Submind YouTube summaries
Thumbnail for Agriculture and land use - part2

Agriculture and land use - part2

Watch on YouTube

Video summary

The video addresses the critical vulnerability of West Africa to climate change, particularly regarding rainfed staple crops like millet and sorghum which form the basis of food security in the region. The presenter highlights that while global warming projections show varied changes in annual precipitation across the continent, there is a consistent increase in extreme rainfall events characterized by higher maximum daily precipitation. This shift, combined with rising temperatures, poses a dual threat: it shortens the growing season for crops due to increased heat stress and accelerates crop cycles, thereby reducing biomass production and yield potential. Consequently, even if some areas might see marginal yield increases under warmer conditions, the overall trend points toward significant reductions in agricultural productivity, which is especially detrimental given the region's existing struggles with hunger and livelihood dependence on traditional farming. To quantify these historical impacts and separate human-induced climate change from natural variability, researchers employed modeling experiments using atmospheric general circulation models to simulate two scenarios: one reflecting actual conditions influenced by human activities and another representing a non-warming counterfactual based on pre-industrial levels. The results of these simulations revealed a stark contrast when compared with observational data; without anthropogenic influences, the simulated temperatures would have remained significantly lower than observed trends. Furthermore, while total rainfall totals showed no significant signal of change due to greenhouse gases in this specific analysis, there were notable differences in very heavy rain events. These findings indicate that human activities have already altered the regional climate, leading to warmer conditions and more intense precipitation extremes that directly threaten crop yields. The study utilized two distinct crop models, STAR and STICS, to assess how these historical climate changes have affected agricultural output across West Africa. Despite differences in their complexity and processes—such as the inclusion of CO2 fertilization effects and nitrogen dynamics in one model versus water balance and radiation use efficiency in the other—both models produced remarkably similar patterns of yield loss. The geographical maps generated from these simulations show substantial decreases in productivity, particularly in the Sahel and northern parts of West Africa like Niger and Senegal, where estimated yield losses range between 10 to 80 percent for millet and 5 to 50 percent for sorghum. These reductions are attributed primarily to anthropogenic warming causing water deficits and shortened crop durations, suggesting a common underlying mechanism driving these declines regardless of the specific modeling approach used. In conclusion, the research underscores that climate change is no longer just a future scenario but an observable reality affecting West African agriculture today, with potential yield losses between 6 and 50 percent already evident in historical data. The presenter emphasizes that even under optimistic global warming scenarios failing to stay below 1.5 degrees Celsius, further production losses are expected in the region. This necessitates urgent development of effective adaptation strategies to mitigate the risks to food security. The presentation also touches upon the importance of measuring uncertainty through large ensemble simulations and validating models against observational data, noting that while natural variability complicates attribution studies, the signal of human influence is becoming increasingly clear. Finally, the speaker mentions ongoing efforts within the agricultural community to expand these modeling protocols across more countries in Africa to better understand and address the growing challenges posed by climate change.
