Video summary
The core message of this presentation is that effective communication in science is not merely an afterthought but a fundamental part of the scientific process itself. The speaker emphasizes that no idea truly exists until it has been shared with others, as knowledge stored only on hard drives or in notebooks will eventually be lost if not communicated. Therefore, every communication activity must have a clear goal and objective tailored to a specific audience, whether one is designing a poster for undergraduates, pitching to grant agencies, or presenting at a conference. Success depends on understanding the background of your listeners; experts often fall into the trap of using too much jargon because they assume everyone knows as much as they do, whereas non-experts might lack necessary context. The goal is always to condense complex information into its core aspects so that the audience can grasp the main points without getting lost in excessive detail, ensuring a clear call to action and genuine engagement.
To achieve this level of efficiency and impact, scientists must adopt a storytelling mindset similar to how children naturally share exciting discoveries around a campfire. The speaker advises presenters to channel their enthusiasm for science into their delivery, imagining themselves as five-year-olds eager to show off the "amazing sticks" they found in their research. This approach helps overcome nervousness and ensures that emotional connection takes precedence over slides or text-heavy bullet points. Since humans process visual information faster than spoken words but often struggle with multitasking between reading slides and listening, it is crucial to avoid cluttered presentations filled with walls of text. Instead, speakers should use high-quality images as the primary focus on their slides while keeping themselves at the center of attention through confident body language, appropriate eye contact techniques, and a clear narrative structure that guides the audience from an intriguing title or hook directly to significant results.
Designing posters requires balancing simplicity with sufficient detail to invite questions without overwhelming viewers who have limited time. The speaker introduces a framework for great communication based on principles such as being simple, unexpected, concrete, credible, emotional, and structured like a story. Visually, this means avoiding "walls of text" in favor of infographics that highlight key take-home messages while relegating gory details to supplementary sections accessible only if the audience is interested. Practical tips include using color effectively—avoiding red-green combinations for accessibility—and choosing software capable of high-resolution printing like Affinity or Keynote rather than low-res PowerPoint defaults. Furthermore, presenters should actively invite interactions by offering brief summaries when approached, respecting that potential visitors are often stressed and time-poor during coffee breaks. Ultimately, the quality of communication matters more than raw scientific results alone; great science does not sell itself without a well-crafted presentation that invites dialogue and leaves a lasting impression on peers, funding bodies, or future collaborators.
Read the full video transcript
warmly welcome to the class and
communicating science
my idea with the next 45 minutes is
going to try to share some tricks tips
thoughts ideas about how to improve your
storytelling particularly for posters
and poster pictures but maybe more so in
general when you communicate in life
science the universe and the future
careers
so nothing in science really is an idea
until you've shared this idea with other
people I might have the world's greatest
results lying on my hard drive or in a
notebook in the lab but unless somebody
else knows about it 10 years from now on
somebody will have thrown away that
notebook or hard drive and that that
knowledge will in effect cease to exist
if nobody else knows about it so
communication is not really an after
thought but part of the scientific
process and I want you to enjoy this
part of the scientific process
now you're likely going to enjoy this
more if you're efficient at it and to be
efficient communication we need to
understand a couple of rules or thoughts
about it and the first one is that every
communication activity has a goal an
objective something you want to achieve
with it now that might be for a pits
that you want people to come to your
poster when you're designing the actual
poster it might be to grab the
audience's attention and where you're
standing in presenting the poster it
might be a third objective that you
would like to make a contact so that you
get a future postdoc or something same
thing for an oral talk or if you're
pitching something to a major foundation
in order to get a research Grant be
aware of your goal and tailor your
communication to reach that goal
now the first part to tailored to is the
audience there is a difference if you're
describing something to say 10 year olds
or undergraduate students or professors
in the Royal Academy of Sciences it
doesn't necessarily mean that you'd make
a more advanced presentation but
depending on the background of your
audience you would likely prefer to
either leave some things out or include
other things
as part of this you should have a
strategy for your entire communication
it's your idea to make them appreciate
you make them more aware of your
research is the idea that you would like
