Video summary
Candace Owens has been vindicated regarding her claims that Charlie Kirk intended to distance Turning Point USA from Israel, a revelation confirmed by Andrew Calvet, who is associated with Kirk's organization. The authenticity of these allegations was supported by text message screenshots showing internal discussions where Kirk expressed frustration over losing significant Jewish donors due to his refusal to cancel Tucker Carlson and stated he felt bullied into leaving the pro-Israel cause. While Owens initially faced skepticism for sharing what she described as "hot" information, Calvet validated her findings, noting that while early whistleblowers often face reputational damage, their eventual vindication can significantly boost credibility. This development suggests a shift in public perception where figures like Owens are increasingly viewed as sources of truth rather than mere conspiracy theorists, potentially leading to a situation where she is fully recognized for exposing hidden realities if further claims regarding Brigitte Macron also prove accurate. The discussion highlights the dangerous reality that Charlie Kirk faced days before his death, with multiple off-the-record witnesses confirming he expressed fear that he was going to be killed. Owens revealed receiving written communications from two Turning Point USA donors and one other individual stating that Kirk feared for his life on the very day prior to his murder. This testimony underscores a broader theme of manufactured consent and information warfare described by James Burnham, where governments and powerful entities manipulate narratives to control public perception. The transcript suggests that when consensus is impossible due to conflicting stories from various sources, society struggles to move forward cohesively, leaving individuals vulnerable to manipulation regardless of whether the threats come from specific groups like Israel or broader government structures. In response to these pressures, Owens adopted a strategy reminiscent of Kanye West and Michael Saylor by releasing an extensive package containing private communications, legal documents, emails, and videos to trusted contacts before her death could occur. She distributed this evidence to approximately eight people she trusts, including journalists and figures like Andrew Tate, ensuring that if anything happens to her, the identities of those attempting to bankrupt or silence her would be exposed immediately. This approach reflects a high-risk strategy where breaking stories early often leads to accusations of conspiracy theorizing until proven true, at which point the whistleblower gains immense credibility. The speaker argues that this method is necessary in an era where wealthy individuals and organizations frequently use legal battles as punishment tools to bankrupt opponents rather than resolve disputes fairly. The transcript concludes with a somber reflection on America's lack of a shared narrative compared to rising powers like China, which unified its population after a century of humiliation. The speaker asserts that without a collective story born out of pain or crisis, the nation cannot march forward effectively despite still being prosperous globally. While acknowledging the controversial nature of suggesting "indoctrination" for children as a means to create unity, the speaker insists this must rise from the bottom up rather than be forced top-down. Ultimately, the video posits that humans require shared narratives to function together in lockstep, and without one, society will face significant trouble as conflicting truths prevent collective progress.
Read the full video transcript
So Candace Owens is vindicated over her
claims that Charlie Kirk planned to
split with Israel. We get confirmations
from Turning Point USA. We are living in
the world that James Burnham warned us
about that when you have the volume and
velocity of information that there is
going to be warfare at the level of what
can anybody believe? When you have
manufactured consent, meaning people
really can control the narrative.
