"Bitcoin Will Go To ZERO If This Happens!" - The Future Of Currency | Peter Schiff vs Raoul Pal
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In a high-stakes debate regarding the future of currency, Peter Schiff and Raoul Pal clash over whether Bitcoin represents a legitimate store of value or merely a speculative bubble destined for collapse. Schiff argues that despite heavy advertising campaigns by crypto companies on cable TV, Bitcoin lacks intrinsic business fundamentals; he compares it to selling "sizzle without steak," noting that while tech stocks like Apple have real products and earnings, Bitcoin offers no tangible utility beyond speculation. He contends that the asset's value relies entirely on a collective belief system akin to religion or cult mentality, which makes rational argument ineffective. For Schiff, if people stop using the network or adoption stalls over time—similar to gold's decline in relevance as digital alternatives emerge—the price will inevitably crash because there is no underlying demand other than expectations of future appreciation. Raoul Pal counters that Bitcoin functions similarly to oil mining; just as supply adjusts based on production costs and market prices, Bitcoin's security relies on the hashing power remaining profitable for miners. He emphasizes that with over 19 million bitcoins already in circulation, the network is mature enough that new issuance matters less than whether holders choose to hoard or sell assets. Pal points out historical precedents where central banks dumped gold reserves without causing a permanent price collapse due to market absorption and industrial demand (which accounts for roughly 10% of global gold supply). He argues that Bitcoin's value proposition lies in its role as a "trust machine" in an era of broken trust, noting that even during the severe bear markets of 2022 when prices dropped by over 75%, active wallet usage actually increased by more than 40%. The core disagreement centers on adoption and use cases. Schiff challenges Pal to demonstrate Bitcoin functioning as a viable currency where transactions occur in Satoshis rather than being immediately converted back to fiat, citing the failure of early promises from companies like AMC or Elon Musk's brief attempt at selling cars with Bitcoin. He insists that for him to change his mind, Bitcoin would need to replace dominant currencies entirely and become universally accepted for daily purchases, a scenario he views as highly improbable given its volatility. Conversely, Pal maintains that adoption is the key metric; if network activity continues to grow despite price fluctuations or regulatory hurdles like CBDCs and blockchain integration by major commodity trading firms, his thesis holds true. He believes the future will be increasingly digital, making Bitcoin essential for a generation raised on technology who may view physical assets as obsolete. Both speakers acknowledge their positions are speculative but differ fundamentally in risk tolerance and asset allocation strategies. Schiff admits to holding gold stocks rather than physical bullion, viewing them as highly speculative bets that could appreciate significantly if market perceptions shift, yet he refuses to hold Bitcoin due to its lack of a non-speculative use case. He warns investors never to treat Bitcoin as "safe" money but only with funds they are willing to lose entirely, contrasting this with gold which serves as an insurance policy and liquidity alternative to the dollar. Pal agrees that speculation involves risk-adjusted returns where one bets on changing perceptions or catalysts driving price appreciation, noting that while he might have bought Bitcoin years ago if given a time machine, his public stance remains grounded in skepticism about its long-term viability without widespread adoption. Ultimately, the debate highlights how market psychology can distort judgment even among intelligent investors who witnessed past bubbles like the dot-com era and real estate crisis. Schiff warns that just as many smart people held assets that went to zero during previous booms, Bitcoin holders may face similar disillusionment if the network fails to achieve mass adoption or stabilize volatility. Pal suggests that while he cannot force others to believe in a digital asset's potential, the trajectory of technology favors its integration into global finance and supply chains. Schiff concludes by questioning why insulting asset holders has become acceptable behavior, drawing parallels between gold believers feeling attacked and crypto enthusiasts who may eventually be viewed as having been trapped in another speculative frenzy once history catches up with their predictions.
Read the full video transcript
got all these ETFs now, that they're in
it, they've been promoting it, and
they've been touting it. There's been
Bitcoin commercials now for years. I
mean, the top advertisers on cable TV
are crypto companies. I mean, they're
pumping and pumping and pumping and
pumping and spending a lot of money to
try to con the public into buying this
stuff. And so, you know, they've
suckered a lot of people in, you know,
but that there's a limit to how much
longer they're going to be able to do
it. You can't do it forever. The bottom
is going to drop out, you know.
