Best agents for 2nd line and treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The presentation focuses on identifying the most effective treatment agents for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma specifically in the second line and beyond, building upon the foundational knowledge of first-line therapies. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma accounts for approximately 75 to 80% of kidney cancer cases and is driven by VHL mutations that lead to tumor hypoxia, making the VEGF pathway a primary target for therapy. To guide treatment decisions, clinicians utilize risk stratification tools such as the Memorial Sloan-Kettering (MSKCC) and IMDC scores, which evaluate factors like anemia, performance status, and time from diagnosis to metastasis. These scores help determine whether a patient's tumor biology is indolent or aggressive, influencing the choice between various approved agents including VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors, and mTOR inhibitors.
As the landscape of kidney cancer treatment has evolved since 2006, the approach has shifted from a linear sequence of single agents to more complex strategies involving combinations of immunotherapy and TKIs. While recent studies have explored these combinations for frontline use, they are not yet fully approved, leaving clinicians with a basket of options including sunitinib, pazopanib, cabozantinib, axitinib, nivolumab, everolimus, and temsirolimus for subsequent lines. A key consideration in selecting second-line therapy is whether to continue an ongoing immunotherapy regimen or switch to a different mechanism of action if resistance develops. Data suggests that TKIs retain their efficacy even after patients have received frontline immunotherapy, indicating that the sequence of treatment matters less than maintaining patient well-being and managing side effects effectively throughout the "marathon" of cancer care.
Managing toxicity is a critical component of long-term survival in metastatic kidney cancer, requiring proactive strategies for both TKI-related and immunotherapy-related adverse events. TKIs often cause predictable side effects such as hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, and thyroid dysfunction, which are generally manageable with dose adjustments, supportive medications like Imodium or Metamucil, and lifestyle modifications. In contrast, immunotherapy side effects, known as immune-related adverse events, involve systemic inflammation that can affect various organs including the thyroid, pituitary gland, colon, lungs, and liver. These reactions are less common but can be more serious and sometimes require corticosteroids or other rheumatologic agents to control the immune response. The overarching goal is to keep patients feeling well enough to tolerate subsequent lines of therapy, as having multiple options available allows for continued treatment even after resistance to a specific agent emerges.
Looking forward, the field is moving toward personalized medicine driven by predictive biomarkers and novel combination trials that aim to improve overall survival rates. Current data from various combination studies show disease control rates between 80% and 100%, suggesting significant benefits from using immunotherapy and TKIs together, though long-term overall survival trends are still being evaluated. The standard of care will continue to evolve as researchers better understand how to sequence treatments, select the right patient for the right therapy, and tailor individual regimens based on specific comorbidities and tumor characteristics. Ultimately, the emphasis remains on quality of life and maintaining functional status, ensuring that patients can access the next best treatment option while minimizing the burden of side effects, a mission supported by the resilience and courage of patients and their families.
Read the full video transcript
good afternoon everyone it's a pleasure
to be here thank you so much for having
all of us okay so my talk is entitled
what are the best agents for second line
and beyond in the treatment of
metastatic clear cell renal cell
carcinoma it's a mouthful it's going to
pay you back right off of dr. Harrison's
talk so dr. Harrison did a beautiful job
of covering what we use frontline I'll
go through all the other agents that are
approved in kidney cancer and sort of
how we think about them and stratify
them in terms of what to do next
sorry I just forwarded a bunch of slides
these are my disclosures so you guys
have heard a lot of this background
already but as you know there are
several different subtypes in kidney
cancer the most common of course is
clear cell kidney cancer which makes up
75 to almost 80% of what we see so most
of these drugs are very well studied in
clear cell disease and so that is the
data I'll be presenting today and we've
talked at length about the associated
VHL mutation and clear cell kidney
cancers and again there's two distinct
patterns here there's the familial
genetic VHL syndrome versus the sporadic
VHL mutation that occurs in the majority
of clear cell kidney cancer so what does
the VHL mutation do it basically causes
a state where that tumor cell does not
have enough oxygenation it's hypoxic so
there's a lot of different regulation of
factors that try and grow blood vessels
to that area so as to provide more
oxygen and nutrients and so this veg F
pathway becomes a very logical target
for our cancer agents you heard from dr.
