A Conversation with Hanne Tierney - TORCHES: 30+ Years of Downtown Performance
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Hanne Tierney recounts her journey into downtown performance art as a result of being a "failed writer," which led her in 1966 to experiment with three-dimensional storytelling using objects rather than human actors. She developed an innovative system involving a grid of strings attached to screw eyes on the ceiling, allowing any material—from fabric and ropes to wooden beams—to be manipulated from below to create emotionally intense gestures without showing a lifter or operator. Tierney describes this approach as "theater without actors," where the objects themselves become instruments that illustrate text through movement, transforming non-figurative materials into sculptural installations capable of conveying complex narratives like despair or mystery solely through their physical behavior on stage.
Throughout her career at Five Miles and beyond, Tierney has balanced her own artistic practice with curating a space dedicated to experimental work, particularly supporting women and artists of color in the Crown Heights neighborhood. She explains that while she did not intentionally set out to focus exclusively on these demographics, the location naturally attracted Black artists who felt comfortable sharing their portfolios within their own community territory. Tierney highlights how gentrification eventually altered this dynamic, creating social barriers where audiences became shy and segregated based on race during openings, a shift she finds sad given that public spaces like subways previously fostered ease among diverse groups regardless of background.
Her philosophy on risk-taking in art stems from the belief that if an artist feels their work is good internally, there is no room for failure; instead, success should be measured by whether people engage with and discuss the dialogue created by the work rather than financial metrics or fame. Tierney notes that while society often celebrates young artists as a commodity, true sustainability requires accepting one's role within a specific artistic tribe without needing constant external validation. She emphasizes that her primary satisfaction comes from seeing objects come alive to express human intensity, noting that she has moved away from physically climbing ladders for performances but continues to write and explore new ways to present political themes regarding violence against men in society through video projects rather than live shows.
Looking toward the future, Tierney plans to curate a show titled "Hope" to address current societal needs while also working with collaborators like Hana Vasineski to digitize her politically charged piece about male soldiers as cannon fodder for wars involving Ukraine and Russia. She expresses hope that puppetry will evolve by adopting systems similar to hers rather than remaining stuck in traditional manipulation methods, a goal she sees realized in the work of artists who merge abstraction with figurative elements or utilize large-scale fabric installations effectively. Ultimately, her legacy is defined not by fame but by changing how objects are perceived and used as vessels for deep emotional expression, encouraging others to broaden their understanding of what constitutes art beyond simple entertainment or investment vehicles.
Read the full video transcript
What kind of legacy do you hope that
your work leaves?
>> Oh, that it changes puppetry.
>> Oh,
[laughter]
ooh.
>> [applause]
[music]
>> Welcome friends. I'm Kristen Martin and
this is Torches. Today we have the
unconventional Hana Turney. Hana is an
award-winning and internationally
acclaimed puppet artist and curator and
founder director of Five Miles. I'm very
excited to speak with her today.
Welcome, Hana.
>> Thank you, Kristen. I'm very excited to
be here. [laughter]
>> So, you lived in Soho for like 50 years.
you've been making work for even longer.
How did you So, how did you come to be
in this downtown performance world?
Because
basically, I've always
I'm a failed writer. And I started to
think if I can't write well like George
Elliot, maybe I should look at 3D
writing if it could be done.
>> So, I actually took a studio and started
playing around. And this is 1966.
And after about 3 years, I saw my
system. I saw that I could actually
produce um an emotionally intense
gesture out of any kind of fabric or
material or nonrepresentational
object um over a long distance. And I
didn't it didn't even show a human being
to lift it up or move it. M
>> well you know my system and that's um
and when I saw that then I thought
that's going to be what I work on. I I
love this idea and so I worked for a
couple of years until I could really
handle it. And then I started performing
in Soho because that that was the time
of um the the old kitchen was still
there Franklin Furnace
>> and I I sort of merged into being an
artist and so
>> you know we moved into so in ' 69.
>> Could you explain your system because
it's so innovative and incredible. Well,
go back to another question that you had
asked is um why did I call it theater
without actors?
>> Okay.
>> Because um when I thought about it in
the theater actors basically
demonstrate a text, not demonstrate but
you know illustrate a text
>> with their gestures, with their
movement, with their expressions.
And because of my system, I realized I
can do that with any anything. And the
way this is done, there's a um a grid
system with screw eyes in a ceiling.
Strings go through these screw eyes and
they come all the way down to the floor.