to make them more aware of the field
Stockholm University or something else
maybe you want to seduce them into doing
an undergraduate education program in
your particular area
there are some tactics and activities to
improve this that we're going to go
through when it comes to evaluations you
can certainly use outstanding
communication as a way to improve your
evaluation say for a research proposal
and in general any type you're preparing
a budget materials timetables task list
these are communication activities and
you should think about how you convey
this and what your goal of the
communication is
and what all this boils down to is that
communication has a purpose and before
you even start to think about how to
design your communication you yourself
need to be aware of what is my purpose
of this particular communication that
I'm going to be delivered today and what
are the things they're going to tailor
this for now mind you time is short
every single communication item is not
going to be perfect but try to think of
one or two things at least where you
adapt your communication to your end
intended audience
and one of the first parts of this has
to do that you have an expertise or
background that might range from low to
high and your audience might not
necessarily have an expertise but
depending on what you communicate to
them they will understand less or more
of what you communicate
already during your poster pitches I
think that many of you realize that your
pizzas are quite specialized you might
not have thought about this for your own
pitch but everyone else's pitches was
likely difficult to understand
the challenge here is that all you are
experts in what you're presenting about
and you might not put yourself at the
right most part of the spectrum but
trust me compared to the general
audience you are a stratospherically
high here just because there is a there
are a handful of people in the world who
might know more about it that doesn't
mean that you're any further to the left
here
so you definitely run the risk of being
too much of an expert and have too much
details mean that you instantly fall
down in the red part of the spectrum
that whatever you're saying is correct
but you're condensing too much
information in too little space so your
audience fails to grab it
now if you instead managed to condense
this down focus on the core aspects take
a step back leave out some details you
can move up from the red part into the
green part the blue printer and whether
that is undergraduate students wanting
to take say the educational program
you're pushing or it's a board
evaluating your research proposal or its
colleagues being interested in your
poster if you make sure that you keep
the details in a level that's low enough
that they actually understand you will
have a much clearer call to action and
they will be aware of what the purpose
of your communication was and hopefully
they've gotten the idea
for communication in general and your
luck here is actually that you have high
expertise but in general in the world
there's quite a lot of communication
happening from people with lower
expertise it happens all the time in
media and social media and there too you
can fall down on the left side of the
spectrum and be ranging either from
or trivial communication that
bumper sticker and here you have an
advantage as scientists people in
general have a lot of credibility in
your expertise so use that wisely to
your advantage
communication is more fun than you think
and while you might be nervous when
you're designing your poster pictures
think of these five six year olds they
have found a stick or a new stone they
love telling stories and we're born to
tell stories whether that's around a
campfire or in kindergarten
and somehow what's happened to all of us
over the last 20 years well 40 years in
my case is that we've forgotten how fun
it is this to tell people what you were
exploring or if you fell in a puddle or
something and if there's one mind mental
image I want you to maintain from this
class it's really this one imagine that
you are these five-year-olds you all
went into science because you love
science and you're standing there and
describing your poster the mental
picture you should have is that you are
these five-year-old telling all the
other colleagues at the conference about
these amazing sticks you found in your
research because they too love research
and they want to see your stick
and if you manage to capture this
attention I think you will get over a
whole lot of this nervosity and is that
focus on all the amazing science you
have to share if you do that people are
going to care less about what you
stutter or if you forget to mention
something or if some of your plots are
not ideal because you're ideally
conveying your enthusiasm for your work
right
now having said that once you go up
there and stand and talk in front of the
audience it's scary we've all been there
at the podium and where there is 50 500
or a thousand people in the room this
can't be nervous it was nervous for me
too in the beginning
so how do you handle this well there are
a couple of ways of doing it right now
in this recording you might perceive
that I'm looking right into your eyes
I'm not I'm looking straight into a
camera lens
and this is hard but you can fake it
right I'm faking that I'm looking into
your eyes you personally being my
intended audience if I asked Edward to
look at my slides it would look
something like this or I would look at
some sort of written notes I have
wrecked the next to my computer and if I