Harrison and some of the other speakers
today about our different strategies for
risk stratifying patients as you heard
there's the Memorial sloan-kettering
score and the IMD C score and these have
become increasingly relevant because a
lot of our recent approvals in kidney
cancer have been based on that patient's
risk criteria and so this takes into
account laboratory factors like anaemia
it takes into account somebody's sort of
performance status which is basically
there
strength and function on a day to day
basis it takes into account sort of the
timing of their diagnosis to the point
at which their metastatic so this is the
Memorial sloan-kettering score the IMD C
score has a lot of similar criteria with
some differences in the labs that we
monitor and that helps us to sort of get
in our minds a sense of the biology of a
patient's tumor so is this somebody who
we think will behave more indolently
with sort of a slower tumor or is this
somebody who we are worried is sort of
quote unquote on fire where things are
moving quickly and we need to kind of
get to action very quickly so as dr.
wood mentioned we didn't have much
before 2006 and gratefully we have a lot
of options now but putting it all
together is something that is still very
much a work in progress and sometimes
the more we know the more we don't know
about sort of what comes next
and so dr. Harrison just covered the
data kind of on the bottom right here
where I'm so the Cabos on data and the
checkmate to one for data brought
Cabazon to nib and nivo it be into the
front line setting very recently I've
just highlighted a couple things to put
on your radar there were two very recent
studies that just resulted out that are
combinations of immunotherapy and tki
and so these have not been approved at
this time but approvals may be
forthcoming so just to keep in your
radar it says ilysm AB InBev assume AB
is a combination of immunotherapy and
tki as is a valium AB and exit nib so a
little bit more on the general
categories of course the veggie forty
key ice act on the veg F pathway there
are seven approved agents in this
category and I'll go into each of these
his open and Bravo treants and it number
Sutent Cabos antennae or code medics
sorafenib above assume a bore Avastin
lin bat nib or lin vemma exit never
written light out in terms of immune
checkpoint inhibitors we have nivolumab
or opdivo a nipple uma map or your voice
and remember dr. Harrison's analogy
these immune checkpoint
essentially ramp up your own immune
system to better recognize those tumor
cells as being foreign and something
that needs to be cleared from the body
is something that's not self tumor or
protein
I'm sorry not tumor protein mTOR
inhibitors are a targeted therapy they
work on a different pathway than budget
far there are two approved agents
everolimus and temsirolimus everolimus
is approved single agent by itself or in
combination with one Batna and then as I
just alluded to there are a lot of
combination immunotherapy tki sort of
novel treatments that are coming down
the pike and so I actually have a slide
later with all six different
combinations but that's gonna be I think
increasingly important moving forward
potentially and then of course you guys
have heard about clinical trials there's
all kinds of different novel agents
coming along as well and so probably in
a year from now this slide will be
incredibly hopefully out of date things
have changed so much in the last year
even so recapping sort of in 2017 in the
good and intermediate risk patients we
use sunitinib or PES openiv primarily
and in poorest patients there was data
for temsirolimus after that frontline we
sort of had this basket of other TK eyes
I'm torn Heba ters immunotherapy to turn
to in 2018 things really shifted with
the advent of the data from checkmate 2
& 4 whoa sorry okay with the data from
checkmate - one for nivolumab and voluma
mAb is being very commonly used in the
frontline setting now and so how does
that change what we do in the subsequent
line that's a new area of interest
Cabo's Sun has meant that more patients
are being potentially started on cab
posing internet upfront and then these
combos studies as they come out people
may get treated with a combination of
TTI and IO in the front line so in the
second line here are sort of our major
options and I'm going to go through each
of these but
Bevis is mad pose opener exit NAB over
almost tensionless cousing of NIMH ofe
so how do we think about these so dr.
