Video summary
The video explores the theme of hypocrisy surrounding CM Punk, a wrestler once celebrated for his perceived authenticity and willingness to stand by his principles. The narrator argues that while everyone experiences moments where their actions contradict their past statements due to changing perspectives or personal interests, Punk's specific instances are particularly notable because he failed to provide meaningful explanations for these shifts in stance. A primary example cited is his 2025 appearance in Saudi Arabia; this event was seen as hypocritical given his previous tweet six years prior where he insulted The Miz and referred to the money wrestlers received from there as "blood money." Although Punk apologized publicly, critics point out that performing for a lucrative contract while condemning others for accepting similar pay demonstrates a selective application of moral standards.
Further evidence presented includes Punk's criticism of Dwayne "The Rock" in the early 2010s regarding his limited appearances and cherry-picking dates on WWE cards. At the time, Punk complained about The Rock working only three days a year while receiving top billing, yet when Punk returned to full-time work himself years later, he also adopted a reduced schedule with high-profile matches. Additionally, after Sasha Banks and Naomi left WWE in 2022 due to backstage frustrations, Punk tweeted advice urging workers to stand together against potential retaliation from employers. However, his own behavior shortly thereafter appeared to contradict this message of solidarity, as he engaged in public feuds and personal attacks within AEW rather than fostering a unified environment.
The transcript details several escalating conflicts that highlight these inconsistencies, including an incident involving Cole Cabana where Punk publicly aired private grievances about their friendship falling apart instead of handling it privately. This was followed by violent confrontations with Kenny Omega and the Jacksons after press conferences, as well as later attacks on Adam Paige regarding merchandise sales. Despite claiming to be a leader backstage who prioritized safety—such as vetoing real glass for Jack Perry's match—the situation eventually led to physical violence when Perry used real glass in his street fight against Punk. The narrator concludes that while these actions might stem from human imperfection and the natural evolution of opinions, they undermine Punk's image as an authentic figure who holds himself to higher standards than others, ultimately suggesting he applies rules selectively based on how disrespected or benefited he feels at any given moment.
Read the full video transcript
What's good y'all? It's your boy Ross
back at again with another video. So,
want to check out CM Punk's past is
catching up to [music] him. CM Punk has
said some things in the past and when
you look at things how things transpire.
Now, people are going to call out the
hypocrisy. People are going to call out,
"Wait a minute. I remember you had this
stance and now you're doing the exact
same thing that you had an issue with."
And time changes people's perspective.
And if you want to be fair, if you want
to be honest, I think a lot of us at
some point, probably all of us at some
point have had some hypocrisy moments,
had a a moment where at one point in our
lives, we viewed things a certain way,
but then later on we're doing the exact
same thing that we said we wouldn't do
or we are doing things that we initially
shunned. it it people have those
hypocrisy moments um just throughout
time of their lives. You know, it's it's
kind of hard to avoid it. People may
think they're on the up and up, but in
actuality, some of the things that you
support, you may not even realize or you
do realize that it's some of the things
that you've actively voted against or
actively shunned. It's it's it's one of
the things that happens with humans. We
say one thing and we can end up doing
another. But nevertheless, we're gonna
check this out. Appreciate all the love
and support, man. Let's get right into
it.
>> At one point, CM Punk was one of the
most beloved and trusted wrestlers in
the world. A major reason was his
perceived authenticity. Punk presented
himself as someone who spoke his mind,
stood by his principles, and accepted
the consequences. In [music] recent
years, however, critics have argued that
Punk does not always hold himself to the
same standards [music] he demands from
everyone else. One of the biggest
incidents cited is Punk's appearance in
Saudi Arabia. Back in 2020, CM Punk
replied to a tweet from The Miz saying,
"Go suck a blood money covered dick
[music] in Saudi Arabia, you dork." This
made it all the more shocking when in
2025 it was announced that CM Punk would
wrestle in Saudi Arabia. More [music]
attention was drawn to the situation
when CM Punk publicly apologized for his
remarks.
>> This guy wants me to apologize for a
mean tweet I wrote 6 years ago.
Legitimately had nothing to do with
Saudi Arabia. I woke up and I was crabby
and I wrote a mean tweet to The Miz. I
really apologized to you and Saudi
Arabia.
>> It's fair to say that performing in
Saudi Arabia is not the same as
endorsing the Saudi [music] government
and that Punk's original tweet was more
of an insult to The Miz made while he
was not in the best headsp space.
