A Conversation with Niegel Smith - TORCHES: 30+ Years of Downtown Performance
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Nigel Smith, an artistic director and downtown performance artist, approaches his work as a guide who helps collaborators reach a shared destination while preserving the essential surprise of not knowing the exact path ahead. His journey into performance art began by studying traditional theater alongside pioneers like Vito Acconci and Augusto Boal, which shifted his focus from commercial entertainment to meaningful community exchange. This philosophy treats the audience as necessary participants rather than passive spectators, aiming to practice empathy that extends beyond the theater walls. Smith actively resists the field's tendency toward amnesia, advocating for the citation of predecessors while valuing collaboration rooted in his church upbringing where co-creating worlds was both fun and unpredictable.
Smith balances personal expression with collective creation by maintaining unscripted elements to allow for spontaneity, even as he engages in solitary poetry writing. He joined The Flea to secure a living wage for experimental work but faced significant tension between his vision of a demographically diverse resident company and the institution's existing anti-capitalist model involving unpaid artists. After five years, he initiated a radical restructuring that reduced staff and board members to pivot toward a new mission centered on Black, Brown, and queer experimental art. This shift involved a six-month process to redefine success based on artist-defined goals, fostering deep pre-production collaboration to ensure transparency and shared vision before contracts were signed. He defines institutional success through building communities that engage with works during their development, believing that art drives social change by altering narratives and helping audiences experience conspicuousness regarding race and space.
A significant piece created shortly after the murder of Trayvon Martin invited community participation to foster unity among art and non-art makers, emphasizing social change and activism. Smith contrasts this activist work with other projects focused on divinity and aesthetic virtuosity, where he seeks to inspire audiences by demonstrating what is possible through discipline and collective insistence. However, he critiques the traditional live performance industry's rushed production cycle, noting that while it initially helped him build micro-communities, it failed to sustain the long-term community life he desired. Consequently, he plans to shift toward a slower, more intimate studio practice involving one-on-one and small group interactions, allowing works to reveal themselves on their own timelines rather than adhering to fixed schedules.
Smith expresses emotional difficulty living in New York City due to its disconnection and overwhelming nature, hoping for a future where his daily life is within walking distance of neighbors to foster genuine connection. In a significant announcement, he stated that he will step down as artistic director at The Flea by the end of December but will remain on the board to oversee the transition. Moving forward, he plans to integrate social work into his creative practice, continuing projects like "Beyond the Stardust" with the Illustrious Blacks and launching a new project called "The Great Thirst" with Justin Tranter in 2027. Ultimately, Smith holds the tension between art as expression and activism uncomfortably yet views both as essential to his practice, striving to create spaces where every voice is heard to prevent silencing.
Read the full video transcript
I do see my role as a director as
saying, "Hey, we're heading over there.
Uh, that's where the finish line is."
But, um, I don't want to know exactly
what's at the finish line because if I
know it, it's not going to be surprising
or mixed in with all of our different
values and artistry.
>> [music]
>> Welcome friends. I'm Kristen Martin and
this is Torches. Today we have my dear
friend Nigel Smith. Nigel is an
award-winning theater director and
performance artist. He's also the
artistic director of New York City's OB
award-winning theater, The Flea. I'm
really excited to speak with him today.
Welcome, Nigel.
>> Thank you, friend. It's good to be
talking to you, too.
>> Great. How did you come to be in
Downtown Performance?
>> Oh. Oh, what a great question. Um, well,
like I I often start with uh Veto
Akanchi and Sophie Cal, [laughter]
>> as we all do.
>> What What am I even talking about?
uh like I was I was tra studying
traditional theater and uh in undergrad
and uh was introduced to the work of
performance art and specifically the
performance artists of the Cal and Vita
Lanchi
uh and their happenings and their
interactions in public space where the
viewer participant uh wasn't aware
whether their work was actually
performance or just lived experience
>> uh and it immediately caught me and made
sense to me. Uh I was also studying the
work of Austo Bal at the same time.
>> Uh and specifically the work around
forum theater and the theater is a place
of uh exchange for community to work out
questions or or or tragedies or uh
excitements for that community. And I
began to think about a
a a role, a work in the theater that was
outside of commercial, outside of the
commercial concerns of are we selling
this for entertainment? Uh and what are
the different exchanges that uh an
audience might have with your
performance, with your work? And um that
led me to uh the movement of the
downtown scene in New York City and uh
the artists and works that are happening
here. Uh, how when did you first do that
kind of soundwalk or experiential walk,
immersive experience? What was the first
one of those you did here in the city?
>> Oh, wow. So, sound Yes. Uh, my Oh, my
first soundwalk was Todd Shalom,
>> uh, who was a longtime collaborator and
friend of mine. Uh, and he was working
with um, acoustic ecology and they were
specifically building soundwalks around
the city. And Todd led this walk in
which we were looking at uh what are the
everyday objects that we could create
scores with.
>> Uh and at the root of this, you know,
investigation was that every choice has
the potential to be a creative choice.
>> And so if we think of the objects around
us as the potential for us to start to
create soundsscapes and scores together
and to listen to one another and co-make
with each other. And I I remember the
culmination of this walk was actually in
like a Gustides nearby [laughter]
in which Todd tasked us with going into
the store for 3 minutes and creating a
score out of the objects in the store uh
with the other
>> like opening the freezer door and
closing it. Opening the freezer door and
closing.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Or crinkling a bag. Uh and
all the while being aware that the
shoppers and the workers in there were
our audience.
both the transgression and the use of
those objects and I was really really
floored by the by that work.
>> Awesome. Um, how do you see artistic
lineage passed down or interrupted and
has that influence the work that you
make?
