Video summary
The panel discussion on artistic autonomy in the Balkans explores how political pressure, economic instability, and regional inequalities are eroding creative freedom through both overt repression and subtle forms of censorship. While direct imprisonment remains a threat in some nations, artists increasingly face hidden constraints such as restricted grant access, government interference in cultural institutions, social media hate campaigns, and economic shrinkage that forces them into self-censorship. Experts note that even in democracies, commercial funding can introduce limitations compared to independent festivals, making it difficult to monitor the gradual loss of independence. The conversation underscores that artistic freedom is not an inherent right but requires active struggle, legal protection, and a shift away from a "victim psychology" toward becoming fighters who mobilize public opinion without relying solely on external financial support.
International dynamics further complicate the landscape for Balkan artists, as global stereotypes regarding conflict and nationalism often shape how their work is received, sometimes turning labels into self-fulfilling prophecies. Although post-9/11 narratives have attempted to humanize these regions beyond Cold War victimhood, historical rhetoric and romanticized views continue to fuel misunderstanding. The dialogue contrasts the "arm's length" funding models of countries like Norway and Sweden with the practical need for local self-determination, highlighting issues such as North Macedonia's name change under international pressure despite its non-member status. Furthermore, the panel addressed the problematic legacy of communist-era collaborators still active today and debated the boundaries of free expression versus violence, concluding that depictions involving children in armed contexts often cross into harmful territory rather than constituting legitimate artistic freedom.
Despite the gap between international human rights conventions and reality, where moral declarations frequently lack enforcement power, there are notable legal advancements in Europe that offer models for protection. Initiatives in France regarding dissemination laws, Portugal's whistleblowing channels, Spain's cultural rights plans, and Malta's satire protections demonstrate how specific legislation can defend artistic integrity against rising authoritarianism. To combat misinformation, superficial intelligence on social media, and right-wing complaints against restrictions, the speakers proposed concrete solidarity actions including documenting censorship globally, supporting resistance projects like the 200-theater-maker protest in Europe, and integrating modules on artistic freedom into university curricula. These efforts aim to foster genuine engagement rather than allowing hierarchies to exclude certain regions or voices, linking mobility justice directly to the preservation of autonomous art.
Ultimately, the session concluded with a call for civil society to recognize its own complicity in the erosion of democratic ideals and to actively defend freedom of expression against complacency in both the West and the Balkans. Drawing inspiration from historical figures like Hemingway and Orwell who took responsibility during crises, the speakers emphasized resilience, citing the example of library staff reading amidst bombed ruins in London as a symbol of enduring spirit. While war is horrific, it is often glamorized, necessitating that civil society convey its true cost to prevent future conflicts. The discussion reinforced the necessity of international cooperation against exclusionary hierarchies and ended with an invitation for continued dialogue at the MC Youth Virtual Center, urging artists and activists to move beyond complaining and instead act as defenders of cultural rights in an increasingly precarious world.
Read the full video transcript
and then we will open the floor and
hopefully we will see you if you will uh
will uh want to uh join the conversation
hopefully. Uh and uh yeah so um I guess
that uh the keynote by Mariana
made a great uh introduction to the
topic of mobility justice and uh uh so
so really uh great kickoff, great
starting point for us. Uh so we all
understand that mobility is not just
about travel, about visas, about uh uh
funding, about invitations or uh yeah
logistics. It's uh mobility is a lot
about power uh and it's about who can be
present uh who is allowed to speak, who
is allowed to uh cross borders safely
and uh whose artistic voice can
circulate without fear of uh censorship
or punishment and uh but today's focus
here is on the Balkans and uh uh we will
look at the connection between their
freedom and freedom of movement.
>> I know it's not your job.
>> Okay. Uh and uh so we will discuss how
political pressure that were already
mentioned in the keynote, economic
pecarity and regional inequalities shape
artistic autonomy. Uh and what happens
when artists and cultural workers
actually cannot move uh cannot
cooperate, cannot speak freely. uh and
uh obviously I think it's clear for for
all of us uh even uh from outside the
sector that the question is urgent and
very concrete. [clears throat]
Uh so we heard and we know and maybe we
even have our own uh personal experience
about the the current situation across
the region. Uh and I guess it's not only
happening in Serbia, it's happening in
different forms even in Slovenia which
is a EU member state and and maybe we
see a future that similar situation will
occur even uh more uh often. Uh so um we
see that uh restrictions affect not only
individual artists and culture works
workers they also weaken crossber
cooperation and we heard in the keynote
that uh uh we in order uh for for
cooperation uh should be a process and
for a process we need time and space and
uh uh in order to make it happen we need
uh resources and support Uh so in order
to practice the solidarity that uh was
mentioned, we need support on different
levels and uh so I'm glad that uh I'm
joined by uh two great uh experts,
outstanding speakers. Uh I have here
Sara Wyatt from uh who is a research
director at Free Muse, a very well-known
international organization working on
artistic freedom. Uh Sara has previously
headed Pen International
um um the freedom of expression program
at Pen International and she has uh
contributed her expertise uh to many
organizations working in the field of
artistic uh freedom and she's also
member of the expert facility of the
2005 UNESCO convention on the protection
and uh promotion of the diversity of
cultural expression. depression uh and
she is also expert in the council of
Europe so-called free to create creative
free initiative maybe she will tell us
more later and then harsh
is I think an institution in the region
uh like
>> 20 words here star institution
>> yeah I mean yeah that that's the fact so
he's like for those who don't know him
as an institution. He's theater and film
director and the director of SO
festival. His uh theater production have
been presented all over the world. uh
and he created the very famous SO red
line uh a public installation of
11,54100
chairs uh uh in central SO commemorating
per all the persons killed during the
siege. He had he also founded the faro
film festival back in 93 and he directed
international theater festival memo
he's artistic director of the east west
center and also professor of directing
at the so academy of performing arts and
currently uh also very much involved in
European festival association as chair
of the jury of so-called ea which stands
for European festival fund for emerging
uh artists. Okay. So let's start. I'm I
will start with you.
So um actually free news uh is not
focusing on living in specific media
right uh but uh we understand you know
that uh um artistic freedom uh gives us
uh a broader lens uh a broader lens for
understanding why actually matters and
uh from your work can you share with us
Um
how you see what is the current state of
artistic freedom globally or maybe you
know what are uh the main patterns
patterns of uh repression that you are
observing or maybe what are uh some less
visible uh forms of oppression and uh so
a big question but easier to answer
easier to answer because um free News
has just published its annual global
report of attacks on artistic freedom
around the world. Um, free news was
founded in 1998 and as its title
suggests mainly for musicians but after
a few years it expanded its u its
monitoring of attacks on uh all art
forms. um and it's based in uh in
Copenhagen and I myself am based in
London and we have a small team of uh
researchers covering most of the world
not all of the world and we react to and
we document we document uh cases of
artists and by artists we mean everybody
including cultural workers and even
really going to the edges let's say of
what we see as cultural expression we
work for people who have been victimized
because of their dress um because of um
because of other works that they do
which might not be seen specifically as
art forms which is actually very much
interesting. And the attacks we see come
from everywhere. Of course, from
governments, but also from
non-governmental organizations and
increasingly um uh individuals and what
we're calling nets, people who don't
really belong in any particular country,
but through social media attack and
vilify um art.
