting by the
way because one thing that's
disappointed me is there seems I
expected to see much much greater levels
of investment in really interesting um
remote working
hardware and by which I mean you know
really really good Tech at home there is
a project apparently in the works called
Google Starline which is a kind of 3D
video conferencing which uh there's a
team at Google probably still working on
I hope so
um but you have I mean don't forget you
have a problem now in that offices have
mostly shrunk their footprint they still
aren't kitted out for the frequency of
video calls in other words the number of
private pods in an office is too few the
number of meeting rooms is probably too
many so there's a whole architectural
problem to be addressed uh in terms of
how because um if I had a day with
mostly video calls I'd want to do it at
home because it's easier to do that um
in you know than it is to try and find
the right conditions in an office um the
other point I make is that there are a
lot of things where um it's very
difficult to sell people on the new
Behavior but once they've experienced
the new Behavior the old Behavior seems
ridiculous the example I always gave of
that is um nobody minded buying CDs when
it was the only way you could listen to
music okay you just accepted okay I
don't really want to buy a whole album I
just want to buy a track but you know um
it's just what you do if you buy music
then you had downloads of course the
music industry resisted this furiously
the whole idea of downloading uh even
even to the point of not making it
possible for people to download things
legally and the problem there is once
you'd experienced downloads the CD
seemed suddenly ridiculous and to some
extent we didn't mind commuting in the
same way when we just thought this is
just a necessary part of place you go
it's just work is the place you go to
it's Wednesday it's Friday so I go into
the office office that's the deal um the
time you spent on the train the time you
spent cleaning your teeth and getting up
early and doing your ablutions didn't
feel like a waste of time okay because
it was just what you had to do the
second you've experienced the
alternative which is get out of bed put
a cardigan over your pajamas and click
join meeting all of that kind of pava
suddenly seems twice as painful and I've
got one of those fantastic quooker Taps
that produces boiling water on demand
and it was difficult to persuade my wife
to get one um but once you have one of
those things waiting for a kettle to
boil feels somehow weirdly Victorious
ridiculous and so technology often works
that way that actually um interesting
with electric cars for example the
latest data seems to suggest that
although there's a huge amount of
resistance to electric cars the people
who make the move generally don't go
back once you've actually once you've
kind of gone over that first initial
hurdle of adoption you don't
revert what does that suggest from a
sort of consumer Behavior standpoint
then that there is a kind of price that
needs to be paid up front kind of make
it kind of makes me think that the first
movers within that industry don't
necessarily have the uh best Advantage
because they presumably need to pay the
most money in terms of marketing it
exactly to break not only somebody into
their brand but break them into an
entire new ecosystem of tap of vehicles
often early technology is probably
driven by status seeking rather than
utility so if you think about early
adopters of cars which were unreliable
and expensive the motivation was either
novelty or showing off rather than
utility Apple Vision Pro as Pro would be
exactly the point I I I would argue that
yeah um you want to be the one person in
your street who has that thing um and
actually those earlier adopters do in a
in a weird way pay a price but I mean
there's an argument by the way which is
that this also H happens in nature which
is the argument that birds dinosaurs
conceivably evolved plumage and wings
for sexual display purposes not as a
mode of transportation so in other words
they did this thing as it was a
peacock's tail but it was on the sides
rather than on the back okay and you
could display your feathers as a proof
of your health and magnific
and then so this effectively evolved as
a status signaling mechanism and then
was parlayed into a mode of
transportation because the wings became
big enough to enable them to be used for
it's a mass it's a massive phallic
appendage in one form or another that
they can then fly with so you might
argue that that's true of thing you know
I mean I've always wondered about
Technologies like the
typewriter where I can't really see okay
there's an advantage in legibility over
handwriting but for a period of about 40
or 50 years um people would write a note
this is how it worked in business I'm
not making this up okay in the 70s in
Ogie there was a typing pool uh which
was a lot of people who you would hand
them a handwritten note and they'd type
it up so that you could then send it on
to your client and then typically there
was always a mistake so you then had to
send it back and have it typed there no
word processes then so the whole thing
had to start all over again from
scratch and the question you got to ask
there is was that simply because you
weren't a serious business unless you
sent typewritten communication signaling
in other words if you're you know you
couldn't as a solicitor's firm or as a
you know unever or whatever you couldn't
send handwritten notes because it simply
looked unprofessional so everything had
to be typed now there may have been
something to do with carbon paper and
copying which had some particular role
which made typing desirable but it's an
interesting question because there's
there's not a no one could really
consider that typing added to
productivity quite the opposite it meant
that every communication producing
anything was painful the only benefit it
may have had is it kept the volume of
communication low because it's so
effortful because it was so effortful
whereas email the cost of actually
sending an email to 100 people is far
too low yes because then the burden of
the burden of both filtering and
prioritizing falls on the rece recipient
not on the sender yeah it's a Terri I
mean it's very it does amuse me this
which is there's this hostility to
flexible working which is partly driven
by the suspicion that people might be
enjoying it now okay so it's not really
to do with productivity but there are
people I mean someone someone in my
company I won't name was driven
practically insane by the fact that the
Netflix CEO revealed that there was a
spike in Netflix viewing between 12 and
1 in many countries m Lun time now first
of all it's lunchtime okay you know it's
accepted that people have a break if
they want to chill out by having a
sandwich in front of Netflix rather than
wandering around to Pratt it doesn't
bother me personally but also I would
argue that a lot of people would be much
more productive in work if they started
work early took a three-hour break in
the middle of the day and then worked
later now commuting makes that
impossible to do but I would argue that
your energy levels would be much better
managed if you did take a break in the
middle of the day with the additional
bonus that you'd actually get a bit of
sunlight a bit of Expos pick the kids up
at at the end of that yeah if you're a
scandy okay in the winter you go to work
in the dark you come home in the dark so
effectively your exposure to natural
light is Saturday and Sunday for three
or four hours so that doesn't bother me
the fact that people are actually
choosing if you look at writers you know
the people who professional writers
journalists
novelists they're they're very different
by the way but all of them have sort of
conditions under which they can and
can't write and they vary some people
demand complete silence some people go
to a cafe because they want some
background noise but what these people
clearly know is that they can optimize
their productivity by controlling the
conditions in which they write and it
strikes me as pretty plausible that's
true for other forms of knowledge work
where um some people can't work if
there's any background noise or matter
other people can't work in complete
silence because it Spooks them out I've
known writers who you know if there's
someone operating electric drill 7even
houses down they're incapable of
producing anything there are other
people who are spectacularly disciplined
now it does strike me that you will make
people more productive if you allow them
some degree of autonomy uh to control
the environment in which they produce
their work now I'm not suggesting that's
five days a week but I'm suggesting it
seems to be implausible that um giving
people some degree of autonomy won't
have benefits so but the interesting
thing is if you look at business we've
imposed loads of things on people open
plan offices email okay um slack teams
Etc without any real investigation of
the effect it has on productivity but we
don't really care because the staff
don't really enjoy that so we don't have
to worry about it but the second you
have an experiment where the workforce
seem to welcome it
suddenly oh my God they've gone to
Sainsbury's on Thursday lunchtime well
they're going to have to go to
Sainsbury's at sometime anyway okay um
yes okay they're doing it during
daylight when the store's quiet well if
they're working at 9 till 10: which they
can do because they don't have to get up
at 7:00 in the morning who cares okay
what do you mean when you say that we're
too impatient to be intelligent oh
that's simply a question which is I I I
think it's a wider question
so I mean email which I mentioned
earlier is an interesting case in point
in that it was assumed that there could
be no finer form of communication other
than immediate and
free and we automatically assume that
faster is better and and and one of the
questions I raised which I still think
is a serious question by the way is do
we need slow
AI do we need slow Tinder do we need
slow right move now let me explain just
just what I mean by this which is that
in most processes of
search if you look at consumers what
they do is they refine their preferences
according to what they find out there so
they go into the property Market the
dating Market the holiday market
and they have a set list of preferences
to begin with if you talk to any real
estate agent most people who deal with a
human real estate agent end up buying or
renting a prop property which meets
remarkably few if any of their initial
criteria that's probably true of the
people people marry as well I would
guess that you if you ask someone
effectively to write down put it put it
very simply we think we know what we
want but we don't is probably the
simplest way in which and the way we
discover what we want is by a kind of
exploratory process of discovery where
we explore the market and what's
available and what they cost and what we
experience when having a look at a
particular house or person then refines
our preferences and so this what you
might call the right move approach to
decision making which is Define what you
like we give it to you you buy one of
those okay looks to us as if it's a
perfectly sensible and efficient way of
choosing a
house but actually we don't see what we
don't see actually I was talking to
someone this morning I been not give
away who they are who who discovered
that right move there are areas of
London which are holes in other words
they don't fall into any predefined area
on right move and property prices in
those areas are disproportionately low
because you can't search for any
property that's in that area now it
might be if you're looking for a much
bigger area but in other words in other
words they're not in Kensington they're
not in Notting Hill in other words
they're these weird little islands of
undefined find location where you can
actually find disproportionately cheap
property because right move is blind to
exist wow you also have the problem
which is you can't sell a property
apparently now for £850,000
your estate agent or anybody else will
tell you no no no you've got to make it
say 810 or 9
890 okay that's fine and the reason is
that people search for property either
900,000 and down or 800 ,000 up and two
things happen one they're less likely to
find you at all because you're further
away from their searching Point secondly
if they do find you the people who are
searching 900 and down are a bit
disquieted because they think you're too
cheap and the people who are searching
800 and up think you're a bit too
expensive so the extent to which what
seems like a completely rational
filtration process in online searching
activity or decision making
may be deeply flawed because it doesn't
reflect the way in which we make
decisions in the real world which is we
re-calibrate what we want according to
what we find we'll get back to talking
to Rory in one minute but first I need
to tell you about element for the last 3
years I've started every morning with
element element is a tasty electrolyte
drink
mix with everything that you need and
nothing that you don't each grabbing go
stick contains a science-backed
electrolyte ratio of sodium pottassium
and magnesium with no coloring no
artificial ingredients or any other junk
proper hydration isn't just about
getting sufficient water in you it's
about having the right number of
electrolytes to use the fluids that are
inside of your body you might not be
tired you might not need more caffeine
you might just be dehydrated and proper
hydration requires electrolytes best of
all they have a no questions asked
refund policy with an unlimited duration
so you can buy it and try it for as long
as you want and if you do not like it
for any reason they'll give you your
money back and you don't even need to
return the box that's how confident they
are that you love it this thing tastes
it's phenomenal it's like a sweet salty
orangey nectar first thing in the
morning and I love it and that's why
I've used it for probably a, days now
right now you can get a free sample pack
of all eight flavors with your first box
by going to the link in the description
below or heading to drink LM nt.com slod
wisdom that's drink LM nt.com
slod
wisdom what was that uh parable of three
men getting onto an airplane
the story at the beginning no that's
just a story about how undoubtedly in
all kinds of areas driven partly by
technology what's urgent um crowds out
what's important and it's a joke it's an
old advertising joke told to me by
someone who is literally from the Madmen
era which is you have a copywriter an
art director and an account man okay who
are boarding a plane to present work to
a
client and they open the overhead locker
and somewhat implausibly Genie gets out
and says I've been trapped in that
overhead Locker for years to thank you
all for releasing me I'll give you each
a wish so you can choose anything you
want and they go to the art director who
says I want um I'd like Picasso's life
you know I don't mind my life but I want
Picasso's life the locations the eye the
