Animal Health Under a Worsening Climate Crisis | ILRI & WorldFish Webinar
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The webinar "Animal Health Under a Worsening Climate Crisis," co-hosted by ILRI and WorldFish under the CGIAR Sustainable Animal and Aquatic Foods Science Program, presented critical findings from a DEFRA-funded project examining how climate change threatens livestock and fish diseases in Ghana, Zambia, and Kenya. Dr. Bony Moyo emphasized that while local communities contribute minimally to global emissions, they bear the brunt of disruptions caused by droughts and floods, making adaptation strategies essential beyond simple pharmaceutical interventions like vaccination. The study utilized a comprehensive risk assessment framework integrating hazard exposure, vulnerability analysis based on socio-economic factors such as poverty, and response measures, revealing strong regional patterns alongside specific differences driven by local ecology and infrastructure that necessitate tailored approaches for each country.
Detailed climate modeling over the next 30 to 40 years indicates diverging but equally dangerous futures for these regions; Ghana faces increasing heat stress with more frequent hot days and drying trends in the east, while Zambia experiences higher variability with intensified rainfall extremes despite overall declining wet spells. These shifting conditions create a dual hazard of prolonged dry periods punctuated by intense flooding events that severely impact disease dynamics. Consequently, livestock diseases are expected to shift into three distinct categories: diminished ranges for heat-sensitive pathogens like fasciolosis due to reduced vector habitats; periodic epidemics in pastoral areas where drought-induced animal movements spread contagious bovine pleuropneumonia and other localized outbreaks; and expanded geographic ranges for vector-borne illnesses such as tick-borne diseases, Rift Valley fever, and fly-transmitted anthrax into currently cooler highlands.
In the aquaculture sector, particularly within intensive cage cultures of tilapia in Lake Volta and Lake Kariba, rising water temperatures projected to increase by up to 4°C threaten economic viability alongside power generation needs. These thermal shifts exacerbate bacterial diseases like *Streptococcus agalactiae* and emerging threats such as *Lactococcus garvieae*, while declining rains cause stratification issues in Lake Kariba that further compromise fish health. To mitigate these risks, experts advocate for practical adaptation measures including aeration systems, selective water withdrawal, low stocking densities, and breeding heat-tolerant strains, alongside policy shifts toward transboundary management of shared lakes. The consensus is clear that relying solely on pharmaceutical solutions or culling infected animals is insufficient; instead, there must be a concerted effort to change risky farming practices, strengthen syndromic surveillance systems involving farmers, and harmonize policies across sectors to build resilient food systems against worsening climate crises like El Niño events.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome everyone. Uh ging from Nasha
Kenya where I'm sitting here with some
of the colleague. Uh we are very happy
to be here today uh to run the webinar
uh animal health under a worsening
climate crisis. Uh I I would like to
introduce myself. Uh my name is Hungu.
I'm working for ENRI International
Livestock Research Institute as regional
director for ENRI in Asia and I'm very
pleased to be moderating our session
today.
Uh actually uh this webinar uh will
share the findings from a DEFRA funded
uh project and that project was jointly
led by our own institution in together
with our CJ sister centerfish
to examine how climate change is
impacting the livestock and fish
diseases in Africa in general with a
special focus on three country namely
Ghana, Zambia, but also Kenya. Uh the
work will also sit within the CGI SAF
sustainable animal and aquatic foods
science program and under that saf
program I'm actually leading the onehell
program what we call in our CJ terms
onehell area of work. So that's why I
would like also to acknowledge the
broader CJ staff support alongside with
DFRA and also the Bonmo group as we get
started uh now in this webinar.
uh I would like to to say that you know
we will spend one and a half hour
together and uh within this uh time uh I
will have also assistance from my
colleague Joffrey who actually is
following the chat uh for Q&A and and
also logistic link to uh this webinar.
So if you have anything
any questions so please feel free to put
in the Q&A chat but also directly in the
chat box. Um and I would like to also
summarize quickly uh the program we are
having today. Uh after uh this uh
logistic information session uh we will
have an opening remark from the DDG of
INRE followed by the key presentation on
the result of the project by different
colleagues from ENRE and WFish and
afterwards we will have a a panel
discussion bringing our national
partners to discuss the result of this
projects and of course you are attending
uh this seminar. you are very welcome to
ask questions and we will have some time
at the end to uh actually uh uh interact
with you from this audience uh related
to our talks and Q&A and so on and of
course you know my DDG will come back to
close uh the webinar.
So with that um I'm very happy to invite
now uh Dr. Bony Moyo. Uh Bon is the
deputy director general DDG research
impact and partnership of ENRI to give
an official opening remark. Uh Bon is
Floyd Z.
>> Um thank you very much moderator. Um
good morning good afternoon colleagues
and all the participants uh wherever you
joining from. I bring you greetings from
the International Livestock Research
Institute based in Nairobi, Kenya.
Today it gives me great pleasure to
welcome you all to this timely webinar
entitled animal help under worning
climate crisis.
This has been convened by a team from
the international livestock research
institute Illyri and the world fish that
has been implementing this project on
climate change and animal health. This
was funded jointly by DEFRA and the
Balma Fund at the Livestock Climate
Solutions Hub here at Il Nairobi. I'm
really pleased to see that the project
has successfully completed all the task
that it was meant to address.
Before I make my um brief remarks, I
would like to sincerely thank all the
partners who made this work possible.
And these include the director Zambia's
department of fraternal services, the
directorate and the director from
Ghana's department of eternal services,
colleagues from the University of Ghana,
University of Nairobi and JO Kenyata
University of Agriculture and
Technology, Welfish and IL and also DERA
from the United Kingdom.
The CGR recognizes the central role that
livestock systems play in human
nutrition, in poverty reduction, and
global security.
Climate change is an existential threat
that threatens to disrupt gains made
towards the realization of these
outcomes.
Assessments by the World Materological
Organization indicate that the world is
approaching a period in which warming
above 1.5°
C may become increasingly persistent.
So what does this mean? Across the
region, climate change is already
transforming livestock and aquaculture
production systems and altering the
distribution and transmission of animal
diseases, including zunosis.
Communities that derive their
livelihoods from these production
systems are already incurring heavy
losses. I'm sure we've seen quite a lot
in the media whenever there's a drought
or flooding from climate change in juice
production uh losses. Yet their
contributions to these changes are
negligible in some instances.
The study applied to the
intergovernmental panel on climate
change IPCC risk and vulnerability
framework. This framework integrates
hazard exposure and vulnerability
analysis to assess how much how climate
change may alter animal health risks in
Ghana and Zambia. These were the focus
countries for this initial study.
Opportunistic analysis were also carried
out in Kenya building on studies that
had been done earlier on on livestock.
Some of the elements of the work that
stood up for me and the team include the
following. First, the multidisiplinary
collaboration.
This project fostered strong and
productive partnerships between ILR
wellish and the other participating
institutions, the universities and the
department of maternal services that I
mentioned earlier. This collaboration
should be sustained beyond the life of
the project as partnerships within the
CGR are essential for addressing complex
and multidisciplinary challenges such as
those examined in this work. Number two,
multi-country multi-isease focus. The
use of multi- countries in a research
project helped us identify shared
regional patterns while at the same time
revealing how differences in climate,
ecology, livestock systems,
infrastructure and access to health
services shape disease risk and
vulnerability in the different countries
and regions. Similarly, studying several
diseases also helps to broaden
conclusions since climate change may
cause some diseases to expand, others to
shift geographically and others to
decline.
So the third observation was on relating
to research translation.
I'm pleased that the project has
identified and prioritized adaptation
measures that can be developed further
to help communities manage the impacts
of climate change
beyond pharmaceutical interventions such
as vaccination. Greater attention is
therefore needed to change the risky
practices and perceptions that increase
farmers exposure to disease through
participatory research.
I'm sure uh colleagues that we are all
eager to listen to the presentations and
panel discussions that are are lined up
for this afternoon. I encourage everyone
to engage actively share your
experiences and reflect on how the
evidence and recommendations presented
here today can be translated into
practical action.
I therefore look look forward to a
stimulating webinar together and
productive discussions. I wish everyone
a successful session and thank you very
much. So I hand you back to the
moderator Kong over to you.
