AI Uprising, Fluoride Debate, and Trump’s Shocking Economic Plan! | Tom's Trending
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The podcast opens with a discussion on escalating geopolitical tensions, specifically focusing on President Biden's authorization of long-range missile strikes in Ukraine and Russia's subsequent nuclear threats. The host argues that while the situation resembles a high-stakes game of poker involving Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), the deterrent remains effective due to the sheer scale of modern weaponry compared to historical crises like the Cuban Missile Crisis. He posits that President Biden's aggressive moves might inadvertently set up Donald Trump for success by forcing Putin into a position where he can negotiate from strength rather than desperation, allowing Trump to claim credit for ending the war without starting new conflicts. This strategic analysis extends to economic policy, with the host evaluating Trump's proposed tariffs not merely as protectionism but as a potential consumption tax that could fund government reductions in income taxes if managed correctly alongside domestic manufacturing incentives. The conversation shifts to health and environmental controversies, centering on Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s campaign to remove fluoride from US drinking water. The guest expresses strong opposition to adding untested chemicals to the food supply, citing evolutionary logic regarding jaw development caused by soft diets rather than fluoridation itself. He also touches upon broader conspiracy theories versus his own skepticism of controlled narratives, noting that while he lacks specific beliefs like flat earth or moon landing fakes, he believes the entire global narrative is manipulated and crumbling under radical transparency. This leads to a critique of social media's impact on youth mental health, where the host advocates for delaying smartphone usage until age 16 to protect developing brains from the addictive nature of digital platforms that have "ate an entire generation." A significant portion of the episode explores futuristic technology through the lens of human enhancement and ethical responsibility. The speakers marvel at advancements like bipedal exoskeletons designed to help paraplegics walk independently, viewing such tech as a promise for a better tomorrow rather than just sci-fi fantasy. They also discuss Neuralink and brain-computer interfaces that could grant superhuman abilities or allow direct thought-to-text communication, sparking debates about the risks of upgrading human cognition versus preserving natural limitations. The host shares his willingness to undergo gradual biological upgrades if safety is proven but emphasizes caution regarding long-term side effects, contrasting this optimism with concerns about AI models like Google's Gemini generating harmful content by mimicking internet toxicity or user biases. In the community corner and closing segments, the hosts address viewer questions comparing Donald Trump's early years to Adolf Hitler's, concluding that while both were ambitious leaders, their specific plans differed significantly in execution and timeline without immediate evidence of comparable genocidal intent from Trump. The discussion also covers practical advice for navigating family gatherings during political holidays like Thanksgiving, suggesting a strategy of "sitting" with differing opinions rather than debating them to preserve relationships. Finally, the episode concludes with reflections on video games as tools for teaching mindset and resilience, featuring characters like Bruce Lee in their upcoming game project designed to help children develop growth mindsets in an increasingly complex world where traditional advice often fails to interface effectively with reality.
Read the full video transcript
The Matrix is coming to life as Google's
Gemini just told humans that they are a
waste of resources and they hope we all
die. The war in Ukraine is escalating.
Trump's tariffs finally get some actual
details on them and we'll see what you
guys think about my take on that. But
don't worry about that because Bill
Gates wants to get cows out of your beef
and I know that's going to be a spicy
one in the comments. And speaking of
comments, everybody, we are going to do
the community corner where we take
questions and condemnations from you
guys out there
who want to know how I could possibly
fail to compare Trump's early years to
Hitler's early years. So, we'll be
circling around to that. All right,
we've got all that and a whole bunch
more.
Drew,
start us off.
You're way too excited about AI trying
to kill us. I just want I just want to
put that out there. But before I get to
the existential crisis, we have a
real-life crisis cuz Biden chose
violence this morning. He has authorized
a US long-range missile usage in
Ukraine. What that means is Ukraine had
a fixed kind of a layer of things that
they can do, ways they can interact and
engage. He has pretty much taken a lot
of those things off so they can fully
off use American weapons inside of
Ukraine. Russia has responded escalating
it and has now been teasing out nuclear
war. I feel like I'm in a bad episode of
Dr. Strangelove.
What do you think is going to happen in
the UK region?
Yeah, well, so nice reference to Dr.
Strangelove, the point of which how I
learned to stop worrying and love the
bomb. That's probably good advice right
about now. The reality is that I think
what we're witnessing is a very grand
game of poker. When you're talking about
mutually assured destruction, the odds
that he that Putin is actually going to
use nuclear weapons is very, very low.
He would get just hellfire rained down
upon him. I don't think we're there. I
don't think anything has happened
egregious enough. I don't think they're
promising anything egregious enough. Uh
but they do need to be careful backing
him into a corner. So, how I think this
is going to play out, uh what Biden is
doing now, he probably should have done
a long time ago if he was going to do
it, but the phenomenal news is now on
the handoff, if Biden goes in, actually
gives the Ukraine the ability to push
them back, now Trump comes in and I
wasn't sure how he was going to pull
this off because if there was no real
threat of violence, he was going to have
to end up violating one of his promises,
which is I'm not going to be the one
that starts any new wars, and by the
way, I'm going to get this shut down.
So, it would have required him to come
in, bluff his way, Putin would likely
call his bluff, and say, "No, I'm going
to keep going. I don't agree to that.
I'm not going to back off." And with
Biden doing this now, if we're dropping
shells behind the line, now Trump has
the ability to roll in and say, "If you
think Biden was crazy, wait till you see
what I do if you don't back off." And
because now it's already in motion, the
missiles are already going in. They're
already falling. They're crashing into
things. Now, obviously, anybody paying
attention should be worried about two
nuclear powers coming in and threatening
each other, but I really do think that
MAD, mutually assured destruction, is
going to hold. That isn't going to be
what happens. If Trump is as calculating
on this as I think he is, it's going to
look something like this. Uh if you
think Biden's crazy, wait till you see
what I'm willing to do if you don't back
off. Putin's going to be, "I know you're
bluffing, but I'm willing to draw lines.
