Curing All Human Diseases & the Future of Health & Technology | Mark Zuckerberg & Dr. Priscilla Chan
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this episode of The Huberman Lab Podcast, host Andrew Huberman interviews Mark Zuckerberg and Dr. Priscilla Chan regarding their ambitious mission to cure all human diseases by the end of the century through the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI). Launched in 2015, CZI operates on a philosophy that major scientific breakthroughs are often preceded by new tools for observation, drawing parallels between historical advancements like telescopes and microscopes. The initiative focuses on three primary avenues: funding groundbreaking science, building durable software and hardware tools such as the Human Cell Atlas to map all human cell types, and establishing BioHubs—collaborative institutes that tackle grand challenges beyond the scope of single laboratories. Dr. Chan emphasizes that understanding disease requires looking at basic biology from first principles, specifically how cells interpret genetic instructions via mRNA, noting that current knowledge often stops at identifying a DNA mutation without fully understanding the cellular mechanisms in between. The conversation highlights the profound personal motivations behind this work, particularly stemming from Dr. Chan's family history as the daughter of Vietnamese refugees who risked their lives on small boats to reach safety. This narrative instills an optimism and belief that "better is possible," which drives the initiative despite significant challenges. Mark Zuckerberg notes that becoming a father shifted his perspective on time horizons, creating urgency to build tools for future generations. The CZI approach also involves incentivizing open science and collaboration across disciplines, such as bringing immunologists into neuroscience research, while utilizing artificial intelligence to analyze vast datasets of single-cell information in ways human researchers cannot alone. The discussion then shifts to the intersection of technology, mental health, and physical well-being, addressing common concerns about screens and social media. Zuckerberg argues that technology is neither inherently good nor bad but depends on how it is used; at its best, platforms facilitate meaningful connections that correlate with longer life spans, while passive consumption can be less beneficial or even detrimental if dominated by negative news cycles. Meta has implemented various safety features to mitigate harm, including robust parental controls for users under 16 and tools to block bullying and harassment. However, Huberman points out the "gravitational pull" of violent content on algorithms, which Zuckerberg acknowledges but maintains that platforms should avoid being overly paternalistic while still minimizing clickbait and toxic experiences through a balance of user data analysis and human feedback loops. Looking toward the future, both speakers explore how emerging technologies like augmented reality (AR) glasses could revolutionize health monitoring by tracking eye movements to detect myopia progression in children and measuring attention patterns during social interactions. Zuckerberg envisions devices that bring computing directly to the eyes, allowing users to work outdoors while maintaining distance viewing habits essential for preventing nearsightedness, alongside features like privacy lights on cameras to prevent covert recording. The dialogue also touches upon AI avatars and assistants; while Meta is developing tools for creators to engage their communities 24/7 via controlled digital versions of themselves or original characters, they emphasize the importance of user control over these representations to ensure authenticity and safety against impersonation. Ultimately, both Huberman and Zuckerberg conclude that with intentional design and a focus on long-term well-being, technology can significantly enhance human health rather than diminish it.
Read the full video transcript
welcome to the huberman Lab podcast
where we discuss science and
science-based tools for everyday
[Music]
life I'm Andrew huberman and I'm a
professor of neurobiology and
Opthalmology at Stanford School of
Medicine my guest today are Mark
Zuckerberg and Dr Priscilla Chan Mark
Zuckerberg as everybody knows founded
the company Facebook he is now the CEO
of meta which includes Facebook
Instagram WhatsApp and other technology
platforms Dr Priscilla Chan graduated
from Harvard and went on to do her
medical degree at the University of
California San Francisco Mark Zuckerberg
and Dr Priscilla Chan are married and
the co-founders of the czi or Chan
Zuckerberg initiative a philanthropic
organization whose State goal is to cure
all human diseases the Chan zukerberg
initiative is accomplishing that by
providing critical funding not available
elsewhere as well as a novel framework
for discovery of the basic functioning
of cells Catal logging all the different
human cell types as well as providing AI
or artificial intelligence platforms to
mine all of that data to discover new
Pathways and cures for all human
diseases the first hour of today's
discussion is held with both Dr
Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg
during which we discuss the czi and what
it really means to try and cure all
human diseases we talk about the
motivational backbone for the czi that
extends well into each of their personal
histories indeed you'll learn quite a
lot about Dr Priscilla Chan who has I
must say an absolutely incredible family
story leading up to her role as a
physician and her motivations for the
czi and Beyond and you'll learn from
Mark how he's bringing an engineering
and AI perspective to the discovery of
new cures for human disease the second
half of today's discussion is just
between Mark Zuckerberg and me during
which we discuss various meta platforms
including of course social media
platforms and their effects on Mental
Health in children and adults we also
discuss VR virtual reality as well as
augmented and mixed reality and we
discuss AI artificial intelligence and
how it stands to transform not just our
online experiences with social media and
other Technologies but how it stands to
potentially transform every aspect of
everyday life before we begin I'd like
to emphasize that this podcast is
separate from my teaching and research
roles at Stanford it is however part of
my desire and effort to bring zero cost
to Consumer information about science
and science related tools to the general
public in keeping with that theme I'd
like to thank the SP sponsor of today's
podcast our first sponsor is eight sleep
eight sleep makes Smart mattress covers
with cooling Heating and sleep tracking
capacity I've spoken many times before
in this podcast about the fact that
getting a great night's sleep really is
the foundation of mental health physical
health and performance one of the key
things to getting a great night's sleep
is to make sure that the temperature of
your sleeping environment is correct and
that's because in order to fall and stay
deeply asleep your body temperature
actually has to drop by about 1 to 3°
and in order to wake up feeling
refreshed and energized your body
temperature actually has to increase by
about 1 to 3° with eight sleep you can
program the temperature of your sleeping
environment in the beginning middle and
end of your night it has a number of
other features like tracking the amount
of rapid eye movement and slow wave
sleep that you get things that are
essential to really dialing in the
perfect night sleep for you I've been
sleeping on an eight Sleep mattress
cover for well over 2 years now and it
has greatly improved my sleep I fall
asleep far more quickly I wake up far
less often in the middle of the night
and I wake up feeling far more refreshed
than I ever did prior to using an
eightsleep mattress cover if you'd like
to try eightsleep you can go to
8sleep.com
huberman to save $150 off their pod 3
cover eights sleep currently ships to
the USA Canada UK select countries in
the EU and Australia again that's
8sleep.com
huberman today's episode is also brought
To Us by element element is an
electrolyte drink that has everything
you need and nothing you don't that
means plenty of electrolytes sodium
magnesium and potassium and no sugar the
electrolytes are absolutely essential
for the functioning of every cell in
your body and your neurons your nerve
cells rely on sodium magnesium and
potassium in order to communicate with
one another electrically and chemically
element contains the optimal ratio of
electrolytes for the functioning of
neurons and the other cells of your body
every morning I drink a packet of
element dissolved in about 32 ounces of
water I do that just for General
hydration and to make sure that I have
adequate electrolytes for any activities
that day I'll often also have an element
packet or even two packets in 32 to 60
ounces of water if I'm EXC exercizing
very hard and certainly if I'm sweating
a lot in order to make sure that I
replace those electrolytes if you'd like
to try element you can go to drink
lm.com huberman to get a free sample
pack with your purchase again that's
drink LM nt.com
huberman I'm pleased to announce that we
will be hosting four live events in
Australia Each of which is entitled The
Brain body contract during which I will
share science and science related tools
for mental health physical health and
performance there will also be a live
question and answer session we have
limited tickets still available for the
event in Melbourne on February 10th as
well as the event in Brisbane on
February 24th our event in Sydney at the
Sydney Opera house sold out very quickly
so as a consequence we've now scheduled
a second event in Sydney at the aware
super theater on February 18th to access
tickets to any of these events you can
go to huberman lab.com
events and use the code huberman at
checkout I hope to see you there and as
always thank you for your interest in
science and now for my discussion with
Mark Zuckerberg and Dr Priscilla Chan
Priscilla Mark so great to meet you and
thank you for having me here in your
home oh thanks for having us on the
podcast yeah like to talk about the czi
the Chan Zuckerberg initiative I learned
about this a few years ago when my lab
was and still is now at Stanford as a
very exciting philanthropic effort that
has a truly big mission I can't imagine
a bigger mission so maybe you could tell
us what that big mission is and then we
can get into some of the mechanics of
how that big mission can become a
reality so uh like you're mentioning in
2015 um we launched the Chan Zuckerberg
initiative and what we were hoping to do
at CCI was think about how do we build a
better future for everyone and looking
for ways where we can contribute the
resources that we have to bring
philanthropically and the experience es
that Mark and I have had for me as a
physician and educator for Mark as an
engineer and then our ability to bring
teams together to build Builders um you
know Mark has uh been a builder
throughout his career and what could we
do if we actually put together a team to
build tools um do great science and So
within our science portfolio we've
really been focused on what uh some
people think is either an incredibly
audacious goal or a inevitable goal but
I think about it as something that will
happen if we sort of continue focusing
on it which is to be able to cure
prevent or manage all Disease by the end
of the century all disease all disease
so that's important right and a lot of
times people ask like which disease and
the whole point is that there is not one
disease and it's really about taking a
step back uh to where I always found the
most hope as a physician which is new
discoveries and new opportunities and
new ways of understanding how to keep
people well come from basic science so
our strategy at czi is really to build
tools fund science um change the way
basic scientists can see the world and
how they can move quickly in their
discoveries and so that's what we
launched in uh 2015 we we do work in
three ways we uh fund great scientists
we uh build tools uh right now software
tools to help move science along uh and
make it easier for scientists to do
their work and we do science um you
mentioned Stanford being an important
pillar for our science work we've built
uh what we call bioh Hubs institutes
where teams can take on Grand challenges
to do work that wouldn't be possible in
a single lab or within a single
discipline and our first biohub was
launched in San Francisco Isco uh
collaboration between Stanford UC
Berkeley and UCSF amazing um curing all
diseases uh implies that there will
either be a ton of Knowledge gleaned
from this effort which I'm certain there
will be and there already has been we
can talk about some of those early
successes in a moment but it also sort
of implies that if we can understand
some basic operations of diseases and
cells that transcend
autism Huntington's Parkinson's cancer
and any other disease that uh perhaps
there are some core principles that
would make the big mission a real
reality so to speak um what I'm
basically saying is um how are you
attacking this my belief is that the
cell sits at the center of all
discussion about disease um given that
our body is made up of of cells and
different types of cells so maybe you
could um just illuminate for us a little
bit of what the cell is in your mind as
it relates to disease and how one goes
about understanding disease in the
context of cells because ultimately
that's what we're made up of yeah well
let's let's get to the cell thing in a
moment but just to even taking a step
back from that you know we don't think
that it's czi that we're going to cure
prevent or manage all diseases the goal
is to to basically give the scientific
community and scientists around the
world the tools to accelerate the pace
of Science and now we we spent a lot of
time when we were getting started with
this looking at the history of Science
and trying to understand the trends and
and how they pled out over time and if
you look over the this very long-term
Arc most large scale discoveries are
preceded by the invention of a new tool
or a new way to see something and it's
not just in biology right it's like
having a telescope um you know came
before a lot of um discoveries in
astronomy and
astrophysics um but similarly you know
the microscope and um and and just
different ways to observe things or
different platforms like the ability to
do vaccines preceded the ability to kind
of cure a lot of different things um so
this is sort of the engineering part
that you were talking about about
building tools we we view our goal is to
try to bring together some scientific
and Engineering knowledge to build tools
that empower the whole field um and
that's that's sort of the Big Arc and
and a lot of the things that we're
focused on including the the work in in
single cell and and cell understanding
which um
you know you can you can jump in and get
into that if you want but yeah I think I
think we generally agree with the
premise that if you want to understand
the stuff from first principles um you
know people study organs a lot right
they like they study kind of how things
present across the body but there's not
a very widespread understanding of how
kind of each cell operates and this is
sort of a big part of you know some of
the initial work that we tried to do on
the human cell Atlas and understanding
what are the different cells and um and
there there's a bunch more work that we
want to do to carry that forward but um
but overall I think when we think about
the next 10 years here of this long Arc
to to try to empower the community to to
um be able to cure prevent or or manage
all diseases we want that we think that
the next 10 years should really be
primarily about being able to measure
and observe more things in in human
biology there are a lot of limits to
that it's like you want to look at
something through a microscope you can't
usually see living tissues because it's
hard to you know see through skin or
things like that so there there a lot of
different techniques um that will help
us observe different things and this is
sort of where the engineering background
comes in a bit because I mean it's when
I think about this is from the
perspective of like how you'd write code
or something you know the idea of like
trying to debug or fix a code base but
not be able to like step through the
code line by line it's like never not
going to happen right and at the at the
beginning of any big project that we do
um at meta you know we like to spend a
bunch of the time upfront just trying to
instrument things and understand you
what are we going to look at and how are
we going to measure things before um so
we know we're making progress and know
what to optimize and this is such a
long-term Journey that and we think that
it actually makes sense to take the next
10 years to build those kind of tools um
for biology and understanding um just
how the human body works in action and a
big part of that is is cells I don't
know do you want to jump and talk talk
about some of the efforts could I just
um interrupt briefly and just ask about
the the different um the different
intervention so to speak um that czi is
is in a unique position to to bring to
the quest to cure all diseases so I can
think of I mean I know as a scientist
that um money is necessary but not
sufficient right like when you have
money you can hire more people you can
