Benefits of the Doubt: Chapter Three: Moleskins, Russian spies and a 40% Fever Dream
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The third chapter of the podcast explores the evolution of the U.S. veteran benefits system from its humble beginnings as an unwritten contract to a massive federal entitlement program that once consumed 40% of the national budget. Initially established in 1832, pensions were viewed merely as welfare requiring proof of poverty, but legislative shifts by 1865 transformed them into earned property rights and eventually social obligations for aging veterans. This transformation was driven largely by the Civil War, which exploded pension rolls from thousands to hundreds of thousands overnight, forcing the government to create a specialized bureaucracy that managed medical records and disability claims independently of standard military channels. The sheer scale of this operation led Congress to pass laws like the Arrears Act in 1879, which retroactively paid veterans for years they should have received benefits but hadn't claimed due to bureaucratic delays; while intended as an act of justice, it inadvertently created a financial frenzy that necessitated rigorous investigations and surveillance.
The physical infrastructure supporting these benefits was designed with remarkable foresight and humanity, particularly the Pension Building in Washington, D.C., constructed by General Montgomery C. Meigs. This structure featured intentional universal design elements long before the term existed, such as shallow stair risers to assist veterans using prosthetics or crutches, and a dedicated entrance known as the "Gate of the Invalids" adorned with imagery of wounded soldiers. The building also incorporated advanced engineering for its time, utilizing steel skeletons hidden behind classical facades to support massive document storage needs while projecting safety and comfort to the public. Beyond Washington, the National Soldiers' Homes were established not merely as hospitals but as self-sustaining communities resembling "Disneyland" in their heyday, complete with farms, theaters, zoos, and lush gardens created through horticultural therapy by veteran gardeners like Frank Mundt. These facilities aimed to keep veterans active and productive while providing a sanctuary that distinguished them from the destitute poor or mentally ill who were often relegated to almshouses at the time.
However, this system was not without significant flaws and contradictions regarding eligibility and social justice. The early laws governing widows' pensions created severe hardships by requiring proof of marriage before 1800 for full benefits, a barrier that excluded many women whose husbands married them after returning from war; one widow famously used a preserved mole skin sent as a gift during the Civil War to prove her relationship and secure her pension. Furthermore, the system was plagued by discrimination against African American veterans and widows, who were frequently targeted by special examiners investigating their private lives for moral failings rather than legitimate fraud claims. The federal government also strictly denied benefits to Confederate soldiers, labeling them insurrectionists under the 14th Amendment until decades later when limited support like headstones was authorized; this disparity highlighted a deep national divide where Union veterans received comprehensive care while Southern counterparts relied on impoverished state funds or nothing at all for generations. Ultimately, these complex legal battles and social experiments laid the groundwork for modern veteran healthcare but revealed how deeply intertwined financial policy with racial tensions and political ideologies of the 19th century remained.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome to the DAV podcast.
I'm Jonathan Cope Hanger and you're
listening to the story of our veteran
benefits.
The 250th anniversary of our country is
more than just a celebration of
independence. It's a renewal of the
contract between the nation and those
who paid for its freedom.
Yet for the first several years of our
country's existence, that contract was
largely unwritten.
Just how did we get from total neglect
to the modern VA?
Well, it took a series of national
scandals,
a moment of political theater, and
civilians causing a real stink. This is
the history of the benefits we earned
and the fragile moments where we almost
lost them. You're listening to benefits
of the doubt.
>> [music]
[music]
>> Chapter 3
Moskins, Russian spies, and a 40% fever
dream.
>> [music]
>> In 1810, it was called the Military
Bounty Lands and Pension Branch.
>> [music]
>> Around 1815, it evolved into the loosely
structured Pension Bureau.
In its first few years, the entire
bureau consisted of just 18 clerks.
Their job was to check handwritten
letters against old, fire-damaged muster
rolls from the 1770s. Formal
consolidation of the Pension Bureau
didn't happen until 1833.
Originally, the Pension Bureau was part
of the War Department because pensions
were seen as a military matter.
But by 1849, the US created the
Department of the Interior to handle
domestic home front issues.
The bureau is moved there, signaling a
shift.
Pensions were now viewed as a social
obligation of the government rather than
just a military expense.
>> [music]
>> By 1860, the bureau thought its work was
almost done.
The Revolutionary War veterans were
nearly all gone, and the bureau was
[music] preparing to downsize its staff.