Artistry uh you know probably the women
folk the Romantic life that's what I
really want and W the art director
disappears and then the genie turns to
the copywriter who goes it's got to be
Heming way you know he enumerates a
whole load of reasons why he'd like to
be able to write and live like Hemingway
and who disappears and then the genie
turns to the account man and says what
about your wish I want those two guys
back I've got an important meeting in
two and a half hours okay and there is
that element where and by the way we
could we could refer to this in
everything from things like the
shareholder value movement to business
quarterly reporting to the extent to
which in
advertising too much money is spent on
shortterm performance advertising and
too little is spent on long-term brand
building and that's not because it's
necessarily more valuable it's because
it delivers measurable results
faster so I'll give you I'll give you a
fundamental problem um the Ft wrote a
very very good article um specifically
about the UK but I think it applies more
widely which is how did customer service
get so
bad now the point is I felt like writing
an article for the ft saying well if you
occasionally acknowledged there was
something interesting about business
other than their quarterly Financial
forecasts maybe the problem wouldn't
have happened if you actually discussed
marketing occasionally or customer
experience or uh you know the value of
repeat business if you looked at
business from the point of view of what
you might call a competition for
customers rather than a competition for
operational efficiencies and cost
cutting maybe we wouldn't have got into
this total [ __ ] storm okay but parking
that rant for a moment um uh what seems
obvious okay if you spend some money on
acquiring customers you can see whether
it's working very quickly and you can
say very confidently we spend X and the
value of the acquired customers was why
let's say you want to make a
corresponding investment in Customer
Loyalty or customer experience in other
words ensuring your existing customers
have a great experience and so they come
back or dealing with problems very well
so that your customers don't
leave generally you could perfectly well
prove that that was
costeffective and indeed my hunch would
be that money spent there would be more
cost effective in many cases than money
spent on
acquisition however it might take you
five years to prove the efficacy of what
you do because it's slower there are
businesses which are fast there are
businesses which are slow there are fast
feedback businesses which you Lear learn
very quickly an example of by the way a
very fast feedback business is comedy
you have an instant feedback mechanism
from the audience which basically tells
you whether or not a joke is any good
and whether you've landed it and so
apparently if you go to small comedy
clubs you'll occasionally be surprised
because you're sitting there and there
only sort of 20 tables and Chris Rock
will come in and effectively it's all a
bit weird but he's trying out his new
material for the next run the ne before
you go to theaters you try your material
out on a small
scale and that's a fast feedback
business Amazon's a pretty fast feedback
business I would argue because it has a
very high degree of frequency of
interaction with customers something
like banking or insurance is
unbelievably slow I mean if you're a
bank and you piss off a customer they
don't even leave by the way they just go
inert okay it's not it's not like people
go I'm going to close my current account
and I'm going to walk off they just open
another current account somewhere else
your current account they don't buy
anything any other products from you but
it's not the same as uh as something
like comedy where you know within
seconds how whether you've landed
something or not and then there are also
things which I which bother me which is
there are also things where I was
talking to the guy who founded AO and
they they have this lovely little system
where when they deliver a washing
machine or a dishwasher or whatever if
there are children in the house because
they deliver things themselves they give
the children a little branded bear
okay now as he said perfectly right you
know someone in finance is going to say
okay what's the cost benefit analysis
okay on that and his point is it's
impossible you just have to make a
judgment subjective
judgment that uh the cost of the bear is
Trivial and the long-term effect is
likely to be quite High what's that
thing about the Bezos has got uh when
anecdotes disagree with data most of the
time trust the yeah yeah yeah I mean the
interesting thing with is he he's he's
going to I mean this is true of all
those people I mean you know uh the sort
of also very true of Elon Musk they have
a very unusual sometimes highly
seemingly irrational thinking style um
speaking to someone who is very senior
early on at Amazon everybody except
Bezos hated the idea of Amazon Prime
they hated the idea of Prime video um uh
they didn't like the idea of Amazon web
services now Jeff has an interesting
notion which is what he calls a two-way
door if you talk to people by the way at
Amazon it's a very very interesting I'm
not sure I could cope with it to be
Absol the honest but it is a very very
interesting culture in terms of its
approach to everything from meetings to
decision-making what a two-way door is
is something where you can walk through
the door and if you don't like what you
see you can walk back so a one-way door
would be deciding to build a sort of 2
million square foot Distribution Center
North of Memphis okay once you've built
that it's difficult not impossible but
it's difficult to reverse the decision
there you actually depend on a large
degree of decision- making riger and
rationality you know and you need a
really rigorous case but in other cases
Jeff would say it's a two-way door try
it if it works whoop D do that's great
if it doesn't work we simply stop doing
it and to be honest the trial possibly
cost less than we would have spent just
arguing about it if we were adopting a
kind of purist uh approach and I think
it is important
because why I think this is becoming
vitally important is most business is
probabilistic but everybody in business
wants to prove and pretend that it's
deterministic so every spreadsheet is in
some ways an act of pretense because
it's past information which you pretend
has wonderful predictive value as if
it's kind of ll's demon but it really
doesn't okay cuz weird [ __ ] happens out
of nowhere all the
time and you have this fundamental
problem I think where I think what
distinguishes someone like Jeff is
they're probabilistic thinkers they just
go well look it probably won't work but
if it does it will be spectacular and
they are in a position where they can
take those decisions in their defense
most people I think first of all most
people are promoted within business for
their aptitude in solving reductionist
deterministic problems how do you
optimize this particular there's number
in the far right hand column of a
spreadsheet somewhere next to a person's
name that says that was green this year
they made the number absolutely right
yeah and actually by the way they they
probably in most cases in business you
capture remarkably few of the Gaines
from a bold
decision whereas you capture 100% of the
blame if it goes wrong correct yeah so
so certain decisions decisions which are
what you might call you know low chance
of success ESS huge
return that's when people leave a
business and become an entrepreneur
because they realize that there's no
point in actually doing those kind of
things within a business because if
things do well you get a pat on the back
and you know and a bonus if things go
badly you lose your job speaking of
things going badly Jaguars Rebrand what
do you reckon um now I'm in a small
minority of people who would argue that
before you criticize what someone does
you've got to understand what they're
trying to do
and they have been completely forthright
about the fact they expect to lose all
but 15% of their customers all but 15%
of their customers exactly of their
customers by moving to a much more
upmarket uh expensive car uh on an
electric
platform
and the argument I might make is
that normally what they did is aema to
anybody who loves what you might call
Brand maintenance and brand management
because but by the way they didn't
change their name okay they didn't call
the car Zog they still call it Jaguar
they still contrary to rumors have kept
the leaping cat Motif
Etc
but what they've done is a very very
bold kind of okay in a sense it's look
bet the farm here okay either we do this
we we either succeed in which case great
or if we fail to be honest we heading
for disaster anyway because you got to
be slightly careful this is where uh you
know uh okay when Dylan went electronic
okay someone shouted Judas the crowd in
the Manchester free trade Hall
absolutely hated it Jaguar purists are
going to hate anything by the way I've
had six Jags by the way so I'm you know
I'm I'm a loyal Jag Enthusiast I I love
the brand and in many ways I love a lot
of the Heritage about that
brand but equally I love red telephone
boxes but I don't think it should be the
BT logo okay I love you know what it GES
Gilbert Scotts designed for red
telephone boxes but I'm also cognizant
of the fact that I don't make many calls
from payones anymore and I like berbery
Max but I'm also cognizant of the fact
that because of various things like uh
you know Central Heating and Uber not
many people wear macintoshes anymore you
know apart from Americans and flashers
in my experience I was saying this the
other day
now there are occasions
where you might argue that
electrification completely reshapes the
competitive landscape for any car brand
or any car
manufacturer and that what you have to
do is a fairly dramatic pivot I'm I'm
going to join you there get that in you
abely not enough stimulant in US exactly
um
the there are cases kid a for example
where bands produce an album that kind
of alienates their existing fan base
okay you might argue that for Jaguar
this was a kind of Sergeant Pepper
moment okay where we've got you know
fundamentally we've got to do am I right
there was a sort of pet sound Sergeant
Pepper interplay going on which was who
was were they on some trajectory toward
slow motion or relevance was that where
they were going the problem with jangu
is lots of people loved the brand but
the people who loved the brand didn't
necessarily buy Jaguars from new in
particular right and the new car buyer
is a pretty Niche audience to begin
with I thought the ad was deeply weird
it wasn't produced by an ad agency by
the way um it was someone said it was
less a branding exercise than a
debranding exercise you might make the
contrary position which is that it got
millions and millions of people all over
the world talking about
Jaguar yeah I mean hadn't happened for
years now you know I'm not I'm not one
of those people any publicity is good
publicity that emphatically is not true
okay um
however it did signal the fact and by
the way it's not as if Jaguar hasn't
done this before okay that a big change
was a foot and that something remarkable
was going to emerge and the new car by
the way which we've only just seen this
morning just for people listening I
haven't seen it what is it um it's high
it's highly polarizing it's an
extraordinarily bold design I personally
like it it seems to come in two colors
Miami pink and London blue okay and the
idea of a pink Jaguar is um
transgressive heretical exactly yeah uh
I don't know whether you saw their
Twitter was replying to people that were
criticizing the campaign whoever it is
in the marketing department they're
being very
um non-apologetic about what they were
doing we don't care about what it was
before this is a New Era etc etc you
know really no uh as or Graces about
trying to bring along the Heritage or be
in mind they have got an advantage now
if you look at it from the the mindset
of a game theorist okay if you're a
volume car maker electrification is
godamn terrifying it's Kay Christensen
and the innovators dilemma because
you've got this huge sunk cost in both
expertise and plant in producing
internal combustion engine cars you have
this incredible engineering head
Heritage which you know don't get me
wrong I love that stuff I love steam
trains okay I love red telephone boxes I
love driving gloves e types you know
girls from Lucy Clayton being taught how
to get in and out of an e type without
showing your pants okay which apparently
was something that finishing schools
taught in the 1960s all of that Heritage
is
wonderful but when technology comes in I
mean okay Blackberry purists okay this
is this is you know this is a kind of
Rim moment where electrification
fundamentally changes what it means to
be a great car because probably
reliability assuming the software
doesn't go wonky is going to be pretty
damn good okay now I I I recently had a
bit of an issue where somebody said
electric cars are expensive and I kind
of went
well kind of depends doesn't it because
an electric scoda will be more expensive
currently than a petrol
scoda but in perform performance and
quietness and you know and driving
Dynamics and efficiency and you know the
the electric scoda is probably more akin
to a petrol Audi than it is to a petrol
scoda and the guy I met who's the kind
of Electric Car Guru at Wired Magazine
was asking this very same question which
is okay you've got a bunch of Engineers
you got a bunch of you know if you think
about it the people who hated Dylan
going electronic were folk people
I rather like folk music but it doesn't
really exist anymore does it okay I me
you know you get the odd little so he
saw the writing on the wall but got
shouted out for having been ahead of the
Cur Dylan had seen the writing on the
wall and decided okay and someone shouts
Judas at him I don't believe you play it
[ __ ] loud as he replies right
now um You Might argue that jangu has
had a bit of a Dylan
moment which is look the things that
made us great at Lon or in the age of
Mike Hawthorne fundamentally what the
hell is a car in 2030 2040 when pretty
much any car can deliver all the
performance and indeed the quietness
that a normal driver would hope
for okay um and the wired guy asked the
question is it going to be all about
Interiors is it going to be all about
design is it going because okay how do
you comp very simple tough question for
Jagua Land Rover is we've got Chinese
competition we're never going to kind of
undercut them given labor costs all the
other costs that apply how on Earth do
we carve out a niche for ourselves in
this new future now for a small car
manufacturer and a small volume
manufacturer Jaguars making about 60,000
a year okay they do have one advantage
which is they can completely pivot and
start all over
again uh whereas um a large volume car
maker has to manage this incredibly
painful trans transition complex supply
chain Etc you know there's a whole
German get R you know which supplies you
know fan belts and weird bits all of