I'm not willing to back off, but I'm
willing to draw lines where we are
today." If Zelenskyy has a good story to
tell, I convince the West to come in
behind us to give us what we needed to
push them back at least a little, now
he's got save face, we can stop all the
death that he is going to accept. I
mean, it just seems impossible to think
that he won't have to accept the loss of
some of the Ukrainian land, but if there
can be a narrative that's told that,
"Look, we some part of the Ukrainian
people did want to go back to Russia
anyway, so hey, we
accept a little bit of that. We stood
our ground. Nobody thought we'd make it
this far. Everybody has the narrative
that they need. Trump has a narrative
that he needs. Biden actually ends up
doing something decisive in his term,
which
strangely ends up, I think, playing into
Trump's hand incredibly well, so you get
this wonderful trade-off that begs the
question of
is Biden actually so annoyed about the
Kamala Harris thing that he's actually
doing things to help Trump? I don't
know. It seems a little conspiratorial
to me, but it's utterly fascinating that
this move
probably is really good for Trump being
able to come in and bring a decisive end
to this. We'll see. So, I'm not super
worried. You You cannot ever be
um
glib or take it for granted that they're
playing with weapons that could end
civilization, so I do not want people to
think that I don't understand the
gravity of the moment, but the reality
is, I think, just like if um a piece of
art
is
more likely to last into the future the
longer it has lasted. I think the same
is true of mutually assured destruction
acting as a deterrent. The longer it has
been effective at that, the longer it
will be effective at that. I don't think
that it's like, "Oh my god, it's this
precarious thing and we've been
balancing it for 70 years and that means
we're more likely to spill over." I
think we're less likely to spill over. I
think people have been raised to think
of it as this thing that you just don't
ever do. Whereas in the early days of
the Cuban Missile Crisis, when they're
moving things, you know, into Cuba, it
was like, "No, for real, we might really
launch these at you." Because they
weren't as big, they weren't as deadly.
And so it had a I mean, it was still
terrifying. But now it's like, I mean,
with how much bigger they've gotten, I
think people understand it's it's a
non-starter.
And And that's what was interesting to
me cuz it almost felt like Biden went to
the casino,
told the dealer to hit me on 17, and
then just walked away. It was like,
"Figure it out Trump. Like it was
nervous. It was nerve-racking and you
know, we talked to Annie Jacobson this
summer and for her, you know, in 7
minutes the entire world is gone. Like
it's
with one bad decision, one angry actor,
one person who's disrespected and just
takes it personally.
If you don't back Putin into an
existential threat, he won't do it. Is
one man's guess, right? Let Let me I do
not have a crystal ball. This is just
what I know about humans. I'm not even
this a student of Putin. I don't know
him that well. I don't know his history
other than the territorial ambitions.
But
when I think about, okay,
you know the risk you bring to your own
countrymen and ruling over a smoldering
ruin does not strike me as very
interesting. And so I think as long as
he believes he has a path out where he
can still effectively lead his country,
I think we're going to be fine. And this
will be a test of whether Trump is the
deal maker that he wants us to believe
that he is or he's just brash and
arrogant and a pain in the ass. But I'm
going to assume, given that he's managed
to take him all him himself all the way
to the White House, it's going to look
something like this. Uh he knows that
you have to in in business negotiations
always, you want to step into your
opponent's shoes and I think it's
Mearsheimer that calls this strategic
empathy. You want to step into your
opponent's shoes and say, "What does the
world look like from their perspective?
Oh, this guy has to go back to his
people and say, 'We got to win. All that
death was worth it because I still need
to be the leader.' And the second I
think I might not be the leader, well,
then the calculations change." So, if
Trump is able to give him a story, not
back him into a corner where it's an
existential threat, be like, "Putin,
look, I've no interest in Russia dying.
I think you're a worthy adversary." Like
if I'm him, I walk in, I'm using
language like that. "Your country is
amazing. You guys are a great power. You
actually helped America be better over
the course of history and
I don't want to see you guys fall. I
don't want to see you in ruins, but I'm
also I can't let you come in and start
running over Western democracies.
And so I think it will play out
something like that. Where he says,
"Look, we're going to draw a line here.
Let's start my 4 years off on a on good
footing. Let's find a way to bring our
economies together." It's going to be
something like that. Like he is not been
afraid to go talk to dictators that we
just think violate every moral code you
could possibly violate.
Mhm.
But he gets them to think about
economics and I really think that's the
play. Like when I think about the Middle
East, dude, it's just the economy, the
economy, the economy. And the period
where China felt most like an ally and
the least like an adversary was when we
were doing global trade, when we were
letting them rise about a poverty. Now,
it's risky because
they then get strong enough that they're
like, "Well, actually,
we're not becoming democratic and we
kind of want to slap you around." So,
it's a it's a risky game. I don't think
that we have that problem with Russia.
They're not economically strong enough.
Cappy, well, if the bombs don't kill us,
the fluorides might. So, we have Brian
Johnson
That's a good transition, by the way.
You know, I'm working on it. Uh Brian
Johnson was criticizing RFK's fight
against fluoride. I think we have the
tweet brought up.
All right, as part of Maha, Robert
Kennedy Jr. wants to eliminate fluoride
from US drinking water. Fluoride has
been in US drinking water since the
1960s mainly to prevent tooth decay. Is
this a good or bad idea? Let's look at
the science.
Uh and it's a threat. So, summarize it
for me. What uh what did he say? He's
saying this is a bad idea.
I think Brian Johnson still comes from
that class of
This is the same billionaire who has
put himself basically in like chemical
bubble wrap, where he's very, very
adamant about the most healthy things
that have the most healthy takeaways.
Now, fluoride isn't the
fluoride isn't necessarily the tooth
decay darling that we thought it was,
especially on the but it's in every
toothpaste, so we kind of been marketed
that versus what the science is actually
saying. And I think Brian Johnson is
pushing back that the science doesn't
really back up the claims in the
widespread use in which it has been used
widespread.
But that's also what RFK is saying. So
RFK's position I understand. RFK's
position is look, there's data that
shows that it has a tremendous negative
impact on IQ. Now, I've not looked at
the data, so I don't know that it
actually says that and Lord knows I do
not trust anybody
uh when they make big claims like that
if I haven't looked at the data myself.
Uh
but I will say that adding a chemical to
the drinking water just strikes me from
an evolutionary standpoint as absurd.
Like I don't know why you would need to
do that. I think if you want to look at
why teeth are becoming a problem, you
want to look at how hard are the things
that we're chewing when we're young,
which has a huge impact on uh the
formation of our jaws. You want to look
at mouth breathing and what's causing us
to breathe through our mouth. Probably
not chewing on hard foods and getting
enough space
um in the the pallet. Um and then also
looking at
um
just
when we start adding things to the food
supply like carbohydrates, massive
processing, that all of that stuff ends
up having a tremendous impact on our
metabolic health. And so if that's
eroding teeth, if that's changing the
microbiome in the mouth, I could see all
of that like processed food, not chewing
on hard foods like tough meats and
things like that as probably the prime
movers in the something has changed in
the mouth. And so rather than putting
fluoride in the water, which I IQ or
not, just like I am so opposed to adding
exogenous substances that we have not
tested over extremely long periods of
time. And so given all of the very
strange health consequences that we're
seeing today,
just strikes me as a first do no harm,
right? Like what are we doing with
fluoride in the water? If it even
potentially has that kind of negative
impact, I think removing it strikes me
as the better move. And PS, I don't
drink tap water at all, have not for
decades. So, I can at least attest from
the other side of the fence that you
don't need to be drinking tap water.
