Daily Current Affairs Analysis | 20th August, 2026 | Shankar IAS Academy | UPSC | Mains 2026
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The video begins by highlighting critical public health and governance challenges facing India in August 2026, starting with a significant spike in H1N1 infections during the monsoon season across major cities like Delhi, Mumbai, and Kerala. This seasonal respiratory illness, which often overlaps with common cold symptoms, poses a severe threat to children returning to school and those with pre-existing conditions like asthma, as evidenced by a dramatic surge in cases and fatalities in Kerala throughout July and early August. To combat this, experts emphasize the importance of annual influenza vaccinations for individuals over six months old and the urgent need for early antiviral treatment within 48 hours of symptom onset. Simultaneously, the Prime Minister's Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations (PM CARES) Fund faces intense scrutiny regarding its lack of transparency, with concerns raised over idle funds exceeding ₹8,000 crore, delayed audits, and exemptions from the Right to Information Act that erode public trust and democratic accountability.
In the realm of rural development, the transition from the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) to a new employment act under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita has inadvertently caused a sharp decline in rural job generation. This disruption was exacerbated by a six-month gap between the enactment of the new law in December 2025 and the enforcement of implementation rules in July 2026, creating confusion among officials who halted projects during the critical agricultural lean season from April to July. Despite a substantial increase in central budget allocation to nearly ₹1.5 lakh crore, employment numbers have not risen, disproportionately affecting populous "Bimaru" states and reducing rural purchasing power. To address these issues, authorities are urged to ensure smooth transitions through grassroots assessments, guarantee income security for workers during the switch, issue clear administrative guidelines, and utilize real-time monitoring technologies like satellite tracking to verify project timelines and fund utilization effectively.
The analysis further extends to global environmental and energy dynamics, noting that a study by the Food Systems Countdown Initiative published in *Nature Food* indicates that most nations are on track to miss their 2030 food security goals due to significant gaps in diet, environment, livelihood, governance, and resilience. On the conservation front, India celebrated its 80th Independence Day with the release of blackbucks into the Banni grassland, a species now classified as "Least Concern" thanks to successful conservation efforts that aim to translocate hundreds more across Gujarat's grasslands. Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions and environmental factors are impacting global energy security, as falling water levels in the Danube River forced Romania to shut down its Sernada nuclear reactor, which supplied about 20% of the nation's electricity, prompting a search for alternative energy sources for European nations dependent on the river. Additionally, diplomatic efforts to ensure safe shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz are underway, with an agreement between Iran and Oman contingent upon US actions in the region.
Read the full video transcript
[music]
Hello everyone, welcome to the daily
current affair analysis brought to you
by Shangar Academy 20th August 2026.
Before getting into the discussion,
please make sure that you subscribe to
our YouTube channel. If you haven't,
please do subscribe and also hit the
bell icon to receive ontime updates from
the academy. And before moving to the
topics for today's discussion, we have
an important announcement. It is
regarding the pre-torrming UPC prelims
test series batch one exclusively for
the Ananaga center will be starting on
7th September 2026. So you can check the
website for more details and you can
register there. So do register and crack
the prelims in 2027. And coming to the
topics for uh today's discussion, the
first topic is about H1N1 infection. So
this is rainy season and several parts
of the country is experiencing a a spike
in the H1N1 infection. And the second
article is about PM care fund. So
recently there are concerns about the
transparency in the management of PM
care fund and the third article is about
food security goals or food system
goals. So a recent study found that most
of the country or no country in this
world is going to achieve the 2013 food
security goals and the fourth article is
about uh the the recent decline in the
employment during the transition phase
from the MG Nara to BBG Ramji act and
the final topic is prelims focus for the
day. So if all said let's begin the
discussion with the first article.
Coming to the first article H1N1 cases
on rise experts say no cause for Allah.
Article is taken from the Hindu. So this
article is talking about the rising
cases of H1N1 infection in various parts
of the country. So in this background
let us understand more about this
article. So talking about H1N1
infection, it is also known as swine flu
and it is caused by the H1N1 virus which
is a subtype of influenza A virus. And
we can see that in 2019 sorry in 2009
this H1N1 caused a major you know
pandemic in various parts of the
country. But now this infection is
circulating as a seasonal infection.
That means this infection is mostly seen
during the time of monsoon season. And
we can see that this infection causes
the virus causes respiratory illness and
uh it is transmitted through respiratory
air droplets.
So this is the primary mode of
transmission and the general symptoms of
this infection includes fever or
chillness, cough and sore throat,
blocked nose, headache and fatigue,
muscle or body pain and also sometimes
vomiting and diarrhea. And we can see
that most of the symptoms are
overlapping with the general cold. So
this is one of the major challenges that
means understanding the difference
between the H1N1 infection and the
common cold is the major uh challenge in
treating this infection. And uh talking
about the most affected regions we can
see that it is Delhi the union territory
of Delhi the city of Mumbai Kerala. So
in the recent time there is an
increasing cases of infection in Kerala
and Bangaluru, Chennai and Telangana.
These are the most affected regions in
the country. And uh talking about the
concern so the major concern is is about
the children because we know that you
know most of the schools in the country
will be reopening during the time of
monsoon and therefore the this infection
this infection is also happening during
the time of mansoon. Therefore the the
children who are already facing some
health issues or who are suffering from
asthma or any such conditions are highly
vulnerable to the infection. So the now
it is school reopening time. Therefore
we have concern about the children
because they will be going outside they
will be interacting with other children.
