Video summary
The core discussion at Workiva Amplify 2026 centers on the critical distinction between merely fast AI agents and those that are truly trustworthy, correct, and defensible within high-stakes environments like financial reporting, auditing, and compliance. Deepak Bharadwaj, Executive Vice President and Chief Product Officer at Workiva, emphasizes that while speed is valuable, it is insufficient when human signatures and legal accountability are involved. The primary differentiator for Workiva's approach is the integration of "trusted data," which is certified and governed within their platform, ensuring that any AI output generated from this data can be audited and traced back to specific actions taken by humans or systems. This foundation allows organizations to maintain control over their operations while leveraging automation, ensuring that every piece of work produced meets rigorous standards of accuracy and governance before it is finalized.
A significant portion of the conversation addresses how to balance autonomous agent capabilities with necessary human oversight, particularly regarding business judgment and complex disclosures. Bharadwaj explains that AI agents excel at executing repeatable, rule-based tasks where instructions can be clearly defined in plain language, such as rolling forward previous filings or processing structured data. However, when tasks require nuanced decision-making, interpretation of regulations, or the creation of sensitive disclosures like those in a 10-K filing, human intervention becomes mandatory. The platform is designed to provide a "cognitive surface" where humans can supervise, verify, and intervene at critical decision points, effectively creating a layered defense system. This approach ensures that while AI can handle the volume and speed of processing, the final accountability and strategic judgment remain firmly in human hands, preventing agents from acting without permission or approval.
To facilitate this balance between governance and extensibility, Workiva introduced "Agent Studio," a tool that empowers business users to build their own custom AI agents without needing deep technical expertise. Traditionally, creating useful AI solutions required significant programming knowledge involving APIs and scripting, which often excluded non-technical business leaders who understand their specific processes best. Agent Studio changes this dynamic by allowing users to describe their business needs in natural language, enabling the system to generate tailored agents that operate within strict guardrails and permission sets. This capability ensures that organizations are not confined by pre-built software limitations but can instead customize their workflows while maintaining a unified governance layer. The result is a flexible ecosystem where companies can scale AI adoption across their teams, fostering innovation without compromising on security or compliance standards.
Ultimately, the success of AI integration in enterprise settings depends on moving beyond simple tool acquisition to solving real user problems and enhancing overall productivity. Bharadwaj illustrates how AI can significantly expand risk coverage in auditing by automating the structuring of unstructured data like PDFs and spreadsheets, allowing auditors to test entire populations rather than just small samples. This shift frees human professionals to focus on high-level remediation and strategic decision-making rather than manual verification. The vision for the future involves layering multiple checkpoints of human review and AI assistance, akin to Swiss cheese where the holes do not align, thereby creating a robust system that improves trust and efficiency. Companies that will thrive are those that view AI as a means to an end—enabling higher quality work and better outcomes—rather than adopting it for its own sake, ensuring that technology serves the ultimate goal of empowering users to solve complex challenges effectively.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome back to Amplify 2026. We're
coming to you live from Las Vegas. I'm
Allison Casic alongside Christa Casease
and we're going to delve into the fact
that AI agents seem to be everywhere
right now, but in all of these other
important areas, um being fast and
capable isn't necessarily the enough. It
there needs to be right. It needs to be
correct and trustworthy.
>> Absolutely, Alison. And we need that
trust for sure.
>> Yeah. Let's dig into it with our next
guest, Deeppac Baratch. He's the EVP of
and chief product officer here at Book
Wara. It's a mouthful. Welcome to the
cube.
>> Thank you, Ellison. Hello, Chris. Good
to meet you all.
>> Great to have you on the cube. So,
Deepek, it seems like every every
enterprise um software company is
announcing AI agents right now. What's
different about building AI for
financial reporting, audit, and
compliance?