At the time, there were only about
11,000 people on the pension rolls in
total, and the annual cost was roughly
$1 million. [music]
Then in 1861, the Civil War [music]
broke out. Within 4 years, those 11,000
pensioners turned into hundreds of
thousands,
>> [music]
>> and that $1 million budget exploded into
the hundreds of millions.
By 1860, only 325 people applied for new
pensions.
By the end of the war in 1865, [music]
that number jumped up to over 75,000 per
year. The bureau had to hire hundreds of
clerks just to process the literal miles
of paperwork. And because the War
Department held the medical and service
records,
the Pension Bureau became the middleman,
>> [music]
>> constantly verifying injuries with the
military.
The United States [music] Pension Bureau
was the powerhouse of the federal
government during the 19th and early
20th century.
At its peak, it managed the single
largest expense of the federal budget, a
whopping 40% of all spending.
And it operated out of one of the most
magnificent [music] buildings in
Washington, D.C.
The Pension Building, now the National
Building Museum here in D.C., was built
by U.S. Army [music] Quartermaster
General Montgomery C. Meigs to serve as
a memorial to Civil War veterans.
You can find other examples [music] of
General Meigs' work here in D.C. He
supervised the construction of the wings
and iron dome of the U.S. Capitol, and
he [music] played a major role in
developing Arlington National Cemetery.
But the building he designed to help
take care of veterans is something to
behold.
Designed in 1880, he included several
intentional universal design features
well before that term existed,
specifically to aid [music] Civil War
veterans.
The most famous accessibility feature is
the design of the staircase.
Meigs designed them with [music]
unusually shallow risers and extra-wide
treads. The benefit was a gradual
ascent, making it significantly easier
for veterans [music] with prosthetic
limbs, crutches, or respiratory issues
to climb between floors without
overexertion. I have been to the
building museum, and I remember [music]
saying to my friend that I really liked
walking up the stairs. It's something
that you notice right away if you visit,
especially if like me you have a bad
back. It's [music] super, super
noticeable.
Now, I do want to give a quick shout-out
to the Society of Architectural
Historians before we go further with our
story.
I don't know anything about 19th-century
architecture, and I didn't have the
first idea who to talk to about it,
either. But they did. [music] They
connected me with Ian Stevenson.
Ian is a lecturer in preservation
studies at Boston University,
and is exactly who we need to hear from
about how the government used buildings
as benefits.
>> [music]
>> Ian explains that General Meigs was
really a product of his time,
and the time was changing how it dealt
with things.
>> There were no fixed rules at this time,
really just conventions based on
accumulated wisdoms of builders for
centuries. But, you know,
designers of buildings of all kinds made
choices based on the needs or available
materials, and they were constantly
adapting. So, it's why we see so much
variety in historic architecture and why
old buildings are often permitted to be
non-code compliant to this day. Earlier
buildings in the colonial period tended
to have very steep staircases, and by
the Victorian period, the staircase had
changed from being a purely functional
piece of a house of a building to being
something a bit more performative. So,
in this Victorian era, staircases became
front and center in buildings. And it
was actually a space that visitors were
meant to watch the owner of the house
kind of descend the stairs into a sort
[music] of waiting hallway. And it was a
bit of a kind of social control. So,
staircases were already becoming
shallower as a way of sort of inviting
the homeowner to kind of descend the
stairs. So, so if you look in older
building, they're very steep and very
functional. And so, we were already
headed this direction. So, Meigs was was
within a cultural moment. However, I do
think he was also responding to a need
of veterans. And I can give an example
of another building where something
similar happened. So, in Maine, there's
a cottage that Union veterans built as a
summer retreat. [music] And they
actually created ground floor bedrooms
for infirm veterans so that they didn't
have to go up the stairs. And in fact,
as more and more veterans became infirm
as the years passed, they moved the
dining room and the kitchen to a
different level to create more ground
floor bedroom space. So,
>> [music]
>> designers were kind of working within
the needs of their constituents.
>> The Pension Building's northern
entrance, called the Gate of the
Invalids, was positioned to provide the
most direct access for veterans arriving
specifically to file disability claims
or seek medical-related assistance. The
exterior terracotta frieze above the
entrance specifically depicts a medical
wagon and wounded soldiers, signaling to
veterans that this was their dedicated
space.