that goes because I mean this is one
thing by the way which I think we all to
say about electric cars which I think is
missed by a lot of
people which is that if you look at a
petrol engine which is you know it's a
cathedral it's a magnificent achievement
a really Advanced you know petrol engine
all of those things that move and Rattle
and bump and filter things and need to
be replaced and and the gearbox and all
that stuff all of those things exist for
only one reason which is to rotate a
shaft to provide form forward movement
okay now I'm team Faraday here because
the way an electric motor works is you
put electricity in it rotates which
explains why with a possible exception
of your lawnmower every single rotating
moving thing in your house uses
electricity as the Motive Power not
petrol okay you know there is a
wonderful advertisement by the way which
was done I think for I think it was
either Renault I think it was the
Renault the first electric Renault which
is equivalent to the Nissan Leaf where
they simply showed someone getting up in
the morning and their what would have
been their electric toothbrush was
actually powered by a little gasoline
engine they shaved and there were sort
of fumes coming out of their Raaz that's
very good okay and it made that very
simple point that nearly everything else
in your life has gone electric it was
only a matter of time before Battery
Technology driven actually probably by
the mobile phone industry made this
possible uh for the car I mean by the
way Henry Ford and Edison worked
together on an electric car it's
interesting the uh resistance that
people have especially around Vehicles
you know I guess second to a house a car
is a it's a type of identifier in a way
it's status symbol it's probably uh in
terms of purchasing uh it's it's going
to be second largest in terms of your
your capital expenditure you notice by
the way when you go back at North that
Northerners have nicer cars than
Southerners do why do you think that is
um their houses are less expensive um
right oh but the price is the same of a
jaguar in Newcastle as a jaguar in you
get this extraordinary phenomenon in in
London which really depresses me which
and I've known people like this who
literally have a 1.2 million house and
a, car F [ __ ]
it pains the I mean come on you know I
mean the car is a much greater thing
than the hous is looked at as a piece of
technology okay you know um you are you
a car fan or are you one of these weird
people who just like young people Ubers
around the place so I have
single-handedly kept Uber liquid in Aus
Texas um but no I have a I think it I I
said to you last year I was threatening
to get a Camaro and sure enough I did at
the start of this year yeah the only way
that I can non-ironically buy an
American muscle car is when I live in
Texas with an American driving license
you just need it to fit in correct well
yeah I mean it's part for the C you know
if somebody drives somebody drives an
American pickup truck a Ford Raptor or
whatever the equivalent a ranger I think
they call it over here if somebody
drives that over here you feel like
they're cosplaying if somebody drives It
in America you think that's that's cute
compared to the tundra next to you and
the six the six bed whatever there's a
Ford F 350 I think it might be a 450
isn't there as well goes all the way up
dude in in Texas there's ones where you
know some guy will happily throw his
kids in the and take them to the park on
a Saturday morning or pull what appears
to be an articulated Lorry behind him on
a Monday morning like he very versatile
in that way big motor home yet that
would that would be one of my
Temptations If I moved to Texas RV would
be would be quite nice um one of the
thing that I've been thinking about
since I've been staying here I'm at the
Royal Garden Hotel in Kensington and uh
on the front door there's maybe two or
three Dorman uh and it it's not so much
of a at least the places that I tend to
stay in America it seem to be so much of
a uh a trait yet over here it could be
replaced I've heard you talk about this
before it could be replaced with an
opening door it could be replaced with a
series of sensors and buttons and
switches but it's not necessarily about
that it's about the experience of the
doorman being outside what you're doing
there is the old Consulting trick of you
define the doorman in terms that make
him most amenable to automation so you
get go function of Dorman opening door
replace the Dorman with uh an infrared
automatic door mechanism lay claim to
the savings um but an awful lot of
Consulting activity do you know
management consulting firms engage in
this thing which is called um gain
sharing now I cannot believe that anyone
in a company would sign up to this
agreement because it's appalling where
they effectively say we will effectively
Define the costs we have saved you and
we want you to pay us a proportion of
the cost savings which we identify but
as Roger Martin says any idiot can cut
costs the real skill comes in cutting
costs without actually losing long-term
Revenue as a
consequence and so short-term cost
cutting is dangerously easy this is
where I come back to that point of we're
too impatient to be intelligent that
intelligence and wisdom is slow whereas
seeming logic is fast you can seemingly
logically replace the dman with a uh
automatic door opening device what
you're failing to notice is the
other tacit and um uh
subtle uh human functions which are
dormant which might be recognition
hailing taxis also security okay you
know basically you know you don't want
drunkards sleeping in your entrance to
your hotel um that and and and simply
maintaining the status of the hotel that
arriving at a hotel which is notionally
a five-star hotel and kind of you know
just being met with an automatic door
even very fancy automatic Americans have
come to a l Americans want a London
hotel okay if you take American or or
for that matter Asian tourists they want
London to be a bit londony with a guy on
a top hat okay A friend of mine booked
some friends from Los Angeles in the
hemple hotel which was um I don't think
it exists anymore it was in baywater but
it was kind of like an LA hotel which is
in London W2 and they were gutted these
Los angelinos and they were very cool
people right but they said if I come to
London I want horse brasses I want
hunting prints okay and so there are all
these nuances which I think are very
very easy to lose because costs are
quantifiable and instantaneous and
opportunity costs lost opportunities
lost Revenue that's slow and it's
generally hard to actually quantify a
lovely story about this which I I I
wrote about actually in The Spectator
but people won't mind hearing it once
more I hope um I'm I'm driving along
this Jill carriageway the Welsh borders
and we wanted to buy some milk and the
motorway service station appeared to be
closed all the lights were off the kind
of you know the petrol fuel logo was off
the fuel prices were off it looked you
know like as I said like the baits Motel
it was completely kind of unlit and my
wife said I'll bugger it's closed we
know we needed to buy her bloody
lactofree milk cuz she's convinced she
has lactose intolerance but um uh I said
no hold on a second I remember going
there on Christmas
Day I'm sure that a place that opens on
Christmas Day wouldn't close at 7:00 in
the evening let's just go in anyway and
sure enough we find a fully functioning
24-hour store um with I think you know
might have been a Starbucks or something
as well or a Burger King and we're the
only
customers it's hardly surprising we're
the only customers because everybody
else on the road it looks like the place
is
closed so I go up to the guy behind the
tilling you I'm a marketing person
you're pissing away Revenue here this is
insane there are you know every every 10
minutes there are three cars driving
past going oh [ __ ] you're clothes so I
got up to the
guy why are the lights off on the on the
road I goes oh yeah I think the guy on
the last shift like forgot to turn them
on okay turn [ __ ] you know there was
no urgency now it occurred to me when I
left and the lights were still off when
I left okay if that guy had nicked a
lion bar at 2:00 in the morning and
being picked up on CCTV right there
would have been a kind of inquiry you
know he might have lost his job there
would been extreme disciplinary action
cost of the lion bar is about you know1
pound uh in Lost Revenue okay the cost
of leaving the lights off is probably
certainly in Revenue terms
200,000 that night could have be more
okay but sins of emission are much Le
dogs that don't bark in the night are
much much less easy to identify than
sins of commission and we
correspondingly get much less upset by
them and so what do you often end up
doing is there are a lot of things like
giving a soft toy to someone when you
deliver their tumble dryer it's I mean
no no nobody would can you imagine a
world I'd love this world but I can't
really imagine it where someone goes
what you mean you deliver you deliver
things to people with kids and you don't
give them some branded mer MH MH okay
are you serious what a [ __ ] idiot the
anchoring and set point that we have but
but no if you if if for some reason you
know there was a cost attached to
something as opposed to so opportunity
cost Finance people basically pretend
opportunities aren't there because
they're too nebulous as far as they're
concerned to pay any attention to but
then you wonder why companies aren't
growing and the reason is because
they're fixated on the efficient
performance of what they're already
doing and completely uninterested in
what they're missing out on trust really
is everything when it comes to
supplements a lot of brands may say they
top quality but few can actually prove
it which is why I partnered with
momentus they make the highest quality
supplements on the planet three of the
products that I use to support my brain
body and sleep every day are Omega-3s
creatine and magnesium al38 honestly I
try and limit the number of supplements
that I rely on but when I take these
consistently they have a massive impact
on my cognitive performance my strength
and my sleep momentus are literally
unparalleled when it comes to rigorous
third party testing what you read on the
label is what's in the product and
absolutely Ely nothing else best of all
they have a 30-day money back guarantee
so you can buy it and try it for 29 days
and if you do not love it they will give
you your money back plus they ship
internationally right now you can get
20% off everything sitewide plus that
30-day money back guarantee by going to
the link in the description below are
heading to liv.com wisdom and using the
code modern wisdom a checkout that's L
IV M O M ENT us.com wisdom and modern
wisdom a checkout talk to me about this
uh the problem with seeking Solutions
through addition rather than subtraction
thing that you've been on
recently that that's an interesting
observation which is that some we have
an automatic default when we want to
solve a problem that we add things
rather than removing
them um there is actually a very good
point I think Nim made this point when
Elon was appointed the was it the
director of government efficiency where
he said quite rightly you should be the
director of government Effectiveness
because it's perfectly impossible to do
things very efficiently which you
shouldn't be doing at all and that's a
Peter duer quote which is I think it's
nothing nothing's more wasteful or
stupid than to see something done
efficiently that shouldn't be done at
all and undoubtedly I think there
are um particularly among things which
are ostensibly well-intentioned
okay we never asked the question would
we be better off if we just got rid of
this entirely
and so there's a great quote from
cybernetics a guy called Stafford beers
where the quote is the purpose of the
system is what it does which is quite a
lot of systems quite a lot of you know
quite a lot of bureaucracy has this
ostensible purpose which is entirely
praiseworthy and
worthwhile and so we actually attach
much less scrutiny to that kind of thing
than we do to something that's actually
selfish I mean you know one thing about
being a commercial company as people go
what's in it for them okay what do they
get out of this I'm suspicious this is
too good to be true I'm not really
comfortable with this you know we we
deploy quite rightly you know High
degrees of skepticism towards the
private sector because we want to know
what they're up to now to some
extent if you're working in for example
something that's altruistic or
charitable we suspend that level of
skepticism we go oh so well intentioned
isn't it brilliant okay okay oh they're
working for so and so isn't that great
now it's nonetheless perfectly possible
that the ultimate consequences of that
well-intentioned action first of all
it's possible that the motivation isn't
nearly as as wholesome as we may like to
think
um uh but secondly it's also possible
that just because something's well
intentioned doesn't mean the
consequences are necessarily positive or
benign and so I mean there is
undoubtedly a really interesting
question of what should we what what
should we stop doing I mean I'm very
interested one of the reasons I'm very
interested in flexible work is it occurs
to me that companies looked at in one
way are actually very inefficient I I
tried to get I did actually get our
finance department I said yeah forget
about the usual method of financial
reporting okay how much does a client
have to pay us in fee income in order
for my younger colleague and by the way
the fact that they're younger is
relevant because they're uh they're not
kind of vested in the property Market as
someone my age is okay in order for my
younger colleague to go out and have a
curry and what you look at is the client
pays us then there are various overheads
and costs and there's HR and finance and
there's office space and there's all
that other expense okay then finally the
money trickles down to the salary of the
person actually doing the work once the
kind of landlord has taken their cut and
the shareholders have taken their cut
and everything else trickles down to my
colleague then from that incremental
amount of money 40% will probably go in
tax okay then of the remainder 40% maybe
50% will go in housing costs and
transportation costs commuting cost so
it works out that in order to buy my
colleague you know you know a trip to
the coin all okay a client has to give
us about 250 Quinn now my argument is if
you could get rid of all that [ __ ] and
just do the work on
Zoom
okay in other words in other words the
people this this seems to be an
extraordinary extent to which you know
in large organizations the people who
are who are creating the value the
people who are doing the real
work I mean it's amazing that capitalism
functions are tall when you look at the
extent to which you know money goes in
and then incidental costs particularly
property I'm georgist okay particularly
you know property costs chip chip ship
away at all of that and so the actual
incentive for the person to perform