Whatever I attach. Oh, yeah. And then
the these strings are on the side of the
stage and it be they become an
instrument. We sort of play maybe 80
strings or maybe even a hund. And we
play these strings almost like an
instrument. And everything that we have
these strings attached to on the stage
floor totally goes into their gestures,
their movement, into their drama, into
the narrative.
And it's really basically a theater
without actors except with things.
>> And when you started making this in
1969, I think you just said, in this
way,
>> um, did you position this into a theater
or performance context or were you
positioning this into a visual art
context?
>> No, that wasn't at all on my mind.
[clears throat]
>> Okay. the visual art context except that
um since it's not very figurative,
it becomes sculptural, you know, it
becomes sort of like a huge sculptural
installation on the stage and then
things start moving and gesturing. But
it never occurred to me to put it into
visual theater. I thought of performing.
>> Yeah, I like that.
>> Yeah. And and it's non-figurative, I
think, is important to say. Yeah, it's
non figurative. I have done figures, but
um it doesn't suit me.
>> Mhm.
>> And it's not that interesting. Of
course, you can make a puppet like
figure, make a gesture saying, "Oh my
god, my husband left me." But,
[laughter] you know, but to do it with a
let's say a construction rope or a 2x4,
that's it actually becomes art then.
>> Yes. And did you have text in those
early days when you were working or was
it solely the movement of the objects
with music?
>> No, for me it's theater.
>> Yes.
>> And it's a text.
>> So you've always had text and you've
always had music and you've always had
these
>> always. And I've used some old symbolist
plays like Oscar Wild Sal and
>> the seagull. But I've always since I'm a
failed writer, I've always written
[laughter] my own text.
How has that evolved as you've worked
inside that same system? How has the way
that you've worked with the materials or
the way that you've thought about story
evolved over the years?
>> You know, like everybody does who
becomes um who does something over a
period of time, you simply become
better. I simply could control extremely
emotional gestures in,
>> you know, like as I said, in a 2x4.
>> Mhm. You have to keep doing things
before you can understand it. But then
for me that was sort of it, you know, if
I can make a 2x4
be absolutely desparing of having no
more movement but this one back and
forth and the audience is oh my god no
that's so sad. [laughter]
Then you know you've you know you've
sort of shown the audience something
meaning that the audience has knows that
sense of despair
>> that they could read it and
>> and the block of wood.
>> Yeah.
>> Yes.
>> Um, how do you balance that kind of
experimentation of finding out how these
materials express themselves with your
craft? How do you bring those together?
>> I think if you experiment or any artist
who's experimenting with any ideas,
visual or what, whichever way, we use
what is expedient. And if it's a craft
thing, we use it. Mhm.
>> And if you don't have it, then you know,
you've fiddled with it. But yeah, I'm
I'm not really a craft person. I'm very
inexact and nothing ever fits properly.
And
>> and your your work is very risky and the
work you did at Five Miles was also very
risky. So, how do you encourage that
kind of risk both in your own work and
in your curating?
>> Well, I didn't think my work was risky.
I thought it was sort of great that I
saw I could do that. [laughter]
I was like, "Oh my god, it's actually f
I think though I don't think my audience
thinks I'm doing risky work." It's just
that they've never seen anything like it
before.
>> Definitely. It's completely unique.
>> They get it. They get it and they think,
"Oh, that's so interesting." and they
feel it. And um no, but I think with
artists, you know, especially sort of
young artists
um I always sort of did a little
missionary work to to get them go a
little beyond what they were going to
really show and and say, "But you could
and you might." And
>> so you feel you were pushing them to try
to push things more to push to go
outside the box more. How did you deal
with failure when that happened?
>> Well,
I don't think I've ever thought about
this much, but
>> I love that.
>> Whatever they, [laughter]
you know, whatever they do, especially
with younger artists.
>> Mhm.
>> You just feel very
you have to sort of be appreciative and
and let them know they're on the way and
>> yeah,
>> doing well.
>> I What is failure in our world anyway?
It means nobody what nobody likes what
you do. If you think what you did is
good, there's no there is simply no
category for failure.
>> Mhm.
>> If you feel in your guts this is good.
Then there's no moment for failure.
>> That is a wonderful centering of
confidence. [laughter] Yes.
>> You have to.
>> Mhm.
>> Yeah.
>> Yes. It's true. At Five Miles, you
worked primarily with women and people
of color. Why did you make that choice
there?
>> I saw that question and I immediately
went into our website and checked the
recent, you know, what or not the recent
whatever we've done previous
>> and it's about 50/50 on the Yeah. Yeah.