And as far as the NASDAQ, look, you
know, yeah, I mean, there's a lot of
liquidity, there's a lot of inflation,
it's been driving uh tech stocks higher.
I'm not short these stocks. I mean, I
think the market could go up because I
think the dollar's going to go down. But
at least in the tech stocks,
you know, a lot of these companies are
real businesses. They may be overvalued,
but they have some value. Uh they're
generate They're You know, you mentioned
a lot of companies that you say have
networks like Tesla or Apple, but they
make a ton of money selling products,
right? They They You know, I got a lot
of Apple products myself. Apple is
earning a lot of money. You know, you
can argue about what the price of the
shares should be, but you can't argue
that there's a valuable business there.
Uh but with Bitcoin, you know, there's
no business. It's nothing. It's like,
you know, in in in sales that, you know,
they say, "Sell the the sizzle, not the
steak." Well, in Bitcoin, there is no
steak. It's just sizzle. It's And that's
so it's all being hyped up. It's not
certainly true because the people who
mine it get given block rewards. So,
they get paid to
mining it, you make some money. Sure,
I'm not talking about Bitcoin mining
could be profitable for now as long as I
can sell it above the cost of mining it,
but that that's that's different.
creates intrinsic value.
It's
as a business.
See, Peter, it's the same as oil mining.
If the cost of production
is above the price of the asset, people
don't mine.
And so supply is reduced, or in this
case, that the amount of hashing in the
network, either the security of the
network gets reduced.
to Bitcoin, the supply has really is
very little to do with mining because
almost all the Bitcoin have already been
mined. So, the question is
with the 19 million odd Bitcoin that
exists right now, forget about the
couple of million more that they can
bring on stream over the next few
decades.
The question is
with the 19 million that exist or
whatever many haven't been lost,
is do people want to hoard them or do
they want to sell them? And if they want
to sell them, is there enough new demand
to buy them? If not, the price crashes.
What happens if China sold its gold?
Oh, the price would crash.
then
they're buying it.
the Fed sold their gold? The price would
crash.
needs it. This is not an argument. 10%
of the all gold supply is used for
industry.
So, if a central bank comes in and dumps
their gold like the UK did,
dumped gold. Central banks have dumped
gold before. Now, and it gets bought. It
gets absorbed in the market.
The price went down.
And so, maybe the price of Bitcoin goes
down when people sell it. No
that's what markets do until you find
the clearing price. It's normal.
I don't see why it has to go to zero.
One of the things that I've learned, you
know, over the years with Bitcoin is it
is like a religion and people believe in
it the way they believe in a religion or
a cult. And when you get to that type of
mentality, there's no rational argument
that you can make. I can't I can't
logically try to tell somebody that
there's no god if they believe in a god.
I mean, it's a belief system that you
have and it's almost impossible to to
entertain
uh that you might be wrong, right? So,
and you know, so
you believe in it, believe in it. I
mean, there's nothing I can do about it.
I mean, uh and if if if you end up
losing a lot of money, you lose a lot of
money. And the problem is, you know,
some people that lose a lot of money
can't afford it. The best thing about
Bitcoin is that most of the people who
are going to lose a lot of money are
young and they got plenty of time to
earn it back and it's going to be a
valuable lesson that people learn that
they can carry into their older years,
the memory of all the money they lost in
in Bitcoin.
Could it possibly be you that learns the
lesson?
I don't think so.
Okay.
I mean, may maybe I'm wrong. Maybe
Warren Buffett is wrong. Maybe a lot of
smart investors, you know, maybe we all
got it wrong and and and you guys got it
right. I I don't think that's the case.
But, you know,
I suppose anything is possible. What
would have to happen for you guys to
reverse your opinion? So, Raoul, what
would have to be true of Bitcoin down to
zero for 10 years, 100 years, whatever
before you give up? Peter, same to you.
What what would have to be true for you
guys to reverse your opinion? For me,
simply, if people stop using the
network.
If if there's less
activity on the network, people start
becoming disinterested,
then it's shown that it's store of value
principles
erode. It would be the same with gold.