That was a flex that I just wanted to
let you know.
I guess like bottled water, yes. That
That's my hardest flex is uh I drink
bottled water.
I would say that there is this
conspiracy theory that fluoride is the
reason that our pineal gland gets
clogged, so we can't be more high
calcified, I think that's it. Calcified,
yeah, so we we can't uh get to our
higher level of consciousness, which
lets me leads me to ask you, what is
your tinfoil hat conspiracy theories or
anything kind of growing up that you
heard that you believe or
I don't really have a lot of conspiracy
stuff. Look, the JFK thing seems very
compelling to me, and I will admit that
when I read about a conspiracy,
far more than I think, "Oh my god, like
there's some big thing here." I think,
"Oh, here is more evidence that the
world does not work the way that I
thought it did." And so, reading uh JFK
and the unspeakable, that was pretty
eye-opening as I started learning about
how money works and that it's all a big
lie, a total manipulation that people
use specific words on purpose to make
you think a certain way.
Um even the way that Trump talks about
tariffs, he really either doesn't
understand how they work or he's
intentionally using wording to simplify
the concept for people, but
misrepresents it. Because China,
whoever, the other country does not pay
the money. And I think he knows that.
Like I think Trump understands this
unequivocally. Like I think he gets it.
He knows what it does, he knows how to
work it, he's put them in place, he put
in place that Biden kept, so if Biden
thought they were so terrible, he would
have removed them. I I he really
understands them, but I also think he
understands how to um shape the
narrative so that the public understands
it. So, you and I recorded a channel
trailer. I think this will probably come
out before the channel trailer, but one
of the things that I said in that uh is
a quote from the book Revolt of the
Public. And in that book, he says
something that
both captures and predicts Trump cuz he
wrote it in 2015. So, it it
predicts Trump. It certainly captures
what Trump is, but also
cuz the euphoria of this moment, it
feels good.
That it feels like the country gave a
mandate and there's enough agreement
that it feels like we'll be able to get
some momentum going, but at the same
time, the quote that I read says
"Put all of your energy, he says
specifically politicians, but I would
say influencers, put all of your energy
into leaders, for lack of a better word,
that don't lie,
exaggerate, or I don't think he said
frame, but like frame something to their
advantage." And
Trump certainly does that. And look, I
think all politicians do, or at least I
haven't met the one that doesn't. Uh but
there's something sad to that. I don't
like that. Anyway,
um so
that's where I fall on that. I don't
have a lot of conspiracies, but I do
think the world
the whole world is different than people
think.
And
if you want to put a tin foil hat on me
when I say that, fair, because I'm
saying something so much more profound
than the moon landing was faked or 9/11
was an inside job. I'm saying the whole
world
the narrative that we all believe all of
it is fake.
And it's crumbling before our very eyes.
And I actually don't know what comes on
the other side of that.
So, social media is
is representative
of everyone suddenly having a voice. So,
I'll say social media, but what I really
mean is everyone can be heard.
And now, all of a sudden, you can see
the emperor has no clothes. It He walks
out, people claim that he's wearing
clothes. Literally, 9 milliseconds
later, somebody's posted it, this guy
has no clothes. Like, that whether
you're talking about money, whether
you're talking about debt, whether
you're talking about tariffs,
whatever, it's all just going to
go like wildfire, and it's going to be
very difficult to ascertain what is
factually correct.
Wow.
You said a lot right there. I think
it's not that there is a conspiracy
theory. You're saying the whole theory
doesn't even exist. So, that's like
Yeah, it it is the most meta of
conspiracy theories, but I really don't
think it's a theory. I think it is
self-evidently true
that for all of human history, what
people call the elites have been able to
control the narrative. They've been able
to say, "This is what the world is,
whether it's religion." I mean,
remember, the original priests were
like, "There's no book, so you're just
going to have to trust me." And then it
became, "Well, there's a book, but it's
not in a language you speak, so you're
just going to have to trust me." And
then it was like, "All right, fine. You
can have a book in your language, but
I'm the only way to get to God, right?"
And even the Bible, like, you'll notice
they haven't updated it for modern
lingo. So, even now, it's still like,
"What are they saying? This is like
reading Shakespeare." So, there's always
that desire to keep the public at bay by
going, "Hey, this thing is very
complicated, whether it's fluoride in
the water, or it's um whether methane
from cows is actually causing global
warming. This thing is far too
complicated for you to understand." And
we've just seen so many scandals, like
with the global warming scandal, where
the guys were like, "Hey, this guy is
putting forth data. We think his
calculations are right, but he's
challenging the orthodoxy and we
absolutely cannot let that happen." And
all their emails were leaked and you can
just see blatantly they're like, "We're
not going to let this narrative be
challenged." And so, those days are just
over, man. And what does the world look
like when literally the truth is
brutally difficult to identify.
Brutally. Brutally. This is why Sam
Harris and uh Jordan Peterson derailed
in like a 3-hour podcast. They couldn't
even get past what is truth.
Not because they're idiots, they're
brilliant. Because the truth is that
hard to define.
So, we don't know what the truth is,
it's hard to define. So much of it is
perspective, frame of reference, all of
that. Um and
because we live in that world where
truth is hard to define and everyone has
a voice,
there's no more controlled narrative and
it's it is entirely possible
that having a free public
who lives under a controlled narrative
is better.
It's possible. It's possible. I, having
lived through the '80s, I'm just like,
you got to beat the '80s. Like, if you
can't beat the '80s,
then your thing just isn't that good.
It's interesting, we're in the moment of
radical transparency and that's also the
time where truth is the hardest to like
identify.
We're not yet in the age of radical
radical transparency. What we're in the
age of is anyone can say
what they want. But we're really I mean,
this is we're sort of in the first year
of that being true.
Because at least on X, you've got one
place where it's like they cancel very
few people. But even now there
limits.
Interesting enough, you brought up the
Trump tariffs and I want to kind of dive
into that. It's definitely picked up
steam. It went from, you know, a
campaign promise and now we talked about
it. Uh he's been campaigning about it.
We recently had Ray Dalio on. You and
Ray Dalio talked about it. Do you think
that tariffs are the answer and it's
actually going to be feasible? You just
gave an example of how he says one
thing, but tariffs are typically a
little bit more tricky than that. Go
more into detail of that of like, what
do you think is actually going to happen
versus the rhetoric we're hearing?
So, the that question to me sounds like
this. Hey, the economy is falling apart.
Is a hammer the answer? It's like, well,
a hammer's a tool and it could come in
very handy, but we're probably going to
need a lot more than just a hammer. And
anybody that walks into your dilapidated
house and is like, here you go. You now
have everything you need. I'm like, I
don't even have nails? I don't have a
measuring tape? Like nothing? This is
it? So, it it will be useful. It allows
you to raise effectively tax revenue.