So the possibility of spread of this in
this infection is very high in the
children. And the next is testing
challenge. So what is the major
challenge? So we know that the routine
H1N1 testing is don't is not done
properly that means it is not focused
that much. So like I mentioned before
most of the symptoms of this infection
is overlapping with the common cold.
Therefore the people are not giving
adequate attention to this infection and
most of them will give attention only
when the condition is severe or you know
if the condition affects their
respiratory system that much. So this is
the major challenge in uh treating or
fighting this infection and
importance of early treatment. So the
doctors recommend testing suspected
cases earlier particularly within 24 to
48 hours of symptom onset. So the you
know uh pe the people are recommended to
take appropriate treatment within 24 to
48 hours once the symptoms appears that
means once the once the symptoms are
visible the doctors are recommending the
people that they have to take the
antiviral within 24 to 48 hours
and the case of Kerala so we have a
major concern uh about the Kerala
because we can see that in the month of
May around 500 plus cases were recorded
in Kerala and six deaths and in the
month of June uh the cases reached 250
and 26 people lost their life because of
the infection and in the month of July
we can see that it again increased to
2,899
and 31 people lost their life uh in the
month of July and till 17th August 2026
we can see that within this month nearly
uh,476
cases are recorded in Kerala and 21
people lost their lives. So the death
rate is slowly increasing right. So we
can see that the death rate is slowly
increasing and uh within this month
nearly 1,500 nearly 1,500 cases are
recorded. So we can see that the Kerala
is becoming more vulnerable to infection
especially we know that what is the
reason because the monsoon will be
arriving there only the first the the
first wave of the monsoon will be
arriving in the Kerala only. So the
kerala is becoming more vulnerable to
H1N1 and vaccination angle. So health
experts recommend annual influenza
vaccination for elder and high-risk
group. So this annual in influenza
vaccination is suitable for the people
from the age of 6 months. So you know
this will reduce the severity of the
disease. It will reduce the
hospitalization and also we can reduce
the mortality and also reduces the
healthcare expenditure. So these are the
general benefits of the vaccination and
once the uh symptoms appears the people
are recommended to take the uh the
medical support within 40 24 to 48 hours
and the best method to treat this
condition is vaccination and we have the
annual influenza vaccination for this
which is suitable for the people above
the age group of 6 months to the elderly
population. And coming to the prelimin
practice question the question is
consider the following statements
regarding H1N1 influence. Statement one,
H1N1 is a subtype of influenza A virus.
Yes, that is correct. And statement two,
antigenic shift in influenza virus
occurs due to gradual accumulation of
mutations. See, it is not antigenic
shift, it is antigenic drift. Antigenic
drift in influenza virus occurs due to
gradual accumulation of mutation. That
is the uh this is where the statement is
going incorrect. And statement three,
humlutin
and neuromminis are surface proteins
used for classifying influenza a
subtypes. Yes, that is correct. These
are the proteins and this is considered
as one of the factors or you know
criteria to classify the subtypes of a
influenza a virus and statement for
antigenic shift is mainly associated
with the influenza A and can contribute
to the emergence of pandemic strains
that is possible. So the statement uh
they are asking for the correct
statement and uh except statement two
all the three remaining statements are
correct. So the correct answer is going
to be option B 1 3 and 4. Yes with this
we will move to the next article. Coming
to the second article why is the PMKS
fund keeping large idle? Article is
taken from the Hind. So this article is
talking about certain concerns
associated with the management of PMKS.
So we know that the full form of PM care
is
prime minister's citizen assistance and
relief in emergency situations. So this
PM care fund was created in 2020 during
the time of COVID 19 and it is
registered as a public charitable trust
and it has 100%age tax exemption under
the article sorry under the section 18
clause G of the income tax act of 1962
and we can say that the prime minister
of India is the chairperson of this fund
that is he is the ex official
chairperson of this fund and it also has
exofficial trustee they are the home
minister, defense minister and the
finance minister of the India. So what
is the primary purpose or what is the
ultimate purpose of this fund? Providing
relief to the citizens when they are
facing any emergency or distress. That
is the ultimate purpose of this fund.
And talking about the governance and
legal framework or the governance or
legal aspect of this fund, we can see
that here from here onwards we have
certain concerns associated with the PMA
fund. So we can see that the donations
to this fund is qualified for 100%age
deduction under the 18 clause G of the
income tax act. So the the donations to
the PMAR fund is exempted from the
taxation under the uh section 18 clause
G of the income tax act. And we can see
that the donations to the fund is also
considered as CSR that is corporate
social responsibility under the
companies act of 2013. And uh we can see
that this PM care fund can also accept
foreign donations. And uh this foreign
donations are working outside the
jurisdiction of the FC that is foreign
contribution and regulation act of 2010.
And uh who is auditing this PM care
fund? It is not audited by the CAG that
is it is not audited by this
combatroller and auditor general.
