Submind YouTube summaries
Thumbnail for Coyote VS. Acme Review - That's All Folks?

Coyote VS. Acme Review - That's All Folks?

Watch on YouTube

Video summary

The video review focuses on the long-awaited hybrid animated and live-action film *Coyote vs. Acme*, a project that faced significant delays before finally reaching theaters in 2026. The reviewer notes that while the three-year wait was ultimately justified, the film is not without its flaws, particularly regarding its visual style. Unlike traditional hand-drawn animation seen in classics like *Space Jam*, this movie relies on 3D rendered characters with a cell-shaded look that often fails to capture the charm of the original Looney Tunes aesthetic. The reviewer compares the visuals unfavorably to video game skins or modern adaptations of shows like *Family Guy*, noting that while the animation mechanics and slapstick physics work well, certain character models, such as Foghorn Leghorn, appear visually jarring and poorly executed. A major point of criticism in the review concerns the human cast, which fails to provide the necessary contrast to the zany cartoon world. The lawyer character played by Will Forte is described as sleepwalking through his role, lacking the comedic presence needed to anchor the story, while other human actors like Lana Condor and John Cena are deemed unengaging or deflated. The reviewer expresses that having every human character act as a boring straight man diminishes the film's potential, contrasting this disappointment with previous successful hybrids where actors like Brendan Fraser or Bob Hoskins brought energy and charisma to their roles. Despite these acting shortcomings, the core premise of Wile E. Coyote suing Acme for decades of product abuse provides a clever narrative framework that keeps the story fresh through courtroom hijinks and mystery elements. Despite the visual inconsistencies and weak human performances, the film succeeds in delivering genuine emotion and heart, which surprises the reviewer given the typical nature of Looney Tunes properties. The animation quality shines when depicting classic gags like anvils falling or the Road Runner's momentum, successfully recreating the feel of the old shorts even within a 3D environment. The story effectively balances humor with emotional weight, allowing viewers to connect with the characters in unexpected ways. Ultimately, the reviewer concludes that while the movie is not as good as previous live-action hybrids and has significant room for improvement, it is still an entertaining watch that justifies its existence and offers a satisfying conclusion to a long-running saga.
Read the full video transcript
A janitor sweeping. >> [gasps] >> Coyote vs. Acme. Well, now that's a name I haven't heard in a long time. Since 2023, when the film was originally supposed to come out, but because of a bunch of shenanigans going on at Warner Brothers and some corporate shake-ups, the film was left to die like Batgirl, which will never come out. But we did get to finally see Coyote vs. Acme. I checked it out at the matinee the other day, so it was a nice cheap $18. What are we even doing at theaters anymore? And so now I'm going to report back and let you know whether or not the 3-year wait was worth it. Let's begin. Subscribe. Sub- subscribe is what I was getting at. My favorite characters from the Looney Tunes have always been Wile E. Coyote and that Road Runner. Beep beep. Watching those animated shorts as that poor son of a Coyote tries to kill the bird that's faster than the blue blur, I think. I mean, you put a Road Runner and Sonic next to each other, I I that's definitely an argument that some 12-year-old is having right now. Granted, that would require the 12-year-old to know who the Road Runner is, and I'm not sure this is going to be the movie that's going to put him in the spotlight. Although, it would be nice if parents took their kids out to this one because it's a nice little film. It's got some problems, but overall, I left the theater positive. There was plenty of moments in this 90-minute flick, PG rating, that put a smile on my face. I take that back. IMDb says this movie's an hour and 41 minutes long. Wait, it seems like it's 90 minutes. Maybe there's a lot of credits, I don't know. I didn't stick around for those. Now, if you know nothing about Coyote vs. Acme, it is a hybrid animated/live-action film, much like Looney Tunes: Back in Action or even further back, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, two films I happen to really enjoy. Maybe you're only familiar with like Space Jam or Space Jam 2. God, that movie sucked. Anybody remember LG Rhythm? The algorithm? Yeah, everybody get up. It's time to suck now. And the storyline for Coyote vs. Acme is actually very fun. It's very clever. It follows our Wile E. Coyote who's still going after the bird all these decades later. After failed attempt number a million, he's starting to finally realize that perhaps he's not entirely at fault. Maybe the products he's using from the company that's making them is the real villain here. So, he heads into Albuquerque, New Mexico, where he's going to see a bunch of billboards featuring a lawyer with a bad comb-over who is a voice for the cartoons, and he's willing to take the big wigs to court. A sleazy lawyer in Albuquerque, New Mexico, operating out of a dingy little place where his clientele are less than savory. This sounds awfully familiar to a different character from a different series. And therein lies one of the biggest mistakes this movie made. I kept thinking of Better Call Saul, Breaking Bad's character Saul Goodman, one of the greatest lawyers in the world who takes on some very questionable cases, but manages to find a way to win them. If Ketchapp Studios, who did this movie, no, Chuck Jones was not resurrected from the dead to draw his characters again, unfortunately. If they somehow would have secured Bob Odenkirk as Saul Goodman and had him in this film, holy it would have been a amazing. Unfortunately, we're following the lawyer Kevin Avery played by Will Forte. Now, I like Will Forte. He's been very funny in the past on SNL. His character MacGruber's great. That show Last Man on Earth was pretty fun for a couple seasons, and I know he was one of the big champions to get this movie into the eyes of the public over many years now, and I just kind of wonder why because he sleepwalks through most of this film. He's just really not a presence here. He's kind of a straight man almost in a world full of zany cartoons. That can work when you have that polar opposite. Unfortunately, every