Um,
globally
the situation is
I hesitate to say worsening
but becoming more complex.
We have when I first started out working
in human rights back in the 1980s the
type of attacks were um against artists
and writers and arts were quite
straightforward.
somebody would write a piece about that
denigrating a president, they would be
brought before the courts and imprisoned
or directly attacked. We're seeing less
of that. There are certain countries
such as Iran, uh Cuba, China, and closer
to Turkey, where we are still seeing um
arrests and long-term trials of artists
and culture workers.
But what we're seeing actually what
we're seeing more is a pattern of um
other forms of
I hesitate to say subtle but hidden
forms of censorship less recognizable
forms of censorship.
A little while ago I was asked by the
Council of Europe to write a report on
the state of artistic freedom in Europe.
And my first response were, you know, if
I write that report, it will look very
familiar to what we've written year
after year. It would be the usual
countries if it be Turkey within mass
arrest and detention. It' be countries
like Poland and Hungary. I'm talking
about uh 2020 [clears throat] here. What
I'm really interested in is what I'm
hearing from artists and culture workers
about the other forms including in
democracies.
And I'm very grateful to the council of
Europe for allowing me to extend my
research beyond the obvious. So my first
report which was published I think in
2022
23 was based on um largely on a closed
discussion
in Lupa
of artists and cultural workers in
anonymity for countries including not
just Hungary, Poland, Turkey but also
Belgium and Norway and the UK and
Ireland. And you began to see a pattern
of well, you know, I'm having difficulty
in getting access to grants to fund or
the conditions that are being applied to
me in order for me to be able to access
the grants. For instance, are um
are becoming more more difficult.
There was talk about increasing control
of cultural institutions, museum, grant
making bodies, by government bodies,
placing friends of governments within
the the bodies. This allowing certain
kinds of uh artworks and topics um to be
to be covered. And also on top of that
there was the um the impact of social
media and hate campaigns and how that
would make a person hesitate before they
might do a certain kind of work or
certain kind of of um of uh criticism or
critical work. And uh finally and not
least the economy.
and the economy has shrunk, artists are
less likely to take the kind of risks
that they might do that might cause them
problems with funding institutions with
being able to perform their their their
pieces on on a particular stage.
It's become a more complex environment
than when I started out in the 1980s and
1990s.
So well I have to start there as well
but I know that the Hugh Harrows have
got a lot more experience working under
a long period of uh of of repression
from the youth day under conflict which
of course other artists are living on
under the moment and the present day
subtleties not quite the word. I don't
know going to hand to you
may maybe just one additional question
before we we move to Harris because
actually already tackled the topic of
self censorship you know like you know
receiving less resources means that you
really think twice what you say how you
say it. So can you maybe like elaborate
a bit more on this self censorship and
like can can mobility or the possibility
of mobility uh reduce self censorship?
Can you think if how this can be
connected?
Self censorship is very hard to identify
and to monitor. Many people will not
even admit to self censorship. Sometimes
it's difficult to know when this is
selfcensorship. I was talking to
filmmakers last week where we raised the
question of is this self censorship or
is this pragmatism. So it's very very
hard um to know. Um I have heard that um
being able to participate in um
independent um festivals and venues you
have more freedom.
Um but [clears throat] uh I've also
heard and I I often refer to global uh
issues. I was also in Malaysia a couple
of weeks ago and a film festival
producer was saying that when his his
festival was completely independent of
commercial funding he had absolute
freedom. But when he introduced a
commercial fund that's where the
censorship came from the funer didn't
come from paint it came from the fun
being concerned for whatever it was you
know their own their own status there as
well.
So yeah, being able to move out and to
participate in other um venues, but
I wonder about the repercussions. Again,
we've got social media, somebody says
something in another country abroad is
going to backlash and it's that backlash
that governments particularly right-wing
governments will pick on pick up on no
matter where it comes from, no matter
where you said or did whatever. So, as
you said earlier, I'm not an expert on
um on on freedom of movement, but I
would imagine that an artist who's
concerned about what they're saying at
home is going to be concerned about what
they're saying abroad because it will be
relayed back.
>> Thanks, S. Okay. So, uh uh Harris uh let
me bring you here uh in the uh the
topic. So when you listen to Sar's
overview uh of repression and like
censored the self censorship uh what
resonates with the realities you think
in this region in the Balkans you know
uh are there any specific forms of uh
repression in the re region that are
maybe less visible to international you
know uh audiences or you
First, thank you for the introduction
that is generous. Thank you very much.
Also, thanks to guys for the team, you
know, we were you see, you know, if you
are if you're strong enough, you know,
people here uh and thank you for for
choosing this this uh uh panel for to to
hopefully take part in. We hope you
will. Um so uh we had yesterday S and I
we shared the taxi from from the airport
and had a very very lively discussion
you know I wish we could repeat it you
know uh because we didn't agree mostly
about anything on the basis on the basis
that we do agree on the basic practice
you know that we do respect
uh not only necessity but the deep um um
principle to uh artistic freedom and uh
everywhere in the province or elsewhere.
So um but I I believe that uh we have
somehow to remind ourselves all the time
that we live in the midst of a massive
massive revolution.
It's so big that sometimes we can't even
really perceive it how how big it is.
You know everything changes you know it
is political revolution with the wars
that usually the revolutions you know
bring with with it change it is economic
uh revolution it's technological
revolution um and this will not um be
without consequences for for the artists
and for civil society. So talking about
artistic freedom, I believe that we need
to reconsider and I find that these
conferences one of the places to
reconsider and redefine what is artistic
freedom and what is it for. Uh because
artistic freedom is not something that
we should take for granted. You know it
will be a little bit spoiled by
very nice consideration by the European
Union of the artistic freedom of Egypt
and generally you know by the 20th
century but artistic freedom is more
than invention you know it is invention
uh of the 20th century because for the
most part the artists were not free to
speak and there was no freedom of
speaking.
So in today's world when you have the
president of one of the biggest probably
the the biggest and the strongest power
in the world uh says to the pope which
is the figure of a greatest authority
shut up you actually don't know enough
about Christianity to speak about
which I don't as you know I don't make
any sure I mean that's what he said
when the pope is has to struggle for his
voice
then I think we have to struggle
uh better than we do.
So the the the long very long history of
uh uh the the the banning of people
speaking of such we can say in the
second commandment 4 years 4,000 years
ago as you know you must not reason to
take the images and to like them
something that we in would not agree
today about you
So uh then we had to wait for 2,000
years quite a span
for the first reform of this amendment
when Jesus said um now the second
amendment actually is bloodline
still this beautiful after all these
years. So uh uh in many parts of the
world. So uh and then another
780 years before um Nissan Council in
which actually
the painting of the images of God in
this case but images in general uh were
allowed.
But then another 50 years of struggle
against it before [clears throat] it
started it became the history of arts in
in in the in the in in in the 20th
century mostly Europe was in other other
contexts. So we see that the history of
this banning and then later we have
remember [clears throat] Marqueis the
sad was for 40 years in the in the
prisons and and the um psychiatric
clinics because of he wrote the books
or yeah he was banned because he wrote
the comedies and you know we can we can
list a lot lot of of artists who were
banned, censored and suppressed in their
music expression. Only from the Wan
Republic uh in 195 constitution in 1990
we started to uh understand when I say
we as the civilization of human race you
know started to to to to believe that we
have to put this in the documents.
