Ahikam Kaufman, Safebooks | theCUBE + NYSE Wired: Business Transformation Edge
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Ahikam Kaufman, co-founder and CEO of Safebooks AI, discusses how artificial intelligence is fundamentally transforming corporate finance by shifting it from a manual, error-prone department into an intelligent operational engine. Historically viewed as a "cottage industry" with limited capabilities compared to other sectors like engineering or sales, finance now faces pressure to adopt AI due to its critical role in data integrity and compliance. Kaufman argues that while energy consumption is often cited as the primary constraint on AI growth, corporate finance acts as another essential bounding function because it requires absolute accuracy for audits and regulatory adherence. Safebooks addresses this unique need by providing a platform rather than just point solutions, embedding "guard rails" into its technology to ensure that every AI-generated response is accurate, auditable, and contextually aware, effectively creating a deterministic layer of intelligence that surpasses human capability in handling vast amounts of financial data.
The core innovation behind Safebooks lies in its ability to connect disparate systems through advanced technologies like graph databases and ontologies, which allow the platform to understand the relationships between different transactions rather than just processing them individually. This approach eliminates the need for manual reconciliation across multiple legacy systems, automating what was traditionally a repetitive assembly-line task performed by humans. By emulating human cognitive processes but at scale, these AI agents can review thousands of orders and financial documents in real-time, identifying anomalies and discrepancies instantly. Consequently, finance teams are liberated from managing standard cases and instead focus on high-level strategic exceptions, while the technology handles the heavy lifting of preparation—estimated to comprise up to 90% of current workloads—which allows professionals to engage more deeply with business strategy and customer relationships rather than getting lost in data entry details.
Beyond technical automation, Safebooks aims to bridge the cultural divide between sales and finance departments by enabling real-time alignment across the organization. In many companies, these teams operate at odds due to differing priorities: sales seeks speed and agility while finance demands precision and control. Kaufman envisions a future where AI acts as a harmonizing force that allows both sides to move faster without sacrificing accuracy, ensuring that deals are approved quickly based on complete data visibility rather than delayed manual checks. The company's business model reinforces this trust by deploying engineers who map specific client processes before configuring agents, offering immediate proof of value and acting as trusted advisors within the customer's ecosystem. This deep integration ensures that financial leaders can rely entirely on their AI systems for compliance and accuracy, fostering a sense of security in an era where data explosions make manual verification impossible.
Looking ahead, Safebooks is preparing to raise its Series A funding round early next year following a successful seed investment used to build the foundational technology stack. Kaufman remains optimistic about the trajectory of AI adoption despite market concerns regarding bubbles or supply constraints, comparing the current moment to the transition from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles—a period where costs will inevitably drop and efficiency will skyrocket as infrastructure matures. He believes that enterprises are currently in a discovery phase, learning how to integrate intelligence into their operations until they achieve positive unit economics, at which point AI becomes an indispensable product rather than just a tool. Ultimately, the competitive edge for companies over the next few years will depend on their ability to inject intelligent systems directly into their business models, transforming finance from a back-office function into a strategic asset that drives growth and operational excellence across all aspects of the enterprise.
Read the full video transcript
Palo Alto studio connection Silicon
Valley and Wall Street. I'm John F co
here with Dave Volante my co-host.
Hello, I'm John Furry your host of the
cube here in our New York Stock Exchange
Cube studios. Of course we have our Palo
Alto studio connecting Silicon Valley to
Wall Street. This is our transformation
edge series where we talk to leaders who
are building the technology, operating
the tech, investing in the technology to
bring in this next era of AI. When
injected into a company, intelligence,
AI intelligence transforms the business,
the business model and all of the
operations. As a result, the entire
business changes. That's the topic we're
exploring. Akam Kaufman's here,
co-founder and CEO of Safebooks AI
entrepreneur taking a large scale
approach, a systems approach to AI in
the financial area, but of course has
implications everywhere. Good to see
you. Thanks for coming on the cube.
>> Thank you, John, for having me. I'm
excited for to to the conversation.
>> So, finance has been this cottage
industry. you know they had applications
a lot of vendors would sell stuff to
finance departments but now with the AI
and postcloud era now we're in the AI
era which builds on top of cloud
largecale finance capabilities can be
done fairly easily and with Agentic and
AI
injecting intelligence is certainly
going to impact the overall company's
numbers and finance actually likes to
roll those up so they're going to be
involved they have their own department
needs so you see finance in the middle
of all
action. In fact, just this week, Jensen
Wong was on TV and I wrote a post in
April. He always says energy bounds AI.
Well, I wrote a post in in April that
said finance B is a bounding function.
They announced Nvidia with Goldman, KKR,
Brookfield, all the top capital 500
billion dollars for AI capital. Finance
and energy are the bounding functions of
AI. But so the word finance is in there.
you're going after this market, right?