And that's one of the reasons gold has
been somewhat lackluster because there's
been less adopters of gold in a new
digital world. So, it's not done as well
as it would have done historically in
the kind of debasement environment that
we've had.
So, if I were to observe in Bitcoin
itself, forget all the other crypto, and
I'm no Bitcoin maximalist as you all
know,
um if we saw that
people
were using it less, there was less
activity, less value was being
transacted,
less new people were joining, you know,
the Bitcoin network, i.e. having
wallets,
then I would say,
"You know what? There's something wrong
here."
And is that persistent over time? If
it's persistent over time, then the
network may not work. And we've seen
many of those things happen in the past.
There's a possibility that happens. I
don't think it's the highest
probability, certainly not this decade.
Could it happen after that?
Of course possible. Now, why don't you
worry about that during the bear
markets? Because so for example in 2022
was a great example is
um the market went down 70 odd percent,
75%.
The number of
active wallets in crypto went up 22%, uh
42%. So adoption was still ongoing while
price went down.
Activity was less.
But then we're saying, okay, so if we
step back and we hear, oh, governments
are going to build on blockchain rails,
CBDCs.
All the banks want to put assets
on blockchain rails.
We're hearing gaming companies want to
put these metaverse gaming experiences
on blockchain rails.
We're hearing I was at the world's
largest one of the world's largest
commodity trading firms in Switzerland
last week.
Speaking to their
one of their senior ag agricultural
commodities physical traders.
I'm like
and she's an investor in my digital
asset
asset management company.
Um
and I'm like, are you guys using
blockchain? Surely you should be solving
supply chain. She goes, oh, we've been
using blockchain since 2021.
So we're doing
eight I think of the world's largest
agricultural commodities houses are
putting their letters of credit
their shipping
their um
the the
all of the kind of transit proofs, the
supply chain, and the settlement all on
blockchain.
So
going back to your question, Tom, when I
see this and I see the price of Bitcoin
down 75% or the whole crypto space down
80%.
You say, I have to ask myself, is
adoption stopping?
Or is just this a cyclical factor
that's driven by the business cycle? And
until I would see otherwise, unless
these things go away,
then I can only assume that tomorrow is
more digital than today.
And tomorrow, more people will use
blockchain technology than they did
yesterday.
Simple as that. Peter, what would you
have to see for you to change your mind?
I don't know, it's going to be tough. I
mean, obviously, it hasn't been changed
yet. I mean, I've been watching Bitcoin
from a few dollars a token to 60,000,
right? So, price obviously isn't going
to do it.
Um
you know,
the whole time I've been observing
Bitcoin and and and in involved in
interacting with the whole community,
and I've seen it grow, and I I I, you
know, I I've, you know, seen more and
more people uh you know, believing in it
and and and speculating on it. But, what
I haven't seen is a use case. You know,
people make a big deal about, "Oh, Peter
Schiff, you know, Schiff Gold, we accept
Bitcoin." Well, we started early on with
uh working with BitPay,
uh where we enable people to take their
Bitcoin through BitPay, and BitPay just
lets you sell your Bitcoin kind of point
of sale and get dollars to buy gold.
Uh but I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I
Everyone assumes that while somebody
buys gold with with Bitcoin, uh but they
don't actually buy it with Bitcoin. They
sell the Bitcoin, and then they buy the
gold with dollars. But,
you know, I remember back in 2017 when
Bitcoin kind of popped on everybody's
radar for the first time because it kind
of went from obscurity, and it had that
big run to 20,000 from, you know, under
1,000. All of a sudden, people start
talking about it. A lot of companies
started to announce, "Oh, we're going to
we're We're sell products in Bitcoin.
We're going to accept Bitcoin. And there
was like a rush of that.
And that all went away. I mean, nobody
today is talking about how they're
taking Bitcoin. I mean, the only company
AMC, the movie the the the the meme
stock for a while stock they they they
said, "Oh, we're going to take Bitcoin
at our theaters." Just part of the the
mania. You know, that stock is down like
99% you know, since that I got hyped up.