valuable work and the reward they
receive for it has mostly disappeared
you talking about feedback loops earlier
on the feedback loop is so slow and it's
so molested from what what goes into to
what actually comes out the amount of
time you're on 30 days you're on 60 days
you're on 60 days from the end of the
month you got it
this the big problem uh on the back end
for instance with um uh podcasting
platforms so YouTube has gamified not
only for the audience but also for the
creators you have this little number
that's one of 10 so it Compares where
this video is now since published in
terms of the duration of time 30 minutes
an hour two hours however long with
other videos and it tells you where it
ranks first of 10 wow this is better
than your last 10 videos at the same
amount of time at the same period after
exactly now obviously some things are
slow burn and some things are up
afterward but generally it's a pretty
good indication so it's pretty good
indicator it you do get the sort of sh
Shank Redemption phenomenon don't you it
kicks in it kicks in toward the end but
you don't have that you don't have that
on uh Spotify you don't have that on
Instagram you don't have that on most
other platforms because they're not
quite as creat of focused and uh yeah
the the power of feedback loops is is
[ __ ] unbelievable speaking of the you
mentioned there um some inefficiencies
within the system and some changes to do
with Britain obviously two million
people just signed a petition to we are
disgruntled with Mr starma Sir starma uh
we want to make some changes there we've
seen a lot of sort of turmoil and stuff
across this year generally 2024 in the
UK what do you make of the state of sort
of British culture the milu that we're
in at the moment I did make the joke
that um voting labor and having a
Chancellor who's come from the bank of
England is a bit like going on a club 18
30 holiday and taking a parents along
which it kind of defeats the object of
the exercise a bit in that one of you
know one of the things I I think we
would like to see as voters and I'm
perfectly happy to give this government
a you know uh uh uh you I think I think
you have to give the people the benefit
of a few years before you get pissy
about it I mean that is EV I'll be
interested to know who's signing that
petition is it people on the left who
are just disappointed is it reform
voters is it conservatives I don't know
um who who is it who feels most kind of
cheated
um I mean you've got to remember that
there are an awful lot of people who
didn't vote for them if you consider the
size of their majority okay they've got
a massive majority but the share of the
popular vote was fairly I'm not sure if
you can be disgruntled with somebody
that you didn't vote for um well it's
interesting who who's demanding a kind
of uh you know run again
um some of the things interest me
because we kind of I think a lot of
people know that uh there's fundamental
inequity intergenerational
inequity uh which is because salaries
are taxed very highly and wealth
particularly capital gains from your
main property are barely taxed at
all and that leads to I think a kind of
absurdity which is that one one piece
written about this is it's not actually
intergenerational inequality that's the
problem
it's going to be intragenerational
inequality when people start inheriting
houses or not inheriting houses because
you can literally have the situation
where you can work incredibly hard for
30 years and reach a um a position of
some Eminence in a business or in an
institution and because your parents
happen to live in an area of low house
prices or didn't own a house at all
you're still living somewhere crap
whereas your underlings you know whose
parents lived in ceton or Kensington or
whatever it may be okay are basically
swanning swanning around in palaces
going on cruises all the time and it
that does strike me as a fundamental
flaw that we've created the system where
unearned income which is not really
particularly meritocratic or inherited
income is treated incredibly generously
whereas earned income I think the top if
I'm right is it the top 5% of taxpayers
pay 50% or 60% of all income tax so in
America it may be the same here too
probably the same here I mean that's by
the way it's a kind of statistical
artifact you generally you you usually
find those power law effects so it's not
quite as weird as it sounds but
nonetheless that is quite weird when you
think about it now one thing I thought
was extraordinarily interesting as an
idea is you you know that chap who who
was it who wrote the trading game Gary
St Gary Stevenson he makes a very valid
Point okay whatever whatever else you
think which is that nearly all economic
models use single representative agents
to populate the models which is they
assume that the person whom they're
trying to optimize for is an average of
everybody and as a consequence
inequality doesn't feature in those
models because you're simply dealing
with an average and
so if Bill Gates walks into a football
stadium everybody in the football
stadium is actually a millionaire
suddenly on average okay it's not it's
simply not a reliable thing to
do and one of the things that strikes me
as as genuinely horrific is the extent
to which I think the tax system is kind
of gont tohil in that uh you know there
are huge huge concessions in terms of
Pensions that are given out huge
concessions in terms of Inherited
property huge concessions in terms of
capital gains and existing
property you also get this utter
absurdity which fascinates me which is
that
um uh there are five bedroom four
bedroom houses which have one or two
pensioners knocking around in them
nothing wrong with that you might argue
except those pensioners are often
skint okay now it's a weird kind of way
of being a millionaire that you live in
a massive house that you don't entirely
need now by the way if if you simply
saved a hell of a lot of money and you
just like living in a big [ __ ] off house
well you can argue that's kind of you
know you're entitled to that but you
literally get people living in these
extraordinary houses who are you know
going to little and worried about the
price of lemons yeah okay pretty weird
if someone told you and you're a kid
you're going to be a millionaire one day
but you're going to be really worried
about where you buy lemons you'd think
this is a pretty weird what's that I
mean one one great idea Roger L Martin's
idea is that you should at the moment
you get your first 10,000 or whatever it
is of your annual salary is taxfree
every year Roger El Martin a Canadian
proposed that that should be a lifetime
tax allowance 50,000 the first $250,000
Canadian dollars you earn in your life
is taxfree after which the tax system
kicks in now that would be
extraordinarily beneficial to younger
people who need the money more and who
could build up some actually you don't
need that much in the way of savings to
I mean one of the interesting things
about the benefits to wealth um is that
there are inflection
points uh you know that first house
deposit you know well actually having
£5,000 you can call on in a crisis is a
really really I me you know is a really
really big difference it fundamentally
changes what people can do I me very
interesting thing when I first went to
America I was I think I was 29
roughly and I remember thinking I'm glad
I never came here when I was
skinned okay it's a bad it's a bad
country to be po it's a terrible country
in which not to have $10,000 sitting
there correct you know um you know one
bad thing goes wrong and suddenly you're
you know you're in Le worth doing a nine
stretch you know right and so you know
so so there are these inflection points
where you can take people you know one
of them I always think is that when you
start earning a bit above median income
you notice that actually it's quite nice
because things are priced for people who
are a bit poorer than you you know um
televisions for example flat screen TVs
let's be honest okay let's imagine that
flat screen TVs cost five grand okay we
both would have bought one by now but we
don't have to pay five grand because
they're priced for sale to people who
earn a lot less than we
do and so you know there are I think
there are these interesting inflection
points in earnings and now what's really
interesting by the way and this
fascinates me is the extent to
which
pre2 20
the only real point of negotiation with
your employer was how much they paid you
because it was assumed that you worked a
5 day week it was assumed that you came
into an office or some other place of
work uh for 5 days and that you had you
had hours and you had um a place those
were nonv variables and the only
variable was your salary now to what
extent will people start to practice
lifestyle Arbitrage which is to say well
I could work for gber Sachs in London
for 2 something whatever but actually
120,000 in Lisbon okay and a pretty good
broadband connection earning in pounds
and spending in pesos spending in and
the number of people who might simply I
mean by the way that applies within the
UK you know there are a load of people
you live in Newcastle and get a 10 times
the house s thing actually my daughter
went to Newcastle University adors the
city quite rightly and I've been up
there it's fantastic you you know that b
than I do okay it's a glorious place
which gets the balance I think he gets a
lot of things absolutely right in terms
of the kind of Yin and Yang of of of a
city you know it's manageable in size
but it's not boring remotely boring it
has beautiful architecture but it also
has utility and it's got a coast okay um
my daughter actually said she said the
tragedy is in a way I didn't really want
to move to London which is bloody
expensive if I could have persuaded six
of my University friends to stay in
Newcastle we all would have tragedy of
the commons you the tragedy of the
commons which is that you're forced to
go along
with this kind of majority consensus you
also can be on the winner takes all
effect you can be on the receiving end
of that too though you can benefit from
that which I have been in Austin why
does any scene appear anywhere any scene
appears anywhere because people go no
one's really too sure why and because
people go more people go and then before
you know it you've got the the hottest
new place I supp it was Rogan in Austin
was it he made he made one of the big
but before him was uh Lex Friedman I
think before Lex was Michael malice
before him was or Marcus you know you've
got you to track it back to wherever you
want and now everybody has a a [ __ ]
second holiday home from Jason kalakanis
coming over from you know investor Bay
West Coast [ __ ] world to come and
now live on a ranch wear a cowboy hat so
yeah it's uh is it you know can I be
really mous here get it in okay and I
always thought this is why Brits like
living in La which is that secretly
everybody over the age of 35 wants to
live in Suburbia okay correct but in
London it's just not cool okay I mean if
I took my younger colleagues I couldn't
get them to move to Bromley if I put a
gun to their head secretly I suspect
they want a little bit of you know a bit
of lawn and a bit of a place to park a
car yes oh so you've got you've got a
blend of La it's totally cool to live in
a Suburban house isn't it same that's
where everybody Liv same in Austin uh
honestly the the suburbs the olden style
suburbs so what's up north which is the
domain is kind of a soulless hellscape
that was created for people that work at
tech companies to not have to go far to
go to the office uh but when you're few
things it was also built after the
invention of the car yeah so the
distance from the center matters a lot
less um by the way it should have I'm
I'm I don't normally criticize the US um
but you could you should create
High-Speed Rail to someone like San
Antonio shouldn't you you could link a
couple of places I think the the the
rumor is that Austin in San Antonio
growing at such a clip that they're
going to merge into one huge mega City
eventually you know it's only
without traffic I think it's only 50
minutes is from sort of the edge of one
to the edge of another and when you
think about we've got this land we might
as well expand it um oh you've got
another advantage in Austin which is
interesting because you saw in the
property crash of 2008 you saw very
dramatic property crashes in Vegas
Phoenix Austin and the reason is uh
they're unusual in that they're not on a
lake and they're not on a coast and so
they can expand in four directions which
I know that sounds San Francisco can't
okay if you're on a kind of peninsul why
how does that impact the price uh
because simply there's four times as
much land actually more than that
because area expands at the square of
distance so you've only got to go a mile
from the a mile further out and you get
uh you know what is it the square of the
the square of the distance [ __ ] T more
land okay so there isn't really much
scarcity combine that with the fact that
they were designed for the car so you I
mean I love Phoenix is fantastic because
they actually synchronize all the they
probably do this in Austin they
synchronize the traffic lights so when
you drive in at night you can ride the
Green Wave have you done this well I
certainly know the way that traffic
flows work that if you hit a red light
you're more likely to hit subsequent red
lights but that's it right okay I
thought that was there's something
called riding the Green Wave where
there's if you obey the speed limit you
can basically keep going through that's
only if you hit the first green though
if you hit the first red you think for
every one that I'm going to hit and we
only a massive muscle car won't be will
obiously try and go as quickly as
possible this episode is brought to you
by function staying on top of your
health requires more than just an annual
physical which is why I partnered with
function they run lab tests twice a year
that track over a 100 biomarkers and
monitor for early signs of thousands of
diseases they even screen for 50 types
of cancer at stage one which is five
times more data than you get from an
annual physical you receive insights
from expert Physicians who provide a
detailed written clinician summary of
their observations and phone
consultations for any critical findings
plus Dr Andrew hubman is their
scientific adviser and Dr Mark Heyman is
their chief medical officer so you can
trust that the data and insights you
receive are as scientifically sound as
they are actionable getting these lab
tests done would usually cost thousands
but with function it is only $500
they've got a $300,000 person waight
list but every Monday they open a few
spots for modern wisdom listeners right
now you can discover where your health
stands by going to the link in the
description below or heading to function
health.com slod wisdom that's function
health.com
modern wisdom just going back to the UK
for a second let's say that starma
brought you in or whoever it is that
does tourism brought you into to improve
UK culture sort of tourist destination
type thing have you got any sort of
