Contract Costs: Acquisition & Fulfillment | CPA FAR (ASC 340-40)
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Bu video bölümü, müşterilerle yapılan sözleşmelerin maliyetlerinin muhasebeleştirilmesi konusunu ele almakta olup, özellikle yeni bir müşteri sözleşmesi elde etmek için ödenen giderlerin nasıl işlendiğini ve bu giderlerin varlık mı yoksa gider mi olarak sınıflandırılacağını açıklamaktadır. Sözleşme imzalanmadan önce ortaya çıkan maliyetler, sözleşmenin başarıyla elde edilip elde edilmeyeceğinden bağımsız olarak şirketin zaten ödeyeceği veya başka bir projede kullanacağı giderler ise doğrudan gider olarak kaydedilir; buna örnek olarak satış sunumları için yapılan seyahat masrafları, pazarlama giderleri, teklif hazırlığı maliyetleri ve sözleşme imzalanmasından bağımsız olarak ödenen avukatlık ücretleri verilebilir. Ancak, sözleşmenin imzalanması durumunda ortaya çıkan ve sözleşmenin gerçekleşmesi olası olmadığı takdirde hiç ödenmeyeceği kesin olan giderler ise "artı maliyet" (incremental cost) olarak kabul edilir ve bu tür maliyetler varlık olarak serbest bırakılır.
Sözleşme imzalandıktan sonra, sözleşmeyi yerine getirmek için ortaya çıkan maliyetlerin de belirli kriterlere tabi tutulduğu vurgulanmaktadır. Bu maliyetlerin varlık olarak kaydedilmesi için üç şartın aynı anda sağlanması gerekir: Maliyetin ilgili sözleşmeye doğrudan bağlı olması, gelecekteki performans yükümlülüğünü karşılamak için kullanılacak bir kaynağı oluşturması veya iyileştirmesi ve bu maliyetin sözleşme fiyatı üzerinden geri kazanılması beklenmesi. Örneğin, müşteriye özel bir indeksleme sistemi geliştirme maliyeti veya tarama ekipmanı satın alma gideri bu kriterleri karşadığından varlık olarak kabul edilirken, mevcut bir yöneticinin projeye kısm zaman ayırması gibi zaten ödenen maaşlar veya çalışan hatalarından kaynaklanan düzeltme maliyetleri ve normal olmayan atıklar (bozulma) ise gelecekte fayda sağlamadığı için doğrudan gider olarak işlenir.
Sözleşme ile ilgili serbest bırakılan varlıklar, ilgili mal veya hizmet müşterinin kullanımına sunuldukça amorti edilir ve sonunda bir gider haline gelir; bu süreç, varlığın ekonomik faydasının zamanla tüketilmesi prensibine dayanır. Amortisman yöntemi, beklenen fayda sağlanma zamanlamasını yansıtmalıdır ve sözleşme süresi kısa (örneğin bir yıl veya daha az) ise pratik kolaylık ilkesi gereği bu maliyetler hemen gider olarak kaydedilebilir. Video, öğrencilerin ve mesleki sınavlara hazırlananların sadece maliyetin adını değil, altında yatan ekonomik gerçekleri analiz etmeleri gerektiğini belirtirken, tüm sözleşme maliyetlerinin sonunda amorti edilerek gelir tablosuna yansımasını ve bu sürecin muhasebe standartlarının temelini oluşturduğunu özetlemektedir.
Read the full video transcript
Hello and welcome to this section. This
is professor Farad in which we will
discuss accounting for cost associated
with customer contract. To obtain a new
contract, often times we have to incur
some sort of a cost. Maybe legal cost,
maybe marketing cost, some cost to
convince the customer that we are the
right solution for them. So businesses
incur these cost before a customer
contract is signed. So basically there's
a place where you sign a contract a time
not a place a place and a time but
there's a time before you sign this
contract that you incur certain cost and
after you obtain that contract there are
costs that incur while performing the
contract and these costs are not are not
all accounted for the same way. Why?