Uh
uh Elon Musk uh announced at one point
he was going to sell cars for Bitcoin.
And I don't know how many months later
he pulled the plug on the whole thing
and said, "No, we're not doing it
anymore." But so, we haven't seen
that adoption. It hasn't It hasn't uh
become any more of a currency than it
was when it was first created.
That's a very fair thing. It hasn't cuz
the problem is it keeps going up. So,
you're disincentivized to sell it or
it's very volatile, right? It's not very
good as a currency.
Well, it's not very good at the main
thing it was designed for. But and and I
remember when I first heard about it,
when I first heard about Bitcoin the way
it was sold to me was, "Hey, you can
circumvent all the AML requirements. You
don't have You get out of the banking
system. You can transact anonymously in
private. And you're And you don't have
to worry about the government spying on
you. You don't You can be out of the
banking system."
I got into it for an entirely different
reason, which is as Dan Tapiero would
call it, it's the security truth
machine. It's the value of the ledger.
It's the value of having a new way of
creating trust
in the world. In a world where trust is
broken. You don't know how much gold the
Federal Reserve has, right? This is a
trust problem. We've got the same trust
problem with the futures market.
I'm going to channel the comment section
right now and they are all saying Peter
Schiff is religious about gold because
Tom asked a question, "What would need
to be true for you to change your mind?"
And you've spent the last 5 minutes
telling us all the reasons you won't
change your mind.
I I well, I'm not talking about gold. I
mean, gold's been valuable for thousands
of years. It's not like it's up to me to
decide.
that. What what would have to be true
for you to change your mind about
Bitcoin? If the answer is nothing, that
is religious conviction from where I'm
sitting.
I've been given the same answer for you
know, for 10 years.
What will prove me wrong about Bitcoin
would be if Bitcoin replaces the dollar,
the euro, you know, as a
uh as a currency.
Uh when I go to the grocery store
and not only does the grocery store
accept payment in Bitcoin, but all the
prices are in Satoshis. But do we do
that with gold? Like that's a valid
comparison.
Have you Have you gone to the Have you
gone to the supermarket with a gold bar
No, because gold No, all right. No, but
gold is not being used as money right
now. It's being used as a commodity.
It's being used as a metal.
Bitcoin can't be used as anything. So,
it it has to be a currency. It was
created to be a currency. So, let me see
it function as a currency. It hasn't
done that at all since it was created.
You're applying a different set of
standards, my friend.
No, I'm not.
It's like
It's like you're also asking me, "What
would it have What would have to happen
for me to believe that Santa Claus is
real?" I don't know. You know, I mean,
you're asking me you know, it
it's a fake asset. It's phony. I I can't
imagine what could happen to convince me
that something that isn't is.
You know,
it's the the the more question is what
gets you to stop believing in it because
you're the one that is that believes in
a fantasy. I live in reality.
that. His answer just to recap is that
the energy in the network adoption usage
would have to go down. Very finite,
totally understand. But you in your
defense just gave a very concrete
answer. I don't know how
worried about that, but
I what I'm trying to do so I'm just
trying to paint a sense of what the base
assumptions are that build your guys'
world view. Uh with that answer, Peter,
I it's very helpful. Um I come back to
your core thesis is if it isn't real
physical tangible and does not have real
physical tangible use cases, then it it
will never cross your threshold. It
could be into It doesn't have to be
physical to be useful.
But, Bitcoin doesn't do anything. All
All All it is is a is a speculative
vehicle that I can trade. I can Yes, I
can hold it and I can sell it. But, my
ability to sell it rests on the the the
the fact that somebody else wants it.
And why would somebody else want it?
Because they think they can sell it. And
they think they can sell it at a higher
price. If they think they can sell it at
a lower price, they're not going to want
it. So, the demand for Bitcoin is a
function of the fact that everybody
expects the future price to be higher.
But, the minute you no longer have that
expectation for an appreciating price,
there's no buyers. There's nothing cuz
there's nothing you can do with it
between the time you buy it and the time
you sell it. And so, it just goes down.