So, we're we're going after corporate
finance. And I'd like to think three,
four years, three and a half years after
the models came out, it's now finance
are being asked, what are you doing
about AI? The challenges or the problem
was always was that finance unlike other
parts of the organization they require
data integrity and accuracy like no one
else because they're subject to
compliance and and you just need to rely
on data which is accurate. So we created
technology that uniquely provide AI with
the right context and the right um um
guard rails to make sure that every
response would be accurate and agents
would be able to operate as if not
better
than human beings. So um you had a
previous venture you sold to QuickBooks
I'm sorry into it right not QuickBooks
is the product Safebooks QuickBooks any
you get the green light to go with Safe
Books on this one. I wanted to
correspond with uh the the you know the
QuickBooks uh brand. H but I wanted also
to pick a name where it kind of like
reflect the the
when when customers buy a product I
think they they they you need to kind of
sell like um a sentiment. You need to
sell an experience and making people
feel safe about the data because every
large company you there is explosion of
data and you can't check everything all
the time. We're creating that cyberlike
experience for finance because with the
automation comes also the level of
accuracy and integrity that human beings
cannot do uh uh with that level of data.
So creating that sense of safety and
security for financial data for the
financial leaders is what our name kind
of
>> yeah and you mentioned accuracy um
because of compliance but also they're
in the numbers game they want to be they
have to be right
>> right
>> because if you get a number wrong think
about the consequences on audits
>> you got to unwind it you got to throw
human more forensic work at it so I
think that's a key point but I want to
ask you about your idea around this
venture because in hearing you talk and
I'd love you expand on this because I
think you'd illuminate it feels like a
platform because you're talking about
>> right
>> not just a point solution.
>> No,
>> you're you're talking about a platform.
Take me through your thinking around
this and what it means
>> to the company not just the finance
department.
>> Right. So from the get-go we we
understood we needed to do two things
which are different. first to develop
the technologies that can provide AI
with the right context and again the
guard rails to be able to be uh uh to be
able to kind of like uh have like a
deterministic way to to uh to make the
actions. the the other things that the
other things that we wanted to do is we
wanted to to make sure that we don't
just generate a single point solution
but eventually with AI because you can
do so many things I don't want the
office of the CFO to deal with multiple
or they don't want to deal with multiple
vendors each for a point solution once
you we've got the data right from all
the systems we can using our aentic
layer we can create that point solution
on top of the platform allowing finance
to go and expand their use using the
same platform the same platform but
instead of using the clouds of the world
which are great but cannot provide that
level of data accuracy and integrity
they're using safe books and using our
aentic layer you can configure any agent
to do any work whether it's across cash
revenues expenses and so on a data layer
in finance is very compelling to me I
like this idea So explain more because
there's technology involved. Um we're
hearing more and more um words like
ontology, graph databases. I mean
Palunteer I mean they popularized the
term that's been around since the 80s. I
did I did that in the in in as a kid. I
was playing with ontology. Not a lot of
infrastructure support the scale. But
now we have a database world where you
can actually connect data. You can put a
context graph together. And there's a
lot of benefits that are is compatible
with computer science of AI recursion
things like that are like you're
starting to see a formation of a brain
>> right
>> metaphor why wouldn't a company want to
have a financial brain and connect it to
all aspects of the business
>> I think again the technology did not
exist even portion of our technology did
not exist even a year ago I think 2026
is the year where finance are starting
to embrace AR and embark working on that
journey. I'd like to think that today
100% of the companies
uh meaning finance organization in
companies are being asked what are you
doing on AI? In 2024 2025 it was more
like engineering, sales, marketing. Now
it's finance because we do have the
technology to be able to provide
accurate results which are also
auditable. We recently acquired our sock
one certification which allows our
customers and their auditors to rely on
the outcome. But the the foundation is
the ability or the the the the pain
point originally was the fact that in
corporate finance every transaction it's
processed by multiple systems and the
ability to connect the dots between
these systems was manual work and now
it's fully automated using our
>> Yeah. And you have connective tissue
with with APIs and MCP servers. But you
brought up a good point because
compliance finance has all the elements
of success built into for AI to to be
injected. It's got a lot of stuff that's
in manuals process rules. It's got um
data probably lab good data not maybe
not perfect clean data. Um it's got
process and if you connect to other
systems in a distributed computing
fashion you now have a mechanism to
cross boundaries outside the department.
Hence other business units,
>> right? I'll tell you even more. I think
uh I think an example maybe Elon Musk
used was that 100 years ago people used
to sit in a bank and calculate the
balance for each account on a monthly
basis. There's works that I don't think
anyone wants to go back and do that. I
think we're going to witness that same
trans transformation in corporate
finance. Imagine people are doing the
same work every day across the data. You
can't do it across all the data because
we're all humane and again there's a lot
of details. So the ability to use a
machine that can that can emulate or
replace some of that manual work
allowing people to focus on more
strategic is actually essential but
technology did not exist. I think a year
a year from now it's going to look
totally different. Well, the thing about
that metaphor of counting money, but
take the modern version of that preai
labor is a essentially a manufacturing
operations concept. It's an assembly
line of people.
