Central Vermont Career Center - August 10, 2026 [CVCC]

Okay, well, let's call this board meeting to order. Uh it's the Central Vermont Career Center. It's Monday, June >> That's the 5th. >> August. >> 5th. >> 5th of August on the agenda. >> No, it's the right day. Wrong date. >> Wrong date. Okay, August >> Got it. >> Superintendent failed. >> No, we just we just did we traveled back in time. >> Yes, we did. >> That's right. We time traveled back. >> Okay. >> [laughter] >> Um First point, any comments not on the agenda? >> Should Jody say make a comment now? >> Yes. >> Okay. So, I've only been on this board a short time, but somehow during [clears throat] the summer, I came to the realization that my husband and I are retired. He's wanted to live in Italy for a long time. And so, we're planning a trip to Italy. Hopefully, leaving in January for 12 months. We have to get a special visa. But so, that means that I'm going to have to step down from the Waitsfield the the Harwood school board um prior to my term ending. And I'm trying to find a replacement. But then, I also need to um helping to find a replacement to this board from the Harwood board. And I have a good person in mind. He was hesitant to commit, but he was willing to kick in if anyone else called me back. And so far, nobody else has responded to my request. >> [clears throat] >> So, anyway, there should be more information coming, but I'm hoping that we will get somebody started early in the year so they don't just jump on and you know, when we're in the middle of budgeting and and doing all that. So, I'm really hoping that um by September I will have everything set. >> Okay, so you're here till January. >> So, technically you're here till January, but >> or until this person can start. >> the person can start. >> Thank you so much. >> Okay, but I really enjoyed this board and it's like I reconnected with a lot of stuff from my past and so, I really it's really a great board and I don't know how I'll feel like doing when I get back and everything, but we'll see. I don't know if I'll run for the board again. Lesson for punishment. >> Okay, great. Well, thank you real much. Dallas. >> I am. >> Yeah, we all are. We're going to all take a field trip. >> Yeah, well, that's what I I already have my liquid ready in the bag. >> K&E, agenda revisions or board comment? >> Uh revision on the date. >> Thank you. >> What year is it? >> Good job. >> The year was great. >> Uh Jody, any public comments or correspondence? Any correspondence? >> No, Bobby's was the only correspondence today. >> [clears throat] >> Okay. >> I do have members of the facilities work group checking in to see where we're at with Washington Central and >> Yeah. >> wanting to be able to share publicly when we're ready to move forward with marketing for the bonds. So. >> That's great people are interested and serious. Good. >> [clears throat] >> Is anybody else online tonight? >> Not yet. >> Okay. So, move to the consent agenda and approval of the minutes from >> [snorts and clears throat] >> is that August 6th? >> No, it is actually >> It's actually >> If we have a >> July. >> June and June. June 8th and June 15th. So we >> Second. >> All those in favor of approving the minutes? >> Aye. >> Any opposed? Minutes are approved. Okay, board reports. >> Students are on vacation. >> Okay, students are on vacation. >> And we don't have program presentations during the summer. >> Okay, excellent. Any committee reports? >> Uh the facilities committee. >> Yeah. >> Andrew, I missed the last meeting. >> Oh my goodness, Andrew. >> Oh well. Jody, what do you want to tell the board? >> our last facilities meeting was last week [clears throat] and we basically reviewed the presentation that I gave to Washington Central on Wednesday of last week. So that's pretty much where we focused our time in that meeting. Uh the architects updated us a little bit on the floor plans and the current state of the asking for pricing and all the little pieces like wetlands delineation. So the wetlands were delineated actually last Friday um on U-32, so they have our architects have that information now. And um there hasn't been anything with the Agency of Natural Resources of concern around it and they did have some conversation with the City of Montpelier around uh the water and septic and we would need to add some cisterns or pump system in order to get the water up the hill for additional an additional building. Um but that's not anything that they aren't concerned about. Uh at the presentation at Washington Central, the biggest thing that came up was concern about if they I'm going to back up and say that I think Washington Central hasn't had a lot of time to think about this and definitely not been thinking about it as long as we