There's no reason to own it. I am very
much not trying to convince you. I
simply want this position to be
understood. You can still reject and say
that it doesn't work for you, and I'd
completely understand. But, um I think
one position that's worth putting on the
table would be that I look at the
economic situation that we're in right
now, and I say I need a flight to
safety. Um so, I have invested in gold.
That That is one potential flight to
safety. I have unease about that because
I have a thesis that the every new child
born now is going to believe in digital
things more than physical things in in
this case. Now, I could end up being
wrong, and over time that that will be
in the wash. But, again, just just
trying to be understood, not trying to
be convincing, um that the use case then
for someone with that belief set becomes
that if
there are only 21 million there will
only ever be 21 million, and people keep
losing them, so that number's actually
deflating, now I have a place that
memetically people believe in, that I
can I can buy and hold that. I don't
need the price to be volatile. In fact,
with my personality, I would rather it
was not volatile. And now, as it
matures, there's no volatility, or at
least low, there's a place for me to um
park my money that cannot be inflated.
Now, I feel good.
Buying Bitcoin today at 60-odd thousand
dollars a Bitcoin, do you think that's
safe? Do you think that's a safe place
for your money?
Do I think it's safe? No, I don't think
anything is safe in a short time
horizon. On a long time horizon right
now, it feels the safest. But even if
even if in the short run it can go from
60,000 to 20,000,
you still think it's safe, even though
you might need to sell it when it's
20,000. Well, so again, I I I don't
consider myself a a a partner in this
debate. I'm merely trying to steer it.
So, I just want to make sure that that
that idea is understood. Again, reject
it is fine. Just trying to place it as a
thing to be understood, because I think
this is the core thing that breaks
between again, you guys' archetypes.
That's where I think this breaks is when
I look at Bitcoin, and now I'm just
speaking about Bitcoin, I see a That's
That's an inflation has that hedge that
resonates with me, because I believe in
the same thing that Raoul has to believe
in, which is the network effects. Just
memetically people believe in it. And
then I ask myself, is tomorrow When I
say is tomorrow going to be more digital
than today, I mean, will people have a
baseline understanding of the world as a
digital place or a physical place? I
think they will have a baseline
understanding of the world as a digital
place more than a physical place. Now,
that that may have horrendous knock-on
effects. I'm I'm not even speaking to
that. I'm just saying I think that is
where it's going. Maybe you're right,
maybe you're wrong, but regardless
uh buying Bitcoin is not safe. It's it's
highly speculative. You're speculating
on a bunch of things that you think
might happen, but you're not playing it
safe. Nobody should operate under the
delusion that I'm buying Bitcoin cuz I
want to play it safe. You're you you
know, you should not put any money into
Bitcoin that you're not 100% willing to
lose, all of it. So, if you're say yeah,
this is risk money. I can lose every
penny that I put into Bitcoin, and I'm
okay with that. I mean, I hope I don't
lose all my money. I hope it goes to the
moon and I buy a Lambo, but if I lose it
all, I'm okay because I got other
resources that I can fall back on. You
know, that's how you have to look at it.
You can't think that oh, I'm going to
put up my money on my all my money in
here cuz it's real safe.
Yeah, I I think that's a very very fair
point and is exactly how I look at it.
Um so, just to put a fine point on it.
So, uh for you to change your mind, it
would have to become uh a currency that
replaces the dominant currencies in use
today. Yeah, it'd have to achieve some
kind of scalability as a medium of
exchange, unit of account. And yeah,
eventually the volatility would
obviously have to go. It'd have to
stabilize, you know, you know, at some
price it could gradually rise, you know,
over time slowly, you know, depending
on, you know,
how much inflation there is
uh in other currencies, but maybe no
other currencies, maybe all the other
currencies go away and all that's left
is Bitcoin, right? That's all That's all
we have left. There's no more euro,
there's no more yen. The US government
wants Bitcoin. Bitcoin is how you pay
your taxes. Bitcoin is If you get a
welfare check, it's it's Bitcoin. That's
what you get, right? If If this all this
happens, then I guess I was wrong.