[music] However, Punk specifically
called the money WWE ants wrestlers got
from Saudi Arabia blood money. This
suggested that Punk believed accepting
the money itself was morally wrong.
>> Yep. And that that's that's a big point
of contention. A very big point of
contention. They even put it in their
promo battle. John Cena and CM Punk.
They even put it in their promo battle.
It's It was a thing where it's like,
"Hey, Punk, you did say that." And you
specifically said blood money. So
anybody that goes over there making
money, get money, you know, extra money
from them, they're part of the problem.
Well, guess what? [laughter]
You got your ass up on that plane, bro.
You got on that plane and you had that
match. You was there. You apologized.
Once again,
it's a it's a hypocritical moment. It
was It was Man. [laughter]
>> While people can change their opinions,
Punk has never meaningfully explained
why his position changed. It's therefore
understandable that some fans believe he
only objected to WWE'se's relationship
with Saudi Arabia when he was not
personally benefiting [music] from it.
This isn't the only incident where Punk
seemed to have a change of opinion when
it was beneficial to him. In the early
2010s, Punk became critical of The Rock
when the People's Champion started
making very few WWE appearances while
still being placed at the top of the
card. In an interview, Punk stated,
"I've been very vocal about The Rock
coming back and cherrypicking the days
he comes [music] in. I just think there
are a lot of people who work their asses
off here. I'm here 24/7, 365 days a
year, and he's here like 3 days a year."
However, [music] when CM Punk returned
to WWE in chosen 23, he was not
competing full-time and made only
limited appearances. [music]
On top of that, Punk would usually be
placed in one of the biggest matches on
the card, and this became especially
apparent in July 2026. Sami Zayn had
just [music] won the undisputed
championship and was a dream moment for
many fans. Then, just 9 days later,
[music] Punk returned after being gone
for several months and defeated Sami
Zayn to win the title. While The Rock
and CM Punk's situations and reasons for
working a limited schedule aren't
identical, the optics [music] are
difficult to ignore, it appears that
Punk is benefiting from the same
star-based hierarchy he criticized when
The Rock was placed above him. However,
>> and it's funny, John Cena's done the
same thing, too. John Cena, when they
had their feud uh many years ago, John
Cena said pretty much the same thing.
And then guess what? John Cena is doing
the exact same thing. The Rock was doing
later on in his career. He wasn't
around. He was in Hollywood. And it was
like, "Well, John, that was very
hypocritical of you because the same
thing that you complain about The Rock,
you're literally following in his
footsteps." So, once again, like I said
at the beginning of this video, we have
all done this at some point in our life
and we'll probably at some point, you
know, continue to do it because we're
humans. We our emotions and our opinions
change depending on how we feeling that
day for a lot of people. So
>> wrestlers who have worked with CM Punk
have also accused him of [music]
hypocrisy backstage. In May 2022, the
WWE women's tag team champions Sasha
Banks and Naomi abruptly left WWE and
walked out of the company. This wasn't
[music] a storyline. It stemmed from
genuine backstage frustrations. Punk
[snorts] chimed in on the situation and
tweeted, "Doesn't matter if your opinion
of your coworker is positive or
negative. stand with [music] them
because they'll do the same thing to you
and you'll wish someone helped. Trust
me, you're expendable together. You're
unstoppable. This would be extremely
ironic just a few months later. At the
time, CM Punk was signed to AEW and was
feuding with the AEW World Champion
Hangman Adam Paige. Days after Punk made
the tweet, he and Paige had a
confrontation on AEW during which Adam
Paige went off script and said this.
>> YOU TALK A BIG GAME ABOUT WORKERS RACE.
YEAH. WELL, YOU'VE SHOWN THE EXACT
OPPOSITE since you've gotten here.
>> Paige was referring to a situation
involving Cole Cabana. Cole Cabana was a
fellow wrestler and one of Punk's
closest friends until they had a falling
out. Cole Cabana had been signed to AW
before Punk arrived, but was moved from
the AW roster to the Ring of Honor
roster when Punk came to the company.
Punk denied having anything to do with
Colt's move and AEW president Tony Khan
confirmed that. [music]
However, reports indicated that some AEW
wrestlers did not believe that, which is
why Adam Paige made the comment about
workers rights. There was clearly an
issue between Punk and some of his AW
[music]
co-workers, but it seemed to have been
resolved privately. That assumption
would be proven wrong when months later
Punk took a shot at Hainman Adam Page on
TV.