But then the first attempt obviously was
a big failure because right legally we
stated at least about autistic freedom
freedom we had someone who used this
artistic
freedom to become Hitler. Uh so you know
we we we see that it is a very very long
and complex struggle. You know, until
today, most of the countries in Europe
don't have uh in the laws anything
concerning artistic freedom. France is
the big and wonderful exception that
with the law from 2006
in which artistic freedom has been
protected by the law.
So talking about the action that
Norman said in in the beginning I think
you know that one of the actions and uh
actually uh um some people uh led by
Mila who was mentioned today he's the
director of winner festival um uh he he
he leads the action uh for your first
European um act of freedom of speech
which would be the beginning you know
and the great step of the European Union
to put
in laws the principles that uh at the
moment European Union operates on
because we don't know if these
principles will survive if they are not
part of the documents of the laws of
European Union it seems impossible to to
say okay it's impossible to think that
these kind of things will not survive.
No, it's possible. Now we see it is
possible. Everything is possible. It's
possible to change to say okay if you
don't give me this I will put you the
tariffs and then you will you will you
will die
and so we see that you know that the
things are very very different. So um
now than than even few years ago
we shouldn't take take for granted that
the civil society will survive.
We have to make it important to survive
because we do believe and we request
very proudly uh the fund public funds
mostly from European Union or uh our uh
national
governments or in some cases some
private foundations mostly American
foundations sometimes interestingly in
the film industry
from the Dha Foundation which is the
foundation of a dictator.
So we are a bit desperate now with these
about this at the same time we say we
have right for this at the same time we
say we are the victims.
So we more or less for those who make
decision uh for those who produce these
funds and for those who have power to
distribute them we are uh uh we emanate
everything what they don't like. So they
don't like the victims they don't like
those who claim some rights or something
you know and we are largely
unproductive. We don't produce drugs. We
don't produce banks. We don't produce
anything useful in this world according
to these people. So you know we have to
prove
that we
we are needed.
We are lucky to live in Europe. And
although we live in Balkans in the
Balkans is a kind of special case of
Europe but still you know close enough
to the European Union or at least part
of the balance is in the European Union
already and European Union with all the
problems.
You see, I censored myself. I wanted to
say something with me, but you know, I'm
super nice. So um European Union um is
still
the paramount of human rights
and this is said
right now by the survivor or genocide in
the pros that I survived despite the
fact that European Union didn't act on
time to prevent it.
So this is pretty much hard European
believer that is speaking right now
because I believe that European Union
didn't that Europe didn't start with
with European Union that uh Europe
started much much earlier
with its humanistic
democratic
principles and before all as a
as the as the credle and source of art
civilization
and uh dreams
of a better future.
>> Thank you.
It's a huge challenge that you are
offering to us. is you're saying that
you know the culture sector should be
stronger than the pope himself and uh so
and still uh like uh uh you also uh
shared with us that there is support
needed on different levels like even on
the legislative level uh European uh uh
can you so actually you think that uh we
need legal base that would offer some
kind of support
uh and also financial you know but it's
like everything is limited and do you
have any you know wild imagination and
imagination idea on how this can be done
we have we have heard in the keynote you
know about this uh uh solidarity in
practice but still we even in Serbia you
know it's a huge movement but it's still
ongoing you know we we thought that
after a few months something will change
you And it's so difficult for ordinary
artistic practitioners to you know uh
living in this precarious condition to
really continue the fight if I may say
you know so you know how how you imagine
this uh support system you know this uh
that would enable you know that we
secure these values we all believe in
>> I [clears throat] don't know if if our
distinguished speaker of our keynote is
here in front of me. I don't see her
because
I don't know if I qualify by her words
because she said that everything was
wrong with the old white men were
around.
So um well I don't agree I mean I do
agree with some but with some white all
white men you know that they shouldn't
be around but also you know I think
there were quite a few in the history
that carried the torch of democracy
human rights and feminism.
So um we
the financial sources are not the main
thing.
This this is something that probably is
very much dis disputeable part.
But again looking through the history
and the recent history including the
siege that you mentioned sort
there uh we uh we can produce art and we
can speak without much of uh financial
I don't say that we don't need it we do
need it you know but it is not like a
precondition you know to to to work and
to
Um
we the laws would be good
that would be helpful but we have the
treasure
which even the politicians
are envious about.
We have our voices. We have talent. We
have ability to articulate meaning in
our local communities on a global stage.
Uh in exchange
uh we can perform on the street. We can
play you know in front of the
government. You know, I was very very
happy, you know, to to see yesterday in
in in front of the Bosnian government in
S uh there was a performance about uh
about uh forests [snorts]
which is very surprising for me you know
I I don't expect you know such a nice
nice thing you know to happen these
days. Uh but it did it did happen and
you see it two or three uh guys made a
nice performance on a small carpet. I
saw the picture in front of of the
government and today I'm speaking to the
international audience about it.
So uh we do have this fantastic power
and I think that to engage this power to
have I mean first of all the civil
society has to quit with the victims
psychology
I mean okay we are they are against us
they don't give us peace they don't they
should come
That's not we are not uh at the
psychotherapy.
We are in the world which is very cruel
in the world that is like a jungle. We
have to survive and you will not survive
if we go around and complain that we are
not treated appropriately.
So
I think you know this what what uh
Abraham Lincoln said in his famous uh
get address you know but he said maybe
we will not be uh remembered by what we
said.
So we'll be paying attention little
attention will be paid to what we send
but we will what counts it's what we do.
So I think that the civil civil society
has to act very quickly
to move from this um jeopardized
uh victims
to
fighters who use
their wonderful opportunities, their
wonderful talents, their wonderful ideas
and to brave the storm and to bring some
errors to this struggle
and stop complaining.
You've given me so many um um uh ideas
there and actually yes uh resistance
rarely needs money. It usually comes
from from my many years of watching it a
group of people coming up and saying
this is wrong stage of performance stage
of protest. maybe where funding comes in
a bit later with when people need to
start documenting or hiring people to do
the the advocacy work. And yes, artist
and cultural workers are in an
exceptionally strong position. And I
know having worked with academics,
having worked with media people that
you have far more reach than those
groups. you have a lot more uh
connection with the public. You can get
your message across in ways that
academics certainly can't for people who
um don't engage with that kind of
language. Even journalists and
journalisms don't reach out to
everybody. Um, and that's why it was a
kind you can put up protests and
prestige performances shouldn't grab the
public imagination in a way that a
newspaper article or certainly an
academic paper and certainly a legal
text does not do. So yes, you have a
particular strength and I quite agree. I
don't think sometime that the um arts
and cultural sectors really understand
that
and um
it you were probably wondering what our
argument was about in the taxi
where it came from was that um I was
talking about my many many years of
having worked in uh in human rights
starting out in 1980
uh when I worked at a documentary film
company which then which focused on
human rights. ites and the malpractices
of uh international uh organ um
companies in the Philippines misselling
drugs um etc. And then I moved on to
Amnesty International and I for some
reason found myself in their Asia
department and the first thing I was
confronted with and we're talking 1984
were the photographs of the hundreds of
thousands of the victims of killing
field and like a lot of fascism fascists
authoritarian organization they
chronicled every single one of them. So
it was a photograph of every person that
was subsequently killed.
