Video summary
Jeff Snider from Euro Dollar University analyzes the recent economic landscape following the June CPI report, arguing that the observed decline in inflation is not a sign of healthy "innovation-led deflation" but rather a dangerous phenomenon known as "crisis-led deflation." This downturn stems primarily from demand destruction, where consumers are no longer able to afford goods after years of aggressive price hikes and depleted savings. While the Federal Reserve focuses on potential inflation spillovers driven by oil prices, businesses have been forced to absorb rising input costs or cut labor instead of passing expenses to customers because consumer spending has effectively collapsed. This situation creates a vicious negative feedback loop where layoffs reduce household income, further suppressing demand and compelling companies to slash margins and staff even more aggressively.
The speaker emphasizes that despite recent spikes in oil prices caused by geopolitical tensions involving Iran and Yemen, as well as OPEC actions, these factors do not indicate sustained inflation but rather temporary effects masking the underlying reality of weak consumer power. Unlike historical events such as the 1973 oil embargo which did not cause a demand collapse, current conditions are defined by stagnant real wage growth and exhausted household savings, leaving consumers unable to absorb higher energy costs without cutting back on other essentials. Market data supports this view, with TIPS break-even rates showing that long-term inflation expectations have fallen below short-term ones since 2022, signaling investor confidence that global demand will eventually decline due to factors like China's housing crisis and the ongoing economic weakness in both the United States and China.
Furthermore, discrepancies exist between official government data used by the Fed and actual market signals; for instance, falling TIPS break-even rates suggest investors expect no inflation risk despite warnings about oil prices, indicating that supply-side narratives may be misleading. The speaker warns against blindly chasing these inflation signals or relying solely on stock market segments, urging viewers to seek disconfirming evidence rather than accepting official stories at face value. This macroeconomic fragility means that energy shocks now trigger a cycle of demand destruction rather than simple price hikes, as the world's two largest economies struggle with supply chain disruptions and suppressed consumer sentiment resulting from long-term pandemic-era lockdowns.
In conclusion, the current economic weakness is largely attributed to the lingering consequences of the pandemic which disrupted global supply chains and dampened consumer confidence for years. Snider highlights that while businesses attempt to manage rising costs through layoffs rather than price increases, this strategy only exacerbates the cycle of income loss and reduced spending power among Americans who are officially out of money to spend. The analysis serves as a cautionary tale about interpreting economic data in isolation from market realities, suggesting that true financial health cannot be gauged by headline inflation numbers alone when the fundamental driver is a lack of consumer demand rather than stable price controls or technological efficiency gains.
Read the full video transcript
This is a guy named Jeff Snider. His
YouTube channel is called Euro Dollar
University, I believe. Uh it'll
certainly come up on screen in a second.
And um he's doing a breakdown of the CPI
that we just saw, and should people be
excited cuz obviously inflation has come
way down. Should you be excited about
this, or should you be paranoid?
>> Big results from the CPI. In fact, what
we're going to hear a lot of as we go
through the numbers is since 2020. Cuz
there's a lot since 2020. And by the
way, this is not all gasoline. In fact,
the more important parts since 2020 are
not gasoline. In addition to that, and
actually similar to it, there is a
twist, a major twist going on in the oil
market and on the oil futures curve. So,
we've got a literal twist and an
unexpected twist.
>> One of the things that I think is very
important for people to understand, this
is a drum I've been beating from time
immemorial. There is a difference
between
crisis-led deflation
and innovation-led deflation. Now,
people are going to try to tell you that
deflation is always bad. And it just
isn't true. Things should get cheaper
over time.
The thing that people are afraid of is
if you're in an environment where people
are a paranoid that they begin holding
their money. This is what happened to
Japan. So, the
everybody starts taking out unimaginable
amounts of debt because their um their
property market is just red red hot. It
finally over inflates, the bubble
bursts, and then everybody is left
scrambling. A lot of people lose their
wealth because they're overextended. And
so, people start going, no matter how
much, dear Japan, and you start
inflating the currency, I'm just not
going to start spending money again. I'm
going to pay down my debt, and I'm just
going to be fiscally conservative or um
conservative in my own house since
fiscal technically means government
spending. So, I'm going to be very
conservative with my wealth. And so, now
you get the
stagnation in Japan. Okay. So, there is
that's a real thing, and I get why and
prices, by the way, start coming down
because nobody's spending money, and so
they try to entice you by making things
cheaper. I get why people are worried
about that kind of crisis-led deflation
cuz it gets very hard to get your
country going growing again. And when
you're not growing, there's not that
level of optimism, enthusiasm,
investment, and so your country
literally just sort of stagnates. Now,
listen, Japan is an amazing place. So,
even in the middle of stagnation, it's
not like they became a hellhole for
cultural reasons that we're not going to
talk about today. But, I get why people
are worried about that. However, just as
a PSA reminder, there is a positive type
of deflation. And so, what Jeff is
trying to parse for people is this is
going to get a drumbeat of this is the
good uh deflation. So, you guys should
be excited that inflation is going down.
This is wonderful. And the reality is
that this isn't at least if Jeff is
correct, this isn't the kind of
deflation that you want to see. This is
being brought on by something that's
crisis-driven.
>> Remember what central bankers are after
here, what they're what they what they
keep talking about, why we need to hike
rates.
>> There's a good chance the Fed is still
going to hike rates though. With the CPI
report, there's less of a chance they
may do it more than once. They're going
to cliche themselves. But, remember what
the Fed is actually talking about.
They're not talking about oil prices
directly. What they're saying is that
oil prices are going to spill over or
they're afraid maybe there's a positive
chance that oil prices spill over into
other prices. So, they're really looking
at the core rate or the core core rate
or the super core rate or basically
services prices.
>> It drives me crazy that um there's so
many different ways of slicing and
dicing the in- uh the inflation rate.