try different things so that that's
critical but a lot of philanthropy
includes money
um the other component is you know you
want to be able to see things as you
pointed out um so you want to know that
normal disease process like what what is
a healthy cell what's a diseased cell
are cells constantly being bombarded
with with challenges and then repairing
those and then what we call cancer is
just kind of the runaway train of those
challenges not being met by the cell
itself or something like that um so
better Imaging tools and then um it
sounds like there's not just a a
hardware component but a software
component this is where AI comes in so
maybe we can at some point uh we can
break this up into to three different
Avenues one is understanding disease
processes and healthy processes we'll
lump those together then there's
Hardware so microscopes lenses digital
deconvolution ways of seeing things in
Bolder relief and more more more uh
precision and then there's how to manage
all the data and then I love the idea
that maybe AI could do what human brains
can't do alone they manage understanding
of the data because it's one thing to
organize data it's another to say oh you
know you this as you point out in the
analogy with code that this particular
Gene and that particular Gene are
potentially interesting where as a human
being would never make that potential
connection that yeah so you know the
tools that czi can bring to the table we
we fund science like you're talking
about and we try to uh there's lots of
ways to fund science and just to be
clear you know what we fund is a tiny
fraction of what the NIH funds for
instance so you guys have been generous
enough that it's uh it definitely um
holds weight to NIH uh nih's
contribution yeah and but I think it
every every funer has its own role in
the ecosystem and for us it's really how
do we incentivize new points of view how
do we incentivize collaboration how do
we incentivize open science and so a lot
of our grants include um inviting people
to look in look at different fields our
first Neuroscience um RFA was uh aimed
towards incentivizing people from
different backgrounds immunologists
microbiologists to come and look at how
our nervous system system works and how
to keep it healthy or um we uh ask that
our grantees participate in the
pre-print movement to accelerate the
rate of sharing knowledge and actually
others being able to build upon science
so that's the funding that we do um in
terms of building um we we build
software and Hardware um like you
mentioned we put together teams that uh
can build tools that are more durable
and scalable um than someone in a single
lab might be incentivized to do there's
a ton of great ideas and uh nowadays
most scientists can tinker and build
something useful for their lab but it's
really hard for them to be able to share
uh that tool sometimes beyond their own
laptop or forget you know the next Lab
over or across the globe so we partner
with Scientists to see like what is
useful what kinds of tools you know in
imaging napari like it's there's it's a
useful image annotation tool um that is
born from an open source community and
how can we contribute to that or a Cell
by Gene which uh works on single cell
data sets and how can we make it build a
useful tool so that scientists can share
data sets analyze their own and
contribute to a larger um Corpus of
information so we have software teams
that are building collaborating with
Scientists to make sure that we're
building easy to use durable
translatable tools across the scientific
community in the areas that we work in
um we also have institutes this is where
the Imaging uh work comes in where you
know we are proud owners of an electron
microscope right now um it it's going to
be installed um at our Imaging Institute
and that will really contribute to a way
where we can sew work differently but we
can the more Hardware need does need to
be developed you know we're partnering
with a fantastic
scientists um in the biohub network to
build a a mini phase plate to increase
to align the electrons through these um
through the electron microscope to be
able to increase the resolution so we
can see in sharper detail to uh so
there's a lot of innovative work within
the network that's happening um and uh
these institutes have grand challenges
that they're working on um back to your
question about cells cells are just the
smallest unit that are alive and um are
your body all of our bodies have many
many many cells there's you know some
estimate of like 37 trillion cells
different cells in your body and what
are they all doing and how do what do
they look like when they're Health when
you're healthy what do they look like
when you're sick and um where we're at
right now with you know our
understanding of cells and what happens
when you get sick is basically we have
we we've gotten pretty good at from the
Human Genome Project looking at how
different mutations in your genetic code
lead for you to be more susceptible to
get sick or directly cause you to get
sick so we go from a mutation in your
DNA to wow you now have Huntington's
disease for instance and there's a lot
that happens in the middle and that's
one of the questions that we're going
after after at at czi is what actually
happens so an analogy that I used I like
to use to share with my friends is right
now say we have a recipe for a cake we
know there's a typo in the recipe and
then the cake is awful that's all we
know we don't know how the chef
interprets the typo we don't know what
happens in the oven and we don't
actually H know sort of how it's exactly
connected to how the cake didn't turn
out how you were had expected a lot of
that um is unknown but we can actually
systematically try to break this down
and one segment of that Journey that
we're looking at is how that mutation
gets translated and acted upon in your
cells and all of your cells have what's
called mRNA mRNA are the actual
instructions that are taken from the DNA
and what our work in single cell is
looking at how how every cell in your
body is actually interpreting your DNA
slightly differently and what happens
when healthy cells are interpreting the
DNA instructions and when six cells are
interpreting those directions and that
is a ton of data I just told you there's
37 trillion cells there's different uh
large in sets of mRNA in each cell but
the work that we've been funding is
looking at how um first of all Gathering
that information um we've been
um incredibly lucky to be part of a very
fast moving um field where we've gone
from in 2017 funding some methods work
to now having really not complete but
nearly complete atlases of how the human
body works how flies work how mice work
uh at the Single Cell level and being
able to then try to piece together like
how does that all come together and when
your health and when you're sick and the
neat thing
about the sort of inflection point where
we're at in AI is that I can't look at
this data and make sense of it there's
just too much of it and biology is
complex human bodies are complex we need
this much information but the use of
large language models can help us
actually look at that data and gain
insights look at what trends are
consistent with health and what trends
are um are unsuspected and eventually
our hope uh through uh the use of these
data sets that we've helped curate in
the application of large language models
is to be able to formulate a virtual
cell a cell that's
completely um uh built off of the data
sets of what we know about the human
body but allows us to manipulate and
learn faster and try new things um to
help move science and then uh medicine a
do you think we've cataloged the total
number of different cell types like you
know every week I look at Great journals
like cell Nature and Science and for
instance I saw recently that um using
single cell sequencing they've um
categorized 18 plus different types of
fat cells we always think of like a fat
cell versus a muscle cell so so now
you've got 18 types um each one is going
to express many many different genes and
rnas mrnas and perhaps the uh one of
them is responsible for you know what we
see in you know Advanced type two
diabetes or um in other forms of obesity
or where people can't lay down fat cells
which turns out to be Ju Just as
detrimental in those extreme cases so
now you've got all these lists of genes
but um I always thought of single cell
sequencing as necessary but not
sufficient right you need the
information but it doesn't resolve the
problem and I think of it more of a as a
hypothesis generating experiment
okay so you have all these gen and you
could say wow this Gene is particularly
elevated in the um diabetics cell type
of let's say one of these fat cells or
muscle cells for that matter um whereas
it's not in non-diabetics so then of the
millions of different cells maybe only
five of them differ dramatically M so
then you you generate a hypothesis oh
it's the ones that differ dramatically
that are important but maybe one of
those genes when it's only you know 50%
ch ched has a huge effect because of
some Network biology effect and so I
guess what I'm trying to um get to here
is you know how does one meet that
challenge and can AI help resolve that
challenge by essentially placing those
lists of genes into a a you know 10,000
hypothesis because I'll tell you that
the graduate students in postdocs in my
lab get a chance to test one hypothesis
at a time and that's really the
challenge let alone one lab and um so
for those that are listening to this and
you know hopefully it's not getting
outside the scope of of kind of like
standard understanding or the
understanding we've generated here but
what I'm basically saying is you have to
pick at some point more data always
sounds great but then how how do you
decide what to test so no we don't know
all the cell types um I think one of the
one thing that was really exciting when
we first launched this work was you know
cystic fibrosis like cystic fibrosis is
caused by mutation and CFT that's pretty
well known it affects a certain channel
that makes it hard for mucus to be
cleared that's the basics of cystic
fibrosis
when I went to medical school it was
taught as fact so their lungs fill up
with fluid these are people carrying
around sacks of fluid filling up I've
known people like I've worked with
people like them they have to literally
dump the fluid out ex they can't run or
do intense exercise life is shorter life
is shorter and when we applied single
cell methodologies to the lungs they
discovered an entirely new cell type
that actually is affected by a mutation
and the CF mutation and cystic fibrosis
mutation that actually changes the
Paradigm of how we think about cystic
fibrosis amazing just unknown so I don't
think we know um all the cell types I
think we'll continue to discover them
and we'll continue to discover new
relationships between cell and disease
which leads me to the second example I
want to bring up is um this large data
set that the entire scientific Community
has built around single cell is starting
to allow us to say this mutation where
is it expressed what types of cell types
it's expressed in
and um we actually have built a tool at
czi called cell by Gene where you can
put in the mutation that you're
interested in and it gives you a heat
map of cross cell types of which cell
types are expressing the uh Gene that
you're interested in and so then you can
start looking at okay if I look at Gene
X and I know it's related to heart
disease but if you look at the heat map
it's also spiking in the pancreas that
allows you to generate a hypothesis why
um and what happens when this Gene is
mutated and in your in the function of
your pancreas really exciting way to
look and ask questions differently um
and you can also Imagine a world where
if uh you're trying to develop a therapy
a drug and you're your the goal is to
treat the function in the heart but you
know that it's also really active in in
the pancreas again so what is there
going to be an unexpect Ed side effect
that you should think about as you're
bringing uh this drug to clinical trials
so I it's an incredibly exciting tool
and one that's only going to get better
as we get more and more sophisticated
ways to analyze the data I must say I
love that because if I look at the
advances in Neuroscience over the last
15 years most of them um did necessarily
come from looking at the nervous system
came from the understanding that the
immune system impacts the brain everyone
prior to that talked about the brain as
immune privilege Ed organ what you just
said also Bridges and uh the Divide
between single cells organs and systems
right because ultimately cells make up
organs organs make up systems and
they're all talking to one another and
everyone nowadays is familiar with like
gut brain Axis or the the microbiome
being so important but rarely is the um
the discussion between organs um
discussed so to speak so um I think it's
wonderful so that that tool was
generated by CCI or CCI funded that tool
so we built that we built that you built
it so is it built by meta is does meta
have a hand C has its own Engineers got
it they're completely different
organizations incredible and um and so a
graduate student or postto who's
interested in a particular mutation
could put this mutation into this
database um that graduate student or
postto might be in a laboratory known
for working on heart but suddenly find
that they're collaborating with other
scientists that work on the pancreas
yeah um which also is wonderful um
because it Bridges The Divide between
these Fields fields are so siloed in
science not just different buildings but
they people rarely talk unless things
like this are happening I mean the
graduate student is someone that we want
to empower because one they're the
future of science as you know and um
within cell by Gene if you put in the
gene you're interested in and it shows
you the heat map we also will pull up
like the most relevant papers to that
Gene and so like read these things
fantastic as we all know quality
nutrition influences of course our
physical health but also our mental
health and our cognitive functioning our
memory our ability to learn new things
and to focus and we know that one of the
most important features of highquality
nutrition is making sure that we get
enough vitamins and minerals from high
quality unprocessed or minimally
processed sources as well as enough
probiotics and prebiotics and fiber to
support basically all the cellular
functions in our body including the gut
microbiome now I like most everybody try
to get optimal nutrition from Whole
Foods ideally mostly from minimally
processed or nonprocessed Foods however
one of the challenges that I and so many
other people face is getting enough
servings of high quality fruits and
vegetables per day as well as fiber and
probiotics that often accompany those
fruits and vegetables that's why way
back in 2012 long before I ever had a
podcast I started drinking ag1 and so
I'm delighted that ag1 is sponsoring the
huberman Lab podcast the reason I
started taking ag1 and the reason I
still drink ag1 once or twice a day is
that it provides all of my foundational
nutritional needs that is it provides
insurance that I get the proper amounts
of those vitamins minerals probiotics
and fiber to ensure optimal mental
health physical health and performance
if you'd like to try ag1 you can go to
drink a1.com huberman to claim a special
offer they're giving away five free
travel packs plus a year supply of
vitamin D3 K2 again that's drink a1.com
huberman to claim that special offer I I
just think going back to your question
from before I mean are there going to be
more cell types that get discovered I
mean I I assume so right I mean no
catalog of the stuff is ever you know
doesn't seem like we're ever done right
we keep on finding more but I think
that that gets to one of the things that
I think are the strengths of of U modern
llms is the ability to kind of Imagine
different states that things can be in
so from all the work that we've done and
funded on the on the human cell atlas
there is a large Corpus of data that you
can now train a a kind of large scale
model on and one of the things that
we're doing um at CCI which I think is
pretty exciting is building um what we
think is one of the largest nonprofit
Life Sciences AI clusters right it's
like a you know on the order of a
thousand gpus and you know it's larger
than what most people have access to in
Academia that you can do like serious
engineering work on and um and you know
by basically training a model with all
of the human cell out lless data and and
a bunch of other um inputs as well we we
think you'll be able to basically
imagine all of the different types of
cells and all the different states that
they can be in and when they're healthy
and diseased and how they'll interact
with um you know different um you know
interact with each other interact with
different potential drugs but I mean I
think the state of llms I think this is
where it's it's helpful to understand
you know have a good understanding and
be grounded in like the modern state of
AI I mean these things are not foolproof
right I mean one of the flaws of modern
llms is they hallucinate right so the
question is how do you make it so that
that can be an advantage rather than a
disadvantage and I think the way that it
ends up being an advantage is when they
help you imagine a bunch of states that
somethingone could be in but then you
you know as the scientist or engineer go