Thank you very much uh DDG Bonoyo for
the very nice opening remark and I have
to say also that you know thank you very
much for the kind support to research
group promoting this topic within the
CGI because that is very important area
that uh uh we need to strengthen uh in
terms of climate change and health uh at
CGI that we are working uh very closely
with different national partners. uh now
let uh move to the next uh series of uh
presentation. You know I see in the
charts that some colleagues asked for uh
screen share or power point but actually
DG bony didn't use any slide for her
opening remark and now I would like to
invite uh uh uh Joffrey to give the
first slide on the framework that Modi
mentioned and I can say a few word about
that uh framework. I don't know who is
sharing the slide.
Okay. So, so let me continue uh as the
slide is coming. Uh uh colleagues and
and friend actually this project uh as
our DDG mentioned is very much taking uh
care of the risk assessment framework of
IPCC and me as someone who have worked
for long on risk assessment risk
analysis framework. I feel a little bit
different between uh the framework of
risk assessment between IPCC and the one
we work with uh uh uh food safety in uh
Indry and other CG uh centers. And uh
please take note that most of the
analyszis and results that will be
presented in the next uh 35 minutes or
so will very much rely on this IPCC risk
assessment framework that include
actually as you can see here on the
screen now on the three very principle
components of this framework. The first
one is actually linked to the hazards
assessment. We all know that in risk
analysis hazards doesn't mean risk and
actually the hazard assessment uh uh uh
look at the potential occurrence of
climate events or trends that can cause
harms to people and animals that we are
talking today. So obviously the hazards
here is very much in the language of
climate impact drivers. The second
component you can see on the screen is
about exposure assessment and this ask
how suitable is a given area of climate
sensitive diseases. In the other word
and uh are the conditions dry the
vectors for example the partition the
environment we are talking today for a
disease to take home or spread there.
And actually uh the last one the third
is about vulnerability
assessment and this is about the
sustainability susceptibility.
How badly would a given area of a
population be affected if the risk
disease risk you know takes place and
this is really where the soio economics
factor come in. for example the poverty
levels access to the services because of
the same diseases risk can mean very
different way uh depending on how
exposure unprepared a community is and
finally of course when you know own this
thing is our own and of different
institution to deal with the responses
you know taking different measure to
mitigate or adapt uh uh to the risk that
we are having in this concept and
actually I want to highlight a few uh
component like this because you know our
colleague will continue now to talk
about different components of the
assessment and with that the first
speaker I would like to invite now is my
colleague from ENRI Dr. uh Terry Reissi
he is a senior climate scientist at
international livestock research
institute based in Bababa to give a talk
on the result linked to the first
component of hazards assessment with
that I would like to invite you to take
the floor
>> thank you uh can you see my screen
>> yes I can see the screen but it would be
good if you can put it in the uh uh
presentation mode because I see both
lines at the same time.
>> Uh it's in the presentation mode. Let me
try to do again.
Uh
>> what about now?
>> Uh
>> same
>> is the same.
>> Okay, let me share again I think.
Okay,
>> now it's okay. It's good.
>> Okay, good.
>> And I I would like to say that you would
have 12 minutes for the print station,
please.
>> Thank you. Thank you. Okay, so uh thank
you so much moderator. Uh my talk will
be more on climate variability and
change and as you mentioned that's one
of the component for risk analysis uh
the hazard analysis specifically for the
livestock sector and this is more
insights from this project related with
climate and health.
Um so uh the objective here uh is
actually to use relatively high
resolution observation and analysis data
to study first the climate trend. How
the focus has been as mentioned on two
countries uh Zambia and also uh Ghana.
So the idea is to look how the trend has
been and how the variability have been
for the last 30 40 years in those two
countries and also to specifically
use some uh indices uh for the livestock
tester to see how those extreme events
also have been evolving for the last 30
40 years in those regions as well as uh
also to look into future climate hazards
so that we can uh plan about the impact
of climate change on the livestock
sector and what adaptation mechanisms
that has to come in specifically related
to those kinds of risks. So this has
been our objective in general. So what
did we use? We used two kinds of data
sets. The first type of data set was
just observational data set. As you know
we have a bit of challenge in Africa to
have a continuous data set in many of
the stations in many of the the
countries. So we used a kind of uh
station merged satellite data which is
widely used uh called chipsy data for
rainfall. We have done a number of
analysis how good this data set is in
Africa and we have made few publication
along that line. So this has been what
we use for rainfall and also for
temperature we used era 5 data sets for
the historical pilot. And one of the
challenge uh looking especially on the
future projection is to really have a
high resolution
uh projection data uh particularly what
is available now from many of the
international climate centers
particularly what we call CMP 6 is
relatively in a higher or in a coarser
resolution like for example about 100
kilometer. So especially if you are
interested to look into impact analysis
we have to do some downscaling bias
correction and and so on. So out of the
42
kind of uh model output from CP6 we did
a comparison because some of them was
done for uh North America and Europe. So
we selected about eight of them that
works best for our region in Africa. So
and once we use that we downscale it to
25 kilometer to look into future uh uh
projection for both kind of scenarios we
use two scenarios one is SP 245 and
another one is 58
uh 85 in simple terms one is more on
extreme cases like for example if we
don't if the CO2 emission doesn't change
very much and one is if we have some
kind of moderate changes on greenhouse
gas emissions. So these are the model
two scenarios that we have chosen
then uh like I said the first thing we
did for both Ghana and Zambia is to look
what the variability looks like for the
last 40 years and and also the trend and
the the climatology. As you can see in
the top row uh what you see is for Ghana
and the last uh the second rows are for
Zambia. So for example in Ghana if you
see the middle variability there is
quite a few uh variability of rainfall
in the southern region of Ghana for the
last uh for the last uh you know 30
years. Uh but the trend also if you look
the trend wherever you see the red is a
dryness trend. So in Ghana especially
the eastern part where you see the the
the the the red there is a decrease in
the rainfall pattern in in Ghana on the
other hand if you see the one in Zambia
it you don't see those red on the trend.
So in in contrast in Zambia you can see
generally lower but more specially
uniform rainfall with higher valability
in the north as you can see in the
middle figure at the bottom row. So
these are the general trends for the
last 40 years. And then we looked at the
interanual variability how the rainfall
has been varying on on from year to
year. And if you see in Ghana especially
from this Elino years of 2015
there is a drying trend in Ghana uh at
least for uh uh but on the other hand in
Zambia you see a bit of uh weightness.
So this is the kind of trend we have
been seeing for the last 30 years in
both in both uh in both countries. What
about the extreme events? So now
specifically for the livestock sector we
know heat stress plays a big role on on
the livestock when it comes to diseases
and a number of other things. So we
looked the trend of heat stress also for
both Ghana and Zambia. So the first
three figures in the first row are for
Ghana. What you can see is both of
course both countries show strong heat
stress signals but mostly if you look
into the Ghana experiencing higher
temperature and more frequent hot days
in the northern part of Ghana while you
see also in Zambia it shows more
localized hot spots. Especially if you
look into the wet spell dry index which
is the last uh one you see uh more uh
dryness also in southern part of Ghana.
So the first plot is uh more on maximum
temperature. The middle plot for both is
number of days having temperature more
than 35°C.
So in in the northern Ghana you see that
kind of increasing trend so far
and we looked also a second uh parameter
to look into is also the drought how the
drought condition has been in both
countries in the last you know uh 30
years and SCPI the first plot is uh
standard precipitation index which just
looks into rainfall data sets the Middle
one is SCPAI which takes evapo
transpiration into consideration which
temperature is also a factor. Also we
looked CDD uh with CDD means consecutive
dry days. So how the dry days have been
there consecutively. So if you see
wherever you see uh in Ghana for example
in the first row it shows uh a mixed
drought trends with increasing dryness
in central areas. Wherever you see for
example in the first two plots of SCPI
and SCPI where you see more redness
that's where uh there is an increase in
uh and dryness central areas but also
some localized waiting uh signals are
there uh in in in some parts of Ghana uh
as well but if you look into the
consecutive dry days uh it's just just
also longer dry spells particularly
where you see the the blue ones are
where there is increase in dry days.
On the other hand, in Zambia, if you see
the trend, uh it shows a bit, you know,
more of you you don't see a drought
increasing trend as you see in Ghana. uh
more of like wetter kind of trend both
as middle CPI and the CPI and also even
if you look into the dry spell uh uh
there is a decrease in the consecutive
dry days which means there has been more
weight days in in in Zambia as compared
to Ghana.