Harrison covered is there a bus
frontline treatment it depends
is there an ideal sequence after
frontline treatment failure and as IO
treatments are incorporated earlier what
does this mean going forward we used to
think of kidney cancer in a very linear
fashion if one thing doesn't work we go
to the next if that doesn't work or
works for some time and stops working we
go to the next and now with these
immunotherapies the question is do we
keep this pressure ongoing if it stops
working do we try different combinations
still incorporating that or do we not do
it anymore so how do we overcome
resistance these are all things that are
trying to be answered at the moment with
different trials so going through the
agents sunitinib is an oral small
molecule inhibitor of Vecchi far it also
hits other receptors such as pdgfr most
commonly it's administered as a pill
that you take once a day 50 milligrams
typically people take it for four weeks
at a time and then a two-week break in
practical data sometimes there's
modified regimens where people may take
it for two weeks and be off for a week
depending on on their you know basically
side effects and tolerance of the
therapy and this was approved in 2006 it
was approved on the basis of this
particular trial where sunitinib was
compared to interferon which was one of
the early immunotherapies that we use in
kidney cancer you guys have seen a lot
of these kaplan-meier curves today so I
won't go into too much detail about it
but the way we think about these curves
is basically we're comparing two
different therapies to each other so
orange line here was sunitinib the green
line here is interferon and what we're
looking for with these kaplan-meier
curves is we're looking for separation
of the curves that indicates that one is
better than the other if they're
crossing it really tells us hey you know
was something really superior here and
then we're also looking for the tale of
the curve are we extending people
survival for X amount of time because
when we see that tail of the curve that
means people are living longer pays
openiv or vote ran is also in a bunch of
our inhibitor also hits other
actors and piss openiv unlike sunitinib
is dosed continuously typically so
people take comes in two hundred
milligram tabs people take four tablets
a day and they take it every day this
was approved in 2009 and again and the
original data you can seep is open it
was superior to its competitors in our
traditional kaplan-meier curves except
it's veg F RC kit and pdgfr it started
at 5 milligrams twice a day
exit nib has a shorter half-life than
most of these other agents which is why
it's twice a day and most of the other
TTI's are once a day and there's data in
exit nib for dose adjustment up which is
unusual for the TPI so you may notice
your oncologist may mention hey we need
to go up on this dose or down on this
dose that's frequently done with next
setting em there's improved
progression-free survival with exit nib
when it was compared to sera fin him in
the second line and beyond setting
Nivola map is a PD one checkpoint
antibody as dr. Hass mentioned this
morning originally it was approved for
every two week dosing however recently
we do have this approval for
administering double the dose every four
weeks which is kind of nice in terms of
convenience for our patients it's less
trips to the doctor to get the infusion
since it is an IV medication and
originally it was approved actually in
the second line setting as a single
agent so you heard a lot about the
combination of nivo and it be in the
front line but originally this was
actually used single agent in later
lines of therapy and that was on the
basis of this trial which compared the
volume AB and everolimus which is one of
the mTOR inhibitors and Nivola mab had a
clear overall survival advantage over
ever Lemus now one thing that was really
unique about this trial is this quality
of life data that they collected and
this is something that is much more
frequently being done in kidney cancer
trials now which is really great because
we're paying attention to the symptoms
and day to day effects of these
therapies on our patients lives so not
only did nivolumab have an improved
survival but patients felt a lot better
on Ebola map compared
ever Lemus as well it had less side
effects Kappas Nanton AB is a inhibitor
of vag affair and it hits some
additional targets called axial and met
it comes in 2040 and 60 milligram
tablets typical starting dose assists 60
milligrams a day and it was approved
initially also in the second and
subsequent wine setting after a previous
tki therapy but with the Cobo some data
earlier this year
kaboo Santina became approved in the
front line setting as well so the
original data for sort of subsequent
line setting for a cab as Antonia was
with the meteoroid trial it compared cab
is Antonia limas in patients that had
previously gotten a cheeky I usually it
was his open a person at nib and Cabos
Antonov had a superior overall survival
compared to everolimus
and then I wanted to introduce you in
the Cabo Sun data that dr. Harrison just
presented to you guys
not only did it show improve
progression-free survival but you can
look at the waterfall plots which the
idea behind waterfall plots is they
actually show you the change in tumor
burden so at the you know at 0 is sort
of where the tumor patient's tumor
burden is at baseline and then on Cabos
antony boron whatever treatment when you
see bars that go up that means that you
more grew when you see bars that go down
