Submind YouTube summaries
Thumbnail for Atheist Bet Hashim £1,000 Then Lost His Temper! Speakers Corner

Atheist Bet Hashim £1,000 Then Lost His Temper! Speakers Corner

Watch on YouTube

Video summary

The video features a heated debate at Speakers Corner where an atheist challenges the concept of good and evil by offering £1,000 for anyone who can define these terms as real entities rather than fictional concepts. The central argument presented is that words like "good" and "evil" are merely labels used to manipulate children into lying about their actions to avoid punishment, thereby damaging family relationships. The atheist claims that teaching a child that evil exists creates psychological illness by forcing them to practice deception from a young age until it becomes second nature, whereas acknowledging these concepts as non-existent encourages honesty and better parent-child dynamics. The discussion quickly devolves into semantic arguments regarding the definitions of health, drugs, and moral categories, with both parties accusing each other of playing word games or speaking out of ignorance. The atheist insists that while negative effects on health can be objectively measured using terms like "bad," subjective labels like "good" and "evil" lack objective reality because they cannot be quantified in the same way physical metrics can. Despite attempts to clarify whether hard drugs are inherently bad for one's health, the conversation circles back to the inability of either side to agree on a concrete definition that satisfies the other, highlighting the subjective nature of moral language versus objective scientific data. As the argument intensifies, interruptions and overlapping dialogue make it difficult for participants to finish their points without being immediately challenged or corrected by the opposing view. The atheist concludes the encounter by stating there is no point in continuing because he believes his interlocutor is engaging in mind games rather than addressing reality directly. Ultimately, the video ends with a mutual acknowledgment that while both sides hold firm opinions on whether moral absolutes exist, they are fundamentally stuck in a debate over semantics and definitions rather than reaching a shared understanding of truth or falsehood.
Read the full video transcript
I mean, because you had a sign there. It says, "Good and evil are not real. Change my mind, win 1,000 pounds." >> It's actually more than that, but I just put it up for the easy thing. But, yeah. >> Interesting, yeah. When you use these terms, >> Mhm. >> can you define them? >> No. >> So, why do you say they are not real then, if you can't define them? >> That's why. >> No, but look, I can define a unicorn. >> Yeah. >> And it's not real. At least I can define what I'm talking about. So, the terms you're using >> define those? >> No, no, but you're using the terms. So, that's why the onus is on you to tell me what it is. >> I'm using only the sound and spelling. I have no idea what they mean. >> No, but you said they are not real. >> Yeah, they exist, but they're not real. >> Hold on. If something exists, how is that not real? >> In fiction. >> Do you think fiction exists? >> Yeah. >> No. The reason it's called fiction is because it doesn't exist. >> No, it's reason called fiction is cuz it's not real. Still exists, cuz it's there. >> No. When you say exist, you mean in the real world? >> No. >> imagination? >> No, I just mean it exists in both. >> No, but the thing is, you know, you're talking about its existence or nonexistence. >> I use then? >> No, no, you can use those terms. I'm not telling you not to use those terms. But, I'm asking you, when you're making a positive claim that they don't exist, >> Yes. >> then it's the onus is on you to first tell me what doesn't exist. >> Good and evil, the words. >> And what are they? >> I don't know. They don't exist. >> What we >> My whole point is they don't exist if I don't know what they are. Does that make sense to everybody? >> Okay. >> Do you If If I said to you, "What's a huganun?" A huganun. >> What's that? >> Yeah. >> He just made it up. >> made it [laughter] up. The same as they're just I'll tell you what, then I'll do this one. I got an idea. I think I know what you're asking me now. I've just been a little confused. To me, good and evil are fictional words that have no meaning whatsoever. They're just designed to make a child believe that they either good or bad, so they will lie to their parents and not tell them the truth cuz they don't want to get in trouble, and therefore destroy the family. >> Okay, do you believe in good and bad, if not good and evil? >> No, I don't >> You You believe in good and bad, either? >> I I think they're connotations to and should be objective words should be used for coherence. When you use good and evil, I don't really know >> a category, you know? Look, there are obviously within that category. For example, >> Negative and positive >> I'll give you an example. Uh hard drugs, are they good or bad? >> No, they're hard drugs. >> No, but are they good or bad for