Now we looked also uh uh the heavy
rainfall uh indicators uh for both uh
countries. uh these are more uh you know
to show if flood events have been
recurrent in those regions heavy
rainfalls have been uh quite uh often in
that uh in these two region for the last
30 years and so on. So we use different
parameters uh to look into the first one
more the total precipitation and then
the the probability of this uh uh uh
what we call R95 and also we looked the
5day rainfall where uh it is beyond a
certain value. So as you can see both
countries shows stronger heavy
precipitation in southern regions with
Ghana showing a clear uh south to north
gradient meaning the northern is a bit
uh not wet as uh the south uh uh but
more wetter condition in the southern uh
parts of Ghana as well.
>> You have two more minutes. You have two
more minutes.
>> Okay. Uh okay. Uh so this is the trend.
Now I will go briefly into the future
climate projections what it looks like.
What we have seen so far is more on the
last 30 years of data how the trend has
been. And now if you look into the heat
stress this is for uh uh like for 2050s
2080s we looked for heat stress. So you
don't see a single area where the heat
stress or the temperature is decreasing
in both countries. So this is alarming
that both Ghana and uh Zambia are
showing strong in in increases in heat
stress in in in in in most parts of
their country. So this is what we look
into in terms of heat stress and we
looked also the uh precipitation uh uh
like the drought conditions again uh
when you look into uh the first plot is
for Ghana and the one below is for uh
Zambia. So both countries show
decreasing wet spells uh and increasing
overall uh drought condition
particularly in in uh in uh in uh in um
in uh in uh Ghana uh relatively Zambia
again in the future projection it shows
more uh increment in in in rainfall
extreme rainfall again we looked at the
extreme rainfall uh in in Ghana even
even drought condition. This is what
people are asking. How do drought and
flood happen at the same time? You know
this is what we are or have been
projecting mostly saying that both
extremes when both extremes are
happening things are very difficult. So
this shows that it is a drought
condition but when the rainfall happens
it is extreme and happens in a very
short period of time. That's why we are
having both drought and uh heavy
rainfall conditions. So in uh Zambia
more uh uh wetter heavy rainfall events
are more likely but in Ghana we see both
trends recurring. Summary uh so you can
have a look at it. So rainfall
variability we have looked at it uh the
climatology of uh trends also the heat
stress increased in both countries. We
have looked into the drought
characteristics and the heavy
precipitations as well as uh uh extreme
elements. This is and for future climate
projections as I said there is strong
increase in extreme heat indicators
across both countries and specifically
Ghana showing a widespread increase also
uh Zambia is experiencing more intense
increases. Drought condition as I said
is uh uh uh u also uh showing more in in
in Ghana as well. Uh precipitation
changes uh heavy rainfall events have
been also shown in this case. So what is
the overall implication? This is I will
close with this more the increasing heat
stress will ne negatively impact
livestock productivity fertility and
survival and also we have seen changes
to reinfor patterns which affects also
feed availability and weather resources.
So uh these are some of the impacts of
those kind of risk analysis and we have
made some suggestions
uh to look into what adaptations
mechanisms can be also taken
specifically
related with heat stress increase what
we should be doing and also how that is
impacting for example on diseases and
and so on. These are some of the
recommendations that has been and I
think the presentation can be shared and
people can see what are some of the
adaptation mechanisms that should
follow. Thank you.
>> Excellent. Thank you very much Tiffrey
for the very nice uh presentation
focusing on on the data two countries. I
think that it would give a lot of basis
for the next talk. uh and I would like
to remind also our participants that you
are very welcome to ask question post
the question in the box uh chat chat box
and also in the Q&A in the webinar of
the zoom platform so with that I would
like now to invite Dr. Bernard Bet my
very dear colleague at Indry. So Bernard
is the principal scientist and team
leader of one health at INRE and he will
actually deep dive in the health impacts
and adaptation measure focusing on
livestock. Why livestock? Because you
know when you talked about climate and
health, climate change and health a lot
of thing have been done on human health
but in agriculture sector in particular
for livestock and aquaculture I believe
that you know the data and evidence
remain quite limited and with that I
would like to invite Bernard to uh give
your talk on uh climate um you know and
health impact on livestock side. Over to
you Bernard.
>> Yes thanks a lot uh Hung. I'm very happy
to cover the animal health perspectives
of this climate change basically using
the results or the data that the ferry
has captured. So I'm very happy um I
thank most of the colleagues I worked
with in this project mainly Sher Johnson
from University of Ghana Peter Kimelli
from University of Nairobi Henry
Kissinger from Joo Kineta University of
Africa and technology Caroline Mugo from
Jinata University of Africa and
technology. Dixon Pelle who was working
with us based in Zambia. Humphrey Bander
from the department of veterary services
in Zambia and uh Liwali Mata from the
same department in in in in Zambia.
So um I'll go straight into the analysis
that we did and basically to define what
we mean by exposure assessment. You
remember the exposure assessment is
number two or the second piece of
analysis in that framework which uh Hong
shared earlier on. It's basically
identification of the factors which
determine the suitability of a given
area to to to diseases. If you're
dealing with disease, if you're dealing
with health in in our perspective and
this is basically an epidemiological
analysis which we used statistical
models as well as published
compartmental mathematical models
because in some cases statistical models
couldn't really work well because of the
nature of data that we were using. We
used negative binomial models for the
stat stats models and basically the
outcome of interest that we were
focusing on were the disease data sets
which we got from countries from their
surveillance systems. The predictors
that were considered were mainly climate
uh variables which the fairy talked
about as well as additional geographical
data sets including land use, land
cover, altitude and and and and a few
other variables. Here is a list of
diseases which we studied. I think I
don't have to list all of them but
basically to clarify that there were
differences in the number of diseases
which we got from countries.
Some of them more common like
contemonia,
foot and mouth disease, lumpy skin
disease, uh thaleriosis,
uh tpannonosomeasis, anthrax from
Zambia. From Ghana, we did um CBP,
fascosis,
Newcastle and tryposomesis.
For Kenya, it wasn't really a study
country per se, but we did some
opportunistic analysis because we had
some data sets which were available from
previous projects for comparative uh
assessments.
So to define the periods we called the
current uh scenario that's the current
status of the disease incidents was that
period which covered 2010 to 2024
and then we did projections based on the
climate projections to 2040s and to toss
uh based on what I've shown uh there.
So before I go to analysis we I need to
cover two main things here. Mainly we
usually think about what are the
mechanisms which are involved in climate
change. Usually these are divided into
two. We have biological impacts which we
call the direct impacts. These are
things which affect this is how climate
affects things like vectors and
pathogens as well as host immune
systems. But also much more important
are the indirect impacts which are
usually very difficult to analyze and
this include soio economic practices you
know behavioral adaptations which people
do as they raise animals in a very
severe climatic conditions. So in a
nutshell our results gave us this very
huge highle summary that we could
actually classify the impacts of climate
change on all those diseases into three
levels. So the first is there are these
clusters of diseases which will get
diminished in in spial range. This is
because it becomes much hotter, less
conducive and less basically the vectors
and pathogens would no longer be able to
survive within those conditions. And
here we have specific examples including
fasciases
and tets which I'll be coming to in a
short while. Then we have diseases which
will then result into periodic epidemics
in areas in which we find these
diseases. This is include contagious
bobin pneumonia uh contagious capine
prolon pneumonia and PPR. These are
diseases which are common in pastoral
areas. We don't expect them to to expand
into high potential areas because
high human population densities are
really limiting movement of animals away
from the pastural areas. But because of
the drought incidences, we'll be
experiencing repeated outbreaks in those
um areas because of local movements of
animals, uh heat stress and poor
nutrition and those are the main drivers
for those uh repeated epidemics. Then we
have a bigger group of diseases which
will then expand in geographical range
and these are mainly vectorbone uh
diseases which includes um um tickbone,
mosquito bone and also those are which
are transmitted by flies like lumby skin
disease and anthrax and others. We don't
have time to go into each analysis. So
what I've done is just picked examples
of each cluster to demonstrate that
effect starting with the ones which
would get diminished. Um this is
fascosis. This is um liver fluke disease
which we know it's a parasitic disease
of cattle. It causes huge um impacts in
terms of weight gain losses loss in milk
yield mortality liver contamination from
abattours and costs of treatment. So
when we did the analysis we were able to
fit um a statistical model which showed
that there'll be reduction in the
incidence of the disease with climate
change and we also found that there's
another study that had been done earlier
on and I I paste it on the slide there
you can see which found similar finding
and used it used a different model apart
from ours. So, so it means the study
that we did really confirms what had
been found uh earlier on. And the map
I'm showing there is just a map from
Ghana showing the different uh uh
distribution of the disease between the
current scenario and the future scenario
which the disease will really get
limited to specific locations where
there are water water bodies.