And I think a big part of this is Some
of it is looked especially traders need
to understand what what's really
happening, what's the signal from the
market. But, I also think that the
government uses it to manipulate the
life out of you. Um but, for people
wondering, so core if you're looking at
core CPI, you're trying to remove energy
and food because those can fluctuate
rapidly. Um they're also two of the most
important things that people spend money
on. Uh, so for the average person that
matters a lot, but for a trader less so
because over time, um, those
fluctuations tend to wash out.
>> Let's talk about the CPI.
CPI for the month of June came in
shockingly weak. Analysts were expecting
a small decline in the monthly rate
because of gasoline prices, energy
shock, you know, the in June oil prices
were down, gasoline prices weren't down
down nearly as much as oil was, but at
least energy prices retreated.
>> Man, I really hope you guys are looking
at your screens. So, he's got mapped out
here the what he calls the face shift.
So, when I say that, that's a phrase
that I got from Jeff. You'll see it in
the interview. We talk about this.
Um, the when you see the inflation rates
for basically COVID and you realize that
the subsequent inflation rates are, um,
those are not like, "Oh, prices have
dropped back down." That's just it's
growing off of that elevated number at a
slower rate, but you're still at the
peak, dude, where those numbers like
skyrocketed to. That is wild. Like, it
really seeing it that starkly, I think
people forget that COVID bumped prices
up massively.
And they never came back down. And so,
that's why, dude, I am so mad at myself
that I was just not economically
literate when COVID was happening. And
so, I remember when they said, "I think
this is going to be really hard on kids.
Like, they're going to have, you know,
whatever amount of time, um, out of
school. It's going to be really damaging
and we're not really going to see the
effects for a long time." and I just
thought,
"I don't know. That doesn't seem like
you're either going to see it right away
or you're not. If if kids are fine in
the moment, they're going to be fine
long term." And the same is true of the
economy. It's like, "Okay, well, prices
will go up for a minute, but they're
going to come back down." Like, I don't
understand why people are talking about,
"Oh, it's going to take years to play
out." And now I'm realizing this [ __ ]
takes years to play out. It takes years
for you to see. Dude, when you're a
9-year-old, 2 years is an ungodly amount
of time. And so, 2 years of not being
able to see somebody's full face
actually does have a knock-on effect
that we don't know what it's going to
be, and it will take years to find out.
Um
doing your senior year in high school
from home is going to have a knock-on
effect. It's going to take years to find
out, and we'll see. But, it's like we're
all products of our time, and those play
out in some of the weirdest ways
possible.
And so, the way like I I wouldn't have
told you that people's response to this
was going to be, first of all, to print
money like [ __ ] mad. I didn't see
that coming. I didn't even understand
what money printing was. And then, I
certainly wouldn't have told you, "Oh,
people are just going to credit card
spend, and they're they're not going to
reduce their monthly bills. They're just
going to go crazy." Which they've done
now for years. And the thing that I
think people lose sight of is costs
jumped way the hell up, and they're
still going up from that new
astronomically high rate. They're going
up from the high rate. When we're in all
these tax debates, and I'm like, uh
people are like, "We just need a little
more tax, and everything's going to be
fine."
I'm like back to this. You're you Gary
have understood, yes, there's a problem.
This is your problem. Your problem isn't
that you need more tax dollars. The
problem is you just made everything more
expensive while disempowering the worker
like systematically for the last 20-plus
years through globalization and
technology and some other things. But,
it's like the everyone is like
what what easy thing. Who when they bat?
Like it's the [ __ ] dumbest, lowest
resolution, not even tied from a
cause-and-effect perspective. And so,
I'm like, you have a glaring problem.
It's a real problem. You've got to fix
this [ __ ] problem. And if you don't
fix this problem, either by making the
middle class richer, or by finding a way
to bring these down, which by the way,
don't [ __ ] keep inflating the
currency, and suddenly you can take
advantage of technology actually making
things cheaper.
Dude, it drives me nuts. And when you
see a graph like this and you're like,
"Oh, found my problem." It's like
everything is [ __ ] astronomically
straight vertical line more expensive.
>> Yeah.
>> PI fell by nearly half a percent in the
month of June alone, which is the most
since April of 2020, and it's not even
close. This is the biggest monthly
decline since April of 2020, and very
one of the very few monthly declines
in the last, you know, many years that
are are very near that rate. So, again,
a marching band full of red flags here.
It's not just motor fuel. We're talking
about something else. And of course, the
Fed's talking about, "Hey, we need to
worry about rate hikes, or we need to
hike rates cuz inflation's out of
control, or it could potentially be out
of control." They were not expecting
this at all, even though they should
have been.
>> Now, I know he's trying to do YouTube
hooks here and keep people engaged, but
I would just give you the spoiler alert.
This is all about demand destruction.
So, uh
when you have people going, "I just
can't afford [ __ ] anymore." Then,
apparently, Americans at least, will
just try to credit card spend their way
through it. They'll spend their savings,
uh but eventually, you reach the end of
that road. And by the way, this is a
precursor of what you can expect when
the US government reaches the end of its
road from a debt perspective.
Eventually, you are forced into
austerity, and that does not go well.