>> Exactly.
>> Who is spec to do this repetitive
[snorts] task, the next person does the
same. So you have uniform deterministic
tasks,
>> right?
>> That's human. That's easy to understand.
Just just to give you an example,
imagine today in large companies, let's
say uh they process thousands of orders
for their customers every every single
month. Now, finance needs to sit down,
look at the documentation, look at the
policies that they have, look at the
billing, and make sure everything is
correct and to approve the deal to this.
And it takes them time until they
approve the deal. The machine can do all
of that which means that less mistakes,
less customerf facing mistakes, less
leakage or missing bills, billing or
whatever. Uh better relationship with
your sales organization because you move
things faster and the anomalies and
discrepancies are still so you manage
the exception. You don't need need to
manage the standard.
>> You know, Aam, that's a really good
point. You brought up something that
made me think and I want to bring this
back up. You mentioned sales and
finance. In every company that I've
worked in, yeah, in every company my
friends worked in, every company that
I've observed,
>> they hate each other basically. And you
got to put the finance department in one
building and you put sales because sales
are like they're very agile, the front
of the office. Um, they think
differently. the cultural intersection
what you're getting at is actually a a a
liberating opportunity from a change
management perspective because finance
people want things buttoned up and say
ah just get the quote out there and then
put it in that bucket so there's a lot
of inbound logistics
>> if you have a problem I want to know
about it fast don't drag me for a week
and then so speed velocity here is an
essential component in the relationship
>> how do you see finance with AI the way
you're thinking about it impacting the
veloc velocity, accuracy, efficacy of
sales and marketing, specifically sales,
go to market because product market fist
change, but like you said, they're just
on the front lines creating marketing,
the value proposition of a company and
then finance has to inside out align
with that group. They're customer focus
with a lot of potential error
opportunities there. How does this fix
that? So I'd like to think that you know
I think eventually everyone needs to be
a corporate citizen and everyone wants
to to to get uh the deal done uh for the
benefit of the customer for the benefit
of the vendor the company and to get
their commission check right and in
order to do that uh they they expect
their finance peers to uh to be able to
look at stuff in time so they can react
to the customer and be able to identify
all the issues in details so if there is
an issue they don't miss it and then
something happens down the road. So the
ability to accurately scan everything
100% in real time. So the velocity and
quality of deal review is one of the
things one of the many things Safebook
solves. and the game.
>> That's a huge value proposition because
that's where miscommunication,
misinterpretation, lack of understanding
the other party, that's where this could
be very harmonious.
>> Right. Right. So, and again allowing
people to focus on managing exceptions
as opposed to managing
>> everything. Yeah. We all seen deal
reviews. Okay. Yes. And then send an
email. It's asynchronous work. It's just
that work gets goes away, right?
>> All right. Talk about the company. Where
are you guys now? take us through the
the plan, the strategy, where you are on
momentum.
>> I love the platform play you have here.
Yeah. So basically uh you know um we
started the company three years ago
uh we've built a very deep technology
and also when the recent models came out
around like maybe 9 months ago we were
able to then uh amplify it with the
agentic layer and we started to go to
market. Now we serve about like uh I
think 15 uh 15 large enterprises
corporates and um basically we uh we
will be starting to think about our
series A soon and uh that's it the the
>> how many customers do you have now?
>> So 15 are they are they pro um are they
design partners early customers? Oh,
they're paying customers. Okay. Paying
customers. We we provide value. Actually
today the way the relationship go we
prefer
>> to do like uh to start the relationship
kick off with a proof of value and we
turn this around. We turn the use case
around in like couple of weeks
>> and then the interaction is different
because we show you stuff on your data.
It's not like
>> it's like a best forward deployed
engineer motion. You go in, look at
their data, and come in with not just a
slick demo, right?
>> You actually have actionable.
>> And then we want to become your trusted
advisor because we know your data as
well as you do. And with our platform,
we actually would like to continue and
deepen the relationship by expanding.
>> Okay, you got me at at at a yes. You got
me to yes. I'm a customer now. I want to
work with you. I want to sign on the
line that's dotted. Tell me what's next.
How do I work with you? What do I need
to do on my end? Right? How do you add
value?