We were dealing with the Philippines on
the market regime and one of the people
that we filmed uh in my previous job was
shot dead for calling for clean water
essentially.
My main focus was on North and South
Korea. North Korea haven't changed very
much over time, but when I was working
in the 1980s, thousands of people were
being arrested, protested on the
streets.
Now, in Cambodia, in the Philippines,
and especially South Korea,
they're not perfect, but they are sort
of democracies. And in each of those,
there wasn't a violent revolution. It
was, "We've had enough." It's the public
sitting down and saying, "That is it."
I think your response to that was,
"We've all Cold War times." And things
have changed since then. [clears throat]
We're now seeing the west is the one
where we are seeing the erosion of
democracy and I think that you're quite
that you're quite right there.
Now going back again to the uh universal
declaration on human rights and the
other treaties that came out of just
before the second world war and were
elaborated on and extended afterwards.
Um my focus have been on article 90
which is the one that guarantees freedom
of expression.
Um
right from the start the universal
declaration itself quite simple. The
covenant which is the document that
states sign on to their commitment gets
a bit more complicated. So if you look
at article 19 there you have point one
everyone freedom gr of expression. it
doesn't mention in the arts and in any
any any media and uh article two further
to that what we as human rights people
tend to sort of push behind us is point
three which is the exceptions.
So even though a state if asking is uh
committing to freedom of expression,
artistic expression, whatever,
that same article allows for some kind
of restraints on things like uh on
public safety, on um uh defamation and
and others. It's never been perfect.
Virtually every state in the world has
in its constitution or whatever
protection of freedom of expression.
I was working on countries which have
said torture is illegal and they were
happily tortured
for whatever excuse. But that does not
make me feel that this is the useless
piece of of of legislation. It actually
strengthens for me. when you go back to
the eur the the European declaration on
human rights
uh that is the the foundation for the
European court on human rights which is
really very interesting um in that it's
uh it takes a long time it's very
bureaucratic it can half kill you going
through it can take seven years
um but if the the judgment sit on the
cases really really consider every
aspect of
They will look at is this really um
preach artist of freedom of expression.
If it's a case they of
look at the right to a person uh right
to religious belief is this is this a
breach of rel religious belief etc. And
you really get a really good and
informed
debate on a particular artwork.
Um there are many sort of interesting
stories you know detail that I found
really very useful. So final.
>> And the final thing of course is funders
are also um directly or indirectly uh
censorship. Um they will make demands of
the grants that make the uh recipients
um maybe
change their focus or include pieces and
that the instrumentalization is of of
arts which I mentioned earlier. Um and
in some in other reports that I have
been involved in for the Council of
Europe for EPA, we really explored that
as well. These good nature nice usually
Scandinavian uh funders insisting on
certain kind of elements to be in the
grants and then not even touch the
bureaucracy. I mean that is another way
that you can exclude people who may not
have the uh capacity or the will to go
through all the many many hoops to order
to get funding.
Thanks. Actually, you answered my next
question because I wanted you to share
with us your involvement with the UNESCO
2005 uh convention framework and uh
actually asking you about uh the gap
between the language of such
international conventions and the live
reality of partying. So actually you you
said there is a gap but you know like uh
so so again like there there is a need
to have these legal frameworks that
would like uh be a kind of a safety net
for at least the minimum standard so to
say to preserve the the democracy the
freedom of expression and so so forth.
But yeah, still there is a gap and is
there how we can uh you know uh go
beyond this gap you know do you have any
like additional insight from your
practice or experience and currently
I thought you reach your point I started
really focusing on artistic freedom
beyond freedom of expression uh 10 12
years ago and then people said it's an
issue there aren't that many artists in
prison women which sort of really does
not take into account all the other
forms of censorship.
Um I've been a bit taken aback um by the
success of the message and I think
success in quote because now artistic
freedom is being cited by governments
around the world. what I said in the
UNESCO meeting every bar government bar
China uh said that they respected
artistic freedom
a lot of talk about
where is the action I'm now reaching to
the point of saying okay we need to do
something it was mentioned earlier the
European act for freedom uh artistic
freedom which is a group of uh artists
and cultural organizations I'm working
on putting together um and this will
take a long trying to get through EU
mechanisms. But I just tell one quick
story uh is that about a month ago my my
the Africa researcher in free free news
happened to be in a meeting in uh at
Zalaba and she was approached by the uh
special reporter on free expression for
the African Union.
And uh this woman said to Lisa, "Um, if
you can write me up a resolution on
protecting artistic freedom in the next
over the weekend, I can put it to the
African Union on Monday
because we had the text there because we
know we do have a model. Lisa and a
couple of other African um uh arts uh
lawyers
had very quickly put it together, handed
it to the representative the following
Monday and it was approved. We don't
have that in Europe. I certainly
wouldn't take that be that quick. Okay,
this is not a binding document. But
what's moving on from there and I think
we can also do that in Europe is the
same group of um of uh arts activists
for one of a better word are now putting
together what they call a model law on
artistic freedom. is a law you know that
could be should be adopted by states and
because the next thing when you get nice
friendly states come to you they say
well what do we need to do we can have a
model law it works in Africa it'll work
in Southeast Asia it'll work in Europe
it's all the same basic principles maybe
tweak here and there but very very
little and we've already got interest I
think it's from the Malawian government
to look at so we are seeing oddly enough
a kind of movement within uh Africa
which is um
almost uh
moving forward faster than it is in
Europe.
Although I mean I do have some examples
and I can do that later of some good
initiatives by various states in Europe
because France is top of the league as
you mentioned but there are also some
other very good ones as well and I can
save that for later.
>> Harris can you add something maybe from
the this region's perspective? No
censorship.
>> Uh no censorship but also you know about
this gap between like because you
yourself mentioned that you know we need
this legal placement that there is a
legal base but you know the the reality
is far away and you know how we can
bring those you know uh theory and
practice closer together for theory and
reality.
>> Yeah. in order to to answer this, you
know, I will still jump a little bit out
of the region because we are so
interconnected and uh and I will give
you the example that everybody is uh u
familiar uh so uh my heart is bleeding
and I'm sure that all of our hearts are
bleeding for the artists who were
executed
executed in uh Iran by their young
people
Uh and uh we don't know even how many
you know
uh and we saw for year two years you
know thousands of people on the streets
including men you know women young women
other women you know all women um
struggling and risking in their lives
you know uh for for freedom and
uh their voices
uh the is democracy in the world
uh used before
pretext which was fake. We know now to
go to defend democracy and then they
invaded Iraq on the pretext to defend
democracy. They invaded white you know
to defend democracy but they needed some
at least some explanation why they went
there. After that we never knew anything
about the state of democracy in Iran.
Now they didn't need any critics.
They went to bomb Iran not because to
defend democracy to refer in any way to
these thousands of these uh killed
people or arrested people you know uh
but rather they go and say we go there
because we want you to do this about the
oil about power and so on you know so
this is this change that I'm talking
about we make the moral laws
unfortunately [clears throat]
doesn't work anymore in the in the world
of the real power.