The second group is what I mentioned to
be this complicated diseases including
contagious bo and pneumonia which our
modeling found that they are highly
correlated with temperature. These are
diseases which you really find high
temperature is associated with high
occurrence patterns and this is the
model which we found which correlates
the disease to to to to to
climate variables.
And we are saying here the drought
conditions which uh teary mentioned will
hasten movement of animals will husten
nutritional stresses as well as um uh
mortality in animals remain and when you
have mortality rates rising in livestock
population what happens is you disrupt
the existing endemic patterns and so you
have naive animals replacing those ones
which had already been exposed and so in
such a scenario you have cases of
increased
disease outbreaks within the pastoral
areas.
The third cluster of diseases are what
we already know, most of us already know
that vectorbone diseases will really
increase with climate change. And I'm
showing you here an example from Zambia.
This is a tickbone tariosis.
Our findings showed that this will
increase by 36% across the country.
That's the incidence. Also there's a
tick that it transmits a disease which
we call cremian congo hemorrhagic fever
which is a zonotic disease. Also our
finding showed that in that country
there'll be an expansion in geograph
geographical range of the tick vector.
So all showing that you know we'll have
more cases of these diseases happening
under climate change. We did some
modeling uh for this um the t theeriosis
using it thick vector which is a
repifilus just to show that with
temperature there'll be reduction in
development rates in the vector
populations as well as increase in
mortality rates for some of the uh thick
stages but I think because we are
sharing slides we'll ex examine this
much more to see how how can we explain
the mechanistic expansion
of the disease into areas which are
already getting warmer because it will
be much more conducive for the thick for
the tick to to thrive. I think this is
my last example to say in in East Africa
there's a huge interest on drift valley
fever and we have also been modeling
mosquitoes to see how they'll spread
across uh the range and here we using a
specific species we call kullex which is
a secondary vector for rift valley fever
we are showing that in the red marked
regions those are the regions which will
continue becoming conducive for the
vector to survive but in the green areas
which we are marking
it will become much hotter for the
vector to survive and so those will
become less conducive but for the blue
blue areas will be having um more um
suitability for the for the for the for
the for the for the vector to survive.
The white areas are places which are
already too hot for the vector to
survive. So those are the shifts which
we are talking about that some
vectorbone diseases will become much
more prevalent especially in the
highlands and in the cooler areas which
currently are considered to be free of
the disease. I think I have two more
slides just to talk about adaptation
measures which we should be promoting
for controlling the diseases. Mainly
what we know already including
strengthening surveillance systems.
And here we talk about emphasizing
syndroic surveillance so that we engage
farmers in terms of reporting and
developing forecasting systems which are
based on climate data for for us to be
able to detect this these diseases in
advance. The second is improving disease
control measures including vaccination
strategies. And what we want to
emphasize here, it's actually much more
safer to do joint vaccinations of
multiple diseases at the same time for
you to save on delivery costs. And that
would be what we could emphasize going
forward.
The third is one health and of course we
know one health that you know
coordination communication and working
together across sectors and lastly
better policies for disease control.
What we found in some countries is we
have multiple policies addressing the
same thing. It will make much more sense
to actually combine and harmonize those
policies.
So lessons learned. This is my last
slide. I want to emphasize that you know
there's there are huge gaps in terms of
surveillance data sets and when even
when you try to fit statistical models
sometimes they don't work and I think we
should really be emphasizing to
countries to continue developing their
capacities for surveillance to improve
uh disease detection. We could as we did
in some cases use theoretical models but
theoretical models also need to be
validated with the same surveillance
data. So it's a kind of um a chicken and
egg kind of a circular problem. We
really need to work on surveillance. The
second thing is um we have seen many
many studies on climate change and most
of them usually do disease by disease
analysis. You so you do tickbone disease
today tomorrow you do mosquitobone
disease that really doesn't give you a
good picture. What we are emphasizing
it's it might be better to do a
ecosystem focused analysis which then
helps you to do the net changes the net
because some diseases will reduce others
will increase and so you need to see the
totality of the changes which are
happening in a given ecosystem for you
to make a call in terms of disease
burden. Lastly and this is important is
we need to go beyond pharmaceutical
interventions. We talk about we keep
talking about surveillance we keep
talking about vaccination but these
things can take us to some point where
we need to do much more and that much
more is actually working with farmers to
change their practices so that in Africa
it's very difficult to emphasize or to
push for testing and slaughter policy to
remove infected animals but actually
maybe that could be the best thing that
we should be doing so that we eliminate
sources of infection for the cleaner so
I think That's the last slide and just
to um want to thank partners who
participated in this work and as Hung
said Dera and the Bulma fund were the
ones who funded uh the work. So over to
you Hung.
>> Thank you Bernard if you can mute
yourself uh that would be nice. Okay.
So, thank you very much Bernard for the
presentation and actually it remind me
also a lot of things that Bernard led
within the ora one one health center for
Africa. He have been leading for the
last six years. He a very large project
uh uh to develop the capacity of one
health in uh different countries in
Africa. I'm very glad also to see some
of the interaction in the chat and
actually you know one of the question is
in fact you know are you talking about
animal health and livestock who speaking
about fish health and and that's exactly
my uh invitation now to uh my colleagues
Dr. David Van refer he's acting director
of aquatic food biosciences and aquatic
animal health science team lead at
woodenfish one of the CG center as I
said before and David you are welcome to
take the floor to talk about health
impacts and adaptation measures on aqua
control site over to you thank you
>> yeah sorry I'm not Bernard vet so I had
some had some technical issues so I'm
speaking from Bernard's thing so yeah
I'm from I'm from Welsh um and we
haven't got long as want to have a rich
discussion later. So I'm going to rattle
through the slides quite quickly but I
briefly want to acknowledge uh the great
colleagues who help with this piece of
the work particularly uh Drs. Netaiji
and Dr. Suni are actually part of the
panelists later and uh and also Dr.
Samado and colleagues from the
University Gh as well as as as other of
other colleagues from Welfish. So um
next slide please.
So our objectives really when we're
talking about the risk assessment
framework is really be focusing on
hazards. Um and what we wanted to do uh
was you know it's a grand title to talk
about aquaculture and climate change but
what we thought we would do was
concentrate on one particular production
system is intensive cage culture in in
in in two contrasting African countries
Ghana and Zambia. And we wanted to see
the vulnerability of fish farmers to
particularly fish diseases. But also we
did do some work looking at potential
other more physical impacts of climate
change. Um using the approaches have all
been elaborated about actually making
predictions about what scenarios might
be and how well the hair may impact um
the the conditions in which the fish are
re being rearing and also potentially
the diseases as well as the data that's
uh that fairies Dr. Tererry's had talked
about earlier. We were also able to
access some data from the Zambiji River
Authority and Vulta River Authority plus
some air temperature data again. Next
slide please.
So there's two study areas I think many
people on the call will know them well
is Lake Vulta in in Ghana and um and
Lake Kuriba in um in in in Zambia
obviously um contrasting both big lakes
um um and but actually by from a
physical point of view actually they
they share a lot of different
characteristics which came out and
affected the the potential hazards and
the likely impact we identified. Um and
I think this is kind of interesting in
uh in many ways because there you have
the intersection of climate change and
the rapid expansion of cage culture. For
those on the call who are not from
agriculture background, tilapia is is is
one of the most widely farmed fish
species um internationally and
particularly in the global south. And
there's a a really big growth of tilapia
culture in the African continent and the
these and a lot of this in particularly
in these two countries is centered
through intensive cage culture. Um both
lakes are extremely important.