and validate that those are true whether
they're you know solutions to how a
protein can be folded or possible states
that a cell could be in when it's
interacting with other things but you
know we're not yet at the state with AI
that you can just take the outputs of
these things as like as gospel and run
from there but they are very good I
think as you said hypothesis generators
or um possible solution generators that
then you can go validate so I that's a
very powerful um thing that we can
basically you know building on the first
five years of science work around the
human cell outlas and all the data
that's been built out carry that forward
into something that I think is going to
be a very novel tool going forward um
and that's the type of thing that I
think we're set up to do well I mean you
you all you had this exchange a little
while back about um you know funding
levels and how CCI is you know just sort
of a drop in the in the in the bucket
compared to NIH but I think we we have
this the thing that I think we can do
that's different is um funding some of
these longer term bigger projects that
it is hard to Galvanize the and pull
together the energy to do that you it's
a lot of what um most science funding is
is like relatively small projects that
are exploring things over relatively
short time Horizons and one of the
things that we try to do is is like
build these tools over you know 5 10 15
year periods they're often projects that
require you know hundreds of millions of
dollars of funding and world-class
engineering teams and infrastructure to
do and that I think is a pretty cool
contribution to the field that um that I
think is there aren't as many other
folks who are who are doing that kind of
thing but that's one of the reasons why
I'm personally excited about the virtual
cell stuff cuz it just it's like this
perfect intersection of all the stuff
that we've done and single cell the
previous um collaborations that we've
done with the field and you know
bringing together the the um industry
and and AI expertise around this yeah I
completely agree that the model of uh
science that you're put together with
CCI is isn't just unique from an age but
it's extremely important the um
independent investigator model is what's
Driven the progression of Science in
this country and to some extent in
northern Europe for the last 100 years
and it's um wonderful um on the one hand
because it allows for that image we have
of a scientist kind of tinkering away or
the people in their lab and then like
the ureas um and that hopefully
translates to better human health uh but
I think in my opinion we've moved past
that model as the most effective model
or the only model that should be
explored yeah I just think it's a
balance you want you want that but you
want to empower those people I think
that that's these tools ow those fol and
there are mechanisms to do that like NIH
but but it's hard um to do collaborative
science it's um it's sort of interesting
that we're sitting here not far for
because I grew up right near here as
well I'm not far from the garage model
of tech right the the H backer model um
not far from here at all um and the idea
was you know the tinkerer in the garage
the inventor and then people often
forget that to implement all the
Technologies they discovered took
enormous factories and warehous so
um you know there's there's a similarity
there to Facebook meta Etc but I think
in science we imagine that the
scientists alone in their laboratory and
those Eureka moments but I think
nowadays that the big questions really
require um extensive collaboration and
certainly tool development um and one of
the tools that you keep coming back to
is these llms these large language
models and um maybe you could just
elaborate for for those that aren't
familiar you know what are what is a
large language model um uh it for the
the the uninformed what is it um and
what does it allow uh what does it allow
us to do that um you know different
types of other types of AI don't allow
um or more importantly perhaps what does
it allow us to do that a bunch of really
smart people highly informed in a given
area of science staring at the data what
what can I do that they can't
do sure so I think a lot of the
progression of machine learning has been
about building systems neural networks
or otherwise that can basically make
sense and find patterns in larger and
larger amounts of data and there was a
breakthrough a number of years back um
that some folks at Google actually made
called this Transformer model
architecture and it was this huge
breakthrough because before then there
was somewhat of a cap where you know if
you fed more data into a neural network
past some some point it didn't really
glean more insights from it whereas
Transformers just you we haven't seen
the of how big that can scale to yet I
mean I think that there's a chance that
we run into some someing but so never
ASM tootes we haven't observed it yet
but we just haven't built big enough
systems yet so I would guess that um I
don't know I think this is actually one
of the big questions in in the AI field
today is basically are Transformers and
are the current model architecture
sufficient and if you just build larger
and larger clusters do you eventually
get something that's like human
intelligence or super intelligence or um
is there some kind of fundamental limit
to this architecture that we just
haven't reached yet and once we we kind
of get a little bit further in building
them out then we'll reach that and then
we'll need a few more leaps before we
get to you know the the level of of um
AI that I think will unlock you know a
ton of really futuristic and amazing
things but there's no doubt that even
just being able to process the amount of
data that we can now with this model
architecture um has unlocked a lot of
new use cases and the reason why they're
called large language models is because
one of the first uses of them
is um people basically feed in all of
the language from uh basically the
worldwide web and you can think about
them as basically prediction machines so
if you you you fit in um you put in a
prompt and it can basically you know
predict a version of what should come
next so you know you you like type in a
headline for a news story and it can
kind of predict what it thinks the story
should be or you could train it so that
it could be a chatbot right okay if if
you're prompted with this question you
can get um this response but one of the
interesting things is it turns out that
there's actually nothing specific to
using human language in it so if instead
of feeding it human language if you use
that model architecture for for a
network and instead you feed it all of
the human cell outlas data then if you
prompt it with a state of a cell it can
spit out um different versions of of
like what you know how that cell can
interact or different states that the
cell could be an nexted when it
interacts with different things does it
have to take a genetics class so for
instance if you give it a bunch of
genetics data do you have to say hey by
the way and then you give it a genetics
class so it understands that you know
you got DNA RNA mRNA and proteins I
think that the basic the basic nature of
all these machine learning techniques is
they're they're basically pattern
recognition systems so they're these
like very deep statistical machines um
that are very efficient at finding
patterns um so it's it's not actually
you you don't need to teach a a language
model that's trying to you know speak a
language um you know a lot of specific
things about that language either you
just feed it in a bunch of examples and
then you know let's say you teach it
about something um in English but then
you also give it a bunch of examples of
people speaking Italian um it'll
actually be able to explain the thing
that it learned in English and Italian
right even though so the crossover and
just the pattern recognition um is the
thing that is pretty profound and
Powerful about this but it really does
apply to a lot of different things
another example in the scientific
Community um has been the work that
Alpha fold you know that that basically
the um the folks at Deep Mind have done
on on protein folding um it's you know
just basically a lot of the the same
model architecture but instead of
language there they fold they they kind
of fed in all of these the protein data
and you can give it a state and it can
spit out solution to how those proteins
get folded so it's very powerful I don't
think we know yet as an industry what
the um what the natural limits of it are
and that that's one of the things that's
pretty exciting about the current state
but um it certainly allows you to solve
problems that just weren't solved with
the generation of machine learning that
came before it sounds like czi is moving
a lot of work that was just done in
vitro in dishes um and in Vivo in um
living organisms model organisms or
humans to in silico as we say so um do
you foree a future where a lot of
biomedical research certainly the the
work of CCI um included is done by
machines I mean obviously it's much
lower cost um and you can run millions
of experiments which of course is not to
say that humans are not going to be
involved um but I love the idea that we
can run experiments in silico um and
Mass
I I think the ENC silic experiments are
going to be incredibly helpful to test
things quickly to cheaply and to um to
just unleash a lot of creativity I do
think you need to be very careful about
making sure it still translates and
matches this uh humans um you know one
thing that's funny in uh basic Sciences
we've basically cured every single
disease in mice like mice have uh we we
know what's going on when they have a
number of diseases because they're where
they're used as a model organism but
they are not humans and a lot of times
that research is relevant but not
directly one toone translatable to
humans so you just have to be really
careful about making sure that it
actually works for
humans sounds like what czi is doing is
actually creating a new field like I as
I'm hearing all of this I'm thinking
okay this this transcends
Immunology Department you know
cardiothoracic surgery I mean
Neuroscience I mean the idea of of a new
field where you certainly embrace the
realities of universities and
Laboratories because that's where most
of the work that your funding is done is
that right it's okay so um maybe we need
to think about what it means to do
science differently and I think that's
one of the things that's most exciting
um along those lines it seems that
bringing together a lot of different
types of people different uh major
institutions um is going to be
especially important so I know that the
initial CCI biohub um gratefully um
included Stanford um we'll put that
first in the list um but also UCSF yeah
forgive me they many friends at UCSF and
also Berkeley um but there are now some
additional institutions involved so
maybe you could talk about that and what
motivated the decision to Branch outside
the Bay Area and um and why you selected
those particular additional institutions
to be included well I mean I'll I'll
just say part of a big part of why we
wanted to create additional biohub is we
were just so impressed by the work that
the folks who are running the first
biohub did yeah um and I also think and
you should walk through the the uh work
of the Chicago biohub and the New York
biohub that we just announced but I
think it's actually an interesting set
of examples that balance um the limits
of what you want to do with like
physical material engineering and and um
and and where things are purely
biological because the Chicago team is
really building more sensors to be able
to understand what's going on in your
body but that's more of like a physical
kind of engineering challenge whereas
the the New York team we basically talk
about this as like a cellular endoscope
of being able to have like an immune
cell or something that can go and
understand um you know what is like
what's a thing that's going on in your
body but it's not like a physical piece
of Hardware it's a cell that you can
basically um you know have have um uh
just go report out on on on different
things that are happening inside the
body so so making to sell the microscope
totally and and then and then eventually
actually being able to act on it but I
mean but you should you should go into
more detail on all this so a core
principle of how we think about bioh
hubs it is that it has to be um when we
invited proposals it has to be at least
three institutions um so really breaking
down the barrier of a single University
often times asking for the people
designing the research aim to come from
all different backgrounds um and to
explain why that the problem that they
want to solve uh requires
interdisciplinary in interuniversity
institution collaboration to actually
make happen um we just put that request
for proposal out there U with our San
Francisco biohub as an example where
they've done incredible work in single
cell biology and infectious disease and
we got I I want to say like 57 proposals
from over 150 institutions a lot of
ideas came together and you know we are
so so excited that we've been able to
launch Chicago and New York um Chicago
is a collaboration between uiu uh
University of Illinois ARA champagne and
University of Chicago and Northwestern
um and if I obviously these universities
are multifaceted but if I were to sort
of describe them by their like
stereotypical strength Northwestern has
an critical medical um uh system and
hospital system University of Chicago
brings to uh the table incredible basic
science strengths uh University of
Illinois is a Computing Powerhouse and
so they came together and proposed that
they were going to start thinking about
cells and in tissue um so that one of
the one of the layers that you just
alluded to so how do the cells that we
know behave and act differently when
they come together as a tissue and the
fir one of the first tissues that
they're starting with is skin so they've
been already been able to um as a
collaboration under the leadership of
sha Kelly design um AR uh engineered
skin tissue the architecture looks the
same as what's in you and I and what
they've done is built these th super
super thin sensors and they embed these
sensors um throughout the layers of this
engineered tissue and they read out the
data they want to see how these cells
what these cells are secreting how these
cells talk to each other and what
happens when these cells get inflamed um
inflammation is an incredibly important
process that drives 50% of all deaths um
and so this is another sort of disease
agnostic approach we want to understand
inflammation and they're going to get a
ton of information out from these
sensors that tell you what H happens
when something goes ay cuz right now we
can say like when you have an allergic
reaction your skin gets red and puffy
what is the earliest signal of that and
these sensors can look at the behaviors
of these cells over time and then you
can apply a large language model to look
at the earliest statistically
significant changes that can allow you
to intervene um as early as possible so
that that's what Chicago's doing they're
starting in the um uh skin cells they're
also looking at the neuromuscular
Junction
um which is the connection between where
a neuron uh attaches to a muscle and
tells the muscle how to behave super
important in things like ALS but also in
aging um the slowed transmission of
information across that neuromuscular
Junction is what causes old people to
fall their brain cannot trigger their
muscles to react fast enough and so we
want to be able to embed these sensors
to understand how these different um uh
interconnected systems within our bodies
work work together in New York uh
they're doing uh a related uh but uh
equally exciting project where they're
um engineering individual cells to be
able to um go in and identify changes in
uh in a human body so um what they'll do
is uh they're calling us it's wild I
mean I love it I mean it's this is we I
don't want to go on a tangent but for
those that want to look it up Adaptive
Optics you know there's a lot of uh
Distortion and interference when you try
and look at something really small or
really far away and really smart
physicists uh figured out well use the
interference as part of the microscope
make those actually lenses of the
microscope we should talk about Imaging
separates talk about new yor it's
extremely clever along those lines it's
not intuitive but then when you hear it
it's like it makes so much sense you
know it's not immediately intuitive make
the cells that are already can navigate
to tissues or embed themselves in
tissues be the microscope within that
tissue love
um the the the way that I explain this
to my friends and my family is this is
Fantastic Voyage but real life um like
we are going into the human body and
we're using the immune cells which you
know are privileged and already working
to keep your body healthy and being able
to Target them to examine certain things
so like you can engineer an immune cell
to go in your body and look inside your
coronary arteries and say are these
arteries um healthy or their plaques
because because plaques lead to blockage
which lead to heart attacks um and the
cell can then record that information
and report it back out that's the first
half what the New York biohub is going
to do fantastic the second half is can
you then engineer the cells to go do
something about it can I then tell a