Instead it is audited by the independent
chartered accountants. So this is also a
concern associated with the management
of the PMKS fund and uh talking about
the transparency. So this PMER fund is
outside the RTI review. So these are the
major uh you know governance aspects of
this PMA fund and we can see that in
each and every line there are some
concerns associated with the the legal
and government's framework. So what is
the current controversy? So what is the
current controversy and why the RTA
activists are rising concern about the
management of PM care. So we can see
that the last annual audit was released
in 20 uh in the financial year 2020
23 that means after this financial year
there was a there was you know uh there
there was on there was no on-time
release of this annual audit. So you
know uh the irregular uh release of the
annual audit is the first major concern
associated with the PM care fund and we
can see that the 2023 2425
annual audit was released in the recent
time only that is it was released in the
last Tuesday only and uh recently
uh nearly 324 cr rupees was refunded
back to the BMK fund and there is no
idea regarding
Why this amount this much amount was
refunded back to the PMARE fund and what
are the agencies that refunded this
amount to the PMAR fund and for what
purpose the PMK fund released this much
amount to different agencies. So the the
refund opacity. So these are the recent
concerns associated with the management
of the PMK fund. And we can see that on
August 8th the Hindu news article, Hindu
newspaper, they highlighted this issue
and RTA activist like Miss Anjali
Baratwatch. So they also raised concern
about this you know uh about the
management of the BMK fund. So this is
the reason behind the present
controversy around the BMK fund. And if
you take the financial year 202425, we
can see that the PMK fund received
around 480 cr rupees as donation. And
that year the total income of this PM
fund was around,279.9
cr rupes. So total income includes not
just the donation it also includes
interest and other sources of income. So
the total income for the financial year
202425 was 1,295
and sorry 1,279.9
cr rupes and we can see that after the
disclosure now the present
total balance in this PMR fund is around
8,000 plus cr 8,000 plus cr but if you
take the spending of the 202425
financial year it is not even 1 cr rupes
so why the government is keeping this
much amount. So we know that recently
the Assam experienced flood and last
year also in 2025 also several regions
of India experienced flood earthquake
and you know and very and many other
issues but the government is not
releasing fund from this PM care fund.
So this is another major concern
associated with the PM care fund and uh
so summarizing the concerns the first
concern is about the ideal cops. So they
have 8,000 plus cr rupees in the fund
but it is remaining unused and second is
unexplained refund. So we saw that
nearly 324 cr rupes was refunded from
various agencies to the PMARE fund. So
we have no idea what are these agencies
you know why PMK released this much
amount to the uh various agencies and
you know for what purpose they released
this much amount. So they we have no
idea about it and uh and there is a
concern about faulty equipment whether
this fund was utilized for the purchase
of some faulty equipments or for some
other you know uh irrelevant purpose. So
such questions are there and missing
audit note. So supporting notes to the
audit report not uploaded publicly. So
we can see that the the the disclosure
is not happening properly. You know the
the release of this annual audit is not
happening properly and op funding. So we
can see that nearly you know the the
funding from the foreign organizations
or from foreign sources are not covered
under the FC that is foreign
contribution and regulation act. So this
is concern about you know the about the
the sources of this donations and
contributions and RTA vision. So we know
that the fund or the contribution to the
PMAR fund is 100%age tax exempted under
the income tax act of 1962 under the
section 18 clause G sorry 80 clause G.
So there is a possibility for using this
uh provision as a tax evision uh you
know by various organizations. So these
are the major concerns that we have
associated with the uh the uh the
present management of the PMK fund and
why this you know the concern matters
why the concern matters first is it will
slowly erode the public trust. So we
know that the fund was ultimately formed
for the uh for providing relief to the
citizens but the fund is not utilized
properly and the funding or the
contribution means itself is remaining
opaque and it is exempted from various
uh regulating act for example CRA income
tax and also the RTI. So this is this
will slowly erode the trust of the
citizens and next is disaster mandate.
So we can see that the fund was
primarily designed for what for for
assisting the people during the time of
distrust but this much fund is kept idle
in this uh you know PMK fund and it is
not utilized properly and the next is
democratic norms. So the opacity in
public purpose fund weakens the
accountability culture. So you know the
government they have the uh you know the
the right to give explanation right but
the this much amount is kept ideal and
the the opacity related to the funding
and the contribution is uh you know may
road the culture of accountability and
next is RTA principle. So refusing the
RTA dilutes the citizens fundamental
right to know. So under the article
19 of the Indian constitution we have
the right to know right the citizens has
the right to know uh about the
government even about the the candidates
that that they are going to vote but if
this um amount this fund is not
adequately covered under the RTI then it
will affect the principle of
transparency right and the next is
foreign inflow so we know that
undisclosed foreign donations or
contributions raises concerns about the
independency as well as the sovereignity
of the country and next is
constitutional checks. So we know that
the the audit is not done by the CAG or
any other government bodies. It is done
by independent chartered accountant. So
this is undermining the the the position
of the CA and the government
organizations.
So what can be done? How we can address
this uh concern? So the first is
bringing under the RTI provision. So we
have to make sure that certain
provisions or certain means of
contributions uh in the uh in in the uh
in the BMK fund is covered under the RTI
or the entire fund itself is covered
under the RTA. So you know bringing the
entire fund under the jurisdiction of
RTI will help. Second is appointing the
CAG to audit uh the the expenditure and
income to this fund is very important
and the timely disclosure. So we know
that in 2000 since 20 since the
financial year 2022 23 there was no
on-time release of the annual audit. So
make sure that the audit is released on
time to maintain public trust and the
culture of accountability. Next is
utilization plan. So for what purpose we
are going to utilize this plan you know
how much amount is going to be utilized.
All this has to be made public. And the
next is independent oversight. So
instead of using you know independent
chartered accountant or instead of you
know uh using them for audit we have to
make sure that independent recognized
bodies will be auditing the account. And
uh next is legislative framework. So we
can see that it is uh you know
registered as a charitable trust.
Instead of that give a statutory nature
to this fund. So that will you know
bring more accountability and
transparency in the management of the
fund. So these are the measures that we
can consider to make the PMKR fund more
transparent and accountable to the
nation.