was sitting like this for the next 20
minutes you would likely not perceive
that I was as engaged in you right
this works equally well in a large
lecture Auditorium if I have 20 people
in front of me I might look at somebody
else in the audience and you see that I
don't wave my attention all over the
room but I'm spending maybe 10 seconds
looking somebody in the eyes and then I
look somebody else in the eye right next
to you and you will always perceive that
I keep going in this communication and I
rest my eyes a few seconds at different
people in the audience but I don't let
my eyes wander all over the audience
actors are great at this they do this if
there's 5 000 people in a dark room and
of course they can't look at those 5 000
people but just as I look into a lens
now they just take their View and fix
their attention of one arbitrary spot in
the room and then they move that to
another arbitrary it's about 10 seconds
later so do play around with this
because we're very human and feeling
this personal in connection really helps
second I'll let you into the little
secret I too can be I wouldn't say
nervous but I'm still a little bit tense
before I give a talk now even 30 years
later that is not bad that's good at
least for me this helps me Focus my
attention maybe replace one or two
slides was there something fun in the
media yesterday that I can include in my
talk and really make sure that I am 100
focused I feel energized and when I
actually walk up on stage and tap the
microphone at least for me nowadays then
the university just Fades away that I'm
enjoying the moment and I love standing
in this Limelight and in particular if
you feel nervous about it take every
single chance you can to practice this
because practice makes perfect and you
will get better at this
then there are a couple of things that
you should and should not do for
instance emotions and emotions are
conveyed with plenty facial expressions
you can probably see that in my face
right we put much more energy and word
selecting and conveying a message while
in reality fifty percent of the words
don't matter if your Expressions were
not aligning with your words hearing is
also slower than human brain's ability
to think we listen to only 100 125 words
per minute while thinking and the Brain
can process up to 300 words per minute
you probably saw what happened here
right there are two things first anybody
reading whether it's from my notebook or
from this light is boring as h-e-l-l it
removes all those motions it removes all
the emotional connectivity don't do this
second while I was reading from my notes
what were you doing
well I bet that half of you were reading
these bullet points too right and the
whole point this is the main reason you
should not have lots of text or slides
because most audiences are not stupid if
I get presented with a bunch of text
what do I do well I start reading it and
unfortunately we are not particularly
good at handling things simultaneously
so when I read the bullet points on your
slides what is that I do not do
I don't listen to you
so what the speaker me in this case have
suddenly achieved is that I managed to
instruct the audience not to listen to
me but read my bullet points instead
instead I would strongly recommend that
you do the exact opposite completely
wipe away all the text from your slides
and create slides that consist in tile
of images don't use your University logo
type in every slide don't use all these
fancy keynote or PowerPoint slide
templates where two-thirds of the slides
are filled out with General graphics for
your University or so but let pictures
expand the entire slide
now that can be dangerous because your
audience don't know what to rasterize on
right so that you will know need to know
how to entertain them and you will speak
but the point is that whether you like
it or not that's what you have to do you
are the presentation the slides are just
the supporting backup materials so dare
to be this presentation
now when you are the presentation this
also means that you're the center of
attention but you are the center of
attention whether you like it or not
that also means that you need to think a
little bit about how you melt in now
you're fairly lucky you're Europeans and
most of you go to conferences either in
Europe pure scientific conferences or
the US nobody's going to care how you're
addressed within reason
but that is not universally true if
you're a senior professor and you go to
a conference in Japan you would likely
be expected to wear a suit otherwise the
other professors would like to take you
for a postdoc
second if you're pitching a presentation
say to the European commission or a
major Grant agency in Europe then you
would likely also be expected to wear a
suit so there are a whole lot of cases
where everyone else in the group might
be significantly better addressed than
you and then you will likely feel a bit
awkward if you come up dressed in shorts
and a t-shirt and conversely of course
if everyone else is dressed into shorts
and t-shirts you're going to feel quite
awkward wearing a tie so adapt a little
bit to the audience it's perfectly fine
to stand out if you know why you're
standing out and if you want to stand
out but if that is not your desired
effect you likely want to make sure that
you're dressed and behave roughly like
the rest of the audience
and as I also mentioned eye contact eye
contact eye contact
messaging and communicating science is
much more about emotional connections
than you think so it's primarily the