>> Uh,
I think that I
personally am always looking out for
amnesia. I'm looking out for the ways in
which uh works incredibly uh
groundbreaking works somehow get
forgotten or moved past or uh and and so
I'm oftenimes find myself insisting that
we look back and see oh who's been in
this terrain before. Uh I've noticed in
the field a real lust for the new uh and
a uh a languaging of the new is somehow
um I mean I'll use the word original
[laughter]
>> right
>> and and yes what what I do find original
is is is how one's own voice attacks a
form or brings a um forms together and
syncing them but uh I I am hungry in our
field for um more citation,
>> more desire for citation,
>> um more acknowledgement of uh who has um
gone before and and affected us. I work
with, you know, this I work with this
artist Taylor Mack and one of the joys
of the early part of our working
together is Taylor is quite clear that
Judy's work was in the lineage of the
theater of the ridiculous. Not only in
that lineage, but partly in that
lineage. and it allowed us to be really
clear to each other and to our audience
that part of what we're doing is part of
a lineage of making that's already taken
place in this space.
>> That's beautiful. Can you share what has
been a moment of pure joy
>> and your art making?
>> Actually directing the Chicago regional
premiere of Father Comes Home from the
Wars parts one, two, and three by the
Queen Susan Lorie Parks.
Wow. [laughter]
It's someone whose work I wanted to
interpret my since I was in undergrad. I
was like, "Ah, this is this there's
something about this playwright, the way
that uh not only is she uh writing
incredible narratives with wonderful
characters, but there's um
>> there's a rhythm to her plays and it's
almost like a jazz rhythm. Uh, and I and
I just felt that in the instinctual and
I knew that like if I could just be in
those worlds, I could guide some folks
through them. Uh, and I got the chance
to direct that at uh, the Goodman
Theater in Chicago. A cast of 18.
>> Wow.
>> Huge for a play. [laughter]
Uh, an incredible blues musician from
Chicago. uh who like just got in and
started leaning on each other and making
this beautiful courageous world. And uh
I I was shocked and surprised by what we
made and just super delighted to have
that.
>> And that collaboration has continued
because I just saw something you're
making with Susan Lori last week. In
fact,
>> yeah. Yes. [laughter]
Susan Lori is like a friend and a
collaborator now and such deep respect.
And you know, we're making this piece uh
called the tuneup. Uh Susan Lord came to
me and said, "Hey, brother. I've been
working uh with my band for a year now,
nine piece band, writing these new songs
and also writing um some what she calls
micro plays and some jingles
uh and wanting to tune us up in this
moment."
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. And it's really a special special
piece uh combining my deep loves which
is like you know great pieces of theater
and also music live music live music
live musicians please.
>> Yes. [laughter] It was really uplifting
and inspiring last week. I'm excited to
see where you guys continue TO TAKE IT.
BLACK SUPERHEROES TO THE RESCUE.
[music]
>> COLLABORATION. That's a good thing to
talk about. you collaboration is so much
a part of your work and work in the
theater in general, but I think of you
as a truly
>> um generative collaborator and that it
you've you create a room that encourages
everyone to feel heard and feel seen and
I would love to hear a little bit about
what that is about for you and why it's
important, why these great
collaborations are important. Yeah.
Look, I think that
I I grew up in a church family. We went
to church, me and my cousins. Uh we
would play church in the front yard. We
would imagine and co-create the world
around us. And it was just fun. Number
one, it's just fun to not know what
someone else is going to bring into the
mix. Uh and yeah, I do see my role as a
director as saying, "Hey, we're heading
over there. Uh that's where the finish
line is." But um I don't want to know
exactly what's at the finish line
because if I know it, it's not going to
be surprising or or mixed in with all of
our different values and artistry. Uh
and so I I really want to create a space
where each person's voice and their
discipline can come uh come to fruition.
And I I also know what it's like to um
to be neglected. Uh to have your voice
um silenced. Uh and that hurts.
>> Yeah.
>> Uh and
part of why I make theater, I make art,
uh is so that we can be heard.
>> Uh and so the the processes should uh
emulate what we're up to. Uh, you know,
someone once said to me, and I I could
wish I could remember who it was, but,
uh, what happens on stage in front of an
audience is a document of what happened
in the rehearsal room.
>> Okay.
>> Yeah.
>> Uh, and I've been in the opposite side
of deeply collaborative spaces. You
know, I've been in rooms that have been
>> uh, diretocracies,
call them. I've led rooms like that and
had to reflect on uh why the work showed
up the way it did or why I showed up as
that human in that particular process.
>> Uh but the majority of my rooms and you
know have a different flavor.
>> Yes, that is very true.
>> Yeah.
>> Would you have any advice you'd offer
around how to navigate conflict or power
in a room
>> around that [snorts] in in in the depth
of warm collaboration? Yeah.
what's really essential is actually sort
of a psychological space uh which is
that my role as a collaborator is to
bring my point of view fully
>> uh and so if I am recognizing that
there's something that is is not working
for the team or someone's being hurt or
or even there's an idea that might not
get us to the finish line. uh my job is
to bring that up and bring it into the
room.
>> Uh and also know that the response of my
collaborator their response is theirs.
>> It's not mine to hold or manage. they
get to manage and then we get to make
the next step decision together because
in the place in the moments the times
when I have withheld when I have not
said uh what should be said in that
moment or that what I'm recognizing uh
we end up more hurt or we end up going
down paths that we that aren't as
productive for longer and so uh really
really it's it's
>> it It's that trust that you can share
something and that your collaborator can
hold it. Uh, and
you know, it it doesn't mean that you
have to do it right away. You can write
it down in your notebook and be like,
okay, maybe I'm going to say this at the
end of the day or maybe I'm going to say
it in a couple rehearsals.