>> Um was down a little bit. In fact, the
daily little rate declined. Like I said,
it's not just gasoline. The annual rate
slid from above 4% back to around 3 and
1/2% well below expectations, moving in
the right direction, though again, for
the wrong reasons. Uh the core rate,
which is important, like I said, what
the Fed is really talking about, this
their economist speak in their
econometric models, what they're saying
is what happens is energy prices go up,
as we know. And as energy is such an
important input into all sorts of
businesses, whether it be goods goods
economy businesses or services
businesses, energy costs go up. Say a
service provider, they they like to
focus on service providers. Service
provider sees their electricity bill go
up, some of their diesel fuel costs go
up cuz they're, you know, they're
driving around probably. So, they got
diesel fuel costs go up, energy costs go
up, input costs go up, and so what does
a service provider do? Well, in a
ceteris paribus world of economist, the
service provider's going to raise their
prices. They're going to try to get back
as much if not all of that increase in
energy costs from their customers. And
as a service provider raises their
prices, that leads to another service
provider re- raise their prices, which
leads to a goods economy producer
raising their prices. Next thing you
know, if our brave heroic Federal
Reserve officials don't step in with
their
laughably irrelevant quarter point rate
hikes, somehow that's supposed to put
the brakes on all this. Without their
rate hikes, they lead to this spiral,
this runaway of second round effects.
The second round effect is energy prices
go up, that's the first round, then say
service providers start raising prices
as a response, and then third round
effect is it gets broader and broader
and broader. Next thing you know, you're
in the 1970s. That's the fear, that's at
least what they're saying. And you
already know it's crap because we went
through this last year with tariff
inflation, which the market said there
would be no tariff inflation, and guess
what? There wasn't tariff inflation.
Yes, the cost of some goods went up, but
broader inflation did not break out, and
there was zero chance it was ever going
to break out for the same reasons we're
seeing here, which is
businesses are seeing their input costs
go up, that is absolutely true, but
they're also finding out as if they
didn't know, they cannot pass those
costs on to customers cuz their
customers can't afford it. And if the
customers can't afford it,
one, they raise their prices and volumes
fall off, which is what retailers have
been telling us, including Walmart.
Walmart said we're going to cut our
prices, not raise them. Or the second
thing is, they just have to absorb the
higher input costs, and in response to
that, rather than leading to further
consumer price rates and consumer price
increases, those businesses who see
their margins squeeze, especially
smaller and mid-size businesses, start
cutting back on their own costs, cutting
their own costs, which usually means
trimming hours of workers, maybe
converting them to part-time instead of
full-time, and in some extreme cases
getting rid of them, which by the way is
exactly what the labor data has been
showing through the energy shock. Not
just the establishment survey recently,
but more so all the rest of the labor
data.
>> Policies have consequences.
>> Mhm.
>> So,
if people start mentally mapping this in
the right way, here's what happened. We
engineered a virus in China.
That virus got loose. People start
started getting sick. Governments the
world over were all like, "Never let a
good crisis go to waste." Cuz I don't
think they released the [ __ ] on purpose,
but never let a good crisis go to waste.
Let's use this as an opportunity to
really lock people down. Let's take
control of social media. Let's shut
people up. There's only one argument and
it's ours, and we're going to tell you
what's true. And we're closing things
down for 2 weeks just to slow the
spread. Psych, just kidding. We're
closing down for [ __ ] 2 years. And
we're going to arrest you even if you're
out on the beach and you're not near
anyone cuz we [ __ ] told you to stay
at home and you're not doing it, so
we're going to arrest you. Um you own a
gym. Sorry, tough break. Your gym goes
out of business. We're going to come
padlock the door. Uh all kinds of
absolutely insane [ __ ] that none of us
should have ever stood for. And they
leveraged fear against everybody, and
just took all this draconian control.
Now, unfortunately, because of the way
that economies work, that policy is
going to have
absolutely staggeringly large
consequences that are going to last for
a very long time. That psychotic desire
for power on behalf of the government is
why the middle class is getting the [ __ ]
kicked out of them now. And they're
going to [ __ ] try to blame
billionaires until the end of time, but
the reality is they made everything more
expensive by locking everything down. He
walked through it. He went through it
kind of fast, so I don't know if people
really think about it. Uh the reason
that a cancerous tumor is so difficult
is because it's not like the tumor is
just stuck on the side of
um your healthy tissue like a frozen
piece of gum and you just peel it off
and take it out, it's like [ __ ] warm
gum in your hair. And now good luck
disentangling all of that. So we'll be
right back in a second, but first let me
tell you about something that happened
to me. I was traveling abroad, my phone
got hacked, it was a nightmare. That was
the moment I really understood exactly
how exposed we all are. The hack is just
the entry point. [music] Once your
data's out, it gets sold to data brokers
who then sell it again and again. Your
name, your address, your phone number,
your social security number sitting on
hundreds of sites available to anyone
willing to pay for it. You can try and
remove it yourself, but tracking down
every site, submitting every removal
request, repeating the process every few
months as your data reappears is [music]
designed to be impossible. So Incogni
does it for you. You authorize them
once, they track your data across
hundreds of broker sites and remove it
automatically. And when it reappears,
because it will, they remove it again.
Plus with customer removals, you send
them any link where your information
shows up and their dedicated team takes
it down. Go right now to
incogni.com/impact
and use code impact for 60% off an
annual plan. Try it risk-free for 30
days. Let's talk about the first thing
you eat or drink in the morning. It's
actually not a small decision. Whatever
you take first sets the tone for how
your cells are going to perform all day.
I've spent years obsessing over what
actually moves the needle on long-term
health and the thing most people
overlook is just [music] consistency.
That's why I'm a huge fan of Nandika
from Peak. Nandika is the Rolls-Royce of
coffee alternatives for longevity. Full
spectrum reishi including spore powder
for cellular resistance and immune
support, fermented [music]
puer tea from 250-year-old
trees for metabolic and gut health, and
ceremonial grade cacao that actually
helps your body absorb all of it. It
gives you calm energy, no jitters, no
crash, and it can elevate your mood and
help you focus. Set your longevity goals
in motion. Get 20% off right now at
peaklife.com/
impact. Now, let's get back to the show.