people in the room that matter they are
10 times more important than your slides
now having said that the reason we have
these talks is that we're going to learn
to design posters and communication in
general and that starts with designing
titles so why do we have to design
titles well that title is the first few
seconds I look at before I decide
whether I'm going to continue to the
next poster or the next press release or
something else
if I like your title I might spend
another few seconds or your introduction
or abstract depending on what the
communication format is and I'm
basically just looking for an excuse to
continue to the next 499 out of 500
posters in the audience so use these
words wisely
this is a random student a picture that
I stole online and her title here is
identification and characterization of
an E coli bacteriophage mutant capable
of growing on a non-permissive host
this is quite an okay title actually and
she's focus on what she has achieved she
has a model organism there and she has a
couple of her results in it
possibly the thing that you could
improve you could make it a bit more
catchier so that you'd remember it but
it's not entirely easy to come up with
such titles
so what should you think about when you
formulate titles well
if you're doing a press release or
something you might want to focus on
something that a journalist might be
interested in writing a full page bet on
um this is like testing a drug against
brittle bones that might have effect on
covet 19s you could speak spice up this
title too the whole point is that if the
if your title doesn't really stand out
from the crowd it should be a bit
surprising or strange fun
there is a fairly large risk that the
audience will just continue to the next
poster because they're tired and they
don't have a whole lot of time available
and that coffee is really tempting so
this is super hard identifying good
titles but it will pay off a good title
means that they will spend more time on
the things you want to tell them
this is equally true if you're pitching
to a venture capital firm and this might
sound horrible why am I saying this and
they talk about scientific communication
well in one way it's not that different
of course we don't talk about dollars or
money and there is less money in science
but ultimately the thing in common here
is that we are asking for resources and
whether that resource is somebody's time
it could be a grant all of us have done
a PhD at some point many of you are
still doing it right and that's because
somebody's secured say 4 million Swedish
Kroner for your project so that you
could do a PhD all this is about
competition for resources and when you
want to pitch a poster to somebody
you're asking for five or ten minutes of
somebody's time likely a person who is
very busy
so why should they spend this time on
resources or indirectly money with you
if it's about the PHD product
of course there you're probably adding
six zeros when it comes to about
pitching to venture capital but
ultimately you need to convey somebody
the message why is it better for them to
spend this time on your poster than the
competition
or your colleagues poster
so this starts with the title
um and these titles have to be impactful
and you need the right keywords so what
are good keywords well you likely want
to tell them quickly what was the main
result
what will they learn from your poster is
there some take-home message
was there any particular technique any
targeted say E coli if it's that's
relevant to you something that's
unexpected
and basically why should I even bother
reading your full introduction or
abstract if everything in your poster is
stuff that sounds kind of obvious that I
expected
well if this is already a while as I
expected why should I spend more time on
something I expected
it's hard to cramp all these things into
a short title right now there are a
couple of tricks
pitches and these abstracts are roughly
the same but not quite identical your
pits is that might be the 30 seconds we
have in a large session where we let
each student pitch 30 seconds while the
audience should come and listen to their
poster the abstract is a bit more dry
the abstract is usually something that
we ask you to submit well ahead of the
conference so that we can print 5000
abstract in an abstract book so that
everyone at the conference can search
among the abstracts and decide what
posters they want to come to
in theory you could print your abstract
on the top left most Corner in your
poster but you usually don't have to and
I would say by the time I come to your
poster I've already decided that I want
to look at your poster and then you
likely want something slightly sexier
inviting rather than having a bunch of
250 words that you ask me to read
the abstract though it is the first part
of the storytelling there is a famous
quote or story attributed turns
Hemingway when somebody asked them if
you could write the shortest story he
could write to bring somebody's eyes to
tears and then he mentioned that it
would be six words and the story is a
classical one that for sale baby shoes
never worn
I don't expect that our scientific
stories are going to be quite as short
as that right but to see bring down your
story to the Bare Essence
um let them fill in the gaps themselves
and if you have a super cool abstract
like that the shorter the better they
will kind of fill in the spaces
themselves and they will decide that
this sounds really cool I need to learn
more about this you don't need to tell