There's only so many ways to convey
something to the general public. Editors
of newspapers, they get together,
politicians get together. They
essentially collude and they tell us
this is the world. And it allowed us to
move forward reasonably well, certainly
here in the West. Because of that, the
average person just marches forward with
their day, feels like they understand
everything. And given that that's gone
away, I don't think we yet understand
the ramifications of a world that simply
cannot come to a consensus. Show the
clip and then then I'll walk people
through like the beats. Charlie and I
never said he was going to decided one
day to become Catholic. It would have
financial implications. So Charlie
writes in this group chat just lost
another huge Jewish donor. Here's the
whole text chain. Just lost another huge
Jewish donor, 2 million a year because
we won't cancel cancel Tucker. I'm
thinking of inviting Candace. Then the
person replies to him, "Ugh." And then
Charlie writes, "Jewish donors play into
all the stereotypes. I cannot and will
not be bullied like this." He then
continues, "Leaving me no choice but to
leave the pro-Israel cause." And then
the other person responds, "Please don't
invite Candace. That might feel good
short-term, but it's not good long-term
in my opinion." Okay, so obviously a
very brief excerpt. She had gone to her
audience and had said, "Hey, I have
these texts." She originally did not
show them. And
actually she may have shown them
straight away. But at nobody believed
that they were real. Then lo and behold,
let's play the next clip, the partner of
Charlie Kirk comes on and says, "Yeah,
that actually is real." So this is
Andrew Calvet authenticating the texts
from Candace Owens. To address some of
the things that have been going around
on public, namely about a text a group
text chain that has been made known
and released by Candace Owens. And I
just want to address it head-on because
you know, that was a text grab a screen
grab that I had shared with people. So
it it is authentic and I want to go into
it because I actually am really excited
that the the truth is out there. There
are other clips that I've seen on him
talking about this and he when he says
that he's excited that these have gotten
out there, he said, "Look, we've been
accused of not trying to find out what
actually happened to Charlie. In
reality, we've been cooperating with the
investigation and we didn't want to
spoil anything. But now that it's out
and I'm not the one that put it out,
great.
So that obviously to your point earlier
brought a lot of credibility to Candace
because people were dragging her on
Twitter saying that she's just
completely lost the plot from what she's
doing with the Brigitte Macron stuff to
this. She just like never found a
conspiracy that she wouldn't endorse.
And so for her to be the one that
clearly in the world, people are like,
"Oh, you've got something hot. You want
to get it out." People are going to
Candace. Now, I won't lie. She's
starting to feel like Alex Jones feels
to me.
They do get like a lot of early stuff
from people. People really do go, "Okay,
when I've got that thing that's like too
hot to handle, nobody's going to believe
it. I'm going to go to one of those two
people."
But there is something it does something
to your reputation when you're always
early on breaking conspiracy theories.
So it'll be interesting to see how this
how this plays out. If she gets
vindicated on the the Macron stuff,
it's game over. She'll be goated. So
I've said this before and I'll say it
again. She is the commentary version of
Michael Saylor. And it's like if her
bets all pay off, she is going to have
all the credibility in the known
universe. However, this is a very
high-risk strategy. So this lent a lot
of credibility for him to come out and
say, "Okay, that's real." So Charlie
really did say that. And it I would say
that is pretty bombshell-y. I will be
very curious to see how this plays out
because
it it is true that humans in general,
that governments specifically, they will
for sure manipulate anybody in any way
that they can. I don't think that's in
any way, shape, or form unique to
Israel, but Israel is in such a
precarious PR position. If
it ends up coming out that this is what
they did,
>> So as we're connecting those threads,
Candace Owens has texts that she would
there was some dissent in Charlie Kirk's
Turning Point USA camp. The president
came and confirmed that. Here is a video
of her expressly saying that Charlie was
fearing for his life days, weeks before
he was actually murdered. Three people
told me off record.
Two people who have this in a written
communication from Charlie.
Uh one who is a Turning Point USA donor
and I would say very much one of the
white knights in this.
The very day before Charlie Kirk died,
he expressed that he thought he was
going to be killed.
He told these people, "I think they're
going to kill me." Okay?
He did not express that to me. So I'm
telling you this based off testimony of
three people. And I am saying this
because I hope that these people who I
think are good will be inspired to come
forward with that.
>> So what she's intimating here is that I
have been given even more information
than I can tell you, that I have
specifics.
There are three people that have
confirmed these specifics. It's my
understanding she said one of them did
so in writing.
And
I am saying I'm not going to betray
that. They told me off the record. And
as a good I need a new word for what you
can't call it journalism.
That doesn't feel good.