That's how price rises that become broad
happen. Is one supplier has to raise
their rates, so then the next supplier
in the chain. So, it's like, you might
have three or four steps, more, seven,
eight steps of all these different
product and suppliers feeding you things
before your end product makes its way to
the customer. And I know this firsthand,
a drought in California impacted the
cost to us of almonds, which impacted
our profit margin on protein bars,
right? And it is a never-ending string
of a thousand things like that that
influence the cost of something to a
customer. And so, even if I, as Walmart
or the end person, I actually thought
about this with video games,
even if I go, "Oh, I'm going to outsmart
the market. I'm going to take smaller
margins, and I'm going to put something
out that's cheaper. So, hey guys, you
can come to me, don't worry, the cost is
lower, and now I should be able to
gobble everything up." The problem is
that I my margins have probably just
gotten thinner and thinner. So, me
trying to quote-unquote outsmart the
market by lowering my cost may put me
into where I have either little to no
margins, like Xbox literally has 3%
margins for other reasons, but I'm just
saying, like you can get yourself into a
position where your margins are so low,
you're in actual like
um danger of going out of business, or
you may put yourself in a position where
you're losing money on every sale that
you make because of all the people that
are selling you things, all of their
prices went up. So, even if I try to
lead the charge on lowering prices, I've
got to get all of them to lower their
prices. They're not going to want to do
it cuz they've got people feeding them.
And so, it it's
the the fact that the government
did not understand economics well enough
to go, "We can't shut down the global
global supply chains. We can't do it."
We can wait and see how many people die,
and there is a point at which, okay,
[ __ ] we're like losing 30 million
people,
uh you know, you're losing 10% of the
population, then obviously at some point
people are just freaking out so much
like you you've got to do something. But
just as a reminder, uh please look up
the exact number, Ryan. The Spanish flu
of 1918 killed something between like 30
and 50 million people globally on the
back of World War I. So, World War I
killed however many millions, we lost
that many more to the um Spanish uh flu,
and still you didn't have the kind of
like draconian lockdowns that we had
during COVID. Like, that [ __ ] crazy. So,
the the knock-on effects economically
are not easy to unwind in the same way
that a tumor is not easy to cut out. So,
[ __ ] these kids for what they did. That
[ __ ] is wild.
>> Not exactly surprising. The Fed is
looking at the possibility of
second-order effects of inflation that
the markets, the economy, common sense,
basically everything has said, "Not
really going to happen." So, they're
surprised when in the month of June, the
latest numbers that just came out this
morning, the BLS says the core CPI rate
was down fractionally, as you can see in
the chart here that I'm showing you.
It's the first decline in the core CPI
rate since May of 2020. So, once again,
we've got a marching band full of red
flags, because the core rate, this is
not about gasoline, this is not about
food, this is everything else. The core
rate is where you would see second-order
effects show up if second-order effects
are showing up. And the thing is,
second-order effects are showing up.
They're just not inflation second order.
They are demand destruction second order
effects. That's why we're seeing weak
prices in the CPI, in the core CPI, and
all the rest of the channels as well.
So, the core rate 8 year-over-year
slipped again down a little bit. Never
really got much out of control, which is
consistent with the TIPS market as we'll
get to that. But, all the rest of the
CPI details, they say the same thing.
The Fed is
like I said, focusing on services were
for a target. If there were going to be
second order effects, you'd see it in
services. So, the services let less rent
of shelter, which isolates the services
part of the economy that's not
susceptible to the imputations of
shelter. So, we're not getting into all
that fakery. And again,
the negative.
>> The reason he's putting so much
attention on this is if your services
are declining and you're not talking
about shelter, you're not talking about
gas, and that's still going down, you
have demand destruction. People just
aren't going and buying the things that
they used to buy, whether that's
a massage or going into a restaurant or
whatever. It's just that you you're
getting a pullback.
>> To your point, when we first announced
it was like, oh, well, that's because of
Iran war, the gas price went down. So,
that's what's driving. He's like, no,
you take that out, this is down. You
take that out, this is down. And seeing
those other ramifications of it.
>> he's going to get to the long tail of
the
oil curve in a second, which is very
important to understand cuz it it is a
weird discrepancy. If you're not if
you're just trying to map this as a
supply disruption, the long tail of the
curve will be very confusing.
>> Red flags, it tells you that there's
there is more demand destruction in the
inflation numbers than there's anything
resembling inflation. Let me say that
again. Across the entire CPI, the
inflation numbers for June, there is
much much more evidence for demand
destruction than there is even a hint of
evidence for second order inflation or
even any inflation for that matter.
These are red flags because they speak
about the macroeconomy and macroeconomic
weakness while the Federal Reserve and
right now the Fed chair up on Capitol
Hill saying, "We're still worried about
inflation
because of oil prices." Again making the
mistake that the Fed did or the ECB did
in 2008. That's why we call it tricheing
and the Fed is increasingly committed to
that course though these numbers are
going to be strong enough that maybe
some of the on the fence FOMC voting
members are going to have to straddle
themselves off the fence or fall off the
fence from straddling it. One of the
things I think might be worth a deep
dive is how did economists miss
2008?
>> Was it a private debt question?
Is it misunderstanding what's actually
driving inflation?
And so you get the people that are
putting the economic policy in place,
they're misreading the signals.
There's another economist that I pay
attention to Professor Steve Keen, I
believe is his name and he's talking
about that. He was like 2008 is really a
story about failing to understand how
money is created
and how private debt impacts the
economy.
>> And so it'll be interesting to see these
two. I don't yet know if they agree or
disagree
but looking they've both mentioned 2008
is it was a misread of the signals
and by the way on behalf of the people
in charge of your economy,
this is where queue that video of
Biden's senior economic advisor who
doesn't understand modern monetary
theory.
>> The government definitely prints money
and then it lends that money by
by selling bonds. Is that what they do?
They they um
They yeah, they they um
>> Same thing when you look at all the rest
of the consumer price numbers excluding
food, energy and shelter. So again, if
you were expecting second order effects
from higher energy prices, this is
exactly where it would show up. So you
got services prices in there as well as
some good prices. We don't have the
energy stuff, we don't have the food
stuff, we don't have the shelter stuff.