branding or psychological interventions
which would maybe be low cost that could
make the UK more attractive across the
board for tourists yeah for tourists or
for people to stay we've got the you
know second in the world the UK is
second in the world for millionaire
exits in 2024 China [ __ ] literal
Communist dictatorship author Arian
hellscape was first with about between
you got to you got to watch the Super
Rich because the super rich don't give a
[ __ ] about democracy okay because they
can capture power using money y rather
than using rights and the super rich I
mean if you look at Dubai which has done
a fantastic job of effectively saying um
we're just going to make this place
unbelievably attractive for wealthy
people to live here in terms of low
taxes okay uh very low crime rate okay
uh you have um uh cheap labor which rich
people really love you know most of us
are you know uh you know in other words
you get lots of people doing stuff for
you so the service industry is are
fantastic and to be honest very rich
people aren't that bothered about being
able to vote because they only get one
vote which is the same as the you know
the teacher down the street why would I
want something I can't have more of than
somebody else yeah so it doesn't
surprise me by the way that actually
very rich people are often quite drawn
to authoritarian spaces because they
don't suffer the
downside okay but but they gain you know
in some respects they they can profit
from the upside China lost about 13 to
15,000 this year the UK lost 10,000 is
millionaires leaving but we have 3% of
the population of China we have about 5%
of the population of India and more
millionaires left the UK second in the
world in millionaire exits we have the
same number of universities in the top
10 as America do but only 20% of the
number of startup Founders and
entrepreneurs so why what what is it
that's going on and one thing you could
do and the Portuguese are playing this
game I mean a lot of people have I mean
I had an interesting conversation okay
which is that the where people spend
wealth is increasingly I think slightly
undesirably okay uh being detached from
where people earn it now in you know I
grew up in the Welsh valleys my Scottish
ancestors moved down to South Wales
because it was the new buy of the late
19th century coal money it was it it was
actually you know it was actually you
know booming I mean my great-grandfather
I think moved down to Edinburgh
intending to join from a Croft intending
to join the police force and uh was told
um don't bother here South Wales is
where you need to go to make money but
the people including the coal owners
lived somewhere within they didn't live
in next to the mine but they lived
somewhere within the proximity of that
thing I remember my grandmother who's
not remotely left wing okay quite the
opposite standing on Cardiff station
looking around and by the way Cardiff
was a lot Grimmer than back then this
was in the 70s that it is now it's
rather nice now lovely okay and saying
just think of the money that's been made
here and spent in more exotic places I
always remember that it was a kind
strangely kind of socialistic sentiment
from a pretty right-wing grandmother and
what you see and I remember having this
conversation with people who are
responsible for investing Kent and I
said to be honest it doesn't really
matter whether you attract businesses to
Kent if you can get people who earn
money in London to come and live in Kent
and their families all spend their money
here
okay that's good
enough and so when you have this
Detachment of where people make money
and where people spend it one thing the
Portuguese are doing they're they're
proposing lower tax rates for people
under 30 they're proposing these Nomad
visas uh Lisbon very cool very
attractive City likewise Porto
um you know attracts people who like
kite surfing and other excitement
Italy's got this new flat tax you pay
100 Grand and that's all the tax that
you pay for the entire year that's a new
one from them so I mean we don't seem
now the other thing you can do is just
make the place one hell of an
entertaining place now I've always
argued I can't get anybody to disagree
with this I don't think pubs cafes and
restaurants should be should pay rates
or taxes because they're actually a
social space when you spend money this
this is interesting which is that
economics holds it as kind of this is an
this is my Gary
Ste which is as well as these kind of
single representative agent models which
don't understand inequality and you know
but by the way really bad inequality is
bad for everybody it's bad for the very
rich okay you want people the ideal
place in which you live is one in which
you're surrounded by a few people who
are richer than you and quite a few
people who are a bit poorer than you but
not they cause a ton of Havoc no well
it's not it's not just a Havoc you want
actually social spaces to be roughly
commen with where you were cohesive and
if you if you live in a place where you
have 10 rich people okay and everybody
else is massively poor the 10 rich
people got nowhere to go to eat there's
a fascinating study that came out of
Australia Candace Blake did this they
correlated wealth inequality with
self-objectification as measured by sexy
selfies online and wealth inequality is
positively correlated the level of
inequality within a local ecology is
positively correlated with sexy selfies
but men are women or both just women
just women yeah so self-objectification
self beautification sexy selfies online
is positively correlated with inequality
what's their explanation for that for
proposed mechanism is that in a high
wealth inequality uh environment women
can see not only how high they can climb
but how low they could fall with the
potential partner so the effort you have
to make in terms of Botox and all the
rest of it there's a very interesting
theory about that which is why um why
nean Marcus this's the academic paper
why nean Marcus started in Texas not in
Boston and there are two explanations
where you get uh more males than
females uh the luxury goods thing is
important but also where you get a high
degree of anonymity so in other words
you had a lot of people moving in who
can who can effectively reinvent
themselves as high status individuals
okay now just to give an example luxury
goods only work really when you have an
audience of strangers okay so had I okay
had I gone into the pub in mouth where I
grew up which is a market town with
sunglasses with machino written across
them okay on inch high letters I would
have been the subject of complete
ridicule everybody knew where I lived
what what I did what my parents did what
I earned Etc and this would have been
regarded as an utterly ridiculous thing
to do signal stress test is but if I go
to Miami I don't know that probably I
don't you know um so so you're undoubtly
right in that in that a lot of these
kind of display and signaling behaviors
are contextually determined by the the
setting there's another one that I'll
give you it's called the environmental
security hypothesis so this is human
behavioral ecology which is kind of
twinned with evolutionary psychology
it's a little bit more concerned with
how we react to the local environment
around us how we sort of inter and so on
um there is some pretty good evidence to
suggest that men prefer bigger women
when the economy is bad so men under uh
resource stress seem to prefer bigger
women and this can be tracked in a bunch
of different ways there's a strange
hemline index as well isn't there which
is that you in the 20s you had very thin
androgynous women with short skirts and
then when you have a depression the
whole thing slightly changes y well it's
the the again the proposed mechanism is
that in a time of resource scarcity
ancestrally you would have wanted a
woman that looks like she could survive
a couple of months bad winter yeah
exactly a cple a couple of months
without a good harvest uh and that seems
to have carried over now so two two
really interesting ones kind of as
you've said there as the economy waivers
up and down it seems to be that the
preferred body size uh overall the sort
of ideal body that women have also
fluctuates but they did a really great
study on University students in the
canteen Hall uh and before and after
they ate they showed them different
women's body shapes and prior to eating
they preferred bigger women and after
eating they preferred thinner women that
there is something about even the sort
of ambient hunger resource scarcity
which impact this the the environmental
security hypothesis as it's
known this is this is fascinating
because undoubtedly I mean but by the
way I think by the way I'm I'm a huge
Enthusiast for evolutionary psychology
but sometimes I think it jumps the shark
a little bit in terms of I think these
things are contributory but I don't
think what sometimes happens in
evolutionary psychology is that this is
believed to be the only game in town so
for example that data on women having
Affairs on one of your with one of your
earlier guests which seem to validate
one hypothesis rather than another and
there is indeed a valid evolutionary
explanation for what they claim that the
data shows but I would argue there were
also five other possible explanations
for that phenomenon not least more
attractive men are likely to be out
there playing the field more simply
because their opportunities are greater
and therefore the fact that women tended
to have affairs with people more
attractive but not necessarily richer
than the people with whom they're in a
long-term relationship with could be
explained by multiple I knew that you'd
come and do a quiz at the end uh talk to
me about your assessment of Trump's
marketing
campaign um I didn't think you need to
do that because actually what he did was
um fairly
consistent uh with what he' done before
he had probably Elon was a little bit of
a um uh clever signal boost signal
boost I think what you really have to
analyze is the Democrats as a marketing
entity and how spectacularly bad they
are in
that you end up the problem with living
in a very tight Urban bubble I did talk
with Rick Rubin for the Christmas
edition of The Spectator he's great
absolutely glorious man and he made the
interesting point that he had a kind of
interestingly bipolar childhood and that
he spent weeks on Long Island which was
effectively a blue collar existence and
then he spent his weekends in Manhattan
with an aunt who is a kind of creative
Services director for Estee louder was
taken to concerts you know the usual
Cultural Events books poetry
Etc and the interesting observation he
said is there was a downside to that
which is that the cultural life in New
York was entirely driven and hence
constrained by what other people thought
of your tastes whereas people on Long
Island the blue collar culture basically
you like things because you like things
it's similar to um uh Rob's point that
what is it that that middle class food
Posh people food looks better than it
tastes and workingclass food tastes
better than it looks okay um uh that's
you know and and and the the constraints
on you on your opinions on your tastes
on what you could
enjoy because you had to defer your
primary concern was what does this say
about me to other people within my group
now in a blue collar environment you can
like what you like there are certain
musical forms which tend to be gospel I
was mentioning this country where no
really cares there no there's no
particular okay there's no particular
kudos to be gained from liking country
or liking gospel okay and therefore
you're free basically to exercise honest
subjective taste without having to
pretend to like things that you don't in
order to fit into a particular M and
there is a problem when the Democrats
become I've got a skin in this I've got
a dog in this fight because actually
woodro Wilson was like my third cousin
twice removed weirdly um everybody's got
a racist in the family my Misfortune is
that my racist was the president of the
United States but um his mom was born in
England to Scottish parents and um but
um the the Democrats fundamentally I
think are in this
bizarre um Hall of Mirrors where
effectively their own opinions and
thoughts have now become subordinated to
a kind of artificial worldview that you
where you have to buy the entire album
as it were there's a ous journalist who
talk talks about this which is sort of
album politics in other words it's not
just that you have leftwing opinions you
have to buy into every single opinion
that is believed to be uh from the left
and you have to buy the whole package
deal and consequently you end up with
this very very
strange group of people think their
Norman and it's very similar to you know
the the phenomenon that Jillian T
spotted um I don't know if you read the
silo effect have you had Jillian on the
show no very very interesting because
she's an ft journalist but principally
her training was an as an
anthropologist and ending up as a
business
journalist she brought her
anthropological skill set and eye to
what was going on in business and by
happy coincidence well in a sense she
ended up looking at what was effectively
the um securitization of mortgages that
whole business before the events of The
Big Short before the crash and she
immediately spotted that you had this
group of people in a particular habitus
or mindset who are incapable of
understanding the world outside their
own particular reference
points and just an amusing detail about
that which I which I thought was just
hold on a second I remember thinking
okay so there was a trump event at
um that huge New York Hall what what the
hell is it called Madison Square Gardens
okay where there was a comedian I think
he's a Texan comedian if I'm right Tony
henchcliffe and he he told a little joke
about um Puerto Rico okay which is we
won't repeat it here and the immediate
assumption because in their worldview
all Latinos identify as latinx and have
a massive sense of solidarity toward
Ward all other Latinos okay because
that's their peculiar worldview was that
TR was that by countenancing this joke
Trump had lost the entire Latino vote I
was sitting there going okay that's a
bit like saying that if the guy had told
an anti-french joke he would have lost
the European vote okay the idea that
Latinos are so kind of homogeneous as an
ethnic group that they identify you know
B together with the Puerto Ricans they I
mean Cubans thought that joke was
hysterically funny okay I'm sure I would
imagine that the other the other Latinos
found that
funnier given that it's jibbing someone
that's close enough to them I mean
you've watched narcos right I mean you
know the Colombian Mexican tension is
enormous I mean yes that you know there
are points of shared commonality but you
also have this thing between actually
precisely because the countries are
quite similar you get this kind of
narcissism of small differences yeah uh
and I always remember I remember looking
at that and they going he's lost the
entire Latino vote and I was going you
clearly have a view of a community which