So the declaration is nice, but since
it's not biting, even if it's biting,
who cares? But if it's not biting, so
it's like a like a nice menu from from
the candy store, you know. So um uh we
have to to
invest our lives. I'm not asking less of
you.
uh Schiller said in one of his plays he
said you can't get life unless you
invest your life for the cause
we do that and I'm saying I'm not
preaching
I was practicing this
I came back from Amsterdam to the
besieged s
and I joined my colleagues who were
already doing some some some some works
in art uh uh in 1992
and we worked together with few
international
people like SA
join few who came from Muslim Americans
who came you know to join us in this in
this struggle on this in this way on
this part we could have been killed
every second
24 hours a day for 4 years.
A friend of mine, a colleague, an actor,
he lost both his legs on this. So it's
not an
I am not spreading any. I'm not saying
tomorrow it will be in your cities. I'm
not saying this and I'm not not saying
this.
I am just saying what I'm saying.
And in order to prevent
bigger disasters, look at this.
The artists in Russia are muted.
We expect this.
The artists in Turkey are muted. We
expect this.
But they are democracies.
They they have the parliament. They are
the democracies.
The artists in Israel are muted.
Well, they are even better democracy.
They were they used to be better
democracy than than uh Russia and and
and Turkey. But now [clears throat] in
their parliament, the minister says,
"I'm so happy, you know, to to to have
this law that we just pass to kill all
these conquers.
This is what we hear every day, you
know.
But even this is not the worst.
For me, the most worrisome is that in
Germany, you cannot say everything you
want to say. That is the problem. I mean
obviously this is all problems you know
that I mentioned but when it comes to
the western Europe when it comes to
counseling the female writers or the
male writers any writers from the book
Frankford book fair
or uh having a protocol among the
cultural institutions what is allowed
what is not allowed
to be brought to the stage and that's
happening in Germany right now. I guess
you know there are Germans here that
confirmed it. So uh then that that is
the problem because that's what what we
what we what we talked yesterday in the
past as long as there was this
democratic ideal in the United States
and Western Europe and that was the cold
war mentality.
We could have said, "Okay, this is
horrible what's happening in Eastern
Europe and Soviet Union and many
countries in Asia and Africa and South
America, but we we will bring all these
countries and these peoples to the level
of the United States and Western Europe
with our democratic ideals.
Now these democratic ideals started to
crumble
and if we don't say the standards of
these democratic ideals in Europe it's
too late for our entire but in Europe
then it will be really problem
and [clears throat] that's I think that
that that civil society um can
reinvigorate it in our communities
[clears throat]
and we have to be really it's most
difficult because I guess most of us
here are left leading when it comes to
the politics.
We also have to recognize that the left
sucks.
You know we have to we have to recognize
cuz we do
we are hopeless
unless we face this mirror
and see that we are not better than the
old ladies and granny's you know meeting
in front of of of their houses. You know
we will not do anything.
We have to understand that not everybody
who is not on the left is our enemy.
We have we all celebrated now the
victory of a super right politician
because we experience one who was super
super super right.
As we know there is no super left there
is no left.
small l
of last in Europe we are all comfortable
centrists I will stop before somebody
assassinate you just kidding sorry I
love to hear the the the question
>> maybe maybe no maybe S can just continue
with the discussion in taxing so how you
react because I I have a feeling But
yeah, you see it a bit differently.
>> Oh, I not not at all actually. I think I
was just starting with my optimistic
view that in 1984
um for instance um torture was accepted
by the public as being okay,
particularly in the UK because in the UK
we had Northern Ireland troubles. We
were torturing uh IRA people. Um but now
nobody would admit to supportive
torture. Yeah. Um women's rights weren't
nowhere on the agenda. That has happened
in the last 40 years. Um there's been a
drop in the number of uh states that
have capital punishment. LGBT were even
further off the agenda. So I'm just
looking at it. You you mentioned earlier
it's a longterm
case. It's not going to happen
overnight. When I hear people saying,
you know, we protested and nothing
happened. That's usual. Yeah. When I'm
working with the UN and I bring artists
or others into the UN sphere, I say
don't expect anything to happen
tomorrow. Yeah. This is a long long long
slog. Yeah. So, no, we weren't really
arguing, were we? No.
>> No. No. We we wanted to save, you know,
the life of our taxi driver. We didn't
want him to be so desperate in our
conversation because I said when it
comes to the the the discussion about
democracy in the western world we can
finish it in 30 seconds by reminding
ourselves that in Guantanamo Bay an
illegal prison of the United States
24 years
after the arrest there are still people
not being charged for anything for 24
years
and we conveniently forgot it.
We forgot 20 we forgot maybe 50 people.
It's about 50 people in the Guantanamo
Bay because we don't know what to do
with it. You know, in the meantime,
there was Barack Obama,
uh, the president.
There was another President, Biden, who
we all pretended that he wasn't demented
for four years talking about freedom of
speech. Even our beloved guardian
pretended that Biden was saying, and we
all saw that he wasn't.
So yeah, I mean that's that's that that
was fortunate city park hotel was was
there when when we when we had to stop.
>> Unfortunately I wanted it to continue
and come on.
I'm just going to add some really maybe
dull pieces. I mentioned earlier that a
number of states in Europe are taking
actually quite practical action uh in
the recent years and this is a result of
a study I carried out for the an
internal study I carried out for the
council of Europe um at the end of last
year where we surveyed well we sent a
questionnaire out to all 54 member
states council of Europe and to my
amazement 26 of them responded some of
them a bit useless I'm not going to
mention any particular countries but I
just saw some interesting initiative is
you mentioned France. Yes, it has the
artistic freedom and importantly not
just the freedom to create but also the
create the freedom to disseminate to
share your work as well. But it also um
has bodies that actively track human
rights artistic abuses in their own
country and it also confidential mailbox
that you can report because a lot of
people it's um they would feel very
uncertain about doing that. Um they're
also looking at transparency and
governance for cultural projects and
it's also obstructing artistic freedom
is a criminal offense because yes France
is doing very well there in Portugal you
have a whistleblowing channel that might
be for things like um I don't know
sexual abuse uh on a set but it can also
include um having your work centered as
well. Um you have Spain is evolving a
cultural rights plan. Um and I think
recognize that cultural rights for
fundamental rights. Um and they've got a
working group that's looking at the
current laws to remove from it any
restrictions on autistic freedom. Let's
see how that goes. The blasphemy law
when I asked my multi friends are now
people running around the streets
blaspheming against everybody now
they've got freedom to do it. No,
they've moved on to other things. Um,
and also interestingly going back to uh
to Malta, it it changed its uh
legislation to specifically protect
interestingly satire. I thought that was
interesting to see that actually into
law. And then you've got um you've got a
lot of discussion around fair pay and
that is kind of linked to the ability to
create freely. I'd be interested to see,
some of you probably know that the basic
basic law for fair pay the title in
Ireland which through a lottery of 2,000
artists were given a weekly salary of I
think €350
with no strings attached. I'd be
interested to see if they they have
already reported they feel freer because
of course they're not having to do other
work. Um but uh I hope they feel felt
freer to create quite controversial
works. And then of course you have in
countries like Norway and Sweden are
talking about arms lengths uh funding.