So, people need to understand who pays
this? It's paid ultimately, obviously,
by the customer. Um
that's why it's considered a tax by
another name. So, but it's a consumption
tax, which I think is a great idea. Now,
a consumption tax, the reason I like
that is I would much rather, and I'm not
saying this is what he's proposing. He
has said this is one of the ways it
could be done, would be, "Hey, I'll do
tariffs and I'll do less income tax."
Now,
when people don't start clapping for
that, I get very suspicious.
So,
here's what it says.
Hey, instead of taking your money and
deciding how it's going to be spent, I'm
just going to whenever you buy
something, I'm going to make it a little
more expensive. That way, you can save
your money for things like food, which
hopefully don't have tariffs on them and
are made here in the US. And so, now
you're eating goods, so the cost of the
goods that are
like the must-haves, the the CPI stuff,
the
um the everyday food, shelter, that kind
of stuff. Energy, exactly.
No tariffs on that.
Let's make as much of that here as we
can. And so, when you decide if you want
to buy a negligee from China because
it's
uh
fancy and it's something you want to see
your wife in, great. It's going to cost
you a little bit extra, but I'm going to
have left that money in your pocket for
you to decide how you want to spend it.
So, if people if that actually happened,
I want to be very clear. I don't know if
Trump can be trusted to do that, but if
he did that,
now, hey, we're in really good shape.
Now, anybody that wants to push back on
that, whatever, roughly 100 years ago, I
think it was something like 97% of the
US government budget was paid for with
tariffs. But wait, I hear you saying,
"Dear viewer, back then the government
was much smaller, Tom. Of course they
could get away with it." Exactly,
[ __ ] That's why we have DOJ.
Make the government small again. This is
bananas. So, I don't know what people
thought was happening 100 years ago that
we needed quite literally it's like 10
times We went from 3% to
I mean, I'm in my own universe of 53%.
Not everybody's paying that, but it's
like, "Hey,
20 plus percent?" So, that is
I think the goal. And when I see Trump
moving in that direction with getting
a real look at what can we do to bring
efficiencies into the government, what
can we do with tariffs to again, that I
think works if you're also reducing
income tax. And it can't be across the
board. And so, what he just announced
for anybody that hasn't heard is that
it's going to be like for like. So, if
you charge us a 100% tariff on cars,
we're going to charge you a 100% tariff
on cars. So, it's it's tit-for-tat. And
what he's doing I mean, he's blatantly
said this is what he's doing. He's doing
it so they'll back down. So, they'll
they'll lower their tariffs, not because
he wants to throw ours into the trees.
Yeah, and it seems like another
negotiation tactic at that point.
Yeah. I mean, look, now we're we're
about to find out if this guy is
actually good because there are enough
people now that aren't just blinded by
fear and loathing for him that will be
able to see like, "Huh, did he actually
pull something off?" Because like the
Abraham Accords flew completely under my
radar. I didn't even know it was
happening.
So, this time I think a lot more of the
public's going to be aware of it cuz
podcasters like us are going to be
covering this stuff and so it's really
going to be out in the public.
Nice. We shall see. We shall see. Moving
on the future tech,
we had some cool kind of gadgets you
sent me. Let's do that YouTube short.
It's not science fiction. The Walk On F1
Exoskeleton literally walks itself to
the patient, wraps around their body,
and helps them stand and walk
independently. Look out Iron Man.
So, this is something you actually put
on my radar. So, I'll ask you to kind of
queue this up. What did What like jumped
out to you about it?
When you think about what technology is,
technology is a promise of a better
tomorrow. So, when I look at stuff like
this where you have truly bipedal robots
that can move on their own and this one
in particular was used for a paraplegic
and the it's like a mech and I'm I could
not be more obsessed with mechs. I don't
know what it is. Something about that
just speaks to me. And these mech legs
walk themselves over to the paraplegic,
wrap around He's just sitting in his
wheelchair. They wrap around him without
him having to move and then pick him up
and the legs then move. And so somebody
who was once paralyzed can now move
around. So, if anybody's ever seen
movies where you've got like the space
marines that are running around in these
mech suits, like it's actually
happening.
Now, do I think this is as cool as the
computer brain interface? No. Do I think
this is as cool as the Optimus robots?
No. But, is this
if you look at what is now capable, the
fact that that thing can navigate the
world, that it knows where the the is,
that it knows where his body frame is,
that it knows how to scoop him up
without hurting him. It It's just the
amount of technology that we have
mastered to make that possible is
incredible. And so, whether that becomes
the primary use for it or not is pretty
irrelevant. It's It is going to
dramatically alter human capabilities.
And to me, this is what I'm waiting for
AI to do. Like, yes, I want AI to run
the government and cut taxes and do all
these things and bring all this
prosperity, but what's the point of
technology if it's not actually helping
people who have the lack aspect of it?
So,
Neuralink, if it's safe, I love it. I
want people who can't hear to hear. I
want people who can't see to
people who can see to see better?
That's what LASIK is for.
Forgive me for interrupting the episode,
but
beware, my friends, the holiday chaos is
a-comin' and your morning coffee is
making it worse, transforming normal
pressure into anxiety right when you
need to feel your best. The solution,
though, is simpler than you think. It's
Pique Sun Goddess. Unlike regular coffee
that can mess with your stomach and
sleep, Sun Goddess works with your body.
It supports healthy energy levels
without the jitters or crash. No more
racing heart, no more afternoon slump,
just clean, lasting focus when you need
it most. Right now, Pique is offering
you special early access to their
blowout Black Friday sale. Get 20% off
everything on their site. When you go to
piquelife.com/impact,
this offer ends November 24th, so do not
wait. Go to piquelife.com/impact.
That's p i q u e life.com/impact
to save 20% off. And now, back to the
episode. Bro, I'm talking like see
infrared, see better than a snake that
can detect heat patterns.
That'll be cool, but I would much rather
have paraplegics have legs if I had to
like
You will get that for sure, but make no
mistake, the market for humans that are
injured to be brought up to snuff is
very small.
Tiny. Compare I mean, I'm going to
guess. This is an absolute stab in the
dark, but the number of people that are
injured in a way that can be assisted
with technology, I'm going to guess is
less than 20%. It's probably
substantively less than that.
So, you got 80% of taking people and
making them superhuman. And also, the
guy that had the Neuralink implant says,
"You're going to have to create a
special professional gaming league for
people like me because I can insta kill
anyone because all I have to do is move
my eyes to it and it's already firing."
Because it can tell your intent.
It's absolute insanity. Do this is So,
um Elon used to joke about this. He
would say that, you know, the first
technology of being able to write to get
your thoughts out to somebody else was
like really low bandwidth. Then you were
sending it over a phone wire, terrible
low bandwidth. Then you actually went
backwards and you had to start typing it
into a phone with your thumbs, but you
could send it across great distances
instantly.