that means the tumor shrank and you can
see that a lot of patients really got
change in sort of reduction of their
tumor on cab byzantium you see that
definitely what sue 10th to but sort of
favored kilos Antonin Lin VAT nib
targets vuja far FGFR pdgfr right and
kit it is approved in conjunction with
our alignments when you they actually
did a three armed study for this agent
so when VAT nib alone was compared to
everolimus
alone it was compared to the combination
of both of them and the combination of
the two led to both improved
progression-free survival overall
survival and response rate and so this
is another
therapy that we frequently utilize so
putting this all together what do we
choose I just named seven different or
ten different agents for you guys how do
we how do we figure out what to do in
reality there's not a lot of head to
head comparisons and with the rate that
our approvals are coming out there will
likely never be a trial that compares
everything had to head to head where we
can say X Y Z is the absolute best but
in reality maybe that's not even a good
question to ask because patients really
end up getting multiple of these as I
mentioned each of these hit different
receptors so maybe if tumors are
resistant to one the fact that you're
hitting other receptors means that you
bypass that resistance with one of the
other agents and so really most people
have at least several of these agents we
also take into account a lot of patient
specific nuances and so particularly for
example with lab functions in a patient
who has liver function issues we might
not want to choose something like his
open it which can cause a higher issue
liver dysfunction with sites or volume
of disease sometimes for example if
somebody's got a lot of bony disease we
have data that Kappos the internet works
a little bit better in bony predominant
disease and so we might favor that this
side-effect profile we take into account
quite often so while these are sort of a
similar class um you know a couple of
agents will have more diarrhea some will
have more issues with rash on the hands
or feet some will have more issues with
blood pressure and depending on a
specific patient's individual medical
comorbidities we may want to avoid some
of those and so we might choose
something different I'm gonna go into a
little bit of sort of the side effects
of all of these agents in reality with
kidney cancer because we have so many
options we think of it as a little bit
of a marathon and so part of our job and
I think a really important part of our
job is to help keep you feeling well as
you're going through therapy we can't
afford to let our patients get beat up
on these agents because we have second
and third and fourth line things we can
try so we have to keep you feeling well
on these so what I tell my patients is
that with Tk eyes side effects are easy
on easy off in that you're very likely
to have sight if
there's a very predictable pattern of
side effects that occur but we also have
pretty easy ways of troubleshooting them
or helping you feel better on so what do
we watch for we watch for blood pressure
most patients on T KS are going to have
an elevation in their blood pressure
when we see it happening we take it as a
good sign the drug is doing what it's
supposed to be doing but of course we
want to protect your heart make sure
your you know other medical issues don't
become exacerbated by this and so we do
need to control it and change up your
blood pressure regimen potentially
diarrhea is another common one I have a
whole slide dedicated to diarrhea in
just a minute
fatigue tastebud and appetite changes
mouth sores and then thyroid issues are
really common on all these agents and so
your oncologist is likely checking your
thyroid function intermittently with
labs to make sure you don't need an
adjustment of synthroid or something
like that so diarrhea I find that
imodium is grossly underutilized by most
of my patients it's we tell people it's
okay to take up to 16 tablets a day but
if you're anywhere close to that we need
to be hearing about it away before that
is what I tell them and so if if you
know for sure you take your tki in 30
minutes later you're running to the
bathroom I tell my patients wake up take
two imodium before you even start eating
for the day if you're not in that boat
if it's sort of more intermittent you
can certainly use it as needed but don't
be shy on the imodium because when you
have severe diarrhea that's not
controlled you're at risk of dehydration
you're not absorbing things while you're
gonna be fatigued and so you know
prevention is really helpful there
probiotics can help I will say we
there's recent data saying probiotics
are not good to be on with immunotherapy
and so I do recommend them on tki but
maybe if you're on immunotherapy maybe
don't don't be on probiotics Metamucil
is actually a really good trick and so
it's funny because we think of Metamucil
for constipation but if you take a scoop
of Metamucil and stir it into something
thick like applesauce or oatmeal it can
really help bind up the bowels so that
can be a really helpful trick and then
sometimes we do have to adjust the dose
that is not uncommon you don't have to
feel bad if your oncologist says hey we
need to go down
by a little bit on your dose or we need
to think about an alternate dosing
schedule like take your meds Monday to
Friday and give yourself a weekend break
part of these strategies are to help
keep you feeling well and so oftentimes