So not the volatile stuff. This is where
the inflation the Fed talks about, this
is where it would be if it's there.
But it's not there. Instead, you have
more demand destruction indications in
the rest of the CPI than you do
inflation. Again, weakest in this part
of the bucket, which is the rest of the
CPI experience, since May of 2020.
This is this should be an eye-opening
red flag moment.
>> Let me let me say what he's saying in a
a different way. The reason he keeps
banging the drum about worse than 2020,
what he's trying to say is, remember
COVID? Remember how psychotic that
period was? You're now seeing things
approaching being as bad as they were in
2020, or at least they haven't been
anywhere near this bad since 2020. So,
this is not something that's mild. This
is if you want to understand why
everything feels so broken. If you want
to understand why like the war is not
causing energy prices to move the way
that you were expecting them to move,
this is because you have something even
bigger than the war in Iran, which is
causing a disinflationary
impulse. So, imagine, the war is
is disrupting supply. So, you have
upward pressure on prices, but the
downward pressure is so extreme that
it's it's not entirely neutralizing it
on the the like right now in this
moment, the the front side of the curve
as they call it. I
remind me never to even as I understand
all of these terms not to use them if I
can avoid them whenever possible. But
like the immediate moment when you're
buying the oil, like [ __ ] I need it
today, that, what they call the front
end of the curve, like sure, that's
going to go up a little, not nearly as
much as people thought it was going to.
And then the sort of near-term long
tail, people are like, nah, it it's all
downward pressure from here. That is
that's a statement, man. And if he
Listen, I think the signals are there.
I know better than to think that, oh,
he's got it right or I've got it right.
It's like
this is be very humble in the face of
data and data interpretation, but it is
pretty interesting if for anybody who's
looking at their screen, like between
where we're at in 2020, you don't get a
lot of these downward beats, and you
don't get one as big as this.
>> For the general public who's thinking
the economy sounds resilient because the
payroll report is positive and maybe GDP
is too, this is not a positive sign. And
of course,
most consumers, the K-shaped economy
nonsense, but most consumers who are in
the bottom part of the K understand this
intuitively, understand it with common
sense. And this is why we see consumer
surveys all over the map, incredibly
pessimistic, not not so happy about job
prospects and income prospects because
they know the demand situation is weak.
Not that they know it in some kind of
top-level macroeconomic context, but
from their own personal experience. The
numbers match up with what people are
experiencing and telling surveys. So,
whether be the University of Michigan or
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's
own survey of consumer expectations,
which do not show inflation. They don't
show inflation expectations among
consumers. What they do show is fears
over jobs and incomes. The kind of stuff
that is consistent with weak demand, the
kind of weak demand that would show up
in some of the most negative CPI rates
since 2020.
Lots of red flags over the CPI report
and not inflation red flags, the other
kind of red.
>> All right, think about it this way. When
you get inflation, what's going on is
people are feeling rich, man. Money's
everywhere. Money's flush. You've got
more money chasing the same amount of
goods. You have a discrepancy between
what's actually available to buy and the
amount of people chasing with money. So,
you can get that by hurting supply, but
if you haven't hurt supply and people
are feeling flush with cash and they're
going out and we're getting inflation
cuz everyone's getting excited, that
does not feel like right now. So, that's
why people have been like, oh, well,
we've got a supply shock. That's that's
really got to be the problem. No, that
was the phase shift in COVID that
created that problem, and that's why
everything is now elevated. But the
problem is right now people are not
feeling flush. People are not feeling
like, "Yo, let the good times roll."
That is not the vibe. I don't see
anybody saying that. So, if you know,
other than oil, which we are stripping
out of these numbers, other than oil,
there's no supply disruption on the
things that we want. So, what exactly is
making the deflation happen? The answer
is
people don't feel flush. They don't have
the money. There's less money chasing
the same amount of goods. When you have
more money, when you have same money
chasing less goods, or more money
chasing same goods,
uh you're going to get inflation. But,
if you have less money chasing same
goods, you're going to get deflation,
and crisis-led deflation. And so, that
is like, if you just want to get it from
a vibes perspective, you can feel that
the vibe is not, "Yo, these are the good
times." And because it's not, "Yo, these
are the good times," both
psychologically and the fact that
people, cuz they've burned through their
savings now, and they've burned the
racked up their credit card debt, there
just really isn't enough
People don't have enough money in their
personal wallets to go out and make the
good times roll. And that's what you're
seeing in the numbers.
>> So, from a consumer's standpoint, he
mentioned it in the presentation
earlier, Walmart dropped their prices.
So, I can get way more Twinkies than I
could have gotten last month. So, this
is a win for me. But, what should we be
worried about because it on on mass, in
the individual level, to his point
again, it's like, yeah, this is this is
actually supposed to happen. Forget the
greedy corporations to make more money.
You know what I mean? What is something,
what's that other shoe that's going to
fall that we might not see in the short
term?
>> So, if you think of people are going to
buy the amount of Twinkies that they
plan to eat, I don't know, this became
about Twinkies, but you're going to buy
the amount of Twinkies that you're going
to eat, Walmart is saying, "Ooh, we The
reason that we're changing the price
here is because people stopped buying
them." So, now I'm just trying to get
back to my normal volume of sales, to
get back to my my volume, or maybe at
least try to move in the right
direction, I'm going to lower price. But
that means that I'm now making less
money and that corporation is going to
try to do something to maintain their
profit margin. They'll eat some of it,
but they're not going to be able to eat
all of it cuz there are just certain
margins. I know everybody gets in a
twist about the family has all this
money. Again, these com- companies are
at a size that the amount that they're
pulling out on an annual basis just
isn't isn't enough to change the outlook
of the company. So, we can talk about
whether they should be paying the
workers more, it's a different story.