Read the full video transcript
for this very inspiring token I imagine I'm a researcher in France in south of France in Mongolia and I will maybe give some example of what Alex just shown about climate change impact about crop on crop productivity and crop Hill but mainly with the focus in in West Africa and on rainfed crops it's quite limited but it could be very important for food security actually so Africa is particularly exposed to a climate probability and climate change as well you have one sort of the population facing widespread hunger and chronic manipulation and you have also people whose livelihood is heavily dependent on traditional rainbow culture so there is a high vulnerability vulnerability and climate change could pose an additional building in achieving food security goals in the region so um indeed when you have additional increase in global warming when you have changes in hot and cold temperatures and also changes in precipitation you could have a strong impact on crop yield and you have here projected changes in in Africa with an increase of four degrees of global warming and you have on the the left annual maximum temperature and your minimum temperature and on the right and your total precipitation and maximum daily precipitation and you can see that there are strong warming in in Africa especially in Continental Africa and it's it's very true in the sahelan and you have also changes in in the rainfall but these changes are not that uniform if you look at annual precipitation you have a part of Africa especially this is also Africa but also the western part of West Africa which is a drawing with the increase of temperature and uh and some other parts were on the opposite with a lot of more rainfall in the future but you have a common feature in in Africa which is the increase of the extreme rain rainfall with the higher number of maximum daily precipitation which is uh could also be a problem for uh for cracking so this change in climate and especially the warming as has been shown by uh by Alex previously could lead to negative impact on crops especially because of this higher temperature which could shorten crop cycle length so with this index of Growing Degree Days and if you have some more temperature you have less time for for crops to to grow and to uh and to produce biomass and yield them and you could also increase water stress with this higher temperature which is overall detrimental for Crop Production and overall we could expect less yield but also more viable yield under uh and uh warmer climate so as an example this study shows the distribution of crop yields and present and future climax So based on cement fiber stimulation and it gives them [Music] the crops we use here are Millet and sorghums which are the the the the main staple food crops in the region and in West Africa and these are animalies given from a crop model so you can see that the distribution is shifted in future climate on the lower yard with also a higher distribution which means that you have more viable yields under climate change so such kind of projection we design a portal with the the national Med service in Senegal to stimulate such kind of a projection of climate but also projection of crop here that could be used for decision making or at least for for some civilization about connection impact on cropian so you have here the the bottle with Israel with the colleagues in in Senegal and you have for instance here different kind of indices we put on the portal with the temperature with precipitation but also a projection of crop yield and you have a revolution of maize under uh different scenarios of climate change using three five scenarios and now we are working on extending the the portal we sleep six data but also to develop the portal to other countries and here you have an example of uh what we are doing in Burkina Faso as well so climate change is not uh climate change and climate warming is that only in climate models and in future scenarios but it's also visible in climate observations you have here an example of what uh we are in the last ipcc report in the original fact sheets in Africa and you have already in the observation mean temperature and how to extremes that have energy both natural viability and you have also uh some happy changes some faster changes that we have on the global average we've also observed the increase in hot extrins and and and the rainfall Extreme as well in this slides you have the upstairs temperature in the sahelum um I think 19 since 1950 during the hottest months uh aprilo junior and in annual mean uh understanding in the same graph and you can see that there is a clear increase of temperature especially during the hottest month season in April where there is a plus 1.4 degrees warming since the 1950s so it's quite important especially when you look at the the hottest months during uh just before the the monsoon season so now the question is uh how uh such changes in terms of temperature has already affected uh agriculture and this is not an easy question for at least two reasons first when you look at productivity time series there is a lot of viability and Trends in the crop politics time series that are not due to a change in changing in climate but that could be due to management change that could be due to a lot of factors that could influence crop yield by the end and second there is also a high natural uh liability in a historical climate especially in Africa and sometimes it's very hard to uh to to attribute the the changes in terms of uh of um a non-tropical global warming and as an example you have here an example of such viability in Africa with two recent climate Extremes in Africa which had a strong impact on food security and these two events were reported by the world weather attribution institution in Madagascar and for the first event the Madagascar was facing a several food crisis exacerbated by exceptionally low levels of rainfall over 2020 and 2021 but the attribution analysis based on past data recline summation concluded that factors or other than climate change were the main drivers of this food insecurity and in fact this higher high drought belonged to the natural language of the climate literature another example is the increase the rainfall associated with tropical Cyclones and on the opposite the theatrician study concluded that there is a closed link with climate change in the region so you have a high viable climate and it's very hard to to look at the um the