Because if you know anything about cost,
every time we incur a cost, a company
will have to make a decision whether
that cost is an asset which is mean
capitalized or an expense. So
specifically in this session, we have to
determine the cost that's contract
related. Contract related mean the cost
that we incur to obtain to sign this c
to sign this new customer. How are we
going to treat this cost? Well, some
costs are expensed immediately. Other
costs are recorded as an asset because
they are expensed to provide future
benefits. Simply put, we capitalize
them. Now, to be more specific, we will
break down the contract related cost
into two categories. Cost incurred to
obtain the contract. So, remember we
signed the contract cost before and cost
to fulfill that contract which is after.
And this is what we will discuss. will
determine what cost is incurred before,
how do we treat them, what cost is
incurred to fulfill the contract and how
do we treat them. This is what we will
discuss in this session. Let's go ahead
and start to discuss cost incurred to
obtain a contract. Before we proceed any
further, I have a public announcement
about my company for farlectures.com.
My AI turns any lecture into a complete
study system. You can create summary
table, formulas and example from each
lecture. Flashcard builds from the
lesson itself. A quiz build on the
lesson and as a bonus convert any
lecture into a portable short audio on
the go. So it helps you with the
retention. No noise, no generic
responses, just clarity based on that
specific lecture. Don't just watch,
interact, test yourself and retain the
material using Farhat AI. Now go to
forhat lectures.com now and see how the
AI can help you understand, practice and
retain the material. What is a cost
incurred to obtain a contract? Well,
think of
a lawyer. You might have to hire a
lawyer. You might have you might have a
legal team inside the company or you may
not. So let's assume you hire the lawyer
for this contract work to draft the
contract for you. Well, that's an
incremental cost. Incremental means
what? Incremental means that's an
additional cost that the company would
not have incurred unless it it
successfully obtained the contract. So
when do you draft a contract? You draft
a contract when you the other party is
ready to sign. So you have to ask
yourself would this cost exist without
signing the contract?
Well if the cost does does not exist
then it's if it does exist
you have to ask yourself would this cost
exist without signing the contract. If
it exists regardless then it's not a
cost to obtain the contract. But if this
cost exist because you are signing the
contract because you are signing the
contract it's incremental cost. If you
need to hire this lawyer to draft the
legal agreement you incur this cost
because you signed the contract.
So if the customer signed and you are
incurring the cost that's an incremental
cost. If this cost is going to happen
anyway it's a sunk cost. Let's assume,
just to simplify it, a lawyer versus,
let's assume you had to travel to Vegas,
to Las Vegas to meet a customer. Well,
guess what? You're going to have to
travel to Vegas to to Vegas to meet that
customer. Whether that customer signed
the contract or did not sign the
contract, you have to incur this travel
cost. It's regardless. But once you're
in Vegas,
you guys negotiated and you agree to
proceed, you might contact the lawyer
and ask them to draft a contract. This
is in
incremental cost. So we need to know
what is the incremental cost. Also we
need to know the difference between
capitalization versus expensing which is
we started by talking about this on the
prior slide. But let's dive a little bit
deeper into the general concept of
capitalization versus expensing. It's an
important concept. As an accounting
student, CPA, CMA, you have to be very
familiar with what is capitalization,
what's expensing. So capitalization is
when we treat the expenditure as an
asset. So what are the capitalization
rule? If we incur an incremental cost
of obtaining a contract is recorded that
cost is recorded as a as an asset when
the cost would not have been incurred
without obtaining the contract. So this
cost specifically was incurred because
we obtained the contract. The company
expect to recover this cost through the
contract. So yes, we incur the cost but
don't worry we kind of build the
expenditure in the revenue because
obviously if you incur a cost as a
business you want to recover this and
the capitalized amount is later
amvertised as the company transferred
the related goods or service to the to
the customer and what you have to do
with that cost you will have to expense
it through amortization and what's
amortization taking the capitalized cost
and expensing that capitalized cost. So
this is the rules the general rule for
capitalization. Expensing well a cost is
generally expense when the company would
have incurred it regardless of whether
the contract is signed or not. You had
to travel to Vegas to Las Vegas to
negotiate with the other party. You
don't know whether the contract will be
signed or not. You had to travel. So
employee salaries for preparing
proposal. If you're if you're paying
your employees to prepare the proposal,
the contract may or may not may not be
signed. Nevertheless, you have to pay
the employee. Travel costs incurred
during sales presentation,
advertising cost, bid preparation cost,
general marketing cost, legal review
fees even if negotiation fails. If you
are asking someone to review
certain document, this is not not
because the contract is signed. Maybe
they made a proposal and you are legally
reviewing the the contract. Nothing
happened yet. No contract is signed.