I mean I'm quite skeptical of that but
you know that's one thing that they wish
to guarantee. Um and uh yeah so there
are some practical moves being put in
place and yeah they can be ignored as
well as respected but I do at least feel
that when I'm talking to other states I
can say well you know Malta did this
thing why can't you do that yeah
thanks for all these practical yeah
talking I mean you kept asking me about
the buttons and I kept talking about
everything But uh by talking about the
Balkans, we are in the country talking
about democracy and self-determination.
We are in the country that had to change
its name because European Union and NATO
pressurized it. So this country that was
used to called Macedonia, the Republic
of Macedonia, now is called North
Macedonia. uh and they did it
while bleeding
expressing their wish to become a member
of European family and yes until today
they're not member of European Union
neither or nature
so I think we should work a little bit
on criticality
>> okay yeah sorry actually I just realized
I I had another question for you related
to balcons and uh I realized that even
my question to you is repeating the
pattern. So actually uh feeling that you
know like we feel that internationally
the balcons are often seen through
stereotypes you know and in this
constellation you are representing the
the region like balcon means you know
conflicts, nationalism, crisis,
transition and stability. Of course, now
this is more global. So, you know, it's
not so unique anymore, right? It's all
all over. But still, you know, maybe how
how you feel this narratives of specific
regions affect uh also the mobility and
the reception of artists elsewhere. You
know, like when when even artists from
this region are invited, they are
expected to represent their region and
you know what the image of this region
is outside. So can can you maybe react
on that? But you point it right know
that there is a big change now you know
in the perception uh although you know
all of these that you that you mentioned
but still you know people are always
asking you is it still boring something
like this you know uh but I'm not so so
so not so I mean
surprised by this but before September
11 during the s and the wars
uh whenever I was in contact especially
not in the area but in some country
western Europe um or America uh
I was
somehow there were three elements that
people were so that people saw me
through you know three filters
the first filter was I was a victim
which means stupid that only victims
only stupid people can be the victims
that was aware of
second that I was a Muslim that's
terrible and the third one I was coming
from a communist country former
communist country which is sweet but so
old so you know this this was like uh
and then you know you have to to go
through all these three filters person
in order to save so
uh when we were saying this can happen
everywhere they said how can it happen
after September 11
and after this horrendous terrorist
Islamic Islamic terrorist act
suddenly
the idea that anybody can vict be victim
became worrying
And [clears throat] then now we see
everywhere you know that this idea that
we can be victims is is more humanized.
I would say you know it's less this cold
war mentality
uh
but this this what you say you know that
uh this perception
of the balconies
mainly you know uh in inspired by
Rebecca West and her horrible farms
which were so romantic
uh that that that I mean she was a nice
woman But she really misunderstood every
but that was the only material that most
of the of the of the people who
cancelled the western politicians you
know you knew
and another inf famous I'm sorry you
know I'm pointing out as as you are you
are responsible for that but Churchill
said too much history you know I mean
that was that was so so so pompous but
so empty you know in Syria many times
many times quoted. Um so uh now now uh
we see that uh all these countries you
know now uh uh that they have half
problems in the EU the other half still
waiting hopefully we arrive there you
know
uh that this this uh this labeling of
other people is easier in many ways and
we know that we know that so how to how
will fight it. Uh the problem is that in
many ways these stereotypes
[clears throat] become the reality and
now maybe it's more true about the
Balkans what was this stereotype than
than before.
Uh so I think these kind of meetings
when we meet when we talk when we
share the taxi when we eat together when
we when we have this genuine exchange
that that changes everything
and that's why I I would like you know
always to come to participate to hear
as you noticed I I like to to to speak
as well but you know I mean I like this
conversation I like this passion I like
you know when we when we uh go around
and see you know I mean you will notice
something which really didn't had before
that I I was born in I still feel when I
come to Macedonia and come to my
country. So you know I mean I I really
feel always any part of
but for Macedonia there is a special
emotion you know we always always enjoy
here people are so warm so lovely so
welcoming you know and and the city was
very beautiful and in 1963
there was a big earthquake
massive massive earthquake you know and
then the whole country of Yugoslavia
solidarity. Talking about solidarity, we
put the funds together, you know, the
city was uh rebuilt
and it was nice city
and I heard uh about you know the the
architectural and changes
unfortunately it became inf famous in
the meantime. I was coming couple of
times but didn't have time to to to to
to explore and today I explored more and
you can see it is beyond
uh architectural
uh mistake. It is complete and total
architectural and urbanistic
catastrophe.
It is so incredibly catastrophic
that it becomes interesting, you know,
transcends
the crime of the days against the taste,
you know, and it becomes kind of your
body, you know, and this architecture,
I mean, you will remember Kas who I
really love and his his philosophy about
architecture and he was talking about
junk space that these junk spaces you
know uh uh reflect
our uh collective mind which is uh
poisoned by the politics by
advertisements by this
and you see here as the example of the
junk space you know this city is
destroyed architecture True. I mean this
horse it is somehow a little bit safe
you know but it is destroyed and it is
the real
scarf face
of what happened to the balcon. The
architecture of this city is our sus
and some 10 minutes ago you kindly
reminded me that we should open the
floor. So let's invite some more
participants to this taxi. You said
you'd love to exchange. Uh so so let's
uh open the the space. Uh anybody has
anything you know to add a reaction, a
question, a comment uh you know um after
you heard Harness and Sara or maybe also
react keynote uh before that.
I I thank you. Thank you. I I can hardly
see anybody so can I
>> think I have two questions. The first is
for Mr. Pash. First my name is I'm happy
finally. You see I was here I was a high
school student during and now I was
following your performances and now I
finally see you in this panel. I just
want to say I'm very happy I finally see
you in saw you in person and um I would
like to uh first to comment for western
civilization like 10 or 15 years ago it
could be distinguished because there was
a very rich council country culture then
and illustration now there's no
illustration everybody can speak what is
freedom of uh expression and what is uh
uh democracy even the mo most
undemocratic people in the world the
darkest dictators. So I would like to
ask you um if you put in a perspective
how do you see do you see the
transformation of our region in this
direction do you think it was so correct
that it as it was in for example in
rest of the eastern Europe Europe like
in Poland then in uh Czech Republic or
in Eastern Europe like some of the
biggest names were treated like Gintar
Grass and the Milano Gandera but here
nobody was illustrated and if we take a
better look uh like uh 60% of the
members of the in Romania they were exor
not in Romania in Eastern German in DDR
they were members of the before the
second war they were members of the Nazi
party and they all went vast majority of
them went the iron on curtain fell down.
They went to
Britain. So now there's a big scandal.
Uh they they nobody paid attention to
this. But now they see they all be
became Russian spies. Do you think that
uh maybe for this situation in our
region the artist themselves are uh the
most to be the ones that should be
mostly blamed because they didn't do
anything about this and actually we see
the biggest name in the region they
should all be illustrated
and how do you speak about this with
your students because here in nobody
students are not allowed to speak about
this with professors. They cannot
criticize the gay the greatest writers
who were communists. Yes. And who were
communists and who who uh had their um
uh career uh uplift because they were
collaborating with the secret service.
They were not frustrated. And those of
them that were illustrated during the
government of uh Nicolola, some of them
really should have been illustrated.