have. And so, as they think about what the future could hold for them, and they think about the idea of becoming a potential regional high school, they haven't thought about whether they have room for all the students that could end up there if that were to happen. And do they want to give the prime prime real estate to us? Do they need to think about their capacity and what they can host there? Do they need to think of themselves in the future as a high school campus at U-32? Or is it a middle school and high school, and what does that mean? And so, they had some capacity questions, and they really wanted some feedback from their facilities director, who has not played a role in this at all, other than talking to our architects when they were on site. Um so, they were going to get him to their next meeting, which is on the 19th, and try to get some information around that. I will say that with those questions that came up at that meeting, our architect team already went to work to answer some of those. And so, we I will have a one-pager for them, um that their board chair will have by the end of this week. We will get our pricing back on Friday internally, and we will have that turned around and ready for our next facilities meeting, which is scheduled for the 18th. And then, I will also have to attend the Washington Central meeting to kind of follow up with any of the continuing concerns there. I think that's it. >> So, I don't know if everybody's had a chance to look at the new plans that the architects have developed, but they're really wonderful. They've got a great plan, beautiful facility, well situated on the site, and to me, it's very positive, and I think some of these bigger questions that the board at um U-32 is asking, they're important questions, but I don't know that they're going to be a giant barrier for us, because I think we have a very compelling argument uh for expanding our services especially in light of changes in public education and it's a perfect location for a regional high school and like Michelle you know setting the example of where schools can really make a difference in their communities. >> I don't think anyone was against [clears throat] us continuing forward with our campus. Having a campus there is just whether that's the right location and whether November is the right time frame for them to have all of their answers their questions answered. Oh, the other piece of that was that the there was a very very drafty lease agreement in there and because it lacked details they're definitely not comfortable with that. I don't blame them. But what we did get was approval to continue working with Sean Tuohy to be able to get those details nailed down and so that you need to approve that tonight as well that we can continue to work with him because again just as Michelle was talking about earlier we all use the same legal firm. And so we need permission. So Washington Central already gave permission for us to move forward with Sean on developing the details of this lease agreement. So what there are some pieces that they're going to have to fill in the blanks but we'll try to fill in as many as we can. >> Does any of this have to do with using the spaces this year? Or is that >> No. >> done? That's all set. >> There's We're not using any spaces this year. >> early childhood in that all that committee. >> We have early childhood on campus and they're just visiting but >> Oh, I thought that I thought we were going to do a space over at >> No. >> small players. >> That was like >> Six months ago. Any question any questions for Jody? >> I just had a question too. Um the architect was Epstein. >> David Epstein. >> David Epstein You saying you know what you're are for are you know, are there any deal breakers? Did you get a sense of that in the meeting with them that there might be something that would be a real deal breaker? >> I don't think there's a deal breaker. I do think that there could be barriers that make it difficult for a November vote. Our time frame for marketing is getting smaller and smaller. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. >> The The window for everything gets smaller and when you have a group of a community that really hasn't thought about this because they've been quite frankly really busy with our closing our two our small elementary schools. Are we Where do we get a superintendent cuz we don't have one right now? >> Right. >> When you're dealing with those things it's really hard to look at this future focused thing that's something else. Right. So, I do think there could be something that breaks the November bond vote possibility, but I don't think the project as a whole. >> Great. It's nice to have that. >> If not November, then March would probably be the next time meeting. >> And of course everything every time you delay, the costs go up of everything. >> Okay. I'm just curious. >> But yes, March. >> And voter turnout may go down, things like that. So >> Does it have to be that you wait till March or could you call a special vote? >> I don't know about special vote. >> It's We could call a special vote. It would be more expensive and town first not love us. >> Would not love us to do that. >> Nobody would. >> And turn out would be holidays. >> Yes, turn out would be tough. >> [clears throat] >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Andrew, any other perspective from >> Uh the board >> All the major talking points were covered by Jody. I think that was the same. I will echo the sentiment that there's a lot going on right now. Offer skepticism on on the November time line. >> Yeah. Thank you very much. >> I like that word better. Skepticism. >> Skepticism. Okay. >> And cautious. >> Skepticism. >> Mhm. I was cautiously optimistic. But now I'm not. Okay, moving on. Program quality. >> Do we have a minute? >> You haven't met. Okay. >> No, normally we meet ahead of this meeting. However, the strategic >> a great retreat. >> Yeah. >> Right? >> Yes. >> Strategic plan, yes, Jody. >> Well, that's under program quality because that's the place where we most frequently look at it. Um for tonight, you've seen it, so you can choose to move it forward tonight or you can choose to let it go so that program quality can take a another look at it and think about um some of the things that we talked about in our retreat and determine any other updates or next steps. So, we can discuss that when we get to it in the action agenda. >> Do you want to discuss it then or discuss it now? >> It doesn't matter to me. >> Let's discuss it then. >> Okay, let's do it then. All right, superintendent's report. >> We had five of us went to the Southern Regional Education Board conference in Nashville. It was wonderful. Michelle and I got to present mostly to our our instructors. Um we were asked to present about how we created a new district and we had a few folks in the room that were not um from Vermont or from our district, but I think what we got from our instructors is that they had no idea of all the work that went into creating a new district. And so, they had a new appreciation of the fact that we don't share everything that we're doing with all the staff cuz they were impressed number one by the amount of tasks that were completed to create a new district. So, I think that was good. Uh we also held the um winning record in the escape room for a few hours at least, maybe a day, maybe overnight. Um so, that was a lot of fun and and I think our secret weapon was Michelle's kids, to be honest. They're great. Um we also had welcomed Seth and Felicia aboard with a team bonding activity of painting the office. >> Awesome. >> [laughter] >> So we did a uh well, we had asked for facilities to paint and they were we were told they were only able to do the foyer. So we got this beautiful It's in our our colors, so our gray, the silver gray that we have, and then we still have the navy. So it's silver and and navy instead of the weird orange yellow. Um so we did the main office and then I noticed that um another room got done this past week, so >> This morning. >> This morning. So it's cool to see it all starting to change cuz the yellow doesn't look good anymore. I used to like it. Um but it's it's kind of toning us down and calming us. >> Okay. >> It's great. But it was a fun activity. >> That's fun. Yeah, that's good. That's it from the superintendent's report. >> That's it. Yeah, it's summer. >> Business manager's report. >> All right. I write. >> Something about shared services? >> Yeah. Uh >> [laughter] >> Human resources, we're currently checking references for our final uh lab assistant position. That's going to be the one that um helps with some heavy trades. I uh it's being paid for by the congressionally directed spending. That grant that we got, that >> [snorts] >> all the tech centers got. We had We wanted to hire a lab assistant to this year and continue next year and hire an additional lab assistant to to support those um heavy trades programs. We were hopeful we were going to bring in candidate forward tonight, but we haven't been able to finish up their reference checks. So shortly. Um EEI did work in the electrical shop space. They took out the classroom space and now we have this um giant much larger space. So, their classroom's going to be upstairs and their shop will be downstairs. Um we're working with Nick Cheruk again um for the upcoming bond campaign. Hoping we can really get that kick-started soon. This time last year, by July 1st, we were up and running. So, I do feel like we're