is one which is based on you know
probably you know some Marxist ideology
about race yeah which is in complete
denial about nationality or nationhood
and it just struck me as really
interesting that you could misread that
so badly um and something you know
fundamentally the way they go about
appointing people the way the whole
thing appears to be kind of a
coronation
um
it's it's very sad because you know this
should be you know this could be a you
know really wonderful you there lots of
aspects I mean you know in by European
standards I'd lean politically right
okay you I'll be honest about that by by
Euro standards but there are aspects to
the US which strike me as ridiculously
right wig okay not least the appalling
vac allowance yes okay which is now
that's a humanitarian crisis two weeks
paid vacation but also it's weirder than
that because unless you're getting
married and going on honeymoon taking a
whole week at a time is looked at as
pretty dubious now I don't know about
you it's not a holiday if you know which
day of the week it is in my definition
okay if you actually if you're conscious
of the day of the week you're not
properly on holiday yet well look at
maternity leave as well in America that
that strikes again was absolutely
extraordinary it's [ __ ] barbaric and
so and yet it's a wonderful case of
status quo bias by the way because if
you think I have never you know I po a
spectator parties and I hav a drink with
Nigel farage once or twice okay I've
never met anybody in the UK so
right-wing that they believe that um uh
the that we'd be better off with fewer
days of vacation roll back let's roll
back this for another 2% of GDP if we
just roll back vacation time I'm
genuinely I've never that's a really
that's a really great point if there's
anybody sufficiently right-wing that
thinks that the UK is too open and free
with the way that we give away the other
weird American instance I had was um uh
that I met somebody who said they would
happily pay $660,000 to a tax attorney
or Tax Advisor to avoid paying $40,000
in tax
they they they said this to me in
absolute seriousness now
okay that is literally you resent your
tax dollars to such an extent that you
would actually happily pay $60,000 you
kind of I think that at least from a a
business perspective because you can
people will have heard uh I got my tax
down to zero as an American thing which
is basically that you can drive profit
down to the the level where the whatever
it is 32% % 37% depending on where you
live that the government would have
taken there is none for them to take
because you've spent it all so you
basically get a 1 thir discount on
anything that you want to buy but what
that it sounds sexy it's like oh my God
he didn't pay any tax it's like yeah but
he did pay 60% of everything that was
taxable that he had to drive down it's
not like you got it for free he just got
quite a big discount on whatever it is
that he's talking about but yeah there
is a such an aversion to giving money to
the government to the stage where people
will happily do this sort of seppuku
like Harry carry thing uh of actually
almost harming themselves in order
simply despite absolutely yes the hand
will get chopped off to order to spite
the finger yeah exactly despite the IRS
on the end of your your middle finger
we'll get back to talking to Rory in one
minute but first I need to tell you
about Shopify Shopify Powers 10% of all
e-commerce in the United States they're
the driving force behind gym shark skims
aloe and neonic which is why I've
partnered with them because when it
comes to converting browsers into buyers
they are Best in Class their checkout is
36% better on average compared to other
leading Commerce platforms and with shop
pay can boost conversions up to 50% best
of all they've got award-winning support
which is there to help you every step of
the way look you're not going into
business to learn how to code or build a
website or do backend inventory
management Shopify takes all of that off
your hands and allows you to focus on
the job you came here to do which is
designing and selling and awesome
product upgrade your business and get
the same checkout that we use at
newtonic with Shopify right now you can
sign up for a $1 per month trial period
by going to the link in the description
below or heading to shopify.com
Modern wisdom or lowercase that's
shopify.com wisdom to upgrade your
selling today but you had this thing
about uh people that pay lots of taxes
needing additional priv or it may be an
idea to offer them exra privileges okay
I'm a big I'm Ling this slowly
accumulating
this is great it's Brant the it's a
thought experiment which we're one of
the things I think we're lacking in is
that I would argue yes that my joke my
joke suggestion was that people who pay
higher rate tax should be allowed to
drive in the bus lanes okay now just to
be clear about this I didn't mean that
entirely seriously I didn't mean that it
should be enacted it was purely a
thought experiment based on the
observation that rich people are pretty
happy paying for things if a small am so
the when you are poor a large part of
your disposable income is spent on what
you might reasonably call
utility as you get
richer both attractively and
unattractively as I said um what you
might call relative status in other
words the relative quality of something
matters more than its absolute value and
so if you look at car manufacturers the
topof the range X probably costs 25%
more to manufacture than the bottom of
the range X but the sticker price might
be doubl and that's simply because the
people buying from the top of the range
are more interested in status and more
interested in you know leather seats and
heads up display and you know adaptive
cruise control they're more interested
in what you might call things you can
show off about or things which are just
novel whereas the poorer person is
buying the car as a mode of
transportation okay it's closer to the
economic idea of
utility and consequently
um it struck me that government should
play the same trick that car
manufacturers do which is to say yes you
pay a lot more tax but in return you get
certain privileges you get certain
advantages
now by the way the evidence that that
something of the kind which is that if
if it was simply reframed with a thank
you
so there's an experiment from Singapore
which I think was adopted in the UK by a
Housing Association which had trouble
getting people to pay their rent on time
and one of the most they they tried a
variety of Behavioral e economic invent
interventions but one of the most
successful was simply every time you
paid your rent on time you got a text
saying thank you and that massively
reduced the incidence of late payment
subsequently it's one of those weird
that's that's a total just it's a tiny
little reframing which is you did a good
thing we're grateful to you we noticed
yeah yeah I mean whereas I don't feel
when I when I pay what whatever vast
amount I pay to the exer if they just
said kind of we noticed thank you for
doing the right thing I by the way just
to be clear on this I do do the right
thing because my wife does my finances
she's a vicer in the Church of England
which is like having the shittest
accountant in the world in terms of tax
she'll say Rory when you attended when
you attended that confidence they gave
you a free pen I really think you ought
to declare this you know I actually
declared all the capital gains on my
bloody Bitcoin God oh
wow oh my God that would bankrupt most
people especially if you've got to pay
it in fear to pay bloody now what kind
of pissed me off about that is had it
been a house of course I wouldn't have
had to pay bloody thing and no capital
gains but but the interesting thing the
interesting thing there is I that I mean
there was the guy who's the expert on
this guy at Berkeley called George aov
who was a left-wing guy who pointed out
that the right to some extent Dent
enjoyed some unfair advantages simply
because of linguistics so the phrase tax
relief for example suggests that tax is
a burden from which you have to be
relieved it's not paying your Civic
duties towards the maintenance of uh
Collective goods and you know as a Brit
okay as I said a right of Center Brit I
can't help noticing when I go to LA to
be absolutely honest I'm not sure I
wouldn't rather have a slightly worse
car and better roads okay cuz because
you know there is a correct ratio of
expenditure of money which is spent uh
at the individual level and money that's
spent at the collective level and by the
way one of the reasons I half jokingly
suggest that pubs cafes and restaurants
should be given a big tax break I
genuinely mean that is because I think
they're a social good if you go to the
pub okay you are maintaining a pub that
I can go to the following day and it
actually benefits the whole community
and you might argue that the rich people
who go to the pub and buy the fancy
Spirits or the high margin drinks are
actually subsidizing the lower margin
drinks for people with less money yeah
so in other words there is an ecosystem
within that kind of thing which is
mutually beneficial there's such
distaste though from anybody to the
people that have got wealth especially
from the media is very much sort of
demonized at the moment it's very uncool
UNC to talk about the level of wealth
that you have especially when we've got
inequality cost of living crisis
inflation housing problems Etc so it
doesn't surprise me that it's hard to
get people to be on board with doing
something you already have enough
benefits as it is look at the wealth
that you have look at the abil I had
this idea with Scott Galloway where I
suggested that presuming that some rich
people are at least somewhat smart given
that they they've managed to get
themselves to the stage of being rich
they're lucky too yes of course
acknowledge that he he's very honest
about's milon a million other reasons
why but that some people in there will
not be total idiots perhaps some of the
people that are real power users when it
comes to tax I think Elon did this made
a statement the other day that he's paid
more money in tax than any human in
history recently paid 10 billion to the
IRS probably Romans who'd take him up on
that I think yeah Nations when you're
competing with entire you know Empires
perhaps that might be something
different my idea to Scott was why don't
people who pay some Uber amount in t you
know the top
0.01% why don't they uh get to have some
sort of consultant at the IRS or or or
the Inland revenue and they can maybe uh
talk about discriminating where their
tax dollars are spent you can say I
really like well education the military
for example or whatever yeah I mean
anything but it it treats your taxes
first off it it makes your uh tax money
more accountable because I think people
that have earned a lot of money
understand efficiency at least in one
form or another in that they've managed
to accumulate the money and they look at
government and think I'm going to give
you these tax dollars and I think that
you're just going to piss it up the wall
how many times has the Pentagon failed
its [ __ ] budget report here so by you
had you had something a little bit
similar in New Mexico there was a guy
called Gary Johnson I think I'm right AR
saying who's the governor of New Mexico
who is a kind of libertarian and it was
kind of Ron
Swanson I don't know if you know parks
of recreation but you had a Libertarian
doing a government job job and he
believed quite interestingly he said
basically I dislike all forms of
government expenditure except roads and
education he believed those things
genuinely had to be collectively spent
they were Collective goods and that I
think his phrase is if you want economic
growth you need a four-lane
highway and so he was almost a case in
point where in other words he he very
very narrowly decided what the focus of
government within New Mexico who and
what was by all accounts actually a very
he was a presidential candidate um for
the libertarian party about 12 years ago
or something um but he was a pretty good
Governor great have you been to New
Mexico it's the a neighboring state no I
haven't glorious go there it's utterly
fantastic um the um Santa Fe Opera give
that a go by the way I'm trying to start
a little tradition that the guests on
podcasts get to advertise something as
well whatever you would like it always
stries to me as very unfair Santa Fe
Opera the Santa Fe is
my a mid roll podcast Jamie Lang's
podcast and started I think I was
plugging a Italian Jamaican Cafe in
Wester um Pro probably giving it a
greater level of indiscriminate Fame I
wonder how many people have bought air
fryers and Mustang mackes off the back
of you I do think down it's had a market
impact on the the Mustang Mack I've got
a new one for you uh only relevant for
Brits really although also possibly
relevant for exat Indians in the United
States the Frozen Paratha I saw you
tweet about this the other day I bought
this from aicardo I thought why the hell
has this Frozen Paratha got 170 votes
and is like a five star literally five
stars on a cardo I thought what's a
cardo oh my goodness you don't know you
see there are lots of things in the UK
so it's it's grocery delivery home
grocery delivery very Innovative bunch
of people who started you know
effectively robotic picking so they have
it's very very high-tech mode of grocery
delivery they used to have a partnership
with waitrose they've now got a
partnership with Marcus and Spencer okay
um it's actually probably better than
anything you've got in the US actually
we by the way in Britain we never really
celebrate our so I would I would include
octopus energy and
acardo as you know and perhaps say um
wise okay we occasionally do these
things incredibly well and in the United
States you'd be fated for doing this
whereas in Britain you're just treated
with kind of mild suspicion
okay um and there is there is I think
there is that British problem which is
there is an acceptable social ceiling to
the amount of wealth you have yes that
Americans have observed even in what you
would think of as pretty Cutthroat
businesses like Investment Banking that
once they've got a flat in London you
know a former rectory in the csws you
know a wife called Polly you know a
labrador two children at private school
a Range Rover and an arer okay basically
that's it you've hit your ceiling and
anything more would be slightly dubious
you know so there is that kind of weird
kind of class-based ceiling to you know
it's quite difficult to create a Dyson
in the UK okay
but but what what's interesting in aard
is the Frozen Paratha is uh it was
invented in what I call Cinnamon Valley
which is this area around Wembley and
London which is where an enormous amount
of innovation in Indian food preparation
goes on which is one of the great I
think one of great um uh reasons I still
live in the UK is the quality of Indian
food surpasses very difficult to find in
America imagine Austin you must have a
large enough XA community that it's
started to raise a I'm yet to find a
good Indian meal in Austin Texas much to
my dismay okay we we we'll go looking