Some of them it was a just a political
revenge. They're still uh working and uh
to be pretty honest, I think the
situation here is really depressive
in regard of this. So tell me how how do
you do you do these questions with do
you talk about this with your students
and for Miss Sar White I wanted to ask
you what do you think about the film of
Vanessa Red the Palestinian do you think
that was a freedom of expression or it
was rather a violence I think it was a
violence because it shows a six-year-old
child with a machine
in its head hand and uh do you have any
more of these issues on your agenda in
the UN? I think there's a lot of uh this
misuse of children and uh uh modifying
of the public opinion with violence
uh because um I for example I don't
think that Iran was attacked for no
reason. I think and even Hillary and
Clinton the she supported the action
during the summer the second one she
didn't because of what Iranian
representatives says in said in
Switzerland that they will bear them
with nuclear weapons and
>> sorry we are running a bit out of time
so to to make sure that there are other
comments can you maybe wrap up and yeah
>> and this is it and also about Gaza I
think the same because I think that is a
con consequence of that virus in the on
the festival of electronic music with in
which about 600 miners were killed or um
or hijacked. So I don't agree with this
and I I came at I don't see how anybody
normal would agree with this thing.
Yes. Well, first of all, I think that
your first um comment which is really
addressed at IS more detail, but uh we
in free news are frequently um
approached by people who uh maybe come
from the right wing whose uh views are
abhorrent to us. Um but we still
consider each one of those cases on
their merit.
um we don't just have freedom of
expression for one and not for another.
So uh for instance we might use
something I think it's the Rome
principle that's a very useful uh guide
as to u around hate speech who is the
audience what is the impact what you
know who to to really see what the
impact of this these statements are. So
we might use those kind of frameworks
but we do take each one of these cases
quite seriously and sometimes you know
we get sort of uh we get kickback for it
in the same way as we get kickback when
we have been supporting uh artists who
might have uh been supportive of uh
Hamas or accused of being supportive of
Hamas. Um it's a really really difficult
area and when we do get these questions
we do sit down and take it on merits. We
don't just automatically assume this
person is right or this person is wrong.
Um if we don't do that how can we really
defend our own rights if we don't at
least take some consideration of what uh
what the others are affected. I have to
say it's the right wing is the one that
who used to over the many years complain
most about their restriction of freedom
of expression most of the time they were
talking rubbish but um uh I suppose the
other thing is if there is a possibility
to respond
um if there is freedom on both side to
be able to have the taxi argument or the
public argument as well is really
problematic and actually it's one of the
reasons why I'm still working here 40 40
years on because it's the complexities
and the difficulties and the challenges
of working on freedom of expression
issues and even more so in the arts that
keeps me thinking pushing and pushing
against those boundaries. But yes, it is
a very uh difficult area at times to be
diligent.
Uh and uh yeah, we live in a constant uh
uh hum, you know, there's humming
humming on all these words, you know, in
social media
and everywhere, you know, and uh there
is a lot of hate speech. It's horrible,
you know, and for everything, you know,
not only political but for everything.
Uh it's it's gibberish most of the
times, you know. It's it's just rubbish,
as you say. Um there is one that that's
one big level you know to be to be
avoided you know the other one is more
complicated
it's what what I would call uh
superficial intelligence we have
artificial intelligence and we have
superficial intelligence superficial
intelligence is when you are on the face
where you're all correct
you
sticks. You have all the the the the
clicks in the right place.
>> But it's not true. There are people that
are
>> I didn't understand.
>> There are people that are destroying.
>> No, no. I'm not talking about those
people. I'm talking about this
phenomenon you know in which you have
this um this uh clivism this this idea
that we are active if we are they
declare something on on social media and
that's that's it on the other side you
have people who are in in some [snorts]
action I'm not looking here you know I'm
an artist look Shakespeare was not ever
successful
He lived in in the kingdom in the
monarch. He wrote some of the most
worthy place ever.
I was never
he was
hitting the right
vortex. You know he was saying the
things in such a powerful way that even
today they are for us you know our guard
and so powerful
but uh he even the queen attended his
so the artist addressed everyone we had
to address every
question if we are also politically
engaged which artists have right to do.
But you know we here it's not a
political uh meeting here it's a social
society uh civil society uh meeting and
talk about artistic uh uh freedoms.
>> Let me finish and then maybe we can we
can we can
I think sorry we only have uh less than
10 minutes so it would be nice to have
another uh you know voice. Yeah.
>> And you will be able to maybe discuss in
a
>> excuse me sir.
>> May I just make another comment?
Firstly I I really enjoyed the keynote
address when you
it resonated emotionally and it
resonated. My name is Andre Lu. from
South Africa, the southwest of Africa,
which doesn't always get spoken about in
this border. So, thank you for
mentioning Africa. I enjoyed the there
was a quotation that we must not lose
the spaces where we can meet, think and
share collective imagination together
and that resonated really well in my
country and in my continent.
And then Sarah, you spoke about the the
ability to quickly implement change and
policy change in the AU and I think on
the continent.
>> Anybody else or
Sah?
>> I just wanted to to thank you for for
those comments as well. Thank you. Uh
yes. Um so my name is Ilich. I I don't
have an answer. I don't know if you do,
but uh but I wonder if something can be
done about that. If uh if the movement
and maybe not even a solidarity, but of
um of of partnership uh uh in a common
struggle can can take hold um in in
Western Europe today uh compared to what
is happening in in in in connection to
what is happening in Poland.
>> Thank you. It's a great uh yeah
conclusion. So let's maybe think forward
a bit and like imagine you know new
scenarios of this uh solidarity actions
or you know can you maybe uh I mean
please react to what Milita uh shared
with us but also as a final thought you
know uh I think we all are aware of this
u you know realities and but you know
how how to move from awareness to action
you know like how to you know keep the
you know the the movements as are
happening in Serbia or Croatia I don't
know how we can really share support
each other on the international level
and maybe just to comment like I was
like already a year ago the situation in
Serbia was already ongoing and I was at
the European networks meeting in
Brussels and actually I was I'm
personally not into social media myself
you know but still I was shocked that I
was coming from Slovenia. I needed to
present what has been happening for
months in Serbia to uh very
well-informed you know representatives
of established European organizations
and I felt oh my god it's all over the
media but still I feel this bombarding
in the media it doesn't mean that you
know uh maybe there is an overdose
overflow of information which which has
the opposite effect talking about
keeping us you know distracted
and not focused and maybe not reacting
properly. I don't know. This is just my
personal
reaction. Yeah. that Christian can have
you
uh maybe uh you know comments yeah the
final comments you know really maybe
concrete forward looking you know like
how you know as I said we are all aware
about you know realities but let's how
can do you imagine a kind of a form of
action that will you know see a better
future of
whatever time What do you think should
>> how we can do it together?
>> That's you know how to how to uh maybe
how to support having time and space you
know and ability to even imagine this
solidarity.
I think that that this conference is one
of us means you know for this because
everybody comes from different context
different uh circumstances in in their
countries and uh in their local
communities. So it there is no uh one
specific way to deal with with
everything was going around. Talking
about the balcons, we can also uh uh
mention that uh uh uh recently few
months last summer uh 500,000
young people came to the concert of uh
the singer in Croatia who was very
openly propagating uh the Gustachi um
iconography let's say ideology I I
wouldn't I wouldn't go into analysis of
this but 500,000 young people means a
lot for the country of 4 million people
going on so talking about what's going
on in Croatia we have to to to have this
in mind as well but this is not an
isolated case there are many things like
this going on in Europe in different
countries and also in different shapes
you know so um the the problem with the
with
um uh our uh nice idea about uh
listening each other uh understanding
what's going on trying to find evolution
in all of this is that it's really slow.