different cell immune cell that is able
to transport in your body to go in and
clean that up in a targeted way and um
so I it's incredibly exciting they're
going to study
things that are sort of immune privilege
that your immune system normally doesn't
have access to um things like ovarian
and pancreatic cancer um they'll also
look at a number of neurod degenerative
diseases since um the immune system
doesn't presently have a ton of access
into the nervous system uh but they it's
it's both mind-blowing and it feels like
sci-fi but science is actually in a
place where if you really pushed a group
of incredible qualified scientists say
could you do this if given the chance
the answer is like probably give us
enough time the bright team and
resources like it's doable yeah I mean
it's a it's a 10 to 15E project yeah but
it's it's awesome engineered cells yeah
I I love the optimism and and the moment
you said make the cell the microscope so
to speak I was like yes yes and yes it
it just makes so much sense what
motivated the decision to do the work of
of czi um in the context of existing
universities as opposed to you know
there's still some real estate up in
Redwood City where there's a bunch of
space to put biotech companies and just
hiring people from all all backgrounds
and and saying hey you know have at it
and and doing this stuff from scratch I
mean it's a it's a very interesting
decision to do this in the context of an
existing framework of like graduate
students that need to do the thesis and
get a first author paper because there's
a whole set of structures within
Academia that I think both facilitate
but also limit the progression of
science you know that independent
investigator model that we talked about
a little bit earlier it it's so core to
the way science has been done this is
very different and frankly sounds far
more efficient if I'm to be completely
honest and um you know we'll see if I
renew my NIH funding after saying that
but um but I think we all want the same
thing we all want to as scientists and
and as um you know as humans we want to
understand the way we work and we want
um healthy um people to persist to be
healthy and we want sick people to get
healthy I mean that's really ultimately
the goal it's not not super complicated
it's just hard to do so the teams at the
biob are actually um independent of the
universities got it so each biohub will
probably have in total maybe 50 people
working on sort of deep efforts however
it's an acknowledgement that not all of
the best scientists who can contribute
to this area are actually um going to
one want to leave a university or want
to take on the full-time scope of this
project so it's the ab ability to
partner with
universities um and to have the faculty
at all the universities be able to
contribute to the overall project um is
how the biohub is structured got it but
a lot of the way that we're approaching
CI is this long-term iterative project
to figure out try a bunch of different
things figure out which things produce
the most interesting results and then
double down on those in the next
fiveyear push right so we're we just
went through this period where we kind
of wrapped up the first five years of
the science program we tried a lot of
different models right all kinds of
different things and um it's not that
the biohub model we don't think it's
like the best or only model but we we
found that it was sort of a a a really
interesting way to unlock a bunch of
collaboration and bring some Technical
Resources that allow for this longer
term development and it's not something
that is widely um being pursued across
the rest of the field so we figured okay
this is like a an interesting thing that
we can that we can help push on but I I
mean yeah we do believe in the
collaboration um but I I also think that
we come at this with you know we don't
think that the way that we're pursuing
this is like the only way to do this or
the way that everyone should do it we're
we're pretty aware of you know the um
you know what is the rest of the
ecosystem and how we can play a unique
role in it it feels very synergistic
with the way science is already done and
also fills in an incredibly important
Niche that frankly wasn't filled before
um along the lines of implementation so
let's say um your large language models
combined with imaging tools that um
reveal that a particular set of genes um
acting in a cluster um I don't know set
up an an organ crash let's say the P the
pancreas crashes a particular stage of
of pancreatic cancer I mean still one of
the most deadliest of the of the Cancers
and um uh there are others that you
certainly wouldn't want to get that's
among the the ones you wouldn't want to
get the most so you discover that and
then and the idea is that okay then um
AI reveals some potential drug targets
that then bear out in vitro in a dish
and in a mouse model um how is the
actual implementation of to drug
Discovery or even maybe this target is
druggable maybe it's not maybe it
requires some other approach you know uh
laser laser ablation approach or
something we we don't know but
ultimately is czi going to be involved
in the impementation of new Therapeutics
is that the idea I less so less so uh
that's you know this is where it's
important to work in an ecosystem and to
know your own limitations like there are
groups and startups and companies that
take that and bring it to translation
very effectively I would say the place
where we have a small window into that
world is actually our work with rare
disease groups um we we have uh through
our rare as one portfolio funded Patient
Advocates to create um rare disease
organizations where patients come
together uh and uh actually pull their
collective experience uh they build bio
Registries Registries of their natural
history and they both partner with uh
researchers to do the research about
their disease and with uh drug
developers to uh incentivize drug
developers to focus on what they may
need for their disease and you know one
thing that's important to point out is
that rare diseases aren't rare there are
over 7,000 rare diseases and uh
collectively impact many many
individuals and I think the thing that's
from
a basic science uh perspective the an
incredibly fascinating thing about rare
diseases is that there are actually
Windows to how the body normally should
work and so there are often uh mutations
that that when uh when genes that were
when they are mutated cause very
specific diseases but that tell you how
the normal biology works as well got it
so you discussed basically the the goals
major goals in initiatives of the czi
for the next say 5 to 10 years um and
then beyond that the targets will be
explored by biotech companies um they'll
grab those targets and and test them and
and Implement them there have also I
think been a couple cple of teams from
the initial biohub that were interested
in spinning out ideas right into
startups so that's just it's even though
it's not a thing that we're going to
pursue because I we're a philanthropy um
we want to enable the work that gets
done to be able to get turned into
companies and things that other people
go take and and and run towards towards
building you know ultimately
Therapeutics so that that's that's
another Zone but that's just that's not
a thing that we're going to do yeah got
it um I gather you're both optimists mhm
yeah is that part of what brought you
together forgive me for switching to a
personal question but I love the
optimism um that that seems to sit at
the root of the czi I will say that we
are uh incredibly hopeful people but it
it manifests in different ways between
the two of us yeah what what do you how
would you describe your optimism versus
mine it's not a loaded question
um I don't know um
huh I mean I think I'm more probably
technologically optimistic about what
can be built and I think you because of
your focus as you know an actual doctor
um kind of have more of a sense of how
that's going to affect actual people in
their lives um whereas for me it's like
I me a lot of my work it is you know
it's like we touch a lot of people
around the world um and the scale is
sort of immense and I think for you just
like it's like being able to improve the
lives of individuals whether it's you
know students at any of the schools that
you've started or any of the stuff that
we've supported through the education
work which isn't the goal here or you
know like just being able to improve
people's lives in that way I think is
the thing that I've seen you be super
passionate about I don't know does that
do you agree with that characterization
I'm trying I'm trying to yeah I agree
with that I think that's very fair and
I'm sort of giggling to myself cuz in a
day-to-day life as like life Partners
our relative optimism comes through as
uh Mark just like is overly optimistic
about his time management and will get
engrossed in interesting ideas I'm late
and he's late and I Physicians are very
punctual and because he's late I have to
channel Mark as an optimist whenever I'm
waiting for him that's such a nice way
okay I'll I'll start using that I that's
what I think when I'm in the driveway
with the kids waiting for you I'm like
Mark is an optimist um and so his
optimism translates to some tardiness
whereas I'm a sort of I'm like how does
what's how is how is this going to
happen like I'm going to open a
spreadsheet I'm going to start putting
together a plan and like a putting
pulling together all the pieces calling
people to sort of like bring something
to life but it is it's one one of my
favorite quotes that is optimists tend
to be successful and pessimists tend to
be
right and yeah I mean I think it's it's
true in a lot of different aspects of
life right we know who said that did you
say that Mark I did I did not
abely no I like it I did not invent it
um we'll give it to you we'll put it out
there just but but I I do think that
there's really something to it right I
there's like if you're discussing any
idea there's all these reasons why it
might not work and so I I I think that
and those reasons are you know probably
true the people who are stating them are
you know probably have some validity to
it but the question is that is that the
most productive way to view the world
and you know I think across the board
you I think the people who tend to be
the most productive and get the most
done um you kind of need to be
optimistic because if you don't believe
that something can get done then why
would you go work on it the reason I
asked the question is that you know that
these days we hear a lot about you know
the future is looking so dark in these
various ways and um you have children so
you have families and um you are a
family excuse me and and you also have
families independently um that are now
merged but um I love the optimism behind
the czi because you know you know behind
all this there's sort of a set of big
statements on the wall one uh the future
can be better than the present in terms
of treating disease maybe even you said
eliminating diseases all diseases I love
that optimism um and that there's a
tractable path to do it like we're going
to put put literally you know money and
time and energy and people and
technology and AI behind that and so um
I have to ask uh was having children um
a significant um modifier in terms of
your your view of the future like wow
like you hear all this Doom and Gloom
like what's the future going to be like
for them did you sit back and think you
know what would it look like if there
was a future with no diseases um is that
the future we want our children in I
mean I I'm voting a big yes so we're not
going to we're not going to debate that
at all but was having children a sort of
an inspiration for the CCI in some way
yeah so I think my answer to that um I
would dial backwards for me um and I'll
just tell a very brief uh story about my
family I'm the daughter of Chinese
Vietnamese uh refugees um my parents and
Grandparents were boat people if you
remember people left Vietnam during the
war in these small boats into the South
China Sea and um the there were stories
about how these boats would sink with
whole families on them and so my
grandparents who both sets of
grandparents who knew each other decided
that there was a better future out there
and they were willing to take risk for
it um but they were afraid of losing all
of their kids I my dad is one of six my
mom is one of 10 and so they decided
that there was something out there in
this Bleak time and they paired up their
kids one from each family and sent them
out on these little boats before the
internet before cell phones and just
said we'll see you on the other side wow
and um the kids were between the ages of
like you know 10 to 25 so young kids my
my mom was a teenager early teen when
this happened um and everyone made it
and I get to sit here and talk to you so
how could I not believe that like better
is possible and like I hope that that's
in my like epigenetic somewhere and then
I carry that on that is a spectacular
story isn't that wild it is spectacular
how can I be a pessimist with that I
love it well and I so appreciate that
you became a physician because you're
now bringing that optimism and
epigenetic understanding and cognitive
understanding and emotional
understanding to the field of medicine
so I'm grateful to um the people that
made that decision yeah and then you
know when I think you don't re i' I've
always known that story but you don't
understand how Wild that feels until you
have your own child and you're like well
I can't even I I refuse to let her use
you know glass bottles only or something
like that and you're like oh my God like
the risk and sort of willing of my
grandparents to believe in something
bigger and better um is just astounding
and it Al our own children sort of give
it a sense of
urgency again spectacular story and of
you're sending knowledge out into the
fields of Science and bringing knowledge
into the fields of Science and I love
this we we'll see on the other side yeah
I'm I'm confident that it will all come
back well thank you so much for that I
um Mark you have the opportunity to talk
about did having kids change your world
view it's really tough to beat that
story it is tough to beat that story and
they are also your children so in this
case you know you get uh you get um two
for the price of one so to speak so
having children definitely changes your
time Horizon so I that that's one thing
is you just like there were all these
things that I think we had talked about
and for as long as we've known each
other that you eventually want to go do
but then it's like oh we're having kids
we we need to like get on this right so
I think there's that was actually of the
checklists the baby checklist before the
first was like the baby's coming you
have to like start czi um truly and like
sitting in the hospital delivery room
finishing editing the letter that we
were going to publish to to announce
think that is an exaggeration it was not
we really were editing the final draft
birth czi before you bir human
child well it's it's an incredible
initiative I've I've been following it
since its Inception and um and it's
already been tremendously successful and
everyone in the field of science and I
have a lot of communication with those
folks it feels the same way and and the
future is even brighter for it it's
clear and thank you for expanding to the
Midwest and and New York and um uh we're
all very excited to see where all of
this goes I share in your optimism you
and thank you for your time today thank
you thank you a lot more to do I'd like
to take a quick break and thank our
sponsor insid tracker insid track is a
personalized nutrition platform that
analyzes data from your blood and DNA to
help you better understand your body and
help you reach your health goals now
I've long been a believer in getting
regular blood work done for the simple
reason that many of the factors that
impact your immediate and long-term
Health can only be analyzed from a
quality blood test a major problem with
a lot of blood tests out there however
is that you get information back about
metabolic factors lipids and hor
hormones and so forth but you don't know
what to do with that information with
inside tracker they make it very easy
because they have a person ized platform
that allows you to see the levels of all
those things metabolic factors lipids
hormones Etc but it gives you specific
directives that you can follow that
relate to nutrition behavioral
modifications supplements Etc that can
help you bring those numbers into the
ranges that are optimal for you if you'd
like to try insid tracker you can go to
insid tracker.com huberman to get 20%
off any of insid tracker's plans again
that's insidetracker tocom huberman and
now for my discussion with Mark
Zuckerberg slight shift of topic
here you're extremely well known for
your role in technology development but
by virtue of your personal interests and
also where Metate technology interfaces
with mental health and physical health
you're starting to become synonymous
with health whether you realize it or
not um part of that is because there's
um post footage of you rolling Jiu-Jitsu
you wanted Jiu-Jitsu competition
recently um you're doing other forms of
martial
arts water sports including surfing and
um and on and on so um you're doing it
yourself but maybe we could just start
off with technology and get this issue
out of the way um first which is that I
think many people assume that technology
especially technology that involves a a