>> Maybe it's not in this whole room right
now.
>> Yeah. Exactly. Yeah.
>> You think a lot about the relationship
to audience in your work and you've
talked about that. Um, you also have
made a lot of work that's had unusual
relationships to audience. So, how do
you approach them as a partner in your
work rather than just as a spectator?
>> Yes. Oh, that takes us back to Augusta
Bal when I was reading Rainbow of Desire
and he said the spect actor and I was
like yes, I know.
>> Like it was like it was like a it was he
put language to something that I just
knew and I knew that because I grew up
in the Pentecostal tradition.
>> Yeah. So that tradition uh it may have a
formal structure that has a uh a worship
leader, the priest or it may have a
choir that has some songs prepared. But
during the course of the worship, if you
if a song comes into your heart, you
start singing it and then the rest of
the like the pianist will come in and
support you and the rest of the
congregation will come in and support
you and whoa, suddenly we're singing
this song.
>> Okay? where suddenly someone's shouting
and we're and we're taking care of them
and and supporting them. And so growing
up in that culture like to me it's like
what the needs of the audience are just
as important to what has been prepared
to share with them.
>> Yeah. Uh and so when I married that with
the language of Austo Bal, it really
began a deep
critical thinking of mine and in my work
about where does the um audience sit as
a participant because I I hope that what
I make, you know, I love going to an
entertaining drama that just sort of or
entertaining musical comedy that I can
get lost in a world like I love that. uh
but the work that I make I I hope that
we are practicing
uh ways of being and empathy that we
carry with us out and so uh being aware
that my participation is necessary or
the participation of the audience is
necessary is
>> I could talk about this for days I don't
know if [laughter] you want me to keep
talking about it I could talk you know
for me I was I also um was lucky enough
to study scenic design uh with Gorgi
Mishkaville and also to work in Eugene
Lee's studio uh when in his studio in
Providence. And so thinking about an
audience's relationship to the offering,
you know, are we surrounding it? Are we
inside of it? Are our bodies necessary?
I mean, this is where we can get into 24
decade and the work with Taylor Mack,
but like what is the audience's role?
>> Yeah.
>> Beyond passive spectator.
>> Yeah. Why don't you talk a little bit
about 24 decade? That feels like a great
uh thing to dip into. There are parts of
that show that are still in my body, you
know, that still sit with me. So, talk a
little bit about over that, for folks
who aren't aware, it was 24 hours of
continuous performance for one evening,
but it was 24 decades of music um that
Taylor and Nigel and company developed.
So, just tell us a bit about that.
>> Yeah. Well, when I think about 24
decade, I actually think a lot about the
chairs
[laughter]
because when we did it in its full
incarnation, there were 650 seats and
there were 650 chairs and we knew that
over a 24-hour duration, an audience
could not be sitting in one seat for
that entire 24 hours that uh something
about that would actually shrink the
person and make them uncomfortable.
Literally, just uncomfortable. and and
also what does it mean to uh so the
piece also um looked at 246
years of American history or 240 years
1776 to 2016 and now beyond. Uh, and so
what did it mean to actually participate
in that um, touching back at history uh,
through this queer lens? And so devising
ways that the audience had to put their
own bodies and voice on the line,
whether that's uh doing a queer prom
where you choose someone of the sim
seemingly same gender to have a dance
with or uh in a decade when you're
blindfolded passing off a rose from one
person to the other uh or helping to
move chairs so that we can have a dance
party or soup kitchen. A favorite part
for me was the white flight part where
all the white people had to move out of
the center of the space and people of
color were able to take that space. And
I thought that was so beautiful.
>> Oh god. So so beautiful. And I remember,
you know, Taylor talking about it that
the impulse behind that was like he
wanted the white folks in the audience
to experience what it was like from a
queer perspective to be in the suburbs.
What does it mean to be cramped and, you
know, and it difficult to have space and
take up space? Uh yeah, it was really
really exciting to come up with that.
>> I still have a fondness for um a woman
that I don't know who she was. I never
will.
>> Um that we passed something to each
other while we were blindfolded.
>> And we had this very intimate exchange
and [snorts] it just I just feel this
incredible warmth towards her even
though I've never met her. I don't know
her name. I don't know who she really
is. But there was a a sense of community
created in that moment.
>> Yeah. Um and I think that that whole
experience there were so many things
that you all did as an ensemble and that
you did in the role of director to
create relationships amongst audience
during the unfolding.
>> Yeah.
>> It's so great to hear you say because
you just gave back to me what the
impulse of the show was.
>> Uh and that is act for me it's the joy
of being a director. I I practice
directing as an interpretive act. I know
other people you know practice it in
different ways. And so when Taylor said
to me, "The goal of this show is for the
community to form while it's also
falling apart."
>> Yeah.
>> That gives me like, okay, so this is
what my writer and co-director are
saying the task is. So you get to go
back to every choice making and saying,
is that what we're doing here?
>> You're measuring it against that. Yeah.
Beautiful.
>> Beautiful. Um, and you've worked in a
spectrum of spaces and styles of work.
You've done performance art. You've done
play plays in regional theater. You've
done largecale concerts in um epic
houses. So all different scales. How
does working in those that range of
spaces affect the art making?
>> Oh, how does it affect the art making?
Well, when you have more money, you have
more problems. So, [laughter]
and when you have less money, you have
more problems.
>> [laughter]
>> So actually I I love working at all the
different scales. Um
>> what the way it affects the art is
>> for me about the invitation. So I think
the work begins when you first say to
someone else, I'm making a work and I
want you to be part of it.
>> So that could be a fellow collaborator
or that could be an audience member.
>> Yeah.