>> Architectural historian Dell Upton has
actually done some writing about how
Americans, [music]
in particular, can use physical spaces
to define a community through what he
calls artificial homelands that are
designed to include some and exclude
others. And so, in the case of Civil War
veterans, [music]
the distinction there might be between
post-war civilians and those who had
experienced the wars
you know horrors first hand and so
embedded imagery or motif
>> [music]
>> are this kind of external projection
that's tied to an internal knowledge
to let individuals know they're part of
a kind of a collective right of a group
and so the architecture is intentionally
doing this as a form of storytelling so
what Meigs is doing here is for wounded
soldiers but this happened at other
sites associated with Union veterans. So
for example
in 1885 just 2 years before the Pension
Building was completed the headquarters
building of the New Hampshire Veterans
Association at Weirs Beach
was built and it has its own freeze that
has the every single core badge of the
Union Army in sequence the first core
second core etc. which were symbols that
were readily known to the men and was
meant to sort of imbue this sense of
belonging.
>> And while not a direct physical feature
for the veterans Meigs installed an
elevated document tract and dumbwaiters.
This allowed the clerks to move the
heavy pension files rapidly between the
floors and was meant to reduce wait
times for veterans as the bureau was
managing over a million active claims at
its peak. Once again here's Ian with
more information.
>> And this was all rapidly changing just
in the moment that the Pension Building
was being designed. So if it was 10
years earlier we may not have gotten
there. What's considered the first
skyscraper in the world the Home
Insurance Building in Chicago was
completed in 1885 so just 2 years before
the Pension Building and it was the
first building to use a steel skeleton
shrouded in masonry. So essentially it
was an efficient industrial product but
made to look like something more
familiar more classical that the public
would understand.
It was able to achieve new heights
without adding massive width. So masonry
buildings, the taller they go, the wider
they have to be to sort of support their
own structure. But, when you start to
use steel frames, you can have buildings
that are much more efficiently designed
for space. And so, the architect of that
Home Insurance Building, William Le
Baron Jenney,
knew the public would be skeptical of a
steel building, and would be afraid of
it. So, he puts a masonry facade to give
people a sense of comfort. And it's no
surprise that the build or or
coincidence that the building is an
insurance company, which is also meant
to sort of project the idea of safety
and comfort. So, Bigs this building off
of the success of the Home Insurance
Building by combining, in his case, this
you know, marvel of structural steel
[music] for weight-bearing for all those
documents and things, but again,
shrouding it in a classical facade for
the sort of aesthetics of a monument
that would be more readily understood by
the public at that time.
>> The Corinthian columns, just fun to say
that. The Corinthian columns in the main
hall were the largest in the world at
the time.
>> [music]
>> And sitting there, unseen and waiting,
are countless government documents that
Big stuffed inside the hollow columns on
the first and second floor arcades,
which he thought would be interesting to
the historians or the antiquarians of
the age when the ruins of this building
shall be open to the curious.
That's a flowery 19th century way of
saying, "Giggle, giggle, they're going
to like this."
And that's the building. Now, let's see
what happened inside.
Before 1832, pensions were seen as
welfare, and you had to prove you were
poor.
>> [music]
>> The 1832 Act turned pensions into a
property right, and since veterans now
had full pay for life, that money was
legally considered part of their estate.
When these veterans began dying, their
widows argued that since the pension was
an earned debt, it shouldn't simply
vanish when the husband died. This legal
shift made the 1836 Widow's Bill a
logical next step rather than a brand
new concept.
Now, the 1836 Act finally recognized the
earned rights of a veteran's family, but
it's often considered a failure in its
initial execution because of how many
women it left behind.
This failure, really three of them, is
now seen as the final hurdle in the
transition from charity to a true
veteran's contract.
The biggest snag [music] was the strict
eligibility requirements.
A widow could only receive the pension
if she had been married to the veteran
before or during his military service.
The problem was most soldiers were young
men and didn't marry until after they
returned from the war. This excluded the
vast majority [music] of war widows. And
because the 1832 Act had been hit hard
by fraud, the 1836 Act required extreme
proof of marriage [music] at a time when
public records were often nonexistent.
If they couldn't provide a document,
they had to find a witness [music] to
testify. And for a woman in her 80s,
finding a living witness to a wedding
that happened in the 1770s
was often an impossible task.
And this roadblock was kept in place for
a long time.
And this became a problem for Charity
Snyder, a Civil War widow living in Long
Rapids, Michigan. She had to prove her
marriage [music] to her late husband,
James J. Van Lou, a Union soldier, to
receive her widow's pension in 1900.
Charity had to get creative when [music]
it came to proving her marriage.
She found an envelope but had lost the
original letter from James that was
addressed to my dear wife. However, she
still had a very [music] special love
token James had sent her from the front.
During the war, a mole infiltrated
James's [music] tent. Now, we're
actually talking the rat-like thing and
not a sneaky person.