But in terms of like the actual profit
margins, what they end up doing is
going, "Fuck, the only thing that we can
control cuz we can't control the
inflation on the incoming goods that are
hurting my profit margin. So, I've got
to do something with my labor costs."
And so, they start they reduce their
price to try to get people in, that
squeezes their margins more, and then
they've got to start letting people go,
and then that person gets let go, then
they can afford less things like less
shoes, less whatever at another store.
So, then that store is like, "Fuck, now
I'm in a bad spot. I can't
I'm not getting the revenue that I used
to be getting, so I'm going to lower my
prices now. But to do that, that's
eating my margins again, so they first
got eaten because the person got laid
off at Walmart that now isn't shopping
at my store. So, I lower my prices, that
hurts my margin. Now I'm trying to get
that back, so I have to let somebody go,
and so then that has a knock-on at
another store, and that's how this burns
across the economy. So, it's like, yeah,
for a minute, we were talking about this
earlier, for a minute, it's like there's
a discrepancy. You haven't lost your
job, you're still making money, you're
feeling good. You go, "Oh, [ __ ]
Twinkies are back down, love it. I'm
going to get my Twinkies." Not realizing
there is like this cascade of people
losing their jobs, which then hurts the
economy because people don't have the
cash, they don't feel flush, they're not
going out, and so everybody just
constricts. And when the when it
constricts, what they're really saying
is people lose their jobs, so they lose
their income, which then means they're
not buying from somebody, which means
somebody else is going to lose their
job. And then that's just how this
spiral starts.
>> We just have to throw this out there. We
just scheduled this.
I'm having another webinar on August
9th, which is a Sunday. And to
Eurodollar University fans and people
who watch this channel for a long time,
or just people who understood what
happened in 2008, yes. August 9th, I
picked that date for a reason. Tune in
to figure out why that is if you're not
if you're not sure already. We're also
going to continue from our last webinar
series, which proved to be really
popular.
>> I'm not sure yet.
>> Talking about how to use these
Eurodollar signals, this Eurodollar
information, the curves, the esoteric
signals, in a portfolio management
context. How to look at where to place
your money, allocate money based on
whichever conditions the marketplace is
telling. Again, we we focus on the
market. In the last webinar, I went
through what the methodology is here at
Eurodollar University. Why we focus so
much on the signals that we do. I also
went through why the mainstream doesn't
focus on those signals, and it's
it's a story you got to you got to check
that out. The the the webinar the the
last webinar from June, just a couple
weeks ago, is on the YouTube channel.
So, if you want to check that out,
highly recommend that, because it goes
through the history of where we went
from we took a different path than the
rest of the mainstream, and history
shows that they chose the wrong path.
Plus, went into the over the background
details about portfolio management,
using this stuff in a portfolio
management context. We're going to go
further into that to talk about pivot
points and phase shifts, and
how to uh how to how to how to really uh
put dial this stuff into uh the overall
portfolio management investment
framework that we talk about. So, yeah.
>> Let's go over that.
>> Sunday August 9th, we'll have fun on
August 9th. We'll talk about what August
9th really means, uh as well as uh it's
5:30 p.m. Eastern time. Link in the
description to sign up.
>> Can't learn too much about the economy.
>> to what we got today, though. The told
you part.
Um nothing that the uh CPI report should
have been a surprise, because we saw it
coming in the TIPS break-even rates. And
remember, TIPS break-even is nothing
more than a relative measure of demand
for inflation protection. It's not to be
taken literally. The break-even rate of
230 basis points doesn't mean the
five-year break even rate is like 232
basis points. That does not mean the
market expects the CPI is going to
average 2.32% over the five years of
that of that security. That's not what
it's saying. These are relative
measures. When you see the break even
rate go up, that just means that there's
more demand for inflation protection
through the CPI that's paid out by the
Treasury Department than there was
before. And if break even rates fall,
that means there's less demand for CPI
protection because the market place
doesn't think the CPIs are going to be
worthwhile investing in the TIPS
security. Therefore, we're going to
invest in the TIPS.
>> if there is no inflation.
>> When we see break even rates fall
quickly, that tells you the market is
looking at inflation conditions or what
goes into inflation conditions and
thinking something big has changed here,
which means I need less inflation
protection, which is consistent with the
inflation numbers that we just what we
just went over. So, first of all, the
TIPS market has said for the last
several years, there is no additional
inflation risk. Whether it be last year,
uh when we talked about tariff
inflation, the TIPS market said, "Not
happening." And of course, it didn't
happen. Whether it was in 2024 was
talking about sticky inflation, higher
for longer, the TIPS market said, "Nope,
not happening there." But more
importantly, more recently, the Iran
conflict, uh the TIPS market first of
all, even though the even though the
break even rate got to a multi-year
high, as you can see in the chart, it
wasn't that much of a multi-year high.
It wasn't really that much different
than early last year. So, the market
place said, "Yes, there's going to be
some direct impact from oil prices on
the CPI, which makes the TIPS uh
security a little bit more valuable. So,
break even rates went up, but they
didn't soar ahead as if the market was
pricing inflation risk or any
substantial inflation risk." And since
the middle or the end of really the
middle of May, end of May, and through
and through June, break even rates have
been absolutely plummeting. And they've
been plummeting quickly and made a huge
move in doing so, which is a key red
flag signal that we are consistent with
everything that we just went over.
>> All right. What I love about all of this
stuff is what he's making clear is once
you know where to look, then there
really are answers to some of your
biggest economic questions. When tariffs
were coming down the road,
um I wasn't looking at this like, "Oh,
there's going to be signals in the
economy I can go check and see what in
aggregate the crowd of very
well-educated investors think is going
to happen." Now, it's not a guarantee
that that's how things are going to play
out. This is why the market is best
understood as gambling. This is people
placing bets. But if you want to know
what people actually believe, you can
see where they're putting their money.