>> Uh and in those spaces you're and I
think about this a lot as an artistic
director. uh because the space I run our
biggest theater is 99 seats and our
smallest theater is 44 seats. Okay. So
when I'm asking an artist to make in
that scale, I'm inviting them to bring
their magic and their uh creativity to
fill that box.
>> Uh and as you mentioned, I I've worked
in really I've worked at the Barbin
Theater. I've wor the Sydney Opera House
and that's a different invitation. Uh,
and so just down from like as an artist,
okay, this is the scale and the budget
and the size, but then back to the
audience. So if I'm inviting you to
experience a piece in a, you know, in a
basement, oh my god, I made this piece
once. I'm one of those people or maybe
when I was younger, I was one of those
people that would open every door and
there was a door in the basement of the
public that had a laundry room in it.
[snorts] Uh, and I made a piece in the
laundry room in the basement of
>> I CAME TO THAT PIECE. [laughter]
AND THAT IS A really like like so
immediately when I invite you to there
you're like well I'm going to the public
theater but I'm going to the basement.
And so we're already starting to deal
with the symbols and the meanings of
that. And so the work has to wrestle
with those symbols. How are you greeted
in the lobby? You're coming to something
that's not ticketed for one of the
normal. So who is meeting you? And
you're going down into the basement.
What do they say to you as you're going
down that you know all of these are the
choices. Whereas if I'm making it the
Sydney Opera House, your expectation is,
oh, there's going to be a dosent there.
Uh, I'm going to know exactly where I'm
sitting when I get in there. And so my
choices as a director and artist are
going to be guided by that invitation.
>> How has your understanding of your own
identity, you were talking or lived
experience, you were talking about the
Pentecostal church, um, and other things
about you, how has it shaped your
aesthetic or access
>> to art making?
>> Yeah.
You make me think about a thing that
I've actually carried with me throughout
my entire career is I make work for
three people. I make it for my mother.
Uh, and I should talk about my mom have
me at 17. She's a black woman. She's
black like me. Uh, she is a workingclass
woman. She's worked for Walmart for 25
years. Wow.
>> Now, uh, and she loves expression. She
loves dance. She loves music. She loves
theater. Uh, and I want my mom to be
able to trace the narrative.
>> Okay. So, I work in experimental form,
but I'm thinking about my mom as someone
who is an experimental person coming to
it and getting something out of it. Uh,
I want to surprise myself. So, I'm also
one of my audiences. Mhm.
>> Uh, and you know, I'm a queer man from
the South, uh, who loves food and loves
community and, uh, and is so grateful to
be queer [laughter]
and I want to and I want to experience
those things on stage, but I also want
to be surprised by what's happening.
>> Uh, I don't want to know everything. And
in fact, uh, this can be frustrating to
some of my collaborators. I don't I
always leave some part of the show
unstaged with a set of rules and that's
part of the ways I like let the
collaborators surprise me in that
moment. [laughter]
>> It's one of my tools for surprise
[snorts] and then there's this aesthetic
uh goddess. Uh and so that's sort of
like the uh the rigor the rigor the
virtuosity and I sort of have that
person in the audience as well. Uh, I
mean that's my way of answering that
question. [laughter]
>> So, who is that aesthetic goddess
though?
>> Do you know?
>> I Yeah, I know. I I know.
>> She's a an angel sitting on your
shoulder.
>> Oh my god. No, she sits over there and
she sits in the chair. It's like, okay,
did you you might want to rehearse that
again or you might want to go home and
replant and do some deeper thinking
around that. Uh and there and there are
some people who uh who come to mind when
I think about her. I think about we
talking about Pina Bosch earlier. Yeah.
>> About Pina Balos. I think about Susan
Lorie Parks. Uh I think about Roberto
Leage.
>> Uh I think about George C. Wolf. So
these are people whose work has
>> um stunned me.
>> Mhm. Uh, and I've studied closely enough
to see some of what they're up to
formally,
>> right?
>> Uh, and I want, even though I might not
be doing the same thing formally, I want
them to go, "Yeah, I see I see the
rigor." Because when you look at their
work, you see the rigor. You can, you
don't know exactly what it's stemmed out
of, but you you see what they're up to.
>> How do you balance deeply personal
expression with collective expression? I
like I make solo work. Uh, and when I'm
making that work, I usually begin with
the text and I write it and rewrite it
and try it out and invite some people to
look at it with me. Uh, and those works
are mine.
>> They're mine. They're uh what vision do
I want to have in the world? And when I
invite people to be part of those works
with me, uh that's part of the contract
and I can be really clear about that.
Uh, and I mix that with I'm sure enough
to make your your dreams come true, you
know, and I'm gonna bring all my special
sauce. I'm gonna put it all on the
table, but if you tell me as the co-c
collaborator, oh, that's not doing it,
that can go away.
>> And and I've got my other place that I
can put it. Uh, and so that keeps me
balanced, you know, showing up for
others, inviting others to show up for
me. Uh, and uh, and for things that
aren't meant to be performed, I have my
poetry.
>> Uh, and so I can also do this purely
text. I'm like, oh my god, it's so
juicy. What I love most about, they say
the writing is in the rewriting, but in
poetry,
the writing is like in the distillation.
>> Uh, and that is a really joyful solitude
practice. Uh,
>> I want to see some of those poems,
Nigel. I've never seen those.
>> You will? I'm I'm actually working on a
a collection right now.
>> Beautiful.
>> Yeah,
>> that's exciting.
>> Speaking of showing up for other people,
um, after a number of years being a
freelance artist and also working inside
larger institutions, you decided that
you wanted to lead an institution.
>> OH MY GOSH.
>> AND so you've had a chapter now for 10
plus years, I think. 10 10 years at the
Flea Theater.