Either as a gesture or a joke, James
killed it and sent [music] the pelt to
Charity.
Because the gift was so bizarre, it left
a lasting impression [music] on those
who saw it.
Charity was able to provide four
testimonials from friends who vividly
remember the letter and the moleskin
[music] from years earlier.
Charity then wrapped moleskin in a note
and sent it directly to the Pension
Bureau as physical proof of their
relationship. Charity was granted
[music] her pension and today that
moleskin remains in her application file
and it's just one of [music] the 1.28
million Civil War Widow files in the
National Archives.
And then there is the remarriage
penalty.
If a widow remarried, she immediately
lost her pension.
This created an unintended consequence
where elderly widows decided to live in
adulterous cohabitation
to avoid losing their only source of
income.
This led to further social stigma and
legal battles as the government
eventually began investigating the
private lives of these women to find
grounds to terminate their benefits.
In the 1880s, the Bureau employed
hundreds of special examiners.
But unlike the clerks in Washington,
these men were stationed in the field.
By 1897, there were about 342 examiners
stationed across the country. Think of
them as the precursor to today's
Inspector Generals.
But their job was to investigate
suspicious [music] claims. Most
investigations targeted disreputable
lawyers who took illegal fees from
veterans or invented fake soldiers to
pocket the money.
While they caught many legitimate
fraudsters, special examiners also
became a tool of discrimination.
African-American veterans of the United
States Colored Troops and their widows
were targeted [music] far more
frequently for investigations. They
often used their power to pry into the
sexual and social lives of black widows
looking for any immoral behavior they
could use as a legal excuse to strip
them of their pension. [music]
That said, one of the most notorious
fraud cases ever handled at the Pension
Bureau involved a Russian aristocrat and
Union spy,
Captain Charles D. Arnauld. Well, at
least he said he was a spy and an
aristocrat and that his name was Charles
D. Arnauld.
D. Arnauld was a minor celebrity in
Washington D.C. at the time. He claimed
to be a Russian military engineer and a
Crimean War veteran who had offered his
services to the Union at the start of
the Civil War. He claimed he had been a
secret agent for General John Fremont.
He swore he had been captured, tortured,
and wounded in the head and leg while
scouting behind Confederate lines. And
he even claimed that Abraham Lincoln had
personally told him that the nation owed
him a debt of gratitude.
For 20 years he lobbied Congress for a
$50,000 payout. This would be millions
in today's money.
And a Medal of Honor.
While waiting for his big payday, he
filed for a standard disability pension
claiming his old battle wounds made him
unfit for work.
The Bureau was suspicious but couldn't
prove he was lying until a coincidence
happened in May 1890.
A doctor in Arkansas named Alfred
Arnauld filed his own pension claim.
When the clerks pulled Dr. Arnauld's
service record, they realized that D.
Arnauld had claimed he served under the
exact same alias.
Dr. Arnauld had a perfect, verifiable
record of service.
The examiner dug deeper and found that
D. Arnauld had never seen the combat he
described.
In August 1890, a grand jury indicted D.
Arnauld for presenting a false claim.
The news was a national sensation and D.
Arnauld's quest for the 50 grand ended
in disgrace.
>> [music]
>> The failure of the 1836 Widows Act was
so apparent that it forced Congress into
a 20-year cycle of patchwork laws to fix
the problem.
In 1838, they relaxed the rule to
include widows married before [music]
1794, but only gave them a 5-year
pension.
>> [music]
>> In 1848, anyone married before 1800
could receive a life pension.
And the real victory came in 1853,
ending the 70-year-long argument between
the government's wallet and nation's
conscience. Congress finally removed all
marriage date restrictions. The nation
finally admitted that the debt owed to a
veteran extended to his family,
regardless of when they wed.
While the public celebrated the
patriotism of age of veterans like
Joseph Winter, politicians in Washington
were sounding the alarm.
>> [music]
>> They feared the Widows' Pension Act had
created a market where young women
traded their youth for a veteran's
recession-proof federal check. To the
skeptics, these May-December matches
were a fiscal disaster.
To the veterans, they were a final
desperate lifeline of care.
The reality was these weren't just
marriages, they were the first informal
long-term care plans in American
history.
And on November 12th, 1906, let me see
that date one more time, November 12th,
1906,
the New York Times marked the end of the
Revolutionary War Widows' Pension era
with this headline,
"Last Revolutionary War Widow Dead."
>> [music]
>> Mrs. Esther Damon, 92 years old, passed
away at Plymouth, Vermont.