And now we have a prelimin practice
question. The question is with reference
to the PMKS fund, consider the following
statements. Statement one, it was
constituted under a specific act of
parliament to deal with emergency
situations. Statement two. Statement one
is incorrect. So we can eliminate option
A, option C, right? And option B and
option D are there. Contributions to the
fund qualify as CSR expenditure under
the company's act of 2013. That is
correct. The audit is uh the fund is
audited by the competer and auditor
general of India. No, it is done by the
independent chartered accountant. So the
statement three is also incorrect. So
the correct answer is going to be option
B 2 and foreign donations to the fund
are exempted from the provisions of the
FC 2010. That is also correct. So the
statement uh two and statement four are
correct. So the correct answer is going
to be option B2 and forward only. Yes,
with this we will move to the next
article. Coming to the third article,
most countries will miss 2030 food
system goal emission removal among
biggest gaps. Article is taken from the
downward magazine. So recently the food
system countdown initiative. They
conducted a study in 17 197 countries to
understand about their progress towards
food security and uh the study regarding
uh this was published in the journal
nature food and this study found that
most of the countries in this world will
miss the 2030 food security goal. So we
know that uh the goal number two of the
sustainable development goals right it
is talking about zero hunger right so
the world is moving towards you know the
objective is achieving the food security
by 2030 but the present study is showing
that the world will not achieve the 2030
food security objectives. So in this
background let us understand more about
this article. So like I mentioned the
study was conducted by the food systems
countdown initiative and the study was
conducted in uh nearly 197 countries
using uh 44 indicators uh under uh five
major themes and we can see that the the
to measure the progress the study used
2015 because in 2015 only we adopted the
sustainable development goals right so
the study adopted 2015 as the base year
for measuring the progress And we can
see that uh most of the countries are
not in a in right direction to achieve
the full security goal. So that is the
uh final conclusion or the uh the
findings of the study. And uh talking
about the five domains of assessment. So
uh we used nearly 44 indicators covering
these five themes. The first is diet,
nutrition and sec health. The second is
environment and uh resources. Third is
lilihood and equity. and fourth is
governance and fifth is resilience. So
we used 44 indicators covering all the
five themes to understand about the
progress of the countries towards food
security and uh so where the progress is
lagging. So the study finally found that
most of the countries are in a are not
in a right track to attain the food
security. So where we are lagging? So
first is emission gap. So global average
is around 20 75% away from the 2030
target. So imagine that we need 100%age
progress to achieve the 2030 goal. In
that case as per the present study we
found that only 25%age is done.
Remaining 75%age of you know uh emission
gap has to be addressed then only we can
achieve the 2030 food security goal.
Second is no country is in the right
track. So zero nations are expected to
meet or projected to meet the 2030 food
security goal. and and the next is food
insecurity. It's a it's the the study
found that this food food insecurity is
a major concern especially in the
continents of Asia and Africa. And
another major concern raised by the
study is government's weakness. So we
know that recently the US state was
reduced you know so all the initiatives
or all the decisions are you know
affecting the food security and also the
the human justice and next is
ultrarocessed food. So on one side the
food security is affected that means the
food system is facing lot of issues but
on other side there's an increase in the
global sale of processed food. So this
is raising concern about the quality of
diet
and the next is slow pace. So most
indicators show only marginal or
reversed progress. So even though there
are progress in certain indicators still
the progress is very slow and some of
the progress are even going backward.
and uh the findings in numbers. So we
can see that uh the study was conducted
on 197 countries using 44 indicators and
we found that we have a an emission gap
of nearly 75%age to meet the uh the food
security and uh 63%age of uh reduction
in the food security is needed for Asia
to meet the food security. So that is
the condition. So if you take the case
of Africa, they need you know progress
in nearly 15 to 20% progress in nearly
23 indicators to achieve the food
security and in the in the case of Asia
which is one of the most affected
regions. So here we have to reduce the
food insecurity by nearly 63%age then
only we can achieve the food security
and in the case of Europe so comparing
with Africa, Asia, America the European
region is very close to the food
security and in the case of Tunisia one
of the most uh you know performing
states or uh countries in the continent
of Africa. So we can see that the
Tunisia has shown progress in nearly 16
indicators. This is the highest
performing nation in the continent of
Africa. So we will summarize this data.
So we have conducted study nearly 197
countries using 44 indicators and we
found that we have to steal a an
emission gap of nearly 75%age a global
emission gap of average 75%age to attain
the food security. And if you go the
regional development we can see that
Africa needs to improve uh you know 23
indicators by at least 15 to 20
percentage to achieve the food security
and in the in the case of Asia we have
to reduce the food insecurity by nearly
63%age to achieve the food food security
and Europe is very close to uh in all
indicators and in the case of Africa the
most or the best performing state is the
uh nation of Tunisia which has shown
progress in nearly 16 indicators
and uh going uh by regional performance
we can like I mentioned Europe and Asia
closest to the uh the food security but
the Asia is still facing the major
problem that is 63%age of food
insecurity has to be reduced to achieve
the food security but Europe is very has
shown very good progress in almost every
indicators and in the case of Africa and
America we can see lot of disparities
within the region for example if you
take In the case of uh Africa, other
states are performing backward while the
Tunisia and some other states are
performing very uh you know good. So
this is really and also in the case of
America certain certain Latin American
countries are not performing very good
while countries like USA and Canada they
are performing good. So this is raising
concern about regional inequality within
uh in the food security system. And next
is Tunisia. So the Africa's leader so
they are performing very good in in
nearly 16 indicators and the regional
benchmark. So we can see that if you
take the case of Africa they need to
address the diet cost gap by 58%age when
it combines with the global average but
if you take the African average it is uh
32%age and uh in the case of Oceanania
so global and regional benchmark broadly
aligned with the you know they means
they are mostly showing a lot of
progress in many indicators but still
they have to you know work on a lot of
areas. So this is the data regarding the
regional performance and uh indicators
moving backward. So we can see that the
f the the study found that some of the
indicators are not performing very good
and some of them are even going
backward. So now we are going to see
where are the areas we are going
backward. So the first is civil society.