So again, these things are not positive.
It's not like the market going and and
saying, "Uh we don't think that we need
TIPS protection."
uh means that you don't need TIPS
protection. However, it does allow you
to like if you're on Who Wants to Be a
Millionaire, you get to ask the crowd.
You get to find out what is the group of
people who are putting their actual own
hard-earned dollars against this bet,
what do they think? And so you get an
aggregate answer. It's very, very
interesting. And man, part of the reason
I'm so into this is I'm constantly
thinking about what what should I be
doing with my own money. I talk about
this stuff all the time. I was just
quizzing the guys the other day. I'm
like, "Do you guys Okay, you hear me
record all this stuff. You see me write
all this stuff. You know how my
thinking's been evolving. Do you guys do
anything with this? Like are you
actually managing your money
differently?" Because it's actually
influencing how I manage my money. And
so
having a deeper understanding of the
signals that you can look at so that you
can actually do something different with
your own money is very freeing. It makes
me feel like this is way less of a black
box and I have somewhere to go. I'm
Trust me, I always approach this stuff
with humility knowing that there are
things that I can't see, that there are
way more variables than I understand
certainly at this point. Um but man, is
it very empowering to start to build a
map of where to look when you see a
certain concern looming on the horizon.
>> Especially you being a cause and effect
person, it's it's interesting now to
actually see the economic data that will
prove this cause and effect. With the
media saying one thing, but the people
who are actively putting their money to
protect it from inflation, they think
the other thing. And just like with the
prediction markets, once you follow the
money, you start to see it. The people
who will bet on it are the people that
actually have that information, versus
the people who, you know, talk about it.
>> So true. Whether it's the five-year
break even rate or all the rest of the
break even rates, the marketplace has
been saying this entire time, yes,
there's an energy shock, but the energy
shock is more likely than not to lead to
demand destruction, not to inflation.
Nothing is ever zero, especially in a
complex marketplace like this, but the
market or the TIPS market was pretty
clear.
It's not a 0% chance, cuz nothing is
zero, but it's as close to zero in a
complex system as you're going to get.
And of course, that's exactly what we're
seeing. The 10-year break even, similar,
maybe even a little bit more forceful on
the downside. One of the One of the
things that you can do in One of the
things that we often do here at Euro
Dollar University, part of our
methodology, is you compare the
five-year break even or other
maturities, too. But you compare the
five-year break even to the 10-year
break even, and what that told you was,
not only is the five-year break even
saying that there was very little chance
of inflation risk, broadly speaking, the
10-year break even rate was less than
the five-year break even rate, which
meant that whatever CPI effect there was
going to be from oil prices, it wasn't
going to last very long. Of course,
that's exactly what we're seeing show up
yet again. So, the TIPS market is sort
of taking a vic- victory lap here. Even
though June is just one month, June was
such a shocking month that it's going to
it's going to resonate beyond just uh
the month of June or just the month of
July that we're in as we move forward
here. Even though the CPI's likely to
rebound with oil prices next month, it's
the underlying mechanics that maybe you
don't see when the CPI's up based on
oil. And that is the weak uh
weak demand conditions that are
consistent with the demand destruction
part of it. Again, the see the the TIPS
market was saying noth- none of this
should be a surprise. Weak demand
conditions, nothing was None of the
ingredients that were that should have
been there for an inflation second round
effects, all that stuff were present."
Especially when you look at some of the
longer-term numbers like the five-year
five-year forward rate. As you can see,
even going back to 2022, the five-year
five-year forward rate, which is sort of
longer-term inflation expectations,
structural inflation expectations,
longer term, the market places said,
"Even back in 2022, this was not the
1970s all over again. This wasn't
inflation, it was a supply shock, a
phase shift." And then every energy
shock that we've experienced since then,
whether it was in 2023 with OPEC and
its, you know, Saudi Arabia's lollipop,
their stupid lollipop that backfired big
time, 2024, the Yemeni rebels, oil
prices surged again, 2025, tariff
inflation, 2026, Iran inflation, the
long-run inflation expectation from the
marketplace has been consistent. It's
not inflation. There are short-run
impacts on the CPI, sure, from each of
those things, but the demand situation,
the monetary situation is not consistent
with any type of inflation risk
whatsoever. So,
>> Here's a big part of why I think this is
playing out, because
you do have to reconcile with you've got
the 1973 oil embargo
has massive supply disruption, and it
doesn't lead to demand destruction. And
so, not not in um energy-related things.
But, it is leading to demand destruction
now
outside of um energy and energy itself.
And so, you have a response now that's
different to what happened in 1973. And
so, the question becomes, why is this
playing out differently? I have a
feeling, though I've not checked the
data, so this could end up not being
true, but I have a feeling that what
you're looking at is as we're coming
into the 1970s, we um had real wage
growth through the '50s and '60s. And
so, there was a cultural sense of like,
okay, I'm feeling good, I'm getting
richer. We hadn't yet been clobbered
with the inflation in the 70's. And so
people are coming into that with just a
totally different mentality than we have
now, which is the exact opposite. Um my
real wages haven't grown in decades or
not much. And so there's a lot of
anxiety around that. And so now that
people have burned through savings,
they've burned through credit cards,
we're getting hit with these disruptions
at a point whether you're talking about
COVID or you're talking about the Iran
war, where it destroys demand instead of
pushing people to be like, well, we got
to keep all the things that require
energy going. It's like, no, it's the
economy is so weak because of that um
weakness in real wage growth that people
are just like, I'm just out of cash,
man. I'm just tapped out. Even if I
wanted to pay more for this, I just
can't. I don't have the money. Um again,
that's a that's very much a hypothesis
as opposed to a thesis. Um but I
wouldn't be surprised if that ends up
holding true.