>> Um, and one of your earliest actions was
to do a whole reframe of the mission of
the organization. And can you talk a
little bit about why you made that
shift?
>> Yeah.
>> And what that's about?
>> Yeah. Well, I think first I should
mention that it wasn't early on.
>> There's a feeling in the community that
it happened early on, but it was
actually a midway shift of the
institution. Look, I
uh made a decision to go into leadership
because I did not know how to um make a
living at my experimental work and I
refused to put the pressure on my work
to make me a living. I just thought that
was not a calculus I wanted uh to work
through. And so I just I looked around
uh to say okay what could I how could I
make a living in this form. Uh and I
knew people uh could I could give a
vision and people could follow it and
and and I seemed to be really good at
that. And you and I actually were having
a conversation because I was interested
in leadership about uh how that might
happen here at art center. uh very
exciting conversation and I wanted and I
looked around and also saw that artistic
directors uh maybe they it wasn't huge
but they actually had a consistent
living
>> uh and the flea happened to be looking
for a leader and I happened to need that
kind of role in my life
>> and was incredibly excited about the
fact that there was a resident company
and what did it mean to have people that
returned show after go that you could
deepen that work with. And
>> uh and yeah, I mean the f I made $58,000
in my first year. I was so excited.
[laughter]
I was so so excited. I was so so
excited. Uh and I had a resident company
of a hundred performers. Right
>> now, here's the the
interesting thing about the flea is that
it had been founded in the mid '9s and
it had been found specifically as a
response to the off Broadway scene um
starting to get more and more commercial
and the value being about can we
transfer something to Broadway and
embedded in the flea was anti-
capitalist um um desire. [snorts]
>> Yeah. Uh and and one of the ways that
came up was a resident acting company
that was unpaid.
>> Okay. So I walked into an institution
where there were a lot of people who
were showing up to make their art and
their artistry uh in an exchange in
which it would allow them to pay their
bills and here I am taking the job
because it would allow me to pay the
bills. Uh so there is tension
immediately
>> inside of that.
>> Absolutely. And uh
I'll just say one thing which is that I
knew that part of my work was to change
that uh relationship
uh that that economy uh and
I'm a I'm the man I am and I was doing
it slowly.
uh and I was uh having conversations
with leadership and the board and you
know slowly getting the stipened up and
looking towards a vision of raising it
in a really major way. Uh and all of
that was much slower than my artistic
vision which was a company of people
that really looked demographically like
New York City.
>> Not just in terms of gender and
ethnicity but also in terms of wealth.
uh and
that desire to hold those kinds of
people in a company that was steeped in
volunteerism. Um
I didn't think through it enough.
[laughter]
Let's be really clear. I didn't think
through it enough and I didn't have my
uh crew with me inside.
>> Uh and uh the company actually asked for
a change,
>> right?
>> They said this place has to change
faster than it's changing right now.
>> Yeah.
uh and
that gave me the space to uh finally
stand up and say either we do a radical
change or I go
uh and some so I have to first say that
like that's five years in to a 10-year
tenure.
>> Okay.
>> So five years in I'm moving slow.
>> Okay. Uh and
I also owe it to the company for saying
think that happened faster because that
also meant the development of my own uh
soul.
>> Yeah.
>> In a very quick way.
>> Uh and uh so when I when I when when I
did was able to say that um some folks
decided a new direction for the company
was not what they wanted to be part of.
They left. that was like huge part of
our board and and such. Uh and um that
was relieving because then the folks
left were the people who were like okay
let's really dig in. Uh and the uh board
leadership at the time asked me if I had
a vision for a new
>> obviously I I mean I had a new a vision
for a newly from the day I walked in and
[snorts] I tried to work with people
from the very first days and it was very
clear
>> that that vision was not the um
not was what wanted to be supported. So,
uh, we,
um,
I'm pausing because it's all like I I
think the timeline of things is very
important to understanding how we arrive
to the new vision. Um
those people who were left uh which I
should name was five board members down
from 17 board members and three staff
members down from 12. So we're also in
the pandemic and yeah
>> these things are affecting things.
>> Uh and we had three months of cash on
hand. Mhm.
>> Uh and the board said there's no there's
no vision you can hand us in which we
could uh pay a hundred a company of 100
actors. So they said we have to end that
program.
>> We have to end that version of fleet and
we have to go in search of a new vision
that you're going to give us. Uh so that
was really hard because
>> these are artists I invited to be in the
institution
>> and sudden and they and also the artists
who said let's move quicker and and so
help my development and help the
institution's development are suddenly
>> and it felt like it was punitive towards
them. Yeah.
>> Instead of
>> Yes.
>> what they were looking for.
>> Right. So, here we are in this situation
of the the rupture of that relationship
uh and an investment and what can the
new flea be?
>> Yeah.
>> And so we invited several of them uh to
be part of a uh a vision group. So I
walked in and said, "Look, the flea in 5
years can look like this." Uh, and they
came in uh, along with some um, former
writers and members of the theater
community uh, for a six-month process
that was about interrogating
uh, a vision, building on it, offering
other insights and restructuring the
company. And where we landed 6 months
later was oh we were asking the question
like what can we actually achieve with
the few resources we have and this
beautiful little building downtown uh
and where could we have a really great
impact and a really fun impact uh and
delicious and so we landed on um
experimental art by black brown and
queer artists which is so thrilling.
>> Yes. Ah, it's thrill. It's thrilling
like in the day-to-day now, but also in
the moment of being able to think about
a uh a downtown experimental venue in
which black, brown, and queer is
centered.
>> Yes.
>> Like you could almost a third space as
well as a rigorous artistic space, a
place where you could show up
authentically in those, you know,
identities. Uh yes.