So the participation of civil society in
the in in in you know in uh in the food
system or in the decision- making is
very important. But in the recent times
we can see that their participation in
the food system decision is very
shrinking. So this bill will increase.
For example like I mentioned the USA you
know cut. So that is affecting the the
role of civil society or the NOS's in
many uh conflict affected region. So
like that the participation of civil
society is reducing especially in food
security. Next is accountability. So the
government oversight of food policy is
weakening. So we can see that you know
uh if you even if you take the case of
the recent amendment for the national
good security act of 2013 there is a
confusion regarding the ceiling or right
there's a confusion regarding the
ceiling of andodi anayojana at 35 kg
rice per household so there are uh
concerns so the the government oversight
not just in India across the world the
government oversight on food security
system is getting reduced and
ultrarocessed food is rising so the
global in the global level there is an
increase in the sale of ultrarocessed
food and this is raising concern about
the quality of diet and also the the
health issues and water withdrawal. So
we can see that agricultural water use
expanding and straining the ecosystem.
So the population is increasing you know
more production is needed and therefore
more water is needed for the production
and also recent development of
artificial intelligence data centers and
all. So this is consuming lot of water
and also the industries for many decades
they are consuming water. So this is
increasing the water strain particularly
in the low and middle inome countries.
And next is pesticide use. So the
consumption climbing despite biod
diversity concerns. So you know the
pesticide use uh you know it can lead to
lot of health issues and also you know
it can lead to long-term health issues
in the people. So that will once again
reduce the productivity. And next is
greenhouse gas emission. So the food
system emission continues to rise not
falling. So the emission from the you
know the food system food processing
system is increasing. So what is mean by
food processing system? It's a chain
right? It is a chain ranging from the
field to plate. So the the processing
the production in each and every stage
of the food production or in the food
system there will be you know emission.
So the emission from the food system is
increasing not falling. So these are the
major areas that we are going backward
and the next is positive signal. So
there are also certain positive signs.
So the first is off on track. So we can
see that about 50%age of the indicators
moving in a desirable direction. But
that is not enough to achieve the 2030
food security goal. And next is one/ird
of the countries have shown progress in
nearly seven seven out of 33 indicators
and uh they can know uh they they uh
they means they can achieve this full
progress in the the seven indicators by
2030. And next is crop land change. So
encouraging stabilization
and agricultural land use. So you know
the changes in the agricultural land use
pattern is uh in certain areas it is
protecting the soil productivity
especially in the regions of uh you know
Europe and all the the the change in the
in the land use pattern has increased in
productivity and also it is ensuring the
soil health. And next is rural
employment. So under undermployment
declining in several regions. So the in
many areas the rural underemployment is
declining and that can be seen as a
positive sign and food supply so
variability in food supply is steadily
reducing. So you know uh that means we
can say that even though there are
conflicts still the the the supply chain
is uh remaining you know stable that
means even though there are price
fluctuations still the the system is
stable but the concern is what type of
can be supplied is it processed or
quality good next is connectivity. So
mobile subscriptions has increased in
the remote areas in many countries.
Therefore, it will ensure or it can
ensure direct uh contact or you know
direct connection with the market.
Therefore, it will reduce the uh you
know the possibility of intermediaries
on middleman and it will ensure income
to the farmers. So these are the
positive areas or positive signs that we
can see from the study
and way forward. So what we need? So we
need a robust food system which is
resilient to the global shock. Right? So
for that we need a lot of reforms. For
example, if you if you take this case of
uh this food food system initiative
study, we can see that you know uh many
areas which are focused on regional
development they have improved a lot. So
instead of going for a larger scale
implementation focus on regional level
and address the regional level problem
so that will bring more effective or
good benefit or good outcome. So
stronger policies. So anger food system
reform in the national priorities with
the regional focus. And next is targeted
investment. So scale finance for
sustainable climate resilient
agricultural chain. So you know
prioritizing uh the you know uh the
green production and at the same time
make sure that this outcome is
affordable for everyone. And next is
innovation push that means uh deploy
agricultural technology precision
farming and also low emission models. So
this will you know reduce the wastage of
water resources and also we can reduce
the emission from the agriculture. For
example the traditional method of patt
cultivation it is one of the major
sources of methane. So you know shifting
in such areas or changing uh in bringing
changes in such areas will will help us
to understand or to reduce this problem
and next is accountability. So
strengthen governance and civil society
participation in the food system
decision making and regional benchmark.
So use income based target to make
progress realistic. So instead of
focusing on you know utopian uh goal
understand the reality understand the
ground reality and based on the ground
reality we have to uh you know reform
the policies and next is long horizon
goals. So extend timelines to 2050 with
accelerated
neartime action. So you know instead of
pressurizing the countries to achieve
the full security by 2030 which is just
4 years from now. know focused on uh the
the abilities of the country and try to
extend the goal to 2040 or 2050 based on
the country's ability. So these are the
measures that we can take in the coming
days to address or to bring a a food
system resilience.