we do need to rely on those adjustments
to make sure we're keeping your
functional status up to par hand-foot
syndrome is also quite common with these
basically a blistering type rash on the
hands or feet it's particularly common
in the feet because it's a
weight-bearing area and really here
moisturization is the key you want to
buy a nice thick lotion really you know
kind of greasy and moisturize the hands
and feet twice a day at least if it's a
really severe again we think about doing
you know dose changes or breaks and then
we also have prescription strength
things that sort of help numb that up to
make it more comfortable mouth sores and
tastebud changes are another one that we
see often a simple home remedy of what I
call salt and soda which is a glass of
warm water teaspoon of salt teaspoon of
baking soda and just gargling with that
multiple times a day really helps to
prevent that and then again there are
prescription strength things to sort of
coat the mouth the taste bud changes are
a lot harder and I'm sure many of you
have experienced appetite changes where
nothing tastes quite right there is a
couple things you can do there's zinc
supplements you can take and then
there's something called M berry which
you can order on Amazon but it makes
everything taste sweeter 50/50 on this
some of my patients love it some hate it
but if you really are in the boat where
things taste terrible you can try that
immunotherapy side effects are a whole
different ballgame okay we call them the
itis a--'s I just means inflammation and
so what's the what's this concept and
immunotherapy we're allowing the immune
system to ramp up and if the immune
system gets overactive it can cause
damage to normal self tissue or
inflammation in some other area part of
the body so immunotherapy severe side
effects are relatively rare most of our
patients feel really well on
immunotherapy but when they're
developing side effects they're often
more subtle it's not like the TTI's
where I said they're easy on easy off
these are much less likely
happen but when they happen they can be
more nuanced and subtle and sometimes
difficult to pick up upon however they
can be quite serious if we don't catch
them and so you'll notice your
oncologists always have their radars up
when you're on immunotherapy in
particularly combination immunotherapy
like the Eppley map and Nivola map we
ask a litany of questions just you know
making sure everything's okay are you
having diarrhea are you having a rash
are you having a cough are you having
changing your energy level looking for
signs and symptoms of whether that
immune system is getting overactive the
truth is it can happen in any part of
the body which is why sometimes it's
nuanced is that it's it's hard to pick
up on but I'm gonna go through some of
the more common ones that we watch her
in just a second here so endocrine Appa
these are basically a change in in
hormone levels of some kind so thyroid
is a common one but on the volumen
nuvola map in a blooming map one of the
things we watch for is actually
dysfunction of your pituitary gland
where your adrenal function can can be
affected and so people feel very very
fatigued they can have issues with sort
of their blood pressure and so that's a
big one we watched for it's not common
at all but one of those things we don't
want to miss colitis or inflammation in
the in the colon causing severe diarrhea
is another one if it's relatively mild
you know sometimes it can be sort of
managed with sort of supportive
interventions but if people are having
more than seven bowel movements a day
that suggests the colon really is very
inflamed and then typically we need to
get involved with systemic ways of
calming down that immune system anytime
these immune mediated adverse events
happen we're looking at something like
steroids to calm the immune system down
steroids are a first pass sometimes it
works but with these immune related
events sometimes as we taper down
stories those symptoms can rebound and
when that happens we sometimes need to
reach for other rheumatologic type
agents to keep that immune system under
check so don't be shocked if your
oncologist mentions other agents that
typically you think of for autoimmune
diseases we often use those in these
subtypes of
vents pneumonitis or inflammation in the
lungs is exceedingly rare
however if somebody develops cough or
issues with oxygenation or getting
winded when they exert themselves it's
something again we don't want to miss
because it can get very severe hepatitis
refers to basically inflammation in the
liver so every time you go in for your
mayo therapy your oncologist is probably
checking your labs and part of that
panel we check is going to look at liver
function tests to make sure there's
nothing like that going on the 3 in red
at the bottom are the ones that I hear
most often on a day-to-day basis so I
kind of mentioned some of the more rare
stuff but the day to day stuff we hear a
lot about our sort of joint aches and
pains so people often say hey you know
I've always had arthritis but all of a
sudden I feel way more creaky it's a lot
worse those are typically managed with
lower doses of steroids or other
rheumatologic agents but again a quality
of life issue thyroid I've mentioned and
then skin rash which can typically be
managed with topical steroids I want to
take just a moment to touch on some
interesting upcoming data you have a
whole lecture dedicated to novel
treatments coming up but just some of
the data that's just coming down the