you? >> what those words mean. You're using them, define them. >> Yeah, yeah. So, hard drugs means uh in in the sense that they >> No, no hard drugs are you said are they good or bad? Define those words. >> So, when you take cocaine, for example, is that good for you? Is that bad? >> You know how you asked me to define those cuz I used them. >> Yeah. >> I did. Now, you're using them. You define them. >> No, no, but you So, you asked me to do it. >> I'm asking you >> Okay, so which word do you want me to define? >> Good. >> Good. Okay, in this case, >> No, just good in in >> Hold on. In this case, I was asking about cocaine, which is not good. >> No, no, no, no, cocaine is just good. >> It's bad. >> No, not to me, it's not. >> Okay, do you know what cocaine is, right? Okay, when when somebody takes them, is it good for the health or bad for the health? >> If you mean it's a negative for the health. >> Bad for the health or good for the health? >> It's negative for the health. >> Good for the health or bad for the health? >> I I don't use those words. >> [laughter] >> I don't >> But they're in the vocabulary, then, the English vocabulary, these words. >> In the English vocabulary, it means evil is something that is >> I didn't use the word evil. I said good or bad. Stick to the >> All right, but I don't know what they mean. >> Okay, is there anything bad for your health? >> No. >> So, you >> ill They are >> Are you a doctor, by the way? Are you Are you a doctor? >> No. >> How do you know if something is good or bad for your health? >> I don't know. >> So, you could take something that might be bad for your health, but you are ignorant about it. >> know what the word bad means. I don't know what it means. >> Oh, I see. So, you don't know what's good health? >> Are you sure the doctor know what it means? No. No one's ever defined it for me. If I asked you what the word There you go. If I asked all you guys to define the word good, would you all come up with the same definition? >> It depends in what context. It depends in which context you talk about. >> Ah, then if it's in context, then it's not objectively real. >> Okay. You're speaking with ignorance. >> Well, I think you're the I think have >> No, no, no. Hold on. >> I tell you what, right? My I have six children. I told the first five good and evil. They wouldn't tell me things when they did wrong cuz they thought they were evil or bad, and so they lied to me. And now I don't have a relationship with them in the same way. My My sixth son, I now tell him evil doesn't exist, but you never know it. You just make mistakes. Daddy will help you. Now he doesn't lie to me, and we have a wonderful relationship. >> So, do you actually >> no. Is that a true statement? Does that happen? I lied to my parents cuz they told me I was naughty. And I didn't want to get caught. >> I believe how we >> No, no, no. Either that what I said is true or not. >> I believe how we can affect what we believe. >> I didn't ask that. I said >> Ho- Hold on. >> When you were a kid and your parents told you were naughty. >> I agree with I agree with him when it's uh it's uh uh >> Thank you. There you go. >> But I'll tell you why. I believe >> Come here. Come here. So So we can hear you. Cuz the mics won't pick up what what are you saying? Okay. You know he said something about he has no relationship with his kids because they lied to him. >> No, I said I have a poor relationship with the kids because they don't tell me the truth. They go here and they don't >> You You use the term lie. >> Yeah. >> Okay. Is that good or bad? >> It's just a lie. >> Do you What do you Would you want your kids to lie or would you not? >> No, I wouldn't want them to lie. >> Why? >> Because it creates incoherence and creates illnesses. >> No, no. When you say incoherence means what? Give an example. >> It means if they If I want to help them, but they lie to me, I can't help them. >> Okay. So >> Cuz I'll give them the wrong advice. I'll give them the wrong help because they didn't trust me because I told them evil was real and they didn't want to be seen as evil. So, what we do is we put a psychological illness in a child. It tells them, "I've got to lie now." Now, if you practice lying as a child because you don't understand, but you do you told evil for 6 7 years, what does practice make? Perfect. So, that child now >> is very good at lying. Yeah. >> with good and evil and will constantly lie to me. But if I tell my child it's not real, there's only illness and there's miseducation. >> No, no, but you tell them not to lie because you're saying it it makes things incoherent. >> Yes. >> Okay. So, you would tell them not to lie. Basically, you discourage them to do that. Okay. Is there anything else you discourage them other than lying? >> It's the only thing I need to discourage. >> Really? Okay, how about drugs? Do you encourage or discourage them? You You understood the term discourage? >> I would just tell them all about it and then they make decisions. >> No, but would you would you actually discourage them >> As a >> about it or not? Yeah. Bro, I can't You