I don't think I was in any way wanting
to show women, but the the that we
showed so many people of color had to do
with Five Miles being in Crown Heights.
>> Mhm.
>> And it's a traditionally black
neighborhood. And so it was very natural
for black artists to come and show their
portfolio. You know, they weren't shy
about it. We were in their territory.
>> Yeah.
>> So I got to see a lot of good work that
>> other people probably didn't. And also
Brooklyn has a lively black art world.
>> So it was nice to be connected with
that.
>> Yeah. And you once said that uh the five
miles was activated by the people who
came through the door. So that sounds
like an example of that, the artists
that came through the door to share
their portfolios.
>> Of course.
>> And I always felt when I visited that it
was so much a part of the neighborhood
and that you really welcomed people. I
remember kids doing homework, you know,
in the front of the gallery and like
what a what a feeling of welcome you
created.
>> Well, I have to tell you one thing art
could do in this case because art is a
public if you have a gallery, you know,
it's a public activity.
>> So therefore there was sort of no border
as to who could come in. But we gave the
key to the gallery to two young women,
girls, so they could make it into
college so they could use our internet,
they could use our computers and they
came late at night because they were,
you know, busy working,
>> right?
>> Both of them, one is a teacher now and
the other one is a fabulous poet.
>> That's incredible.
>> Yeah. And they were there, you know,
people didn't have internet. I mean, who
could afford it?
>> Mhm. But so but that that is what art
could do because it's a public space and
there was no shyness for people to come
in and I thought good for art if it can
do that.
>> What year did you put five miles in
Crown Heights?
>> Um 19
20009
>> 99.
>> And how did gentrification change the
way that it felt in the neighborhood
over the years you were there? For years
and years there were the audiences at
openings were completely at ease with
each other. Complained about the work
being not good enough to each other
whatever
>> but really at ease. And suddenly I could
tell when we had a black artist showing
>> it was mostly black people at the
opening. When we had a white artist
showing or white artists it was mostly
white people. It was suddenly everybody
became shy with each other and didn't
feel that ease anymore because it was a
majority suddenly or something was
happening.
>> Oh, that's interesting and sad.
>> Oh, I so completely saw that.
>> Mhm.
>> And you know, we did a lot of
performances outdoors on the sidewalk.
It was exactly the same thing. The white
people would go to the other side of the
street if it was a black performance or
mostly black people there. Mhm.
>> The same for um black people.
>> Wow.
>> I think we're basically so uncomfortable
with each other. It's outrageous.
>> Yeah. I think it's sad.
>> Yeah.
>> One of the great things about the subway
in New York City is that you run into
everyone from every walk of life and
we're all on the same terms on the
subway. We all know
>> and we tread if we have to. And yeah, I
agree with you.
>> You spoke about resisting the pressure
of growth when you were running five
miles. Did that have to do with
capitalist expectations?
>> No. I think maybe it had to do with my
incompetence. [laughter]
Maybe that just like [laughter]
I mean you were always very centered
around welcoming experimental practices
um in the face of commodification
working against that but but not so
consciously just because it's so much
more interesting
>> to see new things happen or to see
somebody really straining and struggling
to go beyond what they've understood.
Mhm.
>> It's just so much more interesting.
>> How did you balance continuing to make
your own work at the same time as you
were running Five Miles and curating?
>> Ah, because it was a very wonderful
thing at Five Miles. The back of the
gallery was my studio.
>> Mhm. And because of that, you know, it
was obviously and after a while and
because I really did love running five
months,
>> I just gave up going to festivals,
traveling
>> and I only performed in New York as you
know and and also I could work as slowly
as I wanted to until something was ready
and then I could perform it at five
miles for a month. And
>> so I I sort of had given myself really a
very good way of making work that I
could do.
>> Yeah. When you had your own space, why
did you decide to come work like it
here? Like we did I think three of your
shows or just to
>> No, because you have a different
audience, right?
>> You know, the audience in my audience
were all the mostly the artists of
course from the old Soho and so forth.
But you had a real audience, you know,
people who have jobs and [laughter]
come to see performances at here. And I
absolutely like that. You know, you have
to see how people can react to your work
that are not insiders.
>> Mark Bmoody Joseph recently said, "How
do we create conditions for artists to
guide us forward to the other side of
fear?" Do you have thoughts or reactions
to that?