a little bit behind. So, um we're going to be asking a lot if we are going to go forward with the November bond vote from you folks. >> When do we have to decide? >> the sideline's status that Nick has just stepped up and and downtown plan he's taken on the kind of executive director role. So, once the legislative session is up and running, he's going to have to transition to that. >> Do >> work. >> Do we should we make that decision sooner rather than later or is that too early to to call the the November I mean, I I feel like are we going to sit on it and then just have to go or should we make that decision sooner rather than later and get our ducks in a row for March? >> I think we had um the facilities committee had on the timeline an August 24th joint meeting for Washington school and school district. I think we need to just set that as we're going to have a second on this meeting and make the decision now. >> We have to because September 14th is going to be the deadline that the board has to approved the warning language. >> Mhm. Mhm. >> 9:00 a.m. And then September 27th, we need You want posting warnings? >> Wasn't Wasn't all of the post mortem that we did on the last one that we did that we went too fast or too late, too fast, not enough. >> Mhm. >> Anyway, I It feels like we're going to do that again, but let's wait and see what happens. >> And some of the members of the work group who, you know, spent December to April weekly working on this new proposal feel like if we are not doing it, what did they give us that time for? >> There's a gentleman, Mallory, what's he >> Hello. >> Mallory, has he been calling you? >> Yes. >> I wonder where he stands on all of this. >> He's ready to like put the word out on the street that this is the right He's waiting for the >> Good. The go >> numbers to go back >> Okay. >> and the go ahead to >> Yeah, cuz he's a key >> get that out there. >> He's a key leader. >> But he has been talking to people in Berry for sure. >> Okay. Well, it's a big question. >> Yep. >> Right? Whether we say go or no go. I We're not really on that, but we're sort of on that. I think that lease agreement is essential. >> Yes. >> And I know all the board members at E32 want that lease agreement, we want that lease agreement. It doesn't have to be rock solid, but it needs to give them some certainty about how it's going to work out. And once we have that, everything else is a question mark anyway. >> Yeah. >> And so it's like let's just go. Right? Why not? If we can get that lease agreement That's That's how I feel about >> Yes, there is the timeline. So, we don't have to make that We are not making that decision tonight, but in the next >> 2 weeks. >> Yeah. >> Or if we don't like some things, the decision will be made for us and we will not be able to >> Yeah, right now there's no way. >> Um I got the audit draft from last from FY25, but I had some requests for a few updates. Um, that's the one that we we shared last spring that I had said we were delayed. Um, but we are already on track for this year. They're on site in September. So, we're back on the actual the regular schedule that we should be. There were no findings. Overall results were exactly where we thought they would be. So, there there's nothing nothing that I'm concerned about, nothing that you all should be concerned about. It was just a few little things um they missed. They said we overspent our budget, but we didn't truly overspend our budget. We authorized the use of um the fund balance to pay for the electrical classroom. Or the what? Sorry, the welding the welding shop. We're still that far back. >> Mhm. >> Um, so I just wanted them to be very clear on those sorts of things in the notes. So, if if somebody that hasn't followed us doesn't know I what we're doing if they're just reading our financial statements that it's very clear that it was truly intended we were intending to do so. >> Michelle, can I just uh go backwards for a really quickly? >> Yep. >> The table in here >> Oh, yeah. >> that that's 26 27. >> Yep. >> Okay. I >> You know, first of the year. >> Sweet. At first I was like, "Wow, that balance." And then >> Ooh. No, no. We were much closer this year. I want to say we were within $200,000 of our budget. I'm pretty sure that's what we wanted to be. We still have a couple things outstanding, so we don't have those final numbers yet. That's it. And then pretty soon we're talking about budget for next year, FY28. So, you guys have any ideas or things that are going to be coming up you're to let me know. Get that started. >> Still going to come to our meetings? >> Get that started early. Yeah, that's Yes, how we're going to do our budget report. >> Okay. >> So, on the shared services conversation, I sus- I I suspect like uh I