screen excuse me of any kind is going to
be detrimental to our health but that
doesn't necessarily have to be the case
so could you um explain how you see
technology um meshing with inhibiting or
maybe even promoting physical and mental
health sure I mean I think this is a a
really important topic it's um you know
the research that we've done suggests
that it's not like all good or all bad I
think how you're using the technology
has a big impact on whether it is
basically a positive experience for you
and even within technology even within
social media there's not kind of one
type of thing that people do I think at
its best you're forming uh meaningful
connections with other people and you
know there's a lot of research that
basically suggests that you know it's
it's the relationships that we have and
you know friendships that kind of bring
the most happiness and in our lives and
at some level end up even correlating
with living a longer and healthier life
because you know that kind of you know
grounding that you have in community
ends up being important for that so I
think that that aspect of social media
which is um you know the ability to
connect with people to understand what's
going on in people's lives have empathy
for them um communicate what's going on
with your life Express that that's
generally positive there there are ways
that it can be negative in terms of um
bad interactions things like bullying um
which we can we can talk about because
there's a lot that we've done to
basically make sure that that people can
be safe from that and give people tools
and give kids um the ability to have the
right parental controls so their parents
can oversee that but that's sort of the
interacting with people's side there's
another side of of all this which I
think of as just like passive
consumption which it at its best um It's
Entertainment right and entertainment is
an important human thing too but I don't
think that that has quite the same
association with the long-term
well-being and health um benefits as
being able to help people connect with
other people does um and I think at its
worst
um some of the stuff that we see
online um you I think these days a lot
of the news is just so relentlessly
negative um that it's just hard to you
know come away from an experience where
you're you know looking at the news for
you know half an hour and like feel
better about the world
so I think that there's a mix on this um
I think the more that social media is
about connecting with people um and the
more that when you're kind of consuming
and using um the the media part of
social media um to learn about things
that kind of enrich you and can provide
inspiration or education as opposed to
things that um just leave you with a
more toxic feeling and that that's sort
of the the balance that we try to to get
right across our products and think
we're pretty aligned with the community
because at the end of the day you know I
mean people don't want to use a product
and come away feeling bad you know
there's a lot that people talk about
um evaluate a lot of these products in
terms of information and utility but I
think it's as important when you're
designing a product to think about what
kind of feeling you're creating with the
people who use it right whether that's
kind of an aesthetic sense when you're
designing Hardware or just kind of like
what like what do you what do you make
people feel and generally people don't
want to feel bad right so I I think when
you know that doesn't mean that we want
to you know shelter people from bad
things that are happening in the world
but I I don't really think that you know
it's not what people want um you know
for us to just be kind of just showing
like all this super negative stuff all
day long um so we so we work hard on all
these different problems you know making
sure that we're helping connect people
as best as possible helping make sure
that we give people good tools um to
block people who might be bullying them
or harass them or especially for younger
folks you know anyone under the age of
16 defaults into an experience where
their experience is private we have all
these parental tools um so that way you
know parents can can kind of understand
what what their children is up to are up
to in a good balance um you and then on
the other side we try to give people
tools to understand how they're spending
their time um and we try to give people
tools so that you know if you're if
you're a teen and and you're kind of
stuck in some you know Loop of of just
looking at type of content will nudge
you and say hey you've been looking at
content of this type for a while like
how about something else and here's
here's a bunch of other examples so
there were things that you can do to
kind of push this in a positive
direction but I think it just starts
with having a more nuanced view of like
this isn't all good and all or all bad
and the more that you can make it kind
of a positive thing the the better this
will be for all the people who use our
products that makes really good sense in
terms of the negative experience I agree
I don't think anyone wants a negative
experience in the moment I think we're
some people get concerned perhaps and I
think about my own interactions with say
Instagram which I use all the time um
for getting information out but also
consuming information and I happen to
love it it's where I essentially
launched the non-podcast segment of my
podcast and continue
to I can think of experiences that are a
little bit like um highly processed food
where it tastes good at the time it's uh
it's highly engrossing but it's not
necessarily nutritious and you don't
feel very good after afterwards so for
me that would be my the little collage
of default um options to click on in
Instagram occasionally I notice and this
just reflects my failure not Instagrams
right that there are a lot of um like
street fight things like of people
beating people up on the street and I
have to say these have a very strong
gravitational pull I'm not somebody that
enjoys seeing violence per se but you
know I find myself I'll click on one of
these like what happened and I'll see
someone like you know get hit and
there's like a little melee on the
street or something and those seem to be
offered to me a lot lately and again
this is my fault it reflects my prior
searching experience but it I notice
that it has a bit of a gravitational
pull where um you know there's not I
didn't learn anything it's not teaching
me any kind of useful Street um
self-defense skills of any kind um and
at the same time I also really enjoy
some of the the cute animal stuff and so
I get a lot of those also so there's
this polarized you know collage that's
off to me that reflects my prior search
Behavior You could argue that the the
cute animal stuff um is just
entertainment but actually it it fills
me with a feeling in some cases that
truly Delights me I Delight in animals
and we're not just talking about kittens
I mean animals I've never seen before
interactions between animals I've never
seen before that truly Delight me they
energize me in a positive way that when
I leave Instagram I do think I'm better
off so I'm grateful for the algorithm in
that sense
but I guess the direct question is is
the algorithm just reflective of what
one has been looking at a lot prior to
that moment where they log on or is it
also trying to do exactly what you uh
described which is trying to give people
a good feeling experience that leads to
more good
feelings yeah I mean I think we try to
do this in a long-term way right I think
one simple example of this is we had
this issue a number of years back about
clickbait news right so articles that
would have um you know basically a a
headline um that grabbed your attention
that made you feel like I need to click
on this then you click on it and then
the article is actually you know about
something that's somewhat tangential to
it um but people clicked on it so you
know the naive version of this stuff you
know the like 10-year-old version it was
like oh people seem to be clicking on
this maybe that's good but it's actually
a pretty straightforward exercise to
instrument the system to realize that
hey people click on this and then you
know they don't really spend a lot of
time reading the the news that after
clicking on it and um after they do this
a few times they you know it doesn't
really correlate with them you know
saying that they're having a good
experience um some of what you some of
how we we measure this is just by
looking at how people use the services
but I think it's also important to
balance that by having like real people
come in and you know tell us okay we we
show them here are the stories that we
could have showed you which of these um
are most meaningful to you or would
would make it that you have the best
experience and just kind of like mapping
the algorithm and what we do to that
ground truth of what people say that
they want so I I think that through a
set of things like that we really have
you made large steps to minimize things
like clickbait over time it's not gone
from the internet but you I think we've
done a good job of minimizing it on on
our
services within that though I do think
that we need to be pretty careful about
not being paternalistic about what makes
different people feel good right so I
mean I don't know that everyone feels
good about about cute animals and me I
can't imagine that people would feel
really bad about it but maybe they don't
have as profound of a positive reaction
to it as as as you just expressed um and
I don't know maybe people who are more
into fighting would look at the you know
the street fighting videos assuming that
they're within our community standards I
think that there's a level of violence
that we just don't want to be showing at
all but that's a a separate question um
but if they are I mean then you know
it's like I I'm pretty into MMA I I I
don't get a lot of street fighting
videos but if I did maybe I I'd feel
like I was learning something from that
um I I think at various times in the
company's history we've been a little
bit too paternalistic about saying this
is good content this is bad you should
like this um this is unhealthy for you
and I I think that we want to look at
the long-term effects you don't want to
get stuck in a in a shortterm loop of
like okay just because you did this
today doesn't mean it's like what you
Aspire for yourself over time but
I think as long as you look at the long
term of what people both say they want
and what they do giving people a fair
amount of latitude to like the things
that they like I I just think feels like
the right set of values to bring to this
um now of course that doesn't go for
everything there are things that are
kind of truly off limits and and you
know things that you know like bullying
for example or you know things that are
really like inciting violence things
like that I we have the whole Community
standards around this but I I think
except for those things which I would
hope that most people can agree okay
bullying is bad right I I I hope that
you know 100% of people agree with that
you know not 100 maybe
99% um except for the things that kind
of get that sort of
very that that feel pretty extreme and
bad like that I think you want to give
people space to like what they want to
like yesterday I had the um very good
experience of learning from The Meta
team about safety protections that are
in place for kids who are using um meta
platforms and frankly I was like really
positively surprised at the huge number
of filter-based tools and and and just
ability to customize the experience so
that it can um stand the best chance of
enriching not just remaining neutral but
enriching their mental health status
yeah um one thing that came about in
that conversation however was I realized
there all these tools but do people
really know that these tools exist and I
think about my own experience with
Instagram I I love watching Adam aer's
Friday um q&as because he explains a lot
of the tools that I didn't know existed
um and people haven't seen that I highly
recommend they watch that um it's I
think every takes questions on Thursdays
and answers them most every Fridays um
so if I'm not aware of the tools without
watching that um that exists for adults
um how does meta look at the challenge
of making sure that people know that
there are all these tools I mean dozens
and dozens of very useful tools but I
think most of us just know the hashtag
the tag The Click Stories versus feed uh
we now know that that you know I also
post to threads I mean so so we know the
major channels and tools but um this is
like owning a vehicle that has
incredible features that one doesn't
realize can take you Offroad can allow
your vehicle to fly I there's a lot
there so uh what could what do you think
could be done to get that information
out maybe this conversation could cue
people to to their I me that's that's
part part of the reason why I wanted to
talk to you about this is I mean I think
most of the narrative around social
media is not okay all the different
tools that people have to control their
experience it's you know the kind of
narrative of is this just negative for
for for teens or something and and I
think again a lot of this comes down to
you know do um you know how is the
experience being tuned and is it
actually you know like are people using
it to connect and in positive ways and
if so I think it's really positive um so
yeah I me I think part of this is we
probably just need to get out and talk
to people more about it um and then
there's an in product aspect which is
you know if you're a teen and you sign
up we take you through a pretty um you
know extensive experience that um tries
to outline some of this but that has
limits too right because when you sign
up for a new thing um if you're
bombarded with like here's a list of of
of features you're like okay I just
signed up for this really understand
much about what the services like let me
go find some people to follow um who are
my friends on here before I like learn
about controls to you prevent people
from harassing me or something um that's
why I think it's really important to
also show uh a bunch of these tools in
context so you know if you're looking at
comments um and you know if you if you
go to you know delete a comment or um
you go to edit something you know try to
give people prompts in line it's like
hey did you know that you can manage
things in in these ways um around that
or when you're in the Inbox and you're
filtering something right it's um remind
people in line so I know just because of
the number of people who use the
products and the level of nuance
surrounding to the controls I think the
vast majority of um of that education I
think needs to happen in the product but
I do think that through conversations
like this and and others that you know
we we need to be doing I think we can
create a broader awareness that those
things exist so that way at least people
are primed so that way when those things
pop up in the product people like oh
yeah like I I knew that there was this
control and like here's here's like how
I would use that like I find the
restrict function to be very useful um
more than the block function in most
cases I I do sometimes have to loock
people but the restrict function is
really useful that you could filter
specific comments you know someone might
have a you might recognize that someone
has a tendency to be a little aggressive
and I should point out that I actually
don't really mind what people say to me
but I try and maintain what I call
classroom rules in my comment section
where I don't like people attacking
other people because I would never
tolerate that in the University
classroom I'm not going to tolerate that
in the comment section for instance yeah
and I think that the example that you
just you just used about restrict versus
block gets to something about product
design that's important too which is
that block is sort of this very powerful
tool that if someone is giving you a
hard time and you just want them to
disappear from the experience you can do
it but the design tra off with that is
that in order to make it so that the
person is just gone from the experience
um and that you you don't show up to
them they don't show up to you um
inherent to that is that they will have
a sense that you blocked them and that's
why I think some stuff like restrict or
just filtering like I I just don't want
to see as much stuff about this topic um
you know people like using different
tools for very subtle reasons right I
mean maybe um maybe you want the content
to not show up um but you don't want the
person who's posting the content to know
that you don't want it to show up um
maybe you don't want to get the messages
in your main inbox but you don't want to
tell the person that you like that you
actually you know that you're not
friends or something like that I you
actually need to give people different
tools that have different levels of of
kind of power and Nuance around how the
social dynamics around using them play
out um in order to really allow people
to tailor the experience in the ways
that they want in terms of trying to
limit total amount of time on social
media um I couldn't find really good
data on this um you know how much time
is too much I mean I think it's going to
depend on what one is looking at the age
of the user Etc but I agree I I know
that you have tools that cue uh the user
to how long they've been on a given
platform are there tools to