Um but if all it is is a speculative
vehicle, if all we have is more ways to
bet on the direction of the price,
uh then nothing has been proven. And
yeah, the price could go up. Could it go
from 60,000 to 100,000? It could. But it
could go from 60,000 to 10,000 or a lot
lower. And my question would be
and I'm sure if Bitcoin falls today from
60,000 to 20,000 or 10,000, all the
people who have been telling me how
great it is, they're they're not they're
going to be saying the same thing.
They're going to And they're going to be
saying, "Well, don't worry. It'll come
back. It'll come back." Well, maybe
maybe not. Maybe it won't come back, you
know, maybe it Maybe the next time it
really drops, it'll just drop again.
There's no way to know, you know, they
always say past performance is no a
guarantee of future results. So, just
because Bitcoin has come back in the
past doesn't mean it's going to come
back in the future. Do you do
speculative investing? Do you have a
portion of your portfolio? Yeah, I mean,
I do. I mean, I've been buying That's
what I said. I bought a lot more gold
stocks this week. I regard that as
highly speculative, but I bought I
bought them. I thought I think, you
know, I think they're cheap. I think I'm
going to make a lot of money on my gold
stocks. We'll see.
Uh but I know I'm speculating.
I didn't buy I didn't buy any physical
gold. I did I bought I bought gold
stocks. Now, when I buy gold stocks,
I own some physical gold because the
gold mining companies have gold in the
ground. They haven't mined it yet. So,
as a as a stockholder, I have a share of
that unmined gold. Okay, as uh for both
of you, as spec when you're
speculatively investing, do you look for
volatility or do you avoid it? Raoul?
If I'm speculatively
investing, I'm looking for volatility
with a risk-adjusted return I think is
in my favor. Obviously, we get bets
wrong, we get bets right.
That's the idea. So, you you look for a
strong trending asset
with some
hypothesis that is relatively provable
over time that should continue to drive
the asset, whether it's the Indian stock
market, a technology company,
or Bitcoin,
or even gold.
Volatility is something you want if
you're a trader. I mean, if you're
trying to trade a lot,
I don't try to pick the bottom. I don't
try to trade. I don't try to When I talk
about speculating
in an asset like a mining company,
I'm not looking for the volatility. I'm
looking to buy something that I think is
cheap. But I'm also hoping that there's
a catalyst so that in the future it will
become expensive. And so I want to buy
something when I think it's cheap and
not a lot of other people want to buy
it.
And I I want to hold it till I think
it's expensive and everybody wants to
buy it. And I may be wrong, right? I'm
making a gamble cuz I'm betting on
things changing. I'm betting on whatever
exists today, whatever perception people
have, that those perceptions are wrong
and they're going to change in the
future. And so I don't care about
volatility. I mean, I just want to buy.
I want I care about price. I want a low
price.
Uh and um and what I like about the gold
stocks is nobody really owns them.
There's just a handful of people that if
you if you look at the major uh you
know, holders, institutions, endowments,
pension funds, hedge funds, they own
either no gold stocks or just a tiny
amount. But most of them don't own any.
In fact, I I joked on my podcast, you
know, there was
the Nvidia's
increase in its market cap in a single
day basically exceeded the entire gold
mining industry
in one day, just the gain, not the
market cap of the whole company, just
the increase on that one day. Uh so it's
a tiny little segment of the market that
has the potential to be a lot less tiny,
you know? And if that's the case, you
know, I I can make a lot of money in
these stocks. Meanwhile, I do get some
dividends. A lot of my gold stocks are
not my best dividend payers. I mean, but
I get 3 4% dividend. So I collect some
interest, some income on a lot of these
gold stocks. Uh but I'm giving up some
income cuz I get better yields in other
investments, but I think there's a lot
of potential for appreciation. I
recognize I could be wrong, in which
case I don't get the appreciation, but I
think, you know, some of these stocks
can go up five or 10-fold. Some of them,
the smaller ones, could go up 50 or
100-fold. So, I I I think there's a lot
of
uh upside potential relative to the the
downside risk in these stocks. So,
that's why I'm I'm buying them, but I
look at them as speculative.
If you had a time machine, you could go
back in time and buy Bitcoin 10 years
ago, would you do it? Of course. I mean,
I'm not an idiot.