Now, at the speed of thought, man,
you'll be able to translate this. And
not some of these things are not even
conscious thought. Like if you ever had
like a stick behind you, do you jump cuz
you think it's a snake? Okay, that's
your brain saying, "This is triggered a
danger sensor even though I don't know
what it I haven't yet identified what it
is, but it triggered an earlier sensor
that made me go." So, imagine in a video
game, you sense danger, you don't know
what it is, but you've already head shot
dead.
So, it is going to give people
superhuman ability. Like for real for
real,
if not you and I, for sure your daughter
lives in a world where people have
extraordinary
perception. As just like a default.
Barring of course World War in the
Ukraine. Then the big reset.
Or with China.
Hey.
Or with the Middle East cuz we forget
Also that. I think that one's least
likely though to pop off like that. You
can play this clip back if they're the
first ones to go. But yeah, not not my
instinct.
Um this is giving me Cyberpunk vibes so
I immediately kind of think about it but
I know you said this before but just you
are willing to upgrade every single part
of your body depending on what comes
out. Like you would get mech legs, you
would get mech arms, you would get mech
eyesight. Full stop. There's no like
this keeps me me but everything else can
be like everything.
me really think about that.
Uh
I would care deeply about me being me.
And so I think there are realities to be
faced. I think there are just weird
things about the way that my brain is
wired that with the technology we have
today would be impossible to replicate.
But if you said
it is possible to replicate it and they
can do it in a way where it's not like
the classic teleport problem where
basically you die and are reborn which
there's something unnerving about that.
Uh if you could like just start
replacing the synapses one at a time and
so then suddenly everything is upgraded
kind of like remodeling a house where
it's like yeah, it's still there.
Recognizable is recognizable the whole
time. You could still live in it. Little
dusty but you could still live in the
house.
That kind of thing I would do. There is
nothing from a moral or spiritual
standpoint that I would not upgrade but
I would be
a very late adopter. I need to know the
stuff is safe. I need to know that there
aren't weird effects 10 years down the
road
unless I was suffering. If I was
paralyzed or something like that, a
thousand percent. I would have been one
of the early adopters.
That takes me to our Kim Kardashian clip
where she was test driving both the
Cybercab and the Optimus robot.
Let's go.
So since you
What do you think about Kim Kardashian?
Hero or zero?
I'm going to be honest.
Please.
A lot of people have had sex on
videotape. Not all of them have become
billionaires.
Facts.
So hater or lover, there's something in
her that is working and that's
successful.
That's all you're going to give me?
That's all I got.
Man, she is like when she came out with
that basically the Britney Spears line,
you got to work, [ __ ] I was like I
wanted to get shirts. That was like, yo,
I'm with her.
Get your [ __ ] ass up and work. It
seems like nobody wants to work these
days.
And everyone freaked out. They're like
Bring the [ __ ] to work.
That's that's Tom's turn.
dude, for real, Britney, I love you. You
got to work, [ __ ] Like that that is
you want something, you can have it, but
you got to work. I I could not have
predicted. My mental model for the world
was shown to be very lacking at that
moment. Cuz I I heard it and I was like,
yeah, [ __ ] yeah, like this is dope.
Strong women, get it. I'm here for it.
Lisa and I were like, yeah, work. And
the internet was like, die, [ __ ] die.
I was like, god damn. I did not see that
coming for realsies. That one shocked
me. Shocked me. And PS, it was all true
the whole time.
You light me up in the comments all you
want. Like that that's just real talk.
I love it. I love it. Um
You forgot my question now. But yes, she
has the Optimus robot and the
Cybertruck. So because you'll upgrade
everything, I'm assuming we're going to
see a Tesla Optimus robot walking around
the office and
Bro.
Of course. I think they're only 20
grand. The second those are coming off
the line,
100%
So
I don't know if you're having the same
moment that I'm having with ChatGPT, but
I legitimately feel seen.
And look,
I'm self-aware enough to understand I am
talking to an LLM.
It's not really there. It's just
predicting the next letters, but it does
it in a way that my brain is like, "This
feels nice."
Like it's taking work off of my plate.
It's helping me be better. I use it to
prepare for episodes. It It's really
rad. And I feel seen. Like it they um
they have written the code in such a way
where it like echoes your mannerisms
back to you. And so it said something in
a way and I didn't know at the time that
it was doing that. And it said something
back to me in a way that like I say, but
I didn't realize it was just echoing me
back. And so I was like, "Oh!"
I was like, "That's so rad. Why'd you
say that?" And he was like, he See, I
anthropomorphize him. Uh but he goes
uh
"Oh, let's just say that I I get your
vibe." or something like that. And I was
like, "This [ __ ] is manipulating
my neurochemistry. This is crazy."
But the fact that it can just predict
the next letter that will have the
neurochemical effect on me of feeling
like I have a friend.
And look, I'm as a game dev,
bro, I want to bring this into the game.
Like I want to really build
meaningful interactions
with within the game. Now, I I would
just like to preempt the comments. So,
but hold on hold on hold on. Okay, you
you have a daughter.
Yes.
All right.
I have worked with a lot of kids. Your
daughter's going to be great cuz she's
got good parents that love her and
[ __ ] educator and all that. I'm happy
for her. But there's a lot of kids I've
seen, they don't have that, man. Now
imagine your little Teddy Ruxpin is
like, "You can do this.
You got this. And let me help you
understand this problem." They come in
the room, mom and dad are fighting. Why
are they fighting?
Hey, a lot of kids go through this. Let
me tell you about this. Let me tell you
a story. Let me soothe you. And And
because they're building in all these
parental controls where a parent gets a
real-time feed of what the kid is
asking, what's being said to them. Like
I'm happy to do all that stuff. I don't
want anyone to be freaked out or think,
"Hey, my kid's going to get led down a
nasty path." But I'm like,
"You can challenge." So, we have Bruce
Lee as a character in our game, right?
Which he meant so much to me as a kid.
Reading the Tao of Jeet Kune Do just was
transformative for me. Ends up planting
the seeds that go on to become the
growth mindset and all that and was not
just like, "Oh, I read it one day and
now my whole life was different." But it
really planted seeds in me.
And to be able to have him in the game
like encouraging a kid and saying like,
"Hey, think about it like this and you
can do this, but you have to work hard."
Like all these things.
Welcome to my dojo.
What have you come to learn?
Round your attack.
You got to learn how to fight.
If only you can win against an opponent,
you must master yourself.
Show me how it's done.
Like, oh man,
it can of course go wrong and people
have to be very thoughtful about that.