>> Great question, Alison. This is
something that um I get asked every day
and it's really about the risk profile
of our buyers and users and because of
who we serve in financial reporting and
GRC and uh sustainability what they want
is the work that they do can be trusted
uh because ultimately in many of these
cases somebody is signing their name to
it and so really the opportunity for us
uh and the work that we are doing in our
products and solutions is making sure
that not only are agents operating on
what we call trusted data because once
the data comes into our platform it is
certified it is trusted it is governed
and so on and so forth but the AI that
is working on the trusted data is also
producing output that can be trusted so
can you trace the output of AI uh is the
output of AI or the work of AI
defensible in terms of who did what and
when and then uh do you have audit
trails because we want everything that
happens within our platform to be audit
ready as well. So that's really the
difference in terms of how we are
looking at AI agents, agentic
applications
um and that's where you know our
customers expect us to go as well. Yeah,
thank you for that context um Deepo and
I had the opportunity to listen to your
your keynote this morning um alongside
your your CEO and really that was kind
of one of my big takeaways was really
looking at work knowledge in particular
and kind of the ability of work to
potentially provide that grounding that
data lineage those controls and
auditability and also the human
escalation to make sure that there are
those guardrails for you know human
execution. you know, almost kind of this
cognitive surface um to be able to
provide that kind of control layer. So,
I guess when you think about your
product development, you know, does that
ring true for you in terms of where you
think we're heading?
>> Yeah, absolutely. And there's a a few
different pieces to that, right? One is
you mentioned guardrails, right? So,
that's absolutely a big piece of uh what
our customers want and expect. So how
can we make sure that the AI or the
agents don't go off and do things that
they're not supposed to do? Uh then
there's this notion of context.
Knowledge is one of those ways in which
you can uh create context and think of
knowledge as um kind of a a set of
instructions that you can provide to the
agents so that as they are doing their
work uh not only not only are they um
respecting the guardrails but they're
also following some of these
instructions. so that the work work or
output of AI is according to the
company's policies or standards and
things like that
and then you have all of the data like I
said that exists within our platform
which is trusted data and so when AI
operates on that trusted data with the
context that is provided by knowledge
with the guardrails that we then impose
and then we have all these tools that we
allow humans to get in and supervise and
uh verify the output of AI whenever and
wherever they want to. Right? So, you
take all of these mechanisms and that's
what really puts together a platform for
uh trusted data and trusted AI.
>> Well, I'm curious where should an AI
agent, if at all, ever be allowed to act
on its own and it probably can. And
where where should it stop and ask for
human approval based on what you're
saying? I I think a good way to think
about it is something that is fairly
repeatable and it's known in terms of
how a task needs to be completed is a
good place for an agent to to do its own
thing. And usually these tasks are not
what I call rules based, right? And so
there are instructions that you and I
can describe in plain language. An agent
is great for that and it can follow
instructions and execute. But if you
have tasks that require business
judgment or someone needs to look at it
and approve and sign off, that's where
humans have to come in uh and make sure
that what the AI is producing is
correct. Right? So for example, in our
case, if I'm rolling forward, which
means I'm taking previous year's filings
like a 10K or a 10Q and then using that
as a starting point for my next
quarter's filings, that feels automated
and you can just let an agent rip and
complete that. But if it's producing a
disclosure, right? So you got these
sections within the 10K that uh someone
has to actually think about whether that
is an accurate representation of what
you're trying to disclose or convey. You
don't want an agent to produce that and
it show up in a 10K and that's where the
business judgment is required and
oftentimes that's where multiple people
will argue about one word in that
disclosure
>> right and that's just something that at
this stage to your point Dupac we just
can't trust AI with but for those
actions that we are trusting AI with you
know I have been really glad to hear
today um the themes around kind of the
provability of the AI agent or the
explanability So from your perspective,
how do we more tactically go about
proving why an AI agent took an action?
>> You mean proving the output of AI
agents?
>> Yes.
>> Yeah. Um, you know, that's where things
like verification start to come in,
right? So you can as a human go in and
you can verify the output of AI. It
takes you back to where the answer
actually came from. It shows its work.
And so you can then as a human validate
that it did the right thing. Now what is
likely to happen is as we get more and
more comfortable with what the AI is
doing that level of control will change.
It will it may reduce in some cases you
might decide that you need an extra pair
of eyes uh for certain things that are
higher stakes. But really from a
platform standpoint, what we want to do
is provide the toolkit that anyone can
use to either uh run our agents that we
ship out of the box or build their own
agents with uh agent studio which is
also something that we announced today.