Transboundary lakes have huge economic
importance supporting hydroelectric
power generation and livelihoods. Um
next slide please.
So to cut to the chase as we'd say um
what were the climate change modeling
these scenarios pretty extreme actually
we're talking potentially water
temperatures going up to four degrees or
so and in in both lakes. Um uh rainfall
is interesting. see variability. One of
the big things come out of this, anyone
who works with climate change knows this
is not a straight line. Um, some Vulture
in particular, we're likely to see a lot
more increased pulses of rainfall which
are a hazard in themselves. I'll talk
about that later. And in in in Zambia
and Kuriba um that part of the of Zambia
particularly looking at the potentially
declining rainfalls um and again this is
likely predicted to carry on. This is
sort of inconsistency particularly in in
Ghana and potentially reduction in in in
Zambia. Uh and we're likely to have more
extreme events and that's going to have
a massive impact on all farming
practices particularly in agriculture.
Severe droughts obvious issues related
to that but also flooding is also a
massive hazard and we'll talk a bit
Ghana's already seen this and
evaporation. Um both lakes quite
different from a biohysical point of
view or hydraological point of view. Um
the kuribas monometic say turns over
once a year. You have stratification. Um
and you don't tend to see so much that
in in in in Ghana. So there's some
differences there. Next slide please.
Um again some just kind of highlights
like like like we've done a lot but this
is just to show some of the highlights
here is um you can see when you look at
on the left you see what modeling what
the thermal stress that we're probably
already seeing in Kuriba. Um and you
know fish have a have a you know they're
intimately um associated with their
water environment and that affects how
they grow and thrive and when you ext
when you go below certain levels and
above certain levels they will not do as
well. And then as I say as I alluded to
the the Ghana tilapia industry had a big
issue a few years ago when there was an
uncontrolled lease of release of dam
water that basically washed away a lot
of the farms downstream of the dam. Next
slide please.
One of the main things we did my
background is aquatic animal health and
obviously we've worked in Africa for a
while um through wellfish and previous
work is we we did a and with Dr. Sonia
we'll talk a little bit and Dr. Nessai
will talk a little bit later is we
identified what what based on uh based
on literatur and and expert analysis
what might be the main diseases first of
all causing impact and make some sort of
effectly estimations about how climate
change may affect them. Bacterial
diseases u a real issue on both lakes.
Structure caucus galacti is kind of true
one health challenge that can affect is
a wide variety of taxes including humans
and fish. Uh we lactocus garg an
emerging disease in in in lake kuriba.
We think that might become more of a
problem and arommonus again these
bacterial diseases we think will become
more of an issue if things warm up. Um
eus we'll talk a little bit about and
IKV have a couple of slides on those.
Thank you. Next slide.
Dr. Egalactia as I mentioned a very
interesting pathogen. It is you know
cause neonatal problems in humans and it
also is a severe disease of fish and um
certainly the the the industry the
developing tilapia industry in a number
of here anecdotally and also by by the
literature is severely affected by this
disease. We can speculate about what
increasing temperatures or or stress
might do for the fish but it's probably
not going to be good. we may see more of
these type of bacterial diseases causing
problems. Next slide please.
ISKV infeis
virus uh one we're really watching out
for um caused massive impacts in in in
in Ghana uh 200 in 2018 I was involved
in that work with Ghana and colleagues
but effectively it took out about 70 to
80% of the biomass in the lake at the
time which is about 60 70,000 tons it
was a transboundary incursion climate
change and this disease we're not sure
it's probably not good but yeah these
are examples of the sort pathogens and
actually what's coming out of this is we
might identify the particular hazards
and actually we don't really necessarily
have good information about how these
climate change may specifically affect
them. So we're at the hazard
identification stage. Next slide please.
EOS another important disease. It
actually doesn't necessarily affect
tilapia but it certainly affects a lot
of other freshwater species present um
in in in in East Africa in particular
and some nice data from Dr. Song and
colleagues in terms of um of
surveillance work they've done showing
it's relatively high prevalence and
again we're not really sure of the
impact of that the and what the
suggestion is if you have very high if
you have a lot more rainfall and more
water um flooding events then you may
have more eus next slide please
physical responses um yes so just to
repeat what I've said before um it's
going to be different between the the
both lake systems because they're
hydraologically really quite different
and one's monometic turning over. The
other isn't. And that's going to affect
how how how they respond to changing
temperatures. Oxygenamics. Um again,
those who are not agricultures clearly
fish live in water. They're responsible
for that's their home, but it's also
their source of of of of oxygen and and
this will affect um dissolved oxygen
levels and affect them and stress them
and hydraological stress both flood pro
both are not good for aquaculture flood
pulses or drought driven. Um I think
particularly the bacterial diseases we
think will become more of a problem um
as the fish are stressed and
concentrated. Um but there's also other
issues such as Ca how I will bloom risks
as well which we think may be more of a
problem in the lakes if they warm up. So
there may also be some human health
risks as well as to to the biodiversity
on the lakes. um system level outcomes,
chronic stress, multipathogen risks.
None of this is good frankly and the
farmers probably need to start and we'll
talk a little bit about mitigating
adapting to this. Thank you. Next slate.
SL slide please.
So in in brief impacts of climate change
we think they're going to affect water
quality deterioration um say the harle
blooms or or alle blooms may be an issue
um path proliferation transmission lot
is speculative. I think one of people
have to aware fish are completely
hostage to their environment. They they
do not regulate their body temperature
and that affects how they respond to
pathogens and it's not actually that
always that straightforward. Warming up
doesn't necessarily mean you're going to
be more affected. It's actually an
interplay between the immune system and
the pathogen dynamics. A lot of this is
unpredictable but probably not good. And
likewise the food web. There may be
wider impacts on the food webs in these
systems. Thank you. Next slide.
adapt and mitigations. It's going to be
adaptation frankly but as we really for
most of this um you can air rate and
these are some practical mitigation
adaptation measures that farmers may be
able to do um exploring mobile code
systems. I mean often you talk to the
farmers and they're really hostage. They
can't they can't like easily like they
can a herd of goats move them from one
one area to the other. They're stuck
there and that is an issue for them. But
maybe we can explore being able to move
them. Selective water withdrawal. Um in
bio security. The message that myself
and others have been keep stressing is
improve the conditions that you grow
your fish in. Keep your stocking
densities low and you're probably going
to be able to at least kind of mitigate
to some extent these effects. Um
and um yeah, and one of the main main
actual actions farmers can do is
actually reduce feed intake. um when we
spoke to them they say what happens when
when they when they're not doing well um
and then they stress by these thermal
events what we reduce feed so there's
some practical management measures
policy adaption I think this is
important as well uh we need to be and
moving on to the final part I'll talk
about the vaccines afterwards is I've
identified the both these lakes are
transboundary um disease climate change
these are shared problems there's no
point one country managing a particular
disease problem if that disease is just
going to kind of is is you're going to
be affected by what your neighbor's
doing. You need these need to be managed
on an area transboundary basis in our
view. Um vaccines yes people may not be
aware fish also can be vaccinated. It
would be nice to have tilapia um and
other species more widely vaccinated.
There are a lot of um in Bolter in
particular on the big cage farms they do
routinely vaccinate. maybe extend that
approach and find ways that people can
access and be equitable with access to
these these interventions and breeding.
Maybe we can either breed more heat
tolerant fish or the other thing is grow
different sort of fish. Tilapia not good
in those conditions. Think of growing
something else. Thank you. Next slide.
And I think we're done and thank you
very much.
>> Excellent. Thank you very much uh David
for the pres presentation on the fish
and an aquatic site and actually it
complement very much uh the livestock
and aquatic food system that CGI is
addressing uh in the sub program under
the climate framework and and so on and
on this proposal for adaptation and uh
uh mitigation. Okay. Um dear colleagues
and participants I think that know at
that point we we have uh we had a very
good overview about the finding of the
project and recommendation and so on and
you know that you know um we will have
now uh uh discussion in the panels we
want to put together. uh you know that
you know my DDG Booyo says that you know
the CGI mission is really to work with
partners
many national partners and regional
partners really to transform the food
system but also water system and land
systems. This is actually our main job
and all the week all the work we we we
we are doing or we have been doing in
different countries we rely a lot on the
the partnership with the country where
we are working and in the framework of
the webinar today we emphasize very much
our partnership with Zambia and Ghana
and with that I would like to invite and
introduce uh four distin
partners uh on the panels and I would
like now to invite introduce first uh
Dr. Nessay Norris Mud is a senior
scientist at Wfish in Zambia. So you
know you are in CJ people based in
Zambia and Dr.