Esther was born in 1814, during the War
[music] of 1812. She married Noah Damon,
a veteran of the Continental Army in
1835 when she was 21 and he was 75.
And while we're on the last of things,
the very last person in the US to
receive a Civil War pension died on May
31, 2020.
Irene Triplett was only 8 years old when
her father Moses died in 1838.
He was 83 when she was born in 1930. Her
mother, Alida Hall, was Moses' second
wife and was about 50 years younger than
him.
Under the rules of the Pension Bureau, a
veteran's pension usually ended when the
veteran or the widow died.
>> [music]
>> However, there was a specific exemption
for a helpless children.
Irene had cognitive impairments that
began before she was 18 and that
classified her as a helpless child of a
veteran.
And that entitled her to a lifetime
survivor benefit of $73.13
each month.
Now, to help put this in perspective,
when the pension was first authorized,
the primary mode of long-distance
communication [music]
was the telegraph.
And the fastest transport was a steam
locomotive.
By the time the last check was issued,
Irene could have used a smartphone to
watch a live-stream of a private rocket
docking with International Space
Station.
Times sure changed.
>> [music]
>> The final brick laid in the foundation
of what we now know as the Department of
Veterans Affairs [music] happened on
March 3, 1865 when President Abraham
Lincoln signed the National Soldiers
Asylum Act. And while the Pension Bureau
handled the check in the mail, the
Asylum Act addressed the physical
reality of the broken army. Hundreds of
thousands [music] of men returning from
the Civil War with missing limbs,
soldiers' heart, which was PTSD, and no
family to take care of them.
In the Victorian times, the word asylum
meant a place of sanctuary [music] and
safety, not a psychiatric ward.
In 1737, the name was changed to the
National Home for Disabled Volunteer
Soldiers to remove any lingering stigma
of [music] asylum.
Before 1865, a disabled veteran without
a family often ended up in a local
almshouse or poor farm alongside the
destitute mentally ill. [music]
Here's Ian Stevenson again.
>> So, the design of these facilities was
twofold. One was to support the
veterans, right, and their caretaking
and treatment, but it was also about
keeping them physically separated from
the larger community both for their own
benefits but but as well as creating a
sort of um image of veteranhood at this
time. So, you know, unfortunately, many
veterans with both physical and hidden
wounds in the 19th century turned to
self-medication such as alcohol and
opiates to cope. And so, federal and
state governments were keen to reduce
that dependency A, but also remove it
from the public eye in order to minimize
the stigmas against veterans that were
already kind of emerging in this period.
So, for instance, having a drinking
establishment, a canteen as they were
called, on the campus kept veterans that
wanted to have alcohol on site instead
of going into town and drinking and
perhaps over consuming and then create,
you know, adding to the sort of stigma
of the drunk veteran. [music]
This was also the era of the rise of the
temperance movement, so alcohol
consumption in general was becoming more
and more uncouth and seen as sort of
unmasculine, really. So, you know, the
the government was was understood that
these men who were masculine in sort of
the sense of serving their country, they
didn't want to undercut
>> [music]
>> that um you know, from the war
experience by having their consumption
of these um things uh front and center.
>> [music]
>> But, at the same time it wasn't only
about that. Having centralized
facilities actually allowed for
efficiencies of scale, right? To to
manage the sheer number of veterans in
need. And as you mentioned, aging
populations, this just grew as time went
on and more became informed. So, um,
[music]
you know,
on the plus side, it really reflects the
acknowledgement by the government, both
federal and then also at some of these
state facilities, that they needed to
provide services to this class of people
and not rely entirely on charitable
organizations, you know, nonprofit, um,
entities, which was the case in the
past.
>> The 1865 Act declared that men who were
invalidated by service deserved a
dedicated federal space.
>> [music]
>> The Act created a series of branches
across the country. These weren't just
barracks, they were massive,
self-sustaining campuses.
>> [music]
>> And helping us with more information on
these is VA chief historian, Mike
Visconich.
>> There was a surprising amount of thought
when you go back [music] and read some
of the
um, some of the diaries of the time,
some of the the [music] reports of the
campuses, the efforts that were made to
go out of the way to do things that that
made it more comfortable for the
veterans. [music]
And an interesting research we did, uh,
that was done on, uh, Thanksgiving
celebrations and Christmas celebrations
on the campuses. They did, [music] um,
raise some of their own crops, they
raised some of their own animals to the
degree possible. You know, veterans had
jobs on the campuses and uh, this idea
of of
>> [music]
>> uh,
not only a place for them to be to be,
you know, they weren't warehoused there.