self-regulate like I'm thinking about
like the the Greek myth of the sirens
and you know people you know tying
themselves to the Mast and covering
their eyes so that they're not drawn in
by by the sirens is there a function
aside from deleting the app temporarily
and then reinstalling it every every
time you want to use it again is there a
true lockout self lockout function where
one can lock themselves out of access to
the app well I think we give people
tools that let them manage this and and
and there's the tools that you get to
use and there's the tools the parents
get to use um to basically see how how
the usage works but yeah I think that
there's there's different kind of you I
think for now we've mostly focused on
you know helping people understand this
and then you know give people reminders
and things like that um it's tough
though to answer the question that you
were talking about before this of is
there an amount of time which is too
much because it does really get to what
you're doing but if you fast forward
Beyond just the apps that we have today
to an experience that is like a social
experience in the future of the
augmented reality glasses or something
that that we're building a lot of this
is going to be you know you're
interacting with people um in the way
that you would physically as if you were
kind of like hanging out with friends or
working with people um but now they can
show up as Holograms and you can feel
like you're present right there with
them no matter where they actually are
and the question is is there too much
time to spend interacting with people
like that well at the limit if we can
get that experience to be kind of as
rich and giving you as good of a sense
of presence um
as you would have if you were physically
there with someone then I don't see why
you would want to restrict the amount
that people use that technology to any
less than what would be the you know
amount of time that you'd be comfortable
interacting with people physically um
which obviously it's not going to be 24
hours a day you have to do other stuff
um you you have have work you need to
sleep but I I I think it really gets to
kind of how you're using these things
whereas if what you're primarily using
the services for is to you just you're
getting stuck in Loops reading you know
news or something that is really kind of
getting you into a negative mental state
then I don't know I mean I think that
there's probably a relatively short
period of time that maybe that's kind of
a good thing that you want to be doing
um but again even then it's not zero
right because it's it's you know just
because news might make you unhappy
doesn't mean that the answer is to be
unaware of negative things that are
happening in the world I just think that
there's like different people have
different tolerances for what they can
take on that and I think we you know
it's generally having some awareness is
probably good as long as it's not more
than you're kind of constitutionally
able to take so I don't know try to not
be too paternalistic about this as our
approach but we want to empower people
by giving them the tools both people and
if you're a teen your parents to have
tools to understand what you're
experiencing and and what the um and how
you're using these things and then and
then go from there yeah I think it
requires of all of us some degree of
self-regulation I like this idea of not
being too journalistic I mean that's uh
it seems like the right way to go I find
myself occasionally having to make sure
that I'm not just passively scrolling
that I'm learning I I like forging for
organizing and dispersing information
that's been my my my life's career so I
I've learned so much from social media I
find great papers great ideas I think
comments are a great source of feedback
and I'm not just saying that because
you're sitting here I mean Instagram in
particular but other meta platforms have
been tremendously helpful for me to get
science and health information out one
of the things that I'm really excited
about which I only had the chance to try
for the first time today is your new uh
VR platforms the the newest Oculus um
and then we can talk about the glasses
the rayb bands um those are still that
those two experiences are still kind of
blowing my mind especially the the um
the the Rayband glasses and I I have so
many questions about this so I'll resist
but um we can get into that okay well
yeah I have some experience with VR my
lab has used VR
um Jeremy Binson's Lab at at um Stanford
is one of the pioneering Labs of VR and
and mixed reality I guess some they used
to call it augmented reality but now
mixed reality I think what's so striking
about the VR that um you guys had me try
today is how well it interfaces with the
with the real room let's call it the the
physical room I could still see people I
could see where the furniture was so I
wasn't going to bump into anything I
could see people's Smiles I could see my
my um my water on the table while I was
doing this
what felt like a real martial arts
experience except I wasn't getting hit
uh well I was getting hit virtually but
it's extremely engaging and yet it on
the good side of things it really
bypasses a lot of the early concerns
that Balin and lab again Jeremy's lab
was early to say that oh you know
there's a limit to how much VR one can
or should use each day um even for the
adult brain because it can really
disrupt your um vestibular system your
sense of balance
all of that seems to have been dealt
with in this new this new iteration of
VR like it didn't come out of it feeling
dizzy at all I didn't feel like I was
re-entering the room in a way that was
really jarring going into it is
obviously whoa this is a different world
but you can look look to your left and
say oh someone just came in the door hey
how's it going hold on I'm playing this
game just as it was when I was a kid
playing a Nintendo and someone would
walk in it's fully engrossing but you'd
be like hold on and you see they're
there so first of all um Bravo um
incredible um and then the next question
is you know what is this what do we even
call this experience because it is truly
mixed it's a truly mixed reality
experience yeah I mean mixed reality is
sort of the umbrella term that refers to
the combined experience of virtual and
augmented reality so augmented reality
is you know what you're eventually going
to get with you know some future version
of the smart glasses where you're
primarily seeing the world right but um
but you can put Holograms in it right so
I that will have a in a future where
you're going to walk into a room and
there going to be like as many Holograms
as as physical objects right if you just
think about like all the paper the kind
of art physical games media your
workstation if we refer to let's say an
MMA fight we could just draw it up on
the table right here and just see it
repeat as opposed to us turning and
looking at a screen yeah I mean pretty
much any screen that exists could be a
hologram in the future with smart
glasses right there's nothing that
actually physically needs to be there
for that when you have glasses that can
put um a holog there and and it's an
interesting thought experiment to just
go around and think about okay what of
the things that are physical in the
world need to actually be physical and
your chair does right because you're
sitting on it a hologram isn't going to
support you but I like that art on the
wall I mean that doesn't need to
physically be there I mean um so I I
think that that's that's sort of the
augmented reality experience that we're
moving towards and then we've had these
headsets that historically we think
about as VR and that has been something
that kind of it's like a fully immersive
experience but now we're kind of getting
something that's a hybrid in between the
two and capable of both which is a
headset that can do both virtual reality
and some of these augmented reality
experiences and I think that that's
really powerful um both because you're
going to get new applications that that
kind of allow people to collaborate
together and um you know maybe the two
of us are here physically but you know
someone joins us and it's their Avatar
there or maybe you know it's some
version of the future like we're having
a you know you're having a team meeting
and you have some people there
physically and you have some people
dialing in and they're basically like a
hologram there virtually but then you
also have some AIS that personas that
are on your team that are helping you do
different things and they can be
embodied as avatars and around the table
meeting with you are people going to be
doing first dates that are uh physically
separated I could imagine that some
people would is it even worth leaving
the house type date and then they find
out and then they meet for the first
time um I mean maybe I think I think you
know I dating has
you physical aspects to it too so some
people might not be they want to know
whether or not it's worth the effort to
head out to whether
not want to The Divide right it is
possible I mean I know like a some of my
friends who are dating
basically you say that in order to make
sure that they have like a safe
experience and when they're if they're
going on a first date they'll schedule
something that's like shorter and maybe
in the middle of the day like so maybe
it's coffee so that way if they don't
like the person they can just kind of
get out before like going and scheduling
a dinner or like a real full date so I
don't know maybe in the future people
will will kind of have that experience
to where you can feel like you're kind
of sitting there and it's and it's even
easier and lighter weight and safer and
if you're not having a good experience
you can just like teleport out of there
and be gone um but yeah I think that
this will be an interesting question in
the future is um there are clearly a lot
of things that are only possible
physically that or are so much better
physically and then there are all these
things that we're building up that can
be digital experiences but it's this
weird artifact of kind of how the stuff
has been developed that the digital
world and the physical world exist in
these like completely different planes
where you want to interact with the
digital world well we do it all the time
but we pull out a small screen or we
have a big screen and just basically
we're interacting with the digital world
through these screens but I think if we
fast forward you know a decade or more
it's I think one of the really
interesting questions about what like
what is the world that we're going to
live in I think it's going to
increasingly be this mesh of the
physical and digital worlds that will
allow us to feel a that the the world
that we're in is just a lot richer
because there can be all these things
that people create that are just so much
easier to do digitally than than
physically um
but at B you're going to have a real
kind of physical sense of presence with
these things and not feel like
interacting in the digital world is
taking you away from the physical World
which today is just so much viscerally
richer and more powerful um I think the
the digital world will sort of be
embedded in the in that and um and and
will feel kind of just as Vivid in a lot
of ways so that's why I always think and
when you were saying before you know you
felt like you could look around and see
the real room I actually think that
there's an interesting kind of
philosophical distinction between the
real room and the physical room um which
you know historically I think people
would have said those are the same thing
but I actually think in the future the
real room is going to be the combination
of the physical world with all the
digital artifacts and objects that are
in there that you can interact with them
and feel present whereas the physical
world is just the part that's physically
there and I think it's possible to build
a real world that's the sum of these two
that will actually be you know more
profound experience than what we have
today I was struck by the smoothness of
the interface between the VR and the
physical room uh your team had me try a
um I guess it was an exercise class in
the form but it was like essentially
like hitting mits boxing
yeah and and it comes at a fairly fast
pace that then picks up it's got some
tutorial it's very easy to use and
certainly got my heart rate up and I'm
in at least decent shape um and I have
to be honest I've never once desired to
do any of these onscreen Fitness things
I mean I can't think of anything more
aversive than a like like a CL like I
don't want to insult any particular
products um but like riding a stationary
bike while looking at a screen and
pretending I'm on a road outside I can't
think of anything worse for me
um maybe I do like the leader board
maybe I'm just a very competitive person
it's like if you're going to be running
on a treadmill at least give me a leader
board so I can beat the people who are
ahead of me I like moving outside and
and certainly an exercise class or
aerobics class as they used to call them
but what the experience I tried today
was extremely engaging um and I've done
enough boxing to at least know how to to
do a little bit of it and really enjoyed
it gets your heart rate up and you I
completely forgot that I was doing an an
onscreen experience because in part
because I believe I was still in that
physical room MH um and I think there's
something about the mesh of the physical
room and the virtual experience that um
makes it neither of one world or the
other I mean I really felt at the
interface of those and and certainly got
presence this feeling forgetting that I
was in a virtual experience and um got
my heart rate up pretty quickly we had
to stop cuz we were going to start
recording but I would do that for a good
45 minutes in the morning and and and
there's no amount of money you could pay
me truly to uh look at a screen while
pedaling on a bike or running on a
treadmill so um again Bravo I think it's
going to be very useful it's going to
get people moving their bodies more
which certainly social media up until
now and a lot of technologies have been
accused of limiting the amount of
physical activity that that both
children and adults are engaged in so
and we know we need physical activity
you're a big proponent of and
practitioner of physical activity so is
this a major goal of meta get people
moving their bodies more and getting
their heart rates up and and so on I
think we want to enable it and I I think
it's good but I I think it comes more
from like a philosophical view of the
world than it
is necessarily I mean I don't go into
Building Products to try to shape
people's behavior right I I believe in
empowering people to you know do what
they want and be the best version of
themselves that they can be so No Agenda
that said I I do believe that there's
the the previous generation of computers
were devices for your mind and I think
that we are not brains and tanks um you
know it's like I think that there's sort
of a a philosophical view of people of
like okay you you are primarily you know
what you think about or your values or
something it's like no you are that and
you are a physical manifestation and
people were very physical and I think
building a
computer for your whole body and not
just for your mind is very fitting with
this world view that like the actual
essence of you if you want to be present
with another person if you want to like
be fully engaged in experience is not
just okay it's not just a video
conference call that looks at your face
and where you can like share ideas um
it's it's something that that you can
engage your whole body so yeah I I mean
I think being physical is very important
to me I mean it's um you know it's it
just that's a lot of you know the most
fun stuff that I get to do um it's a
really important part of how I
personally balance my energy levels and
just get a diversity of experiences
because you I could spend all my time
running the company um but I think it's
good for people to do some different
things and you know compete in different
areas or learn different things and all
of that um is good if if people want to
you know do really intense workouts with
um with the work that we're doing with
Quest or with um you know eventual AR
glasses great but even if you don't want
to do like a really intense workout I
think just having a Computing
environment and platform which is
inherently physical captures more of the
essence of what we are as people than
any of the previous Computing platforms
that we've had to date yeah I was even
thinking just of the um simple task of
getting uh better of motion AKA
flexibility I could imagine inside of
the VR experience you know leaning into
a stretch you know a standard kind of
like like a lunge type stretch but
actually seeing a meter of like are you
get are you approaching new levels of
flexibility in that moment where it's
actually measuring some some kinesthetic
uh elements on the body and the joints
and I mean I was just trying whereas
normally you might have to do that in
front of a camera which then would give
you the data on a screen that you'd look
at afterwards or hire an expensive coach
but so or looking at um form and
resistance training so you're actually
lifting physical weights but it's
telling you whether or not you're
breaking form I mean there's so much
that could be done inside of there and
then my mind just starts to spiral into
like wow this is very likely to
transform what we think of as quote