Well, I sort of have an immediate
reaction. What makes us think that
artists aren't as fearful as we are? And
what makes us think that they know what
the other side of fear is? I [laughter]
mean, if if we want to go there, we have
to go back to the Renaissance and, you
know, and and paint Madonna and
long-suffering Christs and who promise
happiness. But I don't see how artists
can do this or should do this. I think
they should do their work, think about
things. Art is a field and the field
periodically, you know, needs a little
kick in the teeth and change
>> and that's a good art aren't
missionaries.
>> How how do you think the spirit of
downtown, the experimentation and the
risk? Um, has it changed? H how has it
changed in the time that you've been
working? I I just want to say one thing
about the spirit downtown.
One thing that was important in Soho was
that it really created minimalism
because the we could get these big lofts
and suddenly space became an object and
you know you'd put a 2x4 diagonally
across a huge space and we'd all go oh
my god you know in awe but but it
changed our perception
>> and really as as a culture really we can
now see things slightly differently.
you know, you can see like a white dot
in a black space and feel odd. And I
think um that was the big thing about
downtown. That was the experimentation
that went on, you know, but I think the
experimentation is going on all the time
in art. And look after Black Lives
Matter.
>> Suddenly the galleries were showing
black artists cuz you know, oh my god,
we have to do something. And look at how
wildly people went into identity
paintings. Wild stuff experimenting.
What would be ident? What would I see as
identity? I think that goes on all the
time.
>> We just get a little bit of stuck. What
was our generation's
big experimentation?
>> And do you think you're seeing it now
that the spirit of downtown has changed
that it's it's still happening? And
where do you see it? No, I think
minimalism is young artists don't even
know the names of Richard. Who's Richard
Sarah? Who's Richard Nonus? You know, I
think like in all these kind of
movements.
>> Mhm.
>> They they belong to the history books.
They have influenced lots of people, but
they certainly disappear.
>> Oh, interesting. How would you identify
what movement is happening right now?
>> A lot of searching.
>> Mhm.
a tremendous amount of searching. And
you know, I'm I don't mean to be
prejudiced one way or the other, but I
do kind of keep looking what black
artists are doing. There's um a Jessica
Pekka, a black woman artist showing in a
gallery in Chelsea. She has figured out
a kind of a wonderful merger like a
almost like a marriage of abstraction
and figurative.
>> Mhm.
>> It's beautiful work and you know I
thought oh god it's so exciting to think
that maybe there is a common ground
between the two and she's doing it.
She's,
you know, each painting you can tell
she's been playing a little more with
the idea and where it's going.
>> I have to go to that exhibition.
>> Yeah, it's fabulous.
>> I uh I wonder about in live performance
or in puppetry, what do you see? What
what what movement or action do you see
that you think is interesting right now?
>> I don't really know about puppetry. I
have to tell you I I was hoping that a
lot of puppeteers would start working
because you know I as you know I I work
life size and full stage. It really is a
theatrical production
>> and I was hoping a lot of puppeteers
would take parts of it and and get a
little bigger and get away from five
puppeteers moving a teeny little stick
puppet, you know. Um but I puppetry is
really just kind of
[laughter]
you know it's it's doing what it's
always done.
>> Yeah.
>> Bit differently. Maybe the puppeteers
are wearing white clothes instead of
black clothes. But it's it's not willing
to
change its own systems. It's
manipulation
and manipulation systems.
>> Mhm.
I don't know.
>> How do you define success as an artist
now? And has that definition evolved for
you?
>> No, I think
I think for every artist, as long as
show the work, it doesn't matter where
you show the work. Even in your bedroom,
invite people. As long as your your work
is part of a dialogue, as long as people
talk about it, as long as they want to
tell other people, go see it.
>> Mhm.
>> That's success. You can't measure it
otherwise. What in money, you know.
>> Yeah.
>> No, I I think um
you can just hope that people want to
see your work. They're interested to
find out what you're doing.
>> Isn't much else.
>> How has your practice changed as you've
aged?
No, in a way I'm concentrating now on
writing
>> and thinking I'm
going to see what that will do for me.
No, I I've not perform anymore. It's
because of this overhead grid system.
It's like up and down a ladder, up and
down a ladder. And I'm just done with up
and down a [laughter] ladder.
>> I understand.
>> And I've done enough, you know, it's now
it's now in everybody knows it. If
somebody wants to relate to it, come to
my studio. I've shown another puppet
Japanese puppeteer. I've shown my system
and she does fabulous work with it.
>> How do you work against our society's
celebration of young artists, overseased
artists? How do you think about that?