>> Yes. And on on that point about
launching um agent studio um here at
Amplify that what that you announced,
why is it important do you think to let
users build their own AI agents rather
than relying only on agents created by
software companies? That's that's the uh
best part about AI, right? Um if you
think about the way we have solved for
use cases that our customers have had,
we've we've made platforms extensible
traditionally, but in order to do
anything useful, you needed technical
skills. So we have platforms with APIs
and the ability to do some scripting and
Python and and whatnot, right? Highly
technical. Our business users, they
really understand their business and
with AI now they can just describe what
their business process is and then let
our agent studio which in itself is an
AI application create AI agents that
will do the work for them. And so then
what you get to is our customers can run
their business the way they want to run
it, their processes the way they want to
run it. uh it's it's going to be
impossible for us to create software for
every user at every customer in every
industry vertical in every part of the
world. And what this lets our users do
is not be restricted or confined by what
our software can provide but really
leverage our our extensibility toolkits
whether it is agent studio or MCP and
then uh do what they want to do on top
of our platform. So they get trust and
they get extensibilities.
>> Yeah. Yeah. And sort of is almost
balancing between um providing that
governance layer and also kind of
facilitating that intelligence because
as you mentioned you know through those
kind of MCP extensions.
>> Yeah. And we always make sure that
actions that are happening within the
platform are are permission enforced. So
AI is never doing things on its own.
It's doing things on behalf of whoever
is supervising it. And you know
ultimately someone is going to be
accountable and like I like to say you
cannot send an agent to prison.
>> It's true there has to be that human
accountable at the end of the day. Um
and along that vein Deepo you know you
were kind of talking this morning in the
keynote around the multi- aent
orchestration and I'd love to double
click on that with you because I think
that's going to be a big problem for
enterprises to solve moving forward. um
because we have these potential agent
swarms or these chain of agents that are
you know either collaborating together
or triggering action from other agents.
So can you talk to I guess you know from
your perspective you know where stands
now I guess in terms of really solving
that for customers and what we might
think about looking out for over the
next 12 to 18 months.
you kind of answered part of that
question yourself, right? So guardrails
is a is a very important piece to that.
And so we have the guardrails. So even
though you have multiple agents doing uh
whatever they're trying to get done,
those guardrails come in place, uh we've
got the ability for humans to engage at
the critical decision point. So this is
not just giving them a goal and letting
them rip end to end. Humans can come in
and they can supervise and make sure
that these agents are doing things under
their control.
uh but it's it's really about ultimately
what what are we letting agents do
within the platform right so they don't
really have this unfettered access to go
off and do anything so there's a
specific set of what we call
capabilities that I demoed within agent
studio and that's the list of things
that they are actually able to do within
our platform and so that's the way we we
kind of manage what these agents are
able to do um so yeah we want swarms of
these agents and them orchestrating but
they really have this umbrella of
governance that is going to uh control
what the output is or what the work is.
>> Absolutely. And as you were kind of
mentioning earlier, that's kind of what
differentiates an agent from answering a
question or taking a single action to,
you know, like you're alluding to being
being able to, you know, complete a
process like, you know, filing a 10Q or
a 10K.
>> Yeah. To totally and an end to-end
workflow is is what we ultimately want
to make sure we can orchestrate. uh and
whether that is by automating pieces of
it or by making sure that humans can
come in and do their work, collaborate
with their teams and get assistance from
the agents.
>> Do you think AI could eventually allow
audit teams to get greater uh risk
coverage without simply adding more
people?
>> Um yeah, I mean that's that is the that
is the ultimate goal, right? And so when
we start to automate things like um I
spoke about uh we spoke about automated
uh uh testing as an example one of the
pieces that we want to automate is take
the what is called evidence right so
think about purchase orders invoices
these come in as PDFs and spreadsheets
and it's all unstructured
and so if you're doing this manually
what typically happens is you cannot
look at every transaction you you pick
like 10 15 100 transactions. Then you
look at it manually and and you see if
the purchase order number in the invoice
actually match the purchase order number
that was approved for that invoice. And
you're doing this manually. But if you
start to take that unstructured content
and structure it, then now you can run
this testing over a larger sample
because now you're not doing this
manually. So now you have really
automated coverage for your testing by
taking AI to take unstructured content
and then structuring it. So that's how
you get broader coverage. Uh and then
the the the folks that are doing the
testing you know the auditors they can
actually focus on how to go off and
remediate things that are not working
and that's where their judgment comes
in. So less manual work more on judgment
more on decision support. It's an
important point, Deepo, because when we
think about AI, I think a lot of times
we think about speed, which certainly AI
allows us to move faster, and I know you
kind of again illustrated that in some
of your demos this morning. Um, but what
I'm hearing from you is that it also
potentially helps us to reduce our risk,
improve our compliance because we are
able to offload some of those tasks to
AI, move faster, and then also, like you
say, really leverage that human judgment
more.