pike so combo IO tki treatment and then
as we use more of these immunotherapies
in the front line what happens to the
response to these T key is in the second
line and Beyond and so there are
currently six actually probably even
more now trials ongoing combining
different io s and T key eyes and what
this chart is showing is this is these
gray bars are showing the disease
control rate that refers to the tumor is
either stable or shrinking and you can
see in all of these combos that we're
hitting somewhere between eighty and a
hundred percent so almost all these
patients are deriving benefit from these
combinations in terms of it being stable
or shrinking which these are pretty
unprecedented numbers in single agent
TTI's or single agent immunotherapy so
the combo does seem to be effective
these trials of course I mentioned these
front to the bevacizumab it says ilysm
ab and exit number value map just
resulted out and so we do have data to
support them but one of the big
questions going forward is what's this
going to do
for an overall survival trend in the
coming five and ten years and it's just
too early to know that still but a very
promising sort of area that we're all
excited to see what happens as
immunotherapy is used more in the
frontline you know we were all kind of
wondering does this mean Tiki eyes are
gonna be just as effective in the second
line this is unpublished data but we
just took a quick look at our cohort of
patients at MD Anderson so we had we had
way more than this but we had 42
patients who were treated with upfront
IO in the context of a clinical child
before it was approved when when all the
immunotherapies in the front line were
in clinical trials you know there were
42 patients we collected that had either
stopped deriving benefit or had
progressed her HUD adverse events and
then went on to receive a TI so that
exact scenario a frontline immunotherapy
second-line t ki and really our patients
did really well on it they had minimal
issues with adverse events and when you
look at the water flow pot every single
one of the patients had reduction or
stability in their in their tumor burden
in the second line T ki so you know it's
early days in this setting but it does
suggest that the T key eyes have not
lost efficacy by not being used
frontline that there's still a valid
very good option in second line and
beyond so looking ahead thankfully we
have a lot more options than we used to
combination options are exciting but we
also have a lot to learn about when
someone becomes resistance resistant how
do we sequence these things what's the
optimal sequence how do we better select
who's gonna respond to T ki who's gonna
respond to IO who's not going to respond
and sort of tailor individual therapy
the standard of care will continue to
evolve which is a good thing but it also
means that each time that changes it
affects what we do down the line I think
personally tell everybody and quality of
life are huge here and that's a big part
of what what I deal with on a daily
basis with my patients in clinic is we
have to keep you feeling well to keep
getting to the next best treatment and
predictive biomarkers as I mentioned are
going to be key in terms of right
patient right treatment there's so much
work being done on it it's a huge area
of controversy and interest and so
hopefully in the coming years we'll be a
lot smarter about what we're choosing I
really want to take a moment to thank
our patients and their families you know
our you guys show a tremendous amount of
grace and courage and hope on a daily
basis and that's that's pretty amazing
in the difficult situation and so you
guys are a true inspiration to us to
keep working and trying to improve
things families as well caregivers being
absolutely a vital part to keeping our
patients happy and healthy thank you to
the KC a and and also to my mentors and
friends at MD Anderson I wanted to
highlight a couple of my my I have their
permission to show their pictures and
everything
this is Bruce who we were not sure we'd
be able to get him to surgery
here he is after a very successful
surgery he's recovered in eating a Texas
shaped pancake this is this is Mike and
he six years ago was was diagnosed with
advanced disease and is doing amazing on
his current therapy his scans show no
sign of cancer he's a professional
racecar driver and has won six or seven
major series he's also in the world
poker tournament in Las Vegas every year
and so he's he's really enjoying every
moment to the fullest this is Maria
whoo right around the time of diagnosis
of advanced disease with a very rare
tumor type not clear cell but um was was
found to be pregnant she is doing okay
but her her baby is now nine months old
happy healthy cutest baby you've ever
seen and then a very very special
shout-out to Nick Harmon who's here
today with his wife Kem
Nick joined the Texas game wardens
in 1985 he retired just earlier this
year after 33 years of service I wish
I'd actually showed you guys more
pictures but he was out on the bay
rescuing sea turtles while on active you
know treatment for kidney cancer and
when Nick got diagnosed one of his
buddies told him well unions just need
to get bit by a radioactive spider like
spider-man and you'll be you know fine
so Nick really took that to heart
every single he's gonna hate me for
shyness but every single clinic visit he
comes with spider-man boxers or a
spider-man t-shirt yeah
and so you know we're gonna keep working
to find that magic spider bite so thank
you guys all very much
[Applause]