think Bobby, you mentioned it amidst a bunch of different things, but there would be some sort of like MOU, something that that describes the arrangement in detail that we would then as a board review. Is that correct? >> Yeah, we will and likely will be very minimal this first year of this is just the expectations and then moving forward coming to this and everything that's much more formalized which will have numbers and >> If you agree to do it, it's on your action item. >> Yeah. >> Congressionally Congressionally directed funds, I can't speak tonight. Um We were allocated the funds. We still can't quite see them. We're reaching out to see why we can't actually see the number yet to draw down. It's a 1.4 million million dollars. Um we just can't quite see it in our portal yet. >> 2.4. >> I thought it was 2.5 or 2.4. >> 2.4. >> Okay, good. >> Um we just can't draw down yet, so we can't we can't subgrant it until it's officially it's officially granted to us. There's some technical things we just need to work out, but um Cindy or technical centers have been applying for those funds through us already. They've been completing the applications, so we're ready to draft those agreements and start getting the funds to the other ice centers. >> Is that your responsibility to review those applications? >> Yep, we have to review those applications. >> yeah. >> Review the applications, do the draft the documents. We did it a little differently than normally with the AOE, they have you fill out a bunch of paperwork, promise paperwork. You ask for the money and then they send you a grant agreement and then at any point in the future they may audit you. I also included when they were applying for it, I did some of the pre-audit checklist. Like I wanted them to upload policies and procedures so I could make sure that they were already there and not going back after because I really don't want to audit anybody. Um Ruth Gerke at Day, we made it very clear multiple times to the tech centers that CVCC is taking on a huge risk and a liability. Not that it's a bad thing, we are risk But we are taking on a lot of risk doing this and so they need to be mindful of any kind of situation that they may put us in by not supplanting or using the funds in any incorrect way. >> Do we have somebody in place who can back you up? Let's say that you're find yourself overwhelmed with the other organization, who's going to take on the responsibility? >> Uh we have an assistant business manager. >> Okay. Okay. And they they have the qualifications to do this. >> They do. >> Plus the If you're talking about the shared potential shared services, there would be a grant manager. >> Okay. >> Mhm. >> And they would be involved in this grant, too. >> Mhm. >> [clears throat] >> And then the shared services would be USD. I will draft something. Is that next Is there something on the agenda later for an action item? >> Yes, but we don't have to go and have to take action tonight. >> Yep. We don't have to do anything. I guess I should say something cuz this is now public. >> Yeah. >> There we go. Um USD and CVCC are talking about doing some shared services which include HR, business office, potentially we would look at facilities, technology in the future, but that's not an immediate action. This first year, which is phase one, is integrating payroll, accounts payable, some human resources, budgeting. Um I've gotten good feedback about how we do our budgeting and our transparent transparency. And so I was asked if we could help Barry as well. So moving forward, I will be representing both Central Vermont Career Center and Barry Unified Union School District as their business manager and we'll be sharing office staff, full utilization of office staff for both offices. >> Great. Well, congratulations on being asked to do that big role. >> Thank you. >> Yeah, that says a lot about you. >> Thanks. >> And your leader, of course. All right, ready to move on board discussion and action items. Uh is Carl online? >> No, he was going to come in and he had something come up, so he's >> going to skip that. >> Um it's just the first reading. He can come back for the second reading. Uh this is a new policy that's required. Basically, Carl had drafted an entire cardiac emergency response plan and that we got the model policy delivered. And so he basically just walked through the two documents and merged them into the format um for us to have his plan. I think he will come in for our next meeting, but I think if we can get this first reading out of the way, then he can come in with any questions you have. >> Is this our longest policy? >> It's got to be one of them. I know um yes, it is. >> Probably. >> So I I move that we approve the first reading of the um cardiac emergency response