them the entire answer but the second
they've decided they want to learn more
about this what are they going to do
well they're likely going to come to
your poster and that was the intended
outcome
press releases are actually great
examples of this although we're not
going to focus on them today you need
the full story in one line and that
could be the title or the introduction
and in press releases it's famous that
we usually ask you to answer the
questions who why what when where and
how as journalists that's what you're
interested in if you're going to write a
paper
then you quickly need to get to the
point the context you need some details
you need some credibility you have the
credibility for free you're the people
in white lab coats scientists but you
need to have enough of significance to
make this slightly more credible not
just the cool single line story but what
is the actual contents here a little bit
of background info maybe quotes again it
gives you the human emotional touch add
life to the story and then boom the
results
and then finish off with a call to
action and this call to action could be
so if you're interested in Murder
learning more about this come visit my
poster this afternoon at 3 pm and board
7 43 or contact me at this particular
email or something make it easy for the
reader know what they should do to
follow up if they're interested in
listening to more of your stories happen
so that brings us to the actual posters
right now you hold you have the audience
they're interested in learning more and
there are a couple of do's and don'ts
here rather I would say there are a
couple of different Deuce there is not
one universal truth but there are a
couple of different column formats that
we're going to tell you a little bit
more about so that if you're aware
does this mean that you can't follow any
other format of course not you can in
principle design almost any poster you
want but this is kind of like literature
language or anything else or standing in
the lab for that matter first you need
to learn the rules you need to
understand the rules you need to
understand why we use these rules once
you've understood that you can choose to
deliberately break one or maybe two
rules breaking all of them is virtually
never a good idea because if you're
perfectly purposefully breaking one rule
to make your posters stand out that's
great but if you're ignorantly violating
half of them you're likely not going to
achieve the communication outcome that
you hoped for
so a couple of these tricks
never
underestimate the importance of having a
simple message
occasionally you might feel that we're
arguing to dump things down or so I
don't think this is dumping down
um I could probably give a talk about
almost anything we do in my lab for 60
Minutes instantly
but that is during 60 minutes right I'm
doing now I can afford to move off an
attendant I can make a comment about
something else it doesn't matter if I
lose a minute or two because I can
regain that minute later
now conveying a message in five minutes
on the other hand that is complicated
because in five minutes I need to focus
on the Bare Essence I do not have time
for extensive backgrounds or so so it's
not so much just dumping down but
learning to focus on the core message
and avoiding the need for 10 minutes of
background that is by hard the hardest
way of communicating science but it's
also the most impactful one so making it
easy to understand is not dumping down
it requires a mastermind of
communication to imagine teaching a 12
year old the essence of say quantum
mechanics in a way that they actually
will understand a little bit of it there
is nothing stupid with that that
requires a mastermind communicator
so now you are there
um why do we want to do this well
you want some sort of result you want
them to learn in the poster design
the easiest way for them to stop at your
poster if there's something that's
surprising unexpected cool creative
stunning right remember there are 5 000
posters there might be 499 more in this
session why should they spend more time
on your poster or at least why should
they remember your poster when they
don't remember the other 499 ones
one good way at a quite technical
conference could for instance be that is
there something very Concrete in your
results that the audience can use that
doesn't necessarily translate to the
most striking pictures but if there's
something they can use they will likely
remember your poster
it might be particular techniques or
towards the system the sky is the limit
here you decide what impact you want to
achieve with your poster then you decide
your communication goal and then just go
after it design everything to reach that
communication goal and think of this why
should they like your poster best in
this particular session which might be a
super Advanced session on quantum
mechanics and in that case all the other
posters will likely also be quite the
most
foreign
where why the same thing as press
releases I would argue this is equally
too for posters maybe when and where are
not quite as important because when it's
like you're likely presenting things
that are quite up to date where well the
university would likely say in the
poster logo type so you don't have to
repeat that to them but you are of
course indirectly communicating them and
how might be a little bit more important
than posters because there is enough
room to expand on the techniques but
it's pretty much exactly the same
questions as you're aiming for in a
great press release
now