Well, that's different. That's expense.
The fact that a cost helped the company
obtain a contract doesn't automatically
make it an asset. The cost must be
directly dependent on the successful
completion of the contract. So, we incur
this cost because because we had to sign
this contract. So ask yourself, would
the company have incurred this cost if
the customer had not signed this
contract? If the answer is no, the cost
may qualify for capitalization because
we only incurred it because [snorts] we
signed the contract. If the answer is
yes, so we would have this cost
regardless, then it's an expense. Now,
the best way to illustrate this is to
look at an example cost of obtaining a
contract. Let's assume a security
services company negotiated a 4-year
agreement to provide monitoring services
to a hospital network and the company
incurred the following cost during the
negotiation.
Salaries to employee who prepared the
proposal 14,000 travel and lodging for
the sales presentation 5,000 commission
payable after the agreement is signed
18,000 outside attorney fee payable if
the contract closes 6,000. So let's
determine how do we treat each of these
cost salaries of employees. We pay the
employees 14,000.
They prepare the proposal. Look, if
those are our employees, we are going to
have to pay them salaries whether they
are working on the proposal or working
on something else. So they have nothing
to do specifically
incurred specifically for this contract.
Therefore, the 14,000 is X P. Travel and
lodging for sales presentation. Well,
the company incurred these cost during
the sales process. The cost would still
have been incurred if the customer
rejected the proposal. Even if the
customer at the end says not interested
in your proposal, I already incur these
cost. So, signing or not signing has
nothing to do with it. Therefore, I
expense it. Commission payable only
after the agreement is signed. Now
you're paying someone maybe an outside
party to negotiate on your behalf. But
you only pay them if the negotiation is
successful. If the contract is signed,
this is different. This is capitalized.
We expect also to recover this. We we
paid someone 18,000. We're going to put
this back into the contract somehow to
recover outside attorney fee payable
only if the contract closes.
Only if the contract closes. means we're
going to we're going to incur this fee
only if this contract goes ahead.
Therefore, this is
capitalized and this is what you would
expect to answer on the CPA exam
questions like this. Now, we have to be
aware of legal fees. We have to kind of
clarify this. Legal fees are not
automatically all capitalized. We have
to be careful. The correct treatment
depending on the payment arrangement.
So, what are you dealing with? a legal
fee payable. Regardless of whether a
contract is signed or not, it's expense.
So, if you have a in-house lawyer and
you're paying them salary, it doesn't
matter whether the proposal is signed or
not, it's an expense. A legal fee
payable only when the contract is
successfully obtained may qualify for
capitalization.
A legal fee associated with creating a
separate legal asset or acquiring
another identifiable asset may be
governed by a different accounting
standard depending on what the issue is.
So legal fees is not automatically
capitalized. Just know these two rules
because sometime legal fees are
associated with some third party like
you buy a land there's a closing cost
that's capitalized. So the CPA exam
often require candidate to analyze the
underlying fact rather than relying only
on the name of the cost. Just because
it's a legal expense, it doesn't mean
it's automatically capitalized or
expensed. Read the question carefully
and ask yourself, would this legal cost
be incurred regardless? It's an expense.
If it's only in being incurred because
the contract is signed, it's an
incremental cost to obtain the contract.
Now let's move from the cost of
obtaining the contract until the post
signing.