I'll crowdsource it maybe someone can
comment below some someone can comment
but the Frozen Paratha is a remarkable
thing it just sits in the Freez you can
have an onion one you can have Alo paraa
there's a garlic one but basically you
take it out of the freezer where it's
basically completely long life bang it
in a pan with a little bit of oil about
one and a half minutes either side turn
it over you've had the kind of Paratha
which is literally you know if you went
to a three star mishan Indian restaurant
you would not be disappointed by the
Paratha it's the great I mean what the
hell is sour what what's this sourdough
thing it's fine right sourdough has a
place in my bread repertoire but the
extent to which it's come to dominate
artisan bread rather like IPA dominated
artisan bread caramel in the desert
world yeah you got it exactly yeah the
these things these kind of these winner
take all effects in a globalized economy
are actually problematic because they're
like the gray squirrel you know they
they eliminate the indigenous
alternative myopia in the bread world
yeah yeah it is it is a problem you know
I mean um and likewise you know the
discussion of AI relative to discussion
of the importance of zoom and remote
working strikes me as off whack that
actually over a longer time Horizon um
the importance of being able to have a
conversation with anybody
instantaneously on any continent in a
group or
individually strikes me as you know it's
not far from
teleportation and yet nobody's really
talking about it nobody's developing
hardware for it uh that strikes me as
something slightly weird I've been
thinking a lot about um we built the new
tonic brand and we're building another
one at the moment with a guy called Mike
Israel and um I a lot of the time what
we're talking about is sort of coolness
and credibility two things that we're
trying to aim for now with a millennial
genz degenerate influencer driven online
Tik Tok Instagram brand perhaps that's
easy uh are companies in markets that
aren't necessarily so custom facing that
don't need to have an Instagram account
do you think companies get too concerned
with trying to be cool with trying to
create sort of a no um I think that the
focus on the consumer is um there's a
great passage it's only a small passage
in John K's book The Corporation of the
21st century which is his attack largely
the whole book is an attack on the idea
of the shareholder value movement that
the fundamental point is that the point
of a corporation is not solely to
generate shareholder value but also the
fact that the pursuit of a single
metric is much less Crea and much more
likely to lead to uh value destruction
including for the shareholders than the
pursuit of multiple objectives the
triangulation of multiple objectives
which is looking after your employees
looking after your shareholders looking
after your customers and looking after
the wider Society okay so so a
multi-dimensional objective from a
company will probably lead to a greater
variety of behaviors and a greater level
of creativity than a single-minded kind
of reductionist objective like
short-term shareholder value
maximization and one of K's points which
he makes is that if you look at the
companies that have been kicking around
in the Fortune 500 or the footsy or
whatever for a long long
time it's Nestle it's unver it's proor
and gamble it's reckit okay it's
companies which have a large marketing
function which keeps them rooted in the
real but changing world of what
customers really
want okay and keeps them alert to
effectively exploring new forms of value
exchange which are Ever Changing with
technology taste fashion
Etc and those companies interestingly
seem to have a much greater level of
survival than companies that effectively
develop some proxy measure of success
other than the
marketplace and seek to pursue that now
pursuing success in the marketplace is
more difficult it's more painful uh it
involves you to deal in things that are
highly probabilistic rather than
deterministic it's messy but ultimately
in terms of resilience it seems to keep
companies on their
game in a way that businesses that are
basically focused on what you might call
internal benchmarking
metrics can find themselves actually
massively detached could you give me an
example um well okay if you pursue yeah
I
mean uh if you pursue efficiency at the
delivery of something okay uh you can
end up very efficiently making something
that people no longer want or where
you're completely deposition because uh
uh effectively what you're
making so so in some cases for example
the rules of the game
change okay so there will be a period
where for example
um well I'll give you a perfect example
of this
okay which is an example I love to give
which is when I was a kid okay uh there
were a few rich kids at school who'd
been to skipple airport and they come
back and go it's incredible like there
shops everything you can buy I bought
wman for like so many gilders cu before
the euro okay oh it's amazing you we
went there and we did this and then then
you got then it was changy airport in
Singapore oh it's amazing I bought this
they've got this they've got a Fountain
they've got that and the other you see
and then you then you then eventually
moved to Dubai the crown moved to Dubai
have kind of blinged up airports okay
and that all goes on and then one day
people come back and they go if you get
to London City airport it's brilliant
there hardly any shops you get on the
plane in about 5 minutes and you
suddenly realize that everybody has been
optimizing for turning an airport into a
bloody shopping center and then London
City Airport comes along completely the
opposite yep okay and just changes the
rules of the game so I mean the hotel
industry is interesting I mean okay I
think I'm allowed to plug for this I'm a
weird fan have you stayed in a Moxy
Hotel yeah yeah yeah a few times what's
your take because I think it's quite CL
I think it's a kind of mental hack which
is actually quite smart which is
everything is really basic it's good
good TV good Wi-Fi comfortable room but
not very big no room service um no
laundry I prob remember okay you
wouldn't want to stay there for two
weeks but two things pretty good
location um and secondly the ground the
ground floor you is basically a bit like
a Wei work yes in that you can just hang
out there meet people there's actually a
meeting room even after you've checked
out you can spend three hours doing your
email at The Moxy without feeling like a
weirdo I think whereas if you do that at
a conventional Hotel once you've checked
out you feel they want you to piss off
yes because it's just a small Reception
Area reception area where youd look like
a weirder yeah I uh I've spent a lot of
time on the road over the last couple of
years I've come to believe that the
biggest determining Factor about your
enjoyment of a hotel is the quality of
the pillows and it's not the bed bad bed
good pillows totally fine night's sleep
good bed bad pillows [ __ ] so I every
time you pillow smia don't
you I'm trying to I'm trying to work on
this at the moment I'm trying to find a
uh Amazon Prime pillow which I can get
in most territories that I go to so most
like us UK maybe a Dubai or whatever
that I can get next day dely to any
hotel that if I get there and on the
first day when when I check in I go oh
[ __ ] they no they've got one of those
they've got one of those ones that makes
the sound when you lie on it I'm like
quickly get onto Amazon order it and
have it arrive you need Uber sleeps to
go alongside Uber Eats very good very
good will deliver I that's the that's
the worst the worst part but I mean yeah
interesting pivot at the moment that's
an interesting idea because you would
also have a market if you had Uber
sleeps you can have a
service which if you if you basically
missed the last train and ended up
crashing at a hotel it would deliver
sort of you know a shirt in your size
for the following day or you know and
toothpaste and a toothbrush and all the
things you didn't think to pack cuz you
weren't tow you were going to be staying
yeah that's brilliant there's a a move
at the moment in airports toward um like
Health wellness and stuff there's
meditation areas there's gyms there's
napping rent by the hour rooms which I
imagine are used for all manner
fundamentally by the way I mean the
built environment in every respect has
not caught up with technology and it's
actually I think it's a total failure um
it's largely probably because you can't
measure but I always think okay there's
nowhere at a station in a concourse
they've got all these walls around the
edges which are underused now just put a
shelf there for people to put a laptop
on okay there are trains with no tables
which drives me practically insane
because apparently it's worth spending
120 billion to reduce the time spent on
a train between London and Manchester
but actually putting a table on a train
so the person can work for an hour
rather than basically sitting there like
a Tyrannosaurus Rex trying to type on
some on their knees okay that's that's
considered apparently an unworthy
expense compared to time saving on on on
the actual Journey itself and we will
need offices will need to actually you
know fundamentally adapt to the fact
that patterns of work are different and
that you probably need fewer meeting
rooms and you need more pods but also
the open plan office was insufficiently
variegated so if you take people who are
non-neurotypical for example you know I
mean my argument is that to some extent
the perfect office is not an open plan
space it's 50% Library 50% Pub in other
words half of it should be hypers social
and a bit noisy for people I I actually
like working in cafes I like background
noise even if I don't know anybody
present equally I'm conscious of the
fact there are people who can't work
unless you also don't want to be in that
all the time necessarily if you if you
have the final proof read of this
particular piece of copy that absolutely
needs to be right if you're writing a
best man's speech yes probably best to
be in somewhere that's a little bit more
chill it's your final run through you're
trying to remember a presentation you're
trying to do whatever do you really want
to be in the cafe but yeah I mean I've
you'll have seen this as well to
introverts an open plan office is
probably very tiring well I mean I think
on average it seems like open plan
offices really really damag down uh
productivity the difference even between
noise cancelling headphones and complete
silence is marked uh mutual friend of
ours uh worked uh at a place a social
media management agency years ago and
they had this huge Harry Potter fan page
thing and as a part of that they were
doing a time lapse of them building the
world's biggest Harry Potter jigsaw
puzzle so they were going upstairs they
had an entire room it was one of these
many many many stories and there was
open plan office and [ __ ] asro Turf
on the walls and every you know ping
pong wedding dayss or whatever and uh he
just he he couldn't work he couldn't
think he couldn't focus so he had found
that they'd kind of given up on this
huge Harry Potter thing they maybe got
stuck at some stage of the jigsaw so he
uh there was a point where every morning
for a couple of weeks he went up and sat
in amongst disused Harry Potter jigsaw
puzzle pieces on the floor because it's
the only place you could get any [ __ ]
piece yes y yeah I mean you know
we we have we have some weird sort of
mysterious lavatories on the ground
floor which I notice the occupancy rate
is surprisingly High given that they're
not signposted and I strongly suspect
people using them as a kind of Escape
pod need a little bit of chill time yeah
yeah and I I um you know I I the other
thing I think is interesting is if you
really want to bond people one
interesting thing is to reduce the
amount of money you spend on rent but I
think you have to correspondingly ring
fence a bit of that saving and spend it
on what you might call staff jollies now
doesn't I I don't mean total
self-indulgence but I mean you know away
days where maybe we should take some
office space By the Sea somewhere like
Margate Folkston Brighton okay just
because actually if you want to bond
people I don't think an office is a
particularly good place uh for bonding I
think if you take people on a trip
together you find people Bond very very
tightly I mean famously you'll love this
story from advertising the coke Hilltop
ad I'd Like to Teach the World to
Sing was actually that it was conceived
at I think Dublin Airport because there
was a massive flight delay and
effectively there's a quote from Bob
Dylan in Brownsville girl where he said
isn't it funny how people who've
suffered together have more in common
than who are most content mhm and these
people these people had basically all
been together uh you know and they were
stuck at duin airport like overnight
okay and he noticed that effectively
people were all going to the Coke
machine and because of the shared
adversity they were all bonding in ways
that they never would have done had the
flight been on time it's one of the
reasons that throughout history armies
have been encouraged to Get Drunk
Together a few nights before the first
battle not because the sure the bonding
thing the fact that it's more difficult
to lie the fact that you're a better
liar detector when you're drunk than
When You're Sober Do Do you remember
that cburg campaign you know who your
mates are it only lasted I think it was
um um it interested me from an
anthropological perspective because
there's a theory that the reason young
men get drunk and do stupid things is to
find out who your mates are in other
words the person who at the first sign
of a police siren hoofs it around the
corner is not your mate and so it's a
kind of loyalty test in thing just as to
some extent you know rude banter is a
kind of proof of stress testing it's a
stress test of a friendship if if we
weren't really good friends I couldn't
say this to you therefore the fact that
I'm saying this to you is proof of our
friend signal of friendship uh I wanted
to show you this Europeans according to
a study by simple analytics Europeans
spend approximately
575 million hours per year clicking
through cookie banners the prompts which
appear on websites asking to accept
cookies dividends should have been that
we got rid of that because it was an
absolutely stupid piece of
legislation which adds and by the way
it's also counterproductive because
every now and then I go onto my Google
Chrome and I get rid of effectively all
the cookies right so you've had to rest
the next two weeks it's even worse than
usual and that every godamn page I go to
I have to effectively give permission or
deny it to see whatever this thing was
that was a classic case of what I think
is sometimes called you know the um what
was the famous thing in in the in
British India where they they created a
bounty on cobras python yeah Co cobras
pison snakes and people started farming
them to claim the Bounty there was
something to do with uh um trying to