Monsa Sunj I'm sorry if my pronunciation
of some of the name is not correct so I
apologize for that. Uh so Monza Dr.
Monzai, senior lecturer uh veterary
pathology and aquatic animal health at
the school of veterary medicine of
university of Zambia. Now I see the
camera now and Joffrey please help to
pin on this nice camera on the screen
for our participants. I would like to
invite also and introduce Dr. Ivans uh I
do the deputy director of the veterary
services directorate at the ministry of
food and agriculture in Ghana. So he's
actually the regional director of
veterary services in the northern
region. Last but not least I would like
to introduce uh uh Dr. Sher Johnson,
associate professor at the school of
veterary medicine at University of
Ghana. So we have four panelists uh now
uh uh with us. Um actually you are feel
free uh to turn on the camera and with
that I would like to go through a series
of questions bringing the perspective
from the natural system into the study
that we have been doing with you.
So uh with that the first question I
would like to to ask our actually CG
colleagues uh uh uh uh no actually sorry
Dr. Wanza Sunung from Zambia
uh actually the the princ pres the
presentations uh highlighted quite
clearly the key adaptation measure that
could strengthen the resilience of
Zambia's aquaculture sector to climate
change. So now I would like to ask you
to what extent are these recommendations
already reflected in the Zambia climate
chain uh strategy and if you allowed I
would push you that if so if they are
already included how when are they being
implemented
and if they are not yet included from
the perspective what would be the step
to be taken to integrate them into the
strategy. So a bit long question with
different perspective. So over to you
for the reflections.
>> Thank you so much. H I want to start by
apologizing. My my laptop has gone off
and my internet connectivity is very
poor on the phone I'm using. So I may
have to answer without um my camera on.
So in the Zambian context, you know,
adaptation as mentioned includes a
number of things. of course
surveillance, diagnosis, vaccination,
bio security and uh climate informed
early warning systems. In the Zambian
context, surveillance is really being um
attended to actually even at um
government level at policy level because
from the terrestrial animal perspective
for example there are surveillance uh
documents for a number of of diseases
that affect um the nation. So uh
surveillance is being carried out and
these days there's also this uh move to
ensure that the surveillance is climate
sensitive you know bringing in data from
um the climate uh space as well as um
data from the health but putting it
together so that we are aware of the
changes that are happening in relation
to climate change um biocurity there's a
A lot of capacity building going on
right now to ensure that even the
private sector, the farmers, the small
scale farmers especially are being um uh
becoming aware of the importance of
biocurity because as we all know climate
change is not a sole problem. It's not
the sole cause of these problems. It
worsens in the face of um for example
poor management practices and so on. So
capacity building is really ongoing and
I feel this is making a a bit of a
change in both the aquaculture sector as
well as terrestrial animals. However,
one of the areas where there's need for
improvement is um perhaps putting into
place climate resilience infrastructure
and hopefully these uh will be put in
place with collaboration. The beauty is
that uh policy makers are really
interested in what's going on. As you
could see, they participated even in the
they they sent representation to be part
of this um team that was carrying out
this work. So I think I would end there.
I don't know if I've answered your
question adequately.
>> Yes, it's it's very much uh uh in that
line and and we hear you very clearly
with our video. But thank you very much
for uh the contribution. Um okay so this
very good from from the pesty from
Zambia. Let's let's move now to Ghana
and with that I would like to ask a
question to Dr. Ivans Yamo. Are you
there? Um I see you in the list but if
you can turn on the camera. So um for
the study in
Ghana
uh can you hear me Dr. Ians?
I can hear you please.
>> Okay, very good. Thank you very much. I
hear you also very clearly as well. So
the question to you is in fact you know
in the study um for Ghana shows that
northern Ghana is endemic for several
climate sensitive livestock diseases and
is also the home to pastoral uh
communities that may face challenges in
assessing veterary services. And I know
that you know you are the regional
director of veterinary services in the
north nor northern region. So the
question is in fact now how can the
department of veterinary services instit
institutionalize the use of climate
services to strengthen the disease
surveillance in the regions.
Okay you are muted. I believe that you
listen to me. Okay, good. I can hear you
now, please.
>> Yes. Um, thank you very much.
The northern sector of Ghana practically
shares boundary with Bkina Pasu which is
more or less like they has Tahill region
with um a very oxy
climate factors such as a drought and
some sometimes also flood and um the
study that has been done um putting
everything into um into perspectives
will certainly be able to help northern
in Ghana to be able to take certain
measures so that to prevent losses
during due to climate change and also to
also look at the disease dynamic
actually also goes to climate
vulnerability so that we able to address
some of these disease dynamics and then
um at the end of the day it will
strengthen our surveillance system and
then it will also strengthen our
outbreak response our preparedness and
also puts the livestock ready is a
source of livelihood to a lot of farmers
in the north said that at least it will
certainly also give them a certain
amount of guarantee or security of their
livelihood if um all these things are
able being we are able to implement
them. Ghana actually has got um they
needed legal framework in case of um
outbreak outbreak investigation and
implementing preventive measures and so
on and so forth. But we needed this
collaborative um um studies so that we
put them into our policies so that at
the end of the day it will certainly
advise us when we are doing our policy
and our planning what we should
certainly be able to do to prevent
outbreak of diseases in northern Ghana
taking the climate vulnerability into
consideration. Thank you.
>> Thank you. So it it's very clear and I
I'm very happy to hear you know how um
actually the plan to use on this
fighting for for those region and it's
very good and maybe we come back to you
a bit more later for for some uh uh
others reflection but but let me now
move to the next panelist actually my
colleague from fish in Zambia Dr. Nessia
I see you on the screen now and actually
we are working for CG centers and you
are part of the project team. Um can you
please uh briefly summarize findings
from the aquaculture work and highlight
new leads for for this research in
particular in the context of Zambia
please. Over to you Nessia.
>> Uh okay. Uh thank you very much. So
across the Ghana and Zambia cases, our
main finding is that climate change is
creating conditions that increase the
risk of disease outbreaks in agriculture
systems. Um so for example uh the the
the hazards that have been pre presented
by the previous speakers such as rising
water temperatures, drought, declining
water levels and so on. uh these hazards
they interact with high cage stocking
densities in the legs, organic loading,
weak biocurity measures, limited
diagnostic services, inconsistent
disease surveillance and so on to
increase the livelihood and severity of
outbreaks. So when we look at the two
legs also uh lake kariba and lake vulta
they show uh both common and distinct
risks for kariba we have prolonged
warming drought stratification habitat
compression
um
which are also associated with
heightened uh risks for bacterial
diseases uh which we've already
presented such as lactoas and others
In Lake Va we know that there's
fluctuating water quality trophication
episodic hypoxia which also leads which
contributes rather to severe mortality
events involving ISKNV
and so on. So when we look at the the
the Ghana case especially the experience
with the ISKNV
it also provides an important warning
for countries such as Zambia where the
virus has the virus has not yet been
reported but it it could also have very
serious consequences if introduced. So
we need to learn from our counterparts
in Ghana.