single human in this film is a boring straight man character, especially his tag-along niece. Lana Condor plays Paige Avery and she has zero presence in this film. It's unfortunate. She's likable as a character, but who cares about likability in a Looney Tunes property? Do something, lady. You're just like a rock that gets moved from scene to scene. We are so far removed from Brendan Fraser going over the top with Looney Tunes: Back in Action or Bob Hoskins using his trademark rage to beat the crap out of that annoying rabbit. The only human actor that's at least somewhat entertaining is John Cena, but even Cena feels very deflated and he has been that way for the last few years now. I don't know if he needs to start hitting the juice again, but whatever he needs to do to get that charisma back in check, that would be appreciated. Now, as disappointing as the human characters were, it was an absolute blast being back with the Tunes. I'm going to sound very bipolar in this review because overall, I did enjoy the film, but it has a lot of issues, so I'm going to be constantly pushing and pulling at odds with myself. Overall though, I think it's worth at least a watch, but if you're going in expecting something amazing, I I can't imagine that's going to be the case, especially when you have some great Looney Tunes characters animated in such a horrific way at times. Granted, it works, I would say, more often than it doesn't, but since this film does not do traditional 2D animation, there's no hand-drawn stuff. These are all 3D rendered characters that they try to pretend are 2D ones. Think Fortnite whenever they release one of their animated skins and it just looks pretty awful. Or whenever they take a Family Guy or a Simpsons show and they turn them into video game characters. It It never lines up very well. South Park was the only one that got it right, but I think the way that that show is presented works much better and translates better. It's It's a one-to-one thing. So, from like a visual character model standpoint, it's definitely very rough. Animation though is very strong. They really do nail that old style of, you know, The momentum of the Road Runner is definitely present. Meep meep. You see the road whipping up around and since it's like a real road, but definitely not a real road, but rendered to look real. It's great. That stuff all works really well. The hyperrealistic anvils falling, characters getting punched in the face, it's good stuff and it's animated wonderfully. And because we have mountains of years of stuff to work with, it was fun seeing them kind of go back and make nods to the old classics, even show some footage to remind people of just how long these two have been going at each other's throats. Well, really it's just Coyote going after Road Runner, but you you know what I'm saying. It is always great to see Porky, Daffy, Bugs, like the gang showing up here and there, throwing out some of their iconic one-liners, doing their whole thing. And this whole weird cell-shaded 3D stuff, it works well enough, especially when they light the characters properly and there's some nighttime scenes so you get shadows bouncing off of them. That That looks pretty good. It is amazing though how much better Space Jam looks compared to this when it comes to those animated characters because again, that that one's using the traditional approach and it holds up so much better. Foghorn Leghorn, one of my favorite characters from Looney Tunes, looks like absolute nightmare fuel. He is horrifyingly bad in this. And unfortunately, he's in it quite a bit. And the more they show him, the more I want them to not show him. He looks awful. But let's reel back into the positives again. The story really does help everything. It holds up all ships here. Because we have such a fun premise, because we have a premise revolving around decades of abuse featuring Acme products, and so putting them on the stand, putting them in the courtroom leads to some fun hijinks. And there are a couple of twists and turns here. There is a mystery looming underneath that breaks this thing wide open. There are some different avenues the film goes down that keeps it fresh. As for the laughs, this is not Emperor's New Groove levels of funny here. This is more your standard Looney Tunes stuff, anvils falling on people, a lot of slapsticky gags. There were a few lines of dialogue that made me chuckle, and I appreciated the the sign humor where he's constantly flipping the signs around. And the biggest thing that I liked about this was there was some good emotion. There was some heart, and it hit. It landed really well for me. I thought, "Well, I didn't think I was going to be feeling things in a Looney Tunes property, but here we are in the grand 2026." So, the overall takeaway is I'm happy I saw the movie. I'm I'm glad it came out, especially for everyone involved in making the film. I'm sure it was a a very deflating thing for many years to not be able to see the product you spent probably your working on off and on see the light of day. And so, now we have it. It's another one to add into the lineup of these live-action hybrid films, and I think it's I think it's fine. I think it it works well enough to justify its existence. It is not near as good in my opinion as some of the previous ones I mentioned, but it's a hell of a lot better than Space Jam 2. Let me hear from you, though. I know some people already saw this one a little earlier, so I'd like to hear what you thought about it in the comments below. Are you like me, and you thought, "Eh, it's it's okay. A lot of room for improvement, but it entertained well enough." Or did you think it was just fantastic, and it's everything you wanted it to be? Let me know in the comments below. Please, think of liking and subbing to the show Adam Does Movies. I'm on YouTube. I'm on Spotify, Apple Podcast. Wherever you watch or listen, you can you can probably find me. And hopefully I find you in the comments in this and the next video. I would appreciate it. And that and that and that's all, folks. Thanks again for watching the video. If you didn't know, I'm a one-man operation here at Adam Does Movies. I also have a full-time job. I got a family to take care of. And I would absolutely love if you supported me on patreon.com/adamdoesmovies like these beautiful people did here. These are the silver and gold members. There's also a bronze membership starting at $1 plus access to over 300 videos from the Adam Vault at any support level. I would really appreciate it. It's the best way to support the show. Hope to see you there.