Well, first of all, if I had a time
machine, I could do a lot of things. I,
you know,
uh and I I you know, I'd be the you
know, but of course, look, you know,
yes, do I regret I mean, I remember when
I was sitting at my desk, my studio in
Connecticut, in Weston, and a guy
working with me on my campaign, they
were showing me Bitcoin. And the guy was
like, "Look, just buy some."
You know, what the hell? And I looked at
it, and I don't remember if it was under
a dollar or over a dollar, cuz I can't
remember. But I remember it was like
2010 when I looked at it.
And I remember I thought about it. Yeah,
should I could I mean, I could throw 10
grand in it, 50 grand. I don't know. I
thought about it. And I didn't do it. I
was like, "Ah, you know, this is
ridiculous. Well, what am I you know, I
I I I just I I I went away from it." But
I thought about it. I I thought about
all the odds, and I I I didn't see
this kind of bubble potential. I mean, I
thought, yeah, maybe it could go up, but
I just didn't want to deal with it. Now,
obviously, do I wish I had made a
decision
to have thrown 10 grand, 50 grand, 100
grand into it? Sure, yeah. I mean, it'd
be worth hundreds of millions, assuming
I didn't sell. But again, I don't know
what I would have done had I made that
decision.
Maybe I would have put it all on Mount
Gox, and then lost it there, but I don't
know, maybe some of the Mount Gox money
is coming back.
Um I don't know what I would have done
if I had bought it. But yeah, clearly,
I mean, I I mean, I wish I'd have bought
it, but, you know, I I would even if I
had bought it, even if I would have
bought it, I wouldn't have told other
people to buy it. I would have had to
kept quiet about it because
I never believed in it. So, I would have
bought it
just betting on other people being dumb
enough to buy it and pay a higher price,
right? I I wouldn't have bought it
because I actually believed in it. I
would have bought it because I believed
other people would be would be foolish
enough or greedy enough to buy it. So, I
would have had to kept it quiet. I
couldn't have like encouraged other
people to buy. So, I would have I I I
So, I think publicly I I wouldn't have
had a different you know, I would have
been singing the same song. I just would
have made a lot of money if I would have
if I would have bought it.
So, you don't think there's a remote
chance you might have
been more enthusiastic about it had you
have bought it been involved in the
community, made some money
attended some of these conferences, saw
what's going on with the technology.
Could it have been a different Peter
Schiff and it could have been Schiff
crypto written on the wall there? I
think there's a chance it could have
been and maybe you missed it. Well,
look, I like to think that I have
integrity and that I would have had the
same outlook, but is it possible
that had I bought it like so many other
people did
might the fact that it went way up
might I have decided that rather than
being a lucky gambler, I was some kind
of a genius
and I I I I maybe operated under the
same delusion. I mean, it's possible.
Look, you know, there's you know, power
corrupts so maybe money corrupts or it
distorts your perception. I mean, it's
it's easy for me to see the bubble when
I'm not inside it. So, maybe if I was in
the bubble with you guys, maybe if I was
a crypto billionaire,
maybe it maybe maybe that would distort
my perception. So, maybe I would be
maybe I would be out there, you know,
just as crazed as you guys.
Peter, in what world do you think it's
acceptable to insult
asset holders and think that's a normal
thing?
That they're idiots, they can't see it,
they're speculate it. Why is Why is that
becoming an acceptable way of
interaction?
I don't do it to Apple shareholders.
Well, I mean like Also, I mean it's not
It's not So, there's a there's a some
sort of psychology around gold that it
feels like it's being threatened. And
that therefore there's an attack.
There's an attack going back. I mean,
it's kind of strange.
Well, I I look, I talked to a lot of
people during the 1990s who were in love
with various dot com stocks and they all
went to zero. I talked to a lot of
people who thought they would get rich
owning their home and multiple homes
during the the the real estate bubble.
And so, I know the psychology and and
the way people act when they're trapped
in a bubble and they can't see it. Now,
there were plenty of smart people
that owned these stocks that went to
zero. There were plenty of smart smart
people that owned real estate. So, I'm
not saying There There are some really
smart people, I mean, intellectually
smart, high IQ smart
that own Bitcoin. I'm not saying they're
dumb.