uh it has already also it was also
presented that the impacts of climate
change they are going beyond uh just
production systems they but they also
affect livelihoods for small scale uh
farmers who are in cage culture even
commercial farmers as well women
processors traders and when farmers try
to deal with the the the outbreak of
bacterial diseases it can then also lead
to antimicrobial resistance if this is
not done uh in accordance to the to the
protocols. So in terms of new research
areas, we need to
establish integrated longitudinal data
sets linking climate, water quality,
stocking practices by farmers, fish
performance and also confirmed disease
outbreaks to identify critical
temperature and dissolved oxygen
thresholds. And then we can then use
this information to develop seasonal
early warning models for fish diseases
particularly for for Zambia and also for
Ghana. These early warning models they
are they are lacking and they could be
very helpful for for for for fish
farmers particularly in the cage culture
systems that we're talking about. uh we
also need to investigate how warming and
uh warming of the water and epoxia
affect the transmission career states
and environmental persistence and co-
infection dynamics of ISKV with these
bacterial pathogens and other emerging
pathogens because from the Ghana case we
saw that V is also happening
in all in co-infection uh circumstances
as well. We also need to test the
biological and economic effectiveness of
the adaptation packages that uh have
been uh suggested which include aeration
improved cage sighting even movement of
cages uh seasonal stalking density
adjustment and so on vaccines probiotics
and also having disease tolerant fish
strains that are also heat tolerant. So
that's where we need to work with our
colleagues who are also in in fish
breeding and and genetics. Um when it
comes to the social economic impacts uh
we we could also do research which
examine farmers adaptive capacities,
gendered livelihoods impacts, uptake of
climate information and also insurance
and um some of the institutional
arrangements that are required for
coordinated aquatic health surveillance
because we know that Kariba is a
transboundary lake and also uh lake
volta is also within the VA basin. So
how do we then coordinate aquatic health
surveillance? We had Dr. Sun saying that
uh some surveillance is happening in in
for example in Zambia but is it the same
across the border and so on. So we need
to have some coordinated efforts. uh one
of the last research areas that I could
think of also is to
uh conduct also research on um priority
zonotic disease risks. Uh in the Zambia
case, we heard from the ministry of uh
health uh when we had our last meeting
talking about their surveillance of
pathogens such as Edward Tarda which
have potential which are zunotic
diseases and which are also which where
there is a potential for outbreak due to
changes in in migratory patterns for
birds introducing this disease into new
areas or bringing in this disease and so
forth. So I think that these are some of
the things. Of course in the study we we
didn't focus also particularly on
parasitic diseases but this is also
something that could also be of interest
to look at the links between climate
change and some of these parasitic
diseases in these legs. So overall
instead of reacting to disease outbreaks
we need to to to conduct research which
will help us to predict outbreaks in
order to promote climate informed
aquatic health management. Uh so this
also means that we need to have improved
surveillance which my colleague uh Dr.
Sun has already mentioned. uh we need
also to improve farm management
practices and approaches to also reduce
the incidence of diseases, promote
resilient fish genetics and also provide
social economic support for fishes and
strong transboundary governance. Thank
you.
>> Thank you very much. Uh thank you very
much uh uh nay for for the input but
also highlighting the research direction
from the perspective based on the
fighting in uh in in the country and I
like very much some of the propo
proposal linked to the social science
research but also on the disease
surveillance linked to the one health
approach. I don't know how much you are
aware but I I allow myself to to tell
you that you know in the context of
Zambia uh the EU funded project cohes
capacitating one health in southern in
Africa supported also the country in
some of the activities in one health in
particular developing the one platform
and I think that also point on zonotic
diseases prioritization exercise would
very much link to some of the
partnership we are working there uh in
in in Zambia
Thank you very much. But let me ask the
question now to Dr. Shir Johnson from
Hungana. So um similar to the question I
asked Nessi before uh Sher could you
please briefly summarize the finding
from livestock research component and
highlights the new lead for research in
the context of Ghana. Over to you.
>> Thank you. Um yes this this research has
been very this project has been very
very useful. Um we realized that between
Ghana and and um um and Zambia
contagious um bovine plural pneumonia
was common from from both countries but
uh we had facilosis Newcastle and
trapanosomiasis
um in Ghana and whereas we had in
addition to CBP we had the CCPP east
coast fever lumpinsky disease in Zambia.
Um there were many more other diseases
that we considered but the data quality
at the time of this project influence
what was eventually settled on
and um the in in Ghana situation it's
also possible that there are there's
evidence of river valley fever
um
crime um congo amii fever is also
evident in the vectors
But um there's a need for more work to
be done to establish the effect of um
climate change on this uh vector bone
diseases.
So um one recommendation from all that
we have found is to strengthen the
surveillance system.
um Ghana in Ghana uh I know that there's
been effort to digitize you know to uh
do electronic um reporting of
surveillance data uh but there's still a
lot of um work to be done to make that a
national uh uh uh to to have a national
approach. So it is still very
rudimentary paper based and maybe we are
not doing a lot of analysis as we should
and so this is one area that really
needs to be strengthened. uh in Ghana
they also had the policy on climate
change and agriculture has been
developed and it is available but that
document focus heavily on the on crops
you know um not so much on livestock and
that is why uh this project is is been
very relevant to bring to the four areas
that will need strengthening I'm aware
that Zambia they have the digital
platform where they um their data is
gathered so it was even easier for
analysis. But in both cases, there's a
need to strengthen the surveillance
system. Perhaps it's time to evaluate
maybe select a number of climate
sensitive diseases and evaluate the
surveillance system to see whether the
objectives are being achieved and then
recommend
do some recommendations for improvement
in the face of climate change. Um so for
both for both countries climate change
must be brought to uh in front of the
radar probably we are just working as
usual. Ghana is experiencing a lot of
flooding. The moment it start raining
flooding is a big deal in the southern
Ghana and when floods it's over we have
so much heat that affect uh reproduction
and all of that. So climate change is
something that needs to be brought to
the four in in the um in the analysis.
So my suggestion in the face of all that
we got will be to select a few of the
climate sensitive diseases and do a
longitudinal study where we gather data
now looking at it rainfall temperature
and all the important climate parameters
you know assess them to see what we get
so that we can now plan we can now
predict and be ready for it. A lot of
work is done even when there's flooding.
A lot of work is done on the impact on
human health. How much there's very
little studies on all this flooding that
is occurring, how it's affecting animal
health, the impact of it to the the
farmer and to and to the country. And so
um a peculiar thing for Ghana is that we
also have a lot of livestock mobility
um both coming to and through Ghana to
other countries. And so it's not just
climate change but how how these are
coming together lifetime mobility
climate variability and outbreaks of
diseases. So these are areas that will
need to be looked into to understand the
epidemiology of maybe a selected few
diseases and take them over a period of
time to generate data that is uh robust
and can be used for um prediction.
Thank you.
Thank you very much Sherry for for for
the reflection and also you know um uh
uh uh adding a few uh good direction for
for for future research but also I like
very much the appreciation uh on the
relevance of the project in the context
of of Zambia and Ghana for that. So so
thank you so much. Okay. Um I see that
it has been quite active in the chat and
then Q&A and um I think that is also
very interesting to have some
interaction between the audience and the
speakers of this webinar. I saw some of
the question was uh uh answer live but I
still want to highlight a few key
question in the Q&A in particular for
Bernard and probably Bernard you know
there's a very interesting question from
me to you in the the Q&A box. So I let
you read the question and probably you
know uh provide some elements of respond
to to measin over to you. Thank you very
much.
>> Yes, Hong I think I've seen the
question. It's asking were we able to
use climate uh data to analyze outbreaks
in those countries? I I hope I
understood the question rightly. Yes,
because all the data that that we got
from countries are actually recorded
clinical events and so those are either
outbreaks or or um cases which were
captured and also when we analyzed this
with climate data which we got from the
ferry most of the diseases were showing
positive correlations.
So adjusted correlation with
temperature.
>> It's okay.
>> Yeah.
>> It it was reflected
>> temperature and rainfall. And so meaning
the question you're asking is really um
well captured and we were able to show
that climate variables were positively
correlated with many of these including
you know contagious bow and pronneumonia
most of the vectorborn diseases and I
think we are now finalizing our report
we will post it online it's under peer
review and you will be able to see the
detailed analysis that were done to
arrive at those conclusions which we
were drawing. So over to you Hong.
Thank you very much Bernard. That is is
good in addition to the written answer
here. So so maybe um I pick another
question for David. David says quite a
bit of the things on on fish side in the
chat. Probably I let you so you know
select one qu good questions and and and
provide some elements that respond for
that. Over to you.
>> Okay. Hopefully everyone can see me.
Okay. Hear me. Okay.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Yeah. Thank you. Lots of good
questions. Yeah. Most of them I can't
answer frankly but I'll try. Um one
important point um you know will s
drying um is is a risk associated that's
probably the other way around. I mean I
think I've got animal health colleagues
here. We typically think if we most of
the pathogens we're dealing with
exposing them to sunlight and drying
particularly aquatic pathogens if
anything is like toactivate them doesn't
mean there's no risk but maybe we
shouldn't be too worried about that one.
um had some questions about are we were
we only concerned about the world or
organized animal health diseases? No,
actually most of our analysis is really
around the the good question again
around the bacterial diseases which of
these are typically not where we're
listed but we think of particular impact
and importance and then from Dr. toen.