unquote
exercise yeah I think so I think there's
still a bunch of questions that need to
get answered um you know it's I don't
think most people are going to
necessarily want to install you know a
lot of sensors or cameras to track their
whole body so we're just over time
getting better from the sensors that are
on the headsets of being able to do very
good hand tracking right so we we have
this research demo where you now just
with the hand tracking um from the
headset you can type it just projects a
little keyboard onto your table and you
can type and people like type like a 100
words a minute with that with a virtual
keyboard yeah we're starting to be able
to um using some Modern AI techniques be
able to like simulate and understand
where your torso's position is um even
though you can't always see it you can
see it a bunch of the time and if you
fuse together what you do see um with
like the accelerometer and understanding
how the thing is moving you can kind of
understand what the body position is
going to be um but some things are still
going to be hard right so you you
mentioned boxing um that one works
pretty well because you know we
understand your head position we
understand your hands um and and now
we're we're kind of increasingly
understanding your your body position um
but let's say you want to expand that to
um Muay Thai or kickboxing okay so legs
that's a different part of tracking
that's harder um cuz that's out of the
field of you more of the time but
there's also the element of resistance
right so you can throw a punch and
retract it and shadow box and you know
do that um without upsetting your kind
of physical balance that much but if you
want to throw a roundhouse kick um and
there's no one there then I mean you
know the standard way that you do when
you're Shadow Boxing is you basically do
a little 360 but like I don't know is
that is that going to feel great I mean
I I think that there's a question about
what the what that experience should be
um and then if you want to go even
further if you want to get like
grappling um to to work um I'm I'm not
even sure how you would do that without
having resistance of understanding what
the forces applied to you would be and
it's then you get into okay maybe you're
going to have some kind of bodysuit that
can apply you know haptics but I'm not
even sure that that even a pretty
Advanced haptic system is going to be
able to be quite good enough to do to
simulate like the actual Force that
would be applied to you um in a
grappling scenario so this is part of
what's fun about technology though is
you get you keep on getting new
capabilities and then you need to figure
out what things you can do with them so
I think it's really neat that we can
kind of do boxing and we can do this
Supernatural thing and um there's a
bunch of awesome cardio and dancing and
things like that um and then there's
also still so much more to do that that
I'm excited to to kind of get to over
time but um but it's it's a long journey
and what about things like um painting
and art and music you know I imagine um
you know of course you like different
mediums like I like to draw with pen and
pencil but I could imagine trying to
learn how to paint and virtually and of
course you could print out a physical
version of that at the end this doesn't
have to depart from the physical world
it could end in the physical did you see
the demo the the piano demo where you um
either you're there with a physical
keyboard or it could be a virtual
keyboard but the app basically
highlights what keys you need to press
um in order to play the song so it's
basically like you're looking at your
piano and it's teaching you how to play
a song that you choose an actual piano
yeah yeah but it's Illuminating certain
keys in in the virtual space and it
could either be a virtual Piano if you
or keyboard if you don't have a piano or
keyboard or it could use your actual
keyboard um so yeah um I think stuff
like that is going to be really
fascinating for education and expression
um and for broad excuse me but for and
for broadening access to expensive
equipment I mean piano is is no small
expense exact and it takes up a lot of
space and it needs to be tuned um you
can think of all these things that the
kid that has very little income or their
family has very little income could
learn to play a virtual piano at much
lower cost yeah it gets back to the
question I was asking before about this
thought experiment of how many of the
things that we physically have today
actually need to be physical the piano
doesn't um maybe there's some premium
where it's maybe it's a somewhat better
more tactile tactile experience to have
a physical one but for people who don't
have the space for it or who who can't
afford to to buy a piano or just aren't
sure that they would want to make that
investment at the beginning of learning
how to play piano I think in the future
you'll have the option of just buying
you know an app or a hologram piano
which will be you know a lot more
affordable um and I I think it's going
to be that's going to be unlock unlock a
ton of creativity too because instead of
the market for piano makers being
constrained to like a relatively small
set of experts who have like perfected
that craft and you're going to have like
you know kids or developers all around
the world designing crazy designs for um
potential keyboards and pianos that look
nothing like what we've seen before but
are maybe like bring even more joy and
or even more kind of fun in the world
where you have fewer these physical
constraints so I don't I think it's
gonna there's gonna be a lot of wild
stuff to explore there's definitely
gonna be a lot of wild stuff to explore
I was just had this uh this idea slash
um image in my mind of what you were
talking about merged with our earlier
conversation when Priscilla was here of
you I could imagine a time not too far
long from now where you're using mixed
reality to run experiments in the lab
literally mixing virtual Solutions
getting potential outcomes and then
picking the best one to then go actually
do in the real world which is very both
um financially costly and um time wise
costly yeah I mean people are already
using
VR for surgery and education on it um I
there's some study that was done that um
basically did it tried to do a
controlled experiment of people who
learned how to do a specific surgery um
through just a normal kind of textbook
and lecture method versus like you show
the knee and you you have it you know be
a large blown up model and people can
manipulate it and and kind of practice
where they would make the cuts and and
like the people in that class did better
so um I I think that there's yeah it's I
think that it's going to be profound for
a lot of different areas and last um
example at leavs to mind you know I
think uh social media and online culture
has been accused of creating a lot of um
real world let's call it physical world
social anxiety for people but I could
imagine um practicing a social
interaction or a kid that has a lot of
social anxiety or that needs to advocate
for themselves better learning how to do
that progressively through a virtual
interaction and then taking that to the
real world because it's in my very
recent experience today it's so Blended
now with with real experience that the
kid that feels terrified of advocating
for themselves or or just talking to
another human being or an adult or being
in a new circumstance of a room full of
kids you could really experience that in
in silico first and get comfortable let
the nervous system attenuate a bit and
then take it into the quote unquote
physical world
yeah I think we'll see experiences like
that I mean I also think that some of
the social dynamics around how people
interact in this kind of Blended digital
world will be more nuanced in other ways
so I'm sure that there will be kind of
new anxieties that people develop to
just like you know teens today need to
navigate Dynamics around texting
constantly that um that we just didn't
have when we were kids um so I I think
it will help with some things I think
that there will be new issues that
hopefully we can help people work
through too but um but overall I think
yeah I think it's going to be really
powerful and positive let's talk about
the glasses sure this was wild yeah put
on a pair of rayb bands I like the way
they look they're clear they look like
any other glass rayb bang glasses um
except that I could call out to the
glasses I could just say you know hey
meta um I want to listen to the boach
variations The Goldberg Variations of
box
and meta responded and no one around me
could hear but I could hear um with
exquisite Clarity by the way I'm not
getting paid to say any of this I'm just
still blown away by this folks um I want
a pair of these very badly I could hear
okay I'm selecting those now and or that
that music now and then I could hear it
in the background but then I could still
have a conversation so this was neither
headphones in nor headphones out MH um
and I could say wait pause the music and
it would pause
um and the best part was I didn't have
to quotquot leave the room mentally I
didn't even have to take out a phone it
just it was all interfaced through this
very local environment in and around the
head and as a neuroscientist I'm
fascinated by this because of course all
of our perceptions auditory visual Etc
all occurring in inside the casing of
this of this thing we call a skull but
um maybe you could comment on you know
the the origin of that design for you
you know what the ideas behind that and
where you think it could go because I'm
sure I'm just scratching the surface
the real product that we want to
eventually get to is this kind of full
augmented reality product in a kind of
stylish and comfortable normal glasses
form factor not dorky VR headset so to
speak no I mean because the VR headset
does feel kind of like it the face
there's going to be a place for that too
just like you have your laptop and you
have your workstation um or maybe the
better analogy is you have your phone
and you have your workstation um these
AR glasses are going to be like your
phone in that and you have something on
your face and you will I think be able
to if you want wear it for a lot of the
day and interact with with um with it
very frequently I don't think that
people are going to be you know walking
around the world wearing VR headsets let
Hope but yeah that's that's certainly
not the future that that I'm that I'm
kind of hoping we we get to but I do
think that there is a place where um for
having because it's a bigger form factor
it has more compute power so just like
your workstation or your your a bigger
computer can do more than your phone can
do um there's a place for that when you
want to settle into an intense task
right if you have a doctor who's doing a
surgery I would want them doing it
through the headset not through the kind
of not through their phone equivalent or
the the just kind of lower powerered
glasses but just like phones are
powerful enough to do a lot of things
and the glasses will eventually get
there too um now that said there's a
bunch of really hard technology problems
um to address in order to be able to get
to this point where you can like put
kind of full Holograms in the world
you're basically miniaturizing a
supercomputer and putting it into a pair
of glasses um so that the pair of
glasses still look stylish and normal
and
um that's a really hard technology
problem making things small is really
hard um a holographic display is you
know it's it's different from what our
industry has optimized for for you know
30 or 40 years now building
screens there's like a whole kind of
industrial process around that that goes
into phones and TVs and computers and
like increasingly so many things that
that have different screens like there's
a whole pipeline that's gotten very good
at making that kind of screen and the
holographic displays are just a
completely different thing right because
it's not it's not a screen right it's a
thing that you can shoot light into
through you know a laser or some other
kind of projector and it can place that
as an object in the world so that's
going to need to be this whole other
industrial process that gets built up to
doing that like in an efficient way
so all that said we're basically taking
two different approaches towards
building this at
once one is
we are trying to keep in mind what is
the the long-term thing that you it's
not super far off I think within you
know few years I think we'll have
something that that's sort of a first
version of kind of this full vision that
I'm talking about and we have something
that's working internally that we use as
like a that we'll use as a dev kit um
but that one that's that's kind of a big
challenge it's going to be more
expensive um and it's harder to get all
the pieces
working the other approach has been all
right let's start with what we know we
can put into um a pair of stylish
sunglasses today
and just make them as smart as we can so
you know for the first version you know
we we worked with um we we did this
collaboration with Rayban right because
that's like well accepted you know these
are well-designed glasses they're
classic people have have used them for
decades for the first version we got a
sensor on the front so you could Capture
Moments without having to take your
phone out of your pocket so you got
photos and videos um you had the speaker
and the microphon so you can listen to
music um you could communicate with it
uh but it
was you know that was that was sort of
the first version of it we had a lot of
the basics there we saw how people used
it and we tuned it we made that the
camera is like twice as good for for
this new version that we made the audio
is a lot crisper for the use cases that
we saw that people actually used which
is some of it is listening to music but
a lot of it is like people want to take
calls on their glasses um they want to
listen to podcasts right you um but the
the biggest thing that I think is
interesting is the ability to get AI
running on it which it it doesn't just
run on the on the glasses it also it it
kind of prox through your phone but I
mean with all the advances in llms we
talked about this a bit in the the first
part of of the the conversation um
having the ability to have your meta aai
assistant that you can just talk to and
basically ask any question throughout
the day is I think it to be really
fascinating and you know like you were
saying about kind of how we how we
process the world as people um
eventually I think you're going to want
your AI assistant to be able to see what
you see and hear what you hear maybe not
all the time but you're going to want to
be able to tell it to go into a mode
where it can see what you see and hear
what you hear and what's the kind of
device design that best kind of
positions an AI assistant to be able to
see what you see and hear what you hear
so can best help you well that's glasses
right where where basically has a sensor
to be able to see what you see and um a
microphone that is close to your ears
that can hear what you hear um
the other design goals is like you said
to keep you present in the world right
so I think one of the issues with phones
is they kind of pull you away from from
what's physically happening around you
and I don't think that the next
generation of computing will do that um
I'm just I'm chuckling to myself because
I have a friend he's a very well-known
photographer and he was laughing about
how you know people go to a concert and
everyone's filming the concert on their
phone so that they can be the person
that posts the thing but like they're
literally millions of of other people
who posted the exact same thing but
somehow our unique it feels important to
post our unique experience with glasses
that would essentially smooth that um
Gap um completely totally um you can
just worry about it later download it
there are issues I realize with with
glasses because they are so seamless
with everyday experience even though you
and I aren't wearing them now it's very
common for people to wear glasses um
issues of recording and consent like I I
go into a locker room at my gym I'm
assuming with glasses aren't filming
whereas when right now because there's a
a sharp transition when when there's a
phone in the room and someone's pointing
it um people generally say no no phones
in locker rooms in recording um so
that's just one instance I mean there
are other instan we have the whole
privacy light I don't know did you did
you get I get a chance to explore that
yeah so it's anytime that it's active
that the camera sensor is active um it's
it's basically like pulsing a white
bright light got it so which is by the
way more than cameras
do phones aren't aren't kind of showing
a light a bright sensor when when you're
taking a photo so no people often times
will pretend they're texting and they're
actually recording actually saw an
instance of this in a barber shop once
where someone was recording and they
were pretending that they were texting
and there was an there was a pretty
intense interaction that ensued and it
was like wow you know it's pretty easy
for people to to feain texting while
actually recording yeah so I think when
you're
evaluating a risk with a new
technology the bar shouldn't be is it
possible to do anything bad it's does
this new technology make it easier to do
something bad than what people already
had and I think because you have this
privacy light that is just broadcasting
