Video summary
The speaker begins by offering a profound insight regarding political institutions, emphasizing that parties and organizations do not possess their own agency but are instead directed by the individuals who comprise them. He argues that to truly change society or save European civilization, one must look inward at established parties and work from within to shift their direction, citing how formerly conservative parties in Sweden have successfully turned left due to members with liberal views. Conversely, he points out that the Moderates party has been forced into a rightward turn by the influence of the Sweden Democrats. He strongly advises against the notion that voting is futile, asserting that casting a vote every four years is a highly efficient way to support a specific political direction and that unless a party secures over 51% of the vote, their impact will naturally be limited by the constraints of the democratic process.
The core of the speaker's argument focuses on his support for the Sweden Democrats, specifically Tobias, whom he praises for his outspokenness and dedication to mass remigration over the last four years. He acknowledges that while the progress made is not yet sufficient, it represents genuine improvement largely driven by the hard work of the Sweden Democrats against significant opposition. The speaker explains that coalition politics often involves reluctant partners who may even be hostile, comparing this dynamic to a business scenario where unwilling collaborators stifle growth. He places the blame for slow results on these other parties rather than the Sweden Democrats, noting that had the Liberal, Christian Democratic, and Moderate parties been filled with individuals who prioritized Sweden's interests, the country would be in a much better state today.
Addressing concerns about funding and metapolitics, the speaker clarifies that his support for the Sweden Democrats is not financially motivated but rather a strategic necessity to prevent the Social Democrats from gaining power, which he believes would lead to severe negative consequences including the continuation of demographic replacement. He reveals that he has personally sacrificed significant financial opportunities to maintain his political stance and built successful companies under extreme pressure without major backers, contrasting his situation with other metapolitical actors who receive generous sponsorship. He encourages viewers who disagree with certain statements from Sweden Democrats leaders to remember that a party is larger than any single individual and that the collective infrastructure often drives different outcomes than isolated comments might suggest.
In conclusion, the speaker urges voters to prioritize remigration as the top agenda item and suggests that if one does not wish to vote for the Sweden Democrats due to specific metapolitical disagreements, they should at least consider Alternative for Sweden or Marcus Alk in the Bruun district to ensure a rightward shift continues. He warns of the dire future awaiting Sweden if it fails to reverse its current trajectory, comparing potential outcomes to the decline seen in the United States, Brazil, or South Africa. Ultimately, he frames the upcoming election as a critical juncture where competent individuals must navigate difficult negotiations with reluctant partners to push society toward safety and order, promising to return after the election results are known.
Read the full video transcript
All right. Which party to vote for in
the Swedish election? You might ask.
Which party do I support? Yes, I will
respond to these questions in this
video. But first and foremost, I want to
say something of utmost importance. And
this is my message to all young white
men all over the world. This is the most
important thing I can tell you in this
video. So, I'm using this opportunity to
share an insight. The insight is the
following. that an institution, an
organization, a political party, it does
not have an agency of its own. The
agency, the direction is set by the
members of the organization, the
institution or the party. Do keep that
in mind. Tell a friend about it as well.
This is the most profound insight you
will hear me say in this video. That is
more important than which party you vote
for. So if you truly want to change
society, then commit your life to saving
European civilization. If you want to do
that, then look at which institution can
you go into to change the direction of
said institution. This is true for
political parties as well. So for all
young Swedish men here who are listening
to my my video here, if you want to
change something, look at a party, an
established party, go into the party and
change the direction. Now the left, they
did this perfectly, you know, perfectly
executed change of direction of many of
these parties. formerly conservative
parties taken a leftward turn because
the members of the parties they you know
they harbored leftwing views or liberal
views or whichever we shall whichever
term we shall use so it can be done to
restore order to this um parties the
moderates is a good example now they
have actually taken a rightward turn or
rather the Sweden democrats have forced
them to take a rightward turn so anyway
that is the main point I want to say, I
also want to say that if you post stuff
like the solution isn't political or
vote harder or voting doesn't matter,
stop saying that. It only makes you look
stupid. Of course, voting matters. It's
not the only thing, but
in terms of time efficiency, it takes
you like 20 minutes to do every four
years and it's a massive benefit to
whichever party you support. And when I
say support, I don't necessarily support
any party. I support a direction. Unless
you get 51% of the votes, there's only
so much you can do. And here is also a
good example from Sweden to illustrate
my first point as well. The Sweden
Democrats, they got 20.5% of the votes
in the latest election. So, second
biggest party, but still only a fifth of
the um the population. So, there was
only so much they could do. Many
individuals, they are disappointed in
the Sweden Democrats. I don't really
understand why because they have clearly
worked hard. They've clearly made things
better over this last four years. Anyone
who says differently is lying or they
don't actually live in Sweden. Things
have gotten better over the last four
years. Mainly thanks to the Sweden
Democrats. Now imagine if they had been
in a coalition. So for those you don't
know the Sweden Democrats, they've been
in a coalition with the Liberals, the
Christ Democrats, and the moderates. So,
three reluctant parties. Um, and these
parties, they've been very anti-
Swedish, anti- Sweden Democrats also.
So, I mean, for them to be in a
coalition there, it's hard enough as it
is. It's not, you know, willing
partners. It's not a nice business
partner, you know, you you negotiate
with in a friendly fashion. The Sweden
Democrats have had to drag them in a
better direction, in a rightward
direction. So for if you are
disappointed in the Sweden Democrats,
it's not their fault. It's the fault of
these other parties who have been
extremely stubborn and reluctant and you
know even hostile to a certain extent.