>> What Why did you say our society? You
don't think that's
that's not been the same all the time?
That's true.
>> Of course, the big sellers, they'll
always sell because it's about
investment. So, leave that out.
>> And the young artists,
if there's something about the work that
has made a big difference in the field,
they'll always be mentioned forever. But
it's a fence. It's a fetish. They
they'll disappear. And um you know,
what's left is work that changed
something,
>> right? I I think this is not a a thing
that happens now. It's just always
happens. The young are pushy. They still
have confidence. [laughter]
>> How do you think um an artist can have a
truly sustainable life? What do we need
to change in our society to help that
happen?
>> No, I don't I feel differently about
that. I feel
>> um unless you are you have a big ego,
you're a good PR person, you don't have
two complicated thoughts about your own
work.
You're better off taking a day job you
like and making your work.
>> What else? I mean, don't forget,
nobody's asking us to be an artist.
And the work we make um is more or less
an inside job for our tribe
>> for people who understand about
experimentation and avanguard.
But I I think we have to sort of put up
with that. Mhm.
>> We're small manufacturers
and you know we have to try and either
sell our product or keep improving it
quietly by ourselves and work on an oil
rig [laughter] or whatever we have to
do.
>> Why did you choose to make the work you
chose to make? Where did that come from
inside you? What and what what what
satisfied you about making it?
In the beginning I I think this
I still can get totally excited by um by
a gesture
in a to you know something on the street
and suddenly it's a it's a gesture of
human intensity emotional intensity the
way it's positioned the way it's lying
there I it just really excites me and
when I understood I could do this
actually
>> um you know present that that was my big
moment.
>> And the words that would accompany that,
did they express the emotion or story
that Yeah. where how did these things
how does the thrill of that object
coming to life connect to the words that
you were writing?
>> Well, it it is like an actor on the
stage.
>> It's because the gestures I'm presenting
and obtaining from the objects. Mhm.
>> They do after all also illustrate a text
or in order to make it fully understand
to the audience the text gives the
context.
>> And did you
>> the words give the context?
>> Did you start with the materials and the
objects or the words first?
>> No, I sometimes actually started with a
play. I mean after I understood what I
could do then plays occurred to me
>> and I thought oh that's so there's a
metallink play called uh it's about
death the intruder
>> and I just completely understood that I
could do this you know by not using
human beings um that it would be very
mysterious very worrisome about death
being around and yeah sometimes it's
really a text that I find
>> and what made you choose choose to speak
that text just you and life as opposed
to recording that text and moving the
objects in response because it's a very
different energy.
>> Oh, so different.
>> Yeah.
>> Because my voice activates my hands.
>> Oh,
>> how they move these strings.
>> Mhm.
>> And then I I have to tell you something.
I was in a festival in BF in Belgrad
>> and there were a lot of Russians and I
did the seagull and afterwards the
Russians all walked up to me and they
said you know we must have seen the
seagull 20 times but we've never fully
listened to the text but because I spoke
all the lines I edited a little bit. I
mean, some you don't have to do,
>> but because I spoke it, it was like they
were reading it,
>> thinking,
>> "Oh, [clears throat] look at that." That
made a big impression on me?
>> I love that. And were you thinking about
when when it was your own text,
did was it the text or the objects
first? I'm just curious. I know
sometimes you work from place but when
it was your own text that you created
what
>> then it was a text.
>> It was the text first too. So it's
always text first.
>> Yeah. It's so interesting because I
think of your work so visual and I think
I I always hear the text and the text is
taking me on a journey, but I think so
much about the objects and the these
things coming to life in these
compelling and intriguing ways and
mysterious ways because I never gave up
longing to be a writer [laughter]
and always knowing I wasn't good enough.
What kind of legacy do you hope that
your work leaves?
>> Oh, that it changes puppetry.
>> Oh,
[laughter]
>> for thinking about the object.
>> If it changes puppetry, then people will
broaden it. Make it make it really
>> an art. make it really kind of not
something you just crack up laughing
because somebody can, you know, take a
hand and scratch their wooden head. I
don't know. I I just wish puppetry would
take up and change my system, but know
that it can be done differently.
>> I do think there are people that have
been inspired by your work. Certainly
certainly like Basil Twist and a bunch
of the work that he's done with fabric I
feel is in conversation with your work.
>> He's the first person to say that.
>> Yeah. and Normandy Sherwood. Um, I know
you came to see her psychic self-defense
with all the curtains and the fabric and
all the characters.