I'm just saying they're making a mistake
and their judgment is being clouded by
the money.
Uh they can't they Everything is going
to be obvious in hindsight. See, a lot
of the things that I was saying when I
was warning about uh the housing bubble
and the subprime market, a lot of the
things I was saying in 2003 and four and
five and six that were being dismissed,
all of a sudden people were saying the
same thing. Oh, yeah, of course. Yes,
yes, this that's the Peter, are house
prices higher or lower than they were
then?
Are technology stocks higher or lower
than they were?
a lot A lot of them went to zero. It
doesn't matter. Most of the dot com
stocks went to zero. Yes, if you bought
Amazon,
if you bought, you know, uh
uh know, uh
uh
you know, if you bought There are some
stocks that made it. But if you bought
pets.com or the globe.com, you lost
everything. There were a lot of stocks.
Most of them went to zero. You just need
to know the Nasdaq. It's an index and it
has the top 100 technology companies. So
the bad ones get dropped out, the good
ones survive, and you made an enormous
amount of money by backing technology.
But you're saying that people were
stupid to buy technology in 1999.
talking about individual stocks that I'm
talking about people where they they
were cult-like You would have picked the
stocks better than those people, for
sure, cuz you saw it was all a bubble.
the Nasdaq the Nasdaq went down from
5,000 to 1,000. So it went down 80% and
the only reason it didn't go down 90%
was because the Fed slashed interest
rates to 1%.
15x.
It's up 15x. It's up 15x.
know where it is now. It's another
bubble. So let's see where the let's see
where the next bottom is. You know, I
mean it's not I mean we're going It's a
serial bubble blowing. It's the same
inflation that you're talking about that
is driving these asset bubbles.
I'm not I'm not denying that that
happened. You know, and I own I own some
stocks that are in the technology that
have gone up 10 I don't I don't own none
of these stocks. I I have some. So out
of interest, what value do you get out
of owning your gold? What is it that it
does for you? Gold Gold Gold is a small
part of my portfolio, physical gold, but
it's a it's a store of value. It's a
safe haven. It's an insurance policy.
It's it's I I look at gold
Against what Against what, Peter? Well,
when you ask me, why do I own gold? You
should say, why do you own dollars? Why
do you have dollars in the bank account?
Why do you have euros or yen, right? Why
don't I just spend all my dollars and
buy assets, buy real estate, buy stocks?
See, gold is liquidity for me. It is an
alternative to the dollar, to the euro.
It's not an alternative to real estate.
It's not really alternative to stocks.
Uh it's an alternative to to the dollar.
So, what are you most overweight in? Do
you think your your savings um mainly in
real estate or you know what how how do
you think
are investments. Savings can be in gold,
but you real estate would be an
investment unless it's my you know my
primary residence or something, then
it's more of a
an investment you're speculating in
going up, right? Cuz that's what an
investment is. Well, an investment would
have an income component. So, if I have
real estate, I got rental income. If I
own stocks, I have dividend income. Uh
so, my my my investments are generating
a return.
Um you know, if you're speculating,
you know, you're you're betting on the
price going up.
is Amazon
an investment? Well, Amazon
pay a dividend, right? So, I'm confused
cuz it sounds like it's a bad investment
Well, Amazon has earnings. So, it could
pay a dividend if it wanted to, but it's
reinvesting it.
do, but it doesn't. That makes it okay.
Okay. But
But you're asking me, do I think Amazon
is a good buy? No, I don't. I think
Amazon is very is overpriced. It's
obviously been overpriced for a long,
long time, you know? And and and and
that hasn't stopped it from going up.
But I do think that there is a major
decline in Amazon's future, whether it
happens in nominal terms or in real
terms. So, nominal terms would be the
dollar price goes down. In real terms,
the gold price goes down. But one of
those two things is going to happen.
I don't own Amazon. I mean, I I'm a I'm
a good customer. We buy from Amazon
every every day. So, I know they you
know, there there's definitely value in
that business model. The question is
what's it worth, you know? What's the
what should the price be? And I think
the market has been overpricing it for a
long time. If you like that clip, check
out the full powerful episode here, and
I'll see you there.