>> Hangman Adam Paige, YOU WANT THAT
REMATCH? YOU GOT IT RIGHT HERE, RIGHT
NOW. LET'S GO.
>> I don't know. We have never got that
confirmed. Yay or nay?
>> [cheering]
>> That's not cowboy [ __ ] That's coward
[ __ ] The apology must be as loud and as
public as to disrespect.
>> Then just a few weeks later, Punk would
go on an infamous public rant, bringing
up private details about his
relationship with Cole Cabana.
>> He shares a bank account with his mother
that tells you all you need to know
about what kind of character that is.
>> Bro, he would he didn't give a [ __ ]
Now, here's the thing. Here's the thing.
Here's the thing.
This definitely should have been handled
behind closed doors. Like there's no
denying that Punk was wrong for just
kind of airing this out. This should
have been handled behind closed doors.
Tony Khan, he's at fault, too, cuz he's
letting this [ __ ] rock. He's not doing
anything to stop none of this. And
especially since he know this is real.
It's not even a story or work or
nothing. This is real.
Punk should have been handled this
professionally behind closed doors.
Tony Khan definitely should have stopped
this. And because he didn't, [ __ ] just
just ballooned out of control. And y'all
know the rest, bro. Y'all know the rest
of how it all played out.
>> Additionally, Punk claimed that the
executive vice presidents of AW, Kenny
Omega and Nick and Matt Jackson, were
spreading lies about him and feeding it
to journalists. And the fact that I have
to sit up here because we have
irresponsible people who call themselves
EVPs and couldn't manage a target and
they spread lies and bull and and put
into a media that I got.
>> Look at Tony Khan just like, "Oh dear,
just not doing a damn thing to stop
this."
>> Not somebody fired when I have all to do
with [laughter] him. It's never been
proven that Omega and the Jacksons
leaked information to journalists, but
even if they had, Punk's outburst was
still wrong. Rather than limiting his
comments to denying [music] accusations,
he exposed personal information and
attacked his co-workers intelligence,
professionalism, and credibility. While
Punk was right to be frustrated, this
still made Punk's statement about
workers rights seem hypocritical.
Instead of promoting worker solidarity,
Punk escalated an already divided
workplace and made cooperation between
everyone even more difficult than it
already was. Punk then made the
situation even worse when he was
confronted by Omega in the Jacksons
after he left the press conference.
According to reports, the conversation
turned violent when Punk threw a fist
and a fight broke out. While Kenny
Omega, Nick, and Matt Jackson and others
did not handle the situation
appropriately either, this incident
[music] made CM Punk come off as
vindictive and self-righteous. Punk's
behavior suggested they felt staying
professional didn't apply to him when he
personally felt disrespected. [music] To
Punk's credit, he later admitted that
how he handled the situation was wrong,
and this entire incident could have been
dismissed as [music] one isolated
outburst. However, Punk displayed
similar behavior about a year later.
After the incident at All Out, CM Punk
would be gone for 9 months. When he
returned, Punk was placed on AW's
Saturday show, Collision. For roughly
the first two months, things were fine.
But during an off-air moment, CM Punk
got on the mic and took another shot at
Adam Paige. Earlier today, I went to a
local supermarket and I figured out why
they call him Hangman.
Is because the pegs in the toy aisle are
full of Hangman action figures cuz
nobody wants to buy them. He's a peg
warmer.
>> Unlike me who moves merchandise and pops
ratings and sells toys. Punk and Adam
Paige weren't feuding or even on the
same show. So, it [music] came across as
Punk going out of his way to bury a
coworker.
>> Yeah, even though this is an off air
segment, you know, people are going to
be recording.
Hey, look, I like Punk, but I can
honestly admit
these are these are some of his faults.
These are being outspoken to a fault to
the point where you're causing more
issues,
especially when there's no issues to be
had. I get it. You don't like someone,
cool. It is what it is. Some people,
they're going to say some things, you
know, I get it. I understand that. You
know, maybe after you were hang up the
wrestling boots, you want to do a tell
all, whatever. Cool. But if you're
coming back and you're, you know, they
literally damn near, if I'm not
mistaken, they made a whole new show
essentially for him to be on the
separate show cuz they didn't want any
type of issues on the main show only for
them to ultimately
have this issue reoccur again. And, you
know, it kind of once again, Punk takes
some blame. It's a it's a fair point to
sit there and say years earlier when
Sasha and Naomi leave to have that
solidarity in the locker room and then
many years later you're in a new locker
room and you're not creating no
solidarity. In fact, you're creating
some hostility.