There [music] was a lot of thought to to
it being more than that. Both on the
immediate thinking of how they were
established and how they evolved in
terms of the relationships with the
administration on the campuses, but
veterans themselves played [music] a key
part in driving some of the the
additional things they chose to do on
campuses to enhance their own lives.
>> [music]
>> The first three were the Eastern Branch
in Togus, Maine, the Central Branch in
Dayton, Ohio, and the Northwestern
Branch in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
>> [music]
>> These homes featured libraries,
theaters, farms, and even post offices.
They were designed to help keep veterans
active and productive. [music]
Initially, the law was strict. Only
those who were totally disabled in the
line of duty could apply for these
homes.
>> [music]
>> However, as a Civil War generation aged,
the government realized that old age was
its own form of disability. So, by 1884,
eligibility was expanded to include any
veteran who couldn't support himself,
regardless of whether his disability was
combat-related.
This transformed the homes from
hospitals for the wounded into
retirement communities for the aged.
And just like [music] the Pension
Building in DC, the Soldiers' Homes were
built to be grand and beautiful.
This was a deliberate choice. By
building palaces for disabled veterans,
the government was signaling to the
public that these men were not charity
cases. They were honored guests of a
grateful nation.
In fact, in the late 19th century,
[music] the Dayton Branch of the
National Homes was not just a hospital,
it was the Disneyland of the Gilded Age.
By the 1880s, it was attracting over
15,000 people annually. And by 1910,
that number peaked at a staggering
660,000 [music]
every year.
To put that in perspective, Dayton's
population at the time was only about
116,000. [music]
Here's Mike with more.
>> There was beautiful grounds. There was
over 500 acres at that time. There was a
beautiful garden grotto that the that
the veterans had created themselves.
[music] They had created these fishing
ponds. They again the parades they held,
the zoo, the
uh What a great place as [music] a
destination.
>> And the crown jewel of the campus was
the grotto.
It started as a limestone [music] quarry
used to source stone for the home's
building.
A veteran resident and [music] former
florist named Frank Mundt, a German
immigrant who served in the Union Army
during the Civil War, saw the jagged
[music] empty pit and began planting
vines and flowers in the rock crevices.
Over time it evolved into a lush green
paradise with exotic tropical plants
brought out from the steam heated
greenhouses. It featured man-made lakes,
[music] waterfalls, and stone arches
that were considered more beautiful than
New York's Central Park at the time.
Month would go on to become the chief
gardener for the [music] entire national
home system.
And while the term garden therapy didn't
exist yet,
Month was an early pioneer of
horticultural therapy.
He eventually [music] led a crew of
fellow veterans who found that working
in the soil was much more effective than
any 19th century medicine for their
shattered nerves.
The board of managers for the branch
believed that wholesome recreation was
part of a soldier's rehabilitation.
To entertain the veterans and the
public, they established a full-scale
[music]
zoo and park. The grounds featured a
deer park with over 50 domesticated
deer, a buffalo paddock, and enclosures
[music] for wolves, bears, foxes, elk,
but the most famous attraction [music]
was a pond filled with alligators
complete with an indoor nursery for
their babies.
Victorian era tourism [music] had a
strong patriotic and sometimes
voyeuristic streak. Tourists came
specifically to see the men in blue.
Again, here's Mike.
>> So, at its peak of the latter of the the
turn of the 19th of the 20th [music]
century, over 600,000
annual visitors of that era in the
United States, fascinating. They had to
build a hotel right off campus for the
visitors. They built an extra rail spur
line to get visitors, you know, out to
the campus.
You know, at its peak it had uh about
8,000 veterans in residence. So, you
just imagine this thriving community
with all of these things going on.
Absolutely, people want to come out and
listen to the band and watch the parade,
all of these things. And good for them,
good for the veterans. Just a really,
you know, a unique relationship that
um wasn't wasn't particular necessarily
just today. I mean, this was this was
part of that national home experience.
Depending a little variance, depending
on how many residents and in location.
>> Visitors would gather at the parade
grounds to watch thousands of veterans,
many with empty sleeves and wooden legs,
perform military maneuvers and marching
drills to the music of the home band.
The veterans lived a regulated life,
wearing their Union blue uniforms and
responding to bugle calls. For the
public, this was a living monument to
the Civil War.
The campus was designed as a city within
a city with high-end facilities.
The hotel housed overnight guests who
arrived by train. And the trains would
come from as far away as Cleveland and
Cincinnati.