>> Typically, our initial goal is to
automate your closed processes. So, we
again we have a four uh a team of four
deployed engineers as part of our
delivery team. They would go and map
your closed processes. When you when you
try to nail it down, it could be
anywhere between 150 to 800 tasks
depends on the size and complexity of
the business. And then we go ahead and
configure them on the system. It could
be a process that would take depends on
the size of the company between anywhere
between 8 to 10 weeks to maybe even six
months. But every single week or months,
your life gets better and something else
goes away. And when we create these
agents, they can do three things. They
automate the work. They create the
documentation, the workpapers and all
that specific documents, the proof of
work. That's great,
>> right? The proof of work which is
essential. And you can interact with
them. You can ask them questions like
like a staff member, like an employee.
You can ask them questions. They can
help you.
>> Those questions could be like, "Hey, why
didn't why didn't you do this there?" Or
imagine like if we
>> can you get down to the level of why did
you book it there in that category
versus that,
>> right? The same way because look in
finance, it's critical especially in
public companies that there will be a
prepare and a review. We replace the
prepare. The reviewer is still the human
in the loop. The same way the human in
the loop would ask his team
>> what percentage of work would you say
goes into preparation without AI.
>> So I'd like to think it's like 90%. 90
heavy lift
>> let's say. Yeah probably people you know
8020 but I think it's really 9010.
>> I've heard similar. Yeah right.
>> That's consistent what I've been
hearing.
>> Right. So it's like
>> that's a lot.
>> Right. That's a lot. It's much easy to
review and also you think more
strategically when you need to prepare
every line. It's way more difficult and
like you get lost in the woods as
opposed to uh
>> Yeah. It's the bark of the tree.
Everyone's looking and they not see the
big picture.
>> Right. Right. So being a being able
being able to do that and then you
interact with the agent just like an
employee. You can ask him questions. Uh
you you you can you can challenge him.
You can alter the documentation.
You can
>> All right. What's next for you? Tell us
what's on your agenda. Obviously, you
got 15 customers you're building out.
You're getting more data, proof points
from customers. I'm assuming to continue
to get more customers. What else you got
going on?
>> Uh, so we're looking to raise our series
A by early next year and uh that's
really where we want to go for and and
continue from there. I think our
technology is unique. I think 100% of
finance teams
around the world around the country are
looking at AI
>> and uh I think it's the right moment to
expand.
>> All right. What would you say if I said
well there's a bubble going on? How
would you answer that question?
Everyone's saying there's a bubble in
AI. Um oh supply is constrained. There's
demand for intellect intelligence. I
think like any anything else in the
world, the cost of using AI will drop
will continue to drop down as the
infrastructure will be more efficient
and I'd like to think a AI would be even
avail you know one of the analogies I'm
using I think we're looking at the 40
now in 1920 and we're switching we're
moving from the horse to 40 but I think
the Lexus and the Mercedes-Benz and the
Tesla are like 3 four years down the So
I think we we we're not, you know, it's
it's just getting started.
>> There's a discovery journey for
enterprises right now. They're learning.
They're and once they get unit economics
nailed down, once they see that
intelligence,
>> that's the product they're buying.
>> And the world is going to significantly
change in ways we can't even imagine.
>> Yeah. Yeah. I think the demand curve is
good. Now on the funding, have you had a
seed round?
>> So we raised a slight a relatively big
seed of $15 million.
>> Seed round.
>> Seed round. It used to be the old series
A, but
>> no, no, no. $50 million of seed, uh,
four or five different funds. One of the
leaders is Propel Ventures from San
Francisco and Inside Partners and some
others attendee and um, and u, and that
was really meant to help us build the
foundation, the technology, and to
support grow.
>> So, you're going to have a good A round
because you have some nice investors,
world-class investors in there. Insight,
>> very strong. Um, you probably don't need
any help from me, but if you do rent
from the cube, you get a 20% discount on
the equity.
>> There you go.
>> He's he's [laughter] like, "Yeah,
approved by the board." No, I'm only
kidding. Good luck on the financing.
Love the venture. Again, I love the
systems approach. It's very consistent
with what we're seeing on AI
infrastructure. Kind of the same game,
but everything's denser, close to the
compute. You're seeing
>> the architecture is systematic. It's a
systems game. Congratulations. I'd like
to think the world is changing, but
we're also solving pains that people are
experiencing on a daily basis. And once
we solve that, I don't think anyone
would like to
>> to I mean, prep, it's just grind. Take
that toil, that undifferiated heavy
lifting
>> and move it into review and
>> whatever professional service they can
do. That's the winning hand. Yeah. If
you can get it done. So,
congratulations. Thanks for coming on.
>> Thank you, John, for
>> All right. This is the kind of
conversation at the cube we love. It's
deep tech meets reality. That is the
transformation edge. The competitive
edge for the companies going forward
will be how they can leverage AI. Not
just leveraging for the leverage AI's
sake. It's injecting intelligence into
their organization. It's not an IT
project. The payback is there and
there's money involved. It is a
transformation time and the best edge
will go to the winners. Thanks for
watching.