>> Yes. It's it was it was very very
exciting to get there. Uh, and also
a a place I I I think I've made for a
younger me,
>> you know, that when I showed up uh into
the downtown scene, uh there were weeks
or nights or special events in which
those identities were centered. Uh
but the sort of daytoday
um
investment
uh and also we talked about lineage
earlier that connection to lineage
you know I was very lucky one of my
early works was with you and James
Scrugs and so here is James a
middle-aged man you know making his work
black man middle-aged black man and so
here I have a sudden like connection and
so how can that be uh not a one-off in
the season that I'm coming, you know, to
participate in, but how can that be the
dayto-day?
>> That is the season.
>> That is it.
>> Yes. [laughter]
>> That's gorgeous.
>> Yeah. So what is it meant to build a
truly artist centered institution
>> where it feels like maybe the flea
before thought it was artist centered
because there was the bats that were in
residence and got to keep making works
>> but you've gone a long distance from the
model that was in place when you arrived
>> and so what is this art truly artist
centered institution that you're leading
now? Yeah. And I think it's important to
name that the model before was a really
a producing centered model which is
we're going to create opportunities for
artists.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. We're going to choose some plays.
We're going to choose some music. We're
choose some performance art and people
will be able to do it and get to do
their thing.
>> That's a way. That's a way. Uh and in
this new model, it's what is the artist
up to? What are they yearning hungry to
do? and how can we partner with them to
see that to fruition
>> and provide appropriate resources to
help them get there.
>> Yes. Yeah. And and and also like we we
call it dating because we haven't come
up with a better way of talking about
it, but like doing the front work as
artist and producing institution before
we say yes or moving forward to say, can
we actually show up for each other
through a process
>> so that by the time we're like, okay,
we're going to sign a legal contract
that we're in this marriage, we're in
this thing, we've spent a considerable
amount of time saying, what are your
values? What are you doing? thinking
actually right now about um a recent uh
commission and premiere we did with Jen
Kidwell and I saw a workshop of like
about 20 minutes uh of what was to
become a full-length piece. uh and armed
with this new vision for how to lead
artistically and run the flea. You know,
we spent 4 months of me showing up to
dramaturgical meetings with her and her
collaborators, asking questions of each
other, talking about our working styles,
talking about what she saw as success
for the piece, uh talking about what we
as producers saw as success. So, we
could actually have all those
conversations ahead of time before we
say, "Okay, great. Now [snorts] we're
going to spend another two years
actually developing and getting it
there. That allows for I mean honesty,
transparency. I mean that could roll off
all our values now as an institution. Uh
but what I love most is that it also
puts the lead artists in the role of
they're seeing the full budget. They're
seeing all the marketing ahead of time.
There's no surprises.
>> Yeah. And we both know as guest artist
institutions, the worst is showing up or
or being online and suddenly you see a
poster for your show and no one's ever
had a conversation with you.
>> Absolutely. But you really felt that in
Jen's show. I mean, there was this
really wonderful warmth and energy and
sense of trust in the space and the
welcome when we arrived and the whole
vibe
>> and the show itself felt great in terms
of the relationship between the artist
and the audience and examined and yeah,
you can feel all of that in the blood of
the work.
>> Yeah, she's fabulous.
>> Totally. um in the face of organizations
that are becoming more corporate and
that are becoming more um
embodied in um a commercial spirit
instead of what nonprofit is supposed to
sit inside of.
>> There's a part of the Fle's mission
which is we support and invest in
experimental art by black, brown, and
queer artists. And then we go further in
the mission we're like uh so that they
may share their vision in community with
audiences. Mhm.
>> And that to me is an essential part of
art making is that we are aware that we
are sharing it with someone.
>> Yeah.
>> Inviting someone in. And we have a
responsibility as leaders uh who have a
megaphone and can reach an audience to
uh better articulate what the exchange
is.
>> Yeah.
>> Because uh in the commercial realm it's
quite clear. It's like you have met my
desires [laughter]
and so I'm gonna pay you $500 for that
because you met or exceeded my desires,
you know.
>> Shoot, I'm just thinking about some I I
I saw Gypsy and she exceeded my desires.
[laughter] I didn't know it could be
that good. Did not know Ros's Turn could
be that good. Uh here have all the
monies. Um and so in the in the
experimental place, the virtuosity of
the experimental artist uh has not yet
been defined by the wider culture is
worth your extra monies. [gasps]
>> Yeah.
>> Uh because it's the first time reading
it, the first time seeing it, you know.
Uh and so it is our our place as the
leaders to help um audiences and funders
understand that value and exchange uh to
connect with those people who already
have a sense of that value that the
experimental is a place of that they
want to keep part of you we're in New
York so talking about the vibrant
electricity of New York. What why do
people one of the reasons people are
pulled here is the innovations that
happen in art and culture.
uh and the ways that like when you've
got this critical mass of people from
different disciplines and different
cultures making so close to each other
in proximity
>> and that's the other thing like so if I
was
>> you know director of culture at the
state or city level like the
affordability of um risk-taking artists
to be in close proximity to that's
something I would be looking at. Yeah,
>> I would be looking at housing solutions
as part of uh also the artist practice
solutions because one of the things I
have noticed I was lucky enough to
arrive in New York where people did live
in more proximity to each other and now
experience artists living with such
distance.
>> Yeah.
>> That that bumping up against the
practice and the rigors of folks is
happening less.
>> Downtown really did used to be centered
in a 20 block radius where work was
happening.
>> Yes. And I think I do agree with you. I
think that there's been an expansion of
the field in some ways, but it it's been
stretched to where it's hard to feel a a
connection amongst ourselves in the same
way that existed in the '9s and even in
the 2000s.