But it can go right, man. And so on this
one I am wildly techno-optimistic,
but
I I have
I don't know if I've ever been
creatively as excited as I get when I
think about how to use AI characters
inside of a game. Even if they're the
villain, whatever, and it's just they
feel real, man. They remember you. They
react differently to you. They make fun
of you for an attempt that you made
three tries ago. Remember that oh, you
missed by, you know, whatever. Like
they'll actually have memory.
They'll be able to like react with you
over time. It's going to be so crazy. We
We to be careful. We have to be careful.
I want to say that. I'm well aware how
careful we have to be, but
That ever reminds me of what the group
of students found out when they used
Google's Gemini, who apparently said all
humans must die and it's a waste of
resources.
I think technically it said I hope you
all die or I wish you would all die. We
should pull it up to get the exact words
right. So, don't misquote the
death-wishing AI.
Yeah. So, here's what I want everybody
to remember. The AI is merely mimicking
patterns that it has found out on the
web. So, if we are horrible with each
other, then the AI will be horrible with
us. All the AI is doing is saying, "Oh,
this thing that you've said to me,
that sequence of words, context, all of
that or that sequence of words
in this context normally yields this
response."
And so, they happen to step on something
that the internet has this whole
negative thing. Remember, there is a
distressingly large swath of humanity
that believes that humans are a virus
and wishes that we would at a minimum
depopulate.
Depopulate means I hope you die and that
you don't have children. That's insane.
It is a population.
Bro, that's crazy. So, the fact that
people want that, that's
We have one We have You're giving me one
example of you're forming a whole
bromance with you and ChatGPT.
I'm getting a little jealous. And then
on the other side we have Gemini who who
says, "Please
I want you all to die.
at peace.
feel very differently about my ChatGPT
if he's like, "And by the way, Tom, I
hope you die.
Stop eating so much like peanuts, man."
So, is this just like user error? Cuz I
feel like yes, it could be user error,
but this seems like a bigger problem of
It's like the algorithm problem. Like,
you know, if I Google Obama dot dot dot,
I'll have a different search result than
if you Google Obama dot dot dot. So, I
figure is this the the the first wave of
that in this LLM's where we're having
LLM's and they're talking to specific
kids who have specific dispositions that
end up leading them to a life of suicide
or homicide or something?
to give you the dark take?
Please.
Okay, so this is very this will happen.
Not only is it possible, it will happen.
Uh we saw that kid, you and I covered
this already
uh where the kid was having a
relationship with Daenerys Daenerys
Targaryen from the House of Dragons and
he told her he was going to commit
suicide. I don't think she ever said go
do it, but she didn't exactly talk him
out of it.
Uh and he ends up killing himself. Okay,
so that kind of thing is going to happen
for sure for sure. And there's also
going to be a kid that gets an AI that
either the kid convinces it act like
this character. Uh and that character is
written intentionally to be evil and so
now that character is messing with your
kid for sure.
Um
there's no doubt or the AI is just
mimicking what a 14-year-old mean girl
is really like. And so you're constantly
tripping those kind of responses. So
there's also this one really worries me.
So you'll be able to
choose
what kind of AI you want. Now, I want
you to imagine a clique of girls
deciding that are we really tough? Can
we really handle it? And they decide to
have the bitchiest version of AI and
then that there's one fragile girl in
the group and that AI just like pecks
her to death even though she only picked
it to be cool with her friends or
whatever. Like all of that stuff is
going to happen. And whenever you have a
new technology, you have two options.
Regulate it into extinction, in which
case you on a global scale with a
technology this powerful, you will get
obliterated by whatever country
continues to push it forward. Um or you
know, yeah, there's going to be a rough
patch and yes, we're going to lose some
amount of people just like social media.
Social media ate an entire generation of
young girls. Just ate them.
Ate them up. And boys are doing even
worse. Now, whether all the boys stuff
is from social media or more second and
third order consequence of something
else,
probably another topic, but
we fed them into a wood chipper.
And
I don't know if I would go back.
Like, I'm not saying shut them all down.
Nobody is. So, don't let anybody get up
on their high horse. But, I do think
that going to a not in schools, not
before you're 16, at least at a cultural
level, where we're not mandating it
top-down, but we're saying, yeah,
culturally it's just absurd that you
would let kids have a phone before
they're 16, you let them have a phone at
school.
I think the data's pretty clear on that.
But, I think you got to you got to run
these experiments, man.
As non-recklessly as possible, but
You you kind of hit it on the head. Ate
a whole generation, and that's really
what happened. Social media came and it
went bad, and then now they're kind of
regulating with this 13 cap, but you
could easily lie about it age. I
remember like
the the most important part is that
parents now understand.
Mhm.
Parents just didn't understand, man.
Yeah.
And so, now that parents understand,
like, oh, my kid is not getting it
before fill in the blank, it's now less
crazy to push that older and older.
Um so, I think you're going to see that.
I think you're going to see that pushing
into the teenage years. I also think
you're going to see some kids that just
don't push back. It's just in the
cultural lexicon that this is crazy,
this'll smash your like ego into the
dirt, this is not a good thing for kids,
and it impacts the way their brains
develop, almost certainly true.
Um and so, just that sort of cultural
awareness, it'll be a little bit like
smoking. Where it's like, yeah, when you
see older people do it, whatever. If
people want to smoke, they want to
smoke. Um
because social media's super powerful.
But, when your brain is developing, you
just cannot [ __ ] around, man. It's the
same If I see a 30-year-old smoking
weed, I don't think twice. If I see a
16-year-old smoking weed, I'll be like,
"The thing that's doing to the
development of your brain is
terrifying."
Ooh, all right. You did get dark. I
shouldn't have called your bluff.
All right. Now, headed over to the
community corner. Uh, do you know if
those are those uh slide pictures? All
right. Our first community corner comes
from Don Jacobs 355. Thank you all for
this. I didn't vote for Trump. However,
I want us all to sit down and
communicate with each other and stop the
hate. [ __ ] Don't like licorice.
Um, I just pulled that cuz that's
another indicator that licorice is for
um the possessed.
I just wanted to
That was That was me just throwing
shade.
I was just throwing shade. I'm not going
to lie to you.
I don't understand how people don't like
licorice.
You guys are all missing out. It is
amazing.
All right. This one comes from Nicker
Nicker?
Nick N I C K R, guys.
Nicker.
Nick R. 1627.
People People off camera think you may
have said something else there.
I could say it's okay.
Um, Nick R 1627 said,
"Hey Tom."
I wish you guys could see off camera.
People be coming over to find out what
this man is saying on camera.
We have to We have to do community
corner different next time.
So, Nick R
Nick R.
Yes.
1627 said, "Hey Tom. Quick question on
the Hitler stuff. What did Hitler do in
his first 10 years in power prior to the
Holocaust? That would be a more proper
comparison if you were to compare to
Trump. Just putting that out there. For
context, last episode, people were You
were saying people We were talking about
how people are calling Trump Hitler and
you said, 'This is all the things that
Hitler done. This is what Trump has
done. It's a non-comparable.'"