the cause and to attribute it to climate change so to answer this question and to assess the historical impacts of human activities in West Africa we designed modeling experiments based on two continents them the first component is based on the climate model to simulate historical climatic with and without autop influence and a second component based on crop modeling to assess on topic warming has already affected crop yields in in West Africa so considering climate simulation we use a global model an atmospheric a general circulation model caused by SST by C surface temperature amp and the model was used for two kinds of simulation first a factual simulation with actual conditions that are influenced both a human activities and natural parsenium and then an encounter factual climate simulation with the non-warming climate with pre-industrial climate that lacks in fact a human influence on a global system so here the the surface temperature and sea ice were so that we could remove the influence of a CO2 of human influence in the simulation and by the end we got 60 years of igcn simulation and with an ensembled member of 100 simulation and so this data will interpolated at the 0.5 resolution and also buys collected so that we could use the different dialogues to force crop models and this kind of simulation were already used to assess exchanges in terms of of temperature a different regions of the world and the in a paper made by a shogama and thalam and you have here a result with historical and observation in blackened and you can see that the simulation of the model are quite close when you use the the the simulation using a orthopic emission entrepreneurs and you can also see that uh distribution has been used for assessing climate change impacts in a in the at the global scale so using the sigma crop model so this study based by yuzumi Italian investigated the change in terms of average yield associated with climate change of comparison levels in Redlands you have areas where climate change them decreased yield on their historical in in the past term and on the opposite you have in green the areas where climate change increased yields and you can see clearly that the areas where the Productions were higher because of climate change it's very clear in Northern latitudes in Europe and in New York in in Russia also in Canada but yeah you can see in the tropics in in West Africa and India you know in yeah there is a clear decrease of crop years because of uh of human activities so what are the impacts of human activities on West African climate and so we have a look in the simulation and we compute several user relevant in this season that could be very important for productivity by the end and this this is a part of a lunar list we established during meeting with stakeholders in senegales and we then compare this in this season so that our annual mean temperature easy rainfall events and rainfall intensity will compare this in this season uh between the two simulations so with and without in our gazes and what we found is that uh this most of these indices were significantly different from more information to another one especially annual mean temperature and you have here an example where you show I show you a Time series of annual surface temperature in average over West African in the observation so it's the absorption from the data from cell from crew data and you can see that there is a clear increase of temperature with an average temperature of 27 degrees over the last 10 years of the simulation and you have now in blue the counter factual simulation and it is clear from this simulation that would simulate the the internal reliability of the the temperature but we list the increased temperature and also the the mean temperature just completely different from what we observed in the in the in the previous years and now it's the factual simulation when we introduce now the effects of the anthropic Reynolds gazes in the in the climate model and you can see that now we are very close to the observed temperature and we also have a very close average of temperature over the last 10 years of the simulation so now we uh we have done the the statement for the same comparison but for mean temperature total rainfall very hot taste and very heavy rainfall and what you can see is that it is very clear that we have differences in terms of integration but we have no differences in terms of total rainfall which means that we cannot see any signal of uh increase of greenhouse gases in the in the in the in the changes in terms of total rainfall but we have some changes in terms of very heavy rains in the in the model so we have significant changes in terms of very evarence which could also have an impact on crop here so now what are the impacts in terms of cropianism so um we use the the the the atmospheric GCM outputs to force uh two crop models and that our star and sigma Sarah was developed in a group and sigma was developed in uh in Tokyo and they were used to simulate crop yields using these two simulation the factual and the control Factor simulation and we have done one Android simulations for each so let me briefly introduce you the the two crop models we use them so we use them the Sarah model which has been developed by ciardan and it combines a water balance models of simulating what ordinance salt water availability but also a carbon acceleration a partitioning model with radiation use efficiency with phenology and this model was used was used several retirement and it seemed that when you compare it to a FL captures quite well and the variability of crop yield in the in the region and we also used the the sigma model which was developed by narrow in Japan and including much more processes that uh what we have in the in the in the sarmadon so you have the this Growing Degree Days uh uh stimulation and but you have also a different kind of uh effect especially the the CO2 effect on the crop here but but also a lot of different kind of processes that we don't have such as the the nitrogen deficit it was and excess water that have been considered in the volume so we have first validated the two prop model compared to the observation you have iron the two simulation of millet and saw women for the two crop models includes the Sarah model and the the sigma model and you can see that you have one model doing a good job in terms of simulated the annual Trends so it's the the sigma module and the another model it's the star model which is doing a