you need to get to the point because
when you're standing by the poster or in
your pitch you have tens of seconds
before the reader loses interest and
that is hard because in general you
would likely need half an hour just to
give them the background and I'm sorry
you do not have to after that half hour
you need to decide what you can cut away
so that in 50 60 seconds what background
can you tell them so that you can then
jump straight to your results at that
point they might say that they're super
interested in this and I have some
questions there about panel three then
you can expand but don't steal the time
assuming that you have five minutes of
their attention because in general you
don't
foreign
and then you're standing there and
presenting this and hopefully you're
gonna be have more fun and you will have
a reason why you're presenting this
you're hopefully gonna have five people
around your poster because everyone
likes it you're giving a short sweet
presentation while that other poor
person who might have had much better
research results they haven't prepared
this as much and consequently they're
going to be very few people standing in
front of their poster that is just full
of text and intense graphs so the
communication matters occasionally more
than the actual scientific results that
doesn't mean that you shouldn't aim for
great scientific results of course but
great science does not sell itself you
have to convey just how great to this
there are a couple of Tricks here that
you can use one book that I frequently
buy in my group and share with students
is made to stick by chip and then heat
and this is a bit corny it's American
but it's still quite useful they talk
about six principles of great
communication the first thing is that
your messages need to be simple say that
every year 10 times more people are
killed by deer than sharks in the United
States
simple anybody can understand it it's
also a bit unexpected right it makes you
react and this is a great start
you want it to be concrete not a whole
lot of the complicated things that are
scientists like concrete makes it if
it's easy simple concrete you got me
hooked this is something that I want to
understand more of
credible well there's a lot of
uncredible communication in particular
on social media just imagine covet 19.
you have an advantage here as scientist
you wear the white lab coats you are
credible by these signs you usually get
a pass on this one
but don't forget that they should also
be emotional and here scientists are
frequently lousy remember those
four-year-olds talking about their
sticks they are great at the emotion and
dare to convey your passion for science
the more emotion you show the more
people will likely appreciate your
passion for the science and thus your
results
and at the end of the day this is about
telling a story just like the
five-year-olds do you are the heroes in
your stories you decide what the story
is going to be about but pits this as a
story with a fun introduction and
ideally it's a really cool and and
people will remember the story and
that's not really fundamentally
different from sitting around that
campfire
now the way to remember this this is an
American book and you have this
abbreviation here success simple
unexpected concrete credible emotional
stories it's a great basis for
communication in general whether you're
pitching for your 100 million Venture
Capital firm or for people to come to
your poster
the second part I'm going to talk here
is a little bit about visual design in
particular for posters and the general
recommendation there is that show people
don't tell them
this is a poster that I did in 20
minutes on a flight many years ago and I
show it because it's not a great example
um well I I do one great thing here I
have a striking image right in the
middle of the poster but overall there
is far too much text here and I copied a
little bit of this from a paper do not
do this
the first thing when it comes to the
titles never use more than two lines for
a title and if you run out of space here
most word processor programs have
so-called condensed phones that are
slightly narrower and that allow you to
fit more space
don't forget to add your names and
affiliation in principle you just need
the name of the University then the
email so they can contact you they're
not going to write you a physical letter
but I have seen poster where people
forget this and then it's a bit sad that
they don't know who wrote the poster
the prime real estate of your poster is
the part in the middle here you want
something striking that summarizes your
research that you can point the audience
to when you speak so spend time on this
one you likely want a few logos not the
same one but all your affiliations here
whether you want to use the same format
as the rest of your group to stress that
you're belonging to a group or whether
you want to stand out from the crowd
that's up to you but remember decide
what your purpose is and then design
your poster to fit your purpose
occasionally I've actually seen student
put their photos on the poster which can
be quite a good idea if there are 10
people standing in front of this poster
and there are lots of authors on the
list I have no idea who the presenter is
but in this case you're going to see who
the presenter of this particular poster
is
and then we just fill this in
don't I would
err on the side of not putting a 250
words of abstract text here but a few
bullet points what is the main take-home
message the background they need to know