Now they sign, we're going to have a
cost for fulfilling the contract. So
after the contract is signed, the
company will incur cost to prepare for
or perform its its contractual
obligation. Well,
a fulfillment cost is recorded as an
asset only when all three conditions
exist. So there's three conditions for
that. What are they? The cost related
directly to the specific contract or an
expected contract. So the cost that we
are incurring ties directly with this
contract. That's one. It's not the only
one. They have to be all three together.
The cost creates or improve a resource
that will be used to satisfy future
performance obligation. So that's the
second condition. So the cost created
the cost incurred creates or improve a
resource. And we'll look at an example
for each. And the third condition, the
cost is expected to be recovered. That's
always the case. Now remember all three
conditions must be met. So before
applying these criteria the company must
determine whether another accounting
standard apply. For example, cost
involving inventory, equipment,
intangible asset, software. Those are
just to follow the rules of how do we
capitalize inventory? How do we
capitalize equipment? How do we
capitalize intangible asset? What we're
looking at is cost for fulfilling the
contract. And as long as they meet those
three criterias, we will capitalize
them. Now let's dive into each one of
them. What do we mean by condition one?
The cost relates directly to the
contract. It means the cost must be
clearly connected to the contract like
direct labor, direct material, payment
to subcontractor, contract specific
design specific design work, allocated
costs directly related to to contract
performance cost explicitly chargeable
to the customer. It means we are going
to recover it. Now keep in mind general
business costs usually do not qualify
because they support the entity as a
whole rather than a specific customer
contract. So if the cost is for the
entire company, it doesn't relate
directly to the contract. So those has
to relate directly to the to the
contract.
Condition two, the cost create or
enhances a resource. Basically, you're
creating an asset. The cost must create
or improve something the company will
use to provide future goods or service.
It means it's creating an asset. So, a
resource may include customized design,
contract specific databases,
um a production setup, a specialized
template, work performed in advance of
future services, material dedicated to
future contract performance. So,
whatever you are incurring, you can use
it's it's creating or enhancing an
asset. resource is an asset. And how do
we know we have an asset? If something
provide future goods or service, that's
the definition of an asset. An asset is
a resource that provide future benefit.
So keep in mind the cost does not merely
qualify because it's associated with a
customer. It must also produce a benefit
that support future performance. And the
third condition is the cost is expected
to be recovered because the assumption
is you're capitalizing it then you're
going to recover it. Recovery may occur
through the contract price some
reimbursement clause expected future
revenue payments connected with future
contract performance. Simply put, you
expect to recover this cost one way or
another. Now keep in mind you should not
capitalize if there is any doubt about
recovery. If you don't think you can rec
recover this cost, then you don't do
that. So you have to meet all three. All
three. So that's why in the example they
they will always tell you expected the
cost expected to be recovered. So let's
take a look at this example. A medical
records company signed a three-year
agreement to convert paper files into a
secure electronic archive. Before
processing began, the company incurred
the following cost. Development of a
customer specific indexing system
30,000. Purchasing of scanning equipment
45,000.
Salary of an existing operation manager
assigned part-time to the project. Cost
of redoing work caused by employee
mistakes. We're going to assume that all
costs are expected to be recovered. So,
condition three is already met. Okay.
Let's start with the $30,000 which is
the development of a customer specific
indexing system. Now, is this related
specifically to the contract? Yes. Let
let me ask you this. Do you think if you
if you can create a customer specific
indexing system for this customer, do
you think you can use this knowledge for
another customer? I would say yes, you
can. So, you are you are creating a
resource that could be used in the
future. So, it's related to a customer.
The resource can be used in the future.
And we are told the the amount can be
recoverable means what does that mean?
The 30,000 capitalized purchase of
scanning equipment. Now let me tell you,
you don't have to think about it.
They're telling you equipment scanning
equipment. We capitalize equipment.
That's it. This has not to do with um
just think about it from an asset
perspective. Equipment fits the
definition of an asset. Uh you could use
this equipment in the future. It's an
asset. You capitalize it.
salary of an existing operation manager
assigned part-time to the project. Now,
we have a manager, an operation manager,
and we're assigning this manager to the
project, and we're paying we're paying
the 12,000. Look, it's an existing
operation manager. Whether we assign
them or not, we still have to pay them.