Now, let me see. Let me say this. I
wouldn't say creating, but you're
fueling the flames. In certain
situations, you are creating, but you're
not dowsing like you're not quelling the
flames. you're adding more fuel to the
fire which makes it worse for everybody.
So that's a fair point. Fair fair point
right there.
>> Ironically, it made Adam Pa's comment
about workers rights seem more accurate
in hindsight. Reportedly, CM Punk did
apologize to Paige via [music] text,
which was the right thing to do.
However, this still came across as a bit
hypocritical considering Punk himself
said that the apology must be as loud
and as public as the disrespect. [music]
Critics point to this as more evidence
that CM Punk does not hold himself to
the same standards as he does everyone
else. However, Punk's authenticity would
[music] suffer an even bigger blow just
a few weeks later. Not only was CM Punk
the centerpiece of AW [music] Collision,
but Punk was also reportedly a leader
backstage and had authority over the
show. This became important when one of
the wrestlers on Collision, Jack Perry,
wanted to do a spot where he was thrown
through a car windshield. Perry wanted
to use real glass, but Punk vetoed the
idea for safety concerns. Then not long
after,
>> which is once again, this is
understandable.
This is understandable. Like, hey, let's
not use real glass, bro. That that'll
really [ __ ] you up. Let's let's do
something different. We don't have to
use real glass. But, you know, you y'all
know how this all played out. AW held
the All-In pay-per-view event in London.
Jack Perry was scheduled to compete in a
street fight, and during the match,
Perry was wrestling near a limo. That's
when Perry said this.
>> And then CRUSHING REAL GLASS,
>> CRUSHING the alchemy.
>> Drive me a river.
>> Obviously, this was a direct shot to CM
Punk. After Jack Perry got backstage, he
and CM Punk got into a confrontation.
Punk then attacked Perry before the two
were separated. While Jack Perry was
clearly in the Ron and AW's weak
management was also part of the problem,
it doesn't excuse CM Punk, a 44year-old
man at the time and backstage leader,
[music] from physically assaulting
someone. Yeah, all of this helps explain
why some fans have begun to question
whether CM Punk is as principled and
authentic as he presents himself. Punk
has repeatedly criticized other people's
behavior only to become more flexible
when those same standards interfere with
his own interests. He has changed
positions when doing so has benefited
him, and his commitment to worker
solidarity and professionalism appears
to disappear whenever he feels
disrespected. People are allowed to
change their opinions, but without
meaningful explanations or
accountability, Punk's actions can make
his principles appear less like deeply
held convictions and more like standards
he applies selectively. To CM Punk's
credit, he hasn't taken liberties with
his opponents or behaved
unprofessionally during an actual
[music] match. But other wrestlers have
to see those incidents. Hey man, we're
all human. We're all human. CM Punk has
had a list of hipp uh hypocrisy filled
moments over, you know, his years in
wrestling. And like I said in the
beginning of this video, bro, we've all
done it. If you sit up here and lie and
say you haven't, you're not being honest
with yourself. I've had hypocritical
moments before. It happens. Like I said,
our views and and ideas and points tend
to change all the time, sometimes daily.
One thing you may be cool with at one
moment, next moment you're not cool
with, and then you'll judge someone or
shun someone because they're doing
certain thing that you honestly used to
do or you honestly used to support. It's
hypocritical moments. You can change and
grow from that and learn from those, but
that's that depends on you and and what
are you trying to to grow, you know, how
you trying to grow as a person. But
yeah, see him pump. No matter how much I
like him and stuff like that and respect
what he's done in the business, I can't
lie, he's been very hypocritical and he
has done some things and said some
things that doesn't align with how he
was moving or how he was perceived to be
moving back in the day. But like I say,
we're not uh we're humans. We're not
perfect and all you can do is just learn
from those situations and grow from. But
hey, comment down below. Let me know
some other wrestling related videos you
guys want me to check out. I definitely
will appreciate all love support. Roll
to 200k. Appreciate y'all keeping me.
See you next one. Peace.