>> Yeah. And I've seen that the the impulse
and work and pedagogy of downtown, which
is the experimental and the risk, is now
living in the academy,
>> which is that's fabulous. That's great.
People are learning it. they are
practicing it uh but they're practicing
it separate from the lineage so it's
over there uh and so what we're talking
about is like how are we on top of each
other like
>> I'm sure you have stories like me where
you just walking down the street and
there's a performance happening like oh
and it's experimental so there's always
an extra seat so you just walk over
you're like what are you doing
[laughter] oh my god you're doing that I
mean ended up in a bread and puppet
parade just cuz I asked someone what are
you working on he's like I'm working on
this thing do you and I'm suddenly I'm
in the parade [laughter] you
like that I don't experience that
happening as much anymore and and so
that becomes part of the vision of the
flea
>> right
>> where I lead and can help to uh hold on
to some of that territory and terrain
somehow.
>> So when you're embracing success I mean
embracing experimentation and risktaking
how do you define success
>> um in an organization? Yeah. Well, first
we start with the artist and what how
the artist is defining success.
>> Mh.
>> Uh and then we start with and then and
then it's like as a institution like are
we actually connecting this artist's
vision and voice to folks that can hear
it.
>> Uh and yeah, so it's I don't want to
call it a marketing problem, but it's
really about like developing
uh a community.
>> Yeah. And because there because it's not
just sort of a community that you can
just drop into physically and be there
and be surrounded by it. We now have to
say, "Hey, you are interested in this.
They're interested. You have come on
together. Come get together." And I
think the greatest success we've had uh
in the over the last five years is uh
developing that relationship over a year
and a half of inviting people to the
development of the work,
>> you know, so that they are feeling like
they're participating as it grows.
>> They're stepping in along the way and
they're in relationship.
>> Yeah.
>> And so they can't wait to invite other
people to the finished product.
>> Yeah. We always worked in that iterative
way at here of growing projects over
years and inviting people in along the
way.
>> Yes.
>> That's how I got connected with Taylor
Mack.
>> It was a whip, a work in progress of the
young ladies of
>> and I went, this performer is
phenomenal. [laughter]
>> Got to keep showing up.
>> I used to always say around this idea of
the audience that we're trying to find,
you know, well, we're only trying to get
like 2,000 people to come see this.
We're in a city of 8 million. Yeah,
>> we should be able to find the 2,000
people that would be amazed and
intrigued like we are by this artist.
>> People aren't watching TV with ads.
They're not subscribing to papers. So,
how do you how do you find out what's
going on that you might be interested
in? Like that's also part of the job of
the institution is there are a lot of
curious, adventurous folks out there.
Uh, and how do they know?
>> How do they know? How do they find out?
Where do you see art's potential to
drive social or cultural change?
>> Narratives are changed by storytellers
and artists
[clears throat]
>> and we script ourselves. You know, you
are born into a script and narrative uh
that your parents are or your caregivers
are providing to you. Uh and then you're
faced with other media and story outside
of that. Uh it might be through a faith
group. It might be through a Saturday
morning cartoons. Uh it might be through
a speech you hear at school. Uh and so I
think one of the reasons we have such a
very tense culture wars in this country
is that people understand that
narratives matter. Uh and when I say
narrative, I don't mean necessarily
>> ABC narrative. Yes. Uh, but I mean that
the the artist ability to help you see
or smell or think like, oh, I could leap
like that. You I do my walks are often
about movement and the way we move in
the world. Uh, and it's about that sense
of like, oh, I could actually I did this
walk once where we got on a plane and
the walk, but to get on the plane, we
walked very slowly through LaGuardia
airport. And everyone knows when you go
to the airport, you want to get to the
gate as fast as you can and sit down and
[laughter] rest. And the reason I asked
us to walk very slowly and had us do
that is uh the majority of the walk
participants were white and we were
going into inner city Detroit. And so I
wanted them to experience
conspicuousness ahead of experiencing
conspicuousness.
[laughter]
So the power of the work uh of the
artist is in changing the narratives.
>> Yeah. and bringing awareness. You know,
>> that's fascinating. How do you hold the
tension between art is expression and
art as activism?
[snorts]
>> I hold it very uncomfortably. [laughter]
>> But look, I think that again, it's about
the invitation because I do both. Uh
there are times when I'm not interested
in documentation. I'm not interested in
the rigor of your move. Uh, I'm thinking
now about a piece we made for Trayvon
closely after his murder, Trayvon
Martin. The invitation was for everyone
to participate in this piece at their
own level
because what was most important is that
we were coming together as a community
of uh art makers and non-art makers but
all creative people
>> to say we are here and we see and you
must reckon with this. Okay. So that is
work that is that is first and foremost
about social change and social activism.
>> Okay. And then there is work that is
about uh
our uh divinity. Uh and that is the work
where I really am looking for aesthetic
virtuosity because in those moments I
want uh the audience or the participant
to go oh wow look what is possible. I
mean both of them are about
possibilities. What's possible when we
gather together and insist on something?
And what is possible when we train
ourselves and become deeply disciplined?
Oh, whoa.
Because in those moments, someone
sitting there is thinking, "Oh, wow.
Yes, I really do want to write my book
or I really do want to be able to dance
at my daughter's wedding." You know,
[laughter]
all I have to do is like devote yourself
like Whoa. Sorry. Sorry. I'm not sorry.
Why am I sorry?
>> No,
>> I think I'm sorry because I feel I feel
so passionate.
>> Yeah.
>> Uh, and that's okay.
>> How do you nurture yourself to ensure
you continue to grow and develop as an
artist?
>> Well,
that's so funny. I don't know if you
wrote this question imagining that I
would talk about the fact that I'm
leaving the field.