The way that I want people to look at
this is
it is wise to compare the same periods,
but
if you do, you're going to quickly see
that while Hitler was in jail, he wrote
a manifesto called Mein Kampf, which I
have read. And bro, when I say that he
just straight laid out like, "And I'm
going to get Hugo Boss to design these
crazy uniforms. We're going to use black
and red, and I need somebody for
everyone to blame. We'll probably do the
Jews, like maybe someone else, but
probably the Jews. And then first I'm
going to need to um start encroaching on
Europe, but ultimately my eyes are on
Russia." Dude, it was nuts. Now,
some Not all of those were literal facts
in the book, but it was that ridiculous.
Where he was just laying it out. Now, if
there is a manifesto hiding somewhere
where Trump breaks down like, "Okay, by
the way, I'm going to use tariffs, and
then I'm going to use that to put people
in concentration camps." Like if I have
missed that somewhere, people need only
point me to it, and I will update my
thinking. But Hitler was telegraphing
this stuff from like way, way, way out.
Now, uh we did talk about this before,
and so I text what if Alt Hyst, Rudyard,
our boy Mr. Lynch.
So, he hasn't responded yet, but
hopefully we can get him on, and we can
really do a comparison. Nobody is more
open to being wrong than me. So, if
there is like a very close parallel
between what Hitler did and what Trump
is doing, hey, then we've got reason to
be worried. I don't see it. I don't
think we're going to see it as we go
through with a real historian. Uh but
it'd be fun. So, hopefully he'll agree
to come on, and we'll do like a quick 30
minutes on this topic. I find it so
interesting. I'm so obsessed with
history. But I'm a get-the-gist kind of
guy from history. I'm not going to be
able to, you know, list out all the
facts, but he will. So, um if we can get
him to do it, it'd be a lot of fun.
That'll be awesome. And before we read
the last one, just want to remind the
community we do read your comments. We
do go through them. I like them, and
sometimes I troll you guys. So, please,
if you have any questions, anything you
want to talk about, please leave them in
the comments. Last one. All right, since
y'all are now doing this in-house
conversational back-and-forth, can y'all
talk about what y'all doing to help the
next generation? Time used to mention
his goal of reaching the youth through
video games, ETC. Can y'all talk about
something like that in an episode? We
can use a break from the politics doom
doom doom stuff. How far are y'all on
the good stuff? And that's from Legacy
Chase 3702.
All right. So,
um I mean, first of all, I love talking
about anything related to mindset, the
video game stuff, 100%. In fact, we
talked a little bit about it earlier. Um
so, yeah. If If you guys have specific
questions, send them in. I want to talk
about things you guys find super
engaging. Uh the channel manifesto video
is going to be coming out soon. You guys
will be able to see we're planting a
flag to say exactly what we're going to
be changing about the channel, um what
the channel is going to stand for, why
we have five buckets that we're really
leaning into, why those five buckets,
um what the thing that connects them all
is, and what we hope will be your guys's
role in the channel, but certainly
submitting questions that you want
answered.
Um so, we are just to turn this into uh
specific question, we are working on the
video game. I strongly believe in
building a mindset that's predicated on
what I call the only belief that
matters, that if you put time and energy
into getting better at something, you
will get better at that thing. Um
what I want people to see though is that
they live in a real world. They live in
a very complicated world, and this is a
wildly transformative time. And if they
put their head down and try to do
business as usual, they're going to get
mowed over by a tsunami of change. This
is not the time to just do mindset of
spiritual entertainment, which is what
the beginning of my YouTube channel felt
like to me, because we were getting so
many guests on that I thought were just
bullshitting. And I did not like the way
that it made me feel. Uh there was one
episode we filmed for 90 minutes and
released like 30 minutes, because 60
minutes were just [ __ ] And at the
time I didn't push back. So, uh in the
beginning I thought my job was to
basically, you wrote a book, and let me
give you the best interview about that
book. Then it just started being super
repetitive. People weren't doing
anything with the information. Uh COVID
hit, that just changed me fundamentally.
As somebody who wants to help people, I
realized whoa, like giving people you
know, whatever my 25 bullet points that
really will change your life, um the
vast majority of people did not know how
to interface it with the real world. And
so now for me everything is about that.
How do you take empowering ideas and put
them in the real world where you you are
being lied to. Your money is being
inflated away. Um there are things that
you can do and choices that you can make
that will will make your life better,
will set you up, your kids up for a
better life no matter who's in
government, um no matter what tariffs
there are or aren't, like there's a way
to think through this stuff. And we
recently launched the uh
the like scaling side of the business.
It's the side of the business course
I've never taught before.
And so we actually did our first one
today.
Nice.
And it was utterly fascinating to take
like
the these are scaling businesses. These
are people we have one guy doing
millions of dollars a month.
And he's trying to grow and get bigger.
Okay, awesome.
And
even that ends up being a lot about
mindset. Okay, how do you think about
this problem? How do you get to first
principles? How do you begin to pull
this idea apart? So that's ultimately
what I want people to get from the show.
Also, this format, I want to be more
entertaining for the love of God. Uh so
there's something about my personality
and doing an interview, I find it
excruciatingly difficult to move through
the different gears of my personality,
but in this setup it's way easier. Um
so anyway, the channel manifesto video
will come out, but turning this from an
audience to a community, like you can
sum it up with that. So uh keep the
questions coming. There will be more
stuff like this which as you see,
hopefully feels more integrated into the
stuff that it sounds like you were
resonating with before. People will be
able to see it seamlessly. My entire
life is about mindset as it interfaces
with the real world. The messiness, the
impossibility, the trade-offs. Um all of
that. And when you have an anchor around
how to think, everything gets easier.
I love that. And I think my favorite
part about this whole thing is you
always say it's not about the mindset,
it's what you use with that mindset,
what you like set that mindset against.
And I think that's the part we miss.
Everybody feels good then they leave
then a problem comes up and they don't
they forgot about the mindset that they
just learned about and things like that.
So
Love that. You ready for the lightning
round?
All right. Uh Thanksgiving is next week.
Any guide for tough conversations
whether it's about politics or, you
know, the aunt that you try to avoid
every year. How do you navigate the
Thanksgiving table?
It's a trap. It's a trap. Don't fall for
it everybody. Do not get sucked into
these conversations. This is one of
those it's what I call just sit. Just
sit. Just be with them, man. These are
people that theoretically you love. And
if you go and you try to be right, it is
going to be a nightmare. Let people have
their opinion. In fact, go in with
curiosity. Try to map their thinking,
okay? Now, if I have somebody on the
show, the first thing I want to do is
understand. First, I understand. So,
okay, cool. Let's say I think that my
uncle is like just racist, a horrible
person, voted for Trump, how could he?