>> Boller, keep chasing the inflation ghost
up the some kind of tree. What some kind
of haunted tree or something. I don't
know what the correct analogy is here.
So that's the TIPS market.
Now let's talk about what's going on in
oil cuz it's really interesting what's
happening here today. Now as we know, uh
the Iran conflict has flared up again,
which is should not have been a surprise
either because the what's going on in
Iran and uh this is something by the way
that I talked about with Brent Johnson
yesterday. And that's something I should
bring up too.
>> Oh.
>> I've started a bunch of things over at
Euro Dollar University including a
channel to talk about your dollar talk.
Uh did so did some conversations
yesterday with Hugh Hendry and Keith
Weiner, a good friend Keith Weiner at
Monetary Metals. Uh if you don't know
Keith Weiner, you should. Tremendously
smart guy, knows his history, knows the
gold market in and out. And of course
Brent Johnson. I'm going to talk to Ken
McElroy today. We've got Ed Dowd. We've
got, you know,
Mike I mean
>> Rockstars
>> people over at Euro Dollar University to
talk. Check that out. You subscribe to
that channel. These as These
conversations will be coming out in the
very near term. But we were talking
about how come Brent and I were talking
about how complex the situation is in
the Middle East. And so this is going to
linger on for quite some time. And as
it's flared up again, as you would
expect, you know, supply situation
becomes questionable again, especially
with the blockade. Oil prices are
responding. So you've seen front month
contracts in WTI futures go from the 60s
up until almost the It got into the 80s
earlier this morning. It's right around
7950 today. But today, look at Look at
the price changes that are going on
today. So front month contract, August
delivery, up a dollar 42. It's It was up
more than that, but a dollar 42 almost
2%. September delivery, not nearly as
much, only up a dollar. October
delivery, only up 30 cents. But then
look beyond that. November delivery, the
three-month benchmark, down.
So oil prices are up near term, and
they're increasingly sold off further
into the future, which is, as Clown
Waller is pointing to,
demand destruction. So what the market
is saying is that yes, the flare up in
the Middle East is There's a good chance
it's going to disrupt supply again in
the near term, which is going to raise
the desperation or at least urgency to
buy oil in the short run,
but selling contracts further into the
future because the market is saying,
"Uh-oh, the situation in the
macroeconomy, not good, despite what the
the Federal Reserve says or politicians
or the stock market or at least small
segments of the stock market." Uh the
the oil market is saying, "Look, uh we
were on thin ice to begin with this with
this energy shock. An increase in oil
prices that keeps gasoline around $4
wholesale or $3 wholesale or higher,
it's actually three three and a quarter
today, that keeps retail gasoline up
around 420, 430, maybe even 450, it's
going to lead to demand destruction in
the US, in Europe, across Asia.
Therefore, we're going to buy oil in the
near term because there's going to be
some desperation for supply, but we
don't need to buy oil for a very long
time because we're thinking oil's going
to become cheaper down the road as
demand continues to fall off further and
further and further. What's going on in
China is a big part of this equation.
And you have right now the two biggest
economies in the world both
sick and not doing well. The US for
reasons we've been talking about here
largely an echo of COVID. What's going
on in China is tied to their housing
crisis. Certainly that's my belief. And
so you've got the two biggest economies
in the world in bad shape
looking at what's going on with the oil
prices and China for one is not doubling
down.
They were drawing on their reserves
briefly, but they were actually even
with the disruption from the Strait of
Hormuz, they were able to at the
beginning able to keep building
into their reserve tank. So that's
pretty extraordinary. That tells you
that the what happened in the housing
crisis has caused a massive downturn
both in diesel and consumer
needs for regular gas. So when you get
into a position where you can actually
destroy energy demand, which has for 50
years been considered inelastic, you
know that you're in pretty rough shape.
All right, with all of this first of
all, shout out to Jeff Snider. I'm so
grateful I found him. He's utterly
fascinating.
Be very thoughtful. Always approach this
stuff with massive amounts of humility,
but the story that you're being told
about what's going on in the economy
just isn't the story. I think the vast
majority of people just don't understand
it well enough
and so be very careful. The more you can
get towards what are the actual signals,
what can we look at, where are people
betting their money to get closer to
ground truth, the better off you're
going to be. But these are very complex
systems. So I for one I'm going to walk
away from this saying, okay, this is my
thesis of what's going on right now, but
I'm very actively going to seek
disconfirming evidence cuz I'm making
all of us are making everyday a bet
based on where we put or don't put our
money on what we think is going to
happen in the future and in the
inflationary environment that we all
live in, um don't be confused by a
momentary downturn. Remember what
happened to all of us during COVID. Uh
you've got to find a way to be able to
make ends meet by putting your money to
work. So, just be thoughtful about all
of it. Um another shout-out to Straight
Arrow News. Love those guys. Thank you
so much for supporting everything that
we're doing here on the channel. The QR
code is on your screen. Go to you to get
the unbiased truth on the stories
that matter. Um that's very important.
Making sure that you are not getting uh
spin, that you're not being
propagandized. That is hugely important.
And if we want to keep this sponsor and
keep doing what we're doing here, we're
trying to get to 100 app downloads,
guys. So, if that speaks to you and you
want news that's truly unbiased, go
check them out. That'll be amazing.
It'll be a huge way to support the
channel. My next AI masterclass is
coming up Wednesday, August 5th at 1:00
p.m. Pacific for free. I'm going to
teach you guys how to launch a company
using AI. The link to sign up is in the
description. Until then, be legendary.
All right, peace.
If you like this conversation, check out
this episode to learn more. Boys and
girls, things are popping off in China
and they have a goal to get out from
under the US dollar. I don't think
anybody's confused about that. They also
want to be the global hegemon. The more
you read about Xi Jinping, the more you