to everyone around you hey this thing is
recording now um I think that that makes
it
actually less discreet to do it through
the glasses than what you could do with
a phone already um which I think is is
basically the bar that we wanted to get
over from a design perspective thank you
for pointing out that it has the Privacy
light I didn't get long enough in the
experience to explore all the features
but um again I can think of a lot of
uses um being able to look at a
restaurant from the outside and see the
menu oh yeah um get status on how
crowded it is um as much as I love I
don't want to call out let's just say um
app-based map uh functions that allow
you to navigate and the audio is okay
it's nice to have a conversation um with
somebody on the phone or in the vehicle
and just it be great if the road was
traced where I should turn absolutely
these kinds of things seem like it's
going to be straightforward for for meta
Engineers to create future version will
have it so it also have the holographic
display where it can show you the
directions but I I think that there will
basically just be you know different
price points that pack different amounts
of Technology the holographic display
part I think is going to be
expensive than doing one that just thei
but is um but is primarily communicating
you with you through audio so I mean the
the current Rayband metag glasses are
299 um you know I think when we have one
that has a display in it it'll probably
be some amount more than that but it'll
also be more powerful so I think that
it'll people will choose what they want
to use based on what the capabilities
are that they want and what they can
afford but um but a lot of our goal
building things is um you know we try to
make things that can be accessible to
everyone um you know our game as a
company isn't to build things and then
charge a premium price for it we try to
build things that then everyone can use
um and then become more useful because a
very large number of people are using
them um so it's just a very different
approach um you know we're not we're not
like apple or or some of these companies
that just try to make something and then
sell it for as much um as as as they can
which I mean they're a great company so
I mean I think that that that model kind
of is is fine too but um but our
approach is going to be we want stuff
that can be affordable so that way
everyone in the world can use it along
lines of Health I think the glasses will
also potentially solve a major problem
in a in a real way which is the
following uh for both children and
adults it's very clear that viewing
objects in particular screens up close
for too many hours per day leads to
myopia literally a change in the length
of length of the eyeball and
nearsightedness um and on the positive
side we know based on some really large
clinical trials um that kids who spend
and adults who spend two hours a day or
more out ofd doors um don't experience
that and maybe even reverse their myopia
and it has something to do with exposure
to sunlight but it has a lot to do with
long viewing viewing things at a
distance greater than three or four feet
away and with the glasses I realize one
could actually do digital work out ofd
doors um it could measure and tell you
how much time you've spent looking at
things up close versus far away I mean
this is this is just another example
that leaps to mind but in in accessing
the visual system you're effectively
accessing the whole brain because it's
the only two bits of brain that are
outside the cranial Vault so it just
seems like putting technology right at
the level of the eyes seeing what the
eyes see is just got to be the best way
to go yeah I think well multimodal right
I I think is you want the visual
sensation but you also want kind of text
or language so sure I think it's that
all can be brought to the level of the
eyes right what do you mean by well I
mean I think what we're describing here
is essentially taking the phone the
computer um and bringing it all to the
level of the eyes and of course one
would like more physically at your
physically at your eyes right and one
would like more um kinesthetic
information as you mentioned before
where the legs are maybe even lung
function hey have you taken enough steps
today but but that all can be it can be
figured out on the phone it can be by
the phone it can be figured out by
glasses um but there's additional
information there such as what are you
focusing on in your world how much of
your time is spent looking at things far
away versus up close how much Social
time did you have today it's it's really
tricky to get that with a phone like
like if my phone were right in front of
us as if we were at a standard lunch
nowadays certainly silicon value and
then people we're peering at our phones
I mean how much real direct attention
was in the conversation at hand versus
something else you can get issues of
where are you placing your attention
um by virtue of where you're placing
your eyes and I think that information
is not accessible with a phone in your
pocket or in front of you I mean that a
little bit um but not nearly as Rich uh
and complete information as one gets
when you're really pulling the data from
the level of of vision and what what
kids and adults are actually looking at
and attending to yeah yeah yeah it seems
extremely valuable um you get autonomic
information size of the pupils so you
get information about internal States I
mean that you well there's there's
internal sensor and outside so there's
the sensor on the Rayband metag glasses
is external right so it's basically
allows you to see what you see then uh
allows sorry the AI system to see what
you're seeing there's a separate set of
things which are ey tracking um which
are also very powerful um for enabling a
lot of interfaces right so you want to
if you want to just like look at
something and select it by looking at it
with your eyes rather than having to
kind of drag a controller over or pick
up a hologram or or anything like that
you can do that with ey tracking um so
that's a pretty profound and and cool
experience too um as well as just kind
of understanding what you're looking at
so that way you're not kind of wasting
compute power drawing pixels with in
high resolution a part of the kind of
world that you're that's going to be in
your peripheral vision um so yeah all of
these things um they're interesting
design and Technology trade-offs where
if you want the external sensor that's
one thing if you also want the eye
tracking um now that's a different set
of sensors each one of these um consumes
compute which consumes battery um they
take up more space right so it's like
where are the eye tracking sensors going
to be it's like well you want to make
sure that the rim of the glasses is
actually quite thin because I mean it's
you know there's a kind of variance of
you know how thick can glasses be before
they look more like goggles than glasses
um think that this is there's this whole
space and I think people are going to
end up choosing what product makes sense
for them maybe they want something
that's more powerful that has more of
the sensors um but it's but it's going
to be a little more expensive maybe like
slightly thicker um or maybe you want
like a more basic thing that just looks
like very similar to what Rayband
glasses are that people have been
wearing for decades but kind of has AI
in it and you can Capture Moments um
without having to take your phone out
and send them to people in the latest
version we got the ability into live
live stream
I think that that's pretty crazy that
now you can be kind of you going back to
your concert case or you whatever else
you're doing you know you can be um you
know doing sports and and just you know
watching your kids play something and
and just you can be watching and you can
be live streaming it to your your kind
of family group um so people can see it
I I I think that like that stuff is um I
I I think that's pretty cool that you
basically have a normal looking pair of
glasses at this point that can kind of
live stream and and has like an AI
assistant so the stuff is making a lot
faster progress in a lot of ways than I
would have thought um and I don't know I
think people are going to like this
version but there's a lot more still to
do I think it's super exciting and I see
a lot of Technologies this one's
particularly exciting to me because of
how smooth the interface is and for all
the reasons that you just mentioned um
what's happening with and what can we
expect around AI interfaces and maybe
even avatars of people within social
media are we um not far off from a day
where there are multiple versions of me
uh and you on the internet where people
for instance I get asked a lot of
questions I don't have the opportunity
to respond to all those questions but um
with things like chat GPT people are
trying to generate answers to those
questions on other platforms will I have
the opportunity to soon have an AI
version of myself where people can ask
me questions about like what I recommend
for sleep and circadian rhythm Fitness
mental health Etc based on content I've
already generated that will be accurate
so they could just ask my avatar
yeah this is something that I think a
lot of creators are going to want that
um that we're trying to build um and I
think we'll probably have a version of
next year but there's a bunch of
constraints that I think we need to make
sure that we get right so for one I
think it's really important that it's
not that there's a bunch of versions of
you it's that if anyone is creating like
an AI assistant version of you it should
be something that you could control
right it's um I think there are some
platforms that are out there today that
just let people like you know make I
don't know AI bot of me or or other
figures and it's like I don't know I
mean we we have platform policies for
um for like decades like you know since
the beginning of the company at this
point which is almost 20 years that um
that basically don't allow impersonation
um you know real identity is like one of
the core aspects that kind of our
company was was started on is like you
want to kind of authentically be
yourself so um yeah I I think if you're
if you're almost any Creator being able
to engage your community and and there's
just going to be more demand to interact
with you than you have hours in the day
so they're both people who out there who
would benefit from being able to talk to
an AI version of you um and I think you
and other creators would benefit from
being able to keep your community
engaged and service that demand that
people have to engage with you but
you're going to want to know that that
AI kind of version of you or assistant
um is going to represent you the way
that you would want and um there are a
lot of things that are awesome about
kind of these modern llms but having
perfect predictability about how it's
going to represent something is not one
of the current strengths so I think that
there's some work that needs to get done
there I don't think it needs to be 100 %
perfect all the time but you need to
have very good confidence I would say
that it's going to it's going to
represent you the way that you'd want
for you to want to turn it on um which
again you should have control over
whether you turn it on um so we wanted
to start in a different place which I
think is a somewhat um easier problem
which is creating new characters that
the for or AI personas so that way it's
not um you know we we built you know one
of the AIS is like a chef and um they
can help you kind of come up with things
that you should that you could cook and
can help you cook them um there's like a
couple of people that are interested in
different types of Fitness that can help
you kind of plan out your workouts or
you know help with recovery or different
things like that um there are people
there's an AI That's focused on like DIY
crafts um there's someone who's a travel
expert that can help you make travel
plans or or give you ideas so but the
key thing about all these is they're not
um they're not modeled off of existing
people so they don't have to have kind
of 100% Fidelity to like making sure
that they never say something that you
know a real person who they're modeled
after would never say because they're
just made up characters so I that that
is um that's a somewhat easier problem
um and we actually got those we got a
bunch of different kind of well-known
people to play those characters because
we thought that would make it more fun
so there's like Snoop Dog is the dungeon
master so you can like drop him into a
thread and play text based games and
it's just like I do this with my
daughter when I when I um tuck her in at
night and she just like loves like like
storytelling right and it's like it like
like Snoop Dog is the dungeon master
will come up with like here's what's
happening next and she's like okay I
like turn into a mermaid and then I like
swim across the bay and I like go and
find the the treasure chest and unlock
it and it's like and then Snoop Dog just
always will have a next version of the
like the next iteration on the story so
I me it's stuff is fun but you know it's
not actually Snoop Dog he's just kind of
the actor he's playing the dungeon
master which makes it more fun so and
that's probably the right place to start
is you have like you you can kind of
build versions of these characters that
that people can interact with doing
different things but I think where you
want to get over time is to the place
where any Creator or any small business
can very easily just create an AI
assistant that can represent them and
interact with your kind of community or
customers if you're a business um and
and basically just help you grow your
your Enterprise so I don't know I think
that's gon to be cool but I I think this
is It's a long-term project I think
we'll have more progress on it to report
on next year but um but I I think that's
coming I'm super excited about because
you know we hear a lot about the
downsides of AI I mean I think people
are now coming around to the the reality
that AI is neither good nor bad it can
be used for good or bad and that there
are a lot of Life enhancing spaces that
it's going to show up and really really
improve the way that uh we engage
socially uh what we learn and that
mental health and physical health don't
have to suffer and in fact can be
enhanced by the sorts of Technologies
we've been talking about so I know
you're extremely busy I so appreciate
the um large amount of time you've given
me today to sort through all these
things fun and to talk with you and
Priscilla and and to hear what's
happening and where things are Ed um the
future certainly is bright I I share in
your optimism and it's been uh only
strengthened by today's conversation so
thank you so much and um keep doing what
you're doing and and um on behalf of
myself and everyone listening um thank
you because regardless of what people
say we all use these platforms um
excitedly and it's clear that there's a
ton of intention and care and um and
thought about you know what could be in
the positive sense and um um and that's
really worth highlighting awesome thank
you I appreciate it thank you for
joining me for today's discussion with
Mark Zuckerberg and Dr Priscilla Chan if
you're learning from Andor enjoying this
podcast please subscribe to our YouTube
channel that's a terrific zeroc cost way
to support us in addition please
subscribe to the podcast on both Spotify
and apple and on both Spotify and apple
you can leave us up to a five-star
review please also check out the
sponsors mentioned at the beginning and
throughout today's episode that's the
best way to support this podcast if you
have questions for me or comments about
the podcast or guests that you'd like me
to consider hosting on the hubman Lab
podcast please put those in the comment
section on YouTube I do read all the
comments not during today's episode but
on many previous episodes of The hubman
Lab podcast we discuss supplements while
supplements aren't necessary for
everybody many people derive tremendous
benefit from them for things like
enhancing sleep hormone support and
improving Focus if you'd like to learn
more about the supplements discussed on
the hubman Lab podcast you can go to
live momentus spelled o us so Liv
mous.com
huberman if you're not already following
me on social media it's huberman lab on
all social media platforms so that's
Instagram Twitter now called X threads
Facebook LinkedIn and on all those
places I discuss science and science
related tools some of which overlaps
with the content of the huberman Lab
podcast but much of which is distinct
from the content on the huberman Lab
podcast so again it's huberman lab on
all social media platforms if you
haven't already subscribed to our
monthly neural network newsletter the
neural network newsletter is a
completely zero cost newsletter that
gives you podcast summaries as well as
toolkits in the form of brief PDFs we've
had toolkits related to optimizing sleep
to regulating dopamine deliberate cold
exposure Fitness mental health learning
and neuroplasticity and much more again
it's completely zero cost to sign up you
simply go to hubman lab.com go over to
the menu tab scroll down to newsletter
and Supply your email I should emphasize
that we do not share your email with
anybody thank you once again for joining
me for today's discussion with Mark
Zuckerberg and Dr Priscilla Chan and
last but certainly not least thank you
for your interest in science
[Music]