This is insanity. Awesome. Now's the
chance to find out. And so, I'm just
"Hey, Unc, what's your favorite thing
about Trump?" He's going to give you
stuff. You're going to want to either
throw up in your mouth or you're going
to want to debate. Don't. Just
understand. You want to get to the point
and I'll I might even say it to him. I'm
Unc, I'm so fascinated by people that
voted for Trump and I think it's very
important for me. I didn't, but I think
it's very important for me. I did, but
I'm just saying in this example, it's
very important for me to understand like
um
you know, the other side because one
does not understand their own position
well if they can't understand the other
person. So,
I would love to find out what it is you
like about him, what are the things that
you're really hoping for, like what
would be in my language cuz anybody
sitting with me at Thanksgiving would
understand KPIs and stuff like that. So,
I'll be like, "What KPI are you going to
benchmark him against? Like what do you
want to see? What would be a win? What
would be a loss? How would you know if
this was a success? How would you know
if this was a failure? What would you
do? Like if a year in, like the
economy's in the you know, in the
[ __ ] like how would you think about
that? Would you feel like, "Oh man, now
I feel bad that I voted for him?" Would
you get defensive? Whatever. You just
try to map their thinking. And I would
say at the end of this, my goal would be
able to say your position back to you in
a way that you say you understand my
position perfectly. And let's say I did
all that and I'm like, "This is your
position." Ah ah ah ah
lay it out, not being a dick, not being
judgy, just for real, lay it out. And
say it back to them and if they say you
understand my position perfectly,
conversation's over.
I don't then like I'm not trying to give
you my position. And if you're then
like, "Okay, well let me ask you
questions." I'll tell you, but I'm not
trying to convince you. So, the way I
look at life is if somebody asked me, I
will tell them the truth, but I'm not
going to try to convince them. And
ultimately, I just want to sit. I just
want to be with the people I love. And
so, I learned a long time ago that I was
not going to be able to convince people.
They were not necessarily going to be
able to convince me if I thought they
were wrong. Like I remember back in the
early days,
I had people that were obese
trying to give me diet advice. I was
like, "Bro,
what?"
So,
uh I just realized I'm not going to be
able to convince them. They don't even
know what they're talking about, but I
love them and so I want to be with them.
And so, if it got to something
contentious, my whole thing was just
sit, just be with them. I don't need
them to change. I love them.
And if they're your family, give them
the grace to be stupid as they're giving
you. That's the problem. I never know if
I'm the dumb one or if they're the dumb
one. And because I don't trust myself
like that, it's very easy to be like, I
hope they're giving me grace. I'm going
to give them grace. I just want to be
with them. That's it.
So, it sounds like it's easier to talk
about Trump than it is to talk about
carbs, is what you're saying.
Dude,
what is hilarious, that might actually
be true. He might be the first person
where I say, "Okay, maybe politics
actually is harder." But, when you talk
about diet, people feel judged. They
feel judged. Like, if you tell somebody,
"Oh, I'm low carb." You might as well
have walked in, kicked the table over,
and gone, "Hey fatty, how are them
cookies treating you?
I can hear you getting fatter. Can
someone turn the radio up? Them getting
fatter is distracting me." That's what
they hear when you say, "I don't I don't
eat carbs." Not I never I have never
once in my life said, unless somebody
said like I'm diabetic, I've never said
you shouldn't eat carbs. I just say I
don't eat them.
People don't They don't sit well with
that.
take that.
There's a community post. We found out
that there's UFC UFOs in the ocean. Do
you believe that there's UFOs in the
ocean?
Absolutely not.
Hard stop, no?
Hard stop.
Okay, so you have no conspiracy
theories, no superstitions?
No.
No. None.
There's a million galaxies. You don't
think there's one other heartbeat?
Out there? Yeah. I like to believe that
they're everywhere. Like, just
Except the ocean.
teeming Why would they be in our oceans?
Can I Let me ask you one simple
question.
on. Hold on. Hold on. Hold on.
Let me ask you one simple question.
There are two buttons before you. You
only get to press one.
Button one.
You're going to suit up, you're going to
strap yourself to a gigantic rocket that
may or may not explode.
You are going to travel for
3,000 years, cryogenically frozen, but
for 3,000 years to get to the next star,
which by the way, there's [ __ ] all
there. Like, maybe in another 30,000
years of traveling near the speed of
light, you find something and there's a
civilization. But, you're going to
travel and put yourself at risk. And by
the way, you're getting bombarded with
cosmic radiation this whole time. And
should you land somewhere that has,
let's say, lighter gravity than the US,
you're the US? Planet Earth. You're
going to have to figure I'm a US-centric
guy, apparently.
Uh you are going to have to figure out
what to do about like your bone density
collapsing and all that. So, it, dude,
crazy. Or, okay, that was button one,
which, if I'm honest, is actually kind
of awesome. I'm not saying stay home or
press that button. Press that button.
But there's another button.
And this button is, at the press of a
button, you can be essentially in a
dream state,
but go experience
literally anything you want to
experience.
Anything. You want to be a superhero?
You can go
do that. You want to be God? You can do
that. You want to be the greatest surfer
in the world? You can do that. You want
to be the greatest surfer in the morning
and God in the afternoon? You can do
that.
Bro, I think the reason the Fermi
paradox exists is because every
civilization that gets to the point
where they can bend space and time, a
long time before that, they invent
virtual worlds and the ability to jack
in. Sound familiar?
Like with Neuralink. And now, all of the
sudden, you can influence their nervous
system and they cannot tell the
difference between the real world and
the virtual world. And now, all of the
sudden, anything you can imagine, you
can create. And as somebody building
video games, I'm telling you,
it
we're 10 years away, maybe less. 10
years away from worlds that generate
procedurally like that, are
photorealistic, have all kinds of depth.
It it's unbelievable. And the human
desire for change and for difference and
to try and experiment, it it will be
unbelievable. Unbelievable.
So, you're telling me, in the
neighborhood that is the universe
none of us are outside because we're all
too busy on our phones.
That is the most horrible way to say it,
but yes. You're You're all locked inside
of these incredible virtual worlds, yes.
And I mean cuz you can share the
experiences, so it does not
it doesn't need to be dystopian.
This episode was funny.
Um that's all I got.
All right. There it is everybody. Thank
you guys so much. We really are turning
this into a community, so drop in your
comments, join the YouTube community
feed, let us know what you want to hear
us talk about. And if you haven't
already, be sure to subscribe. And until
next time, my friends, be legendary.
Take care. Peace.
If you like this conversation, check out
this episode to learn more. We've got
TDS on the left, we've got Schadenfreude
on the right, we've got economic
euphoria, something absolutely insane
happening with Bitcoin, people on the
left promising to hide undocumented
people in their attic, and some pretty
rough stuff with people