That's an expense. So, this is
capitalized. Cost of redoing work caused
by employee mistakes.
Is this related to a particular
customer? Yes. Would this create
resources and future performance? Would
errors cause a create any sort of a of a
future benefit? Absolutely not. And most
likely we may not be able to recover
because we did not account for that. But
here they're saying expected to be
recovered. So it's going to meet
condition three, but definitely it's not
going to meet condition two. Most likely
there's a good chance you cannot even
recover it. If your c if your employee
made the mistake, you might have to
absorb it. But regardless, it's an
expense. And this is a detailed solution
analysis of these three three
conditions.
Abnormal waste. Abnormal any waste
that's abnormal, not normal, it's
charged to expense includes material
destroyed because of improper handling.
Excess labor caused by preventable
error. Uh rework resulting from poor
quality. We just talked about this. Idle
time caused by avoidable delays.
unusual spoilage. These costs do not
create or improve a resource and
therefore do not provide future benefit.
Therefore, they don't meet condition
two. Therefore, they are not
capitalized. You might be able to
recover them. You might be able to
charge them to a customer, but they
don't meet the second condition. For
example, a manufacturer enters into a
contract to produce custom conference
tables. They produce furniture. The
company purchased 80,000 of wood for the
project. During production, 72,000 of
the 80,000 is used normally. 8,000 of
the wood is destroyed because of the
employee stored it incorrectly. Guess
what? The 72,000 will be included in
inventory as part of the asset or some
appropriate asset. Uh if it's maybe uh
work in process, the 8,000 is expensed.
So you have to know that any waste is
expensed. We have to understand the
simple rule. The cost cannot be recorded
as an asset when it relates to a good or
service that already been transferred to
the customer. So once the goods or the
service is transferred to the customer,
if you incur additional cost, you cannot
consider this as an asset. Once the
associated performance obligation has
been satisfied, the related benefit is
gone, has been consumed by the customer.
Therefore, there is no future benefit.
For example, a consultant firms complete
the first phase of the project. After
the delivering the report, it incur
4,000 to revise formatting error in the
completed project. The 4,000 is expensed
because it relate to work that has been
already performed. The cost does not
support
a future performance obligation. Now,
keep in mind any cost that's capitalized
contract cost will be amortized. A
capitalized contract cost is not kept
indefinitely on the balance sheet. The
asset is advertised. As the related
goods or services are transferred to
customer. So eventually what do we do
with this capitalized cost? We will
expense it. So we're not expensing it
now, but eventually we'll expense it.
Just like any asset, what do we do with
all assets? Eventually they get burned,
expensed. They go to battle. They get
used up. They are expensed, amortized,
whatever you want to call it. The
appreciated. The amortization pattern
should reflect the timing of the
expected benefit. So, you will try to
expense it over the period that's
benefiting. For example, a company
capitalized $36,000 commission related
to a three-year service agreement.
Assume these services are provided
evenly. What do you do? You spread the
36 over 3 years and you will advertise
$12,000 per year. You will debit
amortization expense, credit contract
cost, or accumulated amortization.
They're both good. Now you have to know
if you created an asset and this asset
would last a short period of time, you
would just expense immediately. Short
period means one year or less. And this
election is for practical expediency. So
you don't want to worry about something
that's going to go away, an asset that's
going to be burned, used up within one
year. For example, a telecommunication
provider pays $300 commission for a
one-year service contract. The company
would apply practical expediency. it may
expense the commission immediately
instead of putting it as an asset and uh
taking care of it down the road. What
should you do now? If you're a CPA exam
candidate, accounting, whatever student
you are, you're studying using this
information, go to Farhad lectures, look
at additional multiplechoice exercises,
resource, true false AI resources that
will help you succeed. Whether you are a
student or studying for a professional
certification, the best investment you
can make is invest in yourself. Don't
short change yourself. And God bless.