you might I usually don't go through the
background but in case the audience has
questions I want to be able to answer
them and that's great to have some
images that I can point them to but
remember I usually don't explain that
and then I have the one or two results
here that I want to stress that I want
to point them to I might have a third
figure and I need to be able to go
through all this in 60 or 120 seconds so
I don't really have room for more than
three four plots then I need the
take-home message compare that to the
call to action and the press releases
you want one clear take-home message
ideally maybe two points but by the time
you start having three or four points
people will not remember what you were
telling them anymore
more information next steps by all means
add it down there but posters are not
like a written paper where it's
important to have a long reference list
or all the acknowledgments the
likelihood that the chair of the
Research Foundation paying for your work
is there is almost nil so you're doing
the poster for the audience reading it
so focus on making this a great Aid in
your oral presentation to them you can
use a QR code for instance if you want
them to find more information
as you might have seen in some of the
background information that I shared
with you there is another alternative
format of Designing posters it's called
better poster format I'm not sure if
it's better but it's different then it's
worth paying with if you're interested
the idea here is to use this Prime real
estate on a plain language plain English
emphasize translation of your results
and emphasize the important words so
that people remember that and then dare
to use empty space and then you have all
the Gory details in the left and right
here
[Music]
um
by all means experiment with this I
don't think it is better you can play
around with them you can even combine
them as I will see the only way the only
thing that matters here it was what
format are you happy with when it comes
to sharing your work play around with it
experience make sure that you have
presented a poster in each format at
some conference or so and eventually you
will likely converge in a format that
you are most happy with
the one thing that you should not do is
formats like this walls of text entirely
without any graphics to rasterize on
because people will literally try to
skip your posters they don't want to
spend 20 minutes going through this
while I posted like this 10 seconds
after seeing it you will know what the
take-home message is and if you're
interested in this research you will
quite likely stop and ask more about the
work here and do you see there on the
right she has all the Gory data if
somebody is interested in the details
but she's likely not going to take you
through that if you only have 60 seconds
to talk to her
but you don't have to pick sites you can
take the good parts of the new formats
keep the useful aspects of the old
introduction methods result you see this
works quite well too the sky is the
limit here the only thing I would advise
you don't change too much because I some
most readers expect you see a title at
the top they expect to see your name
they expect to see a University logo I
expect it to be some introduction
somewhere I expect to see methods I
expect to see results somewhere in the
middle and I expect to see you know the
main take-home message down on the lower
right if you start diverging too far
from that you're going to confuse me and
if you confuse me I'm likely not going
to get your intended take-home message
and that's bad because then you lose
these are all the beautiful examples of
posters they don't have to be those
boring slides with like one panel each
nobody was ever punished for having
colors and posters there to use color
dare to play around dare to have
visually striking illustrations and dare
to use you can even use playful fonts as
you see here on the left
now mind you do that within reason too
um the best posters are usually 70
infographics but you need 30 scientific
paper you shouldn't do 80 scientific
paper but if you start doing 90
infographics then you're dumping it down
a little bit too much so there will of
course be some readers who do want the
Gory details so a few hard results have
to be there otherwise you risk falling
into the territory of that
communication quadrant
but you can go overboard
do not use red green color combinations
for instance why not well seven percent
of males are have this deficiency
because males have only have one X
chromosome and chromosome 23. it's less
common among females but even among the
female population there's roughly one
percent that are colorblind
that is hopefully not the professor that
you want to do your post office with but
you never know so don't well avoid using
Red Wing combinations there are other
combinations that are technically don't
fall in the colorblind territory but you
likely want to avoid them if the
audience get a headache from looking at
your poster they will likely go on to
the next one
you can use colors in many ways though
here you see that we can use color to
draw your attention to a particular
curve and beware that you might
unintentionally be doing this by
mistakes most of us tend to focus on
colors and curves that are bright and
colorful princess bright red
my story
while dark or dull colors dark green are
like the ones that we're going to care
less about
but if you by mistake make your most
important curve dark green I would like
to look at the bright red curve assuming