So this also proves my point. Had it
been the case that the liberals, the
Christ democrats and the moderates had
they been full of individuals
who actually love Sweden, then we would
have seen a lot more results over this
last four years. But due to a cruel
twist of fate, these parties, they
haven't had individuals um who put
Sweden first. Unfortunately, had that
been the case, had it been the case that
all of these parties were full of
committed young men who love Sweden,
yeah, then we would have been in a much
better situation. But now because of
this, because of the fact that we
haven't had these individuals in
institutions pulling the levers of
power, things have gone too slow. So if
you want to place the blame on someone,
place it on these other parties. So why
do I support the Sweden Democrats? Why
will I vote for the Sweden Democrats?
Yes, because they have, despite
everything, put in a lot of hard work to
make Sweden better. Is it good enough?
No. Do we have a lot of work in front of
us? Yes. Do I wish they had worked
harder? Yes. But I also understand that
there is a political process. Things
take time. So therefore, if I support
the Sweden Democrats, I'm not saying
that it's enough. It's nowhere near
enough. I don't think the individuals in
the Sweden Democrats are happy either
because they have had to contend with
very reluctant business partners. I
mean, imagine if you're a businessman
and you want to make business. you want
to make, you know, nice garments or
something like that and your business
partners, they are not willing to
cooperate at all. Yeah, your business is
not going to go off. It's not going to
go. It's not going to grow. So, you need
to have willing partners. Again, if you
want to put the blame on someone, put
the blame on these other parties. Now, I
will vote for Tobias
because he is outspoken. He wants mass
remigration and he has been working
really hard over these last four years
to make Sweden better.
So, I'm concerned with the following.
Now, I have three daughters and the
clock is ticking.
We don't have much time. I want to
ensure remigration as fast as possible.
The best way to do so is to get the
Sweden Democrats more power. Very simple
stuff. Now, I saw some sort of skitso
comment suggesting that I've taken money
to support the Sweden Democrats. I wish
I wish someone would give me money for
my metapolitical work. But as fate would
have it, I am working for the side that
where you don't get any support. You
have to sacrifice a lot of money. And
believe you me, I've said this before,
I'll say it again so you understand.
I've given up a lot of opportunities and
money over all of these years for the
stances, for the political views I have
been openly talking about. It has cost
me a lot. It has cost me very much over
all of these years. So don't forget
that. Now you ask where the money comes
from. Yes, because I have. Because I'm a
genius, literally. I've built two
beautiful companies, Le Gloria, Jud
Nutrition. I've built them under extreme
pressure with many obstacles in my way.
You ask why am I so confident? Yes,
because look at what I've done in a very
hostile environment. Imagine what I
could do in a beneficial environment.
Then of course I have my podcast as
well. By the way, if you do want to
support me, I don't have any big backers
unfortunately. I wish I did. Many of
these other sides, they are very
generous when it comes to sponsoring
their metapolitical actors. I don't have
that kind of support. Again, I wish I
did. If you want to support me, do
subscribe to the greatest podcast. You
can do so on um various platforms. So, I
just wanted to respond to that. If
there's a financial reason for me to
support them, it's because I don't want
the Social Democrats to get into power
because if they do, we're in a very bad
situation, including myself. It will
cost a lot. It will be a lot of pain.
And most importantly, of course, they
will continue the great replacement.
Now, anyway, speaking of the Sweden
Democrats, if you do speak Swedish, I
encourage you to head over to Nick
Alenia's channel, his interview with
Ludvig Aspling. He explains perfectly
well what they've actually been doing.
And I salute Nick for asking hard
questions that many supporters, they
would like to know. Why has it taken so
long? Why have new citizenships been
handed out to people from the third
world? Guaranteed votes for the left.
Yes, because things take time. Unless
you have like 51% of the votes. There's
only so much you can do. If you have
reluctant business partners, it will be
hard. So that is the main thing I want
to say. So again, I'm not happy enough
with the progress, but it is still
progress. And if you look at four more
years going in the same direction as
now, we actually have a chance of saving
Sweden. If we don't, then it's just a
decline into becoming the US or Brazil
or, God's forbid, South Africa. So it is
what it is. Anyway, I want to say
something about alternative for Sweden
and Arabat.
How about those individuals? How about
Gustav? You know, we have had our
differences, but I'm not going to say
anything bad about him. He has set a
high pace and he's a brave man. So, if
you do like Gustav, yeah, vote for
alternative for Sweden. Same thing with
Marcus A lot. Especially if you are in
Bruan, you can try to get him in via 12%
of the votes in Bruan. So, if you like
him, yeah, do vote for him. I like to be
a Sandon. I like the Sweden Democrats
despite some silly things some Sweden
Democrats have said, but you know the
party is bigger than Yokason. So if the
party leader says something you don't
agree with, you have an entire
infrastructure behind it and they want
something different and again
remigration top priority. So anyway to
conclude the political game, a lot of
negotiations uh you need competent
individuals if you want to push things
in your direction and uh it's not always
the case that you get everything you
want. Sometimes you need to negotiate
with people who don't really like you
and then there's only so much you can
do. So anyway, I will vote for Tobias of
the Sweden Democrats. If you really
don't like the Sweden Democrats because
of some metapolitical statements, keep
in mind this is politics and here's
metapolitics. Two different things. But
if you don't want to vote for them, at
least vote for Arab Patit or Alternative
for Sweden. So I'll check back in after
the election. Thanks for watching.