Uh because me as an artist what I have
recognized is that for me many people I
think could work really well in the way
that uh most um live performance is
produced. Most live performance is
produced like you develop the piece and
then you've got once it's developed and
someone says oh it's production ready
then it's like go boom we're off to the
races you know here's four weeks of
rehearsal five if you're lucky and a
couple previews and then it's premiering
and everyone gets to decide whether it's
good or bad and we'll decide whether it
continues in the culture based on that
uh way of making doesn't serve me
>> uh I think I got pretty good at it
because there's a part of me that wants
to please and was a very good student
and so I saw the form and the formula of
doing it and I was like oh I can do that
look at me do it uh and
I I have not gotten out of it what I had
hoped to which was um
the continuation and building of
community. So, I have these micro
communities that came together under
intense pressure to premiere a thing and
we did it and we're all so proud of each
other and amazing and then we scatter to
go and do it again. That's not the life
I want to lead.
>> It was never the life I wanted to lead.
It was a system that I participated in
because I thought it could help me lead
that life. Uh, and so
now I'm going to say thank you for these
amazing 25 years in this kind of field
and I'm going to pursue artmaking in a
different way.
>> Um,
>> can you share what that is?
>> I I'm I'm looking at slower works. I'm
looking at the timing of the soul. Uh
I'm looking at very intimate work on
>> really as a one-on-one work and some
small group work.
>> Uh and I'm also looking at uh how I make
my own works uh and and
timelines that the work is asking for.
So this is a different kind of producing
uh visual. I I I I think and I have more
work to do here. think it's closer to um
a studio practice in which I'm just
returning to the work and returning to
the work and letting it reveal when it's
ready. My vision is that like there's
like a a curtain over the working space
and everyone's like, "Oh, they're
working in there. They're working on
there." And then one day when the work
is ready to be engaged with, the curtain
rises and everyone in the neighborhood
goes, "Oo, it's time. We're invited.
We're invited. We can go in." And then
we go in. Uh, but there's no like
there's the curtain's going to raise
every four months or every once a year.
We don't know.
>> We don't know.
>> Will it still be here in New York City?
>> I don't know.
I don't know that. I don't I don't
really um I find New York City a very
hard place to live in.
>> I love the people here. I love the
intersections of making and who you get
to be inspired by. And so New York will
always be part of my life. Uh but I I
actually cry a lot in this city. There's
so much
disconnection and hurt and
uh sickness.
>> Yeah.
>> And it it feels overwhelming to um
address that. the only because that you
um for me to show up for what I've
committed to do each day, I have to
ignore so much.
>> That's not fair to uh the other humans
around me or to myself.
>> Yeah.
>> Uh and so I often think about where can
I be where I can actually be present
>> and New York doesn't for me doesn't
allow that. I'm not I'm not as
comfortable ignoring you. Maybe if maybe
if so this is might give you a hint of
what's in my future. I'm like maybe if
my if my life in New York on a
day-to-day level was all walking
distance
from where I live, maybe New York would
work for me
>> in my future. And every so often I might
venture further than that
>> because you would have those connections
to the people around you most
immediately. Like I'm like I literally
am thinking like there are people in my
black I've seen them for eight years uh
and have done nothing more than a
pleasantry and that that's not how I
grew up. I grew up in a place where we
>> connected. [snorts]
>> Yeah. And we had each other
>> and so I feel uh separated from a part
of myself.
>> Become a very good student of New York
and of [laughter]
of ways. It's time to let that go.
>> Yeah. I think it can be lonely um to not
take in the humans that are around you
and it's de dehum continues to
dehumanize us.
>> Yeah.
>> Is there anything you'd want to say that
we haven't talked about?
>> Yeah.
>> Well, I want to thank you for a place to
be honest. [laughter]
It's truly like when you know that like
you're part of a
something that's being offered out is
like here we're we're looking at this,
>> you know, uh there's a responsibility in
this these kinds of moments. And so your
uh desire to make this record and
inviting me to be part of it, that's
pretty special.
>> Well, you're so special. couldn't do it
without you in this conversation and
what you've brought to all of us. So,
thank you Nigel.
>> Thank you Kristen
friend
>> friend
>> and thanks to hellound for hosting us
and please come check in some more
torches. So friends, welcome back. We
have a little surprise today. We have a
little postcript to our interview that
we did with Nigel earlier this year.
Nigel's going to share some exciting
updates.
>> Thanks Kristen. Uh it's very exciting
indeed. So, I've been in a wonderfully
moment of evolving as the flea and I
have been looking at the timeline of my
stepping down as artistic director. Uh,
I'm really excited to to share that yes,
I'm stepping down at the end of
December. Uh, but I plan to continue to
play a role in the transition at the
flea and stay on the board. uh
specifically there's been an evolution
around my pole in practice to social
work and I'm looking at how to integrate
uh social work and social practice into
my ongoing creative practice. Uh I have
several uh works that are going to be
moving forward next year in 2027
that I'm really excited to be digging
into. Uh, not least of which is
continuing with Beyond the Stardust with
the Illustrious Blacks and a new project
with Justin Tranter that we're calling
The Great Thirst. Uh, and so I want to
continue to be pouring into those works
and um, really, as we talked about, uh,
the way that my works include like
relevant topics, you know, and are
sometimes embedded in community, how to
bring my social work passion uh, and
work into that.
>> That's really exciting. And I'm really
your work has always included this
thoughtfulness towards the activities
that happen in our lives and their
impact on us and the realness of that.
And so I think this is just a really
exciting marriage that you're going to
be exploring.
>> Yeah, me too. Thank you Kristen for
doing this project
>> and thanks for coming back to chat with
us again.
Chick
[music]
[applause]
oh.
[music]
[applause]
Ooh.
[applause]
>> [music]