know the mics won't pick up anything you're saying. It's okay, you can come here if you don't want to be in the camera. So, I just want your audio to be picked up. Yeah. No, no, no, but but hold on. Drugs, you don't need to be a religious person. Like this man here, he said he told them about the drugs. >> Yeah. >> What did you tell them exactly? >> I said drugs have a negative effect on your psyche, they have negative effect on reality, and taking them at a certain point for the incorrect reasons can damage you. Without education, drugs can do irreparable damage. >> Good, which is bad, right? >> No, it's just that. >> So, it's all about semantics at the end of the day for with this gentleman, unfortunately. I'll let you speak, let me finish my point, please. With all due respect. >> So, you're saying something about me. >> You can You can respond to that, of course. I'm not saying >> Why why say this is not true in the first place? >> if it's not true, you you correct it. Let me finish and then you can correct me. >> Why can't Why finish something I've already told him is not true? >> I haven't finished my statement. So, you need to let me finish and then correct me. >> Again, the statement is why would you want to finish something I've already told you is started untrue? Should you be not saying I would like to correct this? I shouldn't say what I think. >> No, no, you have your opinion, I have mine. Let's respect the opinions. >> You said I, you're talking about my opinion. >> I said this is semantics. What are you What are you saying? >> Because you semantics >> You use terms like discourage, he used terms like incoherent. You know what he's doing? He's just replacing the words good and evil, okay, like with with words with other words from the dictionary. >> Okay. >> Because the Because the term the term good and evil exists in the dictionary, just like the term incoherent, something you discourage, all these things exist. So, at the end of the day, it is just semantics. But anyway, I think I think you have made Make your mind, so if you're if you're not if not in good relationship with six of your children >> No, I >> then that must be some real problem. >> Sorry, when you said good and evil and he said you can't >> What What does the term healthy mean? >> I can't hear you cuz he keeps talking over you. >> Yeah, but I think as well listening. >> Yeah. >> I do believe >> I I spoke two words and you interrupted me earlier. >> I can't hear what you're saying, buddy. >> I think you're playing with words. >> Yeah. >> Yeah, I think you're playing with words because good is playing with >> It's called semantics. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Another Another word in the Sorry. >> You know, even saying it goes in a good thing. >> Yeah. You know, this gentleman might have his heart in the right place, but I don't know why Why play semantics when you probably mean the same thing? >> know Do you know why? Because negative and positive can be measured. Good and evil can't. >> Yeah, but you're To me what it is, you're you're just finding different words to use. >> Yeah, I'm finding Yeah. >> I think you're speaking out of ignorance. >> Hold on. Hold on. When I ask When I ask, is it bad for your health? That can be measured. If something is good for your health or bad bad for your health, it can be measured. So, what you just said >> I'll wait until you give me a moment to >> Yeah. Yeah, sure. >> I can't speak if you both keep interrupting me. >> So, so good and good health and bad health can can be noticed. It can It's objective. Can be measured. Maybe >> Good with it. >> You don't need to be a doctor in order to know that. No, I said good health and bad health can be measured. Do you agree? >> No, um health can be measured. >> Health >> Yeah. >> So, what? >> Good and bad would be the measure. >> No, no, no. Can the report be >> Health would be the thing that's measured. >> Can Can the report >> Let me go through it with you then. If good If you're >> I I think I'm going to end this discussion. There's no point, honestly. >> You know what? >> What's the opposite of good? >> Bad. >> All right. And so, if good is on one side of the coin and bad is on the other side of the coin, what's the coin? >> Something. >> What? >> It >> This is called word games. >> What I'm saying is >> It's silly word games. >> You can't have good without people. >> When you have your medical report, it will either be in your favor which is good or it'll be against you which is bad. Anyway, I'm I'm going to end this discussion to us because this is a semantics at the end of the day. It's It's not So, I'm not surprised your your kids broke up your relationship. >> No, no. >> Your own kids are not not in a relationship. with you because it's okay. It's mind games. What is he guys is what happened >> Thanks guys. >> If I see you guys, I would never call any of you evil. Because you're not. >> There's no point having this discussion. >> Do you believe you can be evil? >> Yeah, exactly. It's semantics. I don't want to play this mind game. >> There's no such questions.