>> 100%. And yeah, I I like to think of it
as layers of Swiss cheese, right? So no
layer is 100% perfect. Like if you think
about human review, it's not 100%
perfect. Uh AI, it has its own gaps, but
you start to layer enough of human and
AI and multiple checkpoints, you get
enough coverage, and that's how you
improve trust within the uh system.
>> What do you think will separate the
companies that truly get value from AI
from the ones that simply, you know,
just have a lot of AI tools? Ultimately,
it's about the customer, right? And the
user uh and and so the companies that
can figure out what are the problems the
users are trying to solve. How can AI
which is a means to an end it's not the
end. How can AI enable users to become
more productive, more efficient, produce
higher quality work? Uh those are the
companies that will will succeed versus
if you start to think about AI for AI
sake then you end up with product bloat.
That's what you get. Uh so that's what
we are focused on. We're making sure
that our early adopters take everything
that we've announced today and we have a
number of programs that will uh put them
through the paces. We want to help them
on their transformation journey, but
when they start to adopt, they'll
provide feedback. We'll make it better
and awesome and that's how we get to a
point where users get what they expect
from work.
>> Absolutely. Deepac and is there anything
in addition to that customer feedback?
Is there anything else that kind of your
team is leveraging when it thinks about
um when your team thinks about you know
kind of the product portfolio and how
like the selective areas that you do
want to integrate AI?
>> Yeah. So customer feedback is a is a big
piece. Clearly the technology landscape
is is changing. It's changing rapidly.
So we're always looking at how do we
leverage the latest and greatest in
technology and solve problems that we
previously just couldn't solve or didn't
even think about solving. And LLMs
themselves are a representation of that.
But each LLM model is different. It's
getting better. It's trying to do more
things. It's trying to do things
differently. And so big part of our work
is really mapping what problems we're
trying to solve with the right model
that will actually solve these problems.
And it's not a one-sizefits-all. And
that's why uh this is something that we
pay attention to and make sure that
users get the value that uh that they're
trying to unlock
>> in in the work product lineup. the
unveiling and I know we we all love our
children equally. What's your what are
you most excited about?
>> Oh my gosh. [laughter]
Um
>> I stumped you.
>> I I would say I'm most excited about
agent studio and for the reasons I
mentioned earlier, right? That is how
it's literally a manifestation of some
of the tools that we use internally as
we build our agents. We are now exposing
that so that our customers and our
partners can go off and build their
agents. So while we'll still continue to
build these fitfor-purpose agents, those
agents will be you know where our deep
subject matter expertise matters where
it's doing something very specific and
difficult within the platform but the
way we'll get scale and the value unlock
uh within our customer community is by
letting them do things their own way.
So, I'm very excited about Agent Studio
and the possibilities that it uh it um
brings to us.
>> Absolutely. And Deepo, do you see
potentially opportunities to kind of see
what customers or partners are doing
with Agent Studio and then perhaps even
productize some of that, you know, um
kind of use that as another lever for
feedback in terms of some of the agents
commonly across your customer base. That
would be helpful.
>> Absolutely. Yeah. I mean, we we always
uh work closely with partners and
customers. So, that's one way we get
feedback. uh we have some
instrumentation uh within our platforms.
We get feedback. The one thing we don't
want to do is see in terms of you know
customer data or uh something that is uh
you know that would uh uh cross the line
on privacy. So we take care uh and and
not get into areas where we are able to
see customer activity specifically. But
yeah, we have these signals that will
tell us what's working, what's not
working, how can we make life better for
our customers and for our partners.
>> All right, Decon, thank you so much. I I
I know you have to get out of here. I
think you have some meetings happening.
Thank you so much for stopping by the
Cube. Appreciate it.
>> Thank you, Chris.
>> And you're watching The Cube, the leader
in live tech coverage and in-depth
expert analysis. We'll be right back.