Thank you very much for that really hard
question about heat shock. Just for
people not aware
um the farmers on Lake Vulture have been
using a technique where they basically
increase their resistance against um
this
important virto
um Dr. Angelu she's been doing a lot of
work with the farmers on there and there
may be something in that I suppose that
shows that this is not I mean the
typical scientist we say it's quite
difficult um sorry
>> yeah I was just going to say very
quickly it shows how complex these
things
And warming up doesn't necessarily mean
the pathogens are going to be worse.
It's more complicated than that. And it
reflects the interplay between the
immune system and the temperature and
the and thermal range of the animals.
And yeah, I think probably is going to
be generally not good. But with some of
these pathogens, warming them up may
even they may even become less
susceptible. And the iskn heat shock
thing is an ongoing thing and there's
been lots of good work by farmers and
university garden researchers on that.
So I refer you to their papers and we
can put them on the chat. I think I
don't know if Dr. Angela's on there. If
she's not, we'll put her papers on.
Thank you.
>> Thank you very much. Uh David, so
actually I'm happy that you addressed
several questions in the same time. So
then this is very very important for
that. Okay. Look look at the time. I
think that know we are about to to to to
close the panelist but I still want to
ask one question um you know combining
different uh uh uh questions. Here you
see uh this is actually a research
scientific project and we talked a lot
about science and analysis and so on but
in the context of climate change and and
diseases uh I believe that you know in
the the process of transdisciplinarity.
So I would like to ask the panelists you
know uh from your perspective how the
fighting from research of this project
can be combined with some of the local
knowledge on climate change and disease
in the areas that you are working. In
another word, I would like to ask you so
reflection. For example, what what would
be the role of local knowledge uh um and
how it can be used uh in combination
with scientific knowledge coming from
from this project to address the uh
issue of climate change and animal
health or or fish health and some of the
topics we discussed today and I reserve
the question eventually you know to some
of the colleagues in the panelists you
know Dr. Sun you do you have any
reflection on that shortly or Ians or
actually other colleagues on the panels?
>> Thank you home. Well, I would say, you
know, locally, for example, in uh in
Zambia, if I focus on the aquaculture
side of things,
um, of course, we hear of mass fish
kills, for example, after a dry spell or
if if there's been um very high
temperatures and so on. But then for me
actually what I was thinking about is
the fact that there's increased
recognition that climate change affects
not only infectious disease but there's
also the animal welfare issue nutrition
and productivity. So if productivity is
really being affected negatively, I feel
it's very important that research brings
in uh an aspect of um checking the
interactions
between uh for example AMR, animal
welfare and nutrition and of course this
requires interdisciplinary one health
research. So I feel it would be
necessary to interact in a one health
space and not just limit it to a few
people. This obviously will bring in
industry partners you know commercial
farmers as well as um the local people
as you referred to local knowledge.
Thank you.
>> Excellent. Thank you very much for for
for the uh uh uh reflection and this
exactly is the one process we are
talking about. Okay. So you want to add
please. Yeah please.
>> Yes.
>> With regards to climate change at the
community level they are fully aware of
it because due to changes in the pattern
especially in the pattern of growing
crops they realize that practically the
rain comes early and short and then and
stop very early. So they are fully aware
of the climate change and its effects
both in the crop site and that of the
livestock sector. But their major
concern is at the community level. what
mitigating um um interventions can they
possibly do to mitigate this whilst
looking at the national level or the
government policy level that other
actions we taken. So if we are able as
results of this research work come out
at at the community level mitigation
measure that can be even educated and
then the farmers or the community can
adopt I think it'll go a certain a long
way to help um the li and protect the
livelihood of the community. Thank you.
Thank you very much. Very interesting uh
as a perspective you you bring in Dr.
Ivans. Okay. So may I ask do you have
any other reflection from other
panelists on this transdisciplinarity
process local knowledge partnerships
uh before we we close the panel.
Okay. Okay. This very good. So, so I'm
very happy to see the interaction in the
chat and but also uh the direct response
from different panelist to you. So, so
with that um I would like to thank you
very much panelists for your
contribution but also uh very active
engagement uh and question from the
audience uh in this discussion for the
webinar today and with that I hand over
now back to my DDG Dr. Bony Moyo from
Indry to conclude the webinar and I'm
very happy also that we have we we have
managed time very nicely so far. So back
to you uh uh Bony.
>> Um
thank you very much. I think uh Joffrey
is going to share something but uh
moderator I just wanted to see if we
have one closing half a second remark
from our climate expert Teferi. Are you
online?
>> Yes. Yes.
>> Yeah. Please.
>> Yes. Okay. Yeah. Thank you so much. Uh
so I as I have presented in the in the
in the presentations
uh climate risks are really serious. uh
and as we have seen both the trend and
future projections of uh temperature
drought and heavy rainfall extremes both
in Ghana and uh Zambia these are going
to be a bit intense and also more
frequent so I think knowing just the
risk or vulnerability and identifying
the hot spots are not just enough that's
why uh such strategies, such adaptation
mechanisms are really key and this is
not going to be just addressed by
climate scientists but an integrated and
interdisciplinary approach and that's
why I like you know uh people from the
academia from CG centers from government
from veterinary and everyone I think we
need uh to see a very integrated
uh uh work together and um and This is
what we witnessed also in our analysis
that these are real things and uh we
have already seen the trend even now. So
I see also some questions on Elino uh
current events and I I think uh people
from Ethiopia for example now they can
witness how the impact of Elino is
already happening in the country and I'm
also uh we are also expecting October,
November, December rainfall in Kenya and
many Eastern African countries are going
to be also very extreme. So that's why
we need to follow and we need to have a
very coordinated climate information and
the early warning system to address this
upcoming challenge. Thank you.
>> Uh thank you very much um that I'm glad
you've also touched on the projected El
Nino and that we really need to have
plans uh for that. So in closing uh
colleagues again join me in thanking the
participants.
I just want to highlight some of what I
heard from the panelists from the
presenters. We've heard that the
analysis on climate projections show
increasing thermal stress and incidences
of drought. I'm sure you've you've seen
this in in your different countries. And
these changes will have major impacts on
animal diseases for both livestock and
aquaculture.
And for aquaculture in uh specifically
they will suffer more production shocks
from flooding, temperature extremes and
declining water quality.
However, we have an opportunity through
the the climate risk assessments which
provide us u identification of
vulnerable hotspots. We are able to
prioritize investment and also design
targeted adaptation strategies. Uh next
slide please. So building on the climate
resilient livestock and aquaculture
systems requires that we translate this
uh um evidence into some integrated
actions and these include climate
information services and early warning
systems sustainable water and feed
resources and also strengthening some
institutional capacities.
So our call to action is let's
accelerate the implementation of proven
adaptation measures while investing in
applied research to strengthen existing
approaches and develop new context
specific interventions and and this
requires uh coming together from
different expertise, different
partnerships. I saw on the chart someone
highlighted that we need to work beyond
with the in our partnerships go beyond
the universities also bring in the
private sector
it's really been a lively uh discussion
also through the chats I just want to
also highlight that uh as someone
already indicated during the discussions
that pharmaceutical interventions
including vaccination can only go so
farm. Greater investment is also needed
in behavior change communication in
order to encourage farmers to adopt
safer and more effective disease
prevention and livestock and agriculture
management practices. So in a nutshell,
this webinar has given us really an
opportunity and is a timely um
opportunity where we have discussed,
reflected and looked at some of the
results from this project on animal
health under a worsening climate crisis.
So I hope this has also motivated you
all to continue to research in this area
but also um connect and through your
networks in country, regional and
continental to to um have some of these
preparedness plans and early warning
systems uh in place for better
uh and sustainable livestock and aquatic
uh food systems.
So colleagues join me again in thanking
all the participants, the presenters,
the panelists, uh our moderator home for
keeping us on time. So I don't want us
to go too much over time. So thank all
the organizers, our our collaborators,
our fun and everyone who made today
possible. So wishing you all a good
afternoon, a good evening and let's
continue to work together on this uh
topic and thank you very much and have a
good day. Bye-bye.