team plan. I'll second. >> I'll second. >> We have a second. Any discussion on this policy? >> Yeah, I did you bring it back to the SBA? >> Uh no, we can do that. >> Just because they took the time to read >> Yeah, he he took his policy and put it into theirs. >> Well, then that's adding content to it, correct? Or is it >> So, he merged him with >> them. >> So, adding content to it and that kind of starts the process of working >> Could be a redundancy. >> Uh does Spalding have one of these policies? >> We So, he shared this with the nurses his original draft with the nurses um and then got feedback. >> Mhm. >> And hoping that it would be the same across the building. >> Mhm. >> Yeah, that would make sense. >> [snorts] >> That would. >> [laughter] >> That is one because it's considered safety. >> Yeah. >> I know I We have a separate um meeting with him as well later this week and so we can bring that up. >> [snorts] >> So, we have a motion on the table. How do we want to move on that? >> We Can I amend my motion to say uh that we approve it with the recommendation or the contingent upon the SBA >> I'll just say >> reading, right? So, >> it can come back at it uh >> Yeah, and we'll have If it's substantive, it has to start over. So, you can start now and then go back. >> Yeah, let's do that cuz in case it's not, then we can Yeah, go through with it. >> So, we're voting to approve >> First reading. >> If that's >> Yes, that is what I do. >> No amendment. >> And it was seconded by Jason. Okay, all those in favor of approving this first reading, say aye. >> Aye. >> Any opposed? First reading's been approved. And we'll make sure SBA looks it over. >> [clears throat] >> Adoption of the strategic plan. >> This is where you need to decide if you're ready to adopt it or if you'd still like program quality to discuss it further before I >> Do we Is there a reason why we would want it adopted sooner rather than later? Just thinking. Seems like having program quality >> Yeah. >> good eyes on it makes sense. >> I agree. >> Guys have already had eyes on it. >> Yeah, but they >> You want to put more eyes on it. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> Doesn't hurt. >> The eyes have it. Uh second I always like saying I like the shelves have it joke. That was good. >> Yeah, that was good. >> [laughter] >> Okay, so we're tabling that. Does that take a motion or is that just okay? Thank you. >> We do not have a new hire for lab assistant yet. >> Okay, so we don't need to do that. Shared services. Mhm. Do we have a motion to um approve the shared services with BUUSD? >> [snorts] >> I make a move to it. >> Do we have to do that? >> You don't have to do that. >> They don't have to. >> No. You don't have to. >> There's nothing to approve, right? >> There's nothing. >> It's only a concept. >> Oh. >> Then we have no power or authority. >> [snorts] >> You don't have anything you have to do right now. >> There's nothing you have to do. >> It's not action right now. >> No action. Okay. How about a plants of treasure? >> So, this actually >> Huh? >> No action at this time. Um this will bring up This one we will have to do, but again, it's going to be need to be moved because we haven't been able to find a new treasure. So, the new assistant business manager at BUUSD will also be helping CVCCC CVCC is Ashley Young, and she's the appointed treasurer for both school districts right now. So, her becoming an employee is a conflict of interest. So, I suggest that as of the 24th of August, she resigns from the position, and that will allow the board to appoint someone else. I checked in with both uh well, Barry Town city clerk is is a Barry Town clerk is also our clerk at the board clerk. Barry City town clerk is unable to become our treasurer. She doesn't She's not able. She doesn't have the capacity. So, if anybody has any any ideas, let me know. I would suggest that Barry and CVCC have the same same treasurer because it makes sense that we're just going to one person to sign over checks. That means that they need to be a resident of Barry City or Barry Town. >> Huh. >> If it was just us, we could have anybody in any of our towns, because we likely should share that service. It needs to be very town or very city. So, if anybody knows of anybody in those towns >> What's the requirement to be the treasurer? >> A resident. >> That's it? >> They have to be able to sign their name. >> And see, is it appropriate to have the same person for both CVCC and >> Mhm. Yep. >> Okay, so there's no conflict of interest. >> Nope. >> Okay. >> We've always We haven't always, but we used to use just the city clerk's, town clerk's, something like that, an appointed position. We felt that that gave them some value to the community. You know, a public-facing person, so it wasn't just somebody signing our checks. So, I would definitely have that in mind, but that's not a requirement. Um, it is required that they're accessible to us, um, physically accessible to us. The checks are not They're all signed electronically, but we occasionally do need wet signatures on things, so having somebody that's not physically located They might be a resident, but they're living They're in Italy for a year. We can't use them. >> [laughter] >> I'm going to assume that it cannot be a board member. >> It cannot be a board member. >> Mhm. If the guy was always around. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> [laughter] >> No. >> Well, we'll take your recommendation on it. >> Yeah, we're asking around right now. The other staff I kind of scrolled the staff directory at both the city and the town. A lot of them aren't residents. Cuz they're and they're not elected officials, like they're just employees, so >> They need to be an elected official? >> They do not need to be. >> Oh. >> But if you are, you are a resident of the town or the city. >> Okay. [snorts] >> So, we can start thinking about that. >> Well, I guess leave that up to you then. >> Good. Just see it sooner than later. >> 5.4 Legal agreement edits. >> This is where we need permission from this board to work with Shawn Tuohy on two different agreements. One, the draft lease agreement for the facilities project at Washington Central, and two, an amendment to our current facilities use agreement with Barry. Right now, one of the things that we would like to amend is the fact that it says we're going to that the lease the facilities use agreement costs are based on the budgeted amount, and then later it says the actuals. We've never actually writed it back to the actuals, so we want to make sure that whatever we decide it's it's the same for both, and that we use that moving forward. Did I say that the right way, Shawn? >> You did. I was just thinking rather than say for Shawn Tuohy to do it, if we could just say their legal firm. >> Linn Linn Blackman and Tuohy. That would be helpful. >> Then we have more flexibility. >> Any of those attorneys can work on it just in case. >> Yep. Okay. >> I'll make that motion. As edited. >> Thank you. >> Do we have a second? >> I'll second. >> Thank you, Brooke. Okay. Any further discussion? All those in favor of using the legal firm, empowering them to work on these agreements, please say I. >> I. I. I. >> Any opposed? Hearing none, the motion passes. >> [clears throat] >> Last thing isn't an action item, but just giving you a look at our new program of studies. We have a different firm that we're working with for our program of studies and annual report this year. So, it's a the refreshed program of studies. And it's about to go to print today. >> Yeah, it looks good. >> So, if you have any edits, let me know. >> By when? >> Yeah. >> Yesterday. >> Uh yesterday, yeah. >> No, I >> [laughter] >> think like two This week is fine. Like by Friday. [clears throat] >> That's great. >> [laughter] >> And even though they're in um double pages, those will be full-size pages. >> Yeah, I see what you >> Yeah, they're not going to be little like they're not going to have a big cover and then little inside pages. It's going to be all going to be the same. >> Good. Okay, excellent. Do we need to go into executive session? >> No, we do not. >> I didn't think so. Sure. Uh any future any other future agenda items? Or anybody want to discuss these future agenda items? >> Yeah, just that we want to we put the goal setting off to the next uh to the next meeting, I guess, right? >> Yeah. >> So, just that half of the first bullet point. We're going to go >> Do you want that at the August 24th, or do you want that at the next regular meeting in September? >> Yeah. >> Thank you. >> September? >> September. >> Board meeting. August 24th, we're going to have a lot to talk about. Special meeting. >> Yes. >> And that's the joint. >> That was the intention. I think we'll get a good sense of whether that's needed then on the 19th. In time to warn it or not. Cuz Washington Central has way too many people making straight down. Yeah. >> Yeah. >> And a little squished, too. >> Yeah, I'm sure. >> [snorts] >> Where's Jane? >> She's at a tennis game. >> She's at her job, though. >> I know I Well, I copy paste. >> Yeah, are we ready ready to adjourn? >> Somebody's got to do it. >> I'll move we adjourn. >> Thank you, Scott. >> We don't need a motion. We need a second. We don't need a We need a second. >> Do we? >> Yeah, you do. We don't need a >> So, >> I think anybody second? >> Yeah. >> No. >> [laughter] >> All right, fantastic. Thank you, everybody. >> What what Yeah, take your brochures. >> That was fun. Take your cheese. >> [music]