Railroads would offer a special soldiers
home picnic excursion, dropping tourists
directly off at the gate.
>> That is so fascinating to me, right? We
really have a hard time conceptualizing
that today.
But, in the period, one couple of
practical why, the why? Well, one, to
visit veterans, so you may have had a a
family member and the idea um
that that was [music] a something that
you wanted to do and and they do was
certainly great, but you know, I talk
about how the veterans did things, you
know, to create some things to make
their lives [music] better. Well, you
know, they
these parades, the band, for instance,
the band, in one newspaper report,
[music]
uh the band in particular, again, the
Central Home was written up as being
second only to John Philip Sousa's band.
So, in that era of the late 1800s, that
was the era of those Sousa-style [music]
bands, right?
And in the era before radio, in the era
before other entertainment, well, gosh.
>> The Dayton branch was ahead of its time
in several respects, most notably in its
demographic makeup.
It housed a significant portion of the
United States [music] Colored Troop, a
force that comprised roughly 10% of the
Union Army.
Even as the nation retreated into the
era of Jim Crow and Reconstruction era
tensions, the Dayton branch maintained a
complex [music] racial landscape that,
while different from modern standards,
represented a unique social experiment
for the 19th century.
Mike explains for us a little bit
better.
>> So, the idea of of segregation is we can
find it is that in those early days
it wasn't so much there was a formal
segregation, but the way that the campus
was set up was oh, uh
units barracks together. So, if you were
a US Colored Troop, you were in the US
Colored Troop barracks.
And guess what? You attended to eat at
the the the dining table with your
buddies from the US Colored Troops or
the 7th Cavalry or whatever you you
know, you you might have been with.
So, it sort of played out that way for
quite a while. Later, we started to see,
you know, a more formal segregation, you
know, language in certain um aspects.
But, I think, you know, what is
interesting, you know, in that era where
we're figuring out as a nation, right,
how to remedy this this this ill. And
what to do with our victory, you know,
in the Civil War was you know, um there
were it wasn't very specific in the
sense that um whether you were
African-American or whether you well or
or white or whatever or if you were
another minority, the benefits were
exactly the same.
>> As the 19th century turned into the
20th, the Civil War generation was
passing away.
By World War I and World War II, the
focus of veteran care shifted from
shelter and scenery to modern clinical
medicine.
The zoo was dismantled. The ornate
gardens fell into disrepair, although
they have been recently restored, and
the campus transitioned into the
high-tech Dayton VA Medical Center that
exists today.
Now, it does need to be stated at some
point that there was a difference
between being a Union veteran and a
Confederate veteran.
To put it bluntly, in the eyes of the
federal government, Confederate soldiers
weren't veterans.
They were insurrectionists.
>> [music]
>> Under the Constitution, levying war
against the United States is defined as
treason.
A government does not traditionally
reward people for trying to overthrow
it. Providing federal pensions to
Confederate veterans would have been a
legal admission that the Confederacy was
a legitimate separate nation, rather
than a collection of states in
rebellion. And they didn't just create a
policy, they had it written into the
supreme law of the land.
Section 4 of the 14th Amendment
explicitly prohibits the US and
individual states from paying any debt
or obligation incurred in aid of
insurrection of rebellion against the
United States. The disparity between
Union and Confederate veterans benefits
was massive, largely because they were
funded by two completely different
sources.
Union veterans were supported by [music]
the federal treasury. Confederate
veterans had to rely on individual
southern states, many of which were
economically devastated for decades
after the war.
By 1900, nearly 95% of Union veterans
were receiving some sort of benefit,
while many Confederate veterans received
nothing at all, or waited decades for a
small state-funded stipend.
>> [music]
>> Public Law 85-425
[music] was passed in 1958 to fix this.
Almost a century after the war ended,
and long after almost every Confederate
veteran [music] had passed away.
By the time it passed, there were no
undisputed surviving Confederate
veterans left to collect the money. It
did, however, provide federal [music]
support to roughly 1,000 surviving
widows of Confederate veterans who were
still alive at the time.
>> [music]
>> Now, technically, there were a couple of
other laws passed earlier that gave
Confederate veterans benefits.
In 1906, the Act of March 9th authorized
[music] federal headstones for those who
died in Union prisons.
Then Public Law 810 in 1929 authorized
federal headstones for all Confederate
graves.
>> [music]
>> The big kicker at the time was the
Arrears Act of 1879.
It allowed veterans to claim back pay
for the years that they should have been
eligible.
This resulted in an average lump sum
check of nearly $1,000 at a time when
the average worker earned only $400 a
year.