>> I love that. She was terrific. And then
I said this this Japanese artist who's
>> doing gorgeous things with abstraction
with with the stringing system.
>> So that would be good.
>> But you know, other than that,
>> it's given me a lot of pleasure.
>> Are what are you thinking of your next
chapter right now? What are you thinking
is coming next?
>> Well, since I've just moved to the
Bronx, I think it's time for me to get
that place in shape. [laughter]
When you left the other day, I was going
to say, "Do you want to come in and see
my place?" But I knew it was time for
you guys to head out. Um,
>> well, I'd love to come back another time
and see your place.
>> No, I'm sort of keeping myself open. I I
like writing a lot and for no reason at
all. I don't have anything in mind like
oh my god I have to find a publisher.
Not at all but I enjoy
>> sentences and I enjoy changing them and
looking at them again and again and I'm
sort of doing that.
>> The last piece that I saw of yours which
I think is the last piece that you made
at Five Miles
>> Yeah. was very political and it was
thinking a lot about violence in our
culture and these younger generations
and how they're coming up into that. Um,
I hadn't felt before that I was seeing
work that was like political and in
response to things that were happening.
Um, could you talk about that direction
change in your work?
>> Well, it I don't know if that's a
direction change, but it was a very
important piece for me of all my pieces.
I think it was the most important. I've
been thinking for years what we're doing
to men that we train them to be killers.
That whenever our leaders have a little
conflict, send in the guys, they'll kill
each other. We see who's left. Well,
what else is war? Send in the guys and
they will kill each other. And the men
don't complain. I They should unionize
internationally and say, "No, we're not
doing that because they're just out
there killing each other." But look at
the Ukraine and the Russians. Yeah.
>> And we've done that to the men, you
know, we really have sort of
>> allocated them into their position.
Small wonder they get a little resentful
about the women being home with the
babies, [laughter] you know, say I'll
bust them around, but you know, like I
can understand that.
>> Mhm.
>> If men really sit back and think about
the role they play in
>> in our civilization, it's pitiful.
>> Mhm. It's been a great issue with me for
a long time.
>> Is there other work that you're making
right now that is in response to things
that you're seeing around you that
you're having realizations about?
>> No. What I really actually I tell you
what I would like to do is I have a very
pretty extensive video of this piece and
I would like to do something with that.
>> You know, get it out, get people to
>> the piece that we were just talking
about that's from Five Miles. Yes.
>> Yeah. Yeah. and get people to really and
I'm working with Hana, you know, Hannah
Vasineseski, the video.
>> So, I'll go to Berlin and we're going to
sort of try and see what we could do
with that piece.
>> So, would you perform again then if you
were to bring that piece back?
>> No. Hana thinks we should do something
on the internet with it.
>> Oh, interesting.
>> That's fascinating.
>> And you know, she she would understand
what we can do. That was incredibly
>> important to me to to do that. I I don't
even know how people generally
understood it but I just felt I needed
to say that you know look at the men.
>> Mhm.
>> They're just cannon foder for the
societies.
>> Yeah. It was a very powerful piece.
>> Yeah. Men
are
indulctrinated
[music]
believing
it's
glorious.
[singing and music]
>> Is there anything that we didn't talk
about that you want to talk about?
>> I don't think so. We pretty much said
what I [laughter] know. I don't know any
more than this. No, I I will say that um
having worked a lot with artists, you
know, curating and so forth,
>> I it's really been a fabulous Well, you
know, that
>> because it really sharpens your own mind
considerably. You know, you you know
what works, what doesn't work, what is
really important, might be important,
where they need little help. I've really
liked that.
>> It's been very enjoyable.
>> Yeah. I'm thinking of maybe curating a
show for a gallery in um
in April or March and I I want to curate
a show called Hope
>> and see what I can come up with artists,
you know, what artists what they can
come up with. What is our idea of hope
right now? Who's got hope, right? I
mean,
>> we need hope desperately right now.
>> Yeah. I want to I want to go to
>> thinking about curating a show called
Hope. I want to go to that show.
>> So, I'll put my mind to it at some
point.
>> Well, I'm deeply grateful for your work
and the inspiration that you've provided
me personally and so many other people
for so many years. Hana.
>> Well, yeah, but the one thing you
understand is about making work and all
those little tortures and struggles
you know perfectly well.
>> Thank you.
>> No, thank you. Uh, thanks for joining us
and thanks to Hal Round for hosting us
and we hope you'll come back to more of
torches.
Mat
oh
hey. [music]