foreign so now these maps are the the geographical impacts of of crop here associated with historical climate change connective to a non-warming counterfactual condition so when you have a negative values it indicates that you have a yield loss due to anthropic warming and what you can see is that you have a high crop in the yellow season especially in the in the north of West Africa in the in the in the sahelan which is uh the statement in the two crop model so even if we have two very different components you you have a kind of exactly the same relaxable patterns with crop losses due to uh increase of greenhouse gases and to a historical climate change and these losses are estimated between 10 and 80 percent formulate and between 5 and 50 percent of sovereign depending of the crop model and it could be very important for some countries for instance if you look at Niger if you look at the Senegal we have a very high losses because of the increase of greenhouse gases and and its impact on climate change so to conclude I'll show you some examples of the impact of human activity and Regional climate so in Africa we have a warmer climate with more intense rainfall which could have a negative consequences on agricultural production and it's already visible when you you when we perform the attribution study so without on topic warming crop field could have been a higher in West Africa so between six percent and fifty percent for trouble and between 11 and 80 for minutes which is quite high and could have an impact on food security and even if we use two different crop models with two level two levels of complexity uh we have a kind of a very similar effect of climate change on cropianism which suggests that we have a common mechanism which might explain this common behavior and we suspect that it's likely to increase construction LED water deficits and also the short-term crop duration induced by the warming and since the most optimistic climate change scenario do not lead to a warming below 1.5 degrees in Africa so we expect further Crop Production losses in West Africa and it's clear that we need to to think about the most effective adaptation meters in the region that will be really critical uh so I think uh I'm done and I open uh for a question if you are thank you very much thank you uh Benjamin that was that was great and we we had a discussion just yesterday about the ways that we might assess things like losses and damages and you know the the impacts uh attribution detection attribution world has become much stronger on the climate side in recent years uh but getting to the impact side I think your study with with Toshi is one of the earlier ones that's really doing that so uh very exciting to see any questions in the room for what we've seen yes uh let me get the microphone and and just for Benjamin's sake could you please uh just say your name in an institution um hi Ben I'm Jean or from Australia I have a couple of questions about your presentation um yeah the first the question is is you mentioned the D100 in Denver members so I just wondering the in the member is from the different calendar model or different initial conditions so I'm not a canier there the second position is your work is under which emissions and the last small question is how much confidence you can put on your simulated results yeah thank you for the question in fact the the one member the 100 simulations are captivation of initial conditions and so we try to look at the the effect of Eternal variability of the model and it could be quite high so we need to uh to uh to to to to assimilate the the model one right time but we believe that uh in fact if we want to really sample the efficiency the the the the uncertainty may be something like 20 to 30 simulation would be a and so the the the question about the uncertainty of this stimulation I mean that it uh it is related to the portal we have done uh or uh or to the number I give by DNA I I don't capture all the I want your question so it's about uncertainty of the world study on um if I paraphrase it's you know in terms of how do you measure uncertainty do you measure it across those hundred um 100 simulations do you measure it with other uh uncertainty elements like the the error bar around um you know representation of different processes uh so when we saw those box and whiskers what was what was the the variation in there was it must have also been space uh let's see I don't know if Benjamin is Frozen okay try again I was offline yeah so can you can you say it again yeah so the question is how do you measure uncertainty is it across the simulations is it uh do you have any kind of larger error metrics about how well the model is performing um or or factors that might be left out for example yes so what we are doing it's uh we are trying first to validate the model uh across against observation uh against yield data and also the we are validating the the way the the model represents the relationship between climate and uh and crop yield in the in the observation for instance we have looking at the correlation between temperature and observed yield the rainfall and absorb yield and we are trying to look at how crop models are doing that and we are confident in the moments that they could do that but it's true that there is a high uncertainty and I think the The agneep Ensemble simulation uh you have shown just before uh a very good example of how we could measure example uh this uh uncertainty and I think using a different crop models it's a way to to sample uncertainty it's really important to do that okay yeah so just just to add on to that within agmap we have taken this study approach that uh that uh Benjamin and and his colleague Toshi Izumi from Japan have pioneered and we are now bringing it to a larger acting Community this is kind of what we do which is when somebody has a nice study we say wouldn't it be great if all of the modelers did this because now we could really understand the model uncertainty uh component of that so we are actually at our Global Workshop later this month uh we are bringing many modelers together to redo this protocol with more models and more sites in Africa so that we can start to factor that in uh maybe one last question in the room before I want to make sure we leave Edmond sometime as well all right I don't see a burning hand so uh Benjamin thank you so much I hope you get to listen also into Edmund's talk um so our next speaker is Edmund Toten who is joining us uh virtually