No such windfall ever existed for
Confederate veterans.
The Arrears Act was arguably the most
significant and controversial turning
point for the Pension Bureau.
It transformed the [music] pension
system from a relatively modest social
and safety net
>> It's the money.
>> into a massive federal entitlement
program that dominated the US budget for
decades.
>> Money.
>> Basically, it was the 19th century
version of back pay on a national scale.
Before 1879, if a veteran waited 10
years after the war to apply for a
disability pension, his payment only
started from the date the application
was approved. He lost [music] those 10
years of potential benefits.
The Arrears Act changed that rule. It
stated that if a veteran's claim was
granted, [music]
the government owed him a lump sum
covering the entire period from the date
of his discharge, which was usually
1865, [music]
to the date the pension was granted. For
many veterans, this resulted in a
sudden, life-changing check.
A veteran who was receiving a modest $8
[music] a month, who was finally
approved in 1880, might receive a check
for roughly $1,400, [music]
which was nearly 45 grand today. And
this was often more cash than a farmer
or laborer
>> [music]
>> would see in a decade.
The act triggered an absolute frenzy.
In the year following its passage, the
number of new pension claims more than
doubled.
And a new industry emerged,
pension attorney.
Today, we sometimes refer to these cats
as claim sharks.
These pension attorneys would scour the
country to find veterans who hadn't
applied yet, charging fees to help
[music] them file for the arrears
windfall.
And since the stakes were now so high,
veterans began claiming internal or
invisible disabilities like rheumatism,
chronic diarrhea, ugh,
or general debility that was hard for
the doctors to disprove 15 years after
the war.
The financial impact was staggering and
again completely underestimated by
Congress.
Before the act, the government spent
about 27 million a year on pensions.
By the late 1880s, [music]
that number ballooned to over a hundred
million dollars.
This is why the Pension Bureau
eventually consumed over 40% of the
entire federal budget. The Arrears Act
split the country's opinion in two.
Supporters argued it was a simple matter
of justice. The government had owed the
money since 1865. The date of the
paperwork shouldn't matter.
Critics, including many newspapers,
called it a pillage of the treasury.
They argued it incentivized healthy men
to fake illnesses and turned the noble
Grand Army of the Republic into a
lobbyist group for pauperism. The
Arrears Act is what necessitated the
special examiners and the high-tech
filing system General Meigs designed for
the Pension Bureau.
It turned the Pension Bureau from a
small office into a surveillance state.
Because when the government is cutting a
thousand-dollar checks in 1880, they
suddenly care very much if a widow has
remarried or if a veteran's limp is
actually from a war wound.
Between 1879 and 1921, the US government
underwent a massive transformation on
how it handled veterans. This period saw
the pension system evolve from a
disability only program into what was
effectively the first national social
security and old age retirement system.
The big one though was the Dependent and
Disability Act of 1890. It shifted the
entire philosophy of veteran care.
Before 1890, you had to prove your
disability was caused by the war.
This act allowed any veteran who served
90 days
>> [music]
>> and was incapacitated for manual labor
to receive a pension, regardless of how
or when they were injured. It turned the
pension into a universal disability
benefit.
>> [music]
>> By 1893, nearly 1 million people were on
the rolls and the Pension Bureau was
spending over $100 million a year, the
largest single expense of the federal
government. As the Civil War generation
reached their 60s and 70s, it became
harder to distinguish between war
injuries and just getting old. So,
Congress passed the Act of February 6th,
[music] 1907. This act was the first to
use age as a qualifier.
If you were an honorably discharged
veteran of the Civil War or Mexican War
and reached [music] age 62, you were
automatically eligible for a pension.
This officially turned the veteran
benefit system into an old age pension.
It was the first time [music] the US
government provided a retirement check
based solely on age and service. The
Sherwood Act of 1812 [music] was a thank
you to the aging boys in blue. It
significantly increased the monthly
rates and made the age-based tiers even
more generous.
And that does it for chapter three. In
chapter four, we discover [music] a
woman who couldn't vote, but somehow
commanded the signatures of the nation's
most powerful men to design the
blueprint for what became the largest
[music] integrated health care system in
the world. Then fast forward to the
aftermath of World War I,
where wounded doughboys survived mustard
gas, only to find themselves trapped in
a bureaucratic shell game of red tape.
But that's next [music] time in chapter
four. And it's called "There are two Ds
in v e t [music] e r a n s b e n e f i t
s".
I'm Jonathan Kropfinger.
>> [music]
>> Bye for now.