And uh now we have a mains practice
question. And the question is critically
examine the structural barriers to
sustainable food system food system
transformation in India and suggest the
measures for an equitable climate
resilient and a nutrition secure food
system. So it's a 15 mark question and
uh write around uh we have to write
around 250 words. Write the answer post
it in the comment section. We will
review and we will reply for your
answer. Now it's time to move to the
next article. Coming to the fourth
article employment guarantee has slipped
into limbo. Article is taken from the
Hindu. So we know that in the month of
December 2025 we enacted the Basit Barat
guarantee for Roskar and Ajiga mission
Ghan or BBG Ramji act. We enacted this
uh BBG Ram G in 2024 25 in the month of
December and in the by the end of June
2026 we prepared the rules for the BBG
Ram. So after 6 months nearly after 6
months only we are preparing the rules
for the VBJ Ramji right and from the 1st
July we implemented the VBJ Ramji act or
the we can say the VBJ Ramji act came to
force that means it officially replaced
the previous employment guarantee act
that is Mahatma Gandhi national rural
employment guarantee act but now we have
a concern that is if you take the
statistics from the April to July we can
see a significant decline in the
employment provided under the Employment
Guarantee Acts of India. So in this
background let us understand what is the
reason behind that and in this
transition that is in the transition
from the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural
Employment Guarantee Act to BBJ Ramji
Act where we have done the mistake. Let
us discuss.
So talking about the before
understanding that we have to discuss
some basics about the VBJ Raman act
right. So the full form is because it
barak guarantee for rosar and aja
mission gram that is a full form of
abjam act and it is a new employment
guarantee act of India and it is more
aligned with the emerging challenges and
also with the objective of vasit bat
2047 and talking about the saline
features of the act we know that the
first major highlight of this act is
enhanced the statutory employment
guarantee. So we can see that in the
previous act the minimum days of work
was provided at 100 days right it was
100 days but now it got increased to 125
that means 25 days of extra work is
provided under the new act and the next
is balanced provision for agriculture
and rural labor. So uh there is a
provision for 60 days of post in the
infrastructure project under the BBJamji
act during the peak agricultural season.
So the people who are already enrolled
in the BBJ Ramji act they can go they
they can go and work in the agriculture
field to meet the agricultural work
demand. And next is timely wage payment.
So once the person is once the work is
completed then we have to make the
payment within 15 days. Within 15 days
the payment has to be done. And next is
decentralized planning with the national
convergence. So instead of uh top-down
planning here under the BBJ act we will
be planning from the grassroot level
that means uh the the draft everything
will be prepared from the vigasit
panchayat and from there it will go to
silap parish and from there it will go
to the state level and from there it
will converge with the mega national
projects like gdeshaki and next is
reformed financial architecture so if
you take the case of previous employment
act that was Mahatma Gandhi employment
act the 100%age of the funding was
provided by
central government. So the central
government provided 100%age of funding
but here the state and the central
government both will make contributions.
So 60%age of the funding will be
provided by the central government and
40%age of the funding will be provided
by the state governments. And in the
case of the northeast and Himalayan
states 90%age of the funding will be
provided by the central government and
10%age will be provided by the state
government. And next is strengthened
administrative capacity. So in the
previous act there was a 6%age ceiling
in the uh uh for the administrative
expenditure but now we can see that
under the new act the ceiling got
increased to 9% that means more staff or
officials can be employed for
administrative purpose under the uh new
employment act and next is employment
guarantee and the right to demand. So
under the section 5 clause one of the
BBG Ramji act uh the state is obligated
to provide work within 15 days of the
acceptance of the application. So once
the person is filed the application once
the government is accepted his
application then from 15 days within 15
days the government has to provide work
to the uh people
and uh these are the four priority areas
under the BBJ Ramji act. So the first is
water security. Second is focusing on
core infrastructural development in the
rural area and next is focusing on
livelihood related infrastructure and
the next is focusing on special project
or work for extreme weather events. So
it is focusing on the sustainable or
inclusive development of the rural area
and also to know uh it the another focus
of this act is mitigating the climate
challenges faced by the rural India. So
this is addressing the two major
challenges in the rural India. And the
next is the next provision is normative
funding and employment provision. So
normative funding. So we know that
instead of providing allocating a mass
amount to a particular region or to a
particular state under the BBG raji act
the government will allocate the fund to
the states based on certain predefined
criteria. So for example sometimes the
government will consider population soil
fertility the previous year's uh
performance financial stability of the
you know the state all these factors
will be considered before allocating the
before providing fund to a particular
state. So this will ensure equity and
also it will limit the the wastage of
resource and next is decentralization
and role of punayat. So like I mentioned
the PJIT level planning will be done at
the beginning and from there it will go
to Silaparia and from there it will go
to national level convergence and next
is employment and asset creation. So the
previous act focused on providing
employment alone but now we can see that
under the Vikas bar act it is focusing
more on employment and also asset
creation. So that that is a path towards
sustainable development. And if these
utilization of technology for example
satellite images you know biometrics and
also uh facial recognition all the
technologies will be done to ensure
proper implementation of the projects.
And next is unemployment allowance. So
once the government accepted the
application from a person but the
government is not providing employment
in that case from 15 days onwards from
the 15th days day onwards the government
has to provide unemployment allowance to
a person. So these are the major
provisions under the new employment
guarantee act and now we will come to
the issue. So what was the issue? The
issue was the temp short decline in the
employment from April to July. So you
have to note this months it is from
April to July. Why the decline in the
rural employment or the employment that
provided under under the employment
guarantee act between the July between
the April to July is a concern because
we can see that the month from April to
July is known as summer agricultural
lean season. That means this time in
this months there will be no major
agricultural activities in the rural
area. So the people will be mostly
depending on what they will be mostly
depending on the government schemes
including the employment act for income.