So all these aggressive actions they are
very very quick you know they come
together they have very clear agenda
they say we will kill all Jews all
Muslims all homosexuals and they do it
simple
that's that's how this this this
uh ideology communicates that is our
challenge how to be to to to to confront
this ideologies and these practices
uh at the same time to keep our
democratic
uh impulse
alive
and nobody has the answer but you know
this conversation is a part of the
answer. Thank you. And I think there is
another question.
>> It's uh first of all, thank you for the
conversation. I really enjoyed it and
it's very my question is very in this
direction too. I just wanted to ask or
comment on what's your thought about uh
what practices do you suggest or what
practices do you already have see worked
on uh young people and how uh to make to
educate them first. motivate um part of
the education anymore or other
practices. It's very hard to see uh and
to have this open mind of what happened
uh was going on and how to make let's
say the right decision or to keep my
mind open. So um not a lot of things can
affected my the courageous act or how I
approach with my art the let's say
reality or whatever things
um to answer that question I um haven't
worked with young people I mean define
that um but one thing that really struck
me is that um that we don't have not
known of any modules within the uh
within the cultural and arts colleges
the art sector on artistic freedom. Um I
did run uh some seminars at Goldman
College specifically about artistic
freedom in broader terms but also
specifically um what is happening in the
UK and what kind of uh resources where
you can go to if you have support giving
advice on what to do if you are for
instance about to um perform a [snorts]
stage play which might cause some
problems. What kind of steps can you
take to ensure that you still manage to
produce without censoring yourself but
at the same time talking and listening
to the people who may take insult groups
and religious groups or pressure groups
talking to the police in the UK you can
do this and the police have openly said
to us we have a problem sometimes uh
between the struggle between protecting
people's rights to freedom of expression
and at the same time protecting public
safety. they don't quite know how to do
that to have the discussion. So I think
that uh the university apart from
Northern College should always have at
least one session dealing with artistic
freedom and also also in the legal
sector as well. Going back to the other
question, one of the positive sides of
the growing oppression in Europe is that
there is a growing resilience of
resistance to it. So you have some of
you might know the resistance now
project which brought together over 200
theater makers to uh protest the growing
crackdown across Europe. You've got the
European uh suggestion for European act
and artistic freedom that I I mentioned
earlier. Um kind of boring but the
success of uh free news over the years
is our documentation.
my team every day, every note every
small instance. There might just be a
press release about um a painting being
taken down in a gallery in Harrari or
something like that. We will note it.
And from this we build a global picture
of what the trends are. They're not the
obvious trends. Sometimes you begin to
see something that is a bit strange. And
this is happening in in Colombia and
it's also happening here and there. Um
so documentation and there isn't that
documentation in in Europe. Not one
central point is I think you do need
several documentation points. There
isn't going to be one organization
that's going to be sort of perfect at
all of it. But we need to document and
that is quite um it's actually very
difficult to get people to pay for but
it does require people sitting and
noticing and reporting how small it
would be censorship. that I think is
really important and I think there are
moves and organizations that are looking
towards that and I think also these kind
of meetings I totally agree with Paris
are really important particularly when
we're talking about the amorphous um
issue of selfcensorship and um
the less obvious means that arts in
particular are being repressed and also
how you reach out to other audiences
young people, how do you respond to the
uh crazy stuff that you get
right-wing and extreme left and also
with the other attempts to crack down on
certain ideas um uh deplatforming
elsewhere which is happening across the
board.
I think I can I [clears throat] can say
only about my my experience with my
approach to your to your question how to
communicate with the with others and
especially with the younger generations.
Uh when I was young, you know, uh it
meant to me that I was very much
fascinated
by some examples.
Um Ellest Hemingway
went to the Spanish Civil War. George
Orwell also
uh Mandri joined as the German joined
American army you know during the
operations to to to liberate Europe from
the Nazis. Uh Anaka wrote the poetry
during the Nazi siege of Leningra. I
didn't know ever in my life that these
people would be my major stars, you
know, to lead me in my life in the way
they did because I could not imagine
that S or my country would win the war
and S would be under the siege. And then
[clears throat] the Serbian army bes
started this four years you know
bombardment and sniping and uh now
without keeping the the the city without
food without medicines without you know
it was horrible now and I was in
Amsterdam and I came back to the city
and I said I will give all my best to to
to do now this is my time now this is my
humming great time you know and I answer
to this so I believe that pointing to
the people who had responsibility who
took responsibility you know that's
that's the way and the young people if
they have the talent and interest some
of them don't but if those who have they
will they will build their own um their
own pace their own part there is one
wonderful and horrible and wonderful
image from uh from London. Uh after the
bombing, the Nazi bombing of London, you
know, the British library was destroyed.
And u then you know the staff of the
British library displayed on on the
ruins, you know, uh some some items you
know from the library and uh I remember
the picture the people very nicely
dressed you know in the hands. I mean
some men were in this picture uh they
were coming to the rise and reading this
you know and we had also the our
national library uh was completely
knocked out you know so you know and and
people were still were dressing nicely
and when they went to the to the
cultural events so I think you know this
is the the the the the
images that we transfer
one thing it's very important and that's
what I I finish with this. Uh, war seems
to be interesting, you know. Looks like
a Hollywood movie. It's interesting.
It's a drones. It's a It's uniforms.
It's a It's a fast. It's a danger. It's
a, you know, bullet, you know. It's
interesting. Unfortunately, that's how
it looks.
But the reality is that the war is the
most horrible experience one can have
ever.
And everything what we need to know
about the war is in cover my
artists and we from the civil society we
have to to to transfer the experience of
the war so that people don't want to
have the war in their yards.
>> Thank you. Thank you Harris because I I
was thank you very much for this last
part of your conclusion because I was
already imagining artists you know
transforming themsel into soldiers which
is yeah not what we want to see we want
but yeah uh and so we were we are uh way
over time so I would like to thank you
both Har thank you very much and
everybody for joining us and for sharing
with us And uh like uh as we have known
already before we started the
discussion, mobility is never new. It's
uh it can open space for freedom uh
protection, solidarity and cooperation.
But it can also reproduce hierarchies
and uh these hierarchies are between
passports, regions, institutions,
economies and between those who are
visible and those who remain uh
excluded. And uh um if we speak about
mobility justice, we also have to speak
about artistic autonomy. So we today we
learned that it's really uh connected
and uh freedom of expression and about
the unequal condition under which
artists are invited or prevented from
taking part. Uh so thank you all and
thank you also to our reporter Slana and
uh thank you all for contributing and
have a a lovely day ahead.
[applause]
Thank you very much also for the for the
facilitation. Thank you very much.
>> [applause]
>> So um as you know in the program so now
uh you are free um and I love this
country where you can even meet you know
in the auditorium first time and after
we can move to uh so the second part of
the conversation will take place in the
MC youth virtual center it is in your
program and we meet there and we start
again at 2:30 p.m. Yeah. And you can of
course uh as some people requested of
course our moderator and speaker are
here during the two days so you can also
continue your conversation. Thank you
very much.
[applause]