reduce the number of cars on the road so
they did they uh logged
the logged the registration plates in
one form or another and all of the rich
people just bought second cars so they
doubled the number of cars that were on
the roads that that was aens yeah I
think you could come into Athens with an
odd number number plate or an even
number number plate to reduce traffic
and so everybody lined up at the the
Greek equivalent of the DMV and that
when they were handing out car license
plates and basically they said I I
really need an even number because my
other car is not car and so they'd all
they'd all Shuffle into order
effectively I'll swap you yeah
in the queue and no I mean I mean if you
think about it there were extraordinar
int if you'd given the job to some nudge
theorists rather than to lawyers you
could have come up with a very simple
solution which I would have thought
would be fairly amicable to everybody
which is you can set your browser to
delete cookies more than x weeks
old okay and that would be you know you
you might mandate that that's an
automatic option that's made available
to you but you know what the problem I
have is that I you know I like to purge
all these things you know I never quite
know what clearing your cash actually
means but I like to do it regularly
because it feels you know cathartic okay
but um but but I you know I like to
clear cookies every now and then because
it occurs to me there's probably an UNH
wholesome buildup of the things but then
every time I purge the damn things um it
makes my browsing experience painfully
bad we could have we could have got rid
of that within weeks of
2016 if we wish to and I have no idea
why no body has done it Meanwhile we're
still struggling with all of the
problems everybody wanted to get rid of
and we've accumulated new ones and some
of them have got worse and now Kia's
done a massive u-turn on immigration
that was surprising if we if we
acknowledge the fact that the bad thing
about government isn't really that money
spent through the government is
necessarily bad because there are things
that probably are better paid for
collectively rather than individually
defense being an obvious example okay
right I don't think sense for everybody
to employ a private Army it you know
it's it's it's pretty logical that we
should actually pull our resources in
the provision of Defense I don't you
know um and and by the way the I would
also argue that the ratio of those
things probably changes you know there
are there are periods where
technologically we'd be better off
spending money on Collective goods and
there are periods where we're better off
spending more money on individual goods
and you know there's a ratio of the
two but you you made the point that
first of all if you allowed very high
taxpayers some degree of control over
where their tax was spent that's the
first thing interestingly good luck with
that because any it's called
hypothecation Uh Dan Arelli is a friend
of mine behavioral scientist believes
that you could get people paying tax
much more happily if it were
hypothecated um but the treasury
absolutely hate the idea because it
removes from them the finance person's
privilege of shoveling money around
around at their at their whim so they
absolutely hate her it also creates a
level of accountability I'll tell you a
clever clever case of hypothecation by
the way was John Maynard
KES had I I think he had it might have
been a million pounds to spend he was
the burer of Kings College
Cambridge and he
um he had two things that were calls on
his finances there was the Arts Theater
in Cambridge which was run and still is
an owned I think by King's College
Cambridge for whatever historical reason
and King's College Chapel which is a
famous you know glorious medieval
building and kan's imediately gave a
million pounds to the Arts Theater and
nothing to the chapel and his argument
was very simple he said raising money
for the chapel is a piece of piss okay I
can get Americans to give money for this
world famous Chapel whereas raising
money for the Arts Theater is going to
be damn near impossible so with the
money I've got at my disposal I'll give
it to the things that can't raise money
at the expense of things that
can treasury absolutely hate
hypothecation I also think that uh for
example um fundamentally I mean I've got
an interesting idea which I'll share
with you which I think is actually a
usable idea which is what I call
charitable yield
management okay let me explain there are
lots of things where you want to
allocate resources according to
willingness to pay so I'll give you an
example I'm out at Athens Airport
there's a massive queue for passport
control there are people in front of me
in the queue my I I'm paranoid I turn up
at airports like 3 hours early I'm
totally paranoid like that other people
these people had left it a bit late
their flight was leaving in 40 minutes
the queue was about 20 minutes long I
was pretty
sympathetic now what you could do is you
could simply have in the end someone
spotted them and let them through it was
quite intelligent but you could have a
system where you pay 20 quid you jump
the queue most people find that rep
but also they see that as the airport
effectively profiting from their own
incompetence okay which is you're
probably deliberately creating a long Q
so you can maximize revenue from Q jump
yeah if you had certain things where you
paid but the money went to
charity that is an interesting thing
because it still identifies willingness
to pay in other words you're clearly
desperate to catch your flight removes
the incen the in and the resentment of
the people doing it because yeah they
may be richer than you but at least
they're doing a good thing so that could
apply to parking in every car park there
should be five station car parks there
should be five spaces where it's 25 quid
to Oxfam on top of the parking charge to
park there the reason being that someone
who is absolutely desperate to park will
always be able to find a space whereas
someone who's got 40 minutes to spare
can drive off somewhere else you've got
maximizing area under the curve you're
maximizing exactly that at the area
under the curve without creating
resentment you could apply that to
street parking one parking space in 10
and it's easy to do with Ringo or pay by
phone or what you use in Austin what's
the parking app in Austin no idea it's
just tap your card tap oh you tap you've
got that so with those apps it's really
really easy if you're in one of those
charity spaces you have a different code
and you just put in a different number
and 20 quid goes to Oxfam on top of your
cost of parking which means that the
parking spaces go to the people who most
desperately need them without anybody
feeling rooked and Charities make a lot
of money now that that strikes me is
quite an interesting you could apply
that to Road pricing as well by the way
interestingly how you know uh
well if people felt that a component of
let's say you had a you had a high-speed
Lane if there's a traffic jam on the M25
you can pay 20 quid to use the it's it's
equivalent to the mult what is it the
multi-occupancy lane you get in the US
okay there's a there's a premium Lane
which lets you jump the queue a bit okay
now I would use that if I going to Heath
row probably okay if I'm if I got a
plane to catch if I haven't got a plane
to catch I went now the great thing is
what would create a lot of resentment is
if people just saw a load of Bentley and
you know flash cars jumping the queue it
creates fundamental
resentment but actually if you made the
thing charitable it would be less
repugnant and you would still be
allocating the road to the people Mo who
were most in need of the road well we
have uh like Fast Lanes or whatever
they're called uh preferential Lanes all
across America and that's basically the
same it's like the T if you've got the
text tag or whatever then you can go
through this one and buy paying that
it's
$186 or whatever uh in order to go
through this particular Lane but that
Lane's got far fewer people on it and
you can everybody kind of I mean it's
interesting Road pricing is going to be
very interesting from a psychological
perspective because one of the things
they did with UL
which is in London which is that if you
had an older diesel diesel vehicle you
had to pay was it20 to come into the UL
Zone which was pretty extensive it went
right to it wasn't like the congestion
Zone which is just the middle of London
uh it was pretty much right to the edges
of London there were ulz cameras
everywhere and what was unfair about
that was not only that we can debate the
whole legitimacy of the charge but let's
say I had an older diesel vehicle I live
in 7 Oaks which is just outside the ules
zone to be honest I drive into the ules
zone six times a year maybe eight okay I
could just about swallow the current
charge okay okay if you travel in every
day so a 100 people paying the ul's
charge once don't really care whereas
one person paying it a 100 times it's
practically bankrupting them and the
fact that there was no recognition of
that so if you were a nurse who lived
outside London or indeed inside London
and because of shift work needed to
drive to work and because you hadn't got
much money you hadn't old a diesel
car that was the fact that there was no
equivalent of Amazon Prime which is okay
pay pay once pay for a year y okay was
fundamentally unfair and that that again
is down to Gary Stevenson's observation
actually that if you optimize for the
average you don't distinguish between
one person paying something a hundred
times and 100 people paying something
once I always noticed when you drive
down the French Motorway which is called
the auto route Des zongle from Cal down
towards I think this one towards A10 or
something it's called can't remember the
exact number and he was noticed that for
the first sort of 50 miles basically all
the cars are English this bloody Road a
bit odd don't the local French want to
use their auto route and then you
realize of course if you're English you
drive to France once a year you pay the
French Motorway tolls it if you drive a
long way down to the south of France
it's going to come to a few hundred
euros okay but that's a lot less than
you'd pay for a higher car If you flew
and it's just something you just you
suck it up if you want to drive down to
the south of France if you're French
okay and you've got a stretch of
Motorway of 20 miles and it costs you5 a
goddamn day okay that's ,000 EUR a year
it's a completely different completely
different
equation and so one of the things we
need to understand much better is two
economists prices a number but to
Consumers prices are
feeling and fundamentally
economists have this weird idea of money
that it kind of I mean one of the most
important topics I think in economics is
how to spend it I mean Scott Galloway
did quite an interesting piece on on
this uh just a few days ago which is in
other words it's not just about
investment it's not just about wealth
optimization the level of skill with
which you trans translate available
money into meaningful experiences in
some into into happiness well-being
flourishing whatever you want to call it
I mean that that's a skill in itself and
there are undoubtedly people who do it
very very badly by the way not only
people who are extravagant but actually
people who are too
stingy um so there's a wonderful piece
of research uh by George Lowenstein
which looks at the fact that we all IGN
knowledge and economics there are people
who spend too much in other words they
get into debt they're extravagant they
live for the moment uh they they're
probably you know they they kind of have
short time Horizons and optimize for the
moment to a point where they neglect
their long-term
wealth but George Lowenstein also made
the point that correspondingly you would
expect there to be people who are not
spend thrifts you call them skin flints
who actually find the act of spending
money so painful just the act of parting
with money is something you know the
very transaction itself is so painful
they been far too
little and I think he did a kind of
survey on this and roughly speaking
about 40 to 50% of the population get it
roughly right and then you have a chunk
of people at one end actually skin
flints outnumber spend thrifts if I
remember his data wow so there is I mean
one of his points is that he you know
he's a very big believer in buying
experiences rather than
stuff um that um and that's one of the
reasons I think Americans by the way
should have more time because Americans
have quite a large non-working
population but it's all people at the
beginning of Life and at the end of life
and the Americans massively over index
in terms of leisure in ter or or lack of
economic participation in terms of
students and in terms of
retirees but they massively they're
massively too busy in the middle of
life and one of the things I would argue
is that if Americans spent more money on
experiences
Leisure Travel Etc which tend to be
quite labor intensive rather than say
buying more Goods which is what you do
when you have very little spare time
would they actually would the actual
American economy benefit because you
can't because you got in other words
it's better off having people working in
a New Orleans Cafe than it is importing
a Chinese um device that you know I
don't know I robotically cleans your
cappuccino machine or something okay but
whatever it is that people are buying
and that that's a that's now having said
that you got to be very careful about
dividing what is a good and what is an
experience because if you buy a guitar
and then spend a lot of time playing the
guitar it's both it's both yeah so it's
very dangerous to say I know it's just
it's just goods are solid things
experiences are intangible because
there's a combination of both Rory
southernland ladies and gentlemen Rory
let's bring this one home I appreciate
you eighth time ninth time on the show I
love it every time you come on always a
pleasure it's a delight yeah I just feel
too honest I just feel I'm a crap
version of Eric Weinstein I don't don't
invite Eric every time I watch him I
feel
inadequate I just feel like this rubbish
rubbish version of Eric if Eric's made
it to the end of this episode uh I
forgot to text you and ask what brand of
shirt you wear he wears these incredibly
plutocratic white shirts I'm just
intrigued I'm I will remember and if not
I've just put it out on a his theory
which is ingenious that um uh Jeffrey
Epstein was basically uh an intelligence
Ploy that couldn't survive into the
internet age um that was one of those
eye-opening moments where you go surely
not act because if you think about it
okay for a government for a state actor
right operating a billionaire looks
expensive right but compared to an
aircraft caral budet it's it's a it's a
rounding out Jeffrey Epstein was the
deal of the century Rory Sutherland said
it here Rory I appreciate you until next
time mate thank you very much indeed
thank you very much for tuning in if you
enjoyed that episode you will love my
fulllength conversation with Alex hosi
right here