But now we can see that in in the phase
of transition from the Mahatma Gandhi
National Employment Act to Vasit Barat
Act there was a short decline in the
employment provider under the employment
uh uh employment provider under the new
employment act. So the if you take the
the data of the uh last two years we can
see there was a significant decline in
the employment provided under the
employment act. For example if you take
the financial year 202425
uh we provided nearly 128 cr persons day
of employment during June April to July.
But in the 2025 the next financial year
we can see that there was a decline from
20 128 to 119 cr persons day of work. So
what is mean by person's day of work? It
is a measurement it is a measurement you
used by the institutions including the
government to understand how much amount
of work is provided under a scheme.
Okay. And in another way another way we
can say that it is a it is a total
amount of work done by a large group of
people. So the government in the
financial year 202425 they provided a a
work which which can employ nearly uh
128 cr people. But in the 2024 2526
uh we can see that the total uh amount
of work provided under the scheme got
reduced and again in 2026 27 it got
again reduced to 70 cr person's day of
employment or 70 cr person's day of
work. So the amount of work is reducing.
So if you compare the uh the this 2026
27 with the average of the last two
years we can see around 40 43%age
decline 43%age decline in the employment
generation. So these are the major
concern associated with the uh with the
transition from BBG from Mahatma Gandhi
National Rural Employment Guaranty Act
to BBJ Ramji Act and talking about the
statewide decline we can see that the
Himadra Pradesh is the most affected
state. So we can see that between April
and July there was a decline of nearly
84%age Uttarand 80%age Punjab 76 Jakand
75.5
Hana 75 Uttar Pradesh 74 Madhya Pradesh
68 Karnataka 68.3 Odisha 62.2 and
Gujarat 60%age. So if you take all these
states, majority of the states including
the big states like Uttar Pradesh,
Madhya Pradesh, all the states are
agricultural states and this period that
is from April to July there won't be
much agricultural activity. So the
decline in the employment provided under
the employment guarant act has affected
the Bimaru states disproportionately.
So what was the reason or why or what
what was the issue in this transition
stage? So the first major concern is
rules not ready. So we can see that we
uh we made the BBJ Ramji bill into VBJ
Ramji act in the month of December 2025.
But the rules for the implementation of
this act came only in the June 2026 that
is nearly 6 months of gap. So this
within this six this 6 months of gap led
to lot of confusion in the ground level.
That means the officials who are
responsible for the implementation of
the employment act did not take up new
projects under the previous act and also
the new act that is the the BBJ Ramg act
implementation also got a delayed. So
this confusion this uh gap led to lot of
confusion in the ground level and this
led to a decline in the employment. So
this is the issue. So uh the we replaced
the MG narga you know we we we planned
to replace the MG narga from 1st April
2026 but there was a delay in the
preparation of rules. The the the draft
rules came only on 22nd May and the
final rules came only in the June month
that is in the end of June 2026 and we
implemented that means we enforced the
new act from 1st July 2026. So this six
months of gap the six months of uh you
know uh gap led to lot of confusion in
the uh in the officials and therefore
the officials did not take up any new
projects under the previous act and also
the the new act also did not uh came on
time. So this led to a lot of confusion
and that is the major reason behind this
decline in the employment in this
transition stage.
And uh talking about the budget paradox
in this uh in the case of VBJ Ramji act.
So we can see that the central alone
allocated nearly 95,962
cr for the financial year 2026 27 for
the implementation of the VBJ Ramji act
and if you combine the state
contribution it will come around 1.5
lakh cr. So this is much higher than the
previous employment guarantee act. Even
with much higher allocation, even with
much higher budget, the employment
generation under the
uh new act is not rising.
So why this is a concern? Why this is a
major concern? So we already mentioned
it. So we can see that MGA normally
provides employment during the summer
agricultural lean season. But now we can
see that this transition from the engine
to VBJ Ramji came in the agricultural
lean season that is from April to July.
So this lack of coordination or this
know lack of institutional preparation
led to disruption of employment and now
this is raising concern about reduced
rural income increase of unemployment
know uh yes majority of the states if
you take the majority of the affected
states most of them are Bimaru states
they are large they also have high
population and majority of the
population are depending on the rural
income and this led to this will
increase the rural vulnerability.
and also it will weaken the rural safety
and also reduces the purchasing power in
the rural area. So in simple words we
can say that this in lack of
institutional preparation in this
transition stage has significantly
increased the risk of rural v
vulnerability and also rural poverty
and uh talking about way forward. So
what can be done?
So the concern there are two concerns.
First is
the decline in the employment in this
agricultural lean season. Second concern
is about the utilization or the
utilization of this budget. So we have
high budget comparing with the previous
act but still the question is can we
fully utilize this budget? If the budget
is not fully utilized then you know the
effective of this uh new act will not be
you know that much strong. So if you
want a real change now we have to focus
on that means anyway this uh the this uh
you know this this decline in the
employment guarantee sorry employment
has happened but now we have to focus on
utilizing this 1.5 lakh prof so how we
can utilize this so so what are the
methods that we can take at the present
situation to address or to reduce the
shock so the first is ensuring a smooth
transition between Mahatma Gandhi
National Rural Employment Guarantee Act
and VBJ Ram GI so here we have to you uh
go for you know state level and district
level or even grassroot level assessment
you know whether we have to confirm
whether any new projects have taken up
you know all the villages or the punch
have taken the or started implementing
the BBJ Ramji act so that we have to
consider and second is avoid disruption
in the employment during the transition
period so we have to make sure that the
people who worked in this transition
stage will receive you know appropriate
income and next is clear administrative
guidelines to states and districts to
avoid uh confusion and also for strong
center state coordination. So the rules
has to be properly implemented to the
grassroot level. So we have now the
ceiling for the administrative
expenditure also got increased.