But it is something it's a new
it's a new
it's a new era of something. She really
is able to show people behind-the-scenes
stuff that's turning out some of it to
be valid. And so
what I want to see is basically like
will the people actually come out? Cuz
she's trying to use the like, "Listen,
I'm not going to rat you out. So if you
want to stay invisible, go for it. But
you know who you are. I know who you
are. I want you to do the right thing. I
think you're a good person." Right? So
she's trying to pressure them to come
out and say the stuff. But
somebody really did kill Charlie. So I
can understand why people would be
tense. If they think they know who did
it and they think it's a government,
then they're really going to be slow to
be like, "Yeah, let me say more things."
I went ahead this week and sent around a
life insurance policy of sorts of sorts
package rather to people that I trust
package filled with text messages emails
private communications videos and
private legal documents. So if anything
happens to me, you guys will know
exactly who it is that has been making
my life a living hell
over the past couple of years. People
that are trying to bankrupt me, trying
to bankrupt me and my family, that are
threatening us to sue us. Everything
that Kanye said was so real. Okay? I'm
now at that point look back and you go,
"Man, Kanye was right. He was really
saying something about what it takes
This all comes back and we're like, "Yo,
Kanye was early, bro."
He was early. Kanye did it again. Kanye
is undefeated, yo. The wildest
thing ever. And he and he would be
intolerable. We wouldn't be able to tell
him anything
>> in future.
In the future.
[Music]
He's just going to have he's going to
have the shade glasses on. He's going to
bring them back. Leave me alone. Let me
say what I believe and you say what you
believe. Fight fair.
Why do you always have to make this
threat to bankrupt people? She has a
point there. It's like the process is
the punishment. Like there are people
that have enough money that they can
yeah, whatever. It's cost a couple
million to go in and fight this for the
next 2 or 3 years. Whatever, it doesn't
matter. They just bankrupt the other
person. Yeah. They'll just literally
make your life a nightmare. Do I fight
this all the way knowing that I could
still lose either legally or in the
court of public opinion and now be the
millions of dollars in debt and having
lost.
It's wild. And so people coming after
someone like her, presumably Listen, we
don't know who it is. So this could all
be made up in her head, but that
certainly is a real strategy. And many a
very wealthy person, organization,
government have run that kind of
strategy before. If anything happens to
me, you guys will know exactly who it is
that has my to release it all, detonate
it all, expose all of these people in
politics and in the movement who behave
like this behind the scenes.
It's necessary.
And I highly recommend every single
person that is out there that has a
platform and is going through things and
scared, do the same. Send everything
around to about eight people that you
trust. And I mean I I've ranged it. I
sent it to journalists Someone somewhere
is like eight people I got to take out
of people. Okay, got it.
to Andrew Tate. They won't know where
it's coming from. A year from now,
people can play this clip. I'm telling
you that when you have the amount of
information getting out into the world
that we have now,
something is going to break. I don't
know precisely what that's going to be,
but things are going to get wild. Humans
need a shared narrative in order to
march forward together in lockstep. The
need for a shared narrative is part of
how we move forward well. And if we
don't get a shared narrative, we will
not be able to move forward well. And
the bad news is I can I do in the piece
state very explicitly what I think the
shared narrative for America needs to
be. I even use the word we need to
indoctrinate our children, and I'll let
people decide for themselves whether
they think what I'm suggesting we all
collectively decide we're going to
indoctrinate kids with is good or bad.
Um but I don't see another way. Like we
we really do it can't be forced from the
top down. It's got to rise up from the
bottom up. And admittedly when I was
writing the things that I was writing,
it's like I end the paragraph going,
"Look, I know how cheesy that sounds."
But it's like if we don't do that, we're
going to be in trouble. And I have
almost no faith that as a collective
we'll be able to march forward with a
shared narrative. I think shared
narratives are born out of pain. And I
think a country has to go through I mean
this is China's rise.
China first had to go through a century
of humiliation, their words.
And with that, they were able to
galvanize people with a shared
narrative. And now that they have a
shared narrative and things are going
well, it's like you can't stop them. So,
we're wildly prosperous, but because
we're declining, even though we're still
ahead of basically everybody on planet
Earth, that decline feels some kind of
way. And we absolutely do not have a
shared narrative.