that the bright red curve is going to be
the most important and then you're
unintentionally drawing my attention
away from your key data
there is more than one way to skin this
cat then there's more than one way to
design a poster
if you want to you can use PowerPoint
I'm a Mac convict so I kind of prefer
keynote both of these programs work fine
the one thing you need to bear with is
that they're bitmapped so if you're
designing this with a normal slide they
might just have 1024 by 768 pixels and
that's far too little if you're going to
print this in poster formats
so in that case you need to start with
going to the page setup or something and
really tell the program that this is
going to be a0 format and make sure that
you have much higher resolution
I also would like doing my posters and
pages on max if I don't have any other
alternative it comes with ill with Max
and it's free and it's this too can
definitely render very high quality
posters
if you are on Max in general I would say
apple is slightly better typographic and
graphical taste in Microsoft so Apple
programs are usually quite good for this
if you want to Splash out financially
Adobe has great programs if you're more
on a budget or if you're at Stockholm
University we have great site license
deals on the Affinity programs Affinity
designer and Affinity photo and they're
just a few tens of dollars each I can
really recommend them they're almost as
good as Adobe ones and much much cheaper
yeah
and then you're there at the big day of
the conference you're standing in front
of the conference and that big headshot
comes by and you really would like to
present your poster
and this is where it's important to dare
to speak to people too many of us we
might just stand there and hoping that
they will contact you spontaneously but
they might not
this big shot on the left he might be on
his way to a coffee break or something
and he's just glancing by your poster
and you might recognize him or her
if you're just standing there looking
down at my shoes or something or talking
to my fellow student or something they
might very well not stop by at all in
particular if I'm not looking at them
this way right
if I instead look at you when I see you
looking at my title when I say hi
um would you want to take me through it
that is kind of an invitation right
the problem is that the audience might
still be thinking they only have 15
minutes for coffee they're stressed out
so the key thing don't you say that
you're going to take them through the
poster say should I take you through it
in 60 seconds or two minutes because
this really stresses that you're aware
that their time is short you prepared a
really short pitch and they know that
well they have 15 minutes but if you
just take two of those minutes they will
still have 13 minutes for coffee and
they will likely spend that on you if
you're a little bit interested in the
poster but if I suspect that this is a
wall of text and it's going to take you
20 minutes I will likely find an excuse
to move on to the next poster so
everything from your poster pits to the
design of your poster to how you deliver
this to remember this call to action at
the very end of the poster this creates
an opportunity to you to follow up with
this audience whether it's a peer
student or a senior Professor or
somebody from a grant agency everything
is part of your communication pipeline
and with that I think I've taken you
through the ideas that I would like to
share with you uh time is short and this
is the end of my time for this talk and
normally I would have had questions and
Reflections here I'm not able to take
questions interactively feel free to
send me a mail if you have them
otherwise I would strongly recommend
reflection reflection is one of the most
powerful things we have but we rarely do
it intentionally so for instance when
you've delivered a pits the first time
reflect back what was good with this
what could have been improved is there
anything in particular that say some
other student gave that I would have
liked if I did that well steal that you
can't steal the research result but you
can definitely steal their formats
remember lesser artists borrow great
artists steal
same thing when you've designed a poster
maybe it was not such a great idea to
make a whole background green and the
text red make note of that and mistakes
are bad but mistakes happen but make
sure you don't do the same mistake twice
and you can use the purple and blue
combination next time but the third time
you will hopefully not do that but a
better contrast same thing with how you
presented your poster at the conference
once you go home after the conference
was there anything you were happy with
anything that you could have done better
did you notice patterns among the other
students the posters where there were
lots of people talking is there anything
particular with those posters I would
almost bet that there is relatively
little correlation with how great the
science was and the most important
factor is usually they have designed the
poster that invited question and that
invited
bi-directional communication while many
of our posters including mine
occasionally are more that they are
stating results and if they're just
stating results it's difficult for the
audience doing dates
and we're going to have a great time
together in about two weeks when we get
a chance to practice this part two when
we're going to look at all your posters
so with that I'd like to thank you very
much for your attention and good luck
with the poster design