Therefore there is a pro there is a
chance or there is a possibility for
increasing the uh you know uh the
employment of administrative officers.
So we can implement more or we can
appoint more administrative officer.
Therefore we can go for more planning
and effective implementation. Next is
timely release of fund and the wages uh
to take up on time project you know to
complete the project on time and then we
can uh make the uh make the payment also
on time. And next is monitor employment
generation through realtime data. So we
already have provisions for you know
satellite tracking you know biometrics
facial recognition. So we have to make
sure that uh the employment generation
is done and also the project taken up is
also completed on time. And next is
ensure that the increased budget
allocation translates into actual
person's day of work. So we can see that
in 20 comparing with the last two years
there was a 43%age decline in the
person's day of work. So we have to make
sure that this new budget that means
this increase in the allocation of
budget will translate into real benefit.
That means we can materialize it. So
these are the measures that we can
consider uh in in this in this situation
or in the transitional stage and also
for ensuring a long-term benefit from
the BBJ act. And uh now we are going to
see a mains practice question. The
question is a higher budgetary
allocation does not necessarily
translate into higher employment
generation. Examine the statement in the
context of the recent decline in rural
employment under the transition to BBG
Ramji. So it's a 15 marks question and
you have to write around 250 words.
Write the answer, post it in the comment
section. We will review and we will
reply for your answer. Now it's time to
move to the prelims focus for the day.
Coming to the prelims focus for the day.
The first topic is straight of former
shipping route agreement. So recently
the Iran and Oman they came to an
understanding regarding the straight of
shipping route agreement. So this
agreement is focusing on ensuring safe
and you know safe and secured movement
of goods and services through the state
of commerce. So both came to an
understanding but the finalization of
this agreement will be based on the US
reaction or US action in this region. So
Iran uh Iran and Oman came to an
understanding but Iran made a condition
that the reopening of the straight of
that means uh the normal reopening of
the straight of the finalization of this
agreement will be based on the US action
in this region. So from the prelims
point of view you have to understand
about the straight of hormos we know
that straight is a narrow channel of
water that connects two major water
bodies and in the straight of in the
case of the straight of hormos it
connects the the Persian gulf with the
gulf of and from there it can reach the
uh the Arabian sea and the Indian Ocean.
So it is vital for the uh energy trade
it is vital for the energy and we can
see that this agreement so talking about
this agreement just note what are the
countries involved in it. So we have two
countries. The first is Iran and second
is Oman. And the next topic. So here you
can see the straight of it is connected
to the it is connected. It is connecting
the Persian Gulf with the gulp of we
have done lot of article about the
straight of since the outbreak of the US
war. Right.
And the next topic is rewed black bucks
in Gujarat's beni. So as a part of the
80th independence day the nation
released 20 blackbuck into the bunny
grassland of Gujarat. So we can see that
currently the black buck is considered
as the least concern in the IUCN red
list because through various strong
initiatives we have know brought back
the population of this black buck and
nearly now as a part of the 8th
independence day we have released 20
blackbuck in in the beni grassland of
Gujarat which includes five males and 15
female and we can see that this
initiative initiative was done by the
Gujarat forest department in support
with the Wantara and uh the objective is
you know uh restoring the ecosystem
balance and at the same time now the
government has approved transllocation
of nearly 500 black bucks and 100
chinkara across the various grasslands
of Gujarat and uh
so talking about yeah 20 black bucks
were recently released in the bene
grassland and it is focusing on
restoring the population in the natural
ecosystem itself.
And the next is about Sernoda nuclear
reactor shutdown. So we know that the
the water level in the Danube river is
reducing. So it provide it was a
lifeline for 10 plus uh European nations
and now the water level in this Danu
river is reducing and as a part of it
the Romanian government has decided to
shut down the second reactor a nuclear
reactor at Sernaboda plant due to the
the fall in the water level of the Danu
river and we can see that this reactor
contributed approximately 20%age of the
national electricity but now the
government has promised that they are
looking for alternative sources to
restore for to address this gap. So uh
few days back we have done you know uh
an article in the prelims focus about
the fall of water level in the Danu and
in that we have discussed some fact
associated with this Danu river and now
we can see that it you know it is the
real lifeline of the European nations
including Romania, Bulgaria and all and
uh considering now we have the prelims
practice question. The question is
consider the following statements
regarding the state of Armos. Statement
one, it connects Persian Gulf with the
Gulf of Oman and Arabian Sea. Statement
two, Iran and Oman are two countries
that border that border the street of
Armas. And statement three, it is one of
the world's most important checkpoints
for global oil transportation. And
statement four, the straight provides
the only maritime route for all vessels
entering or leaving the Persian Gulf. So
which of the statements given above is
or are correct. Option A 1 2 and three
only. Option B 1 and three only, option
B 2 and four only and option D 1 2 3 and
four. So you can mention the correct
answer in the comment box. We will reply
for that. With this we are coming to the
conclusion for today's prelims focus.
With this we are coming to the
conclusion for today's current affair
analysis. If you like the video hit the
like button, give your feedbacks as
comments and share this content with
your friends. And before leaving this
channel, don't forget to subscribe and
also hit the bell icon to receive on
time updates from the academy. Thank you
for listening to us. Thank you for
listening to me. Have a nice day.
[music]